The URL can be used to link to this page

2022-12-15 V. A. #22-003-SE Opposition, Exhibit 1 Patty Burnette From: Samantha Braswell <samanthab@jimersonfirm.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2022 5:17 PM To: Dawn Hoover; Douglas McCoy; Phil Baughman; Karyne Brass; Rick Chartier; Mac Jonassaint; David McAuley;James Shaw; Carl Berlin; Patty Burnette; jfumero@nasonyeager.com; gvelazquez@nasonyeager.com; phahn@bakerdonelson.com Cc: C. Ryan Maloney; Melissa Murrin Subject: Opposition to Special Exception Petition No. 22-003-SE (3585.004) Attachments: Letter to Okeechobee County (Opposition to Special Exception) 1.pdf Dear City of Okeechobee Board of Adjustment Members, Please find attached a correspondence from Mr. Maloney regarding the above referenced matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you need anything further. Best Regards, SAMANTHA BRASWELL Paralegal Legal Advice Today, P(904)389-0050 I F(904)212-1269 Enduring Value Tomorrow.® E samanthab@jimersonfirm.com JIMERSONFIRM.COM Attorneys I Industries I Blogs&Resources I News I Careers Download my VCard Subscribe to our Content JACKSONVILLE nn'•.ANI'O :? VITF'/Fnv Ti'." n,SSEE Wells Fargo Center I One Independent Drive,Suite 1400 I Jacksonville,FL 32202 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:This e-mail transmission and any accompanying documents may contain confidential information,which is legally protected by the attorney-client privilege.The information contained in or accompanying this message is intended only for the use of the person or entity to whom it is addressed.Any unauthorized review,use,disclosure,or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,please respond to the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original e-mail. FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT:This is an attempt to collect a debt,and any information obtained will be used for that purpose. Unless you dispute the validity of this debt or any portion within 30 days of receipt of this notice,we will assume this debt is valid as stated. If you write and dispute this debt,or any portion of it,within the same 30 days,we will obtain and mail verification of the debt,or a copy of the judgment,whichever is applicable. Upon written request,within the same 30 days,we will provide you with the name and address of the original creditor,if different from the current creditor. 1 C.Ryan Maloney rmalonevaiimersonfirm.com Partner j I M E R S O N B I R R Florida Bar Board Certified in Construction Law December 14, 2022 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL (dhoover(a,cityofokeechobee.com) (dmccoy@cityofokeechobee.com) (pbaughman( cityofokeechobee.com) (kbrass( cityofokeechobee.com) (rchartier(a,cityo fokeechobee.com) (m j onassaint(a,c i tyofokeechobee.com) (dmcauley@cityofokeechobee.com) (jshaw(a,cityofokeechobee.coln) (cberlin@cityofokeechobee.com) pburnette@cityofokeechobee.com) (j fumero na,nasonyeager.c om) (gvelazquez@nasonyeager.com) (phahn@bakerdonelson.com) City of Okeechobee Board of Adjustment Attn: Dawn Hoover(Chairperson) Douglas McCoy(Vice Chairperson) Phil Baughman Karyne Brass Rick Chartier Mac Jonassaint David McAuley James Shaw(Alternate) Carl "Butch"Berlin, Jr. (Alternate) Patty Burnette(Board Secretary) Re: Opposition to Special Exception Petition No. 22-003-SE Dear City of Okeechobee Board of Adjustment Members, This letter is written on behalf of SBA 2012 TC Assets, LLC, a subsidiary of SBA Communications Corporation ("SBA"), in opposition to the Application for Special Exception ("Application") submitted by Ignite Wireless/Kyle Lotze, as authorized agent for CitySwitch II- A, LLC ("CitySwitch"), which is scheduled to be considered by the Board of Adjustment at its upcoming meeting on December 15, 2022,at 6:00 p.m. This Opposition amends and replaces the Opposition submitted by SBA on October 19, 2022. The Application seeks approval for the construction of a new 150-foot telecommunications tower, with an additional 10-foot lightning rod(total above ground level ("AGL") height of 160- feet) ("Proposed Tower") on CSX Transportation Inc.'s ("CSX") property located at 1117 NW 9th Street, Okeechobee,FL 34972,under Application File Number 22-003-SE. SBA is the owner One Independent Drive-Suite 1400 I Jacksonville,FL 32202 I Telephone:(904)389-0050 I Facsimile:(904)212-1269 I www.jimersonfirrn.com City of Okeechobee Board of Adjustment December 14, 2022 2 of an existing 150-foot telecommunications tower ("SBA's Tower") located at 3079 NW 8th Street, Okeechobee, Florida 34972, just 0.7 miles from the planned location of the Proposed Tower. Please see Exhibit A for the specific location of the Proposed Tower and SBA's Tower. As described in more detail below, the Board should deny the Application because CitySwitch failed to demonstrate compliance with all of the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations ("LDR")necessary for the Application to be approved, as follows: (1)CitySwitch failed to demonstrate a need or demand for the Proposed Tower,as required by LDR Section 90-602(2)(b),because: (a) AT&T's argument that the Proposed Tower is needed due to the cost of rent on SBA's Tower is no longer applicable because SBA offered to match the monthly rent rate currently offered to AT&T by CitySwitch on the Proposed Tower, less $10.00; and (b) the Proposed Tower would not provide any appreciable increase in signal coverage or strength over the SBA's Tower due to its close proximity to SBA's Tower and another existing tower owned by American Tower Corporation which is located to the West of the Proposed Tower and available for AT&T's collocation ("Existing ATC Tower"); and (2) the Proposed Tower will have an adverse effect on the interests of the citizens of the City contrary to LDR Section 70-373(c)(3), by allowing the proliferation of an unnecessary new tower without any additional cell coverage or benefit, and AT&T's relocation from SBA's Tower to the Proposed Tower will decrease available coverage to the citizens located to the West of the SBA's Tower. CitySwitch Fails to Demonstrate a Need or Demand for the Proposed Tower For the Application to be approved, CitySwitch is required to demonstrate a "need or demand for the"Proposed Tower under LDR Section 90-602(2)(b). In its Application,CitySwitch states that the Proposed Tower is needed for AT&T to "relocate equipment off an existing tower where rent has become exorbitantly high." However, the "need" referenced in LDR Section 90-602(2)(b) was clearly intended to be the "need" of the public, i.e., the citizens of the City, for a new communications tower for cellular coverage. "Need" under that section of the Code was certainly not intended to be the desire of a Fortune 100 company like AT&T to get out of a lease that it previously signed and agreed to as a contract. Further, any alleged need related to the rental payments under AT&T's lease with SBA is negated by the fact that on December 14, 2022, SBA offered to match the monthly rental rate