Loading...
2007-10-18The Okeechobee News P.O. Box 639, Okeechobee, Florida 34973 (863) 763 -3134 Published Daily STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Judy Kasten, who on oath says she is Publisher of the Okeechobee News, a DAILY Newspaper published at Okeechobee, in Okeechobee County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertise- ment, being a in the matter of in the 19th Judicial District of the Circuit Court of Okeechobee County, Florida, was published in said newspaper in the issues of /0/ pi Affiant further says that the said Okeechobee News is a newspaper published at Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been published continuously in said Okeechobee County, Florida each week and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. -.i0Ej_Y Sworn t an subscrib me this day of 1 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CITY PLANNING BOARD PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND LAND gDEVELOPMENT REGULATION AMEMOOMENTS NOTICE: chobee, Rodda will meet n Thuorsday,lOcteber 18, 2907 M 6:OO j.rn aras soon thereafter as possible. The meeting will be held at City Hat, 55 Southeast 3rd Avenue, in the :Council Chambers, Room 200, Okeechobee, Rodda. The items of consideration at this meeting are: Conduct a Public'Headng to Consider Comprehensive Plan Small Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Apptcation No. 07- 012 -SSA. The application is be- ing submitted by Kelly Kite, Jr., on behalf of property owner(s) Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC. The application is to change the Future Land Use designation from Single Family (SF) to Commercial (C) fa property located at 1108 State Road 70 East Legal description: Being a parcel of land lying in Section 22, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, fbnda and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the tiftsection of the center- • line of S.R. 70 (as shown on FDOT Right-of-Way Map for S.R. 70 Okeechobee County Section 91070 -2514, dated DWN =3.76) with Easterly boundary of Gov- ernment Lot 2 extended, thence South 00 degrees 14 feet 21 inches East, along said Easterly boundary of Govemmert Lot 2 extended, a distance of 44.5 feet to a point thence South 89 degrees 54 feet 49 inches West along the Southerly Right -of -Way of S.R. 70 a distance 'of 125.00 feet to the point of beginning; -thence South 00 degrees 14 feet 21. inches ,East, a distance of 690.53 feet thence North 89 degrees 54 feet 49 inures East, a distance of 100.00 feet to a pant lying on the Westerly Right -of -Way line of Southeast 13th Avenue; thence South 00 degrees 14 feet 21 inches East a distance of 230.05 feet to the paled of intersection of the Westerly Right -of -Way line of Southeast 13th Avenue and the Hopkins Meander Line; thence North 71 degrees 49 feet 20 inches West, a dis- tance of 424.14 feet thence North 00 degrees 03 feet 47 Inches West, a distance of 787.65 feet to a point tying on the Southerly Right-of-Way line of S.R. 70; thence North 89 degrees 54 feet 49 inches East, along said Southerly Right -of- Way one of S.R. T0, a distance of 300.00 feet to the point of beginning, and is ap- proumatey 6.27 acre(s). The proposed use is for a hotel, bank, restaurant and general retail. Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider Comprehensve Plan Small Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 07 -013 -SSA. The application is be- ing submitted by Attorney Steven A. Ramunni, on behalf of property owner(s) Mary Arm Newcomer n/k7ar Mary Ann Newcomer - Tuten. The application is to change the Future Land Use designation from Commercial (C) to Industrial (IND) for property located at 701 Southwest Park Street Legal description being: Be- ginning at the Southeast comer of Block 161, Town of Okeechobee, according to thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 17, Public Records of St Lucie County, 'da, and run thence South 70 feet to South one of North Park Street for the Point of inning; run then South 150 feet to intersection with North line of South Park Street; run thence West along said North line 300 feet to intersection with East fine of former but now abandoned FEC RR; run thence North along said right-of -way 150 feet to intersection with South line of North Park Street afore- said; run thence East along said South line 200 feet to Point of Beginning; said and lying in and comprising part of East one -half of Southwest one - quarter of Section 16, and Northeast one- quarter of Northeast one - quarter of Northwest one- quarter of Section 21, Township 37 South; Range 35 East and is approximately 0.642 acre(s). The proposed use is for a drive -thru convenience store. Consider any proposed amendments, submitted by City Staff or citizens, to the Comprehensive Plan, which include the Land Development Regulations ILDR's) and render a recommendation to the City Council for consideration and final adoption. A copy of the entire application(s) and agenda are available in the General Services Office, Rm 101 at City Hall or by calling Betty Clement at (863) 763 -3372 x 218. The Planning Board will make recommendations to the City Council for considera- tion and final adoption of Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Rezoning Applica- tions and Land Development Regulations (LDR's) Amendments. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that if any person desires to appeal any decision made by the Planning Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, or hearing will need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the ap- peal is to be based. General Services media are used for the sole purpose of back -up for the department In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Rorida Statute 286.26, persons with disabilities needing special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact Betty Clement no later than two (2) worldng days prior to the eeding at 863 -763 -3372 x 218; if are heanng or voice Im- paired, call TOD 1- 800.222 -3448 (voice) or 1- 888 -447 -5620 (TTY). BY: Brian Whitehall,-Zoning Administrator 241733 ON 10/3/07 A.D. 20 0 Notary Public, State of Florida at Large Janetta Thiboult Commission # DD505311 ,4 Expires January 10, 2010 —y Fain Insurance Inc 800- 385.7019 The Okeechobee News P.O. Box 639, Okeechobee, Florida 34973 (863) 763 -3134 Published Daily STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Judy Kasten, who on oath says she is Publisher of the Okeechobee News, a DAILY Newspaper published at Okeechobee, in Okeechobee County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertise- ment, being a in the matter of in the 19th Judicial District of the Circuit Court of Okeechobee County, Florida, was published in said newspaper in the issues of Affiant further says that the said Okeechobee News is a newspaper published at Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been published continuously in said Okeechobee County, Florida each week and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. [1,e .I [- Sworn tolanitsubS fore Te this day of ,,rr'''a 7 A.D. 20 l.i ary Public, State of Florida at Large NOTICE OF CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION AMENDMENTS NOTICE: The City of OkeechbbeiPlaning Board/Board of Adjustment and Appeals will meet as the Land Planning Agency on Theisdhy, October 18, 2007 at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible, to consider any proposed amendments, submitted by City Staff or citizens, to the Comprehensive Plan, which include the Land Development Regulations (LOR's). The meeting MI be held at City Hall, 55 Southeast 3rd Avenue, in the Council Chambers, Room 200, Okeechobee, Flori- da. A copy of the agenda are available In the General Services Office, Rm 101 at City Hall or by caling Betty Clement at (863) 763 -3372 x 218 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that if any person desires to appeal any decision made by the Planning Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting; or hearing will need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the ap- peal is to be based. General Services media are used for the sole purpose of back -up for the department. . th accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Florida Statute 286.26, persons with disabilities needing special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact Betty Clement, no later than two (2) working days prior to the proceeding at 863- 763 -3372 x 218; if you are hearing or voice im- paired, call TDD 1-800- 222 -3448 (voice) or 1- 888. 447 -5620 (TTY). BY: Brian Whitehall, Zoning Administrator 241935 ON 10/12/07 Janetta Thiboult Commission # DD505311 Expires January 10, 2010 OF Fl"` Bonded Troy Fain insurance. Inc 800- 385 -7019 The Okeechobee News P.O. Box 639, Okeechobee, Florida 34973 (863) 763 -3134 Published Daily STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Judy Kasten, who on oath says she is Publisher of the Okeechobee News, a DAILY Newspaper published at Okeechobee, in Okeechobee County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertise- ment, being a in the matter of in the 19th Judicial District of the Circuit Court of Okeechobee County, Florida, was published in said newspaper in the issues of Ay/9/0-7 Affiant further says that the said Okeechobee News is a newspaper published at Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been published continuously in said Okeechobee County, Florida each week and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. /i Sworn to fore mefthis A.D. 20 • blic, State of Florida at Large NOTICE OF PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT NOTICE A PUBLIC HEARING will be held before the City of Okeechobee Plami Board/Board of Adjustment and Appeals on Thursday, October 18, 2007 at 6:- p m. or as soon thereafter as possible. The meeting will be held at City Hall, Southeast 3rd Avenue, in the Council Chambers, Rom 200, Okeechobee, Flo da To consider a request for a Comprehensive Plan Small Scale Future Land Use M. Amendment Application No. 07 -012 -SSA. The application is being submitted Keay Kite, Jr., on behalf of property owner(s) Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LL The appficalion is to change the Future Land Use designation from Single Fami (SF) to Commercial (0) for property located at 1108 State Road 70 East. Legal description: Being a parcel of land lying in Section 22, Township 37 Souu Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, 'Florida and being more particularly d: scribed as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the centerline of S.R. 7 (as shown on FDOT Right -of -Way Map for S.R. 70 Okeechobee County Sectic 91070-2514; dated DWN =3.76) with Easterly boundary of Government Lot 2 e tended, thence South 00 degrees 14 feet 21 inches East, along said Easteri boundary of Government Lot 2 extended, a distance of 44.5 feet to a poke; thenc South 89 degrees 54 feet 49 inches West, akxg the Southerly Rigid -of -Way r S.R. 70 a distance of 125.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence Stith 00 dc grees 14 feet 21 inches East, a distance of 690.53 feet thence North 89 degree 54 feet 49 inches East, a distance of 100.00 feet to a point Nang on the Westerf Right-of-Way East a line distan 230.05 ffeet the point of ntersectiiongofathe Westert Right -of-Way one of Southeast 13th Avenue and the Hopkins Meander Line thence North 71 degrees 49 feet 20 inches West, a distance of 424.14 feet thence North 00 degrees 03 feet 47 inches West, a distance of 787.65 feet to point lying on the Southerly Right-of-Way one of S.R. 70; thence North 89 de grees inches ,gfs istanceof 300.00 feet to the point of beginning, and 6.2r acre(s). The proposed use is for a hotel, bank, restaurant and general retail. A copy of the entire application(s) and agenda are available in the General Services Office, Rm 101 at City Hall or by calling Betty Clement at (863 763 -3372 x 218. The Planning Board will make a recommendation to the City Council for consid- eration and final adoption tentatively scheduled for Tuesday. November 6. 2007 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that if any person desires to appeal any decision made by the Planning Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, or hearing will need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the ap- peal is to be based. General Services media are used for the sole purpose of back -up for the department In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Florida Statute 286.26, persons with disabilities needing special accommodation to participate in r this proceeding should contact Betty Clement, no later than two (2) working days prior to the needing at 863 -763 -3372 x 218; if you are heanng or voice im- paired, call MD 1 -800- 222 -3448 (voice) or 1- 888 -447 -5620 (TTY) BY: Brian Whitehall, Zoning Administrator 241 07-012-SSA 937 ON 11 0/12/07 2 O.st'Y P`'e Janetta Thiboult Commission # DD505311 � 9 Expires January 10, 2010 OF FtOF Beoea Troy Fain insurance Inc 800. 395.7019 The Okeechobee News P.O. Box 639, Okeechobee, Florida 34973 (863) 763 -3134 Published Daily STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Judy Kasten, who on oath says she is publisher of the Okeechobee News, a DAILY Newspaper published at Okeechobee, in Okeechobee County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertise- ment, bei : a in the matter of in the 19th Judicial District of the Circuit Court of Okeechobee County, Florida, was published in said newspaper in the issues of xy/9/6) Affiant further says that the said Okeechobee News is a newspaper published at Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been published continuously in said Okeechobee County, Florida each week and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Sworn' t day of e me this /% A.D. 20 ary public, State of Florida at Large NOTICE OF CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS • NOTICE: A PUBLIC HEARING will be held before the City of Okeechobee Planning Board/Board of Adjustment and Appeals on Thursday, October 18, 2007 at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. The meeting will beheld at City Hail, 55 Southeast 3rd Avenue, in the Council Chambers, Room 200, Okeechobee, Ronda To consider a request for a Comprehensive Plan Small Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 07 -013 -SSA. The application is being submitted by Attorney Steven A. Ramunni, on behalf of property owner(s) Mary Ann Newcomer n/k/a/ Mary Ann Newcomer - Tuten. The application is to change located Land Use designation from Commercial (C) to Industrial IND for at 701 Southwest Park Street Legal description being: Beginning at the Southeast comer of Block 161, Town of Okeechobee, according to plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 17, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Ronda, and run thence South 70 feet to South line • of North Park Street for the Point at Beginning; run then South 150 feet to inter- section with North line of South Park Street; run thence West along said North line 300 feet to intersection with East line of former but now abandoned FEC RR; run thence North along said light-of -way 150 feet to intersection with South line of North Park Street aforesaid; run thence East along said South line 200 feet to Point of Beginning; said land lying in and comprising part of East one -half of Southwest one- quarter of Section 16, and Northeast one - quarter of Northeast one - quarter of Northwest one - quarter of Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East and is approximately 0.642 acre(s). The proposed use is for a dove -thru convenience store. A copy of the entire application(s) and agenda are available in the General Services Office, Rm 101 at City Hall or by calling Betty Clement at (863) 763 -3372 x 218. The Planning Board will make recommendations to the City Council for considera- tion and final adoption tentatively scheduled for Tuesday, November 6. 2007. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that if any person desires to appeal any decision made by the Planning Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, or hearing will need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the ap- peal is to be based. General Services media are used for the sole purpose of back -up for the department. , In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Florida Statute 286.26, persons with disabilities needing special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact Betty Clement, no later than two (2) working days prior to the proceeding at 863 - 763 -3372 x 218; if you are hearing or voice im- paired, call TDD 1 -800- 222 -3448 (voice) or 1 -888- 447 -5620 (TTY). BY: Brian Whitehall, Zoning Administrator Application No. 07 -013 -SSA 241936 ON 10/12/07 c ?" Pie, Janetta Thiboult Commission # DD505311 o- Expires January 10, 2010 Bon0e0 Troy Fain Insurance Inc 806385 -7019 The Okeechobee News P.O. Box 639, Okeechobee, Florida 34973 (863) 763 -3134 Published Daily STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Judy Kasten, who on oath says she is Publisher of the Okeechobee News, a DAILY Newspaper published at Okeechobee, in Okeechobee County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertise- ment, being a in the matter of in the 19th Judicial District of the Circuit Court of Okeechobee County, Florida, was published in said newspaper in the issues of 16 / /(i Affiant further says that the said Okeechobee News is a newspaper published at Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been published continuously in said Okeechobee County, Florida each week and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. J A.D. 20 _1 Sworn day of ribe before rite this tary Public, State of Florida at Large NOTICE OF CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED ZONING RECLASSIFICATION NOTICE: A PUBLIC HEARING will be held before the City of Okeechobee Planning Board/Board of Adjustment and Appeals on Thursday, October 18, 2007 at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. The meeting will be held at City Hall, 55 Southeast 3td Avenue, In the Cuncil Chambers, Room 200, Okeechobee, FIori- da. • TO consider &request fora change in zoning from the existing classification of Resi- dential Multiple Family (RMF) to the proposed classification of Heavy Commer- cial (CHV) for Petition No. 7- 011 -R. The petition is being submitted by Kelly Kite, Jr., on beha8 of property owner(s) Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC. The property is located at 1108 State Road 70 East. Legal description: Being a parcel of land lying in Section 22, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Ronda and being more particularly de- scribed as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the centerline of S.R. 70 (as shown on FDOT Right-of-Way Map for S.R. 70 Okeechobee County Section 91070 -2514, dated DWN= 3 - 76) with Easterly boundary of Govemment Lot 2 ex- tended, degrees feet said boundary off thence overnment Lot 2extended distance of 44.5 feet o point thence South 89 degrees 54 feet 49 inches West, along the Southerly Right-of -Way of S.R. 70 a distance of 125.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence South 00 de- grees 14 feet 21 inches East, a distance of 690.53 feet thence North 89 degrees 54 feet 49 inches East a distance of 100.00 feet to a point lying on the Wester Right-of -Way line of Southeast 13th Avenue; thence South 00 degrees 14 feet 21 inches East a distance of 230.05 feet to the point of intersection of the Westerly Right-of-Way line of Southeast 13th Avenue and the Hopkins Meander Line; thence North 71 degrees 49 feet 20 inches West, a distance of 424.14 feet; thence North 00 degrees 03 feet 47 incahyes West, a distance of 787.65 feet to a point de- grees lying 54 feet 49 inc es East, along said Southerly Right-of-Way nline of S.R. 70, a distance of 300.00 feet to the point of beginning, and is approximately 6.27 acre(s). This petition is associated with Comprehensive Plan Small Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 07 -012 -SSA. A copy o1 the entire application(s) and agenda are available in the General Services Office, Rm 101 at City Hall or by calling Betty Clement at (863) 763 -3372 x 218. The Planning Board will make a recommendation to the City Council for consid- eration and final adoption tentatively scheduled for Tuesday, December 4, 2007. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that if any person desires to appeal any decision made by the Planning Board/Board of Adjustments and Appeals with re- spect to any matter considered at this meeting, or hearing will need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Media are used for the sole purpose of back -up for the General Services Office. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Horida Statute 286.26, persons with disabilities needing special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact Betty Clement, no later than two (2) working days poor to the proceeding at 863- 763 -3372 x 218;4 you are hearing or voice im- paired, call TOD 1-800- 222 -3448 (voice) 001-888-447-5620 (TTY). BY: Brian Whitehall, Zoning Administrator Petition No. 07 -011 -R 241923 ON 10/12/07 RY P4e, Janette Thiboult Commission # DD505311 04 Expires January 10, 2010 co- We dpnaen Troy Fain insurance Inc 800- 385-7019 The Okeechobee News P.O. Box 639, Okeechobee, Florida 34973 (863) 763 -3134 Published Daily STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Judy Kasten, who on oath says she is Publisher of the Okeechobee News, a DAILY Newspaper published at Okeechobee, in Okeechobee County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertise- ment, being a in e)matt r of -I /I �� _ ! /Lt �sl� in the 19th Judicial District of the Circuit Court of Okeechobee County, Florida, was published in said newspaper in the issues of Affiant further says that the said Okeechobee News is a newspaper published at Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been published continuously in said Okeechobee County, Florida each week and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Sworrito and subscribed before me this day of A.D. 20 Public, State of Florida at Large NOTICE OF CONSIDERATION OF PROOSED ZONING RECLASSIFICATION NOTICE: A PUBLIC HEARING will be held before the City of Okeechobee Planning Board/Board of Adjustment and ' , als on Thursday, October 18, 2007 at 6:00 p m. ar as soon thereafter as r r le. The meeting will be held at City Haft, 55 Southeast 3rd Avenue, in the Council Chambers, Room 200, Okeechobee, Ronda To consider a request for a change in zoning from the existing classification of Com- mercial Business District (CBO) to the proposed classification of Heavy Commer- cial for Petition No. 67- 012 -8. De petition is being submitted by Attomey Steven A. Ramunni, on behalf of owner(s) on behalf of property owner(s) Mary Ann Newcomer rt/k/y Mary�Newcomer- Tuten. The property is located at 701 Southwest Park Street Legal description: Beginning at the Sootleast comer of Block 161, Town of Okee- chobee, according to plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 17, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Raida, and run thence South 70 feet to South One of North Park Street for the Point of Beginning; run then South 150 feet to inter- section with North line of South Park Street; run thence West along said North line 300 feet to intersection with East line of former but now abandoned FEC RR; run thence North along said right-of-way 150 feet to intersection with South line of North Park Street aforesaid; run thence East along said South line 200 feet to Point of Beginning; said land lying in and comprising part of East one -half of Southwest ohe- quarter of Section 16, and Northeast one- quarter of Northeast one- quarter of Northwest one - quarter of Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East and is approximately 0.642 acre(s). This petition is associated with Comprehensive Plan Small Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 07- 013 -SSA. A copy of the entire application(s) and agenda are available in the General Services Office, Rm 101 at City Hat or by calling Betty Clement at (863) 763 -3372 x 218. The Planning Board will make recommendations to the City Council for considera- tion and final adoption tentatively scheduled for Tuesday, December 4, 2007. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that if any person desires to appeal any decision made by the Planning Board/Board of Adjustments and Appeals with re- spect to any matter considered at this meeting, or hearing will need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Media are used tor the sole purpose of back -up for the General Services Office. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Florida Statute 286.26, persons with disabilities needing special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact Betty Clement, no later than two (2) working days prior to the proceeding at 863- 763 -3372 x 218; if you are heanng or voice im- paired, can TDB 1-800-222-3448 (voice) or 1 -888 -447 -5620 (TTY). BY: Brian Whitehall, Zoning Administrator Petition No. 07 -012 -R 241927 ON 10/12/07 Janetta Thiboult Commission # DD505311 Expires January 10. 2010 1-1,os Bonded Troy Fain Insurance Inc 800-385 -7019 The Okeechobee News P.O. Box 639, Okeechobee, Florida 34973 (863) 763 -3134 Published Daily STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Judy Kasten, who on oath says she is Publisher of the Okeechobee News, a DAILY Newspaper published at Okeechobee, in Okeechobee County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertise- ment, being a in the matter of in the 19th Judicial District of the Circuit Court of Okeechobee County, Florida, was published in said newspaper in the issues of Affiant further says that the said Okeechobee News is a newspaper published at Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been published continuously in said Okeechobee County, Florida each week and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. 1 LAC r /r Sworn to/and subsc day of `l �l A.D. 20 me)this 7C92L NOTICE OF CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED ZONING RECLASSIFICATION NOTICE A PUBLIC HEARING will be held before the City of Okeechobee Plating Board/Board of Adjustment and Appeals on Thursday, October 18, 2007 at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible.' The meeting wN be held at City Hal, 55 SoiNieast 3rd Avenue, in the Council Chambers, Room 200, Okeechobee, Flori- da. To consider a request for a change in zoning from the existing classification of Light Commercial (CLT) to the proposed classification of Commercial Profession Office (CPO) for Petition No.. 07 -014-6. The petition- is being submitted by Tammy Black on behalf of property owner(s) Building Blocks Academy. The property is located at 1811 Southwest 2nd Avenue. • Legal description: Lots 11 and 12 of Block 35 and Lots 7 and the North one -half of Lot 8 of Block 40, First Addition to South Okeechobee, Plat Book 1; Page 17, Pubic Records of Okeechobee County, Florida. A copy of the entire application(s) and agenda are available in the General Services Office, Rm 101 at City Hall or by calling Betty Clement at (863) 763 -3372 x 218. The Planning Board will make recornmendalonsto the City Council for considera- tion and final adoption tentatively scheduled for Tuesday, December 4, 2007. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that if any person desires to appeal any decision made by the Planning Board/Board of Adjustments and Appeals with re- spect to any matter considered at this meeting, or hearing will need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Media are used for the sole purpose of back -up for the General Services Office. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Florida Statute 28626, persons with disabilities needing special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact Betty Clement, no later than two (2) working days prior to the proceeding at 863- 763 -3372 x 218; it you are hearing or voice im- paired, call TDD 1- 800- 222 -3448 (voice) or 1 -888- 447 -5620 (TTY). BY: Brian Whitehall, Zoning Administrator Petition No. 07 -014 -R 241931 ON 10!12/07 y Public, State of Florida at Large Janetta Thiboult Commission # DD505311 � o` Expires January 10.2010 of F.� Bonded Troy Fen Insurance Inc 800- 385 -7019 The Okeechobee News P.O. Box 639, Okeechobee, Florida 34973 (863) 763 -3134 Published Daily STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Judy Kasten, who on oath says she is Publisher of the Okeechobee News, a DAILY Newspaper published at Okeechobee, in Okeechobee County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertise- ment, being a Iytlle m r of ,, 1 in the 19th Judicial District of the Circuit Court of Okeechobee County, Florida, was published in said newspaper in the issues of 7 op ,9---/o 7 Affiant further says that the said Okeechobee News is a newspaper published at Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been published continuously in said Okeechobee County, Florida each week and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. IIrJ ft - 4 7 Sworn to rid bscriibE Lbefore me this day of PROPOSED ZONING RECLASSIFICATION NOTICE: A PUBLIC HEARING will be held before the City of Okeechobee Planning Board/Board of Adjustment and Appeals on Thursday, October 18, 2007 at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. The meedng will be held at City Hall, 55 Southeast 3rd Avenue, in the Council Chambers, Room 200, Okeechobee, Flori- da. To consider a request for a change in zoning from the existing classification of Resi- dential Single Family -One (RSF-1) and Holding H to the proposed classification of Planned Unit Development Residential (PUD -A) for Petition No. 07- 013 -R. The petition is being submitted by Jose Rasco, CFO. on behalf of property owner (s) 15th Street Homes, LLC. The vacant unplatted property is located between Southwest 6th Street and Southwest 15th Street. Legal description: ,NI that part of Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida, tying West of Blocks 248 and 249, and Southerly extension thereof, "Rrst Addition to Okeechobee Florida,' as recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 6, Okeechobee County Public Records; South of Southwest 9th Street; North of Southwest 15th Street; and East of Block 202, and Southedy extension thereof, 'Okeechobee' as recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 5, Okeechobee County Public Records; and East of Southwest 10th Avenue, within the City Limits of Okeechobee, Ronda. Less and except from the above described parcel the fol- lowing: Beginning al the intersection of Hopkins Meander Line and the South Boundary Line of Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, and run North- easterly along said Hopkins Meander Line 28.6 for a Point of Beginning; thence East paralleling said South Line of Section 21, aforesaid 56.6 feet, then North 175 feet; thence West 240 feet; thence South 175 feet; thence East 183.4 feet to the Point of Beginning, said land lying in and comprising a part of Government Lots 3 and 5 of Section 21 Township 37 South, Range 35 East. Together with the fol- lowing described parcels: PARCEL I: (0.R. Bock 581, Page 401): from the Southwest corner of Government Lot 5, Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, thence East along the South boundary line of said Govemment Lot 5 to intersection with the West right- of -way line of Okeechobee Avenue extended South, thence North along said right- of-way line of Okeechobee Avenue 25 feet for Point of Beginning; thence North along West right-of -way line of Okeechobee Avenue 97.3 feet; thence West paral- lel to South boundary line of Government Lot 5, 99.6 feet; thence South parallel to East line of tract, 97.3 feet; thence East parallel to North tine of tract, 99.6 feet, to Point of Beginning, being a part of Government Lot 5, Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Ronda. PARCEL 11: (O.R. Book 581, Page 401): from the Southwest comer of Government Lot 5, Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, run thence East along South boundary line of said Government Lot 5 a distance of 336.7 feet to inter- section with the West right-of -way of Okeechobee Avenue extended South; thence North along the West right-of -way line of Okeechobee Avenue a distance of 122.3 feel for Point ot Beginning; thence West parallel to South boundary of Government Lot 5 for a distance of 199.7 feet to intersection with the West boundary line of Government Lot 5; thence Northeasterly along West boundary One of Government Lot 5 a distance of 89.73 feet; thence east parallel to South line of tract a distance of 154.76 feet to the West right-of-way ine of Okeechobee Avenue; thence South along said West right-of -way line a distance of 77.7 feet to Point of Beginning, being a part of Government Lot 5, Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Ronda. PARCEL 01: (from Tide Commitment): A portion of abandoned County Road right- of -way in Section 21, Township 17 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Ronda, being more particularly described as follows: commence at the South one - quarter comer of said Section 21 and bear South 89 degrees 45 feet 48 inch- es West along'the South line of said Section 21 to the intersection with the West right-of -way line of Southwest 7th Avenue, extended ar�distance of 56.50 feet lineeof saidrSouth Southwest degrees h Avenue, a distance West feet' thence South 89 degrees 45 feet 48 inches West, a distance of 155.43 feet to the intersection with the East right-of -way line of the said abandoned County Road and the Point of Beginning; thence continue South 89 degrees 45 feet 48 inches West to the in- tersection with the extension of the West One of Block 248, Rrst Addition to Okee- chobee, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 11, Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida, a distance of 44.61 feet thence bear South 00 degrees 02 feet 53 inches West along the West line of said Block 248 extended to intersect with the aforesaid East right-of -way line of the abandoned County Road a distance of 77.71 feet, thence bear North 29 degrees 48 feet 39 Inches East along the East right-of -way line of abandoned County Road a dis- tance of 89.77 feet to the Point of Beginning. PARCEL IV: (O.R: Book 471, Page 1544):' A parcel of land lying in Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 15 East, Okeechobee County, Ronda. Being more particularly described as follows: commencing at the intersection of Hopkins Meander Lineand;the South' line of Section 21, bear Northeasterly along the said Hopkins Meander Line, a distance of 28.6 feet thence bear East parallel to the said South line of Section 21, a distance of 56.6 feet thence bear North 17500 feet; thence bear West, _ a distance of 80.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue West, a distance of 80.00 feet thence bear South, a distance of 175.00 feet thence bear East, a distance of 80.00 feet thence bear North a dis- tance of 175.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL V: (0.R. Book 419, Page 788): Beginning at the Intersection of Hopkins Meander Line and the South boundary line of Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, and run Northeasterly along said Hopkins Meander Line 28.6 feel for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence East paralleling said South line of Section 21 - aforesaid, a distance of 56.6 feet thence North 175 feet; thence West 240 feet; thence South 175 feet; thence East 183.4 feet to the Point of Beginning, said land lying in and comprising a part of Government Lots 3 and 5 of Section 21, Town- ship 37 South, Range 35 East. Less and except the East 160 feet PARCEL Vii A parcel of land lying in Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Ronda, being more particularly described as follows: for a POINT OF REFERENCE, commence at the intersection of the Hopkins Mean- der Line and the South' line of Section, 21; thence bear Northeasterly along said Hopkins Meander Line a distance of 28.6 feet to the North right- of-way Inc of Souhhwest 15th StreetY; thence bear North 89 degrees 36 feet 23 Inches East South line 01 Section 21) a distance eeiof 56.43 feet the Southeast of the Inds described in in 0.R. Book 153, Page 803 and the POINT OF BEGINNING; West along the East line of thosee lands described in In 08 Book 153 Pageh803 a distance of 97.24 feet to the Southwest comer of the Inds referred to as 'Parcel 2' in O.R. Book 581, Page 401; thence bear North 89 degrees 36 feet 39 inches East along the South line of said 'Parcel 2' a distance of 99.49 feet to the North- west comer of the Inds referred to as 'Parcel 1 'in O.R. Book 581, Pape 401; thence South 00 degrees 39 feet 46 Inches East along the West line of said 'Par- cel 1' a distance of 97.23 feet to,the North - right-of -way line of said Southwest 15th Street thence bear South 89 degrees 36 feet 23 inches West along said right-of-way linen distance of.100.10 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, cntain- ing- O:22acDesarnoraocJess,.- ,, PARCEL VII: beginning at the intersection of Hopkins Meander Line and the South boundary line of Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, and run North- easterly along said Hopkins Meander Line 28.6 feet for a Point of Beginning, thence East paraleling said South line of Section 21 aforesaid, a distance of 56.6 feet thence North 175.0 feet thence West 80 feet; thence South 175.0 feet; thence East 23.4 feet to a Point of Beginning; said land lying and comprising a part of Government Lots 3 and 5'of Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, 0.R. Book 596, Page 1731. All parcels containing 50.81 acres, more or less. A copy of the entire application(s) and agenda are available in the General Services cl 101 at City H oesle Conia The PanningBo d*II make recommendations to the C Council for considera- tion and final adoption tentatively scheduled for Tuesday, December 4, 2007. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that'd any person desires to appeal any decision made by he Planning Board/Board of Adjustments and Appeals wth re- spect to any matter considered at this meedng; or hearing will need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal Is to be based. Media are used for the sole . purpose of back -up for tbe General Services Office. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Ronda Statute 286.26, persons with disabilities needing special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact Betty Clement, no later than twb (2) working days prior to the proceeding at 863-763-3372 x 218; if you are heanng or voice im- paired, call TDO 1 -800 -222 -3448 (voice) or 1- 888. 447 -5620 (TTY). BY: Brian Whitehall, Zoning Administrator Petition No. 07 -013 -R 241930 ON 10/12/07 A.D. 20 O .cPµY p6e, Janetta Thiboult Commission # DD505311 "� se Expires January 10, 2010 Or f1.1 Bonded Troy an Insurance. Inc 800 - 385.7019 blic, State of Florida at Large CITY OF OKEECHOBEE PLANNING BOARD /BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS OCTOBER 18, 2007 SUMMARY OF BOARD ACTION AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER - Chairperson. Planning Board /Board of Adjustment and Appeals October 18, 2007, 6:00 p.m. II. CHAIRPERSON, MEMBER AND STAFF ATTENDANCE - Secretary. Chairperson William Ledferd Vice - Chairperson Dawn Hoover Board Member Terry Burroughs Board Member Kenneth Keller Board Member Devin Maxwell Board Member Douglas McCoy Board Member Carol Johns Alternate Member Epifanio Juarez Alternate Member Mike O'Connor Attorney John R. Cook Senior City Planner Bill Brisson Secretary Betty Clement III. MINUTES - Secretary. A. Motion to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Board Action for the September 20, 2007 regular meeting. ACTION- DISCUSSION VOTE PAGE 1 OF 9 Chairperson Ledferd called to order the October 18, 2007 Planning Board /Board of Adjustment and Appeals at 6:00 P. M. Board Secretary Clement called the roll: Present Present Present Present Present Present Absent (with consent) Absent (without consent) Present (moved to voting position) Present Present Present Board Member Burroughs motioned to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Board Action for the September 20, 2007 Regular Meeting; seconded by Board Member McCoy. VOTE LEDFERD -YEA BURROUGHS - YEA O'CONNOR - YEA HOOVER - YEA JOHNS - ABSENT MOTION CARRIED. KELLER -YEA JUAREZ- ABSENT MCCOY -YEA MAXWELL - YEA From: Maxwell & Maxwell, P.A. Date: 1 0/9/2007 2:03:40 PM To: betty clement Subject: Oct 18 Planning Mtg Betty, I will be unable to attend the Oct 18 Planning Board meeting due to another prior commitment. Devin Maxwell & Maxwell P.A. 405 NW Third Street Okeechobee, Florida 34972 (863) 763 -1119 (863) 763 -1179 facsimile Page 1 of 1 10/9/2007 today's agenda. IV. AGENDA - Chairperson. RegUests for the a ddition, deferral or withdrawal of items on A. on today's agenda? of items fromthe�une addition, deferral or withdrawal minute language were any requests for the ad , deferral or wit whether there 15,2007 meeting, Chairperson Ledferd asked was postponed to the November A submitted by 07 -013-SSA Okeechobee p + RING A submi C for Q7- 012 -SSA, Commercial ( l THE Application No. MF} to Com Florida and is LEDFERD OPENED Amendment App . from Multi-Family (Win CHAIRPERSON Use designation City , Okeechobee e the Future Land tted lands of the Y Plan Small Scale Future Land Use Map I g C S 70 Holdings, $ Highway tl the applicant Plan p erty located (� recommendation. with the Comprehensive f the mailability prox+ma p l cation No. T 6:00 P. M. 21 2007 meeting. PUBLIC HEARING is to chap lion' Unp a Consider Comprehensive The application al deSCr►p policies and s LLC. 70 East. Leg I ant has submitted p Staff Report R ted at 110 He state mprehensive rop ailandm of tely 6.27 acres Staff report and recomme uses', assessment nt h su amendment ap planning demonstrated consistently w+ the LaRue e request, and comp Staff believes to requested omprehensive Plan. resented use chang . ability to be compatible with surrounding Mr, public ser presented the land to SR 70 a Y with surrounding property's proximity compatibility FLUME is consistent with the procedures sign e th p f ensuring Use Map co p b1 c SeN►ce property g is changed us pro t given the pro ability o what they conclusion, g and cap s and facilities., Commercial on the Future an n ed the owner can do already U i subject serious o designate the subj ends approval. Once the zoning Traffic is a Office, the traffic Wa the Staff recommends light z property. Consequently Chairperson, Use Map Amendment FARING • s LLC. 70 Holding ' ted by Okeechobee SR from Multi-Family Comprehensive Plan Small Future an o Consider Comp SSA submitted nab Legal 07'012 Highway 70 East. 9 Application No. e the Future Land Use d 08 Hig Florida and is The application is to change ro etty located at County , Commercial (ci for property Okeechobee (MFG to Comm lands City, description. Unpfatted Planning Consultant. approximately 6.27 acre(s) V, OPEN PUBLIC H A. heart 13th Avenue, addressed the Board. ed just behind the Post Southeast lights that do not shine and g develop Burnett, 177 and lig roject that is scheduled to be Mr, Sohn Wayne block wall for security p t What t want +s a the low income w a I as made, an t th Post Office d serious. With Site Plan R pr told the Board, zoning eft regarding this application. Mr. Burnett commercial. Northeast 13 w Pi fried, 1170 6` ve them. that Chris Burnett brought up, and are addressing that Mr, Review phase. e 'ce an this area will become more o, a dea w oblem etty years ag towards Fort all and lights will be addressed at the chased his prop al flow of traffic heading r Burnett thew He reported' when he purchase due to the natur Mr. Cook told N► h+ng. ng is everyt n A nue will become a p M as single faml \Y, not ca Mr. Burn or reported being contacted by ce. n led the applicants are aware of the issues Mr er 0 Can Horn, sta and Member Burroughs and Alternate Bo Beach, Florida, engineer with Kimley h Avenue, Vero V. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. A. Consider Comprehensive Plan Small Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 07- 012 -SSA continued. OCTOBER 18, 2007 PLANNING BOARD /BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS - PAGE 3 OF 9 ACTION - DISCUSSION VOTE The site includes a hotel and some leisure type uses located on the SR70 frontage. Parking and associated parking would go along the East property line. The owners are looking at and considering a pre -cast wall as a buffer. This development is a national franchise hotel, it is a quality hotel, and they have their own requirements for developing that require nice amenities such as the concrete wall. Also proposing the storm water retention occur in the southern part of the property. Mr. Goetzfried reported working with the Post Office concerning mutual access driveway connections and adding a right turn lane. This would allow traffic from this project to travel through the Post Office parking lot out to the light at Southeast 10" Avenue which is a much better way of turning west than coming out of Southeast 13th Avenue. Right turn out of the access onto SR70 is the dominant egress from the site. Board Member Maxwell inquired of Mr. Goetzfried whether getting access through the Post Office would eliminate traffic on 13th? Mr. Goetzfried replied, it would restrict traffic to 13th quite a bit, because it would be more convenient to access from 10". With the access of 10th, it would significantly reduce the amount of traffic on 13tH Board Member Burroughs encouraged the developers and engineers to continue to work with the neighbors. He stated he applauded the efforts of the developers working with the surrounding property owners. Kelly Kite, 1901 Indian River Boulevard, Vero Beach, Florida, representing the developers and owner of Okeechobee SR70 Holding, LLC., said he was very pleased to bring this project to Okeechobee. Our experience with Okeechobee has been very positive. We are not just the developers of this property, we are also the owners. We look to hold this property for the long term and become active members of the community. Mr. Kite also stated they intend to be good neighbors. He also said he had photographs of some of the walls they were considering and was also looking into the lighting for the project as the site plan progresses. He reported building the hotel in accordance with the Florida Green Lodging Code to be environmentally friendly. We have secured a franchise with Hampton Inn. A lot of time and money went into the market study and securing the franchise agreement and we fully intend to put a hotel on the site. He thanked the Board. Kim Burnett, 177 Southeast 13th Avenue, stated she wanted to reiterate the neighborhood has been a residential area, not the front edge, but certainly the back part. She reported having five grandchildren that play in her backyard, and this would completely change the life they are accustomed to having by putting a commercial property there. Personally, she wants to go on record that she is not happy and this is unacceptable to her. She asked if the suppliers would be using Southeast 13" Avenue as this would create a lot of traffic going past her house. Mr. Burnett asked if this would be developed in phases? Would the hotel go in the front and what would be developed in the back part of the property? Mr. Goetzfried said the leisure uses would go in the front part of the property and the hotel in the back. AGENDA V. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. A. Consider Comprehensive Plan Small Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 07- 010 -SSA continued. Application will be forwarded in ordinance form for a final Public Hearing on November 6, 2007 before City Council. B. Consider Comprehensive Plan Small Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 07- 013 -SSA, submitted by Steven Ramunni on behalf of property owner Mary Ann Newcomer - Tuten. The application is to change the Future Land Use designation from Commercial (C) to Industrial (IND) for property located at 701 Southwest Park Street. Legal description: Unplatted lands of the Town of Okeechobee, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 17, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, and is approximately 0.642 acre(s) - Planning Consultant C. Consider Rezoning Petition No. 07- 011 -R, submitted by Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC on behalf of property owner Kelly Kite, Jr. to change the zoning designation from Residential Multi - Family (RMF) to Heavy Commercial (CHV) for property located at 1108 Highway 70 East. Legal description: Unplatted lands of the City, Okeechobee County, Florida, and is approximately 5.5 acre(s) - Planning Consultant. OCTOBER 18, 2007 PLANNING BOARD /BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS - PAGE 4 OF 9 ACTION - DISCUSSION - VOTE Chair Ledferd asked whether the Board or citizen had further questions? There were none. Board Member Burroughs moved to approve Application No. 07- 012 -SSA and recommend City Council change Future Land Use Map from Single Family (SF) to Commercial (C); seconded by Alternate O'Connor. VOTE LEDFERD - YEA BURROUGHS - YEA O'CONNOR - YEA HOOVER - YEA JOHNS - ABSENT MOTION CARRIED. KELLER -YEA JUAREZ- ABSENT MCCOY -YEA MAXWELL - YEA Application will be forwarded in ordinance form for a final Public Hearing on November 6, 2007 before City Council. Consider Comprehensive Plan Small Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 07- 013 -SSA, submitted by Steven Ramunni on behalf of property owner Mary Ann Newcomer - Tuten. The application is to change the Future Land Use designation from Commercial (C) to Industrial (IND) for property located at 701 Southwest Park Street. Legal description: Unplatted lands of the Town of Okeechobee, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 17, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, and is approximately 0.642 acre(s) The applicant requested this application be postponed to the November 15, 2007 meeting Consider Rezoning Petition No. 07- 011 -R, submitted by Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC on behalf of property owner Kelly Kite, Jr. to change the zoning designation from Residential Multi- Family (RMF) to Heavy Commercial (CHV) for property located at 1108 Highway 70 East. Legal description: Unplatted lands of the City, Okeechobee County, Florida, and is approximately 5.5 acre(s). Mr. Brisson explained this was a companion petition to Application No. 07- 012 -SSA Small Scale Land Use Map Amendment. Mr. Brisson told the Board that LaRue Planning Staff recommend approval based on applicant submitting supporting statements relative to the proposed project's consistency with the findings required for granting rezoning petitions. Mr. John Wayne Burnett of 177 Southeast 13th Avenue reiterated he did not want Southeast 13th Avenue used in any way for the project. Vice Chair Hoover asked about sidewalks. Attorney Cook stated the Board should only be looking at the use of the area for the rezoning, all developing issues will be address at the site plan review phase. V. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. C. Consider Rezoning Petition No. 07 -011 -R continued. Application will be forwarded in ordinance form for a final Public Hearing on December 4, 2007 before City Council. D. Consider Rezoning Petition No. 07- 013 -R, submitted by Jose Rasco on behalf of property owner 15th Street Homes, LLC. to change the zoning designation from Residential Single Family One (RSF -1) and Holding (H) to Planned Unit Development - Residential (PUD -R) for property located at all that part of Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida, Tying West of Blocks 248 and 249, and Southerly extension thereof, First Addition to Okeechobee as recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 6, Okeechobee County Public Records, and is approximately 50.478 acre(s) - Planning Consultant. OCTOBER 18, 2007 PLANNING BOARD /BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS - PAGE 5 OF 9 ACTION - DISCUSSION - VOTE Board Member Burroughs moved to approve Petition No. 07 -011 -R and recommend City Council change the zoning from Residential Multi - Family (RMF) to Heavy Commercial (CHV) with the stipulation the level of traffic stays stable as indicated in the applicant's traffic analysis relative to the type of business; seconded by Alternate O'Connor. LEDFERD - YEA BURROUGHS - YEA O'CONNOR - YEA VOTE HOOVER - YEA KELLER - YEA JOHNS - ABSENT JUAREZ - ABSENT MOTION CARRIED. MCCOY -YEA MAXWELL - YEA Application will be forwarded in ordinance form for a final Public Hearing on December 4, 2007 before City Council. Consider Rezoning Petition No. 07- 013 -R, submitted by Jose Rasco on behalf of property owner 15th Street Homes, LLC. to change the zoning designation from Residential Single Family One (RSF -1) and Holding (H) to Planned Unit Development - Residential (PUD -R) for property located at all that part of Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida, lying West of Blocks 248 and 249, and Southerly extension thereof, First Addition to Okeechobee as recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 6, Okeechobee County Public Records, and is approximately 50.478 acre(s). Mr. Brisson stated the LaRue Planning Staff recommendation. He reported the petition meets all comprehensive plan requirements. He went on to explain, essentially the only difference with the PUD -R and single family is the lots are smaller. In conclusion, he further stated, LaRue Planning Staff finds the requested rezoning and associated concept plan to be in conformance with the intent, standards, and requirements of the PUD -R District and Staff recommends approval. Mr. John Cassels, Jr., representing the applicant explained the commitment for specific design for the project. Chair Ledferd inquired once the zoning was established, could there be design changes? Attorney Cook replied, no. Mr. Jose Rasco, owner addressed the Board with happiness to be pioneering the initial PUD zoning, and looking forward to being part of a new process with a traditional neighborhood with walkable areas and pocket parks in all four quadrants of the project. Mr. Rasco added all garages will be in the rear of the homes for curb appeal. Deara Thompson, 1605 Southwest 5`h Avenue, said she is pleased the owner and developers listened to the people regarding the multi- family request that was made a few months ago, and is looking forward to being their neighbor. Carlotta Collier, 908 Southwest 7th Avenue, said this property is in her backyard. She has no problem with the land being developed one family at a time, but does have a problem with this large scale happening all at once. I do not want a Wellington or a Royal Palm in my backyard, that is what we are coming down to. What we say today is not what happens tomorrow. V. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. D. Consider Rezoning Petition No. 07 -013 -R continued. OCTOBER 18, 2007 PLANNING BOARD /BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS - PAGE 6 OF 9 ACTION DISCUSSION - VOTE When you lose one thing you never get it back. Originally the City Fathers of this town designated this area as single family, and it was to be developed that way. I think if you change what you have there now, you are opening a pandora's box that you can never put a lid on. Vice Chair Hoover spoke to Ms. Collier's concerns regarding single family. Basically this PUD -R is single family. A lot of people do not want to have a lot of property to maintain and want to live on top of each other, also your concerns regarding the schools, they will only build new schools if the numbers are warranted. Board Member McCoy replied this type of development is very common in other parts of the country. Board Member Maxwell inquired as to whether the building plans were ready for submission? Mr. Sumner replied the plans have been submitted to South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and are currently under review by the Utility Authority. Board Member Maxwell also inquired about the drainage. Mr. Sumner stated the drainage system is the one thing that has been reviewed at the state level, literally for months. The drainage work is pretty much locked down. The swale is designed to take what minor sheet flow that comes from off-site. Its primary function is to be the outfall path for the project drainage to get to the 7`h Avenue ditch. Mr. Sumner stated that he understands that a lot of other residences in this area have experienced drainage problems, and would contend that not a single one of the subdivisions in the area was built to any kind of State standards or even the City's current standards. Board Member Maxwell asked, when you say your water, do you mean water that goes above your control elevation in your lake? Mr. Sumner answered yes. It is a wet retention system. We have to detain the design form on site and bleed that water out at a rate that is less than what is at the site now. It is held to the rate of the SFWMD pumping station at the down stream end. Chair Ledferd asked whether most of the retention's have an area where there is a pipe that takes you to a certain level where excess water will go through a pipeline and down through the sewer system? Mr. Sumner replied, anything over a 25 year three day storm. If we get more than nine inches of rain then it will over top the control structure, at that point there is only so much you can do. This is why there is a design standard from a drainage standpoint. We've all got bigger problems after that. Board Member Hoover asked whether this property is currently holding water from surrounding properties? Mr. Sumner answered very little water comes this way, according to the topographic survey, but what does is picked up in the swale and transferred to the 7th Avenue ditch. Our topographic surveys go well off -site specifically to look at that issue. Alternate O'Connor said he lived behind the area and the soil percolates well. Mr. Sumner also reported, there is a lake in the middle that is being cut down a couple of feet from natural ground level to the water table and that storage is there to compensate for the fill that is placed elsewhere on the site. Alternate O'Connor moved to approve Petition No. 07 -013 -R and recommend to City Council to change the zoning from Residential Single Family -One (RSF -1) and Holding (H) to Planned Unit Development -Residential (PUD -R; seconded by Board Member Burroughs. VOTE LEDFERD - YEA HOOVER - YEA KELLER - YEA MCCOY -YEA BURROUGHS - YEA JOHNS - ABSENT JUAREZ - ABSENT MAXWELL - YEA O'CONNOR - YEA MOTION CARRIED. V. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. D. Consider Rezoning Petition No. 07 -013 -R continued. Application will be forwarded in ordinance form for a final Public Hearing on December 4, 2007 before City Council. E. Consider Rezoning Petition No. 07- 014 -R, submitted by Tammy Black on behalf of property owner Building Blocks Academy to change the zoning designation from Light Commercial (CLT) to Commercial Professional Office (CPO) for property located at 1811 Southwest 2nd Avenue, Lot 7 and North one -half Lot 8, Block 40; Lots 11 and 12, Block 35; First Addition to South Okeechobee, Planning Consultant. Application will be forwarded in ordinance form for a final Public Hearing on December 4, 2007 before City Council. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING VI. NEW BUSINESS. A. Consider motion to amend City of Okeechobee Planning Board/Board of Adjustment and Appeals June 21, 2007 Summary of Board Action, Quasi - Judicial item H. Variance Petition No. 07 -001 -V submitted by John Raddatz on behalf of property owner Southeast Milk, Inc.- Chairman Ledferd OCTOBER 18, 2007 PLANNING BOARD /BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS - PAGE 7 OF 9 ACTION - DISCUSSION VOTE Application will be forwarded in ordinance form for a final Public Hearing on December 4, 2007 before City Council. Consider Rezoning Petition No. 07- 014 -R, submitted by Tammy Black on behalf of property owner Building Blocks Academy to change the zoning designation from Light Commercial (CLT) to Commercial Professional Office (CPO) for property located at 1811 Southwest 2nd Avenue, Lot 7 and North one -half Lot 8, Block 40; Lots 11 and 12, Block 35; First Addition to South Okeechobee. Mr. Brisson addressed the Board regarding the rezoning petition. He reported LaRue Planning Staff recommends approval. Chair Ledferd asked whether the Board or any citizens wished to speak. There was no response. Board Member McCoy moved to approve Petition No. 07 -014 -R and recommend City Council change the zoning from Light Commercial (CLT) to Commercial Professional Office (CPO) for property located at 1811 Southwest 2nd Avenue; seconded by Vice Chair Hoover. VOTE LEDFERD - YEA BURROUGHS - YEA O'CONNOR - YEA HOOVER - YEA JOHNS - ABSENT MOTION CARRIED. KELLER - YEA MCCOY -YEA JUAREZ - ABSENT MAXWELL - YEA Application will be forwarded in ordinance form for a final Public Hearing on December 4, 2007 before City Council. CHAIRPERSON LEDFERD CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:37 P.M. Consider motion to amend City of Okeechobee Planning Board /Board of Adjustment and Appeals June 21, 2007 Summary of Board Action, Quasi - Judicial item H. Variance Petition No. 07 -001 -V submitted by John Raddatz on behalf of property owner Southeast Milk, Inc. Amend page 7 of the Summary of Action of the Planning Board/Board of Adjustment and Appeals on motion 07 -001 -V from Alternate O'Connor moved to approve Variance Petition No. 07 -001 -V for a three foot side and rear setback; seconded by Board Member Burroughs, to Alternate O'Connor moved to pass 07 -001 -V for a variance of 3 feet with approved landscaping as defined by the LDRs; seconded by Board member Burroughs; and to change Maxwell vote from Yea to Nay Chair Ledferd asked whether there were any comments from the Board. There were none. AGENDA VI. NEW BUSINESS. A. Consider motion to amend continued. OCTOBER 18, 2007 PLANNING BOARD /BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS - PAGE 8 OF 9 ACTION DISCUSSION - VOTE Board Members Burroughs made a motion to amend 07 -001 -V Petition No. as read in the Planning Board meeting October 18, 2007; seconded by Alternate O'Connor. Mr. Brisson expressed he had concerns on the same topic, due to the upcoming Technical Review Committee (TRC) on Wednesday, October 24, 2007. There were really three issues that was discussed at that June 21, 2007 Planning Board meeting. The applicant had requested a 3 foot variance for the new building along South Park, which was 90 percent of the discussion. Also requested was zero setback for the expansion of the existing building along 10th Avenue, and add a covered porch. They did not put in their application a request for a variance for any of the required 20 foot setback off SR70, but you remember I mentioned when I looked at their drawing it was 19.27 feet, and it was my feeling, when that motion was made, that you were approving the 19.27 front setback. I do not think any of the Board Members have problems with the side variance on 10th or the one on 70, all the discussion was for the 3 foot or whatever was supposed to be down on South Park. When I wrote my staff report for the TRC meeting, I had the feeling that you had actually approved the other variances as well and simply said you cannot have zero feet on the South building, you can have 3 feet. Was that your intent? The TRC cannot change the variance you have not approved. Alternate O'Connor said that he made the motion based on the 3 foot variance on the South side, which is on Park Street. Mr. Brisson then said the Board really did not address the other requested variances? Mr. O'Connor replied he did remember that being on the request, regarding the building on 10th, but possibly overlooked, main issue was on Park Street so they could put the building there. Apparently then, when the applicant goes before the TRC, they cannot really show a design which has a zero setback on South 10th or 8 foot 2 inches for the porch or anything less that 20 feet on SR70, unless they come back before the Board of Adjustments. Mr. O'Connor said he made the motion to the Variance number. As long as you have that number and make the motion on that number, that is what the motion was based on. Mr. Cook stated, if the Board concentrated on one aspect of the request it is fine, but if the motion was made to approve the petition, the Board approved every request or relief that is in that petition. The front setback was not in the petition and was not addressed. This Board has no further opportunities with this petition. VOTE LEDFERD - YEA HOOVER -YEA KELLER - YEA MCCOY -YEA BURROUGHS - YEA JOHNS - ABSENT JUAREZ - ABSENT MAXWELL - YEA O'CONNOR - YEA MOTION CARRIED. AGENDA VII. ADJOURNMENT - Chairperson PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that if any person desires to appeal any decision made by the Land Planning Agency with respect to any matter considered at this proceeding, such interested person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose may need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. General Services media are for the sole purpose of backup for official records of the Department. William Ledferd, Chairperson ATTEST: Betty J. Clement, Secretary OCTOBER 18, 2007 PLANNING BOARD /BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS - PAGE 9 OF 9 ACTION DISCUSSION - VOTE There being no further items on the agenda, Chairperson Ledferd adjourned the meeting at 7:53 p.m. CITY OF OKEECHOBEE - OCTOBER 18, 2007 - PLANNING BOARDIBOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS HANDWRITTEN MINUTES I. CALL TO ORDER - Chairperson: October 18, 2007, Planning Board /Board of Adjustment and Appeals Regular Meeting 6:00 p.m. II. CHAIRPERSON, BOARD MEMBER STAFF ATTENDANCE - Secretary Present Chairperson William Ledferd Vice - Chairperson Dawn Hoover Board Member Terry Burroughs Board Member Kenneth Keller Board Member Devin Maxwell Board Member Douglas McCoy Board Member Carol Johns Alternate Epifanio Jurarez Alternate Mike O'Connor IN, Attorney John R. Cook Secretary Betty Clement PAG Absent PAGE nt VA A th- eOCllt) (Loom COrn6e4t1 ,7\ III. MINUTES - Secretary A. Motion to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Planning Board /Board of Adjustment and Appeals Action for the September 20, 2007, regular meeting. Board Member a,_. i.ILA, + oved to dispense with the reading RA -•pr• e the Summary of Agency Action for the September 20,4'2007 regul.fineeting; seconded by Board Member VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT Non Voting Mbr LEDFERD ` HOOVER BURROUGHS KELLER MAXWELL X MCCOY JOHNS J U RAREZ O'CONNOR RESULTS DENIED IV. A. V. AGENDA - Chairperson. A Requests for the addition, deferral or withdrawal of items on today's a CHAIRPERSON LEDFERD OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT V1 ,oO PAGE -2- genda. 07 -013 -.S5/4 t(LIFO'l‘6 -40 `\Jke-- v (Y■•e4h P.M. 9LizALL� PUBLIC HEARING 1. Application No. Request Location Applicant Staff Representation LaRue Planning Staff Recommendation DISCUSSION: • 07- 012 -SSA Change FLU from Single Family (SF) to Commercial (C) 1108 Highway 70 E, Unplatted lands of the City, approximately 6.27 acres Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC Senior Planning Consultant Approval 4 -C v-d-- • fa e kOx*-k ` 1 Q0µ WX`y` mct-.-t — . lorzWa X r de)gi /14" bi _oft -sue -))1 v9. W�L , City GL . oc2,that( - u c134,2 4 L, 6), ate,k,a ia-Q-k( -,,k ? '. iil- - 644 (1)t,,,44),,,,, bbefewoue 0.ta,-,,,,LfAti, Co& - .,LL . -ua_Q a.e4) wo4. k- t -esL._- -- 3-(064 ts- ?lc ecThem t 13 ' �eQ.# YtozkA,k,f Limoduz_of - 91- -4 c/ C - ir�z,e�oG�i-10 to/ALILL_ citc-ked ,c9-7_ sie fr. 0 , 0+A-ith213 — C)A'("-3.'/ filA14.1/ ca - Y. i t - O-ze3),L_ c-u-e-. 43G642- 02u, , -6,,I,,,k,-,,,ai(cA-- 0.60_,,,,Laz,,, II oc-)),.&„/ vk r0. cUm+� G�.w� LokckA .t MOTION: Board Member I, , . r AI 11, moved to Change FLU from Single Famil P(SF) to Commercial (C City, approximately 6.27 acres, submitted by property owner Member ( e X -O ce /deny to City Council Application No. 07- 012 -SSA to erty located at 1108 Highway 70 E, Unplatted lands of the Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC; seconded by Board PAGE -3- VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT NOT TOE SERVING AS MEMBER LEDFERD HOOVER BURROUGHS KELLER MAXWELL- - MCCOY X JOHNS JURAREZ O'CONNOR 7 RESULTS CARRIED DENIED 2. Application No. Request Location Applicant Staff Representation LaRue Planning Staff Recommendation De 07- 013 -SSA Change FL 701 SW P Steven Ra Senior Pla om C ►, i= ,C� to'Inau Is) • • att: d la • - : e City, approximately 0.642 acres • _ • : of property owner Mary Ann Newcomer onsultant DISCUSSION: PAGE -4- MOTION: Board Member Change FLU from Commercial (C approximately 0.642 acres, sub Board Member d ny to ity Co it App '. ation o. 07- 013 -SSA to 01 :4 '- rk /, Unplat -d lands of the City, wcomer; seconded by VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT NOT SERVING AS VOTING MEMBER LEDFERD HOOVER BURROUGHS KELLER MAXWELL -----X--- MCCOY JOHNS JURAREZ O'CONNOR RESULTS CARRIED DENIED 3. Petition No. Request 07 -011 -R Change Zoning from Residential Multi - Family (RMF) to Heavy Commercial (CHV). Location 1108 Highway 70 E, Unplatted lands of the City, approximately 6.27 acres Applicant Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC Staff Representation Senior Planning Consultant LaRue Planning Staff Recommendation Approval PAGE -5- DISCUSSION: 4 I I id; r s r iiMiilM 91,11..• ft4t 1 •' r I 4 i All a,i •' , ► AV/ �_t� • 1• .4 . !j d ■is_4\....K_ ill. :'. . I.. I' ► L /A. 'MEylL I • W Wa% _' ••• i U 4i 1 ANA 1 r !A i' a .r ` .�, MINA %.� _' �� . � i - fir. ,e d ' 0 �� � .. r , ,.. _ • . ' u • -0. r. At r� .�i s s� • Jam_ ,__ — l�- i - • / 1 Coo--e\D 76 . CaLet /i! off - Q(-1- QJL 'wou,o,&&e- DI- 9)4-) G-yvktcl — — LoOvi2,1 0.4 C-c. -- 0, \ u 4a fkii414,4- (I NT =- ,e„,30 +. eeet,L_ eC). .JAvyt-k: )),„/LQ_ NE)-0-0 — L1 L ( . ark _ °�o (- C9�� O`Ctx,4U L - C � -tom 4 L4& , ,-j(-=-0-qsAAA)&k* C9)7(6; . *LE- ao,, Goal' Cf) MOTION: Board Member moved to recommen • deny to City Council Petition No. 07- 011 -R tot the Zoning from Residential Mu i- Family (RMF) to He. C. a -rcial (CHV) for property located at 1108 Highway Unplatted lands of the City, approximately 6.27 acres, submitted by property owner Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC; seconded by Board Member PAGE -6- VOTE YEA NAY . ABSTAIN ABSENT (/ NOT SERVING AS VOTING MEMBER LEDFERD HOOVER BURROUGHS KELLER MAXWELL_ MCCOY JOHNS v /� J U RAREZ O'CONNOR -• .4 RESULTS CARRIED DENIED 4. Application No. Request Location Applicant Staff Representation LaRue Planning Staff Recommendation DISCUSSION: 07 -013 -R Change Zoning from Residential Single Family -One (RSF -1) and Holding (H) to Planned Unit Development - Residential (PUD -R). SW 9th Street South to SW 15th Street, Portions of Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East. Approximately 50.478 acres Jose Rasco, CFO on behalf of property owners 15th Street Homes, LLC Senior Planning Consultant Approval I■ _'r ,_�ri_ otl-o/3 -r. !ii . , - _) ?�.., 1.1! • 4— 6.a. -7 1 1 w i, _i • 1 r 1. • ✓. / Ai A 4 ,. I 4-4...• ,, -• . C. Vw-V L. (.0 0.6 .•� i- - .III_ ErilligiMELA OM ■ L Iris • i ••u 1. 4. LIMA WV- MrNin I 1 Immignimmi QJt.,Lea 04.0AKA,._ Q.)-4,t4„irkti_ i` NA [• M Ng, 4.114 '-1174 MAIIPLA 641M P fr 01A___-,.• o reovit-61— kl_ck-21 —19tAtzi. (4-.