The URL can be used to link to this page

2008-04-17CITY OF OKEECHOBEE PLANNING BOARD /BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS APRIL 17, 2008 SUMMARY OF BOARD ACTION PAGE 1 OF 6 I. CALL TO ORDER - Chairperson. Planning Board/Board of Adjustment and Appeals, April 17, 2008, 6:00 p.m. II. CHAIRPERSON, MEMBER AND STAFF ATTENDANCE - Secretary. Chairperson William Ledferd Vice- Chairperson Dawn Hoover Board Member Terry Burroughs Board Member Kenneth Keller Board Member Devin Maxwell Board Member Douglas McCoy Board Member Mike O'Connor Alternate Member Chris Close Alternate Member Malissa Morgan Attorney John R. Cook Planning Consultant Bill Brisson Secretary Betty Clement III. MINUTES - Secretary. A. Motion to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Board Action for the March 20, 2008 regular meeting. Chairperson Ledferd called to order the April 17, 2008 Planning Board/Board of Adjustment and Appeals at 6:00 p.m. Board Secretary Clement called the roll: Present Absent (With consent) Present Present Present Present Present Absent (With consent) Absent (With consent) Absent (With consent) Present Present Board Member McCoy motioned to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Board Action for the March 20, 2008 Regular Meeting; seconded by Board Member Burroughs. VOTE LEDFERD - YEA BURROUGHS - YEA MCCOY -YEA MOTION CARRIED. HOOVER- ABSENT CLOSE- ABSENT MORGAN - ABSENT KELLER - YEA MAXWELL - YEA O'CONNOR - YEA APRIL 17, 2008 PLANNING BOARD/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS- PAGE 2005 9 IV. AGENDA - Chairperson. A. Requests for the addition, deferral or withdrawal of items on today's agenda. V. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING - Chairperson. A. Consider Comprehensive Plan Small Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 08- 004 -SSA, submitted by David and Anita Nunez to change the Future Land Use designation from Single Family (SF) to Commercial (C) for property located on Northeast 7th Street. Legal description: City of Okeechobee, Lots 6, 7, 8 and 9, Block 147 and is approximately 1.74 acre(s) - Planning Consultant. IApplication will be forwarded in ordinance form for a final Public Hearing on May 6, 2008 before City Council. Chair Ledferd asked whether there were any requests for the addition, deferral or withdrawal of items on today's agenda? Secretary Clement reported Special Exception 08- 004 -SE and 08- 006 -SE have been withdrawn. CHAIRPERSON LEDFERD OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:00 P. M. Consider Comprehensive Plan Small Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 08- 004 -SSA, submitted by David and Anita Nunez to change the Future Land Use designation from Single Family (SF) to Commercial (C) for property located on Northeast 7th Street. Legal description: City of Okeechobee, Lots 6, 7, 8 and 9, Block 147 and is approximately 1.74 acre(s). Mr. Brisson presented the LaRue Planning Staff Report of denial stating the request is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and could potentially have greater negative impact upon Taylor Creek than may be the case, under the current land use designation, and incompatibility with the zoning and existing land use pattern in the area. Traffic impact was also a consideration. Anita Nunez, 2085 Northeast 7th Avenue, Okeechobee, FL 34972 addressed the Board. Mrs. Nunez distributed copies of the development she is trying to establish in this area. She also stated she has met with Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA) and South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) with no opposition to the project. The Board discussed the Creek and potential growth for the City, citing people are drawn to the water and felt that this would be a positive growth opportunity for the City. Chair Ledferd asked whether there was any citizen who wished to address the Board. There were none. Board Member Burroughs moved to approve Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 08- 004 -SSA consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and recommend to City Council to change the Future Land Use from Single Family (SF) to Commercial (C) for vacant property located on Northeast 7th Street; seconded by Board Member O'Connor. VOTE LEDFERD - YEA HOOVER - ABSENT BURROUGHS - YEA CLOSE - ABSENT MCCOY -YEA MORGAN- ABSENT MOTION CARRIED. KELLER - YEA MAXWELL - YEA O'CONNOR - YEA Application will be forwarded in ordinance form for a final Public Hearing on May 6, 2008 before City Council. V. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. B. Consider Rezoning Petition No. 08 -002 -R submitted by Steven Ramunni, Esq. on behalf of property owner Mary Ann Newcomer. The petition is to change the zoning designation from Central Business District (CBD) to Industrial (IND) for property located at 701 Southwest Park Street and is approximately 0.642 acres. Brief Legal; Block 161, Town of Okeechobee - Planning Consultant. Application will be forwarded in ordinance form for a final Public Hearing on May 20, 2008 before City Council. APRIL 17, 2008 PLANNING BOARD/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS - PAGE 3 OF 6 Consider Rezoning Petition No. 08 -002 -R submitted by Steven Ramunni, Esq. on behalf of property owner Mary Ann Newcomer. The petition is to change the zoning designation from Central Business District (CBD) to Industrial (IND) for property located at 701 Southwest Park Street and is approximately 0.642 acres. Brief Legal; Block 161, Town of Okeechobee. Mr. Brisson presented the LaRue Planning Staff Report, citing the rezoning would be contrary to the City's Comprehensive Plan and not consistent with the intent of the Commercial land use designation presently applied to the property. Mr. Steve Ramunni, Esquire of LaBelle, Florida addressed the Board. Mr. Ramunni started by stating the City zoning map is incorrect due to the omission of the abandoned railroad bed not being coded. The same abandoned railroad bed to the North is zoned Industrial and same should be zoned for this property, allowing the compatibility of the Industrial zoning for 701 Southwest Park Street. The Board discussed the possibility of Industrial uses and the impact to the area. It was stated, this is the Central Business District and as such would not be appropriate to be zoned Industrial and would not be consistent with the current land use and zoning. The map error could be argued for commercial zoning, due to the surrounding zoning. Chair Ledferd inquired whether there were any citizens to addressed the Board. There were none. However there were two letters submitted in opposition to the rezoning; Billie Jean Reynolds 744 Southwest 24th Avenue and Sarah Regina Hamrick, PO Box 837. Board Member Maxwell moved to deny Rezoning Petition No. 08 -002 -R on the basis, the proposed use is contrary to the City's Comprehensive Plan; and that Industrial Use is not consistent with the Commercial Land Use classification; and further, Industrial Use would have an adverse impact on the public interest should it be situated in our downtown area and on the basis that this use is incompatible with adjacent uses; and that it be a deterrent to adjacent property; and due to the size of the property would be impossible to offer Industrial uses of neighboring property; and recommend to City Council not to change the zoning from Central Business District (CBD) to Industrial (IND); seconded by Board Member Burroughs. VOTE LEDFERD -YEA BURROUGHS - YEA MCCOY - YEA MOTION CARRIED. HOOVER - ABSENT CLOSE- ABSENT MORGAN- ABSENT KELLER - YEA MAXWELL - YEA O'CONNOR - YEA Application will be forwarded in ordinance form for a final Public Hearing on May 20, 2008 before City Council. APRIL 17, 2008 PLANNING BOARD/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS - PAGE 2F6 1 V. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. QUASI- JUDICIAL C. Consider a Special Exception Petition No. 08- 005 -SE to allow a drive through service and outdoor sales and storage located within Heavy Commercial (CHV) Zoning District (ref. Code Book Sec. 90- 283)(1)(5)) submitted by Rudd Jones on behalf of property owner Linda Bridges. The subject property is located at 920 Northwest Park Street. Legal description: Lots 14 through 17, Block 163 and is approximately 0.586 acre(s) - Planning Consultant. Consider a Special Exception Petition No. 08- 005 -SE to allow a drive through service and outdoor sales and storage located within Heavy Commercial (CHV) Zoning District (ref. Code Book Sec. 90- 283)(1)(5)) submitted by Rudd Jones on behalf of property owner Linda Bridges. The subject property is located at 920 Northwest Park Street. Legal description: Lots 14 through 17, Block 163 and is approximately 0.586 acre(s). Mr. Brisson presented the LaRue Planning Staff Report of approval, finding that the use is not contrary to the Comprehensive Plan requirements. He also stated, there is plenty of room for the drive through and parking. Patricia Gorter, Rudd Jones & Associates addressed the Board. She stated in the original application, the potted and hanging plants were shown in the Northeast area. They are not visible for people driving by, so they will be relocated. The Board asked whether this project would be completed within twelve months. Ms. Gorter doubted that it could be, due to the renovations that have to be made. Ingress and egress onto or off SR70 was discussed. The ingress and egress will be on NW 10th Avenue. Mr. Brisson stated there was ample room for the drive through and parking, and would be addressed at the TRC meeting for site plan review. The Board discussed the Special Exception (SE) classification should the property were to be sold. Would the SE stay with the land or the use. The Board was instructed unless they were specific with the motion the SE would stay with the land. Chair Ledferd asked whether the citizens had any questions? There were none. Board Member Maxwell moved to approve Special Exception No. 08- 005 -SE to allow a drive through service and outdoor sales and storage for retail sales and be conditioned on, or limited to, a retail use of a similar nature and character and that the use be commenced within 12 months; seconded by Board Member Burroughs. VOTE LEDFERD -YEA BURROUGHS - YEA MCCOY - YEA MOTION CARRIED. HOOVER- ABSENT CLOSE- ABSENT MORGAN- ABSENT KELLER - YEA MAXWELL - YEA O'CONNOR - YEA V. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. QUASI- JUDICIAL C. Consider a Special Exception Petition No. 08- 005 -SE continued. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING VI. NEW BUSINESS. A. Consider and discuss requests for amendments to the City's Land Development Regulations - Chairperson. APRIL 17, 2008 PLANNING BOARD /BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS - PAGE 5 OF 6 Chair Ledferd inquired whether the applicant understood the motion? Ms. Gorter addressed the Board stating that Special Exceptions are good for two years. The applicant has two years to pull a building permit according to Section 70 -348 according to the City Code Book. Board Member Maxwell made a motion to rescind and amend the approval of Special Exception No. 08- 005 -SE to allow a drive through service and outdoor sales and storage for retail sales and be conditioned on, or limited to, a retail use of a similar nature and character and that the use be commenced within 12 months; seconded by Board Member McCoy. VOTE LEDFERD - YEA HOOVER - ABSENT KELLER - YEA BURROUGHS - YEA CLOSE - ABSENT MAXWELL - YEA MCCOY - YEA MORGAN - ABSENT O'CONNOR - YEA MOTION CARRIED. Board Member Maxwell moved to approve Special Exception No. 08- 005 -SE to allow a drive through service and outdoor sales and storage for retail sales and be conditioned on, or limited to, a retail use of a similar nature and character and that the use be commenced within 24 months,; seconded by Board Member Burroughs. VOTE LEDFERD - YEA HOOVER- ABSENT KELLER -YEA B IQDAI CHS _ v� �.#I 11 I I I - �A CLOSE - ABSENT MAXWELL - YEA MCCOY - YEA MORGAN - ABSENT O'CONNOR - YEA MOTION CARRIED. CHAIRPERSON LEDFERD CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:33 P.M. Consider and discuss requests for amendments to the City's Land Development Regulations 1. Public School Facilities Element, Comprehensive Plan. 2. Intergovernmental Coordination Element, Comprehensive Plan. 3. Capital Improvements Element, Comprehensive Plan. VI. NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED. A. Consider and discuss requests for amendments to the City's Land Development Regulations - continued. 1. Public School Facilities Element, Comprehensive Plan. 2. Intergovernmental Coordination Element, Comprehensive Plan. 3. Capital Improvements Element, Comprehensive Plan. VII. ADJOURNMENT - Chairperson. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that if any person desires to appeal any decision made by the Land Planning Board with respect to any matter considered at this proceeding, such interested person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose may need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. General Services media are for the sole purpose of backup for official records of the Department. William Ledf:Ro, Chairperson APRIL 17, 2008 PLANNING BOARD/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS - PAGE 2,6 3 The Board asked Mr. Brisson a few questions concerning the Elements. Mr. Brisson reported the Elements had been prepared by Kimley Horn. Mr. Maxwell questioned about the lack of and need for more sidewalks in the City, especially around the schools. Mr. Brisson stated the time to address that issue would be the next time the Comprehensive Plan was updated, which will be started reasonably soon. Board Member Burroughs moved to recommend to City Council for approval of the Public School Facility Element, Intergovernmental Coordination Element and Capital Improvements Element, Comprehensive Plan; seconded by Board Member O'Connor. VOTE LEDFERD -YEA BURROUGHS - YEA MCCOY - YEA MOTION CARRIED. HOOVER- ABSENT CLOSE- ABSENT MORGAN- ABSENT KELLER - YEA MAXWELL - YEA O'CONNOR - YEA There being no further items on the agenda, Chairperson Ledferd adjourned the meeting at 7:50 p.m. MEMORANDUM GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT TO: Chairman Ledferd FROM: Secretary Clement DATE: April 17, 2008 SUBJECT: Board Members MESSAGE: Bill The City Council has appointed Malissa Morgan as an Alternate Board Member Dawn and Chris Close will not be attending the meeting this evening. Malissa will assuming her alternate duties for the May meeting. MEMORANDUM GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT TO: Chairman Ledferd FROM: Secretary Clement DATE: April 17, 2008 SUBJECT: Board Members MESSAGE: The City Council has appointed Malissa Morgan as an Alternate Board Member Dawn and Chris Close will not be attending the meeting this evening. Malissa will assuming her alternate duties for the May meeting. CITY OF OKEECHOBEE - APRIL 17, 2008 - PLANNING BOARD /BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS HANDWRITTEN MINUTES I. CALL TO ORDER - Chairperson: April 17, 2008, Planning Board/Board of Adiustment and Appeals Regular Meeting 6:00 p.m. II. CHAIRPERSON, BOARD MEMBER STAFF ATTENDANCE - Secretary Chairperson Ledferd Vice - Chairperson Hoover Board Member Burroughs Board Member Keller Board Member Maxwell Board Member McCoy Board Member O'Connor Alternate Close Alternate Morgan Senior Planner Brisson Attorney Cook Secretary Clement III. MINUTES — Secretary Present Absent X X (WITH CONSENT) X X (jCi4)�t 7(lwlc0-�,�t X A. Motion to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Planning Board /Board of Adjustment and Appeals Action for the March 20, 2008, regular meeting. MOTION: Board Member March 20, 2008 regular meeting; seco moved to dispense ed by Board Member h the readin and approve he Summary of Agency Action for the ARRIED TO Ca) DATE: MEMORANDUM GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning Board Members Secretary Clement April 10, 2008 SUBJECT: 08- 004 -SE and 08- 006 -SE MESSAGE: These two Special Exceptions are being pulled from the meeting. Due to being advertised, the must be 'art of the a_enda. O -ocq- 5SA IW kw/ NME.. WIW,T��, MAAi , .__� - el •%t .I VP r -!1 IMOr ANWI I . `. ..ill dr • I'm 4)t4 L • • 1 ---4 L��L��M WI iyW .��i� OMMININNEINININIFIIIIIMIMINA II :ft-E A IE .! ' M1!s"P ■ • 11 2 A 1'.. �� f �� `_Au i / �� / !._ i NM= propnwir WIRMISSIMai 01111MMv Mr._ AP 1.■41111PMEMMIlbbA.41 1/1J 5� I i.� -� r...I. IvL .ate. � ./ A �� _14-$7111MMIN l• 1. it . ~� 1 'i — /r 17111M, 4.4A./2A, 111111.1MMIIIM IAMIMMAIIMPIfffl OW- i 11 L 1' , ; - M Pi^I[/I� � i .i - 4411112 ' .' s_ I _ ._C.. V _I. �,. TE/ILL�PI�1/ !1 /.:'�'Ij -•= !'jam(• ,y0AA-trti,,,No # - • IV. AGENDA - Chairperson. A. Requests for the addition, deferral or withdrawal of items on today's agenda. 1. Withdrawal of 08- 004 -SE 2. Withdrawal of 08- 006 -SE V. CHAIRPERSON LEDFERD OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:00 P.M. 1. Application No. 08- 004 -SSA Request Recommend to City Council to change land use from Single Family (SF) to Commercial (C) Location Northeast 7th Street, Lots 6, 7, 8, and 9, Block 147 Okeechobee Applicant David and Anita Nunez Staff Representation Senior Planning Consultant LaRue Staff Recommendation Denial DISCUSSION: see attached sheet(s) Motion: Board Member QuvZ t�.�moved approv deny recommendation to City Council to amend the Future Land se Map Applicaticallo. 08- 004 -SSA Ingle Family to Commercial for pro erty located on Northeast 7th Street, Lots 6, 7, 8, and 9, Block 147, Okeechobee; seconded by Board Member c f`_074(-61. VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT Non Voting Mbr. LEDFERD HOOVER X BURROUGHS X KELLER �,/ MAXWELL MCCOY O'CONNOR Y CLOSE �( MORGAN X RESULTS CARRIED DENIED 0 alifffflAIVINN _, , •;lr ! i Vii♦ Arignirrolgkorik INONINIMIL • MOM CJ i AVM OreS/91111MMITIOWNWSIVOMMO0114 ofermanta i _ _ OMAN SCITRAMIIIPIIMalinffiffli r ii� . � i;iM�' inlaMMIPIr I 1 li*lAare614 Ticiaa a LOwsillgrirlirliallg. j'i '' EXICAVIESi 21/ffirifillMIZEill ),/,„th wARITRAMILVWSWll I II !N , i c, b() t-•...'" V. Public Hearing Continued. 2. Application No. Request Location Applicant Staff Representation LaRue Staff Recommendation DISCUSSION: see attached sheet(s) MOTION: 08 -002 -R Recommend to City Council to consider a change in zoning from Central Business District (CBD) to Industrial (IND) 701 Southwest Park Street Steven Ramunni, Esquire, on behalf of property owner(s) Mary Ann Newcomer Senior Planning Consultant Denial Board Member tUD moved to approv the zoning from Centr I Busine District (CBD) to Industr; I (I 701 Southwest Park Street; seconded by Board Member nd recommend City Council to change etition No. 08- 002 -R, for property located at VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN 1 ABSENT Non Voting Mbr. LEDFERD )( HOOVER X BURROUGHS )(/ KELLER MAXWELL MCCOY i O'CONNOR l CLOSE MORGAN RESULTS CARRIED DENIED 3. Application No. Request Location Applicant Staff Representation LaRue Staff Recommendation 08- 004 -SE To allow a recreation vehicles park, for transient recreation use only, within a Residential Mobile Home District (Ref. Code Book Section 90- 163(4)). 516 Southeast 4th Street, Okeechobee Trailer & Fishing Resort Roger Jones Senior Planning Consultant 6� _Boa -� U ?-()(),p - o g-cC 5 SF Off ,- __ ,proararammor ittremogroffsenowswommemi mirir,_,_ illinliMirillialrafilari 11, Ar � , • � �1/ / ■ d i ., r.. —i ce r,�. parr r' _� M1 ^lr fit! /,. I EMINEAMINIPINi /• ir V. Public Hearing Continued. QUASAI- JUDICIAL 4. Application No. Request Location Applicant Staff Representation LaRue Staff Recommendation DISCUSSION: see attached sheet(s) MOTION: 08- 005 -SE To allow a drive through service and outdoor sales and storage within a CHV District (Ref. Code Book Section 90- 283(1)(5)). 920 Northwest Park Street, Lots 14 through 17, Block 163 Linda Bridges Senior Planning Consultant Approval Board Member moved f� and outdoor sales nd storage within a CH' 4 7L9cation 92Q Northwest Park, Street, Lots 14 through approv eny08- 005 -SE To allow a drive through service (Ref. Code Book Section 90- 283(1)(5)). 17, Block 163; second by Board Member y"`-' \XJ Li ) (Xl (A-,"-L---- 1 VA.•l 134---4L -`... T '.' (, W\ J 1 /j�L�f _j iCe.(Jc -t ,>14-e-4-s..- ( J { v f- fee----=-0- r Wi' VOTE YEA NAY ABSTA1W4 ! ABSENT Non Voting Mbr. LEDFERD HOOVER X BURROUGHS KELLER MAXWELL JK �. MCCOY ( O'CONNOR K CLOSE MORGAN RESULTS ( CARRIED) DENIED di i 1l (L' ftki 5. Application No. Request Location Applicant Staff Representation LaRue Staff Recommendation 08- 006 -SE To allow a recreation vehicles park, for transient recreation use only, within a Residential Mobile Home District (Ref. Code Book Section 90- 163(4)). 1307 South Parrott Avenue, Riverbend Mobile Home Park Isaac and Cinderella Kelbie Senior Planning Consultant CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING — Chairperson 7 , L3 P.M. VI. New Business A. Consider and discuss requests for amendments to the City's Land Development Regulations - Chairperson. 1. Public School Facilities Element, Comprehensive Plan. 2. Intergovernmental Coordination Element, Comprehensive Plan. 3. Capital Improvements Element, Comprehensive Plan. DISCUSSION: see attached sheet(s) MOTION: Board Member 61,c owti moved to recommend City Council Public School Facilities Element, Intergovernmental Coordina n Element, and Capital Improvements Element, Comprehensive Plan,; seconded by Board Member U `c 4u-6_ . VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT Non Voting Mbr. LEDFERD HOOVER X BURROUGHS KELLER MAXWELL MCCOY O'CONNOR CLOSE X MORGAN RESULTS CARRIED DENIED VII. CHAIRPERSON LEDFERD ADJOURNED THE MEETING AT 7� P.M. CITY OF OKEECHOBEE PLANNING BOARD /BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS MEETING APRIL 17, 2008 OFFICIAL AGENDA Page 1 of 3 I. CALL TO ORDER: Planning Board/Board of Adjustment and Appeals, April 17, 2008, 6:00 p.m. - Chairperson. II. CHAIRPERSON, BOARD MEMBERS AND STAFF ATTENDANCE - Secretary. Chairperson William Ledferd Vice - Chairperson Dawn Hoover Board Member Terry Burroughs Board Member Kenneth Keller Board Member Devin Maxwell Board Member Douglas McCoy Board Member Mike O'Connor Alternate Chris Close Attorney John R. Cook Senior Planner Bill Brisson Secretary Betty Clement III. MINUTES - Secretary. A. Motion to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Planning Board /Board of Adjustment and Appeals Action for the March 20, 2008 regular meeting. IV. AGENDA - Chairperson. A. Requests for the addition, deferral or withdrawal of items on today's agenda. V. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING - Chairperson. 1. Application No. Request Location Applicant Staff Representation LaRue Staff Recommendation 2. Application No. Request Location Applicant Staff Representation LaRue Staff Recommendation QUASAI- JUDICIAL 3. Application No. Request Location Applicant Staff Representation LaRue Staff Recommendation 4. Application No. Request Location Applicant Staff Representation LaRue Staff Recommendation 5. Application No. Request Location Applicant Staff Representation LaRue Staff Recommendation APRIL 17, 2008 - PB/B0A AGENDA - PAGE 2 OF 3 08- 004 -SSA Recommend to City Council to change land use from Single Family (SF) to Commercial (C) Northeast 7th Street, Lots 6, 7, 8, and 9, Block 147 Okeechobee David and Anita Nunez Senior Planning Consultant Denial 08 -002 -R Recommend to City Council to consider a change in zoning from Central Business District (CBD) to Industrial (IND) 701 Southwest Park Street Steven Ramunni, Esquire, on behalf of property owner(s) Mary Ann Newcomer Senior Planning Consultant Denial 08- 004 -SE To allow a recreation vehicles park, for transient recreation use only, within a Residential Mobile Home District (Ref. Code Book Section 90- 163(4)). 516 Southeast 4th Street, Okeechobee Trailer & Fishing Resort Roger Jones Senior Planning Consultant 08- 005 -SE To allow a drive through service and outdoor sales and storage within a CHV District (Ref. Code Book Section 90- 283(1)(5)). 920 Northwest Park Street, Lots 14 through 17, Block 163 Linda Bridges Senior Planning Consultant Approval 08- 006 -SE To allow a recreation vehicles park, for transient recreation use only, within a Residential Mobile Home District (Ref. Code Book Section 90- 163(4)). 1307 South Parrott Avenue, Riverbend Mobile Home Park Isaac and Cinderella Kelbie Senior Planning Consultant APRIL 17, 2008 - PB/B0A AGENDA - PAGE 3 OF 3 CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING - Chairperson. VI. New Business A. Consider and discuss requests for amendments to the City's Land Development Regulations - Chairperson. 1. Public School Facilities Element, Comprehensive Plan. 2. Intergovernmental Coordination Element, Comprehensive Plan. 3. Capital Improvements Element, Comprehensive Plan. VII. ADJOURNMENT - Chairperson. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that all interested parties and citizens shall have the opportunity to be heard at these public hearings. Any person deciding to appeal any decision made by the Planning Board /Board of Adjustment and Appeals with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing will need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceeding is made and that the record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based. General Services media are for the sole purpose of backup for official records of the Department. The Okeechobee News P.O. Box 639, Okeechobee, Florida 34973 (863) 763 -3134 Published Daily STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Judy Kasten, who on oath says she is Publisher of the Okeechobee News, a DAILY Newspaper published at Okeechobee, in Okeechobee County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertise- ment, being a •ill in the matter of N3c-he. - x(.t O() in the 19th Judicial District of the Circuit Court of Okeechobee County, Florida, was published in said newspaper in the issues of Affiant further says that the said Okeechobee News is a newspaper published at Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been published continuously in said Okeechobee County, Florida each week and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. / Sworn to apd ?{tbscribed.l1efore me this day of A.D. 20 62 7/: -4 star tblic, State of Florida at Large NOTICE OF CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS NOTICE: A PUBLIC HEARING will be held before the City of Okeechobee Planning Board/Board of Adjustment and Appeals on Thursday, AprO 17, 2008 at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. The meeting will be held at City Hall, 55 Southeast 3rd Avenue, in the Council Chambers, Room 200, Okeechobee, Ronda To consider a request for a Comprehensive Plan Small Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 08 -004 -SSA. The application is submitted by Tom Murhpy, on behalf of property owner(s), David and Anita Nunez. The application is to change the Future Land Use designation from Single Family (SF) to Commer- cial (C) for property located West of Taylor Creek between Northeast 2nd and 3rd Streets and Northeast 7th Avenue. Legal descption: Parcel One: Commencing at the point of intersection of the Northerly extension of the East lice of Block 147 and the Southeast comer of Lot 12 in Block 116, Okeechobee, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 5, Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida, and run Southwesterly along said Northern extension of the East line of said Block 147, to the intersec- tion with the cenfei line of Northeast 3rd Street, (formerly Ninth Street), also being the Southwest corner of a parcel of land as described in O.R. Book 405, Page 664, Public Records of Okeechobee County, Ronda and the Point of Beginning; thence continue Southwesterly along said extended line to the Northeast comer of Lot 1 in said Block 147; thence continue Southwesterly along the East fine of said Lot 1 and the Southerly extension thereof; to the Northeast comer of Lot 9 in said Block 147; thence run East along the Easterly extension of the North Tine of said Lot 9, to the Westem shoreline of Taylor Creek thence run Northeasterly, along said Western shoreline, to the intersection with the .Easterly extension of the aforesaid centerline of Northeast 3rd Street, also being the Southeast comer of said land described in O.R. Book 405, Page 664; thence run West along said ex- tended centerline and also along the South boundary One of said parcel of land to the Point of Beginning; and Parcel Two: Lots 6 through 9 of Block 147, City of Okeechobee Subdivision, ac- cording to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 5, Public Records of Okeechobee County, Ronda; and Parcel Three: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 9 of Block 147, City of Okee- chobee, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 5, Public Records of .Okeechobee County, Ronda, and run Southwesterly along the East line of said Lot 9 to the Southeast comer of said Block 147; thence run South- westerly to the Northeast corner of fractional Block 148 of said plat of Okeecho- bee; thence run East, along the Easterly extension of the North line of said Block 148, to the Western shoreline of Taylor Creek; thence run Northeasterly along said Western shoreline, to the intersection wth the Easterly extension of the North line of aforesaid Lot 9; thence run West along the extended North line of said Lot 9, to the Point of Beginning; and is approximately 1.74 acre(s). The proposed use is for a muti functional building. A copy of the entire application(s) and agenda are available in the General Services Office, Rm 101 at City Hall or by calling Betty Clement at (863) 763.3372 x 218. The Planning Board will make recommendations to the City Council for considera- tion and final adoption tentatively scheduled for Tuesday, May 6, 2008. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that O any person desires to appeal any decision made by the Planning Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, or hearing will need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the ap- peal is to be based. General Services media are used for the sole purpose of back -up for the department. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Ronda Statute 286.26, persons with disabilities needing special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact Betty Clement, no later than two (2) worldng days prior to the proceeding at 863- 763 -3372 x 218; d you are heanng a voice im- paired, call TDD 1-800-222-3448 (voice) a 1- 888- 447 -5620 (TTY). BY: Brian Whitehall, Zoning Administrator Application No. 08-004 -SSA 267972 ON 4/2,11/08 Op -R'� pUe/ Janette Thibouit .e Commission # DD505311 (PA oa Expires January 10, 2010 P-� Bondec troy Fain Insurance. Inc 800-385.7019 City of Okeechobee General Services Department 55 S.E. 3rd Avenue, Room 101 Okeechobee, Florida 34974-2903 . Phone: (863) 763 -3372, ext. 218 Fax: (863) 763 -1686 . . Date: ._11_O i Petition No. OY- 0o41-5SA. Fee Paid: ' -4 ° Jurisdiction: / Current Zoning Designation: N s'e-c - c&-wo . C Applicant mailing address: 1st Hearing: y! /7,%8( ! 2nd Hearing: / ti_ l Publication Dates: --,pt,„„i- Legal Description ofth- Pro.erty (Lengthy Description _ be .p Attached): CL.,- Qk p 1a19, 4,-f -� 6-q /q7 `. � y t-,e-x-Ipba_tezo-.k. xewat-tipc(r-ed,5,-,--- i !, &,_dt_494 Notices Mailed: Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Application Please Check One: Small Scale Amendment (Under 10 Acres) _ Large Scale Amendment (Over 10 Acres) ✓ Name of property owner(s): DQ v ,,d 4 A,\;-k u n -- Owner mailing address: NE Ay�o. EL 3 ; _ = _- R 20R-5 7-6, oKee_clohPe 72-- Name of applicant(s) if other than owner (state relationship): Current Zoning Designation: N s'e-c - c&-wo . C Applicant mailing address: Existing Use of the Property: VQ.,e,o- -ate Name of contact person (state relationship): R „; V ,_n�zfro M t_ iy. Contact person daytime phone(s): t91 -0 (P I I Fax: ✓ Property address / directions to property: 3 _IS- 31.3 5 _Co j _0,(470 - co (G,G ; _ = _- R 3-15 -3 - 3 5 k / - - coo /0— ctj / /-{ -a- OO / /-1 Parcel Identification Number: , be..iwe e y, NC ,3,4 � ST S 5-1, 706, Size of the Property (in acres): 1 _ 7 tF Q ,a J Current Zoning Designation: N s'e-c - c&-wo . C Current Future Land Use Designation: <i Fct.