currently offered to AT&T by CitySwitch on the Proposed Tower, less $10.00. As set forth in the Declaration under oath of SBA Site Marketing Manager Brooke Irby, attached as Exhibit B, in a good faith effort to accommodate AT&T's newly expressed desire to re-negotiate the terms of its lease with SBA for AT&T to continue collocating on SBA's Tower, SBA sent a letter to AT&T on December 14,2022,offering to match the monthly rental rate currently offered to AT&T JIMERSON BIRR One Independent Drive-Suite 1400 I Jacksonville,FL 32202 I Telephone:(904)389-0050 I Facsimile:(904)212-1269 I www.jimersonfirm.com City of Okeechobee Board of Adjustment December 14, 2022 Page 13 by CitySwitch, less $10.00, upon AT&T providing a copy of bona fide documentation of the monthly rental rate offered by CitySwitch. In short, SBA has offered AT&T lease terms at a lower cost than what AT&T could obtain from CitySwitch. As stated in the Sworn Statement of Spencer Gamrell with AT&T that CitySwitch provided in support of the Application, AT&T will bear a significant capital cost in decommissioning its equipment from SBA's Tower and re-locating to the Proposed Tower, and would prefer not to do so. As SBA has offered to match the monthly rental rate offered by CitySwitch, less $10.00, AT&T will be better positioned by remaining on SBA's Tower and avoiding the cost of re-locating to the Proposed Tower. AT&T can instead use the relocation costs to benefit the public by upgrading its equipment and installing FirstNet equipment on SBA's Tower. Moreover,although AT&T provided an RF analysis and RF maps("AT&T RF Analysis") which appear to depict a slight gap in coverage in the middle of the map and to the East of SBA's Tower, the AT&T RF Analysis fails to consider coverage from all of the existing and available towers located in AT&T's search ring, including the Existing ATC Tower. As demonstrated below, the Existing ATC Tower is located in the exact area that AT&T claims there is a gap in coverage: f � itairin ,tt�il4 • Ij ! . Proposed Tower i .: : SWESTOKEE -- Existing SBA AT&T Existing Alt tower (OKEE Existing Crown AT&T • • � . �• aaoleeilDUbinN.•I) - c;aolnNlDUIaMC••LS ..... KYi' �asaasm rosnaea..lw .. ... .Ala.I - .1 Figure 1—Predicted coverage map of AT&T's Mobility network with the SBA site(West Okee) and its antennas at 120' As explained in the Declaration under oath of SBA Vice President, New Business Technology and Operations Sanjay Dhawan, attached as Exhibit C, when considering the scope or strength of available coverage in the area,it is necessary to consider coverage from both SBA's Tower and the Existing ATC Tower. In comparing coverage from SBA's Tower and the Existing ATC Tower to the Proposed Tower,it is clear that the Proposed Tower will not appreciably expand �B JIMERSON BIRR One Independent Drive-Suite 1400 I Jacksonville,FL 32202 I Telephone:(904)389-0050 I Facsimile:(904)212-1269 I www.jimersonfirm.com City of Okeechobee Board of Adjustment December 14, 2022 14 the scope or strength of available coverage in the area. Rather, the Proposed Tower will provide duplicative or overlapping coverage with SBA's Tower and the Existing ATC Tower, making the Proposed Tower unnecessary. Instead of constructing another new tower in AT&T's identified search ring,AT&T should instead put its equipment in a location where it expands coverage to the citizens of the City by keeping its equipment on SBA's Tower and putting any new equipment on the Existing ATC Tower. This is exactly what other carriers in the area have done,including T-Mobile and Verizon. Should the Board approve the Application and allow for construction of the Proposed Tower without a demonstrated need, it will set a dangerous precedent that could result in the proliferation of multiple unnecessary towers throughout the landscape. Clearly, such a situation would be to the detriment of the citizens of the City, and contrary to the intent and plain language of the City's LDR. Accordingly,because CitySwitch fails to demonstrate a need for the Proposed Tower, the Application should be denied. The Proposed Tower Will Have an Adverse Effect on The Interests of the Citizens of The City by Allowing the Proliferation of an Unnecessary New Tower and By Decreasing Available Cell Coverage To The Citizens Located To The West of SBA's Tower Further, in granting a special exception use, the Board is required to find that the proposed special exception use "will not have an adverse effect on the public interest." LDR Section 70- 373(c)(3). As stated in the Application,the Proposed Tower is being sought for AT&T to relocate its equipment from SBA's Tower to the Proposed Tower to receive a lower lease rate. However, if the Board approves the Application and allows an entirely new communications tower to be constructed less than a mile from SBA's Tower without any additional cell coverage or benefit, it will have an adverse effect on the interests of the citizens of the City by allowing the proliferation of an unnecessary new tower. Further, if AT&T removes its equipment from SBA's Tower, it will result in a loss of some of the available cell coverage to the citizens located to the West of SBA's Tower. As explained in the Mr. Dhawan's Declaration (Exhibit C), the Proposed Tower will shift the available coverage in the area 0.7 miles to the East, causing at best a marginal improvement of coverage 0.7 miles to the East. However,this relocation would also eliminate some of the available coverage to the citizens located to the West of SBA's Tower. Rather than building an entirely new tower that would at best only marginally improve coverage to slightly to the East of SBA's Tower, while also reducing some of the available coverage to the West of SBA's Tower, AT&T could remain on SBA's Tower and also collocate onto the Existing ATC Tower,which would maximize coverage to all citizens in the area. In fact, carriers in the area including Verizon and T-Mobile are collocated on both SBA's Tower and the Existing ATC Tower to achieve maximum cell coverage to its customers in the area. Should the Board approve the Application and allow for construction of the Proposed Tower, it will be at the expense of the citizens located to the West of SBA's Tower, who will experience a decrease in the available cell coverage, as well as all of the citizens in the City, who JBJIMERSON BIRR One Independent Drive-Suite 1400 I Jacksonville,FL 32202 I Telephone:(904)389-0050 I Facsimile:(904)212-1269 I www.jimersonfirm.com City of Okeechobee Board of Adjustment December 14, 2022 Page I5 will experience the proliferation of an unnecessary and unsightly new tower. Clearly, such a situation would be to the detriment of the citizens of the City, and contrary to the intent and plain language of the City's LDR. Accordingly,because the Proposed Tower will have an adverse effect on the interests of the citizens of the City, the Application should be denied. Conclusion In sum, the Application should be denied because (1) CitySwitch failed to demonstrate a need or demand for the Proposed Tower, as required by LDR Section 90-602(2)(b), and (2) the Proposed Tower will have an adverse effect on the interests of the citizens of the City,contrary to LDR Section 70-373(c)(3). Accordingly, SBA respectfully requires for the Board to deny the Application. Sincer ly, C an Maloney CRM/mgm Enclosures: (Exhibits A-C) cc: Client(via email w/enclosures) File JIMERSON BIRR! One Independent Drive-Suite 1400 I Jacksonville,FL 32202 I Telephone:(904)389-0050 I Facsimile:(904)212-1269 I www.jimcrsonfirm.com Exhibit «A„ SBA FL46235-A Okeechobee Distance Map NW1 Barber NW 9th St Proposed CitySwitch 150'monopole(160'ow Quarters Length 3,933.544 ft Angle 86.39° • F L46235,A • ,isting 150'SBA monopole(ATT @ 120'AGL) NW 8th St NW 8th St NW 7th Ct y'\ �.y NW 711 NW (15SI ,p,i,, 4\ o z NW 6th St NW 6th St NW 1 z n ro iat at NW 5th St ¢ NW 5th St t • s t ( _ m 98 2 ?