(4,% (LeAL,, — cc--"— f/D- ?7ye-etsit.,( 7 MOTION: (Q Board Member moved t• recommen deny to City Council Petition No. 07 -013 -R to Change the Zoning from Residential Single Family -One (RSF- mg (H) to Planned Unit Development - Residential (PUD- R) for property located at SW 9th Street South to SW 15th Street, Portions of Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East. Approximately 50.478 acres, submitted by Jose Rasco, CFO on behalf of property owners 15th Street Homes, LLC; seconded by Board Member* VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT NOT SERVING AS VOTING MEMBER LEDFERD HOOVER BURROUGHS KELLER MAXWELL MCCOY JOHNS JURAREZ O'CONNOR RESULTS (ARRI,IIDENIED 5. Application No. Request Location Applicant Staff Representation LaRue Planning Staff Recommendation DISCUSSION: �- _! . 07 -014 -R Change Zoning from Light Commercial (CLT) to Commercial Professional Office (CPO). 1811 SW 2nd Avenue, Lot 7 and N 1/2 Lot 8, Block 40; Lots 11 and 12, Block 35, 1' Addition to South Okeechobee, approximately 0.57 acres Tammy Black, Building Blocks Academy Senior Planning Consultant Approval ,o m fir. ./., L.L4e,,klul Wu_ Stert( MOTION: r Board Membes - moved to recommend/beny to City Council Petition No. 07 -014 -R to Change the Zoning from Light Comm ial (CLT) to Commerciaf-prefes nal Office (CPO) for property located at 1811 SW 2nd Avenue, Lot 7 and N %2 Lot 8, Block 40; Lots 11 and 12, Block 35, 1S' Addition to South Okeechobee, approximately 0.57 acres, submitted by property owner Tammy Black, Building Blocks Academy; seconded by Board Member VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT NOT SERVING AS VOTING MEMBER LEDFERD HOOVER BURROUGHS KELLER MAXWELL MCCOY JOHNS JURAREZ O'CONNOR RESULTS (CARRIE A DENIED CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING - Chairperson. VI. NEW BUSINESS - Chairperson. A. Consider and discuss requests for .am �m,r`p O/ Discussion endments to the City's Land Development Regulations - Chairperson. 0-' .L,, 2e, & SK 7 VII. ADJOURNMENT - Chairperson. VII. CHAIRPERSON LEDFERD ADJOURNED THE MEETING AT 7:53 P.M. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that all interested parties and citizens shall have the opportunity to be heard at these public hearings. Any person deciding to appeal any decision made by the Planning Board /Board of Adjustment and Appeals with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing will need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceeding is made and that the record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based. General Services media are for the sole purpose of backup for official records of the Department. NEw 4vs,'as Motion to amend page 7 of the Summary of Action of the Planning Board /Board of Adjustment and Appeals on motion 07 -001 -V ® Alternate O'Connor moved to approve Variance Petition No. 07 -001 -V for a three foot side and rear setback; seconded by Board Member Burroughs, ■ Alternate O'Connor moved to pass 07- 001 -V for a variance of 3 feet with approved landscaping as defined by the LDRs; seconded by Board Member Burroughs; and to change Maxwell vote from Yea to Nay. (Verbatim: O'Connor: Mr. Chairman I'd like to make a motion to pass 07 -001 -V with a hardship with a variance of 3 feet, (Burroughs: with approved landscaping ?) to approve it with and with the beautification, (Burroughs: with approved landscaping) O'Connor: yes, yes roger that, but to improve the landscaping, yes, (Burroughs: you got that ?)Second.. yoic41wA A E77 - -GO I- �/ Cx-wiL-4 CITY OF OKEECHOBEE PLANNING BOARD/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS MEETING OCTOBER 18, 2007 OFFICIAL AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER: Planning Board /Board of Adjustment and Appeals, October 18, 2007, 6:00 p.m. - Chairperson. II. CHAIRPERSON, BOARD MEMBER AND STAFF ATTENDANCE - Secretary. Chairperson William Ledferd Vice - Chairperson Dawn Hoover Board Member Terry Burroughs Board Member Kenneth Keller Board Member Devin Maxwell Board Member Douglas McCoy Board Member Carol Johns Alternate Epifanio Juarez Alternate Mike O'Connor Attorney John R. Cook Senior Planner Bill Brisson General Services Secretary Betty Clement III. MINUTES - Secretary. A. Motion to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Planning Board /Board of Adjustment and Appeals Action for the September 20, 2007, regular , , ular g IV. AGENDA - Chairperson. A. Requests for the addition, deferral or withdrawal of items on today's agenda. V. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING - Chairperson. PAGE 1 OF 3 V. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Application No. Request Location Applicant Staff Representation LaRue Planning Staff Recommendation 2. Application No. Request Location Applicant Staff Representation LaRue Planning Staff Recommendation 3. Application No. Request Location Applicant Staff Representation LaRue Planning Staff Recommendation 4. Application No. Request Location Applicant Staff Representation LaRue Planning Staff Recommendation 07- 012 -SSA Change FLU from Single Family (SF) to Commercial (C) 1108 Highway 70 E, Unplatted lands of the City, approximately 6.27 acres Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC Senior Planning Consultant Approval 07- 013 -SSA Change FLU from Commercial (C) to Industrial (IND). 701 SW Park St., Unplatted lands of the City, approximately 0.642 acres Steven Ramunni on behalf of property owner Mary Ann Newcomer Senior Planning Consultant Denial 07 -011 -R Change Zoning from Residential Multi - Family (RMF) to Heavy Commercial (CHV). 1108 Highway 70 E, Unplatted lands of the City, approximately 6.27 acres Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC Senior Planning Consultant Approval OCTOBER 18, 2007 - PB /BOA AGENDA - PAGE 2 OF 3 07 -013 -R Change Zoning from Residential Single Family -One (RSF -1) and Holding (H) to Planned Unit Development - Residential (PUD -R). SW 9th Street South to SW 15th Street, Portions of Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East. Approximately 50.478 acres Jose Rasco, CFO on behalf of property owners 15th Street Homes, LLC Senior Planning Consultant Approval � in rn Kimley -Ho and Associates, Inc. September 7, 2007 047833002 Via Email and Federal Express 863/763 -3372 Mr_ William Brisson LaRue Planning and Management Services, Inc. 2427 Porter Lake Drive Suite 110 Sarasota, FL 34240 RE: Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC Statement of Special Reason and Basis of Request Rezone Application and Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application Dear Mr. frisson: Okeechobee SR 70 Holdings, LLC holds fee simple title to 6.28 acres of land in the City of Okeechobee_ The site presently is open pasture with one single family home and is located approximately 105 feet west of the intersection of State Road 70 (SR 70) and SE 13`h Avenue and fronts SR 70 for 300 feet_ The existing land use for the property is divided between Commercial and Single Family. The existing Commercial land use portion covers an app' oximate 250 foot depth along the SR 70 frontage or approximately 13 acres. The remaining 4.5 acres is under the Single Family land use designation_ The existing Heavy Commercial (CHV) zoning covers an approximate 110 foot depth along the SR 70 frontage or approximately 0.8 acres and the remaining 5.5 acres is zoned Residential Multiple Family (RMF). Okeechobee SR 70 Holdings, LLC is requesting a small scale land use amendment and rezoning to bring the entire 6.28 acre parcel under the Commercial land use classification and CHV zoning. A description of the proposed project and justification for the land use amendment and rezoning follow. ■ TELL 772 562 7981 FAX 772 562 9689 • Suite 300 60121st Street Veto Beach, Florida 32960 Verbatim of minutes from the 6/21/07 Planning Board Meeting for Petition No. 07 -001 -V Chair Ledferd read the petition as follows: Petition No. 07- 001 - Victor requests side setback from 8 feet to 0 feet, rear setback from 10 feet to 0 feet with CHV, reference 90 -285. Location 1005 WN Park St. Lots 1 -20 exclusive of block 21, SW addition to Okeechobee subdivision, applicant John Raddatz on behalf of property owners Southeast Milk Inc. Secretary Clement interjected one correction to the description of the block being block 1 not block 21. Yes mam replied Chair Ledferd. Secretary Clement: We have some letters here Mr. Dobbs just gave me, um signed ah I would assume surrounding property owners that are unopposed to this, I will pass them down so you can see them. Ledferd: I believe it is to late for those. The board has voted. Clement: No, no, no for this Ledferd: Oh, for what's coming up now. Okay, I'm sorry. I thought it was for back what we just voted on. I think it's to late now. Yes sir. Brisson: Okay, this particular application is for variance primarily in two respects. Southeast Milk has an existing building in the NE corner which they wish to expand and ah make the setback off SR 70 just slightly less than required 20 feet, I believe it would be 19.27 and then they wish to continue about an 8 foot setback from 10`h Ave, 10`h, 10`h ah which is also less than would be required ah for a side street yard. It's important to realize first of all, all of your, the entire block fronts on streets. So for all practical purposes all of the yards or street yards are required to be about 20 feet, there is exception for one of um being probably 15. Ah, the biggest problem, one of course you have the extending the existing building which is already a non - conforming with regard to its side street setback from 10`h. Ah, and then further exacerbating the setback from 70, probably most importantly, however, is they want to put a new building right on, ah, on South Park Street, right on the property line. There is no building there now, ah and that required setback would be 20 feet. ah, there is some question as to whether every one of those side yards has to be setback the full 20, but what's probable most important, and the big problem is South Park, it is adjacent to a residential zoning district, there are homes right across the street, as residentially zoned, there's residential homes except for the Western corner, which is the Senior Center or Senior Services Center. What's important is when looking at a variance or the criteria you have to look at, ah, are there really special conditions that exist ?, that are peculiar to the land? or the structures with regards to the new structure, there is no structure there, so there's certainly nothing peculiar to that, nothing peculiar about that lot, that is a large 1 -1/2 roughly 1 -1/2 acres rectangular piece of land. Ah, so we have found that there are no really any special conditions or circumstances, ah, secondly I think it is important to look and see if you can ask yourself are those situations, for which the applicant is asking a variance, were they created by the 1 applicant? cause if they are, they do not qualify for a variance. That building that exists up in the North, I usually get my directions, in the NE corner was build non - conforming. I believe. I mean it is non - conforming already ah, and my, our opinion in this is that really the problem with that structure was created by the applicant. The problem with that structure and the fact that they want to expand it further to create, greater non- conformity, was created by the applicant by placing in the position it is positioned in now, and as far as the overall development of that particular site although it's been years, O'Connor: Let me ask you something. Your talking about the concrete building on the NE corner? Brisson: Actually it looked like a metal building to me. O'Connor: Not the blue one, but the sort of, it that the white one? Isn't that the one the milk people had there? Brisson: The white one's gone, as I understand, it's just a metal building. O'Connor: Oh, okay, I was thinking it was the one the milk people had there when Ray was ther. Burroughs: This is the blue one. Brisson: The ah, the enforcement of this case, if it had to be built according to code, it would not be any special detriment to that particular applicant as opposed to other people who in the area who would be wanting to build on lots. In other words, there is no special condition for that ah, the biggest problem really is the new building. I can see no, the applicant has demonstrated no hardship, he has given nothing in his application that says there is a hardship in placing that building on the southern property line. That is a large site. It may be an inconvenience, it may be more expensive to re- design the site and relocate things, but an economic cost normally doesn't, well most communities do not consider economic cost to be a hardship. A hardship is supposed to be run with the land. Supposed to be a problem with the site. Not the way you have developed the site. Ledferd: If you don't mind, can we stop there? Brisson: That's really all, that's just about it. Ledferd: Let them step up and show me the grievance, because through the LDRs I need to see a grievance why this needs to be done. Brisson: Right, and that actually was all I needed to say at this point, thank you. Ledferd: Thank you very much. 2 Steve Dobbs, Rudd Jones & Assoc. representing Southeast Milk. And I understand the variance, and there are no peculiarities with this piece of land, other than, it has changed hands over the years. It used to be a tank line depot up there, ah, um, the clients are like other people down the street there trying to make things look better. They want to put a new front on that metal building, have a retail outlet, and I don't necessarily think Bill was to much opposed to that, that variance, I'm not sure, but. Brisson: That's relatively minor. Dobbs: Yea, and the other variance for the storage building, um, we have a 26' storage building, right now the existing building has two bays in it with big roll up doors, 14 foot roll up doors. If you take this 26 ft. building and put it at 20 ft. setback in effect you have blocked these doors here. This is where they store their chemicals. They want to get this metal building in here. The other thing is, you know, if we had to, we could put up a, like you were saying before, a buffer, we could put up a block wall, on the property line, you know, 8 ft. high, 20 ft. high, I mean just to break the, the view. Okay, ah, you know they are trying to do an office building, a contemporary office building they put in here, moving into this facility with retail outlet, and provide storage to get there stock out some. Use the existing building, like I said, the previously was built on 0 lot line. I wasn't around when that happened, but it's just, just the facts. Ah, Ledferd: The only thing I can't understand, Steve, is all that's fine and dandy, but I don't hear a grievance of why. I don't see any reason to change the variance, because I don't see anything that's stopping you from doing something else, than going to a zero property line. I don't see what the, what the owners have that's a grievance that's stopping them. Why can't they kick it up a little bit? What do they need zero for? That's what I'm saying, you know our LDRs, they say no. Dobbs: Right Ledferd: You've got to show us a reason why. Dobbs: The main reasons is because of the two roll up doors. If you move this up off of the property line, you're going to block these two doors. Burroughs: What do you use the doors for? Dobbs: For the forklift to move material. Ledferd: I'm not a builder or developer or nothing, I just still don't understand the grievance. Just cause they can't get in those two roll up doors, that don't sound like a grievance for a variance. I'm Mack Worley, I'm the general contractor, and Southeast Milk approached me because they want to beautify their property. 3 Ledferd: Yes sir. Worley: The Eli's, the trailer sales across the street, that whole street has gone through a process of beautification and ah, a new facade to make the street look better. They want to join in that, and that's what they originally approached me about. Not to correct your planner, but the zero lot line on the East lot line, when this building was built, was allowed. At that time you could build zero lot line or 8 feet in a commercial district, which is what this is. So, it may be non - conforming now, but it was not when it was originally built. Um, if they leave things the way they are, they have materials stored on the South property line, which is a line that is across the street from the three residences and using this map that a previous applicant has provided, I think you'll see, or if you look at your City map, those three residences are the only thing on that block that is not commercial. So in your future, this is not going to be a problem, because we wouldn't need that setback that you us to have now. Ah, and you said, Mr. Ledferd, that, that, where you have residential in a parking area, you would prefer to see a screen, a wall, some sort of screen. Ledferd: Yes sir. Worley: And in essence, that's what we're trying to do, is build a metal building, ah, we have even discussed the possibility of trying to set it in enough to put some landscaping on the South side of that building, if that's more appealing. And the photographs that we circulated, I apologize, I didn't make it clear, I gave you twelve sets so everybody had a copy of the two photographs. That's what we're buffering the residences from having to look at, which is not particularly attractive in my opinion. If we took everything away, those residences would be looking across our property, across North Park Street, at what you see in these photographs. So I think that they're whole plan, taken as we're asking for it, is actually an improvement, a great deal of improvement in the overall site. A, you're correct in saying that, that we have other options, but this is our first option, and we feel that it makes sense. It will allow them to maintain their traffic flow within their property and their basic way of doing business. It actually would improve the traffic flow coming on and off North Park Street, of 70. So I'll turn it over to Mr. Raddatz who is here from Southeast Milk. Ledferd: Need your name and address, sir. My name is John Raddatz, 1409 SE 8th Avenue. Ah, by the drawing that Mr. Dobbs has here, the reason I'm asking for the variance on the property along here, the reason being, if we have to move this building 20 foot out from the property line, it is going to put this building all the way out, almost in the middle of our business, and we're just not gonna have the room we need. We sold off a big portion of the property to the State to widen 70 out, and it is narrowed our property up quite a bit. Ledferd: But what I'm asking is, ah, a variance to be granted from us, requires a hardship on your part. Why does it have to be zero? You just mentioned 20 feet, if the building is 4 moved 2 feet or 6 feet, would that still block your doors? I'm just trying to help you get a hardship for your variance. Raddatz: I mean we could move it five feet out, if the City could live with that, I could live with that. But I can't live with 20. I can't, I can't do it with coming out 20 foot from the property line. O'Connor: Your saying that if, if the hardship as I see it, if I understand what your saying is, if you have to go with a 20 foot setback, that's gonna put your building, ending up in, over there by that, that trailer that's over there on 70, and you won't be able to get a truck in there to that building to unload with a forklift. Raddatz: That is correct. O'Connor: Now, to me that would be a hardship, cause then I'd have to figure out another way of getting it there, especially if I needed that building. But Bill are you saying that it's a 20 foot setback from, now if they're gonna call that building, if they're gonna call the North side of it the front of that building, can't they be like um, wouldn't that change the difference on the South side? Brisson: No, it's, any, the way your ordinance reads, if that property fronts on the street, they usually look at it as a corner lot. O'Connor: Yes sir. Brisson: It's a front yard, but however, in this case, even if it isn't a front yard setback, it's adjacent to a residentially zoned property. So it's required to have 20 feet. Now, if you find a hardship, and if you can find a distance that is the minimum necessary, you know, then you can still grant a variance, doesn't have to be 20 feet, may not be 5, you know, one thing I think is important to look at is ah, it may look fine with a wall or may look better now blocking the storage by putting the building up, but it would look better if it had a setback. So you need to find out at that point, what would be the minimum, that might alleviate the hardship. And it shouldn't be the smallest that's convenient for them, it's the smallest that would work in some fashion. Burroughs: I thinks that what we're trying to get to a few moments ago. Brisson: That's what he was starting to work on, but he's at five feet now, and thing is that the absolute minimum. O'Connor: Okay, so if he went with five foot, with what like Hoot was talking about, about, ah, maybe beautifying it, landscaping it or something, that if it wasn't on the line, Worley: Their objection here is to beautify the property, and make it more acceptable. We're kind of painted in the corner with your LDRs because this requires this, I feel like there's a lot of mitigated circumstances that yes, lets say that we go ahead and build the 5 building and put a 20 foot setback, there's nothing to stop them from storing that material that we're trying, to make inside the building. O'Connor: Understand. Worley: They can put around back, and the people across the street are still looking O'Connor: Well they're looking at it now. Worley: Right O'Connor: They're looking at the material that's on the South side right now, because it's stacked up there, and I thought that was the purpose of this building, like you said, is to put that undercover, but you say you could live, like you said you could live with a five foot setback off that line. Would that still give you room to clear the big building with the double doors? Worley: What if we asked for a two foot setback and agree to landscape that 2 foot? and O'Connor: I don't know, I think, I don't know, I think a Burroughs: I think it all determines is the grievance, that Bill was trying to get to is that you can't use the other building, if we put it out 20 feet. That's the problem. Worley: It obstructed O'Connor: To me that's the hardship. Burroughs: Exactly, so lets back up and say, is to put the right number that you can put in there, you put your landscaping, etc., etc. does that affect you of using that building for the current usage that you have today? Raddatz: I could work with the two foot. Worley: In order to keep the building from encroaching on the door easement, the building is going to have to be made smaller, by whatever amount you take. We need a zero lot line to get the building we planned and proposed. If you give us a two foot easement, or two foot setback, the building is gonna be two foot smaller. Burroughs: Right, that what I was trying to O'Connor: How deep is the building, Hoot? Worley: 26 foot right now. O'Connor: 26 foot deep? 6 Worley: Right Burroughs: Inside the inside? Worley: From the front to the back. It will be a single slope to the roof, it will slope to the south, ah, so if, I mean we're Burroughs: You know personally, I think you've proven your grievance. You can't utilize your building, your existing building and you want to use this to beautify the property or restore your Raddatz: Originally we had planned on adding on the existing warehouse, but way it was build we cannot add on to it. It cannot be Burroughs: I think you'd probable run into more problems if you started adding on to that existing structure. Raddatz: But what they did, the original building was a 30 foot span that had a ridge line that ran north and south. And they added on to the west with a single slope building and, and that's one thing our plan proposes is to put the sign in front of that to hide, to make that front more symmetrical and have porch and give it a pleasing appearance. Maxwell: You know, I think that we can't forget the fact this is the entry to our City, and this road curves around this property, and it needs to be beautified. I really though would like to see it beautified within our current LDRs. And the reason I say that is that we over the years, have had a history of, how to make an exceptions and it makes perfect sense to me know, but, you know we have to live with these things, and I was coming back into town last night after being over on the West Coast for a couple days on business, and I have a habit of looking around while I'm in other communities, and, and taking note of how their planning's going, whether they are a wealthy community, how they're maintaining their infrastructure and their buildings, and you know when you travel through these small towns, and you travel through a couple, coming back to Okeechobee, such as Arcadia and a number of other places, you know I try to, I look around and I try to imagine what people think when they come into Okeechobee, whether they are visiting or just passing through, and it was just last night that I came into town from the West and it wasn't pretty. And I talked with my wife about, what would your impression be, would you want to live here? And we looked at this Tocoria, that was one of the things, that an unsightly thing, and I think that's a code enforcement issue, and there's a number of them on that side of town. And I just, I have to see us, first of all I don't like metal buildings in the City. And we've done a lot them for office uses and retail uses and they are not very attractive, but I have to see us put up a metal building without following our Land Development Regulations in order to hide something unsightly across the street. And so, no matter how legitimate it seems, and I don't disagree with what's being said, I'm going to have a hard time voting for something just as a matter of principle when this is a commercial owner, it's not like it's a homeowner and it's effecting their, you know their house, um, so that's my position on it. I would 7 just like to, I'd like to, I personally won't vote for it, because I think that we need to look at code enforcement and we need to be forward looking, and try to insist that, you know that, and see the problem with these variances they set a terrible president and we struggle with them every time they come before us because, um, the fact is, it's not following the rules, and it's very hard to go and be consistent and turn somebody else down you know, later. Worley: I have two points, since I am the chairman of the City Code Enforcement Board, Maxwell: Well, you know (interrupted) Worley: And State Law prohibits me from telling the code officer where to go, I'd be pleased if you would call in a complaint. Maxwell: I wasn't thinking of that when I said that, but Ledferd: Your picture is worth a thousand words. Worley: One mitigating thing that I think you're overlooking here is, is this map. If you look at, if this spot zone that is still residential, the 3 residences across the street to the South, when they fill in, and it's eminent from this map that they will, then we would not be up here asking you for a variance. See here, here is the Southeast Milk property. Brisson: This is all residentially zoned. Worley: Everything on that side of the street is commercial. Brisson: Across from South Park. Everything across from that street is zoned residential. Across from your new building. Worley: Where? Brisson: On the South side. Maxwell: Just for the sake of understanding, the point that was being made O'Connor: Where the house where Group lives, and all that along there, it's all residential, including where the old folks home is. That's probably public use, public something. Maxwell: What's the setback if it were commercial? Ledferd: Senior Services on the corner and that little antique store 8 O'Connor: That's commercial and it's commercial right on up to City Electric and all the rest of that to the City limits. And also going East when you get there to where the water company is now, retention pond and then the water company. Ledferd: That little yellow house, little yellow house down on the other corner I believe we turned that over to commercial O'Connor: That is commercial. The old awning (interrupted) Ledferd: All they got is that old gas station Burroughs: You got two lots past that, that is residential and the rest is Ledferd: I agree with Devin Maxwell about beautification and our City is kind of made some mistakes, no, no, my point is this none of our concern. Our concern is, this is a variance and are we going to grant it and do you have a hardship for a special exception. That is what my Boards' here for. I'm not here for beautification, I don't care if you build a metal building or turn it upside down. Ain't none of my business. Site plan review board will handle that. Brisson: Might be able to help you. Way, normally if someone going to come forward with something like this here, and you're wondering where's the hardship and they say it blocks our doors, etc. In reality the best way to determine if it's a hardship they should do a site plan which shows the location of the building, where they store things, what is their access, their internal circulation pattern, where the things are, so that you can say wait a minute, you don't have to have those there, if you move this, then you would need 7 feet setback or something. Another words, you could determine what the minimum setback is if you saw a site plan of how that site is intended to be, not just the location of the building without driveways, access Ledferd: I agree with you there Bill, but it's the expense to the owner to do a site plan and then come to us and we go no! Then he's out the money. Brisson: I don't know (interrupted) Ledferd: We've never requested a site plan before. It would be a great thing if it could happen. Brisson: How can you determine what your minimum, what's your minimum variance unless, you can only say well we need 2 feet or we need 5 feet because it blocks our doors. Ledferd: Yes sir. Brisson: That's the trouble, you are not getting the information you need that allows you to determine the minimum setback or minimum variance. 9 Ledferd: Absolutely Burroughs: We're relying on them to tell us what the setback is. That's what basically your telling us. Brisson: Right Worley: Regardless whether we have a variance or not, those residents will be looking at a metal building. The question is whether it will be 20 foot closer to them. If you would consider, due to the hardship already expressed, giving us a 2 to 5 foot setback with landscaping, seems to me like that would be a win/win for everybody. I'll just leave it in your hands at that. Ledferd: Thank you O'Connor: I have a question then. Hoot, you being a contractor, and you said a two foot or five foot, and that building is gonna be 26 feet in depth, I would rather have you ask us for the desired setback that you thing that you would want on the hardship for the metal of that building. Cause metal comes in a even length, doesn't it? Worley: Mike, that's not the case, metal building comes any size you want to build. O'Connor: Okay then, well than what I'm trying to do, I'd rather you ask this Board for the setback that you think that y'aIl could live with for the variance. You said whether it's 2 foot or 5 foot, well we could say 5 foot and you'd rather have 2, but I thought it would be better if you told us that, because you know the size of that building and what you have to do to build it, if your gonna be the builder. What's gonna be the best for them? Ledferd: Would 5 really hurt you? Is what I think he's trying to say. Worley: The best for them would be a 26 foot building with a zero foot setback. O'Connor: I understand that, but lets talk reality now. Worley: But if we can offer you something that you feel would be attractive enough that you'd grant us the variance, a (interrupted) O'Connor: I want you to ask us, what's that distance gonna be? Worley: Mike, I'm a big proponent of landscaping, a, when I sat on the County Zoning Board, I pushed so hard that Bill Royce was gonna call it the Hoot Worley landscaping ordinance. I think that's one thing our City is slacking on is landscape. Not just the City, but our whole community. County and City as well. That was my suggestion. I would like to see some landscaping on the back side of that building. I think it would enhance the character of our City. Minimum for that, we need two feet. If we have a 26 foot 10 building proposed and we end up taking 5 foot off it, we have a 21 foot building. They can still work, that's workable, they can't store as much material in there, and that's what their attempting to do is get the material out of site and into a building. And I feel like that, that everybody here's on the same page. We're all working toward the same, just like Devin said. We want to beautify the City. O'Connor: But I want you to tell me the figure. What you think. Worley: Two and one -half feet. O'Connor: Two and one -half feet. Worley: Yes sir. Maxwell: What would it cost to move one of these roll up doors in order to allow access to the existing building? Worley: Devin look, the cost of just moving a door, I might could give you some idea, but that's an established business that's been there 20 years. Their traffic flow in and out of that building the way they have their racks inside the building that they store their materials on I couldn't estimate the cost because they would have to completely re -work the inside of that building. You see what I mean. It's a material storage building, they have racks they go in with a forklift and turn. The cost of just moving the door, I could give you an idea, but not the cost of this client and the hardship it would cost them. Ledferd: Bill would you be willing to give me something if he gives up two feet? How would you feel about it then? Brisson: Well (interrupted) Ledferd: With a buffer in the back? Brisson: I can't really as your consultant negotiate for you, but I can tell you one thing, two feet is unacceptable for landscaping. Two foot of landscaping doesn't stay alive for very long. My feeling is, if your gonna landscape strip it ought to be at least 5 feet. At least that way you can get some irrigation in it, you can get some plants, something with height, perhaps to block the building some. To me 2 feet not much better than being on the line. Ledferd: Two feet, 3 feet, 5 feet, feel from everything you heard (interrupted) Brisson: You like to get about 5 foot for your parking islands, for your trees. Something like that can work.. Two feet to me is, I'm not a landscape architect either, but having seen what I've seen, two foot of landscaping usually dies in a short period of time. You don't adequate irrigation, you don't get dirt, not enough sun, because the building blocks 11 it half the time, whatever the case may be. It doesn't usually work. Yea, I think you could manage with 5 feet, at least that would be some softening of it for the residences. Ledferd: Just questions. Cause I know what I need for a variance. How would you feel if I went zero setback and put a 6 foot block wall fence behind that metal building? Brisson: I don't think a 6 foot block wall fence looks better than the back of the building. Ledferd: No sir, I'm just saying it will hide the building. Brisson: I don't see a wall around a building like that to be any different than the building. No real softening. Ledferd: Two feet or 5 feet ain't gonna keep those plants alive. We got a City sidewalk there, he'd have to put a sprinkler in. Brisson: Well they certainly should have a sprinkler system if you are going to require landscaping. They should have a sprinkler system in. Otherwise your going to end up with a thing of dirt. Ledferd: Okay, I don't wanna go 5 feet and go okay you give me a little bit of landscaping and all of a sudden I got these big hook racks out there and that's where all the pipes go is on the back side of the building. Now I got an eyesore for the residences. Brisson: Well, you can condition the variance, once you found your hardship you can condition the variance with whatever things that you want. O'Connor: You can condition the variance and then also the site plan. Then you can call it Hoot's Code officer to go cite them. Burroughs: Hoot, is there a reason whey that building cannot be shifted to the West? Worley: Physically? Burroughs: I mean the new building. Worley: It does affect the traffic flow of their forklift trucks coming in and out. Physically, no. There is (interrupted) Burroughs: That's what I was trying to find out. Worley: Yes, There is (interrupted) Ledferd: Need you to come back up. Burroughs: That's what we couldn't see off this print here. 12 Raddatz: The curb cut is right here. This is the existing fence. We want to put that building right here. Burroughs: He just pulled his print out here. That's the reason we asked that question. Ledferd: I understand the swing of the semi's. Burroughs: Hoot, are we between 0, 2 -1/2 or 5 now? I'm lost. Worley: 2 -1/2 Burroughs: 2 -1/2, okay. O'Connor: Boy, is this familiar. Ledferd: Anybody got a pair of dice? (Laugh) O'Connor: Mr. Chairman I'd like to make a motion to pass 07 -001 -V with a hardship with a variance of 3 feet, (Burroughs: with approved landscaping ?) to approve it with and with the beautification, (Burroughs: with approved landscaping)O'Connor: yes, yes roger that, but to improve the landscaping, yes, (Burroughs: you got that ?)Second. Ledferd: We have a motion and a second. Worley: Can we have discussion? Ledferd: Pardon? Worley: Do we have discussion before you vote? Ledferd: We can if anybody want to discuss anything. Worley: When you say approved landscaping, what should we use? The City's landscaping ordinance? Burroughs: The one I wrote? (laugh) We can use the County's, the one I wrote, and is still sitting on their desk. Worley: I'm asking a serious question. Ledferd: Absolutely. Worley: We just need to define landscaping. Burroughs: It should be, it is defined in the LDRs. 13 O'Connor: Yes, yes Ledferd: If there's no further discussion, I have a motion and a second. All those in favor, roll call by Betty: Burroughs — Yea Keller — Yea Maxwell — Nay Johns — Yea O'Connor — Yes Ledferd: a yes vote on my count. Clement: Carried Ledferd: Motion passed 10/16/2007 15:37 8636754174 AMIRA DAJANI FOX amira@goxramunni.com FRED R. KAHLE fred@foxramunni.com 2211 Peck Street Suite 250 Fort Myers, Florida 33901 Tel: 239.791.3900 Fax: 239.791.3901 FOX & RAMUNNI PA PAGE 02 FOX & RAMUNNI, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Betty Clement City of Okeechobee General Services Department 55 S.E. 3`i Avenue, Room 101 Okeechobee, Florida 34974 -2903 October 16, 2007 Via facsimile and U.S. mail IN RE: Rezoning Application -Mary Ann Newcomer -Tuten 701 SW Park Street, Okeechobee, FL STEVEN A. RAMUNNI' steve@foxramunni.com *also licensed in Texas Post Office Box 1118 LaBelle, Florida 33975 Tel: 863.675.4646 Fax: 863.675.4174 Dear Mrs. Clement, Pursuant to our telephone conversation this morning, I am requesting that the Small Scale Co Ian Amendment currently scheduled fo(ctober,8, 2007 be continued to the LPA's ovember eeting. If possible we would like to maintain our position on the City Council's— December 4, 2007 meeting. I will sub the Rezoning Application to request Industrial category. Please advise accordingly. SARIIp cc: Client Res,,ectfutl ubmitted, St= en , . _ - munni www.foxramunni.com 10/16/2007 15:37 8636754174 AMIRA DAJANI FOX amira@foxramunni.com FRED R. KAHLE Fred @foxremunnl.com 2211 Peck Street Suite 250 Fort Myers, Florida 33901 Tel. 239.791.3900 Far 239.791.3901 FOX & RAMUNNI PA PAGE 01 FOX & RAMUNNI, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW FAX COVER SHEET STEVEN A. RAMUNNI* stave tfo xra m u n n L. com " e/ao licensed in Texas Post Office Box 1118 LaBelle. Florida 33975 Tel: 863.675.4646 Fax: 883.675.4174 Send to: Betty Clement Attention: From: Steven A. Ramunni Date: October 16, 2007 Office location: Office location: LaBelle Fax number: 863- 763 -1686 Phone number: 863 -675 -4646 1 Urgent -1 Reply ASAP I_ -...,I Please comment Total pages, including cover: 2 Comments: Please review For your information THIS FACSIMILE CONTAINS PRIVILEGED INFORMATION INTENDED FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE, W RECEIVED IN ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY US AND RETURN THE ORIGINAL VIA U.S. POSTAL SERVICE. THANK YOU. LODOC 1!, LLC Post Office Box 912 Okeechobee, FL 34973 -0912 October 17, 2007 City of Okeechobee Planning Board c/o Department of General Services 55 SE 3rd Avenue, Room 101 Okeechobee, FL 34974 -2903 RE: Petition 07- 013 -R, The Lakehouse PUD -R Dear Mr. Chairman: Thank you for the opportunity for public input and participation on the above referenced petition. After reviewing the application and staff reports, I must strongly object to the proposal. d in close My mother and I own all of Blocks 13 and 16, of the Southwest Addition o the ultimate proximity to the proposed development. We purchased the property goal of building single family residences in a typical residential setting. I am sure many others in the general area have similar hopes and aspirations. e Okeechobee County Property encouraged with the 2006 valuation of our property. Appraiser valuation of our property also seems to indicate that the area has tremendous potential. However, it is my belief that by allowing a proposed development such as this that a decline in property values in the area is inevitable. In addition, the proposed development of 136 additional residences on the subject property will increase the population density pattern thereby increasing and overtaxing public services and facilities. I also believe the proposed development will excessively increase traffic congestion and will adversely influence living conditions in the general area. Once again thank you and the City of Okeechobee Planning Board for giving me the opportunity to express my opinion. Sincerely yours, G. Kelley Johnson Managing Partner LODOC II LLC RECEIVED AUG City Ohobee General of Services Department 55 SE. 3n' keec Avenue, Room 101 Okeechobee, Florida 34974 -2903 Phone: (863) 763 -3372, ext. 218 Fax: (863) 763 -1686 Date: g I 1-7107 Fee Paid: 53 • Oct 1st Hearing. 9,G'/o 7 Publication Dates: Notices Mailed: Petition No. 01 -19% ^ -..55 Jurisdiction: � � ; `� C C 2nd Hearing Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Application Please Check One: ✓ Small Scale Amendment (Under 10 Acres) Large Scale Amendment (Over 10 Acres) A P P L c A T Name of property owner(s): Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC Owner mailing address: 3055 Cardinal Drive, Vero Beach, FL 32963 Name of applicant(s) if other than owner (state relationship): Applicant mailing address: "same" Name of contact person (state relationship): Kelly Kite Jr., Vice President Contact person daytime phone(s): 772/231 -9333 Fax: 772/231 -0033 Property address / directions to property: 1108 Highway 70 E, Okeechobee, FL 34972 Parcel Identification Number: 2- 22- 37- 35 -0A00- 00004 - 0000 -HX Size of the Property (in acres): 6.27 ACRES Current Zoning Designation: RMF P-1 4 kt p 4 it Current Future Land Use Designation: Single- family Existing Use of the Property: Single- family Proposed Future Land Use Designation: Commercial Proposed Use of the Property: Commercial - Hotel, Bank, Restaurant and General Retail Description of Surrounding Properties: North - undeveloped (SR70), South - single family, East - commercial and single - family, West - commercial (US Post Office) Legal Description of the Property (Lengthy Description May be Attached): See Attached Unifonn Land Use Application trey. IJQ3) Page 1 of 2 1' Survey of Property (11" x 14", 20" Scale) Letter Outlining Request Notarized Letter of Owner's Authorization Application Fee (non-refundable) City Location Map . . • Confirmation nfInformation Accuracy I hereby certify that the information in this application is correct. The information included in this application is for use by the City of Okeechobee in processing my request. False or misleading information may be punishable by a fine of up to $500.00 and imprisonment of up to 30 da s and ma Alult in the summary denial of this application. Aio, g Si V<ELL,1 Krrci S. Printed Name Uniform Land Use Application (rev_ 12/03) Date Page 2 of 2 pez_Wf I LLC REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT August 7, 2007 047833002 Via Federal Express 863/763 -3372 City of Okeechobee Ms. Betty Clement General Services Department 55 S.E. 3rd Avenue, Room 101 Okeechobee, FL 34974 RE: Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC Statement of Special Reason and Basis of Request Rezone Application and Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application Dear Ms. Clement: The SR70 corridor within the City of Okeechobee limits is continuing to develop into a commercial node. As the applicant and owner of Parcel ID #2 -22 37- 35 -0A00- 00004 - 0000 -HX,1 am interested in developing this property as a mixed use commercial project to address the needs of the community and to provide additional hotel rooms within the city limits. Additional outparcels will provide convenient access to services (banking, restaurant and retail) for hotel guests and surrounding city residents. For this reason, I am respectfully requesting to rezone the property listed above from RMF to CHV and to amend the Future Land Use Comprehensive Plan from Single - Family to Commercial. Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC a Florida limited liability company By: Kite Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC a Florida limited liability company, its managing member 3055 CARDINAL DRIVE, SUITE 300 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32963 TEL (772) 231 -9333 FAx (772) 231 -0033 WWW.KITEPROPERTIESLIC.COM Prepared By and Return to John D. Cassels, Jr. Esq. Cassels & McCall P.O. Box 968 Okeechobee, Florida 34973 Parcel ID Number :2- 22- 37- 35 -0A00-00004 -0000 IIIIIII1JIJMIIfJJIlaff�ffNIJIJJIJJIJflJij fBiff! FILE NUM 2007009267 OR BF; 00634 PG 0650 SHARON ROBERTSON, CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FL RECORDED 07/02/2007 11:48 :01 AM RECORDING FEES 18.50 DEED DOC 11,200.00 RECORDED BY h Pinon Pas 0650 – 651; C2p9s) SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED THIS SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED, made this day of June, 2007, between JOSEPH G. ARBOGAST, as the Donee of that Durable Power of Attorney dated April 16, 1999 which was executed by KEITH LEE ARBOGAST, SR. and recorded in Official Records Book 490, Page 738 of the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida and as Attorney -in -Fact for KEITH LEE ARBOGAST, SR, of Post Office Box 201, Okeechobee, Florida 34973, GRANTOR, and OKEECHOBEE SR70 HOLDINGS, LLC., a Florida Limited Liability Company, of 3055 Cardinal Drive, Suite 300, Vero Beach, FL 32963 -1687, GRANTEE; WITNESSETH, that said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN (510.00) DOLLARS, and other good and valuable consideration to said Grantor in hand paid by said Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Grantee, and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Okeechobee County, Florida, to-wit: DESCRIPTION ATTACHED AS EXRIIBIT "A" enants with said Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee awful authority to sell and convey said land; that the Grantor hereby fully the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. hereunto set Grantors' hand and seal the day and year first above AND the Grant simple; that the Grantor has warrants the title to said land .:... r S3 IN WITNESS WHE written. Signed, sealed and delivered in itte"' presence of: ' ',tness .. • tur FrintName:.— STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF BUNCOMBE JOSEPH C. ARBOGAST, as the Donee of that Durable Power of Attorney dated April 16,1999 which was executed by KEITH LEE ARBOGAST, SR and , ecorded In Official Records Book 490, Page 738 of the •lie Records of Okeechobee County, Florida and as Attorney- in-Fact for KEITH LEE ARBOGAST, SR BY: AM/ OSE'H G.ARBOGAS as the Donee The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of June, 2007, by JOSEPH G. ARBOGAST, as the Donee of that Durable Power of Attorney dated April 16, 1999 which was executed by KEITH LEE ARBOGAST, SR. and recorded in Official Records Book 490, Page 738 of the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida and as Attorney -in -Fact for KEITH LEE ARBOGAST, SR., pt who is personally known to me or ❑ who has produced as identification. `\�,,,U,tlU 11[ttt/,,,,,/ ' N Signature of Notary Public Tal1i �1-r. �iTfYlorrl i Printed name of Notary My commission expires: D 01 i [4168 - 73118. WPD[ Notory Public c Buncombe County i'P 9 CARD\ \\\\\�� Book634 /Page650 CFN #2007009267 Page 1 of 2 DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL AS DETERMINED BY THIS SURVEY: BEING A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 35 EAST, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF S.R. 70 (AS SHOWN ON FDOT RIGHT—OF—WAY MAP FOR S.R. 70 OKEECHOBEE COUNTY SECTION 91070 -2514, DATED DWN =3 -76) WITH EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 EXTENDED; THENCE SOUTH 00 °14'21" EAST, ALONG • SAID EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 EXTENDED, A DISTANCE OF 44.5.FEET TO A POINT; 'THENCE SOUTH 89 °54'49" WEST, ALONG THB SOUTHERLY RIGHT—OF—WAY OF S.R. 70 A DISTANCE OF 125.00 11F.E1' TO T1IE POINT OFf ?!j 1 G; THENCE SOUTH 00 °14'21" EAST, A DISTANCE. OF 690.53 :w; I,ii' CB NORTH 89 °54'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A PO I li i • N THE WESTERLY RIGHT —OF —WAY LINE OF S.B. 13TH AVENUE; THEN fA: = • "L 00°14'21" EAST A DISTANCE OF 230.05 FEET TO THB POINT OF I i RS ON OF THB WESTERLY RIGH —OF —WAY LINE OF S.E. 13TH A :10 i . ' i ■ HOPKINS MEANDER LINE; THENCE NORTH 71 °49'20" WEST, A DIS • 4 ��- s 424.14 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 °03'47" WEST, A DIET "' + 1787 a TO A POINT LYING ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT —OF —WA a•i • " . 70; THENCE NORTH 89 °54'49" EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RI • •F—WAY LINE OF SR 70, A DISTANCE OF 300.00 FEET TO ' 4 P i '-'1. . ' BEGINNING Book634 /Page651 CFN #2007009267 Page 2 of 2 11 21537350A00000090000 7 AC 215373501,00000110000 5.06 AC w w 10 11 12 2z-4.1537350030000500100 11 373050030000400100 45 45 126 4 5 6 0 45 45 1 9 8 7 1163735003000050007 0 5 L_Lj 11 ]■637 1 45 45 N. E. 3 RD 45 45 9 8 7 ]}7350030001200070 0 0 10 11 12 53735003000120010 45 45 126 7350030000500010 2 3 4 5 6 126 Q 1jJ w STREET = 15 126 0 3735003000120001C 2 126 3 4 5 6 0 73 03000130001C 4 3 1 153735021000010001 1 0735003000130004 315 735021000010 110 3 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 8 130101300090 STATE 05 3) 222x7 OA 000030.00 100 176 � 12237 _102100 12'3735(10 0000800 12 7. 000008 37350 80022000 222:735040000005 000115 2200120 53735003 0023000 22237 0A00000090000 22237350A00300040000 37350030002300070 023000 i0 222 7350A0d00006u000 100 30002 ACCESS EASEMENT 0 ) 222 :7350A0b00007 000 30005 E N Lin 0 222 735040b000081000 130.5 ( 1 ) 1223735040000001000 1. 53 AC (CALC. 73 AD 0001C0 0 3YC17E032m30Cm030 20 19 18 t7 16 Cr) J u, A 1-- 12237350040000040010 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 0 S. E. 4 TH STREET 2 145 145 14 140 15 25 80 5377 35003Q00030O07C 45 45 N. E. 4 TH 7 8 9 10 135 11537350031 11 12 135 7 8 9 10 11 12 135 1 135 N. E. 2 NE 45 45 .537350030001400041 6 5 4 7 8 9 1 11537350030001400070115 46 010 123 STAT .74 50 5 4 N CT 122373500200000/ 621 130 S. 123 S. E. 150 16 50010000900160 15 12 3735001000090015C w 14 12 123 350010000900140 F-- 123 ;73500100b9001.8 w jaa 12 735001006900120 12: 123 7350010000900110 123 123: 35001000109Q 00100 12 1233 50010000900890 0 2 145 3 4 »an3sm366m266mu 145 3 32277NR m)02000i0 4 ,3 145 ) ,� 3rrn35oa3m6p30m3a 25 25 25 00010 2 1 7r2771502ID0003uooa 6 5 3500 00000.0090 37237X ]0000206010 5 Q13736m3mmr6m50 (0I 75 12337351 4 11 • 12 Inf N. E. 10 TH STREET 61 3 2 Ir N. E.9 114 STREET • 7 l21 1r{ 1 • 8 2 is 3 l i • 14 STREET 3 2 I STREET 7 2 1 10 11 12 STREET 1170 02 AC 62.19 AC Y 12Y 368 STREET 11 5 F 12 177.f 00.7 6 • • 7 008 048 1 8 2 9 3 5 6 7 N. E.7 TH STREET N. E. 7 TH STREET ism Ilk =It Z1111 "NE immitt r riimnirt 8. . .814. IFNI N. E. 5 TH STREET b.r b 13 14 1 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 6 15 14 13 24 9 25 y4 1 10 11 12 STREET 1 8 10 11 12 STREET 11 12 4 4? AC BA 1.82 AC 0 18.98 4 tp RA OO 7 AC O 2.5 AC .'J 2 12 40 NS010NJ50 ICE ADDITI M1 , 1 J STATE ROA0 70 ID 11 12 N. E. 3 80 9 8 7 • 10 II 12 If 0 2 r ; 37 r i y 9 10 IX Y 1 a 6 • 5 6 • STREET W u I i 2 3 5 la 6 • N �•1 61 25 19 f0 1 12 N E.5 TH S PEET 6 5 3 7 7 9 10 11 v 12 2 N. E. 4 TH STREET • 7 'Y 1Y I r 8 2 9 ] 10 6 1 5 • 12 u 1Y 6 N E. 2 NO STREET N. E. 6 TH a119n 18 ;17. STREET fi 12 11 5 6 12 11 12 11 18 0 8 6 5 4 3 2 y" 066E7806E0 COUNT 7 ▪ 9 10 II 12 • 9 Ia 2 • • 7 u 9 m I7 ✓ It 17 0 i o 6 6 5 1 3 2 1 M p 9 7 0 9 10 11 12 9 MI 0 6 5 1 3 2 1 b 20 8 9 10 II 12 11 12 9 10 11 12 STATE ROAD 70 16 130 15AI STA Cs 3.29 3 6 27 AI 111 1.53 AC 1791.7.0 W 27 26 25 24 • 16 • 15 2 s 14 IJ 4 5. .4 TH STREET 12 C 10 918{ 8 Ib 5. E. 4 TH STREET S. E..15 iH AVENUE • 16 e 15 2 • 13 12 6 10 9144 1110 9 3111518 87654321 718192021212324 S. E. 5 TH STREET 5. E. 5 TH STREET 21110 9 8 7 311151617181920 1222121 5. E. 6 TH STREET TH STREET K Lei 0 2 4 10 e 4 3 2 11 20 It EN 5. E. 6 TH LANE S. E. 7 TH STREET 5. E 7 TH STREET A23 KAN fl, S. E. 6 TH STREET S. E. 8 TH COURT 4, , >t x 1 K 1 1Y d 15700 1/1111111/11 and Associates, and Associates, Inc. 1 proposed project Descriution Okeechobee SR70 Holding, LLC proposes to develop the 6.28 acre site into a commercial node that will consist of an 85 room national chain quality hotel, an approximate 3,400 square foot bank branch office, an approximate 5,500 square foot national chain, full service, restaurant and accessory retail, as City of Okeechobee land development regulations dictate. A shared access driveway with the US Post Office, located adjacent to the west property line, is the proposed main access driveway from SR70. An additional secondary access driveway to SE 13`h Avenue at the south extent of the project is also proposed'The most lows recent site plan locates the hotel along the west property lin full traffic circulation around the hotel. The bank and restaurant are both located along the SR70 frontage with associated parking internal to the property. Accessory retail space and associated parking is located along the east property line and centrally aligned in the north/south two direction. Full traffic circulation thro the is achieved in the design. access drives, and to each of the proposed The south one quarter of the site is dedicated to stormwater retention. 2. Findings Required for Grantini, Petitions Per the City of Okeechobee land development regulations section 70 -340 the following addresses the nine listed items as they relate to the requested zoning change. 1) The use is not contrary to comprehensive plan requirements_ Presently, the site's underlying future land use designation does e support the requested zoning change. A small scale compr plan amendment is being requested to address this inconsistency. However, the proposed use and requested zoning change is not of contrary to the provisions of the comprehensive plan andve pion the amendment request, consistencies with the comprehensive are being presented. 2) The use is specifically authorized under the zoning district regulations applied for. The proposed uses; hotel, bank, restaurant, retail are all uses specifically authorized wider the requested CHV zoning district. 3) The use will not have an adverse effect on the public interest. Per the Okeechobee Utility Authority a sufficient excess capacity of potable water and wastewater treatment is available for the proposed use and intensity. A traffic impact analysis was prepared as required for this zone change request and indicates no lowering of level of service in the roadway system as a result of this development at maximum intensity. ❑ =�Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 4) The use is appropriate for the location proposed, is reasonably compatible with adjacent uses, and is not contrary or detrimental urbanizing land use patterns. The SR70 corridor within the City of Okeechobee is continuing to develop into a commercial node. This location is very suitable for the proposed uses as SR70 is a principal arterial that significant portion of City thorou° a gfare traffic. Providing these services at this location keeps through minor collectors and local roadways. Compatible other ses and zoning districts presently exist on three (3) sides of the site. Along the north side of SR70 the zoning is CHV. A full service US Post Office operates adjacent to and west of the site. A convenience store and equipment repair operation are adjacent and east of the site for approximately 400 feet south of the SR70 south right-of-way. The balance of the east property line borders single - family residences and SE l3s` Avenue and the south property line also borders single- family residences. The proposed site plan locates all the storrnwater management retention facility in the south portion of the site providing a large buffer between the proposed commercial uses and the adjacent residential uses. 5) The use will not adversely affect property values or living conditions, nor be a deterrent to the improvement or development of the adjacent property. The affect of the proposed use on the properties adjacent along the north west and east property boundaries will be to increase property values and promote improvement and development since these properties are ofa similar use and are either presently undeveloped or ofa lesser quality development. No adverse impact will occur to the single - family development to the south and southeast since the proposed uses will be effectively buffered along the project site perimeter. 6) The use can be suitably buffered from surrounding uses, so as to reduce the impact of any nuisance or hazard to the neighborhood. As stated above the only non - similar uses bordering the property occur along the south and south third of the east property boundaries. The proposed stormwater retention facility will provide a wide buffer to the south. Also, the project will have a minimum I0 -foot wide Iandscape buffer along its entire perimeter. 7) The use will not create a density pattern that would overburden public facilities such as schools, streets and utility services. The density pattern has already been established in the area surrounding the site and the site is the only remaining property south :2— r Kimley -Hom and Associates, Inc. along the SR70 that is not yet consistent with the established density pattern. 8) The use will not create traffic congestion, flooding or drainage problems, or otherwise affect public safety. As indicated above, the traffic impact analysis prepared for this zoning change request indicates that the proposed will of reduce the level of service on the affected roadways• development approval it will be necessary that a stormwater management system be designed to meet standards e developed by the oversight agencies to address flooding drainage. designed to these standards will result in lower potential for off -site flooding and drainage impacts. neg e5 ffects on public safety will occur as a result of the proposed 9) The use has not been inordinately burdened by unnecessary restrictions. impact use that is The proposed use is a common and low imp specifically addressed without excessive restrictions in the City of Okeechobee land development regulations. ���Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. !uture Land EJeme „* Poly= v l l: The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of development approval conditional on the availability of facilities and services necessary to serve the proposed development and that the facilities meet adopted level of service standards. As part of the amendment review process the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA) wilt confirm the availability of the required potable water supply and capacity for wastewater disposal. It is the applicants understanding in speaking with representative of the OUA that this capacity exists. The included Traffic Impact Analysis reports that traffic level of service is essentially unaffected and the development approval process will evaluate a stormwater management system based on the 25 year /24 hour design storm. Pohcv t .2: The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of continuing to ensure that needed public facilities will be in place prior to or current with new development through implementation of the Concurrency Management System. Presently, existing paved roads surround the proposed property. Both water and sewer services are run in proximity to the proposed property to which the proposed development can easily tie into_ All needed public facilities are currently in place. Polio_ —v 103" The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of enforcing land development regulations addressing the subdivision of land. Any potential subdivision of the proposed property will occur in compliance with existing land development regulations. Policy 12 1 The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy regarding the criteria, standards and related provisions established in the Land Development Code for reducing the impacts from any Land Uses that are not in conformance or are inconsistent with this Comprehensive Plan shall as a minimum_ C) The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of ensuring safe and convenient on -site traffic flow and vehicle parking needs through the Site Plan review process and off - street parking regulations. The proposed development's off- street parking and on -site traffic flow will be designed in compliance with the existing applicable land development regulations. This design will be presented to the City for review and comment to assure consistency with this policy. C Horn and Associates, Inc. D) The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of ensuring that public facility, utility and service authorization has been procured prior to issuing any development order and that constnsction of said facilities, utilities, and service is concurrent with development. Verification of public facility, utility and service availability for the proposed project will be confirmed as part of the site planning process. E) The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of providing that development orders and permits shall not be issued which result in a reduction of the level of services for affected public facilities. The Traffic Impact Analysis (1'IA) prepared for this amendment request indicates that no lowering of level of service occurs as a result of this land use change. In discussion with OUA representatives the potable water and wastewater treatment capacity exists for intensity of development ff ted liresulting acilities as directly relates to use, Level of the proposed site, will be affected public as part of the site planning process. Traffic Circulation Element Policy 4.l : The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of implementing a program to monitor and evaluate the impacts of existing and proposed development on the transportation system in order to ensure consideration of transportation issues in local land use decisions. The TIA report included with this amendment request analyzes the proposed development's impacts on the transportation system in order to identify any potential transportation issues. Consistent with the comprehensive plan the TIA concludes no lowering of level of service as a result of this land use change. 1221icy 6-3: The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of enforcing provisions in its land development regulations, which meet or exceed FDOT standards to control access to arterial and collector roads by limiting new curb cuts and driveway permits, °and curb designs for the proposed site will be Potential roadway, driveway completed in compliance with applicable land development regulations and FDOT standards. The possibility of re- designing the existing US Post Of ursued. access driveway on SR70 to a shared access driveway is presently being p Acceptance of the shared driveway proposal will eliminate the need for an additional driveway access off SR70. LAKimley -Nom and Associates, Inc. PohCY 7_l: The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy .ofminimum peak . hour operating levels of service to consistent with those set forth in the Florida Highway System Plan, Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manual. As demonstrated in the Traffic Impact Analysis report minimum peak hour operating levels of service were examined for the proposed development and the land use change does not lower the level of service of SR70, a principal arterial. below level C. Pohcv$4' The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of en forcing provisions in its land development regulations to require sidewalks in new commercial and residential developments which are subject to plat or site plan approval, to be linked where possible to the existing sidewalk system. The pedestrian sidewalk design for the proposed use will be linked to the existing sidewalk in the SR70 south right -of -way. Sanitar Sewer Solid Waste Draina a Potable Water and Natural Groundwater Rechar a Element Poly — �Y ice?= The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of interim drainage level of service standards. Stormwater treatment and disposal facilities shall be designed for a 25 -year storm event of24 -hour duration. Such facilities shall meet the design and performance standards established in Section 17- 25.025, F.A.C. The first inch of stormwater runoff shall be treated on -site, pursuant to Section 17 -1051, FA.C. Stonnwater discharge that the receiving water body shall not bed facilities shall be designed such necessary to assure the suitability of water forrtthe designs minimum use of conditions classification as established in Chapter 17 -3, F.A.C. `ham standards shall apply to all development and redevelopment. The proposed development's stormwater treatment and disposal facilities will meet the design and performance standards established in the applicable Florida Administrative Code. Site development under the proposed land use change will require the design of a stormwtaer management system that meets the comprehensive plan's stated standards. Policy b 1- The City of Okeechobee's land development regulation shall enforce stormwater drainage provisions which ensure that: ❑i� i me -Horn and Associates, Inc. g (a) The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy r quirin r new developments to manage runoff from the 25 year frequency, duration design storm event on-site so that post - development rtmoff rates, volumes and pollutant loads do not exceed pre - development conditions. The proposed development will examine pre and post - development runoff rates as part of the site planning proCess and will manage runoff in compliance with the existing applicable City land development regulations and South Florida Water Management District water quality standards. (b) The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of ensuring stormwater engineering, design and construction standards for on -site systems are provided. Stormwater engineering, design and construction standards for on -site systems for the proposed development will be provided as part of a site planning process and will occur in compliance with applicable development regulations. (c) The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of enforcing erosion and sediment controls are used during development. Erosion and sediment controls for the proposed development will occur in compliance with applicable land development regulations and best management practices. The and development activity will be required to he covered by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection general permit for stormwater discharges associated with construction activities and the requirements associated with this permit coverage. Conservation Element PoUay 5_l: The new development, enforce provisions dless its land location in the City, meets the following that new develop , g conditions: (a) The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of ensuring that new development does not degrade water quality in Taylor Creek. The proposed development will develop a stormwater pollution prevention plan during the site planning process in compliance with land development regulations and other permitting agencies. of tread g storm design of a stormwater management system for the purpose runoff from the developed site is a requirement m District it. plan review by the City and South Florida Water Management standards as set by the Water discharge will meet water quality Management District. • �m�Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. (b) The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of ensuring that new development does not threaten groundwater quality, particularly in the vicinity of municipal wells; The project site is not in the vicinity of a municipal water well or in the City's groundwater recharge area. Stormwater runoff that percolates into the local aquifer will be subject to treatment by the implemented stormwater treatment system. (c) The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of ensuring that new development preserves existing wetland areas; The proposed development will complete an Environmental Resource Analysis to identify wetland areas during the site planning process and if necessary develop a preservation plan in compliance with land development regulations and other permitting agencies. (d) The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of ensuring that new development avoids the disturbance of natural drainage features; The site is not located in an area that transects any existing natural drainage features. In preparation of the stormwater management plan the existing site drainage pattern will be maintained. (e) The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of ensuring that new development preserves habitat for endangered and/or threatened wildlife species. If required, an Endangered Species Analysis to identify any endangered species and/or threatened wildlife species on the site will be presented during the site planning process. If necessary a preservation/mitigation plan compliant with the applicable land development regulations will be prepared and will consider preservation of the required habitat within the site boundary_ Policy 6 6- The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of the quality of water to be discharged from the new surface water management systems shall be subject to Federal, State, Regional and Local permitting programs and regulations that determine compliance with Federal, State and Local water quality standards. Stormwater discharges from development must meet relevant water quality and surface water management standards as set forth in Rules 62, 62. -40, 62 -302, 40E-4, F.A.C. and by local ordinance. The proposed development's stormwater treatment and disposal facilities will meet the design and performance standards established in the applicable Florida Administrative Code. Site development under the o require the design of a stormwater management system hats meets u hechange will comprehensive plan's stated standards. �-� and A -Horn and Associates, Inc. Poli_ cy C.1; The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of requiring all new developments to meet the provisions of the SFWMD Volume IV, Basis of Review for Surface Water Management and local provisions pursuant to this Comprehensive Plan to protect surface water quality within the City. Nance with The proposed development will protect surface water quality y proposed SFWMD and applicable land development regulations. royal n the proposed development on the site will require the water quality standards set by SFWMD• management system with red 1375 Jackson Street, Suite 206 Fort Myers, Florida 33901 -2845 Phone: 239 - 334 -3366 Fax: 239 - 334 -6384 LaRue Planning & Management Services, Inc. Staff Report —Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Prepared for: The City of Okeechobee Applicant: Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC/Kelly Kite Petition No. 07 -012 -SSA Staff Report Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: Okeechobee SR70 Holdings LLC Petition No.: 07- 012 -SSA General Information Applicant: Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC Applicant Address: 3055 Cardinal Drive Vero Beach, FL 32963 RMF Applicant Phone Number: 772 - 231 -9333, FX: 772 - 231 -0033 Single - Family Residence, balance vacant Hotel and associated retail. Owner: Kelly Kite, Jr. Owner Address: As above Future Land Use Map Classification Existing Single- Family Proposed Commercial Zoning District RMF CHV Use of Property Single - Family Residence, balance vacant Hotel and associated retail. Acreage Total parcel size is 6.27 acres, but SSA involves only 4.5 acres 4.5 acres Location: 1108 Highway 70 East Legal Description: BEING A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 35 EAST, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF SR70 (AS SHOWN ON FDOT RIGHT -OF -WAY MAP FOR SR70 OKEECHOBEE COUNTY SECTION 91070 -2514, DATED DWN =3 -76) WITH EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 EXTENDED; THENCE SOUTH 00 °14'21" EAST, ALONG SAID EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 EXTENDED, A DISTANCE OF 44.5 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 89° 54'49" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY OF SR70 A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 00 °14'21" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF SE 13TH AVENUE AND THE HOPKINS MEANDER LINE; THENCE NORTH 71 °49'20" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 424.14 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 °03'47" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 787.65 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF SR70; THENCE NORTH 89 °54'49" EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF- WAY LINE OF SR70, A DISTANCE OF 300.