Loading...
2023-05-16 VI. B. Ordinance 1274 Exhibit 2 • • Exhibit 2 05/16/2023 ORDINANCE NO. 1274 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA; RELATING TO REQUESTS FOR CODE ENFORCEMENT FINE REDUCTIONS, AMENDING PART II OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE WITHIN CHAPTER 18 CODE ENFORCEMENT, ARTICLE II CODE ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURE, BY SPECIFICALLY AMENDING SECTION 18-38 POWERS OF MAGISTRATE; SPECIFICALLY AMENDING SECTION 18-39 FINE REDUCTION REQUEST PROCESS; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 18-33 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Okeechobee states "Florida Statutes (F.S.) Chapter (Ch.) 162, Parts I and II, Local Government Code Enforcement Boards Act is adopted in its entirety, as presently written or as hereafter amended by the State Legislature, as substantive authority for, and to proscribe procedures for, the establishment, organization, and operations of the local code enforcement program for the City"; and WHEREAS, F.S. Section 162.09(2)(c) states that "[a]n enforcement board may reduce a fine imposed pursuant to this section; and WHEREAS, consistent with the authority found in F.S. Ch.162 and Section 18-33 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Okeechobee, the City utilizes a Special Magistrate rather than an Enforcement Board to adjudicate code enforcement matters; and WHEREAS, a number of local governments specify the grounds in which local government staff and Special Magistrates evaluate code enforcement fine reduction requests; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance promotes the public health, safety and welfare of its citizens and inhabitants of the City, pursuant to Article VIII, Section 1(g), Florida Constitution. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained before the City Council of the City of Okeechobee, Florida; presented at a duly advertised public meeting; and passed by majority vote of the City Council; and properly executed by the Mayor or designee, as Chief Presiding Officer for the City; that: SECTION 1: RECITALS. The foregoing "WHEREAS" clauses are ratified and confirmed as being true and correct and are made a specific part of this Ordinance. SECTION 2: AMENDMENT TO SECTION 18-38. That Section 18-38 Powers of Magistrate of Part II of the City Code of Ordinances within Chapter 18 Code Enforcement, Article II Code Enforcement Procedure is hereby amended to read as follows: (a) The Magistrate shall have all powers created by F.S. Ch. 162. Additionally, the magistrate shall have all powers delegated by the City Council relating to the exercise of its police powers pursuant to F.S. Ch. 166. The Magistrate shall have the express power to: (1) Adopt rules for the conduct of Code Enforcement meetings and hearings. (2) Subpoena alleged violators and witnesses. Ordinance No. 1274, Page 1 of 4 Language to be added is underlined. Language to be deleted is struck-t# eugka. • • (3) Subpoena evidence as necessary for hearings, including but not limited to physical and documentary evidence, such as records, surveys, plats, and photographs. (4) Take testimony under oath. (5) Issue orders having the force and effect of law which can command whatever steps are necessary to bring a violation into compliance, such decision to be made at the hearing and reduced to writing and mailed to the violator within ten working days thereafter. (6) Establish and enforce fines pursuant to this municipal code. (7) Authorize the reduction of any fine he or she has imposed. (b) 4ny aggrieved party magi appeal an order of the magistrate to the circuit court in F.S. 162.11, including but not limited to the magistrate'c, determination of a fine reduction. Fine reductions are only authorized for properties that have been brought into full compliance with City's Code of Ordinances and in which the property owner has no other open Code violations or liens on any other property in the City. In evaluating a request fora reduction of any fine he or she has imposed, the Magistrate shall use the following criteria: (1) The recommendation of the City Administrator or his/her designee as to the amount of the lien reduction. (2) The gravity of the underlying code violation which gave rise to the fine imposed by the Magistrate. (3) The number of times within the last five years that an applicant has applied to the City for lien reductions at the property. (4) Whether the property has any liens or expired permits. (5) Whether there are any outstanding balances owed to the City by the property owner. A fine imposed by the Magistrate may be reduced by a maximum of 60 percent. (c) Any aggrieved party may appeal an order of the Magistrate