� z z a z z NW 4th St a NW en... 10/18/2022,1:18:27 PM 1:6,213 0 0.04 0.09 0.18 ml I t ', r 11 , 't 0 0.07 0.15 0.3 km Esri Community Maps Contributors,University of South Florida,FDEP,ata OpenSbeetMap,Microsoft,Esri,HERE,Garmin,SafeGraph,GeoTechnologies, Inc,METVNASA,USGS,EPA.NPS,US Census Bureau,USDA SBA Communications VCGI I TNRIS,Various Counties,Various Vendors I Ohio Department of Natural Resources I Washington State Department of Ecology,Washington State Office of the Chief Information Officer(OCIO),Washington Stale Counties I Commonwealth or Massachusetts Office of Geographic Exhibit «B» SBA Communications Corporation S I)1 8051 Congress Avenue Boca Raton, FL 33487-1307 T+561.995.7670 F+561.995.7626 City of Okeechobee sbasite.com Board of Adjustment RE: Application No. 22-003-SE DECLARATION OF BROOKE IRBY STATE OF GEORGIA COUNTY OF FULTON I, Brooke Irby, hereby certify and state as follows: 1. I am the Site Marketing Manager for SBA 2012 TC Assets, LLC, a subsidiary of SBA Communications Corporation ("SBA"). 2. I make this Declaration with the understanding that it is to be used in opposition to the Application for Special Exception, Application No. 22-003-SE, submitted by Ignite Wireless/Kyle Lotze, as authorized agent for CitySwitch II-A, LLC ("CitySwitch"). All statements contained in this Declaration are based upon my personal knowledge or my personal knowledge of the business records of SBA. I am over the age of eighteen and I am fully competent to testify to the facts recited herein.l 3. It is my job to interact with carriers, such as AT&T, who have located, or are interested in locating, onto an SBA telecommunications tower in Florida. In my capacity working for SBA, I am one of the primary custodians of the organizational documents, files, applications, letters, correspondence, reports, and other paperwork transmitted or received in connection with the dealings with AT&T Wireless ("AT&T") in Florida (the "Records"). SBA's files contain documents which were made and/or kept as part of the Records,contemporaneously at or near the time of the events so memorialized herein, by or from information transmitted by SBA's employees and personnel who had knowledge of the facts set forth in such documents. The Records are kept in the course of a regularly conducted business activity and for each such document contained in the Records,it was the regular practice of business activity to make or retain such document. To the extent that I refer to any such document other than those made or received by me personally,such document is one of SBA's Records. 4. I maintain an open line of communication with the carriers, such as AT&T, to discuss tenant issues, including but not limited to, collocation, new equipment, centerline placement of equipment onto SBA communication towers, and other related matters. This would include the communications tower SBA has owned, operated, and maintained since October 1, 2012, in Okeechobee County,FL on property located at 3079 NW 8th Street,Okeechobee, Florida 34972 ("SBA's Tower"). 5. I understand CitySwitch is seeking approval for the construction of a new 150-foot telecommunications tower, with an additional 10-foot lightning rod (total above ground level ("AGL") height of 160-feet) ("Proposed Tower") on CSX Transportation Inc.'s ("CSX") property located at 1117 NW 9th Street, Okeechobee, FL 34972. 6. I was surprised by CitySwitch's Application for Special Exception that identified AT&T as the primary intended tenant on the Proposed Tower, as I regularly communicate with AT&T. 7. AT&T currently leases space and maintains its communications equipment on SBA's Tower. AT&T has collocated on SBA's Tower since 2008, prior to SBA's ownership. 8. In exchange for collocating on SBA's Tower,AT&T agreed to make rent payments to SBA, in accordance with the Site Lease Agreement dated September 23, 2008, originally established between Nextel South Corp and AT&T. SBA has always billed AT&T in accordance with the agreed upon Site Lease Agreement. 9. Since AT&T has collocated on SBA's Tower, the Site Lease Agreement has been amended 6 times. The most recent amendment to the Site Lease Agreement is dated August 30, 2021, for AT&T to make changes to its equipment mounted on SBA's Tower. 2 10. When AT&T executed the Site Lease Agreement on August 30, 2021, AT&T did not mention any issues or concerns with the Site Lease Agreement with SBA or raise any concerns about the amount of the rent due to SBA for collocating on SBA's Tower. 11. In my prior communications with AT&T, it has not mentioned concerns or issues with SBA's Tower, inquired whether SBA's Tower could accommodate FirstNet equipment, nor has AT&T raised any other concerns to SBA about its occupancy on SBA's Tower. Notably, AT&T has never contacted me about reducing the overall monthly rent rate on SBA's Tower, nor attempted to re-negotiate the terms of the Site Lease Agreement relating to the monthly rent rate. 12. AT&T is currently a tenant on over 6,690 SBA telecommunications towers nationwide. Given our relationship with AT&T, SBA would certainly appreciate the opportunity to work with AT&T to stay collocated on SBA's Tower, which prevents the unnecessary and needless proliferation of telecommunication towers in the City of Okeechobee, Florida. 13. Notably, on December 14, 2022, in an effort to accommodate AT&T's newly expressed desire to re-negotiate the terms of the Site Lease Agreement for AT&T to continue collocating on SBA's Tower, I sent an email to AT&T offering to match the monthly rent rate currently offered to AT&T by CitySwitch on the Proposed Tower, less $10.00 ("SBA's Rent Match Email"). A copy of SBA's Rent Match Email that was sent to AT&T on December 14, 2022, is attached as Exhibit 1. 14. As stated in SBA's Rent Match Email, SBA is willing to match the monthly rental rate currently offered to AT&T by CitySwitch on the Proposed Tower, less $10.00, upon AT&T providing a copy of bona fide documentation of the monthly rental rate offered by CitySwitch on the Proposed Tower. 