Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2020-10-20 Handwritten Minutes
CITY OF -OKEECHOBEE-ReRMA ;TOBER 20, 2020-, REGULAR M.EETING__________ ... _. _WRITTEN MINUTES BY LANE GAMIOTEA I. CALL. TO. ORDER____ - Mayor Watford called the regular meeting of the -City Council for the City of Okeechobee to order on Tuesda-y� October 20; 2020, a -- -� .M.--ire-the City Council Chambers,- located at 55 Southeast 3rd Avenue, Room 200, Okeechobee, Florida. Pursuant to Executive Order No. 20-69 issued by Governor DeSantis on March 20, 2020, and ext6ft%d-b6y Executiv`e-Ur-der No. 20-246 effecfive September 30, 202 a mee ng was conducted utilizing communications media technology (CMT) as provided by Florida Statutes 12b.54(5)(b)2, by means of Zoom.com Meeting ID 2459713294. The Host uter wa&operated_by-Executive-Assistanf_.Bmck..----.- ---- -- - _.- -- . -_ - - The video, -audio, -and digital comments were recorded and- retained as a permanent record. The invocation was offered by _.` l followed by the Pledge of Allegiance by - 'Z144° . i II. ATTENDANCE Mayor Dowling R. Watford, Jr. Council Member Wes Abney Council Member Clark Council Member Jarriel Council Member Keefe PRESENT ABSENT K City Attorne_y__John Fumero_ ^ _ ✓ _ City Administrator Marcos MontesDeOca _ Policehief. Boh Peterson-. �. Fire W Herb Smith C Public Works -Director -David -Allen - Deputy City Clerk Bobbie Jenkins c/ Executive Assistant Robirr-Brock - General Services Coordinator Patty Burnette_ Finance Director India Riedel Planner Ben Smith i III. AGENDA AND PUBLIC COMMENTS A. Mayor Watford asked -teeter there were a or withdrawn; _ VIA ZOOM? B. Council Member moved to approve the -agenda as presen seconded by Council Member'..J! ':rred, --- --. . Mayor Watford �' utfcil Members Abney k�Jarriel I , Keefe— Moti arriefUDenied. J C. Agenda item forms or comment cards submitted for public not -on the agenda. 7Oox , I -Yt r for anv issues 10/20/2020, Page 1 of 9, L. Gamiotea MinutesAl _ IV. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Mayor Watford proclaimed October 24, 2020 as "World Polio Day." The document was accepted by Mrs. Melisa Jahner, and read into the record as follows: "Whereas, -- Rotary is a global network of neighbors, friends leaders, and problem -solvers who unite and take 14 action to create lasting change in communities across the globe; and Whereas, 4h,-- Rotary motto,---------- - l005 t'D Service Above Self, inspires members to provide humanitarian service, follow high ethical standards, and promote goodwill and peace in the world; and Whereas, Rotary in 1985 launched PolioPlus and { r in 1988 helped establish the Global Polio Eradication Initiative, which today includes the World Health d. Organization, U.S. Centers fcr Disease Control and Prevention, UNICEF, and the -Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, to immunize the children of the world against polio; and Whereas, polio cases have dropped by 99.9 percent since 1988 and the world stands on the threshold of eradicating the disease; ana Whereas, to date, Rotary has contributed more than US $2.1 billion and countless volunteer hours to protecting more than 2.5 billion children in 122 countries; and Whereas, Rotary is working to raise an additional $50 million per year, which would 6e leveraged _ -- for maximum impact by an additional $100 million annually from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and Whereas, these efforts are providing much -needed operational support, medical staff, laboratory equipment, and educational materials for health workers and parents; and Whereas, in addition, Rotary has played a major role in decisions by donor governments to contribute more than $10 billion to the effort; and Whereas, there are over 1.2 million Rotary members in more than 35,000 clubs throughout the world that sponsor service projects to address such critical issues as poverty, disease, hunger, illiteracy, and the environment in their local communities and abroad. Now Therefore, I, Dowling R. Watford, Jr., Mayor of the City of Okeechobee, FL, do hereby proclaim October 24, 2020. as 'World Polio Day' in Okeecnobee and encourage all citizens to join me and Rotary International in the fight for a polio -free world." poa V. CONSENT AGENDA A motion and second was made by Council Members n� X# a to approve the consent agenda items A through C [September 2020 Warrant Register in the amounts: General Fund $596,022.92, Public Facilities Improvement Fund $23,201.64, Capital Improvement Projects Fund $225,414.61, and Law Enforcement Special Fund $225.00 (the complete list is incorporated within the official minute file); annual renewal of the crime lab fees of $35,620.00 with Indian River Crime Laboratory (as provided in Exhibit 1)1 - rejection of submittals received for Bid No. PW 04-00-09-20 City Hall, Fire Department, Records Retention Building Painting Project (as provided in Exhibit 2)]. a _ Mayor Watford Council Members Abney Clark, Jarriel , Keefe Moti n arried/Denied. — 4- V1. MAYOR WATFORD OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT P.M. A. A motion was ofiFered by Council der Tto read proposed Ordinance No. 1218 by title only -a� regarding Land Development Regulations Text Am ndment No. 20-001-TA [as provided in Exhibit 3]; seconded by Council Member Mayor Watford;- Council Members Abney , Keefe . MotionyCarried/Denied. " Attorney Fumero read proposed Ordinance No. 1218 by title only as follows: AN �s _ ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA; AMENDING CHAPTER; 90 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS CIF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE; AMENDING SECTION 90-162, REVISING PERMITTED USES IN THE RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOME ZONING DISTRICT; AMENDING SECTION 90-165, REVISING MINIMUM LOT AND STRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE." 10/20/2020, Page 2 of 9, L. Gamiotea Minutes rt' VI PUBLIC HEARING ITEM A. CONTINUED.__ Council Member OL!& moved to approve the first r 1-91.8;. seconded by Council Member ,��c- J11 j - `V proposed Ordinance No. Amends:-Part II of the Code of Ordinances, Subpart B-Land Development Regulations, Chapter 90-Zoning, Article III -Districts and District Regulations, Division 4-Residential Mobile Home (RMH) District, Section 90-162 Permitted Uses (2) Mobile home park, with one mobile home per site (each site meeting -the -lot -and -site area requirements of Section 90- (8) Site -built or mod ula[ We -family homes ku, —y) a all _c (9) Mobile homes and single-family homes on undersized lots that have existed since August 1, 2 . Section 90-165 Lot and structure requirements amended as follows: = O� (2) Minim lot and site area. s I Area 7,620 square feet �. Mobile home: ` II Width -- Area b. Single Family Home: Width Area c. Other permitted principal uses: .-"-Width 50 feet 10,006-sgaare feet 50 feet 10,000 square feet 100 feet L(3) Minimum yard requirements. Except where a greater distance is required by these'reg,ju ations for a particular use, the minimum yard setbacks in the RMH district shall be as follows: AdMV I/ r,11AA ArA A,-/ A J_A Jn j j X �lr md< A�IY, oow7,>Z' lillfLl►iJL� - - - — ,. _ - : ' �� home and single-family home: N M principalMobile - . -- r���� J►AOF MF. I. n - __ . ' • +�.