to the Circuit Court as provided in F.S. 162.11, including but not limited to the Magistrate's determination of a fine reduction. SECTION 3: AMENDMENT TO SECTION 18-39 That Section 18-39 Reserved of Part II of the City Code of Ordinances within Chapter 18 Code Enforcement, Article II Code Enforcement Procedure is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 18-39. Fine Reduction Request Process. (a) The City Administrator shall establish a process consistent with this section in which property owners may request a fine reduction imposed by a Magistrate. (b) Property owners wishing to request a fine reduction shall complete a Request for a Fine Reduction Application and submit it to the City Administrator or his/her designee along with the applicable fee. (c) Upon receipt of a completed Request fora Fine Reduction, the City shall schedule an inspection of the property and determine whether there are any other liens or expired permits. The fine shall be tolled until the inspection is completed. Ordinance No. 1274, Page 2 of 4 Language to be added is underlined. Language to be deleted is st{ask-tbreugh. • • (d) If, after inspection, the property is found to be in compliance, a hearing before the Magistrate shall be scheduled. If the property is found not to be in compliance, the property owner shall be promptly notified in writing and be given a reasonable period of time to correct the violation(s) and request a re-inspection. If the property owner fails to correct the violation(s) and/or request a re-inspection within the time frame set forth by the City, the Request for Fine Reduction shall be denied and the fines will retroactively accrue. (e) The City Administrator shall direct Code Enforcement to evaluate each request prior to making a recommendation to the Magistrate. In making its recommendation to the Magistrate, Code Enforcement shall use the following criteria: (1) The gravity of the underlying Code violation which gave rise to the fine imposed by the Magistrate. (2) The length of time in which the property was not in compliance with the City's Code of Ordinances. (3) Whether the property owner was proactive in bringing the property into compliance with the City's Code of Ordinances. (4) Whether there are any exigent circumstances that were the underlying reason for untimely compliance with the City's Code of Ordinances. (5) Whether the property is subject to a foreclosure proceeding. Sections 18-40 — 19-70 Reserved. SECTION 4: SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, clause, or provision of this Ordinance is declared invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder shall not be affected by such invalidity. SECTION 5: CONFLICT. All sections or parts of sections of the City of Okeechobee Code of Ordinances in conflict herewith are intended to be repealed to the extent of such conflict. SECTION 6: INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. It is the intention of the City Council of the City of Okeechobee, and it is hereby ordained that the provisions of this Ordinance shall become and made a part of the City of Okeechobee Code of Ordinances, that the sections of this Ordinance may be renumbered or re-lettered to accomplish such intentions; and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "Section" or other appropriate word. SECTION 7: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be effective upon final adoption on second reading. INTRODUCED for FIRST READING and set for Final Public Hearing on this 16th day of May 2023. Dowling R. Watford Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Lane Gamiotea, CMC, City Clerk Ordinance No. 1274, Page 3 of 4 Language to be added is underlined. Language to be deleted is strusic-th-roug4. • • SECOND READING AND FINAL ADOPTION held this 20th day of June 2023. As required by City Charter Section C-4.1 .C, ordinances shall be adopted by roll call on final reading and recorded, the vote was as follows: Yes No Abstained Absent Council Member Chandler: Council Member/Vice Mayor Clark: Council Member Jarriel: Council Member McAuley: Mayor Watford: Dowling R Watford Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Lane Gamiotea, CMC, City Clerk REVIEWED FOR LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: John J. Fumero, Esq. City Attorney Ordinance No. 1274, Page 4 of 4 Language to be added is underlined. Language to be deleted is struck through • 270 IV. NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED C. Continued.All have their pros and cons which led to considering a blended/staggered option where the OUA could consider immediately moving forward with design, permitting, and construction of a LPS system to serve the residential