3 15. Further, having reviewed SBA's corporate records, I can confirm SBA most certainly can accommodate additional equipment for AT&T, including FirstNet equipment, and can accommodate CSX's equipment, on SBA's Tower. 16. Should AT&T's needs require modifications to SBA's Tower, SBA is willing to discuss AT&T's needs with them further. Such modifications as may be needed to accommodate AT&T at a higher height or for more/larger equipment are common practice in the telecommunications industry. 17. In sum, there is ample structural capacity for SBA's Tower to handle more equipment, including CSX's equipment and AT&T's FirstNet equipment, as SBA constructed SBA's Tower to house multiple tenants. [Signature follows on next page] 4 UNDER PENALTIES OF PERJURY, I DECLARE THAT I HAVE READ THE FOREGOING STATEMENTS,AND THAT THE FACTS STATED THEREIN ARE TRUE AND CORRECT. Date: 12/13/2022 BROOKE IRBV 5 Exhibit 1 From: Brooke Irby Sent:Wednesday, December 14, 2022 11:57 AM To:John Heggy(jh7803@att.com)<jh7803@att.com> Subject:SBA site FL14326-A Okeechobee Park in the City of Okeechobee, FL/AT&T Cell Site ID: 10126641 West Okee (FL) Importance: High Re: SBA collocation lease offer to AT&T at SBA Site#: FL14326-A Okeechobee Park in the City of Okeechobee, FL Site Address: 30709 NW 8th Street, Okeechobee, FL AT&T Cell Site ID: 10126641 Cell Site Name: West Okee (FL) Good Morning John, I hope this email finds you well and please consider this email as SBA's offer to renegotiate the lease terms at the referenced SBA Site in the City of Okeechobee, FL. I did not know that AT&T had any interest in renegotiating the current lease or moving away from SBA's tower until SBA discovered CitySwitch's and AT&T's application to construct a new wireless communications facility (.7 miles from the SBA tower) after it already had been filed. It surprises SBA that AT&T did not reach out to SBA or contact me to attempt to renegotiate the lease at issue before moving forward with relocation efforts especially since AT&T just amended this lease in 2021. SBA comes in good faith, seeking to negotiate a lease for AT&T's continued collocation at this site. Please accept this email as SBA's offer to match the corresponding monthly rental rate currently offered to AT&T by CitySwitch on the above referenced tower lease for the above referenced site, less $10.00. SBA will require AT&T first to provide a copy of bona fide documentation proving the rate offered by CitySwitch to AT&T. In order to expedite this process, please send the requested documentation to me via e-mail at birby@sbasite.com. SBA is hopeful we can reach a solution that is best for the City of Okeechobee community while helping AT&T be successful. Thanks in advance, Brooke Brooke Irby Site Marketing Manager SBA 1 SBA Communications Corporation 11415 Old Roswell Road Suite 300 Alpharetta, GA 30009 678.386.5587 +T Blrby(a�sbasite.com Your Signal Starts Here. Exhibit S BA ° , SBA Communications Corporation 8051 Congress Avenue • Boca Raton, FL 33487-1307 1, T+561.995.7670 F+561.995.7626 sbasite.com City of Okeechobee Board of Adjustment RE: Application No.22-003-SE DECLARATION OF SANJAY DHAWAN STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PALM BEACH I, Sanjay Dhawan, hereby certify and state as follows: 1. I am employed as the Vice President, New Business Technology and Operations for SBA Communications Corporation. I am providing this Declaration on behalf of SBA Towers IX, LLC, a subsidiary of SBA Communications Corporation ("SBA"). 2. I have thirty(30)years of wireless experience working in designing,deploying,and optimization of networks with wireless carriers. During my tenure in the wireless industry,I have worked with wireless carriers on multiple generations of deployment from 2G to 5G. Additionally, I manage a team of Radio Frequency ("RF") Engineers, who focus on wireless design and engineering, in and among other things. 3. I make this Declaration with the understanding that it is to be used in opposition to the Application for Special Exception,Application No. 22-003-SE("Application"), submitted by Ignite Wireless/Kyle Lotze, as authorized agent for CitySwitch II-A, LLC ("CitySwitch"). All statements contained in this Declaration are based upon my personal knowledge or my personal knowledge of the business records of SBA. I am over the age of eighteen (18) and I am fully competent to testify to the facts recited herein.' 4. SBA has owned, operated, and maintained a 150-foot communications tower situated on property located at 23079 NW 8th Street, Okeechobee, Florida 34972 ("SBA's Tower"). 5. I understand the Application is seeking to construct a new 150-foot communications tower,with an additional 10-foot lightning rod(total above ground level("AGL)" height of 160-feet,to be situated on property located at 1117 NW 9th Street, Okeechobee,Florida 34972 ("Proposed CitySwitch Tower"), which is only 0.747 miles from SBA's Tower. 6. The SBA Records include an RF Coverage Plot Analysis and the RF Coverage Plots, which compare the available coverage at varying frequencies on SBA's Tower at 120-feet and 155-feet, and the Proposed CitySwitch Tower at 145-feet (collectively, the "SBA RF Analysis"). The SBA RF Analysis is attached to this Affidavit as Exhibit 1. 7. I have reviewed the SBA RF Analysis,and based upon my education,training, and experience, I can confirm that the SBA RF Analysis is an accurate depiction and comparison of the RF coverage between SBA's Tower and the Proposed CitySwitch Tower at varying frequencies. In my capacity working for SBA, I am one of the primary custodians of the organizational documents, files, applications, letters, correspondence, reports, and other paperwork transmitted or received in connection with communication towers located in Florida (the "SBA Records"). SBA's files contain documents which were made and/or kept as part of the SBA Records, contemporaneously at or near the time of the events so memorialized herein, by or from information transmitted by SBA's employees and personnel who had knowledge of the facts set forth in such documents. The SBA Records are kept in the course of regularly conducted business activity and for each such document contained in the SBA Records, it is the regular practice of business activity to make or retain such documents. To the extent that I refer to any such document other than those made or received by me personally,such document is one of the SBA Records. 2 8. Based upon my education, training, and experience, I agree with and adopt the findings in the SBA RF Analysis that the Proposed CitySwitch Tower would not appreciably expand the scope or strength of available coverage in the area, but would instead provide duplicative or overlapping coverage with the that provided by SBA's Tower. Further, the installation of additional antennas on the Proposed CitySwitch Tower would be considered an "overbuild" or impractical given the coverage overlap with SBA's Tower. 9. I have also reviewed the RF analysis by AT&T entitled,"RF Justification for HRR Site FA 15611191, West Okee Relo" (the "AT&T RF Analysis"), which was included with the Application. A copy of the AT&T RF Analysis is attached to this Affidavit as Exhibit 2. 