�r, Existing Use of the Property: VQ.,e,o- -ate Proposed Future Land Use Designation: C°IA M Eg. C l JAL. Pr . . osed Use of the Property: I , it Description of Surr; un g Pro erties: ",h:tzhic, -5 d Wed fF 5- Cc, - --,pt,„„i- Legal Description ofth- Pro.erty (Lengthy Description _ be .p Attached): CL.,- Qk p 1a19, 4,-f -� 6-q /q7 `. � y t-,e-x-Ipba_tezo-.k. xewat-tipc(r-ed,5,-,--- i !, &,_dt_494 Uniform Land Use Application (rev. 12/03) Page 1 of 2 V .,,Survey of Property (11" x 14 ", 20" Scale) �f Letter Outlining Request Notarized Letter of Owner's Authorization ITpplication Fee (non - refundable) —City Location Map I hereby certify that the information in this application is correct. The information included in this application is for use by the City of Okeechobee in processing my request. False or misleading information may be punishable by a fine of up to $500.00 and imprisonment of up to 30 days and may result in the summary denial of this application. Signature it* tNEz- .2— I ( Printed Name Date Uniform Land Use Application (rev. 12/03) Page 2 of 2 David & Anita Nunez, Jr 610 N. Parrott Ave. Okeechobee, Fl. 34972 863 - 467 -0611 863 - 467 -0610 February 8, 2008 TO: City of Okeechobee RE: Zoning Change Request, Letter of Intent; Outline Letter We are making the request to change the zoning on this property for the construction and use of a multi functional building. This construction of a large building would serve as a facility where events such as weddings, birthdays, family reunions, graduation parties, school events, sports, holiday events, public meeting, political agendas meetings, church socials, fund raisers and a verity of other events and needs would be satisfied. « Prey I D_SearchResults. Okeechobee County. Property Appraiser Last Updated: 1/24/2008 .. Parcel ID: 3-15-37-35-0010-00010-001H Owner& Property_Info_ Owner'S' Name SiteAddress Mailing;; Address: Brief: Legal Retrieve Tax Record Page.1 of 2 2007 Certified Values Property:Card NUNEZ S 6: Okeechgtiee 2085 SE. 4.- STREET AKEECHOBEE'. FL,34974 GIS Aeria Prey, Search . Search Result: 39 of 54 Next» ,Interactive GIS Map. Print CIT OF OKEECHOBEE BEGINNING. AT THE NORTHEAST SCORNER OF;LOT :BLOCK .1471: " :: ?': Neighborhood UD Codes DOR :Use Code: 0 67:0,ACRES: 153651.00. Tax District Market Area VACANT (000000)` r 50 40- The DOR Use Code shown here is a Dept: of Revenue. code. Please contact the Okeechobee County Planing & Development office at863- 763 -5548 for specific zoning information. Property & Assessment Values ; Mkt Land Value cnt: (1)` $26,800.00 Ag Land Value cnt: (0) $0.00 Building Value cnt: (0) $0.00 XFOB Value cnt: (0) $0.00 Total Appraised Value $26,800.00 Sales History 2007 Proposed Values Just Value $26,800.00 Class Value $o.00 Assessed Value $26,800.00 Exempt Value so.o0 Total Taxable Value $26,800.00 Sale Date Book/Page Inst. Type Sale Vimp Sale Qua! Sale RCode Sale Price 6/27/2003 511/1166 WD V U _ 03 $4,000.00 8/21/1997 394/1929 ,•,. WD - V U 03 $6,000.00 11/29/1996 .. 385/960 WD V 11 03 ` $0.00 Building Characteristics Bldg Sketch l Bidg. Item J Bldg Desc 1 Year Blt Heated S.F. Actual S.F. I Bldg Value NONE Extra Features & Out Buildings -( Show Codes) Code Desc 1 Year Bit I Value I Units Dims Condition (% Good) NONE Land Breakdown Lnd Code Desc .Units Adjustments Eff Rate Lnd Value 961CAC NON /CONFG (MKT) .670 AC 1.00/1.00/1.00/1.00 $40,000.00 $26,800.00 Okeechobee County Property Appraiser Search Result: 39 of 54 Next» Last Updated: 1/24/2008 HOME I Record Search I GIS Map 1 General Info I Exemptions I Tangible Tax I FAQ I Contact Us This information was derived from data which was compiled by the Okeechobee County Property Appraiser's Office solely for the http: / /www. okeechobeepa .com/GIS/D_SearchResults.asp 2/8/2008 Okeechobee County Property Appraiser - Map Printed on 2/8/2008 10:05:58 AM Page 1 of 1 E -4 TIR• STREET.!" Okeechobee County. Property Appraiser • W.C. "Bill" Sherman, CFA - Okeechobee, Florida - 863 - 763 -4422 PARCEL: 3-15-37-35-0010-00010-001K - VACANT (000000) CITY OF OKEECHOBEE COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE NORTHERLY Name:NUNEZ DAVID JR & ANITA S Site: 0 , Okeechobee Mail: 2085 . SE 4TH STREET OKEECHOBEE, FL 34974 Sales 6/27/2003 $4,000.00V / U 8/21/1997 $6,000.00V / U Info 11/29/1996 $0.00V / U LandVal BldgVal ApprVal JustVal Assd Exmpt Taxable 1 200 400 600 ft. $19,200.00 $0.00 $19,200.00 $19,200.00 $19,200.00 $0.00 $19,200.00 This information, Last Updated: 1/24/2008, was derived from data which was compiled by the Okeechobee County Property Appraiser's Office solely for the govemmental purpose of property assessment. This information should not be relied upon by anyone as a determination of the ownership of property or market value. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the accuracy of the data herein, it's use, or it's interpretation. Although it is periodically updated, this information may not reflect the data currently on file in the Property Appraiser's office. The assessed values are NOT certified values and therefore are subject to change before being finalized for ad valorem assessment purposes. http: / /www.okeechobeepa.com/GIS/Print Map. asp? pjboiibchhjbnligcafccjfhojiaehdomhloankkimfbpfhbo ... 2/8/2008 D_SearchResults Okeechobee County Property Appraiser Last Updated: 1/24/2008 Parcel ID: 3- 15- 37 -35- 0010- 01470 -0060 Owner & Prope ( Retrieve Tax Record) ty 200. (: Property Card J m Page 1 of 2 SF. ertified- Values. (, Interactive GIS Map ) Owner's :Name -- Site'Address `K`ddress; Brief Info -: NUNEZ DAVID 7R & ANITA S 306 N1n 7TFFlVE, Okeechobee ", Print Search Result. a9 of 54 - Next» 1S: Aeri 20.85SE.4T171 STREET QKEECF70BElr .FL`34.97 '.CITY OF,OKEECHOBE5LOTS fi TO.9 INC BLOCK-;147 Ne'ighborhood UD ,Codes Ta eDistr District'<. 50.:- DOR Use Code:` - Market Area :SINGLE: FAM (000100)'' 40 The QOR Use -Code shgwn here is� a Dept::af Revenue code.: Please Contact the Okeechobee County : Planing; &Develepment'officeat' 863463 -5548 ferspecificzoning information. . 515: :. Property & Assessment Values Mkt Land';Value cnt' $62,240:.00' Ag LandValue. cnt :'(03 $0.00 Building Value cnt: (1) $78,145:00. )(FOB-Value : cnt- (3) . $594 :00 Total Appraised Value $140,979.00 Sales History 2007 Proposed: Values Just Value . $140,979 :00 Class Value $0.00 Assessed Value $140,979.00 Exempt Value $0.00 Total Taxable Value $140,979.00 Sale Date Book/Page , Inst. Type . Sale Vimp Sale Qual Sale RCode Sale Price 6/27/2003 - :' 511/1151. WD I : U 02 $136,000.00 11/27/1996. 385/191 , :.. WD: I.: Q 7 x 5 x 0 $41,000.00 6/1/1990 '..314/1828 , - WD : I U. 03 : $40,454.00 Building Characteristics Bldg Sketch . Bldg .Item` . Bldg Desc Year Blt Heated S.F. ; Actual S.F. Bldg Value Show Sketch 1 SINGLE FAM (000100) 1952 1411 2626. $78,145.00 Extra Features & Out Buildings ( Show Codes )_ Code ' Desc Year Bit Value Units Dims Condition (% Good) BCT N4 BLK CC. TIN: 1991 : $131.00 40.000 8 x 5 x 0 . PD (25.00) ODA OPN DRT AL - 1991 $28.00 35.000 7 x 5 x 0 PD (25.00) PLUMB2 2 FIXTURE 1991 $435.00 1.000 0 x 0 x 0 PD (25.00) Land Breakdown <. Lnd Code Desc Units Adjustments Eff Rate Lnd Value 161CI8 CITY LT (MKT) 169.500 FF - (.581AC) 1.00 /1.00 /1.00 /1.00 $367.20 $62,240.00 Okeechobee County Property Appraiser « Prev Search Result: 39 of 54 Next » Last Updated: 1/24/2008 HOME 1 Record Search I GIS Map I General Info I Exemptions I Tangible Tax I FAQ I Contact Us http:// www. okeechobeepa .com/GIS/D_SearchResults.asp 2/8/2008 Interactive GIS Map ) D SearchResults Okeechobee .County Property Appraiser Last Updated: 1/24/2008. Parcel ID: 3-15-37-35-0010-.00010-001K Owner & Property Info Owner's Name Site Address Mailing Address Brief Legal Total "Lane Retrieve Tax Record NUNEZ'DAVID JR`& ANITA S 0:; Okeechobee'•,; .ID= I IL 1flla MEM w frzum Wan wlm &R �et'se ma ` ?Y wan 1g :ice :s L. Von ma br nstrall. 0011... &MR 4S POLIO <w..IwaliCa..RiINIMINL.4OWr ILLIM I 41..an1_ RI \YDI ll �wi t�l`w`NIII IIEwwt�9�wlflR Ian �fIIHf .ww It fBl.i- OIIII iy�, t.".�F. w,w radiaO \14101 {:t ra.- �1wil�w „.4. �w ic?w34n.r< NIA .Ow.w I. ILO Ina L. WWII IL Rani ®n a,RUM t. del 11.00. NIS pIINrItfa ®tan�Ydr1t4111��0an1[�r�e�O IM.” O b rrukar4:17. any 111M YI MUM x 101 SEW IL PM. Erg urirl..oel. omen wv UK V' 4w aLat la WM WS 1 _ 1 MVO Me 0.6.W Esa Illeilleslawas 166.66 266.6.1 1375 Jackson Street, Suite 206 Fort Myers, Florida 33901 -2845 Phone: 239 - 334 -3366 Fax: 239 - 334 -6384 LaRue Planning & Management Services, Inc. Staff Report -Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Prepared for.• The City of Okeechobee Applicant: David & Anita Nunez Petition No. 08- 004 -SSA General Information s 2085 NE Okeecho Same '''`as .a` Existing , Prropos Zoning Holding and RMF CHV Acreage Location: NE 7th Avenue 1.74 Legal Description: COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF BLOCK 147 AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 12 IN BLOCK 116, OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND RUN SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERN EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID BLOCK 147, TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE CENTERLINE OF NE 3RD STREET (FORMERLY NINTH STREET), ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN O.R. BOOK 405, PAGE 664, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID EXTENDED LINE, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 IN SAID BLOCK 147; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 AND THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 9 IN SAID BLOCK 147; THENCE RUN EAST, ALONG THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 9, TO THE WESTERN SHORELINE OF TAYLOR CREEK; THENCE RUN NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG SAID WESTERN SHORELINE, TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE AFORESAID CENTERLINE OF NE 3RD STREET, ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LAND DESCRIBED IN O.R. BOOK 405, PAGE 654; THENCE RUN WEST, ALONG SAID EXTENDED CENTERLINE AND ALSO ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. AND: LOTS 6, 7, 8, AND 9 BLOCK 147, OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. Staff Report Applicant: David and Anita Nunez Small-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Petition No. 08- 004-SSA AND: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 9 OF BLOCK 147, OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND RUN SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 9 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 147; THENCE RUN SOUTHWESTERLY TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FRACTIONAL BLOCK 148 OF SAID PLAT OF OKEECHOBEE; THENCE RUN EAST, ALONG THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK 148, TO THE WESTERN SHORELINE OF TAYLOR CREEK; THENCE RUN NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG SAID WESTERN SHORELINE, TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH LINE OF AFORESAID LOT 9; THENCE RUN WEST, ALONG THE EXTENDED NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 9, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Description of the Request The matter before the Local Planning Agency and City Council is an application for an amendment to the Future Land Use Map from Single Family Residential to Commercial for approximately 1.74 acres of land bordering Taylor Creek. Subsequent to this,an application for rezoning to either CHV or CLT can be expected. Adjacent Future Land Use Map Classifications and Zoning Districts Zoning District: East: Future Land Use Map Classification: Existing Land Use: West: n: Zoning District: and Use: Future Land Use Map Classification: arlli g- District: RSFI Taylor Creek; Single - Family on east side of Taylor Creek Mobile Home Park east of Taylor Creek Existing Land Use: CHV 1/r fyM'6 ' Y 40:0 Single- family and Multi - Family across NE 7th Avenue SF:I° and RMF across Avenus `;. Single- family 2 Staff Report Small-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: David and Anita Nunez Petition No. 08- 004-SSA General Analysis and Staff Comments Based on the size of the property (1.74 acres) this application qualifies under Chapter 163, F.S. as a Small Scale Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. The Applicant also owns the one acre parcel immediately to the south that is zoned CHV and is proposed for commercial development and for which the Board of Adjust- ment has heard an application for variances to allow "zero" setbacks along the west and north property lines. The Applicant requested postponement and to -date the matter has not yet received further review or consideration by the Board. The applicant is requesting this amendment to the Future Land Use Map to allow a multi - functional building for social, religious, political, holiday, sports and other special events. While the proposed use is similar to a community center, because it will be primarily operated for profit, it does not qualify as a community center and therefore would have to be considered commercial indoor recreation. Commercial indoor recreation is a permitted use in the CHV zoning district and is allowed by Special Exception in the CLT zoning district. Comprehensive Plan Analysis A. Consistency with the Land Use Categories and Plan Policies. The Comprehensive Plan requires the City to manage future growth and implement land development regulations which would protect the use and value of private property and environmentally sensitive areas from adverse impacts of development. Allowing a Commercial Future Land Use designation on this property would encourage further pressure for conversion of nearby single - family lands to Commercial. Due to problems in the past, the City's Plan includes a series of policies to protect Taylor Creek with particular reference to water quality. Except for the parcels immediately adjacent to SR 70, and the Industrial park in the northeast corner of the City, all lands adjacent to Taylor Creek are designated Single - Family on the Future Land Use Map. Single- family use is the least intensive use and is less likely to have detrimental effects upon the Creek than any commercial use. Because commercial lands are allowed up to 85% impervious coverage, as compared to just 55% for single - family uses, the greater intensity of commercial use increases the potential for adverse impacts upon the Creek. 3 Staff Report Applicant: David and Anita Nunez Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Petition No. 08- 004 -SSA B. Adequacy of Public Facilities Potable Water: Water is available to the site via a two -inch line running along NE 7th Avenue. Under the Single- family land use category up to a maximum of five units per acre is allowed. Therefore the maximum number of units would be seven dwelling units. Staff estimates that up to about 36,000 square feet of commercial space could possibly be constructed on the 1.47 acres by building a two -story structure. The overall Level of Service Standard (LOSS) is 114 gallons per person per day. While OUA has no specific standard for demand for potable water associated with commercial uses, review of other sources including Manatee County, which has developed a table for estimating utility flow for various uses, and the Florida Depart- ment of Health, which also estimates flows associated with certain uses for determining system size, lead us to believe that it would be reasonable to use a factor of 100 gallons per 1,000 square feet of floor area. Projected demand with seven single- family units = 798 gpd Projected demand from 36,000 square feet of commercial space = 3,600 gpd Sewer: Sewer service is available to the site but the applicant would need to extend a line a couple hundred feet to connect to the gravity sewer at the west of end of Block 146 or construct a pump station if the gravity sewer would not work. It is questionable whether or not the regulatory agency would allow the use of a septic tank so close to Taylor Creek. LOSS is 130 gallons per person per day. Demand from a general commercial use is estimated to be the same as for water, about 100 gallons per 1,000 square feet of floor area. Projected demand with seven single - family units = 910 gpd Projected demand from 36,000 square feet of commercial space = 3,600 gpd Solid Waste: LOSS is 13 pounds per person per day. Projected demand with seven single - family units = 91 Ibs /day. 4 Staff Report Applicant: David and Anita Nunez Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Petition No. 08- 004 -SSA We have no specific data that would indicate the amount of waste that would likely be generated by general commercial space, but we suspect it would be somewhat greater than 91 Ibs/day for a 36,000 sf commercial use. However, there have been a number of instances in the recent past where the capacity of the landfill has been confirmed as being capable of accommodating new development. Staff understands this would continue to be the case in this instance, regardless of the type of use. Traffic: LOS — Principal Arterials C Minor Arterials D All other roadways D Based on the Seventh Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual single - family uses generate approximately 1.01 trips in the PM Peak Hour. Commercial traffic generation varies widely depending on the specific use, but even general office use would generate 1.49 trips per 1,000 square feet in the peak hour, and most other commercial uses generate at least three trips per 1,000 square feet. Peak hour traffic with seven single - family units = 7 trips. Each of the following represents uses of varying levels of intensity allowed in the Commercial Land Use Category: Peak hour traffic with 36,000 square feet of office space = 54 trips. Peak hour traffic with 36,000 square feet of general commercial space = 108 trips. Peak hour traffic with 36,000 square feet of medical office = 134 trips. C. Compatibility with Adjacent and Nearby Land Uses As can be seen on the aerial view of the property most of the nearby property is either vacant or developed residentially. For the most part, lands located east of NE 4th Avenue and north of NE 2nd St. are zoned and either vacant or developed in residential use. There are some scattered commercially designated, zoned, and developed parcels within this area, but they are the exception. The Fish House is the nearest commercial use and is located on the north side of NE 3rd St. However, it is a nonconforming use and may not be used as a basis for rezoning other properties. Staff does not believe that the more intense development that would be allowed by changing the land use designation from Single- Family to Commercial, and the likely increase in traffic on NE 7th Avenue and potentially other local roadways is compatible with the surrounding area and would be detrimental to the area. 5 Staff Report Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: David and Anita Nunez Petition No. 08- 004-SSA Recommendation Based on the Staff's finding that the request is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, could potentially have greater negative impact upon Taylor Creek than may be the case under the current land use designation, and incompatibility with the zoning and existing land use pattern in the area, Staff recommends denial of the Applicant's request to amend the Future Land Use Map from Single- Family to Commercial. Submitted by: James G. LaRue, AICP April 9, 2008 Property Appraiser's Aerial Photograph FLUM Zoning Map 1st Hearing Planning Board April 17, 2008 6 Staff Report Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: David and Anita Nunez Petition No. 08- 004-SSA SUBJECT PROPERTY AND VACINITY 7 ZONING P ,TTERN 11111111111 1111111f:ill 111 HJI1H num! num ilia all III IPA LEGEND CHV CLT & CPO H IND RMF RSF1 600 0 600 1200 Feet FUTURE UE PATTERN LEGEND Subject property SINGLE - FAMILY MULTI - FAMILY COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL 600 0 600 1200 Feet City of Okeechobee General Services Department 55 S.E. 3rd Avenue, Room 101 Okeechobee, Florida 34974 -2903 Phone: (863) 763 -3372, ext. 218 Fax: (863) 7634686 Date: f /f770r Petition No. QK- Fee Paid: 560 • OD Jurisdiction/18X , 1st Hearing: 0)0g , 2nd Hearing: LPL/ , /t2 7' - e Publication Dates: Approximate number of acres: (0, 622102 Is property in a platted subdivision? y Notices Mailed: is there a current or recent use of the propert\ that is /was a violation of county ordinance? If so, describe: Uniform Land Use Application Rezone • Special Exception • Variance ✓ Name of property owner(s): r' ann (J of n Jx)& a jy Cnn letocvr ier- T Owner mailing address::O54 re. "ax /537 0 ghee FL 3� 9 73 } A P P I c A N T Name of applicant(s) if other than owner (state relationship): n j CA vrne y Applicant mailing address } f , x u t 18 l La-Belk )e , FL.3"6`17 5 n Name of contact person (state relationship): Nev U -j n ESq . Ca n , . ilea-Of t Contact person daytime phone(s): (o _ (015j - t- f (Q p Fax: L3- (oi 5 - 41-74- ✓ . Property address / directions to property: `7 b' S(,6-POr K S e€ f Okeechobee FL R 0 P R T Y Indicate current use of property: a mml✓rna. i - C even ie nee, rare. - .bri'ye ThrLL Describe improvements on property, including number /type of dwellings and whether occupied (if none, so state): COnven i erl C.e— St-o-re, - D r t i e_ I h r-LC, Approximate number of acres: (0, 622102 Is property in a platted subdivision? y is there a current or recent use of the propert\ that is /was a violation of county ordinance? If so, describe: Have there been any land use applications concerning all or art of this property in the last y ar. so, indicate nature and applicant's name: p� • Sant dt q," 5,Yf/%1 5'0 C am)) - > ' ate, - n Is a sale subject to this application being granted? 0 / Is the subject parcel your total holdings at that location? If not, describe the remaining or intended uses: Describe adjoining land uses / improvements to the North: C 13 D c. IN D , / South: CBD 4 rh; D East: }�- uz West: C1-1 1� Existing zoning: C13D Future Land Use classification: CQrnr)- e.r(i a Actions Requested: ( tit) Rezone ( ) Special Exception ( ) Variance Parcel Identification Number: ' -_.2)-37-_.5 - (MOO- e� 006,5- 000 ie eby certify the City of Ok $50.01)0- . d Confirmation of Information Accuracy at the information in this application is correct. The information included in this application is for use by hobee in processing my request False or misleading information may be punishable by a fine of up to risonment of up to 30 days and may result in the sum denial of this application. Signatur 'el/el1) ./ t f1 i- vG4 Printed Name Date Uniform Land Use Application (rev /03) Page 1 of 2 Unifonn Land Use Application (re., 1/05) Page 2 of 2 Current zoning classification: C13 D Requested zoning classification : =/Nf--D What is your desired permitted use under the proposed classification: CO nVen1 en& 5-1-ore, - ,�r∎ ve.. --'hq,c. - S i l l boa.r4 R E z o E If granted, will the new zone be contiguous with a like zone? yesN Why would granting your request be in the best interest of the area and residents? Is a Special Exception necessary for your intended use? NQ Variance? N D Unifonn Land Use Application (re., 1/05) Page 2 of 2 Describe the Special Exception sought: S P E C I A L E X C E P T I O N Provide specific LDR ordinance citation: Are there other similar uses in the area? If so, describe: Why would granting your request be in the best interest of the area and residents? If business_ briefly describe nature including number of employees. hours. noise generation and activities to be conducted outside of a building: Unifonn Land Use Application (re., 1/05) Page 2 of 2 Describe Variance sought: V A R I A N C E Describe physical characteristic of property that makes variance necessary: Did you cause or contribute to the characteristic? Is so, describe: What is the minimum variance necessary? Unifonn Land Use Application (re., 1/05) Page 2 of 2 0. Printed for lawyers'. Titk Guaranty Fund, Orlando, Florida aL raISty ieed (STATUTORY FOUi— SECTION 6Ef 04 F.S.) i$11rii 3iibtllduit. Mode this 4 day of January JOHN A. SMITH, JOHN R. BROOKS and WILLIAM J. VACHON, of the County of • Okeechobee MARY ANN NEWCOMER whose post office address is F. 0. Box 1537, Okeechobee, FL 34973 , State of Florida of the County of Okeechobee , Stote of Florida Te: 2R2 ce 0539 This Instrument was prepared byt PAUL R. STANTON, ESQ. WELL1SCH AND MET26ER, P.A. 141 Aiwa la Avow, #700.1 COSA/ OA3s11, /1Ott1DA 13114 19 88 , iirtf�lrn As Tenants in Common , grantor', and ,grantee, 310ttllrMBttt1, That said grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and 00 1100 ($10.00) -- -- :. ---- -- - - -.. — --- _— ..__ -7Doibrs, and other good and valuable considerations to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said grantee, and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Okeechobee County, Florida, to-wit, Fit :,.7 I rtn-ril 0.o ms's o i Beginning at the SE Corner of Block 161, TOWN OF OKEECHOBEE, according to plat thereof recorded in Flat Book 2, Page 17, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, and run thence South 70 feet to South line of North Park Street for the point of beginning; run thence South 150' to intersection with North line of South Park Street; run thence West along said North line 200 feet to intersection with East line of former but now abandoned FEC RR; run thence North along said right of way 150 feet to intersection with South line of North Park Street aforesaid; run thence East along said South line 20D feet to Point of Beginning; said land lying in and comprising part of E 1/2 of SW 1/4 of Section 16, and NE 1/4 of NE 1/4 of NW 1/4 of Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East. This is commercial property and is not the Homestead property of any of the Grantors. w(( Subject to ;j 1. Taxes for the year 1988 and subsequent years; 2. Conditions, restrictions, reservations, limitations and easements of record; 7 - 's1 3. Applicable zoning ordinancea, regulations and other restrictions imposed by governmental authorities. '""ana said grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and wit) defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. "" Grantor' and "grantee" ore used for singular or plural, as context requires. 3n Witness Nt1lirEf, Grantor has hereunto set grantor's,boodiseld seal the day and year first bove .� ryr�lrl FILED FOR RECOnO �I,� /,;�'� Li Sign d, sealed and delivered in our "resent_, 195147 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day before me, on officer duly qualified to take acknowledgments, personally appeared JOHN A. SMITH, JOHN R. BROOKS and WILLIAM J. VACHON to me known to be the person s described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and ocknowledged before me that C he yexecuted the some. WITNESS my hand and officio) seal in the County and State lost aforesaid this 4 day of January 19 88 OK CS ,NII BROOKS GLORIA e t OF CI RCUITU M; i J. VACHON ritten. (Seal! (Seat) (Seal) (Seal) My commission expires: S/3 t! v UUCI Lt; 6'1 :O (I,1,:- . • - l • f 58 D. 1 . Notary ttubli - AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE I, Mary Ann Newcomer Tuten a/k/a Mary Ann Newcomer, Affiant state the following: 1. That I am hereby the owner of the property located at 701 SW Park Street, Okeechobee, Florida, also particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast comer of Block 161, Town of Okeechobee according to plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 17, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, and run thence South 70 feet to South line of North Park Street for the Point of Beginning; run thence South 150 feet to intersection with North line of South Park Street; run thence West along said North line 200 feet to intersection with East line of former but now abandoned FEC RR; run thence North along said right -of -way 150 feet to intersection with South line of North Park Street aforesaid; run thence East along said South line 200 feet to Point of' Beginning; said land lying in and compromising part of East one -half of the Southwest one - quarter of Section 16, and the Northeast one - quarter of the Northeast one - quarter of the Northwest one- quarter of Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35, East. Less and except: Additional D.O.T. Road right -of -way on S.R. 70. 2. That Steven A. Ramunni, Esq. is authorized to act on my behalf concerning the rezoning application submitted contemporaneously with my affidavit and he is further authorized to appear at all public hearings herein. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing affidavit and the facts stated in it are true. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE Y NEWCOME TUTEN, AFFIANT Sworn to and subscribed before me this ay of August, 2007. Mary Ann Newcomer Tuten is personally known to me or has produced as identification and did p6 to an oath. NOTARY PUBLIC -STATE OF FLORIDA Lisa Pace Commission # DD549434 My Comm. Expires: 12/20/2007 TORY PUBLIC NOVEMBER 15, 2007 PLANNING BOARD /BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS - PAGE 2 OF 6 V. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING - Chairperson. CHAIRPERSON LEDFERD OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:00 P. M. A. Consider Comprehensive Plan Small Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 07- 013 -SSA, submitted by Steven Ramunni on behalf of property owner Mary Ann Newcomer - Tuten. The application is to change the Future Land Use designation from Commercial (C) to Industrial (IND) for property located at 701 Southwest Park Street. Legal description: Unplatted lands of the Town of Okeechobee, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 17, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, and is approximately 0.642 acre(s) - Planning Consultant. Bill Brisson, Senior Planner for LaRue Planning and Development reported the LaRue Planning Staff recommendation of denial. This property is located between Southwest 7th and 8th Avenues on the south side of State Road 70. This is at the western extremity of the City's Central Business District (CBD) and essentially within a commercial area. Looking at the surrounding land uses and future and use designation, the land to the north is zoned CBD, with Commercial Land Use designation, consisting of a restaurant, car sales and vacant land, immediately to the east is the Park Avenue Greenbelt, to the south a large furniture store, also zoned CBD with Commercial Land Use designation. There is a little confusion as to the actual designation immediately to the west of the property. To the west there is the abandoned right of way. It does not show up on the future land use map as having any land use category, nor does it show any zoning category. Approximately 50 to 60 feet wide in width. Board Member Burroughs inquired whether this strip of land was unincorporated? Mr. Brisson replied, "it is within the City, but it is land that is not officially showing on the maps." Mr. Brisson stated LaRue Planning does not believe that this land or for that matter a number of other lands that are presently shown as Industrial, either on the zoning map or the future land use map, really are practical planning designations. They are carry overs from the fact that this was railroad property and they are given a variety of different land use designations, not all of which make a lot of sense. In light of the way much of these properties are shown on the maps, one would have expected it could have been Industrial in designation. In conclusion, LaRue Planning Staff does not believe the land use to be consistent in the application of the Industrial designation along the railroad right of way. We believe it is a hold over from the previous use of the land as railroad right of way and does not really reflect the most appropriate designation from a planning prospective. This is property located at the end of the CBD district and the Industrial zoning would essentially interrupt the Commercial land use pattern. It tends to introduce the potential of heavy duty manufacturing use in an other wise commercial area. We recommend this proposal be recommended for denial to the City Council. Steven Ramunni, representing property owner Mary Ann Newcomer - Tuten, addressed the Board. He stated, last February the Board acted in an appellate capacity with regards to the recision of the building permit that was issued by the City for a billboard. The City testified before this Board that the property adjacent to this property was designated Industrial, so I have a problem tonight with it being coded as, not really anything, because this Board rendered its decision based on the testimony of the City Staff at the February meeting. NOVEMBER 15, 2007 PLANNING BOARD /BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS • PAGE 3 OF 6 Now it seems like it is being pulled out from under us, so to speak. If you look at the City maps, and there is some confusion, but the property on each side of the abandon right of way, is coded as Industrial property as far as zoning. Somehow there is an error or an omission undoubtably in the City maps where it leaves a gap as to this particular piece of property, which is adjacent to our subject property. In the Land Use designation, there is nothing for any of the abandoned right of way property and we believe that in and of itself creates an inconsistency within the City's comprehensive plan future land use map and the defacto (actually existing, esp. when without lawful authority) zoning that has gone on in the City. It is our contention that the subject property is contiguous to property that is in fact zoned Industrial. With the potential use of manufacturing or processing, this application is consistent and compatible with the surrounding land uses. Vice Chair Hoover stated the objective of the Board is to get the zoning to match with the land use designations of the Future Land Use Map. Mr. Brisson concurred. Mr. Ramunni interjected, unfortunately this is the procedure we have to go through first as suggested by Mr. Cook at the February meeting to rezone the property. To rezone the property, we have to ask for a future land use change. Ms. Hoover then added maybe she misunderstood, but she thought Mr. Ramunni said he thought the property was already zoned Industrial. Mr, Ramunni replied, we believe the property adjacent, which is one of the factors is in fact Industrial and think that is a critical element because that is what gives us our consistency and compatibility to rezone the subject property ultimately as Industrial if the Board was to adopt the Future Land Use Map Amendment. Shelly Johnson, Planner for the applicant, distributed a paper she had prepared, comparing permitted uses within the CBD and Industrial zoning districts. The main question she had was whether the Board was clear on the presentation so far as to the inconsistency between the land use map and the zoning map with regard to the Industrial designations of railroad right of way in the City. I think that is key to this application. The railroad right of way is zoned Industrial, but it does not have a land use designation at all, which creates obvious inconsistencies in the land use map and zoning, which is an issue. The inconsistency makes it difficult to argue one way or the other whether proposed change is consistent with adjacent land use, because the adjacent land use does not exist to the west. The placement of the billboard was proposed on the west side of the property, which is adjacent to the railroad right of way. It was not proposed on the east side adjacent to the park. If the zoning and land use maps were consistent and applied the Industrial land use designations to all the railroad right of ways in the City, it would in fact fall adjacent to Industrial zoned and use designation. The tendencies, based on the land use pattern that has been established on right of ways in the City, is that it probably should have been zoned Industrial at some point in time when all the rest of the right or ways received that designation. Board Member Burroughs stated that you are requesting to make more Industrial property right in the middle of town and that I do not agree with. The Planner for the applicant stated there are other avenues. There is litigation going on and the applicant is more than willing to establish this as criteria of eliminating the litigation process. NOVEMBER 15, 2007 PLANNING BOARD /BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS - PAGE 4 OF 6 Mary Ann Tuten, formerly Mary Ann Newcomer, owner of the property, said my property has always been Commercial. She stated she does not want to change her property from Commercial to Industrial. All I want is to get an approval for the billboard sign to be put on the property line. She stated she told Carter - Pritchard, the billboard sign company, she wanted the sign placed as far away from her business and as close to the property line as allowed. "Can we just take the little strip of land by the property line and change to Industrial and make it contiguous with the railroad and leave the rest of my property alone, would that be alright ?" Chair Ledferd replied that setbacks for Industrial would not allow for the sign. Chair Ledferd then instructed the Board, this application was for land use change, not a sign. She then asked if she could apply for partial zoning. Board Member McCoy said the Board needs to look at the application as submitted, to change the designation of the whole lot, not a portion of. Chair Ledferd asked if there were further questions from the Board, applicant, or citizens. There were none. Board Member Burroughs moved to recommend denial to City Council for being inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan for application No. 07- 013 -SSA to change Future Land Use from Commercial (C) to Industrial (IND); seconded by Vice Chair Hoover. VOTE LEDFERD — YEA MCCOY — YEA MAXWELL — ABSENT MOTION CARRIED. HOOVER — YEA JOHNS — ABSENT O'CONNOR — YEA KELLER — YEA JUAREZ — YEA BURROUGHS - YEA Application will be forwarded in ordinance form for a final Public Hearing on December 4, 2007 before City Council. B. Consider Comprehensive Plan Small Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 07- 014 -SSA, submitted by property owners Gwynn and Linda Johnson. The application is to change the Future Land Use designation from Commercial (C) and Single Family (SF) to Industrial (IND) for property located at 105 Northeast 9th Street. Legal description: Lots 1 through 7 and 20 through 26, Block 36, City of Okeechobee, approximately 2.84 acre(s) — Planning Consultant. Mr. Brisson presented the LaRue Planning Staff recommendation of approval, stating the application is compatible with surrounding property and consistent in land use. Chair Ledferd asked if the applicant wished to address the Board. Vikki Aaron, representing the applicant, stated this was being requested due to property appraisal. Mr. Johnson stated when he bought the property many years ago it was Industrial and that is the way he would like to see it remain. Board Member Burroughs interjected, this is an Industrial area and has been zoned that way for a long time. From a contiguous stand point, this request should not be a problem. Board member Maxwell affirmed the need for more Industrial zoning. Chair Ledferd asked if there were further comments or concerns from the Board or citizens. There were none. AGENDA VII. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. C. 2. b) Public discussion and comments on proposed Ordinance No. 1003 continued. c) Vote on nation. D. 1. a) Motion to read by title only proposed Ordinance No. 1004, Comprehensive Plan Small Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 07 -013 -SSA, submitted by Steven Ramunni, Esquire, on behalf of property owner, Mary Ann Newcomer - City Planning Consultant (Exhibit 4). b) Vote on motion to read by title only. c) City Attomey to read proposed Ordinance No. 1004 by title only. DECEMBER 4, 2007 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 110E 18 COUNCIL ACTION- DISCUSSION-VOTE 8. The proposed use will not create traffic congestion, flooding or drainage problems, or otherwise affect public safety. Continuation of the current use will create no traffic congestion, flooding or drainage problems. 9. The proposed use has not been inordinately burdened by unnecessary restrictions. The property is subject to no extraordinary restrictions. 10. The proposed change will not constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed change will not constitute a grant of special privilege to the owner. Mayor Pro Tem Watford asked whether there were any questions or comments from the public? There were none. The only comment from the Council was that this basically is to clean -up a problem that was created when the new land development regulations were adopted. The existing use was permitted to remain, although the type of zoning that was previously designated CII was changed to CLT. However, upon sale of the property, bringing all codes up to date was triggered, causing the rezoning. VOTE KRK • ABSENT MARKHAM • YEA WATFORD - YEA C. Wilms • YEA L. WILLIAMS - YEA MOTION CARRIED. Council Member L. Williams moved to read by title only proposed Ordinance No. 1004, Comprehensive Plan Small Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 07 -013 -SSA, submitted by Steven Ramunni, Esquire, on behalf of property owner, Mary Ann Newcomer; seconded by Council Member C. Williams. VOTE KIRK - ABSENT MARKHAM - YEA WATFORD • YEA C. WILLIAMS - YEA L. WILLIAMS - YEA MOTION CARRIED. Attomey Cook read proposed Ordinance No. 1004 by title only. "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA AMENDING THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ORDINANCE NO. 635 AS AMENDED, BY REVISING THEFUTURE LAND USE MAPON A CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN FROM COMMERCIAL TOINDUSTRIAL; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION OFORDINANCE AND REVISED FUTURE LAND USEMAPIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE." AGENDA VII. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. D. 2. a) Motion to adopt proposed Ordinance No. 1004. b) Public discussion and comments. DECEMBER 4, 2007 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 12 OF 18 COUNCIL ACTION DISCUSSION -VOTE Council Member Markham moved to adopt proposed Ordinance No. 1004; seconded by Council Member C. Williams. The Planning Board reviewed the land use application at their November 15, 2007 meeting and voted unanimously to find the request in-consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Both the Planning Board and Planning Staff are recommending denial of the land use change. Mr. Brisson reviewed Planning Staff Report findings as follows: The Applicant is requesting a Future Land Use Map Amendment to Industrial and will subsequently apply for a rezoning to Industrial to allow an off - premises sign to be constructed on the property. The subject property is located in the westem part of the North West Park Street (alkla State Road 70 West) corridor at the western extremity of the City's business district (CBD zoning) and within a predominately commercial area. A. Consistency with the Land Use Categories and Plan Policies. The current and proposed uses for the property are consistent with the Industrial Future Land Use Category and the policies that which govern this category. However, with the exception of the park to the west of the subject property, surrounding land use designations, zoning, and existing uses are largely commercial rather than industrial. Staff does not believe that a change to an industrial land use designation at this site is consistent with sound planning as it inserts the possibility for manufacturing or processing activities into an area intended for office, retail, wholesale and related commercial activities. As such, Staff does not believe the requested amendment is consistent with the Goal set forth on page 1 of the Future Land Use Element, and which reads as follows: "Through a well - planned mix of compatible land uses, the City of Okeechobee shall continue to maintain a high quality living environment, preserve its distinctive natural and historic resources, and provide public services to its residents at a minimum cost.' B. Concurrency of Adequate Public Facilities. The subject property contains an existing commercial use that is already enjoys provision of public utilities from the City and traffic volumes in the area will not likely change as a result of a change to the Industrial land use category. Staff sees no likelihood of concurrency deficiencies associated with the requested plan amendment. C. Compatibility with Adjacent and Nearby Land Uses. While there is nothing inherently incompatible with industrial uses in close proximity to commercial uses, Staff does not believe that the insertion of the potential for heavy industrial at the perimeter of the City's CBD is good planning and is incompatible with the predominantly commercial character of the SR 70 corridor in this area, and particularly in relation to the CBD. AGENDA VII. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. D. 2. b) Public discussion and comment regarding proposed Ordinance No. 1004 continued. c) Vote on motion. DECEMBER 4, 2007 - REGULAR MEETING • PAGE 13 OF 18 COUNCIL ACTION DISCUSSION -VOTE D. Pattem of current land use and zoning designations. The City has treated abandoned railroad rights -of -way in the general vicinity of the subject property in an inconsistent manner with regard to assigning future land use designations. In some instances, abandoned railroad rights -of -way are shown as Industrial on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM); sometimes the lands remain undesignated; and in still others, a residential designation has been applied. Application of zoning to these lands has been somewhat more consistent in that most of the lands have been zoned Industrial, although sometimes in conflict with the future land use designation. Staff believes the application of Industrial zoning is a holdover from the lands' prior association with the railroad, and does not necessarily reflect the most appropriate designation from a planning perspective. Consequently, the existing land use and/or zoning classifications (or lack thereof) do not provide a basis upon which to make land use decisions for nearby properties. The abandoned railroad rights -of -way in this area and elsewhere in the City need to be examined so that their Future Land Use designations and Zoning classifications can be assigned based on sound planning principles rather than just their prior association with the railroad use. While the Applicant may have no intention of introducing manufacturing or processing onto the site, amending the plan as requested will afford current and future owners the potential to do so. These types of uses, which would be allowed only with industrial land use designation, would not be compatible with the commercial character of the area. To allow the possibility of their introduction into the area would be inconsistent with good planning and the Future Land Use Element Goal. Therefore, Staff recommends denial of the requested amendment. Attomey Steven Ramunni, Post Office Box 1118, Labelle, Florida addressed the Council on behalf of the property owner, by offering a brief summary of the issues with this application and a previous building permit that was found to be issued in error. In attendance with Attomey Ramunni was a Planning Consultant, Mr. Stephen Pizado, who gave a summary of why he believes the and use change would be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and surrounding uses. Discussion ensued between the Council, City Staff and representatives for the applicant. Mayor Pro Tem Watford asked whether there were any comments or questions from the public? There were none. The Council concluded that the Planning Staff and Planning Boards recommendation should be up held. That the findings based in the Planning Staff Report are substantial, Application No. 07- 013 -SSA was found not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, as specifically noted in the Planning Staff Report. Therefore the vote was as follows: VOTE KIRK • ABSENT MARKHAM • No WATFORD - NO C. WILLIAMS • No L. WILLbws • No MOTION DENIED. GURVEYOR r'IOTEG S. •Bearings shown are relative assuming N87'24 16'E along New S.R /W Line N.Park. 2. This survey Is based on Information provided by the customer /agent and no search was made of public records by this office to verify or deny owners, easements, or right'= of'ways. 3. No visible or underground Improvement has been located except as shown. 4. This survey Is not valld without the signature and the original raised seal of a Florida Licensed Surveyor and Mapper. 5. According to FIRM map dated 2/04/19Si panel m 120177 01758, parcel Iles in Not Included Area of City Limits, Flood Zone C, per Okeechobee County Planning S Zoning Department. 6. Property Address is: 70t W.North Park Street, Okeechobee. FL 7. There may be additional restrictions that are not recorded on this survey that may be found In the Public Records. 'O1.110ARY 6URVEY OP. 0. R. BOOK 292, PAGE 539: • BEGINNING AT THESE CORNER OF BLOCK 161, THEREOF RECORDEDEIN ACCORDING TO , PLAT AG 17, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST.LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA. AND RUN THENCE SOUTH 70 FEET'TO SOUTH LINE OF NORTH PARK STREET FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING; RUN THENCE SOUTH " 150' TO INTERSECTION WITH NORTH LINE OF SOUTH PARK STREET; RUN THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 200 FEET-TO INTERSECTION WITH EAST LINE OF FORMER.BUT NOW ABAN- DONED FEC RR; RUN THENCE NORTH ALONG SA10 RIGHT OF WAY 150•FEET TO INTERSECTION WITH SOUTH LINE OF NORTH PARK STREET AFORESAID; RUN THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 200 FEET TO POINT OF 6=GIN- NING: SAID LAND LYING IN AND COMPRISING PART OF E 1/2 OF SW 1/4 OF SECTION 16, AND NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SEC- TION 21. TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 35 EAST. 1155 AND EXCEPT: ADD I T I ONAL D. 0. T. ROAD R/11 ON S. R. 70. . R. 70 — rt )Rm PARK G.-MEET 70'R /W - ASPHALT - NO MEDIAN. OLD RAY LII I .e. 'ire ig9.srlc] EAST 2W (RP) ... NSr2Y trEIAS SUnEal:2a¢w,6V ................... Tn6,.r.TattF>GAe,,.c 247 a ▪ s �• a is O tlT frGUETER g SaF:ae7' s S8759' 2911 284 1 EDGE PAVFJT.n. 601.1TH PARK 6fREET - ASAMALT— SCME r. it M ': 0:-mF5 RATIFT,M' II' {� II"y IM/Fl wGRRAlTING�G FD/ME IMP CAM MW MARY' AM riewco ez / u" t RR DATE 6/22/87 DIM VI/G0 44 ?II rIG 4`+ , (LAND SLIONtEtl100 ISS we W. 11:3271.1 P GnIET EEObOEd. FLORIDA A 54172 -4 q .cre 865-467 -0801 PAX 467-13111 MOM .:u6w6t AnnaR MCI 11 0 n tC 4. E e1 W. cNAT4 ra ' e 17a D 5 1375 Jackson Street, Suite 206 Fort Myers, Florida 33901 -2845 Phone: 239 - 334 -3366 Fax: 239 - 334 -6384 Email: info @larue - planning.com LaRue Planning & Management Services, Inc. Staff Report Rezoning Request Prepared for: City of Okeechobee Applicant: Steven Ramunni, Esq. for Many Ann Newcomer From: CBD To: IND Petition No. 08 -002 -R Staff Report Rezoning Request Applicant: S. Ramunni for Newcomer Petition No.: 08 -002 -R General Information: Applicant: Steven Ramunni, Esq. Applicant Address: P.O. Box 1118 Labelle, FL 33975 CBD Applicant Phone Number: 863 - 675 -4646, FAX: 863 - 675 -4174 Commercial convenience store (drive -thru) Commercial convenience store (drive -thru) and billboard Owner: Mary Ann Newcomer Owner Address: P.O. Box 1537 Okeechobee, FL 34973 Future Land Use Map Classification Existing Commercial Proposed Previous request for a change to Industrial was denied and designation remains Commercial. Zoning District CBD Industrial Use of Property Commercial convenience store (drive -thru) Commercial convenience store (drive -thru) and billboard Acreage 0.642 0.642 Location: 701 SW Park Street Legal Description: Beginning at the Southeast corner of Block 161, Town of Okeechobee according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 17, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, and run thence South 70 feet to South line of North Park Street for the Point of Beginning; run thence South 150 feet to intersection with North line of South Park Street; run thence West along said North line 200 feet to intersection with East line of former but now abandoned FEC RR; run thence North along said right -of -way 150 feet to intersection with South line of North Park Street aforesaid; run thence East along said South line 200 feet to Point of Beginning; said land lying in and compromising part of East one -half of the Southwest one - quarter of Section 16, and the Northeast one - quarter of the Northeast one - quarter of the Northwest one - quarter of Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35, East. Less and except: Additional DOT Road right -of -way on SR 70. Request: The Applicant is requesting to rezone the subject property from CBD to Industrial to allow an off - premises sign to be constructed on the property. 1 Staff Report Rezoning Request Applicant: S. Ramunni for Newcomer Petition No.: 08 -002 -R Adjacent Future Land Use Map Classifications and Zoning Districts: North: Future Land Use Map Classification: Commercial Zoning District: CBD Existing Land Use: Restaurant, car sales, and vacant East: Future Land Use Map Classification: Public Facilities Zoning District: PUB Existing Land Use: Park Avenue Greenbelt public park South: Future Land Use Map Classification: Commercial Zoning District: CBD Existing Land Use: Large furniture store West'): Future Land Use Map Classification: Commercial Zoning District: CHV Existing Land Use: Retail (l) These designations are for the property on the west side of NW 7a' Avenue. The property immediately west and adjacent to the subject property is vacant, abandoned railroad right -of -way and, as discussed in detail during consideration of the prior request for a Plan amendment, the adjacent property presently carries no Future Land Use or zoning designations. Summary: The subject property is located in the western part of the SR 70 corridor at the western extremity of the City's CBD and within a predominately commercial area. This property was previously the subject of a request to change the Future Land Use designation from Commercial to Industrial, which request was recommended for denial by the Planning Board and subsequently denied by the City Council. Analysis: Section 70 -340 of the Land Development Regulations requires that the reviewing body find that the application for rezoning meets each of the following conditions. The Applicant has submitted no information that would convince the Staff that rezoning the subject property to Industrial would allow for the required findings. Staff offers the following comments: 1. The proposed use is not contrary to Comprehensive Plan requirements. No, the requested rezoning would be contrary to the City's Comprehensive Plan. Rezoning the property to Industrial is not consistent with the intent of the Commercial land use designation presently applied to the property. The Industrial zoning district permits uses that are neither listed nor contemplated as permitted uses within the Commercial Land Use Category and, as such, rezoning to Industrial would be 2 Staff Report Applicant: S. Ramunni for Newcomer Rezoning Request Petition No.: 08 -002 -R inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Furthermore, with the exception of the park to the west of the subject property, surrounding land use designations, zoning, and existing uses are largely commercial rather than industrial. 2. The proposed use being applied for is specifically authorized under the zoning district in the Land Development Regulations. A billboard is permitted within the Industrial zoning district, although there is presently a moratorium on the location of billboards within the City. 3. The proposed use will not have an adverse effect on the public interest. No, the rezoning presents the potential for disruption of the predominantly commercial character of the area by introducing the possibility of more intensive industrial uses. This would not be conducive to promoting a well - planned mix of compatible land uses and the continuation of a desirable land use pattern in the area. 4. The use is appropriate for the location proposed, is reasonably compatible with adjacent land uses, and is not contrary or detrimental to urbanizing land use patterns. Insertion of industrial zoning at the perimeter of the City's CBD is not good planning and is incompatible with the predominantly commercial character of the SR 70 corridor in this area. Industrial zoning on this site could result in the introduction of uses incompatible with the character of the surrounding area, particularly in relation to the CBD and could therefore be detrimental to the land use pattern desired for the area. 5. The proposed use will not adversely affect property values or living conditions, or be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property. Industrial zoning at this location could prove a deterrent to improvement or devel- opment of adjacent properties in the manner that is considered desirable and consistent with the commercial character of the area. 6. The proposed use can be suitably buffered from surrounding uses, so as to reduce the impact of any nuisance or hazard to the neighborhood. It may not be possible to suitably buffer all industrial uses that would be permissible on the property. 3 Staff Report Applicant: S. Ramunni for Newcomer Rezoning Request Petition No.: 08 -002 -R 7. The proposed use will not create a density pattern that would overburden public facilities such as schools, streets, and utility services. It is not expected that rezoning to Industrial would likely result in development that would overburden public facilities. 8. The proposed use will not create traffic congestion, flooding or drainage problems, or otherwise affect public safety. It is not expected that rezoning to Industrial would likely result in excessive traffic congestion, flooding or drainage problems, or otherwise affect public safety. 9. The proposed use has not been inordinately burdened by unnecessary restrictions. The property is not inordinately burdened by unnecessary restrictions. Rather, it has been subject only to restrictions imposed on other similarly zoned properties in the area. Recommendation: In light of the above analysis and findings, Staff recommends denial of the request to rezone the property from CBD to I (Industrial). Submitted by: James G. LaRue, AICP Planning Consultant March 11, 2008 Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Property Appraiser's Aerial Photograph Zoning Map 1st Public Hearing, Planning Board, March 20, 2008 4 130 129 128 57FfEl 127 126 125 124 X.W. SRD ET RE ET 133 .134 N ( A =135 136 _ 137 .W. 2N D 61-REET ND 4 Uf: RS FX E S.W. RMX 8TR@T L FE EY 164 165 166 167 16 B.W. 250 875E17 NO 1[..71411. S ID�iA.. W. 2 50 Q RE ET 5 Staff Report Rezoning Request Applicant: S. Ramunni for Newcomer Petition No.: 08 -002 -R 6 03/18/2008 00:58 8637F -4831 PAGE 01 BILLItE JEAN REYNOLDS 744 S. W. 24113 .Avenue Okeechobee, Florida 34974 March 18, 2008 City of Okeechobee Planning Board Okeechobee, F1onda Re.: Rezoning Property at: 701 South West Park Street This letter is to inform you of my objections of re- zoning the above property. The said property begins the downtown area and should not be zoned industrial. 1 own property at 107 South West 7th Avenue. Billie Jean Reynolds March 13, 2008 Sarah Regina Hamrick Trustee PO Box 837 Okeechobee, Fl 34973 Dear City Planning Board/Board of Adjustment I am opposed to the rezoning of Petition No. 08- 002 -R. The petition is to change the zoning designation from Central Business District {CBD} to Industrial for property located at 701 Southwest Park Street. I have adjacent property and do not want to have it decrease in value. I would appreciate your consideration in this matter. Respectfully, Sarah Regina Hamrick The Okeechobee News P.O. Box 639, Okeechobee, Florida 34973 (863) 763 -3134 Published Daily STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Judy Kasten, who on oath says she is Publisher of the Okeechobee News, a DAILY Newspaper published at Okeechobee, in Okeechobee County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertise- ment, being a in the matter of Nocec', ';tc,&Q (i -tOy) in the 19th Judicial District of the Circuit Court of Okeechobee County, Florida, was published in said newspaper in the issues of Affiant further says that the said Okeechobee News is a newspaper published at Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been published continuously in said Okeechobee County, Florida each week and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Sworn to day of d ' '+ A.D. 20 Gi blic, State of Florida at Large fore me this 1 1' NOTICE OF CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED SPECIAL EXCEPTION NOTICE: A PUBLIC HEARING will be held before the City of Okeechobee Planning Board/Board of Adjustment and Appeals on, Thursday, April 17, 2008 al 6:00+ p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. The meeting will be held at City Hall, 55 SE 3rd Avenue, in the Council Chambers, Room 200, Okeechobee, Honda To consider Special Exception Petition No. 08-005-SE, submitted by property owner Linda Bridges, to allow a drive ttxough service and outdoor sales and storage within a CHV District (Ref. Code Book Section 90- 283(1)(5)). Property is located at 920 NW Park Street Legal description: Lots 14 through 17, Inclusive, Block 163, City of Okeechobee Subdivision, according 10 plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 10, public records of Okeechobee County, Florida. A copy of the entire application(s) and agenda are available in the General Services Office, Rm 101 at City Hall or by calling Betty Clement at 863) 763 -3372 x 218. Please be advised that the Board of Adjustment and Appeals will serve as the de- cision making body (quasi - judicial), on behalf of the City, to approve or deny Spe- cial Exception Petitions. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that it any person desires to appeal any decision made by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals with respect to any mat- ter considered at this meeting, or hearing will need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. General Services media is for the sole purpose of backup for official records of the department. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Florida Statute 28626, persons with disabilities needing special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact Betty Clement, no later than two (2) working days - prior to the proceeding at 863 -763 -3372 x 218; if you are heanng or voice im- paired, cal TOD 1-800- 222 -3448 (voice) or 1-888-447-5620 (TTY). BY: Brian Whitehall, Zoning Administrator Petition No. 08- 005 -SE 267966 ON 4/2,11/08 Janetta Thiboult Commission # DD505311 s� o" Expires January 10, 2010 94 fe Bonded Troy Fain Insurance. Inc 800.985.7019 Master Land Development Application and Checklist Rezone — Special Exception — Variance (Rev. 12/07) City of Okeechobee General Services Department 55 S.E. 3'hI Avenue, Room 101 Okeechobee, Florida 39974-2903 Phone: (863) 763 -3372, ext. 218 Fax: (863) 763-1686 Date: 3?) C Petition No. ©g 6 ©S = S tT Jurisdiction: ,g p, Fee Paid: am 4bda$8, / 15t Hearing: L/ r N D 3/ 2"n Hearing: A_ rtes. Publication Notices Mailed: (below for office use only) »:'4 ,-; '11" = ' -: : a_ ?: � • "- ' ° ;:m �-- „ :, `NR1 � � '- vc 1.4'..'