Loading...
2024-08-20 V.D. Ex.5 • •ibit 5 08/20/2024 ORDINANCE NO. 1292 1.4tni Y b. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA AMENDING CHAPTER 18, ARTICLE II OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES AND IMPLEMENTING GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES FOR CODE ENFORCEMENT SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARINGS; REVISING ADMINISTRATIVE FEES AND AMENDING OTHER PROCEDURES TO ENSURE THE EFFICIENT ENFORCEMENT OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY CODE; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY OF PROVISIONS; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Chapter 162 of the Florida Statutes permits municipal code enforcement programs to be administered using a Special Magistrate to handle Code Enforcement Proceedings; and WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Okeechobee has determined it is in the public's best interest to enact provisions ensuring that participants in a Special Magistrate Proceeding are provided with reasonable opportunities to be heard in a Public Hearing forum that is consistent and provides due process to all participants; and WHEREAS, other nearby jurisdictions, which are similarly situated, have also implemented standard procedures to carry out Special Magistrate Hearings to ensure the administration of Code Enforcement Hearings in the most fair, efficient, and equitable manner; and WHEREAS, in an effort to prevent any unnecessary delay to the adjudication of Code Enforcement matters, the City Council for the City of Okeechobee finds that certain procedures must be established to maximize efficiency of these proceedings; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City of Okeechobee and its residents to institute more efficient measures for carrying out the City's Code Enforcement Program. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Okeechobee hereby enacts the following amendments to the Code of Ordinances, which have been presented at a duly advertised public meeting, and passed by majority vote of the City Council; and properly executed by the Mayor or designee, as Chief Presiding Officer for the City: SECTION 1: RECITALS ADOPTED. The foregoing "whereas" clauses are incorporated herein as legislative findings by this reference and made a part hereof for all intents and purposes. SECTION 2: CODE AMENDED. That the City Council for the City of Okeechobee, Florida, amends herein Part II of the Code of Ordinances, Subpart A-General Ordinances, providing for amendments to Chapter 18- Code Enforcement; Article II-Code Enforcement Procedure as follows: Amend Section 18-32. —Definitions, adding a definition for Alleged Violator as follows: Alleged Violator means a party who has been cited with a violation of a provision of the Code of Ordinances of Okeechobee, Florida. Amending Section 18-39. — Fine Reduction Request Process to be renumbered as Section 18-40.Then adding a new Section 18-39"Code Enforcement Hearing Guidelines" as follows: Section 18-39.—Code Enforcement Hearing Guidelines. To achieve uniformity and fairness through the administration and adjudication of Code Enforcement Hearings, the City of Okeechobee will observe and follow the listed procedures. to the extent possible: (a) Both the City and Alleged Violator shall have opportunities to present evidence and cross-examine same at a duly noticed Hearing, and at the conclusion of testimony at such a hearing, the record shall be closed, and no further evidence will be accepted. Hearings shall adhere to the following format: (1) The case shall be called by the Special Magistrate. Ordinance No. 1292 Page 1 of 3 If applicable,language to be added is double undedined. If applicable,language to be deleted is struck through • • (2) The City shall first present its case, along with any evidence and/or witnesses necessary for the presentation of the case. (3) At the conclusion of the presentation of the City's case, the City shall enter its complete case file into evidence. (4) The Alleged Violator shall then present its response, along with any evidence and/or witnesses,which may form a rebuttal or the basis of defense to a violation. (5) At the conclusion of the presentation of the Alleged Violator's case, the Alleged Violator shall enter his/her complete case into evidence. (6) It shall be within the Special Magistrate's discretion to allow cross-examination by either the City or the Alleged Violator, following the presentation from both sides. (7) Where the Special Magistrate deems necessary, the City and Alleged Violator shall be afforded an opportunity to provide closing statements, at the conclusion of examination of witnesses. (8) At the conclusion of all testimony, the record shall be closed, and the Special Magistrate may ask questions of both the City