10. The AT&T RF Analysis only considers coverage from SBA's Tower which is 0.747 miles to the West of the Proposed CitySwitch Tower and another tower which is 3.107 miles to the East of the Proposed CitySwitch Tower(the"OKEE Tower"),on which AT&T also currently has active antennas. 11. However,the AT&T RF Analysis does not consider coverage from another existing tower owned by American Tower Corporation which is 0.866 miles to the East of the Proposed CitySwitch Tower and available for collocation(the"Existing ATC Tower"). A map identifying the locations of SBA's Tower, the Proposed CitySwitch Tower and the Existing ATC Tower is attached as Exhibit 3, and the specific addresses of each Tower are set out below: • SBA's Tower (existing AT&T colocation) Address: 3079 NW 8th Street, Okeechobee, FL 34972 Coordinates: Latitude 27.2514; Longitude -80.85687 • Proposed CitySwitch Tower Address: 1117 NW 9th Street, Okeechobee, FL Coordinates: Latitude 27.25214; Longitude -80.84480 • Existing ATC Tower(colocation candidate) Address: 119 NW 8th Street, Okeechobee,FL 3 Coordinates: Latitude 27.250869; Longitude -80.830700 12. SBA's Tower and the Existing ATC Tower are both located within the search ring identified by AT&T in the AT&T RF Analysis. 13. When considering the scope or strength of available coverage in the area, it is necessary to consider coverage from the towers that are located within AT&T's search ring and are available for collocation,including SBA's Tower and the Existing ATC Tower. In comparing coverage from SBA's Tower and the Existing ATC Tower to the Proposed CitySwitch Tower, it is clear that from the SBA RF Analysis, that the Proposed CitySwitch Tower would not appreciably expand the scope or strength of available coverage in the area, but would instead provide duplicative or overlapping coverage with SBA's Tower and the Existing ATC Tower. 14. Further,if AT&T re-located from SBA's Tower to the Proposed CitySwitch Tower, it would shift the available coverage in the area 0.7 miles to the East, causing at best a marginal improvement in coverage 0.7 miles to the East. However, this relocation would also eliminate some of the available coverage to the citizens located to the West of SBA's Tower. 15. Rather than building an entirely new tower that would at best only marginally improve coverage to slightly to the East of SBA's Tower, while hurting coverage at the expense of the citizens located to the West of SBA's Tower, AT&T could remain on SBA's Tower and also collocate onto the Existing ATC Tower,which would maximize coverage to all citizens in the area. 16. In fact, the other carriers on SBA's Tower (Verizon and T-Mobile) are already collocated on both SBA's Tower and the Existing ATC Tower to achieve maximum coverage to all citizens in the area. 4 17. Instead of constructing another new tower in AT&T's identified search ring,AT&T should instead put its equipment in a location where it expands coverage to the citizens of the City of Okeechobee by keeping its equipment on SBA's Tower and putting any new equipment on the Existing ATC Tower. [Signature follows on next page] 5 UNDER PENALTIES OF PERJURY, I DECLARE THAT I HAVE READ THE FOREGOING STATEMENTS,AND THAT THE FACTS STATED THEREIN ARE TRUE AND CORRECT. Date: I / I= -/'ZD Z2 SANJAY DHAWAN 6 Exhibit 1 TO: SBA Subject: RF Coverage Plot Analysis: City of Okeechobee, FL Date:October 18, 2022 1. METHODOLOGY. The attached plots depict broadcast radio frequency(RF) coverage from the existing site to City of Okeechobee, FL and a proposed site approximately 0.7452 miles to the East. At each location,cellular industry typical LTE operating parameters were considered for omnidirectional antennas mounted at 120 and 155 feet above ground level at the existing site, and at 145 feet above ground level for the proposed site. Ground elevations are 33 and 29 feet above mean sea level, respectively. Plots for both locations were generated for 700, 850, 1900 and 2100 MHz operations. The signal levels depicted are associated with LTE service reliability where the strong coverage levels in green and blue occur near the towers and decrease with distance from the sites and intervening terrain obstructions. Signal levels greater than -70 dBm shown as blue are associated with feasible coverage within buildings. Marginal coverage is provided in the regions depicted in yellow between-90 dBm and-80 dBm and signal levels between-100 dBm and-90 dBm shown as red represent poor coverage associated with call failures. A comparison of coverage performance for each site is based on low band (700 and 850 MHz) and high band (1900 and 2100 MHz) prediction results. Radiowave propagation conditions between these bands differ because of terrain and ground clutter (e.g. vegetation) effects at different frequencies. Generally, low band operations provide greater area coverage. Therefore, high band operations provide additional customer traffic capacity closer to the cellular site. 2. COMPARISON. The sites considered in these coverage plots provide service to the depicted locations and roads leading to City of Okeechobee, FL. For low band operations, the existing site provides strong coverage approximately 1.3 miles in all directions and to non-contiguous areas to 1.7 miles from the site. This includes 1.6 miles of US Hwy 98. The proposed site provides strong coverage approximately 1.3 miles in all directions and to non-contiguous areas to 1.7 miles from the site. This includes 1.6 miles of US Hwy 98. For high band operations, both sites provide strong coverage to non-contiguous areas 0.7 miles in all directions. 3. CONCLUSION. Based on the coverage comparison presented above, the proposed site provides comparable coverage to City of Okeechobee, FL due to its close proximity to the existing site. For wireless operators with antennas mounted on the existing site, the installation of additional antennas on the proposed site would be considered to be an "overbuild" or impractical given the coverage overlap. �. t ud.. . y1 ti. 1v 1.r r i 4;N � .Ir ; '• '� ', 14y, a w 1 .. i . - F A " i r, ' i 'l k 'Ir.- . T 'r 0 n a eir 'tt . r** r t '' Jn � � f 4rt .+ 9+ •.�..�wH , �. * ]i „` 0 �T z ,u li � 0Y, "+ c ' ' 'Mb �4t� ' . s' ° 5w ; l, � , , l �.t d.`•0 fR �... hti ` y• , i _ . r «' i =rv � t ^` i ry,„. + NGd. w. u' A.t' s�a• a I"44w ,, #r n % _ m . 4 r v }a �may= � r ■_ _ a iy 11 P-4 ..., ` p Y 1S, "• ' .y w ,u a = n /4 f ° '~ .r � I. if h r ' , w ^" "' ''9 lAb1441'r t4% l i ,�' t �yyt ky •""�s. � w` a � ,f^a ` (( ., ! Yl.4ri t f t,, ,a y" ., • • �a_ C1 4 T t + F , t 'r-• It .fir I-0.1 1 +' , 'A, w d a, ;t a ~Zs K. • Sr v tC: rt'wr+ 'I+...1 u ,f ,+�� !.- a..aw, �,r "'�F`r?.� N. ' t ! ' 111 i* r air .1� {� 'AI r 9 '4 i,�1�N s• i t':. - 1 aro. �A,*r , Nr , • , ar .., }}y�( .rryx� ' L 5. ' ti, ' �, r'."ti J. . �. ■ M.r• "fir* �� r.•.F _ tv9t • T+� a� '"k- ,. 1 r� •1 it .