?"-•i77,..itiA ' `,' -4 E 5 . ,:� .. = . . �. g y ' � i : a•rac �` e. ` � t�r �T� "_ .4 G�� ` �'a, I �-5: ;Fv4 ��. 3i•'�- �• � � • 1 t- Name of property owner(s): Linda L. Bridges ;,t 2 Owner mailing ddress: 18180 SW 66th Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33331 n8 1, `� ` -w'� • ; ': -.4 .. J.,. mss -.:` 3 Name of applicant(s) if other than owner nom- aW ' - 4 Applicant mailing address: -” - • ,, r= ::- 5 Name of contact person (state relationship): Fred R. Jones, Jr., P.E. (Engineer of Record) .103ii 6 Contact person daytime phone(s): -- N!:, i . - • '...-,•• i:r cri-: !.' -`-`• t..f 1'4._ 'Y' "4-- - 3•w ' e 7" ; . ,.,:z i.» ~4 i a - y k.',:- :i. � Rvo �!i:'•ti :c4^i:- �e?:i. �% �"�''=' R-r +�t °=3 :T r i�:re_ �- 'IJi �7e +" _ i !EI6_y C:i!;3:ti�— 7 Property ?address/directions to property: 920 NW Park Street, Okeechobee, FL NE Comer of SR 70 and NW 10th Avenue °`: .` =- ' - Describe current use of property: Single family home is currently located on this site. • ° " <' " -:- g Describe improvements on property (number /type buildings, dwelling units , occupied or vacant, etc.): 1 - Single family residence currently occupied by owner, 2 - Storage garages and fencing around property. _ _�y� :r. ' ^�i :14 -^ : z ; l; SS - -: -_ °- I0 Approx. acreage: 0.651 ac. Is property in a platted subdivision? ( ) Yes (x ) No 11 Is there a use on the property that is or was in violation of a city or county ordinance? ( ) No; C x) Yes If, yes, describe the use and violation: - - -_- `- - 1 [ ' ==rte =-:r - i' .E -- :.� 12 Have there been any land development applications submitted in the past year that involve an y part of the property? ( )No (X )Yes If yes, provide date, name of applicant, and brief description of the -, _: n ew•' p _ : r =' , :_• 1 '•'';•;"^_ nature of the application: Site plan application went to TRC on 01/23/08. Approval is pending the approval of the two exceptions which are addressed in this application. . , rr"- 13 Is a pending sale of the property to this application being granted? ted? ( ) Yes (X) No : ` " _.. if . �..... , 14 Do you own any other lands adjacent to the subject property? (X ) No ( ) Yes If yes, describe the current and intended uses: 14-. c _:--. : s g2? } -. `' - '4 airy. A- s'zr�•:ti:�t ?� %: 15 Describe uses on adjoining property to the: North: Commercial / Residential South: SR70 ROW / Commercial East Professional Office West: NW 10th Ave ROW / Convenience Store i r s - `1' - F" }` i a := t ::: ~`3 " "'�` .:` s:=-tF � �•= �ti.;- 16 Existing zoning: CHV Future Land Use classification Commercial `_vj} =_;; 17 18 Request is for. ( ) Rezone ( x ) Special Exception ( ) Variance Parcel Identification Number. 3- 15- 37 -35- 0010 - 01630-0150 "" ` „_ -= Master Land Development Application and Checklist: Rezone — Special Exception — Variance (Rev. 12/07) [below for aim use onlyl -__a, •, .40.. , •- �i ii.:> -� �— ly'E�ti• --i�•. r .0 E.'ur�•1 y LI 0 LTt [T;'.':� sR�,x: 7 -.i -•_ =. ^!'. 4i''_ �,• S �li Qe. •ice ? ^; -�-�` 3'L �.. �•m .�� =.r _: ;rtr� rL . w�...,_ r— e. .: .*j c. 1ti - rtzT '{� ,+. SCii su m r - 19 ,= Applicant's statement of interest in property Owner of property a 7 -4 20 Last recorded warranty deed Last recorded 04 /01/1995 - Book 365 / Page 1796 , _ ; -. . 5_!; - ;i° 21 is different from a owns- N/A ) `" Prof rti' (• aPP property Notarized letter of consent from property owner if applicant -22 Property survey [ono copy 11" x 17" and two copies 24" x 3G') containing: See attached a. certified boundary survey, date of survey, surveyor's name, address and phone Hummer b. Legal description c. Computation of total acreage to nearest tenth of an acre r G - r ;.. Y -', `"- -;; l,1 23 List of surrounding property owners with addresses and location sketch of the subject prrn°r+u G0-0 MO Information Request Form from the Okeechobee Property Appraiser's Office (attached) See attached . "°i,� i. b 24 Affidavit attesting to completeness and correctness of the list (attached) See attached ` . =- . ., = r 25 Nonrefundable application fee: Rezone:$500, coral Exception: Variance:S250; all plus $30/acre: "' �°a;, '5s '� ' amain .w .. ... -- '''fir•: y�_•� ^1..•�-.�?Ma' �rs.�"'S':- .�.-' -d �y ;Cl. - -L - - - •u.s ww.hLS'ii•.YL' •SI...7,4..:::;=:-.-d •' 'l.1 ---R, C.':..j.:..,, -d ^- TT" i.s_: n�:v;- a=te -x Ted -t'' �:. , -_ '' -Trig, ir+t`vr..�, ��, -,s .4 -may .C' �`? �: w. Vii:.. �,s s�y:tir� -.k . /.'...p•-{ � F i i i i T ■ l i ' ° 1 s�� - - " . . � , 7, c7' �i•��:9 :s^.rn�1Sr. %I.va -. 3e�lYf liC +._- rX =�3=i. _..r �•'� °'kr_- _ faj' .s zi- '�•ai�'}°PZy�y' q '- 26 I hereby certify that the information in this application is correct. The information included in this application is for use by the City of Okeechobee in processing my request. False or misleading information may be punishable by a fine of up to 5500.00 and imprisonment of up to 30 days and may g e surmary nial of this application. Linda Bridges Signature % Printed Name Date For questions relating to this application packet, call the General Services Dept. at (863) 763-3372, ext. 218 Special Exception- Specific Application and Checklist (Rev. l2J07) STANDARDS FOR GRANTING A SPECIAL EXCEPTION (Sec. 70-373(b), in the Land Development Regulations) Applicants are required by Sec. 70- 373(b) to address the following issues in his/her presentation before the Board of Adjustment Staff strongly recommends that the Applicant include, in his/her application, materials that address each of these issues in order to allow Staff and the Board of Adjustment sufficient time to adequately consider the Applicant's request. 1_ Demonstrate that the proposed location and site are appropriate for the use_ Please see attached map which reflects the adjacent existing zoning, land use and current use demonstrating that It is an appropriate use. 2. Demonstrate how the site and proposed buildings have been designed so they are compatible with the adiacent uses and the neighborhood, or explain why no specific design efforts are needed. Adjacent properties are of similar use (commercial) and residential is separated by proposed detention area. Access to site is one way in and out off NE 10th Ave. 3. Demonstrate any landscaping techniques to visually screen the use from adjacent uses; or explain why no visual screening is necessaryA landscape plan for this site was submitted with the site plan application. Gocix 11') / ( h.i•_clge rs proposed a-- r10P4-he ry - propo4t.j Lou alp al u.4 la„dsco -pe_ e le* C.orriI$ 4. Demonstrate what is proposed to reduce the impact of any potential hazards, problems or public nuisance generated by the nse : nr explain how the nature of the use creates no such notential problems. Applicant is installing storm pipe across 10th Ave. frontage to improve curb appeal. No fertilization of plants will occur on -site. 5. Demonstrate how the utilities and other service requirements of the use can be met. Any utility improvements will tie to the existing available service on -site. 6. Demonstrate how the impact of traffic generated will be handled, oil site and on site_ Access points include one way in and one way out off NE 10th Avenue. The site plan will allow for staging at the dnve -thru along with on -site parking. For questions relating to this application packet, call the General Services Dept. at (863) - 763 -3372, Ext. 218 Page 1 of 2 � � -. ,_..vm ".-= .ter -4 ?�" =tic_ ..� r4 i I i. _ -•1-�- `-..9 it 0r.�ti: t ; �.T•". t-1,. "'z-- - ., - bT'G -. t . (� - �•_-, -'. .,.- »rn . *•'Y ": `-: ."_:. �� L:.. � ..p........ '_'r ' '''.'�� . +:.+t'e :71 �-oY - u i1 n�� D t �� t, o n o .�Jir� t' ■ °2:-:41.12-,1, It 'd a � V �S .n • 1r�'1+1. . � h}t,. �- i • ra A pr ._ y � r — y.- ..pia`.,? � .t. -� r.. -. .a- -7 ..:- c •�. o�. -S�..u.- De crihe the Snecial Execution sought: Exception to allow for outdoor display and sale of garden decorations, plants and produce and a drive thni for produce and other related items. B Are there similar uses in the. area? No C X ) Yes If yes, briefly describe them Commercial uses abut the property less and except the northeastern comer which abuts multi- family zoning. C - • Tie business, briefly describe the nature of the business, number of employees, hours of operation, and any. " activities to lie conducted outside of a buildins . The proposed retail business would include the sale of garden decorations, fountains, plants, produce and other related items. The owner may have an interest In the sale of antiques in the future. Estimated employees: 3; Estimated Hours of Operation: 7 Days/Wk - 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. . " ' D" -lumen a. frame impactotnay preps ea oy a p roressionat uansporwuon piawusi er iranmporiauou ettguicer, u. "the Special Exception sought will generate 100 or more peak hour vehicle trip ends using the trip generation factors for the most Overlrar ,, 0 a ,wl n Ass 1,.elih„ta of T rnennrtat t n T.rurrinanrc Tnnat rnrnnt ariitinn of Trio Generation. _Traffic not expected to exceed 100 peak hour vehicle trips (see attached calculations). B - Attachment addressing the standards and required findings for a special exception as described below: STANDARDS FOR GRANTING A SPECIAL EXCEPTION (Sec. 70-373(b), in the Land Development Regulations) Applicants are required by Sec. 70- 373(b) to address the following issues in his/her presentation before the Board of Adjustment Staff strongly recommends that the Applicant include, in his/her application, materials that address each of these issues in order to allow Staff and the Board of Adjustment sufficient time to adequately consider the Applicant's request. 1_ Demonstrate that the proposed location and site are appropriate for the use_ Please see attached map which reflects the adjacent existing zoning, land use and current use demonstrating that It is an appropriate use. 2. Demonstrate how the site and proposed buildings have been designed so they are compatible with the adiacent uses and the neighborhood, or explain why no specific design efforts are needed. Adjacent properties are of similar use (commercial) and residential is separated by proposed detention area. Access to site is one way in and out off NE 10th Ave. 3. Demonstrate any landscaping techniques to visually screen the use from adjacent uses; or explain why no visual screening is necessaryA landscape plan for this site was submitted with the site plan application. Gocix 11') / ( h.i•_clge rs proposed a-- r10P4-he ry - propo4t.j Lou alp al u.4 la„dsco -pe_ e le* C.orriI$ 4. Demonstrate what is proposed to reduce the impact of any potential hazards, problems or public nuisance generated by the nse : nr explain how the nature of the use creates no such notential problems. Applicant is installing storm pipe across 10th Ave. frontage to improve curb appeal. No fertilization of plants will occur on -site. 5. Demonstrate how the utilities and other service requirements of the use can be met. Any utility improvements will tie to the existing available service on -site. 6. Demonstrate how the impact of traffic generated will be handled, oil site and on site_ Access points include one way in and one way out off NE 10th Avenue. The site plan will allow for staging at the dnve -thru along with on -site parking. For questions relating to this application packet, call the General Services Dept. at (863) - 763 -3372, Ext. 218 Page 1 of 2 Special Exception - Specific Application and Checklist (• i FINDINGS REQUIRED FOR GRANTING A SPECIAL. EXCEPTION (Sec. 70-373(c) , In the Land Development Regulations) • It is the Applicant's responsibility to convince the Board of Adjustment that approval of the proposed special exception is justified. Specifically, the Applicant should provide in his/her application and presentation sufficient explanation and documentation to convince the Board of Adjustment to find that 1. The use is not contrary to the Comprehensive Plan requirements. The comp plan allows for the requested special exceptions per section 90.283. 2. The use is specifically authorized as a special exception use in the zoning district. Yes, per section 90.283 of the code. 3. The use will not have an adverse effect on the public int zest. No, the current zoning allows for commercial retail. This exception application is to allow for outside sales and. drive -thru. 4. The use is appropriate for the proposed location, is reasonably compatible with adjacent uses and is not detrimental to land use patterns. Yes, surrounding uses are commercial / multi- family properties. Site abuts SR 70. 5. The use will not adversely affect property values or living conditions, nor be a deterrent to the development of adjacent property. No, the owner intends to improve the property induding the building and the drainage along SR 70. 6. The use may be required to be screened from surrounding uses to reduce the impact of any nuisance or hazard to adjacent uses. a 1.004X 11791,4Pe kid* i5 proposed notti e1-vi pave/41z/ %0 2/on9 A landscape plan for this site was submitted to the City with the site plan application. Cad cCa�j ^� /of C'v►� l C 7. The use will not create a density pattern that will overburden public facilities such as schools, streets, and utility services. No as the density is not being increased - sufficient capacity exists to service the property. 8. The use will not create traffic congestion, flooding or drainage problems, or otherwise affect public safety_ The proposed site improvements will beautify the appearance and will improve on -site stormwater quality. The City staff will, in the Staff Report. address the request and evaluate it and the Applicant's submission in light of the above standards and required findings and offer a recommendation for approval or denial. NOTE: NOTE: AN APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL EXCEPTION EXPIRES IF A BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION HAS NOT BEEN SUBMI'I°I ED WITHIN TWO YEARS OF THE APPROVAL [Sec. 70-348(4)] For questions relating to this application packet, call the General Services Dept. at (863) - 763 -3372, Ext. 218 Page 2 of 2 Please see the attached exhibit `B" which outlines the proposed modifications to the existing structure. As this exhibit shows, there is a proposed 420 sq. ft. arbor at the east side of property which is planned for plant display. Also, there is 764 sq. ft. at the west side of the property proposed for plants and produce sales (indoor sales). The client plans to have intervals of potted plant and fountain displays on the property for viewing by potential customers of which most will be located at the west side and south side of the building. The client has no intentions of fertilizing plants onsite. If fertilization is necessary, the plants will be relocated to another site outside of the City limits for care. U0 Grantee SS Number. 262729781 A rho' Grantee SS Number: Parcel Number. .t `�`'�it. -H — ....�i J, •:d.c�:�. ,,.+:t' i•?l;.ir- T i'?. `1?% : 4...._ • .r.. .. Do Nary Stamps paid In the amountot Clotkof0ltou'" tt nth WARRANTY DEED This Indenture made this _1 _. day of April, 1995. BETWEEN Catherine Whidden and R.L. Whidden, her husband, of Route 2, Box 629g, Moore Haven, FL 33471 GRANTOR', and Linda L. Bridges, of 920 Park Street N.W., Okeechobee, FL 34974 GRANTEE', tcx 365 et6E1 796 WITNESSETH, That said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND 001100'S ($10.00) Dollars and other good and valuable considerations to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has grantted, bargained and sold to the grantee and grantee's heirs forever the following described land .located in the County of Okeechobee, State of Florida, to -wit: LOTS 14 THROUGH 17, INCLUSIVE. BLOCK 163, CRY OF OKEECHOBEE, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 10, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY. FLORIDA. SUBJECT TO RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD, IF ANY. 271610 FILED FOR RECORD OKEECII );'LE CO. FL. 95 APR 13 P:1 2: 1 D GLORIA J. FORD CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT and said grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. 'Singular and plural are interchangeable as context requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal this day and year first above written_ . LrcocaR TNESS/Pr .t r; n COUNTY OF 06-6 STATE OF FLORIDA Catherine Whidden �• alp R.L. Whidden The foregoing insuumcnt was acknowledged before me this 1514—day-of April, 1995 by Catherine Whidden and ILL Whidden, her husband, who is ( )personally known to me or ()has produced D C._ as idcntl icaisan and who ( )did ( did not take an oath. Prepared By and Return To: JOHN D. CASSELS, JR, ESQ. Cassels & McCall Post Office Box 969 Okeechobee, Florida 34973 (813) 763-3131 File Number. WHIDDEN NO1 AR b PUBTJC - My Commtssidn Expires: (SEAL) ^ra KARIN RAY en EXPIRES ur Junes 2 1895 - v i° BOM'JED %URU NOTARY MAC UNDiDDIVIER3 AVERAGE DAILY TRIPS FOR Bridges Nursery March 3, 2008 1905 S. 25th Street • Suite 200 • Fort Pierce, FL 34947 Phone: 772 -461 -6997 • Fax: 772 - 461 -0442 INTRODUCTION & PROJECT DESCRIPTION This site is located at the northeast corner of NW 10th Avenue and S,R. 70 in the City of Okeechobee. The property will have a one way entrance to the site from NW 10th Avenue and one way exit from the site to NW 10th Avenue. The purpose of this analysis is to estimate the number of peak hourly trips that this proposed business could produce. North Park Street /SR 70 is a four lane roadway that runs in an east and west. ESTIMATED PROJECT TRAFFIC Estimated peak hourly trip generations for this site were calculated using 1TE Trip Generation, 6th Edition. Calculations reflect that the proposed will not exceed over 100 peak hour trips. See below table: Peak Weekday AM Hourly Trips for # Lots Calculation Estimated Hourly Trips Specialty Retail Center 1 Proposed building: 2,836 sq. ft. (avg.6.41 / 1000 sf) 18.14 Trips Peak Weekday PM Hourly Trips for. # Lots Calculation Estimated Hourly Trips Specialty Retail Center 1 Proposed building: 2,836 sq. ft. (avg.4.93 / 1000 sf) 14.09 Trips Peak Saturday per Leasable Area # Lots Calculation Estimated Daily/Hourly Trips Specialty Retail Center 1 Proposed building: 2,836 sq. ft. (avg.42.04 / 1000 sf) 118.97 Trips Per Day 13.21 Trips Per Hour Peak Sunday per Leasable Area # Lots Calculation Estimated Daily/Hourly Trips Specialty Retail Center 1 Proposed building: 2,836 sq. ft. (avg.20.43 / 1000 sf) 57.81 Trips Per Day 6.42 Trips Per Hour There are four (4) categories listed above which reflect average hourly trips for Weekday Peak A.M., Weekday Peak P.M., Saturday and Sunday. As you can see, worst case scenario reflects an average trip count of 18.14 trips per hour (Weekday A.M. Peak Trips). 1905 S. 25th Street • Suite 200 • Fort Pierce, FL 34947 Phone: 772 -461 -6997 • Fax: 772 - 461 -0442 Specialty Retail Center (814) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area On a: Weekday, A.M. Peak Hour of Generator Number of Studies: 2 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GLA: 104 Directional Distribution: 48% entering, 52% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 6.41 5.40 - 8.85 Data Plot and Equation Caution - Use Carefully - Small Sample Size T = Average Vehicle Trip Ends 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 x x 300 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 X = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area X Actual Data Points Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not given R2 =.+.. Trip Generation, 6th Edition 1226 Institute of Transportation Engineers Specialty Retail Center (814) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area On a: Weekday, P.M. Peak Hour of Generator Number of Studies: 2 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GLA: 104 Directional Distribution: 57% entering, 43% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area - Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 4.93 4.59 - 5.75 Data Plot and Equation Caution - Use Carefully - Small Sample Size T = Average Vehicle Trip Ends 800 700 600 500 400 x -x 300 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 X = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area X Actual Data Points - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not given R2 IN** Trip Generation, 6th Edition 1227 Institute of Transportation Engineers Specialty Retail Center (814) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area On a: Saturday Number of Studies: 3 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GLA: 28 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 42.04 22.57 - 54.47 13.97 Data Plot and Equation Caution - Use Carefully - Small Sample Size T = Average Vehicle Trip Ends 2,100 2,000 1,900 1.800 1,700 1,600 1,500 1,400 1,300 1,200 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 x X X 10 20 30 40 50 X = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area X Actual Data Points Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not given R2 ="`. Trip Generation, 6th Edition 1228 Institute of Transportation Engineers Specialty Retail Center (814) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area On a: Sunday Number of Studies: 3 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GLA: 28 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 20.43 6.96 - 32.82 10.27 Data Plot and Equion Caution - Use Carefully - Small Sample Size T = Average Vehicle Trip Ends MOO 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 x x 10 20 30 40 50 X = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area X Actual Data Points Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not given 112 Generation, 6th Edition 1229 Institute of Transportation Engineers ZONING : CHV, .I. URE LAND GFRRIHIC SCALE ZONING : RMF !ZONING ; RMF ,FU URE LAND USE ; RMF !FUTURE LAND USE t,;R /!F t,., RENTUSE SINGLE !CURRENT USE : SINGLE MILY H `FAMILY HOME, It G CHV FUTURE LAND USE : CHV CURRENT USE : :PROFESSIONAL OFFICE 3=emt es ma woossnessey es wan tessassassus as - -- = STATE ROAD 70 87' NG : CHV E LAND USE T USE : ABA ' DONED ZONING : CHV I FUTURE LAND USE : CHV CURRENT USE : RETAIL S Rudd Jones, P.E. & Associates, P.A. Consulting Engineers 1905 South 25th Street, Suite 200 Fort Pierce, Fl 34947 Phone: (772) 461 -6997 nom* CER7iifaTE 7s AU oortaAnet Nd 000(6503 DATE FEB., 2009 DRAWN BY: MCS DESIGNED BY MCS CHECKED BY: SLD PROJECT No 2007-225 HORZ SCALE: AS SHOWN VERT. SCALE: NA. CADD FILE: SPEC BRIDGES NURSERY FOR LINDA BRIDGES LOCATED IN THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA t xffl/_ / 'Ai, SPECIAL EXCEPTION AERIAL EXHIBIT SCALE VERIFICATION - UA SOLID BAR 15 EQUAL TO HALF AN INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY Sheet No. 1 of 1 /N1 t ' !kr OUTSIDE- War K, ArLA 288 325 SF NEW OVERHANG ROOF 25.3' NCRETE 12E COVER CONCRETE & F.F.E. = 33.05' a5 , 119 SF 32.73 12.0' 32.73 12.0' 1,245 SF 1 STORY RESIDENCE F.F.E. = 33.29' SINGLE STORY WOOD FRAME RESIDENCE T SHED L CARPORT COVERED CONCRETE F.F.E. = 32.73' 348 SF 15.7' COVERED CONCRETE F.F.E. = 33.03' 126 SF 27 7' I /IrCdUeetPia.n4- °Rt+Li sol. cr.) 7.7' 1.8' 'Waal (1,VO4. oco BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PREPARED FOR LINDA BRIDGES PAP rA(a fl iai -D0 FELT DESCR11.770A17 L07S 1.4 75 15 AND 1Z BLOCK 184 O A03c4WINIG 70 711E PLAT 711FJBEAr RECORDED N PLAT BOOK 4 PAGE 4 PUBLIC RECORDS or OOEOIOEEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOT15 TOTAL PARCEL CSYTANS 10581 AOPL3' (TO NEW R/W UDC) LOT IS 9 9 9 MCMF rSTTA ROOADm70 SAM 9 war 1.07 fa LOT tar ri PRO.ECT SPEaFIC NOTES 1) L.NRE55 9501W o7NfJRRISE ALL DIYOID S AAF CA7.OXA7ED(C) AND 11EAS/BEL 3 X P) 97E ADDRESS 920 ALE PARC S7REET. .3) PARCE7. Bic 3- 15- 37 -,55- 0010 - 01830 -0150 4) FIRM. ZONE ZONE UNDE7E7DIAED, PARCEL LES ERN PE oicam BEE OT LIMITS 5) THIS DEWY IS NOT NTDIDED 10 DEPICT JUREDICD0RAL AREAS OR 071ER AREAS Or LOCAL CDR OM 6) 7/E DESOBI.'770V SHOWN =EON WAS FRONDED BY 77E =NT OR 77E DEWS RFPRESENTAAl£ 7) BEARING REFERRED THE NORTH LNE OF LOTS 14-17, BLOOD 184 5 TAKEN 70 BEAR NORDN 897827' EAST. 8) 77E E2EYA77518 917114/ NERELN ARE BASED ay 77E NA7OVAL G ODE77C Ifl7RCAL DARN O. 1929 (NOW 1929) 9) 77E 9ARIEY DEPLCTED HOPE 18 NOT COLD= BY PRGYESSICNAL LIABILITY I1157RANCE =IRONS OR 0ELE77OWS 70 SURVEY MAPS Of REPORTS BY 071104 77IAN 7NE 9GIND PART OR PARTIES IS PROMBITED NTNOUT WIDEN CONSENT Or 77E 9OWYC PARTY OR PAR767 10) DATE Or LAST FLELD SPRIER) 07/03/07. PRO.ECT SPELYP7C LEGEND.• MPP - MOOD POWER POSE U7S - 1UEF/KNE PEDESTAL - SPOT ELEVATION PREPARED FOR 771E EXCIUSIYE USE OF.• LINDA L. BRIDGES / ADD SEWER UNE REVISE LOC. & EL SEWER UNE REPASS R/W BOUNDARY SURVEY & TOPO 12/12/07 07/03/07 06/13/07 06 /06/07 226/25 216/53 N/A 212 /16 KB WC WC WC 1 KAB KAB KAB KAB OLSCRNRON DWG DATE I7/PC BY CA' SC" r - 20' DRAWING NUMBER: 21290 J SHEET � or 1 LEGEND 0-501 Iron Rod 0nd Cop 10.6,5 6719 •-Found Cu e -Fend bon Rod (and Cop) a -Found 919. (and Cop) AB5RENA110NS TL, •E -I i/f-E i Prem.. EDUT•e'. c'riz:rw .:-.F°: _ 45.t°.se40l« a r+t 54x.)1.,10 see om . 0).m..., 0)- c•••• 10 Liam M1Plat PC,* at cp6.e1.ne 'rename TA ullwk x601 u.om p..% w1r Datum STANDARD 401ES 1. No search of Me public rcorde 10 d.terminatbn of owners* or reebicDme affecting the Imde Mom ms performed by the wrwtar. 2. The .spry depicted here S prepared esdualvely for mo.e parties noted 3. No rrponeblety or itabINy P aepned by Me surveyor for um by other. not specifically named. 4. Not Mid without the *p.m 0nd emboeed seal of Florida licensed velar orM mapper 90(123 5. Thre ore no visible abam ground encroachments except m .howl. e. No attempt .m mode to locals under }and 509,0 merll. and /or encroachments Of my) es port of this survey. 7. ibis eury y wail prga.d b 0000rdonee .IM minimum technical rondo. *Wed by the Florid° Flood of Surname and Poppers (Chapter 61017 -6, F.A.S.) purwmt to Section 472027, Florld0 Statute TRADEWINDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC. SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS 200 B.T. 3rd Avenue Okeechobee, FL 34874 Tel: (883) 783 -2887 Kenneth A. Breeer Jr. (P011 4820) I. et Imadadratisa trn• RE: BRIDGES NURSERY APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO ALLOW FOR OUTSIDE SALES AND A DRIVE -THRU Response to Sec 70- 373(b) - Standards for Granting a Special Exception 1) Demonstrate that the proposed location and site are appropriate for the use. RESPONSE: Please see attached map which reflects the adjacent existing zoning, land use and current use which shows that the proposed is an appropriate use. 2) Demonstrate how the site and proposed buildings have been designed so they are compatible with the adjacent uses and the neighborhood, or explain why no specific design efforts are needed. RESPONSE: Adjacent properties are of similar use (commercial) and residential is separated by proposed detention area. Access to the site is one way in and out off NE loth Avenue. 3) Demonstrate any landscaping techniques to visually screen the use from adjacent uses; or explain why no visual screening is necessary. RESPONSE: A landscape plan for this site was submitted with the site plan application. A wax myrtle hedge is proposed at the northern property line along with landscaping at the lot corners. 4) Demonstrate what is proposed to reduce the impacts of any potential hazards, problems or public nuisance generated by the use or explain how the nature of the use creates no such potential problems. RESPONSE: Applicant is installing storm pipe across 10th Avenue frontage to improve curb appeal. No fertilizations of plants will occur on -site. 5) Demonstrate how the utilities and other service requirements of the use can be met. RESPONSE: Any utility improvements will tie into the existing available service on- site. 6) Demonstrate how the impact of traffic generation will be handled off site and on -site. RESPONSE: Access points include one way in and one way out off NE 10th Avenue. The site plan will allow for staging at the drive -thru along with on -site parking. Response to Sec 70- 373(b) - Standards for Granting a Special Exception 1) The use is not contrary to the Comprehensive Plan requirements. RESPONSE: The comprehensive plan allows for the requested special exceptions per section 90.283. 2) The use is specifically authorized as a special exception use in the zoning district. RESPONSE: Yes, per section 90.283 of the City Code. 3) The use will not have an adverse effect on the public interest. RESPONSE: No, the current zoning allows for commercial retail. This exception application is to allow for outside sales and a drive -thru. 4) The use is appropriate for the proposed location, is reasonably compatible with adjacent uses and is not detrimental to urbanizing land use patterns. RESPONSE: Yes, the surrounding uses are commercial / multi- family uses. Site abuts SR70. 5) The use will not adversely affect property values or living conditions, nor be a deterrent to the development of adjacent property. RESPONSE: No, the owner intends to improve the property including g the building and the drainage along SR70. 6) The use may be required to be screened from surrounding uses to reduce the impact of any nuisance or hazard to adjacent uses. RESPONSE: A landscape plan for this site was submitted to the City with the site plan application. A wax myrtle hedge is proposed at the northern property line4 along with landscaping at lot corners. 7) The use will not create a density pattern that will overburden public facilities such as schools, streets, and utility services. RESPONSE: No as the density is not being increased - sufficient capacity exists to service the property. 8) The use will not create traffic congestion, flooding or drainage problems, or otherwise affect public safety. RESPONSE: The proposed site improvements will beautify the appearance wand will improve on -site stormwater quality. INITIAL COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS FOR PATRICIA GORTER (RUDD- JONES) RE: BRIDGES RETAIL NURSERY SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION 1. Is the 325 sf under the new overhang (call it Area "A ") to be paved or on a slab, or will it be just on natural ground? What will be done there, what type of work or storage, describe. Also, what 's the difference between the 325 sf overhang and the 288 sf of work area? RESPONSE: A misprint has been noticed on the exhibit originally submitted. The square footage of the work area was calculated in error at 288 sq. ft. when in actuality it proposed at 325 sq ft. This area will be used to make plant arrangements, hanging plants, etc. The owner is proposing cement slab in this area. 2. Is the Arbor Plant Sales area (call it Area "B ") natural ground or paved or on a slab? What will be kept there and how (in pots, planted in the ground)? Describe RESPONSE: The arbor area will be of natural ground. This area will be used for the storage of potted plants, planters, etc. Plants will not be planted in the ground in this area. 3. Is the additional area (call it Areas "C ") between the drive thru and the covered carport to be covered, paved, or just open land on which the produce and plant sales and display will take place. In other words, will it be essentially an open air market where someone drives up along side and orders and receives the goods, or is it a drive -up window where the produce etc. is not generally visible from outside? Describe, particularly how the drive thru operates. RESPONSE: The area between the drive thru and covered carport is proposed as an expansion to the existing building. This will be enclosed and will include sliding glass doors for customers to drive up to for the pick -up of produce and other related items. 4. How will the two existing shed that are to be relocated be used? RESPONSE: Pot, baskets, fountains, etc. which will be used to create arrangements that will be for sale will be stored in these sheds. 