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 1 Staff Report Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: Okeechobee SR70 Holdings LLC Petition No.: 07- 012 -SSA Request: The applicant is interested in developing this property as a mixed -use commercial project providing for hotel rooms within the City limits. A bank and full service restaurant for hotel guests and surrounding City residents are also proposed for adjacent out - parcels encompassing about 1.7 acres. The request is for a change in the land use designation on the Future Land Use Map for the 4.5 acre parcel from Single - Family Residential to Commercial. This application qualifies under Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes as a Small -Scale Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan because it involves less than ten acres. Adjacent Future Land Use Map classifications and Zoning Districts: North: Future Land Use Map Classification: Zoning District: Existing Land Use: East: Future Land Use Map Classification: Zoning District: Existing Land Use: South: Future Land Use Map Classification: Zoning District: Existing Land Use: West: Future Land Use Map Classification: Zoning District: Existing Land Use: Commercial CHV Vacant Commercial and Single - Family CHV and RMF Equipment repair operation and four single- family residences Single - Family RMF Vacant Single - Family RMF U.S. Post Office Summary: The entire site is currently vacant and undeveloped except for one single- family home. The northern portion fronting on SR 70 is already designated Commercial on the FLUM and zoned CHV and is the location for the proposed bank and restaurant. The southern portion of the property is the subject of the proposed amendment. The applicant is proposing to develop a hotel on the part of the site for which the amendment is being sought. However, if the Small Scale Amendment and rezoning are approved, the Applicant, or any future owner of the prop- erty, will not be rot required to limit future development of the site to any specific use, but may develop any use allowable within the Commercial land use category and zoning district applied to the property. 2 Staff Report Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: Okeechobee SR70 Holdings LLC Petition No.: 07- 012 -SSA Comprehensive Plan Analysis A. Consistency with the Land Use Categories and Plan Policies. The Applicant is requesting to amend the Future Land Use Map from Single Family to Commercial. As prescribed by the Comprehensive Plan, a hotel and related retail uses are contemplated as allowable uses within this land use category. The Applicant has submitted supporting statements relative to the proposed project's consistency with specific Policies in the City's Comprehensive Plan and which are provided as an appendix to this Staff Report. Staff does not disagree with the Applicant's assertions. B. Concurrency of Adequate Public Facilities Potable Water and Wastewater The Applicant has provided letters from the Okeechobee Utility Authority confirming that the Authority has adequate capacity to provide for the potable water supply and wastewater disposal needs associated with the propose project. Copies of these letters are provided at the end of this report. Roadways The City's adopted level of service standard (LOSS) for SR 70 and US 441 /SR 7 is "C" and for local roads is "D ". The Applicant has furnished a revised Traffic Impact Analysis addressing questions and concerns initially posed by the Staff and which shows that the pro- posed project will impact both SR 70 and US 441 /SR 7 to only a minor degree. In neither case does the project's impact amount to as much as 10% of the traffic volume associated with level of service "C" for these roadways. Therefore, the Applicant has stated that the project is deemed not to have a significant impact on these roadways. Staff has identified a few additional areas where corrections or additional analyses are needed and has provided the Applicant with our comments. The Applicant should be able to provide these changes at the Planning Board meeting, or certainly by the City Council hearing. We do not, however, expect these data to substantively modify the general findings that the traffic generated by the project will be relatively minimal on the affected constrained roadways. SR 70, and US 441 south of SR 70, are constrained roadways and are presently operating at traffic volumes in excess of their design capacities. This is commonly referred to as operating at a level of service "F ". In fact, after construction of this development these roadways will be operating between 20% and 70% over their design capacities for both daily traffic and the PM Peak period. This is officially referred to as operating at a vehicle to capacity ratio of between 1.2 and 1.7. While the Applicant's contribution to this situation is relatively minimal, the cumulative impact of new developments in the future is of considerable concern to us. Since any additional traffic to these roadways will only continue to make matters worse, we suggest that the City consider implementing a policy that would not allow 3 Staff Report Applicant: Okeechobee SR70 Holdings LLC Small-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Petition No.: 07- 012 -SSA approval of any future requests for rezoning or amendments to the comprehensive plan that will increase the density or intensity on lands that will generate traffic onto these constrained roadways. The project will also affect two local roadways: NE 10th Avenue and NE 13th Avenue. The impacts on these local roads are projected to represent only 4.29% and 5.36 %, respectively, of the levels of service of these roadways and will not degrade their level of service below LOS D. However, since the intersection of SR 70 and NE 10th Avenue "fails" in three approaches, and on an overall basis, at the PM Peak, with or without the traffic generated by the project, the Applicant will need to contribute at the development order stage its fair share of the cost of making the necessary improvements (i.e., whether through signal timing adjustments within the existing geometry of the intersection or any turn lane improvements that might mitigate a failing situation). This may also be the case for the intersection of SR 70 and NE 13th Avenue. Solid Waste The County has recently confirmed a considerable level of excess capacity available to serve the solid waste disposal needs of other major developments in the City. It appears reasonable that the volume of solid waste associated with a development of this size can also be accommodated within the capacity of the County's Solid Waste Facility. Drainage The proposed development will be required to meet all standards required by the City of Okeechobee and the South Florida Water Management District. Compatibility with Adjacent and Nearby Land Uses The SR 70 corridor has been developing into a commercial node within the City. SR 70 is the major east -west roadway through the City. Concentrated commercial development on this arterial will reduce the potential for increased traffic on major and minor collectors and local roadways in the City. A major land use amendment and rezoning has been approved on about 16 acres on the north side of SR 70. Frontage on the south side of SR 70 (the site of the out - parcels associated with the proposed development) already carries a Commercial land use designation and CHV zoning. The full service U. S. Post Office is located immediately to the west of the subject property and a convenience store and equipment repair operation are adjacent to the northeast portion of the site. The properties to the south of the property are vacant, but are designated Single- Family on the Future Land Use Map but are zoned RMF. When developed, this area will likely be in residential use. This potential residential area can be protected from the effects of the pro- posed commercial development through the use of stormwater retention facilities as a spatial buffer. 4 Staff Report Applicant: Okeechobee SR70 Holdings LLC Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Petition No.: 07- 012 -SSA There are four single - family residences just south of the existing commercial uses on 13th street. These four properties abut the subject property's eastern boundary. If the plan amend- ment and requested rezoning are approved, buffering of these properties from the proposed commercial uses will need to be taken into consideration during site plan review. Conclusions Given the property's proximity to SR 70; ability to be compatible with surrounding uses; assessment of the availability of public services and facilities; and capability of ensuring compatibility with surrounding uses, Staff believes the requested amendment to designate the subject property Commercial on the FLUM is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Consequently, the Staff recommends approval. Submitted by: James G. LaRue, AICP October 10, 2007 1st LPA Hearing: 9 -20 -07 (postponed) lst LPA Hearing: 10 -18 -07 Maps or Diagrams — FLUM and Property Appraiser Map Applicant's Project Description and Consistency with Comprehensive Plan Letters from Okeechobee Utility Authority 5 Staff Report Small-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Future Land Use Map Applicant: Okeechobee SR70 Holdings LLC Petition No.: 07-012-SSA Subject Property E. III maw= 1111 1,1111111 IIII srArs P OW•Ctlf*A17 41 14, vie sn 'nun B .• • OA • • lb • ;7 r • D ,L• • • •• "04. • • • • s.v. Ifl 11774IT • • I 7 • F 1,7 •• ft . la • • la • s a • • • ■ • • • • • • • ■ • • • , - • _ ■ 1 ; COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE SINGLE - FAMILY MULTI - FAMILY • COMMERCIAL • INDUSTRIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES 6 Staff Report Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: Okeechobee SR70 Holdings LLC Petition No.: 07- 012 -SSA 2- 22.3 7-9 5.OADO- 00004-0000 ARBOGAST KEITH LEE .267AC 1 612E42007 -41.600 7 APPENDIX PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN As submitted by the Applicant Okeechobee SR 70 Holdings, LLC holds fee simple title to 6.28 acres of land in the City of Okeechobee. The site presently is open pasture with one single family home and is located approximately 105 feet west of the intersection of State Road 70 (SR 70) and SE 13th Avenue and fronts SR 70 for 300 feet. The existing land use for the property is divided between Commercial and Single Family. The existing Commercial land use portion covers an approximate 250 foot depth along the SR 70 frontage or approximately 1.7 acres. The remaining 4.5 acres is under the Single Family land use designation. The existing Heavy Commercial (CHV) zoning covers an approximate 110 foot depth along the SR 70 frontage or approximately 0.8 acres and the remaining 5.5 acres is zoned Residential Multiple Family (RMF). Okeechobee SR 70 Holdings, LLC is requesting a small scale land use amendment and rezoning to bring the entire 6.28 acre parcel under the Commercial land use classification and CHV zoning. Future Land Use Element Policy 1.1: The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of development approval condit- ional on the availability of facilities and services necessary to serve the proposed development and that the facilities meet adopted level of service standards. As part of the amendment review process the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA) will confirm the availability of the required potable water supply and capacity for wastewater disposal. It is the applicants understanding in speaking with representative of the OUA that this capacity exists. The included Traffic Impact Analysis reports that traffic level of service is essentially unaffected and the development approval process will evaluate a stormwater management system based on the 25 year /24 hour design storm. Policy 1.2: The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of continuing to ensure that needed public facilities will be in place prior to or current with new development through implementa- tion of the Concurrency Management System. Presently, existing paved roads surround the proposed property. Both water and sewer services are run in proximity to the proposed property to which the proposed development can easily tie into. All needed public facilities are currently in place. Policy 10.3: The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of enforcing land development regulations addressing the subdivision of land in that any potential subdivision of the proposed property will occur in compliance with existing land development regulations. 8 Policy 12.1: The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy regarding the criteria, standards and related provisions established in the Land Development Code for reducing the impacts from any Land Uses that are not in conformance or are inconsistent with this Comprehensive Plan shall as a minimum: C) The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of ensuring safe and convenient on -site traffic flow and vehicle parking needs through the Site Plan review process and off - street parking regulations. The proposed development's off -street parking and on -site traffic flow will be designed in compliance with the existing applicable land development regulations. This design will be presented to the City for review and comment to assure consistency with this policy. D) The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of ensuring that public facility, utility and service authorization has been procured prior to issuing any development order and that construction of said facilities, utilities, and service is concurrent with development. Verification of public facility, utility and service availability for the proposed project will be confirmed as part of the site planning process. E) The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of providing that develop- ment orders and permits shall not be issued which result in a reduction of the level of services for affected public facilities. The Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared for this amendment request indicates that no lowering of level of service occurs as a result of this land use change. In discussion with OUA representatives the potable water and wastewater treatment capacity exists for intensity of development resulting in the change of land use. Level of service for affected public facilities as directly relates to the proposed site, will be confirmed as part of the site planning process. Traffic Circulation Element Policy 4.1: The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of implementing a program to monitor and evaluate the impacts of existing and proposed development on the transportation system in order to ensure consideration of transportation issues in local land use decisions. The TIA report included with this amendment request analyzes the proposed development's impacts on the transportation system in order to identify any potential transportation issues. Consistent with the comprehensive plan the TIA concludes no lowering of level of service as a result of this land use change. 9 Policy 6.3: The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of enforcing provisions in its land development regulations, which meet or exceed FDOT standards to control access to arterial and collector roads by limiting new curb cuts and driveway permits, or other appropriate means. Potential roadway, driveway and curb designs for the proposed site will be completed in compli- ance with applicable land development regulations and FDOT standards. The possibility of re- designing the existing US Post Office access driveway on SR70 to a shared access driveway is presently being pursued. Acceptance of the shared driveway proposal will eliminate the need for an additional driveway access off SR70. Policy 7.1: The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of minimum peak hour operating levels of service to consistent with those set forth in the Florida Highway System Plan, Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manual. As demonstrated in the Traffic Impact Analysis report minimum peak hour operating levels of service were examined for the proposed development and the land use change does not lower the level of service of SR70, a principal arterial, below level C. Policy 8.4: The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of enforcing provisions in its land development regulations to require sidewalks in new commercial and residential developments which are subject to plat or site plan approval, to be linked where possible to the existing side- walk system. The pedestrian sidewalk design for the proposed use will be linked to the existing sidewalk in the SR70 south right -of -way. Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, Potable Water and Natural Groundwater Recharge Element Policy 1.5: The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of interim drainage level of service standards. Stormwater treatment and disposal facilities shall be designed for a 25 -year storm event of 24- hour duration. Such facilities shall meet the design and performance standards established in Section 17- 25.025, F.A.C. The first inch of stormwater runoff shall be treated on -site, pursuant to Section 17- 3.051, F.A.C. Stormwater discharge facilities shall be designed such that the receiving water body shall not be degraded below minimum conditions necessary to assure the suitability of water for the designated use of its classification as established in Chapter 17 -3, F.A.C. These standards shall apply to all development and redevelopment. 10 The proposed development's stormwater treatment and disposal facilities will meet the design and performance standards established in the applicable Florida Administrative Code. Site development under the proposed land use change will require the design of a stormwtaer management system that meets the comprehensive plan's stated standards. Policy 6.1: The City of Okeechobee's land development regulation shall enforce stormwater drainage provisions which ensure that: (a) The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of requiring new devel- opments to manage runoff from the 25 -year frequency, 24 -hour duration design storm event on -site so that post - development runoff rates, volumes and pollutant loads do not exceed pre - development conditions. The proposed development will examine pre and post - development runoff rates as part of the site planning process and will manage runoff in compliance with the existing appli- cable City land development regulations and South Florida Water Management District water quality standards. (b) The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of ensuring stormwater engineering, design and construction standards for on -site systems are provided. Stormwater engineering, design and construction standards for on -site systems for the proposed development will be provided as part of the site planning process and will occur in compliance with applicable land development regulations. (c) The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of enforcing erosion and sediment controls are used during development. Erosion and sediment controls for the proposed development will occur in compliance with applicable land development regulations and best management practices. The land development activity will be required to be covered by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection general permit for stormwater discharges associated with construction activities and the requirements associated with this permit coverage. Conservation Element Policy 5.1: The City shall enforce provisions in its land development regulations to ensure that new development, regardless of its location in the City, meets the following conditions: (a) The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of ensuring that new development does not degrade water quality in Taylor Creek. The proposed development will develop a stormwater pollution prevention plan during the site planning process in compliance with land development regulations and other 11 permitting agencies. The design of a stormwater management system for the purpose of treating stormwater runoff from the developed site is a requirement of site plan review by the City and South Florida Water Management District. Stormwater discharge will meet water quality standards as set by the Water Management District. (b) The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of ensuring that new development does not threaten groundwater quality, particularly in the vicinity of municipal wells; The project site is not in the vicinity of a municipal water well or in the City's groundw- ater recharge area. Stormwater runoff that percolates into the local aquifer will be subject to treatment by the implemented stormwater treatment system. (c) The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of ensuring that new development preserves existing wetland areas; The proposed development will complete an Environmental Resource Analysis to identify wetland areas during the site planning process and if necessary develop a preservation plan in compliance with land development regulations and other permitting agencies. (d) The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of ensuring that new development avoids the disturbance of natural drainage features; The site is not located in an area that transects any existing natural drainage features. In preparation of the stormwater management plan the existing site drainage pattern will be maintained. (e) The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of ensuring that new development preserves habitat for endangered and /or threatened wildlife species. If required, an Endangered Species Analysis to identify any endangered species and/or threatened wildlife species on the site will be presented during the site planning process. If necessary a preservation/mitigation plan compliant with the applicable land develop- ment regulations will be prepared and will consider preservation of the required habitat within the site boundary. Policy 6.6: The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's policy of the quality of water to be dis- charged from the new surface water management systems shall be subject to Federal, State, Regional and Local permitting programs and regulations that determine compliance with Federal, State and Local water quality standards. Stormwater discharges from development must meet relevant water quality and surface water management standards as set forth in Rules 62. -. 62. -40, 62 -302, 40E -4, F.A.C. and by local ordinance. 12 City of Okeechobee General Services Department 55 S.E. 3' Avenue, Room 101 Okeechobee, Florida 34974 -2903 Phone: (863) 763 -3372, ext. 218 Fax: (863) 763 -1686 Date: '` 0 7 Fee Paid: S627. Jurisdiction: 19/5 c. 1st Hearing: j O g 2nd Hearing: 1 o20 Petition No. 0 - 72/ ,s Publication Dates: Notices Mailed: Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Application Please Check One: Small Scale Amendment (Under 10 Acres) _Large Scale Amendment (Over 10 Acres) Name of property owner(s): i Owner mailing address:°} p54 Off I. C-t- Name of applicant(s) if other than owner (state relationship): $t' v €n LciJ3 &i le 3)ci7S 1 * �: L4) 1f n ( it lee tt E6`." Applicant mailing address: Name of contact person (state relationship): 6 P. - -75- ydo Contact person daytime phone(s): 4 • h1 Tam i► Fax: )3` 215 174 Property address / directions to property: -10 Parcel Identification Number: a - I -.& 1 35_ C&R G G c.C. 3 - - cc Size of the Property (in acres): Current Zoning Designation: `' C©M1 C Current Future Land Use Designation: C V Existing Use of the Property: -e FL If •.�• ■. Proposed Future Land Use Designation: L tS-Fr t GL- I Proposed Use of the Property: Cory-) i C_ 1 —(covent e.nCe_ ,S+E) re- Dr; ve` 1-ic - EoarC Description of Surrounding Properties: WOr -1-h : D u \cl u_str i l Soid -h ; CB Legal Description of the Property (Lengthy Description May be Attached): t 1 fl See a etc iced CXk � bb) �St ; -43 LAB , es+ : c v _1� � YI r,cS-� rya 1 Uniform Land Use Application (rev. 12/031 coat( Page 1 of 2 Survey of Property (11" x 14 ", 20" Scale) Letter Outlining Request Notarized Letter of Owner's Authorization . Confirmation of Information Accuracy her .y ce fy that the information in this application is correct. The information included in application is for use by the City of Okeechobee in processing my request. False or islea g information may be punishable by a fine of up to $500.00 and im riso 0 da, s and may result in the summary denial of this application. p nment of up to Uniform Land Use Application (rev. 12/03) Page 2 of 2 i k0 Printed for Lawyers' THU Guaranty Fund, Orlando, Florida aL ranty (STATUTORY FORA— SEQfOR 8114.01 F.S.) T.'; 226C( 0539 This Instrument was prepared by, PAUL R. STANTON, ESQ. WELLISCH AND METZGER, P.A. let Alwerte Ammo, 4200.1 COW OAKES, /LOMIDA a11M 131115 3itbtttturr. Mode this 4 day of January 19 88 , ittllltttt JOHN A. SMITH. JOHN R. BROOKS and WILLIAM J. VACHON, As Tenants in Common of the County of • Okeechobee , State of Florida MARY ANN NEWCOMER whose post office address is p. 0. Box 1537, Okeechobee, FL 34973 of the County of Okeechobee , grantor', and • SIote of Florida , grantee', #tttttUetth. That said grantor, for and in considerotion of the sum of Ten and 00 /100 ($10.00) -Dollars, and other good and valuable considerations to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said grantee, and grantees heirs and assigns Forever, the following described lond, situate, lying and being in Okeechobee County, Florida, to -wits gl v Beginning at the SE Corner of Block 161, TOWN OF OKEECHOBEE, according to plat ' thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 17, Public Records of St. Lucie County, ~1"' A Florida, and run thence South 70 feet to South line of North Park Street for the Cr'ril o0 Mi to point of beginning; run thence South 150' to intersection with North line of 1 •I;rr:_- South Park Street; run thence West along said North line 200 feet to intersection '•l with East line of former but now abandoned FEC RR; run thence North along said `. _�'' right of way 150 feet to intersection with South line of North Park Street rte... '� aforesaid; run thence East along said South line 200 feet to Point of Beginning; C,:�.:'•, said land lying in and comprising part of E 1/2 of SW 1/4 of Section 16, and [0rl� NE 1/4 of NE 1/4 of NW 1/4 of Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East. 1"- 'lS 'This is commercial property and is not the Homestead property of any of the Grantors. Q c I P P Y P P Y Y emu(,_ Subject to 0I•,�;; ;:j 1. Taxes for the year 1988 and subsequent years; ' 2. Conditions, restrictions, reservations, limitations and easements of record; L : i r- = ° 3. Applicable zoning ordinances, regulations and other restrictions imposed by r.N�p_. governmental authorities. '44'xona sold grantor does hereby fully worront the title to said land, and will defend the some against the lawful claims of oll persons whomsoever. ' "G4ontor" and "grantee" are used for singufor or plural, as context requires. 3n Whores lhrrenf. Grantor has hereunto w nrontol's hnnddad seal the dov and year first 'boys. ritten. Sign r , sealed and delivered in our resence: 195147 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day before me, on officer duly qualified to take acknowledgments, personally appeared JOHN A. SMITH, JOHN R. BROOKS and WILLIAM J. VACHON to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and ocknowledged b_elore me that t he yexecuted the same. OKEECti {(? ! ' ` Jat GLORIA lJ. FORD_ BROOKS FLIED FOR RECOt;O APAPINIWA BROOKS J. VACHON (Seal) (Seal) (Seoi) (Seal) WITNESS my hand and official seol in the County and State lost oforesaid this 4 day of January 19 88 My commission expires: 5�31�? i::,��it„ lrtr�'., • ' 1,.11 1'1 ILL 11,:; _Dlo A) MX 513U.e EXHIBIT 'A„ Notary ftublk AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE I, Mary Ann Newcomer Tuten a/k/a Mary Ann Newcomer, Affiant state the following: 1. That I am hereby the owner of the property located at 701 SW Park Street, Okeechobee, Florida, also particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of Block 161, Town of Okeechobee according to plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 17, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, and run thence South 70 feet to South line of North Park Street for the Point of Beginning; run thence South 150 feet to intersection with North line of South Park Street; run thence West along said North line 200 feet to intersection with East line of former but now abandoned FEC RR; run thence North along said right -of -way 150 feet to intersection with South line of North Park Street aforesaid; run thence East along said South line 200 feet to Point of Beginning; said land lying in and compromising part of East one -half of the Southwest one - quarter of Section 16, and the Northeast one - quarter of the Northeast one - quarter of the Northwest one - quarter of Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35, East. Less and except: Additional D.O.T. Road right -of -way on S.R. 70. 2. That Steven A. Ramunni, Esq. is authorized to act on my behalf conceming the rezoning application submitted contemporaneously with my affidavit and he is further authorized to appear at all public hearings herein. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing affidavit and the facts stated in it are true. M Y N I EWCOME TUTEN, AFFIANT STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE Sworn to and subscribed before me this,/ ay of August, 2007. Mary Ann Newcomer Tuten is personally known to me or has produced . as identification and did an oath. NOTARY PUBLIC -STATE OF FLORIDA Lisa Pace Commission # DD549434 My Comm. Expires: 12/20/2007 TJRY PUBLIC VI, MINUTES - City Clerk. A, Motion to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Council Action for the August 7, 2007 Regular Meeting, . VII. WARRANT REGISTERS • City Administrator, A, Motion to approve the July 2007 Warrant Register; General Fund $342,164,21 CDBG Fund $1,869.00 Public Facilities Improvement Fund $635,12 VIII. AGENDA - Mayor, A. Requests for the addition, deferral or withdrawal of Items on today's agenda. IX, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE AND FINAL PLAT • ADOPTION - Mayor,,. A, 1, a) Motion to read by title only proposed Ordinance No, 994, amending Code Book Chapter 90, Division 5, Signs Regulations • City Attorney (Exhibit 2). b) Vote on motion to read by title only, AUGUST 21, 2007 • REGULAR MEETING AND BUDGET WORKSHOP . PAGE 8 of 15 Council Member L Wi!iiams moved to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Cour011 Action for the August 7, 2007 Regular Meel!ng; seconded by Council Member Markham. There was no discussion on this item. KIRK - YEA C. WILLIAMS YEA VOTE • MARKHAM - YEA L. WILUAMS - YEA WATFORC • YEA MOTION CARRIED. Council Member Watford moved to approve the July 2007 Warrant Register In the amounts of: General Fund, three hundred forty-two thousand, one hundred sixty-four dollars and twenty -one cents ($342, 164.21); Community Development Building Grant Fund, one thousand. eight hundred sixty -nine dollars and zero cents ($1,869.00); Public Facilities Improvement Fund, six hundred thirty-five dollars and twelve cents ($635.12); seconded by Council Member Markham. The .e was no discussion on this Item. KIRK - YEa C, WILLIAM] . YEA • • VOTE • MARKHAM - YEA WATFORD - YEA L. WILLIAMS - YEA MOTION C ARRIED. Mayor Kirk asked v ether there were any requests for the addition, deferral or withdrawal of Items on today's agenda? There were none. MAYOR KIRK OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE AND FINAL PLAT ADOPTION AT 6:32 P.M. 4,• Council Member Watford moved to read by title only, y, proposed Ordinance No, 994, amending Code Book Chapter 90, Division 5, Signs Regulations; seconded by.Councll Member L. Williams. . KIRK - YEA C. WILLIAMS • YEA . VOTE MARKHAM - YEA L. .WILLIAMS - YEA WATFORD • YEA MOTION CARRIED. AUGUST 21, 2007 - REGULAR MEETING AND BUDGET WORKSHOP - PAGE 9 OF 15 IX. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED, A, 1,c) City Attorney to read proposed Ordlnance No, 994 by title only. 2, a) Motion to adopt Ordinance No, 994, b) Public comments and discussion, c) Vote on motion, Attorney Cook rear proposed Ordinance No. 994 by title only as follows: "AN ORDINANCE OF THECITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA PROVIDING FOR A COMPREHENSIVE AMENDMENT TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, ORDINANCE NO, 716; DIVISION 5 THEREOF, FROM SECTIONS 90.561 THROUGH 90 -600; PROVIDING FOR RESCISSION OF THESE SECTIONS IN THEIR ENTIRETY; PROVIDING FOR CREATION OF D1VISION5 SIGN ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR ENACTING A UNIFORM SIGN CRITERIA; PROVIDING FOR REGULATION OF SIGNAGEAS PROVIDED HEREIN; SETTING FORTH DEFINITIONS; REQUIREMENT OF PERMIT AND MAINTENANCE; PROVIDING FOR EXEMPT AND PROHIBITED SIGNS; PROVIDING FOR TEMPORARY SIGNS; PROVIDING FOR SIGNS IN COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL AREAS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS AND SEVERABIL /TY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE." Council Member Markham moved to adopt proposed Ordinance No, 994; seconded by Council Member L. Williams. Mayor Kirk asked whether there were any questions or comments from the public? There were none. The Council discussed certain requirements of the proposed sign ordlnance that seemed too strict Ror example, Okeechobee Main Street wou a ,o oe allowed to keep their small signs on the trash receptacles they purchased 'or the City to install along South Park Scree( me Okeechobee Cattlemen's Association could not continue to park horse trailerswith banners' tied tothem, on private propeny c ac ertise the various rodeo events throughout the year. The consensus was that the proposed ordinance needed more work oy Staff and the Planning Board, Council Member Watford moved to postpone, until a date certain of October 16, 2007, the actIgn of adopting proposed Ordinance No 994 so that it may be reviewed further by the City Planning Board on September 20, 2007; seconded by Council Member Markham, VOTE, KIRK • YEA MARKHAM -YEA WATFORD - YEA C, WILLIAMS • YEA ' L; WILLIAMS • YEA , MOTION CARRIED, Based on the action above, Councll Member Watford moved to extend the date from September 1, 2007 until October 16, 2007 for Resolution No, 07-06 Imposing a moratorium on the acceptance by the cltyof applications for off- premises signs designed to be billboards; seconded by Pound Member Markham. KIRK • YEA C, WILLIAMS • YEA VOTE MARKHAM - YEA WATFORD • YEA L. WILLIAMS • YEA MOTION CARRIED, RESOLUTION NO. 07-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA, EXTENDING THE PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTIONS NO. 06-10 AND NO. 07-04 WHICH IMPOSED A MORATORIUM ON THE ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY OF APPLICATIONS FOR OFF - PREMISES SIGNS DESIGNED TO BE BILLBOARDS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Okeechobee, Florida, by previous Resolutions No.06 -10 and 07- 04, imposed a moratorium on the acceptance and processing of any applications within the City for the erection of off - premises signs designed as billboards; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 07 -04 set a date of May 1, 2007 by which time the City would consider and enact amended sign ordinances for use in the City that addressed such billboard advertising; and WHEREAS, since the imposition of the moratorium the City has been sued by Centennial Builders of Lee County, Florida, a develop /sign contractor, concerning the denial of permit for erection of billboard advertising, which suit seeks damages and a judicial determination via declaratory judgment concerning the legal effect of the present ordinance and denial of permit, which suit may not be resolved for several months; and WHEREAS, such judicial determination and /or amendment to current sign regulation is a prerequisite to lifting the moratorium in order to secure the rights and liabilities of the City in the dispute, which further requires an extension of the moratorium. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved before the City Council of the City of Okeechobee, Florida; presented at a duly advertised public meeting; and passed by a majority vote of the City Council; and properly executed by the Mayor or designee, as Chief Presiding Officer for the City: SECTION 1. THAT the provisions of Resolutions No. 06 -10 and No. 07 -04 previously adopted by the City are herein extended in their entirety to September 1, 2007, or until the City Council adopts an amendment to the sign ordinance, or until the pending litigation is resolved, whichever first occurs. PQge 1 0- INTRODUCED,ANDADOPTED in regular session this 1st d ATTEST a, CMC, City Clerk RE JEVIfED FOR LE q I L SUFFICIENCY: John R. Cook, City Attorney Page2.of . James E. Kirk, Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 07 -04 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA EXTENDING THE PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 06 -10 WHICH IMPOSED A MORATORIUM ON THE ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY OF APPLICATIONS FOR OFF - PREMISES SIGNS DESIGNED TO BE BILLBOARDS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Okeechobee, Florida by previous Resolution No. 06-10, imposed a moratorium on the acceptance and processing of any applications within the City for the erection of off- premises signs designed as billboards; and WHEREAS, said Resolution set a date of March 1, 2007 by which time the City would consider and enact amended sign ordinances for use in the City that addressed such billboard advertising; and WHEREAS, the legal appeal by a developer concerning the denial and refund of a permit issued by the City for a billboard was not heard and considered by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals for the City until February 16, 2007, which appeal initially caused the moratorium to be enacted; and WHEREAS, such appeal was denied by the Board on February 1, 2007, and additional time is now needed to consider amendments and re- drafting of the existing sign ordinances within the City. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved before the City Council of the City of Okeechobee, Florida; presented at a duly advertised public meeting; and passed by a majority vote of the City Council; and properly executed by the Mayor or designee, as Chief Presiding Officer for the City: SECTION 1. THAT the provisions of Resolution No. 06 -10 previously adopted by the City are herein extended in their entirety to May 1, 2007, or until the City Council adopts an amendment to the sign ordinance, whichever first occurs. INTRODUCED AND ADOPTED in regular session this 20" d 2007 ATTEST: Lane Gamiotea, G`MC, City Clerk REVIEWED FOR LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: • John R. Cook, City Attorney James Kirk, Mayor • • RESOLUTION NO. 06 -10 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA, TEMPORARILY SUSPENDING THE APPLICATION OF SECTION 90 -561, DIVISION 5, SIGNS, AS IT PERTAINS TO THE PERMITTING AND ERECTION OF SIGNS DEEMED TO BE BILLBOARD SIGNS; PROVIDING FOR TIME CERTAIN AMENDMENT OF THE CITY'S SIGN ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR ENACTMENT OF DEFINITIVE STANDARDS FOR THE PLACEMENT, DESIGN AND ERECTION OF SUCH SIGNS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 90 -561 et.seq. of Division 5, the Sign Ordinance for the City of Okeechobee, Florida does not address the design, placement and construction of billboards within the City; and WHEREAS, such signs are typically construction in a manner that may encroach into neighboring property; be intrusive; be highly visible; be a distraction to traffic; and unsightly to residential areas; and WHEREAS, the City has a legitimate interest in the aesthetics, location, size, placement, design and construction of billboard signs, but not initiating a ban on such signs that would meet reasonable City codes; and WHEREAS, due to the time necessary to study the issue; to arrive at a consensus on new regulations; and to enact the necessary Ordinance, that in the interim it is in the best interests of the City and its citizens to impose a moratorium on permitting billboard signs; NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved before the City Council for the City of Okeechobee, Florida; presented at a duly advertised public meeting; and passed by majority vote of the City Council; and properly executed by the Mayor or designee, as Chief Presiding Officer for the City: SECTION 1. THAT from and after the date of adoption of this Resolution, the Department of General Services and Building Official for the City of Okeechobee shall not accept, review or approve any permit to any person or entity for the placement and erection of a billboard sign within the City. SECTION 2. THAT other permissible signs may be approved by the City in the interim, but no sign shall, in any Zoning District, until further amendment of the Sign Ordinance, exceed 100 square feet in display, nor exceed a total height of 20 feet. SECTION 3. THAT the office of the City Attorney and Staff are directed to study the issue of billboard sign and construction, and draft a proposed Ordinance clearly setting forth acceptable standards for approval of such signs within the City. Page 1 of 2 SECTION 4. THAT this Resolution shall remain in effect until further modification or approval of the Ordinance amending the Sign Ordinance, or until March 1, 2007, whichever first occurs. INTRODUCED AND ADOPTED in regular session this 7`" day of November. 2006. ATTEST: Lane Camiotea, CMC, City Clerk REVIEWED FOR LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: John R. Cook, City Attorney Page 2 of 2 James E. Kirk, Mayor 1375 Jackson Street, Suite 206 Fort Myers, Florida 33901 -2845 Phone: 239 - 334 -3366 Fax: 239 - 334 -6384 Staff Report -Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendme Prepared for.- The City of Okeechobee Applicant.• Steven Ramunni, Esq. for Ma Ann Maly Newcomer Petition No. 07- 013 -SSA (from Commercial to Industrial) Staff Report Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: Steve Ramunni, Esq., for Newcomer Petition No.: 07- 013 -SSA Applicant Address: Applicant Phone Number: Applicant Fax Number: Future Land Use Map Classification Zoning District Use of Property ere ` Commerciai corn store (drive -thru) Commercial convenience store (drive -thru) and Billboard 0.642 Location: 701 SW Park Street Legal Description: Beginning at the Southeast corner bliBlock 161, of St. Lucie Okeechobee ling to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 17, run thence South 70 feet to South line of North Park Street for of South Park Street h u e nthen�e West along run said North South 150 feet to intersection with North line o line 200 feet to intersection with East tine of former h bSouth line of North ParkRStreet afoR; run ut now abandoned FEC along said right -of -way 150 feet to intersection wit h East along said South line 200 feet to Point Section Beginning; and the Noyrtheastaone quarter oIf the part of East one -half of the Southwest one - quarter o f Sec Northeast one - quarter of the Northwest one-quarter of Section SR 70. Township 37 South, Range 35, East. Less and except: Additional DOT Road righ Y Request: Amendment from The matter for consideration is an application for a Future Land Use Map A li endm qualifies Commercial to Industrial. Based on the size of the property (0.642 acres), this app under Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes as a Small -Scale Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. Adjacent Future Land Use Map classifications and Zoning Districts: Future Land Use Zoning Existing Use North: Commercial CBD Restaurant,' Car sales, and vacant Park Avenue Greenbelt Public Park East: Public Facilities PUB furniture store South: Commercial �'� West: Commercial I CHV Retail(1) (1) These designations are for the property on the west side of NW 71A Avenue. The property immediately west and adjacent to the subject property is abandoned railroad right -of -way, and presently carries no Future Land Use or zonin • desi • nations. 1 Staff Report Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: Steve Ramunni, Esq., for Newcomer Petition No.: 07- 013 -SSA The Applicant is requesting a Future Land Use Map Amendment to Industrial and will subsequently apply for a rezoning to Industrial to allow an off- premises sign to be constructed on the prope . The subject property is located in the western part of the SR 70 corridor at the western extremity of the City's CBD and within a predominately commercial area. Comprehensive Plan Analysis A. Consistency with the Land Use Categories and Plan Policies. The current and proposed uses for the property are consistent with the Industrial Future Land Use Category and the policies that which govern this category. However, with the exception of the park to the west of the subject property, surrounding land use designations, zoning, and existing are largely commercial rather than industrial. Staff does not believe that a change to an 9 industrial land use designation at this site is consistent with sound planning as it inserts the possi- bility for manufacturing or processing activities into an area intended for office, retail, wholesale and related commercial activities. As such, Staff does not believe the requested amendment is consistent with the Goal set forth on page 1 of the Future Land Use Element, and which reads as follows: `Through a well - planned mix of compatible land uses, the City of Okeechobee shall continue to maintain a high quality living environment, preserve its distinctive natural and historic resources, and provide public services to its residents at a minimum cost." [emphasis added] B. Concurrency of Adequate Public Facilities The subject property contains an existing commercial use that is already enjoys provision of ubli c utilities from the City and traffic volumes in the area will not likely change as a result of a change to the Industrial land use category. Staff sees no likelihood of concurrency deficiencies associated with the requested plan amendment. C. Compatibility with Adjacent and Nearby Land Uses While there is nothing inherently incompatible with industrial uses in close proximity to commerci al uses, Staff does not believe that the insertion of the potential for heavy industrial at the perimeter of the City's CBD is good planning and is incompatible with the predominantly commercial char- acter of the SR 70 corridor in this area, and particularly in relation to the CBD. 2 Staff Report Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment D. Pattern of current land use and zoning designations The City has treated abandoned railroad rights -of -way in the general vicinity of the subject prop- ens. In some rty in an inconsistent manner with regard toa a hown as Industture ondthe Future Land Use Map instances, abandoned railroad rights -of -way (FLUM); sometimes the lands remain undesignated; and in still others, a residential designation has been applied. Application of zoning to these lands has been somewhat m reh the consistent t in that most seof the l nds have been zoned Industrial, although sometimes in conflict Staff believes the application of Industrial zoning is a holdover from ia a prior from association p an- with the saeo ve and does not necessarily he existing land use and/or zoning classifications (or lack Wing perspective. Consequently, ro properties. thereof) do not provide a basis upon which to make and use decisions for nearby P p examined The abandoned railroad rights -of -way in this in classifications can be astligned based on so that their Future Land Use designations and Zon sound planning principles rather than just their prior association with the railroad use. Applicant: Steve Ramunnl, Esq., for Newcomer Petition No.: 07- 013 -SSA Conclusion and Recommendation While the A plicant may have no intention of introducing man fatter i tghe pproces to onto t These amending the plan as requested will afford current and fure types of uses, which would be allowed only if the land ea To allow designated possibility in ria their introduction o not be ction into YP compatible with the commercial character of the and the Future Land Use Element Goal. the area would be inconsistent with good planning Therefore, Staff recommends denial of the requested amendment. Submitted by: James G. LaRue, AICP October 11, 2007 1st Hearing 10 -18 -07 LPA Planning Board 2nd Hearing November 20, 2007 Future Land Use Map Zoning Map Aerial from Property Appraiser's web site 3 Staff Report Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: Steve Ramunni, Esq., for Newcomer Petition No.: 07- 013 -SSA City Future Land Use Map Subject Property COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE SINGLE - FAMILY MULTI - FAMILY COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES 4 Staff Report Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment City Zoning Map Subject Property Applicant: Steve Ramunni, Esq., for Newcomer Petition No.: 07- 013 -SSA 5 Staff Report Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: Steve Ramunni, Esq., for Newcomer Petition No.: 07- 013 -SSA City Future Land Use Map Subject Property COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE SINGLE - FAMILY MULTI - FAMILY is COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES 4 Staff Report Small-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: Steve Ramunni, Esq., for Newcomer Petition No.: 07-013-SSA City Zoning Map Subject Property ' • • . -504" •'-'14••'•':••••-••••• • ••• •••••••;••••••• ZONING UNICORPORPS CB 0 CLT CHV CPO IND PuB MAP RAH RS F-3 5 Staff Report Small -Scale Comp rehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: Steve Ramunni, Esq., for Newcomer Petition No.: 07 -013 -SSA 6 City of Okeechobee General Services Department 55 S.E. 311' Avenue, Room 101 Okeechobee, Florida 34974 -2903 Phone: (863) 763 -3372, ext. 218 Fax: (863) 763 -1686 Date: 1 1 "1 1 O -7 Petition No () 7 — / % Fee Paid: 5o t Jurisdiction: .T C ; ; CC 1st Hearing. ci ao /C7 Publication Dates: 2nd Hearing: / U /p`L '+ /0/1(0/07 Notices Mailed: Uniform Land Use Application Rezone • Special Exception • Variance 4/ Name of property owner(s): Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC Property address / directions to property: 1108 Highway 70 E, Okeechobee, FL 34972 A P P L 1 c A T Owner mailing address: 3055 Cardinal Drive, Vero Beach, FL 32963 Name of applicant(s) if other than owner (state relationship): Applicant mailing address: "same" P R 0 P E R T Y Name of contact person (state relationship): Kelly Kite Jr., Vice President Have there been any land use applications concerning all or part of this property in the last year? If so, indicate date, nature and applicant's name: No Contact person daytime phone(s): 772/231 -9333 Fax: 772/231 -0033 Confirmation of Information Accuracy i hereby certify that the information in this application is correct The information included in this application is for use by the City of Okeechobee in processing my request. False or misleading information may be punishable by a fine of up to $500.0+ alp priso �m� of up to 30 days and may result in the summary denial of this application. rte', •.; Sie ge_s_L{ Printed Name Uniform Land Use Application (rev. Iro3) Page 1 of 2 V Property address / directions to property: 1108 Highway 70 E, Okeechobee, FL 34972 indicate current use of property: Single - Family Residence Describe improvements on property, including number /type of dwellings and whether occupied (if none. so state): Single- family residence (including 1 -house and 1- stable) Approximate number of acres: 6.27 is property in a platted subdivision? No P R 0 P E R T Y 1,, 'here a current or recent use of the property that is'was a violation of county ordinance'? 11,,o. describe: No Have there been any land use applications concerning all or part of this property in the last year? If so, indicate date, nature and applicant's name: No Is a sale subject to this application being granted? No is the subject parcel your total holdings at that location? If not, describe the remaining or intended uses: Yes Describe adjoining land uses / improvements to the North: Undeveloped (along SR 70) South: Single- family East: Commercial /Single- Familywest: Commercial (USPS) Existing zoning: RMF Future Land Use classification: Single - Family Actions Requested: ( X) Rezone ( ) Special Exception ( ) Variance Parcel identification Number: Confirmation of Information Accuracy i hereby certify that the information in this application is correct The information included in this application is for use by the City of Okeechobee in processing my request. False or misleading information may be punishable by a fine of up to $500.0+ alp priso �m� of up to 30 days and may result in the summary denial of this application. rte', •.; Sie ge_s_L{ Printed Name Uniform Land Use Application (rev. Iro3) Page 1 of 2 Uniform Land Use Application (rev. 1/03) Page 2 of 2 Current zoning classification: RMF Requested zoning classification : CHV R E z 0 N E What is your desired permitted use under the proposed classification: Commercial - Hotel, Bank, Restaurant and General Retail if granted, will the new zone be contiguous with a like zone? Yes, Post Office located adjacent to the property on the west side. Is a Special Exception necessary for your intended use? No. Variance? No. If business. briefly describe nature including number or employees_ hours. noise Lteneration and activities to be conducted outside ofa buildin_: Uniform Land Use Application (rev. 1/03) Page 2 of 2 Describe the Special Exception sought: S P E C I A L E X C E P T I 0 N Provide specific LDR ordinance citation: Are there other similar uses in the area? 1 P so, describe: Why would granting your request be in the best interest of the area and residents? If business. briefly describe nature including number or employees_ hours. noise Lteneration and activities to be conducted outside ofa buildin_: Uniform Land Use Application (rev. 1/03) Page 2 of 2 Describe Variance sought: V A R I A N C E Describe physical characteristic of property that makes variance necessary: Did you cause or contribute to the characteristic? Is so, describe: What is the minimum variance necessary? Uniform Land Use Application (rev. 1/03) Page 2 of 2 Fi'ie_z'Cer, LLC REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT August 7, 2007 047833002 Via Federal Express 863/763 -3372 City of Okeechobee Ms. Betty Clement General Services Department 55 S.E. 3`d Avenue, Room 101 Okeechobee, FL 34974 RE: Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC Statement of Special Reason and Basis of Request Rezone Application and Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application Dear Ms. Clement: The SR70 corridor within the City of Okeechobee limits is continuing to develop into a commercial node. As the applicant and owner of Parcel ID #2- 22- 37- 35 -0A00- 00004 - 0000 -HX, I am interested in developing this property as a mixed use commercial project to address the needs of the community and to provide additional hotel rooms within the city limits. Additional outparcels will provide convenient access to services (banking, restaurant and retail) for hotel guests and surrounding city residents. For this reason, I am respectfully requesting to rezone the property listed above from RMF to CHV and to amend the Future Land Use Comprehensive Plan from Single- Family to Commercial. Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC a Florida limited liability company By: Kite Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC a Florida limited liability company, its managing member 3055 CARDINAL DRIVE, SUITE 300 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32963 TEL (772) 231 -9333 FAX (772) 231 -0033 WWW. KITE P ROPE RTIESLLC.COM Prepared By and Return to John D. Cassels, Jr. Esq. Cassels & McCall P.O. Box 968 Okeechobee, Florida 34973 Parcel ID Number:2- 22- 37- 35 -0A00-00004-0000 1111110111111111111111111101111111 FILE NUM 2007009267 OR Bk 00634 PG 0650 SHARON ROBERTSON? CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FL RECORDED 07/02/2007 11:48:01 AM RECORDING FEES 18.50 DEED DOC 11,200.00 RECORDED BY M Pinon P9s 0650 - 651; (2pos) SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED THIS SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED, made this LD day of June, 2007, between JOSEPH G. ARBOGAST, as the Donee of that Durable Power of Attorney dated April 16, 1999 which was executed by KEITH LEE ARBOGAST, SR. and recorded in Official Records Book 490, Page 738 of the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida and as Attorney -in -Fact for KEITH LEE ARBOGAST, SR., of Post Office Box 201, Okeechobee, Florida 34973, GRANTOR, and OKEECHOBEE SR70 HOLDINGS, LLC., a Florida Limited Liability Company, of 3055 Cardinal Drive, Suite 300, Vero Beach, FL 32963-1687, GRANTEE; WITNESSETH, that said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN ($10.00) DOLLARS, and other good and valuable consideration to said Grantor in hand paid by said Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Grantee, and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Okeechobee County, Florida, to-wit: AND the Grant simple; that the Grantor has warrants the title to said land DESCRIPTION ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT "A ". enants with said Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee awful authority to sell and convey said land; that the Grantor hereby fully the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. written. IN WITNESS WHERE Tj 4 hereunto set Grantors' hand and seal the day and year first above Signed, sealed and delivered in presence of: JOSEPH G. ARBOGAST, as the Donee of that Durable Power of Attorney dated April 16,1999 which was executed by KEITH LEE ARBOGAST, SR. and corded in Official Records Book 490, Page 738 of the lic Records of Okeechobee County, Florida and as Attorney -in -Fact for KEITH LEE ARBOGAST, SR. itness Print Name: )/l1ryr Fvhrha -hn STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF BUNCOMBE ,Qt& OSE H G. ARBOGAS'Ir, as the Donee The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this a'8 day of June, 2007, by JOSEPH G. ARBOGAST, as the Donee of that Durable Power of Attorney dated April 16, 1999 which was executed by KEITH LEE ARBOGAST, SR. and recorded in Official Records Book 490, Page 738 of the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida and as Attorney -in -Fact for KEITH LEE ARBOGAST, SR, p( who is personally known to me or o who has produced as identification. l . 0-)0-11,A0 Signature of Notary Public Tork�,- Y,.TL. (Y1orr�S Printed name of Notary My commission expires: Tvro_ .D011 [4168-73118 WPDI ` \ \ \il l l I I I t i iiio //i if�QO O�`r�= Notary Public s Buncombe County .- :'LC + ,r' 9 co- /r/11i1111111\ \1\ Book634 /Page650 CFN #2007009267 Page 1 of 2 DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL AS DETERMINED BY THIS SURVEY: BEING A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 35 EAST, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF S.R. 70 (AS SHOWN ON FDOT RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP FOR S.R. 70 OTOBEE COUNTY SECTION 91070 -2514, DATED DWN =3 -76) WITH EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 EXTENDED; THENCE SOUTH 00 °14'21" EAST, ALONG 'SAID EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 EXTENDED, A DISTANCE OF 44.5.FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 89 °54'49" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF-WAY OF S.R. 70 A DISTANCE OP 125.00 IT. .E1, TO 111E POINT 0F! N I G; THENCE SOUTH 00 °14'21" EAST, A • DISTANCE OF 69033 141141):I d CE NORTH 89 °54'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A PO t •.. •N THE WESTERLY RIGHT -01 -WAY LINE OF S.E. 13TH AVENUE; THEN u • : i ►L • 00°14'21" EAST A DISTANCE OF 230.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF 1 RS ON OF THE WESTERLY RICH OFWAY LINE OF S.E. 13TH A •i ii' ' i; HOPKINS MEANDER LINE; THENCE NORTH 71 °49'20" WEST, A DIS %• s 424.14 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 °03'47" WEST, A DIST • " • i • :A TO A POINT LYING ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WA tai • ' 70; THENCE NORTH 89 °54'49" EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RI c - WAY LINE OF S.R. 70, A DISTANCE OF 300.00 FEET TO ' ' P BEGINNING Book634 /Page651 CFN #2007009267 Page 2 of 2 TRACT •A• MCI SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD 11E1 1 12 IREET it 12 :ET' 11 12 Lj o REET 11 22 TREET 01 22 STREET 73 AC in sun ®1 7 B 9 10 11 12 se 13 u TRACT TRACT 52 19 AC (EAST 1/2 Of LOT In USA - NMI x El NM NMI N. E. 5 TN STREET 17 19 19 20 21 22 23 24 a 5 1u 1 e 15 26 48 TAYLOR CREEK 7 AC Mr, re 10 A 20 1.82 AC a 20 CD 18.98 A n 1 AC 2.5 AC E. Zi IS 22 2498 13 14 0 AC OID 3 2 1� 3 1 13 n 14 15 in RN EP If 13 Id 16 gqi E. 9 1 9 H .4 3 2 18 2 11 10 «1 STREET MI 6 8 2 22 23 24 3 :111 IS 16 11 121 s 6 N. E. 115 TH STREET 3 4 a 6 2 9 10 12 WS 5 10 11 a 12 1u5 A'S 2 2 a 5 E. 10 TH STREET EA 3 If 3 2 19 10 6 ; 12 AS STREET pB 7 14 4 NE 9 TH STREET 3 10 ZEN 5 00 6 9 7 IaT 191 1 tl 2 9 10 l� u 12 3 a 1" d a 7 9 N. E. rH STREET 2 IC a. 9 c 10 11 Y °SL. 5 9 F. rtl Y 130 5 6 1u. a N SECON S1 ICE A UITI N a 9 10 11 12 STATE ROAD 70 6 27 AC 15A1 151 6 8 AL �s i 2 1d 6 a 7 2 I fY ; 8; 9 10 2 12 rd 10 6 p 3 5 6 6 Y 12 s ur.s 1 2 6 N. E. 7 TH STREET 0 2 n 3 9 SE 9 10 s 11 124 N. E.5 TH STREET 111111 •1 N.E. 4 TH STREET 10 11 12 5 6 a 12 N . 3 R STREET B 913 5 v 12 a 6 N. E. 2 90 STREET I 6 3 11 5 s STATE ROAD 10 N. E. 6 TH ;19� 10 STREET ASS 6 6 5 4 3 2 ; 36640080EE 0007112 2 6 10 II 12 9 10 II g 12 7 19 1 10 11 v 12 2 5 6 fi 5 4 40 4 3 2 9 B 9 10 11 1 16 '7 B 9 10 11 12 2 3 6 15 14 13 17 74 5 a7 H 9 2 10 i1 12 2 3 4 6 6 15 11 13 6 15 14 13 13 12 11 12 11 12 11 12 11 EINIA S. E. 1 5T 51RE S. E. 2 ND STREET •1 3 Igo xi MN* "WM E. 3R0 CT. pp 4 S 10 n1S 12 2 1n 2 6 as 1.3 S E. 4 TH STREET 211109 87654321 21110 718192021222324 07664 row 7 10 E 6TH CT cos" CO S. E.8 TH COURT 10 1 6 S. E. 6 TH STREET 3 6 5 <a 2 15 4.,„, 10 r i � II 12 M 2 222324 ,O SEM 14 13 1© S. 64 4 IN STREET 11 10 NOP 5. E. 5 TH STREET 9811 121110 1 314151617181920 1222324 MTh sJ 2 3 NMI 8 10 11 12 13 STA J 29 S. E. 6 TH STREET I2 111 X1111111 5.E. 7 TH STREET 5. E.6 TH STREET 12 TH LANE 2153735060 900090000 7 AC 21537350A00000110000 6. 06 AC 4 10 11' 37350030000400100 5 45 45 1 126 6 9 8 7 1 53735003000050007 5 W 10 11 12 W X1'37350030000500100 45 45 126 1 7350030000500010 2 126 3 4 5 6 N. E. 3 RD STREET 2LU735410GUJ0090000 10 11 12 1 53735003000120010 45 45 126 LO 3735003000120001 2 126 3 4 5 6 Q 153M025!1ETOW ST 3 1 153735021000010001 6 4 1 8735003000130004 315 7350210000101110 a, 115373 1537 02 1000100081 7 8 10 12 1153,3 03 0T300nb 11301 1 58 3500300000300007 45 45 N. E. 4 TH W w Q 7 8 9 10 11537350031 11 12 135 135 7 8 9 10 11 12 N. E. 2 135 1 135 NE 45 45 1.53735003000140004( 30001 rn 01300090 5 11 12 STATE 176 2 12237 5002 00 00 12 373 0 0000000 46 100 m 1 N 0020 77 20000001010 6 5 4 7 8 9 11537 50030001400170115 46 222 :735060000005 000 130.5 11'373003000220005' 7 11 37350030 0220008 373501 40022000 130.5 W W 22237 .0600000090000 6.27 AC 22237350600000040000 222 :735060000005 00011 100 5373500310023000 STAT °6 5 4 122373500200000 / 5 6 ° 130 oLl 21 A S. 123 11 373500 00 2300070 222 7 50601000061000 W 0 5 2 R[1Tffi111 J 222 7 5060b00007i000 11 100 ACCESS EASEMENT S. E. 150 16 50010000900160 J 222 7 5060 000081000 130.5 122 7 060 00016 00 105 ( 11 L_Li 1223735060000001000 1 1233 1.53 AC ( ALC. 122 73' A0 00010010 V�1�) 123 15 12 37350010000900155 14 1` 350010000900140 73500100619001V) 7350010061900120 20 19 18 17 16 \.1 138.53 12237350A0000001E0 0 1.1 1 1 12. 7350010000900110 12237350040000060010 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 W 1 S. E. 4 TH STREET 145 145 1 2 3 4 pylnityppplp0At 6 5 14 15 14— 145 ° y23J 02 MWMW 0 4 5 OLL 1233 80 1233 25 1( 123: 35001000]00100 12 9 5001000 90050090 2 D2313 2 000M 1. 145 00010 2 1 75 12337351 :1 4 PANIC PLACE I� I VI OKEECHOBEE, FL - OKEECHOBEE COUNTY 11111111 11111111111111 L THE PROJECT 85 Room Hotel to Anchor Site Outparcels Available ideal for Restaurant, Retail, Bank Just 3/4 mile from U.S. 441 Close to Lake Okeechobee and Okeechobee County Airport Storm Water Retention and Access Provided FA K'LACE 5I1"�FLAN THE MARKET 60 120 SCALE AS SHOWN Mile Radius 3 5 Est. Households 23,000 26,000 Avg. Household Income $46,000 $48,000 K PLACE r Ct� vit 0 OKEECHOBEE, FL - OKEECHOBEE COUNTY TRAFFIC COUNTS S.R. 70 35,000 AADT "BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS & MAKING THINGS HAPPEN" LOCATION Located on S.R. 70. easily accessed from U.S. 41 i k6. P pel'6ef 1 LLC REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT Michael D. Lore Office (772) 231 -9333 Cell (772) 766 -9389 Email: Mike @KitePropertiesllc.com 3055 Cardinal Dr, Ste 300 ♦ Vero Beach, FL 32963 www.KitePropertiesLLC.com P1�eY6es I Lc REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT August 23, 2007 Resident Address Okeechobee, FL 34972 Re: Land Purchase and Development Dear Kite Properties, LLC is a hospitality developer located in Vero Beach, FL. Through our subsidiary, Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC, we have recently purchased the 6.25 acre parcel located at 1108 HWY 70 E and have plans to develop a Hampton Inn with commercial out parcels on this site. Our goal is to develop a successful project while maintaining the integrity of the community and increasing employment and business opportunities for local residents. The property is currently zoned Heavy Commercial (CHV) in the northern portion fronting State Road 70 and Residential Multiple- Family (RMF) in the southern portion. The current zoning would permit apartment buildings to be built on the southern portion. On Friday, August 17th, we submitted a Small Comprehensive Plan Amendment and a Rezoning Application to change the portion of the property zoned RMF to CHV which will allow hotel development on the parcel as well as other commercial uses. Our current plan places the Hampton Inn on the western edge of the property near the Post Office with storm water retention area to the south and a restaurant and bank on the northern portion fronting State Road 70. The site area will meet the all of the cities landscape buffer requirements to shield this development from the neighboring residential properties. We would be happy to speak with you to address any questions, comments or concerns that you may have about our project. Warmest Regards, elly ' . Kite, Jr. Managing Director 3055 CARDINAL DRIVE, SUITE 300 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32963 TEL (772) 231 -9333 FAX (772) 231 -0033 WWW.KITEPROPERTIESLLC.COM RECEIVED AUG 7 20V City of Okeechobee General Services Department 55 S.E. 3"t Avenue, Room 101 Okeechobee, Florida 34974-2903 Phone: (863) 763 -3372, ext. 218 Fax: (863) 763 -1686 Date: I ► -710 Petition No. 0 7 -(�fa— ssrg Fee Paid: A o • 60 Jurisdiction: Cv CC 1st Hearing: 9, f© 7 2nd }fearing: AO /fla f, 7 , Publication Dates: Notices Mailed: Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Application Please Check One: ✓ Small Scale Amendment (Under 10 Acres) Large Scale Amendment (Over 10 Acres) P_ P L 1. c A N T Name of property owner(s): Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC Owner mailing address: 3055 Cardinal Drive, Vero Beach, FL 32963 Name of applicant(s) if other than owner (state relationship): Applicant mailing address: "same" Name of contact person (state relationship): Kelly Kite Jr., Vice President Contact person daytime phone(s): 772/231 -9333 Fax: 772/231 -0033 P 0 P E R T Y Property address / directions to property: 1108 Highway 70 E, Okeechobee, FL 34972 Parcel Identification Number: 2- 22- 37- 35- 0A00- 00004 - 0000 -HX Size of the Property (in acres): 6.27 ACRES Current Zoning Designation: RMF Current Future Land Use Designation: Single- family Existing Use ofthe Property: Single- family Proposed Future Land Use Designation: Commercial Proposed Use of the Property: Commercial - Hotel, Bank, Restaurant and General Retail Description of Surrounding Properties: North - undeveloped (SR70), South - single family, East - commercial and single - family, West - commercial (US Post Office) Legal Description of the Property (Lengthy Description May be Attached): See Attached Unifonn Land Use Application (rev. 12/03) Page 1 of 2 Survey of Property (11" x 14 ", 20" Scale) Letter Outlining Request Notarized Letter of Owner's Authorization ✓ = oafinmahon of Information Accuracy. I hereby certify that the information in this application is correct. The information included- in this application is for use by the City of Okeechobee in processing my request False or misleading information may be punishable by a fine of up to $500.00 and imprisonment of up to .a s and ma = u11 in the surnmary denial of this application. 