area (from SW 5th to 7th Avenue's), and then consider future expansion of the gravity sewer for the commercial corridor(SW 3rd to South Parrott Avenue) in the future. He then reviewed the Southwest Service Area (SWSA) Project 1, the master force main and pump station are currently under construction, the SWSA SE 2 Interconnect is in design and permitting. Both the SWSA Project 2 Collection System and Project 3 Okee-Tanie/State Road 78 are in the design and permitting stage. The Treasure Island Project is being reviewed for engineering, this is a large project that the OUA has received funding for and will eliminate over 2,500 septic tanks. The Pine Ridge Park Project is under construction. Mr. Creasman along with Mr. John Hayford, OUA Executive Director responded to Council questions. There was concern expressed in regards to using the LPS system for the SW 5th Avenue Project. Mr. Creasman acknowledged those concerns and advise he would convey them to the OUA Board and request to look at all options. A copy of the power point has been incorporated into the official minute file. This item was for informational purposes, no official action required. D. A discussion was held regarding the current protocol for Code Enforcement reduction of fines. Council Member Jarriel expressed his concern that the Code Enforcement Magistrate recently approved a fine reduction of 75 percent on a $10,000.00 fine. In order to provide historic practices on fine reduction, Chief Hagan distributed two spreadsheets, which have been incorporated into the official minute file. One spreadsheet provided in table format, nine cases that went before the City Council requesting fine reductions between January 2020 through April 2021. Of those nine, one was approved for a reduction of 50 percent, one for 70 percent, one for 75 percent, two for 80 percent, and four for 90 percent, none were repeat violators. The Council, by ordinance in April 2021, gave the authorization to the Special Magistrate to approve all future fine reduction requests. The second spreadsheet provided in table format, nine cases that went before the Special Magistrate requesting fine reductions between May 2021 through September 2022. Seven were approved for a reduction of 75 percent, one was approved for 90 percent due to special circumstances, and one noted as a repeat violator was approved for 50 percent. City Attorney Greg Hyden was in attendance and reviewed Florida Statutes Chapter 162 which addresses Code Enforcement and gave an overview of the process required when approving fine reductions. It was also noted that the intent of issuing fines is to gain compliance and never to be looked at as a source of revenue. The discussion continued with Code Enforcement Officers Anthony Smith and Christina Curl, Chief Hagan, Attorneys Fumero and Hyden responding to questions from the Council. The outcome was for Staff to re-develop their current matrix used when making their recommendation for fine reduction requests to the Special Magistrate, to include the length of time it takes for the property to come into compliance and efforts made by the property owner. It was not noted whether this would need to come back before the Council. E. Motion and second by Council Members Clark and Keefe to approve a Police Fleet purchase of four 2023 Dodge Chargers in the amount of$145,748.00 from Garber Fleet Sales [via the Florida Sheriff's Association bid as presented in Exhibit 3]. A motion to amend the motion on the floor, to purchase five 2023 Dodge Chargers, was made by Council Member Clark and seconded by Council Member Jarriel. Motion to Amend Carried Unanimously. Motion as Amended Carried Unanimously. F. Added Item. Motion and second by Council Members Keefe and Clark to approve an Interlocal Agreement with Okeechobee County for storm debris removal and monitoring [as presented in Exhibit 4]. Motion Carried Unanimously. G. Added Item. Motion and second by Council Members Keefe and Jarriel to approve a Worker's Compensation Settlement with William Saum [as presented in Exhibit 5]. Motion Carried Unanimously. V. CITY ATTORNEY UPDATE • Completed Settlement Agreement with William Saum;and • Interlocal Agreement with the County of Okeechobee for storm debris removal. VI. CITY ADMINISTRATOR UPDATE • Worked closely with County Emergency Management during Hurricane Ian; • Thanked Staff for their dedication and work both before and after Hurricane Ian; • Will be reviewing and updating the Emergency Management Procedures which was last done in 1994. OCTOBER 4,2022,CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING,PAGE 2 OF 3 • • 283 -- CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA s(�" m_ DECEMBER 6, 