The URL can be used to link to this page

2006-10-25 CITY OF OKEECHOBEE TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES October 25, 2006 AGENDA I. Call to Order - Chairperson. Technical Review Committee Meeting - Chairperson. II. Chairperson and Staff Attendance - Secretary. Voting Members: Brian Whitehall, City Administrator Tom Forbes, Building Official Denny Davis, Police Chief Herb Smith, Fire Chief Oscar Bermudez, City Engineer Donnie Robertson, Public Works Director Non- Voting Ex-Officio Members: John Cook, City Attorney Eddie Trent, Okeechobee County Health Department Jim LaRue, LaRue Planning and Management Services John Hayford, Okeechobee Utility Authority School Board Representative Betty Clement, General Services Coordinator III. Minutes - Deputy Clerk II PAGE 10F6 I ACTION - DISCUSSION - VOTE Administrator Whitehall called the October 25,2006 Technical Review Committee meeting to order at 10:03 a.m. Deputy Clerk Eddings called the roll. Present Present Absent (without consent) Present Present Present Absent (with consent) Present Present Absent (without consent) Absent (with consent) Absent (with consent, Deputy Clerk Eddings present in her absence) A. Motion to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Technical Motion to approve minutes by Director Robertson, seconded by Chief Smith. Review Committee for September 27,2006 regular meeting. WHITEHALL - YEA SMITH - YEA MOTION CARRIED. VOTE FORBES - YEA BERMUDEZ -YEA DAVIS - ABSENT ROBERTSON - YEA AGENDA II October 25, 2006 - TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE - PAGE 2 OF 6 ACTION - DISCUSSION-VOTE I IV. New Business. A. Southern Trace. The application was submitted by Insite Development Group. Staff Report: This is a site plan review for the first phase of a multi-family development which The owner proposes site development improvements with 130 units on a 14.52 will consist of approximately 135 units on 14.53 acres of land (Blocks 4, 13 and 20). This report is acre multi- family residential development. This application includes Blocks 4, focusing specifically on the portions of the property which already have the proper Future Land Use 13, and 20 only. The owner is proposing to amend the land use for Blocks 11, Category and Zoning District. 12,21 and 22 to comply with residential multi-family at a later date. The second phase of the development (Blocks 11, 12,21, and 22) will not be discussed within this report as the applicant is in the process of proposing an Amendment to the Future Land Use Map for Multi Family and a rezoning to RMF. Until the applicant receives approval of the request, Staff will not be reviewing this phase of development findings: Land Use Future Land Use Zoning Existine None Mulit Family RMF Proposed Multi family development None None Required Provided Density Min Lot Area 10 du/ac or 145 units 4,356 sf/du 135 units Block 4 = 211.050 sf 27 units @ 7,816 sf/unit Block 13 = 211.959 sf 54 units @ 3,908.3 sf/unit* Block 20 = 211.050 sf 54 units @ 3,908.3 sf/unit* Min Lot Width Set Back Requirements Front 100ft 670 ft 25 ft Block 4 = 40 ft Block 13 = 40 ft Block 20 = 40 ft AGENDA October 25,2006 - TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE - PAGE 3 OF 6 ACTION>-DISCUSSI IV. New Business Continued. A. Southern Trace, continued. Sides 20 ft Block 4 = east (28 ft) west (27 ft) Block 13 = east (27 ft) west (28 ft) Block 20 = east (28 ft) west (28 ft) Rear 20 ft Block 4 = 215 ft from NW 14th Street Max Lot Coverage 40% Block 4 = 15.7% Block 13 = 31.4% Block 20 = 31.4% Max Imperv Surface 60% Blocks 4, 13, and 20 = 57.44% Maximum Height 45 ft Must not exceed 45 feet in height Parking The minimum parking space Size shall be 9 X 20. Number of spaces 2 per dwelling = 270 spaces Block 4 = 27 units wi 54 spaces Block 13 = 54 units wi 108 spaces Block 20 = 4 units wi 108 spaces Total Spaces = 270 spaces Landscaping Parking Area 3 trees/du = 405 trees Not included Staff does not recommend approval at this time until the minimum lot issues are resolved and landscaping is actually seen and evaluated for compliance. Mr. Bermudez requested to see the permit from South Florida Water Management (SFWM). Mr. Dobbs replied that he had the permit, but not with him at the meeting. Mr. Dobbs told the committee that the alley closing application has been filed with the clerk's office on Monday October 23, 2006. AGENDA October 25,2006 - TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE - PAGE 4 OF 6 ACTION - DISCUSSION IV. New Business Continued. A. Southern Trace, continued. Mr. Whitehall requested that the committee refer to Mr. Bermudez's memorandum. Mr. Dobbs said that Item two, site boundaries, that a chain link fence is shown on the plans. Item three, regarding parking, the plans show 40 feet in front of building to the parking line. Two point two five (2.25) spaces are required and Southern Trace project has provided three. Item four calls for sidewalks along the entire sub-division. Item five regarding the SFWM, there are no wetlands located on this property. Mr. LaRue asked, going back to the parking what the total package would be. Mr. Dobbs replied that 270 spaces as indicated on the plans. Mr. Bermudez told Mr. Dobbs that the committee needs to know how many bedrooms will be in each apartment. Mr. Dobbs replied that there will be three bedrooms in each apartment. Mr. LaRue then stated that more parking will be required. Mr. Whitehall stated that the committee needed bold