5. Calculation of open and enclosed storage and sales (total is 2,836 sf). ENCLOSED OUTDOOR SALES AND STORAGE Description Square feet Description Square feet Office and retail sales area within structure 1,364 Area A — Outside work area under new overhang. 288 325 Area B — Arbor 420 6. Finally, the application includes a statement that the approval of the site plan is pending the approval of the two special exceptions. However, these are not the only things that must be changed in the site plan. First it appears that the drive through will be located differently than implied in the original site plan submission and there are a number of other require- ments that will be necessary to be met when the site plan is resubmitted for consideration by the TRC. RESPONSE: Acknowledged. We are aware that along with the special exceptions requested in this application, additional items must be addressed for site plan approval. These items were outlined at the TRC meeting dated January 23, 2008 and are being addressed through the TRC process. plant storage and sales Area C — Covered carport and new area between it and the proposed drive - through. 764 TOTAL 1,364 TOTAL 1,472 1,509 6. Finally, the application includes a statement that the approval of the site plan is pending the approval of the two special exceptions. However, these are not the only things that must be changed in the site plan. First it appears that the drive through will be located differently than implied in the original site plan submission and there are a number of other require- ments that will be necessary to be met when the site plan is resubmitted for consideration by the TRC. RESPONSE: Acknowledged. We are aware that along with the special exceptions requested in this application, additional items must be addressed for site plan approval. These items were outlined at the TRC meeting dated January 23, 2008 and are being addressed through the TRC process. 1375 Jackson Street, Suite 206 Fort Myers, Florida 33901 -2845 Phone: 239 - 334 -3366 Fax: 239 - 334 -6384 Email: info @Iarue- planning.com LaRue Planning & Management Services, Inc. Staff Report Special Exception Request Prepared for: City of Okeechobee Applicant: Bridges Retail Nursery Petition No.: 08- 005 -SE Staff Report Special Exception Request Applicant's Name: Linda L. Bridges Petition No. 08 -005 -SE General Information: Owner: Contact Person: Owner Address: Linda L. Bridges. Fred R. Jones, Jr., P.E. 18180 SW 66th St;. Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33331 Contact Phone: 772- 461 -6997 Legal Description of Subject Property: LOTS 14 THROUGH 17, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 163, CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 10, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. Item before the Board of Adjustment: The matter for consideration by the City of Okeechobee Board of Adjustment is an application requesting a Special Exception to permit outside sales and storage and a drive through sales facility on a 0.65 acre parcel located at the southwest corner of NW 10th Avenue and NW Park Street (SR 70). Description of the Situation: The site is presently occupied by a single - family structure occupied by the owner and generally situated in the middle of the parcel. The Applicant proposes to run a retail establishment selling garden decorations, fountains, plants, produce and other related items and, perhaps, in the future including other retail items such as antiques. The requested outdoor storage aspect will involve a 325 square foot slab unenclosed area covered by an overhang for the assembly of plant arrangements, hanging plants and the like. There will also be a 420 square foot arbor plant sales area at the east end of the existing structure where potted plants and planters will be stored and displayed on natural ground. The use will involve expansion of the west side of the existing building to provide a 764 square foot enclosed area associated with the requested drive - through to which customers will drive up to order and /or pick up purchases. No plants will be grown in the ground and if fertilization is required, they will be relocated to another site outside the City for such care. Page -2- Staff Report Special Exception Request Applicant's Name: Linda L. Bridges Petition No. 08- 005 -SE Consistency with Land Development Regulations: Section 70 -373 (b) requires that the Applicant address the following standards for granting a Special Exception. The Applicant has submitted materials addressing these standards. These materials are presented herein for your consideration. (1) Demonstrate that the proposed location and site are appropriate for the use. RESPONSE: Please see attached map which reflects the adjacent existing zoning, land use and current use which shows that the proposed is an appropriate use. (2) Demonstrate how the site and proposed buildings have been designed so they are compatible with the adjacent uses and the neighborhood, or explain why no specific design efforts are needed. (3) RESPONSE: Adjacent properties are of similar use (commercial) and residential is separated by proposed detention area. Access to the site is one way in and out off NE 10th Avenue. Demonstrate any landscaping techniques to visually screen the use from adjacent uses; or explain why no visual screening is necessary. RESPONSE: A landscape plan for this site was submitted with the site plan application. A wax myrtle hedge is proposed at the northern property line along with landscaping at the lot corners. (4) Demonstrate what is proposed to reduce the impacts of any potential hazards, problems or public nuisance generated by the use or explain how the nature of the use creates no such potential problems. (5) RESPONSE: Applicant is installing storm pipe across 10th Avenue frontage to improve curb appeal. No fertilizations of plants will occur on -site. Demonstrate how the utilities and other service requirements of the use can be met. RESPONSE: Any utility improvements will tie into the existing available service on -site. Page -3- Staff Report Applicant's Name: Linda L. Bridges Special Exception Request Petition No. 08- 005 -SE (6) Demonstrate how the impact of traffic generation will be handled off site and on -site. RESPONSE: Access points include one way in and one way out off NW10th Avenue. The site plan will allow for staging at the drive -thru along with on -site parking. When reaching a conclusion on a Special Exception request, the Board of Adjust- ment shall consider and show in its record the following findings as set forth in Section 70- 373(c). Following are the Staff comments pertaining to these findings: A. The use is not contrary to the Comprehensive Plan requirements. No, the property is designated Commercial on the Future Land Use Map and the use is not contrary to any provision of the Comprehensive Plan. B. The use is specifically authorized as a special exception use in the zoning district. The CHV zoning district lists both drive - through service and outdoor sales and storage as allowable special exception uses under Sec. 90 -283, (1) and (5). C. The use will not have an adverse effect on the public interest. Drive - through operations can cause problems associated with access and ingress from public roads and outdoor storage can be visually distracting or unsightly. However, based on the materials submitted by the Applicant, it appears that the drive - through facility will be sufficiently removed from NW 10th Avenue such that it should have not an adverse effect upon traffic movements. The outdoor storage areas are limited and located along the north and east sides of the building sufficiently removed from adjoining property owners to avoid subjecting them to potentially unsightly views. Similarly, these areas are not expected to be readily visible from public rights -of -ways. Staff Report Applicant's Name: Linda L. Bridges Special Exception Request Petition No. 08- 005 -SE D. The use is appropriate for the proposed location, is reasonably compatible with adjacent uses and is not detrimental to urbanizing land use patterns. With the exception of the single - family homes to the immediate north and northeast, the subject property is surrounded by commercial uses. There is a private school to the northwest across NW 10th Avenue. The drive through service will be removed from the single - family uses and should have no more effect than a similar business without a drive - through. View of the outdoor storage areas from the single - family homes can be blocked by landscaping or fencing along the northern property line and would be address during the site plan review stage. E. The use will not adversely affect property values or living conditions, nor be a deterrent to the development of adjacent property. No, the requested special exceptions will not adversely affect adjacent properties for the same reasons described in D, above. F. The use may be required to be screened from surrounding uses to reduce the impact of any nuisance or hazard to adjacent uses. It may be advisable or necessary to screen properties to the north and east from view of outdoor storage areas. This will be addressed during the site plan review stage. G. The use will not create a density pattern that will overburden public facilities such as schools, streets, and utility services. Neither the drive - through service nor outdoor storage will affect density or public facilities. The drive through facility will be sufficiently removed to avoid conflicts with traffic along NW 10th Avenue. H. The use will not create traffic congestion, flooding or drainage problems, or otherwise affect public safety. Neither the drive - through service nor outdoor storage is expected to contribute to traffic congestion. The Applicant has submitted traffic genera- tion information that indicates that traffic generation during the PM Peak Hour is likely to be about 14 trips, well below the 100 trip threshold triggering the need for a traffic impact analysis. Drainage considerations should be no different than those normally associated with commercial development. These will be addressed during the site plan review stage. Page -5- Staff Report Special Exception Request Applicant's Name: Linda L. Bridges Petition No. 08- 005 -SE Recommendation: Based upon the foregoing analysis and findings, Staff recommends that Petition No. 08- 005 -SE be approved. Submitted by: James G. LaRue, AICP Planning Consultant April 9, 2008 Property Appraiser's Aerial Photograph Zoning Map 1 ST Hearing — Board of Adjustment, April 17, 2008 Staff Report Special Exception Request Applicant's Name: Linda L. Bridges Petition No. 08- 005 -SE Okeechobee County Property Appraiser Aerial — Subject Property PARK STREET DOT 1,1; O3 +479/344 >,. Staff Report Applicant's Name: Linda L. Bridges Special Exception Request Petition No. 08- 005 -SE Insert zoning pattern map ZONING PATTERN LEGEND I RSF1 RMF CHV IIII IND 300 NW Park St. SW Park St. 0 300 600 Feet The Okeechobee News P.O. Box 639, Okeechobee, Florida 34973 (863) 763 -3134 Published Daily STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Judy Kasten, who on oath says she is Publisher of the Okeechobee News, a DAILY Newspaper published at Okeechobee, in Okeechobee County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertise- ment, being a P Lop Vk \ cc, in the matter of NAc t 0.0(- ictLer on in the 19th Judicial District of the Circuit Court of Okeechobee County, Florida, was published in said newspaper in the issues of Affiant further says that the said Okeechobee News is a newspaper published at Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been published continuously in said Okeechobee County, Florida each week and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Sworn to &I'd subscri before me this 1 ,`t'�' day of 5 »S A.D. 20 ;o4ary'Public, State of Florida at Large NOTICE OF CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED SPECIAL EXCEPTION NOTICE: A PUBLIC HEARING will be held before the City of Okeechobee Planning Board/Board of Adjustment and Appeals on Thursday, Aprll 17, 2008 at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. The meeting will be held at City Hall, 55 SE 3rd Avenue, in the Council Chambers, Room 200, Okeechobee, Florida To consider Special Exception Petition No. 08- 004 -SE, submitted by property owner Roger Janes, of Okeechobee Trader and Fishing Resort, Inc., allowing a recreation vehicles park, tor transient recreation use only, within a'Residential Mobile Home District (Ref. Code Book Section 90- 163(4)). Property is located at 516 Southeast 4th Street. Legal description: Lots 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7; less the West 5 feet of Lots 3 and 6 of Block A, Central Park Subdivision, according to plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 39, public records of Okeechollee County, Aonda. A copy of the entire application(s) and agenda are available in the General Services Office, Rm 101 at City Hall or by calling Betty Clement at (863) 763 -3372 x 218. Please be advised that the Board of Adjustment and Appeals will serve as the de- cision making body (quasi - judicial), on behalf of the City, to approve or deny Spe- cial Exception Petittons. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that if any person desires to appeal any decision made by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals with respect to any mat- ter considered at this meeting, or hearing will need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. General Services media is for the sole purpose of backup for official records of the department. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Florida Statute 286.26, persons with disabilities needing special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact Betty Clement no later than two (2) working days prior to the proceeding at 863- 763 -3372 x 218; if you are heanng or voice im- paired, call TDD 1- 800 -222 -3448 (voice) or1 -888- 447 -5620 (TTY). BY: Brian Whitehall, Zoning Administrator Petition No. 08-004-SE 267970 ON 4/2,11/08 rPR ,„e, Janetta Thiboult Commission # DD505311 i N9 Q,o¢ Expires January 10, 2010 of 0. Bonded Troy Fain Insurance Inc 800-385-7019 .1t uth Master Land Development Application and Checklist: Rezone — Special Exception — Variance (Rev. 12/07) City of Okeechobee General Services Department 55 S.E.3'd Avenue, Room 101 Okeechobee, Florida 399742903 Phone: (863) 763 -3372, ext. 218 Fax: (863) 763-1686 Date: , j f f Petition No. 0 e'_ 0 Q (f - 56 Fee Paid: / j ( • #42.923g 6, Jurisdiction: 15t Hearing: 0/10p- 2nd Hearing: Publication Dates.. Notices Mailed: -CN (x� ,.t,� �+y?- }1 Y °�.:ie•, - +Z.:,1 : -.:.:i -J_t y4Xit. �1' .:�F- ' 'L1. t�c: � i 1T- e"'ccR- 1 5:1 5 _- .4f1•.i4 ,ax :=0.~-..-•a. —L •- �-, -'.:- �. t Via:. --�� 7 �r�, 1 Name of property owner(s): 04(p e bl? fGir •`P r•i'- 2 Owner mailing address: PO'QX 6/6' CEO 3 Name of applicant(s) if other than owner er- Z o Y.e S CEO Applicant mailing address: sa i,.� S (below for office use only) %' vivo Wag 4 5 Name of contact person (state relationship): - V g ^- 'lCrin�- iEief= •iscii.•eatit��. ' acinz`kE''.a: .Li 5 -T �:::_. _. .h. ^w tk� =''wn: tr, qc _lit: RUI'ER'Ir]Y;�j O r n .. r�"'` t:y- ?e?l...r••y:4- "LL.v.:___ —� � n',•- ••�- �- �l_r`:':'. .ir:^:� �".: ld- t�.!�- e= r`.�.•- ^-•��•.•_��-r' - =•! �_ "` �'� "�'�'' �� r4ej �:.i . _ ' l�c�� Property address/directi ns to property: 5Ito SE s ree - ta 44E :144' -::. Describe current use of property: flobi le_ Nome_ £'i' Describe improvements on property (number /type buildings, dwelling units , occupied or vacant, etc.): 1 r S/4■4 eA i V s (/1,0 10 Approx. acreage: 11 Is property in a platted subdivision? (P( ) Yes ( ) No Is there a use on the property that is or was in violation of a city or county ordinance? ( ) No; (des If, yes, describe the use and violation: Have there been any land development applications submitted in the past year that involve any part of the property? ( ( )Yes If yes, provide date, name of applicant, and brief description of the 12 nature of the application: 13 Is a pending sale of the property subject to this application being granted? ( ) Yes I4 15 Do you own any other lands adjacent to the subject property? (.- No ( ) Yes If yes, describe the current and intended uses: Describe uses on adjoining property to the: North: East 14 C 16 Existing zoning: R tkliv 17 Request is for ( ) Rezone 18 Parcel Identification Number- to. • South: AMF West: Future Land Use classification ( ' pecial Exception ( ) Variance Master Land Development Application and Checklist: Rezone — Special Exception -- Variance (Rev. 12/07) �i:zi =� __- _ — _ _ _ :t �1;�`..:_ ".r 1:.."•_i= tuc.uw cur mum +. use on .,t: �:2 ' -- • { -; - Sic =� c.: .�- .: ��= �41..-+_ s.�c_�T.= ri>an- .le. �•..,f =-s: �r4rVlt. -_,-__,,,,....1,,... rm�.- at- 19 ._t ..==.e.�&IF��. stirs -13ntF ,:sue= 3'�v- ...j.. Applicant's statement of interest in property ow N e .•r.`st,a�•. _ � r 20 Last recorded warranty deed `, . =p - 21 Notarized letter ofconsent from property y owner (if applicant is different from property � owner) � /l ��. •:` .. _ � _., 22 Property survey (one copy 11" x 17" and two copies 24" x 36 ") containing a, certified boundary survey, date of survey, surveyor's name, address and phone number b. Legal description . c. Computation of total acreage to nearest tenth of an acre • _ G.A? , g _- �,;;., 23 List of surrounding property owners with addresses and location sketch of the subject property: See the Information Request Form from the Okeechobee Property Appraiser's Office (attached) ' '-;^ 2`= • v `. 24 Affidavit attesting to completeness and correctness ofthe List (attached) 4 `R 25 Nonrefundable application fee: Rezone :$500; Special Exception:S250, Variance: 8250; all plus $30 /acre: ti x''_10"1 ^ � :� sl:.t~..� ... • ..; . �F�.�,ei -r :ra.' �..•^ __ 7'.s: ._,�Y ti.ti :c-- -i .- .n -__- .11- ;...L. err , }.:�a�:v:�' "r • <-- "-,�s: "''' '},r•J.: :.r-.- '+k`r • -•c- _..4 -Y..- E �=�;- .t,•ie }r-' x • �� r 2 Fc,•"F��. -•- a'V,..- ,t Cona�iQmofrmatonc`racy�•(��a - _ "-.'. g= : —! 1 .?a_ ..7..7"....:-/ 3_:eX_ = �_ €_r.r . .- .:.. -±.. ,41-t -fin: Fit': =.'..'t• —e - .r._?: _ -. ��r.:.: rr•::4 "+ ikei ..� �?c:,17s •. :Pricy: _ .•,:.ag r�i F41- Cr.l.:t$t'.ist e.�bse- "-=- iztti7 26 I hereby certify that the information in this application is correct. The information included in this application is for use by the City of Okeechobee in processing my request. False or misleading - information may be punishable by a fine of up to $500.00 and imprisonment of up to 30 days and may resulting the summary denial of this application. Signature Printed Name Date For questions relating to this application packet, call the General Services Dept. at (863) 763 - 3372, ext. 218 Special Exception - Specific Application and Checklist (Rev.12/07) .. -, P._.+ -y •=t-tf -i. '• - - •. c...,a..:fi" 'n. "._i nrh -1.- -: txr --.� _j4 Ems, -` }�(� 'H.>. • o °B OK eR . = ® �� D-151!'J R. t.. st - -...Z �lC (� ,,,, �_•�,�_ p- � e,. �3. I``, £ a� !7 F, p ,. 'S : �� .�Q ®' - ":!e. _ �FJ� ---1.= r C 1 r4. . A Describe the Special Exception sought +rt ye, ( +VC" I e rs 40 , rm i t t �, .1 A r e there similar uses in the. area? N o ( ) Yes If yes, bn -41 y describe them: f01V\ e f • - If a business, briefly descrbe the nature of e business, numb ' of employees, hours of operation, and any. - activities to be conducted outside of a building: " - " . . .. D" • Attach Traffic Impact Study by a transportation planner or transportation engineer, if • a prepared professional the Special Exception sought will generate 100 or more•peak hour vehicle trip ends using the trip generation factors for the most similar use as ontained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers most recent edition . of Trip Generation. - At fit E - Attachment addressing the stafldards and required findings for a special exception as described below: STANDARDS FOR GRANT1NG A SPECIAL EXCEPTION (Sec_ 70-373(b), in the Land Development Regulations) Applicants are required by Sec_ 70- 373(b) to address the following issues in his /her presentation before the Board of Adjustment. Staff strongly recommends that the Applicant include, in his/her application, materials that address each of these issues in order to allow Staff and the Board of Adjustment sufficient time to adequately consider the Applicant's request 1. Demonstrate that the proposed location and site are appropriate for the use 2. Demonstrate how the site and proposed buildings have been designed so they are compatible with the adjacent uses and the neighborhood, or explain why no specific design efforts are needed. 3. Demonstrate any landscaping techniques to visually screen the use from adjacent uses; or explain why no visual screening is necessary. 4. Demonstrate what is proposed to reduce the impact of any potential hazards, problems or public nuisance generated by the use; or explain how the nature of the use creates no such potential problems. 5. Demonstrate how the utilities and other service requirements of the use can be met. 6. Demonstrate how the impact of traffic generated will be handled, off site and on site. For questions relating to this application packet, call the General Services Dept. at (863) - 763 -3372, Ext. 218 Page of 2 Special Exception - Specific Application and Checklist (Rev. 12/07) FINDINGS REQUIRED FOR GRANTING A SPECIAL EXCEPTION (Sec. 70- 373(c) , in the Land Development Regulations) It is the Applicant's responsibility to convince the Board of Adjustment that approval of the proposed special exception is justified. Specifically, the Applicant should provide in his/her application and presentation sufficient explanation and documentation to convince the Board of Adjustment to find that 1. The use is not contrary to the Comprehensive Plan requirements. o --� Lsif-vim—. (4) 2. The.use is specifically authorized as a special exception use in the zoning district. (18.5 e . G�D _ `(p3 3. The use will not have an adverse effect on the public interest �j� ,_. �. ""'7"""' lix,c� l cW-L Dr, IA 4. The use is appropriate for the proposed location, is reasonably compatible with adjacent uses and is not detrimental to urbanizing land use patterns. 5. The use will not adversely affect property values or living conditions, nor be a deterrent to the development of adjacent property. '')I O 6. The use may be required to be screened from surrounding uses to reduce the impact of any nuisance or har+rd to adjacent uses.zy 7. The use will not create a density pattern that will overburden public facilities such as schools, streets, and utility services. fj 8_ The use will not create traffic congestion, flooding or drainage problems, or otherwise affect public safety_ '-})( • The City staff will, in the Staff Report, address the request and evaluate it and the Applicant's submission in light of-the above standards and required findings and offer a recommendation for approval or denial. NOTE: NOTE: AN APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL EXCEPTION EXPIRES IF A BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION HAS NOT BEEN SUBMITTED WITHIN TWO YEARS OF THE APPROVAL [Sec. 70- 348(4)) For questions relating to this application packet, call the General Services Dept. at (863) - 763 -3372, Ext. 218 Page 2 of 2 ZONING § 90 -163 (c) Maximum lot coverage by all buildings. Maximum lot coverage by all buildings in the RSF 2 district shall be as follows: (1) (2) Maximum Coverage Maximum Impervious Surface Single - family dwelling- 45 percent Other permitted principal uses: 25 percent 55 percent 55 percent (d) Maximum height of structures. Except where further restricted by these regulations for a particular use, the maximum height of structures in the RSF 2 district shall be as follows: (1) Single- family dwelling: (2) Other permitted principal uses: (LDR 1998, § 334) 30 feet, unless a special exception is granted 30 feet, unless a special exception is granted Sec. 90 -136. Additional regulations. Additional regulations which shall apply to all uses in the RSF 2 district include, but are not limited to: (1) Concurrency regulations. (2) Parking and loading regulations. (3) Landscaping regulations. (4) Sign regulations. (5) Accessory use regulations. (6) Supplementary use regulations. (7) Environmental and stormwater regula- tions. (8) Utilities regulations. (LDR 1998, § 335) Secs. 90- 137 -90 -160. Reserved. DIVISION 4. RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOME (RMH) DISTRICT Sec. 90 -161. Generally. (a) Residential mobile home (RMH) zoning dis- tricts shall be permitted only on land designated as future land use category single - family residen- tial in the comprehensive plan. (b) Uses in residential mobile home (RMH) zoning districts shall be subject to the regulations of this division. (LDR 1998, § 340) Sec. 90 -162. Permitted uses. The following principal uses and structures in the RMH district are permitted: (1) Mobile home subdivision, with one mobile home per lot. (2) Mobile home park, with one mobile home per lot. (3) Hurricane shelter. (4) Public and private schools. (5) House of worship, on a lot of at least five acres. (6) Open space. (7) Public facility or use. (LDR 1998, § 341) Sec. 90 -163. Special exception uses. The following uses and structures are permit- ted in the RMH district after issuance of a special exception use petition and may have additional conditions imposed at the time of approval: (1) Adult family care homes or assisted living facilities as provided by law. (2) Day care center. (3) House of worship on a lot less than five acres. Supp. No. 2, Rev. CD90:13 (4) Recreation vehicle park for transient rec- reation use only. (5) Community center. (6) Indoor recreation. D_SearchResults Okeechobee County Property Appraiser Last Updated: 1/24/2008 Parcel ID: 3- 22- 37 -35- 0030 -000A0 -0010 Owner & Property Info Retrieve Tax Record Owner's Name OKEECHOBEE TRAILER & FISHING R Site Address 516 SE 4TH ST, Okeechobee Mailing Address BOX 516 OKEECHOBEE, FL 349730516 Brief Legal g CENTRAL PARK LOTS 1 & 2, LOT 3 LESS W 5 FT LOT 6 LESS W 5 FT, LOTS 7& 8 Total Land Area 0.000 ACRES Neighborhood 286010.00 Tax District 50 UD Codes 1.00 /1.00 /1.00 /1.00 Market Area 40 DOR Use Code PK /LT RVMH (002800) The DOR Use Code shown here is a Dept. of Revenue code. Please contact the Okeechobee County Planing & Development office at 863- 763 -5548 for specific zoning information. Property & Assessment Values Mkt Land Value cnt: (2) $194,250.00 Ag Land Value cnt: (0) $0.00 Building Value cnt: (0) $0.00 XFOB Value cnt: (1) $1,768.00 Total Appraised Value $196,018.00 Sales History Page 1 of 2 2007 Certified Values Property Card GIS Aerial ( Interactive GIS Map Print Search Result: 1 of 1 2007 Proposed Values Just Value $196,018.00 Class Value $0.00 Assessed Value $196,018.00 Exempt Value $o.00 Total Taxable Value $196,018.00 Sale Date Book/Page Inst. Type Sale Vimp Sale Qual Sale RCode Sale Price 3/1/1978 0/0 03 V Q 16 x 12 x 0 $10,000.00 Building Characteristics Bldg Sketch I Bldg Item I Bldg Desc 1 Year Blt ( Heated S.F. 1 Actual S.F. 1 Bldg Value NONE Extra Features & Out Buildings - ( Show Codes ) Code Desc Year Bit Value Units Dims Condition (% Good) BCR W4 BLK CC R/F 2005 $1,768.00 192.000 16 x 12 x 0 PD (75.00) Land Breakdown Lnd Code Desc Units Adjustments Eff Rate Lnd Value 561BSW BMH SITE 5 (MKT) 21.000 LT - (.000AC) 1.00 /1.00 /1.00 /1.00 $12,600.00 $264,600.00 261AMH HXMH SITE (MKT) 1.000 LT - (.000AC) 1.00 /1.00 /1.00 /1.00 $13,125.00 $13,125.00 Okeechobee County Property Appraiser Search Result: 1 of 1 Last Updated: 1/24/2008 HOME I Record Search I GIS Map I General Info I Exemptions I Tangible Tax I FAQ I Contact Us This information was derived from data which was compiled by the Okeechobee County Property Appraiser's Office solely for the governmental purpose of property assessment. This information should not be relied upon by anyone as a determination of the ownership of property or market value. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the accuracy of the data herein, it's use, or its interpretation. Although it is periodically updated, this information may not reflect the data currently on file in the Property Appraiser's office. The assessed http://www.okeechobeepa.com/GIS/D_SearchResults.asp 2/12/2008 wmtm.n our ,. no. mornesM 1 otoroosnon This iUarcanty kited M.1.111. ' /G fir'. 4,4 of mvichs, A 0, "I4 7& by: ROGER L. JONES and MILDRED E. JONES -, his bereinafiei called the snow. to INC.. , Jp ; 010EECNOSEE TRAILER & FISHI1io' RESORT, waR Os truamneN lr.et.ff 1 corporation noting under the lawn of the Stat. of Florida alerts w hereinafter .oiled the grmnte.i i.d.d..t w..oren sb.�r, .,t . _ ttif . ee ere t:w a a.� rs„r""* r S....... w ..o. .t mr+.r! .. I ,., t..n. ,rot errn.nte.i►a.. Whir I • owl the sans of 1.0.00e ulG, alterre. it �U{ corukith: 7fw1 the aroma: fir and ry as dmsnea of bendy tte•nt d valuable ,p„tdrrattonr. receipt whereof t• hoary �y Waal* b. Okeechobee 1 • ! Wm. nearer. t;ons.p earl confirms to11a the gran • County. Florida. aar Lora 1, 2, 3, 6e and 7; LESS the esstK 9feetVISI08. of Lots 3and 6, Block A. CENTRAL according to plat of Okeeccbbobee Plat County, Florida. page 39, pub ib!i 212 riu541 end easements of record. SUBJECT Co rests ictioaa, reservations _ . • .:ii Together a to all the tenements. hnedua+e.nte and aoptietorrosser lhn.te t.le.tgtng a• lit a7- alt. w4w'rminIss. To But and b lipid, th...me a fe. rumpto tomer. Rod doe granter hmoy t° ..«a wlh e.14 9+snM* the the granter to l...f•lly � •�° , th. In fee simple; that 1he.srantor hes good right and lawful wthorey to sell and convey rumor hereby folly WW,) d the trio le .aid land ea will defend 14 sow w ` l all'persons t.henuoen.l and tlwl sstd had is fart of all enewmbreinso. to December St. to 77. ' ,.. • - • j. • k t t . , {' •', FILED FOR RECORD • \ ECHFF' COUNTY. F ! t. ^ X � n 4- t; a 116 I 6.6 19T8}AR t6 Al lf:lT s; 3n Witness Wtihertof, .th. add it.,tler hae lurnrulsa ad CLERK Cl u CIRCUIT ay owl year •� (teat .beer wtusn• reeled and dawned' t .► y rencen Mildred E. one r � x etltTlyx tw .• sw dey. >>� t.e. it-Ailt OF FLP1l1DA. cot:NTY °P OKEECHOBEE 1 t[111211 etfem duty ,.hoed Is tie Suer dae+aid mad in de CN.ty dna.ld to Mks ede..ledpm.at' 9v3SI 7 •PPO..d ROGER L. JONES and MILDRED E. JONES. his %1ife.n each „k,m..leaetd m me 1ao.n m be Me Pens a detenbed 1. mad mho ncemted !h (.1'1 i.t Wore me atm t.hey..m. 04 tie mt.e. •' \�•;•• .fataaid this /� Sae a( \55[TNFSraril s.d .d official erg is tb. C;n ee'.� March. A. D. to 78. •'' ° r~ J ;.t 711 lorunrnt mod by: Adlrcsr " T207 W. 2a Stteetl a.>e• �q 1 Okeechobee. Florida 33472 11:t 214 M'= 541 ' Heuer h!@. state a Nome et tlso G •. • tar t..®4e• 0 0F. S. tut XIMEXSD a venuXBD • . t 27 2. 21 AC 1 ;1 I; ;I L. sl 1. L A 1 12 11 12 2 1 • 41 „ 2 1 11 12 EET N. E. 4 TN STREET EXAM 9 10 11 12 N. E. 3 PO STREET • 6 5 4 3 2 1 • 42 7 6 9 10 11 12 N. E.2 NO STREET 5 5 1 3 7 B 9 2 10 11 12 P 5. E. PARK STREET le 171 2 • 170 -5 51 5-6 MIN 6 5 4 3 2 - ^ -�20 B 9 f0 11 12 fi 5 1 3 2 9 10 II 12 7 B 10 11 12 • E.4 TH STREET 7 6 9 II 112 E 3 PO STREET z • •11. 62 AC .17 10 • 7 8 9 10 II 12 10 9• 111 66 AC CALL • 6 5 4 7 6 9 10 11 12 STATE ROA0 70 3 2 1+ • 10 11 t 5. E.3 R0 STREET 5. E.4 TH STREET S. E 2 ND STREET 210 -1 171 -12 • p 2 252 A 5 6 7 S. E. 5 TH STREET 6 5 4 3 2 6 5 4 3 2 221 „ 7 6 9 G 1• 3 • 8 9 ID 1f l2 5. E. 6 TH STREET 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 S. E. 4 fN AVENUE .7 .1 1 ME 7 6 5 1;113 2 IUUi2b2223b4 S. E. 5 TH STREET 6 5 4 3 2 6 5 4 3 2 221 „ 7 6 9 G 1• 3 • 8 9 ID 1f l2 5. E. 6 TH STREET 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 .7 .1 1 4 4 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 6 8 10 If 12 • • • e • • (511 35 AC (491 .54 AC S. E. 7 TH STREET 12 11 f0 9 13 11 15 16 E 2 NO STREET mom 48 02x20 -00201 102520 -00211 . 