�,.. r ,,� _ �-. ,1J i MINIM FL46235-A Okeechobee Antenna: 15.15 dB'Omni Existing Site Site Name Park RSRP: <300 dBm >=-100 dBm >=-90 dBm >=80 dBm >=70 dem 700 MHz Coverage Latitude: N27 2514 Alpha Rad Center(ft): 120 Longitude: W80.8569 Azimuth(Deg): 0 ERP per RS(W): 2.0 i. act >'.'�j 7 ,.�y i` a• ♦ » `9ry y.•s ,; �''k`N f a�7 r1. '¢ � ''V w. 1,. A • t■ Y! ��a A • ' It'‘.. e.. c"i„+�&_ .-w ••5. �F a � K!r N T TS. f� - • ' �. "� `f�' "��++ AIL •"ex� "a 4,qx� cam• . I. ,� <" 79�r�.. +.r I. • (iti �. - .- • +.': f r i r fir..' .r, p^ .",.` FrC'r,s1Cti n, 1.,' 1J r e `� . i 7 a �e 1 �i �'} ,a .. ;1 f�,i itrk�ryF >tl . / ;,1'L ••fir, st- ii# ,� r : dR . Yl'n} • �'1! .7v. ,�,,• .i. ' ..4 1 �'_o-.. r .r -werl � ''" ' . .r.� - apt YR - '� - -::h, 1.4 j 1.q tb,X44 "In 4.- - "•t§ " • :. ' .. A Fe es- i. a iRei v, a[; 2'7 !4 al +v v » -� + ` r v .1t ■ t a+we. T �. •: , ,• a• i r I W " f, ,O r. c I. / ' 4• f r r .4 � F ,, 4 ,t .-, , e .. s 'x T ` k,i � „ ° f .•1 t 21.4h "�. rA ' n ^ r �t t ';'{ sy ar a 11 �. "dr`i may i ., Lrr r �it /' - .($/ { aY`� ya *r «Rl.. + + r �" �- , oi §" � 4t ,„ .iht :k •.;k. j , 4. P r „ yi!..-it `T+.; .�' N ' i� Sty fi t J �e i�3 • •{i. • �,( I� r 1J FAA�f' .- '.wi i ^' f�••+, .,.tis,.. GG .:. 1'iw' ay�� y +'F rT tt� .Ti. _as�, d ^`,• •d`"y \�� # 'to 'r. t, d :�„ 4 F ,'°.F X�.•,aY'�, Y .- • ter , FL46235-A Okeechobee Antenna: 15.15 dBi Omni Existing Site Site Name Park RSRP <-300 dem>=-100 dem >=-90 dBm >=-80 dOm =-70 dBm 700 MHz Coverage Latitude: N27.2514 Alpha Red Center(ft): 155 Longitude: W80.8569 Azimuth(Deg): 0 ERP per RS(W) 2.0 Nr P� At it • ' i L >I�rwA �, rM"11 ei ! h+ iedi 'i L R '' ,"..,-,,,.: ::- ` Y frt !'�� Y � Y r L F w� { J - �1 : 411ir w ,A, ' . r y i, ^kRR. 'R.� "`�t • r I - '" w�,.`9, - ♦ 14.14401. t N `- 'r v 41110-• tl - h I % 4, . ., I I I Wig ; ' -1`AL..' L fa- y ( • y • i ; My [, E �7, -'r rl_? ffit -'4r i� �N a >! to awa -.,.I ,...1 A --r.: , tik n :r R4,�•F.A r a € r.r. aRcR�� e,r x �' ' r 7 ck y9 +9� •4 W .r•R� M { fit! •{ d rC. A r • n ,y. _ tP4,;.�t 1- yrt • _ it e w ( t R ] t A i Ja '�� t4 ,r 'lit' � v . • '' '.* + 2'y . .. r '� .I+, 9 '�i.. ^pp7 "f`"r • �" Y.-'dii '8 ? "p • A fl ' c... 4 ii.,:k'„I.g",;, - , r,- -..,,--...i,. ' ,•-: , .„„-1,-_, t , ... ., ..„ .., ..., — s..,, - -L. — ti,Ei,1, --Ti r.,,,..,'1.1. , -l'i )4,6. .rt.'t -•.1,0,1,‘„,'N..-: • +' :4+... .K ice, ,�, ,� ,i4. Jr r L:p4 r't„eL:,�..TM't. N.� � P�I a }�-! ` f7CrR .y J 't: `� r" 1b1�R ,r, Ad" Site Name Proposed Center Antenna: 15.15 dBi Omni Proposed Site Latitude: N27 25214 AI ha Rad ft: 145 Bsar: p ( ) <-]BB dBm>=300 dBm >=-90 dBm >=-tW dBm 9=-70 dBm 700 MHz Coverage Longitude. W80.844796 Azimuth(Deg): 0 I laZ ERP per RS(W): .2 0 e, •r •1 -r�l .. _�+^ r ,I,}J` M Tom: rH...t e� � 1. ► ti .... F .!' ._ / ), :. !..,_;. .7: ¢ie •y yg/ Lyid L } •�:✓f�*i 1 ,t• ...ra q -w � s III • F.t Jif Sa.e.x;'I"'.'.J 1 • ` •s"0 • �� f .' ,1 t ' a $a i.liis {it f°' qs... 1 :�; ..` . 5 kf I... •ter. • -�; a. ':'1. ` '} t 'Tr ;v4„i,, - 'J 'n ..4 ° � • oti - w .t+'r r . tt! ' . {l 1. 4. 'b" �-.4 t a A �` 4:: t •3 • r t :d.t �" Jr > _1 Ir}. ) • h` • • ' 4 wg � J 4A -rp , .�- ";" ilk' k I i '4.T A�• : >Rt,« �.,{.x0'1FT,'!, 4 ,.okt, "' •-: • 1 4k' :!,>„ 7.• � 'a+#' 9 �r , t^' - ',YSii •I: .±. • t+t�f!j_',yjam--. ) � . a�` r 14 � ' �, 1 %''t"Rr; r' 4 t1. rt Vn( . • y - R.. +r --.; ' ,) • • .\ • 1•-j T i f J I .l I. .*.r — Jam' ' � �f...... .. 7 1' yam. .V r P 11_ 1 r , J T•.. i•. i. .-1 ry 1,ii '•' •; i p, � .,C am'" , • , .. ..:t t . .. r:—::-'2. 2'1°4 '" 1 . • ',./. 4 fL46235-A Okeechobee Existing Site Site Name Park Antenna: 15.15 dBi Omni RSRR: <-100 dBm >=-300 dBm >=-90 dOm >=-80 dBm >=-70 dBm 850 MHz Coverage Latitude: N27.2514 Alpha Rad Center(ft): 120 Longitude: W80.8569 Azimuth(Deg): 0 ERP per RS(W): 2.0 .. , r .-.1.'' SI /,: 4 ..41.°'..''':.- ' - 4.1.\,-Ok, '' ',41' • 'A r ii.. ' -Al. ' t. . ,,... . , '0- - t.4.. N - Art-. -,-;!..1/‘ f",t :::),„ ,4' -•., -.. ',4411Ptr,..r .. x fp P f, ... ' : ....is ''. ' i'1 t).3*' ''.g .1,,,' •''' .717..1 - '' 1 ICI r 4 i„.. -.,::„..••.•,,,cr.,-..,,,,,,-, . . .., ., .,,t. , , . ..... , ); ., ; • , . ..- - • ' ., ,,1 43./.. -4. --,- ....4 ..1,.1, • 1' 44 ..../1, .-4'' ,14 op,. • •,,, •,,, 1 .,..., . t, -1 - •-, • -- 0 ,•,...t.„ •; •ti"' - ' •;;14,4 -., ,i,:r•-to. ' - ' '-',- ~,,,..‘..,-, , ,. • 0.p - .1. • r-;4 .-- , .ift,#.- ••••-_-_____ ... ----•,,x, r." ‘,...'"'"c''t..,-, '''. r ., ;,•.,1 • . . at:el -4e.: -. ,1, .. , • - ' '1 ' i;t4N-''''.• -•., :•,.' .4?:',,' ., ' 4 , ..k. . rs • • • ' „0, 4 . ' '''''''''-—ii:r.r.'ilir''.-Iiikl'7;;I:',;411:1'Oil''•:"''i,• 441 i lb. , ,' .-' . 5--:'-f \ • '&4:-' ,g' 11'.,,,,,,• • r 101. .,k.,i..-, . ,4....CA th 1 It".../.i.• ..„-1,,..„-,..kr,;,t, qp k •• -• •v'#,41,-, ' ,., V . ,. ,,,, &f..--1,•..p6 - ,,....'- .. - -• .0 ., - .... . 4 ... . ,..., ,,, 2"...._, "4 ,. • , -a - IV6. : .:.. , " i".. Ai- • ,...k.d 4. ; , . 1. 4...., I ii.,'t.•••‘ ° . P 1 4- *. It V:)'' ''' tk..1..---Ty; ,• ' . ''' /0,/ - ' ...,,kr l',• -likkf 4.'t4.'"'•''' . Ste "‘ .. ft. ., /., - .'1,7,' -AR.-tv,,4)„ ' ' ..,t .„ '. 1 P',L •• ...0 ' ' . • ''' '''' ` se'61..? -1,, ".. '. 111ANi."' 4gt _ :./.:,I,'',4 'I : ' - ' 4 P - ,t'' " yr , v . • ,.., ill A i 1 •A I ;•, 7,, • ,;',,,tr,141/ .... . . .......+1,-. ..____ ., L :11- •,°... '.., ' ao. 1 "., ,• ' °-,i Ir. ,, .1,. -.. '', - . ,rr ,, '',...gz--- •<-• .._,4 .if:L ‘ . A .., ! •- : ,,2',., -, ,,ip.4. , '.',.1.4 -,, 4r.,..,‘;.• i - _.:::,,,,,,' .1 a;.14. V i .• . • • .''•'• =t'..L. vr0e:4:....1..0 411$,J.:.1',,:....i' • Nti-. . e!ri, : .., A $ . ._ . . . , .,' „„Z-749°' ....w .11 , ----- ,- do ° . - ' '" - 1' :'7-7721(16f il.,;,71.1,Ir.. 1 1.2,/-,-;1,„!%r, , . v . k I , .,,, . • „ • . -. ''''s • . 'Pri.4"/'141-,!..-J-'•L'',Z-- •z.' ''' -'•,, ''''"A, , ^,4‘•9 . e *,. • ..• I . '.=:1 '.:.,6',..7;'4,t -ri,scur.-,. .. .,.. . „,,, , . ... .., _-_,.... . A ;iw., . , ' - . - 1 17.:):14" A ;',... 1'"' 4,:de.. , 1 11 • 0 4, ; ... r - 7 - ,, • ..:, , --- .1,1 I ,,,;1.1. t* roIN ',.., i-----,jir. -,'-, A ,,, .r. - _ '..1 • ' ' 1 F 1 "' , ''•-•.' • .. —. — • a. -01• '" a j, we -.....Nv 4404, IF .1 ri...:1 • NA •21-%,X - * 1;. '''• ,,':4 1. ,...c" d., z 1.7', i',Iir, 17; 'm -,,-':*: .'"'. ;', , -f. --• ,1:-4-7N, •, •• t x 1 _6.: :71: '''' .:. spot. t ‘,..,- 17 4- ... t, #' 41 11.•/gSr_2,- - Ir. ,... . 'i : ",,1 ---- ;721*-....---4,1.1,,,-,101 ...,,,..-: ..,,..,.(ti• .., • I ' '''' tt.',„,:r •, or g ' 7'-2.'irr P'-1 • ':1 -..; - ,„, , — •-'% eo, - ,,, .." • .---- c• .07.*--71 2 r'‘'''.. ' --..t--a , -, t. 2 .-",,,,i4.,r, .." ;•‘,141Z,• 4,1,4 • ... ,t 'c .,..*„; _., ,..:,.. r ilm , • ',8:‘ t i • . 11..... rA. •s'"S.: ... f7...jiiP`:•.t..,:,;."• ' • ", 4' . FL46235-A Okeechobee RSRP Existing Site Site Name Park Antenna 15 15 dB'Omni <100 dB m>.100 dB m 850 MHz Coverage Latitude. N27.2514 Alpha Rad Center(ft) 155 r ME Longitude. W80 8569 Azimuth(Deg) 0 ERP per RS(W): 2 0 • "",_._ '�ti r h* '�-"'..ems` `,� r M r i 1 VC JO Ii tky".-�` l yhP`.:r ,t -, T`� r na .. ,,,.•,� { s3 } ✓" ' pg, 'E� `vt rl.r 4_i� ��; r tt. .y .�� x �-iva f`e� ia" `.t a/ h . • •r ,, ti " Q.1� •i ' , 'P _.,A * x ";9 1• . - pf•. + .7'„ " r 4, t yr ht.