typicals or summary sheet to keep up with the phases of the project. Chief Smith reported on Item six. The minimum radius is okay, but water infrastructure needs to be in place before the construction. Mr. Forbes asked whether the purchase of the lot would include the town home? Mr. Dobbs replied yes. They will be individually platted. The Fair Housing Act has to be complied with when the project starts. Mr. Bermudez asked whether the plans reflected a clubhouse or an office? Mr. Dobbs replied that it is a clubhouse. Mr. Whitehall stated that Item seven, landscaping was typical of all projects. Mr. Dobbs presented the landscaping plans. Mr. Bermudez stated that he wants typical separation on all buildings. Mr. Dobbs said that there will be no wheel stops or curbing. At this time he was instructed that all street striping has to be done with thermal paint. Mr. Whitehall asked whether each unit has a one car garage? Mr. Dobbs replied yes, although the driveways will accommodate two cars. Two units sharing one driveway. Mr. Bermudez said that nine by twenty is an adequate size for a driveway. AGENDA IV. New Business Continued. A. Southern Trace, continued. B. Nunez Office Building. The application was submitted by Tom Murphy on behalf of property owners David and Anita Nunez. The applicant is requesting to continue the use of a commercial office building which, historically, had no on-site parking available. The property is located at 701 Northeast Park Street. October 25, 2006 - TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE - PAGE 5 OF 6 ACTION'....DIS Mr. LaRue asked whether the zoning and land use map has been platted? Mr. Dobbs answered that on the recorded deed that it shows that it has been platted. Mr. LaRue than stated that this needs to be re-platted. Mr. LaRue explained that re-platting could make a difference in setbacks. Mr. Forbes replied that we need a typical site plan. Mr. Trent had no comments. No action taken on the project, due to re-platting. Nunez Office Building. The application was submitted by Tom Murphy on behalf of property owners David and Anita Nunez. The applicant is requesting to continue the use of a commercial office building which, historically, had no on-site parking available. The property is located at 701 Northeast Park Street. Staff Memo: The applicant is requesting to continue the use of a commercial office building which, historically, had no on-site parking available. The applicant says there are 15 parking spaces on the street which were being used by the site. The Land Development Code would require the applicant to provide 2 spaces on the site and the applicant is requesting to use street parking instead. After reviewing the application and its attachments, Staff recommendation is for the applicant to submit a site plan which depicts the amount of on-street parking spaces in order for staff to make an educated recommendation for the applicant's request. When an adequate amount of on-street parking spaces is available to accommodate parking in the area, the City Engineer should verify that the existing spaces conform to City requirements. Only then can the applicant's request be recommended for approval. Mr. Murphy spoke on behalf of property owners David and Anita Nunez. He stated that they have 15 regular parking spaces and one handicap for a total of 16 spaces available. Property owners are requesting not to have to add the two additional parking spaces. The property owners do no feel they need the additional spaces. IV. New Business Continued. AGENDA B. Nunez Office Building, continued. V. Adjournment - Chairperson. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that if any person desires to appeal any decision made by the Technical Review Committee with respect to any matter considered at this proceeding, such interested person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose may need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. General Services tapes are for the sole purpose of backup for official records of the Department. ATTEST: trl 'c;~~ L ~ . , J k4AJ . (/,.' . .' Melisa Eddings ' II October 25, 2006 - TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE - PAGE 6 OF 6 ACTION. DISCUSSION. VOTE I Mr. Bermudez answered that the Land Development Regulations (LDR) stated that an Occupational License cannot be issued without the specified parking being available. Mr. Murphy said that Radio Shack and Laura Simms property were examples of those who did not have on site parking, but went to the City Council and were approved. Mr. Forbes reported that Laura Simms is still in the process of bringing her building up to the LDR codes. Mr. Whitehall replied that Radio Shack did go before the City Council because they were using all their spaces that were available, but that Mr. and Mrs. Nunez has the space to add the two additional parking spaces that are required. Mr. Murphy reported that the only thing that has changed on that property is the occupant. We have been operating in this building with this many parking spaces for years. There being no further discussion the motion was made. Mr. Whitehall moved to deny continued use of a commercial office building which, historically, has no on-site parking available; seconded by Mr. Bermudez. WHITEHALL - YEA SMITH - YEA MOTION CARRIED. VOTE FORBES - YEA BERMUDEZ -YEA DAVIS - ABSENT ROBERTSON - YEA There being no further items on the agenda, Chairperson Whitehall adjourned the Technical Review Committee Meeting at 10:50 a.m. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLISHER OKEECHOBEE TIMES 106 S.E. 5th St., Okeechobee, FL 34974 (863) 763-7283 Published Weekly STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE: Before the undersigned authority personally appeared James A. Hughes, Jr., who on oath says that he is publisher of the Okeechobee Times, a newspaper published weekly at Okeechobee in Okeechobee, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement, being a Technical Review Committee Meetino Notice PO #13317 in the matter of Citv of Okeechobee City of Okeechobee 55 SE Third Avenue Okeechobee. FL 34974-2932 Inthe was published in said newspaper in the issues of Court, 10/19/2006 Affiant further says that the said Okeechobee Times is a newspaper published at Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Okeechobee, Florida as a daily, weekly, or bi-weekly and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. ~.., this day of (7 t) i~' -if ,Irt.-,fL(/i / A.D. -) 1d" " .' (, ,"-.X/\", /-\.;'-.._(}. .-~ '--.__ (SEAL) """" Rosealee A. Brennan "","YPiJ" 83 ::~~ .'. -'.;&(i'-_ Commission #DD3184 ~.:'~'\~;~ Expires: Jun 25,2008 -:',"}:;;" . . '0;';-'0.-- Bonded Thru "",~~,'>" Atlantic Bonding Co.. Inc. TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMiTTEE" MEETING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN 'ha, ,he Technical Rev~ew Co~tlee 01 the City of O~_eechobee will meet 10 Regular Session on ~ednesday, October 25, 2006, 10:00 a.m. al CllyHalJ. 55 SE 3rd Ave. Rm 200, Okeechobee. Flonda The ,public is invited and encouraged to attend. For a copy of the agenda contact the General Services Depllrtmenla' (863) 763.3372 .218. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVIS~I? that if on)' person desires to appeaJ any deciSion made by the Technical Review Co~mittee with respect to anymslter conSidered at this meeting, such interested person will need a record of the proceedings, and f~r such purpose may need to ensure a ver?attm reco~ of the proceedings is made, w~lch record IDcludes the testimony and eVidence: upon which the appeal is to be based. Tapes are used for tpe sole purpose of bock-up for the Clerk's Office. J~ accordMce with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Florida Statute 286.26, per~ns with disabilities needing special accommodation 10 pnrticipotc in rlUs proceeding should contact Berty Clemenl, no later than two (2) work..ing days prior to the proceeding at 863. ?63-~372 x 214; if you are hearing or voice ImpaJred, call roo 1.800.222.3448 (voice) or 1.888.447.5620 (TrY). by: Brian Whitehall, City Admillistralor Betty Clement, General Services Coordinator Publish,10/19/2006 Okeechobee Times PAGE -1- CITY OF OKEECHOBEE -October 25, 2006 - TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE - HANDWRITTEN MINUTES 8uL~ aJ/UI I. CALL TO ORDER - Chairperson: October 25. 2006 Technical Review Committee Meetine. 10:00 a.m. ~ II. STAFF ATTENDANCE - Secretary Present Absent Administrator Whitehall Building Official Sdttmb (t)~-(iS ~ / Chief Davis Chief Smith Engineer Bermudez ./ Attorney Cook County Health Department Trent Planner LaRue OUA Hayford School Representative Secretary Clement III. MINUTES - Secretary. A. Motion to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Technical Review Committee Minutes for the AYgHEt 2~ 2006 regular meeting. ~-~I /2rJ.bc:.d4j;-J moved to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Technical Review 11..mittee Minutes for the September 27, 2006 regular meeting; seconded by (~A . VOTE Bermudez Davis Forbes Robertson Smith Whitehall MOTION: YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT IV. ~RRI~-DENIED..I .' J/_ e&:WWtJ tU/tit AtJ /lul1jY J<J~1Uj NEW BUSINESS - Chairperson. 16 Jr) ~y. ~U4..a~L l;;(N~ ;pf, 2A-M ~ /v;J/ 7U rf#-eaLvl/t Southern Trace. The application was submitted by Insite Development Group. The owner proposes site development improvements with a 130 units on a 14.52 acre multi-family residential development. This application includes Blocks 4, 13, and 20 only. The owner is proposing to amend the land use for Blocks 11, 12,21 and 22 to comply with residential multi-family at a later date. A. PAGE -2- Staff Report: This is a site plan review for the first phase of a multi-family development which will consist of approximately 135 units on 14.53 acres of land (Blocks 4, 13 and 20). This report is focusing specifically on the portions of the property which already have the proper Future Land Use Category and Zoning District. The second phase of the development (Blocks 11, 12, 21, and 22) will not be discussed within this report as the applicant is in the process of proposing an Amendment to the Future Land Use Map for Multi Family and a rezoning to RMF. Until the applicant receives approval of the request, Staff will not be reviewing this phase of development.findings: Existine Proposed Land Use None Multi family development Future Land Use Mulit Family None Zoning RMF None Reauired Provided Denisty 10 du/ac or 145 units 135 units Min Lot Area 4,356 sf/du Block 4 = 211.050 sf 27 units @ 7,816 sf/unit Block 13 = 211.959 sf 54 units @ 3,908.3 sf/unit* Block 20 = 211.050 sf 54 units @ 3,908.3 sf/unit* Min T ,ot Witlth 1 nn ft f\7n ft Set Back Requirements Front 25 ft Block 4 = 40 ft Block 13 = 40 ft Block 20 = 40 ft Sides 20 ft Block 4 = east (28 ft) west (27 ft) Block 13 = east (27 ft) west (28 ft) Block 20 = east (28 ft) west (28 ft) Rear 