�. f.__._ri rviwo 991 /IAMIZ �. '1 Wayo r Keefe_ MAYO Jarriel- , 10/20/2020, Page 3 of 9, L. Gamiotea Minutes �. a V11. A. NEW BUSINESS A motion was offered by Council Member _ h; to read proposed Ordinance No. 1219 by title only a —L -date for NovembeF-V1 -2,- 2, regarding Land Development Regulations Text Am �i ment No. 20-002-TA [as provided in Exhibit 4]-, seconded by Council Member - - Mayo r Watford u n c i l eefe otio arried/ E Hied Members Abney Clark Jarriel - J 4___ Attorney Fumero read proposed Ordinance No. 1219 by title only as follows: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA; AMENDING CHAPTER 70 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE; AMENDING SECTION 70-340, BROADENING THE APPLICABILITY OF THE FINDINGS REQUIRED FOR GRANTING PETITIONS; AMENDING FORM 1 OF APPENDIX A TO CLARIFY THE PROCEDURES FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PETITIONS; AMENDING FORM 3 OF APPENDIX A TO CLARIFY THE PROCEDURES FOR ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY CHANGE PETITIONS; CREATING FORM 19 IN APPENDIX A TO PROVIDE STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR ADMINISTRATIVELY INITIATED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS; CREATING FORM 20 IN APPENDIX A TO PROVIDE STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR ADMINISTRATIVELY INITIATED ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY CHANGE PETITIONS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE." - Council Member _�Ohk moved --to- approve the first reading -`of- proposed Ordinance No. 121A seconded by Council Member Amends: Part 11 of the ode of Ordinances, Subpart B-Land Development Regulations, Chapter 70- Administration, Article III -Administrative Procedures and Requirements, Division 4-Application Requirements, Section 70-340 Findings Required for Granting Petitions: All petitions for change of land development regulations and change of zoning district boundary shall be considered in relation to the following criteria, where applicable. In acting upon a petition, the city council, planning board, or board of adjustment, as appropriate, shall find that: (1) The request is not contrary to comprehensive plan requirements. (3) Approval of the request will not have an adverse effect on the public interest. - (5) Approval of the request will not adversely affect property values or living conditions, nor be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property. (7) Approval of the request will not create a density pattern that would overburden public facilities such as schools, streets, and utility services. (8) Approval of the request will not create traffic congestion, flooding or drainage problems, or otherwise affect public safety. Amends: Appendix A -Applications Forms and Content Requirements, Form 1-Comprehensive Plan Amendment Petition as follows: 2. Processing. Comprehensive plan amendment petitions are processed as follows: b. Administrator reviews petition, initiates processing, issues notice of planning board public hearing. d. Administrator issues notice of city council public hearing. Amends: Appendix A -Applications Forms and Content Requirements, Form 3-Zoning District Boundary Change Petition as follows: ' 2. Processing. Zoning district boundary change petitions are processed as follows: b. Administrator reviews petition, initiates processing, issues notice of planning board public hearing. d. Administrator issues notice of city council public hearing._ _ e. City council holds first public hearing, renders decision. f. If approved, Administrator issues notice of second city council public hearing. g. City council holds second public hearing, renders final decision on petition. Amends: Appendix A -Applications Forms and Content Requirements, Form 19-Administratively Initiated Comprehensive�plan Future Land Use Map Amendment as follows: Appendix A -Applications, Forms, and Content Requirements, Form 19 Administratively Initiated comprehensive plan future land use map amendment. 1. Application contents. Comprehensive plan future land use map amendments initiated by the City of Okeechobee shall be presented by city staff in a report which includE's the following: a. List of property owners. b. Location map identifying subject property. c. Future Land Use Map identifying subject property. d. Zoning Map identifying subject property. e. Legal description of subject property. f. Reason for amendment. d. Supplementary supporting information. e. Information and documents requested by city administrator prior to public hearing. 10/2012020, Page 4 of 9, L. Gamiotea Minutes 2. - Processing. Administratively initiated comprehensive plan amendment applications are processed as follows: a. Staff prepares a report on the proposed map change. b. Administrator reviews application, initiates processing, issues notice of public hearing. c. Planning board holds public hearing, forwards advisory recommendation to city council. d. Administrator issues notice of city council public hearing. e. City council holds public hearing, renders final decision on application. Amends: Appendix A -Applications Forms and Content Requirements, Form 20-Administratively Initiated Zoning District Boundary _ Change Petition as follows: Appendix A -Applications, Forms, and Content Requirements, Form 20-Administratively Initiated zoning district boundary change petition. 1. Petition contents. Zoning district boundary changes initiated by the City of Okeechobee shall be presented by city staff in a report which includes the following: a. List of property owners. b. Location map identifying subject property. c. Future land use map identifying subject property. d. Zoning map identifying subject property. T e. Legal description of subject property — -f. Reason for rezoning g. Supplementary supporting information. h. Information and documents requested by city administrator prior to public hearing. 2. Processing. Administratively initiated zoning district boundary change petitions are processed as follows: a. Staff prepares a report on the proposed map change.-- b. Administrator reviews staff report, initiates processing, issues notice of planning board hearing. c. Planning board holds public hearing, forwards advisory recommendation to city council. d. Administrator issues notice of first city council public hearing. e. City council holds first public hearing, renders decision. f. If approved, Administrator issues notice of second city council public hearing. - g. City council holds second public hearing, renders final decision. ■rltr911111 do ..ra L nail Members Abney_ Clark , Jarriei , lenied. 