100 4/1. Alf lv%A0 Date r l — Printed Name f;��ri 0 Uniform Land Use Application (rev 12/03) Page 2 of 2 1 , P.2:4?"e_i'Cief 1 LLC REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT August 7, 2007 047833002 Via Federal Express 863/763 -3372 City of Okeechobee Ms. Betty Clement General Services Department 55 S.E. 3rd Avenue, Room 101 Okeechobee, FL 34974 RE: Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC Statement of Special Reason and Basis of Request Rezone Application and Comprehensive PIan Amendment Application Dear Ms. Clement: The SR70 corridor within the City of Okeechobee limits is continuing to develop into a commercial node. As the applicant and owner of Parcel ID #2- 22- 37- 35- 0A00- 00004 - 0000 -HX,1 am interested in developing this property as a mixed use commercial project to address the needs of the community and to provide additional hotel rooms within the city limits. Additional outparcels will provide convenient access to services (banking, restaurant and retail) for hotel guests and surrounding city residents. For this reason, I am respectfully requesting to rezone the property listed above from RMF to CHV and to amend the Future Land Use Comprehensive Plan from Single- Family to Commercial. Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC a Florida limited liability company By: Kite Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC a Florida limited liability company, its managing member 3055 CARDINAL DR.3vE, SUITE 300 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32963 TEL (772) 231 -9333 Fax (772) 231 -0033 WWW.KITEPROPERTIESLLC.COM Prepared By and Return to John D. Cassels, Jr. Esq. Cassels & McCaII P.O. Box 968 Okeechobee, Florida 34973 Parcel ID Number:2-2 2-37 -3 5 -000 0 -00004 -0000 1111111111111111111111111111111 FILE NUM 2007009267 OR Bk 00634 PG 0650 SHARON ROBERTSON, CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FL RECORDED 07/02/2007 11 :48:01 API RECORDING FEES 18.50 DEED DOC 11,200.00 RECORDED BY tl Pinon P9s 0650 - 651; (2p9s) SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED THIS SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED, made this 28 day of June, 2007, between JOSEPH G. ARBOGAST, as the Donee of that Durable Power of Attorney dated April 16,1999 which was executed by KEITH LEE ARBOGAST, SR and recorded in Official Records Book 490, Page 738 of the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida and as Attorney-in -Fact for KEITH LEE ARBOGAST, SR., of Post Office Box 201, Okeechobee, Florida 34973, GRANTOR, and OKEECHOBEE SR70 HOLDINGS, LLC., a Florida Limited Liability Company, of 3055 Cardinal Drive, Suite 300, Vero Beath, FL 32963 -1687, GRANTEE; WITNESSETH, that said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN ($10.00) DOLLARS, and other good and valuable consideration to said Grantor in hand paid by said Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Grantee, and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Okeechobee County, Florida, to-wit: DESCRIPTION ATTACHED AS EXIIIBIT "A ". enants with said Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee awful authority to sell and convey said land; that the Grantor hereby fully the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. hereunto set Grantors' hand and seal the day and year first above AND the Grant simple; that the Grantor has a- . warrants the title to said land an • IN WITNESS WHE written. Signed, sealed and delivered in i tee presence of: JOSEPH G. ARBOGAST, as the Donee of that Durable Power of Attorney dated April 16,1999 which was executed by KEITH LEE ARBOGAST, SR and corded in Official Records Book 490, Page 738 of the lie Records of Okeechobee County, Florida and as Attorney -in -Fact for KEITH LEE ARBOGAST, SR Print Name: turS�// ,� ,( hripf Fvhv3t041n OSE H G. ARBOGAS'Ir, as the Donee STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF BUNCOMBE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this a8 day of June, 2007, by JOSEPH G. ARBOGAST, as the Donee of that Durable Power of Attorney dated April 16, 1999 which was executed by KEITH LEE ARBOGAST, SR. and recorded in Official Records Book 490, Page 738 of the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida and as Attorney -in -Fact for KEITH LEE ARBOGAST, SR., IX who is personally known to me or 0 who has produced as identification. Signature of Notary Public Printed name of Notary My commission expires: 7.11—c_yro_ \a.'D01 i 14168.7311 S. WPDI u., mil tool/. `,.op, D. MO Notary Public Buncombe County m T O %,,�iy ICAR I \ 0sc Book634 /Page650 CFN #2007009267 Page 1 of 2 DESCRIPTION OF. PARCEL AS DETERMINED BY THIS SURVEY: BEING A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 35 EAST, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE J TTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF S.R. 70 (AS SHOWN ON FDOT RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP FOR S.R. 70 OKEECHOBEB COUNTY SECTION 91070 -2514, DATED DWN =3 -76) WITH EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 EXTENDED; THENCE SOUTH 00°14'21" EAST, ALONG SAID EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 EILTBNDBD, A DISTANCE OF 44.5•FEET-TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 89 °54'49" WEST, ALONG THB SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF S.R. 70 A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET TO.1 HL•f POINT QF ! 1 G; THENCE SOUTH 00° 14'21" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 69053 �+:`�' CB NORTH 89 °54'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A PO 1 • I •N THB WESTERLY RIGHT - OF-WAY LINE OF S.B. 13111 AVENUE; THEN u:ML 00 °14'21" EAST A DISTANCE OF 230.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF I t R5 ON OF THB WESTERLY RICH -OF -WAY LINE OF S.E. 13TH A zl HOPKINS MEANDER LINE; THENCE NORTH 71 °49'20" WEST, A DIS e . s 424.14 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 °03'47" WEST, A DIST "' • 787 • u TO A POINT LYING ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT- OF -WA\ L tei • ' " . 70; THENCE NORTH 89 °54'49" EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RI i F-WAY LINE OF S.R 70, A DISTANCE OF 300.00 FEET TO ' '► P BEGINNING Book634 /Page651 CFN #2007009267 Page 2 of 2 John Wayne and Kim E. Burnett 177 S. E. 13th Avenue Okeechobee, FL 34974 863 -357 -1060 (home) 863- 447 -0046 (cell) Our concerns about the proposed re- zoning include: 1. Privacy. We will literally have a commercial establishment in our back yard. The property line is approximately 40 feet from the back of our home and approximately 14 feet from the back of our garage. 2. Safety — Commercial use of the property opens us up to increased traffic flow and exposes us to a transient population right behind our home. a. We have grandchildren who play in the back yard. 3. Comfort — commercial use of the property will increase the noise level, the lighting level and destroy the peace we've come to expect in a residential neighborhood. 4. Property values - will be negatively affected. Who would want to buy a home next door to a heavy commercial area like the one proposed? NOTE: The land is currently zoned residential and was zoned single family for future use. IF the zoning is approved we feel that the following conditions must be met by the commercial property owners: 1. Lighting needs to be shaded to keep it from shining on our home and property. 2. The proposed entrance /exit onto S. E.13th Avenue should be disallowed. All entrance and egress should be onto Highway 70. 3. Roads need to be widened and have sidewalks to maintain safety with increased traffic, if the exit onto S.E. 13th is allowed.. 4. A 10 foot high concrete barrier/wall should be erected to shield our existing residential property from the commercial property. property line no (Ale_ 1 o* r 7 1314/A Van Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT HAMPTON INN OKEECHOBEE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FL Prepared for: Kite Properties, LLC 3055 Cardinal Drive, Suite 300 Vero Beach, FL 32963 047833002 August 2007 © Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. Certificate of authorization Number 00000696 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 561/845 -0665 TEL 561/882-0199 Jo F1 onaldso , P.E. stration Numb d0 mul "I Kim ley-Horn and Associates, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 INVENTORY AND PLANNING DATA 3 Inventory 3 Planning Data 3 PROJECT TRAFFIC 5 Trip Generation 5 Traffic Distribution 7 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 9 Existing (Year 2006) 9 Short Range (Year 2012) 9 Long -Range (Year 2017) 10 ASSURED AND PROGRAMMED CONSTRUCTION 11 ROADWAY EVALUATION 12 Level of Service 12 Year 2006 12 Year 2012 12 Year 2017 13 CONCLUSION 21 APPENDIX Following page 21 047833002 -0807 Page 1 b..' and V Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. LIST OF TABLES Table No. Title Page 1 Land Use Petition Summary 4 2 Trip Generation @ Maximum FAR 6 3 Study Area Significance 14 3 -A 2006 AADT Link Analysis @ Maximum FAR 15 3 -B 2006 Directional Traffic Link Analysis 16 4 -A 2012 AADT Link Analysis @ Maximum FAR 17 4 -B 2012 Directional Traffic Link Analysis 18 5 -A 2017 AADT Link Analysis @ Maximum FAR 19 5 -B 2017 Directional Traffic Link Analysis 20 LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. Title Page 1 Site Location Map 2 Z Project Traffic Assignment 8 047833002 -0807 Page ii pn EN pi Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. INTRODUCTION A Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment is proposed for a 4.5 acre parcel of land located on the south side of State Road 70 (SR 70) between S.E. 10th Avenue and S.E. 13th Avenue within the City of Okeechobee, immediately west of the city limit boundary. The 4.5 -acre parcel has a current land use designation of Single Family Residential (4 dwelling units per acre) and its maximum development intensity is based on a combination of rates found in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation, 7th Edition. The intensity is based on a maximum of 4 dwelling units per acre. A land use change from the Single Family designation requiring a comprehensive plan amendment is being requested to allow a Commercial land use designation, which allows maximum lot coverage of 50 percent. The location of the site is illustrated in Figure 1. Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. was retained to prepare a Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment traffic analysis for the subject property. This document presents the methodology used and findings from the analysis. The data used in the analysis are the most current data available from The City of Okeechobee, the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and data collected by KHA. The traffic impact analysis was conducted in accordance with the requirements of City of Okeechobee' s Small Scale Future Land Use Amendment Application for 2007 and a pre - application meeting held with the City's consultants on July 30, 2007. 047833002 -0807 Page 1 441 4th St. N r PARK ST. L cc W 441 98 NOT TO SCALE 32 0 EN t3 P: \0478 \33002 \GADD \HAMPTON.dwg Flc -1 Aug 13. 2007 9:14am by dgw.gN inn SITE I 2nd ST. 4th ST. 5th ST. 7th ST. FIGURE 1 HAMPTON INN SITE LOCATION MAP Pr_� Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 0 047833002 ❑ m Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. INVENTORY AND PLANNING DATA Inventory Data The data used in this analysis were obtained from City's Consultants, the FDOT (2006 Traffic Data CD) and supplemented by data collected by KHA. This data includes: • 2006 24 -hour traffic volumes • FDOT Historic traffic count data • 2006 and 2007 turning movement counts • (FDOT) "2006 Peak Season Factor Category Report" The data listed above are included in the Appendix. Planning Data Development density for the approved land use designation was determined as specified by the Future Land Use Map Amendment requirements. The current and use designation is Single Family Residential with a maximum development intensity based of 4 single family dwelling units per acre. It is proposed to change the land use to allow for a Commercial land use assuming Institute of Transportation Engineers trip generation rates for General Commercial Retail and Single Family. The proposed land use designation was analyzed for the site at a maximum FAR of 0.35. Table 1 summarizes the following: • Current future land use designation and resulting daily traffic. • 0.35 Maximum FAR • Proposed actual land use development and resulting traffic. 047833002 -0807 Page 3 TABLE 1 HAMPTON INN OKEECHOBEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT LAND USE PETITION SUMMARY Existing Land Use Designation., Land Use Acres Maximum Single Family Residential 4.5 FAR / Densi 4 units / acre Yield 18 units Proposed Maximum Land Use Designation Land Use Acres Maximum Commercial 4.5 FAR / Density 0.35 Yield 68,607 sq. ft. p: 104781330021augustl[ hampton _inn_comp _plan.xlsJluse_table1 8/13/2007 9:57 � _� Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Copyright © 1006, Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. CIECI Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. PROJECT TRAFFIC Trip Generation The trip generation potentials for the current land use designation and proposed future land use development were developed based on the trip generation rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation, 7t Edition. Table 2 summarizes the trip generation comparison of the proposed future land use development compared with the current land use designation for the maximum 0.35 FAR. The trip generation potential for the proposed future land use is greater than the trip generation associated with the existing land use development. The radius of development influence (as specified by the City of Okeechobee's Planning Consultant) was based on the net trip increase. Based on a maximum net trip increase of 3,359 trips per day, the radius of influence is one mile from the site access with only those links impacted by 10 percent or more of Level of Service "C" capacity requiring analysis.. 047833002 -0807 Page 5 TABLE 2 HAMPTON INN OKEECHOBEE TRIP GENERATION 0.35 FAR Land Use Current Site Designation Single - Family Residential Intensity Daily Trips Net Total 18 units 172 172 Maximum FAR Commercial Retail Pass -By Capture General Commercial Retail Net Trips Subtotal Subtotal Net trip Increase Notes: Trip generation was calculated using the following data: Daily Traffic Generation General Commercial Retail Single - Family Residential AM Peak Hour Traffic Generation General Commercial Retail Single - Family Residential PM Peak Hour Traffic Generation General Commercial Retail Single- Family Residential Pass -By Capture Calculation General Commercial Retail 68,607 sq. ft. 34.00% 5,350 5,350 1,819 1,819 3,531 3,359 ITE ITE ITE ITE ITE ITE ITE Ln(T) = 0.64Ln(X) + 5.87 T = 9.57 trips / d.u. T = 1.03 *(X) (61% in, 39% T = 0.70 *(X) + 9.43 (25% in Ln(T) = 0.66Ln(X) + 3.40 (4 Ln(T) = 0.90Ln(X) + 0.53 (E 0.34 p:104781330021augustl[hampton_ inn _comp _plan.xls]table2a_tgen_max 8/13/2007 9:57 ■ Kn an( Copyright C 2006, Kimtey -Horn and Associates, Inc. VI Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Distribution The external traffic distribution was determined by a review of the roadway network and its travel time characteristics. Information was also obtained from approved traffic studies in the area. The distribution, by general direction, is summarized below: NORTH 20% SOUTH 25% EAST - 30% WEST 25% The distributed external trips for the project were assigned to the roadway links within the radius of influence based on the additional impacts from the proposed and use amendment. The assignment is illustrated in Figure 2. 047833002 -0807 Page 7 441 4th St. 25% (DI 65% L PARK ST. N 441 98 NOT TO SCALE Ol 0 70% a 0 P: \0478 \33002 \CADO \HAMPTON.dwg 11G -2 Aug 13, 2007 9:160m by do..grJKn SITE' ITE 300/a U W 2nd ST. 4th ST. 5th ST. 5 7th ST 5 FIGURE 2 HAMPTON INN SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT pr_� Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 047833002 15% 1:1MT1 Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. BACKGROUND TRAFFIC Background traffic was developed for existing, short range (2012) and long range (2017) level of service analyses for maximum 0.35 FAR development plans as outlined below: Existing (Year 2006) Background traffic for the existing level of service analysis was determined by taking the 2006 24 -hour counts obtained from the FDOT and applying FDOT "K" and "D" adjustment factors to calculate a peak hour two -way volume for each roadway link. Additionally, an analysis was performed on City of Okeechobee Roadways. Year 2007 volumes were collected in August. This count information was converted to AADT for use in this analysis by applying the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) "2006 Peak Season Factor Category Report". Then FDOT "K" and "D" adjustment factors were utilized to obtain peak hour volumes. The factor determinations are included in the appendix. Short -Range (Year 2012) The existing average daily traffic volumes determined above were then grown by six years to year 2012. This growth from background traffic comprises two components: • Traffic from approved but unbuilt portions of committed developments • Historic growth (2.92 %) Traffic volumes for committed development projects were obtained from the City of Okeechobee's planning and traffic consultants and included six amendment changes from 2006 which are included in the Appendix of this report. A growth rate of 2.92 percent per year was used as background growth on each link within the radius of influence. The total background traffic was then determined for each link within the 047833002 -0807 Page 9 ❑ — V Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. radius of influence. Year 2012 volumes for City of Okeechobee were developed by applying the same 2.92 percent growth rate plus committed project traffic volumes to the 2006 traffic volumes. This is consistent with the analysis used for recently approved projects in the area. Long -Range (Year 2017) The existing average daily traffic volumes determined above were then grown by eleven years to year 2017. This growth from background traffic comprises two components: • Traffic from approved but unbuilt portions of committed developments • Historic growth (2.92 %) Traffic volumes for committed development projects were obtained from the City of Okeechobee's planning and traffic consultants and included the Okeechobee Commons development on the north side of SR 70 plus five additional sites. A growth rate of 2.92 percent per year was used as background growth on each link within the radius of influence. The total background traffic was then determined for each link within the radius of influence. Year 2017 volumes for City of Okeechobee were developed by applying the same 2.92 percent growth rate plus committed project traffic volumes to the 2006 traffic volumes. This is consistent with the analysis used for recently approved projects in the area. 047833002 -0807 Page 10 Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. ASSURED AND PROGRAMMED CONSTRUCTION The existing number of lanes on each link analyzed was identified. A review was undertaken of the FDOT and Okeechobee County Five -Year Plans to identify programmed roadway improvements. There are no planned improved within the study area. 047833002 -0807 Page 11 III ri Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. ROADWAY EVALUATION Level of Service Roadway links within the radius of influence were analyzed to determine their level of service for year 2006, 2012 and 2017. Links are considered as being significantly impacted if they meet the following criteria: • The net increase in the proposed traffic impacts a roadway link by 10% of its Level of Service "C" capacity. (See Table 3) Year 2006 A link level of service analysis was undertaken for links within the project's radius of influence. Table 3A summarizes the results of the daily level of service analysis for the proposed maximum development traffic added to 2006 AADT traffic volumes. As can be seen in Table 3A, no FIRS links are significantly impacted by the proposed project and one local road (S.E. 13t Avenue) was significantly impacted. A peak hour, two -way analysis was performed as well. The results of this analysis are included in Table 3B. Year 2012 Table 4A summarizes the results of the level of service analysis for the proposed maximum development traffic added to the year 2012 background traffic. As can be seen in Table 4A, SR 710 from SR 70 south to the Martin County line, SR 70 fro NE 18th Avenue to Parrott and US 441 from SR 70 south to SR 78 will not meet the adopted level of service standards with or without the proposed amendment. It should be noted that these roadways are all expected to operate at the same level of service with or without traffic associated with the proposed amendment, and the 047833002 -0807 Page 12 G1E Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. amendment represents an insignificant impact to all FIHS links. A traffic concurrency study would be able to demonstrate that this section of roadway would be able to operate within the acceptable level of service upon completion of the project. A peak hour, two -way analysis was performed as well. The results of this analysis are included in Table 4C. Year 2017 Table 5A summarizes the results of the level of service analysis for the proposed maximum land use designation traffic added to the year 2017 background traffic. As can be seen in Table 5A, numerous links in the study area will not meet the adopted level of service standard. It should be noted that these roadways are all expected to operate at the same level of service with or without traffic associated with the proposed amendment, and the amendment represents an insignificant impact to all failing links. A peak hour, two -way analysis was performed as well. The results of this analysis are included in Table 5B. 047833002 -0807 Page 13 Roadway From TABLE 3 HAMPTON INN OKEECHOBEE STUDY AREA - 10% SIGNIFICANT LINKS To Existing Number LOS 'C' Of Lanes Capacity Committed SR 710 SR 70 Martin County Line SR 70 St. Lucie County Line SR 710 SR 710 CSX Crossing CSX Crossing NE 18th Avenue NE 18th Avenue Site Site Parrot (US 441) NE 10th SR 70 NE 13th SR 70 US441 /SR7 SR 70 SR 70 South South CSX Crossing SR 78 2L 2L 4L 4L 4L 4L 2L 2L 4L 4L 13,100 13,100 32,800 32,800 32,800 32,800 9,400 9,400 32,800 24,400 Project Traffic Number LOS 'C' Percent Net Of Lanes Capacity Assignment Proposed 2L 4L 4L 4L 4L 4L 2L 2L 4L 4L Project FINS Impact Roadway? 10% Significant Impact ? 13,100 13,100 32,800 32,800 32,800 32,800 9,400 9,400 32,800 24,400 ni 15% 15% 30% 30% 30% 65% 12% 35% 20% 25% 504 504 1008 1008 1008 2183 403 1176 672 840 3.85% 3.85% 3.07% 3.07% 3.07% 6.66% 4.29% 12.51% 2.05% 3.44% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No Note: LOS based on FDOT Generalized Level of Service Tables (Local Roads are LOS D) Note: 2006 Volumes from FDOT � _� Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Notes: �I N IGmley -Hom and Associates, Inc. TABLE 3A HAMPTON INN OKEECHOBEE 2006 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC LINK ANALYSIS - 0.35 FAR Roadway From To Existing Committed 2006 AADT Volumee Project Traffic Project Impact Total Traffic v/c FIHS Roadway? Significant Impact? Number Of Lanes LOS 'C' Capacity Number Of Lanes LOS 'C' Capacity Percent Assignment Net Proposed _ SR 710 SR 70 Martin County Line SR 70 St. Lucie County Line SR 710 SR 710 CSX Crossing CSX Crossing NE 18th Avenue NE 18th Avenue Site Site Parrot(US441) SE 10th Ave. SR 70 South SE 13th Ave. SR 70 South US441 /SR7 SR 70 CSX Crossing SR 70 SR 78 2L 2L 4L 4L 4L 4L 2L 2L 4L 4L 13,100 13,100 32,800 32,800 32,800 32,800 9,400 9,400 32,800 24,400 2L 4L 4L 4L 4L 4L 2L 2L 4L 4L 13,100 13,100 I" 32,800 32,800 32,800 32,800 9,400 9,400 32,800 24,400 12,700 9,200 23,500 23,500 35,000 35,000 4,530 575 24,500 28,500 15% 15% 30% 30% 30% 65% 12% 35% 20% 25% 504 504 1008 1008 1008 2183 403 1176 672 840 3.85% 3.85% 3.07% 3.07% 3.07% 6,66% 4.29% 12.51% 2.05% 3.44% 13204 9704 24508 24508 36008 37183 4933 1751 25172 29340 1.01 0.74 0.75 0.75 1.10 1.13 0.52 0.19 0.77 1.20 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No Notes: �I N IGmley -Hom and Associates, Inc. (1) Per FDOT K = 10.64, D = 58.36 � 1/71111111/111 Kimley -Hom and Associates, Inc. TABLE 3B HAMPTON INN OKEECHOBEE 2006 PEAK HOUR TWO WAY DIRECTION LINK ANALYSIS - 0.35 FAR Roadway Existing Committed 2006 Project Traffic From To Number LOS 'C' •t Number LOS 'C' Two Way Percent Net Project Total Traffic v/c FIRS Significant Of Lanes Capacity Of Lanes Capacity Peak Hour Assignment Proposed Impact Roadway? Impact ? SR 710 SR 70 Martin County Line 2L 1,260 2L 1,260 1,351 15% 45 3.57% 1396 1.11 Yes No SR 70 St. Lucie County Line SR 710 SR 710 2L 1,260 4L 1,260 "" 979 15% 45 3.57% 1024 0.81 Yes No CSX Crossing CSX Crossing NE 4L 3,150 4L 3,150 2,500 30% 90 2.86% 2590 0.82 Yes No 18th Avenue NE 18th Avenue Site 4L 3,150 4L 3,150 2,500 30% 90 2.86% 2590 0.82 Yes No Site 4L 3,150 4L 3,150 3,724 30% 90 2.86% 3814 1.21 Yes No Parrot (US 441) 4L 3,150 4L 3,150 3,724 65% 194 6.16% 3918 1.24 Yes No SE 10th Ave. SR 70 South 2L 900 2L 900 482 12% 36 4.00% 518 0.58 No No SE 13th Ave. SR 70 South 2L 900 2L 900 61 35% 105 11.67% 166 0.18 No Yes US441 /SR7 SR 70 CSX Crossing SR 70 4L 3,150 4L 3,150 2,607 20% 60 1.90% 2667 0.85 Yes No SR 78 4L 2,340 4L 2,340 3,032 25% 75 3.21% 3107 1.33 Yes No Notes. (1) Per FDOT K = 10.64, D = 58.36 � 1/71111111/111 Kimley -Hom and Associates, Inc. TABLE 4A HAMPTON INN OKEECHOBEE SHORT TERM (2012) AVERAGE DAI I,Y TRAFFIC LINK ANALYSIS - 0.35 FAR Roadway From To Existing Committed Number LOS Lanes Capacity Number LOS 'C' Of Lanes Capacity 2006 AADT Volumes' Project Traffic Percent Assignment 2012 Net Proposed Growth Background Rote Tank Committed Volumes" Growth & Committed Total Traffic v/c With Project v/c No Project FIHS Roadway? Significant Impact ? SR 710 SR 70 Martin County Line SR 70 St. Lucie Cowry Line SR 710 SR 710 CSX Crossing CSX Crossing NE 18511 Avenue NE 18111 Avenue Site Site Parrot (US 441) SE 10th Ave, SR 70 SE 13111 Ave. SR 70 US 441 /SR7 SR 70 SR 70 South South CSX Crossing SR 78 2L 21, 41, 4L 4L 41, 21, 2L 41. 4L 13,100 13,100 32,800 32.800 32,800 32,800 9,400 9.400 32,800 24,400 21, 4L 4L 41, 41, 41, 21, 21. 4L 41. 13.100 13.100 to 32,800 32,800 32,800 32,800 9.400 9,400 32,800 24,400 12,700 9,200 23,500 23,500 35,000 35,000 4,530 575 24,500 28,500 15% 15% 30% 300/ 30% 65% 12% 35% 20% 25% 504 504 1008 1008 1008 2183 403 1176 672 840 2.92% 2.92% 2.92% 2.92% 2.92% 2.92% 2.92% 2.92% 2.92% 2.92% 15,094 10,934 27,930 27,930 41,597 41,597 5,384 683 29.118 33,872 1101 1101 2203 2203 2203 5139 220 220 1248 1689 16195 12035 30133 30133 43800 46736 5604 903 30366 35561 16699 12539 31141 31141 44808 48919 6007 2079 31038 36401 1.27 0.96 0.95 0.95 1.37 1.49 064 0.22 0.95 1.49 1.24 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.34 1.42 0.60 0.10 0.93 1.46 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No Notes (1) Commined Traffic is from Okeechobee Density Changes 2006 IGmleyHom 11....11MI/ 1 and Associates In ommined Tra c is from Okeechobee Density Changes 2006 Vl-n IGmley -Hom and Associates, Inc. TABLE 411 HAMPTON INN OKEECHOBEE SHORT TERM (2012) PEAK HOUR TWO WAY TRAFFIC LINK ANALYSIS - 0.35 FAR Roadway From To Existing Committed 2006 Project Traffic 2012 Total Traffic v/c With Project v/c No Project FIRS Roadway? Significant Impact? Number Of Lanes LOS 'C' Capacity Number Of Lanes LOS 'C' Capacity Two Way Peak Hour Percent Assignment Net Proposed Growth Background Rem Tremc Commuted Volume01 Growth& Committed SR 710 SR 70 Martin County Line SR 70 St Lucie County Line SR 710 SR 710 CSX Crossing CSX Crossing NE 18th Avenue Site NE 18th Avrnue Site Parrot(US441) SE loth Ave. SR 70 South SE 1386 Ave. SR 70 South US441 /SR7 SR 70 CSX Glossing SR 70 SR 78 Norm: 21. 21. 4L 41. 41. 4L 2L 21. 41. 4L 1,260 1,260 3,150 3,150 3,150 3,150 900 900 3,150 2,340 2L 4L 4L 4L 41. 4L 21. 21, 41. 4L 1.260 1,260 P1 3,150 3,150 3,150 3,150 900 900 3,150 2,340 1,351 979 2,500 2,500 3,724 3,724 482 61 2,607 3,032 15% 15% 300 /, 30% 30% 65% 12% 35% 200 /, 25% 45 45 90 90 90 194 36 105 60 75 2.92% 2.92% 2.92% 2.92% 2.92% 2.92% 2.92% 2.920% 2.92% 2.92% 1.606 1,164 2,971 2,971 4,426 4,426 573 72 3,098 3,604 109 109 217 217 217 507 22 22 123 167 1715 1273 3188 3188 4643 4933 595 94 3221 3771 1760 1318 3278 3278 4733 5127 631 199 3281 3846 1.40 1.05 1.04 1.04 1.50 1.63 0.70 0.22 1.04 1.64 136 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.47 1.57 0.66 0.10 1.02 1.61 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No ommined Tra c is from Okeechobee Density Changes 2006 Vl-n IGmley -Hom and Associates, Inc. From To SR 710 SR 70 Martin County Line SR 70 St. Lurie County Line SR 710 SR 710 CSX Crossing CSX Crossing NE 1801 Avenue NE 18th Avenue Site Site Parrot (US 441) SE 10th Ave. SR 70 SE 13th Ave. SR 70 US 441 / SR 7 SR 70 SR 70 South South CSX Crossing SR 78 Notes (I) Committed Traffic is from Okeechobee Density Changes 2006 Number Of Lanes 2L 21, 4L 4L 41, 41, 2L 2L 4L 41, LOS 'C' Capacity 13,100 13,100 32,800 32,800 32,800 32,800 9,400 9,400 32,800 24,400 Number Of Lanes 21. 4L 4L 4L 4L 41. 21. 21. 4L 4L TABLE 5A HAMPTON INN OKEECHOBEE LONG TERM (2017) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC LINK ANALYSIS - 0.35 FAR LOS 'C' Capacity 13,100 13,100 Ot 32,800 32,800 32,800 32,800 9,400 9,400 32,800 24,400 AADT Percent I.. Net Volumes19 J Assignment Proposed 12,700 9,200 23,500 23,500 35,000 35,000 4,530 575 24,500 28,500 15% 15% 30% 30% 30s/ 65% 12% 35% 20% 25% 504 504 1008 1008 1008 2183 403 1176 672 840 Growth Background Committed Rate Tnlik 2.92 % 2.92% 2.92% 2.92% 2.92% 2.92% 2.92% 2.92% 2.92% 2.92% 17,430 12,627 32,253 32,253 48,036 48,036 6.217 789 33,625 39,115 1101 1101 2203 2203 2203 5139 220 220 1248 1689 Growth & Total Traffic v/e v/c FIBS I Significant Committed With Project J No Project Roadway? l Impact ? 18531 13728 34456 34456 50239 53175 6437 1009 34873 40804 19035 14232 35464 35464 51247 55358 6840 2185 35545 41644 1.45 1.09 1.08 1.08 1.56 1.69 0.73 0.23 1,08 1.71 1.41 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.53 1.62 0.68 0.11 1.06 1.67 Ycs Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes No � - IGmley -Hom and Associates, Inc. No From To TABLE 5B HAMPTON INN OKEECHOBEE LONG TERM (20 7) TWO WAY PEAK HOUR LINK ANALYSIS - 0.35 FAR Number LOS 'C' Of Lanes Capacity Number Of Lanes LOS 'C' Capacity Peak Hour Percent Volume?' Assignment Net Proposed Growth Background Rate Traffic Committed Volume.'" Growth & Committed Total Traffic SR 710 SR 70 Martin County Line SR 70 • Sc Lucie County Line SR 710 SR 710 CSX Crossing CSX Crossing NE 18th Avenue NE 1816 Avenue Site Site Parrot (US 441) SE 10th Ave. SR 70 South SE 13th Ave. SR 70 US 441 / SR 7 SR 70 SR 70 Notes' (1) Commitred Traffic is from Okeechobee Density Changes 2006 South CSX Crossing SR 78 2L 2L 41. 4L 4L 4L 21. 2L 4L 4L 1,260 1,260 3,150 3,150 3.150 3,150 900 900 3,150 2,340 21. 41. 4L 41. 4L 4L 21. 2L 4L 41. 1,260 1,260 l i 3,150 3,150 3,150 3,150 900 900 3,150 2,340 1,351 979 2.500 2,500 3,724 3,724 482 61 2,607 3,032 15% 15% 30% 30% 30°A 65% 12% 35% 20% 25% 95 45 90 90 90 194 36 105 60 75 2,92% 2.92% 2.92% 2.9294 2.92% 2.92% 2,92% 2.92% 2.92% 2.92% 1.854 1,344 3,431 3,431 5,111 5,111 662 84 3.578 4,161 109 109 217 217 217 507 22 22 123 167 1963 1453 3648 3648 5328 5618 684 106 3701 4328 2008 1498 3738 3738 5418 5812 720 211 3761 4403 v/c With Project 1.59 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.72 1.85 0.80 0.23 1.19 1.88 v/c No Project 1.56 1.15 1.16 1.16 1.69 1.78 0.76 0.12 1,17 1.85 FIRS Roadway/ Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Significant Impact 7 No No No No No No No Yes No No o-mnt and Associates, Inc. ❑—� Kimley -Horn INN and Associates, Inc. CONCLUSION This traffic analysis demonstrates that the proposed change in land use designation for the 4.5 Acre Hampton Inn Okeechobee Site will not adversely affect Level of Service thresholds for any project links in the existing (2006), short term (2012) or long term (2017) horizons. Although some of the FIHS roadways are projected to operate below Level of Service C, these roadways are all expected to operate at the same level of service with or without traffic associated with the proposed amendment. The proposed amendment does not represent a significant impact to any FIRS roadways. Additionally, the City of Okeechobee roadways are expected to operate at an acceptable level of service on a twenty four hour as well as peak hour, two -way basis. Therefore, the proposed amendment change is consistent with the requirements of the City of Okeechobee's Comprehensive Plan. 047833002 -0807 Page 21 � Kimley -Horn ® and Associates, Inc. APPENDIX E Apr 03, 2007 4:15pm 1 1 1 1 E 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 AERIAL SCALE 1' -250' SCALE N.T.S. DESIGNED 6Y KHA DRAWN BY Jason GaRO CHECKED BY �❑ IGmley -Hom and Associates, Inc. © 2005 KIA&EY -HORN AND ASSaQAIES. INC 601 21st Str9t, Suits 400. Vero Bead,. FL 62960 PHONE (772) 362 -7991 FAX (772) 362 -9669 WWW.IOA&EY- NCRN.CON CA 00000696 DATE 11/03/05 PROJECT NO. 047833002 HAMPTON INN OKEECHOBEE DESIGN ENGINEER: James G.Vtter,II,P.E. FLORIDA P.C. LICENSE 71II98Et 59536 SHEET NUMBER 1 of 1 - MAP■VEST �7»k �.: Ne 6 \ / 9 Ne 4th St A 3rd St slth In= ro co # i2 Bm 'w■ Ne 7 St 2t 9.3'4 Se 4th St Se Sr St Se 6th St S 6th a }77 e2007-M paue,1 » ? £ / / Se 2nd'S.t m. ... � . �/ . .g : \ Se 4th # » : 4th % ©2007 NA prri Kim y Hom 11111111 and Associates, Inc. Engineering, Planning, _dEnvironmental Consultants omm&«eHom and Associates, Inc. 601 21st Street, Sui te 300, Vero Be ach, FL 32960 Phone (772) 562-7981 Fax (772) 562-96+ www.kimley-horn.com Site Location Map HAMPTON INN OCKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FL SCALE: NTS PROJECT NO 047725000 11 CITY OF OKEECHOBEE r� Okeechobee Density Changes for 2006 Amendments # Amendment Acres Old Density New Density Usage Change 1 06- 003 -SSA 0.516 2 units 5 units SF - MF 2 06- 001 -SSA 0.344 1 unit 14,984.64 sq. ft. MF - COM 3 06- 008 -SSA 0.52 2 units 22,651.2 sq. ft. SF - COM 4 06 -C1 -001 21.14 85 units 200,000 sq. ft. SF - COM 5 06- 005 -SSA 0.327 1 unit 14,244.12 sq. ft. SF - COM 6 06 -C1 -002 32.97 132 units 330 units SF - MF 7 06- 009 -SSA 0.25 1 unit 10,890 sq. 'ft. SF - COM 8 06 -011 -SSA 0.48 2 units 20,908.8 sq. ft. SF - COM 9 06- 004 -SSA 0.688 3 units 7 units SF - ME 10 06 -012 -SSA 9.89 40 units 99 units SF - -MF 11 06- 002 -SSA 2.06 8 units 89,733.6 sq. ft. SF - 1ND 12 06- 010 -SSA 9.33 37 units 93 units SF - MF TABLE Al HAMPTON INN OKEECHOBEE DENSITY CHANGES LIST Major Project OLD DENSITY NEW DENSITY NET TRIPS 06- 003 -SSA 06- 008 -SSA 06 -C1 -001 06- 005 -SSA 06- 012 -SSA 06 -C1 -002 TRIPS 1 UNIT 2 UNITS 85 UNITS 1 UNIT 40 UNITS 132 UNITS 2610 14985 SF 22651 SF 200000 SF 14244 SF 99 UNITS 330 UNITS 12438 9828 p: 104781330021augustl [hampton_inn_comp.plan.xls, 8/7/2007 9:43 TABLE A2 HAMPTON INN OKEECHOBEE TRIP GENERATION DENSITY CHANGES Land Use Intensity Daily Trips Current Site Designation 261 units 2,610 Single - Family Residential Net Total 2,610 Maximum FAR Single - Family Residential 429 units 4,290 Commercial Retail 251,880 sq. ft. 12,346 Subtotal 16,636 Pass -By Capture 34.00% 4,198 General Commercial Retail Subtotal 4,198 Net Trips 12,438 Net trip Increase 9,828 Notes: Trip generation was calculated using the following data: Daily Traffic Generation General Commercial Retail ITE = Ln(T) = 0.64Ln(X) + 5.87 Single - Family Residential ITE = T = 10 trips / d.u. AM Peak Hour Traffic Generation General Commercial Retail ITE = T = 1.03 *(X) (61% in, 39% Single - Family Residential ITE = T = 0.70 *(X) + 9.43 (25% in PM Peak Hour Traffic Generation General Commercial Retail ITE = Ln(T) = 0.66Ln(X) + 3.40 (4 Single - Family Residential ITE = Ln(T) = 0.90Ln(X) + 0.53 (( Pass -By Capture Calculation General Commercial Retail ITE = 0.34 p:104781330021augustl[hampton inn _ comp plan.xls) project list 8/7/2007 9:43 • riKin anc Copyright m 2006, Kim ey -Horn and Associates, Inc. TABLE GENERALIZED ANNUAL AVERAGE AREAS TRANSITIONING IN AREAS OVER 5,000 NOT 4 -2 DAILY VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S TO URBANIZED AREAS OR IN URBANIZED AREAS* UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Lanes Divided 2 Undivided 4 Divided 6 Divided A 2,400 18,600 27,900 Level of Service B C D 8,000 14,900 21,100 30,200 43,600 56,500 45,200 65,500 84,700 E 26,700 64,200 96,200 Class I (>0.00 to STATE TWO -WAY ARTERIALS 1.99 signalized intersections per mile) Lanes Divided 2 Undivided 4 Divided 6 Divided Level of Service A B C D ** 4,000 13,100 15,500 4,600 27,900 32,800 34,200 6,900 42,800 49,300 51,400 Class II (2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) Lanes Divided 2 Undivided 4 Divided 6 Divided A ** ** ** E 16,300 *** * ** Level of Service B C D E ** 10,500 14,500 15,300 3,700 24,400 30,600 32,200 6,000 38,000 46,100 48,400 Class III (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile) Lanes Divided 2 Undivided 4 Divided 6 Divided A B ** ** ** ** ** ** Level of Service C D 5,000 1 1, 800 11,700 27,200 18,400 42,100 E 14,600 30,800 46,300 Lanes 4 6 8 10 A 23,500 36,400 49,100 61,800 FREEWAYS Level of Service B C D 38,700 52,500 62,200 59,800 81,100 96,000 80,900 109,600 129,800 101,800 138,400 163,800 E 69,100 106,700 144,400 182,000 Lanes Divided 2 Undivided 4 Divided 6 Divided Lanes Divided 2 Undivided 4 Divided NON -STATE ROADWAYS Major City/County Roadways A ** ** ** Level of Service B C D ** ** ** 7,000 13,600 16,400 29,300 25,700 44,100 Other Signalized Roadways (signalized intersection analysis) A ** ** B ** ** Level of Service C D 4,400 9,400 10,300 20,200 E 14,600 30,900 46,400 E 12,000 24,000 BICYCLE MODE (Note: Level of service for the bicycle mode in this table is based on roadway geometries at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of bicyclists using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two -way maximum service volumes.) Paved Shoulder/ Bicycle Lane Coverage 0-49% 50 -84% 85- 100% A ** ** 3,200 Level of Service B C D 1,900 3,300 13,600 2,500 4,000 >4,000 7,100 >7,100 * ** PEDESTRIAN MODE E >13,600 *0* *** (Note: Level of service for the pedestrian mode in this table is based on roadway geometric at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of pedestrians using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two -way maximum service volumes.) '/u Sidewalk Coverage A ** ** ** 0-49% 50 -84% 85- 100% Level of Service B C D E ** ** 2,200 ** ** 11,200 6,300 9,800 >11,200 15,400 18,800 * ** Source: Florida Department of Transportation 05/17/07 Systems Planning Office 605 Suwannee Street, MS 19 Tallahassee, FL 32399 -0450 http://www.dot.state.fl.us/planning/systems/sni/los/default.htm Lanes 2 2 Multi Multi ARTERIAL/NON -STATE ROADWAY ADJUSTMENTS (alter corresponding volume by the indicated percent) Median Divided Undivided Undivided Undivided Left Turn Lanes Adjustment Factors Yes No Yes No ONE -WAY FACILITIES +5% -20% -5% -25% Multiply the corresponding two- directional volumes in this table by 0.6. *Values shown are presented as two-way annual average daily volumes for levels of service and are for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated. Although presented as daily volumes, they actually represent peak hour direction conditions with applicable K and D factors applied. This table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications. The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications. The table and deriving computer models should not be used for condor or intersection design, where more refined techniques exist. Level of service letter grade thresholds are probably not comparable across modes and, therefore, cross modal comparisons should be made with caution. Furthermore, combining levels of service of different modes into one overall roadway level of service is not recommended Calculations are based on planning applications of the Highway Capacity Manual, Bicycle LOS Model, Pedestrian LOS Model and Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, respectively for the automobile/truck, bicycle, pedestrian and bus modes. •*Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults. **`Not applicable for that level of service letter grade. For automobile/truck modes, volumes greater than level of service D become F because intersection capacities have been reached. For bicycle and pedestrian modes, the level of service letter grade (including F) is not achievable, because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input value defaults. TABLE 4 - 5 GENERALIZED PEAK HOUR TWO -WAY VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S AREAS TRANSITIONING INTO URBANIZED AREAS OR AREAS OVER 5,000 NOT IN URBANIZED AREAS* UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D E 2 Undivided 230 770 1,440 2,040 2,580 4 Divided 1,790 2,900 4,190 5,420 6,160 6 Divided 2,680 4,340 6,280 8,130 9,240 STATE TWO -WAY ARTERIALS Class I (>0.00 to 1.99 signalized intersections per mile) Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D E 2 Undivided ** 390 1,260 1,490 1,560 4 Divided 440 2,680 3,150 3,290 * ** 6 Divided 670 4,110 4,730 4,930 *4* Class II (2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) Lanes Divided 2 Undivided 4 Divided 6 Divided A ** ** ** Level of Service B C D E ** 1,010 1,390 1,470 360 2,340 2,940 3,090 580 3,640 4,420 4,650 Class II1 (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile) Lanes Divided 2 Undivided 4 Divided 6 Divided A B ** ** *4 ** ** ** Level of Service C D 480 1,130 1,130 2,610 1,770 4,040 E 1,400 2,960 4,450 FREEWAYS Level of Service Lanes A B C D E 4 2,350 3,870 5,250 6,220 6,910 6 3,640 5,980 8,110 9,600 10,670 8 4,910 8,090 10,960 12,980 14,440 10 6,180 10,180 13,840 16,380 18,200 Lanes Divided 2 Undivided 4 Divided 6 Divided Lanes Divided 2 Undivided 4 Divided NON -STATE ROADWAYS Major City/County Roadways A ** ** ** Level of Service B C D E ** 670 1,300 1,400 1,570 2,810 2,970 ** 2,470 4,230 4,460 Other Signalized Roadways (signalized intersection analysis) A B ** ** ** *1 Level of Service C D E 430 900 I,150 990 1,940 2,300 BICYCLE MODE (Note: Level of service for the bicycle mode in this table is based on roadway geometrics at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of bicyclists using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two -way maximum service volumes.) Paved Shoulder Bicycle Lane Level of Service Coverage A B C D E 0-49% ** 180 310 1,310 >1,310 50 -84% ** 240 390 >390 * ** 85 -100% 310 680 >680 * ** * ** PEDESTRIAN MODE (Note: Level of service for the pedestrian mode in this table is based on roadway geometric at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of pedestrians using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two -way maximum service volumes.) Level of Service Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E 049% ** ** ** 600 1,480 50 -84% ** ** ** 940 1,800 85 -100% ** 210 1,080 >1,080 * ** Source: Florida Department of Transportation 05/17/07 Systems Planning Office 605 Suwannee Street, MS 19 Tallahassee, FL 32399 -0450 http://www.dot.statenus/planning/systems/sm/los/default.htm Lanes ARTERIAL/NON -STATE ROADWAY ADJUSTMENTS (alter corresponding volume by the indicated percent) Median Left Turn Lanes Adjustment Factors 2 Divided Yes +5% 2 Undivided No -20% Multi Undivided Yes -5% Multi Undivided No -25% ONE -WAY FACILITIES Multiply the corresponding two- directional volumes in this table by 0.6. • Values shown are presented as hourly two-way volumes for levels of service and are for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated. Although presented as peak hour two-way volumes, they actually represent peak hour peak direction conditions with an applicable D factor applied. This table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications. The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications. The table and deriving computer models should not be used for corridor or intersection design, where more refined techniques exist. Level of service letter grade thresholds are probably not comparable across modes and, therefore, cross modal comparisons should be made with caution. Furthermore, combining levels of service of different modes into one overall roadway level of service is not recommended. Calculations are based on planning applications of the Highway Capacity Manual, Bicycle LOS Model, Pedestrian LOS Model and Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, respectively for the automobile/truck, bicycle, pedestrian and bus modes. •"Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults. ** *Not applicable for that level of service letter grade. For automobile/truck modes, volumes greater than level of service D become F because intersection capacities have been reached For bicycle and pedestrian modes, the level of service letter grade (including F) is not achievable, because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input value defaults. TABLE 4 - 8 GENERALIZED PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONAL VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S AREAS TRANSITIONING INTO URBANIZED AREAS OR AREAS OVER 5,000 NOT IN URBANIZED AREAS* UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D E I Undivided 120 420 790 1,120 1,410 2 Divided 980 1,590 2,300 2,980 3,390 3 Divided 1,470 2,390 3,460 4,470 5,080 FREEWAYS Level of Service Lanes A B C D E 2 1,290 2,130 2,890 3,420 3,800 3 2,000 3,290 4,460 5,280 5,870 4 2,700 4,450 6,030 7,140 7,940 5 3,400 5,600 7,610 9,010 10,010 STATE TWO -WAY ARTERIALS Class I (>0.00 to 1.99 signalized intersections per mile) Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D E I Undivided ** 210 690 820 860 2 Divided 240 1,470 1,730 1,810 * ** 3 Divided 370 2,260 2,600 2,710 * ** Class II (2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D E 1 Undivided ** ** 560 760 810 2 Divided ** 200 1,290 1,620 1,700 3 Divided ** 320 2,000 2,430 2,560 Class III (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile) Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D E 1 Undivided ** ** 260 620 770 2 Divided ** ** 620 1,440 1,630 3 Divided ** ** 970 2,220 2,450 BICYCLE MODE (Note: Level of service for the bicycle mode in this table is based on roadway geometrics at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of bicyclists using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine maximum service volumes.) Paved Shoulder/ Bicycle Lane Level of Service Coverage A B C D E 0-49% ** 100 170 720 >720 50 -84% ** 130 210 >210 * ** 85- 100% 170 380 >380 * ** * ** PEDESTRIAN MODE (Note: Level of service for the pedestrian mode in this table is based on roadway geometric at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of pedestrians using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown by number of directional roadway lanes to determine maximum service volumes.) Level of Service Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E 0-49% ** ** ** 330 810 50 -84% ** ** ** 520 990 85- 100% ** 120 590 >590 * ** NON -STATE ROADWAYS Major City/County Roadways Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D E 1 Undivided ** ** 370 720 770 2 Divided ** ** 870 1,550 1,630 3 Divided ** ** 1,360 2,330 2,450 Other Signalized Roadways (signalized intersection analysis) Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D E 1 Undivided ** ** 230 490 630 2 Divided ** ** 540 1,070 1,270 ARTERIAL/NON -STATE ROADWAY ADJUSTMENTS (alter corresponding volume by the indicated percent) Lanes Median Left Tum Lanes Adjustment Factors 1 Divided Yes +5% I Undivided No -20% Multi Undivided Yes -5% Multi Undivided No -25% ONE -WAY FACILITIES Source: Florida Department of Transportation 05/17/07 Systems Planning Office 605 Suwannee Street, MS 19 Tallahassee, FL 32399 -0450 http://www:dot.state.fl.us/planning/systems/sm/los/default.htm Increase corresponding volume by 1.2. * Values shown are hourly directional volumes for levels of service and are for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated. To convert to annual average daily traffic volumes, these volumes must be divided by appropriate D and K factors. This table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications. The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications. The table and deriving computer models should not be used for corridor or intersection design, where more refined techniques exist Level of service letter grade thresholds are probably not comparable across modes and, therefore, cross modal comparisons should be made with caution. Furthermore, combining levels of service of different modes into one overall roadway level of service is not recommended. Calculations are based on planning applications of the Highway Capacity Manual, Bicycle LOS Model, Pedestrian LOS Model and Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, respectively for the automobile/truck, bicycle, pedestrian and bus modes. * *Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults. ** *Not applicable for that level of service letter grade. For automobile/truck modes, volumes greater than level of service D become F because intersection capacities have been reached For bicycle and pedestrian modes, the level of service letter grade (including F) is not achievable, because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input value defaults. Traffic Trends - V2.0 SR70 -- E. of US 441 PIN# Location 973215 -1 1 70000 60000 50000 40000 1- >, 30000 O c 20000 d 10000 0 Observed Count •Fitted Curve County: Station #: Highway: Okeechobee (91) 0 SR70 2000 2005 2010 -+ +- i + a + F 2015 2020 Year 2025 2030 2035 ** Annual Trend Increase: Trend R- squared: Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: Trend Growth Rate (2005 to Design Year): Printed: 1,000 61.76% 3.41% 2.92% 21- Jun -07 Straight Line Growth Option Year Traffic (ADT /AADT) Count* Trend ** 2000 30500 29300 2001 29000 30300 2002 32500 31300 2003 30000 32300 2004 34000 33300 2005 35000 34300 2010 Opening Year Trend 2010 N/A 39300 2 15 Mid -Year Trend 2015 N/A 44300 2025 Design Year Trend 2025 N/A 54300 TRANPLAN Forecasts /Trends *Axle- Adjusted 2006 Peak Season Factor Category Report - Report Type: ALL Category: 9100 OKEECHOBEE CNTYWIDE Week MOCF: 0.90 Dates SF PSCF 1 01/01/2006 - 01/07/2006 0.99 2 01/08/2006 - 01/14/2006 0.96 * 3 01/15/2006 - 01/21/2006 0.93 * 4 01/22/2006 - 01/28/2006 0.92 * 5 01/29/2006 - 02/04/2006 0.91 * 6 02/05/2006 - 02/11/2006 0.90 * 7 02/12/2006 - 02/18/2006 0.89 * 8 02/19/2006 - 02/25/2006 0.88 * 9 02/26/2006 - 03/04/2006 0.87 *10 03/05/2006 - 03/11/2006 0.86 *11 03/12/2006 - 03/18/2006 0.85 *12 03/19/2006 - 03/25/2006 0.88 *13 03/26/2006 - 04/01/2006 0.90 *14 04/02/2006 - 04/08/2006 0.93 *15 04/09/2006 - 04/15/2006 0.96 16 04/16/2006 - 04/22/2006 0.97 17 04/23/2006 - 04/29/2006 0.98 18 04/30/2006 - 05/06/2006 1.00 19 05/07/2006 - 05/13/2006 1.01 20 05/14/2006 - 05/20/2006 1.02 21 05/21/2006 - 05/27/2006 1.04 22 05/28/2006 - 06/03/2006 1.05 23 06/04/2006 - 06/10/2006 1.07 24 06/11/2006 - 06/17/2006 1.08 25 06/18/2006 - 06/24/2006 1.10 26 06/25/2006 - 07/01/2006 1.11 27 07/02/2006 - 07/08/2006 1.13 28 07/09/2006 - 07/15/2006 1.14 29 07/16/2006 - 07/22/2006 1.14 30 07/23/2006 - 07/29/2006 1.13 31 07/30/2006 - 08/05/2006 1.13 32 08/06/2006 - 08/12/2006 1.13 33 08/13/2006 - 08/19/2006 1.12 34 08/20/2006 - 08/26/2006 1.11 35 08/27/2006 - 09/02/2006 1.11 36 09/03/2006 - 09/09/2006 1.10 37 09/10/2006 - 09/16/2006 1.09 38 09/17/2006 - 09/23/2006 1.08 39 09/24/2006 - 09/30/2006 1.06 40 10/01/2006 - 10/07/2006 1.05 41 10/08/2006 - 10/14/2006 1.04 42 10/15/2006 - 10/21/2006 1.02 43 10/22/2006 - 10/28/2006 1.02 44 10/29/2006 - 11/04/2006 1.01 45 11/05/2006 - 11/11/2006 1.00 46 11/12/2006 - 11/18/2006 0.99 47 11/19/2006 - 11/25/2006 0.99 48 11/26/2006 - 12/02/2006 0.99 49 12/03/2006 - 12/09/2006 0.99 50 12/10/2006 - 12/16/2006 0.99 51 12/17/2006 - 12/23/2006 0.97 52 12/24/2006 - 12/30/2006 0.95 53 12/31/2006 - 12/31/2006 0.93 * Peak Season Page 1 of 2 1.10 1.07 1.04 1.02 1.01 1.00 0.99 0.98 0.97 0.96 0.95 0.98 1.00 1.04 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.11 1.12 1.14 1.16 1.17 1.19 1.20 1.22 1.24 1.26 1.27 1.27 1.26 1.26 1.26 1.25 1.24 1.24 1.22 1.21 1.20 1.18 1.17 1.16 1.14 1.14 1.12 1.11 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.08 1.06 1.04 Page 1 Volume count Counted by: DHG Counter #: 8924 Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 Station ID: 271PARK-13AV SE 10th Ave. (Okeechobee) South of Park St. Start 31 -Jul- Time Tue 12:00 12:15 12:30 12 :45 01:00 01:15 01:30 01 :45 02:00 02 :15 02:30 02:45 03:00 03 :15 03:30 03 :45 04:00 04 :15 04:30 04:45 05:00 05:15 05 :30 05:45 06:00 06:15 06:30 06:45 07:00 07:15 07:30 07:45 08:00 08:15 08:30 08 :45 09:00 09:15 09:30 09 :45 10:00 10:15 10 :30 10:45 11 :00 11:15 11:30 11:45 Total Day Total % Total Southbound A.M. P.M. Northbound A.M. P.M. Combined A.M. P.M. 01 -Aug Southbound Wed A.M. P.M. 0 4 0 1 0 3 1 5 1 1 0 4 0 2 1 3 1 3 0 4 1 1 1 4 1 7 1 7 0 7 0 5 0 9 0 7 0 12 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 3 8 1 1 3 7 1 1 1 6 1 4 2 5 3 3 1 5 2 3 1 2 6 3 3 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 0 1 2 1 5 1 0 3 1 0 240 83 196 0 144 5 3 3 5 8 7 4 0 4 6 2 5 3 1 2 1 0 4 1 2 1 0 2 0 144 0 96 0.0% 60.0% 0.0% 40.0% 96 Peak 04:45 Vol. 33 P.H.F. 0.825 240 279 04:30 04:30 26 55 0.722 0.724 Northbound Combined A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. 0 6 0 10 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 6 0 4 1 9 0 3 1 4 0 1 0 5 0 2 0 4 0 1 1 4 0 4 1 7 1 2 1 6 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 5 0 4 1 11 0 5 1 12 1 4 1 11 0 2 0 7 1 5 1 14 1 8 1 15 1 2 1 14 1 3 2 5 3 1 4 12 2 3 3 8 3 4 5 3 3 r 6 3 6 4 9 11 3 2 4 3 2 1 3 7 7 1 8 5 8 4 10 9 1 3 4 6 2 4 3 9 1 3 3 6 5 4 6 6 0 0 6 3 2 3 5 4 1 2 3 3 4 1 6 3 1 1 3 3 1 2 2 1 7 3 2 5 0 1 K 1 1 5 3 8 4 96 134 179 330 230 509 16.3% 38.5% 18.9% 26.3% 10:45 05:00 10:30 05:45 10:45 05:30 30 36 22 22 50 52 0.833 0.750 0.688 0.786 0.833 0.813 Page 2 Volume count Counted by: DHG Counter #: 8924 Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 Station ID: 271PARK-13AV SE 10th Ave. (Okeechobee) South of Park St. Start 02 -Aug Southbound Time Thu A.M. P.M. 12:00 1 6 12 :15 0 0 12:30 3 7 12:45 0 3 01:00 0 3 01:15 0 3 01:30 1 7 01:45 1 3 02:00 2 2 02:15 0 6 02:30 1 4 02:45 0 2 03:00 0 3 03:15 0 5 03:30 0 4 03:45 0 04:00 0 04 :15 0 04:30 0 04 :45 0 05:00 0 05:15 1 4 05:30 1 8 05:45 0 6 06:00 0 8 06:15 0 0 06:30 0 0 06:45 1 0 07:00 1 * 07:15 0 * 07:30 2 * 07:45 1 08 :00 0 * 08 :15 3 08:30 4 * 08:45 2 * 09:00 2 * 09 :15 3 * 09:30 2 * 09:45 1 * 10:00 3 * 10 :15 2 10:30 10:45 11:00 11:15 11:30 11 :45 Total Day Total % Total Northbound A.M. P.M. Combined A.M. P.M. 9 2 12 8 7 5 11 8 3 8 8 3 4 5 6 4 8 14 10 16 9 03 -Aug Fri Southbound Northbound Combined A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 2 59 117 76 97 135 214 176 173 349 16.9% 33.5% 21.8% 27.8% Peak 10:30 04:00 07:30 05:15 10:30 05:15 Vol. 18 27 18 28 28 54 P.H.F. 0.563 0.675 0.643 0.500 0.636 0.614 ADT Not Calculated 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0 Page 1 Volume count Counted by: DHG Counter #: 8437 Kim ley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 Station ID: 271 PARK -10AV SE 10 Ave. (Okeechobee) South of Park St. Start Time 12:00 12 :15 12:30 12:45 01:00 01:15 01:30 01:45 02:00 02:15 02:30 02:45 03:00 03:15 03:30 03:45 04 :00 04:15 04:30 04:45 05:00 05:15 05:30 05:45 06:00 06:15 06:30 06:45 07:00 07:15 07:30 07:45 08:00 08:15 08:30 08:45 09:00 09:15 09:30 09 :45 10:00 10:15 10:30 10:45 11:00 11:15 11:30 11 :45 Total Day Total % Total Peak Vol. P.H.F. 31 -Jul- Tue Southbound A.M. P.M. Northbound A.M. P.M. Combined A.M. P.M. 01 -Aug Wed Southbound A.M. P.M. 2 38 1 31 2 31 0 41 0 1 28 1 0 29 0 0 33 0 0 30 0 0 30 0 0 51 0 0 32 1 0 37 0 0 43 1 0 42 0 0 32 0 3 44 1 2 3 0' 2 2 �` { 2 3 ° 1 5 42 6 8 28 7 6 25 9 9 28 9 10 26 12 9 22 16 3 19 7 9 22 20 16 7 18 19 12 16 17 12 17 15 9 21 25 12 31 12 16 25 29 14 24 23 6 28 29 17 23 27 8 28 36 9 32 35 5 34 31 4 41 28 2 32 29 6 47 1 45 0 693 0.0% 45.9% 34 48 31 28 28 23 27 20 13 20 12 21 14 10 9 6 5 15 14 2 9 6 2 6 1 1 2 4 3 3 693 42 * 46 * 80 47 95 44 * 75 36 * 64 38 * 66 25 48 34 * 61 19 * 39 25 * 38 22 * 42 16 * 28 13 * 34 16 * 30 12 * 22 11 * 20 8 14 8 * 13 8 * 23 10 * 24 8 * 10 6 * 15 6 * 12 1 * 3 3 * 9 6 * 7 2 * 3 0 * 2 2 * 6 1 * 4 2 * 5 0 818 818 0.0% 54.1% 0 1511 1511 Northbound A.M. P.M. 0 49 0 49 Combined A.M. P.M. 2 87 1 80 3 0 2 0 0 93 0 92 0 82 0 100 1 68 0 69 1 91 0 89 0 74 4 85 5 96 2 81 4 96 4 101 11 110 15 61 15 57 18 59 22 53 25 50 10 46 29 49 34 16 35 25 34 21 36 22 56 21 37 32 53 24 51 15 52 33 55 16 68 16 69 14 72 9 60 7 76 12 90 3 7 1 5 2 2579 60 62 52 49 36 32 48 47 42 41 52 43 50 55 68 33 32 31 27 28 27 27 9 13 9 13 9 16 10 9 16 8 7 9 5 5 6 2 4 0 656 1105 1761 774 1474 2248 16.4% 27.6% 19.3% 36.8% 1430 4009 03:30 03:15 03:30 10:45 04:00 11:00 00:30 11:00 00:30 174 218 387 167 174 213 280 378 409 0.967 0.865 0.913 0.888 0.946 0.729 0.824 0.788 0.812 Page 2 Volume count Counted by: DHG Counter #: 8437 Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 Station ID: 271PARK -10AV SE 10 Ave. (Okeechobee) South of Park St. Start Time 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 01:00 01 :15 01:30 01 :45 02:00 02:15 02:30 02:45 03:00 03 :15 03:30 03:45 04:00 04:15 04:30 04:45 05:00 05:15 05:30 05:45 06:00 06:15 06:30 06:45 07:00 07:15 07:30 07:45 08:00 08 :15 08:30 08:45 09:00 09:15 09:30 09:45 10:00 10 :15 10:30 10:45 11:00 11 :15 11:30 11:45 Total Day Total % Total 02 -Aug Thu Southbound A.M. P.M. 1 41 37 42 30 32 34 43 26 30 38 28 25 40 37 36 30 1 0 2 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 3 6 9 4 7 9 14 6 11 13 9 18 28 23 22 28 23 20 28 27 20 23 35 31 * 590 845 Northbound A.M. P.M. Combined A.M. P.M. 03 -Aug Fri Southbound A.M. 34 33 24 25 12 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 3 2 3 9 9 6 14 13 18 16 13 19 14 27 24 17 26 26 35 25 36 37 40 38 49 57 53 47 58 67 41 48 45 41 39 44 47 31 47 43 52 60 51 44 28 25 13 0 0 0 2 4 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 5 5 7 15 18 10 21 22 32 22 24 32 23 45 52 40 48 54 58 45 64 64 60 61 85 81 101 93 71 86 73 66 79 81 83 61 85 78 101 106 85 77 52 50 25 0 0 0 P.M. Northbound Combined A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. 845 1149 1435 1994 1435 1994 3429 17.2% 24.6% 24.6% 33.5% Peak 10:30 04:00 10:30 12:00 10:30 12:00 Vol. 157 168 255 225 412 375 P.H.F. 0.818 0.857 0.817 0.879 0.851 0.957 ADT Not Calculated 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2006 Annual Average Daily Traffic Report - Report Type: ALL County: 91 OKEECHOBEE Site AADT "K" "D" "T" Site Type Description Direction 1 Direction 2 Two -Way Fctr Fctr Fctr 0002 SR 15 /US 441 NORTH OF NW 13TH STREET, OKEECHOBEE N 10500 S 11000 21500 C 10.64F 58.36F 10.77A 0003 SR 70, E OF KISSIMMEE RIVER, E OF HIGHLANDS COUNTY E 2400 W 2400 4800 C 10.64F 58.36F 25.03A 0006 SR 70, EAST OF NE 64TH AVENUE, EAST OF OKEECHOBEE E 4500 W 4700 9200 C 10.64F 58.36F 17.10A 0007 SR 70 WEST OF SR 710, EAST OF OKEECHOBEE E 11500 W 12000 23500 C 10.64F 58.36F 15.54A 0008 SR 15/700/US 98/441, SE OF CR 15B /SE 126TH BLVD S 1500 N 1500 3000 C 10.64F 58.36F 26.72A 0009 SR 15 /US 441, NORTH OF SR 70 N 12000 S 12500 24500 C 10.64F 58.36F 7.26A 0012 SR 70 WEST OF SR 700 /US 98, OKEECHOBEE E 7000 W 6800 13800 C 10.64F 58.36F 12.43A 0014 SR 15 /US 441 N OF CR 15C /NE 304TH ST, FT DRUM N 2100 S 2100 4200 C 10.64F 58.36F 38.62A 0016 SR 15 /US 441, SOUTH OF CR 68 /NW 160TH STREET N 2900 S 3000 5900 C 10.64F 58.36F 28.31A 0019 SR 70, 700 /US 98 EAST OF SR 700 /US 98, OKEECHOBEE E 10000 W 9300 19300 C 10.64F 58.36F 11.59A 0023 SR 700 /US 98, SOUTHEAST OF CR 68 /NW 160TH ST S 1700 N 1700 3400 C 10.64F 58.36F 25.52A 0103 SR 15/700, US 98/441 SOUTH OF SR 70 N 13500 S 15000 28500 C 10.64F 58.36F 6.94A 0104 SR 710 SOUTHEAST OF SE 59TH BOULEVARD OKEECHOBEE S 4100 N 4000 8100 C 10.64F 58.36F 24.26A 0105 SR 15, 700 /US 98, 441 WEST OF TAYLOR CREEK BRIDGE E 5800 W 5800 11600 C 10.64F 58.36F 12.28A 0106 SR 15 /700 /US 98/441, EAST OF SE 38TH AVENUE E 4500 W 4400 8900 C 10.64F 58.36F 11.22A 0111 SR 700 /US 98 NE OF KISSIMMEE RVR BR & HIGHLANDS CO E 1300 W 1400 2700 C 10.64F 58.36F 29.77A 0112 SR 700 /US 98 NORTH OF SR 70 /US 98 OKEECHOBEE S 5600 N 5600 11200 C 10.64F 58.36F 14.22A 0114 SR 78 NE OF KISSIMMEE RIVER BR, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY N 2700 S 2700 5400 C 10.25F 53.90F 16.04A 0123 SR 15/700, US 98/441, N OF WOLFF RD, OKEECHOBEE N 12500 S 12500 25000 C 10.64F 58.36F 7.61A ..,,40,0207 SR 710, S OF CENTER STREET & NE 34TH AVENUE S 6400 N 6300 12700 C 10.64F 58.36F 16.27A 0208 SR 710, SOUTH OF SE 40TH STREET S 4400 N 4300 8700 C 10.64F 58.36F 23.26A 0211 SR 15 /US 441, 800' S OF CR718 /NW 36TH STREET N 6600 5 6900 13500 C 10.64F 58.36F 15.36A 0212 SR 15/US441, 1000' NORTH OF CR718 /NW 36TH STREET N 4800 S 4900 9700 C 10.64F 58.36F 18.76A Site Type : P= Portable; T= Telemetered AADT Flags : C= Computed; E= Manual Est; F= First Yr Est P= Prior Year; S= Second Yr Est; T= Third Yr Est; X= Unknown "K /D" Flags : A= Actual; F= Volume Fctr Catg; D= Dist /Func. Class; P= Prior Year; S= State -wide Default; W= One -Way Road "T" Flags : A= Actual; F= Axle Fctr Catg; D= Dist /Func. Class; P= Prior Year; S= State -wide Default; X= Cross - Reference 30- Apr -2007 16:59:16 Page 1 of 2 622UPD [1,0,0,2] 1_91_CAADT.txt FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2006 Annual Average Daily Traffic Report - Report Type: ALL County: 91 OKEECHOBEE Site AADT "K" "D" "T" Site Type Description Direction 1 Direction 2 Two -Way Fctr Fctr Fctr 0213 SR 70, WEST OF CR 70A /SW 48TH AVENUE E 4100 W 4300 8400 C 10.64F 58.36F 15.31A 0214 SR 700 /US 98, 700' NW OF CR 718 /NW 36TH STREET S 2500 N 2600 5100 C 10.64F 58.36F 19.45A 0215 SR 15/700, US 98/441 SOUTH OF WOLFF ROAD N 8900 S 10000 18900 C 10.64F 58.36F 8.07A 0216 SR 15/700, US 98/441 500' NORTHEAST OF SR 78 E 4300 W 3700 8000 C 10.64F 58.36F 13.62A 0217 SR 15 /700 /US 98/441, SE OF CR 15A /SE 86TH BLVD E 1800 W 1800 3600 C 10.64F 58.36F 24.O1A 0218 SR 78, 0.3 MI SW OF SR 15 /700 /US 98/441 N 3200 S 3300 6500 C 10.25F 53.90F 16.31A 5012 SR 70, EAST OF SR 15 /700 /US 98/441 E 18000 W 17000 35000 C 10.64F 58.36F 7.46A Site Type : P= Portable; T= Telemetered AADT Flags : C= Computed; E= Manual Est; F= First Yr Est P= Prior Year; S= Second Yr Est; T= Third Yr Est; X= Unknown "K /D" Flags : A= Actual; F= Volume Fctr Catg; D= Dist /Func. Class; P= Prior Year; S= State -wide Default; W= One -Way Road "T" Flags : A= Actual; F= Axle Fctr Catg; D= Dist /Func. Class; P= Prior Year; S= State -wide Default; X= Cross - Reference 30- Apr -2007 16:59:16 Page 2 of 2 622UPD [1,0,0,2] 1_91_CAADT.txt Florida Department of Transportation Transportation Statistics Office 2006 Historical AADT Report County: 91 - OKEECHOBEE Site: 0007 - SR 70 WEST OF SR 710, EAST OF OKEECHOBEE Year AADT Direction 1 Direction 2 K Factor D Factor T Factor 2006 23500 0 E 11500 w 12000 10.64 58.36 15.50 2005 25000 C E 12500 W 12500 10.80 59.30 18.90 2004 23000 C E 11500 W 11500 10.80 61.40 18.90 2003 22000 C E 11000 W 11000 10.10 59.90 15.30 2002 21500 C E 11000 W 10500 10.30 56.20 14.10 2001 21000 C E 10500 W 10500 10.80 57.80 15.20 2000 19400 C E 9900 W 9500 10.60 58.50 16.70 1999 19100 C E 9200 W 9900 11.20 59.00 12.40 1998 18700 C E 9300 W 9400 10.90 58.10 14.50 1997 19600 C E 9600 W 10000 11.30 60.40 11.00 1996 17000 F E 8500 W 8500 9.90 55.50 14.40 1995 16800 C E 8400 W 8400 10.90 54.00 13.40 1994 17500 C E 8600 W 8900 10.10 56.90 13.60 1993 16900 C E 8400 W 8500 9.80 54.80 12.30 1992 17500 C E W 0.00 0.00 11.90 AADT Flags: C = Computed; E = Manual Estimate; F = First Year Estimate S = Second Year Estimate; T = Third Year Estimate; X = Unknown Florida Department of Transportation Transportation Statistics Office 2006 Historical AADT Report County: 91 - OKEECHOBEE Site: 0009 - SR 15 /US 441, NORTH OF SR 70 Year AADT Direction 1 Direction 2 K Factor D Factor T Factor 2006 24500 C N 12000 S 12500 10.64 58.36 7.30 2005 25000 C N 12000 S 13000 10.80 59.30 10.60 2004 25500 C N 12500 S 13000 10.80 61.40 10.60 2003 23500 C N 11500 S 12000 10.10 59.90 10!40 2002 27000 C N 14000 S 13000 10.30 56.20 6.90 2001 22500 C N 11500 S 11000 10.80 57.80 7.70 2000 24000 C N 12000 S 12000 10.60 58.50 9.60 1999 22500 C N 11000 S 11500 11.20 59.00 9.50 1998 22000 C N 10500 S 11500 10.90 58.10 10.90 1997 22000 C N 11000 S 11000 11.30 60.40 7.50 1996 21500 C N 10500 S 11000 9.90 55.50 7.00 1995 22500 C N 10500 S 12000 10.90 54.00 10.00 1994 21500 C N 11000 S 10500 10.10 56.90 8.50 1993 17900 C N 8700 S 9200 0.00 0.00 0.00 AADT Flags: C = Computed; E = Manual Estimate; F = First Year Estimate S = Second Year Estimate; T = Third Year Estimate; X = Unknown Florida Department of Transportation Transportation Statistics Office 2006 Historical AADT Report County: 91 - OKEECHOBEE Site: 0103 - SR 15/700, US 98/441 SOUTH OF SR 70 Year AADT Direction 1 Direction 2 2006 28500 C N 13500 S 15000 2005 28000 C N 14000 S 14000 2004 30000 C N 14500 S 15500 2003 27500 C N 13000 S 14500 2002 30500 C N 14500 S 16000 2001 30000 C N 14500 S 15500 2000 28500 F N 13000 S 15500 1999 28000 C N 13000 S 15000 1998 29500 C N 14500 S 15000 1997 28500 C N 14000 S 14500 K Factor 10.64 10.80 10.80 10.10 10.30 10.80 10.60 11.20 10.90 11.30 D Factor T Factor 58.36 59.30 61.40 59.90 56.20 57.80 58.50 59.00 58.10 60.40 6.90 8.40 8.40 7.90 5.90 7.50 18.10 6.50 6.80 6.60 AADT Flags: C = Computed; E = Manual Estimate; F = First Year Estimate S = Second Year Estimate; T = Third Year Estimate; X - Unknown Florida Department of Transportation Transportation Statistics Office 2006 Historical AADT Report County: 91 - OKEECHOBEE Site: 0207 - SR 710, S OF CENTER STREET & NE 34TH AVENUE Year AADT Direction 1 Direction 2 K Factor D Factor T Factor 2006 12700 C S 6400 N 6300 10.64 58.36 16.30 2005 12400 C S 6300 N 6100 10.80 59.30 16.50 2004 11600 C S 5700 N 5900 10.80 61.40 16.50 2003 11500 C S 5700 N 5800 10.10 59.90 16.50 2002 10400 C S 5300 N 5100 10.30 56.20 13.50 2001 10500 C S 5300 N 5200 10.80 57.80 13.40 2000 9200 C S 4700 N 4500 10.60 58.50 15.90 1999 10000 C S 5000 N 5000 11.20 59.00 15.40 1998 9800 C S 4900 N 4900 10.90 58.10 15.60 1997 9800 C S 4900 N 4900 11.30 60.40 13.60 AADT Flags: C = Computed; E = Manual Estimate; F = First Year Estimate S = Second Year Estimate; T = Third Year Estimate; X = Unknown Florida Department of Transportation Transportation Statistics Office 2006 Historical AADT Report County: 91 - OKEECHOBEE Site: 5012 - SR 70, EAST OF SR 15/700/US 98/441 Year AADT Direction 1 Direction 2 K Factor D Factor T Factor 2006 35000 C E 18000 W 17000 10.64 58.36 7.50 2005 35000 C E 18000 W 17000 10.80 59.30 8.40 2004 34000 C E 16000 W 18000 10.80 61.40 18.90 2003 30000 C E 14500 W 15500 10.10 59.90 15.30 2002 32500 C E 16000 W 16500 10.30 56.20 14.10 2001 29000 C E 14500 W 14500 10.80 57.80 15.20 2000 30500 C E 15500 W 15000 10.60 58.50 16.70 1999 30500 C E 14500 W 16000 11.20 59.00 12.40 1998 26500 C E 13000 W 13500 10.90 58.10 14.50 1997 29500 C E 15000 W 14500 11.30 60.40 11.00 1996 29000 C E 13000 W 16000 9.90 55.50 12.60 1995 27000 C E W 10.90 54.00 13.40 1994 25500 C E W 10.10 56.90 13.60 1993 27000 C E W 0.00 0.00 0.00 AADT Flags: C = Computed; E = Manual Estimate; F = First Year Estimate S = Second Year Estimate; T = Third Year Estimate; X = Unknown Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS HAMPTON INN OKEECHOBEE SITE OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA Prepared for: Kite Properties, LLC 3055 Cardinal Drive, Suite 300 Vero Beach, FL 32963 047833002 August 2007 Kimley-Hom and Associates, lnc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 561/845 -0665 TEL 561/882 -3703 FAX ona!dson, P.E. gistration Number 05 VI Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 4 PROJECT TRAFFIC 5 Project Trip Generation 5 Traffic Distribution 5 Traffic Assignment 9 ROADWAY LINK ANALYSES DRIVEWAY ANALYSES CONCLUSION APPENDICES Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix 047833002 - 807 15 18 Following Page 18 A — Site Plan B — FDOT Count Data C — Turning Movement Counts D — Growth Rates and Peak Hour Factors E — FDOT Generalized LOS Tables F — FDOT Signal Data G — 2008 Operational Analysis Worksheets 2008 With Project Operational Analysis Worksheets 2008 Total Traffic Operational Analysis Worksheets H — Okeechobee Commons Data Page i ❑ 111111111 Kimley -Horn all and Associates, Inc. LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. Title Page 1 Site Location Map 2 2 Traffic Assignment 8 3 Driveway Volumes 16 4 Shared Access Driveway Volumes 17 LIST OF TABLES Table No. Title Page 1 Trip Generation 7 2 Study Area Significance 10 3A 2006 ADT Link Analysis 11 3B 2006 Peak Hour Analysis 12 4A 2008 ADT Link Analysis 13 4B 2008 Peak Hour Analysis 14 047833002 - 807 Page ii r7 IN rig Kimley -Horn I■1 MN and Associates, Inc. INTRODUCTION This is a traffic impact analysis for the proposed Hampton Inn site proposed to be located on the south side of SR 70, just west of SE 13th Avenue in the City of Okeechobee, Florida. A location map is presented in Figure 1. The site is envisioned for a mixed use of hotel, retail commercial, bank with drive thru and a restaurant. Access for the site will be from a right in/right out joint driveway (with the post office) access on SR 70 at the northern portion of the site and two full access points to S.E. 13th Avenue on the eastern boundary of the site. SR 70 is on the Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIHS) and is maintained by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). The City of Okeechobee maintains SE 10th Avenue and SE 13th Avenue. This traffic impact analysis is prepared in accordance with typical District 1 standards and based on a pre - application and methodology meeting held with the City of Okeechobee's planning and traffic consultants on July 30, 2007. 047833002 - 807 Page 1 441 4th St. PARK ST. L 441 98 I NOT TO SCALE 0 P:\ 0478 \33002 \DADD \NAMPTON.dwg FlO -1 Aug 13, 2007 2:00pm by john.donaldson 0 SITE 1i 2nd ST. 4th ST. 5th ST. L 7th ST. FIGURE 1 HAMPTON INN SITE LOCATION MAP � _� Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc, 047833002 Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. EXISTING CONDITIONS SR 70 is a four -lane arterial on the Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIRS). Turn lanes and median openings exist to serve existing adjacent land uses. Roadway link volume counts were obtained from the FDOT for the most current year (2006). In addition, traffic turning movements counts performed by KHA from July 31, 2007 to August 8, 2007. To account for seasonal variation in traffic volumes, the existing 2007 volumes were adjusted to peak season using factors published by FDOT, which are located in the appendix to this report. 047833002 -0807 Page 3 ❑ MI , Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. BACKGROUND TRAFFIC Background traffic is the traffic expected in the buildout year (2008) prior to the addition of project traffic. Background traffic includes overall growth of traffic in the area and vehicle trips vested by approved developments in the vicinity of the project. A typical annual background growth rate of 2.92 percent was assumed to represent overall traffic growth in the area. This annual growth rate was applied to estimate background growth in 2008. There are no significant developments with a buildout prior to 2008. 