20 ft Block 4 = 215 ft from NW 14th Street Max Lot Coverage 40% Block 4 = 15.7% Block 13 = 31.4% Block 20 = 31.4% Max Imperv Surface 60% Blocks 4, 13, and 20 = 57.44% Maximum Height 45 ft Must not exceed 45 feet in height Parking The minimum parking space Size shall be 9 X 20. Number of spaces 2 per dwelling = 270 spaces Block 4 = 27 units wi 54 spaces Block 13 = 54 units wi 108 spaces Block 20 = 4 units wi 108 spaces Total Spaces = 270 spaces Landscaping Parking Area 3 trees/du = 405 trees Not included Staff does not recommend approval at this time until the minimum lot issues is resolved and landscaping is actually seen and evaluated for compliance. )rUJ) ;CC/;Io _ pU$d ~ ~ I::;:!'L l! . / eJ PAGE-3. (T>ttKW- J~ ~~~ Jd; ~4 -Jv:>>(O/L'fc,i) ~AA sruJH - ~tft:; ~ jt{J7x 'ikno. 4c~,t, /uJW11 ~i~ un-,Jlucfe,J ~ ~/u('Uw~ )rtUQ _ oJful (1{~1r <<Pr!- j~ ~ ~,{:jJ (!&./.A lJjo It f.A/{"'UL cr' (J YJ; .LV-i-t (0) a.?, ) . ~,<j. ~~J~ ~_~\.y. ~ ~c )itrA1 - ~~ ~ :J. _ pAlL ~JdU:~- (!.~ .~ fAd I!~ ~^'-- S ~. ~ 0 6f, r. 06 W3 ]v rf'} fj<1 I?L ~ J, ;l. J S' I ()l.IAO (ljJ ~ o. . ::, . jJAg "'" 4 _ APt ,Jo.i.fv'J ;vB.( ~ ~ vl""J: y.r;uIJ ft<Ur.tf< ]/ptJ>'- ~5 _ }lJ W:V.J.~ i'fl~ JJ-#.ltrfflu. sFwff ., (I/A.- '.L ' . v '1lo uJ.Jh.Jp 0'pflL , cril ~"/rJ;;'~ (lA.p<J..srr:;JM ," . . . . . ' "'"! v ~~. 0'0 ,,,J .... t iJcr rJMN'-~' >j~fA1 _ jf.+al pit tt -:> J '( 0 r' Ie. f/l/J flfprJll.7 ~ j vue I /,1J1S +0 (uk,,) ~~.1 j'rI--+ (y..k\(}.()",,: ,~JiLt'. '" '1f) >>J,i _ 3 U - ,#fCu-< - UJ)fi} p.ed /r'A/<f p fu"'J' ~i;. _ t~ :~1:!~~~/.J.~~~(f ~ - ~ tV,; N~ JY9~ (r ~J (P~.}l~ olC · CJ.-uts:,~4: - LJtl:U:'G 0t"J-t\ ue&.uJ jlLd' ~ t-< r p1 L4L l1:~\J..J u4)l1.,l.cfJAc. ::JAJY'A (_ {L II ~fV:'1 jef!' /,-U' ~i7f ??/':,LL v-j j{J t ? Ae,]J I fjd ~~( :/ it !f<~. ~(viiw..U;J pJ d1:r:t- J'oi ~ ~ &k'; ~ ad J p,*, "'- e ~L uJd:1... vJJ-i\l W'L---t. 0 ~ ~ w _ cJu./ct (..u..u./ 8-1. Iii c. / /-,-\-tx"il., ).:-1. b fi. cJ;.tc ""~ Ju~~ - h?L'C~ (~ fJA-c-fd jULb.L. ..;)fL1frL '1- .j.J.-J-U.-'-jU 7f ~ t>-01-A{ - Jlrz10 b' -- '-1~: )bcl+ irbi/;.JLf;f Jr'1X &<L ~v<JJ. /7' ' c U ,1,Ul c~( IU.. c ~ rr"- - /7D / " ~ / _ CJll' Lv uf JOl.f1il'.;UIJ-,L [-,t [Ui< vli'Ji.. At,;. 1;JluJ ~f0/ cwv()A.~ - /)Ji};t. { Iu.-JR rwr- tuJ _ E~cJ' (),;1 J\P / eM ~~''f/ ~ ~t:iA/L, W~ . OJ W /;J (1).Jl~'"t cifu)./~f - ~ i 0.(:) ('u.JoA, ~7 (jV:1D )/J rJ.<ri-ejwj Itt dHV.RL,I"j ~r .::\ t{ fCw - PAGE -4- ~:~ 4~~wi ~ ~LP JUi'" #c .dj. &u...... f1'~ - Jet-'> -<-t? .~-t,"~1 / t V/"li~ Z'-td fh( )lR~{)IIJiLl rlttf~idA piLi: - Jt ~ {l l1-pi 1J-{...pA C ~4V. 8 JtJl~flwl ~ fJ- i<>>vJ~.lJ rJ d/j l ~.ifj t:. ~ I --tr-i 4 Cj1J,. ~Ul t u rJ___ Npl fL-t . (f'!.J<!.I-I' Il diJ!.f!/dtU. U I U / A7 f!tUk- h j~' Y . J Y ~~~ ~J/'fcUL J.:/piCAY ~dLrl<-''-- t{t l-u ~,~j - j\t 0 (l fl 1\./1 XO L-60. "- !1 C (1 tfi.[, ~G jt Ili"" - rw iJ"o, . I . . I ..- r ,~L()- 'to COnL l U-~J!:i0 . acre multi-family resiede':::evet ttoa 4Pprove/deny a develo ,os , 13 and 20 pment with 130 VOTE Y ,; seconded by units on a 14.52 Ber~udez EA NAY ABSTAIN DaVIS ABSENT Forbes Robertson Smith Whitehall MOTION: CARRIED - DENIED PAGE -5- B. Nunez Office Building. The application was submitted by Tom Murphy on behalf of property owners David and Anita Nunez. The applicant is requesting to continue the use of a commercial office building which, historically, had no on-site parking available. The property is located at 701 Northeast Park Street. Staff Memo: The applicant is requesting to continue the use of a commercial office building which, historically, had no on-site parking available. The applicant says there are 15 parking spaces on the street which were being used by the site. The Land Development Code would require the applicant to provide 2 spaces on the site and the applicant is requesting to use street parking instead. Afterreviewing the application and its attachments, Staff recommendation is for the applicant to submit a site plan which depicts the amount of on-street parking spaces in order for staff to make an educated recommendation for the applicant's request. If an adequate amount of on-street parking spaces is available to accommodate parking in the area, the City Engineer should verify that the existing spaces conform to City requirements. Onl y then can the applicant's request be recommended for approval. -1 JCy\\ lk"tLr4f-,- IS-'N-~,,' ic I,~J t-LL(e~ .LL .kh1 0/ {V LLA-eJ ftfO-<U~. f2i~~ ft-Lf -./'fo ~d--14 ~0 cLl~{ J-iu 01. cdJj-l 2. pfu,1- Jfnu I (Kd~V-Wt.I' f!JC:L rLu-J€b - L DR llJ-} ~'hjL - (t tit 4 /~uu fi (/~~ wi tw1 Jt1 r~ ~. ')WAp ~_ - RCLLC, .") ).4~i ~.. kYJ.A LdtJcY PJ'fl: I vruJ {j (f ,~ <1/' ~"UJu ~ u~' -t J-l-J-e.. /j~l T ?k-/tf~ '! rt1L-t ~IPA-:t- ~ (! 6.k4 ~ o..ffL~, / . . J, .J L', J' , . c, ;", A P jUf!J ~1G f1kb.-U- .bU_'-;/0 !J.-U-J'f, J())y( C/ULU-/,) - CJtLUU- )XJA/'''''''-' r' r1 U-i)..) >10 )...j) 12 Q (J~v... . X ' ' ~ I / q t. {L; (! C/. /~ / :'.. - t: /2, J- GO :Jj..+, [Iv ,(}J~", . j LJ /c, M, '. -- Jt.:txJ ~ I, , . tl Y-I-LUL aD.M &l/ 0 y./u [...~ ({. /,' f) , II; , Ai (j ,,' ,-,1--vv yu. ~ ::h, a{~/ L'(-tU7 ~d-' In". ~; -- , ,I; d Ju-; ~ LM<-U1-( J>1 V-tu-- g(1{J<yU4 -, u..u~ j) it~ - f}--Ll;i 'j-1U-- '''-L '{-1- I J 0 '--fru- {)J,z'o/-e !tetVJL, i O--t~ VIL fA !J ~ f'{' .~jt~TR G ;tC-t (Ub'{l A U ~{ / ~-^' ~ft'/l--M +, {~ .~ ^ ,,,,CLI j} . /fl4CJit ~~ ~w ~~vwi-" PAGE -6- &' ~. J R...