77 10/20/2020, Page 5 of 9, L. Gamiotea Minutes I VII NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED: B. Council Member ti moved to adopt proposed Resolution No. 2020-18, creating the Flagler Park Design Review dvisory Committee [as provided in Exhibit ---- 5]; seconded by Council Member _0. Attorney Fumero read proposed Resolution No. 2020-18 by title only as follows- "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFOKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE FLAGLER." Exhibit 5 included a memorandum issued from Attorney Fumero explaining that at the October 6, 2020, City Council meeting, a discussion occurred about the proposed Flagler Park improvements. -The City Council decided to create an advisory committee to participate in, and make recommendations on, specified aspects of the Flagler Park design and improvements and to solicit citizen input regarding proposed and potential improvements and enhancements to the Park. As proposed, the Flagler Park Design Review Advisory Committee (FPDRAC) would be comprised of seven members appointed by the City Council along with two alternate members. The terms of the FPDRAC would be for a one-year term. As an advisory body, FPDRAC members are subject to state of Florida Sunshine, Ethics and Public Records laws. Among other things, the resolution outlines the FPDRAC charge as well as the rules of conduct and authority of the chair. The City Administrator, or his designee, would serve as a non -voting ex officio member and support staff for the FPDRAC would be provided by his office. i LA Milo", wrzff-� ME" ® O Mayor atford ncil N mbers Abney Cla Ke�fe . Motio arriedTenied. 1 10/20/2020, Page 6 of 9, L. Gamiotea Minutes Jarrie� a ru .�► r). . Vil NEW -BUSINESS • C. Consideration of appointment of Wes Abney. as Ex Officio Member to the Charter Review o -- ♦� i lumalul, PI, mig 0 OW, Ni 17T P, N W�, u wwPulufflam C1.11H 001AN gm 11 VII NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED: D. Consideration of City of Okeechobee/Okeechobee Agreement (Exhibit 6). County Fire Services Interlocal Exhibit 6.included a memorandum from Attorney Fumero explaining the following: The collective City/County goal is to have a finalized Fire Services Interlocal Agreement, with exhibits, for City Council consideration at the October 20 meeting. City fire personnel were informed. that they must submit completed County employment applications on or before October 16, 2020, if they wish to be considered for County employment. Background: At its meeting on July 21, 2020, the City Council directed the City Attorney to directly negotiate with Okeechobee County to develop a proposed FSIA. Since fhat time, we have conducted numerous conference calls with the Okeechobee County Administrator and County Attorney to discuss specific FSIA terms and conditions. To maintain open and up-to-date communications, Attorney-Fumero provided updates on negotiations and outstanding issues concerning the FSIA at the August 28, 2020, September 3, 2020, September 21, 2020, and October 6, 2020 City Council meetings. On September 18, 2020, Administrator MDO and Attorney Fumero conducted one-on-one briefings with each City Council Member. City Council Direction: At the October 6 City Council meeting, Attorney Fumero reported on the outstanding FSIA items as set forth in his October 2, 2020 memo. Final City Council direction and subsequent negotiations with the County encompassed the following: 1. City shall fund a maximum of up to 3 temporary positions at the County for a period of no longer than 2-years. There are 3 City A4 P employees who are not currently in paramedic training but who may enroll in the future. The County will consider these individuals for employment as temporary employees. In this regard, we developed additional FSIA language to set forth the conditions for up to 3 temporary. positions at the County. These temporary positions are intended to allow additional time for City fire personnel to - successfully obtain paramedic certification. 2. City. Council directed that, in the event that any 1 of those 7 City fire personnel currently in the paramedic program are unsuccessful in obtaining paramedic certification, such individuals shall have priority preference (based upon its seniority at the City) in taking one or more of the 3 temporary City funded positions at the County. 3. Regarding the FSIA commencement date, to allow ample time for City fire personnel to complete paramedic training and become certified, the City Council signed off on a FSIA commencement date of June 1, 2021. 4. White outside the scope of the FSIA, City Council agreed on the separation packages for each of the affected fire personnel. Each affected City fire personnel will be provided with a separation agreement specifying payment terms and related issues. Pension and Union issues: Certain aspects of the FSIA are subject to review and approval by pension and union consultants retained by the City. Two experts were retained for the limited purpose of reviewing the pension, labor, and union issues raised by the FSIA. With regard to pension issues, we retained an attorney Yl c [name/firm???] r$— who is a specialist in pension law to review the City's obligations and options regar ing City fire personnel pension obligations.VI (1� We retained an attorney [name/firm???] who is a specialist in - labor and employment issues for the limited purpose of reviewing union and separation agreement terms. FL While the body of the FSIA is generally complete, at the time this memorandum was prepared, the exhibits are in a process of being _ Wo 'CP finalized. The FSIA included four substantive exhibits that are incorporated by reference. tJ1;fLt�Cf1 Exhibit A - Listed employees to be hired by County _ Exhibit B - Temporary positions - l.-iA�M_3)_C_ - VLC f_0 4A Exhibit C - Pension election form — .` CLL'.,1cRA 4A L 9 ev, Exhibit D City's inventory fire vehicles an equipment to be transferred to County T ©fi t irhoou.In J (r1u�7 fY1CilCllvt,a _ ao rm �1 L DLc)� h� : ria , a. VJ7 V�u GO/t�- I ty 0-0 - -;10� 679 7 ram. `� U- ►_1`p�p n" J, --- pmrcn Is A-01-d It— Nlot +1) 10/20/2020, Page 8 of 9, L. Ganniotea Minutes_ I IMMIN EMINIMI Al W ��L � IN IN U3, IWOW FJ L MEN u CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA OCTOBER; 20, 2020, REGULAR MEETING HANDWRITTEN MINUTES BY BOBBIE JENKINS I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Watford called the regular meeting of the City Council for the City of Okeechobee to order on Tuesday, October 20, 2020, at _6:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, located at 55 Southeast 3rd Avenue, Room 200, Okeechobee, Florida. Pursuant to Executive Order No. 20-69 issued by Governor DeSantis on March 20, 2020, and extended by Executive Order No. 20-246 effective September 30, 2020, the meeting was conducted utilizing communications media technology (CMT) as provided by Florida Statutes 120.54(5)(b)2, by means of Zoom.com Meeting ID 2459713294. The Host computer was operated by Executive Assistant Brock. The video, audio, and digital comments were recorded and retained as a permanent record. The invocation was offered by BJ II. ATTENDANCE DW , followed by the Pledge of Allegiance by PRESENT ABSENT Mayor Dowling R. Watford, Jr. Council Member Wes Abney Council Member Clark Council Member Jarriel Council Member Keefe City Attorney John Fumero City Administrator Marcos MontesDeOca Police Chief Bob Peterson Fire Chief Herb Smith Public Works Director David Allen City Clerk Lane Gamiotea Executive Assistant Robin Brock General Services Coordinator Patty Burnette Finance Director India Riedel VIA ZOOM? III. AGENDA AND PUBLIC COMMENTS A. Mayor Watford asked whether there were any agenda items to be added, deferred, or withdrawn; New Business Item E Ex. 7. B. Council Member _WA_ moved to approve the agenda as amended; seconded by Council Member BJ VOTE: Ayes -Mayor Watford, Council Members Abney, Clark, Jarriel, and Keefe. Nays - none. Motion Carried. C. There were no agenda item forms or comment cards submitted for public participation for any issues not on the agenda. None from Zoom IV. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Mayor Watford proclaimed October 24, 2020 as "World Polio Day." The document was accepted by Mrs. Melisa Jahner and Denise, and read into the record as follows: "Whereas, Rotary is a glcbal network of neighbors, friends, leaders, and problem - solvers who unite and take action to create lasting change in communities across the globe; and Whereas, the Rotary motto, Service Above Self, inspires members to provide humanitarian service, follow high ethical standards, and promote goodwill and peace in the world; and Whereas, Rotary in 1985 launched PolioPlus and in 1988 helped establish the Global Polio E=radication Initiative, which today includes the World Health Organization, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, UNICEF, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, to immunize the children of the world against polio; and Whereas, polio cases have dropped by 99.9 percent since 1988 and the world stands on the threshold of eradicating the disease; and Whereas, to date, Rotary has contributed more than US $2.1 billion and countless volunteer hours to protecting more than 2.5 billion children in 122 countries; and Whereas, Rotary is working to raise an additional $50 million per year, which would be leveraged for B. Jenkins Handwritten Minutes, October 20, 2020, Page 1 of 10 maximum impact by an additional $100 million annually from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; and Whereas, these efforts are providing much -needed operational support, medical staff, laboratory equipment, and educational materials for health workers and parents; and Whereas, in addition, Rotary has played a major role in decisions by donor governments to contribute more than $10 billion to the effort; and Whereas, there are over 1.2 million Rotary members in more than 35,000 clubs throughout the world that sponsor service projects to address such critical issues as poverty, disease, hunger, illiteracy, and the environment in their local communities and abroad. Now Therefore, I, Dowling R. Watford, Jr., Mayor of the City of Okeechobee, FL, do hereby proclaim October 24, 2020, as `World Polio Day' in Okeechobee and encourage all citizens to join me and Rotary International in the fight for a polio -free world." Melisa-on behalf of rotary, thank you for proclamation. More than 30 years, partners have driven to eradicate Polio. It can attack nervous system and lead to paralysis. Mainly affects children under the age of 5. 350k cases in 125 countries in 1988. Afghanistan and Pakistan still have cases. We are optimistic we can eliminate polio. Rotary's commitment is $50million per year with $100million matched by Bill Gates Foundation. Asking establishments to put polio pigs to put in each department to collect money. V. CONSENT AGENDA A motion was made by Council Member _BK_ to approve the consent agenda items A through C [September 2020 Warrant Register in the amounts: General Fund $596,022.92, Public Facilities Improvement Fund $23,201.64, Capital Improvement Projects Fund $225,414.61, and Law Enforcement Special Fund $225.00 (the complete Ilist is incorporated within the official minute file); annual renewal of the crime lab fees of $35,620.00 with Indian River Crime Laboratory (as provided in Exhibit 1); rejection of submittals received for Bid No. PW 04-00-09-20 City Hall, Fire Department, Records Retention Building Painting Project (as provided in Exhibit 2)]; seconded by Council Member _MC_ VOTE: Ayes -Mayor Watford, Council Members Abney, Clark, Jarriel, and Keefe. Nays - none. Motion Carried. VI. MAYOR WATFORD OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT _6:12_P.M. A. A motion was offered by Council Member_BJ to read proposed Ordinance No. 1218 by title only regarding Land Development Regulations Text Amendment No. 20-001-TA [as provided in 1=xhibit 3]; seconded by Council Member _MC_. VOTE: Ayes -Mayor Watford, Council Members Abney, Clark, Jarriel, and Keefe. Nays - none. Motion Carried. Attorney Fumero read proposed Ordinance No. 1218 by title only as follows: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA; AMENDING CHAPTER 90 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE; AMENDING SECTION 90-162, REVISING PERMITTED USES IN THE RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOME ZONING DISTRICT; AMENDING SECTION 90-165, REVISING MINIMUM LOT AND STRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE." Council Member _MC_ moved to approve the first reading and set the Final Public Hearing date for November 17, 2020, of proposed Ordinance No. 1218; seconded by Council Member BJ Ben Smith -LaRue Planning -the city received an inquiry from a builder regarding development rights in the RMH district. We became aware of several issues with it and the FLU of SF. The permitted uses in the RMH district was not very clear in terms of how those uses were defined, also the required setbacks, and the allowable density in a SF and RMH district. Part II of the Code of Ordinances, Subpart B-Land Development Regulations, providing for amendments to Chapter 90-Zoning, Article III -Districts and District Regulations, Division 4- Residential Mobile Home (RMH) District, Section 90-162 Permitted Uses as follows: The following principal uses and structures in the RMH district are permitted: (1) Mobile home subdivision, with one mobile home per lot. B. Jenkins Handwritten Minutes, October 20, 2020, Page 2 of 10 (2) Mobile home park, with one mobile home per letsite (each site meei:inq the lot and site area requirements of Section 90-165 2 a . important for density reasons. (3) Hurricane shelter. (4) Public and private schools. (5) House of worship, on a lot of at least five acres. (6) Open space. (7) Public facility or use. (8) Site -built or modular single-family homesG„;etS iR mebile home arks existing as of August 1, 2-007. Did a little research on that language adopted with the intent of allowing SF homes to be built on MH lots, however we feel that language is riot perfect either. Recommended a few changes in the ordinance to clarify how that works. (9) Mobile homes and single• -family homes on undersized lots that have existed since August 1, 2007 (Nov. 17, 2020)_ That will allow for SF homes to be built on non -conforming lots. Allows for higher building standards. Section 90-165 Lot and structure requirements amended as follows: (1) Minimum area. a. Mobile home park: Area T b. Mobile home subdivision:- c. I Recreation vehicle park: (2) 1 Minimum lot and site area. Mobile home -and -single -f—�em a.ieme: (3) b. Single Family Home: bc. Other permitted principal uses: Area 10 acres 10 acres 10 acres Area 5,00 )7,620 square feet Width 50 feet Area 10,000 square feet Width 50 feet Area 10,000 square feet Width 100 feet Minimum yard requirements. Except where a greater distance is required by these regulations for a particular use, the minimum yard setbacks in the RMH district shall be as follows: ba. Mobile home and single-family home: c-b. 