2022, REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 5, MEETING MINUTES ?IC,- . • I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Watford called the regular meeting of the City Council for the City of Okeechobee to order on December 6, 2022, at 6:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, located at 55 Southeast (SE) 3rd Avenue, Room 200, Okeechobee, Florida. The invocation was offered by Mayor Watford; followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Council Member Clark. II. ATTENDANCE Roll was taken by Deputy City Clerk Heather Prince to establish a quorum. Members present: Mayor Dowling R. Watford, Jr., Council Members Noel A. Chandler, Monica M. Clark, Robert "Bob" Jarriel, and Robert "Bobby" M. Keefe, Jr. III. AGENDA AND PUBLIC COMMENTS A. There were no requests for items to be added, deferred, or withdrawn from the agenda. B. Motion and second by Council Members Keefe and Jarriel to approve the revised agenda as presented. Motion Carried Unanimously. C. There were no comment cards submitted for public participation for issues not on the agenda. IV. CONSENT AGENDA A. Motion and second by Council Members Keefe and Jarriel to [dispense with the reading and] approve the meeting Minutes for November 8, 2022, and November 15, 2022, [as presented]. Motion Carried Unanimously. V. NEW BUSINESS A. Ms. Connie Vanassche, of CAS Governmental Services, LLC, highlighted the City's 2023-24 Legislative Priorities, as presented with the published agenda, that will be presented at the Delegation Hearing scheduled for February 4, 2023. Appropriation Funding requests will include $1,200,000.00 for the hardening of the Public Safety Building, $1,200,000.00 for the hardening of City Hall, and $412,503.00 for State Law Enforcement Radio System Equipment that is a State unfunded mandate. Issues of concern are unfunded mandates and attacks on Home Rule which further fiscally constrain our area that is designated a Rural Area of Opportunity. Our unemployment rate and poverty level are above the State averages. Seek support for the Lake Okeechobee System Operating Manual Project, the Broadband Expansion Programs, and the State's continued financial commitment to the widening of State Road(SR) 70 West to U.S. Highway 27. Request to increase or maintain State Funded Programs: Florida Department of Environmental Protection water quality grants, and Recreation Development Assistance Program grants. Florida Department of Economic Opportunity Rural Infrastructure Fund grants and Historical Preservation grants. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Small County Outreach Program grants. Issues of financial concern are State mandated exemptions, Local Business Taxes, and Communications Services Taxes. There were no modifications made, therefore this item was for informational purposes only. B. City Attorney Greg Hyden reviewed the Code Enforcement Lien Process utilizing an 11-slide power point presentation[as presented in Exhibit 1,with a revised slide 11 and added slide 12 distributed during the meeting]. He highlighted the specifics of Florida Statute Chapter 162 as it applies, then aspects of the City's current Ordinances, and presented the Staff's recommendations for amendments to specify the criteria considered by the Special Magistrate when reviewing requests for lien reductions. This includes reducing liens to a maximum of 60 percent as well as considering the gravity of the violation, efforts towards compliance, and frequency of violations.Attorney Hyden responded to several questions posed by the Council. Following the discussion, the Council agreed to proceed with the amendments as presented. An ordinance will be presented at a future meeting. C. Motion and second by Council Members Chandler and Jarriel to approve the Termination of Grant of License with American Legion Post No. 64 regarding Veterans Square in Flagler Park [as presented in Exhibit 2]. For the record, it was verified that Mr. Steve Lynn of the American Legion is aware of matter and in agreement they are no longer able to maintain the Park as originally agreed; and clarified the Park would continue to be used to honor Veterans and would remain known as Veterans Memorial Square. Motion Carried Unanimously. DECEMBER 6,2022,CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING,PAGE 1 OF 2 V • • 314 VI. NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED A. Continued. The completely voluntary S.A.F.E. program provides for family members/caregivers of individuals who may be on the autism spectrum, have cognitive disabilities, physical disabilities, or other special needs,to register those individuals regarding critical information before an emergency occurs. By doing