- moved.t~prove/~ontinued use of a commercial office bUildi~historic.aIlY, has no on-site parkmg available; seconded by VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT Whitehall Smith Robertson Bermudez Davis Forbes ~~ MOTION: "-~-DENIED IV. There being no further items on the agenda, ChairPerson tV fdJ[l$ adjourned the Technical Review Committee Meeting at /0 i 5ZJ a.m. CITY OF OKEECHOBEE TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE OFFICIAL AGENDA OCTOBER 25, 2006 CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS 55 S.E. 3RD AVENUE OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA 34974 Page 1 of 2 I. CALL TO ORDER: October 25, 2006, 10:00 a.m. - Chairperson. II. ST AFF ATTENDANCE - General Service Cooridinator. Voting Members: Tom Forbes, Building Official Denny Davis, Police Chief Donnie Robertson, Public Works Director Herb Smith, Fire Chief Oscar Bermudez, Engineer Brian Whitehall, Administrator Non- Voting Ex-Officio Member: Eddie Trent, Okeechobee County Health Department Jim LaRue, LaRue Planning and Management John Cook, City Attorney John Hayford, Okeechobee Utility Authority School Representative Betty Clement, General Services Coordinator III. MINUTES - Secretary. A. Motion to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Technical Review Committee Minutes for the September 27, 2006 regular meeting. October 25, 2006 - Agenda - Page 2 of 2 III. NEW BUSINESS - Chairperson. A. Southern Trace. The application was submitted by Insite Development Group. The owner proposes site development improvements with a 130 units on a 14.52 acre multi-family residential development. This application includes Blocks 4, 13, and 20 only. The owner is proposing to amend the land use for Blocks 11, 12,21 and 22 to comply with residential multi-family at a later date. B. Nunez Office Building. The application was submitted by Tom Murphy on behalf of property owners David and Anita Nunez. The applicant is requesting to continue the use of a commercial office building which, historically, had no on-site parking available. The property is located at 701 Northeast Park Street. IV. ADJOURNMENT TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING - Chairperson. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that if any person desires to appeal any decision made by the Technical Review Committee with respect to any matter considered at this proceeding, such interested person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose may need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Tapes are for the sole purpose of backup for official records of the Department. City of Okeechobee 55 Southeast 3rd Avenue Okeechobee, Florida 34974 Phone: (863) 763-3372 Fax: (863) 763-1686 Application for Site Plan Review Name of project: Southern Trace Applicant: Curt Lundberg Property Owner: Insite Development Group Description of project including all proposed uses: Owner proposes site development improvements with a 130 unit 14.52 acre multi- family residential development Number/description of phases: One phase Location off directions to project: 1 Block West ofHWY 441 Existing improvements on property: None Is proposed use different from existing or prior use? ~ Yes) L No) L- NI A) Source of potable water: OUA Method of sewage disposal: OUA Total project area in square feet: or acres: 14.52 Existing impervious surface: square feet o acres 0% of site Additional impervious surface: square feet 8.34 acres 57.44 % of site Proposed total impervious surface: square feet 8.34 acres 57.44 % of site CurrentlProposed zoning: RMF Future land use: RMF Parcel Identification number: Parcel ID 3-15-37-35-0010-00040-0010, 3-15-37-35- 0010-00040-0140,3-15-37-35-0010-00130-0010,3-15-37_35_0010-00130-0140,3-15- 37-35-0010-00200-0010,3-15-37-35-0010-00200_0140, and, 3-15-37-35-0010-00110- 0010. Application for Site Plan Review: Name of project: Southern Trace Applicant: Curt Lundberg Address: 2 Niblick Lane Columbine Valley, CO 80123 Phone: 303-909-1017 Fax: 303-795-0304 Other Phone: 321-356-1356 Contact person: Steven L. Dobbs Address: 210 NW Park Street Suite 204 Okeechobee, FL 34972 Phone: 863-467-0076 Fax: 863-467-0091 Other Phone: 863-634-0194 Property owner: Insite Development Group, LLC Address: 2 Niblick Lane Columbine Valley, CO 80123 Phone: 303-909-1017 Fax: 303-795-0304 Other Phone: 321-356-1356 Engineer: Steven L. Dobbs, P.E. Address: 210 NW Park Street Suite 204 Okeechobee, FL 34972 Phone: 863-467-0076 Fax: 863-467-0091 Surveyor: Expedition Surveying & Mapping, Inc. Address: P.O. Box 1610 Okeechobee, FL 34973 Southern Trace RE: Site Plan preUm.inary review. I have reviewed the preliminary Construction Plans and Specifications for the above project and I found that some information and requirements as required by the Okeechobee LDR's and the Engineering Office are missing: All of Block 4; block 11; block 12; block 13; block 20; block 22 Lots 1-3, West 15' of lot 9, lots 10-26, block 21 Lots 7-11, less the west 28' of said lot 11, block 29 Okeechobee, FL · Existing Site Information Required - Property and Topography Survey, with adjacent properties within fifty (50) Ft. of the Project boundaries showing existing elevations, all existing utilities, easements, perimeter streets and interceptions with RjW's widths, one benchmark (NGVD) for each control structure with one benchmark minimum per project. · Site boundaries dimensions for existing OUA Lift Station are not clearly determined. · Parking layouts are not indicated in the drawing. · Sidewalk along the entire sub-division will be requiring within the project limits. (LDR 78-36) · SFWM permit for storm water