'Other permitted principal uses Front Side Rear Front Side Rear 20 feet 10 feet 10 feet 25 feet 20 feet 20 feet WA-MH and SF homes since Aug. 1, 2007: date significance? Ben -existing in the Code, last time this part had been updated. Presumably no new lots should have been created smaller before that time. Talk about changing that date, but that was just existing. Public Comments: none Attorney Fumero: Abney raised a good question about that date, create unwittingly an envelope in no man's land. Recommend making the effective date Nov. 117, 2020. Then the status would not be uncertain. Ben -I think that's appropriate. Motion to amend Ordinance -WA, 2nd BJ Discussion: none VOTE ON MOTION TO AMEND: Ayes -Mayor Watford, Council Members Abney, Clark, Jarriel, and Keefe. Nays -none. Motion Carried. VOTE ON MOTION AS AMENDED: Ayes -Mayor Watford, Council Members Abney, Clark, Jarriel, and Keefe. Nays -none. Motion Carried. B. Jenkins Handwritten Minutes, October 20, 2020, Page 3 of 10 MAYOR WATFORD CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:25 P.M. VII. NEW BUSINESS A. A motion was offered by Council Member _bJ_to read proposed Ordinance No. 1219 by title only regarding Land Development Regulations Text Amendment No. 20-002-TA [as provided in Exhibit 4]; seconded by Council Member _MC_ VOTE: Ayes -Mayor Watford, Council Members Abney, Clark, Jarriel, and Keefe. Nays - none. Motion Carried. Attorney Fumero read proposed Ordinance No. 1219 by title only as follows: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF: OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA; AMENDING CHAPTER 70 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE; AMENDING SECTION 70-340, 13ROADENING THE APPLICABILITY OF THE FINDINGS REQUIRED FOR GRANTING PETITIONS; AMENDING FORM 1 OF APPENDIX A TO CLARIFY THE PROCEDURES FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PETITIONS; AMENDING FORM 3 OF APPENDIX A TO CLARIFY THE PROCEDURES FOR ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY CHANGE PETITIONS; CREATING FORM 19 IN APPENDIX A TO PROVIDE STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR ADMINISTRATIVELY INITIATED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS; CREATING FORM 20 IN APPENDIX A TO PROVIDE STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR ADMINISTRATIVELY INITIATED ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY CHANGE PETITIONS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE." Council Member _MC_ moved to approve the first reading and set the Final Public Hearing date for November 17, 2020 for proposed Ordinance No. 1219; seconded by Council Member BK Ben -origination of this ordinance as you may know, we've been discussing city initiated changes quite a bit lately, preparing for when the City moves forward. Streamline the process for the city a little bit. Checked other municipalities, and we think that as long as you've identified everything appropriately, no need for survey. Also just clarifying a little bit of the language when an app comes forward for a rezoning criteria. First section is generalized language. Part II of the Code of Ordinances, Subpart B-Land Development Regulations, providing for amendments to Chapter 70-Administration, Article III -Administrative Procedures and Requirements, Division 4-Application Requirements, Section 70-340 Findings Required for Granting Petitions as follows: All petitions for change of land development regulations and change of zoning district boundary shall be considered in relation to the following criteria, where applicable. In acting upon a petition-fer a prepesed use, the city council, planning board, or board of adjustment, as appropriate, shall find that: (1) The u-sereguest is not contrary to comprehensive plan requirements. (2) The use is specifically authorized under the zoning district regulations applied for. (3) The useApproval of the request will not have an adverse effect on the public interest. (4) The use is appropriate for the location proposed, is reasonably compatible with adjacent uses, and is not contrary or detrimental to urbanizing land use patterns. (5) T"�eApproval of the request will not adversely affect property values or living conditions, nor be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property. (6) The use can be suitably buffered from surrounding uses, so as to reduce the impact of any nuisance or hazard to the neighborhood. (7) The tse royal of the request will not create a density pattern that would overburden public facilities such as schools, streets, and utility services. (8) The 4jeApproval of the request will not create traffic congestion, flooding or drainage problems, or otherwise affect public safety. (9) The use has not been inordinately burdened by unnecessary restrictions. Amendments to Appendix A -Applications Forms and Content Requirements, Form 1- Comprehensive Plan Amendment Petition as follows: B. Jenkins Handwritten Minutes, October 20, 2020, Page 4 of 10 1. Petition contents. Comprehensive plan amendment petition shall be submitted on the appropriate application form and comprises the following: a. Petitioner's name, address, phone number. b. Reason for requesting the amendment. C. Details of the requested amendment. d. Supplementary supporting information. e. Information and documents requested by city administrator prior to public hearing. f. Application fee. 2. Processing. Comprehensive plan amendment petitions are processed as follows: a. Applicant submits petition to general services department. b. Administrator reviews petition, initiates processing, issues notice of fif-&tplanning board public hearing. C. Planning board holds public hearing, forwards advisory recommendation to city council. d. Administrator issues notice of seGO Idcity council public hearing. e. City council holds public hearing, renders final decision on petition. Appendix A -Applications Forms and Content Requirements, Form 3-Zoning District Boundary Change Petition as follows: 1. Petition contents. Zoning district boundary change petition shall be submitted on the appropriate application form and comprises the following: a. Petitioner's name, address, phone number. b. Proof of interest in property. C. Property survey and location map. d. Property owner's list. e. Site development plan. f. Statement of use. g. Supplementary supporting information. h. Impact analysis. i. Application fee. 2. Processing. Zoning district boundary change petitions are processed as follows: a. Applicant submits petition to general services department. b. Administrator reviews petition, initiates processing, issues notice of f#sfplanninq board public hearing. C. Planning board holds public hearing, forwards advisory recommendation to city council. d. Administrator issues notice of seGend city council public hearing. e. City council holds first public hearing, renders decision. f. If approved, Administrator issues notice of second city council public hearing. eg. City council holds second public hearing, renders final decision on petition. Appendix A -Applications Forms and Content Requirements, Form 19-Administratively Initiated Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment as follows: Appendix A -Applications, Forms, and Content Requirements, Form 19-Administratively Initiated comprehensive plan future land use map amendment. 