047833002 - 807 Page 4 Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. PROJECT TRAFFIC In order to quantify the relative impacts associated with project traffic, a traditional trip generation, distribution and assignment procedure was followed. Project Trip Generation Trip generation is the calculation of how much traffic is expected to and from the project site upon project buildout. Project trip generation was determined using the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip Generation, Seventh Edition. Trip generation was calculated for the proposed Hampton Inn Okeechobee Site development in accordance with ITE using the appropriate ITE land use codes. Table 1 summarizes the expected project trip generation. Traffic Distribution Traffic distribution is the process by which traffic is allocated to various roadways in the area. Based upon a review of the existing shopping and employment opportunities in the area and considering the arterial network and its travel time characteristics, the following cardinal distribution of traffic was developed: North: 20 percent South 25 percent East: 30 percent West: 25 percent These percentages are illustrated in Figure 2. They were used to assign project traffic to project driveways and intersections near the site. 047833002 -0807 Page 5 ®— V Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Assignment The amount of traffic generated by the project was assigned to the roadway system and the project driveways. The result of this traffic assignment is a set of project turning movement volumes at project driveways and project volumes on roadway links in the study area. 047833002 -0807 Page 6 TABLE 1 HAMPTON INN OKEECHOBEE TRIP GENERATION Land Use Intensity Daily Trips AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Proposed Site Traffic Hotel 71 RM 633 48 28 20 50 25 25 Commercial Retail 10,000 S.F. 1,546 10 6 4 137 66 71 Drive -in Bank 3,393 S.F. 900 42 24 18 155 78 77 High Turnover Sit -Down Rest. 5,786 S.F. 754 67 35 32 63 38 25 Sub Total 3,833 167 93 74 405 207 198 Internal Capture Daily AM PM Hotel 07.00% 10.00% 05.00% 44 5 3 2 3 1 2 Commercial Retail 10.00% 00.00% 10.00% 155 0 0 0 14 7 7 Drive -in Bank 05.00% 05.00% 05.00% 45 2 1 1 8 4 4 High Turnover Sit -Down Rest. 07.00% 07.00% 07.00% 53 5 2 3 4 3 1 TOTAL INTERNAL CAPTURE 07.75% 07.19% 07.16% 297 12 6 6 29 15 14 Pass -By Commercial Retail 34.00% 473 3 2 1 42 20 22 Drive -in Bank 47.00% 402 19 11 8 69 35 34 High Turnover Sit -Down Rest. 43.00% 301 27 14 13 25 15 10 TOTAL PASS -BY 1,176 49 27 22 136 70 66 DRIVEWAY VOLUMES 3,536 155 87 68 376 192 184 NET NEW EXTERNAL 2,360 106 60 46 240 122 118 Note: Trip generation was calculated using the following data: Daily Traffic Generation Hotel [ITE 310] = T = 8.92 trips/Rooms Commercial Retail [11 E 820] = T =e0 64 • Ln(X) + 5.87 Drive -in Bank [ITE 912] = T = 265.21 trips /1,000 S.F. High Turnover Sit -Down Rest. [1'I"h 932] = T = 130.34 trips /1,000 S.F. AM Peak Hour Traffic Generation Hotel [ITE 310] = T = 0.67 trips per Room; (58% in, 42% out) Commercial Retail [ITE 820] = T = 1.03 trips /1000 SF; (61% in, 39% out) Drive -in Bank [111. 912] = T = 12.34 trips /1000 SF; (56% in, 44% out) High Turnover Sit -Down Rest. [ITE 932] = T = 11.52 trips/1 000 SF; (52% in, 48% out) PM Peak Hour Traffic Generation Hotel [1'1E 310] = T = 0.70 trips per Room; (49% in, 51% out) Commercial Retail [HE 820] = T =e .66 • Ln(X) + 3 40; (48% in, 52% out) Drive -in Bank [ITE 912] = T = 45.74 trips /1000 SF; (50% in, 50% out) High Turnover Sit -Down Rest. [ITE 932] = T = 10.92 trips /1000 SF; (61% in, 39% out) p :10478133002augustl[081007 concurrency.xlsJproposed 8/13/2007 14:28 441 4th St. N 25% 65% PARK ST. 70% 30% t 2 n 441 98 NOT TO SCALE t3 0 SITE 2nd ST. 4th ST. 5th ST. L 7th ST. FIGURE 2 HAMPTON INN SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT pniming Kimley -Hom and Associates, Inc. O 047833002 5°I° 710 15% P: \0478 \33002 \CADD \NAMPTON.dwg FlG -2 Aug 13, 2007 2:09pm by john.00noldson � Kimley -Horn e and Associates, Inc. ROADWAY LINK ANALYSES The study area is composed of all roadways within one -mile or which the project will significantly impact. Significantly impacted links are defined as those links on which the project will add five percent or more of the generalized level of service C volume. No FIHS links were found to be significantly impacted by the Hampton Inn Okeechobee Site. The only local street to be significantly impacted by the proposed project is SE 13th Avenue. Table 2 reports the project impact on roadways in the vicinity of the project. Typically, a link capacity analysis is undertaken for links that have been significantly impacted. However, for this study all links were still evaluated for link capacity for completeness. Total traffic is defined as the sum of existing traffic, historic growth, and Hampton Inn Okeechobee Site project traffic. Projected 2008 total traffic conditions are shown in Table 3 for peak season peak hour conditions. The level of service capacity for each roadway link is defined by the capacities published in the Florida Depaituient of Transportation's 2002 Quality/Level of Service Handbook. In accordance with the Okeechobee County standards, roadways were evaluated using the criteria of Level of Service C for peak hour conditions. As can be seen in Table 3, the significantly impacted roadway in the study area, (SE 13th Avenue) will operate within the level of service thresholds. There are links on SR 710, SR 70 and US 441 that will operate below Level of Service C in 2008; however, these links are not significantly impacted by the proposed project. In addition, a SYNCHRO arterial analysis was conducted for SR 70 at the request of the City's consultant. This analysis indicates that the arterial will operate at LOC "C" at the project's buildout in 2008 in both the AM and PM peak hours. 047833002 -0807 Page 9 TABLE 2 HAMPTON INN OKEECHOBEE STUDY AREA - 5% SIGNIFICANT LINKS Roadway Existing Committed Project Traffic 5% From To Number LOS 'C' Number LOS 'C' Percent Net Project FIRS Significant Of Lanes Capacity Of Lanes Capacity Assignment Proposed Impact Roadway? Impact ? SR 710 SR 70 Martin County Line 2L 13,100 2L 13,100 15% 354 2.70% Yes No SR 70 St. Lucie County Line SR 710 2L 13,100 4L 13,100 "' 15% 354 2.70% Yes No SR 710 CSX Crossing 4L 32,800 4L 32,800 30% 708 2.16% Yes No CSX Crossing NE 18th Avenue 4L 32,800 4L 32,800 30% 708 2.16% Yes No NE 18th Avenue Site 4L 32,800 4L 32,800 30% 708 2.16% Yes No Site Parrot (US 441) 4L 32,800 4L 32,800 65% 1534 4.68% Yes No SE 10th Avenue SR 70 South 2L 9,400 2L 9,400 12% 283 3.01% No No SE 13th Avenue SR 70 South 2L 9,400 2L 9,400 35% 826 8.79% Yes Yes US441 /SR7 SR 70 CSX Crossing SR 4L 32,800 4L 32,800 20% 472 1.44% Yes No 70 SR 78 4L 24,400 4L 24,400 25% 590 2.42% Yes No Note: LOS based on FDOT Generalized Level of Service Tables (Local Roads are LOS D) Note: 2006 Volumes from FDOT ❑ _� Kimley -Horn e and Associates, Inc. TABLE 3A HAMPTON INN OKEECHOBEE 2006 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC LINK ANALYSIS Roadway Existing Committed 2006 Project Traffic From To Number LOS 'C' Number LOS 'C' AADT Percent Net Project Total Traffic v/c FIRS Significant Of Lanes Capacity Of Lanes Capacity Volumes' Assignment Proposed Impact Roadway? Impact ? SR 710 SR 70 Martin County Line 2L 13,100 2L 13,100 12,700 15% 354 2.70% 13054 1.00 Yes No SR 70 St. Lucie County Line SR 710 2L 13,100 4L 13,100 " 9,200 15% 354 2.70% 9554 0.73 Yes No SR 710 CSX Crossing 4L 32,800 4L 32,800 23,500 30% 708 2.16% 24208 0.74 Yes No CSX Crossing NE 18th Avenue 4L 32,800 4L 32,800 23,500 30% 708 2.16% 24208 0.74 Yes No NE 18th Avenue Site 4L 32,800 4L 32,800 35,000 30% 708 2.16% 35708 1.09 Yes No Site Parrot (US 441) 4L 32,800 4L 32,800 35,000 65% 1534 4.68% 36534 1.11 Yes No SE 10th Avenue SR 70 South 2L 9,400 2L 9,400 4,530 12% 283 3.01% 4813 0.51 No No SE 13th Avenue SR 70 South 2L 9,400 2L 9,400 575 35% 826 8.79% 1401 0.15 No Yes US 441 / SR 7 SR 70 CSX Crossing 4L 32,800 4L 32,800 24,500 20% 472 1.44% 24972 0.76 Yes No SR 70 SR 78 4L 24,400 4L 24,400 28,500 25% 590 2.42% 29090 1.19 Yes No Notes: (1) This link is designated as a CRALLS facility; therefore, the designated level of service standards are used (2) Average daily traffic volumes were obtained by applying the FDOT seasonal adjustment factors to the daily peak season counts. pr-i_/ 1 Kimley -Horn ® /__, and Associates, Inc. Notes: (1) Per FDOT K = 10.64, D = 58.36 ❑�^ Kimley-Horn I 1 and Associates, Inc. TABLE 313 HAMPTON INN OKEECHOBEE 2006 PEAK HOUR TWO WAY DIRECTION LINK ANALYSIS Roadway Existing Committed 2006 Project Traffic From To Number LOS 'C' a Number LOS 'C' Two Way Percent Net Project Total Traffic v/c FIRS Significant Of Lanes Capacity Of Lanes Capacity Peak Hour Assignment Proposed Impact Roadway? Impact ? SR 710 SR 70 Martin County Line 2L 1,260 2L 1,260 1,351 15% 36 2.86% 1387 1.10 Yes No SR 70 St. Lucie County Line SR 710 2L 1,260 4L 1,260 "' 979 15% 36 2.86% 1015 0.81 Yes No SR 710 CSX Crossing 4L 3,150 4L 3,150 2,500 30% 72 2.29% 2572 0.82 Yes No CSX Crossing NE 18th Avenue 4L 3,150 4L 3,150 2,500 30% 72 2.29% 2572 0.82 Yes No NE 18th Avenue Site 4L 3,150 4L 3,150 3,724 30% 72 2.29% 3796 1.21 Yes No Site Parrot (US 441) 4L 3,150 4L 3,150 3,724 65% 156 4.95% 3880 1.23 Yes No SE 10th Avenue SR 70 South 2L 900 2L 900 482 12% 29 3.22% 511 0.57 No No SE 13th Avenue SR 70 South 2L 900 2L 900 61 35% 84 9.33% 145 0.16 No Yes US 441 / SR 7 SR 70 CSX Crossing 4L 3,150 4L 3,150 2,607 20% 48 1.52% 2655 0.84 Yes No SR 70 SR 78 4L 2,340 4L 2,340 3,032 25% 60 2.56% 3092 1.32 Yes No Notes: (1) Per FDOT K = 10.64, D = 58.36 ❑�^ Kimley-Horn I 1 and Associates, Inc. Notes.. 1 AIiLL 9A HAMPTON INN OKEECHOBEE BUILDOUT (2008) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC LINK ANALYSIS Roadway From To Existing Committed 2006 AADT Volumes" t Protect Traffic 2008 Total Traffic WithvPro ect With No Pro ect 1 Roadway? Impact ot- Number Of Lanes LOS 'C' Capacity Number Of Lanes LOS 'C' Capacity Percent Assignment Net Proposed Growth Background Rate Traffic 2L 4L 4L 4L 4L 4L 2L 2L 4L 4L 13,100 13,100 1" 32,800 32,800 32,800 32,800 9,400 9,400 32,800 24,400 12, 9,200 23,500 23,500 35,000 35,000 4,530 575 24,500 28,500 IS% 15% 30% 30% 30% 65% 12% 35% 20% 25% 354 354 708 708 708 1534 283 826 472 590 2.92 % 2.92% 2.92% 2.92% 2.92% 2.92% 2.92% 2.92% 2.92% 2.92% 13,453 9,745 24,892 24,892 37,074 37,074 4,798 609 25,952 30,189 13807 10099 25600 25600 37782 38608 5081 1435 26424 30779 1.05 0.77 0.78 0.78 1.15 1.18 0.54 0.15 0.81 1.26 1.03 0.74 0.76 0.76 1.13 1.13 0.51 0.06 0.79 1.24 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No SR 710 SR 70 SR 70 St. Lucie County Line SR 710 CSX Crossing NE 18th Avenue Site SE 10th Avenue SR 70 SE 13th Avenue SR 70 US 441 / SR 7 SR 70 SR 70 Martin County Line SR 710 CSX Crossing NE 18th Avenue Site Parrot (US 441) South South CSX Crossing SR 78 2L 2L 4L 4L 4L 4L 2L 2L 4L 4L 13,100 13,100 32,800 32,800 32,800 32,800 9,400 9,400 32,800 24,400 n• Notes.. TABLE 4B HAMPTON INN OKEECHOBEE BUILDOUT (2008) PEAK HOUR TWO WAY TRAFFIC LINK ANALYSIS Roadway Existing Committed 2006 Project Traffic 2008 From To Number LOS 'C' Number LOS 'C' Two Way Percent Net Growth Background Total Traffic v/c v/c FIRS Significant Of Lanes Capacity Of Lanes Capacity Peak Hour Assignment Proposed Rate Traffic With Project No Project Roadway? Impact 7 SR 710 SR 70 Martin County Line 2L 1,260 2L 1,260 1,351 15% 36 2.92% 1,431 1467 1.16 1.14 Yes No SR 70 St. Lucie County Line SR 710 2L 1,260 4L 1,260 t't 979 15% 36 2.92% 1,037 1073 0.85 0.82 Yes No SR 710 CSX Crossing 4L 3,150 41. 3,150 2,500 30% 72 2.92% 2,648 2720 0.86 0.84 Yes No CSX Crossing NE 18th Avenue 4L 3,150 4L 3,150 2,500 30% 72 2.92% 2,648 2720 0.86 0.84 Yes No NE 18th Avenue Site 4L 3,150 4L 3,150 3,724 30% 72 2.92% 3,945 4017 1.28 1.25 Yes No Site Parrot (US 441) 4L 3,150 4L 3,150 3,724 65% 156 2.92% 3,945 4101 1.30 1.25 Yes No SE 10th Avenue SR 70 South 21. 900 2L 900 482 12% 29 2.92% 511 540 0.60 0.57 No No SE 13th Avenue SR 70 South 2L 900 2L 900 61 35% 84 192% 65 149 0.17 0.07 No Yes US 441 / SR 7 SR 70 CSX Crossing 4L 3,150 4L 3,150 2,607 20% 48 2.92% 2,761 2809 0.89 0.88 Yes No SR 70 SR 78 4L 2,340 4L 2,340 3,032 25% 60 2.92% 3,212 3272 1.40 1.37 Yes No Nn,or '-11111 � Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. DRIVEWAY ANALYSES Access to the site is proposed at one right in/right out only driveway on SR 70 that is proposed to be a joint use driveway with the post office facility to the west. In addition, two full access driveways are proposed for site access along SE 13th Avenue. Project traffic was assigned to these driveways based on the project distribution. The proposed AM and PM peak hour driveway turning movement volumes are illustrated in Figure 3. Given the nature of the joint use driveway shared with the post office, it is recommended that an east bound right turn lane be provided at the joint driveway. The shared access volumes are shown in Figure 4. 047833002 -0807 Page 15 70 PARK ST --- 43 (111) f-- 9 (19) 19 (38) 70 NOT TO SCALE Post Office (10) 4 -► (106) 48 7,, N 'L- 20 (55) f 14 (37) (10) 4 —► 1970 SITE 1070 500 (18) 7 - (37) 14 -► (10)47,. o rn • (74) 27 . 0 L--- - -- '4J (18) 7 S LEGEND 7 AM PEAK HOUR VOLUME (18) PM PEAK HOUR VOLUME DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME 500 'v FIGURE 3 HAMPTON INN DRIVEWAY VOLUMES ❑ V711=1,1 Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc, 047833002 P. \0478 \33002 \ CAN \HAMPTON.dwg FIC -3 Aug 13, 2007 2:09pm by john.donoldaon 70 PARK ST. ,,c (52) NOT TO SCALE Post Office (108) 49 -,. t 20 (55) AI-- 14 (37) SITE — — (27) 8 -Z. 0 (18) 7 •±"r LEGEND 7 AM PEAK HOUR VOLUME (18) PM PEAK HOUR VOLUME r► CD N CO CO LO FIGURE 4 HAMPTON INN SHARED DRIVEWAY TOTAL VOLUMES ❑� Kimley -Horn 0 and Associates, Inc. 047833002 P' \0475 \33002 \CA00 \ HAMPTON . dwg FIG -4 Aug 13, 2007 4: 56pr, by dovo. grilfin ill Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. CONCLUSION The proposed Hampton Inn Okeechobee Site development meets the capacity constraints set by FDOT for FIRS Roadways and with the City of Okeechobee for the local streets. No adverse impacts to levels of service are expected on any links within the study area. It is recommended that an east bound right -turn lane be constructed at the shared joint use driveway on SR 70. 047833002 -0807 Page 18 I1Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. APPENDIX ®� rl Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. APPENDIX A Site Plan State Road 10 Entrance Proposed Bank 3 ,393 sf East Exit >n Area Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. March 14, 2007 Job Number: 047833002 3 9 7 SC. -E AS MOTEL) CROSS ACCESS & MAINTENANCE EASEMENTS DESIGNED BY 017AMM BY 04E5570 BY ❑_o IGnnley -Ham and Associates, Inc. © 2007 14141-7-70514 5710 A SOPANEi 114C e T 2157 5755E7. 9t ET. h 300 0 00E R 32960 PHONE: 272- 552 -7961 7 2020 7. AY 772- 362 -9619 N1551.15 5- 71 09 04.501 G 00000656 DATE 07 -25 -07 PROJECT ND. 047833002 OKEECHOBEE SR 70 HOLDINGS, LLC DE900 DARREN FLORIDA PE 115E714 MW4B. DATE SHEET NUMBER EXH -3 ❑ all in Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. APPENDIX B FDOT Count Data FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2006 Annual Average Daily Traffic Report - Report Type: ALL County: 91 OKEECHOBEE Site Site Type AADT "K" ype Description "D" "T" Direction 1 Direction 2 Two -Way Fctr Fctr Fctr 0002 SR 15 /US 441 NORTH OF NW 13TH STREET, OKEECHOBEE N 10500 S 11000 21500 C 10.64F 58.36F 10.77A 0003 SR 70, E OF KISSIMMEE RIVER, E OF HIGHLANDS COUNTY E 2400 W 2400 4800 C 10.64F 58.36F 25.03A 0006 SR 70, EAST OF NE 64TH AVENUE, EAST OF OKEECHOBEE E 4500 W 4700 9200 C 10.64F 58.36F 17.10A 0007 SR 70 WEST OF SR 710, EAST OF OKEECHOBEE E 11500 W 12000 23500 C 10.64F 58.36F 15.54A 0008 SR 15 /700 /US 98/441, SE OF CR 15B /SE 126TH BLVD S 1500 N 1500 3000 C 10.64F 58.36F 26.72A .100009 SR 15 /US 441, NORTH OF SR 70 N 12000 S 12500 24500 C 10.64F 58.36F 7.26A 0012 SR 70 WEST OF SR 700 /US 98, OKEECHOBEE E 7000 W 6800 13800 C 10.64F 58.36F 12.43A 0014 SR 15 /US 441 N OF CR 15C /NE 304TH ST, FT DRUM N 2100 S 2100 4200 C 10.64F 58.36F 38.62A 0016 SR 15 /US 441, SOUTH OF CR 68 /NW 160TH STREET N 2900 , S 3000 5900 C 10.64F 58.36F 28.31A 0019 SR 70, 700 /US 98 EAST OF SR 700 /US 98, OKEECHOBEE E 10000 W 9300 19300 C 10.64F 58.36F 11.59A 0023 SR 700 /US 98, SOUTHEAST OF CR 68 /NW 160TH ST S 1700 N 1700 3400 C 10.64F 58.36F 25.52A 0103 SR 15/700, US 98/441 SOUTH OF SR 70 N 13500 S 15000 28500 C 10.64F 58.36F 6.94A 0104 SR 710 SOUTHEAST OF SE 59TH BOULEVARD OKEECHOBEE S 4100 N 4000 8100 C 10.64F 58.36F 24.26A 0105 SR 15, 700 /US 98, 441 WEST OF TAYLOR CREEK BRIDGE E 5800 W 5800 11600 C 10.64F 58.36F 12.28A 0106 SR 15 /700 /US 98/441, EAST OF SE 38TH AVENUE E 4500 W 4400 8900 C 10.64F 58.36F 11.22A 0111 SR 700 /US 98 NE OF KISSIMMEE RVR BR & HIGHLANDS CO E 1300 W 1400 2700 C 10.64F 58.36F 29.77A 0112 SR 700 /US 98 NORTH OF SR 70 /US 98 OKEECHOBEE S 5600 N 5600 11200 C 10.64F 58.36F 14.22A 0114 SR 78 NE OF KISSIMMEE RIVER BR, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY N 2700 S 2700 5400 C 10.25F 53.90F 16.04A 0123 SR 15/700, US 98/441, N OF WOLFF RD, OKEECHOBEE N 12500 S 12500 25000 C 10.64F 58.36F 7.61A .....15.0207 SR 710, S OF CENTER STREET & NE 34TH AVENUE S 6400 N 6300 12700 C 10.64F 58.36F 16.27A 0208 SR 710, SOUTH OF SE 40TH STREET S 4400 N 4300 8700 C 10.64F 58.36F 23.26A 0211 SR 15 /US 441, 800' S OF CR718 /NW 36TH STREET N 6600 S 6900 13500 C 10.64F 58.36F 15.36A 0212 SR 15/US441, 1000' NORTH OF CR718 /NW 36TH STREET N 4800 S 4900 9700 C 10.64F 58.36F 18.76A Site Type : P= Portable; T= Telemetered AADT Flags s C= Computed; E= Manual Est; F= First Yr Est P= Prior Year; S= Second Yr Est; T= Third Yr Est; X= Unknown "K /D" Flags : A= Actual; F= Volume Fctr Catg; D= Dist /Func. Class; P= Prior Year; S= State -wide Default; W= One -Way Road "T" Flags : A= Actual; F= Axle Fctr Catg; D= Dist /Func. Class; P= Prior Year; S= State -wide Default; X= Cross - Reference 30- Apr -2007 16:59:16 Page 1 of 2 622UPD (1,0,0,2] 1_91_CAADT.txt FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2006 Annual Average Daily Traffic Report - Report Type: ALL County: 91 OKEECHOBEE Site AADT "K" "D" "T" Site Type Description Direction 1 Direction 2 Two -Way Fctr Fctr Fctr 0213 SR 70, WEST OF CR 70A /SW 48TH AVENUE E 4100 W 4300 8400 C 10.64F 58.36F 15.31A 0214 SR 700 /US 98, 700' NW OF CR 718 /NW 36TH STREET S 2500 N 2600 5100 C 10.64F 58.36F 19.45A 0215 SR 15/700, US 98/441 SOUTH OF WOLFF ROAD N 8900 S 10000 18900 C 10.64F 58.36F 8.07A 0216 SR 15/700, US 98/441 500' NORTHEAST OF SR 78 E 4300 W 3700 8000 C 10.64F 58.36F 13.62A 0217 SR 15/700/US 98/441, SE OF CR 15A /SE 86TH BLVD E 1800 W 1800 3600 C 10.64F 58.36F 24.O1A 0218 SR 78, 0.3 MI SW OF SR 15 /700 /US 98/441 N 3200 S 3300 6500 C 10.25F 53.90F 16.31A 5012 SR 70, EAST OF SR 15 /700 /US 98/441 E 18000 W 17000 35000 C 10.64F 58.36F 7.46A Site Type : P= Portable; T= Telemetered AADT Flags : C= Computed; E= Manual Est; F= First Yr Est P= Prior Year; S= Second Yr Est; T= Third Yr Est; X= Unknown "K /D" Flags : A= Actual; F= Volume Fctr Catg; D= Dist /Func. Class; P= Prior Year; S= State -wide Default; W= One -Way Road "T" Flags : A= Actual; F= Axle Fctr Catg; D= Dist /Funs. Class; P= Prior Year; S= State -wide Default; X= Cross - Reference 30- Apr -2007 16:59:16 Page 2 of 2 622UPD [1,0,0,2] 1_91_CAADT.txt Florida Department of Transportation Transportation Statistics Office 2006 Historical AADT Report County: 91 - OKEECHOBEE Site: 0007 - SR 70 WEST OF SR 710, EAST OF OKEECHOBEE Year AADT Direction 1 Direction 2 K Factor D Factor T Factor 2006 23500 C E 11500 W 12000 10.64 58.36 15.50 2005 25000 C E 12500 W 12500 10.80 59.30 18.90 2004 23000 C E 11500 W 11500 10.80 61.40 18.90 2003 22000 C E 11000 W 11000 10.10 59.90 15.30 2002 21500 C E 11000 W 10500 10.30 56.20 14.10 2001 21000 C E 10500 W 10500 10.80 57.80 15.20 2000 19400 C E 9900 W 9500 10.60 58.50 16.70 1999 19100 C E 9200 W 9900 11.20 59.00 12.40 1998 18700 C E 9300 W 9400 10.90 58.10 14.50 1997 19600 C E 9600 W 10000 11.30 60.40 11.00 1996 17000 F E 8500 W 8500 9.90 55.50 14.40 1995 16800 C E 8400 W 8400 10.90 54.00 13.40 1994 17500 C E 8600 W 8900 10.10 56.90 13.60 1993 16900 C E 8400 W 8500 9.80 54.80 12.30 1992 17500 C E W 0.00 0.00 11.90 AADT Flags: C = Computed; E = Manual Estimate; F = First Year Estimate S = Second Year Estimate; T = Third Year Estimate; X = Unknown Florida Department of Transportation Transportation Statistics Office 2006 Historical AADT Report County: 91 - OKEECHOSEE Site: 0009 - SR 15 /US 441, NORTH OF SR 70 Year AADT Direction 1 Direction 2 K Factor D Factor T Factor 2006 24500 C N 12000 S 12500 10.64 58.36 7.30 2005 25000 C N 12000 S 13000 10.80 59.30 10.60 2004 25500 C N 12500 S 13000 10.80 61.40 10.60 2003 23500 C N 11500 S 12000 10.10 59.90 10.40 2002 27000 C N 14000 S 13000 10.30 56.20 6.90 2001 22500 C N 11500 S 11000 10.80 57.80 7.70 2000 24000 C N 12000 S 12000 10.60 58.50 9.60 1999 22500 C N 11000 S 11500 11.20 59.00 9.50 1998 22000 C N 10500 S 11500 10.90 58.10 10.90 1997 22000 C N 11000 S 11000 11.30 60.40 7.50 1996 21500 C N 10500 S 11000 9.90 55.50 7.00 1995 22500 C N 10500 S 12000 10.90 54.00 10.00 1994 21500 C N 11000 S 10500 10.10 56.90 8.50 1993 17900 C N 8700 S 9200 0.00 0.00 0.00 AADT Flags: C = Computed; E = Manual Estimate; F = First Year Estimate S = Second Year Estimate; T = Third Year Estimate; X = Unknown Florida Department of Transportation Transportation Statistics Office 2006 Historical AADT Report County: 91 - OKEECHOBEE Site: 0103 - SR 15/700, US 98/441 SOUTH OF SR 70 Year AADT Direction 1 Direction 2 K Factor D Factor T Factor 2006 28500 C N 13500 S 15000 10.64 58.36 6.90 2005 28000 C N 14000 S 14000 10.80 59.30 8.40 2004 30000 C N 14500 S 15500 10.80 61.40 8.40 2003 27500 C N 13000 S 14500 10.10 59.90 7.90 2002 30500 C N 14500 S 16000 10.30 56.20 5.90 2001 30000 C N 14500 S 15500 10.80 57.80 7.50 2000 28500 F N 13000 S 15500 10.60 58.50 18.10 1999 28000 C N 13000 S 15000 11.20 59.00 6.50 1998 29500 C N 14500 S 15000 10.90 58.10 6.80 1997 28500 C N 14000 S 14500 11.30 60.40 6.60 AADT Flags: C = Computed; E = Manual Estimate; F = First Year Estimate S = Second Year Estimate; T = Third Year Estimate; X = Unknown Florida Department of Transportation Transportation Statistics Office 2006 Historical AADT Report County: 91 - OKEECHOBEE Site: 0207 - SR 710, S OF CENTER STREET & NE 34TH AVENUE Year AADT Direction 1 Direction 2 K Factor D Factor T Factor 2006 12700 C S 6400 N 6300 10.64 58.36 16.30 2005 12400 C S 6300 N 6100 10.80 59.30 16.50 2004 11600 C S 5700 N 5900 10.80 61.40 16.50 2003 11500 C S 5700 N 5800 10.10 59.90 16.50 2002 10400 C S 5300 N 5100 10.30 56.20 13.50 2001 10500 C S 5300 N 5200 10.80 57.80 13.40 2000 9200 C S 4700 N 4500 10.60 58.50 15.90 1999 10000 C S 5000 N 5000 11.20 59.00 15.40 1998 9800 C S 4900 N 4900 10.90 58.10 15.60 1997 9800 C S 4900 N 4900 11.30 60.40 13.60 AADT Flags: C = Computed; E = Manual Estimate; F = First Year Estimate S = Second Year Estimate; T = Third Year Estimate; X = Unknown Florida Department of Transportation Transportation Statistics Office 2006 Historical AADT Report County: 91 - OKEECHOBEE Site: 5012 - SR 70, EAST OF SR 15 /700 /US 98/441 Year AADT Direction 1 Direction 2 K Factor D Factor T Factor 2006 35000 C E 18000 W 17000 10.64 58.36 7.50 2005 35000 C E 18000 W 17000 10.80 59.30 2004 34000 C E 16000 W 18000 8.90 2003 30000 C E 14500 10.10 59.90 15.30 2002 32500 C E 16000 W 16500 10.10 59.90 15.30 10.80 56.20 14.10 2001 29000 C E 14500 W 14500 2000 30500 C E 15500 10.60 57.80 15.20 1999 30500 C E 14500 W 16000 10.60 58.50 16.70 1998 26500 C E 13000 W 16000 11.20 59.00 12.40 1997 29500 C E 15000 W 13500 10.90 58.10 14.50 W 14500 1996 29000 C E 13000 W 16000 19.90 60.40 12.60 1995 27000 C E 0.90 55.50 12.60 1994 25500 C E W 10.90 54.00 13.40 1993 27000 C E W 10.10 56.90 13.60 W 0.00 0.00 0.00 AADT Flags: C = Computed; E = Manual Estimate; F = First Year Estimate S = Second Year Estimate; T = Third Year Estimate; X = Unknown ❑ MN Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. APPENDIX C Turning Movement Counts Location: Post Office E Ent. & Park ST. City, State: Okeechobee, Florida Counter: MK Day of week: Tue. Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 • File Name : 271PARK -Pc Site Code : 00073107 Start Date : 7/31/2007 Page No • 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 11 7 7 1 26 49 100.0 94.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 3 100.0 5.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 Park St. Post Office Park 12 7 7 1 27 52 Rig uiuups rrm[ea- unsnitted Northbound Eastbound Start Time Peak Hour From 04:00 Thr Southbound Ped s Total Park St. Westbound I Thr Left Post Office Northbound I App. Total Rig ht Park St. Eastbound Left Start Time Factor Right 1.0 Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Ina. 04:00 PM 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Total 0 04:15 PM 0 04:30 PM 0 04:45 PM 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 7 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 0 0 0 7 7 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 76 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 11 7 7 1 26 49 100.0 94.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 3 100.0 5.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 Park St. Post Office Park 12 7 7 1 27 52 n Volume Percent 05:00 Volume Peak Factor High Int. 3:45:00 PM Volume 0 0 0 0 Peak Factor 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 3:45:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 30 100 .o 0.0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0 0 11 05:00 PM 11 0 0 0 11 0.682 2 0 0 0 100 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 2 1 0 0 0 1 04:45 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0.500 32 12 0.667 Rig VVC Luvunu Northbound Eastbound Start Time Peak Hour From 04:00 Thr I Left Ped s Total Rig I Thr Left I Ped s I App. Total Rig ht Thr u Left I Ped s App. Total Rig ht Thr Left Ped App. Int. PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 oft ' t u s Total Total n Volume Percent 05:00 Volume Peak Factor High Int. 3:45:00 PM Volume 0 0 0 0 Peak Factor 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 3:45:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 30 100 .o 0.0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0 0 11 05:00 PM 11 0 0 0 11 0.682 2 0 0 0 100 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 2 1 0 0 0 1 04:45 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0.500 32 12 0.667 Location: Park St. & SE 13th Ave. City, State: Okeechobee, Florida Counter: DHG Day of week: Tue. Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 Grouas Printed- Unshifted File Name : 271 PARK -13TH Site Code : 07310707 Start Date : 7/31/2007 Page No : 1 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total 0 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 1 Apprch % 100.0 Total % 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 222 215 215 241 893 0 1725 0.0 98.2 0.0 47.8 1 7 5 3 16 30 1.7 0.8 0 0 0 1 2 0.1 0.1 1 2 1 0 4 21 58.3 0.6 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 0 1 11 0 15 0.0 41.7 0.0 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 6 3 2 5 16 305 270 205 198 978 33 1780 1.8 97.9 0.9 49.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0 0 1 5 0.3 0.1 540 504 428 448 1920 3612 Dirt Drive Southbound Park St. Westbound SE 13th St. Northbound Park St. Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Trn Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Trn Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 185 3 0 7 0 0 0 8 194 0 1 398 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 210 4 1 2 0 2 0 3 202 0 1 425 04:30 PM 1 0 0 0 0 212 1 0 4 0 2 0 3 188 0 1 412 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 225 6 0 4 0 0 0 3 218 0 1 457 Total 1 0 0 0 0 832 14 1 17 0 4 0 17 802 0 4 1692 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total 0 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 1 Apprch % 100.0 Total % 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 222 215 215 241 893 0 1725 0.0 98.2 0.0 47.8 1 7 5 3 16 30 1.7 0.8 0 0 0 1 2 0.1 0.1 1 2 1 0 4 21 58.3 0.6 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 0 1 11 0 15 0.0 41.7 0.0 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 6 3 2 5 16 305 270 205 198 978 33 1780 1.8 97.9 0.9 49.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0 0 1 5 0.3 0.1 540 504 428 448 1920 3612 Date: p CONDITION DIAGRAM Proj. No.: Main St: P#/)<' c 7-* Indicate • North Side St:5 F. 13 7-,9- 4 VX.- city:0 ik k:..C.11061.-g- County: SIGNS. A I STOP .1 .1•■•••.. As shown TAY! Reverse NO TURNS 'REDON F I RIGHT LA. TURN • RIGHT Temp: Weather. 0— Vegetation —0— Power/Telephone Pole •–> Building 0 Traffic Signal Pole 83—> X X Fence Guardrail ci Hydrant Take note of all traffic signs around the intersection Traffic Signal Head (all) Traffic Signal Head (Arrow) Ped. Signal Head 0-0 Signs (1 & 2 Post) Overhead Sign 11 Sign (On span wire) Controller Cabinet 0 Ped Pushbutton Right of Way Line 1 1 Vehicle Detection Loop Notes: (sight distance problems?, queue backups?, accidents?) RR Signal (w/Gate) APPROACH DATA EB WB NB SB TYPE OF CONTROL Approach Speed Limits Pedestrian Crosswalks Pedestrian Buttons Traffic Signal [I Flashing Beacon El Stop Sign (Two,AII) n Time Period: PHASES AND TIMING Cycle Length: Location: Park St. & SE 13th Ave. City, State: Okeechobee, Florida Counter: DHG Day of week: Tue. Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 File Name : 271PARK-13THA Site Code : 00870707 Start Date : 8/7/2007 Page No : 1 Dirt Drive Southbound Start Time Rig Thr Left Ped App. Rig ht u s Total ht Peak Hour From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersectio n Volume 0 0 0 0 0 07:30 AM Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 07:45 Volume Peak Factor High Int. 6:45:00 AM Volume 0 0 0 Peak Factor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Park St. Westbound Thr Ped Left u s SE 13th Ave. Northbound Park St. Eastbound App. Total Rig ht Thr Left Ped u s App. Total Rig ht Thr Left Trn App. Total Int. Total 0 961 2 0 963 0.0 99' 0.2 0.0 0 279 0 0 279 07:45 AM 0 279 0 0 279 0.863 5 0 6 0 45 0.0 55 0.0 5 2 0 4 0 07:45 AM 2 0 11 6 4 0 6 0.458 1 555 1 1 558 0.2 99' 0.2 0.2 0 113 0 0 113 08:00 AM 0 154 0 0 154 0.906 1532 398 0.962 Dirt Drive Southbound Park St. r Westbound SE 13th Ave. Northbound Park St. Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Trn Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 153 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 153 0 0 310 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 153 2 0 1 0 3 0 1 136 0 0 296 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 218 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 152 1 0 373 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 279 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 113 0 0 398 Total 0 0 0 0 0 803 4 0 5 0 9 0 1 554 1 0 1377 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 218 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 154 0 0 375 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 246 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 136 0 1 386 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 209 0 0 3 0 1 0 2 149 0 0 364 08:45 AM 1 0 0 0 0 181 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 154 3 0 344 Total 1 0 0 0 0 854 2 0 6 0 5 0 4 593 3 1 1469 Grand Total 1 0 0 0 0 1657 6 0 11 0 14 0 5 1147 4 1 2846 Apprch % Total % 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.6 58.2 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 44.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 56.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 99.1 40.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 Dirt Drive Southbound Start Time Rig Thr Left Ped App. Rig ht u s Total ht Peak Hour From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersectio n Volume 0 0 0 0 0 07:30 AM Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 07:45 Volume Peak Factor High Int. 6:45:00 AM Volume 0 0 0 Peak Factor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Park St. Westbound Thr Ped Left u s SE 13th Ave. Northbound Park St. Eastbound App. Total Rig ht Thr Left Ped u s App. Total Rig ht Thr Left Trn App. Total Int. Total 0 961 2 0 963 0.0 99' 0.2 0.0 0 279 0 0 279 07:45 AM 0 279 0 0 279 0.863 5 0 6 0 45 0.0 55 0.0 5 2 0 4 0 07:45 AM 2 0 11 6 4 0 6 0.458 1 555 1 1 558 0.2 99' 0.2 0.2 0 113 0 0 113 08:00 AM 0 154 0 0 154 0.906 1532 398 0.962 Location: Park St. & SE 13th Ave. City, State: Okeechobee, Florida Counter: DHG Day of week: Tue. Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 File Name : 271 PARK -13T= Site Code : 07310707 Start Date : 7/31/2007 • 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % 0 0 0 0 0 100.0 0.0 Rig ht 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 Dirt Drive Southbound Thr u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 222 215 215 241 893 0 1725 0.0 98.2 0.0 47.8 1 7 5 3 16 30 1.7 0.8 0 0 0 2 0.1 0.1 1 2 1 0 4 21 58.3 0.6 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 0 1 11 0 15 0.0 41.7 0.0 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 6 3 2 5 16 305 270 205 198 978 33 1780 1.8 97.9 0.9 49.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0 0 1 5 0.3 0.1 Ped s Park St. Westbound Rig 1 Thr ht 1 u Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersectio n Volume 0 0 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 05:00 Volume Peak Factor High Int. 3:45:00 PM Volume 0 0 0 0 Peak Factor Start Time 04:45 PM Left App. Total 0 0 0 0 SE 13th Ave. Northbound Left U- Trn App. Total Rig ht 0 877 19 1 897 0.0 9 8 2.1 0.1 0 222 1 0 223 04:45 PM 0 225 6 0 231 0.971 Thr I Left I Ped 8 0 10 0 44' .0 55' 0.0 1 0 4 0 App. Total 18 5 05:15 PM 2 0 6 0 8 0.563 Rig ht Park St. Eastbound 540 504 428 448 1920 3612 Thrl Left I U- u Trn App. Total 14 998 0 2 1014 1.4 95' 0.0 0.2 6 305 0 1 312 05:00 PM 6 305 0 1 312 0.813 Int. Total 1929 540 0.893 croups rnntea- Unshifted Dirt Drive Southbound Park St. Westbound SE 13th Ave. Northbound Park S Eastbound tbounn Start Time Factor Right 1.0 Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Trn Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru d Left U Int' 04:00 PM 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Total 04:15 PM 0 04:30 PM 1 04:45 PM 0 Total 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 185 210 212 225 3 4 1 6 0 1 0 0 7 4 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 8 3 3 202 02 188 218 1.0 0 0 0 1.0 1 1 1 425 425 412 0 0 0 0 832 14 1 17 0 4 0 17 0 802 0 1 4 457 1 RQ9 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % 0 0 0 0 0 100.0 0.0 Rig ht 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 Dirt Drive Southbound Thr u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 222 215 215 241 893 0 1725 0.0 98.2 0.0 47.8 1 7 5 3 16 30 1.7 0.8 0 0 0 2 0.1 0.1 1 2 1 0 4 21 58.3 0.6 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 0 1 11 0 15 0.0 41.7 0.0 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 6 3 2 5 16 305 270 205 198 978 33 1780 1.8 97.9 0.9 49.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0 0 1 5 0.3 0.1 Ped s Park St. Westbound Rig 1 Thr ht 1 u Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersectio n Volume 0 0 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 05:00 Volume Peak Factor High Int. 3:45:00 PM Volume 0 0 0 0 Peak Factor Start Time 04:45 PM Left App. Total 0 0 0 0 SE 13th Ave. Northbound Left U- Trn App. Total Rig ht 0 877 19 1 897 0.0 9 8 2.1 0.1 0 222 1 0 223 04:45 PM 0 225 6 0 231 0.971 Thr I Left I Ped 8 0 10 0 44' .0 55' 0.0 1 0 4 0 App. Total 18 5 05:15 PM 2 0 6 0 8 0.563 Rig ht Park St. Eastbound 540 504 428 448 1920 3612 Thrl Left I U- u Trn App. Total 14 998 0 2 1014 1.4 95' 0.0 0.2 6 305 0 1 312 05:00 PM 6 305 0 1 312 0.813 Int. Total 1929 540 0.893 Date: p CONDITION 'DIAGRAM Indicate Nortjh Proj. No.: Main St: P A Mc" C Side St: V.„E r9 , City:oe‘kLeilatigg— County: OK SIGNS A ON) 0 NO ENTER M shown 1111 IrAY I Reverse ... IP AA/ ,1 c 11-PICPZ/A ,tAJq iV r Do Temp: Weather: Vegetation I.,,,,, Building X X Fence —0-- Guardrail Right of Way L3ne Notes: (sight distance problems?, queue backups?, accidents?) Power/Telephone Pole Traffic Signal Pole Hydrant Take note of all traffic signs around the intersection Traffic Signal Head (Ball) D Controller Cabinet Vehicle Detection Loop Signs (1 & 2 Post) Traffic Signal Head (An-ow) Ped. Signal Head Ped Pushbutton Overhead Sign Sign (On span wire) RR Signal (w/Gate) APPROACH DATA EB WB NB Approach Speed Limits Pedestrian Crosswalks Pedestrian Buttons SB TYPE OF CONTROL Traffic Signal n Flashing Beacon n Stop Sign (Two,AII) Green Yellow M—Red Location: Post Office E Ent. & Park St. City, State: Okeechobee, Florida Counter: MK Day of week: Tue. Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 Groups Printed- Unshifted File Name : 271PARK -P0-. Site Code : 00070707 Start Date : 8/7/2007 Page No : 1 Start Time Factor 07:00 AM * ** BREAK * ** 07:30 AM 07:45 AM Total 08:00 AM 08:15 AM 08:30 AM 08:45 AM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % Southbound Right 1 Thru Left Peds 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 Park St. Westbound Right I Thru I Left 1.0 1.0 1.0 Peds Right Post Office Northbound Thru Left Peds Right Park St. Eastbound Thru 1.0 0 0 0 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2 0 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 5 0 0 5 100.0 20.8 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 2 4 8 2 2 2 4 10 18 100.0 75.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 Left I Peds 1.0 1.0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0 4.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 Int. Total Start Time Rig ht Southbound Thr u Left Ped s App. Total Park St. Westbound Rig I Thr I Left ht u Peak Hour From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersectio n Volume Ped s App. Total Post Office Northbound Rig I Thr ht u Left Ped I App. s j Total 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 10 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 0.0 0.0 08:45 Volume Peak Factor High Int. 6:45:00 AM 08:45 AM Volume 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 Peak Factor 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.417 10 4 08:45 AM 4 0 0 0 4 0.625 Rig ht Park St. Eastbound Thr I Left I Ped I App. u s Total 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 6:45:00 AM 3 2 4 9 2 2 4 7 15 24 Int. Total 0 15 0 7 0.536 Location: Post Office E Ent. & Park ST. City, State: Okeechobee, Florida Counter: MK Day of week: Tue. Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 s Printed- Unshifted File Name : 271 PARK -PO Site Code : 00073107 Start Date : 7/31/2007 Page No : 1 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 11 7 7 1 26 49 100.0 94.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 1 3 100.0 5.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 12 7 7 1 27 52 Southbound Southbound Post Office Northbound Park St. Eastbound Park St. Westbound Start Time Rig ht Post Office Northbound Left Ped s Park St. Eastbound Rig ht Thr u Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 04:00 PM 0 04:15 PM 0 04:30 PM 0 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 7 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 5 6 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 25 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 11 7 7 1 26 49 100.0 94.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 1 3 100.0 5.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 12 7 7 1 27 52 Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 o Intersectio n Volume 0 0 0 04 :45 PM 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 05:00 Volume Peak Factor High Int. 3:45:00 PM Volume 0 0 0 Peak Factor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 3:45:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 100 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 11 0 0 0 30 11 05:00 PM 11 0 0 0 11 0.682 2 0 0 0 100 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0 0 04:45 PM 1 0 2 0 0 1 0.500 32 12 0.667 Southbound Park St. Westbound Post Office Northbound Park St. Eastbound Start Time Rig ht Thr u Left Ped s App. Total Rig ht Thr u Left Ped s App. Total Rig ht Thr u Left Ped s App. Total Rig ht Thr u Left Ped s App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 o Intersectio n Volume 0 0 0 04 :45 PM 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 05:00 Volume Peak Factor High Int. 3:45:00 PM Volume 0 0 0 Peak Factor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 3:45:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 100 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 11 0 0 0 30 11 05:00 PM 11 0 0 0 11 0.682 2 0 0 0 100 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0 0 04:45 PM 1 0 2 0 0 1 0.500 32 12 0.667 Date: Enitials: CONDITION DIAGRAM Proj. No.: Main St: P '',j< • Side St: )°OST"` or! fop '� ► • City: County: SIGNS AI (1-01) Temp: Dl As shown KIONE i►AYJ D21 Reverse NO TURNS ON RED RIGHT LA. •MUST TURN RIGHT Weather. �MNMM X X Vegetation Building Fence —0-- Power/Telephone Pole H Traffic Signal Pole Hydrant Guardrail Right of Way tine 1 1 Controller Cabinet D 0 Take note of all traffic signs around the intersection Traffic Signal Head (Ball) Traffic Signal Head (Arro Ped. Signal Head Ped Pushbutton Q—fl Signs (1 & 2 Post) Overhead Sign Sign (On span wire) Vehicle Detection Loop Notes: (sight distance problems ?, queue backups ?, accidents ?) RR Signal (w /Gate) APPROACH DATA EB WB J► NB SB TYPE OF CONTROL Approach Speed Limits Pedestrian Crosswalks Pedestrian Buttons Time Period: Traffic Signal El Flashing Beacon Stop Sign (Two,NM) LI PHASES AND TIMING Cycle Length: Green Yellow All —Red Location: Park St. & SE 10th Ave. City, State: Okeechobee, Florida Counter: MK Day of week: Thur. Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 inted- Unshifted File Name : 271PARK -10TI Site Code : 00080107 Start Date : 8/2/2007 Page No : 1 08:00 AM 08:15 AM 08:30 AM 08:45 AM Total * ** BREAK * ** 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM Total 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total 0 0 0 0 0 Grand Total Apprch % Total % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 210 159 197 199 765 180 193 245 226 844 8 2 4 9 23 211 248 217 203 879 8 12 14 12 46 0 3250 0.0 96.5 0.0 46.5 0 0 0 0 0 13 10 7 7 37 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 4 4 13 0 0 0 0 119 3.5 1.7 0 0.0 0.0 8 2 5 4 19 0 0 0 0 0 4 9 6 2 21 0 0 0 0 0 72 16.4 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 20 14 24 14 72 34 30 33 41 138 0 0 0 0 0 43 31 18 15 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 368 0.0 83.6 0.0 5.3 0 0 0 0 0 20 15 19 21 75 39 23 38 38 138 0 0.0 0.0 27 24 21 24 96 110 124 155 116 505 221 202 193 235 851 279 276 255 186 996 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 10 349 2827 11.0 88.7 5.0 40.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0.3 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 372 315 403 363 1453 490 472 528 556 2046 577 598 524 437 2136 6995 Southbound Southbound SE 10th Ave. Northbound Park St. Eastbound Park St. Westbound Start Time Rig ht SE 10th Ave. Northbound Left Ped s Park St. Eastbound Rig ht Thr u Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Ina. l Tota Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 124 2 0 4 0 12 0 7 105 0 0 254 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 151 4 0 6 0 8 0 5 125 0 0 299 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 240 5 0 3 0 8 0 10 124 0 0 390 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 247 2 0 6 0 23 0 18 121 0 0 417 Total 0 0 0 0 0 762 13 0 19 0 51 0 40 475 0 0 1360 08:00 AM 08:15 AM 08:30 AM 08:45 AM Total * ** BREAK * ** 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM Total 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total 0 0 0 0 0 Grand Total Apprch % Total % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 210 159 197 199 765 180 193 245 226 844 8 2 4 9 23 211 248 217 203 879 8 12 14 12 46 0 3250 0.0 96.5 0.0 46.5 0 0 0 0 0 13 10 7 7 37 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 4 4 13 0 0 0 0 119 3.5 1.7 0 0.0 0.0 8 2 5 4 19 0 0 0 0 0 4 9 6 2 21 0 0 0 0 0 72 16.4 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 20 14 24 14 72 34 30 33 41 138 0 0 0 0 0 43 31 18 15 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 368 0.0 83.6 0.0 5.3 0 0 0 0 0 20 15 19 21 75 39 23 38 38 138 0 0.0 0.0 27 24 21 24 96 110 124 155 116 505 221 202 193 235 851 279 276 255 186 996 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 10 349 2827 11.0 88.7 5.0 40.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0.3 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 372 315 403 363 1453 490 472 528 556 2046 577 598 524 437 2136 6995 Peak Hour From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 o Intersectio n Volume 0 0 0 07:45 AM 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 07:45 Volume Peak Factor High Int. 6:45:00 AM Volume 0 0 0 Peak Factor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 813 16 0 829 0.0 98' 1.9 0.0 0 247 2 0 249 07:45 AM 0 247 2 0 249 Peak Hour From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersectio n Volume 0 0 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 04:30 PM 05:15 Volume Peak Factor High Int. Volume 0 0 0 Peak Factor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.832 0 930 49 0 979 0.0 95' 5.0 0.0 0 248 10 0 258 04:30 PM 0 245 14 0 259 0.945 15 0 81 0 15' 0.0 84. 0. 6 0 23 0 96 29 07:45 AM 6 0 23 0 29 0.828 22 0 148 0 12. 0.0 87' 0.0 9 0 31 0 170 40 05:00 PM 4 0 43 0 47 0.904 72 510 0 0 582 12. 87' 0.0 0.0 4 6 18 121 0 0 139 08:30 AM 19 155 0 0 174 0.836 127 983 0 0 1110 11. 88. 0.0 0.0 4 6 24 276 0 0 300 05:00 PM 27 279 0 0 306 0.907 1507 417 0.903 2259 598 0.944 Southbound Park St. Westbound SE 10th Ave. Northbound Park St. Eastbound Start Time Rig ht Thr u Left Ped s App. Total Rig ht Thr u Left Ped s App. Total Rig ht Thr u Left Ped s App. Total Rig ht Thr u Left Ped s App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 o Intersectio n Volume 0 0 0 07:45 AM 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 07:45 Volume Peak Factor High Int. 6:45:00 AM Volume 0 0 0 Peak Factor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 813 16 0 829 0.0 98' 1.9 0.0 0 247 2 0 249 07:45 AM 0 247 2 0 249 Peak Hour From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersectio n Volume 0 0 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 04:30 PM 05:15 Volume Peak Factor High Int. Volume 0 0 0 Peak Factor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.832 0 930 49 0 979 0.0 95' 5.0 0.0 0 248 10 0 258 04:30 PM 0 245 14 0 259 0.945 15 0 81 0 15' 0.0 84. 0. 6 0 23 0 96 29 07:45 AM 6 0 23 0 29 0.828 22 0 148 0 12. 0.0 87' 0.0 9 0 31 0 170 40 05:00 PM 4 0 43 0 47 0.904 72 510 0 0 582 12. 87' 0.0 0.0 4 6 18 121 0 0 139 08:30 AM 19 155 0 0 174 0.836 127 983 0 0 1110 11. 88. 0.0 0.0 4 6 24 276 0 0 300 05:00 PM 27 279 0 0 306 0.907 1507 417 0.903 2259 598 0.944 Date: -2 -0 % Initials: Indicate North CONDITION DIAGRAM Proj. No.: Main St: P/I R /< 5. 7 Side 'sf t 4 City: QX ij County: 0 A SIGNS AI ( 6 Temp: Weather: X X Vegetation Building ---0— Power/Telephone Pole 0 Traffic Signal Pole Fence Hydrant Guardrail Right of Way Line CEO Controller Cabinet 0-> Vehicle Detection Loop Notes: (sight distance problems ?, queue backups ?, accidents ?) ADO 1+17 D1 As shown KGNE'ATI' D1 E( NO TURNS ON RED F RIGHT LA MUST TURN • RIGHT HI Take note of all traffic signs around the intersection Traffic Signal Head (Ball) Traffic Signal Head (Arrow) Ped. Signal Head Ped Pushbutton 1:1-0 Signs (1 & 2 Post) Overhead Sign II Sign (On span wire) RR Signal (w /Gote) APPROACH DATA JI EB WB NB SB Approach Speed Limits Pedestrian Crosswalks Pedestrian Buttons Time Period: TYPE OF CONTROL Traffic Signal i1 Flashing Beacon Stop Sign (Two,AII) I ] PHASES AND TIMING Cycle Length: II Green Yellow All —Red P: \dave \FORNS \CONDIT —O.dwg 8501 Aug 24, 2006 11 11am by. dave.grit( Location: Park St. & SE 8th Ave. City, State: Okeechobee, Florida Counter: DHG Day of week: Thur. Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 - Unshifted File Name : 271 PARK -8TF Site Code : 00820707 Start Date : 8/2/2007 Page No : 1 08:00 AM 08:15 AM 08:30 AM 08:45 AM Total * ** BREAK * ** 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM Total 3 5 4 4 16 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total 1 3 4 1 9 0 0 0 1 4 2 3 10 0 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 40 Apprch % 71.4 Total % 0.5 1 1 1 0 3 0 0 1 2 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 4 12 7.1 21.4 0.0 0.1 1 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 257 206 202 231 896 1 196 2 244 2 301 0 274 5 1015 0 0.0 0.0 6 1 4 12 23 2 291 1 285 1 248 0 219 4 1043 9 16 12 8 45 13 3803 0.3 96.6 0.2 44.9 0 0 0 0 0 9 14 9 11 43 0 0 0 0 0 119 3.0 1.4 3 3 2 4 12 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 4 3 15 0 1 0 1 2 9 5 7 4 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 0.0 10.8 0.0 0.7 0 0 1 0 1 29 34 26 47 136 27 16 26 34 103 0 0 0 0 0 41 39 33 29 142 0 0 0 0 0 3 482 0.6 88.6 0.0 5.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 17 12 18 14 61 136 168 178 156 638 26 272 26 280 40 256 46 283 138 1091 60 40 45 38 183 321 338 284 236 1179 0 4 2 1 7 3 2 7 2 14 430 3476 10.9 88.1 5.1 41.0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 2 2 13 0 0 0 0 0 38 1.0 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 NE 8th Ave. Southbound Park St. Westbound SE 8th Ave. Northbound Park St. Eastbound 454 436 437 471 1798 539 594 652 651 2436 739 731 638 544 2652 8479 Start Time Rig ht Thr u Left Ped s App. Total Rig ht Thr u Left Ped s App. Total Rig ht Thr u Left Ped s App. Total Rig ht Thr u Left Ped s App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersectio n Volume 11 1 2 0 14 Percent 6 7.1 14' 0.0 07:30 AM 07:45 Volume Peak Factor High Int. 08:15 AM Volume 5 0 1 Peak Factor 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0.583 3 992 12 0 1007 0.3 98' 1.2 0.0 1 277 3 0 281 07:45 AM 1 277 3 0 281 Peak Hour From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersectio 04:30 PM n Volume 10 90. 9 1 Percent 05:00 Volume Peak Factor High Int. 04:30 PM Volume 4 0 Peak Factor 0 0.0 0 1 0 11 9.1 0.0 1 0 2 0 0 4 0.688 0.896 5 115 43 0 1199 0.4 9 3.6 0.0 2 291 9 0 302 04:30 PM 2 301 12 0 315 0.952 11 1 132 7.6 0.7 91. 7 3 0 47 07:45 AM 3 0 47 21 0 140 13' 0 0.0 8. 0 9 0 41 05:00 PM 9 0 41 0 144 0.0 0 50 0 50 0.720 0 161 0.0 0 50 0 50 0.805 52 596 8 0 656 7.9 99' .2 0.0 16 143 1 0 160 08:15 AM 12 168 4 0 184 186 119 8 13. 85. 3 4 60 321 0.891 18 0 1402 1.3 0.0 4 0 385 05 :00 PM 60 321 4 0 385 0.910 1821 491 0.927 2773 739 0.938 NE 8th Ave. Southbound Park St. Westbound SE 8th Ave. Northbound Park St. Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Ina. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 07:00 AM 1 0 1 0 0 154 1 0 1 0 12 0 10 144 0 0 324 07:15 AM 1 0 1 0 0 166 2 0 1 0 20 0 15 132 0 0 338 07:30 AM 3 0 0 0 0 252 2 0 2 0 22 0 7 149 3 0 440 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 1 277 3 0 3 0 47 0 16 143 1 0 491 Total 5 0 2 0 1 849 8 0 7 0 101 0 48 568 4 0 1593 08:00 AM 08:15 AM 08:30 AM 08:45 AM Total * ** BREAK * ** 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM Total 3 5 4 4 16 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total 1 3 4 1 9 0 0 0 1 4 2 3 10 0 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 40 Apprch % 71.4 Total % 0.5 1 1 1 0 3 0 0 1 2 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 4 12 7.1 21.4 0.0 0.1 1 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 257 206 202 231 896 1 196 2 244 2 301 0 274 5 1015 0 0.0 0.0 6 1 4 12 23 2 291 1 285 1 248 0 219 4 1043 9 16 12 8 45 13 3803 0.3 96.6 0.2 44.9 0 0 0 0 0 9 14 9 11 43 0 0 0 0 0 119 3.0 1.4 3 3 2 4 12 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 4 3 15 0 1 0 1 2 9 5 7 4 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 0.0 10.8 0.0 0.7 0 0 1 0 1 29 34 26 47 136 27 16 26 34 103 0 0 0 0 0 41 39 33 29 142 0 0 0 0 0 3 482 0.6 88.6 0.0 5.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 17 12 18 14 61 136 168 178 156 638 26 272 26 280 40 256 46 283 138 1091 60 40 45 38 183 321 338 284 236 1179 0 4 2 1 7 3 2 7 2 14 430 3476 10.9 88.1 5.1 41.0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 2 2 13 0 0 0 0 0 38 1.0 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 NE 8th Ave. Southbound Park St. Westbound SE 8th Ave. Northbound Park St. Eastbound 454 436 437 471 1798 539 594 652 651 2436 739 731 638 544 2652 8479 Start Time Rig ht Thr u Left Ped s App. Total Rig ht Thr u Left Ped s App. Total Rig ht Thr u Left Ped s App. Total Rig ht Thr u Left Ped s App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersectio n Volume 11 1 2 0 14 Percent 6 7.1 14' 0.0 07:30 AM 07:45 Volume Peak Factor High Int. 08:15 AM Volume 5 0 1 Peak Factor 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0.583 3 992 12 0 1007 0.3 98' 1.2 0.0 1 277 3 0 281 07:45 AM 1 277 3 0 281 Peak Hour From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersectio 04:30 PM n Volume 10 90. 9 1 Percent 05:00 Volume Peak Factor High Int. 04:30 PM Volume 4 0 Peak Factor 0 0.0 0 1 0 11 9.1 0.0 1 0 2 0 0 4 0.688 0.896 5 115 43 0 1199 0.4 9 3.6 0.0 2 291 9 0 302 04:30 PM 2 301 12 0 315 0.952 11 1 132 7.6 0.7 91. 7 3 0 47 07:45 AM 3 0 47 21 0 140 13' 0 0.0 8. 0 9 0 41 05:00 PM 9 0 41 0 144 0.0 0 50 0 50 0.720 0 161 0.0 0 50 0 50 0.805 52 596 8 0 656 7.9 99' .2 0.0 16 143 1 0 160 08:15 AM 12 168 4 0 184 186 119 8 13. 85. 3 4 60 321 0.891 18 0 1402 1.3 0.0 4 0 385 05 :00 PM 60 321 4 0 385 0.910 1821 491 0.927 2773 739 0.938 NO TURNS ON RED Date: .2,-0 Initials: pp 6- CONDITION DIAGRAM lndi ate North ... 1-414. 114:tr5) ‚ji) Proj. Main St: S fAin $ Side St: ." ,r Al.-rm._ 4 e City: (714.cf/p/3,ge___.„- County: SIGNS. 21 17. NO 511- A y 6 6- Temp: Weather: 0.10** P./ X X Building 0 Traffic Signal Pole EIg-> Vegetation ... A / STOP Di As shown 2 NE WAY 1 Reverse {RIGHT LA. MUST • RIGHT TURN —0— Power/Telephone Pole IIF-> Fence Guardrail Hydrant NO gills 1?-cve p G pk- /),f) , F 'VP,/ Take note of all traffic signs around the intersection Traffic Signal Head (Ball) Traffic Signal Head (Arrow) Ped. Signal Head 0=-13 Right of Way Line Controller Cabinet 0 Ped Pushbutton Signs (1 & 2 Post) Overhead Sign Sign (On span wire) 1 1 Vehicle Detection Loop Notes: (sight distance problems?, queue backups?, accidents?) RR Signal (w/Gate) J 1 APPROACH DATA EB W B NB S B TYPE OF CONTROL Approach Speed Limits Pedestrian Crosswalks S' 35" Pedestrian Buttons Time Period: PHASES Traffic Signal El Flashing Beacon LI Stop Sign (Two,AII) n AND TIMING Cycle Length: Green Yellow M—Red SR 70 & US 441 OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: I. GONZALEZ & M. GONZALEZ SIGNALIZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272 -3255 FAX (561) 272 -4381 LIGHT VEHICLES, HEAVY VEHICLES Site Code : 00060154 Start Date: 05/31/06 File I.D. SR70_441 Page : 1 US 441 _ISR 70 SUS 441 1SR 70 From North 1From East From South 1From West .Right Thru UTurn Left 1 Right Thru UTurn Left 1 Right Thru UTurn Left ( Right Thru UTurn Left 1 Total Date 05/31/06 07:00 7 64 0 49 1 41 66 0 46 1 40 51 0 22 07:15 14 63 0 52 � 44 80 0 61 1 43 46 0 18 07:30 20 67 0 56 � 58 101 0 66 � 46 96 0 20 07:45 34 109 0 46 1 70 132 0 113 1 55 118 0 41 Hr Total 75 303 0 203 1 213 379 0 286 1 184 311 0 101 08:00 '18 98 0 54 1 67 89 0 77 1 55 95 0 40 08:15 21 85 1 62 1 50 78 0 73 1 59 80 0 36 08:30 22 91 0 57 1 60 99 0 79 1 46 71 0 34 08:45 18 89 0 43 1 68 102 0 86 1 - 49 94 0 39 Hr Total 79 363 1 216 j 245 368 0 315 1 209 340 0 149 * BREAK * 14 77 D 18 I 495 24 103 0 30 1 578 13 83 0 25 1 651 30 84 0 55 1 887 81 347 0 128_ 1 2611 22 101 0 49 1 765 24 60 0 30 1 659 21 82 D 41 1 , 703 22 77 0 37 J 724 89 320 0 157 1 2851 11:00 19 144 1 79 11:15 20 147 1 71 11 :30 25 137 0 82 11:45 27 131 1 66 Hr Total 91 559 3 298 12:00 26 173 1 85 12 :15 14 117 1 65 12 :30 22 128 0 73 12:45 15 106 0 61 Hr Total 77 524 2 284 * BREAK * 42 88 0 89 1 75 -103 0 37 1 31 92 0 30 1 830 40 91 1 84 1 102 102 0 57 1 28 87 0 33 1 864 49 106 0 101 1 86 90 0 48.1 51 89 0 21 1 885 45 109 0 91 1 113 88 1 42 1 44 95 0 42 1 895' 176 394 1 365 1 376 383 1 184 1 -•154 363 0 126 f 3474 54 101 0 76 1 101 94 0 63 44 98 0 87 1 117 93 0 58 45 91 0 91 1 125 94 1 65 59 128 0 82 1 133 135 0 61 202 418 0 336 1 476 416 1 247 52 115 0 28 1 969 35 112 1 46 I 880 30 79 0 38 1 882 42 115 0 37 1 974 159 421 1 149 1 3713 16 :00 20 120 0 83 1 58 105 0 96 16:15 28 128 1 69 1 41 131 0 81 16:30 27 123 1 73 1 55 126 0 78 16:45 33 159 1 79 f 59 125 0 93 Hr Total 108 530 3 304 1 213 487 0 348 17:00 41 160 0 74 70 150 0 05 17:15 21 128 0 77 � 65 117 0 91 17:30 21 145 0 74 1 62 99 0 77 17:45 15 107 0 80 1 52 116 0 83 Hr Total 98 540 0 305 t 249 482 0 336 89 106 1 '56 101 99 0 49 96 102 0 64 102 110 0 51 388 417 1 220 121 122 0 50 114 110 0 53 111 116 0 50 101 95 0 55 447 443 0 208 38 97 0 38 1 907 32 79 0 29 I 868 37 125 0 37 1 944 29 97 0 .41 1 979 136 398 0 145 3698 39 141 0 27 1080 43 131 0 31 I 1 981 22 95 0 38 1 910 38 105 0 27 1 874 142 472 0 123 3845 *TOTAL* 528 2819 9 1610 1 1298 2528 1 1986 1 2080 2310 3 1109 1 761 2321 1 828 I 20192 SR 70 & US 441 OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: I. GONZALEZ & M. GONZALEZ SIGNALIZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAy BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272 -3255 FAX (561) 272 -4381 LIGHT VEHICLES, HEAVY VEHICLES Site Code : 00060154 Start Date: 05/31/06 File I.D. : SR70 441 Page : 2 US 441 ISR 70 !US 441 ISR 70 From North (From East (From South !From West I I i Right Date 05/31/06 Thru UTurn Left I Right Thru UTUrn Left I Right Thru UTurn Left I Right Thru UTurn Left 1 Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:00 t Peak start 07:45 07 :45 Volume 95 383 1 219 247 398 0 342 Percent 141 554 01 314 254 404 04 354 Pk total 698 987 Highest 07:45 07 :45 Volume 34 109 0 46 70 132 0 113 Hi total 189 315 PHF 92 .78 SR 70 85 10 95 • • US 441 364 19 383 698 09:00 on 05/31/06 07:45 215 364 0 151 294 504 04 214 730 07:45 55 118 0 41 214 .85 204 16 220 175 364 247 786 1,484 i 151 398 644 • LIGHT VEHICLES 95 • HEAVY VEHICLES 987 398 374 171 24 4 175 1,243 1,749 ) 342 12 07:45 97 327 0 175 161 554 04 29} 599 08:00 22 101 0 49 172 .87 231 247 16 303 24 327 599 1 Intersection Total. 3,014 95 2 97 1 1,552 f - 730 342 149 • 345 383 2 . 19 97 82211 151 364 US 441 204 11 SR 70 220 762 327 215 0 0 215 0 TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. SR 70 C. US 441 624 GARDENIA TERRACE Site Code : 00060154 OKEECHOBEE., FLORIDA DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 Start Date: 05/31/06 COUNTED BY: I. GONZALEZ & M. GONZALEZ (561) 272 -3255 FAX (561) 272 -4381 File I.D. : SR70_441 SIGNALIZED Page : 3 LIGHT VEHICLES, HEAVY VEHICLES US 441 From North Right Thru UTurn Date 05/31/06 Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: Peak start 12:00 12:00 Volume 77 524 2 284 202 418 0 Percent 94 59% 0% 324 21% 44% 0% Pk total 887 956 Highest 12:00 12:45 Volume 26 173 1 85 59 128 0 HS total 285 269 PHF .78 .89 ISR 70 'US 441 ISR 70 From East From South From West Left ( Right Thru UTurn Left Right Thru UTurn Left Right Thru UTUrn Left Total SR 70 248 418 743 77 146 4 150 74 3 77 • 11:00 to 13:00 on 05/31/06 12:00 12:00 336 476 416 1 247 159 421 1 149 354 42% 36% 0% 224 22% 58% 0% 20% 1140 730 12:45 12:00 82 133 135 0 61 52 115 0 28 329 195 .87 .94 US 441 508 16 524 887 388 33 421 730 152 7 159 J 1,473 • • 273 13 286 ( 1,655 150 416 202 - LIGHT VEHICLES • HEAVY VEHICLES 768 2,139 Intersection Total 3,713 2,159 x"- 336 • 243 524 • 5 159 1,019 248 US 441 0 0 • 202 • 179 23 384 956 418 • 34 1,140 • 402 14 416 • 323 336 • 13 1,183 SR 70 286 421 476 • 457 • 0 19 0 476 0 SR 70 & US 441 OKEECHOBEE; FLORIDA COUNTED BY: I. GONZALEZ & M. GONZALEZ SIGNALIZED US 441 From North TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272 -3255 FAX (561) 272 -4381 LIGHT VEHICLES; HEAVY VEHICLES Site Code : 00060154 Start Date: 05/31/06 File I.D. : SR70 441 Page 4 Right Thru UTurn Date 05/31/06 Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Peak start 16 :30 Volume 122 570 2 Percent 121 57t 01 Pk total 997 Highest 17:00 Volume 41 160 0 Hi total 275 PHF .91 ISR 70 From East IUS 441 From South Left I Right Thru UTurn Left Right Thru UTurn Intersection for 16:30 303 249 301 221 1114 17 :00 74 70 305 .91 SR 70 218 518 858 122 133 3 136 467 1 121 1 122 the Period: 16 :00 t 518 0 347 461 01 311 150 0 B5 US 441 562 8 570 997 -- 1,636 18 :00 on 16 :30 433 401 1095 17 :00 121 293 .93 287 18 3'05 1,826 05/31/06 444 0 411 01 122 0 LIGHT VEHICLES HEAVY VEHICLES 136 444 249 829 2,346 27 494 778 1 Intersection Total 3,984 145 3 148 1 347 570 148 1' , 0 6 5 • • 2,160 1,095 2161.• 433 2 11 US 441 218 444 ISR 70 From West Left Right Thru UTurn Left Total 218 201 50 16:30 148 494 0 136 191 631 0# 171 778 17:00 39 141 0 27 207 .94 1,114 518 483 35 425 8 433 347 1,232 SR 70 0 0 0 • . 334 13 305 494 433 Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272 -3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals . Page 2 ************************** * * * *,x * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Data File : D0425013.PRN Station : 000000042404 Identification : 000411692109 Interval : 15 minutes Start date : Apr 25, 06 Start time : 00:00 Stop date : Apr.25, 06 Stop time : 24:00 City /Town : Okeechobee, Florida County : Okeechobee Location ' : SR 70 West of SR 710 ************************************************ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Apr 25 Total Volume for All Lanes End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - =- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- 15 49 49 43 29 40 112 278 351 418 334 353 370 30 38 31 36 29 47 142 334 403 427 338 369 349 45 40 25 28 68 56 188 369 441 378 377 369 334 00 27 23 37 42 89 223 433 531 383 382 332 371 Hr Total 154 128. 144 168 232 665 1414 1726 1606 1431 1423 1424 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 399 362 376 469 405 541 442 301 237 201 126 85 30 350. 391 407•` 432 .417 :531 400 337 209 146 134 • ..77 45 380 426 394 480 • 46.7 ' 507 351 243 215 142 .80 48 00 '368 ..:369 433 460 4.93. ` 439 338 250 207 123 79 '39 Hr Total-1497 '1548 1610 1841 X1782 2018 1531 1131 868 612 419 249 24 Hour Total AM peak hour begins..: e :30 , `AM peak volume : x1817 Peak hour factor. : 0.86 PM peak hour .begins • : - 1"6 :.45• . PM peak volume • 2072 'Peak hour factor -: 0.96 ` ' :' -********.**************************************** * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** - Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272 -3255 ************************* o***** R********* h******* * * *o * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Page 1 Data -File : D0425015.PRN. Station : 000000042407 Identification : 000058410088 Interval Start date : Apr 25, 06 : 15 minutes Stop date : Apr 25, 06 Stopt time : 24:00 City/Town p Stop time 24:00 • Y/ : Okeechobee, Florida County Location : SR 710 S of SR 70 1 =NBLT 2=NBRT to SR 70 0keechobee ************************************************ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Apr 25 Northbound Volume for Lane 1 End Time • 00 - -01 - -02 - -03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 15 12 16 5 - -17 - -21 - -31 - -75 127 82 116 - 30 10 12 12 7 99 30 13 9 5 37 7 22 64 92 96 94- 106 -74 45 3 10 30 77 136 106 91 75 74 - 7 16 14 17 27 123 198 103 114 106 90 Hr Total- - 43 40 49 • 59 51 100 295 501 432 381 403 337 End .Time • 12 -- __ -_14 _- -- - -16 17 . 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 108 85 96 131 94 113 126 - -72 - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -1 -.:. 30 73 121 109 89 ': ?2. 48� -; 35. 31 21 45 70 102 83 104. -98 124: 79 47, 36 31 -. 31 12 00 ' -101 98 101 108 113 97. 4�• 46�: 32 .9 15 _ _ 94 97 41.. 48: 32. 9 5 Hr. :Total 352 406 389 432 - 3.97' 463 -- :400-' 173: .` "128 80 - -54 24 Hour Total : 6179 AM. peak hour begins 07:30 AM peak volume 557-- PM:Peak-;hour begins • 16:45 Peak hour 'factor : 0,70 ************************************************. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Apr 25 482. Peak" hour factor 0.91 Northbound Volume for Lane 2 End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 15 0 1 7 0 - - -0 '30. 5 0 0 0 1 45, 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 - - - Hr Total 5 - - -1 7 - - -p _ -_- 13 7 13 8 8 7 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 - - -- 18 19 20 21 22 23 - - -- 15 5 - - -- -- 30 4 0 4 2 2 1 2 6 8 - - -2 - - -- - - -- - -- 4 5 0 13 2 2 0 2 2 2 1 1 3 0 0 2 4 4 6 1 3 1 4 0 0 0 1 - - - - - -- 4 0 0 1 4 Hr Total 11 21 9 12 12 18 - -- -- -- - - -- - - -- ____ ____ 6 12 2 6 4 5 1 0 1 0 1 2 - -06 -_07 __08 09 10 11 6 0 3 - - -3 - - -2 - - -4 4 4 1 2 2 0 2 0 6 1 3 0 - - -1 -- 3 3 2 1 3 24 Hour Total : 190 AM peak hour begins : 08 :30 AM peak volume PM peak hour begins : 13-:15 14 Peak hour factor : 0.58 ************************ * * * * * * *PM *P *a * * *� * * * * * * * * * * * * ** *Pea *hour *factor * * * * *** 0.42 Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272 -3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 2 ***************************************.********** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Data File : D0425015.PRN Station : 000000042407 Identification.: 000058410088 Interval : 15 minutes Start date : Apr 25, 06 Start time : 00:00 Stop date : Apr 25, 06 Stop time : 24:00 City /Town : Okeechobee, Florida - County : Okeechobee Location : SR 710 S of SR 70 1 =NBLT 2 =NBRT to SR 70 ************************************************ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Apr 25 Total Volume for All Lanes End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- 15 15 13 23 5 17 21 37 75 130 85 118 103 30 15 12 12 7 8 23 68 96 97 96 108 .74 45 13 9 5 33 10 30 79 136 112 92 78 74 00 5 7 16 14 17 28 124 201 106 116 107 93 Hr Total 48 41 56 59 52 102 308 508 445 389 411 344 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18. 19 •20 21 22 23 15 113 85 97 133 100 121 128 74 49 40 31 21 30 77 125 111 91 97 _ 137 10.0 56 42 31 34 16 45 70 115 85 106 98 126 80 51 36: 31 9 13 ;00 -103 102 105 114 114> 97 98 45 48' '• 32' ' 10 9 Hr Total 363 427 398 444 409 48.1'. 406= 226' 175 134' 84 59 24 Hour Total : 6369 AM peak hour begins : 07:30 AM peak volume -_: 564 Peak =hour factor : 0.70 PM peak hour begins : 16:45 PM peak volume 498 Peak hour .factor 0.91 Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272 -3255 ************************ o***** R ** ** * * * * *h * * * *H° * * * *o *a * * * * * ** •Data File Page 1 : D0425010.PRN * * * * * * * * * * **** * * *** Station : 000000042405 Identification : 000058410084 Start date : Apr 25, 06 Interval : 15 minutes Stop date : Apr 25, 06 Start time : 00:00 City /Town Okeechobee, Florida Stop time : 24 :00 Location SR 70 East of SR 710 County : Okeechobee Apr************************************************ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** 25 Eastbound Volume for Lane 1 End Time 00 01 02 03 04 15 --05 __06 07 08 09 _ 11 15 10 7 6 - - -- __ 45 18 2 9 4 14 29 111 97 87 71. 91 104 14 4 10 11 17 93 86 85 102 00 5 4 3 49 106 78 88 103 78 95 __ __ 2 29 69 87 69 88 78 92 105 Hr Total 53 20 29 23 - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- 69 177 409 323 356 338 346 406 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 15 - - - -• - -- - -17 - -18 -- 20 21 22 23 92 - 94 99 146 123 180 101 - - -- - - -- - - -- --30 121 109 115 127 131 141 112 122 80. 67 ' <- -43 - - -5 45 107 25 101 98 123 150 178 109 77 60' 40.:';.43 24 '00 88 <.106 114 142 148 139 23 14 - - -- - - -- 87: 88 66 40 k;-20 22 Ht Total 408 -•. 410 ' 426' 538 552 638 409 380 279 - 205. .43 - --- 24.Hour Total . : 6992 . 85 AM -peak hour begins : 111:30 • - - �- FPM peak hour�:be ins._ AM peak volume : 413 Peak hour factor g 16 :45 PM.peak volume : 647 : 0.85 *************************************************' * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * *. * * ** * * * * * * ** ** Apr 25 Peak hour factor 0:90 Westbound Volume for Lane 2 End Time 00 01 02 03 __04 _ -05 06 07 •08 09 10 15 8 19 - -- - - -- - - -- - __ 11 30 1 9 6 9 8 22 61 101 135 98 75 86 45 7 5 4 15 12 38 87 123 153 95 122 00 -3 7 4 33 104 158 120 98 - -- __ 7 17 48 130 177 115 101 188 19 Hr Total 19 40 20 - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- _ 88 119 40 End Time 12 44 141 382 559 523 408 392 393 - 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 15 94 82 92 - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- -- 23 30 83 87 Z92 99 109 146 118 85 52 - - -- - - -- - - -3 45 110 140 128 111 137 106 82 46 34 26 00 111 106 120 140 123 122 86 81 54 32 27 16 109 128 120 126 97 76 54 36 22 8 Hr Total 398 - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- 58 _ 27 26 8 415 433 495 463 531 407 324 218 141 109 ^55 24 Hour Total : 6950 AM peak hour begins : 07:30 PM peak hour begins : 17 :00 AM peak volume 623 Peak hour factor : ********************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * *0 88 Peak hour factor 0.91 * * ** Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272 -3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 2 ************************************,************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** Data File : D0425010.PRN Station : 000000042405 Identification : 000058410084 Start date : Apr 25, 06 Stop date : Apr 25, 06 City /Town : Okeechobee, Florida Location : SR 70 East of SR 710 ************************************************ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Interval Start time Stop time County • : 15 minutes :00:00 24:00 : Okeechobee Apr 25 Total Volume for All Lanes End Time 00 01 02 03 04 .05 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 24 29 13 15 17 52 166 198 222 169 166 190 30 19 11 15 13 21 67 198 202 246 181 207 200 45 21 9 14 26 29 82 210 236 208 217 185 i85 00 8 11 7 9 46 117 217 246 203 179 180 224 Hr Total 72 60 49 63 113 318 791 882 879 746 -738 799 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 186 176 191 245 232 326 219 .178 132 113 61 _. 48 30, - 204. 196 227 255 242 278 218 204 127'',:90 .70 40 45 ' 217 . 241. 218 263 273 300 195 158 114`- 76 45.E :22 00 199 '212 . 223 270 268 265 184 164 -124, 67 "46 ,.. 30 Hr Total 806 A325 859 1033 1015 1169 816 704 497 346 -1222 140 24 .Hour. Total 13942 AM .peak hour begins :_07:30 AM peak volume : 950 Peak hour factor 0.97, PM peak 'hour :begins : :° 16:45. PM peak volume : 1172 Peak hour factor-i'0.90 **************-********************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Survey Phone Gardenia Terrace (561) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** with Totals * * ** *255 Data File : D0425011.PRN * * * * * * * * * * *Pag * ** Station • : 000000042406 Identification : 000210749420 Start date : Apr 25,,r, Interval : 15 minutes Stop- date : Apr..:25, . Start time : 00:00 City /Town : Okeechobee; Florida Stop time : 24:00 Location : SR 70 1 =EBRT to 710 2= County : Okeechobee *•************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** WBLT to 710 Apr 25 -_ -- Eastbound Volume for Lane 1 ******** End Time 00 01 02 01 - -02 03 04 ----------------------- 15 11 8 10 - - -- - - -- - -05 - -06 - -_? __08 09 10 - --_11 30 14 5 11 13 6 36 83 95 74 - - -- - - -- ___ 45 .7 8 9 7 18 47 86 117 94 72 68 76 00. 14 5 11 17 77 82 81 78 78 71 76 - - -5 10 23 83 80 83 80 90 85 78 Hr_Total- 46 26 41 39 - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- -- -- - -64__ 243 331 376 - - -- - - -= -- ---- - - - - -- 326 End Time 12 --- - - - --- ___ ___ 13 14 15 16 _-17--------------------- - - - - -- - -_301 - - -- 18 19 20 21 22' 23 15 94 95 84 -_92 - - -- - - -- - - -- - 30 89 79 99 109 92 118 79 58 55 - - -- - - -- -- - 00 78 7 83 191 97 115 102 94 82 48 28 29 19 66 49 55 38 36 20 - -- 93 7;6 55 41 11 0 Hr Total 348 330 384 - - -- - -- - - - -. - - -- - - -- -- _ 21 21 0 - -- --- - - - - -= 396 383 ._.436 315 244 2700 132 102 48 24 Hour Total 5722------- ------- ------ '- --- - - - -- ___ ___ AM peak hour begins : 07:00 - - - --- PM peak hour begins 16:45 AM peak volume : 376 Peak hour factor .**************************************** * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** 0.80 PM peak volume Peek hour factor Apr 25 - -- Westbound Volume for Lane .2 0.93 End Time 00 01 02 -------- -_____ 15 - -0 - -0 - -03 __04 - -05 06 07 08 - - -- - - -- - - - - -- 30 0 0 0 0 0 -o - - -9 - - -- - - -- -_09 10 11 45. 0 0 0 5 2 40 0 - 0 0 0 0 3 3 2 4 4 30 1 0 0 0 9 4 0 0 4 1 1 3 5 .5 Hr Total 0 0 0 - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- 4 2 2 0 End Time 12 - -- ----- - - - -__ 13 13 __ 13 14 15 16 17------------------- - - - - -- - - -- g. 18 19 30 4 2 4 - - -5 - - -3 - - -- - -1 - -1 -_20 __21 - 22 23 35 4 0 8 6 1 1 1 1 2 2 - -0 - - -- 45 3 4 5 2 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 8 -5g 2 0 1 1 - -- 2 3 1 3 0 5 Hr Total 13 7 - -17 - - -- - - -- - - -- 1 0 • 0 21 11 10 - - -- 24. Hour Total --------- - - - - -- _6__ __5__ 4 0 - - -- AM peak hour begins : 05:15 - --- -'- - -- PM peak hour begins : 15:00 AM • peak volume : 22 *****.