this, a notification will be provided when first responders are dispatched of the potential encounter, making those first responders better prepared to approach an individual depending on their needs. Additionally, when an individual is registered, they will receive decals to be strategically placed on the home entrance door or window, and/or on a vehicle,to alert first responders to be prepared to encounter someone who may not respond as expected in an emergency situation.Sheriff Stephen recently learned about the program through the Florida Sheriff's Association, it was initiated by Santa Rosas County Sheriff Robert Johnson. The information about implementing the Program was well received by the Council, all were congratulated for their efforts.An enrollment flyer and decal were distributed, a copy of which has been added to the official minute file. B. Utilizing a 16-slide power point presentation, Code Enforcement City Attorney Greg Hyden reviewed the proposed changes as recommended by Staff, to the Code Enforcement fine reduction procedures, as presented in Exhibit 2 and provided below: Code Section 18-38(b), delete the existing paragraph, and add: Fine reductions are only authorized for properties that have been brought into full compliance with City's Code of Ordinances and in which the property owner has no other open code violations or liens on any other property in the City. In evaluating a request for a reduction of any fine he/she has imposed, the Magistrate shall use the following criteria: 1) The recommendation of the City Administrator or his/her designee as to the amount of the lien reduction. 2) The gravity of the underlying code violation which gave rise to the fine imposed by the Magistrate. 3) The number of times within the last five years that an applicant has applied to the City for lien reductions at the property. 4) Whether the property has any liens or expired permits. 5) Whether there are any outstanding balances owed to the City by the property owner.A fine imposed by the Magistrate may be reduced by a maximum of 60 percent. Add a Code Section 18-38(c)to read,Any aggrieved party may appeal an order of the Magistrate to the Circuit Court as provided in Florida Statute 162.11, including but not limited to the Magistrate's determination of a fine reduction. Add Code Section 18-39, Fine Reduction Request Process. a) The City Administrator shall establish a process consistent with this section in which property owners may request a fine reduction imposed by a Magistrate. b) Property owners wishing to request a fine reduction shall complete a Request for a Fine Reduction Application and submit it to the City Administrator or his/her designee along with the applicable fee. c) Upon receipt of a completed Request for a Fine Reduction, the City shall schedule an inspection of the property and determine whether there are any other liens or expired permits. The fine shall be tolled until the inspection is completed. d) If, after inspection, the property is found to be in compliance, a hearing before the Magistrate shall be scheduled. If the property is found not to be in compliance,the property owner shall be promptly notified in writing and be given a reasonable period of time to correct the violation(s)and request a re-inspection. If the property owner fails to correct the violation(s) and/or request a re-inspection within the time frame set forth by the City, the Request for Fine Reduction shall be denied, and the fines will retroactively accrue. e) The City Administrator shall direct Code Enforcement to evaluate each request prior to making a recommendation to the Magistrate. In making its recommendation to the Magistrate, Code Enforcement shall use the following criteria: 1) The gravity of the underlying code violation which gave rise to the fine imposed by the Magistrate. 2) The length of time in which the property was not in compliance with the City's Code of Ordinances. 3) Whether the property owner was proactive in bringing the property into compliance with the City's Code of Ordinances. 4) Whether there are any exigent circumstances that were the underlying reason for untimely compliance with the City's Code of Ordinances. 5) Whether the property is subject to a foreclose proceeding. The presentation also included a four-page Request for Fine Reduction Application and Instructions to be adopted and implemented along with an application fee. Following discussion,the Council did not object to,or offer by consensus or other action,amendments to the proposed changes;they will be presented at a future meeting in a proposed ordinance for a first reading. APRIL 18,2023,CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING, PAGE 2 OF 4