1. Application contents. Comprehensive plan future land use map amendments initiated by the City of Okeechobee shall be presented by city staff in a report which includes the following: a. List of property owners. b. Location map identifying subject property. C. Future Land Use Map identifying subject property. d. Zoning Map identifying subject property. e. Legal description of subject: property. f. Reason for amendment. d. Supplementary supporting information. e. Information and documents requested by city administrator prior to public hearing. 2. Processing. Administratively initiated comprehensive plan amendment applications are processed as follows: a. Staff prepares a report on the proposed map change. b. Administrator reviews application, initiates processing, issues notice of public hearing. C. Planning board holds public; hearing, forwards advisory recommendation to city council. d. Administrator issues notice of city council public hearing. e. City council holds public hearing, renders final decision on application. B. Jenkins Handwritten Minutes, October 20, 2020, Page 5 of 10 Appendix A -Applications Forms and Content Requirements, Form 20-Administratively Initiated Zoning District Boundary Change Petition as follows: Appendix A -Applications, Forms, and Content Requirements, Form 20-Administratively Initiated zoning district boundary change petition. 1. Petition contents. Zoning district boundary changes initiated by the City of Okeechobee shall be presented by city staff in a report which includes the following_ a. List of property owners. b. Location map identifying subject property. C. Future land use map identifying subject property. d. Zoning map identifying subject property. e. Legal description of subject property f. Reason for rezoning g_ Supplementary supporting information. h. Information and documents requested by city administrator prior to public hearing_ 2. Processing. Administratively initiated zoning district boundary change petitions are processed as follows: a. Staff prepares a report on the proposed map change. b. Administrator reviews staff report, initiates processing, issues notice of planning board hearing. C. Planning board holds public hearing, forwards advisory recommendation to city council. d. Administrator issues notice of first city council public hearing. e. City council holds first public hearing, renders decision. f. If approved, Administrator issues notice of second city council public hearing. g_ City council holds second public hearing, renders final decision. WA -changing the rules for city, are we changing rules the applicant does? Ben -really the changes that you're seeing in the actual way they are processed due to the statutory requirements, planning board, two hearings, etc. WA -as far as surveys, that's not a requirement. Ben -if you're a citizen, application is still the same. WA -legal issue? JF-its ok, Ben and I have been talking about this issue for 6 months and we're comfortable with what we have here. Public Comments: Steve Dobbs, question I know that there are a number of parcels in the city that are inconsistent, my question is if someone came in and had that situation, could that be a city initiated? I also know that there are parcels that have Commercial uses, with MF zoning. In those situations, there some of them out there, could that be, even if the applicant came in and wanted to do that, they have to do something with the parcel. Could that be classified as City initiated. DW-great question, Ben Ben -preview of what the planning board is working on. There are a lot of discrepancies. We were directed to start looking at properties zoned holding first, workshops moving forward with creation of a program that would allow for property owners to come forward and request the change, but the city would be adopting an ordinance initiating a temporary program reducing the requirements, run for a limited time, maybe a reduced application fee. Still a little more work to be done. Our next step is to go property by property to create recommendations for what the map changes would be, to see if the City would approve. If the property owner would come in with what the city would support, it would be a very streamlined process. Applicant could get it done very quickly. DW-we did something similar when we changed the zoning regulations. WA -I'm glad this is being addressed. VOTE: Ayes -Mayor Watford, Council Members Abney, Clark, Jarriel, and Keefe. Nays - none. Motion Carried. B. Council Member _BJ__ moved to adopt proposed Resolution No. 2020-18, creating the Flagler Park Design Review Advisory Committee [as provided in Exhibit 51; seconded by Council Member _BK_ Attorney Fumero read proposed Resolution No. 2020-18 by title only as follows: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE FLAGLER." B. Jenkins Handwritten Minutes, October 20, 2020, Page 6 of 10 Exhibit 5 included a memorandum issued from Attorney Fumero explaining that at the October 6, 2020, City Council meeting, a discussion occurred about the proposed Flagler Park improvements. The City Council decided to create an advisory committee to participate in, and make recommendations on, specified aspects of the Flagler Park design and improvements and to solicit citizen input regarding proposed and potential improvements and enhancements to the Park. As proposed, the Flagler Park Design Review Advisory Committee (FPDRAC) would be comprised of seven members appointed by the City Council along with two alternate members. The terms of the FPDRAC would be for a one-year term, unless council action to the contrary. As an advisory body, FPDRAC members are subject to state of Florida Sunshine, Ethics and Public Records laws. Among other things, the resolution outlines the FPDRAC charge as well as the rules of conduct and authority of the chair. The City Administrator, or his designee, would serve as a non -voting ex officio member and support staff for the FPDRAC would be provided by his office. MC-i would like to see us expand the ex-officio member group, consensus of the board to encompass the entire community. Denise is very experienced in grant writing, meeting at TDC, if our parks look good, her parks look good. We need to work together. WA-7 members, is there any minimal requirements other than live in the County. Various affiliations? JF-Section 5 basically says....... looking for language of residency. MC-i think we did not want to limit: them. BK-if it needs to be stated, Okeechobee county at large. MC -conversation because of Seminole Tribe. Thought we could WA -do agree with MC adding additional ex-officio's. DW-there may be other areas of expertise to be added to that. Maybe landscape architect. Do we want committee to determine who the ex-officio members are? JF-once they become a member, they're subject to sunshine. They can't: react outside the meeting. I'd almost rather they not be members. DW-may be a good point, centennial committee had their hands tied. BK-what is the purview