************************** PM* P* . * * * *g * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *P * * * * *o * ** *actor : 21 Peak hour factor 0.61 0.66 Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272 -3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 2 ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Data File : D0425011.PRN Station : 000000042406 Identification : 000210749420 Interval : 15 minutes Start date : Apr 25, 06 Start time : 00:00 Stop. date : Apr 25, 06 Stop time : 24:00 City /Town : Okeechobee, Florida County : Okeechobee Location : SR 70 1 =EBRT to 710 2 =WBLT to 710 ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * ** Apr 25 Total Volume for All Lanes End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 11 8 10 9 6 36 92 100 76 77 71 77 30 14 5 11 13 18 53 89 119 98 76 71 76 45 7 8 9 7 17 80 85 90 82 78 90 '83 00 14 5 11 10 23 87 81 84 83 94 77 73 Hr Total 46 26 41 39 64 256 347 393 339 325 '309 309 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 .20 21 22 23 15 98 97 88 97 95 124 83 =59 58 47 29 20 30 - 93 79 107 115 86 124 195 84 48. :- 38 36 21 45 .. 89 87 96 99 93 103 67 :51 55 29 16 14 00 81 74 110 106 120 95 79 56 44 22 '21 0 Hr Total 361 337 401 417 394 446 324 250 , 205 136 -'102 55 24 Hour Total 5922 AM peak hour begins : 07:00 AM peak volume :' 393 Peak hour factor : 0.83 ''PM peak hour begins': 16:45 PM peak volume : '471 ' Peak hour factor : 0.95 ************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * ** rnrn Late: J1111 //LUVO OKEECHOBEE CNTYWIDE Category: 9100 Note: " *" indicates peak season week Florida Department of Transportation Transportation Statistics Office 2004 Peak Season Factor Category Report Week - Dates SF PSCF 1 01/01/2004 - 01/03/2004 0.98 1.08 2 01/04/2004 - 01/10/2004 0.98 * 3 01/11/2004 - 01/17/2004 0.97 1.08 * 4 01/18/2004 - 01/24/2004 0.96 1.05 7 * 1.05 5 01/25/2004 - 01/31/2004 0.94 1.03 * 6 02/01/2004 - 02/07/2004 0.92 * 1.0 7 02/08/2004 - 02/14/2004 0.91 * 8 02/15/2004 - 02/21/2004 0.89 0.90 0 * 9 02/22/2004 - 02/28/2004 0.89 0.98 0.98 * 10 02/29/2004 - 03/06/2004 0.88 * 11 03/07/2004 - 03/13/2004 0.88 0.97 0.97 * 12 03/14/2004 - 03/20/2004 0.87 0.96 * 13 03/21/2004 - 03/27/2004 0.90 * 14 03/28/2004 - 04/03/2004 0.92 1.0 * 15 04/04/2004 - 04/10/2004 0.95 1.01 1.04 16 04/11/2004 - 04/17/2004 0.98 1.08 17 04/18/2004 - 04/24/2004 0.99 18 04/25/2004 - 05/01/2004 1.00 1. 9 19 05/02/2004 - 05/08/2004 1.02 1.110 20 05/09/2004 - 05/15/2004 1.03' 1.12 1.13 21 05/16/2004 - 05/22/2004. 1.05 22 05/23/2004 - 05/29/2004.. 1:06 1.15 23 ' 1.16,,` 05/30/2004 - 06/05/2004 _• :: 1:07 � .... .1.18 -: 24 06/06/2004 = 06/12/2004 .: _ 1.08 ,:.., 25 06/13/2004 - 06/19/2004 1.10 1.1 26 06/20/2004:- 06/26/2004 i:10 1.21 1.2 27 06/27/2004 - 07/03/2004 1.11 28 07/04/2004 - 07/10/2004 1.12 1 22 2 29 07/11/2004 07/17/2004 1.13. 1 23 30 07/18/2004 - 07/24/2004 . _ 1.11 124 31 07/25/2004 - 07/31/2004 1.10 1.22 1.21 1. 32 08/01/2004 - 08/07/2004 1.09 1.20 33 08/08/2004 - 08/14/2004 " 1.07 1.18 1. 34 08/15/2004 - 08/21/2004 1.06 1.16 1.2 35 08/22/2004 - 08/28/2004 1.09 1.20 36 08/29/2004 - 09/04/2004 1.12 37 09/05/2004 - 09/11/2004 1.16 1.23 38 1. 1. 09/12/2004 - 09/18/2004 1.19 31 39 09/19/2004 - 09/25/2004 1.13 40 09/26/2004 - 10/02/2004 1.08 1.24 1 1.12 41 10/03/2004 - 10/09/2004 1.02 1. 42 10/10/2004 - 10/16/2004 0.97 43 10/17/2004 - 10/23/2004 0.97 1.07 2 44 1.07 10/24/2004 - 10/30/2004 0.96 45 10/31/2004 - 11/06/2004 0.96 1.05 1.05 46 11/07/2004 - 11/13/2004 0.95 1.04 47 11/14/2004 - 11/20/2004 0.95 1.04 48 11/21/2004 - 11/27/2004 0.96 49 11/28/2004 - 12/04/2004 0.97 1.05 1.07 50 12/05/2004 - 12/11/2004 0.97 1.0 51 12/12/2004 - 12/18/2004 0.98 52 12/19/2004 - 12/25/2004 0.98 1.08 1.08 53 12/26/2004 - 12/31/2004 0.97 1.07 MOCF = 0.91 Page 1 ❑ � Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. APPENDIX D Growth Rates and Peak Hour Factors Traffic Trends - V2.0 SR70 - -E. ofUS441 1PIN# 1973215 -1 I Location 1 70000 60000 ea 50000 — r 40000 — 0 30000 0 d g 20000 10000 County: Station #: Highway: Okeechobee (91) 0 SR70 0 EMI Observed Count Fitted Curve 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 —1 -1—F 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Year **Annual Trend Increase: 1,000 Trend R- squared: 61.76% Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: 3.41 % Trend Growth Rate (2005 to Design Year): 2,92% Printed: 21- Jun -07 Straight Line Growth Option 2035 Year Traffic (ADT /AADT) Count* Trend ** 2000 30500 29300 2001 29000 30300 2002 32500 31300 2003 30000 32300 2004 34000 33300 2005 35000 34300 2010 Opening Year Trend 2010 N/A 39300 2015 Mid -Year Trend 2015 N/A 44300 2025 Design Year Trend 2025 N/A 54300 TRANPLAN Forecasts /Trends *Axle- Adjusted 2006 Peak Season Factor Category Report - Report Type: ALL Category: 9100 OKEECHOBEE CNTYWIDE Week Dates SF MOCF: 0.90 PSCF 1 01/01/2006 - 01/07/2006 0.99 2 01/08/2006 - 01/14/2006 0.96 * 3 01/15/2006 - 01/21/2006 0.93 * 4 01/22/2006 - 01/28/2006 0.92 * 5 01/29/2006 - 02/04/2006 0.91 * 6 02/05/2006 - 02/11/2006 0.90 * 7 02/12/2006 - 02/18/2006 0.89 * 8 02/19/2006 - 02/25/2006 0.88 * 9 02/26/2006 - 03/04/2006 0.87 *10 03/05/2006 - 03/11/2006 0.86 *11 03/12/2006 - 03/18/2006 0.85 *12 03/19/2006 - 03/25/2006 0.88 *13 03/26/2006 - 04/01/2006 0.90 *14 04/02/2006 - 04/08/2006 0.93 *15 04/09/2006 - 04/15/2006 0.96 16 04/16/2006 - 04/22/2006 0.97 17 04/23/2006 - 04/29/2006 0.98 18 04/30/2006 - 05/06/2006 1.00 19 05/07/2006 - 05/13/2006 1.01 20 05/14/2006 - 05/20/2006 1.02 21 05/21/2006 - 05/27/2006 1.04 22 05/28/2006 - 06/03/2006 1.05 23 06/04/2006 - 06/10/2006 1.07 24 06/11/2006 - 06/17/2006 1.08 25 06/18/2006 - 06/24/2006 1.10 26 06/25/2006 - 07/01/2006 1.11 27 07/02/2006 - 07/08/2006 1.13 28 07/09/2006 - 07/15/2006 1.14 29 07/16/2006 - 07/22/2006 1.14 30 07/23/2006 - 07/29/2006 1.13 31 07/30/2006 - 08/05/2006 1.13 32 08/06/2006 - 08/12/2006 1.13 33 08/13/2006 - 08/19/2006 1.12 34 08/20/2006 - 08/26/2006 1.11 35 08/27/2006 - 09/02/2006 1.11 36 09/03/2006 - 09/09/2006 1.10 37 09/10/2006 - 09/16/2006 1.09 38 09/17/2006 - 09/23/2006 1.08 39 09/24/2006 - 09/30/2006 1.06 40 10/01/2006 - 10/07/2006 1.05 41 10/08/2006 - 10/14/2006 1.04 42 10/15/2006 - 10/21/2006 1.02 43 10/22/2006 - 10/28/2006 1.02 44 10/29/2006 - 11/04/2006 1.01 45 11/05/2006 - 11/11/2006 1.00 46 11/12/2006 - 11/18/2006 0.99 47 11/19/2006 - 11/25/2006 0.99 48 11/26/2006 - 12/02/2006 0.99 49 12/03/2006 - 12/09/2006 0.99 50 12/10/2006 - 12/16/2006 0.99 51 12/17/2006 - 12/23/2006 0.97 52 12/24/2006 - 12/30/2006 0.95 53 12/31/2006 - 12/31/2006 0.93 * Peak Season Page 1 of 2 1.10 1.07 1.04 1.02 1.01 1.00 0.99 0.98 0.97 0.96 0.95 0.98 1.00 1.04 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.11 1.12 1.14 1.16 1.17 1.19 1.20 1.22 1.24 1.26 1.27 1.27 1.26 1.26 1.26 1.25 1.24 1.24 1.22 1.21 1.20 1.18 1.17 1.16 1.14 1.14 1.12 1.11 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.08 1.06 1.04 ❑=I � Kimley -Horn IM and Associates, Inc. APPENDIX E FDOT Generalized LOS Tables TABLE GENERALIZED ANNUAL AVERAGE AREAS TRANSITIONING IN AREAS OVER 5,000 NOT 4 -2 DAILY VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S TO URBANIZED AREAS OR IN URBANIZED AREAS* UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Lanes Divided 2 Undivided 4 Divided 6 Divided A 2,400 18,600 27,900 Level of Service B C D 8,000 14,900 21,100 30,200 43,600 56,500 45,200 65,500 84,700 E 26,700 64,200 96,200 STATE TWO -WAY ARTERIALS Class I (>0.00 to 1.99 signalized intersections per mile) Lanes Divided 2 Undivided 4 Divided 6 Divided Level of Service A B C ** 4,000 13,100 4,600 27,900 32,800 6,900 42,800 49,300 Class II (2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) Lanes Divided 2 Undivided 4 Divided 6 Divided A ** ** ** D 15,500 34,200 51,400 Level of Service B C D ** 10,500 14,500 3,700 24,400 30,600 6,000 38,000 46,100 Class III (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile) Lanes Divided 2 Undivided 4 Divided 6 Divided A ** ** ** B ** ** ** Level of Service C D 5,000 11,800 11,700 27,200 18,400 42,100 E 16,300 # *# *** E 15,300 32,200 48,400 E 14,600 30,800 46,300 FREEWAYS Level of Service Lanes A B C D E 4 23,500 38,700 52,500 62,200 69,100 6 36,400 59,800 81,100 96,000 106,700 8 49,100 80,900 109,600 129,800 144,400 10 61,800 101,800 138,400 163,800 182,000 Lanes Divided 2 Undivided 4 Divided 6 Divided Lanes Divided 2 Undivided 4 Divided NON -STATE ROADWAYS Major City/County Roadways A ** ** ** B ** ** ** Level of Service C D E 7,000 13,600 14,600 16,400 29,300 30,900 25,700 44,100 46,400 Other Signalized Roadways (signalized intersection analysis) A ** ** B ** ** Level of Service C D 4,400 9,400 10,300 20,200 E 12,000 24,000 BICYCLE MODE (Note: Level of service for the bicycle mode in this table is based on roadway geometrics at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of bicyclists using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two -way maximum service volumes.) Paved Shoulder/ Bicycle Lane Coverage 0-49% 50 -84% 85 -100% A ** ** 3,200 Level of Service B C D 1,900 3,300 13,600 2,500 4,000 >4,000 7,100 >7,100 * ** PEDESTRIAN MODE (Note: Level of service for the pedestrian mode in this table is based on roadway geometric at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of pedestrians using the facility) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two -way maximum service volumes.) '/o Sidewalk Coverage A ** ** ** 0-49% 50 -84% 85 -100% B ** ** 2,200 Level of Service C D E ** 11,200 6,300 9,800 >11,200 15,400 18,800 * *# Source: Florida Department of Transportation 05/17/07 Systems Planning Office 605 Suwannee Street, MS 19 Tallahassee, FL 32399 -0450 http: / /www. dot. state. fl. us / planning /systems/sm/los/default.htm Lanes 2 2 Multi Multi ARTERIAL/NON -STATE ROADWAY ADJUSTMENTS (alter corresponding volume by the indicated percent) Median Divided Undivided Undivided Undivided Left Turn Lanes Adjustment Factors Yes No Yes No ONE -WAY FACILITIES +5% -20% -5% -25% Multiply the corresponding two - directional volumes in this table by 0.6. 'Values shown are presented as two-way annual average daily volumes for levels of service and are for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated Although presented as daily volumes, they actually represent peak hour direction conditions with applicable K and D factors applied. This table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications. The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications. The table and deriving computer models should not be used for corridor or intersection design, where more refined techniques exist Level of service letter grade thresholds are probably not comparable across modes and, therefore, cross modal comparisons should be made with caution Furthermore, combining levels of service of different modes into one overall roadway Level of service is not recommended Calculations are based on planning applications of the Highway Capacity Manual, Bicycle LOS Model, Pedestrian LOS Model and Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, respectively for the automobile/truck, bicycle, pedestrian and bus modes. "Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults ' **Not applicable for that level of service letter grade. For automobile/truck modes, volumes greater than level of service D become F because intersection capacities have been reached. For bicycle and pedestrian modes, the level of service letter grade (including F) is not achievable, because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input value defaults. TABLE 4 - 5 GENERALIZED PEAK HOUR TWO -WAY VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S AREAS TRANSITIONING INTO URBANIZED AREAS OR AREAS OVER 5,000 NOT IN URBANIZED AREAS* UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Lanes Divided 2 Undivided 4 Divided 6 Divided Level of Service A B C D 230 770 1,440 2,040 1,790 2,900 4,190 5,420 2,680 4,340 6,280 8,130 STATE TWO -WAY ARTERIALS Class I ( >0.00 to 1.99 signalized intersections per mile) Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D 2 Undivided ** 390 1,260 1,490 4 Divided 440 2,680 3,150 3,290 6 Divided 670 4,110 4,730 4,930 Class II (2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D 2 Undivided ** ** 1,010 1,390 4 Divided ** 360 2,340 2,940 6 Divided ** 580 3,640 4,420 Class III (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile) Lanes Divided 2 Undivided 4 Divided 6 Divided A ** ** ** B ** ** ** Level of Service C D 480 1,130 1,130 2,610 1,770 4,040 NON -STATE ROADWAYS Major City/County Roadways Level of Service Lanes Divided C D 2 Undivided 670 1,300 4 Divided 1,570 2,810 6 Divided 2,470 4,230 Other Signalized Roadways (signalized intersection analysis) A ** ** ** B ** ** ** Lanes Divided 2 Undivided 4 Divided A ** ** B ** ** E 2,580 6,160 9,240 E 1,560 * ** *** E 1,470 3,090 4,650 E 1,400 2,960 4,450 E 1,400 2,970 4,460 Level of Service C D E 430 900 1,150 990 1,940 2,300 FREEWAYS Level of Service Lanes A B C D 4 2,350 3,870 5,250 6,220 6,910 6 3,640 5,980 8,110 9,600 10,670 8 4,910 8,090 10,960 12,980 14,440 10 6,180 10,180 13,840 16,380 18,200 BICYCLE MODE (Note: Level of service for the bicycle mode in this table is based on roadway geometries at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of bicyclists using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two -way maximum service volumes.) Paved Shoulder Bicycle Lane Coverage 0-49% 50 -84% 85- 100% A ** ** 310 Level of Service B C D 180 310 1,310 240 390 >390 680 >680 * ** PEDESTRIAN MODE (Note: Level of service for the pedestrian mode in this table is based on roadway geometric at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of pedestrians using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two -way maximum service volumes.) Sidewalk Coverage 0-49% 50 -84% 85 -100% Lanes 2 2 Multi Multi A ** ** ** Level of Service B C D E ** ** 210 ** ** 600 1,480 940 1,800 1,080 >1,080 * ** ARTERIAL/NON -STATE ROADWAY ADJUSTMENTS (alter corresponding volume by the indicated percent) Median Left Tum Lanes Adjustment Factors Divided Undivided Undivided Undivided Yes No Yes No +5% -20% -5% -25% ONE -WAY FACILITIES Multiply the corresponding two- directional volumes in this table by 0.6. Source: Florida Department of Transportation 05/17/07 Systems Planning Office 605 Suwannee Street, MS 19 Tallahassee, FL 32399 -0450 http: / /www.dot.state.fl.us/ planning /systems/sm/los/defauit.htm *Values shown are presented as hourly two-way volumes for levels of service and are for the eutomobe7dtrock modes unless represent peak hour peak direction conditions with an applicable D factor applied. This table does not constitute a specifically uaedd. only Although presented in as Y volumes, they actually from which this table is derived should be used for more specific standard and should be used onl for I� hour two-wa vo which this t ble is derived letter spa planning applications: The table and deriving general intersection applications. The more me fine techniques from grade thresholds are probably not comparable across modes a c ossmoda models should hldh not d used for corridor or intersection r design, , o where levl refined service idues modes into one overall roadway level of service is not recommended Calculation are based on planning modal somparison should be made with caution. F Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, respectively for the amomobild as B applications moe. of the Highway Furthermore, combining levels of service ofditfetent ”Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults. �o� bicycle, g y Capacity Manual, Bicycle LOS Model, Pedestrian LOS Model and Transit Yc Pedestrian and bus modes. * *'Not applicable for that level of service letter grade. For automobilchmck modes, volumes greater than level of service!) become F because intersection capacities have been reached. For bicycle and pedestrian modes, the level of service letter grade (including 9 is not achievable, because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input value defaults. TABLE 4 - 8 GENERALIZED PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONAL VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S AREAS TRANSITIONING INTO URBANIZED AREAS OR AREAS OVER 5,000 NOT IN URBANIZED AREAS* UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D E 1 Undivided 120 420 790 1,120 1,410 2 Divided 980 1,590 2,300 2,980 3,390 3 Divided 1,470 2,390 3,460 4,470 5,080 STATE TWO -WAY ARTERIALS Class I (>0.00 to 1.99 signalized intersections per mile) Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D E 1 Undivided ** 210 690 820 860 2 Divided 240 1,470 1,730 1,810 * ** 3 Divided 370 2,260 2,600 2,710 * ** Class II (2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D E 1 Undivided ** ** 560 760 810 2 Divided ** 200 1,290 1,620 1,700 3 Divided ** 320 2,000 2,430 2,560 Class III (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile) Lanes Divided 1 Undivided 2 Divided 3 Divided A B ** 4* 4* *4 4* *4 Level of Service C D E 260 620 770 620 1,440 1,630 970 2,220 2,450 FREEWAYS Level of Service Lanes A B C D E 2 1,290 2,130 2,890 3,420 3,800 3 2,000 3,290 4,460 5,280 5,870 4 2,700 4,450 6,030 7,140 7,940 5 3,400 5,600 7,610 9,010 10,010 BICYCLE MODE (Note: Level of service for the bicycle mode in this table is based on roadway geometries at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of bicyclists using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine maximum service volumes.) Lanes Divided 1 Undivided 2 Divided 3 Divided NON -STATE ROADWAYS Major City/County Roadways A B *4 4* *4 *4 4* *4 Level of Service C D 370 720 870 1,550 1,360 2,330 Other Signalized Roadways (signalized intersection analysis) E 770 1,630 2,450 Paved Shoulder/ Bicycle Lane Level of Service Coverage A B C D E 0-49% 4* 100 170 720 >720 >210 210 * ** 50 -84% ** 130 85 -100% 170 380 >380 * ** *4* PEDESTRIAN MODE (Note: Level of service for the pedestrian mode in this table is based on roadway geometric at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of pedestrians using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown by number of directional roadway lanes to determine maximum service volumes.) Level of Service Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E 0-49% ** ** 4* 330 810 50 -84% ** ** ** 520 990 * ** 85- 100% ** 120 590 >590 Lanes ARTERIAL/NON -STATE ROADWAY ADJUSTMENTS (alter corresponding volume by the indicated percent) Median Left Turn Lanes Adjustment Factors 1 Divided Yes +5% 1 Undivided No -20% Multi Undivided Yes -5% Multi Undivided No -25% Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D E 1 Undivided ** ** 230 490 630 2 Divided ** ** 540 1,070 1,270 Source: Florida Department of Transportation 05/17/07 Systems Planning Office 605 Suwannee Street, MS 19 Tallahassee, FL 32399 -0450 http: / /www. dot. state. fl. us / planning /systems/sm/los/default.htm • Values shown are hourly directional volumes for levels of service and are for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated To convect to annual average daily traffic volumes, these volumes must be divided by appropriate 0 and K factors. This table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications. The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific are r palino applications. comparable Tho is m des deriving computer therefore, cross modal mpparisons should made with intersection design, iurtherm°� °mbibining leve s of service of different modes into one overall roadway thresholds e are probably cot mended C l across la Calculations are bad, r of Service level of service is not recommended. Calculations are based on planning applications of the FGghway Capacity Manuel, Bicycle LOS Model, Pedestrian LOS Model and Transit Capacity and Quality Manual, respectively for the automobile/buck, bicycle, pedestrian and bus modes. ••Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults. "'Not applicable for that level of service letter grade. For autom roil achievable, modes, because there is greater r maximum of ss service lame become because intersection ctiot value p capacities have been reached For bicycle and pedestrian modes, the level of service letter grade (including F) ONE -WAY FACILITIES Increase corresponding volume by 1.2. ❑� �, Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. FDOT Signal Data APPENDIX F • 4 AS - 16 As 1.8 X 9 FINANCIAL P/?OJ. ID STATE PROD. NO.. SNEC 196900- 1 -52 -01 91070-3525 T -5 /, 9 l8 X 9 'r-- — — r— SR 70 '7/ -1 -400 LOCATION NO. 2 S.R. 70 /S.R. 700 (US 98) a SR 15 (US 4411 NIP 90 4-e9 OLsR:vCO Br, YfJ( OArtl ' DRAWN BY YW DATE' '8-98 CNECfED BTt 71AB DATE' 4 -99 OAT 1 slq /Pr,ON FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FLORDDA.LkPp+4T,IIENr . TRAUSPORTATIQN APPROITED 8i t GATE r 1 Z. I9 PLAN SHEET. Z5 80A SERrES [+IOO `mow ZS 6 A A.Lca RA04 • 75 SACATRLY140 QNM • CREEY _ LEEEXO t Emma 7r/rrrE RAYS IV< Di y/tl,/j,ETERS. 3-f ' • P012' Lt .4 wVn STA. P64012, IL:Jm LT SAll /EA P LI STATE PROD. N0. SHgE1 L/D. s SERVICE POLE SHALL SE 4 m IN LENGTH WITH AN IN- GROUND DEPTH OF 1.5 m. 6 1/I 2 EA 196900- 1 -52 -01 6H/ ZEA /EA 61n lEA RAE LcCATNN- 4 Z5429.2, 1319 LT -R PVC FM Z EA R/W .. ..12' DI ............... S.R. 70 26 3 WI /£A 1EA 1 E L2 Pdnef7 4 £A 7LE LLCATlOY= it Ps•CS9, Y7Jm RT 4/ / EA IAS • IEA J-2 POLE LLCATIoN- STA.26429419.Sm RT 3 Yl 361!7 - q` CONTROL ±R TO REMAIN 39 MI ip 9Y1 et III 2630 -I -A LOCATION NO, 3 S.R. 70 AT 8TH AVE. EAST DES.cYEO Err, Lcc DARE, 9•-9s ORAWR MI fin oATE& s -39 TJ/£CXED Br. LILA AA/Er 4-59 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EXISTING MAST ARMS AND CONTROLLER ARE TO REMAIN. • FINANCIAL PROJ. ID STATE PROJ. NO. 196900- 1 -52 -01 • 91070 -3526 5116E _ NO. T -7 2635-1 -11 2620 -1 1E4 3 All LOCATION NO 4 S.R. 70 AT 10TH AVE. EAST• • DESCNED ®'r fLG DATE: 9 -S9 • MRAHN 19', CGC DAM' 9 -99 CHECKED BY, Mb( DaTEt 4 -99 FLORIDA Lb7'A. T1IElVf•.OF TRAarrPORTAT • APPROVED- BY : • • ,/ O _ ? r ! Ca baTE DESCRIPTION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PLAN .SHEET • IAS 50LF • 2 RUNS 9 LP 9 LF 2 EA 1 EA. IEA 20 LF 1 AS 20 LF 1/2 LF 0 7:LF 12'oP 241)%1 SR 70 1 E 72 STATE PROD. 9906/ -3S8 9906 o_DO, o, I PI REMovE 44 gF OF • THERMOPLASTIC • 265'0F 24'' WHr: 1EA !A9 12 A/4 RPM'S IA 706 -HZ1 20Ls- R/W LOCATION OF PROJECT e R. 710 AT s.R, 70: • Sc4LE: I ". 2 . EXIST /A,G TO REMAIIJ iuPcnnrm ❑ NE � Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. APPENDIX G 2008 Operational Analysis Arterial Level of Service 8/13/2007 Arterial Level of Service: EB SR 70 8th Ave. SR 710 III III Arterial Level of Service: WB SR 70 30 98.6 16.4 115.0 0.82 30 77.0 23.4 100.4 0.64 25.7 23.0 B C 10th Ave. III 30 77.0 11.6 88.6 0.64 26.1 B US 441 III 30 98.6 54.5 153.1 0.82 19.3 C AM Peak Hour Okeechobee Synchro 6 Report Page 1 Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Arterial Level of Service 8/13/2007 Arterial Level of Service: EB SR 70 SR 710 111 30 77.0 28.8 105.8 Arterial Level of Service: WB SR 70 0.64 21.8 US441 111 30 98.6 109.6 208.2 0.82 14.2 D PM Peak Hour Okeechobee Synchro 6 Report Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SR 70 & US 441 8/9/2007 Lane Configurations Total Lost time (s) 4.0 Frt Satd. Flow (prot) Satd. Flow • erm 'I +t �i tio r ' ?+ r 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.97 1770 3417 248 3417 1.00 0.95 1770 3367 248 3367 4.0 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 248 3539 1583 420 3539 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Tum Type pm +pt Permitted Phases 4 Effective Green, g (s) 52.0 30.0 23 Clearance Time s 5.5 v/s Ratio Prot v/c Ratio Progression Factor Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) 6.0 0.08 0.24 0.46 0.95 1.00 1.00 48.4 65.6 62.6 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 0 0 48 0 0 0 281 pm +pt pm +pt 8 2 52.0 30.0 5.5 6.0 c0.21 c0.30 1.17 1.13 1.00 1.00 137.0 119.0 124.6 1.20 96.1% 0 Perm pm +pt 2 6 0 119 Perm 6 52.0 30.0 30.0 52.0 30.0 30.0 5.5 6.0 0.13 0.16 6.0 5.5 6.0 c0.17 0.21 6.0 0.73 0.66 0.72 0.93 0.84 0.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 40.0 44.1 51.7 54.8 52.2 35.1 ICU Level of Service 46.3 F 50.9 PM Peak Hour Okeechobee Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: SR 70 & 8th Ave. 8/9/2007 Lane Configurations Total Lost time (s) 4.0 ++ 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3537 169 3539 1583 169 3537 Satd. Flow (• erm 4' r 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.85 1774 1583 1269 1583 4.0 0.89 1648 1598 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 RTOR Reduction (vph) Tum Type Permitted Phases 0 0 130 Perm 4 0 Perm Perm 4 8 1 Effective Green, g (s) 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 Clearance Time s v/s Ratio Prot v/c Ratio Progression Factor Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 c0.46 6.0 6.0 0.45 029 0.95 0.16 0.71 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.58 0.65 22.3 34.1 13.2 46.2 21.5 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 31.1 0.65 70.0% 22.4 0 0 Prot ICU Level of Service 0 6 0 Perm Perm 2 38.0 38.0 6.0 c0.06 0.31 0.03 1.00 1.00 18.5 15.3 18.1 6.0 C 6 11 17.0 6.0 0.02 1.00 29.8 29.8 0 PM Peak Hour Okeechobee Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: SR 70 & 10th Ave. 8/9/2007 Lane Configurations Total Lost time (s) 4.0 i 4\ P 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Frt 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Satd. Flow (prot) 3478 1770 3539 1770 1583 Satd. Flow rm 3478 186 3539 1770 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 RTOR Reduction (vph) 11 Turn Type Permitted Phases Effective Green, g (s) 56.0 Clearance Time s v/s Ratio Prot v/c Ratio Progression Factor Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) 6.0 c0.44 0.70 0.98 11.7 11.7 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 0 0 Perm 8 0 0 22 Perm 2 56.0 56.0 26.0 26.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 0.37 c0.11 0.51 0.60 0.40 0.02 1.19 1.20 1.00 1.00 22.4 13.2 28.0 23.0 13.6 27.3 0.60 63.8% ICU Level of Service B PM Peak Hour Okeechobee Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11:SR70 &SR710 8/9/2007 Lane Configurations Total Lost time (s) Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 1770 1863 1770 1583 Satd. Flow (• erm 1863 1583 236 1863 1770 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 + r 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 RTOR Reduction (vph) Turn Type Permitted Phases 0 0 0 Free Perm Free 8 0 0 16 Perm 2 Effective Green, g (s) 46.0 90.0 46.0 46.0 36.0 36.0 Clearance Time s 6.0 v/s Ratio Prot c0.42 v/c Ratio 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 0.35 c0.33 0.83 0.35 0.21 0.68 0.83 0.02 Progression Factor 1.16 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) 16.4 27.6 0.4 15.9 20.4 34.9 16.4 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 0.83 76.9% 20.2 34.2 ICU Level of Service D PM Peak Hour Okeechobee Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3:SR70 &US441 8/9/2007 Lane Configurations Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 Frt Satd. Flow (prot) Satd. Flow • erm ft) 1.00 0.97 1770 3418 248 3418 4.0 4.0 14 r ?+ r 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1770 3336 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 460 3336 541 3539 1583 581 3539 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Tum Type pm +pt Permitted Phases 4 23 0 0 80 0 0 0 211 pm +pt pm +pt 8 2 52.0 30.0 6.0 5.5 6.0 Effective Green, g (s) 52.0 30.0 Clearance Time s 5.5 v/s Ratio Prot 0.11 0.16 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.62 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 Delay (s) 31.7 43.3 Approach Delay (s) 39.9 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.5% ICU Level of Service c Critical Lane Group 0.84 c0.19 0.25 1.01 0.91 1.00 1.00 74.0 60.0 64.8 0 Perm pm +pt 2 6 0 93 Perm 6 52.0 30.0 30.0 52.0 30.0 30.0 5.5 6.0 6.0 5.5 0.08 0.13 6.0 6.0 c0.11 0.14 0.43 0.54 0.18 0.61 0.56 0.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 25.3 41.3 36.3 29.5 41.9 34.8 36.5 37.0 D AM Peak Hour Okeechobee Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: SR 70 & 8th Ave. 8/9/2007 Lane Configurations Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3538 Satd. Flow • erm 169 3539 1583 491 3538 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.85 1775 1583 1271 1 4, 4.0 0.90 1653 1586 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 RTOR Reduction (vph) Tum Type Permitted Phases 0 Perm 4 0 36 0 0 0 0 0 Perm Perm 4 8 Prot Effective Green, g (s) 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 Clearance Time s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 v/s Ratio Prot v/c Ratio Progression Factor Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) 0.23 c0.38 0.13 0.47 0.04 0.07 0.79 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 0.59 15.9 16.2 12.1 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 15.9 0.55 58.6% 7.8 14.7 14.6 ICU Level of Service 9 0 Perm Perm 2 38.0 38.0 6.0 6.0 c0.05 0.29 0.01 1.00 1.00 18.2 15.1 18.0 B 6 11 17.0 6.0 0.02 1.00 29.9 29.9 0 AM Peak Hour Okeechobee Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: SR 70 & 10th Ave. --► 4- 4 Lane Configurations T. Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Frt 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Satd. Flow (prot) 3474 1770 3539 1770 1583 Satd. Flow erm 3474 580 3539 1770 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 RTOR Reduction (vph) 12 Tum Type Permitted Phases Effective Green, g (s) 56.0 8 2 56.0 56.0 26.0 26.0 Clearance Times 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.23 c0.31 c0.06 0.36 0.04 0.50 0.22 0.01 v/c Ratio 9.6 7.8 11.4 25.3 22.9 8/9/2007 Approach Delay (s) 9.6 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.41 Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.6% ICU Level of Service A c Critical Lane Group AM Peak Hour Okeechobee Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11:SR70 &SR710 8/9/2007 Lane Configurations Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 r 4.0 4.0 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 1770 1863 1770 1583 Satd. Flow • erm 1863 1583 640 1863 1770 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 RTOR Reduction (vph) Tum Type Permitted Phases 10 Free Perm Free 8 Perm 2 Effective Green, g (s) 46.0 90.0 46.0 46.0 36.0 36.0 Clearance Time s) v/s Ratio Prot 0.27 v/c Ratio 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 c0.41 c0.40 6.0 0.53 0.29 0.08 0.80 0.99 0.01 Progression Factor 1.41 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) 12.1 22.8 0.5 11.7 25.0 57.6 16.3 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.3% ICU Level of Service c Critical Lane Group 0.88 24.6 56.7 D AM Peak Hour Okeechobee Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 4 1/11111111191 Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 2008 With Project Operational Analysis Worksheets Arterial Level of Service 8/13/2007 Arterial Level of Service: EB SR 70 8th Ave. SR 710 111 111 30 30 98.6 77.0 17.3 115.9 23.2 100.2 0.82 0.64 25.5 23.1 B c Arterial Level of Service: WB SR 70 US441 111 30 98.6 76.9 175.5 0.82 16.9 D AM Peak Hour with Project Okeechobee Synchro 6 Report Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Page 1 Arterial Level of Service Arterial Level of Service: EB SR 70 8/13/2007 8th Ave. 11 45 65.7 17.3 83.0 0.82 35.6 Arterial Level of Service: WB SR 70 AM Peak Hour with Project Okeechobee Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3:SR70 &US441 8/14/2007 Lane Configurations Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 -► c ■- 4\ t I' �► t r Frt 1.00 0.97 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3422 Satd. Flow •erm) 248 3422 1.00 0.94 1770 3335 436 3335 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 541 3539 1583 581 3539 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Turn Type pm +pt Permitted Phases 4 Effective Green, g (s) 52.0 30.0 22 Clearance Time s 5.5 v/s Ratio Prot v/c Ratio Progression Factor Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) 6.0 0.11 0.17 0.59 0.64 1.00 1.00 31.8 43.8 40.4 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 0 0 pm +pt 8 52.0 30.0 5.5 6.0 c0.19 0.26 1.06 0.94 1.00 1.00 85.9 63.5 71.3 0.88 81.2% 81 0 0 pm +pt 2 0 223 0 Perm pm +pt 2 6 0 93 Perm 6 52.0 30.0 30.0 52.0 30.0 30.0 5.5 6.0 0.08 0.13 6.0 5.5 6.0 6.0 c0.12 0.14 0.43 0.54 0.19 0.64 0.56 0.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 25.3 41.3 36.5 30.4 41.9 34.8 ICU Level of Service 36.6 D 37.2 AM Peak Hour with Project Okeechobee Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: SR 70 & 8th Ave. 8/14/2007 fir I 1, 4/ Lane Configurations 1I e r +I) 4' Total Lost time (s) Frt Satd. Flow (prot) Satd. Flow • erm 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1770 3539 1583 1770 3538 169 3539 1583 455 3538 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.85 1775 1583 1271 1583 4.0 0.90 1653 1586 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 36 Turn Type Permitted Phases Effective Green, g (s) 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 Clearance Time v/s Ratio Prot v/c Ratio Progression Factor s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 c0.39 Dela (s) 0.13 0.50 0.04 0.08 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.61 0.59 15.9 16.5 12.1 8.0 15.2 Approach Delay (s) c0.05 0.29 0.01 1.00 1.00 18.2 15.1 18.0 HCM Volume to Capaci ratio 0.56 Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.4% ICU Level of Service B c Critical Lane Group 0.02 1.00 29.9 29.9 AM Peak Hour with Project Okeechobee Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: SR 70 & 10th Ave. 8/14/2007 Lane Configurations Total Lost time (s) Frt Satd. Flow (prot) Satd. Flow (• erm ) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 3473 1770 3539 1770 1583 3473 547 3539 1770 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 RTOR Reduction (vph) 12 Tum Type Permitted Phases Effective Green, g (s) 56.0 Clearance Time (s Ws Ratio Prot v/c Ratio Progression Factor Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) 6.0 Perm 8 14 Perm 2 56.0 56.0 26.0 26.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 0.24 c0.32 c0.06 0.38 0.06 0.51 0.22 0.01 1.10 1.13 1.16 1.00 1.00 9.7 7.7 11.4 25.3 22.9 9.7 11.3 24.9 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Intersection Capacity` Utilization c Critical Lane Group 0.42 42.2% ICU Level of Service AM Peak Hour with Project Okeechobee Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: SR 70 & SR 710 4-- I\ Lane Configurations + tr 4, VI r Total Lost time (s) Frt Satd. Flow (prot) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1863 1583 1770 1863 1770 1583 Satd. Flow ( erm 1863 1583 630 1863 1770 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 RTOR Reduction (vph) Tum Type Permitted Phases 8/14/2007 Free Perm Free 8 Perm 2 Effective Green, g (s) 46.0 90.0 46.0 46.0 36.0 36.0 Clearance Time s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.27 c0.41 c0.39 v/c Ratio Progression Factor Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) 0.53 0.29 0.08 0.81 0.97 0.01 1.41 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 12.2 HCM Volume to Ca acity ratio 0.88 Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.2% ICU Level of Service D c Critical Lane Group AM Peak Hour with Project Okeechobee Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3:SR70 &US441 8/14/2007 Lane Configurations Total Lost time (s) Frt Satd. Flow (prot) Satd. Flow • erm Peak -hour factor, PHF RTOR Reduction (vph) Turn Type Permitted Phases 4.0 ft 4.0 1.00 0.97 1770 3422 248 3422 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.95 1770 3364 248 3364 . 4\ r 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 248 3539 1583 420 3539 1583 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 pm +pt 4 22 Effective Green, g (s) 52.0 30.0 Clearance Time s v/s Ratio Prot v/c Ratio Progression Factor Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) 5.5 6.0 0.08 0.25 0.46 0.99 1.00 1.00 48.4 73.5 69.2 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 1.27 99.9% 50 pm +pt 8 52.0 30.0 pm +pt 2 276 Perm pm +pt 2 6 119 Perm 6 52.0 30.0 30.0 52.0 30.0 30.0 5.5 6.0 5.5 6.0 6.0 5.5 c0.23 c0.31 1.25 1.20 1.00 1.00 168.6 144.7 152.2 0.13 0.16 6.0 c0.18 0.21 6.0 0.73 0.66 0.81 0.98 0.84 0.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 40.0 44.1 58.7 66.8 52.2 35.1 ICU Level of Service 49.3 F 54.8 PM Peak Hour with Project Okeechobee Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6:SR70 &8th Ave. 8/14/2007 Lane Configurations rr + r 4 Total Lost time s () 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Frt Flow (prot) Satd. Flow • erm Peak -hour factor, PHF RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Turn Type Permitted Phases Effective Green, g (s) 44.0 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1770 3539 1583 1770 3537 169 3539 1583 169 3537 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.85 4.0 1648 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0 0 123 Clearance Time s v/s Ratio Prot v/c Ratio Progression Factor Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) 1 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 c0.49 0.29 1.00 0.17 0.71 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.57 0.64 22.3 44.0 13.3 45.8 27.2 0 0 0 5 0 38.0 38.0 6.0 6.0 c0.06 0.31 0.03 1.00 1.00 18.5 15.3 11. 17.0 6.0 0.02 1.00 29.8 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Intersection Capaci Utilizatioi Critical Lane Group 0.68 PM Peak Hour with Project Okeechobee Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: SR 70 & 10th Ave. 8/14/2007 Lane Configurations Total Lost time (s) Frt Satd. Flow (prot) Satd. Flow . erm Peak -hour factor, PHF -► f 4 4\ p 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 3477 1770 3539 1770 1583 3477 155 3539 1770 1583 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 RTOR Reduction (vph) 12 Tum Type Permitted Phases Effective Green, g (s) 56.0 Clearance Time s v/s Ratio Prot v/c Ratio Progression Factor Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) 0 0 Perm 8 0 0 22 Perm 2 56.0 56.0 26.0 26.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 c0.46 0.39 c0.11 0.74 0.68 0.62 0.40 0.02 0.99 1.19 1.20 1.00 1.00 12.3 37.5 13.6 28.0 23.0 12.3 14.7 27.3 6.0 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 0.63 67.0% ICU Level of Service C PM Peak Hour with Project Okeechobee Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: SR 70 & SR 710 8/14/2007 4\ / Lane Configurations 4' Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Frt Satd. Flow ( rot) 1863 1583 1770 1863 1770 1583 Satd. Flow Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 RTOR Reduction (vph) Tum Type Permitted Phases 0 0 0 0 0 16 Free Perm Perm Free 8 2 Effective Green, g (s) 46.0 90.0 46.0 46.0 36.0 36.0 Clearance Times 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 v/s Ratio Prot c0.43 0.36 c0.34 v/c Ratio Progression Factor 0.84 0.36 0.23 0.70 0.85 0.02 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay (s 27.2 0.4 17.1 21.0 37.0 16.4 Approach Delay (s) 16.1 20.8 36.2 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.7% ICU Level of Service c Critical Lane Group 0.85 D PM Peak Hour with Project Okeechobee Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 4 Ginn Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 2008 Total Traffic Operational Analysis Worksheets (With Okeechobee Commons) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SR 70 & US 441 8/14/2007 Lane Configurations Total Lost time (s) Frt 1.00 0.97 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3426 248 3426 4.0 4.0 Satd. Flow • erm 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.94 1770 3335 406 3335 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 an 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 541 3539 1583 581 3539 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 20 0 0 81 pm +pt 4 8 52.0 30.0 Turn Type Permitted Phases pm +pt Effective Green, g (s) 52.0 30.0 Clearance Time s 5.5 6.0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.11 0.17 c0.21 0.28 tq: v/c Ratio 0.59 0.66 1.17 1.03 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay (s) 52.4 44.5 127.9 84.8 Approach Delay (s) 46.7 99.7 0 0 0 239 0 pm +pt 2 Perm pm +pt 2 6 0 93 Perm 6 52.0 30.0 30.0 52.0 30.0 30.0 5.5 6.0 6.0 5.5 6.0 0.43 0.54 0.20 0.68 0.56 0.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 25.3 41.3 36.7 32.1 41.9 34.8 36.6 37.6 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 0.96 85.0% ICU Level of Service E AM Peak Hour with additional Project Okeechobee Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6:SR70 &8th Ave. 8/14/2007 Lane Configurations Total Lost time (s) Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3538 Satd. Flow • erm 169 3539 1583 407 3538 f r-- r ' ft 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 1 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.85 1775 1583 1271 1583 4 4.0 0.90 1653 1586 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 RTOR Reduction (vph) Turn Type Permitted Phases 0 Perm 4 0 36 0 Perm Perm 4 8 0 Effective Green, g (s) 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 Clearance Time s v/s Ratio Prot v/c Ratio Progression Factor Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) 6.0 6.0 0.26 0.13 0.53 0.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 15.9 17.1 12.1 16.7 6.0 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 0.60 62.6% 6.0 6.0 c0.43 0.87 0.66 19.5 19.4 8.6 0 0 Prot ICU Level of Service 0 9 Perm Perm 2 38.0 38.0 6.0 6.0 c0.05 0.29 0.01 0.02 1.00 1.00 18.2 15.1 18.0 0 6 11 17.0 6.0 B 1.00 29.9 29.9 0 AM Peak Hour with additional Project Okeechobee Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9:SR70& Lane Configurations + 4.0 Total Lost time (s) Frt Satd. Flow (prot) Satd. Flow 4.0 1.00 0.98 1770 3473 360 3473 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1770 3539 1583 1770 547 3539 1583 1770 8/14/2007 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.85 1.00 0.85 1583 1770 1583 1770 1583 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 12 u n 29 0 0 14 0 0 69 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot custom custom custom Permitted Phases 2 Effective Green, g (s) 56.0 56.0 56.0 56.0 56.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 Clearance Time s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.24 0.32 0.06 v/c Ratio Progression Factor Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) 0.80 0.38 0.06 0.51 0.05 0.22 0.01 0.09 1.39 1.02 1.13 1.16 1.46 1.00 40.5 9.1 7.7 11.3 9.7 25.3 14.6 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.62 Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.0% ICU Level of Service A c Critical Lane Group 0.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 22.9 23.7 AM Peak Hour with additional Project Okeechobee Kim ley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 23.6 23.7 Synchro 6 Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: SR 70 & SR 710 8/14/2007 Lane Configurations Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 1770 1863 1770 1583 Satd. Flow • erm) 1863 1583 589 1863 1770 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 RTOR Reduction (vph) Tum Type Permitted Phases 0 0 0 Free Perm Free 8 0 0 10 Perri 2 Effective Green, g (s) 46.0 90.0 46.0 46.0 36.0 36.0 Clearance Time s) 6.0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.29 v/c = do 0.56 0.31 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 c0.42 c0.40 0.09 0.82 0:99 0.01 Progression actor 1.34 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) 12.0 22.5 0.5 11.8 26.4 58.3 16.3 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.6% ICU Level of Service c Critical Lane Group 0.89 25.9 57.3 E AM Peak Hour with additional Project Okeechobee Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SR 70 & US 441 8/14/2007 4- Lane Configurations Total Lost time (s) 4.0 Frt Satd. Flow (prot) Satd. Flow • : rm 111 ft+ 4.0 1.00 0.97 1770 3434 248 3434 +t. 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.95 1770 3359 248 3359 +1 r ' 14 r 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 248 3539 1583 420 3539 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 RTOR Reduction vph) 0 Tum Type pm +pt Permitted Phases 4 18 0 0 54 0 0 0 266 pm +pt pm +pt 8 2 52.0 30.0 5.5 6.0 c0.27 0.37 1.50 1.41 1.00 1.00 287.7 235.9 252.4 Effective Green, g (s) 52.0 30.0 Clearance Time s 5.5 6.0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.46 1.10 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 Delay (s) 48.4 107.7 Approach Delay (s) 98.5 0 Perm pm +pt 2 6 0 119 Perm 6 52.0 30.0 30.0 52.0 30.0 30.0 5.5 6.0 0.13 0.16 6.0 5.5 6.0 6.0 c0.21 0.21 0.73 0.66 1.07 1.12 0.84 0.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 40.0 44.1 109.1 109.2 52.2 35.1 72.2 70.1 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Intersection Capacity Utilization 110.6% ICU Level of Service c Critical Lane Group 1.49 H PM Peak Hour with additional Project Okeechobee Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: SR 70 & 8th Ave. 8/14/2007 Lane Configurations Total Lost time (s) Frt Satd. Flow (prot) f -+ f 4- 4.0 4.0 r 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1770 3539 1583 1770 3538 Satd. Flow •erm) 169 3539 1583 169 3538 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.85 1774 1583 1269 1583 4 4.0 0.89 1648 1598 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 RTOR Reduction (vph) Turn Type Permitted Phases 0 Perm 4 0 108 0 0 0 0 0 2 Perm Perm 4 8 Effective Green, g (s) 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 Prot 0 Perm Perm 2 38.0 38.0 6 11 17.0 Clearance Times 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 v/s Ratio Prot c0.56 0.54 c0.06 v/c Ratio 0.29 1.14 0.19 0.71 1.11 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.81 Delay (s) 22.3 93.8 13.5 45.2 73.5 Approach Delay (s) 83.9 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75 Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.3% ICU Level of Service c Critical Lane Group 72.7 0.31 0.04 1.00 1.00 18.5 15.4 18.1 D 0.02 1.00 29.8 29.8 0 PM Peak Hour with additional Project Okeechobee Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 2 Arterial Level of Service 8/13/2007 Arterial Level of Service: EB SR 70 SR 710 III 30 77.0 32.3 109.3 0.64 21.1 Arterial Level of Service: WB SR 70 US 441 111 30 98.6 213.3 311.9 0.82 9.5 F PM Peak Hour with Project Okeechobee Synchro 6 Report Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Page 1 Arterial Level of Service 8/13/2007 Arterial Level of Service: EB SR 70 8th Ave. SR 710 11 11 45 45 65.7 51.4 95.1 43.9 160.8 95.3 0.82 0.64 18.4 24.3 D c Arterial Level of Service: WB SR 70 US 441 11 45 65.7 213.3 279.0 0.82 10.6 F PM Peak Hour with Project Okeechobee Synchro 6 Report Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Page 1 CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS MAPPERS CIVIL AGRICULTURAL WATER RESOURCES WATER & WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION SURVEYING AND MAPPING 'Partners for Results Value by Design' TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared by: Donald E. Hoiloman PE Reg # 37496 7/24/06 3550 SW Corporate Pkwy. Palm CAy. PL 34990 (772) 2963883 (772) 2863925 www.Porh.com For Okeechobee Commons Prepared for: H2Oldings, LLC Okeechobee, Florida �_r1 Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. APPENDIX H Okeechobee Commons Data CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS 6 MAPPERS CIVIL AGRICULTURAL WATER RESOURCES WATER & WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION SURVEYING AND MAPPING 'Partners for Results Value by Design' 3550 SW Corporate Pkwy. Palm City, FL 34990 (772) 286-3883 (772) 2863925 www.lbfb.mm TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Site Data Project Traffic Trip Generation Trip Distribution and Assignment Future Traffic Conditions Design Year Design Year Traffic Roadway Capacity Roadway Improvements Committed Trips Project Traffic Volumes Roadway Link Analysis 2006 Analysis — Existing Conditions 2006 Analysis — With Project Added 2009 Analysis — Without Project 2009 Analysis — With Project Added Conclusions Recommendations CONSULTING CNIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS& MAPPERS CIVIL AGRICULTURAL WATER RESOURCES WATER & WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION SURVEYING AND MAPPING `Partners for Results Value by Design' 355D SW Corporate Pkwy. Palm City, FL 34990 (772) 2863883 (772) 288-3925 www.@OVmm Introduction LBFH has been retained to prepare a traffic impact report for a proposed development located on the north side of .SR 70 at 10th Avenue. The site is located such that its main entrance is opposite 10th Avenue. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of the proposed development on adjacent roadway links and to determine if there are specific traffic improvements that are necessary in order to maintain acceptable levels of service in the vicinity of the project. Site Data The site is located on the north side of SR 70 at 10th Avenue. The initial development plan includes approximately 200,000 square feet of space. Approximately 165,000 would be commercial retail space, approximately 25,000 general office space and 10,000 in restaurant use. Access plans for the site indicate that the main entrance would be an extension of 10th Avenue and would be signalized as the north leg of the existing traffic signal. Exhibit 1 is a map of the area depicting the project location. A copy of the proposed site plan for this project is included as Exhibit 2. SR 70 in this vicinity is a four lane divided facility. Left turn lanes are provided in the center median of this existing facility. 10th Avenue is a two lane facility that serves a residential area along the south side of SR 70. The Okeechobee Post Office is located on the east side of 10th Avenue and much of the traffic using the existing intersection here is associated with this facility. SR 98/441 (Parrott Avenue) is also a four lane divided facility with turn lanes in the median. Traffic volume data for the year 2004 was obtained from FDOT for State roads in the vicinity and current data was collected at selected intersections and roadway links within the general vicinity of the site. The data was factored to represent peak conditions for 2006 Exhibit 3 is a tabulation of the data utilized for this analysis. The data from FDOT is taken from the 2004 summary report of traffic information state wide. Lh Project Traffic Trip Generation Trip generation for the proposed site was developed utilizing the 7th Edition of the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. The table below tabulates the daily, AM and PM peak hour trip generation data for the proposed development. Okeechobee Commons Summary of Muel -Use Trip Generalbn Average Weekday Driveway Volumes Land Use Size 1000 SF Shopping Center 185 General Office Building 25 Reataurant 10 Total Trips 24 Hour AM Pk Hour PM Pk Hour Two -Way Volume Enter Exit Ester Exit 9404 . 129 82 418 453 459 54 7 18 89 1272 80 55 67 43 11135 243 144 503 585 Net Trips 24 Hour AM Pk Hour PM Pk How Percent Two -Way New Trips Volume Enter Exit Enter F 5 0.64 6018 83 '5 14 290 7 0.75 344 41 3 � 14 0.77 979 48 33 42 52 33 -WwwwwWi_ 7342 170 99 334 390 Included in this table is an estimate of the percent new trips that are likely to be associated with the proposed development. This factor accounts for the fact that some of the traffic that will be associated with the proposed development is contained in the existing traffic stream. The percentage values are taken from other agency data where impact assessments have been made. We think that they are reasonable for use in this instance. The PM peak hour is the most intense with a total of 390 trips expected to exit the site and 334 trips to enter the site. Trip Distribution and Assignment The overall distribution of trips into and away from the project site will be influenced by socio- economic conditions in the communities that surround the area. The conditions in the Okeechobee area are changing in the current climate of growth in the south Florida region. Population density, job base, recreational amenities and travel time were utilized as factors impacting the final trip distribution estimate. While the population of Okeechobee County is relatively low, it is surrounded by areas where population is growing and the growth in these surrounding areas will be an influence on growth in the Okeechobee region. \\pc\Employee \don- h106.0162 Okee Commons W. Report \TIA Okee Commons.doc 2 Lh The graphic below provides a detail of the anticipated project traffic distribution to the surrounding roadway network. Future Traffic Conditions Design Year Based upon the size and complexity of the proposed project, a design year of 2009 has been selected as an appropriate year to expect that this project will be completed. Design Year Traffic The growth of traffic in the area was estimated by combining data from the FDOT Traffic Information 2004 data set along with recent trends in the area. Based on the data from FDOT, forecasts for traffic growth in the area for the next ten years is likely to be just under 2% per year. This same data package indicated that growth over the past ten years to be just under 3% per year. Although the past 4 years experienced growth at a slower rate, it was felt that a more conservative approach to the estimate should be made in order to ensure that under estimates are avoided. \ \pc\Employee \don -h \06.0162 Okee Commons\A_ Report\TIA Okee Commons.doc 3 LI,c. Consequently, a growth rate for the expected life of this project was selected at 2.5% per year. Turning movement data collected at the intersections was compared to machine collected data and traffic volumes were adjusted through the area to reflect continuity of volumes. From this data, a set of traffic volumes for the current year was developed for the roadway network. These data were used for detailed corridor and intersection analyses. A summary of these turning data is included in Exhibit 4. For the planning years of 2007 through 2009, the daily traffic volumes for the roadway kinks were factored to reflect the growth anticipated through the years. A 2.5% annual growth rate was applied along with a peak season factor in each instance. The graphic below details the anticipated growth in traffic using the adjacent roadways over the projected life of this project. 2004 Year Route From To AADT 2007 2008 SR 70 Parrott 8th 009 34,000 Al 41,754 42,669 43,607 SR 70 11th SR 710 23,000 26,971 27,590 28,225 SR 70 SR 98 Parrott 17,200 20,505 20,968 21,443 441 SR 70 6th 25,500 28,709 29,395 30,099 441 21st SR 70 30,000 33,995 34803 35,631 Roadway Capacity The ability of roadways to accommodate specific volumes of traffic at certain speeds and with measured delays is generally termed as its "capacity ". Capacity is typically given a letter designation from A • to F denoting acceptable to unacceptable. The Generalized Tables from FDOT are typically used as an initial basis for making a determination as to whether or not operating conditions will be acceptable under specific volumes of traffic. A copy of the section of the Generalized Tables used for this project is included- as Exhibit 5. The table below summarizes the general level of service thresholds for the roadways in the vicinity of the project. The capacities indicated in this table are for Level of Service (LOS) D. While none of the roadway segments exceed the assigned capacity threshold, the segment of SR 70 east of Parrott and SR -441 approaching SR -70 are both nearing the noted threshold. 1 \pe\Employeeldon- h106AI62 Okee Commons1A. Report\TIA Okee Commons.doc Route From To SR 70 Parrott 8th 34,000 34,200 1,810 SR 70 11th SR 710 23,000 34,200 1,810 SR 70 SR 98 Parrott 17,200 34,200 1,810 441 SR 70 6th 25,500 34,200 1,810 441 21st SR 70 30,000 34,200 1,810 2004 Service Volume AADT AADT PK Dir 4 The values provided in the generalized tables are derived from a specific set of operating conditions that could be expected to be used where traffic is operating at non- critical levels of service. Actual operating conditions are frequently different and a detailed arterial analysis may indicate generalized tables. roadway has an operating capacity above the limit given in tables. Roadway Improvements FDOT currently has no plans for major roadway improvements in this general area. A project has recently been completed on SR 70 that continued the four lane treatment to the west to a point just west of SR 98. 70 in the There are long range plans being made for improvements to SR immediate region as an element of the intra -state highway program. improvement plans were found, however, within the area potentially impacted by this project. Committed Trips Traffic that is associated with approved projects that are not yet being constructed must be accounted for within the year. There are no projects that h ave been identified area of this proposed project that ouldt have an impact for traffic in the that is not adequately addressed in the overall growth rate Project Traffic Volumes Traffic volumes from the project have been distributed to the roadway Ths network in accord with information noted previously p distribution indicates that approximately 17% of the traffic will be destined for points to the north; about 23% to the south; a remainder to the east and north toward Brighton and Lake Placid; and the rema south toward Palm Beach County. The table below summarizes the anticipated traffic from the project on the roadway links adjacent to the development site. Project Traffic 2004 Service Volume 7,342 Route From To AADT AADT PK Dir % ADT SR 70 Parrott 8th 34,000 34,200 1,810 70.0 %0 5,139 SR 70 11th SR 710 23,000 34,200 1,810 30.0% 2,203 1810 27.0% 1,982 441 SR 70 6th 4R 70 SR 98 Parrott 25 500 34,200 1,810 17.0% 1,248 441 21st SR 70 30,000 34,200 1,810 23.0% 1,689 \ \pc\Employee \don -h \06.0162 Okee Commons. Repoli \TIA Okee Commons.doc Roadway Link Analysis Background traffic for the years 2007, 2008, and 2009 was added to the estimated project traffic in order to determine the likely demand on roadway capacity in each of these years as the project is constructed. The table below provides an initial estimate of the ability of the roadway segments to handle both the normal growth in traffic through the region as well as traffic from the proposed development. Project Traffic 2004 Service Volume 7,342 Route From To AADT MDT PK Dir % 2008 r SR 70 Parrott 8th 34,000 34,200 1,810 70.0% 5,1139 38,670 41,384 43,607 SR 70 11th SR 710 23,000 34,200 1,810 30.0% 2,203 25,650 27,040 28,225 SR 70 SR 98 Parrott 17,200 34,200 1,810 27.0% 1,982 19,315 20,472 21,443 441 SR 70 6th 25,500 34,200 1,810 17.0% 1,248 27,960 29,083 30,099 441 21st SR 70 30,000 34,200 1,810 23.0% 1,689 32,982 34,381 35,631 i As is evident from the data included in this table, a segment of SR 70 and of SR 441 is projected to exceed the level of service thresholds, as defined within the generalized tables, by the design year of 2009. Consequently, a detailed analysis of the corridor and impacted intersections is needed in order to confirm actual operating conditions. 2006 Analysis- Existing Conditions A traffic simulation network was developed to include the intersections along SR 70 from SR 710 to 5th Avenue W.; and SR- 441 (Parrott Avenue) from SR -70 to 21st Street. This network provides a basis for evaluating the capacity of the corridor based upon the signalized intersections within the corridor and the operating conditions that exist at the intersections. Current signal operating data was obtained from FDOT. With current operating data along with traffic volume data, an assessment of current operating conditions can be made. Data obtained from FDOT is included in Exhibit 6. The operating parameters for the signalized intersections through the immediate area were input into the traffic simulation network and level of service parameters were calculated for the existing traffic conditions. Current level of service calculations indicates that conditions, at present, are reasonably good in both travel directions. An increased amount of delay and a somewhat slower travel time is evident at the major intersection of SR 70 and Parrott Avenue. \1pc1Employee \don - 11\06.0162 Okee Commons\A. Report\TLA Okee Commons.doc 6 L� The chart shown below summarizes both the morning and afternoon operating conditions for SR 70. The increased signal delay time and slow operating speeds at the intersection of SR 70 and Parrott Avenue are evident during both peak traffic periods. The slower speed and higher delay to the eastbound travel direction is attributable to the very heavy volume of traffic turning left onto Parrott Avenue southbound from SR 70. The overall level of service, however, is within acceptable limits. A similar series of calculations was performed for the intersections along Parrott Avenue. The chart below summarizes the operating conditions currently being experienced along this roadway segment. Existing Conditions Period 2006 AM Route SR 70 EB Route SR 70 WB Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS 5th Parrott 8th i0th SR.710 5.4 48.6 13.5 10.2 8.1 25 12.3 24.6 18.5 32.7 B E B C A SR 710 10th 8th Parrott 5th 7 12.2 8.6 34.3 5.4 23.7 31.7 19.5 19.2 25.9 C A C C B Summary 85.8 24.1 B 67.5 25.4 B Period 2006 PM :. Route SR 70 EB Route SR 70 WB Parrott Av SB Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial. Speed LOS Cross Street . Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS 5th Parrott 8th 10th SR 710 7.3 160.5 15.5 9.2 9 23.6 5.2 23.9 19.1 32.5 C F C C A SR 710 10th 8th Parrott 5th 7.5 13.4 5.6 48.3 6.1 23.4 29.4 21.9 , 16.8 24.2 C B C D B Summary 201.5 18 C 82.9 23.7 _ C The increased signal delay time and slow operating speeds at the intersection of SR 70 and Parrott Avenue are evident during both peak traffic periods. The slower speed and higher delay to the eastbound travel direction is attributable to the very heavy volume of traffic turning left onto Parrott Avenue southbound from SR 70. The overall level of service, however, is within acceptable limits. A similar series of calculations was performed for the intersections along Parrott Avenue. The chart below summarizes the operating conditions currently being experienced along this roadway segment. Summary \ \pc\Employee \don -h \06.0162 Okee Commons\A. Report \T1A Okee Commons.doc 7 Existing Conditions Period 2006 AM • Route Parrott Av NB Route Parrott Av SB Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS Shopping Cntr 28th 21st R 70 8.4 9.8 8 46.4 39.2 29.1 31.5 31.7 A B B B SR 70 21st 26th Shopping Cntr 42 7.7 7.2 7.5 23.4 42.1 32.1 30.7 C A B B Summary Period 72.6 32.9 B 64.4 33.3 B 2006 PM Route Parrott Av NB Route Parrott Av SB Cross Street Signal Delay ' Arterial Speed LOS Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS Shopping Cntr 28th 21st SR 70 7.3 10.5 11.9 55.2 39.9 28.7 29 30 A B B B SR 70 21st 28th Shopping Cntr 64.8 10.7 9.2 4.5 18.5 41 30.7 33.1 D A B B ..... „ . n 89.2 30.7 B i Summary \ \pc\Employee \don -h \06.0162 Okee Commons\A. Report \T1A Okee Commons.doc 7 Current level of service on SR 70 through the area is B in the morning and C in the afternoon. Parrott Avenue has level of service B during both the morning and afternoon peak traffic periods. Exhibit ?contains details of this analysis. 2006 Analysis- With Project Added The same network was used and the project traffic was added to the volumes on the impacted links. The results are summarized in the charts included below. Existing Conditions with project traffic added Period Route Cross Street 5th Parrott 8th 10th' SR 710 Summary 2006 AM with project traffic SR 70 EB Signal Delay Arterial Speed 5.5 24.9 54.1 11.5 14.4 24.3 10.2 18.5 8.2 32.7 92.4 23.6 Route SR 70 WB Period 2006 PM with project traffic Route SR 70 EB Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed 5th 7.9 23.2 Parrott 224.7 3.9 8th 20.8 22.4 10th 9.2 19.1 SR 710 9.1 32.5 Summary 271.7 15.6 LOS B E B C A c ross Street R 710 h arrott Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS 7.2 23.6 ' C 12.2 31.7 A 9.1 19.2 C 36.3 18.8 C 5.5 25.8 B 70.3 25.2 B Route LOS C F C C A 0 ross Street R 710 th arrott h SR 70 WB Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS 7.8 23.2 C 11 29.9 B 7 20.7 C 89.4 12.2 E 8.8 23.8 C 124 21.2 C LOS numbers for eastbound SR 70 are impacted the greatest amount. This impact is due to the increased volume of traffic turning south onto Parrott Avenue. The chart below summarizes the impacts to Parrott Avenue. Existing Conditions with project traffic added Period 2006 AM with project traffic Route Parrott Av NB Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS Shopping Cntr 8.4 A 28th 10 21st 8.2 B SR 70 49.1 39.2 29 31.4 31.1 75.7 32.6 2006 PM with project traffic B Route Cross Street SR 70 21st 28th Shopping Cntr Parrott Av SB Signal Delay 42.2 7.8 7.3 7.5 Arterial Speed 23.3 42 32 30.7 LOS. C A B B 64.8 313 B J Route Cross Street Signal Delay Parrott Av NB Arterial Speed LOS 39.9 A 28.5 B 28.6 SR 70 29.9 B Summary 86.4 31.5 Shopping Cntr 28th 21st 7.3 10.8 12.5 55.8 Route Cross Street SR 70 21st 28th Shopping Cntr Parrott Av SB Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS 57.7 19.8 D 11.3 40.8 A 9.6 30.4 B 4.5 33.1 B 83.1 \ \pc\Employee \don -h \06.0162 Okee Commons \A. Report\TIA Okee Commons.doc 31.3 8 vfh Conditions along Parrott Avenue remain at LOS B. Overall, the effect of adding the full impact of the proposed project to the roadway network under current conditions will have a relatively minor impact on traffic operating conditions. Exhibit 8 contains details of this analysis. 2009 Analysis- Without Project The analysis for 2009 conditions was performed only for the afternoon peak period. The afternoon period is the critical period of the day for traffic in Okeechobee as well as other areas of South Florida. Summary operating condition charts are included below for the two corridors with traffic projected for the year 2009 used as the basis for analysis. Current signal operations were continued for this initial analysis. 2009 without project traffic added Period Route Cross Street 5th Parrott 8th 10th SR 710 Summary Period Route Cross Street Shopping Cntr 28th 21st SR 70 Summary 2009 PM without project traffic SR 70 EB Route Signal Delay Arterial Speed 9.5 22.1 211.4 4.1 18.1 23.2 9.7 18.8 9 32.5 257.7 16.1 2009 PM without project traffic Parrott Av NB LOS Cross Street C SR 710 F 10th C 8th C Parrott A 5th D Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS 7.4 39.8 A 11 28.3 B 12.7 28.5 B 59 29.3 B 90.1 31.1 B Route Cross Street SR 70 21st 28th Shopping Cn SR 70 WB Signal Delay Arterial Speed 7.8 23.2 11.9 29.7 6.2 21.4 72.3 13.8 S_6 23.9 106.8 22.2 Parrott Av SB Signal Delay Arterial Speed 74.3 17 11.4 40.8 9.8 30.3 5.9 32 101.4 29.6 LOS c B C E C C LOS D A B B B The information contained here indicates that operating conditions on roadways within the study area will be reduced slightly due to normal growth in traffic volumes that is expected over the time period noted. Conditions will remain at an acceptable level and congestion \ \pc\Employee \don -h \06.0162 Okee Commons\A_ Report\TIA Okee Commons.doc 9 will remain to be a concern for the intersection of SR 70 and Parrott Avenue. Exhibit 9 contains details of this analysis. 2000 Analysis-. With Project Traffic Added When project traffic is added to the 2009 projections and the operating results tabulated, there is little difference in the overall operating parameters. 2009 with project traffic added Period Route Cross Street 5th Parrott 8th 10th SR 710 Summary Period Route Cross Street Shopping Cntr 28th 21st SR 70 Summary 2009. PM with project traffic added SR 70 EB Signal Delay 10.2 273.1 23.8 15.5 9.4 332 Arterial Speed 21.7 3.3 31.6 15.7 32.4 14 2009 PM with project traffic added LOS c F C D A D Parrott Av NB Signal Delay 7.4 11.4 13.2 56.9 88.9 Arterial Speed 39.8 28.1 28.2 29.7 31.2 LOS A B B B B Route Cross Street SR 710 10th 8th Parrott 5th Route Cross Street SR 70 21st 28th Shopping Cn Signal Delay 8.2 46 7.4 134.2 9.6 205.4 Signal Delay 67.8 12.1 10.2 5.9 96 SR 70 WB Arterial Speed 23 23.8 20.4 9.4 23.4 17.6 Parrott Av SB Arterial Speed 18 40.6 30 32 30 LOS C C C F C D LOS D A B B B The results clearly indicate that the overall growth in traffic within the region will have a greater impact on operating conditions than will the proposed development project. Exhibit 10 contains details of this analysis. 4c\Employeeldon- h106:0162 Okee Commons\A. ReportalA Okee Commons.doc 10 Lh Conclusions The overall impact of the proposed project is not expected to push traffic operating conditions to unacceptable levels. Level of service is likely to . remain at level of service D or better within the impact area. The intersection of SR 70 and Parrott Avenue will remain the critical intersection within the area. Congestion is being experienced at this location at the current time due to the high volume of turning rn vehicle lhness at the intersection and the limitation of space for additional turn situation will continue to be a concern into the future as traffic volumes increase. Recommendations The proposed project will generate a relatively large flow of traffic into and out of the proposed development site. The entrance of the project should be incorporated into the signal that exists at the intersection of SR 70 and 10th Avenue. This will require the signal facilities to be adjusted accordingly. A left turn lane at the project entrance will be needed. Based should the projected volumes entering from the west, this lane approximately 350 feet in length. With the growth in traffic expected within the region, a right turn lane should also be provided along with the development. This turn lane should be a minimum of 150 feet in length and should with a minimum nimum of delay to in order to facilitate the right turn movem ent with traffic on SR 70. Although existing traffic signals in the area Avenue an are 10 not open sng in ba coordinated system, the signals at 8th Ave considered for local coordination. A conduit system should be installed and the two signal controllers connected. \ \pc\Employee \don -h \06.0162 Okee Commons \A. Report\TIA Okee Commons.doc 11 Exhibit 1 Project Location TABLE Al HAMPTON INN OKEECHOBEE DENSITY CHANGES LIST I OLD I NEW Major Project DENSITY I DENSITY 06- 003 -SSA 1 UNIT 14985 SF 06 -008 -SSA 2 UNITS 22651 SF 06 -C1 -001 85 UNITS 200000 SF 06- 005 -SSA 1 UNIT 14244 SF 06- 012 -SSA 40 UNITS 99 UNITS 06 -C1 -002 132 UNITS 330 UNITS TRIPS 2610 12438 p: 104781330011augustl (Fampton_inn_comp _pianxfs; 8/7/2007 9:43 NET TRIPS 9828 TABLE A2 HAMPTON INN OKEECHOBEE TRIP GENERATION DENSITY CHANGES Land Use Intensity Daily Trips Current Site Designation Single - Family Residential Net Total 261 units 2,610 2,610 Maximum FAR Single - Family Residential Commercial Retail Pass -By Capture General Commercial Retail Net Trips Subtotal Subtotal Net trip Increase 429 units 251,880 sq. ft. 34.00% 4,290 12,346 16,636 4,198 4,198 12,438 9,828 Notes: Trip generation was calculated using the following data: Daily Traffic Generation General Commercial Retail Single - Family Residential AM Peak Hour Traffic Generation General Commercial Retail Single - Family Residential PM Peak Hour Traffic Generation General Commercial Retail Single - Family Residential Pass -By Capture Calculation General Commercial Retail ITE ITE ITE ITE ITE 11'E ITE Ln(T) = 0.64Ln(X) + 5.87 T = 10 trips / d.u. T = 1.03 *(X) (61% in, 39% T = 0.70 *(X) + 9.43 (25% in Ln(T) = 0.66Ln(X) + 3.40 (4 Ln(T) = 0.90Ln(X) + 0.53 (€ 0.34 p: 104781330021augustl[ hampton _inn_comp _Plan.xlsjproject list 8/7/2007 9:43 • • Kin anc Copyright ® 2006. Kim ey-Horn and Associates, Inc 1. 