management and drainage positive drainage outfall route will be required. Also, inventory of wetland and its approval from SFWM to be used. · Minimum radius to entrances will be 25Ft. The Fire departments may need more than that in the interior roads of the complex. · Landscaping plans were not included. · Provide description of measurements to implement during construction to mitigate adverse effects to water quality and quantity of the project and off- site areas and bodies of water. · Proposed Site Plan with all Development Information Required - Location of all proposed buildings, setbacks and separation dimensions for all structures, roads, parking, landscaping and buffer plan and details, wheel stops/ curbing, fire hydrant location, sidewalks · City Alleys are accounted but the Developer had not submitted applications for abandon those. Oscar Bermudez PE City Engineer cc: Mr. Brian Whitehall City Administrator Mr. Building Inspector Mr. Donnie Robertson Director of Public Works Ms. Betty Clement, General Services Mr. City Police Department Mr. City Fire Department September 2, 2006 City of Okeechobee 55 S.E 3rd Avenue Okeechobee, FL 34974 Job No.: Subject: 2005-201 Application for Site Plan Review for SOUTHERN TRACE Dear Reviewer: Enclosed find 11 copies of application for Site Plan Review, 1 copy of most recent recorded Warranty Deed, 3 signed and sealed Boundary and Topographic surveys, 3 copies of sealed Drainage Calculations, 11 copies of sealed Site Plan Drawings including Landscaping plan, 2 Aerials, 2 copies of the Traffic Study, 2 copies of the Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration and a check in the amount of$1600.00 for Application fee. This application is to include Blocks 4, 13 & 20 only. The owner is proposing to amend the land use for Blocks 11, 12,21 & 22 to comply with residential multi-family. We understand that this submittal is being made at our own risk and that Blocks 11, 12, 21 & 22 may not receive land use amendment approval. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Rudd Jones, P.E. & Associates, P.A. Jr~rjQMj)w Steven L. Dobbs, P.E. Senior Project Manager ;Z10 ;Y.;r. f'ar/< 5lred' .5(#117 ;Z04' . O/<~ It ;74-97;Z . f'!uJ.n& 86;7-4'67-0076 . ffzK 86;7-4'67-0091 . - ...... 1375 Jackson Street, Suite 206 Fort Myers, Florida 33901-2845 Phone: 239-334-3366 Fax: 239-334-6384 Email: larue-planning~att.net Staff Report - Site Plan REVIEW Prepared for: Southern Trace Applicant: Curt Lundberg Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant's Name: Curt Lundberg General Information Owner: Insite Development Group Applicant Name: Curt Lundberg Applicant Phone Number: 321-356-1356 Legal Description of Subject Properly: All of Block 4, Block 13, and Block 20; all lying in "'OKEECHOBEE", according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 5 of the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida Discussion: This is a site plan review for the first phase of a multi-family development which will consist of approximately 135 units on 14.53 acres ofland (Blocks 4, 13 and 20). This report is focusing specifically on the portions of the property which already have the proper Future Land Use Category and Zoning District. The second phase of the development (Blocks 11, 12, 21, and 22) will not be discussed within this report as the applicant is in the process of proposing an Amendment to the Future Land Use Map for Multi Family and a rezoning to RMF. Until the applicant receives approval of the request, Staff will not be reviewing this phase of development. Findings: Existing Proposed Land Use None Multi family development Future Land Use Map Multi Family None Zoning RMF None Required Provided Density 10 dulac or 145 units 135 units Min Lot Area 4,356 sf/du Block 4 = 211.050 sf 27 units @ 7,816 sf/unit Block 13 = 211.050 sf 54 units @ 3,908.3 sf/unit* Block 20 = 211.050 sf 54 units @ 3,908.3 sf/unit* Min Lot Width 100 ft 670 ft JIfI- Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant's Name: Curt Lundberg ReQuired Provided Setback Requirements Front Max Imperv Surface Maximum Height 60% 45 ft Block 4 = 40 ft Block 13 = 40 ft Block 20 = 40 ft Block 4 = east (28 ft) west (27 ft) Block 13 = east (27 ft) west (28 ft) Block 20 = east (28 ft) west (28 ft) Block 4 = 215 ft from NW 14th Street Block 4 = 15.7% Block 13 = 31.4% Block 20 = 31.4% Blocks 4, 13, and 20 = 57.44% Must not exceed 45 feet in height 25 ft Sides 20 ft Rear 20 ft Max Lot Coverage 40% Number of spaces The minimum parking space size shall be 9x20. 2 per dwelling = 270 spaces Block 4 = 27 units wi 54 spaces Block 13 = 54 units wi 108 spaces Block 20 = 54 units wi 108 spaces Total Spaces = 270 spaces Parking Landscaping Parking Area Buffer 3 trees/du = 405 trees Not included Recommendation: Staff does not recommend approval at this time until the mInImUm lot Issue IS resolved and landscaping is actually seen and evaluated for compliance. Submitted by: James G. LaRue, AI CP Planning Consultant October 18, 2006 City of Okeechobee October 16, 2006 Mr. Curt Lundberg 2 Niblick Lane Columbine Valley, CO 80123 Dear Mr.Lundberg: Please be advised that the Technical Review Committee of the City of Okeechobee will be reviewing your Site Plan on Wednesday, October 25, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. in the City Council Chambers. A copy of the Technical Review Committee Agenda is enclosed, along with a copy of the Staff Report and any City Staff Comments that have been received to date . If you have any questions, please contact my office at (863) 763-3372 ext. 218. Sincerely, 93~g.