of the ex-officio member. Obviously you can't force anyone to come to meetings. I stated this the last meeting, I want participation from all the stakeholders that will be impacted by this. We can certainly invite, but we can't mandate. If the committee is better served by those experts not being under sunshine. JF-these committees live or die with staff support. MDO-idea from my standpoint. There may be different topics on the agenda. Park 1-use VFW, Just my thoughts, we could get more involvement if it was a meeting important to the group. BK-who will be responsible for inviting? MDO-once we have the initial meetings, from there me or staff. JF-the way these are drafted, the chair has a lot of authority. The chair runs the meeting and develops the agenda. MC -could we consider someone from the County Staff as an ex-officio member? MDO-liked to limit because I can go and talk to her. DW-may I ask, city support staff be provided by this. Who is going to take the minutes? MDO-workload with Lane and Patty, divvy back DW-make sure the clerk is involved because she is custodian of public records. Public comments: none VOTE: Ayes -Mayor Watford, Council Members Abney, Clark, Jarriel, and Keefe. Nays - none. Motion Carried. C. Consideration of appointment of Wes Abney as Ex Officio Member to the Charter Review Committee. MDO-recap for Council, add after he leaves office to continue as a member, but to start as an ex-officio is better. JF-do as a separate action upon leaving office. MC -motion 2nd-BK CC -specify voting or non -voting member JF-ex-officio is non -voting WA -until my term is up then reconsider as a member. Can I vote on this? JF-there's no financial gain. DW-I don't feel like its right that once we set the committee we don't add to it. VOTE: Ayes- Council Members Abney, Clark, Jarriel, and Keefe. Nays- Mayor Watford,. Motion Carried. B. Jenkins Handwritten Minutes, October 20, 2020, Page 7 of 10 D. Consideration of City of Okeechobee/Okeechobee County Fire Services Interlocal Agreement (Exhibit 6). Latest agreement distributed by Attorney at meeting JF-appreciate county attorney and administrator for working with us. Exhibit 6 included a memorandum from Attorney Fumero explaining the following: The collective City/County goal is to have a finalized Fire Services Interlocal Agreement, with exhibits, for City Council consideration at the October 20 meeting. City fire personnel were informed that they must submit completed County employment applications on or before October 16, 2020, if they wish to be considered for County employment. Background: At its meeting on July 21, 2020, the City Council directed the City Attorney to directly negotiate with Okeechobee County to develop a proposed FSIA. Since that time, we have conducted numerous conference calls with the Okeechobee County Administrator and County Attorney to discuss specific FSIA terms and conditions. To maintain open and up-to- date communications, I provided updates on negotiations and outstanding issues concerning the FSIA at the August 28, 2020, September 3, 2020, September 21, 2020, and October 6, 2020 City Council meetings. On September 18, 2020, the City Administrator and I conducted one-on-one briefings with each City Council member. City Council Direction: At the October 6 meeting I reported to City Council on the outstanding FSIA items as set forth in my October 2, 2020 memorandum. Final City Council direction and subsequent negotiations with the County encompassed the following: 1. City shall fund a maximum of up to three temporary positions at the County for a period of no longer than two years. There are 3 City employees who are not currently in paramedic training but who may enroll in the future. The County will consider these individuals for employment as temporary employees. In this regard, we developed additional FSIA language to set forth the conditions for up to three temporary positions at the County. These temporary positions are intended to allow additional time for City fire personnel to successfully obtain paramedic certification. 2. City Council directed that, in the event that any one of those 7 City fire personnel currently in the paramedic program are unsuccessful in obtaining paramedic certification before commencement date, such individuals shall have priority preference (based upon its seniority at the City) in taking one or more of the 3 temporary City funded positions at the County. I have retained an attorney in Tallahassee well versed in Pension Law. He is reviewing the agreement. He may have some minor comments. However, in that regard, the Florida Division of Retirement is reviewing this matter. Somebody in Tallahassee who specifically oversees City FF pension funds. Making sure there are no implications. They would not commit to a timetable. Directed Pension attorney to make sure it is doable for the FF to maintain with the City Pension plan or transferred. We are having an actuarial study conducted to assess the liability to the City, suggested by the Pension attorney. There are a lot of moving parts. Bottom line this agreement is pretty much the final form. The County Attorney and Administrator are supportive of the agreement. There are now 4 exhibits, but have not been finalized. 3. Regarding the FSIA commencement date, to allow ample time for City fire personnel to complete paramedic training and become certified, the City Council signed off on a FSIA commencement date of June 1, 2021. 4. While outside the scope of the FSIA, City Council agreed on the separation packages for each of the affected fire personnel. Each affected City fire personnel will be provided with a separation agreement specifying payment terms and related issues. Pension and Union issues: Please note that certain aspects of the FSIA are subject to review and approval by pension and union consultants retained by the City. Two subject matter experts were retained for the limited purpose of reviewing the pension, labor and union issues raised by the FSIA. With regard to pension issues, we retained an attorney who is a specialist in pension law to review the City's obligations and options regarding City fire personnel pension obligations. We retained an attorney who is a specialist in labor and employment issues for the limited purpose of reviewing union and separation agreement terms. B. Jenkins Handwritten Minutes, October 20, 2020, Page 8 of 10 While the body of the FSIA is generally complete, at the time this memorandum was prepared, the exhibits are in a process of being finalized. The FSIA included four substantive exhibits that are incorporated by reference. Exhibit A - Listed employees to be hired by County Exhibit B - Temporary positions Exhibit C - Pension election form Exhibit D - City's inventory fire vehicles and equipment to be transferred to County DW-a motion is in order to approve the ILA at this point. BJ-move to approve ILA between substantial conformance with draft (get what he read from); MC second. WA -longevity is still being worked out, extra pays to the FF. JF-I actually spoke to WA and Personnel Admin. We are going to get it done, make revisions to whatever is needed. We are not sure where, but its going to be a priority. Ordinances had to