��, e, v ' k. Y dr' X ,Y'. V. 'a I. s,'^*S,t t .r 1. 4" +:4' .. .m' vYl. .1610' ..51`- -�,'f'N ir1..v.+�w 1°iY . i�•. f 5 I y•. ��I. br ,Y T9 r .;i• 0 `at t- * j v.r rry fi 1 ♦ i ' i . } ure► L.-i1 } er-�/ .mot 7 1•. � 41 a+ j` + 77.. i rF1^ic.l•y { St1r� � ," .- k . VV../ y4 Ir 7yt 1 t m . • • 4. � `� • ,, f ( • t' f , ' l t *x `- L • J.. yE } �.-^-•m + tk 71' ' ,F s s`i�' ' �1• • ii Y q� ,! t kr " ,. -' .. ,cam Ise �M $' �' �.. • 4y 'y ,qj", ' p x '' N ,e, ,i r:g I. • ;'+F,� .1 ��.r-_a.-,� ;, 7. �''"S l6 '_s ... !„'a�, �' r�C�p,'.') L� �( �/r �'�` a�S-t.: t1 t.�7 '� ,,_•�.. ` + ff 4. ',:� ! r"S a s„ �i'?? '.}eyr w +.�_�' a s^� ". r�. . • 3+r ... 1 •�i' , •+' ,•. ' /-.4� - ,ram • ® . .- .-.:..At."'* .-�. '; , " Site Name Proposed Antenna. 15.15 dBi Omni Proposed Site Latitude: N27.25214 Al ha Red Center ft: 145 RSRP: p ( ) <-300 dBm >=-300 dBm >=-90 d6m >=-80 dBm =-70 dBm 850 MHz Coverage Longitude: W80.844796 Azimuth(Deg): 0 ERP per RS(W): 2.0 • �9 r � ' ! •._ 1;4 t , '— ..• f•a % • a •petr of f. _ �_,_ 4 r„t} v i`,y • ,�,` etSj ,�pp,[�p,��rt' 111 �'�>�t''' ,iti A r ri �}f a b C+7a� j {'- 9 « ---t4...UG r F., 'ram'' ,* 'm',F: , i . r !;45 _. �• ~ 1. „, �� ` - " iIC:"Ilt .. kk i g'. • s. j • `.'Y, 1 t 1 N 1 Iti .......7..., ! ll. •• - d; YI..-!.�" ► sa rr 1 ^.'. •.w�j�. .3, �e _- (7 •_ ,r•1,.-],L.i , lc + [ s c; Y "��rF �6!1 +.Icr - �i�r; �' + y ,r 9YA:'t sit + u 4 1µ l g �c2 _Y X +' t '+4 - ) . "...Art!:-h ` app -.M M i., _ � r..x T•�• 'r v Jr -. t w,.y, •: ^,woe x, � �i i•`� �e�i��''i r ,_x t ii.r i ' y,rr ie �,,,,t ■+ i "}f p 4 i 1 a4 it" •,'r `lj 'a= 'Ili 1 !' c:P k r:� r 5 't ' 1 gi �-,. p 4 ,1 . 165. J a ` ; ft ` Its c. r —w "- -i - ' tro., e. ... ti , / +a*d y,17 rr�� - _ FL46235-A Okeechobee Existing Site Site Name Park Antenna: 17.15 dBi Omni RSRP: <•300 tlBm >=-300 dBm >=-90 dBm >=-80 dBm >=JO dBm 1900 MHz Coverage Latitude N27 2514 Alpha Rad Center(ft): 120 i EINE Longitude W80.8569 Azimuth(Deg): 0 ERP per RS(W) 4.7 } •r< �1p:L V. �e Y' 7 • ` WSJ^_' y7► �. t _ li) s .. w i mr ' t i, e •' 's, y t R a �'�r��' 'j• F �ft; .i$'W r r � '=�, ". .'ram i • .. Illarrori• .arac g Nr„1„-... i,...- '. ar ! 7�...:V.. , r (.r• . " ( ._ o w . i. 1�p . ` f p{ lyttsek it -4411Zrtlf frw4ii li f, " ' It 1 war.4 ,itt,, '1-• * .7;',i ii:,,A. ivtfi gi'*.tiL '-' „A --;,::.4-1,::.,iii! , " arii " ''' f 1'/kai; . g. '-+' /1 nd-- tre '"R Yx � i M k 1te 't4i I` '. & t r+i '. +wf • q ,y - I' � C '{p7 x ....7. Mwlc '4.Yv'a'_ Y �,.•II y ,.J' - •FT, "•'� .i r- cy1 al • mow ar• y / ` ' Y 1 .} f .:4 r.RI 1 ��°,?Y'r l' 4 i rp i iyf�.-='f.- `1'r,-ta�f 41.,1 lf �4 S Vy%11 ', !i ,►f;:J �—, ; •. � +.y..rr ...¢ t ). ',. a tom' ,.. '''.• 4 .if. 1 �z . .. `! 1) t '-' :3i v.r n �l QQti ". �i +f y11 C?e I !..... ..4 • _ 1 ti " N4v. h"iw, ^...,, t'_ ..' ; �® ' ce ` • FL4623S-A Okeechobee Antenna: 17.15 dBi Omni RSRR: .-100 dem >=-100 dem >=-90 dem >=-BO dem =-70 dBm Existing Site Site Name Park 1900 MHz Coverage Latitude N27.2514 Alpha Red Center(ft): 155 Longitude: W80 8569 Azimuth(Deg): 0 ERP per RS(W): 4.7 ilk, _t T r li � i r, ,.T . t w A.'itl .'t r �, • 1 w. t..,, i it ,J. r a NItilley ii L. • ,'" ' ' 'I,.,, ,-;11 ..,.7,,..L .,,,,,!-i.. ' 7.Y11...' .." .'', ••••.:'..,,'-'l'3t, ,,'..i •, . .. • ,,, i ' . rtl • �r •'3x '� {yam w .Q. r rl' if _ (1�. r , 1' rL ( + •VI. �y• : r-• .., i t'wi.`'' 4,,,,, .• .._..: • ••,-„,„„:„., vt,.. ••.•,..,... .... ,.., . , , _ .. „ .. , ,, . . ,,,,., ,..,. __, :.....: ...,.. . ii„,14••••tl. , t -1±-. T' , ,-„ 4., ae,•' Wm..' . ,1,9s, ... 0- , r .../c, : 4 i i ‘'Ix "ter .ei l, b ` , `ram 1 d .. q� M sx Ik ' 1" irr �w -r x :' , ; ..fi _ t � ` , k ,t ; , r s «Yw #— ---41 1r f( r ` T k ' ? •`t . L Y +�+4 7 '4( " f L..-•.:".r , '. ti. ( r a -se. a ',,.y�ni..t t -- tl,rp` ..,. 4�i I „ v ,r i `r L'`• .S. , • 1AKr' G 'a c(. 1i(' i �� c ` .Y, •��i,L,. 'i t .�144 �,.� •,4# 1 --- � • r � r yr �q.,, ? I"i� �,�j L� i �;;4Y .,Z; .. Y. ,.' � ',q71� ir ( a °ari. . yam.• 1C Site Name Proposed Antenna: 17.15 d8i Omni Proposed Site Latitude: N27.25214 Alpha Rad Center ft: 145 ¢s¢v: p ( ) <-iood¢m >=-iooa¢m >=-eoa¢m >=-soaem aodem 1900 MHz Coverage Longitude: W80.844796 Azimuth(Deg): 0 Mill ERP per RS(W): 4.7 t.' 1 -: - .! . .! }.. r h' 4 i i '�A.r'�..i '7.5 a'" ' '}'P"'S"h•+•,4`f'�$ • • t ,, 1• I I t ' s s r V f V' 1 +r +✓f' • "> ."q "-Tr • . . t ` y1• A.•'S'• r' • ) ( .l ,;I�r{w yak„ 44' ^'-.' it;_> T'� . L 4 al�*�, y .. ij 'T.y,, • 0 :'c s. ,i tit r _ [ 15 4 r; �' �lij • .....414 , .,,".. : r--- -in-.• „. „:0„ :fr.) ,, I '', + .do,. • i .� \ k a .� l+r.! rrs',r w S� t ♦ .A li:i0i- ' . i . o u l ..,„,..„0r.dQ" � tL.. , „i .. yP•r o•4* .a r1 ,, y An ��,--2 �M RP > i r -L. .--, • T. +{ — •...,., , t•' ,rP a �. � "{i— � any s� � ., . �"". '° " ', � '' ;l' ,fi :,,,. . T i rA 4- .111'''''111116r.....• t. 1 T1 r y':s T 1`'I 1•,! _ j r Z•lti • 1 _rent • lie y Ai .r Ii i ..r . FL46235-A Okeechobee Existing Site Site Name Park Antenna: 17.15 dBi Omni RSRR: <aoo dem>=-Pao dom >=-90 dam >=-w dam >=-7o aem 2100 MHz Coverage Latitude N27.2514 Alpha Red Center(ft) 120 ZEE Longitude: W80.8569 Azimuth(Deg): 0 ERP per RS(W): 4.7 try r r • ��' ... •' '� • 4r `' tip' ?�r a f :�4 '#�]1t , i+ � t� t + "fix .* '�.. r f { �� .' �� ...• d { 1l R "� '}$� aft "t �tO�R� - r .�F. .'�' vs?, -v` •1 �' ' 1l/ " 'ti I y �•. � S - � � '-Li '4� � '� 41- '.-' •v . .„10 ,. '4s ilk- .y „, ,,'•h 't: . " fo •, '"r►Z u' , ., .' 7 L :et'�+ ' „w,`�. _ rp, ?' q a'.. irk :. _ • ~'""' 4. mot• t.:.0 ° e•t, ttl �.' ■ k�4' k SE % w �.f • ' 5• rF' v ��.r" � { Sri ,.,,�fS� g 7tf « _ fwi'+ ; y \ s� y _c �''i`+.R'�.. � Nii-ipir " 'Vty7 4 arn�. f > ri'l 'L q r L tF aw., ,� -rn. }; rIr .e' '', '.,Mk'''' . 4/'4211'' ' 1,04'• , til'12111,, I".j 4 ._ -2-_,,- ,L-.1, .yy •�' ;.� � •w., 'e.rr +a��w""I� •fit i�• -v w+F :� " a ..-.,,irk;.. °;.- . z+e' ji a ..11c' yt h \ '.' F _4- G y," yb r• ' ,4': .", —04., ALA ,.._ri."1,C, -r; , ,.,, - : PI + i .,' M � "fah �i • � a ;� a 3�4 x� c,Rr �.« ' L�r" � • �'� •► tL �• :X • _ yam • r , ,�-vr �F s {L. w ry- y.. ,. , .4 ; .i.. ,"fQ .,\* �r r ..x;.: ,-'�'„ •ems ) i t '- a�;��F. !4' ,*.�s • r i: 4sP��7 _4W c�Rg,;, I F w t JI' 1 . y .�, «.. '�••e' } .11, .y _� ,.. PLv�1,.'-.,> 1/ ,{- _ ° ..eJ" j'''. «.r • '' i°.. 4- - t°« • : • ay Ft ! A P t'.Y�>4 f)'" .:I.�� a. N'•' ^ �.E /4 ,Ez ?i'il..;-..i....k,e. ,,', _ ,. .„,„ •• , .,,. ... , . L L.--..,. ': re.1,,:..?1-;:,..11triiiA LA,s,,',' -.-it-,4-- a .-tru Existing Site FL46235-A Okeechobee Site Name Park Antenna: 17.15 d8i Omni RSRr: <-100 dBm >=-100 dsm a=-90 dBm >=80 tlBm >e-70 dBm 2100 MHz Coverage Latitude: N27.2514 Alpha Rad Center(ft): 155 Longitude: W80.8569 Azimuth(Deg): 0 ERP per RS(W); 4.7 • "'411-P.- -1,••••:.1-*L•li.,,'• - , -• • L.; , . .r. •• •1., '4 I - *I'n' , _ h -t":',.:.'1,),r,•,;;•,.:,,,".*1.:*:'?:+>`:;(44.4,,1''''*,''. ' ..'*.i.V..13.r 4. . . ',---. .-.. Lrl-... . ''• '. , 31. "C$r • ... ,. . t• ' • : 5-11,/rt. ;"••,:.-‘,0',- ,. ..,,.i. bI-1 • iestt . -,4 - • . .•,,, k,•' ,.,, -._ : ,.0 ,:r4M kr" . ., .., •• - --,.. ' •r-r" vr-cr• '.1- ,. , . . • .. . .:. ,.. .. .„4,,,.., ,et, .....4 , .""