and the Alleged Violator. (9) The Special Magistrate shall then enter a ruling. The Special Magistrate's ruling shall be solely based on the evidence presented at the Hearing as to whether the Alleged Violator has violated the City's Code of Ordinances. (b) In the interests of time and resources, Hearings shall not be scheduled or proceed for multiple days, except in extenuating circumstances and only upon the agreement of the City and Alleged Violator. (c) Where a violation prompts the scheduling of a Hearing, and the Hearing proceeds as scheduled, an administrative fee shall be assessed. (d) Where an Alleged Violator is represented by legal counsel, or another individual who is not an interested party, the representative shall file a Power of Attorney with the City Clerk, in advance of the Hearing. (e) At the conclusion of a duly noticed Hearing, where testimony from both sides has been taken, and such testimony concludes, the Special Magistrate shall enter an order, which shall indicate an outcome of the duly noticed Hearing. Section 18 3918-40. - Fine reduction request process. (a) The city administrator shall establish a process consistent with this section in which property owners may request a fine reduction imposed by a magistrate. (b) Property owners wishing to request a fine reduction shall complete a request for a fine reduction application and submit it to the City Administrator or his/her designee along with the applicable fee. (c) Upon receipt of a completed request for a fine reduction, the City shall schedule an inspection of the property and determine whether there are any other liens or expired permits. The fine shall be tolled until the inspection is completed. (d) If, after inspection, the property is found to be in compliance, a hearing before the magistrate shall be scheduled. If the property is found not to be in compliance, the property owner shall be promptly notified in writing and be given a reasonable period of time to correct the violation(s) and request a re-inspection. If the property owner fails to correct the violation(s) and/or request a re-inspection within the time frame set forth by the City, the request for fine reduction shall be denied and the fines will retroactively accrue. (e) The City Administrator shall direct Code Enforcement to evaluate each request prior to making a recommendation to the magistrate. In making its recommendation to the magistrate, code enforcement shall use the following criteria: (1) The gravity of the underlying Code violation which gave rise to the fine imposed by the magistrate. (2) The length of time in which the property was not in compliance with the city's Code of Ordinances. Ordinance No. 1292 Page 2 of 3 If applicable,language to be added is do bl. and.dined. If applicable,language to be deleted is struck through • • (3) Whether the property owner was proactive in bringing the property into compliance with the city's Code of Ordinances. (4) Whether there are any exigent circumstances that were the underlying reason for untimely compliance with the city's Code of Ordinances. (5) Whether the property is subject to a foreclosure proceeding. SECTION 3: ENFORCEMENT. That specific authority is hereby granted to codify and incorporate this Ordinance in the existing Code of Ordinances of the City of Okeechobee. SECTION 4: CONFLICT. That all Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed. SECTION 5: INCLUSION IN THE CODE. That if any section, subsection sentence, clause, phrase of this Ordinance, or the particular application thereof shall be held invalid by any court, administrative agency,or other body with appropriate jurisdiction, the remaining sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases under application shall not be affected thereby. SECTION 6: SEVERABILITY. That this Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its passage. INTRODUCED for first reading and set for final Public Hearing on this 20th day of August 2024. Roll Call Vote: Yes No Abstained Absent Council Member Chandler: Council Member/Vice Mayor Clark: Council Member Jarriel: Council Member McAuley: Mayor Watford: Dowling R. Watford, Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Lane Gamiotea, CMC, City Clerk PASSED AND ADOPTED after second reading and final Public Hearing this 11th day of September 2024. Roll Call Vote: Yes No Abstained Absent Council Member Chandler: Council Member/Vice Mayor Clark: Council Member Jarriel: Council Member McAuley: Mayor Watford: Dowling R. Watford, Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Lane Gamiotea, CMC, City Clerk REVIEWED FOR LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: John J. Fumero, City Attorney Ordinance No. 1292 Page 3 of 3 If applicable,language to be added is double underlined. If applicable,language to be deleted is skaskthrough