be changed so longevity pay can be made to these FF"s. MDO-if we change that in the Code, it will be for all employees. WA -my understanding something had to be changed in the ordinance to facilitate what we want to do. JF- I haven't made a deep dive into this, confident that MDO and CC will jump on this. MDO-dollar figures seemed dated, up to council to address the dollar figure. WA -including the payout structure. DW-I don't think we can commit to that at this moment. JF-staff can commit to bring back recommended changes to make a decision. WA -when would we see that? Next meeting JF/MDO-within a month. DW-do we know what vehicles they are going to request. One pumper, ladder truck? HS-I've been in touch with Chief Franklin and asked him what he needs. I don't know if this has been worked out. DW-can somebody tell me the vehicles? MDO-pickup truck, ladder truck, engine 9. Pickup truck is in question. DW-and giving at no charge? Yes DW-inspection fees remitted quarterly to County that we collect? Yes DW-we are not receiving any collection fee? Yes DW-Fire Station for storage — assuming they are just using the bays. MDO-just the bays DW-we get no reimbursement for that? Utilities? MDO-utilities JF-no insurance just utilities. MC -inspection fees for new set of plans or businesses that pay? MDO-when an app come in with new development. BTR will be the same thing. MC -in the county meeting, Robbie stated those fees would come back to the City. DW-you're correct she did make that comment JF-I specifically addressed that and have a detailed email where that is not her position. DW-I think what we're saying, I assumed he was paid out of the fire fees. MC-i thought it was not to exceed what we would pay for fire assessment. DW-originally but that's out of the window now. JF-that went away about 13 drafts ago. DW-the fee we are paying is what the assessment will be in the City. Chief Smith -just for clarification. Thank you for trying to take care of everybody. One of the 7 will bump one of the three positions who are already engaged in employment, J F-yes MDO-because we committed to the County we would be sending 7 paramedics, we are still going to get billed for 7 paramedics. So what happens through attrition, those people will fill through attrition JF-so the county, based on historic attrition rates, easily absorb the 3 positions in two years. HS-if it doesn't happen JF-positions will not exist after two years. HS-possibility of the 3 being bumped out its over as far as the City paying for them. DW-yes DW-city fire station, time limit? JF-two years, Section 7 Public comments B. Jenkins Handwritten Minutes, October 20, 2020, Page 9 of 10 Frank W. Williamson, III, ECOK. Want to thank you all for your tremendous efforts, tax dollars reduced, tremendous efforts for taking care of the employees. Steve Dobbs -I'm not speaking on behalf of anyone. I have been downsized, laid off, there is a life after that. I appreciate all of you guys, I know you've been attacked personally, and this is happen in a public forum and its difficult. I was talking to someone today and they said it's a business decision, it's a difficult thing to go thru but life goes on. Done the best job you could do with the tools that you had. Council Comments DW-everyone knows how I'm going to vote. First of all if we want to save tax money, I think it's an issue, saving tax money vs. services. The city is here to provide services, that's the only reason it exists. Are the savings worth the services will be giving up? If you wanted to save tax money, just do away with the city and you won't have city taxes. There are times when you have to save money. Major change to our city, our city has provided fire services since 1915, for over a 100 years, this is a major change, I would have preferred a referendum to let the voters decide. We have a great crowd tonight, one of the biggest crowds in a long time. Very few come to council meetings. The number of people to attend on this subject is far above, the majority that have come to the meetings have spoken against. If you truly want to save the taxpayers money, you would create a fire tax in the city through the county, therefore we would not be paying for this with tax money. Let the county take the service and they do the fire tax. I object to completely giving the county those vehicles at no charge. The vehicles will be used for the taxpayers and unincorporated areas. We should be getting some type of collection fee. This decision is going to be made by 5 people, one will not be here after January, two may not be here after two years as they have been indicated. I just wanted to make those comments, because I've held my peace for a long time. I just want to let everyone know my reasons. This is going to be unpopular. VOTE: Ayes- Council Members Abney, Clark, Jarriel, and Keefe. Nays- Mayor Watford,. Motion Carried. ADDED TO AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS ITEM E. Motion MC; 2nd WA. VOTE: Ayes- Mayor Watford,. Council Members Abney, Clark, Jarriel, and Keefe. Nays - none. Motion Carried. Vill. COUNCIL COMMENTS WA -none BJ-1 feel like the Council is 5 people, when you take a vote, you should respect the other Council and that should be the end of it. I'm disappointed by your comments tonight. We are obligated to do things during our term. My obligation is to the city taxpayers. That why I'm here, if I'm on the losing side, when I leave here I respect this council. I'm not going to put you down. I hope I don't hear in the radio or in the paper. We've taken 18 months to decide it. The vote tonight was on the facts. They Firemen due their job, no complaints, I'm happy that some of our council wanted to make sure they were taken care of. I thank them and there will be a lot of things between now and next June when this happens. I see so many councils around the state that fight each meeting. BK-nothing MC -thank everybody for all of their hard work. Very happy we came to a decision after 18 months. I talked to the firemen and they were very appreciative of the severance package. Lacked the initial communication with them. I gave an event calendar from the County TDC. One of the things is we have a slight reduction in tourist tax coming in, but is very small. They have not stopped trying to bring events in. no hotel rooms left for the football tournament. Important we give this info to the hotels, restaurants, businesses, etc. IX. There being no further items on the agenda, Mayor Watford adjourned the meeting at _7:31 P.M. The next regular meeting is scheduled for November 5, 2020, at 6.00 P.M. B. Jenkins Handwritten Minutes, October 20, 2020, Page 10 of 10 October 20, 2020 Pcifdaw-#*U,aoaa mc��W I MOVE TO APPROVE the Interlocal Agreement between Okeechobee County and the City of Okeechobee for Fire Services in substantial conformance with the draft dated October 12, 2020 that has been presented tonight, recognizing that there may be additional refinements to the Agreement including those addressing labor and pension issues. If there are material changes to the Interlocal Agreement hereafter, staff is directed to present such changes to Council for approval. D4U�'j �rom NU-Kcj ��Mtw jw)JU4, tom+ v�.�-a qG.-t VCQA4 UA a