~ Betty J. Clement General Services Coordinator cc w/enclosures: Insite Development Group, LLC Steve L. Dobbs, P. E. 55 S.E Third Avenue. Okeechobee, Florida 34974-2903 . (863) 763-3372 . Fax: (863) 763-] 686 .... Southern Trace RE: Site Plan prelbninary review. I have reviewed the preliminary Construction Plans and Sp<<ifications for the above project and I found that some information and requirements as required by the Okeechobee LDR's and the Engineering Office are missing: All of Block 4; block 11; block 12; block 13; block 20; block 22 Lots 1-3, West 15' of lot 9, lots 10-26, block 21 Lots 7-11, less the west 28' of said lot 11, block 29 Okeechobee, FL . Existing Site Information Required - Property and Topography Survey, with adjacent properties within fifty (50) Ft. of the Project boundaries showing existing elevations, all existing utilities, easements, perimeter streets and interceptions with RjW's widths, one benchmark (NGVD) for each control structure with one benchmark minimum per project. . Site boundaries dimensions for existing OUA Lift Station are not clearly determined. . Parking layouts are not indicated in the drawing. . Sidewalk along the entire sub-division will be requiring within the project limits. (LDR 78-36) . SFWM permit for storm water management and drainage positive drainage outfall route will be required. Also, inventory of wetland and its approval from SFWM to be used. . Minimum radius to entrances will be 25Ft. The Fire departments may need more than that in the interior roads of the complex. . Landscaping plans were not included. . Provide description of measurements to implement during construction to mitigate adverse effects to water quality and quantity of the project and off- site areas and bodies of water. ....... >> --. . Proposed Site Plan with all Development Information Required - Location of all proposed buildings, setbacks and separation dimensions for all structures, roads, parking, landscaping and buffer plan and details, wheel stops! curbing, fire hydrant location, sidewalks . City Alleys are accounted but the Developer had not submitted applications for abandon those. Oscar Bermudez PE City Engineer cc: Mr. Brian Whitehall City Administrator Mr. Building Inspector Mr. Donnie Robertson Director of Public Works Ms. Betty Clement, General Services Mr. City Police Department Mr. City Fire Department ,.. ... 1375 Jackson Street, Suite 206 Fort Myers, Florida 33901-2845 Phone: 239-334-3366 Fax: 239-334-6384 Email: larue-planning(tI;att.net LaRue Planning & Mana ement Services, Inc. Staff Report - Site Plan REVIEW Prepared for: Southern Trace Applicant: Curt Lundberg Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant's Name: Curt Lundberg General Information Owner: Insite Development Group Applicant Name: Curt Lundberg Applicant Phone Number: 321-356-1356 Legal Description of Subject Property: All of Block 4, Block 13, and Block 20; all lying in "OKEECHOBEE", according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 5 of the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida Discussion: This is a site plan review for the first phase of a multi-family development which will consist of approximately 135 units on 14.53 acres ofland (Blocks 4, 13 and 20). This report is focusing specifically on the portions of the property which already have the proper Future Land Use Category and Zoning District. The second phase of the development (Blocks 11, 12, 21, and 22) will not be discussed within this report as the applicant is in the process of proposing an Amendment to the Future Land Use Map for Multi Family and a rezoning to RMF. Until the applicant receives approval of the request, Staff will not be reviewing this phase of development. Findings: Existine Proposed Land Use None Multi family development Future Land Use Map Multi Family None Zoning RMF None Required Provided Density 10 du/ac or 145 units 135 units Min Lot Area 4,356 sf/du Block 4 = 211.050 sf 27 units @ 7,816 sf/unit Block 13 = 211.050 sf 54 units @ 3,908.3 sf/unit* Block 20 = 211.050 sf 54 units @ 3,908.3 sf/unit* Min Lot Width 100 ft 670 ft Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant's Name: Curt Lundberg Required Provided Setback Requirements Front 25 ft Block 4 = 40 ft Block 13 = 40 ft Block 20 = 40 ft Block 4 = east (28 ft) west (27 ft) Block 13 = east (27 ft) west (28 ft) Block 20 = east (28 ft) west (28 ft) Block 4 = 215 ft from NW 14th Street Block 4 = 15.7% Block 13 = 31.4% Block 20 = 31.4% Blocks 4, 13, and 20 = 57.44% Must not exceed 45 feet in height Sides 20 ft Rear 20 ft Max Lot Coverage 40% Max Imperv Surface Maximum Height 60% 45 ft Parking The minimum parking space size shall be 9x20. 2 per dwelling = 270 spaces Block 4 = 27 units wi 54 spaces Block 13 = 54 un its wi 108 spaces Block 20 = 54 units wi 108 spaces Total Spaces = 270 spaces Number of spaces Landscaping Parking Area Buffer 3 trees/du = 405 trees Not included Recommendation: Staff does not recommend approval at this time until the mInImUm lot Issue IS resolved and landscaping is actually seen and evaluated for compliance. Submitted by: James G. LaRue, AICP Planning Consultant October 18, 2006 .- City of Okeechobee 55 Southeast 3rd Avenue Okeechobee, Florida 34974 Phone: (863) 763-3372 Fax (863) 763-1686 Applicant: Description of project: 6. Proposed use(s) for the entire building: cl/'tf e Number/description of phases: ,-&Jc:.:.