1 252 lea 2 66 AC 1.16 AC 27) (261 (2611 25 25A 24 MINIS Comm 23 20 • 19 17 5 1 3 2 7.1 2 12 • 10 IP 5 4 3 2 • 18 22 2 AC IIIHiHHIIlflhiiII1 !1311 5.32 AC 1CALC.1 alga S E 3RO Er I6 - 5 2. 6 .t* Maw 9 S. E. 8 TH STREET • 2 1 IA as s / 11 5. E 8,1.CDURr 88 W 91 92 • 93 94 • S. E.9 TH STREET 78 . 79 70 n A, 71 BD 81 BA 65 . 72 7. 71 76 77 t 5. E 9 TH COURT 61 9 62 53 04 05 08 W 1 0 7 K. 51 56 57 50 58 I. 6 2 F SO 11 6 11 5 • 1 1"..3.0o 3. E. 2 ND STREET 50 50 25 25 50 91 4 3 x 2 Xi '2137350020025100030 3213 7 Y2137350020025100040 3213)3 50 020 05100 010 11 254 9 I21323<,00mp251W1p0 10" 11 137300261010 2 50 ° L0T *6 0. 278 AC (PLAT) 3223730010000000060 121 18 ° 121. 14 L0k 1 0.279 AC (PLATT 322173500100000000u1 121 19 LOT ,5 0.279 AC [PLAT] 750011000000050 121. 22 ° LCD 2 1n 0. 279 AC [ PLATJ 32237350010000000020 171 74 LOk 4 0.279 AC (PLAT) 322.173511.000000010 o m ° LOT 3 `7-0. 273 PLATJ 32237350010000000030 50 11 10 075011001025140 50 25 25 50 50 25 25 50 2/19350■30000000010 114 50 45 44. 9 U1 �190606L1010101B0 .i34 4 15 16` 17 11 18 3223/3ffi±000Wm111 L2936013000000010 25 25 50 50 25 25 50 LC1 3223715003000011001 15 2 0 21 9m36ggt!mm10zoq 3 2 4 50 25 25 50 50 45 45. 7 to AC C n LLJ LLJ CD L.,_i UJ 60 60 F.3,x'aLm11242 G 321373�15203010 J ( 2X1 22717250A00000270000 22237350400000260000 22237350400000264000 ( )2G1 (2&,41 /22373�03010�pFi0000 ARTICLE III. DISTRICTS AND DISTRICT REGULATIONS Page 1 of 1 Sec. 90 -162. Permitted uses. The following principal uses and structures in the RMH district are permitted: (1) Mobile home subdivision, with one mobile home per lot. (2) Mobile home park, with one mobile home per lot. (3) Hurricane shelter. (4) Public and private schools. (5) House of worship, on a lot of at least five acres. (6) Open space. (7) Public facility or use. (LDR 1998, § 341) Sec. 90 -163. Special exception uses. The following uses and structures are permitted in the RMH district after issuance of a special exception use petition and may have additional conditions imposed at the time of approval: (1) Adult family care homes or assisted living facilities as provided by law. (2) Day care center. (3) House of worship on a lot less than five acres. (4) Recreation vehicle park for transient recreation use only. (5) Community center. (6) Indoor recreation. (7) Outdoor recreation. (8) Golf course. (9) Public utility. (LDR 1998, § 342; Ord. No. 781, § 3, 10 -2 -2001; Ord. No. 866, § 1, 8 -17 -2004) http://library1.municode.com/default/DocView/11366/1/135/138 2/12/2008 The Okeechobee News P.O. Box 639, Okeechobee, Florida 34973 (863) 763 -3134 Published Daily STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Judy Kasten, who on oath says she is Publisher of the Okeechobee News, a DAILY Newspaper published at Okeechobee, in Okeechobee County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertise- ment, being a in the matter of C t-rt 4; ll Yi in the 19th Judicial District of the Circuit Court of Okeechobee County, Florida, was published in said newspaper in the issues of y� l ii/ocz Affiant further says that the said Okeechobee News is a newspaper published at Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been published continuously in said Okeechobee County, Florida each week and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. J Swom 4 indissuubs�cr1ribed before me this day of .1.3 A.D. 20 a NOTICE OF CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED SPECIAL EXCEPTION NOTICE: A PUBLIC HEARING will be held before the City of Okeechobee Planning Boa(dfBoard of Adjustment and Appeals on Thursday, April 17, 2008 at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. The meeting will be held at City Hag, 55 BE 3rd Avenue, in the Councir hambers, Room 200, Okeechobee, Honda To consider Special Exception Petition No. 08- 006 -SE, submitted by property own- ers Isaac and Cinderella Kelbie, allowing a recreation vehicles park, for transient recreation use oMy, within a Residential .Mobile Home District (Ref. Code Book Section 90- 163(4)). Property is located at 1307 South Parrott Avenue. Legal description: All that part of Me South one -half of the Southwest one - quarter of the Southwest one - quarter of Section 22, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, tying Wept of Taylor Creek, Okeechobee County, Florida. Less and except the North 113 feet thereof. Subject to restrictions, reservations and easements of record and further subject to right- of -way for Taylor Creek improvement as shown in Plat Book 2, Page 83, Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida, and subject to taxes for the year 1989 and subsequent years. Together with a non - exclusive easement 31.00 feet in width, for the purposes of ingress and egress tying within Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida, and lying 15.5 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Commencing at a point 243.00 feet North of the Southeast comer of said Section 21 and bear West along the North boundary of Block 50, First Addition to South Okeechobee, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 17, Public Records 01 Okeechobee County, Honda, a distance of 361.00 feet, more or less, to the East boundary of Parrott Avenue. Thence Northerly along the East boundary of Parrott Avenue, a distance of 175.50 feet to the Point of Beginning of said centerline; Thence East - erty along a line parallel to the aforesaid North boundary of Block 50 to the inter- section with the East line of said Section 21 and.end of said centerline, a distance of 361.00 feet, more or less. A copy of the entire application(s) and agenda are available in the General Services Office, Rm 101 at C'ity‘Hall or by caging Betty Clement at (863) 763 -3372 x 218. Please be advised that the Board of Adjustment and Appeals will serve as the de- cision making body (quasi - judicial), on behalf of the Cay, to approve or deny Spe- cial Exception Petitions. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that if any person deskes to appeal any decision made by the Board of Adjusbnents and Appeals with respect to any mat- ter considered at this meeting, or hearing will need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony-and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. General Services media is for the sole purpose of backup for official records of the department. In accordance with the Americans with DisabOi0es Act (ADA) and Honda Statute 286.26, persons with disabilities needing special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should.contact Betty Clement, no later than two (2) working bays prior to the proceeding at 863- 763 -3372 x 218; if you are hearing or voice irk paired, calTDD 1.800- 222 -3448 (voice) or 1-888-447-5620 (TTY). BY: Brian Whitehall, Zoning Administrator Petition No. 08-005 -SE 267964 ON 4/2,11/08 e„; Janette Thibouit Commission # DD505311 Or Expires January 10, 2010 C� Bonded Troy Fan Insurance. Inc 800-385-7019 blic, State of Florida at Large 1, Master Land Development Application and Checklist: Rezone — Special Exception — Variance (Rev. 12/07) City of Okeechobee General Services Department 55 S.E. 3"3 Avenue, Room 101 . Okeeobee, Florida 39974-2903 ch Phone: (863) 763-3372, ext. 218 Fax: (863) 763-1686 Date: 5/4'/o s, Petition No. Fee Paid:63,750 00 Jurisdiction: A2/9 1 st Hearing: zio -# 2nd Hearing: 1174_ Publication Dkes: Notices Mailed: . (below for office use only) 7 .g0-7.- ;fr.- g — '-.77:taditstiet4-4-... 7 0 ' WaND '--F, ---ii-Ilmirq — :_,-,-,- ;-,27b-t-r•-----r--- %, , 1 Name of property owner(s): ....r.s-igiic.. i<1.:.:1.40/E 2 Owner mailing address: i s 0 .:7 g yozr . e i a 7-7. .9 a ad ir.-- 4-: C 6de 0 T i .are:.• 3 Name of applicant(s) if other than owner .V___.6r 4 Applicant mailing address: , ...--,.. 5 Name of contact person (state relationship): 6 Contact person daytime phone(s): 4 I eL •''' li; . i.4441&":1-a e _ ,. -3.41.F.M0.?: i Viiie: Li ••1. - . ''1.1...."21.U52.Ti.-.47-• ' (AVIIIM5.-''''' '• (5- ' Z4•11f .- ..- . .---- T...iir? 4. '-‘ '53-1P.14.- 'Pt tft a ite-C- 5. ''At'erlif#4 g FW"-Tfa , , Pa;';t g ;4•i-31,..41:5LYttfdioatitiallgbr-"%ii ,ST ..ft.l. I. M!... '''. 1-4 4sY r ■ ; • ..i. - ..; 4-- t .. TrZ....1. , ,lai aia4..;---g Rtairrikgr. 1 WA rk al ''-ii • . 4 -31:34-e,- Ir44,4,i,-.‘7.fti giv:_a;:m Property address/directions to property: / 3 c 7 £. r/9/neee 77- / c I pt 4-::- Describe current use of property: • mil 8 / A.,e Min a ititAw R il • p ,-____-----z.—_-==.---.---- . Describe improvements on property (number/type buildings, dwelling units , occupied or vacant, etc. ) M v i 4, ti. lit, firt.tr 4 Prs ,9 / ;0 11 Approx acreage Is property irl a planed subdivision? (_).) Yes ) No Is there a use on he property ft, yes, describe the use and violation: that is or was in violation of a city or county ordinance? (K)N ) Yes . =-- ---.4.. -- -,=--Y.----,...-----. 12 Have there been any land development applications submitted in the past year that involve any part of the property? CK)No ( )Yes If yes, provide date, name of applicant, and brief description of the 1- - --- F. --- - - --L----- -....,„__ .... _. — nature of the application: 13 Is a pending sale ofthe property subject to this application being granted? ( ) Yes (X) No ,E 14 Do you own any other lands adjacent current and intended uses: to the subject property? ()S) No ( ) Yes If yes, describe the ,z.:-,--,-.--,--P..---- -,-s.--- - :._ 15 Describe uses on adjoining property to the: North: VAC.; // Air I-• A -,(44:' South: i I 4 117(17— A "7 iti ii- , East: rA 0 L4 West A 17 AA> it' 00400 Gi7/. i /ei. if , _ • • ' „ .., -:-: ---2:7, —.. 16 Existing zoning: R m ii Future Land Use classification ipi 17 Request is for ( ) Rezone (X) Special Exception ( ) Variance 18 Parcel Identification Number_ 3, 3 7-- 3 c --- c3 . 'i3 e, - a ct 0 Master Land Development Application and Checklist: Rezone - Special Exception - Variance (Rev. 12/07) _ :i.,c1�' '.:xY t- — - .n.:J'�'G- [..'= .1•i'.� ::i. :JS• �Ca,' �- Y4: - .vf, ,.�—__ �:.�= t'.$3.i� lit'- ___ _ _ — _ _ __ = skS=. .< � - = Pr -' 'F - - � ~�.iTr�� '- _^ -i-`'L ..� �' T =1';-'4--"-=:':411.;47.-- �- i-�eslvma?..T,- '�". -..: x�� ,.rt?�P<,..n9.— .•c.:::is. _..a�.��:.,FF'Rc}3 !�Gs�� 5"`sctr ^}O _ — -•!ti_ .. �_ :_ s.�4 _uH.Yi �� , h��c 19 ..._.._ -�� Applicant's statement of interest in property — 3'�.l'` _ .,,, 0 u J U j 20 Last recorded warranty deed. 1/ .` 6.,__ „_:'- rj • J - 21 Notarized letter of.consent from property owner (if applicant is different from property owner) iv "�V, '. - ',:. 4::::-- "", Property survey (onc copy 1 I" x 17” and two copies 24" x 36 ") containing. r--- '. ,= '� s - - = z i-2•'1j:- .- a. certified boundary survey, date of survey, surveyor's name, address and phone number r/ .22 b. Legal description _ i.,,n _,, -` ,,;;; - ; . , E- i c. Computation of total acreage to nearest tenth of an acre 4/ �`�' e 23 List of surrounding property owners with addresses and location sketch of the subject property: See the %. ; ; °i`` 1 -. r Information Request Form from the Okeechobee Property Appraisers Office (attached) .44.— t 24 Affidavit attesting to completeness and correctness ofthe Iist (attached) ff= = _� ,. = ice._. •vycs_r.. = Y':tt -r=t- 25 Nonrefundable application fee: Rezone :$500; Special Exception :$250; Variance :S250; all plus $30 /acre: : j e 4 j - ''' • 1 f �;,.... .-. r_ s . V3� µ • . -��-... _ � :rY _•V - i A - _•- t.}.:; h} g I- mo. p s_� � :n gc wc '' Y. .. f c1g4, - w4- s •g'r a.. hr_am ' „a_ � �: �' M � i:fa: - - a - ; _,-- -N-O gi —K.g il - •eWr CeC...La,C C� 4 a: z 'c E a' r•. m-4 , t -;r : 26 Eg. -- .i 7,. -.% -�y ...� ,94.^ .l.- rs�.= ELa ..- .,-...�-_ I hereby certify that the information in this application is correct. The information included in this application is for use by the City of Okeechobee in processing my request. False or misleading information may be punishable by a fine of up to 5500.00 and imprisonment of up to 30 days and may resulting the summary denial of this application. . ,•-. t =...__ v. — Ili X L`Gu 3°/ J M- Lg14 2- -36 - -t)g Signature Printed Name Date For questions relating to this application packet, call the General Services Dept. at (863) 763 -3372, ext. 218 Special Exception- Specific Application and Checklist (Rev.12/07) STANDARDS FOR GRANTING A SPECIAL EXCEPTION (Sec. 70- 373(b), in the Land Development Regulations) Applicants are required by Sec_ 70- 373(b) to address the following issues in his/her presentation before the Board of Adjustment Staff strongly recommends that the Applicant include, in his/her application, materials that address each of these issues in order to allow Staff and the Board of Adjustment sufficient time to adequately consider the Applicant's request. Demonstrate that the proposed location and site are appropriate for the use_ Demonstrate how the site and proposed buildings have been designed so they are compatible with the adjacent uses and the neighborhood, or explain why no specific design efforts are needed_ 3. Demonstrate any landscaping techniques to visually screen the use from adjacent uses; or explain why no visual screening is necessary_ Demonstrate what is proposed to reduce the impact of any potential hazards, problems or public nuisance generated by the use; or explain how the nature of the use creates no such potential problems. 5. Demonstrate how the utilities and other service requirements of the use can be met_ 6. Demonstrate how the impact of traffic generated will be handled, off site and on site. For questions relating to this application packet, call the General Services Dept. at (863) - 763 -3372, Ext_ 218 Page 1 of 2 : -cs _ -,,_ -a - -' - _ ., _ « 3` ft . a h y..._ r, f x• • 'mot aL. A ` -- —I- .- _. __} �.! t. :i_ '' ...=, irr, S .. t f_ _......-?,..-.,-74,m Describe the Special Exception sought yLd-. a .v r:,. "s j/ 'Meal 4 /I� 1170 )a9, '/ ( _ B Are there similar uses in the. area? NoX ( ) Yes If yes, briefly describe them: . . C- If a business, briefly describe the nature of the business, number of employees, hours of operation, and any. . activities to be conducted outside of a building. . . - - -• _ . D -- Attach a Traffic Impact Study prepared by a professional transportation planner or transportation engineer, if the Special Exception sought will generate 1.00 or more-peak hour vehicle trip ends using the trip generation factors for the most similar use as contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers most recent edition - of Trip Generation. = . /7/ A E - Attacliment addressing the standards and required findings for a special exception as described below: . STANDARDS FOR GRANTING A SPECIAL EXCEPTION (Sec. 70- 373(b), in the Land Development Regulations) Applicants are required by Sec_ 70- 373(b) to address the following issues in his/her presentation before the Board of Adjustment Staff strongly recommends that the Applicant include, in his/her application, materials that address each of these issues in order to allow Staff and the Board of Adjustment sufficient time to adequately consider the Applicant's request. Demonstrate that the proposed location and site are appropriate for the use_ Demonstrate how the site and proposed buildings have been designed so they are compatible with the adjacent uses and the neighborhood, or explain why no specific design efforts are needed_ 3. Demonstrate any landscaping techniques to visually screen the use from adjacent uses; or explain why no visual screening is necessary_ Demonstrate what is proposed to reduce the impact of any potential hazards, problems or public nuisance generated by the use; or explain how the nature of the use creates no such potential problems. 5. Demonstrate how the utilities and other service requirements of the use can be met_ 6. Demonstrate how the impact of traffic generated will be handled, off site and on site. For questions relating to this application packet, call the General Services Dept. at (863) - 763 -3372, Ext_ 218 Page 1 of 2 FROM :Keibie FAX NO. :9545770030 Feb. 19 2008 11:17AM P9 'Special ExcepdorkSpecific Application and Checklist FINDINGS REQUIRED FOR GRANTING. A SPECIAL EXCEPTION (Seta. 70-373(o) , In the L,erid Development Regulations) (Rev. 12/01) It Is the Applicant's responsibility is convince the Board of Aclluslment that approval of the proposed special exception Is justified. Specifically, the Applicant should provide In hlMier application and Presentation sufficient explanation and documentallon to convince the Board of At4ustment to find that 1. The use is net =Rory to the C omprehersive Plan requires. No --,� c O t. 04 if - 90- /6,30 2. Theme is spec fly authorized as a special exception use itt the'zoning distinct. CS - R,e _ Sec °/0 -i6 3 (f) 3. 'The WO Val not have adverse effect on the public interest. s p ee n u S e_ S I' n c e_ a ar roY . 3.01r5 rS 4. Theme is nppm ante fcr tile proposed location, isx•aasOnioy cumpatfbla with adjacent >t>ses said is not dep l tou g ndusepanierns :Th u'S� 1CS ) .6_en rl �-�eGl af. . 3o NIA 5. The tie will not adversely affect property values or livb g c iditians, nor be a deterresito tie develoment of adjacentpropexty. - s 61,03(-) s e . n. i r� , C a y-e1 s e bat Noon 1,� 6. The use may be required to be screened from - t. • ... i g use to iec Ince the impact of tiny nui ssace air lard to adjacent meg.4( -e_ak screen , acid set -) -14i 'T_ The use will not create a density pattern that will overburden public facilities such es schools, streets, and utility services. Ko - pLL 4eeu Hs 8. The use will net create trstiffec congestion. flooding or drainage problems. or otherwise affect public safety_ NO — The e City start will. in the Staff Report, address the request and evaluate it and the Applicant's submission in {i jlzl of the above standards and required findings and oiler a recommendation for approval or denial. NOTE: NOTE: AN APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL EXCBPTII01 EXPIRES IF A BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION HAS NOT BEEN SUBiVII'i 't 31.11 WITHIN TWO YEARS OF TEE APPROVAL [Sec- 70- 346(4 }J For questions relating to this application packet, call the General Services Dept_ at (863) -763- 3372, Ext. 218 Page 2of2 wC-c,c„ WARRANTY DEED iy1fP.lft� 60 This Indenture made this / {t day of May, 1990, BETWEEN 6115' JAMES W. WALSH and ESTELLA M. WALSH, his wife of 827 San Marcos Blvd., Naples, FL 33947 PRANTOR*, d ISAAC KELBIE and CINDERELLA KELBIE, his wife of 1307 South Parrott Avenue, Okeechobee, Florida 34974 GRANTEE *, 13.1,,1:11' 1' 1 "'9 • C) • 11 CO • C ns :71 W ITN E S S E T H, That said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND 00 /100'S (310.00) Dollars and other good and valuable considerations to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the grantee and grantee's heirs forever the following described land located in the County of Okeechobee, State of Florida, to -wit: SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED. and said grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. *Singular and plural are interchangeable as c- ntext requires1 ++ j IN WITN ti WHE a F or has hereunto set ant s hand and seal yea trst abq _ 1 �t 1 ✓! WITNESS COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE SPATE OF FLORIDA WALSH STELLA M. WALSH I. THEREBY CERTIFY that on this day of May. 11990, before me, an officer duly qualified to take acknowledgments, personally appeared JAMES W. WALSH and ESTELLA. M. WALSH, his wife to me known to be the person(s) described in and who executed the t'• .ing .` t acknowiedged be : me that they executed the same. Prepared .Ry and Return ' JOHN D. CAMELS, JR„ ESQUIRE Post Office Best 968 Okeechobee, Florida 34973 (813)'763 -3131 Pik Number: 90 -3438 STATE r cn DOMI IFEV•f,:\ i4 ^YI '9" • c� � t{tt9t R) i r.l JOliN 0, CASSELS, JR, MY CCMMf,9SJJN EXPIRES June 11, 1990 .,,« „ SONDFO YHRU ro0'.Jl PVLLIe uNaallwlI'tc %$ (J!7'iy ■ n i"' ,1. 7. t,] r: ..� n, _ t . list: i V � °'_"_'J r'" i - Si.:ts': • 999.0,! • • j oa% 313 PACE 81.7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that part of the S 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 22, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, lying West of TAYLOR CREEK, Okeechobee County, Florida. LESS AND EXCEPT the North 113 feet thereof. SUBJECT TO restrictions, reservations and easements of record and further subject to right of way for Taylor Creek improvement as shown in Plat Book 2, Page 83, Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida, and subject to taxes for the year 1989 and subsequent years. TOGETHER WITH a non - exclusive easement 31.00 feet in width, for the purposes of ingress and egress lying within Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida, and lying 15.5 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Commencing at a point 243.00 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Section 21 and bear West along the North boundary of Block 50, First Addition to South Okeechobee, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 17, Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida, a distance of 361.00 feet, more or less, to the East boundary of Parrott Avenue. Thencee northerly along the East boundary of Parrott Avenue, a distance of 175.50 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of said centerline; Thence easterly along a line parallel to the aforesaid North boundary of Block 50 to the intersection with the East line of said Section 21 and end of said centerline, a distance of 361.00 feet, more or less. FROM : Ke . n i e OESCR1PTION F Far: NO. : 9 ' � y :0a0 0 Feb. 19 2000 1 1 : 34.041 P4 Ail that part or the South 1/2 of ine Southwee t 1/4 of the Sotrthmeat 1/4 of Section 22. Township 37 South, Pango 3S East, lying Nest of Taylor Crook, Okeechobee County, Florida. LESS AND EXCEPr the North 113 root thereat. TOGETHER WITH a non - exclusive easement 31. 00 feet in width for the pur- Pampe 3t3 Ingress Okeechobee Florida ®and °lying I5 reet3ronoeach aide or the fottoaing described a rtter(ine: Commencing eta point 243.00 feet North or the Southeast corner of sold Section 21 one bear Not along the North boundary elf Block SO. First Ad- dition to South Okeechobee, according to the plat thereof recorded in Piet Book 1, Page 17. Public Records of Okeechobee County, F'lartde. a distance of 361.00 feet. more or less. to the East boundary of Parrott Avenue; Thence northerly along the East boundary of Parrett Avenue, a distance of 17 c0 feet to the POINT OF BCGiNN(NG of ; ;std centerIlne; Thence ;tarty along a i/he parallel to the aforesaid North boundary of Block o the intersection with the East line of sold Section 21 and end of . - rd center! ine, a distance of 361 CO root. ;sore or less. CFRT1F1CATE OF SURVEY 1 HEREBY CERT iFY THAT rHE FLAT T OF SUR vEY SHOWN HEPE0 4 WAS PREPARED FROM A SURVEY PEAFORKEO UNDER NY DIRECTION ANO SUPERV t S/C0 IN ACCORDANCE To THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 21 HH-+5. PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.024 FLORIDA STATUTE'S. AND IS TRUE AND COMEDY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOVLEDOE A/O 8ELlEF, worm' sum e^? Prot L ELAN11DYALS Ft i!• S 20S-A-- Sec. 21 anti 22. Tipp 37 S. , p��. �ctrrrchobee Count ISAAC and CINDERELLA KELBIE • - 100' S. 0, NW a.rECLWwW M Il ELL S1 hgcrt 27, 1990 C ZCO 21 9ei7 O ME 257 -SA 304 S K Srd AVENUE OK. EECHOIEE. FL OR 1 DA army KEk TY 4 FAX ;40. :9!-5,:".7.-,'7(..1030 Fed. J.9 ?0 i : 3:2W-111 LEGE {F) - i MEASUREMENT P0F - 5ld• i?E'BAA FOUNW RBS ° FiEp8A}�i3p WI CAP ou pS�E�]T hg r: 1p. CaEiEEMt1FiUMENT FOUND NOTES : Bearings shown hereon are based upon the STANDARD PANE RECTANGULAR COORDINATE SYSTEM for the EAST ZONE of FLORIDA. FLOOD ZONE - C" trio. r) City Vette) CERTIFIED TO ISAAC End CINDERELLA KELBIF' ATTORNEY'S Tl rLE fNSUrA..CE FUND. INC. BARNET T BANK OF LAKE OKE. EClHOB E DESCfn I pr I ON 4ii that part of the South sit or the Siruthkest f/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22. Township 37 South, parge 15 East. iytng west or raysnr Creek. Okeechobee County, P1arida. LESS ANC EXCEPT the North 113 feet them,* TOGETHER WITH. a non-exclusive easement 33, gd root In limier for the our- coact- cr Ingress and agrees. tying >.i tale! Section 21. Township 37 .South. Flange .95 East. Okeechobee County. Florida one lYthE 15.5 reef ern each Side of the fottowing diiscrrb*d cehterilha Caooeneinp at a point 243. 00 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Section 2i and bear Nest aidny1 the North ioundary of Block 50. Fret Ad- dition to South Okeechobee, according to the plat thereof recorded In Plat Book 1. Page t7, Public Records or Okeechobee County, Florida, distance or 361.00 feet, *ore or leesY, to the East boundary or Parrott Avenue; rt.9nce northerly etorp the East boundary or Parrott Avenue, a distance et 3. 33 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING or said centerline: Thence =terry along is Dint parallel to ens aforesaid North boundary of RIock o trte intersection kith the. East line of said Section 21 end I SCALE 1' • 100' I' Ingress end Egress Dot. 21 28 N89. 21'15'E 684. 3.416.1 400- I I it I I \ \ \ (8a Per Plat 01 PIvarbane 'gab l la Haat 6 R 5. Park) RIVERBEND MOBIL 27 ADULT o\ HOME & R. V. PARK a\ r\ COMMUNITY N89422' 25'E 1043. 75'(F) O / Q C1 s \ / / \ \ 7 476. 61' i I \ / / 1 1 \ 7 �7 \ \ - --- \ Y Y TAYLOR CREEK AS PER NORTH SHORE LEVF AND TAYLOR CREEK IMPROVEMENT (Recorded In Plat Book 2. Page 83, Okeechobee COUnty. Public Records) 1 \ \\ �3• x 3• CMF \ I \ \ \ i \\ \ \ � \ \ \ \ \ tab LEGE (F) - r •:0 MEASUREMENT RBF - 5 /d' REBAR FOUND FIBS- R6q8a4(t9 1M //p CAP SET CMF - tONCREIEEMONONr FOUND NOTES COOROINATEn 5YSTEMr Tor the EASTdZONEn 0fh 510810AARO PLANE RECTANGULAR FLOOD ZONE - •c• (Within City 11.115) CERTIFIED TO (5,:AC and CINDERELLA KELBIE ATTORNEY'S TITLE INSURANCE FUND. INC. BARNETT BANK OF LAKE OKEECHOBEE DESCRIPTION All that part of the South 1/2 Of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22. Township 37 South. Range 35 East, lying West of Taylor Creek, Okeechobee County, 5101(08. LESS ANO EXCEPT the North 113 feet thereof TOGETHER WITH a non - exclusive easement 31.00 feet In wldtn for the 9101' - ',ngress and Egress. lying wit,4ln Sectlun 01. Townsn(0 37 South. Range 35 East. Okeechobee County. Florida and lying 05. 5 feet on each side of the followIng described centerline: Commencing at a point 243.00 feet Nortn of the Southeast corner of said Section 21 and beer Nest along the North boundary of Block 50, First Ad- dition to South Okeechobee, according to the plat thereof recorded In Piet Book 1. Page 17, Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida. s dlatanCe or 361. 00 feet. more or less, to the East boundary of Parrott Avenue; Thence northerly along the East boundary of Parrott Avenue. a distance Of 17 S0 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of said centeriine; Thence :tarty along a line parallel to the aforesaid North boundary of Block 'o the Intersection with the East (Inc or said Section 21 and end of ':d centerline, 8 distance of 361.00 feet, more or leas. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PLAT OF SURVEY SHORN HEREON WAS PREPARED FROM A SURVEY PERFORMED UNDER MY OIRECTION AND SUPERVISIONNN IN ACCORDANCE TO THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 21 HM -6, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027. FLORIDA STATUTES. AND (5 TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF LfLANO OYALS 5 2094 .:.. Sec. 21 and 22, Two 37 S.. Age. 35 E., Okeechobee County ISAAC and CINDERELLA KELBIE 100 aw 5. 0. HENN000 KE1 ... ''tJrr 14/7 CLIEQ.Dmm J 1L EL (L4Q100 Z0300011n 0 CIE 304 5. N. 3rd AVENUE OKEECHOBEE. FLORIDA April 27 1990 a.... 2357-SA The Okeechobee News P.O. Box 639, Okeechobee, Florida 34973 (863) 763 -3134 Published Daily STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Judy Kasten, who on oath says she is publisher of the Okeechobee News, a DAILY Newspaper published at Okeechobee, in Okeechobee County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertise- ment, being a - LLA) t ( t<iC-hc l.. in the matter of in the 19th Judicial District of the Circuit Court of Okeechobee County, Florida, was published in said newspaper in the issues of Affiant further says that the said Okeechobee News is a newspaper published at Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been published continuously in said Okeechobee County, Florida each week and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Sworn to Ind,' ubscrib4d',efore me this day of A.D. 20 6-3 NOTICE OF CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION AMENDMENTS NOTICE: The City of Okeechobee Planning Board/Board of Adjustment and Appeals will meet as the Land Planning Agency on Thursday, April 17, 2008 at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible, to consider any proposed amendments, sub- mitted by City Staff or citizens, to the Comprehensive Plan, which include the Land Development Regulations (LDR's). The meeting will be held at City Hall, 55 Southeast 3rd Avenue, in the Council Chambers, Room 200, Okeechobee, Ron- da. A copy of the agenda are available in the General Services Office, Rm 101 at City Hall or by calling Betty Clement at (863) 763 -3372 x 218 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that if any person desires to appeal any decision made by the Planning Board with respect to any mater considered at this meeting, or hearing wit need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the ap- peal is to be based. General Services media are used for the sole purpose of back -up for the department. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Honda Statute 286.26, persons with disabilities needing special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact Betty Clement, no later than two (2) working days prior to the proceeding at 863-763-3372 x 218; if you are hearing or voice im- paired, call TOD 1 -800- 222 -3448 (voice) or 1- 888 -447 -5620 (TTY). BY: Brian Whitehall, Zoning Administrator 267975 ON 4/2,11/08 Nota blic, State of Florida at Large Janetta Thiboult Commission # DD505311 Expires January 10, 2010 Ve Bonded Troy Fain Insurance. Inc 800. 385.7019 Public School Facilities Element Goal, Objectives and Policies City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan GOAL: To provide a public school system that offers a high quality educational environment, provides accessibility for all of its students, and ensures adequate school capacity to accommodate enrollment demand within a financially feasible School District Capital Plan. [9J- 5.025(3)(a)] Objective 1: Provide adequate school facilities in Okeechobee County Schools by adopting a concurrency management system to achieve and maintain the adopted level of service for the short and long term planning periods. [9J.