- .;,1,:'!"•• '17"-,,i; .".":7,4°.'-... ' ;;'. . "i. • ...," t,.. ,, 41?..1.% ' . • • 4 i I • '• ••..., 1;jirlt,i.:‘• .:.1T,.. ".17 ,: -,v• -, ' . '.. *k 4'.r...6.1.:'110‘. --. P 41'+.' . ,,.t.. ..,---,..• ....- -.. .-_, . 4..• .., .14. . . ...015 -, -,A i....c. . . - .....1 lk7-. a fil ' • . I r '4 %.' '' i '• • '7,`,!4.-. ,..':-.... 17 • • ;4 , , •ea ' • ,: ' ._, , .. v ••••,,,• „ , . - - I . . •IP .1,..417,'i.,,i'4 ' jvi, 'kv't - Mt .9 • . Ks, • ' rs ' •- itt".• , .ish,, -.1. ,,i, , ---,- ...r. , ,,Y . .. ' •,,,'' 1 t'.• - i ''t i. oja -rt ,...,, . , 4 - . .4.. . • .: ' . Ir.la r:iiic-olgt .. 05P— - .--, . ',--. . Irv.- .;NI - . . .bilL -0.- ,,4 .„...,,,,,,,.. ,.; ..•L , ,,,:.;41.,,,, .: .,... . ,' ; ,,,_,`z'Ask.'',„ ,T*43/..`..y;1,.,.','.,.,.,.''.,,;.' '''. 1 1.1 -* ,t '-le •-t..i•-, .. r. ,,,A., ,.1 A3". ,'' 'X i,. Le4 . ,..',.„.,.:,;...."--;.- .i:..,.,,,,ecH• -L„..4., • ''.._ "• • :*4 n " " • ' 1,4' L..11/21:' ''''' ' '....4 .,.:..,-;v,_:. .,‘-,..,,,,. i.-..:",.,:r.".f.-, x.,-..i* . •,,,,-, . • .. ; , -,, -Nib..I 4.-.,..4.,'.:L. _ - , . '4 . ,:a •' ‘ ' ' ''"..4', '''41. .I , R . ',....4.2d..%:'' '... ••,'.%' ...ii • •, F'24,.. t.. r . -L-' =74.-\-• ' .- ' 41 "" ' ;•1',,=.:-'' '',.e1.-4• . , i' ' , , ,P 7......1.eel p i •.„ , -:1.111.; l'Ir ,-.!' '' ..••-••""‘ Iii." -. *if _ 1,41:,',..'''', s•• ,,,, • • ..•••• ,0 . fr ' f, i, L 0," ,I ,•_.-•.1..,1,,'..: ., ' i e i ." , . 5.1...:::.• .14.' . - "0.. .' i...., ...,. f.P2. .me .....• :r.....7.-. ...m. ,O., i 1;„"It .-:,- -.,,,,I. .. -• .3, .., ,-,,,,,...., II 1 .•:...- . '' T- '`' 'C.- '''''' *IPLY1 , '.....'LliP ,P.. "11A- ,,'.. -0.:'' - '. / 4111 . ••ir#r!...2,,evii, '',.:7.1, • 11'1'',4---,:r:'' ' '- .., ., .itt.i.•.-TA:E',..1.i ,7-.. i..v..1'--7.*:-.;.:!. :: ,i'L.,' - ',.,;:c ' .-:'' \ r ..,.. ...-,•.,•,......ir•rdtg,,, '1;'"1"; •"`".iii, 'If*" '"'•.- ' -- r;,•-•::....00 ,.. ZIP, ,e , .v• , . . . .,..4 Tr T-i-,:• ••.. ,•^ 46,• -,- •'' •• i . '''-;.' -i..k - -• ' . .• '.• l',.t. ' '' • •4 "...' ''‘. .'''. :-''!VP't l''',.'4'....;:,-,..:,;,-I. ;-,g.,,: .,.••;. r ,4,..,.. ,-.,- ''..., . , :l'!...1.,7„,..:-'' '.-1.,;L:,.7....y.`,:':••y.,,!;•-•-itiittl-- ,;41.1,7414,—.1.r.,-,./1 . '' -116%',#;111P.4'' . ,• ....... _... ., . 1 ...' • I.'.' " - .',..4.'. .-;,. f.,-1-e4‘.,,,.:.,'..4.:i • 0"'-.7.01!will'., •••• , .....-•,.t..1 • .4 ' -......., Abri..„„:"'-•-• ;:11 • ..41 •. 111, . , , _ - .Z -.''.4. ...rfr ...a. , . . -... h,,,i,•;.:.; •.• ,, i. . .••:., ,...., ', - .• .91 r . -, . „ . . I; t* L t -1--• Orim..... %„ . . - •4, — r ,,,.' - - . . . ,. r. . _• "1.• '‘I4' ,Vain Of :'• 'r 't, ... , . .; i,. _.... .., .. , ...... . ie... . ".'1', 17"....' .. •31141K.p. ,41- -, ..,'.. bi. •,...:.. I, - 14.- up--,411,.Zi••:,..1ki!,-,:i• • .r .1.1 t.'-",:.,' -tt•,- 4,,,5,-,-- , ,.. : 1•Ak,..,-,`'. 1,,-1:0-•-i.;4••.:. ••••'-'7 .." -,I ',' , ,_ •• it , I A.. i--"---t A. :i,.s7..J.T •.. ..,.;;,2.$1,..... ,:,d.. .,. Ig5-. !1...5...,..,...,•!... ,,.•t•i•,•. •.,,,e•a A•, -. „--- ---.-... -0,-- ..cio.v..,lr _•..,„.".., ' i .,: i :; .. ..,..,. zp . . ' 1. ',"),-1 .... ' •klA .6.•• .. ''''t :`-.• ' r. ...0." .-z "•-- ,.;,.., . , ...• "' :I •.'".Tri -.• %Lai , -,':1,-vy ...,, •:..--- :-.„-- -:t4,": T.,. .--- #..- , .. 4 -P. .. .1b' , )" I, .1. ••.•- . -Jr , .'isk,,,t,-400•- - ,,. "<....*-fr:i., — .11r.,,--4,..,.:.14.4,,i41-_ k'''r..3-11...1,,, . .--- ' •..::.&.7... ,..v...4,,,.,„„..t.,,:,,,,;<„....,1.-.,.,.,..,. .' '..., -..- ..!r..*711• - Site Name Proposed Antenna: 17.15 dB i Omni RSRP: >=-80 dBm >=-70 dBm Proposed Site Latitude: N27.25214 Alpha Rad Center(ft): 145 <-100 dBrn >=.-100 dBrn >.-90 dBm BEN 2100 MHz Coverage Longitude: W80.844796 Azimuth(Deg): i. 0 4 ERP per RS(W): .7 Exhibit 2 `4- 0-'.4-11".' at&t May 24, 2022 Re: RF Justification for HRR Site FA 15611191, West Okee Relo AT&T's RF department has been asked to provide RF coverage maps for proposed site West Okee Relo, the subject of this application. AT&T intends to remove its equipment from the SBA tower (West Okee) located at 2773 NW 8th Street in Okeechobee and install it on the proposed tower to be located at 1678 NW 9th Avenue in Okeechobee. Figure 1 below shows a predicted cellular coverage map for the AT&T network with the SBA site as the network exists today and Figure 2 shows the same predicted cellular coverage map view with the SBA site replaced by the proposed West Okee Relo site. W - ' t -1. r. I • %1 _ mph! , •,,w01 : . 4. -'fir j f r `7. ., Okeecho. , .. q , •12 . .. . Airpor, _ , , i . , , ..,,,, ti.y_ ,a0.- >r I •ofir — E., y *WEST OKEE t -1 ' YPress rC " ; � Quarters Or - + 9 El RSRP level(DU(d8m)>=-90 II. RSRPtevel MU(dam)>=-105 -'^ RSRP Level(DU fdem(>..115 +L k",r - NI RSRP Level IOU(d8m)>=-140 Igi_4lIi '`'I '. Figure 1 — Predicted coverage map of AT&T's Mobility network with the SBA site (West Okee) and its antennas at 120' # it -,,.r i , 4 dry -, ' , iii ,,, , . 41:10 a s -' -;. ., ... -'•4 _ .. .N u Conty ° v•- 4 Airport t 7. S , _,. WEST OKEE RELO:• •r :.�� C' re _ t tr r _ YP J — :.,V . Quart. J. .y,'''. -,P' .tea. . #4114: .— . )'.giok - . l'' , 're , 6 t '''''N.i it di,: .„4„,... • k 7 ,. .wsaarase, .\ III RSRP tree(Dl!(dem)>=-90 ` ,* 1ri RSRP level(DU(dem)>--105 ;MP level(Dl1(dCmi>--115 - ��•>` III RUM level Mt)fdB ti m)>--140 ' , Figure 2 — Predicted coverage map of AT&T's Mobility network with proposed West Okee Relo site and its antennas at 145' AT&T moving their cellular equipment from the SBA tower West Okee to the proposed West Okee Relo tower will enable AT&T to maintain existing service toward the west and improve indoor service levels in downtown Okeechobee where the area's structure density exists the most Sincerely, 0Oefe /Jwosseau George Brosseau Principal RF Design Engineer AT&T Mobility (561) 312-3000 Exhibit 3 Surrounding Towers CT Estatei3 3 m m m m Z NW 34th St z a Z NW 32nd St c NW 30th Ln 2 iii �`r�! Z y NW27th(� O Okeechohse County Airport NW 23rd Ln d , A Z s,'a Z us, q n o • \,a sr n • o NW 18th St bP i " z D 1 N11 Z NW 13th St a NW 12th St „r NW 11th St ProposiCitySwitch 'clpFLM41 D4^i NE 9th St ei aL> N Quarters m NE Yth 1 NW Bth g p C Existing AT l Monopole At Existin SBAlMono ole �NW 7th�t AT PON-AIR - "We§ttc<KEE" `uvrrsih 5t Available cOlocation zZ _a. a. NW 4th St NW 4th St z Z NW 3rd St NE 3rd St • NW 1st St Cypress Existing Crown Lattice Tower ® Okeechobee Quarters AT `bKisAIR - "OKKEE" Site a a L ¢ a e < D vie D SW 8th St SW 8th St "' v3i v3i J w SE 8th St 1° a £ SE 10th St A t7 C 12/14/2022,9:50:33 AM 1:36,112 0 0.28 0.55 1.1 mi AII_Competitor_Data • Crown Castle • T-Mobile 1 + 4 r '' ' 1 Override 1 0 0.42 0.85 1.7 km Independent • AT&T 13 US SBA Owned Esri.NASA,NSA,USGS,FEMA.University of South FDEP.Esri, HERE, Gamin,SafeGraph,GeoTechniversis,Inc, Florida,FlASA,USGS,EPA, — — NPS,US Census Bureau,USDA • American Tower SBA Communications Esri.NASA,NGA.USGS.FEMA I Esri Community Maps Contributors,University of South Florida,FDEP,Esti.HERE,Garmin,SafeGraph,GeoTechnologies,Inc,METI/NASA.USGS.EPA.NPS.US Census Bureau,USDA I VCGI I TNRIS.Various Counties,Various Vendors I Ohio Department of