-/;rv1 Location of/Directions to the project: &lcla;l~ ew k Existing improvements on property: lei ;V e Pfrldk Sf B:+~~ b?JO ~A/.!-e /:7 t/~i'c~ ~ 19~Q7 Is proposed use different from existing or prior use? ~ Yes) ~NO) ~N/A) ,ISC; Existing impervious surface: { C1d.- ~ \j ( r 'J7cO or acres: Total Land area in square feet: square feet f acres ~~ % of site square feet acres % of site Additional impervious surface: Proposed total impervious surface square feet acres % of site Source of Potable Water: l> ~ Method of sewage disp~sal: ~ Current zoning: (~\-i V Current Future Land Use: ~ lyyvvW\.'{2A.~ Parcel identification number: 3-)s-~r;-3~ -0010- (J/J/-8tJ - (JOlt) Application for Site Plan Review Page 2 - ~r~~rR~kA'~ / Name of project: . PI':5-h,,/ 6-";~.-u~~ Applicant 1keI-- h-~.....J Addres~: ;z..pt~. _/~ 1J..i ~+ c[y&JW~./ ,yr ;S,'W7 r '- -- %63 - ~ 7 -f/t; (( Fax: f 15'3 - Vb 7-fJf; /0 Phone: Other phone: Contact Person: "/ ~ ~"""" Address: '6/d / "ii~ &5~7..p(;'J/ Fax: f63-07-Db/tl (P5c/ -'d-35~ I~ )2~/ ~ Phone: Other phone: Property Owner: Address: Phone: .s~ /1/ /n-- , Fax: s~~ Engineer: Address: Phone: Fax: surveyor:Y...e-hA--y~ _ j)~ _ .. Addre~s: ~~ & u1 ~~, ~ck. .s..V t~~ ~ ~ 31'~72- W3-47-cYJ>li Fax: th3-~7- ~/II Phone: / / RBF w/Cap NO.50Bi FC: O. 2' E. . O. 7' N. S890 58' 50'E 159. [;7' (F) to POL / / / :-:-:-:-:-:-:-:.:-:-:-:-:-:-:-: / ~~ ~ :::::::>~~>::::::: / .!. ~ ~ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::-::: ............. .. 20.2' ::::::::.'::: ::'. 00 d ::: i:2 .,. en ". ex> o ... 0 N u , , " , . , " , , , " , i ~ ' , " , n- ' . ..... ~ ,~, f-I- W ,~, ~I ~ ,3:- .~ ~tP ~ '* '(Ji '~ :~ E~ ~~ u ~~ .. . .. , .. . .~ ,u.., ,- :~: c:l '~. 'W' .!n' - / / OG/T .~. '0' '8' 9.9' .:Z / / / lilt) / / / I / / I ~-/ / I ..... . ~ ~~- :xi RBF w/Cap No.508i- FC: 0, l' E.. O. B' N. /EfJ I G I Gr1 RBF w/Cap 60. lB' (F) to POL 0 No. 50Bl: POL S890 58' 07' E B1. 29' (C) to TOB LITE , ':::::,"'::::<<;Y~AW~C':-:-:-:-:-:- VALVE o ~5 lV~jt ~ $ E8 10 I ~,~. RM~ ~~~~t~~.~ ~IDc: (;.. R. 70 e. rtJR r. R/NNIOTH VARIE David & Anita Nunez, Jr 2085 S. E. 4 m Street Okeechobee, Fl. 34974 863-467-0611 863-467-0610 September 20, 2006 TO: City of Okeechobee Site Plan Review Application The application has items missing for the following reasons. 1. Item #2 sealed site plan drawing - since the existing structures have been on site sine 1968 and applicant is not requesting to add additional structures nb such plan exist. 2. Item #4 building facades - no new structural additions to present facades for. 3. Item #6 sealed drainage calculations - existing drainage has created no known incidents with city, water management or corps of engineers since structure built in 1968. -~ This application is for review of on site parking r~quirements. Since the structure has been in existence no on site parking has been needed or required. There are 15 parking sites on the street that have been adequate for the business using this site and other businesses in area. Since this structure, and its use, have historically caused no parking problems applicant feels there is no need for on site parking. The existing tenants are construction related and only sped, on average, no more than two hours a day at the site and store no vehicles or equipment at the location. Your consideration in this matter will be appreciated. .ta Nunez Applicant Check in amount of $400.00 to City for application fee, property less than ~ acre. City of Okeechobee October 16, 2006 Mrs. Anita Nunez 2085 SE 4th Street Okeechobee, FL 34974 Dear Mrs. Nunez: Please be advised that the Technical Review Committee of the City of Okeechobee will be reviewing your Site Plan on Wednesday, October 25, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. in the City Council Chambers. A copy of the TechnicaLReview Committee Agenda is enclosed, along with a copy of the Staff Report and any City Staff Comments that have been received to date. If you have any questions, please contact my office at (863) 763-3372 ext. 218. Sincerely, ffi~g. ~ Betty J. Clement General Services Coordinator cc w/enclosures: Tom Murphy 55 S.E. Third Avenue. Okeechobee, Florida 34974-2903. (863) 763-3372 . Fax: (863) 763-1686 LARuE PLANNING & MANAGEMENT SERVICES, Inc. 1375 Jackson Street, Suite 206 Fort Myers, Florida 33901-2845 239-334-3366. FAX: 239-334-6384 e-mail: larue-planning@att.net Memo To: TRC Members From: James G. LaRue, AlCP Date: October 9, 2006 Subject: Nunez Office Building .- Parking Reduction Request Ihc applicant is requesting to continue the lIse of a commercial oflicc building \vhich. historically, had no on-site parking available. The applicant says there are IS parking spaces on the street which were being used by the site. The Land Development Code would require the applicant to provide 2 spaces on the site and the applicant is requesting to use street parking instead. After reviewing the application and its attachments, Staff recommendation is for the applicant to submit a site plan which depicts the amount of on-street parking spaces in order for staff to make an educated recommendation for the applicant's request. If an adequate amount of on-street parking spaces is available to accommodate parking in the area, the City Engineer should verify that the existing spaces conform to City requirements. Only then can the applicant's request be recommended for approval. JGLlk cc: Bette Clement, General Services Coordinator