- 5.025(3)(b)(1)] Policy 1.1: The City hereby adopts the following Level of Service standards for existing and new schools: [9J -5.025 (3)(c)(7)] Type of School Level of Service Existing School Permanent FISH Capacity Considering Utilization Rate (100 %) New Elementary 750 New Middle 1,000 New K -8 1,200 New High School 1,500 Source: Okeechobee County Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning. Policy 1.2: The City hereby adopts a district -wide School Concurrency Service Area (SCSA). Policy 1.3: By school year 2011 -12, school concurrency will be applied on a less - than district -wide basis, using school attendance zones as the SCSAs. [9J- 5.025(3)(c)(1)] Policy 1.4: The City, the County, and the School District shall utilize the following procedures for modifying SCSAs: [9J- 5.025(3)(c)(1)] a. Modification shall be made at the same time as the establishment of modified attendance zones with data and analysis to support the change. Any proposed change to the SCSAs shall require coordination with the City and Okeechobee County, and demonstration by the School District that the change complies with City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan Public School Facilities Element Goal, Objectives and Policies Draft - March 2007 — Revised May 2007 the public school LOS standard and that utilization of school capacity is maximized to the greatest extent possible. b. All parties subject to school concurrency will review the proposed modification and send their comments to the School District within 60 days of receipt of the proposed change. c. The modification of the SCSAs shall be effective upon adoption by the School Board. Objective 2: A school concurrency evaluation will be performed by the Okeechobee County School District to review projected residential development in order to accommodate new students at the adopted level of service for adequate school facility capacity. [9J- 5.025(3)(b)(2)] Policy 2.1: The City shall not approve any non - exempt residential development application for preliminary plat, site plan or functional equivalent until the School District School has verified that available capacity exists to serve the development. Policy 2.2: The City shall consider the following residential uses exempt from the requirements of school concurrency: a. b. Single family lots of record, existing at the time the school concurrency implementing ordinance becomes effective. Any new residential development that has a preliminary plat or site plan approval or the functional equivalent for a site specific development order prior to the commencement date of the School Concurrency Program. c. Any amendment to any previously approved residential development that does not increase the number of dwelling units or change the type of dwelling units such as single - family to multi- family. d. Age restricted communities with no permanent residents under the age of 18. Exemption of an age restricted community will be subject to a restrictive covenant limiting the age of permanent residents to 18 years and older. City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan Public School Facilities Element Goal, Objectives and Policies Draft - March 2007 — Revised May 2007 2 Policy 2.3: The City, through its land development regulations, shall establish a school concurrency review process for all residential projects that are not exempt under Policy 2.2. The minimum process requirements are described below: a. A residential development application is submitted to the City, which includes a School Impact Analysis (SIA). b. The City determines application is sufficient for processing and transmits the SIA to the School District for review. c. The School District reviews the application for available capacity and issues a School Capacity Availability Letter (SCAL) to the City: 1. If capacity is available within the SCSA, the School District shall issue a SCAL verifying available capacity. 2. If capacity is not available within in the SCSA, the School District shall issue a SCAL indicating the development is not in compliance with the adopted LOS and may offer the developer a negotiation period to present mitigation options. 3. The City shall not issue approval any preliminary plat, site plan or functional equivalent for a residential development until receiving confirmation of available school capacity in the form of a SCAL from the School District. Policy 2.4: If adequate school capacity is not available to support a proposed residential development, the City, in conjunction with the School District, shall review proportionate share mitigation options which will add the school capacity necessary to satisfy the impacts of the proposed development. [9J -5.025 (3)(c)(9)] a. Acceptable forms of mitigation shall include, but are not limited to: 1. School construction 2. Contribution of land 3. Expansion of existing permanent school facilities subject to the expansion being less than or equal to the student capacity needed for a new school of the same category. 4. Payment for construction and/or land acquisition 5. Cost of financing City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan Public School Facilities Element Goal, Objectives and Policies Draft - March 2007 — Revised May 2007 Policy 2.5: Policy 2.6: Policy 2.7: Objective 3: Policy 3.1: Policy 3.2: Policy 3.3: b. If mitigation is approved, the City and the School District shall enter into a legally binding commitment with the residential developer, and the School District shall issue a SCAL. c. If mitigation is denied, the City shall deny the application based on a deficiency in available school capacity to support the residential development. The City shall, upon acceptance of a mitigation option identified in Policy 2.4, enter into a legally binding commitment with the School District and the developer. [9J -5.025 (3)(c)(9)] The City shall be responsible for notifying the School District when a residential development has received approval of a preliminary plat, site plan or functional equivalent, when the development order for the residential development expires or is revoked, and when school impact fees have been paid. No later than December 31, 2008, the City shall adopt school concurrency provisions into its Land Development Regulations (LDR). Beginning with an effective date in 2008, all new public schools built within the City will be coordinated to be consistent with the City's future land use map designation, will be co- located with other appropriate public facilities when possible, and will have the on -site and off-site infrastructure necessary to support the new school. [9J- 5.025(3)(b)(4), 9J- 5.025(3)(b)(5), 9J- 5.025(3)(b)(6) The City, in conjunction with the School District, shall jointly determine the need for and timing of on -site and off -site improvements necessary to support a new school. [93 -5.025 (3)(c)(5)] The City shall enter into an agreement with the School Board identifying the timing, location, and the party or parties responsible for constructing, operating, and maintaining off -site improvements necessary to support a new school. [9J -5.025 (3)(c)(5)] The City shall encourage the location of schools near residential areas by: [9J -5.025 (3)(c)(4), 9J -5.025 (3)(c)(5), 9J -5.025 (3)(c)(10)] a. Assisting the School District in the identification of funding and/or construction opportunities (including developer participation or City capital budget expenditures) for sidewalks, traffic signalization, access, water, sewer, drainage and other infrastructure improvements. b. Reviewing and providing comments on all new school sites. City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan Public School Facilities Element Goal, Objectives and Policies Draft - March 2007 — Revised May 2007 4 c. Allowing public schools, meeting the minimum land size criteria established by the State, within all residential future land use categories. Policy 3.4: The City, in conjunction with the School District, shall seek opportunities to co- locate public facilities with schools, such as parks, libraries, and community centers, as the need for these facilities is identified. [9J -5.025 (3)(c)(4)] Policy 3.5: Policy 3.6: The City, in conjunction with the School District and Okeechobee County, shall identify issues relating to public school emergency preparedness, such as: [9J -5.025 (3)(c)(9)] a. The determination of evacuation zones, evacuation routes, and shelter locations. b. The design and use of public schools as emergency shelters. c. The designation of sites other than public schools as long -term shelters, to allow schools to resume normal operations following emergency events. The City, the School District and Okeechobee County hereby establish an oversight committee to monitor the Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning (ILA) which includes provisions for school concurrency in Okeechobee County. [9J -5.025 (3)(c)(3)] Objective 4: Beginning with an effective date in 2008, the City's annually updated five -year schedule of capital improvements will include school capacity projects adopted by the School Board necessary to address existing deficiencies and meet future needs. [9J- 5.025(3)(b)(1), 9J- 5.025(3)(b)(3)] Policy 4.1: The City shall, no later than December 1St of each year, incorporate into the Capital Improvements Element a summary of the capital improvements program and estimated revenue sources from the School District's annually adopted Five -Year Capital Plan. [9J -5.025 (3)(c)(2)] Policy 4.2: The City, in conjunction with the School District, shall annually review the Public School Facilities Element and maintain a long -range public school facilities map series, including the planned general location of schools and ancillary facilities for the five -year planning period and the long -range planning period. The map series shall include at a minimum maps showing: [9J -5.025 (3)(c)(3)] City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan Public School Facilities Element Goal, Objectives and Policies Draft - March 2007 — Revised May 2007 5 a. Existing public school facilities by type and location of ancillary plants [93 -5.025 (4)(a)] b. Public school facilities and ancillary plants generally planned for the five -year and long -range planning periods [9J -5.025 (4)(b)] Policy 4.3: The City, in conjunction with the School District, shall coordinate the long -range public school facilities map with the City's comprehensive plan and its future land use map. [9J -5.025 (3)(c)(6)] Policy 4.4: The City shall include schools as a part of the Annual Concurrency Report. City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan Public School Facilities Element Goal, Objectives and Policies Draft - March 2007 — Revised May 2007 APPENDIX A MAP SERIES City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan Public School Facilities Element Goal, Objectives and Policies Draft - March 2007 — Revised May 2007 7 Figure 1 — Existing Elementary School Location and Attendance Boundary Map City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan Public School Facilities Element Goal, Objectives and Policies Draft - March 2007 — Revised May 2007 Existing School Locations and Boundary Map Elementary Schools Public School Facilities Element Data and Analysis Okeechobee County Legend #-"\„r Roads Concurrency Boundary gaP Water Bodies ,t Elementary Schools Kmley -Horn � No �� and Associates, Inc. March 28, 2007 8 Figure 2 — Existing Middle School Location and Attendance Boundary Map City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan Public School Facilities Element Goal, Objectives and Policies Draft - March 2007 — Revised May 2007 Existing School Locations and Boundary Map Middle Schools Public School Facilities Element Data and Analysis Okeechobee County Legend e"\_., Roads Concurrency Boundary Water Bodies j Middle Schools - #Cimley -Horn �.i Mir 1 and Associates, Inc. March 28, 2007 Nip 9 Figure 3 — Existing High School Location and Attendance Boundary Map )BEE 1s7G11 SCH Lake Okeechobee Please LiDtt. the aheaclartrc bwuutanes of the tigh school d. the spend pup schoots taclude tP.x ctdur. County. City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan Public School Facilities Element Goal, Objectives and Policies Draft - March 2007 — Revised May 2007 School Location and Attendance Boundaries High Schools Public School Facilities Element Data and Analysis Okeechobee County �.- n Kimley Hol7i and Associates, Inc. March 28, 2007 10 Figure 4: Future School and Ancillary Facility Location Map Future School Facilities Public School Facilities Element Data and Analysis Okeechobee County City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan Public School Facilities Element Goal, Objectives and Policies Draft - March 2007 — Revised May 2007 Miley-BM and Associates, Inc, March 29, 2007 11 Intergovernmental Coordination Element Goals, Objectives and Policies Goal: Objective 1: Policy 1.1: Policy 1.2: Policy 1.3: Policy 1.4: City of Okeechobee EAR -based Comprehensive Plan To achieve greater governmental efficiency and resolve conflicts by coordinating development activities between the City of Okeechobee and Okeechobee County, and relevant regional, state, and federal entities. The City of Okeechobee shall continue to coordinate its Comprehensive Plan with Okeechobee County, the Okeechobee County School Board, and other relevant state or local agencies through the sharing of information and by seeking intergovernmental agreements. The City of Okeechobee shall continue to ensure coordination of activities in its Comprehensive Plan with plans of the Okeechobee County School Board, Okeechobee County, and other state or regional entities through regular exchange of information. This information shall include, but not be limited to, building permits, zoning cases, planned land use amendments, engineering plans, demographics, proposed annexation areas, socio- economic information, and utility service areas and capacity. The City of Okeechobee shall, at the least, annually provide text and future land use map updates of its Comprehensive Plan to adjacent local governments. The City of Okeechobee shall continue to request information and assistance as is feasible from local governments and Okeechobee County, including the County Comprehensive Plan and any Plan updates. The City of Okeechobee shall continue to notify the Okeechobee County Manager in writing of all proposed annexations. The City Administrator, or his designee, will meet with the Okeechobee County Manager, or his designee, to resolve any potential annexation conflicts or issues. Policy 1.5: The City of Okeechobee shall maintain a database of interlocal agreements which provides a listing of active formal agreements. 1 City of Okeechobee EAR based Comprehensive Plan Amendments Intergovernmental Coordination Element Adopted: March 19, 1991 Amended: September 19, 2000 Amended: May 15, 2007 Policy 1.6: Objective 2: Policy 2.1: Policy 2.2: Policy 2.3: Policy 2.4: This data/ database shall be updated at least every five years for the evaluation and appraisal report on the Comprehensive Plan. The City of Okeechobee shall, where practical, formalize all intergovernmental agreements within one year of the adoption of these amendments, or by 2001. The City of Okeechobee shall maintain mechanisms to address development issues proposed in its Comprehensive Plan, affecting unincorporated Okeechobee County and other governmental jurisdictions. The City of Okeechobee shall continue to utilize the informal mediation process established by the Central Florida Regional Planning Council (CFRPC) to attempt to resolve land use conflicts with adjacent local governments. The City of Okeechobee shall continue to request that each of the entities analyzed in this element designate a representative to act as liaison to the City for the purpose of providing relevant information to be used in the planning and development review process. On request, the City Administrator and Planning Director, as liaisons, shall continue to provide and exchange information pertaining to significant proposed development among the appropriate local and regional agencies. For proposed development in the City which may have extra - jurisdictional impacts due to its size, character or location, the City shall establish procedures for the review of comprehensive plans and comprehensive plan amendments which shall include: 1. Identifying intergovernmental issues and conflicts; 2. Identifying the impacts of capital projects listed in the Capital Improvements Element of the City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan upon the provision of basic services; and 3. Determining the relationship of development proposed within the City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan to the development proposed in the Comprehensive Plan or Comprehensive Plan Amendments of Okeechobee County and/or adjacent municipalities. This shall include distributing a copy of relevant proposed plan amendments 2 City of Okeechobee EAR based Comprehensive Plan Amendments Intergovernmental Coordination Element Adopted: March 19, 1991 Amended: September 19, 2000 Amended: May 15. 2007 Policy 2.5: Policy 2.6: to adjacent local governments. The City of Okeechobee shall, at least annually, implement the procedures established in Policy 2.4. If any issues or negative impacts are identified, the City shall implement Policy 2.1. The City shall periodically review applications to Okeechobee County for zoning changes, major development orders, or proposed County Future Land Use Map Amendments falling within the City of Okeechobee Planning Area, to ensure consistency with the City of Okeechobee's Comprehensive Plan. Objective 3: The City of Okeechobee shall continue to coordinate with FDOT and the Okeechobee Utility Authority, where appropriate, any change in established level of service standards for public facilities including, at a minimum, all 10 -year updates of the Okeechobee County Comprehensive Plan, and 5 -year updates to the Okeechobee County Long -Range Transportation Plan. Policy 3.1: Policy 3.2: Objective 4: Policy 4.1: The City of Okeechobee shall coordinate establishing and changing roadway level of service standards with FDOT and shall inform Okeechobee County and any other appropriate governmental entities within the Okeechobee Planning Area of proposed changes in any level of service standards. The City of Okeechobee shall, when notified by other governmental entities of changes in their level of service standards, review and comment on these changes. The City shall continue to coordinate its Comprehensive Plan with the Resource Management Plan for the Lower Kissimmee River and Taylor Creek Drainage Basins. Coordination shall take place annually and as new development is proposed in areas where the two Plans overlap. Comprehensive Plans and Resource Management Plan coordination shall take place to the extent that coordination is consistent with the principle that local governments and landowners alone should not be forced to bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole, and would not result in inverse condemnation. Policy 4.2: The City shall continue to coordinate with the Resource Management Plan for the Lower Kissimmee River and Taylor 3 City of Okeechobee EAR based Comprehensive Plan Amendments Intergovernmental Coordination Element Adopted: March 19, 1991 Amended: September 19, 2000 Amended: May 15. 2007 Policy 4.3: Objective 5: Policy 5.1: Policy 5.2: Policy 5.3: Policy 5.4: Policy 5.5: Creek Drainage Basins through the adoption of other objectives and policies contained in this element and the mutual exchange of information pertaining to development review so that the City may ensure that direct and irreversible impacts on environmental sensitive areas are minimized. By 2002, the City shall coordinate its Comprehensive Plan with the Resource Management Plan to address drainage problems in the Lower Kissimmee River and Taylor Creek Drainage Basin regions. The City of Okeechobee shall cooperate in an effort with the School Board to ensure that the planning activities, services and facilities of the School Board are consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City of Okeechobee shall exchange data with the School Board regarding population projections and the School Board (5- year) facility plans as such data or plans are updated. The City of Okeechobee shall coordinate major residential project reviews (pursuant to Chapters 163 and 235, Florida Statutes) to consider joint park/schools dedications to meet future demands. The City of Okeechobee and the School Board shall coordinate in their joint efforts to study and implement innovative methods, including park/school site dedications and contributions, as a means to address infrastructure needs associated with the City's growth. The City of Okeechobee shall provide input for notify the School Board in of all new residential development projects or modifications to existing residential developments which increase density as a part of the review process for school concurrencv.potentially affecting the potential locations of new schools. The City of Okeechobee shall maintain and implementing a(n) joint interlocal agreementts) with the School Board and the County for Public School Facility Planning which includes the provisions for the implementation of school concurrence and a the-coordination process for e€ locating new schools_, and expanding or redeveloping existing school facilities. The School Board shall be encouraged to locate new educational facilities near urban residential areas where public 4 City of Okeechobee EAR based Comprehensive Plan Amendments Intergovernmental Coordination Element Adopted: March 19, 1991 Amended: September 19, 2000 Amended: May 15, 2007 Policy 5.6: Policy 5.7: Policy 5.8: Objective 6: Policy 6.1: Policy 6.2: Policy 6.3: Policy 6.4: infrastructure -and services exist to support the new facilities. The City of Okeechobee shall advise and meet with the School Board as necessary, regarding all Plan amendments and proposed annexations that may affect school sites. The City of Okeechobee shall coordinate with the School Board regarding shared use of recreational facilities owned by either entity. In addition, the City shall consider all reasonable opportunities to collocate new parks, libraries, and other facilities with public schools. The City of Okeechobee, although not currently impacted, shall enter into any appropriate agreement with the State of Florida University System or the School Board implementing the requirements of Section 240.155 (11 -15), F.S., regarding campus master plans. A consistency review of the campus master plans for non -state post - secondary institutions shall also be considered where a "campus" exists or is planned. The City of Okeechobee shall establish, maintain, and improve intergovernmental coordination for collaborative planning efforts including joint or extra - territorial services, changes to service or corporate limits, any joint committees for review of locally unwanted land uses, and regulatory concerns to ensure consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. The City shall encourage annexation of land where service delivery systems are available, where the formation of enclaves may be prevented, and where the land is adjacent to and consistent with the incorporated land's Comprehensive Plan. The City shall require infrastructure services to be available to proposed annexation areas at the adopted level of service consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City of Okeechobee shall coordinate with other jurisdictions, as appropriate, to establish a joint planning process and delineate the direction and extent of annexation for the planning period. The City of Okeechobee shall notify the appropriate enforcement agencies of any regulatory violations of which it becomes aware, and shall cooperate with those agencies in enforcing regulations. 5 City of Okeechobee EAR based Comprehensive Plan Amendments Intergovernmental Coordination Element Adopted: March 19, 1991 Amended: September 19, 2000 Amended: May 15. 2007 Policy 6.5: Policy 6.6: Policy 6.7: Policy 6.8: The City shall inform the County in a timely manner of proposed annexations. The City shall notify jurisdictions other than the County of proposed annexations when the affected area is within approximately one mile of the other jurisdictions' limits. The City shall draft a map of potential annexation areas, showing those areas first being considered for annexation, and the land uses envisioned to be assigned to these areas. The City shall distribute this map to the School Board, the County, and any other governmental entities to be impacted by these annexations. By 2002, the City shall review interlocal agreements with the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA) for central potable water and sanitary sewer facilities and services in terms of extending that agreement for another 10 -year period. The City shall coordinate with neighboring municipalities, if applicable, to ensure that each one has a copy of a map delineating the utility service planning area for their community for the planning period. Each municipality shall, annually thereafter, discuss the potential need for reassessing utility service area lines, if relevant, and share any official service area map updates. Each municipality shall also provide any official utility service planning area map updates to the County in order to ensure coordination for County utility and land planning. Policy 6.9: The City shall coordinate with the County regarding the use of the Okeechobee County Landfill relative to recycling and reduction of total wastes by weight. Objective 7: The City shall, upon adoption of this objective, coordinate the Comprehensive Plan with the School Board Five -Year Facilities Plan. Policy 7.1: In accordance with Section 5 of the Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning, Until such time as interlocal agreement is adopted by the City and the School Board, in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 163, Part I1 and Chapter 235, Florida Statutes, the following procedure shall be used to ensure intergovernmental coordination with the School Board for the location of educational facilities within the City: (a) At least sixty (60) days prior to acquiring or leasing property that may be used for a new public educational 6 City of Okeechobee EAR based Comprehensive Plan Amendments Intergovernmental Coordination Element Adopted: March 19, 1991 Amended: September 19,12000 Amended: May 15, 2007 facility within the City, the School Board shall provide written notice to the City. (b) Upon receipt of a written notice from the School Board ( 0 Policy 7.2: informing the City of the acquisition or leasing of property to be used for new public educational - facilities, the City shall notify the School Board within sixty -forty -five (6945) days as to thca preliminary consistency determination of the site with the Comprehensive Plan; and In conjunction with the preliminary consistency determination, the School Board and the City will jointly determine the need for and timing of on -site and off -site improvements necessary to support each new school or the proposed significant renovation of an existing school, and will enter into a written agreement as to the timing, location and the party or parties responsible for constructing, operating and maintaining the required improvements. Subsequent to a request by the School Board for a Comprehensive Plan determination, the City shall In accordance Section 2 of the Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning, the City shall coordinate with the County and the School Board and base plans upon consistent projections for population growth and student enrollment. Until such time as , and Chapter 235, Florida Statutes, the following procedure shall govern the collaborative planning program and decision making (a Upon receipt of the annual report specified in Chapter 235, the City of any additions to the School Board's Five Year School Facilities Plan, the City shall respond to the receipt of said plan in accordance with Policy 7.1 of the Comprehensive Plan; and (b) The City shall coordinate population estimates and the Five Year School Facilities Plan. 7 City of Okeechobee EAR based Comprehensive Plan Amendments Intergovernmental Coordination Element Adopted: March 19, 1991 Amended: September 19,12000 Amended: May 15, 2007 Policy 7.3: Policy 7.43: Policy 7.5: (a) In order to address the extension of public facilities to existing or new schools, subject to concurrency, all expansions or new construction of public, charter and private schools shall be subject In order to coordinate the effective provision and siting of educational facilities with associated infrastructure and services within the City, representatives of the City, the County and the School Board shall meet - - . - !!!annually to develop review the mechanisms and progress made towardfor coordination ^+ educational facilities planning. The City shall focus on the following coordinating mechanisms • ° - - b arecment, required by Chapter 163, Part II and Chapter 235, Florida Statues, with the School Board: (b) Policy 7.64: Coordinate the review of the annual update of the Capital Improvements Element of the City and the annual Plan of the School Board; Coordinate the review and assessment of the associated costs and expenditures of siting and developing schools with needed public infrastructure; Coordinate the review of land uses that increase residential density: Use a unified data base, including population forecasts (student population), land use, and facilities; and Use recreational and physical plant facilities in a manner The City of Okeechobee shall use the Central Florida Regional Planning Council's dispute resolution process when necessary to mediate the resolution of conflicts with other local governments and regional agencies. The City may use alternative procedures whenever appropriate for the matter of imminent dispute, including agreements authorized by Section 163.3177, F.S., or other non- 8 City of Okeechobee EAR based Comprehensive Plan Amendments Intergovernmental Coordination Element Adopted: March 19, 1991 Amended: September 19,12000 Amended: May 15, 2007 Policy 7.75: judicial approaches. The City of Okeechobee shall maintain, as a particular area of attention in its planning program, a systematic review of the aesthetics and physical conditions between its boundary and those between unincorporated areas and other cities in an effort to improve the appearance of these areas and the compatibility and transition between the adjoining communities. Joint planning area agreements will be implemented if appropriate. 9 City of Okeechobee EAR based Comprehensive Plan Amendments Intergovernmental Coordination Element Adopted: March 19, 1991 Amended: September 19, 2000 Amended: May 15, 2007 Capital Improvements Element Goals, Objectives and Policies City of Okeechobee EAR -based Comprehensive Plan Revenues Their Sources, Funds, and Expenditures This section is a summary of the various revenues the City receives and any restrictions on their usage. The City uses fund accounting and is compliance with the accepted Government Accounting Principles to segregate revenues and expenses that are designated for a particular purpose. A fund is a self - balancing group of accounts that includes assets, liabilities, equity, revenues and expenses. By using fund accounting, the City can demonstrate compliance with laws and regulations that control the use of particular revenue sources. The following is a description of the various funds of the City by fund type, a description of significant revenues found in each fund and a discussion of any restrictions on the use of these funds. General Fund The General Fund is the City's primary operating fund. It account for all financial resources of the general government, except for those funds required to be accounted for in another fund. The following are the primary revenues of the general fund: • Ad Valorem Taxes: these are taxes levied on the assessed value (net of exemptions) of real and personal property at a mileage rate set by the City of Okeechobee. The amount of taxes to be collected is determined by multiplying the mileage rate times the assessed value of property within the City. The mileage rate for fiscal year 2006 is set at 7.1899 mills for the general fund. The assessed value of real and personal property as of the latest valuation date (January 17th, 2006) was $293,842,487.00, with an estimated revenue for 2006 at $2,112,697.00, and is the largest revenue source for the City of Okeechobee. These revenues may be used for any public purpose including repayment of debt ($1,991,978.00). • Local Government Half -cent Sales Tax: This is a distribution of net sales taxes to eligible cities and counties and represents the largest source of state shared revenues. Its primary purpose is to provide relief from ad valorem taxes and utility taxes in addition to providing funds for local programs. ($393,074.) • One Cent Sales Surtax (Small county Surtax): These revenues are derived from a discretionary One cent sales tax based on the first $5000 of any single taxable item which is subject to the state tax imposed on sales, use, services, rental, and admissions. ($675,000.00) City of Okeechobee Concurrency Update Comprehensive Plan Amendments 1 Capital Improvements Element Adopted: March 19, 1991 Amended: February 20. 2007 I Amended: May 15, 2007 • State Revenue Sharing (Municipal Revenue Sharing program): These revenues are distributed by the state from net cigarette taxes and certain sales taxes. There are no restrictions on these revenues except for some statutory limits on the amount that can be pledged to debt. ($156,013.00) • Communications Services Tax: This tax is a simplification of the taxes that were charged on telecommunications, cable, and related services prior to October 1, 2001. The City of Okeechobee chose not to levy permit fees and based on Section 202.19(1) Florida Statue, the Local Communication Tax may be levied and is levied at a rate of 5.1 percent. These funds may be used for any public purpose including repayment of debt. ($347,7428.00) • Building Permit Fees: These revenues are regulatory fees imposed by the City of Okeechobee. The fees are imposed by City Ordinance Chapter 70, Article I - III. A Fee Schedule for permitting, inspections. Plan and site reviews were adopted by the City Council. Revenues collected are to be used for cost of applications or petitions made, which include clerical, postage, legal advertising, professional consultants, and other administration cost. ($180,000.00) • Occupational Licensing Fees: These revenues are regulatory fees imposed by the City of Okeechobee. The fees are imposed by the City of Okeechobee under Ordinance, Chapter 14 enacted based on Sections 166.221 Florida Statute. Application, Inspection and Licensing fees are based on class of business and occupancy. Revenues collected are to be used for regulating and inspecting businesses for compliance with the requirements of the City's ordinances. ($52,510.00) • Interest Income: Pooled cash accounts are maintained for each fund. Excess operating funds are placed in the State Board Accounts. Each fund is then credited with interest earnings based on its month end balance. Interest earnings can be used for any public purpose. ($60,000.00) Special Revenue Funds Special revenue funds are used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are legally restricted to expenditures for specified purposes (other than for major capital projects). The City maintains a number of special revenue funds. A discussion of the more significant funds follows: Public Facilities Improvement Fund: This fund is used to account for revenues and expenditures incurred to carry on all work on roads and bridges in the City in accordance with Section 336.022, Florida Statues. Some of the major sources of revenue include: City of Okeechobee Concurrency Update Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2 Capital Improvements Element Adopted: March 19, 1991 Amended: February 20. 2007 Amended: May 15, 2007 Goal: • Local Option Gas Tax: A city may levy between one to six cents per gallon on motor fuel. The City of Okeechobee has imposed 6 cents per gallon. These proceeds may be used to fund transportation expenses including roadway and right of way operations, maintenance and drainage; street lighting; support services and facilities such as traffic signs, engineering, signalization and pavement markings, bridge maintenance and operation; and debt service.($351,652.00) • SRS Eight Cent Motor Fuel Tax: (Municipal Revenue Sharing Program) the City of Okeechobee is a recipient of funds based on the minimum entitlements in each fiscal year.The Revenue Sharing Trust Fund for Municipalities receives 1.3409 percent of sales and use tax collections, 12.5 percent of the state alternative fuel user decal fees and the net collections from the one -cent municipal fuel tax. The City receives its portion of the tax based on pre- described formulas. These funds received from the one -cent municipal fuel tax for transportation- must be used for transportation- related expenditures. ($75,272.00) Community Development Block Grant Fund: This fund is to account for the revenues and expenditures in accordance with the Community Development Block Grant for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act. Capital Projects- Vehicles Fund: This fund is to account for the expenditure of revenues for vehicles purchased and sold within the fiscal year. Industrial Development Fund: To account for the revenues and expenditures during the development of city -owned property, the City of Okeechobee Commerce Park. The most significant revenue will be obtained from grants for the purpose of developing the Commerce Park, and/or creating a positive economic impact for the City of Okeechobee. Law Enforcement Special fund: To account for the proceeds from the sale of confiscated property in accordance with Section 932.7055, Florida Statues. Debt Service Fund: Debt Service funds are used to accumulate funds to pay principal and interest on the City's outstanding bonds. The City has no outstanding bonds issued. The City of Okeechobee shall continue to ensure that public facilities and services are provided, on a fair -share costs basis, in a manner which maximizes the use of existing facilities and promotes orderly growth. Objective 1: The City of Okeechobee shall continue to use the Capital Improvements Element to schedule construction and identify funding sources for the City of Okeechobee Concurrency Update Comprehensive Plan Amendments 3 Capital Improvements Element Adopted: March 19, 1991 Amended: February 20. 2007 Amended: May 15, 2007 Policy 1.1: Policy 1.2: Policy 1.3: Policy 1.4: Objective 2: Policy 2.1: City's capital facility needs in order to accommodate existing and future development, and to replace obsolete or worn-out facilities. Proposed capital improvements projects shall continue to be ranked and evaluated according to appropriate policies adopted in other elements of the Comprehensive Plan. The following criteria will also be considered: (1) whether the proposed project will eliminate a public hazard; (2) whether the proposed project will eliminate capacity deficits; (3) local budget impacts; (4) locational needs based on projected growth patterns; (5) accommodation of new development or redevelopment; (6) financial feasibility; and (7) plans of state agencies or water management districts that provide facilities in Okeechobee. The City of Okeechobee shall continue to integrate its planning and budgeting processes such that expenditures which are budgeted for capital improvements recognize policies related to public facilities and services set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. In accordance with Policy 7.1 of the Sanitary Sewer... Element, the City shall complete a stormwater management study to identify drainage deficiencies, and allocate any available funds for that purpose in its Administrative Operating Budget for fiscal year 2000 -2001. The 5 -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements will be amended as soon as possible to include the study, its projected cost, and the identified revenue source(s). The City of Okeechobee shall identify its needs for public facility improvements, the revenues required for project funding, and shall itemize the costs for such projects - in its 5 -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements. The City of Okeechobee shall continue to coordinate land use decisions with the schedule of capital improvements in a manner that maintains the adopted level of service standards and meets existing and future needs. The City of Okeechobee shall continue to use the following level of service standards in reviewing the impacts of new development and redevelopment: Facility Level of Service Sanitary Sewer 130 gallons /capita/day (see Policy 1.6 City of Okeechobee Concurrence Update Comprehensive Plan Amendments 4 Capital Improvements Element Adopted: March 19, 1991 Amended: February 20. 2007 Amended: May 15, 2007 Policy 2.2: Development orders and permits shall be granted only when required public facilities and services are operating at the established levels of service, or shall be available concurrent with the impacts of the development. Such facilities and services may be provided in phases if development correspondingly occurs in phases; however, required service levels must be maintained at all times during the development process. City of Okeechobee Concu rency Update Comprehensive Plan Amendments 5 Capital Improvements Element Adopted: March 19, 1991 Amended: February 20. 2007 Amended: May 15, 2007 of Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, Potable Water, and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Element) Potable Water 114 gallons /capita/day (see Policy 1.6 of Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, Potable Water, and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Element) Solid Waste Average Solid Waste Generation • 13 lbs./person/day • at least 13 years available capacity in Okeechobee County landfill (see Policy 1.4 of Sanitary Sewer...Element) Principal Arterials C Minor Arterials & All Others D Recreation and Open Space 3 acres /1,000 persons Drainage Interim Standard (see Policy 1.5 of Sanitary Sewer... Element) Design Storm • 25 -year storm • 24 -hour duration Facility Design Standards • as required by Florida Administrative Code (see Policy 1.5 of Sanitary Sewer... Element) Public Schools Existing School Permanent FISH Capacity New Elementary Considering Utilization Rate 750 New Middle 1000 _ New K -8 1200 New High School 1500 Development orders and permits shall be granted only when required public facilities and services are operating at the established levels of service, or shall be available concurrent with the impacts of the development. Such facilities and services may be provided in phases if development correspondingly occurs in phases; however, required service levels must be maintained at all times during the development process. City of Okeechobee Concu rency Update Comprehensive Plan Amendments 5 Capital Improvements Element Adopted: March 19, 1991 Amended: February 20. 2007 Amended: May 15, 2007 Objective 3: In order to maintain adopted level of service standards, future development shall bear a proportionate cost of necessary public facility improvements equivalent to the benefits it receives from the improvements. Policy 3.1: The City of Okeechobee shall continue to evaluate potential revenue available for public facility expenditures through alternative sources such as user fees, special benefit units, or special assessments. Policy 3.2: The City of Okeechobee shall continue to maintain adopted levels of service by using revenue sources considered under Policy 3.1 to ensure that new development pays a pro rata share of the costs of public facility needs which it generates. Policy 3.3: Objective 4: The City of Okeechobee shall continue to continue to apply for and secure grants or private funds when available to finance the provision of capital improvements. The City of Okeechobee shall continue to ensure the provision of needed public facilities within the City limits, based on adopted levels of service as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. Public facilities needs shall be determined on the basis of previously issued development orders as well as the City's budgeting process and its joint activities with Okeechobee County and the Okeechobee County School District for planning, zoning, and concurrency management. Policy 4.1: Existing and future public facilities shall operate at the levels of service established in this plan. Policy 4.2: Debt service shall not exceed 20% of annually budgeted revenues. Policy 4.3: A five -year capital improvements program and annual capital budget shall be adopted as part of the City of Okeechobee's annual budgeting process. This program shall include the annual review, and revision as needed, of the Five -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements. Policy 4.4: The financially feasible School District Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan (Tentative Facilities Work Program) which achieves and maintains the adopted level of service standards for public schools, as approved by the Okeechobee County School Board shall be included and adopted each year as part of the City of Okeechobee's annual budgeting process. Objective 5: The City of Okeechobee shall furnish meaningful opportunities for the School Board to have input and coordination in the City's development City of Okeechobee Concurrency Update Comprehensive Plan Amendments 6 Capital Improvements Element Adopted: March 19, 1991 Amended: February 20. 2007 Amended: Mav 15, 2007 Policy 5.1: review process in order to assist the School Board in their provision of adequate and efficient schools. The City of Okeechobee and the School Board shall coordinate to ensure that schools are adequately and efficiently provided commensurate with growth. Key coordinating mechanisms shall include: (a) promotion of joint infrastructure park/school facilities when feasible; (b) consideration of the adequacy and availability of educational infrastructure during appropriate review of development order applications; (c) ensuring the provision of adequate infrastructure, on and off site, normally associated with new or expanded schools where consistent with state law restrictions on expenditures by the School Board; (d) evaluation of the School District's annually updated Capital Improvement Plan to ensure that it is financially feasible and that the adopted level -of- service standard for public schools is achieved and maintained consideration of future inclusion of the School Program in the Comprehensive Plan Technical Support Documents infrastructure; (e) seeking that any new major residential development or redevelopment applicant submit information regarding projected school enrollments from the project; and (f) request that the School Board submit site plan information for all timely new schools. City of Okeechobee Concurrency Update Comprehensive Plan Amendments 7 Capital Improvements Element Adopted: March 19, 1991 Amended: February 20. 2007 Amended: May 15, 2007 Capital Improvements Implementation City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan Capital improvement needs identified in the Comprehensive Plan will be met through implementation of a 5 -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements. This schedule is adopted by the City Council along with Goals, Objectives and Policies, and must be consistent with the Capital Improvements Element. The purpose of the Schedule is to ensure that the City has adequate revenues to implement the Comprehensive Plan. The 5 -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements focuses on the capital outlay required to meet existing deficiencies and to maintain adopted level of service standards planned for public facilities in the Plan. The City shall advise the OUA on these standards. City of Okeechobee Concurrency Update Comprehensive Plan Amendments 8 Capital Improvements Element Adopted: March 19, 1991 Amended: February 20. 2007 Amended: May 15, 2007 CITY OF OKEECHOBEE FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Operating Summary - All Departments 1 8 9 10 Im ' rovements City Hall Computer Hardware - Monitors & Hardware as needed Computer software - intergrated and compatible with all De. artments Computer upgrades based on Software needs Subtotal Police Squad Car Lease Subtotal Current Budget FY05 /06 Proposed Revenue Source FY06 /07 $1,000 Proposed Revenue Source A $72,000 A $72,000 FY07 /08 $8,000 $1,000 Proposed Revenue Source A A FY08 /09 Proposed Revenue Source FY09 /10 Planned Revenue Source FY10 /11 Planned Revenue Source $1,000 A $10,000 $5,000 A A A $72,000 $72,000 A $72,000 A $72,000 A Legend for Revenue Sources A = General Fund Revenues B = Constitutional Fuel Tax; Local Option Gas Tax; SRS Eight Cent Fuel Tax C = Community Development Block Grant (Anticipated) D = Possible Homeland Security Grant E = Public Safety Grant (to be applied for) F = Other Grants to be applied for City of Okeechobee Concurrency Update Comprehensive Plan Amendments 9 Capital Improvements Element Adopted: March 19, 1991 Amended: February 20, 2007 Amended: May 15, 2007 CITY OF OKEECHOBEE FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Capital Outlay Summary - All Departments Improvements Current Budget FY05 /06 Proposed Revenue Source FY06 /07 Proposed Revenue Source FY07 /08 Proposed Revenue Source FY08 /09 Proposed Revenue Source FY09 /10 Planned Revenue Source FY10 /11 Planned Revenue Source City Hall 3 Imaging plans - Need more detail $2,000 A $2,000 A $2,000 A $2,000 A $2,000 4 Map cabinet $2,000 A 5 Furniture -Desk, chairs $1,100 A $800 A 6 Laser Fiche - change from stand alone system to networking system for City Hall, Police and Fire A,F Fire Subtotal 1 Ladder Truck $800,000 D,F 2 Fire truck/Pumper 3 Brush truck Police Subtotal $75,000 D,F $225,000 D,F,A 1 Computer System - Police /Dispatch/Evidence/Property $100,000 D, F, A 3 Squad Car Equipment $40,000 $40,000 A $40,000 A $40,000 A $40,000 A $40,000 A 4 Handheld radios (new) E, A Public Works Subtotal City barn #1 garage doors City of Okeechobee Concurrency Update Comprehensive Plan Amendments 10 Capital Improvements Element Adopted: March 19, 1991 Amended: February 20, 2007 Amended: May 15, 2007 CITY OF OKEECHOBEE FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Im I rovements Truck (301) Tractor (301 ?) Backhoe to re 'lace 15 oldJCB Bucket truck Air com.ressor Gas/Diesel . um. s W alkie- talkie/Nextels Subtotal Capital Outlay Summary - All Departments Current Budget FY05 /06 Proposed Revenue Source FY06 /07 $50,000 $80,000 Proposed Revenue Source A A FY07 /08 $50,000 Proposed Revenue Source A FY08 /09 Proposed Revenue Source Legend for Revenue Sources A = General Fund Revenues B = Constitutional Fuel Tax; Local Option Gas Tax; SRS Eight Cent Fuel Tax C = Community Development Block Grant (Anticipated) D = Possible Homeland Security Grant E = Public Safety Grant (to be applied for) F = Other Grants to be applied for City of Okeechobee Concurrency Update Comprehensive Plan Amendments 11 Capital Improvements Element Adopted: March 19, 1991 Amended: February 20, 2007 Amended: May 15, 2007 FY09 /10 Planned Revenue Source FY10 /11 Planned Revenue Source CITY OF OKEECHOBEE FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Improvements Current Budget FY05 /06 Summary - All Departments Revenue Source FY06 /07 Proposed Revenue Source FY07 /08 Proposed Revenue Source FY08 /09 Proposed Revenue Source FY09 /10 Planned Revenue Source 1 2 City Hall Planned Revenue FY10 /11 Source City Hall handicapped accessability Record Storage facility (pkg lot shed im . rovements) $30,000 Subtotal 4 Fire Trainin • tower $100,000 D Subtotal Public Works 1 2 Street overlay project (301)1 $450,000 B $350,000 B $350,000 B $350,000 B $350,000 B $350,000 Storm Sewer installation/replacement2 $50,000 A $50,000 A $50,000 A $50,000 A $50,000 A 3 Ditch grading/culverts Commerce Park SE Cal -de- sac/Lakes $700,000 C 1 This project will be completed pursuant to LOS standards set forth Roads and Traffic Circulation located in the Comprehensive Plan, specifically Policy 2.1 of the Capital Improvements Element (page 2). 2 This project will be completed pursuant to LOS standards set forth Drainage located in the Comprehensive Plan, specifically Policy 2.1 of the Capital Improvements Element (page 2). City of Okeechobee Concurrency Update Comprehensive Plan Amendments 12 Capital Improvements Element Adopted: March 19, 1991 Amended: February 20, 2007 Amended: May 15, 2007 CITY OF OKEECHOBEE FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Summary - All Departments Lighting Improvements Current Budget FY05 /06 Revenue Source FY06 /07 Proposed Revenue Source FY07 /08 Proposed Revenue Source FY08 /09 Proposed Revenue Source FY09 /10 Planned Revenue Source Planned Revenue FY10 /11 Source Sidewalk repair /replacement/new Sign replacements Canal cleanup - w/ Air boat - is the airboat part of the request Canal cleanup - removal of debris, trees etc Storage Bldg at SW 23rd St Subtotal Total Budget $593,100 Legend for Revenue Sources $2,247,000 A = General Fund Revenues B = Constitutional Fuel Tax; Local Option Gas Tax; SRS Eight Cent Fuel Tax C = Community Development Block Grant (Anticipated) D = Possible Homeland Security Grant $613,790 City of Okeechobee Adopted: March 19, 1991 Concurrency Update Comprehensive Plan Amendments 13 Amended: February 20, 2007 Capital Improvements Element Amended: May 15, 2007 $690,800 $529,000 $739,000 E = Public Safety Grant (to be applied for) F = Other Grants to be applied for City of Okeechobee Concurrency Update Comprehensive Plan Amendments 14 Capital Improvements Element Adopted: March 19, 1991 Amended: February 20, 2007 Amended: May 15, 2007 Lire No. 13escri0601t Table 6 Okeechobee Uility Authority Monomial Evaluation Six- -Year Estuaaled Capital ImOmvement Pram Pegg: 10(4 DRAFT Water Wastomater Pmjrctcd Fiscal Year EmlingSeptkrnber 39, Allocation Allocation Funding Uudgcted Adjusted SowoC 2006 Adjustments 3006 2007 2008 2009 3010 2011 Total TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 1 Sonars Wolof Timm:mat Plant knptevemants (Project) 100.0% 0.0% 31.167,1150 SO 51,867,850 50 SO SO 30 S0 51,867,850 2 24• Wale Lire- Highway 781014WltdStreet 100.0% 0.0% 1,499,631 0 1,499,631 a 0 0 0 0 1,499,631 3 Replace Filter at 'Wastewater Treatment Platt 0.094 1110.O% 200,000 0 200,000 a 0 0 0 0 200,000 4 SR 70 West Utility Relocations 100,0% 0.0%. 600,000 0 600.000 0 9 0 0 0 600.009 5 PER and Design Services Waslexuterireotment Mani 0.0% 100.0% 306,000 0 300,000 301430 0 0 a 0 602,630 6 NW 34dt Sums Wafter Main 100.0% 0,054 0 0 0 120,000 0 0 0 0 120,000 7 NW 20thSoca Witter Main 100.094 0.056 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 8 Noah 441 Noah of Hide School 100.0% 0.0% 170,000 0 170,000 0 0 0 0 0 170,000 9 Wastcuater Tradatcnt Plant Inotovcmenta 0.0%" 100.0% 2,443,557 0 2,443,557 10,996,006 10,996007 0 0 0 24035,570 10 SCADA Syslcta For Matta and Litt Stations 0.096 100.0% 100,000 0 100.000 100.000 50,000 50,000 0 0 300,000 11 Waltman Effluent Disposal System 0.0% 100.0% 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Re sidunk Mmmgc01:16 System 0.09. 100.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 13 Fomo Main For East Side 0.054 1004% 0 0 0 3,000,006 0 0 0 0 3,1100,000 14 Air Vac System For Eon Side 0.0% 100.0% 0 0 0 1,000,000 6,000,000 0 0 0 7000,000 15 Lill Stations - Rehab a.O% 100.0% 50,000 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 50.0110 50,000 50,000 300.000 16 Water PisvIbulion System b0pt0vrments 100.0%. 0.0% 150,1100 0 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 159,000 900,000 17 US 441 NorthUdllty Relocation 40.01. 60.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 )lank Filtration For SWTP 1110.094 0.0% 100,000 0 100,500 0 0 500,400 0 0 000,000 19 Ongoing CIP Projects (Pc:sonaet Costs - Coaslntction Crew) 75.094 25.0% 275,000 0 275,000 232,758 250,000 268,000 287,001 307,000 1,619,758 20 Wastewater System Improvements (Rehabilitation) 0.0% 100.0% 250,000 0 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,500,000 21 NW 4111, 603 and 8dt Avenue Between NW 36th lard NW 34th Street Water Lines 100.0% 0.0% 0 0 0 0 105,000 0 0 0 105,000 22 Demolition Wink at SWTP 100.04. 0.6% 0 0 0 150,000 150,000 0 0 0 300,000 23 New Ground Storage Tack S1YTP 1110.0% 0.0% 0 0 0 a 1,759,000 1.750000 0 0 3,500,000 24 Fire: Peokelion 100.09. 0.0% 50,000 0 50,000 50,000 50,134 50,362 50,614 51,867 301,977 25 King's pay WW Punip Simeon 0.0% 100.0% 0 0 0 100,000 300,000 0 0 0 200,000 26 Adman 19a0ding Evaluation 50.0% 50.0% 0 0 0 0 125,000 0 0 0 125,000 27 U.S. 441 S.E. Water Main 100.054 0.064 0 0 0 0 2,500,000 0 0 0 3.500,000 28 Elevated Water Tank 100.09. 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 150,000 0 a 150,000 29 Total CnplInl Improvemens Plan Projects SO056 ,038 50 58,056,038 516,601394 52_2,6 4,141 53,218362 ' S787.614 3807,167 551997,416 TOTAL DEPARTMENTAL CAPITAL 3D Deparnreraal Capital 75.054 25.9% 3632,000 50 5632,000 5500,000 5500,000 5500 ,000 5500,000 5500,000 53.132000 31 Additional loan 50.0% 50.0% 4 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 32 Additlami item 510% 50.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 Total Departmental Capital Projects 3632,000 50 56632,000 5500,000 3500000 5500,000 5500,000 3500,000 53,132,000 34 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM! AND DEPARTMENTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS S8.688.038 30 S8.688.038 517.101.394 523,026,141 53.718.361 51,287.614 51307.867 555.129,417_ City of Okeechobee - Concurrency Update Comprehensive Plan Amendments 15 Capital Improvements Element Adopted: March 19, 1991 Amended: February 20, 2007 Amended: May 15, 2007 Tabkt 4 Okeechobee UMW Authority Financial Evaluation Sts Year Est oglo s 11pjU1 imatavemeat Ptoetata Page 2 of 4 DRAFT Water Wastewater Projected Fiscai Year Ending September 30. Lim Allocution Allocation Fading Dodgem! Adjusted No. Description 14 % Source 2006 Mitts Meats 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total WATER SYSTEM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Water Prujeds 35 Surface Watts Treatment Pleat Improvements (Project) PID 1.867.850 0 1,067,830 0 0 o 0 0 1,867,950 36 24" Water Line - l4igbway 78 to NW ltd Sttret PEI 1,499,631 0 1,499,631 a 0 0 0 0 1.499,631 37 Replace Filter at Wastaevater7teatmem ?km NIA 0 D q 0 0 0 0 a 0 35 SR 70 West Utility Rclocatio,s MC 600,000 0 39 PER and Design Services Wastewater TreatmeMF feat WA 0 0 600,000 0 0 0 0 0 600,000 o 40 NW 34th Street (Voter Main WCAP 0 0 0 121,000 0 0 0 a 120.000 41 NW 201 Stmt Water Meta WCAP 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 41 North 441 North of High School WCAP 170,000 0 170,000 0 43 Wastewater Transient Platt mvctmats NIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 170,000 Oap 44 SCADA System For Platte and Lill Stations NIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 W ennter Effluent Disposal System NIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 46 Residuals Management Sysian NIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o 47 Fame Main For East Side NIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 Air Vac System For East Sidc NIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 Lift Stadom - Rehab NIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 Water Distrbution System bnpmvo,, nts RR) 130,000 0 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 900,000 51 Water Distrbation System bnpmm voems RRI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 US 411 North Utility Relocation NIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 Bank Filtration Far SWr? WCAP 100,000 0 looms 0 0 500,000 0 0 600,000 54 Ongoing CO' Projects (Pastrami Casts - CamLuctlon Crew) RR) 206,250 0 206,2 174,569 187,500 201,000 215,250 230,250 1 ,214,819 55 Wastewater System loynommcats (Rehabilitation) NM 0 0 a 0 0 0 o 0 a 56 NW 4d4 Mud 8th Avtmme Dew= NW 36th opal NW 34th Snag Water Does MU a 0 0 0 105,000 0 0 0 105.000 57 Demolition Work at SWFP RR! 0 0 0 150,000 150,000 0 0 0 300,000 58 New Ground Storage Tank SWTP WCAP 0 0 0 0 1,750,000 1,610,000 0 0 3,360,000 59 New Ground Storage Tank SWTP WCAP 0 0 0 0 60 Fire Pmlcction 4 159.36p 0 0 (00,977 61 icings Bay WW Pump Swim NIA MOOD 0 �A110 50,000 50,130 Sa 362 50 610 50860 301,970 62 Adage Du3diag Evaluation WCAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 wcAP a 0 0 0 crsao c o 0 62,500 63 U.S. 441 SE. Water Mehl 64 Elevated water Tank WCAP 0 0 a 0 2500'x00 0 0 0 2,500,000 a 1150,000 15 oa 0 0 tsaga0 Departmental Capital ?Injects - Water 65 Departmental Capital b6 Additional Lem 67 Additional hem 68 TOTAL WATER SYSTEM CAPITAL EXPENSES REV 474,000 0 474,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 2,349,000 NIA 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 o 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53,117,731 City of Okeechobee Concurrency Update Comprehensive Plan Amendments 16 Capital Improvements Element Adopted: March 19, 1991 Amended: February 20, 2007 Amended: May 15, 2007 30 .55,117,731 51,119,569 55, 330,134 53,176,362 5790,864 5806,117 S16,340,737 I4r No. Description WASTEWATER SYSTEM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PK.AN Table 6 Okeechobee Utility Authority Flnaacid Evaluation aCix- YearEslbaatcd Clonal Aaatovemeal Tsoerom Water Wasteaatcr Allocation A11oca6oa Funding Budgeted Adlastad % Solute 2006 Adjustments 2006 Page 3 of 4 DRAFT Projected Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total Wastewater Projects 69 Septum WalerTrcalnxot Pint Improvements (Project) MA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 2d" Water Lbie - Highway 7810 NW Led Street NIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 Replace FBtaot WastetwurTmatmeat Plant SRI 119,000 0 1 19,000 a 0 0 0 0 119,300 72 Replace Sher ot Wastewater Treatment Phial RRI 81,000 0 81,000 0 0 0 0 0 81,000 73 SR70 Weal Wily Refutations N/A 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 74 PER and Design Services WaaleauterTreatment Plant OR 300,000 0 300,000 302,630 0 0 0 0 602,630 75 PER and Design Senrics Wasiaanter To:atmertt Plant SCAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 76 NW 34th Sheet Water Main NIA 0 0 0 0 0 o a 0 0 77 NW 20th Street Water Main NIA 8 0 0 0 a a a o 0 78 North 441 North of High School N/A 0 0 0 a 0 o 0 0 0 79 Wastawuter TreaWteta Plata haprvvcmenis RRI 0 0 0 s0 WaskwatarTreatmaa Iaya Plant ovements CF 0 0 ?413557 10,996,006 10,996,007 0 0 0 0 o 24 81 Wastewater Treatment Phu kgwvements 0 0 0 0 ¢35570 o 82 SCADA System For Plants and Lill Stations SOAP 100,000 0 100,000 100,000 53,000 50,000 0 0 300,000 83 Wastewater Meat Dispoml System BI 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 a 84 Residuals Management System 85 Foxe MaIn For East Side 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o 86 Air Vac System For Bast Side G 0 0 0 1,, ,000 6.000,000 0 0 0 3.000,000 7.000,000 17 S#tbtpas -Rehab 15101 50,000 0 50,000 7,000,000 88 Water Distribution System Iraprd.vmemts 50,000 50,000 50 000 50 000 300,000 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 89 US 441 North UkTity Soleadnn 90 Sack FRtnuioo For SWTP NIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 91 Ongoing CIP Projects (Personnel Costs • Contraction Crew) Rill 68,7$0 9 68,750 58,190 62,500 67,000 71,750 76,750 404,940 92 Wastemmm System ampnmmaatr (Rehabilitation) RAI 250,000 0 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1.500,000 93 NW 4th, 6th and 96, Meow Between NW36d tmaNW341), Street Water Lines N/A a 0 0 0 0 o 0 a a 94 DomoRNon Work atSW P N/A 95 New Ground Stomp Tank SWTP sr 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 Fire Protection NIA 0 0 mg4 Bay Pimp Simian 0 0 0 0 a o 0 97 1r WW SCAP 0 0 a tnaolro 100.000 0 0 0 200000 90 Admin BuiltEua Evaluation SCAP 0 0 0 0 99 U.S. 441 S.C. Water Main N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 mss 0 100 Elevated Water Tar* N/A 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 Departmental Candid Projects - Weimar.. 101 DepartmerdalCapital 102 Addidwwihem 103 Additiomd hero 104 TOTAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM CAPITAL, EXPENSES REV 150,000 0 150,000 125,000 125,000 125.000 125,000 125,000 783,000 0 n WA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51,126,750 SO 53,570,307 515,981,826 817,696,007 5542,000 5496,750 5501.750 538,788,640 105 TOTAL WATER AND WASTEWATER CAPITAL EXPENSES 56,244.481 50 58.688.038 517.101394 823.026,141 51718,362 51.287.614 51,307.867 555.129,417 City of Okeechobee • Concurrency Update Comprehensive Plan Amendments 17 Capital Improvements Element Adopted: March 19, 1991 Amended: February 20, 2007 Amended: May 15, 2007