11 CITY OF OKEECHOBEE .1 Okeechobee Density Changes for 2006 Amendments # Amendment Acres Old Density New Density Usage Change 1 06- 003 -SSA 0.516 2 units 5 units SF — MF 2 06- 001 -SSA 0.344 1 unit 14,984.64 sq. ft. MF — COM 3 06- 008 -SSA 0.52 2 units 22,651.2 sq. ft. SF — COM 4 06 -C1 -001 21.14 85 units 200,000 sq. ft. SF — COM 5 06- 005 -SSA 0.327 1 unit 14,244.12 sq. ft. SF — COM 6 06 -C1 -002 32.97 132 units 330 units SF — MF 7 06- 009 -SSA 0.25 1 unit 10,890 sq. ft. SF — COM 8 06- 011 -SSA 0.48 2 units 20,908.8 sq. ft. SF — COM 9 06- 004 -SSA . 0.688 3 units 7 units SF — MF 10 06- 012 -SSA 9.89 40 units 99 units SF — MF 11 06- 002 -SSA 2.06 8 units 89,733.6 sq. ft. SF — IND 12 06- 010 -SSA 9.33 37 units 93 units SF - MF MS 11111111111111 16410164Vallosallivi! 10111111 7N r E • OKEECHOBEE UTILITY AUTHORITY 100 S,W. 5th Avenue Okeechobee, Florida 34974 -4221 October 3, 2007 Mr. Christopher Goetzfried Kimely -Hom and Associates, Inc. 601 21st Street, Suite 300 Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Ref: Wastewater Capacity Request Kite Properties Parcel ID: 2- 22- 37- 35 -0A00- 00004 -0000 Dear Mr. Goetzfried: (863) 763 -9460 FAX: (863) 763 -9036 In reference to a request of the availability of wastewater capacity to the subject property, I submit the following information for your use in the permitting of the above referenced project. The Okeechobee Utility Authority owns and operates one regional wastewater treatment plant, the Cemetery Road Wastewater Treatment Facility (1 MGD). Currently, the annual average daily flow (September 2006 — August 2007) to the treatment facility is approximately 0.718 MGD utilizing about 72% of the system capacity. As you are aware, wastewater service is readily available to this property. Minimal infrastructure improvements at the developers' cost will be required prior to service being made available to the subject property. Should you have any other questions, comments or concerns with regards to the wastewater system capacity, please contact the writer at 863/63.9460. Sincerely, ,John F. Hayfo Executive Director Okeechobee Utility Authority LaRue Planning & Management Services, Inc. Staff Report Rezoning Request Prepared for City of Okeechobee Applicant: Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC./Kelly Kite, k From: RMF' To: CHV Petition No. 07-011-R Staff Report Rezoning Request Applicant: Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC Petition No.: 07 -011 -R General Information Applicant: Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC Applicant Address: 3055 Cardinal Drive Vero Beach, FL 32963 RMF (5.5 acres), CHV (0.8 acres) Applicant Phone Number: 772 - 231 -9333, FX: 772 -231 -0033 Contact Person Hotel and associated retail Owner: Kelly Kite, Jr. Owner Address: As above Future Land Use Map Classification ;xist ng Single- Family Commercial Zoning District RMF (5.5 acres), CHV (0.8 acres) CHV Use of Property Single- Family Residence, balance vacant Hotel and associated retail Acreage 6.27 acres, but rezoning applica- tion involves about 5.5 acres 5.5 acres Location: 1108 Highway 70 East Legal Description: BEING A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 35 EAST, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF SR70 (AS SHOWN ON FDOT RIGHT -OF -WAY MAP FOR SR70 OKEECHOBEE COUNTY SECTION 91070 -2514, DATED DWN =3 -76) WITH EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 EXTENDED; THENCE SOUTH 00 °14'21" EAST, ALONG SAID EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 EXTENDED, A DISTANCE OF 44.5 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 89° 54'49" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY OF SR70 A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 00 °14'21" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF SE 13TH AVENUE AND THE HOPKINS MEANDER LINE; THENCE NORTH 71 °49'20" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 424.14 BEET; THENCE NORTH 00 °03'47" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 787.65 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF SR70; THENCE NORTH 89 °54'49" EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF- WAY LINE OF SR70, A DISTANCE OF 300.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 2 Staff Report Rezoning Request Applicant: Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC Petition No.: 07 -011 -R Request: The applicant is interested in developing this property as a mixed -use commercial project providing for hotel rooms within the City limits. A bank and full service restaurant for hotel guests and surrounding City residents are also proposed for adjacent out - parcels encompassing about 1.7 acres. The Applicant is requesting to rezone the 5.5 acres from RMF to CHV. Adjacent Future Land Use Map Classifications and Zoning Districts: North: Future Land Use Map Classification: Zoning District: Existing Land Use: East: Future Land Use Map Classification: Zoning District: Existing Land Use: South: Future Land Use Map Classification: Zoning District: Existing Land Use: West: Future Land Use Map Classification: Zoning District: Existing Land Use: Commercial CHV Vacant Commercial and Single - Family CHV and RMF Equipment repair operation and four single- family residences Single- Family RMF Vacant Single - Family RMF U.S. Post Office The entire site is currently vacant and undeveloped except for one single- family home. The northern portion of the property encompassing about 0.8 acres fronting on SR 70 to a depth of about 110 feet is already zoned Heavy Commercial (CHV) and is the location for the proposed bank and restaurant. The southern 5.5 acres is the subject of the requested rezoning from RMF to CHV. The applicant is proposing to develop an 85 -room hotel on the part of the site for which the rezoning is being sought. However, if rezoning is approved, the Applicant, or any future owner of the property, will not be required to limit future development of the site to any specific use, but may develop any use allowable within the CHV zoning district. 3 Staff Report Rezoning Request Applicant: Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC Petition No.: 07 -011 -R Analysis The Applicant has submitted supporting statements relative to the proposed project's consistency with the fmdings required for granting rezoning petitions. These are provided in the appendix to this Staff Report. Staff does not disagree with the Applicant's assertions. In addition, following are the Staff comments pertaining to the required findings. 1. The proposed use is not contrary to Comprehensive Plan requirements. The applicant is requesting to rezone the above- described property from its current zoning of RMF to Commercial in conjunction with a Small Scale Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan in order to provide for development of a hotel and associated commercial. These uses are contemplated in the Commercial land use category and allowed under the requested CHV zoning. 2. The proposed use being applied for is specifically authorized under the zoning district in the Land Development Regulations. Yes. Hotel, bank and restaurant are all commercial uses specifically identified as permitted uses within the CHV zoning district. 3. The proposed use will not have an adverse effect on the public interest. No, it will not adversely affect the public interest. The Applicant has provided letters from the Okeechobee Utility Authority confirming that the Authority has adequate capacity to provide for the potable water supply and wastewater disposal needs associated with the propose project. Copies of these letters are provided at the end of this report. The County has recently confirmed a considerable level of excess capacity available to serve the solid waste disposal needs of other major developments in the City. It appears reasonable that the volume of solid waste associated with a development of this size can also be accommodated within the capacity of the County's Solid Waste Facility. The City's adopted level of service standard (LOSS) for SR 70 and US 441/SR 7 is "C" and for local roads is "D ". The Applicant has furnished a revised Traffic Impact Analysis addressing questions and concerns initially posed by the Staff and which shows that the impact of the proposed project on SR 70, US 441/SR 7, and SE 10th and SE 13th Avenues will be insignificant. In none of these cases does the project's impact amount to as much as 5 %of the traffic volume associated with adopted level of service for these roadways. Therefore, the Applicant has stated that the project is deemed not to have a significant impact on these roadways. 4 Staff Report Rezoning Request Applicant: Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC Petition No.: 07 -011 -R Staff has identified a few additional areas where corrections or additional analyses are needed and has provided the Applicant with our comments. The Applicant should be able to provide these changes at the Planning Board meeting, or certainly by the City Council hearing. We do not, however, expect these data to substantively modify the general findings that the traffic generated by the project will be relatively minimal on the affected constrained roadways. SR 70, and US 441 south of SR 70, are constrained roadways and are presently operating at traffic volumes in excess of their design capacities. This is commonly referred to as operating at a level of service "F'. In fact, after construction of this development these roadways will be operating between 20% and 70% over their design capacities for both daily traffic and the PM Peak period. This is officially referred to as operating at a vehicle to capacity ratio of between 1.2 and 1.7. While the Applicant's contribution to this situation is relatively minimal, the cumulative impact of new developments in the future is of considerable concern to us. Since any additional traffic to these roadways will only continue to make matters worse, we suggest that the City consider implementing a policy that would not allow approval of any future requests for rezoning or amendments to the comprehensive plan that will increase the density or intensity on lands that will generate traffic onto these constrained roadways. The project will also affect two local roadways: NE 10th Avenue and NE 13th Avenue. The impacts on these local roads are projected to represent only 4.29% and 5.36%, respectively, of the levels of service of these roadways and will not degrade their level of service below LOS D. However, since the intersection of SR 70 and NE 10th Avenue "fails" in three approaches, and on an overall basis, at the PM Peak, with or without the traffic generated by the project, the Applicant will need to contribute at the development order stage its fair share of the cost of making the necessary improvements (i.e., whether through signal timing adjustments within the existing geometry of the intersection or any turn lane improvements that might mitigate a failing situation). This may also be the case for the intersection of SR 70 and NE 13th Avenue. Further, it should be noted that the projected traffic and associated effects upon the aforementioned roadway are based on a development scenario involving 85 hotels rooms, 3,400 square feet of branch bank offices, a 5,800 square foot high- turnover sit -down restaurant. To the extent that the requested amendment is found to be within acceptable traffic generation parameters, it is based only on a project of a similar intensity. If a different development of differing character and greater intensity should be proposed in the future, it would be subject to additional concur- rency review. 4. The use is appropriate for the location proposed is reasonably compatible h adjacent land uses, and is not contrary or detrimental to urbanizing and u epatterns t 5 Staff Report Applicant: Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC Petition No.: 07 -011 -R Rezoning Request Yes. The proposed rezoning continues a pattern of concentrating the more intensive commercial and other nonresidential uses in nodes located on the City' s two major arterial roadways (SR 70 and U.S. 441). A major land use amendment to Commercial and rezoning to CHV has been approved on about 16 acres on the north side of SR 70, paving way for a major commercial concentration in the immediate vicinity. Frontage on the south side of SR 70 (the site of associated out - parcels) The full service already carries a Commercial land use iatel designation � d of�tlie zoning. t property and a to U. S. Post Office is located Y convenience store and equipment repair operation are adjacent to the northeast portion of the site. The properties to the south of the property are vacant, but utare d designated this Single- Family on the Future Land Use Map but are zoned RMF. When will likely be in residential use. This potential residential area can be protected from the effects of the proposed commercial development through the use of stormwater retention facilities as a spatial buffer. 5. The proposed use will not adversely affect property values or living conditions, or be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property. The most likely effect on nearby property will be to promote improvement and rede- velopment of the adjacent commercial properties, as these are either undeveloped or of a lesser quality development than the proposed use. Vacant, residentially designated properties to the south should not be adversely affected as they will likely be separated from the proposed commercial uses by areas likely to be used for drainage retention. 6. The proposed use can be suitably buffered from surrounding uses, so as to reduce the impact of any nuisance or hazard to the neighborhood Yes, the vacant lands to the south will likely be physically separated from the proposed commercial development. However, care will need to be taken to ensure that the four existing on SEe 13th Avenue) homes ar adequately dequately buffered toe proposed development (fronting o reduce the likely impacts of the proposed commercial development nearby. 7. The proposed use will not create a density pattern that would overburden public facilities such as schools, streets, and utility services. The proposed uses will be commercial and will not create an inappropriate density pattern nor have any impact on schools, and the utility needs of the project are within the available capacities of the local utility providers. The proposed commercial uses 6 Staff Report Applicant: Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC Rezoning Request Petition No.: 07 -011 -R are consistent with the pattern of intensity established or anticipated in the area. While there will be some increase in traffic on SR 70, US 441, SE 10th Avenue, the Applicant's Traffic Impact Analysis has shown this to be insignificant in relation to the existing and adopted levels of service. The traffic analysis also shows that SE 13th Avenue may experience an increase in traffic as a result of a possible secondary access at the southeast corner of the property, but this will also be negligible. 8. The proposed use will not create traffic congestion, flooding or drainage problems, or otherwise affect public safety. The Applicant's traffic impact analysis indicates that the proposed use will not reduce the level of service on the affected roadways and have only negligible impacts upon nearby major roadways and local roads. A stormwater management system will be designed to meet standards developed by the oversight agencies to address flooding and drainage. Management systems designed to these standards will result in lower potential for off -site flooding and drainage impacts. No negative affects on public safety will occur as a result of the proposed use. 9. The proposed use has not been inordinately burdened by unnecessary restrictions. 10. No. The only restrictions on the proposed uses are those commonly applied to commercial uses in the City's Comprehensive Plan and its Land Development Regulations. Recommendation Staff recommends approval 3f the request to allow rezoning from RMF to CHV permitting the applicant to develop commercial uses on the subject property. Submitted by: James G. LaRue, AICP Planning Consultant October 10, 2007 1st LPA Hearing: 9 -20 -07 (postponed) lst LPA Hearing: 10 -18 -07 Maps or Diagrams — FLUM and Property Appraiser Map 7 Staff Report Rezoning Request Applicant: Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC Petition No.: 07 -011 -R Applicant's Project Description and Consistency with Comprehensive Plan Letters from Okeechobee Utility Authority Subject Property 234 ..'twLi,n 8 Staff Report Applicant: Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC Petition No.: 07 -011 -R Rezoning Request 2-22-37-35-0A00-00004-0000 ARBOGAST KEITH LEE 6.26.7AC 1 628200 7 -$1.600 9 Staff Report Applicant: Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC Rezoning Request Petition No.: 07 -011 -R APPENDIX PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING As submitted by the Applicant 1. Proposed Project Description Okeechobee SR70 Holding, LLC proposes to develop the 6.28 acre site into a commer- cial node that will consist of an 85 room national chain quality hotel, an approximate 3,400 square foot bank branch office, an approximate 5,800 square foot national chain, full service, restaurant, as City of Okeechobee land development regulations dictate. A shared access driveway with the US Post Office, located adjacent to the west property line, is the proposed main access driveway from SR70. An additional secondary access driveway to SE 13th Avenue at the south extent of the project is also proposed. The most recent site plan locates the hotel along the west property line and allows full traffic circulation around the hotel. The bank and restaurant are both located along the SR70 frontage with associated parking internal to the property. Full traffic circulation through the project, between the two access drives, and to each of the proposed uses is achieved in the design. The south one quarter of the site is dedicated to stormwater retention. 2. Findings Required for Granting Petitions Per the City of Okeechobee land development regulations section 70 -340 the following addresses the nine listed items as they relate to the requested zoning change. 1) The use is not contrary to comprehensive plan requirements. Presently, the site's underlying future land use designation does not support the requested zoning change. A small scale comprehensive plan amendment is being requested to address this inconsistency. However, the proposed use and requested zoning change is not contrary to the provisions of the comprehensive plan and as part of the amendment request, consistencies with the comprehensive plan are being presented. 2) The use is specifically authorized under the zoning district regulations applied for. The proposed uses; hotel, bank and restaurant are all uses specifically authorized under the requested CHV zoning district. 10 Staff Report Applicant: Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC Rezoning Request Petition No.: 07 -011 -R 3) The use will not have an adverse effect on the public interest. Per the Okeechobee Utility Authority a sufficient excess capacity of potable water and wastewater treatment is available for the proposed use and intensity. A traffic impact analysis was prepared as required for this zone change request and indicates no lowering of level of service in the roadway system as a result of this develop- ment at maximum intensity. 4) The use is appropriate for the location proposed, is reasonably compatible with adjacent uses, and is not contrary or detrimental urbanizing land use patterns. The SR70 corridor within the City of Okeechobee is continuing to develop into a commercial node. This location is very suitable for the proposed uses as SR70 is a principal arterial that supports a significant portion of City thoroughfare traffic. Providing these services at this location keeps through traffic off other major and minor collectors and local roadways. Compatible uses and zoning districts presently exist on three (3) sides of the site. Along the north side of SR70 the zoning is CHV. A full service US Post Office operates adjacent to and west of the site. A convenience store and equipment repair operation are adjacent and east of the site for approximately 400 feet south of the SR70 south right -of -way. The balance of the east property line borders single- family residences and SE 13th Avenue and the south property line also borders single- family residences. The proposed site plan locates all the stormwater management retention facility in the south portion of the site providing a Large buffer between the proposed commercial uses and the adjacent residential uses. 5) The use will not adversely affect property values or living conditions, nor be a deterrent to the improvement or development of the adjacent property. The affect of the proposed use on the properties adjacent along the north west and east property boundaries will be to increase property values and promote improve- ment and development since these properties are of a similar use and are either presently undeveloped or of a lesser quality development. No adverse impact will occur to the single - family development to the south and southeast since the pro- posed uses will be effectively buffered along the project site perimeter. 6) The use can be suitably buffered from surrounding uses, so as to reduce the impact of any nuisance or hazard to the. neighborhood. As stated above the only non - similar uses bordering the property occur along the south and south third of the east property boundaries. The proposed stormwater retention facility will provide a wide buffer to the south. Also, the project will have a minimum 10 -foot wide landscape buffer along its entire perimeter. 11 Staff Report Applicant: Okeechobee SR70 Holdings, LLC Rezoning Request Petition No.: 07 -011 -R The use will not create a density pattern that would overburden public facilities such as schools, streets and utility services. The density pattern has already been established in the area surrounding the site and the site is the only remaining property south along the SR70 that is not yet consistent with the established density pattern. 8) The use will not create traffic congestion, flooding or drainage problems, or otherwise affect public safety. As indicated above, the traffic impact analysis prepared for this zoning change request indicates that the proposed use will not reduce the level of service on the affected roadways. In the course of the development approval it will be necessary that a stormwater management system be designed to meet standards developed by the oversight agencies to address flooding and drainage. Management systems designed to these standards will result in lower potential for off -site flooding and drainage impacts. No negative affects on public safety will occur as a result of the proposed use. 9) The use has not been inordinately burdened by unnecessary restrictions. The proposed use is a common and low impact use that is specifically addressed without excessive restrictions in the City of Okeechobee land development regulations. 12 OKEECHOBEE UTILITY AUTHORITY"` 100 S.W. ' 5th Avenue Okeechobee, Florida7; October 3, 2007 Mr. Christopher Goetzfried Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc 601 21st Street, Suite 300 Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Ref: Water Capacity Request Kite Properties Parcel ID: 02- 22- 37- 35- 0A00- 00004 -0000 Dear Mr. Goetzfried: In reference to a request of the availability of water capacity to the subject property, submit the following information for your use in the permitting for the above referenced project. The Okeechobee Utility Authority owns and operates two water treatment plants with a combined treatment capacity of 6 MGD. For the past twelve months (September 2006 -- August 2007), the combined finish maximum flow leaving the plants is approximately 2.8 MGD. This combined maximum flow utilizes approximately 47% of the FDEP permitted system capacity. Water service is available to the property; Should you have any other questions, comments or concerns with regards to the water system capacity, please contact the writer at 863.763.9460. Sincerely, John F. Hayford,' : Executive Director Okeechobee Utility Authority OKEECHOBEE UTILITY AUTHORITY 100 S.W. 5th Avenue Okeechobee, Florida 34974-4221 October 3, 2007 Mr. Christopher Goetzfried kimely-Horn and Associates, Inc. 601 21st Street, Suite 300 Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Ref: Wastewater Capacity Request Kite Properties Parcel ID: 2-22-37-35-0A00-00004-0000 Dear Mr. Goetzfrieci. (863) 763-9460 FAX: (863) 763-9036 In reference to a request of the availability of wastewater capacity to the subject property, I submit the following information for your use in the permitting of the above referenced project The Okeechobee Utility Authority owns and operates one regional wastewater treatment plant, the Cemetery Road Wastewater Treatment Facility (1 MGD). Currently, the annual average daily flow (September 2006 — August 2007) to the treatment facility is approximately 0.718 MGD utilizing about 72% of the system capacity. As you are aware, wastewater service is readily available to this property. Minimal infrastructure improvements at the developers) cost will be required prior to service being made available to the subject property. Should you have any other questions, comments or concerns with regards to the wastewater system capacity, please contact the writer at 863.763.9460. Sincerely, ',John F. HayforccRE. Executive Director Okeechobee Utility Authority City of Okeechobee General Services Department 55 S.E. 3rd Avenue, Room 101 Okeechobee, Florida 34974 -2903 Phone: (863) 763 -3372, ext. 218 Fax: (863) 763 -1686 Date: ' Ia -7i07 Fee Paid: cd o'_ 60' 1st Hearing fr.)) l� o t t Publication Dates: 7 PetitionNo.Q 7 -0/ • — Jurisdiction: 2nd Hearing. 1.1 i( LI j 0'� Notices Mailed: Uniform Land Use Application Rezone • Special Exception • Variance ✓ Name of property owner(s): 15" Street Homes LLC A. Owner mailing address: 701 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1740, Miami, FL 33131 Pa. Name of applicant(s) if other than owner (state relationship): Jose Rasco, CFO for Owners I$ '; A N. Applicant mailing address: 701 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1740, Miami, FL 33131 Name of contact person (state relationship): John D. Cassels, Jr., Attorney for Owners Contact person daytime phone(s): 863/763 -3131 Fax:: 863/763 -1031 ✓ Property address / directions to property: Southwest 9th Street South to Southwest 15th Street Indicate current use of property: Single family /vacant/natural pasture P R 0 P E R, Y Describe improvements on property, including number /type of dwellings and whether occupied (if none, so state): Three (3) single family residence (2 vacant -1 occupied) Approximate number of acres: 50.478 Is property in a platted subdivision? No Is there a current or recent use of the property that is/was a violation of county ordinance? If so, describe: No }lave there been any land use applications concerning all or part of this property in the last year? If so, indicate date, nature and applicant's name: 12/20/06 - Rezoning application from RSF1 to PUD consisting of a mix of RSF detached and RSF attached and condominiums - 15th Street Homes, LLC Is a sale subject to this application being granted? No Is the subject parcel your total holdings at that location? If not, describe the remaining or intended uses: No, remainder for future development. Describe adjoining land uses / improvements to the North: Residential single family (RSF1) South: RSF East: RSF1 NE: Church West: RSF1 Existing zoning: RSF1 and Holding ` Future Land Use classification: Single family (SF) Actions Requested: ( X ) Rezone ( ) Special Exception ( ) Variance Parcel Identification Number: See attached exhibit Confirmation of Information Accuracy I hereby certify that the information in this application is correct. The information included in this application is for use by the City of Okeechobee in processing my request. False or misleading information may be punishable by a fine of up to $500.00 onment of up to 30 days and may result in the summary denial of this application. Signature Jose Rasco 8%i6/a> Printed Name Date Uniform Land Use Application (rev. 1/03) Page 1 of 2 Uniform Land Use Application (rev. 1/03) Page 2 of 2 Current zoning classification: RSF1 and Holding Requested zoning classification: Planned Unit (PUD -R) R�. E' What is your desired permitted use under the proposed classification: Residential Single Family Homes Provide specific LDR ordinance citation: 1V If granted, will the new zone be contiguous with a like zone? No C3 P." T' I .:. 0 N , E x Is a Special Exception necessary for your intended use? No Variance? No Uniform Land Use Application (rev. 1/03) Page 2 of 2 Describe the Special Exception sought: R L;;,: A. Provide specific LDR ordinance citation: c E; Are there other similar uses in the area? Is so, describe: C3 P." T' I .:. 0 N Why would granting your request be in the best interest of the area and residents? If business, briefly describe nature including number of employees, hours, noise generation and activities to be conducted outside of a building: Uniform Land Use Application (rev. 1/03) Page 2 of 2 Describe Variance sought: R L;;,: A. Describe physical characteristic of property that makes variance necessary: c E; Did you cause or contribute to the characteristic? Is so, describe: What is the minimum variance necessary? Uniform Land Use Application (rev. 1/03) Page 2 of 2 JOHN D. CASSELS, JR., P.A. LAURA ANN McCALL, P.A. LAW OFFICE OF CASSELS & MCCALL.ex.e..iipjgx�ntuon�l eth.,. P. O. BOX 968 • 400 NW 2nd STREET • OKEECHOBEE, FL 34973 • TELEPHONE 863- 763 -3131 • FAX 863 -763 -1031 • E -MAIL mail @legal- one.com August 27, 2007 Mr. James G. LaRue City of Okeechobee 55 S.E. 3rd Avenue Okeechobee, FL 34974 RE: The Lakehouse Our File No: 4107 Dear Mr. LaRue: Enclosed please find an application to change the zoning classification from RSF -1 to Planned Unit Development (PUD -R). Naturally, the required exhibits are enclosed with each petition together with a number of optional exhibits which will assist in the City's evaluation and action upon the requests. To summarize the information contained in the attachments and exhibits to this letter, the proposed Lakehouse community comprises approximately 50 acres in the southwest section of the City and is made up of multiple parcels separated only by S.W. 9`h Street. The project is owned by 15`h Street Homes, LLC. The property is currently within the Single Family Future Land Use classification of the City's Comprehensive Plan and is zoned RSF -1 and holding. A change to the PUD -R is requested due to the unique nature of the property and preserve areas necessitated not only by water quality and storm water management issues, but protection of a Bald Eagle habitat as well. The PUD zoning is needed to afford flexibility with regard to lot area, yard requirements and set backs. Despite the request for the PUD designation, the Lakehouse seeks no commercial or industrial uses. The City's planned unit development ordinance is the ideal method of achieving the developers' vision for this property while at the same time providing the City with an enforceable development plan which will not permit a substantial deviation without re- submittal to the City Council. Few, if any other zoning classifications, permit the degree of oversight or require adherence to a stated development plan. In this sealed back project, the developers of the Lakehouse are committed to adhering to the concurrency requirements of the City of Okeechobee Code of Ordinances and the state law. The roads and sidewalks will be dedicated to the public with ample passive recreation and preserve areas are within the site. The development team has made initial contact with the Okeechobee County School District and recognizes that school impact fees are now in place. Payment of concurrency fees are required at the building permit application process and accordingly, the Lakehouse will have complied with the school concurrence requirements prior to unit occupancy. The regional landfill has ample reserves for this project and a letter to this effect has been requested from Waste Management. Likewise, the Lakehouse Project had reserved 210 Equivalency Units (EU's) and is in the process of negotiating for the balance necessary. With the announcement by the Okeechobee Utility Authority of the proposed plant expansion, there will be [4107 - 73842. WPD) UUL 1. NU 1:16FM CASSELS & McCAI_L 863 - 163 -1031 NO. 4166 15th Street Homes LLC 701 Bricked Avenue, Suite 1740 Miami, FL 33131 August 1, 2007 Brian Whitehall, Administrator City of Okeechobee 55 S.E. 3`d Avenue Okeechobee, FL 34974 RE: The Lakehouse - Okeechobee, Florida Dear Mr. Whitehall: Please be advised that 1 am the manager for 15th Street Homes, LLC, which is the fee title holder ofthe parcel sought to be developed as The Lakehouse in the City of Okeechobee. My intention is to develop the property as a project containing only single family residential opportunities. This letter constitutes the owner's acknowledgment and authorization of the request to re -zone to accommodate The Lakehouse planned unit development. 1 also confirm Jose Rasco's authority to act on behalf ofthe company and to serve as the applicant for any and all petitions required to obtain the necessary governmental approvals for this project. Sincerely_ I5th STREET HOMES LLC Jua e, Manager STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF /lib 0,444 Sworn to and subscribed before me this 16 4-11 day of August, 2007, by JUAN D. CALLE, who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification. NOTARY 1UBLIC, STATE OF FLORIDA My Commission Expires: [4107- 70825.WPDI so"n" I REJOICE eoe11W � y g NOb y Pubic• Stab of Fbdida a'y Comdata &p Met 79,2009r Commission It DD 412351 B411ded Nitbni Assn. Mr. James G. LaRue August 27, 2007 Page 2 adequate EU' s available for this project which is anticipating a four year build out. Naturally, the developers of the Lakehouse are in the process of addressing City concurrence requirements and have conducted a traffic analysis. A copy of the report is attached which indicates little off -site road infrastructure improvements being necessary due to the multiple means of ingress and egress from the project. In fact, traffic circulation in the area should be enhanced due to the construction of Ninth Street and Fifteenth Street, by means of a central boulevard through the Lakehouse community. Drainage issues are summarized in Exhibit "F" and utilities in Exhibit "G" attached to the application. The project will undergo significant engineering and water management district review prior to final permitting. The project will also receive additional scrutiny as a result of the regulated resources and Bald Eagle nest depicted in Exhibit "E ". In summary, given the small remaining amount of undeveloped acreage within the City Limits, the Lakehouse presents a rare, and perhaps unique, opportunity to utilize the planned unit development ordinance to realize a community affording a mix of residential housing needs for residents and those moving into the community. This unified development should be preferred over some of the historic small scale developments, which by their very nature, create traffic and drainage interface problems with neighboring properties. Under a master property owners association, the community will be able to maintain its own preserves and common areas while at the same time providing a unique housing alternative for our growing community. As planned unit developments are not common within the City, the development team consisting of LBFH, The Evans Group, Northstar Geomatics, Ecological Consulting of Florida, the Ball Group, Inc., as well as our office, look forward to meeting with you and other county officials to review and discuss in detail the types of assurances which will be understandably required by the City and included in the newly adopted PUD enabling ordinance. We also stand ready and willing to provide additional information or clarification as you may need as you undertake the review process. Finally, I am enclosing my firm's check in the amount of $1,530.00 to support the application for re- zoning of the Lakehouse property. It is my understanding that the $500.00 fee has been waived, due to the non -start of the last petition due to the Comprehensive Plan rejection. With kindest regards, I am Sincerely, ohn D. Cass , Jr. JDC /msp Enclosures: As stated [4107- 73842.WPD] Exhibit A.1 Project Location Map w/ Aerial 14107 - 70848. WPD] Lh CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS CIVIL AGRICULTURAL WATER RESOURCES WATER & WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION SURVEYING & MAPPING GIS "Partners for Results Value by Design" 421 N.W. 3 "' Street Okeechobee, FL 3 -1972 (863) 763 -8999 FAX: (863) 763 -6692 Project No. 05 -0260 ADDITIONAL PROJECT STATEMENTS THE E LAKEHOUSE OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA Project Description: The Lakehouse is a planned urban development proposed on 50± acres located in the City of Okeechobee. The proposed project is bound by SW 9th Street to the north, SW 15th Street to the south, existing single family residential and SW 101 Avenue to the west, and existing single family residential and SW 7`h Avenue to the east. The proposed development will include all of the essential stormwater management facilities, roadways, utilities, and preserve area. The utilities proposed include underground power, central water & wastewater service, phone, and cable. Areas to be Dedicated for Public Use: The areas to be dedicated for public use for the Lakehouse will include sidewalks and other infrastructure throughout the project located within the right of way of the arterial roadway. Phasing Plan and Time Frame for Completion of the Entire Development: The project is proposed to be built in one phase and construction for the project is expected to be completed by 2009. Description of Environmentally Sensitive Areas: Environmentally sensitive areas located within the project include an eagle's nest with 100' primary protection zone and a 492' eagle buffer zone. There are also 3 wetlands located within the project all with 25' wetland buffers and upland preserve areas surrounding them. Please refer to the attached construction plans for the size and location of each of these environmentally sensitive areas. List of Required Regional, State, and Federal Permits: • Environmental Resource Permit — South Florida Water Management District • Water Use Permit - South Florida Water Management District ( requirement pending) • Consumptive Use Permit (Dewatering Permit) - South Florida Water Management District • Wastewater Collection/Transmission Permit — Florida Department of Environmental Protection • Construction of Water Main Extensions for Public Water Systems - Florida Department of Environmental Protection Exhibit A.2 - Project LocationMap w/o Aerial Okeechobee County Property Appraiser - Map Printed on 8/13/2007 11:14:18 AM Page 1 of 1 2 21 37.35 -0AOO- 00006- 6000 15TH STREET HOMES LLC 50.478, ,C 11113Q2005 - $2 ,696,700 VK� Okeechobee County Property Appraiser W.C. 'Bill" Sherman, CFA - Okeechobee, Florida - 863 - 763 -4422 PARCEL: 2- 21- 37- 35 -0A00 -00006 -6000 - SINGLE FAM (000100) ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 35 EAST, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, Name: 15TH STREET HOMES LLC LandVal $2,032,506.00 Site: 0 SW 2ND ST, Okeechobee BldgVal $47,674.00 M ail: 701 BRICKELL AVENUE SUITE 1740 ApprVal $2,080,488.00 MIAMI, FL 33131 JustVal $2,080,488.00 12/23/2005 $O.00V/ Assd $2,080,488.00 U Exmpt $0.00 , , ,, , , r �c� aoa inn nn V Taxable $2,080,488.00 Sales Info 4/16/2003 $0.00 U This information, Last Updated: 7/23/2007, was derived from data which was compiled by the Okeechobee County Property Appraiser's Office solely for the governmental purpose of property assessment. This information should not be relied upon by anyone as a determination of the ownership of property or market value. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the accuracy of the data herein, it's use, se updated, t a reflect the Property Appraisers The assessed values are NOT cert fiedvaluesand therefore are subject to change before being finalized for ad valorem assessment purposes. 260 520 no ft hllp : / /www.okeechobeepa.com/GI S/Print_ Map. asp? pjboiibchhjbnligcafccjfhojiaehdomhloa ... 08/13/07 Exhibit A.3 - Conceptual Site Plan [4107 - 70848. WPD] Okeechobee County Property Appraiser - Map Printed on 8/27/2007 3:39:23 PM X 1 1 I i1 J S.W:7_T.H4.STREET ti► .W 8 TH• STREET S. W_ Page 1 of 1 5- -S =W 11TH STREET 1 z W 1= (TH TS 1 I ET W z. W I•• P —to I ; I —2 r, I I 1 -L - - -- S.W.-15TH STREET 2 - 21-3 5 OfiAO 000(IE-6000 15TH STREET HOMES LLC ....: 50.478AC I 11,002005 $2,696,700 - V W14 TH :STRI ET7 7/ S.,W-1 T-H- COURT t / 1 4 r I 1 4 U CITY; L MITS- W t -1 x C/. 2 J l: ', '` ! Orl y, j S_N1.19-fjTH- STREETS ! `� Okeechobee County Property Appraiser W.C. "Bill" Sherman, CFA - Okeechobee, Florida - 863 -763 -4422 PARCEL: 2- 21- 37- 35 -OAOO- 00006 -B000 - SINGLE FAM (000100) ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 35 EAST, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, Name: 15TH STREET HOMES LLC LandVal $2,032,506.00 Site: 0 SW 2ND ST, Okeechobee BldgVal $47,674.00 • Mail: 701 BRICKELL AVENUE SUITE 1740 ApprVal $2,080,488.00 MIAMI, FL 33131 JustVal $2,080,488.00 12/23/2005 $0.00 U Assd $2,080,488.00 Exmpt $0.00 Info s 11/30/2005$2,696,700.00 Q Taxable $2,0813,488.00 4/16/2003 $0.00 U/ 0.05 0.1 0.15 mi This information, Last Updated: 8/27/2007, was derived from data which was compiled by the Okeechobee County Property Appraiser's Office solely for the governmental purpose of property assessment. This information should not be relied upon by anyone as a determination of the ownership of property or market value. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the accuracy of the data herein, it's use, or it's interpretation. Although it is periodically updated, this information may not reflect the data currently on file in the Property Appraiser's office. The assessed values are NOT certified values and therefore are subject to change before being finalized for ad valorem assessment purposes. hnp://www.okeechobeepa.com/GIS/Print Map. asp ?pjboiibchhj bnligcafccjfhojiaehdomhloa... 08/27/07 CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS CIVIL AGRICULTURAL WATER RESOURCES WATER & WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION SURVEYING & MAPPING GIS "Partners for Results Value by Design" 421 N.W. 3 "'Street Okeechobee, FL 34972 (863) 763-8999 FAX- (863) 763 -6692 Project No. 05 -0260 ADDMONAL PROJECT STATEMENTS THE LAKEHOUSE OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA Project Description: The Lakehouse is a planned urban development proposed on 50± acres located in the City of Okeechobee. The proposed project is bound by SW 9th Street to the north, SW 15th Street to the south, existing single family residential and SW 10th Avenue to the west, and existing single family residential and SW 7t Avenue to the east. The proposed development will include all of the essential stormwater management facilities, roadways, utilities, and preserve area. The utilities proposed include underground power, central water & wastewater service, phone, and cable. Areas to be Dedicated for Public Use: The areas to be dedicated for public use for the Lakehouse will include sidewalks and other infrastructure throughout the project located within the right of way of the arterial roadway. Phasing Plan and Time Frame for Completion of the Entire Development: The project is proposed to be built in one phase and construction for the project is expected to be completed by 2009. Description of Environmentally Sensitive Areas: Environmentally sensitive areas located within the project include an eagle's nest with 100' primary protection zone and a 492' eagle buffer zone. There are also 3 wetlands located within the project all with 25' wetland buffers and upland preserve areas surrounding them. Please refer to the attached construction plans for the size and location of each of these environmentally sensitive areas. List of Required Regional, State, and Federal Permits: • Environmental Resource Permit — South Florida Water Management District • Water Use Permit - South Florida Water Management District ( requirement pending) • Consumptive Use Permit (Dewatering Permit) - South Florida Water Management District • Wastewater Collection/Transmission Permit — Florida Department of Environmental Protection • Construction of Water Main Extensions for Public Water Systems - Florida Department of Environmental Protection l �: \05- 0260 \Permit \CITY\Exhibits \PUD DRAINAGE- BOUNDARY EXHIBIT.dwg, Boundary, 8/15/2007 11:39:20 AM, mark -w, LBFH Inc. STORMWATER DETENTION AREA 8.1 ACRES C� CONTROL EL. =23.5' i Dote Scale. Design By Drown By Check By 8/7(2007 VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING DATE BY REVISIONS 0 1 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY i 1 l? . A Boyle Engineering Company 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fax. (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No 959 www.lbfh.com CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results. Value By Design" 1 THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE EXHIBIT B PROJECT BOUNDARY, STREETS, BUILDINGS, & LAKES LBFH PROJECT No 05 -0260 SHEET 1 of 1 A.4 - Boundary Exhibit A and Topographic Survey [4107 -70848 WPD) Exhibit B - Project J Aerial [4107 - 70848. WPD1 EXHIBIT B PROJECT AERIAL 1 V Cl. 0 Z 0 0 0 v x Id Id 0_ a E 0 a 0 E 0 Z CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, INC. Value By Design" 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fax: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 www.lbfh.com Scale: 1-, 500 Sheet 1 OF 1 PROJECT NAME: THE LAKEHOUSE Computed: RR Checked: MM Date 8/24/2006 FILE NO. PERMIT -EXH Project No. 05 -0260 Exhibit C - Project Soils Map [4107 - 70848. WPD] EXHIBIT C SOILS MAP SOILS LEGEND: 7- FLORIDANA, RIVIERA, & PLACID SOILS, DEPRESSIONAL 1 1- IMMOKALEE FINE SAND CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, INC. Value By Design" 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fox: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 www.lbfh.com 2006 LBFH Inc. Scale: 1", 600' Sheet 1 OF 1 PROJECT NAME: THE LAKEHOUSE Computed: RR Checked: MM Date 8/24/2006 FILE NO. PERMIT -EXH Project No. 05 -0260 Exhibit D - Project Quadrangle Map [4107 - 70848. WPDI +1 0 a 4 111 EXHIBIT D QUADRANGLE MAP 30-/- • • C � r i...�,.,.,� -- 111111....,,.,.......-..... �_- ,......I,...,.,._�.....�..�... , 4d WOWS • • ■ �. X o ■� • w • 01-- ■ 0 Ii a i • • 1 0 1 at 1 4 • • i >11 it 11 • i 0 # ! • • * 1 2 g ■ f F, I 4 [II • : g 1111 CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, INC. Value By Design" 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fox: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 www.lbfh.com • ■ aMI 0 • • ■ i © 2006 LBFH Inc. Scale: 1 "= 600' Sheet 1 OF 1 PROJECT NAME: THE LAKEHOUSE Computed: RR Checked: MM Dote 8/24/2006 FILE NO. PERMIT —EXH Project No 05 -0260 Exhibit E - Regulated Resources Exhibit Prepared by ECF Cxr1Ibl I t • VVI. 3 ;,_ 1 :34 a( les / WI 4 2 2G acres 0 47 acre 427' F3uffel (13.15 aGies) • NF:.ti1 LOCAiit)N it; AF'PROXIMn11 AN1) f0 131. CON1 IRjy1} 1).L1Y$URVEYOR . * i 100, DUFFER (0 7 AC) - NO SCJRFFCf'1 AMR MANAGEMENT gY5`FPI91" 3 :12,1 au. t THIS DOCUMENT. TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE. IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADOPTATION BY ECOLOGICAL CONSULTING OF FLORIDA SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO ECOLOGICAL CONSULTING OF FLORIDA ECF Eoologlcal Consulting of Florida REGULATED RESOURCES THE LAKEHOUSE OKEECHOBEE COUNTY FLORIDA GRAPHIC SCALE 200 0 200 1 inch = 400 ft. SOURCE 0565 OKEECHOBEE 1IBM) QUADRANGLE SECTION 21. TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH RANGE 35 EAST FIGURE 1 600 DATE. 10 -13 -06 PROJECT No 0053 00 •:w o- UZbU\ Permit \CITY\ Exhibits \PUD ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS.dwg, ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS, 8/15/2007 11:39:52 AM, mark -w, LBFH Inc. © 2007 IBFH Ina Jc S.W. 10th AVENUE JO l0 J9 - UPLAND PRESERVN 2.04 ACRES \\ \ 1 1 7 i 1' r 21 WETLAND BUFFER 1 UPLAND PRESERVE` 0.39 ACRES 100' PRIMARY PROTECTION ZON NO ACCESS 25' WETLAND BUFFER 1 ` UPLAND PRESERVE EAGLE EL. -2 1 0 0.88 ACRES ■ POND 3 �� �� 8.1 ACRES © CONTROL \ 0 EL. =23.5' -- \\\ <vP25' WETLAND BUFFER \ O fi t tWEll-AND ;'4: t , 0.63: ,ACRES' UPLAND/PRESERVE 0.1S ACRES WETLAND BUFFER sr S.W. 7th AVENUE UPLAND PRESERVE 0.35 ACRES .L:TTdIS 416 'WS SCALE: 1 " =100' DATE BY REVISIONS VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 IMONMEMIS 1 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY DC_ A Boyle Engineering Company CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, Valve By Design" 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fax: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 www.lbfh.com 1 1 THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE EXHIBIT C ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS LBFH PROJECT No: 05 -0260 SHEET 1 of 1 1 Lh CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS CIVIL AGRICULTURAL WATER RESOURCES WATER & WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION SURVEYING & MAPPING GIS "Partners for Results Value by Design" 421 N.W.3 "'Street Okeechobee, FL 34972 (863) 763 -8999 FAX: (863) 763 -6692 Project No. 05 -0260 DRAINAGE STATEMENT THE LAKEHOUSE OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA Pre - Development: The current drainage pattern on the 50± acre parcel is natural sheet flow to onsite wetlands and then sheet flow to offsite facilities via perimeter ditches and swales. The south parcel (50± acres) collects in the three wetlands that are throughout the property then runoff via sheet flow to the south to reach the existing ditch along SW 15th Street. There is also a ditch along the western property boundary that collects sheet flow to transmit it to the ditch along SW 15th Street as well. Along the east property boundary there is no defined stormwater routing mechanism, but the proposed project does accept runoff from the houses to the east of the property via sheet flow, which ultimately flows south along with the onsite runoff. Post - Development: The proposed project is going to include a stormwater management system (SWMS) to treat and attenuate the runoff prior to discharging downstream. The parcel will operate to mimic existing conditions. The proposed SWMS will incorporate wet - detention ponds to provide treatment and attenuation. The treatment volume will be the greater of 2.5" times the impervious area associated with basin or 1" times the basin area. The bleeder structure that will slowly release the stormwater will be sized to discharge one -half inch per acre of contributing area per day. The attenuation proposed will be a compromise of the South Florida Water Management District's (SFWMD) criteria for the area (15.6 cubic feet per second per square mile (csm)) and an acceptable recovery of the system to receive additional runoff from reoccurring storm events. The primary stormwater storage component of the SWMS will be the proposed wet - detention areas and the onsite wetlands that are intended for preservation. All of the runoff will be transmitted to the wet - detention areas by curb and gutter drainage along the roadways and ditch bottom inlets in swales for all of the open spaces. This development will reduce the currently overtaxed drainage in the area. This will be accomplished by providing attenuation for the 25 year 3 day storm event (design storm) and restricting all site discharge from events that produce less runoff than the design storm to the proposed control structures. This will reduce the volume of runoff at peak times allowing the downstream system to recover prior to receiving the bulk of the runoff from this site. Exhibit F - Drainage Statement [4107-70848.WPD] SCALE: 1' =100' S.W. 10th AVENUE r __ — 1� Ir /" ONSITE DRAINAGE OFFSITE DRAINAGE rI AMMENITYI AREA 03 \� 0 u_ LL E N LLJ m m m 0 m X w 4 0 Z 0 w W U` Q z 0 0 a 6, K as STORMWATER DETENTION AREA 8.1 ACRES CONTROL El- -23.5' Il; i • ) /7/ �II `III\ i N, � it 1 ` "-_1 / a Iai GT`;li j m S.W. 7th AVENUE (D 2007 LB1H Inc g 2007 Dora: Score: Design By Drown By Check Sy 4— PROJECT OUTFALL STRUCTURE VERIFY INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 -1 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, 1 SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For ]results. INC. value By Design" — "9 Company Fl 34972 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee. 3492 (863) 763 -8999 Fax. (863) 763 — www Ibfh.com BPR & FBPE License No 959 THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE EXHIBIT A PROPOSED DRAINAGE PLAN tWFH PROJECT No: 05 -0260 SHEET 1 of 1 Exhibit G - Utility Statement [4107- 70848.WPD] L h CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS CIVIL AGRICULTURAL WATER RESOURCES WATER & WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION SURVEYING & MAPPING GIS "Partners for Results Value by Design" 421 N.W. 3 "'Street Okeechobee, FL 34972 (863) 763 -8999 FAX: (863) 763 -6692 Project No. 05 -0260 UTILITY STATEMENT THE LAKEBOUSE OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA This document describes the proposed water and wastewater utilities that will serve the planned Lakehouse residential development in southwestern Okeechobee County, Florida. The Lakehouse is a 50+ acre proposed planned urban development, to be located north of SW 1561 Street and south of SW 9th Street, in the southwestern quadrant of the City of Okeechobee. The proposed development is to include 136 single family homes, along with related infrastructure — i.e. roads, drainage, wetland and upland preserve areas, etc. Water Services: Water and fire suppression services will be provided by extending existing water mains and adding fire hydrants as required. Municipal water is available to the development. The applicable FDEP and local approvals required for water main extensions will be acquired by the client prior to construction. The project area and the client have signed a developer's agreement with the Okeechobee Utility Authority. Wastewater Services: Wastewater services will be provided by connecting to existing sanitary manholes located near the development. Municipal wastewater service is available to the development. The applicable FDEP and local approvals required for wastewater collection will be the acquired by the client prior to construction. The project area and the client have signed a developer's agreement with the Okeechobee Utility Authority. einky 10 0 i .05:53p CI s El ®r •,■ Jaice Boetius 305- 372 -0079 6 5 --o2Gd 13.1 fKEECHOBEE UTILITY AUTHORITY _ .TER AND WASTEWATER SYSTE. STANDARD DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT (10 /2D Plan) THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this,, f" day of Na 8 Lam- , 20 t , by and between Montebello 13, LLC and 15th Street Homes, LLC, hereinafter referred to as " DEVELOPER," and OKEECHOBEE UTILITY AUTHORITY, hereinafter referred to as "OUA." RECITALS 1 DEVELOPER owns lands located in Okeechobee County, Florida, and described in Exhibit "A ", attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set out in this paragraph and hereinafter referred to as "Property," and DEVELOPER has or is about to develop the Property by constructing or erecting improvements thereon. 2_ DEVELOPER is desirous of providing for the construction and /or maintenance of central water and wastewater facilities so the improvements constructed will receive adequate water and wastewater service. 3. OUA is willing to provide, in accordance with the provisions and stipulations hereinafter set out and in accordance with all applicable laws, central water and wastewater service, and to-have extended such service by of water. mains, wastewater mains, and lift station, and to thereafter operate same so the occupants of each residence or commercial improvement constructed on the Property will receive an adequate water and wastewater service from OUA. ACCORDINGLY, for and in consideration of the Recitals, the mutual undertakings and agreements herein contained and assumed, and other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged by the parties, DEVELOPER and OUA hereby covenant and agree as follows: SECTION 1. RECITALS. The above Recitals are true and correct, and form a material part of this Agreement. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS. The definitions set forth in the Interlocal Agreement creating the Okeechobee Utility Authority between Okeechobee County, Florida (the "County "), and the City of Okeechobee, Florida (the "City"), dated November 10, 1994, and the Master Transfer Agreement by and among OUA, the County, the City, and Okeechobee Beach Water Association, Inc. ( "OBWA "), dated July 13, 1995, and OUA Resolutions shall apply in this Agreement unless otherwise specified below. The following definitions and references are given for the purpose of interpreting the terms as used in this Agreement and apply unless the context indicates a different meaning: ,(1) "Service" - The readiness and ability on the part of OUA to furnish water and wastewater service to each unit. (2) "Point of Delivery or Distribution" - The point where the pipes of the utility are connected with the pipes of the customer. Unless otherwise 1 Last Edited 11/03/06 Straat Project Deferred Water 13 a MtaY 10 07 05:53p Joice Boetius 305- 372 -0079 p.2 indicated, the point of delivery shall be at a point in the customers tot or property line_ (3) "Contribution -in A]d -of- Construction" - The sum of money, and /or property, represented by the value of the water distribution and wastewater collection systems . constructed by DEVELOPER, which DEVELOPER covenants and agrees to pay for and deliver to OUA, as a Contribution-in-Aid- of- Construction; to induce OUA to provide water and wastewater service to the Property_ SECTION 3. EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF ACCESS. DEVELOPER hereby grants and gives OUAthe exclusive right or privilege to own, maintain, and operate the water and wastewater facilities in under, over and across the present and future streets, roads, easements, reserved utility sites as provided and dedicated to public use in the record plats, or as provided for in agreements, dedications or grants made otherwise and independent of said record plats. DEVELOPER hereby further agrees that the foregoing . grants include the necessary right of ingress and egress to any part of the Property; that the foregoing grants shall be for such period of time as OUA requires such rights, privileges or easements in the ownership, maintenance, operation or expansion of the water and wastewater facilities; that in the event OUA is required to install any of its water and wastewater facilities in lands within the Property lying outside the streets and easement areas described above, then DEVELOPER shall grant to the extent reasonably possible to OUA, without cost or expense to OUA, the necessary easement or easements for such "private property" installation; provided,all such "private property" installation by OUA shall be made in such a manner as not to interfere with the then or future use of such "private property." OUA covenants that it will use due diligence in ascertaining all easement locations; however, should OUA install or accept ownership of any facilities outside a dedicated easement area, DEVELOPER, on behalf of itself and the successors and assigns of DEVELOPER, covenants and agrees that OUA will not be required to move or relocate any facilities Tying outside a dedicated easement area so long as the facilities do not interfere with the then or future use of the area in which the facilities have been installed. In the event any such facilities, which have been funded and installed by QUA, do interfere with the then or future use of the area, OUA agrees to relocate such facilities at its own cost as promptly as reasonably possible. OUA hereby agrees that all easement grants will be utilized in accordance with the established and generally accepted practices of the water and wastewater industry with respect to the installation of all its water and wastewater facilities in any of the easement areas, and DEVELOPER in granting easements therein, or pursuant to the terms of this instrument, shall have the right to grant exclusive or non - exclusive rights, privileges and easements to other entities to provide to the Property any utility services other than water and wastewater service. SECTION 4. PROVISION OF SERVICE. In consideration of, and upon full compliance with all of the prerequisites to be performed by DEVELOPER, contained in this Agreement, and all applicable OUA policies, procedures, and Resolutions, OUA covenants and agrees that it shall allow the connection of the water distribution and wastewater collection facilities installed by DEVELOPER to the central water and wastewater facilities of OUA in accordance with the terms and intent of this Agreement. Such connection shall be in accordance with rules and regulations of the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services and the Florida Department of Environmental 2 Last Edited 11/03106 S[raat Project Deferred Water May 10 07 05:53p Joice Boetius 305 -372 -0079 p.3 rrotection. uui agrees-mat, once it provides water and wastewater service to the Property, and BEVEL( ER or others have connected custon ;nstallations to the Water and Wastewater System, thereafter QUA shall provide, at its cost and expense, but in return for payment of all applicable rates, fees, and charges and in accordance with and subject to the other provisions of this Agreement, and of applicable laws, including rules and regulations and rate schedules, water and wastewater service to the Property in a manner to conform with all requirements of all governmental agencies having jurisdiction over the water distribution and wastewater collection operation of OUA. SECTION 5. DESIGN, REVIEW, CONSTRUCTION, INSPECTION, AND CONVEYANCE OF FACILITIES. 5.1. To induce OUA to provide water and wastewater facilities, and to provide customers located on the Property with water and wastewater services, DEVELOPER hereby covenants and agrees to pay for the construction and to transfer ownership and control. to QUA as a Contribution -in- Aid -of- Construction, the on -site and off-site water distribution and wastewater collection systems referred to in the Special Conditions attached hereto as Exhibit "B". 52. DEVELOPER shall pay, in accordance with OUA's applicable published rate schedule for the same classification of service, OUA to review engineering plans and specifications of the type and in the form as prescribed by OUA, showing the on -site and off -site water distribution and wastewater collection systems proposed to be installed to -provide service to the Property. - OUA will advise DEVELOPER engineer of any sizing requirements as mandated by OUA Resolutions for the preparation of plans and specifications for facilities within the Property. If applicable, such detailed plans may be limited to a phase of the Property, and subsequent phases may be furnished from time to time. However, each such phase, if applicable, shall conform to a master plan for the development of the Property and such master plan shall be submitted to QUA concurrent with or prior to submission of plans for the first phase. All such plans and specifications shall be submitted to OUA and no construction shall commence until OUA has approved such plans, shop drawings and specifications in writing. After approval, DEVELOPER shall cause to be constructed, at. DEVELOPER expense, the water distribution and/or wastewater collection systems as shown on all plans and specifications. 5.3. During the construction of the water distribution and wastewater collection systems by DEVELOPER, OUA shall have the right to inspect, with prior reasonable notice to DEVELOPER, such installation to determine compliance with the plans and specifications, adequacy of the quality of the installation, and further, shall be entitled to perform, with prior reasonable notice to DEVELOPER, standard tests for compaction, pressure and leakage, infiltration /exfltration, line and grade, and all other normal engineering tests required by specifications and/or good engineering practices. Two (2) sets of Record Drawings, an electronic copy of Record Drawings in a coordinate system acceptable for standard geographic information system platforms, FDEP approvals, itemized cost of construction and quantities of material used in construction and a one year warranty as described in Exhibit B attached shall be submitted to OUA upon completion of construction. Las: Edited 13/03/06 Straat Project Deferred Water May TO 07,05:53p Joice Boetius 305 - 372 -0079 p.4 004, rees, to accordance with OUA's applicable published rate schedule for the same classification of vice, will be levied by OUA to cover cost of plan review and inspection, and the cosrof DEVELOPER negotiations. 5.5. By these presents, DEVELOPER hereby transfers to OUA titre to all water distribution and wastewater collection systems installed by DEVELOPER contractor, pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. Such conveyance is to take effect without further action upon the acceptance by OUA of the said installation. As further evidence of said transfer of title, and upon the completion of the installation and prior to the rendering of service .by OUA, DEVELOPER shall convey to OUA, by bill of sale, or other appropriate documents, in form satisfactory to OUA's counsel, the appropriate on -site and complete off- site water distribution and wastewater collection system as .constructed by DEVELOPER and approved by OUA, as set forth in this Agreement. DEVELOPER shall further cause to be conveyed to OUA, all easements and/or rights -of -way covering areas in which water distribution and wastewater collection systems are installed by recordable document in form satisfactory to OUA's counsel. All conveyance of easements and/or rights-of-way shall be accompanied by evidence of title satisfactory to OUA, which establishes DEVELOPER'S right to convey such continuous enjoyment of such easements or rights -of -way for those purposes set forth in this Agreement. The use of easements, granted by DEVELOPER shall include the use by other utilities, so long as such uses by electric, telephone or gas utilities, or cable television do not interfere with use by OUA OUA agrees that the acceptance of the water distribution and wastewater collection systems installed by DEVELOPER, for service, or acceptance of the bill of sale, shall constitute the assumption of- responsibility' by OUA for the operation and maintenance of such Water and Wastewater System from that date forward. 5_6. All installations by DEVELOPER or its contractor shall be warranted for at least ONE (1) year from the date of acceptance by OUA. Mortgagee(s), if any, holding prior liens on such properties shall be required to release such liens, subordinate their position and join in the grant or dedication of the easements or rights -of -way. All water distribution and wastewater collection facilities shall be covered by easements if conveyed to QUA and not located within platted or dedicated rights -of -way. 5.7. When ever in the opinion of OUA, ownership by OUA of the internal water distribution and wastewater collection system is not necessary, then, at the sole option of OUA, DEVELOPER, or its successor or assigns, may retain ownership and the obligation for maintenance of such on -site facilities. 5.8. Payment of the Contributions -in- Aid -of- Construction does not and will not result in OUA waiving any of its rates, rate schedules or rules and regulations, and their enforcement shall not be affected in any manner whatsoever by DEVELOPER making the contribution. OUA shall not be obligated for any reason whatsoever nor shall OUA pay any interest or rate of interest upon the contribution. Neither DEVELOPER nor any person or other entity holding any of the Property by, through or under DEVELOPER, or otherwise, shall have any right with respect to a refund of contributions, or interest payment on said contributions. No user or customer of water and wastewater services shall be entitled to offset any bill or bills rendered by OUA for such service or services against the contributions. DEVELOPER shall not be entitled to offset the contributions against any claim or claims of OUA. 4 Last Edited 11/03/06 Straat Project Deferred Water May 10 07' 05 :54p Joice Boetius 305 - 372 -0079 p,5 SECTION 6. EVI/ NICE OF TITLE. At the expense c EVELOPER, OUA shall order from a title insurer licensed to do business in the State—Of Florida, and otherwise acceptable to. OUA, evidence of title with respect to Property and /or that portion of the Property which shall be subject to the easement(s) for On -Site Facilities (as defined herein), if any, being granted to OUA pursuant to the terms hereof_ Any lien holder acceptable to OUA and any mortgagee having an interest in the Property shall be required to join in the grant of service rights set forth in this Agreement and in any document evidencing easement rights granted to OUA. SECTION 7. OWNERSHIP OF FACILITIES. DEVELOPER agrees with OUA that all water and wastewater facilities conveyed to OUA for use in connection with providing water and wastewater services to the Property, shall at all times remain in the complete and exclusive ownership of OUA, and any entity owning any part of the Property or any residence or building constructed or located thereon, shall not have the right, title, claim or interest in and to such facilities, or any part of them, for any purpose, including the furnishing of water and wastewater services to other persons or entities located within or beyond the limits of the Property. SECTION• 8. APPLICATION OF RULES, REGULATIONS, RATES, FEES, AND CHARGES. Notwithstanding any provision in this Agreement, OUA may establish, revise, modify and enforce rules, regulations, rates, fees and charges covering the provision of water and wastewater service to the Property. Such rules, regulations, rates, fees and charges are subject to the approval of the OIJA. Board.. Such rules and regulations shall at all times be reasonable and subject to regulation as may provided by law or under contract. Rates, fees and charges assessed to DEVELOPER or customers located upon the Property shall be identical to rates, fees and charges assessed for the same classification of service. All rules, regulations rates, fees and charges in effect, or placed into effect in accordance with the preceding shall be binding upon DEVELOPER, upon any other entity holding by, through or under DEVELOPER and upon any customer of the water and wastewater service provided. to the Property by OUA. SECTION 9_ PERMISSION TO CONNECT REQUIRED.. DEVELOPER, or any owner of any parcel of the Property, or any occupant of any residences or buildings located thereon, shall not have the right to and shall not connect any customer installation to the water and wastewater facilities of OUA until approval for such connection has been granted by OUA. SECTJON 10. BINDING AGREEMENT; ASSIGNMENTS BY DEVELOPER. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of DEVELOPER, OUA and their respective assigns and successors by merger, consolidation or conveyance. This Agreement shall not be sold, conveyed, assigned or otherwise disposed of by DEVELOPER without the written consent of OUA first having been obtained. OUA agrees not to unreasonably withhold such consent SECTION 11. NOTICES. Any notice, report, demand or other instrument authorized or required to be given or furnished hereunder shall be deemed given or furnished (1) when addressed to the party intended to receive the same, at the address of such party set forth below, on the date hand delivered at such address, or (ii) three (3) business days after Last Edited 11/03106 Straat Project Deferred Water 5 May 10 07 05:54p Joice Boetius 305- 372 -0079 p.6 me same is deposited in the United States mail as first class mail, postage paid, return receipt requested, wh er or not the same is actually receiv ay such party, or (iii) on the first business day to- lowing delivery of same to an overnight courier, as evidenced by the sender's copy of the bill of lading issued by such overnight courier. To DEVELOPER: To OUA: Montebello 13, LLC 15th Street Homes. LLC Attn: Jose L Rasco 701 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1740 Miami, Florida 33131 OKEECHOBEE UTILITY AUTHORITY Attn: Executive Director 100 SW 5th Avenue Okeechobee, Florida 34974 -4221 Any party may change the address to be used for notification purposes hereunder by providing written notice thereof in accordance with the terms hereof to the other parties. SECTION 12. SURVIVAL OF COVENANTS.. The rights, privileges, obligations and covenants of DEVELOPER and OUA shall survive the completion of the work of D- EVELOPER with respect to completing the water and wastewater facilities: and services to any phase area and to the Property as a whole_ SECTION 13. ENTIRE AGREEMENT; AMENDMENTS; APPLICABLE LAW; ATTORNEY'S FEES. This Agreement supersedes all previous agreements or representations, either verbal or written, heretofore in effect between DEVELOPER and OUA, made with respect to the matters herein contained, and when duly executed, constitute the agreement between DEVELOPER and OUA. No additions, alterations or variations of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid, nor can provisions of the Agreement be waived by either party, unless such additions, alterations, variations or waivers are expressed . in writing and duly signed. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida, and it shall be and become effective immediately upon execution by both parties hereto_ In the event that OUA or DEVELOPER is required to enforce this Agreement by court proceedings or otherwise, by instituting suitor otherwise, then the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all costs incurred and including reasonable attorneys' fees, at both the trial and appellate court levels_ SECTION 14. DISCLAIMERS; LIMITATIONS ON LIABILITY. 14.1. STATUS. The parties deem each other to be independent contractors, and not agents of the other. 14.2. INDEMNITY_ DEVELOPER shall indemnify OUA, its board members, agents, employees, consultants, and contractors, from and against any and all claims, liability, demands, damages, expenses, fees, fines, penalties, suits, proceedings and actions, including attorneys' fees, for injury (including death) to persons or damage to 6 Last Edited II /03/06 Straat Project Deferred Water May 9 07' 05:55p Joice Boetius 305- 372 -0079 p.7 property or property rights that may arise from or be related to acts, errors, or omissions of DEVELOPER, its age , employees, servants, licensees, it ees, or contractors or by any person under the control or direction of DEVELOPER, or-6y DEVELOPER'S use of OUA's system, and DEVELOPER shall indemnify OUA as aforesaid from all liability, claims and all other items above mentioned, arising or growing out of or connected with any default, breach, violation or nonperformance by. DEVELOPER of any covenant, condition, agreement or provision contained in this agreement concerning all or any part of OUA's system. 14.3.. FORCE MAJEURE. OUA shall not be liable or responsible to. DEVELOPER by reason of the failure or inability of OUA to take any action it is required to take or to comply with the requirements imposed hereby or any injury to DEVELOPER or by those claiming by or through DEVELOPER, which failure, inability or injury is caused directly or indirectly by force majeure as hereinafter set forth. The term "force majeure" as employed herein shall mean acts of god, strikes, lock -outs, or other industrial disturbance; acts of public enemies, war, blockades, riots, acts of armed forces, militia, or public authority epidemics; breakdown of or damage to machinery, pumps, or pipe lines; landslides, earthquakes, hurricanes, fires, storms, floods, or washouts; arrests, titre disputes, or other litigation; governmental restraints of any nature whether federal, state, county; municipal or otherwise, civil or military; civil disturbances; explosions; failure or inability to obtain necessary materials, supplies, labor or permits or governmental approvals whether resulting from or pursuant to existing or future rules, regulations, orders, laws or proclamations whether federal, state, county, municipal or otherwise, civil or military; or by any other causes, whether or not of the same kind as enumerated herein, not within the sole control of OUA and which by exercise of due diligence OUA is unable to overcome. 14A. DISCLAIMER OF THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. This Agreement is solely for the benefit of and shall be binding upon the formal parties hereto and their respective authorized successors and assigns, and no right or cause of action shall accrue upon or by reason hereof, to or for the benefit of any third party not a party to this Agreement or an authorized successor or assignee of any third party. 14.5. DISCLAIMER OF SECURITY. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, DEVELOPER expressly acknowledges (1) that it has no pledge of or lien upon any real property (including, specifically, OUA's system), any personal property, or any existing or future revenue source of OUA (including, specifically, any revenues or rates, fees, or charges collected by OUA in connection with OUA's system) as security for any amounts of money payable by OUA under this Agreement; and (2) that its rights to any payments or credits under this Agreement are subordinate to the rights of all holders of any stocks, bonds, or notes of OUA, whether currently outstanding or hereafter issued. i 14.6. AGREEMENT NOTA COMMITMENT FOR SCHEDULE. There shall be no liability whatsoever on the part of OUA for failure to provide water and wastewater service to DEVELOPER according to DEVELOPER needs or schedules. This Agreement constitutes a promise of good faith and not a timetable for delivery of utility services by the OUA. Likewise, the schedule provided by the DEVELOPER in Exhibit "G ", is a good faith estimate and not an absolute fixed timetable for actual absorption of the ERC's reserved under this Agreement. Last Edited 11103/06 Straat Project Deferred Water 7 M y 10 07 05:55p Joice Boetius 305- 372 -0079 p.8 SECTION 15_ CE iNANT NOT TO ENGAGE IN Wf R OR WASTEWATER BUSINESS. DEVELOPER, as a further consideration for this Agreement, agrees that it shall not engage in the business of providing water and wastewater service to the p'r13 erty during the period of time OUA, or its successors and assigns, provides water and wastewater service to the property, it being the intention of the parties hereto that the foregoing provision shall be a covenant running with the land. Under said provision and also under other provisions of this Agreement, OUA shall have the sole and exclusive right.and privilege, so long as it is reasonably capable of doing so, to provide water and wastewater service to the property and to the occupants of each residence, building or unit constructed thereon. SECTION 16_ RECORDATION. The parties hereto agree that an executed copy of this Agreement and Exhibits attached hereto shall be recorded in the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida, at the expense of DEVELOPER. SECTION 17. SEVERABILITY. If any part of this Agreement is found invalid or unenforceable by any court, such invalidity or unenforceability .shall not affect the other parts of this Agreement if the rights and obligations of the parties contained therein are not materially prejudiced, and if the intentions of the parties can continue to be effected. To that end, this Agreement is declared severable_ ' SECTION 18. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT. The signature by any person to this Agreement shall be deemed a warranty by that person that he has the full . power and authority to bind any corporation, partnership, or any other business entity on behalf of which he signs-hereunder. SECTION 19. CAPACITY. The execution of this Agreement between DEVELOPER and OUA does not constitute a specific reservation of capacity by DEVELOPER, and OUA does not hereby guarantee that capacity will be available for DEVELOPER'S project at any later date. Any specific reservations of capacity must be detailed within the body of this Agreement, under the heading "Special Conditions" and such capacity shall be so reserved, for a definite period of time only upon the payment of appropriate fees and charges or negotiated between the parties, by DEVELOPER to OUA. Said .fees and charges shall also be set forth in Exhibit "B" hereto. SECTION 20. SPECIAL CONDITIONS The following Special Conditions are mutually agreed between DEVELOPER and OUA: SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED TO AND INCORPORATED IN THIS AGREEMENT a Gast Edited 11/03/06 Straat Project Deferred Water May 10 07 05:55p Joice Boetius 305 -372 -0079 p.9 IN WITNESS WHERI _, DEVELOPER and OUA have ex ,ted or have caused this Agreement, with the named Exhibits attached, if any, to be duly executed in several counterparts, each of which counterpart shall be considered an original executed copy of this Agreement. ATTEST: } F. Hayford; III erk/Executive Direc (Official Seal) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE OKEECHOBEE UTILITY AUTHORITY BY: George Long Chairman APPROVED AS TO FO-RNI AND CORRECTNESS: OUA Attorney The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this / 7m-day of avcn bc-r - 200[A by e, ►� , Chairman op--behalf of the OKEECHOBEE UTILITY YAUTHO TY. Sad! person (check one) is personally known to produced a driver's license (issued by a state of the United States within the last five (5) years) as identification, or produced other identification, to wit: 101 w- ile.,51(a--ti-c.) Print Name: L-(he a.ri c Notary Public, State of: Commission No.: • My Commission Expires: Last Edited 11/03/06 Straat Project Deferred Water tort c(ct 9 May 10 07' 05 :55p Joice Boetius WITNESSES FOR II ELOPER: Print Name ? e , 0 ' c . L Print Na'h-e STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF 1414cc�►�" The foregoingjnstrument w acknowledged 20(.- 0 p by 1(.{ OM Of L . as a Florida Limited Liability Company. Said person me, produced a driver's license (issued last five (5) years) as identification, or 305 -372 -0079 DEVELO R: Montebello 13, LLC p.10 Juan D. Calle Print Name Its: I E1-rl fib Officer [Corporate Seal] ore me this C day of 1v0i/ t ri c� of Montebello (check one} is personally 13 LLC, a known to by a state of the United States within the produced other identification, to wit: Print Name: Notary Public, State of: Commission No.: My Commission Expires: 10 Last Edited 11/03/06 Straat Project Deferred Water - REJOICE BOETIUS Notary Pubic - State al Florida -pay Commission Expires Mar 29. 2OD �� d� Cattx�t+sslolip DO 412351 ` Me Banded: NiaBonal NoiaryAssn: May 10 07 05:56p Joice Boetius WITNESSES FOR D. = LOPER: s� Print Name H, 7?-c, ce- 1-Z-9 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF l L,rcrt/li -- The foregoin instrument was acknowledged U/T Florida Limited Liability Company. Said person me, produced a driver's license (issued last five (5) years) as identification, or 305 - 372 -0079 p.11 DEVELOF 15th Street Homes, LLC By: Juan D. Calle Print Name Its: M4 4 U Officer [Corporate Seal] 2Q by at- fore me this day of 1 /9ve� , c- of 15 Street Homes, LLC, a (check one) 'x is personally known to by a state of the United States within the produced other identification, to wit: Print Name: 0' Notary Public, State of: Commission No.: My Commission Expires: Last Edited 11103/06 Straat Project Deferred Water 11 May 10 07 05:56p Joice Boetius JOINDER 305 - 372 -0079 p.12 /54k 5T• The undersigned, as Owner and holder of that certain Mortgage (the "Mortgage ") dated AY:-( day of , 20 0 (o , recorded in Official Records Booker , Page oc l , Public Records f Okeechobee County, Florida, hereby joins in the execution of the foregoing Agreement to consent b the terms and conditions set forth therein and to make the lien of the Mortgage and the security interest in any personal property, as it may be modified arid /or assigned in the future, subject, subordinate, junior and inferior to (a) the Agreement, and any amendments thereto in the future, (b) the easements, rights and obligations granted or created, or contemplated to be granted or created thereunder, and (c_..))1. utility facilities contemplated to be transferred to OUA thereunder, if any. tj By: John ak--C 04/1-5 Its: ,1,r • t Ofcer STATE OF FLORI A COUNTY OF D(C�d- The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this -7111t" day of t\i v • 20G ,by Joky WLI i'Q.0 ,as U - of gi ,a corporation. Said person (check one) ✓ is personally known to me, produced a driver's license (issued by a state of the United States within the last five (5) years) as identification, or produced other identification, to wit: Yckalizt --&A.e.gob Print Name: %iea VAC /{S� 5 ,„9, 200 A9% Notary Public, State c ': r' ' :.. Commission No.: T.- . * t � . .G • #D1) Q013G6 ; o My Commission Expi .� • i ,c >� -,cu * Last Edited 11/03/06 Straat Project Deferred Water 12 May 10 07 05:56p Joice Boetius JOINDER 305 -372 -0079 p.13 Mon te-b41 Thief undersigned, s owner a d holder of that certain Mortgage (the " ortgage ") dated day of , 20 , recorded in Official Records Book , Page Public Records f Okeechob e County, Florida, hereby joins in the execution the foregoing Agreement to consent to the terms and conditions set forth therein and to make the lien of the Mortgage and the security interest in any personal property, as it may be modified and /or assigned in the future, subject, subordinate, junior and inferior to (a) the Agreement, and any amendments thereto in the future, (b) the easements, rights and obligations granted or created, or contemplated to be granted or created thereunder, and (c) the utility facilities . ntemplated to be transferred to OUA thereunder, if any. By: Its: Officer Previously Submitted STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2D,by ,as of ,a corporation. Said person (check one) is personally known to me, produced a driver's license (issued by a state of the United States within the last five (5) years) as identification, or produced other identification, to wit Print. Name: Notary Public, State of: Commission No.: My Commission Expires: Last Edited lI /07/06 Awesome Ranch Project 11 May 10 07 05:56p Joice Boetius EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel ID Number: 2- 21- 37- 35 -0A00- 00006 -B000 Parcel ID Number: 2- 21- 37- 35 -OA00- 00006 -A000 14 Last Edited 11/03100 Straat Project Deferred Water 305- 372 -0079 p.14 May 10 b7 05 :57p Joice Boetius 305- 372 -0079 p.15 EXHIBIT "8" SPECIAL CONDMONS The following Special Conditions set forth in this Exhibit "3" are attached to and incorporated in that certain Okeechobee Utility Authority Water and Wastewater System Standard Developer Agreement (the "Agreement ") by and between Montebello 13, LLC and 15th Street Homes, LLC, hereinafter referred to as "DEVELOPER ", and OKEECHOBEE UTILITY AUTHORITY, hereinafter referred to as "OUA." 1. Site Area Map. Attached to the Agreement as Exhibit "C" and made a part thereof is the Site Area Map. Contributions in Aid of Construction for On -Site /Off -Site Facilities. a. Plans. All of DEVELOPER construction of utility facilities, whether on -site or off - site, whether conveyed to OUA or not, shall be in accordance with the standards and specifications as designated by the OUA, as the saute may be revised by OUA prior to final approval. b. On- Site /Off -Site Facilities_ Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in the Agreement, DEVELOPER shall provide, install, convey and dedicate to OUA all water mains, wastewater collection mains and lift station, together with all appurtenances thereto, with an electronic copy of Record Drawings in a coordinate system acceptable for standard geographic information system platforms, two (2) sets of Record Drawings, FDEP approvals, itemized cost of construction and quantities of materials used in • construction and a one year warranty described herein prior to OUA's . acceptance of the water and wastewater system, in accordance with OUA's standards and specifications and OUA's Resolutions, as shown on Exhibit "D" and more particularly described on the Plans. 3. Pursuant to Paragraph 5.4 of the Agreement, recording, administrative, inspection and title insurance fees are to be paid by DEVELOPER, concurrently with execution of this Agreement, as follows: (to be determined later and agreed to in a Addendum to this Agreement) Last Edited 11/03/06 Straat Project Deferred Water 15 May 10 07 05:57p Joice Boetius EXHIBIT "B" (continued) 305- 372 -0079 p.16 Description - Amount Document Recording Fee' pages @ $11-.50 per page . $ TBD Review of plans relating to installation of water and sewer lines $60.00 per page (Estimated , pages) $ TBD Inspection Fees Hours @ $25.00 per hour $ TBD Administrative Fee (Cost of processing Agreement; project tracking through Certificate of Occupancy) hours @: $ TBD $25:00 per hour Title Insurance Fee $ TBD TOTAL $ TBD TBD — To Be Determiner! 4. Notwithstanding the fact that this Agreement is being executed solely in connection with the provision of water and wastewater service to the Property by OUA, DEVELOPER acknowledges, understands and agrees that OUA is the sole and exclusive provider of water and wastewater services within the service areas of OUA's utility systems. Accordingly, notwithstanding provisions to the contrary set forth in Section 3 of this Agreement., DEVELOPER shall not have the right to grant any rights, privileges or easements to any other entities to provide water and wastewater service to the-Property. Additionally, notwithstanding language to the contrary set forth in Section 15 of this Agreement, DEVELOPER agrees (a) that it shall not engage in the business of providing water and wastewater service to the Property during the period of time OUA, its successors and assigns, provide any utility services to the Property, the foregoing being a covenant running with the land, and (b) OUA, its successors and assigns, shall have the sole and exclusive right and privilege to provide water and wastewater service to the Property and to the occupants of each residence, building or unit constructed thereon. 5. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 19 of the Agreement,- DEVELOPER is reserving 52,500 average gallons per day, equating 210 ERC's (the Reserved ERC's) as calculated and set forth on Exhibit "F" hereto. Provided DEVELOPER (a) pays the charges shown on Exhibit "F ", (b) complies with all the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement, and complies with all the provisions of OUA's applicable Resolutions, as the same may be modified or amended, DEVELOPER shall have the right to utilize the Reserved ERC's so long as DEVELOPER connects to OUA's Water and Wastewater System to utilize the Reserved ERC's. 16 Last Edited 11/03/06 Straat Project Deferred Water May 10 07 05:57p Joice Boetius 305 - 372 -0079 p.17 DEVELOPER sha _day the Capital Connection Cha,_;, which shall be non- refundable, for all capacity reserved hereunder at the time of the execution of this Agreement. This payment may be for the entire project or for specific phases, however plant capacity shall only be reserved for that portion for which the Capital Connection Charges have been paid. in the event DEVELOPER elects to pay Capital Connection Charges in phases, he shall pay such charges for each phase prior to the commencement of each such phase; however, a new Agreement will be required for each phase with current rates and charges in effect at time of execution of each new Agreement. Each additional equivalent residential connection (ERC) reserved by DEVELOPER for the subject property in the future will be subject to an Accrued Guaranteed Revenue Charge (AGRC) which begins accruing on December 1, 2006. The AGRC will continue to accrue on a monthly basis until November 30, 2011. The amount of the monthly accrual will be calculated on the 1st day of the month. After November 30, 2011, the accrual of AGRC will cease and the amount shall remain fixed as of that date and thereafter unless the OUA Board directs otherwise. The AGRC will be calculated .according to the Okeechobee Utility Authority Rate Schedule. An accrual schedule based upon current rates is attached as Exhibit "E ". The date of execution of a new Agreement and the number of ERC's reserved on the date of the execution of the new Agreement will determine the amount of the AGRC. The AGRC is clue and payable upon execution of the new Agreement. After the new Agreement has been executed and the AGRC paid, no additional AGRC will be charged against the ERCs reserved in the new Agreement. Beginning December 1, 2008 or the completion date of the expansion of the WWTF, whichever is later, each ERG reserved by DEVELOPER that is not connected to the OUA system shall be subject to a Guaranteed Revenue Charge (GRC) as specified and defined in the OUA Rate Schedule. DEVELOPER shall pay the GRC to the OUA in advance on an annual basis for a fiscal period from October 1 to September 30. The GRC shall be due and payable on or before October 15 and will be deemed fate if payment is not received by October 31. if DEVELOPER has not paid the GRC to OUA by October 31, a late charge of five percent (5 %) on the amount owed shall be due and payable. If the full payment (GRC plus late charge) is not received by the OUA by November 30, then the Developer Agreement shall become null and void and all monies paid to OUA shall be retained by OUA as agreed and liquidated damages and all reserved ERC's not connected to the OUA system shall be forfeited. DEVELOPER shall be responsible for providing to OUA on a monthly basis a tabulation of those ERC's transferred by DEVELOPER to third parties (representing service connections to the OUA system). Each fiscal year ending September 30, the DEVELOPER shall submit an analysis to OUA showing those ERC's transferred to third parties during the year (October 1 through September 30). OUA will review all information submitted by DEVELOPER and may refund or credit to DEVELOPER the amount of any excess GRC's found to have been paid for such period. Gast Edited 11/03/06 Straat Project Deferred Water 17 Mey 10 07 05:57p Joice Boetius 305- 372 -0079 p.18 EXHIBIT "B" (continued) DEVELOPER shall deliver or assign to OUA a one year warranty for the portion of the water and wastewater system constructed and placed in service by DEVELOPER, warranting that such portion is free of defects including deficiencies in the design, materials or installation of the system or failure to operate properly. The warranty will begin on the date of the final acceptance by OUA. The warranty will provide, among other things, that DEVELOPER will, upon written. notification by OUA, correct any deficiencies . as soon as possible or reimburse the OUA for any work performed by OUA to correctthe deficiencies_ Payment of the Capital Connection Charges shall not be payment of contributions in aid of construction. The OUA reserves the right to adjust the Capital Connection Charge (CCC) if and when the actual flows of the project are found to be in excess of the estimated flows used for the project or at any time the site plan, occupancy or use of any existing building is changed. A. Water Service Fees: Connection Fees and Capital Connection Charges are to be paid by the DEVELOPER upon execution of this Agreement. Fees and Charges other than those paid as a reservation for water capacity are subject to change and payment will be required based on the fees which are current at the time of payment for service. Description Amount Connection Fees (inspect and Install 3/1" Meter 210 X $ $ TBD - per unit) ` Capital Connection Charges (210 ERC's X $ ) $ TBD Total due for Water Service - $ TBD _ One (1) Water equivalent residential connection (ERC) = 250 gallons per day TBD — To Be Determined B. Wastewater Service Fees: Connection Fees and Capital Connection Charges are to be paid by the DEVELOPER upon the execution of this Agreement_ Fees and Charges other than those paid as a reservation for wastewater capacity are subject to change and payment will be required based on the fees which are current at the time of payment for service. Description Amount Inspection Fee for Connection (210 X $140.00 per unit) $ 29,400.00 Capital Connection Charges (210 ERC's X $3,650.00) $ 766,500.00 Total due for Wastewater Service $ 795,900.00 One (1) Wastewater equivalent residential connection (ERC) = 250 gallons per day 18 Last Edited 11103/06 Straat Project Deferred Water May 10- 0/ Ob:b8p, Joice Boetius .Last Frilled 11/03/06 Straat Project Deferred Water 305 - 372 -0079 p.19 EXHIBIT "C" SITE AREA MAP I ' N V llR • AVE , - 41.7_6 1 , S_YL6 TN- STREET QI n 4 Parcel ID Number: 2- 21- 37- 35 -0A00- 00006 -A000 I9 -I_ -- • •': 'x 'i _Z_.:::. _ ~iii{ • • • • z':..... e' ,`;.'. "�? •c::i r• „i; MONTEBELLO f 2J23l1Z105.. 13 L1Ci is ,900.` %!Q . . - _ • i- ••.i..._iit•� :5...._� .:i:�[tii�A. .4 't. • wi: .ii:^ iiii �: •�`x L•i sGiu :W: es':'•iici1 i5n F ... ::ii_i s- %�i:ir. Wciw(EN �:� ::: ..:.: a:ercxi? S : EiuiiE(lii� Ef[ ... •ti:i si R2e; -:.. :•cs�y: •s::., e.: _ - 4- [ - Ct ' .fa 3 D . : ' -- - YEh.iJJ;fC n1l 3IX>'!_Si3':: - - - ii� ft.i: ::N��J ii iiir _= r;... :_. .: -- - ':L•Jr:.. - iiTi3iEft ii;A'rj c °ru ° 7 ' =• _ _ __ _ _ • �:` _ - - _ - -- !J - t :i.C.: _ --r_:i ••'r•,;_ - - 'r:. ••t -:_ - '., _ _ "� _ __ _.fir •t _ I ' N V llR • AVE , - 41.7_6 1 , S_YL6 TN- STREET QI n 4 Parcel ID Number: 2- 21- 37- 35 -0A00- 00006 -A000 I9 May 1U Uf Ub:btip Joice 13oetius EXHIBIT "C" SITE AREA MAP (Continued) 305 - 372 -0079 p.20 Parcel ID Number: 2- 21- 37- 35 -OA00- 00006 -B000 20 Las( Edited 11/03/06 Straat Project Deferred Water May 10 0 / Ub:b8p Joice 13oetius 305 - 372 -0079 p.21 EXHIBIT "D" ON -SITE CONTRIBUTION IN AID of CONSTRUCTION WATER The quantity required for this-project is as determined and specified in EXHIBIT UB" and DEVELOPER has not reserved the capacity with this Agreement. As an inducement to the OUA to forego the reservation of and payment for water service ( ERC's) fees in this Agreement, the DEVELOPER agrees to execute separate Developer Agreement(s) for water service ( ERC's) based•upon the drawdown schedule included in EXHIBIT "F° of this Agreement. The fees due for water service ERC's will be based upon the rate schedule current at the time the separate Developer Agreement(s) is (are) executed. The fees due will be paid in full upon the execution of the separate Agreement(s). Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed to prohibit the DEVELOPER from requesting an acceleration of the drawdown schedule provided the OUA has the water service capacity available. Proposed Water Mains and Fittings as shown on Drawings to be prepared and presented at a future date are to be connected to the existing OUA Water Mains and an easement, as required, providedto the .OUA for operation•and maintenance of the water mains and connections to the water main. DEVELOPER shall install the water service line from the water m ain to the property line as required by OUA and shall include the installation ofthe Angle Valve and Meter Box set to finish grade. WASTEWATER The quantity required for this project is as determined and specified in EXHIBIT °B" and DEVELOPER has reserved the capacity with this Agreement However, the capacities reserved are not vested or entitled until payments have been received and only for those portions paid. Proposed Sanitary Sewer Pump Station, Manholes, Force Main, Sewer Piping and other appurtenances as shown on Drawings to be prepared and presented at a future date are to be connected to the, existing OUA service system. 2I Last Edited 11103/06 Straat Project Deferred Water May 10 0 Ob:b9p Joice Boetius 305 - 372 -0079 p.22 EXHIBIT "D" (Continued) OFF -SITE CONTRIBUTION IN AID of CONSTRUCTION TO BE DETERMINED AND ADDRESSED BY SEPARATE ADDENDUM TO THIS AGREEMENT. 22 Last Edited 11/03/06 St aat Project Deferred Water- May 1U U/ Ub :b9p Joice t3oetius EXHIBIT "E" Accrued guaranteed revenue charges (AGRC) beginning December 1, 2006, are based on OUA's Rate Schedule effective October 1, 2006, and are as follows: Water Base Facility Charge = $15.94 Wastewater Base Facility Charge= $16.70 AGRCs are based on current OUA Rate Schedule and are subject to change. The following table shows AGRC for the time period December 1, 2006 November 30, 2011 305 - 372 -0079 p.23 Accrued Accrued Total Total Water Water Wastewater Wastewater Accrued Month Months Base Base Base Base Base Dec 2006 . 1 $15.94 515.94 $16.70 $16.70 $32.64 Jan 2007 2 _ $15.94 $31.88 516.70 533.40 $65.28 Feb 2007 3 $15.94 $47.82 $16.70 $50.10 597.92 Mar 2007 . 4 $15.94 563.76 $16.70 $66.80 8130.56 Apr 2007 5 515:94 $79.70 $16.70 $83.50 8163.20' May 2007 6 $15.94 $95.64 516.70 5100.20 8195.84 Jun 2007 . 7 $15,94 5111.58 516.70 5116.90 S228.48 Jul 2007 8 515.94 $127.52 516:70 Aug 2007 9 - $133.60 5261.12 $15.94 $143.46.. 516.70 5150.30 5293.76 Sep 2007 10 515.94 5159.40 $16.70 5167:00 S326`40 Oct 2007 11 $15.94 $175.34 $16.70 5183.70 5359.04 Nov 2007 12 $15.94 5191.28 $16.70 5200.40 S391.68 Dec 2007 13 515,94 $207.22 $16.70 $217.10 5424.32 Jan 2008 14 $15.94 $223.16 $16.70 5233.80 $456.96 Feb' 2008 15 515.94 $239 -10 $16.70 5250.50 $489 :60 Mar 2008 16 51.5.94 5255.04 516.70 $267.20 $522.24 Apr 2008 17 515.94 5270.98 $16.70 5283.90 5554.88 May 2008 18 $15.94 5286.92 $16.70 5300.60 $587.52 Jun 2008 19 $15.94 5302.86 $16:70 $317.30 5620.16 Jul 2008 20 515.94 $318.80 $16.70 5334.00 5652.80 Aug 2008- 21 $15.94 $334.74 516,70 $350.70 5685.44 Sep 2008 22 $15.94 8350.68 $16.70 $367.40 5718.08 Oct 2008 23 $15.94 5366.62 516,70 5384.10 5750,72 Nov 2008 24 515.94 5382.56 516,70 5400.80 $783.36 Dec 2003 25 515.94 8398.50 $16.70 5417.50 5816.00 Jan 2009 26 515.94 5414,44 516.70 $434.20 5848.64 Feb 2009 27 $15.94 5430.38. $16.70 $45090 $881.28 Mar 2009 28 - $15.94 S446.32 $16.70 $467.60 $913.92 Apr 2009 29 $15.94 S462.26 $16.70 _ $484.30 $946.56 May 2009 30 $15.94 5478.20 516.70 5501.00 5979.20 Jun 2009 31 $15.94 S494.14 516.70 $517.70 51,011.84 Jul 2009 32 $15.94 $510.08 $16,70 5534.40 51,044.48 Aug 2009 33 $15.94 5526.02 516,70 $551.10 51,077.12 Sep 2009 34 $15.94 $541.96 $16.70 5567.80 $1,109.76 Oct 2009 35 515.94 $557.90 516.70 5584.50 51,142.40 Nov 2009 36 . $15.94 5573.84 $16.70 $601.20 $1,175.04 Dec 2009 37 $15.94 $589.78 516,70 $617.90 51,207.68 Las! Edited 11/03/06 Straat Project Deferred Water 23 ,Niay rlu of Ub:b3p Joice t3oetius 3Ob -312 -00(9 p.24 EXHIBIT "E" (Continued) Accrued Accrued Total Total Water Water Wastewater Wastewater Accrued Month Month s Base Base Base Base Base Jan 2010 38 $15.94 $60532 $16.70 $634.60 $1,240.32 Feb 2010 39 $15.94 • $621 ..66 $16.70 $651.30 $1272.96 Nlar 2010 40 $15.94 $637.60 $16.70 $668.00 $1,305.60 Apr 2010 41 $15.94 $653.54 $16.70 $684.70 $1,33824 May 2010 42 $15.94 $669.48 $16.70 $701.40 $1,370.88 Jun 2010 43 $15.94 $685.42 $16.70 $718.10 $1,403.52 Jul 2010 44 $15.94 $701.36 $16.70 $734.80 $1,436.16 Aug 2010 45 $15.94 $717.30 $16.70 $751.50 $1,468.80 Sep 2010 46 $15.94. $733.24 $16.70 $768.20 $1,501.44 Oct 2010 47 $15.94 $749.18 $16.70 $784.90 $1,534.08 Nov 2010 48 $15.94 $765.12 $16.70 • $801.60 $1566.72 Dec 2010 ` 49 . $15.94 $781.06 $16.70 $818.30 $1,599.36 Jan 2011 50 $15.94 $797.00 $16.70 $835.00 $1,632.00 Feb 2011. 51 $15.94 $812.94 $16.70 $851.70 $1,664.64' Mar 2011 52 $15..94 $828.88 $16.70' $868.40 $1,69728 Apr2011 53 $15.94 $844.82 $16.70 $885.10 $1,729.92 May2011 54 $15.94 $860.76 $16.70 $901.80 $1,762.56 Jun 2011 . 55 $15.94• $876.70 $16.70 $916.50 $1,795.20 Jul 2011' 56 $15.94 $892.64 $16.70 $935.20 $1,827:64 Aug 2011 57 $15.94 $908.58 $16.70 $951.90 $1,860.48 Sep 2011 58 $15.94 $924.52 $16.70 $968.60 $1,893.12 Oct 2011 59 $15.94 $940.46 $16.70 $985.30 $1,92536 Nov 2011 60 $15.94 $956.40 $16.70 $1,002.00 $1,958.40 24 Last Edited 11/03/06 Straat Project Deferred Water May 10 Or 05 :59p Joice Boetius 305 - 372 -0079 p25 EXHIBIT "F" PAYMENT OBLIGATION Prior to completion of this project all fees (administrative, recording, capital connection charges, connection fees, etc.) shall be paid to OUA prior to the connection to the OUA System. The OUA has estimated the number of sheets to be reviewed for this project. When plans are complete and permit received from FDEP for this project, OUA will adjust the amount due for plan review and bill the balance to the DEVELOPER. The DEVELOPER agrees to pay OUA for the additional sheets at the rate of $60,00 per sheet for all sheets not included in the previous estimate. The OUA has reviewed the plans and specifications of the proposed project and estimated the time OUA Employees will inspect the construction of the water and wastewater lines. The DEVELOPER agrees to pay OUA for any additional hours required for inspections at the rate of $25.00 per hour for all hours between 7 :00 AM and 4:00 PM during normal work days (Monday— Friday) and 1.5 times that rate for all hours before or after the normal work hours and for those hours on weekends & Holidays. Any additional hours for inspections will be billed monthly and must be paid to OUA before final approval by OUA and before water and wastewater service is provided to any of the lots within the development Any additional meetings or review of the project involving the Administrative Staff and/or Engineer of OUA will be billed at the rate of $60.00 per hour per person and must be paid to OUA before final approval by OUA. The DEVELOPER shall notify all potential buyers of the lots within the proposed development that all OUA fees forconnection to the water and wastewater system shall be paid prior to connection to the OUA systems. The DEVELOPER shall not connect or allow anyone to connect to the OUA water and /or wastewater system without prior approval by the OUA; Such approval shall not unreasonably be withheld. Total due for Administrative Fees (See Exhibit "B" - 3 for details) Total Due For Water Service (See Exhibit "B" — 5A for details) Total Due For Wastewater Service (See Exhibit "B" - 5B for details) Total Due For Off -Site Contribution In Aid of Construction (See Exhibit "D" for details) TOTAL DUE NOW TO OUA $ TBD $TBD TBD — To Be Determined $ 795, 900.00 I $ TBD $ 795,900.00 Prior to approval of the Developer Agreement and before OUA will reserve the capacity for the project, the water and wastewater fees as specified above must be paid in full. All other fees are due and payable to OUA prior to the connection of the service lines to the property and before any meters will be set by OUA. Payment will be required based on the fees and charges which are current at the time of payment for service_ Last Edited 11/03/06 Straat Project Deferred Water 25 ' May 10 Of 06:OOp Joice Boetius 305- 372 -0079 p.26 EXHIBIT "G" PROJECT SCHEDULE Prior to completion of this "Agreement", the DEVELOPER shall provide the following schedule of absorption of the ERC's reserved for the project. While this schedule is understood to be a projected schedule, and therefore subject to change with time, the DEVELOPER should use the best information available to prepare a most reasonably correct schedule. This schedule has been prepared based upon a calendar year. ERC's Reserved 2008 2009 2010 2011. 2012 2013 TOTAL 10 80 60 .60 0 Q 210 26 Last Edited 11/03/06 Straat Project Deferred Water May °10 07 06:OOp Joice Boetius 305 - 372 -0079 p.27 FIRST ADDENDUM TO OKEECHOBEE UTILITY AUTHORITY WATER AND WASTEWATER SYSTEM STANDARD DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT • (10/20 Plan) THIS First Addendum to the Okeechobee Utility Authority Water and Wastewater System Standard Developer's Agreement ( "Addendum ") is made this -6 day of V115 200 , by and between Montebello 13, LLC and 15th Street Homes, LLC, hereinafter referred to as "DEVELOPER," and the OKEECHOBEE : UTILITY AUTHORITY, hereinafter referred to as "OUA ". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the parties hereto executed that certain Okeechobee Utility Authority Water and Wastewater System Standard Developer's Agreement dated 6 41— day of pidvvirlf3t2c 200_6 (the "Agreement "); and WHEREAS; DEVELOPER is the owner of lands described in Exhibit °A" attached to the Agreement and such lands are located within the OUA service area; and WHEREAS, DEVELOPER intends to develop its land into no less than 210 residential and /or commercial units (hereinafter referred to as ERCs and as further defined in the Agreement); and WHEREAS; OUA presently does not have permitted capacity at the existing WWTF to serve any of the units proposed by DEVELOPER and is in the process of expanding the Cemetery Road VVV TF from a present permitted treatment capacity of 1.2 million gallons per day to approximately 3_0 million gallons per day; and WHEREAS, OUA lacks the funds required to construct the expansion of its existing WVVTF, and has been responsive to the DEVELOPER's development concerns in attempting to find a mutually agreeable way for this VVWT'F expansion to occur; and WHEREAS, DEVELOPER wishes to encourage, support and assist OUA in the expansion of the existing WWTF; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, the mutual undertakings and agreements herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. The above recitals are true and correct and form a material part of this Addendum. LAST REVISED 11103/06 Straat Project 1 'May i0 07 06:OOp Joice Boetius 305- 372 -0079 p.28 2. Upon the execution of this Addendum, the DEVELOPER shall pay to OUA the sum of $ 79,590.00, said sum being 10% of the total amount due as shown in the Agreement, Exhibit "F" - Payment Obligation, Water Service Fees and Wastewater Service Fees, and the balance of said amount to be evidenced by a series of non -ad valorem special assessments levied and assessed by OUA on the lands of DEVELOPER as described in Exhibit "A" attached to the Agreement in the amount of $ 716,310.00. DEVELOPER hereby acknowledges that the value of the benefit to the lands described in Exhibit "A" is greater than the amount of the special assessments and hereby consents to the levy of the special assessments by OUA on said lands in said amount. The special assessments shall be payable as a part of and in conjunction with the ad valorem taxes levied and assessed against said land ( "property tax bill ") as follows: A. $ 79,590.00 (10% of the total amount) shall be due and payable as a part of and in conjunction with the property tax bill for 2007; $ 159,180.00 (20% of the total arnount) shall be due and payable as a part of and in conjunction with the property tax bill for 2008; C. $ 159,180.00 (20% of the total amount) shall be due and payable as a part of and in conjunction with the property tax bill for 2009; D. $ 159,180.00 (20% of the total amount) shall be due and payable as a part of and in conjunction with the property tax bill for 2010; and E. $ 159,180.00 (the unpaid balance) shall be due and payable as a part of and in conjunction with the property tax bill for 2011. These fees previously stated in paragraphs 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D and 2E in this Addendum, do not address nor do they include any Guaranteed Revenue Charges (GRC) as defined and specified in the Agreement. Any remaining fees, charges or monies due as shown in the Agreement, Exhibit "F" as pertaining to Water Service Fees and Wastewater Service Fees, will be paid as stipulated in the Agreement. LAST REVISED 11 /03/06 Straat Project 2 May 10 07 06 :OOp Joice Boetius 305 - 372 -0079 p.29 3. The ERC's hereby reserved for DEVELOPER, upon payment, shall attach to and run with the land described in said Exhibit "A" and shall not be severed therefrom and sold, conveyed or transferred separate and apart from the and by DEVELOPER, however, the OUA may re- purchase any excess, unused ERC's from DEVELOPER, following a written letter from DEVELOPER. to OUA offering the re- purchase, in the future related to or resulting from a change in the site plan or permittable densities by the respective local, state or federal permitting entities at a re- purchase price of $2,225.00 per ERC, provided OUA has a third party purchaser ready, willing and able to purchase said excess ERC's from OIJA under a then - pending Standard Developer's Agreement. OUA agrees to respond to DEVELOPER's re-purchase offer within forty- five (45) business days and advise DEVELOPER of OUA Board action on the status of the offered 're- purchase. 4. With the prior written consent of the OUA, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, for so long as a balance remains unpaid on the special assessments: A. The DEVELOPER may sell, ` transfer or convey all of the property described in Exhibit "A" of the Agreement, and the balance of the special assessments may be assumed by the transferee and paid as said special assessments become due and payable; and B. The DEVELOPER may sell, transfer or convey any portion of the property described in Exhibit "A" which includes fifty (50) or more of the reserved ERC's, and the balance of the special assessments applicable to the portion of the property sold, transferred or conveyed may be assumed and paid by the transferee as said special assessments become due and payable. 5. Upon the safe, transfer or conveyance by DEVELOPER of any portion of the property described in Exhibit "A" which '. includes less than fifty (50) of the reserved ERC's, the balance of the special assessments applicable to the portion of the property sold, transferred or conveyed shall be immediately and concurrently become due and payable. 6. The following conditions shall apply to the property sold, transferred or conveyed pursuant to paragraphs 4 and 5: A. Any transferred ERC's shall be subject to any new costs and any unpaid Guaranteed Revenue Charges (GRC's) or other amounts outstanding and owed by DEVELOPER to OUA under this Agreement as of the date of the transfer; all of which shall be paid in full at the time of the transfer; and B. The transferred property and the transferee shall be subject to the same requirements as the original property and DEVELOPER under this Agreement; and LAST REVISED 1 1/03/06 Straat Project 3 May 10 07 06:OOp Joice Boetius 305 - 372 -0079 p.30 C. The transferee shall be required to pay for any connection(s) of the transferred property to the existing .OUA facilities as required under this Agreement; and. D. The . DEVELOPER shalt pay the cost, if any, associated with the adjustment of legal descriptions and assessment methodology and any other costs related thereto to accommodate the original property and the transferred property. 7. _ Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to prevent DEVELOPER from acquiring additional ERC's from OUA in the future, but all such future acquisitions shall be at the prevailing rate at the time such acquisition is made. 8. DEVELOPER understands that the wastewater ERC's reserved under the Agreement do not and shall not exist until the expansion of the existing, VVV7TF is complete: 9. OUA shall be free to spend the money paid to it by the DEVELOPER under the provisions hereof to pay for or to obtain financing for the expansion of the existing. WWTF and shall diligently pursue the final completion of such expansion. 10. This Addendum shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of OUA, DEVELOPER and their respective assigns and successors by merger, consolidation or conveyance /transfer_ ti, This Addendum is incorporated in and shall be a part of the Agreement and supersedes all previous agreements or representations, either verbal or written, heretofore in effect between OUA and DEVELOPER, made with respect to the matters contained herein, and when duly executed, together with the Agreement, constitutes the agreement between OUA and DEVELOPER. No additions, alterations, or variations of the terms of this Addendum or the Agreement shall be valid, nor can provisions of this Addendum or the Agreement be waived by either party, unless such additions, alterations, variations or waivers are expressed in writing and duly signed. 12. If any of the provisions of this Addendum conflict with the Agreement, the terms of this Addendum shall control. 13. If any part of this Addendum or the Agreement is found to be invalid or unenforceable by any court, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the other parts of this Addendum or the Agreement if the rights and obligations of the parties contained herein are not materially prejudiced, and if the intentions of the parties can continue to be effected and to that end, this Addendum and the Agreement are declared severable. 14. The Agreement and this Addendum shall both be recorded in the public records of Okeechobee County, Florida. LAST REVISED 11 /03 /06 Straat Project 4 May ''0 07 06:01p Joice Boetius 305- 372 -0079 p.31 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, DEVELOPER and OUA have executed . or have caused-this-Addendum to be duly executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be considered an original executed copy. ATTEST: 7 F. Hayford, 111 erk/Execufive Direc (Official Seal) APPROVED BY OUA BOARD ON 1 9÷It of liovernbe-r , 200 Le STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE OKEECHOBEE UTILITY AUTHORITY BY: George Long Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS OUA Attorney The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /.7k day of i0mt3t.r -, 200 (' by George Long, Chairman, and John F. Hayford, 111, Clerk, on behalf of th OKEECHOBEE UTILITY AUTHORITY. Each of said persons (check one) [ is personally known to me or [ ] produced a driver's license issued by a state of the United States within the last five (5) years as identification, or [ ] produced other identification, to wit: i��N11Ei1plilry�r. e‘ke Marie z o #DD242465 4zr: • LAST REVISED II/03)06 Straat Project 5 Printed Name: ,.df---e, ;r %o►r� . Notary Public, State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: May ".'D 0 ( 06:01p Joice Boetius WITNESSES /1S- 0 DEVELOPER: aas Reseo 305- 372 -0079 p.32 DEVELOPER : 15th Street Homes, LLC Mont-bello 13, LLC Print Name By: chc� Print NatS Title: Juan 1. Calle Print Name NANA -4 Officer STATE OF FLO IDA -71 , - � 1 COUNTY OF f'Gj CLMAR' r Y xx1-C, The foregoin.• instrumentwas ackno 2006, by �� 1 /edged before me this day of c of 1� _ } APS . a Said person (check one)'is personally known to me, [ 1 produced a driver's license issued by a state of the United States within the last five (5) years_as identification or_[ }produced other identification, to wit: 6 LAST REVISED 11/03/06 Straat Project Printed Name: Notary Public, State of Commission No My Commission Expires: Exhibit H - Schools [4107 - 70848. WPD] School Statement The Lakehouse - Okeechobee, Florida The Lakehouse development acknowledges the completed impact fee study and resolution of the Okeechobee School Board adopting an initial impact fee to be paid concurrent with the issuance of a building permit for residential units. The enabling ordinances adopted by Okeechobee County, requires this impact fee be paid prior to the Lakehouse receiving it's building permits for the residential units. Accordingly, the Lakehouse intends to meet the school board concurrency by payment of the impact fee. Additionally, the Lakehouse project team will meet with school district staff to discuss bus routes, school bus stops and student safety while walking to or from the designated bus stops. Reasonable requests will be accommodated. [4107 - 70828. WPD] Exhibit I - Traffic Analysis [4107-70848.WPD] A Traffic Impact Analysis of The Lakehouse Located in: Okeechobee, Florida Prepared for: The Evans Group Okeechobee, FL Prepared by: LBFH Inc. Consulting Civil Engineers, Surveyors & Mappers 3550 SW Corporate Parkway Palm City, Florida 34990 (772) 286-3883 LBFH Project No. 05 -0260 Boyle Project No. 31629 August 15, 2007 Prepy ed by: Lee Giari• :e, PE PE Reg #86387 08 -15 -07 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 2 Site Data 3 Trip Generation 4 Existing Conditions 5 Trip Distribution 6 Future Conditions 7 Roadway Capacity 8 Background Conditions 9 Project Traffic Volumes 10 Roadway Link Analysis 11 Conclusions 12 Recommendations 12 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 — Site Location 2 Figure 2 — Trip Distribution 6 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 — Trip Generation 4 Table 2 — 2006 Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) 5 Table 3 — 2009 AADT Without Development 7 Table 4 — 2009 Level of Service (LOS) Without Development 8 Table 5 — 2009 AADT and LOS With Development 10 P: \05- 0260 \Traffic- Revised \05 - 0260. Lakehouse .TLA.report.lmr.08.15.07. doc INTRODUCTION LBFH has been retained to prepare a traffic impact analysis for a proposed development located in the City of Okeechobee. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of the proposed development on adjacent roadway links and to determine if specific traffic improvements are necessary in order to maintain acceptable levels of service in the vicinity of the project. The site is bounded by SW 9th Street to the north and SW 15th Street to the south. The project is located between SW 7th Avenue and SW 10th Avenue but does not border either street. The site location and surrounding road network are shown in Figure 1 below. Figure 1— Site Location P: \05- 0260 \Traffic- Revised\05- 0260. Lakehouse .TIA.report.lmr.08.15.07.doc 2 SITE DATA The project site consists of approximately 50.46 acres. The proposed development plan includes 136 single family detached residential units. The northern portion of the development will have primary access onto 9th Street but will be connected to the southern portion of the project and will have access to 15th Street. The southern portion of the development, below the wetland preserve, will have a primary access onto 15th Street but will be connected to the north such that access will be possible onto 9th Street. A copy of the proposed site plan for this project is included as Exhibit I. P:105- 0260\Traffic- Revised\ 05 - 0260. Lakehouse .TIA.report.Imr.08.15.07.doc 3 TRIP GENERATION The trip generation rate was selected based on the type of residential units being proposed for the development. The single fancily detached residential units utilized ITE Code 210. Table 1 below tabulates the daily, AM and PM peak hour trip generation data for the proposed development. Trip generation for the proposed site was developed utilizing the 7th Edition of the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Table 1 The Lakehouse Total Trip Generation Summary Code Land Use Amount In AM Peak Hour Out Total In PM Peak Hour Out Total ADT 210 I Single - Family Detached I 136 DU I 26 1 78 1 105 1 89 1 52 j 141 1 1,360 Total 26 78 105 89 52 141 1,360 The PM peak hour is the most intense with a total of 52 trips expected to exit the site and 89 trips to enter the site. The total daily trips added to the roadway networks is 1,360. The equations utilized in the trip generation shown in Table 1 are summarized as follows where T is equal to vehicle trips and X is equal to the number of dwelling units: • Single Family Detached - 210 o AM Peak Hour: T =0.7X +9.43 • Entrance Split: 0.25 • Exit Split: 0.75 o PM Peak Hour: T = e0914X) +0.53 • Entrance Split: 0.63 • Exit Split: 0.37 P:\05- 0260 \Traffic- Revised105- 0260. Lakehouse .TIA.report.hnr.08.15.07.doc 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS The project site is surrounded by local roadways. These local roadways serve as primary connections to the arterial network. Traffic, once leaving the site, will have numerous ways to connect to the arterial roadway network. A brief description of the area roadways is included here. • SR 70 in this vicinity is a four lane divided facility. Left turn lanes are provided in the center median of this existing facility. • US 98/441 (Parrott Avenue) is also a four lane divided facility with turn lanes in the median. • SW 9th Street is a two lane roadway with uncontrolled access via driveways. • SW 15th Street is a two lane roadway with some discontinuities at about its intersection with SW 5th Street that serves to slow traffic through the area. Traffic volume data for the year 2005 was obtained from FDOT for State roads in the vicinity. These data were factored to represent peak conditions for the current year 2006. Data were also collected at selected intersections and roadway links within the general vicinity of the site. Table 2 is a tabulation of the data utilized for this analysis. Table 2 The Lakehouse 2006 Average Annual Daily Traffic (AAD Road Name From To Type 2006 AADT Volume AADT Service Volume Concurrency Test SR 70 SW 48 Ave US 98 2 -Ln 13,530 13,800 OK SR 70 US 98 SW 7 Ave 4 -Ln 17,118 34,700 OK SR 70 SW 7 Ave SW 5 Ave 4 -Ln 18,963 34,700 OK SR 70 SW 5 Ave Parrott 4 -Ln 23,063 34,700 OK SR 70 Parrott SE 8 Ave 4 -Ln 35,875 34,700 FAILS US 98 NW 36 St NW 9 St 2 -Ln 5,330 13,800 OK US 98 NW 9 St SR 70 2 -Ln 10,353 13,800 OK US 98 SR 70 SW 6 St 4 -Ln 28,700 34,700 OK US 98 SW 6 St SW 16 St 4 -Ln 28,700 34,700 OK US 98 SW 16 St Wolf Rd 4 -Ln 27,675 34,760 OK US 441 NW 9 St NW 6 St 4 -Ln 22,038 34,700 OK US 441 NW 6 St SR 70 4 -Ln 25,625 34,700 OK SW 11 Ave SW 15 St SW Park St 2 -Ln 1,500 14,600 OK SW 7 Ave SW 15 St SW Park St 2 -Ln 1,508 14,600 OK SW 5 Ave SW 15 St SW Park St 2 -Ln 2,987 14,600 OK SW 15 St SW 12 Ave SW 3 Ave 2 -Ln 3,255 14,600 OK SW 16 St SW 3 Ave S Parrott 2 -Ln 1,742 14,600 OK SW 9 St SW 11 Ave S Parrott 2 -Ln 653 14,600 OK SW St SW 11 Ave S Parrott 2 -Ln 1,159 14,600 OK SW 4 St SW 7 Ave S Parrott 2 -Ln 1,200 14,600 OK SW 2 St SW 10 Ave SW Park St 2 -Ln 500 14,600 OK SR 70 from Parrott to SE 8th Avenue is failing level of service (LOS) requirement in its current condition. P: \05- 0260\Traffic- Revised\05- 0260 .Lakehouse.TiA.report.Imr.08. 15.07.doc 5 TRIP DISTRIBUTION The overall distribution of trips into and away from the project site will be influenced by socio- economic conditions in the communities that surround the area. The conditions in the Okeechobee area are changing along with the current climate of growth in the south Florida region. Population density, job base, recreational amenities and travel time were utilized as factors impacting the final trip distribution estimate. While the population of Okeechobee County is relatively low, it is surrounded by areas where population is growing rapidly. The rapid growth in these surrounding areas is and will continue to be an influence on growth in the Okeechobee region. Lake Okeechobee to the south will be a major attraction for some of the trips generated from this development. In addition, the close proximity of this project to Palm Beach County indicates that a significant portion of traffic will have some destinations there. Likewise, the concentration of attractions in the Orlando area to the north will have a noticeable influence in travel patterns from this development. These factors, along with the varied attractions within Okeechobee County were considered as the distribution was being estimated. Figure 2 provides a detail of the anticipated project traffic distribution to the surrounding roadway network. now man 1N 1Pr22ND 1H m.t�, -.e.. wzc,• artzorul NW 20TH CH 6*10TH...MM E►v uTH _ MX13M _ HR uT11 19TH 14TH HEITH a 20% L i 2 HE 13TNt HE 11TH NE tjm NE RD/ .. z 2"- u. x.c'P. tNa1T.,. a. g ; NE BiNy1 r�Y 1; 57514 51 NW 4TH 1ST..._ 3RD TH R R 7TH CENTER.. q€ Rg SE 0TH L1!T SE TTN � s aK. SW 10TH g__...' :MD.Lati. i..n&., ..$2.1 ma p.Llrt+10 SW 12111 SW 14TH SW 15THsw 5E454 m2 € $ 6 SE 0TH DE j2 28% Figure 2 — Trip Distribution P: \05- 0260\ Traffic- Revised105- 0260. Lakehouse .TTA.report.imr.08.15.07.doc 6 FUTURE CONDITIONS A design year of 2009 has been selected as an appropriate year to expect that this project will be completed. The growth of traffic in the area was estimated by combining data from the FDOT Traffic Information 2005 data set along with recent trends in the area. Based on the data from FDOT, forecasts for traffic growth in the area for the next ten years is likely to be just under 2% per year. This same data package indicated growth over the past ten years to be just below 3% per year. Although the past 4 years experienced growth at a slower rate, it was felt that a more conservative approach to the estimate should be made in order to ensure that low estimates are avoided. Consequently, a growth rate for the expected life of this project was selected at 2.5% per year. For the planning year of 2009, the daily traffic volumes for the roadway links were factored to reflect the anticipated growth. A 2.5% annual growth rate was applied along with a peak season factor in each instance. Table 3 details the anticipated growth in traffic of the adjacent roadways over the projected life of this project. Table 3 The Lakehouse 2009 Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) Without Development Road Name From To Type 2006 AADT Volume 2009 AADT Volume SR 70 SW 48 Ave US 98 2 -Ln 13,530 14,570 SR 70 US 98 SW 7 Ave 4 -Ln 17,118 18,434 SR 70 SW 7 Ave SW 5 Ave 4 -Ln 18,963 20,421 SR 70 SW 5 Ave Parrott 4 -Ln 23,063 24,836 SR 70 Parrott SE 8 Ave 4 -Ln 35,875 38,633 US 98 NW 36 St NW 9 St 2 -Ln 5,330 5,656 US 98 NW 9 St SR 70 2 -Ln 10,353 11,149 US 98 SR 70 SW 6 St 4-Ln 28,700 30,907 US 98 SW 6 St SW 16 St 4 -Ln 28,700 30,907 US 98 SW 16 St Wolf Rd 4 -Ln 27,675 29,803 US 441 NW 9 St NW 6 St 4 -Ln 22,038 23,732 US 441 NW 6 St SR 70 4 -Ln 25,625 27,595 SW 11 Ave SW 15 St SW Park St 2 -Ln 1,500 1,615 SW 7 Ave SW 15 St SW Park St 2 -Ln 1,508 1,624 SW 5 Ave SW 15 St SW Park St 2 -Ln 2,987 3,217 SW 15 St SW 12 Ave SW 3 Ave 2 -Ln 3,255 3,505 SW 16 St SW 3 Ave S Parrott 2 -Ln 1,742 1,876 SW 9 St SW 11 Ave S Parrott 2 -Ln 653 703 SW 6 St SW 11 Ave S Parrott 2 -Ln 1,159 1,248 SW 4 St SW 7 Ave S Parrott 2 -Ln 1,200 1,292 SW 2 St SW 10 Ave SW Park St 2 -Ln 500 538 FDOT currently has no immediate plans for major roadway improvements in this general area. A project has recently been completed on SR 70 that continued the four lane treatment to just west of US 98. There are long range plans being made for improvements to SR 70 in the region as an element of the infra -state highway program. No immediate improvement plans were found, however, within the area potentially impacted by this project. P: \05- 0260 \Traffic - Revised\ 05 - 0260. Lakehouse .TIA.report.lmr.08.15.07.doc 7 ROADWAY CAPACITY The ability of roadways to accommodate specific volumes of traffic at certain speeds and with measured delays is generally termed as its "capacity ". Capacity is typically given a letter designation from A to F denoting acceptable to unacceptable. The Generalized Tables from FDOT are typically used as an initial basis for making a determination as to whether or not operating conditions will be acceptable under specific volumes of traffic. A copy of the section of the Generalized Tables used for this project is included as Exhibit 2. Table 4 includes a summary of the maximum service volumes required by the City of Okeechobee for the roadways in the vicinity of the project. The LOS threshold for SR 70, US 441, and US 98 is Level of Service (LOS) C. The LOS thresholds for the remaining local roadways are LOS D. Table 4 The Lakehouse Daily Traffic (AADT) and Level of Service (LOS) Without Development Road Name From To Type 2006 AADT Volume 2009 AADT Volume AADT Service Volume Concurrency Test SR 70 SW 48 Ave US 98 2 -Ln 13,530 14,570 13,800 FAILS SR 70 US 98 SW 7 Ave 4 -Ln 17,118 18,434 34,700 OK SR 70 SW 7 Ave SW 5 Ave 4 -Ln 18,963 20,421 34,700 OK SR 70 SW 5 Ave Parrott 4-Ln 23,063 24,836 34,700 OK SR 70 Parrott SE 8 Ave 4 -Ln 35,875 38,633 34,700 FAILS US 98 NW 36 St NW 9 St 2-Ln 5,330 5,656 13,800 OK US 98 NW 9 St SR 70 2 -Ln 10,353 11,149 13,800 OK US 98 SR 70 SW 6 St 4-Ln 28,700 30,907 34,700 OK US 98 SW 6 St SW 16 St 4 -Ln 28,700 30,907 34,700 OK US 98 SW 16 St Wolf Rd 4 -Ln 27,675 29,803 34,760 OK US 441 NW 9 St NW 6 St 4 -Ln 22,038 23,732 34,700 OK US 441 NW 6 St SR 70 4 -Ln 25,625 27,595 34,700 OK SW 11 Ave SW 15 St SW Park St 2 -Ln 1,500 1,615 14,600 OK SW 7 Ave SW 15 St SW Park St 2 -Ln 1,508 1,624 14,600 OK SW 5 Ave SW 15 St SW Park St 2 -Ln 2,987 3,217 14,600 OK SW 15 St SW 12 Ave SW 3 Ave 2-Ln 3,255 3,505 14,600 OK SW 16 St SW 3 Ave S Parrott 2 -Ln 1,742 1,876 14,600 OK SW 9 St SW 11 Ave S Parrott 2 -Ln 653 703 14,600 OK SW 6 St SW 11 Ave S Parrott 2 -Ln 1,159 1,248 14,600 OK SW 4 St SW 7 Ave S Parrott 2 -Ln 1,200 1,292 14,600 OK SW 2 St SW 10 Ave SW Park St 2 -Ln 500 538 14,600 OK The segment of SR 70 from Parrott Ave to SE 8th Avenue currently exceeds the assigned capacity threshold and will continue to do so in the future without necessary improvements. SR 70 from SW 48th Avenue to its intersection with US 98 is nearing the noted threshold and will exceed capacity if anticipated growth continues. According to the Okeechobee County Code of Ordinances, (5.00.02 - Applicability of level of service standards) SR 70 from CR 70A to US 98 and from NE 18th Ave to SR 710 is classified as a backlogged facility where the service level is "maintain and improve ". The values provided in the generalized tables are derived from a specific set of operating conditions that could be expected to be used where traffic is operating at non - critical levels of service. Actual operating conditions are frequently different and a detailed arterial P:105- 0260 \Traffic- Revised1 05 - 0260. Lakehouse .TlAreport.lmr.08.15.07.doc 8 analysis may indicate that the roadway has an operating capacity above the limit given in the generalized tables. BACKGROUND CONDITIONS Traffic that is associated with approved projects that are not yet being constructed must be accounted for in the impact analysis for the design year. The background traffic was calculated by utilizing the growth rate as published by FDOT of 2.5 %. FDOT worksheets are included in the appendix of this report. The growth factor is intended to account for future area growth as well as future projects that get developed within the area. P:\05- 0260 \Traffic- Revised\05- 0260. Lakehouse .TIA.report.lmr.08.15.07.doc 9 PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES Traffic volumes from the project have been distributed to the roadway network in accord with information noted previously in this report. This distribution indicates that approximately 20% of the traffic will be destined for points to the north; about 22% to the west and north toward Brighton and Lake Placid; and the remainder to the east and south toward St. Lucie, Martin, and Palm Beach Counties. Table 5 below summarizes the anticipated traffic from the project on the roadway links adjacent to the development site. Table 5 The Lakebouse ADT) and Level of Service (LOS) With Development Road Name From To Distribution Percentage Project Trips 2009 AADT Volume 2009 Total Volume AADT Service Volume Percent Level Of Service Concurrency Test SR 70 SW 48 Ave US 98 12% 163 14,570 14,733 13,600 12% FAILS SR 70 US 98 SW 7 Ave 22% 299 18,434 18,733 34,700 0.9% OK SR 70 SW 7 Ave SW 5 Ave 7% 95 20,421 20,516 34,700 0.3% OK SR 70 SW 5 Ave Parrott 15% 204 24,836 25,040 34,700 0.6% OK SR 70 Parrott SE 8 Ave 28% 381 38,633 39,014 34,700 1.1% FAILS US 98 NW 36 St NW 9 St 10% 136 5,656 5,792 13,800 1.0% OK US 98 NW 9 St SR 70 10% 136 11.149 11,285 13,800 1.0% OK US 98 SR 70 SW 6 St 25% 340 30,907 31,247 34.700 1.0% OK US 98 SW 6 St SW 16 5t 10% 136 30,907 31,043 34,700 0.4% OK US 98 SW 16 St Wolf Rd 30% 408 29,803 30,211 34,760 1.2% OK US 441 NW 9 St NW 6 St 20% 272 23,732 24,004 34,700 0.8% OK US 441 NW 6 St SR 70 10% 136 27,595 27,731 34,700 0.4% OK SW 11 Ave SW 15 St SW Park St 10% 136 1.615 1,751 14,600 0.9% OK SW 7 Ave SW 15 St SW Park St 5% 68 1,624 1,692 14,600 0.5% OK SW 5 Ave SW 15 St SW Park St 10% 136 3,217 3,353 14.600 0.9% OK SW 15 St SW 12 Ave SW 3 Ave 15% 204 3.505 3,709 14,600 1.4% OK SW 16 St SW 3 Ave S Parrott 10% 136 1,876 2,012 14,600 0.9% OK SW 9 St SW 11 Ave S Parrott 20% 272 703 975 14,600 1.9% OK SW 6 St SW 11 Ave S Parrott 10% 136 1,248 1,384 14.600 0.9% OK SW 4 St SW 7 Ave S Parrott 2% 27 1,292 1,319 14,600 0.2% OK SW 2 St SW 10 Ave SW Park St 2% 27 538 565 14,600 02% OK The only roadway links that do not meet concurrency standards are on SR -70. The link immediately east of Parrott Avenue shows failure as well as the link to the west of SR -98. With a failure based on the generalized tables, a more detailed arterial analysis is in order to determine a more precise estimate of the level of service being provided by area roadways. P:105- 0260 \Traffic- Revised\ 05 - 0260. Lakehouse .T1A.report.hnr.08.15.07.doc 10 ROADWAY LINK ANALYSIS 2006 Analysis- Existing Conditions A traffic simulation network was developed to include the intersections along SR 70 from SR -98 to NE 8th Street. This network provides a basis for evaluating the capacity of the corridor based upon the signalized intersections within the corridor and the operating conditions that exist at the intersections. Current signal operating data was obtained from FDOT. With current operating data along with traffic volume data, an assessment of current operating conditions can be made. Data obtained from FDOT is included in Exhibit 2. The operating parameters for the signalized intersections through the immediate area were input into the traffic simulation network and level of service parameters were calculated for the existing traffic conditions. Current arterial level of service calculations indicates that conditions, at present, are reasonably good in both travel directions. However, the amount of delay and a somewhat slower travel time is evident at the major intersection of SR 70 and Parrott Avenue. This causes the arterial LOS to be at E during the morning peak hour for the westbound direction. The eastbound direction remains at LOS C. The increased signal delay time and slow operating speeds at the intersection of SR 70 and Parrott Avenue are evident during both peak traffic periods. The slower speed and higher delay to the eastbound travel direction is attributable to the very heavy volume of traffic turning left onto Parrott Avenue southbound from SR 70. Exhibit 3 contains printed reports of this analysis. 2009:Analysis- With Project The analysis for 2009 conditions was performed only for the afternoon peak period. The afternoon period is the critical period of the day for traffic in Okeechobee as well as other areas of South Florida. Summary operating condition charts are included below for the two corridors with traffic projected for the year 2009 used as the basis for analysis. Current signal operations were continued for this initial analysis. The information contained here indicates that operating conditions on roadways within the study area will be reduced slightly due to normal growth in traffic volumes that is expected over the time period noted. Conditions will remain at previously noted LOS levels and congestion will remain to be a concern for the intersection of SR 70 and Parrott Avenue. Exhibit 3 contains details of this analysis. P: \05- 0260 \Traffic- Revised\ 05- 0260.Lakehouse.TJA.report.lmr.08. 15.07.doc 11 CONCLUSION The overall impact of the proposed project is minimal. This is due, in part, to the fact that the surrounding roadway network offers several potential points of ingress and egress from the site. Levels of service for some roadway links are likely to be above the adopted limits with or without this project. The project will consume only about 1.9% of the adopted level of service on the most heavily impacted roadway link. The intersection of SR 70 and Parrott Avenue will remain the critical intersection within the area. Congestion is being experienced at this location at the current time due to the high volume of turning vehicles at the intersection and the limitation of space for additional turn lanes. This situation will continue to be a concern into the future as traffic volumes increase. Surface streets that will be impacted include 15th Street; 9th Street; 11th Avenue and 5th Avenue. The volumes of traffic entering and exiting these streets, however, from the project are not at a level that will require turn lanes. RECOMMENDATIONS Traffic signal timing and operating parameters should be updated on a regular basis due to changing traffic demands and growth in the area in general. The signal operating parameters for the intersections along SR 70 in this area can be modified to allow for somewhat greater efficiency than is currently being maintained. It is recommended that traffic volume movement counts be conducted along with some long term seasonal factor traffic volume counts. The data collected from this effort should be used to develop a revised set of signal operating parameters for the intersections along SR 70 through the area. P: \05- 0260 \Traffic- Revised\ 05 - 0260. Lakehouse .TiAreport.tmr.08.15.07.doc 12 APPENDIX List of Exhibits Exhibit 1— Site Plan Exhibit 2 — FDOT Generalized Annual Average Daily Traffic Exhibit 3 — Synchro 7.0 Worksheets Exhibit 4 — Traffic Counts EXHIBIT 1 Site Plan -+ PrOd.u.ST and_Lot design5tandards for Residential Buldl (Aid, Product District Mix a units Plantation Lot 2400 - 3000 s.f. SF Estate 10% 14 village Lot - 1900 - 2400 sF Village 10% Bungalow Lot .1600. 1900 el, SF_ Bungalow Sb% Cottage ,-.--1500 - 1500 s.f. _ 9P Cottage 42% 5T Note: This matrix is believed to be within current City of Note: A 10 Front Yard Utility Easement is anticipated. Square Foota�e/Data Calculations 2: Total Site Area: a of Units: Overall Gross Residential Density (DU /AO): Required Per Proposed LOC. Regs: Maximum Allowable Lot Coverage (40 %): Max. Allowable knpervious Surface Area (60%): i Min. Open Space Required (40 %): Si Min. Improved Recreation Area Required (15 s.f /du): Proposed Per Current Plans: Landscaping /Open space Provided: cis Percentage Landscaping /open Space Provided: ) Park/Buffer open Space: ' Lake Area (Within Eagle Circle): . Upland/Existing Yietiard ( Within Eagle circle): Impervious Surfaee Calculations: Total Lot Coverage: 5: Lot Coverage Percentage: Impervious Area (Plantation Lot): e of lots: Impervious Across site: Impervious Area (Village Lot.) 4 • of Ids: Impervious Across site: Impervious Area (Bungalow Lot). r M of lots: Impervious Across Site: ■ I impervious Area (Cottage Lot) 4 a of lots, '4 Impervious Across Site( ,. n _ E CLUBHOUSE TRACT -4,000 5.F. CLUBHOUSE) 4:0 AUGUST 14, 2001 NVIROSCAPe ID PLANNING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE A DIVISION OF THE EVANS GROUP 1001 N. MANGE AVE ORUNDD, FLORIDA 32801 40716501770 FAX 4 07/6 5 04 7n The Lakehou'VANS7ap jj�7 1 A Walkable, Community Fri &PLANNING 1001 N. ORANGE AVE ORLANDO, FLORIDA 3*01 407300-B770 FAX 407/6504771 + EXHIBIT 2 Generalized Annual Average Daily Traffic TABLE 4 'I dENERAJIUUD ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY VOWMES:FQR FLORIDA'S URBANUED AREAS` TTfii IfPFidl'8T.0W i110-15VIaS LevalotSnrvice I,seee Divided A & C D B Undivided 2000 7;000. 13;800 19:600 27,000 4, .flivided' 20•,400 23,000 47,800 6t,800 10,100. ;Divided 30 ;100. 49 500 ..18 92,700.. 105,400 • CTW t(50.00.to. 97i1g0alitedMiami:Milsyecmills) Lend o#HeMco C D Woe Jn Undivided ! 2 13,800 16,400 16,900 x Uadivldad " 4',200. 4. divided 4,800 29,300 34,700 35,700 "• 6 - 7101080' 1,300 44,100 52:100 53,500 •" , 3 Divided 9,400 58,000 66,100 67,800 •" Class H {7,0010 460 signalizd(nts mnsper.udle) Level Wiervke ,14tmesDivided A 9 C D 8 t undivided er, 1,900 11,200 15,400 16,300 4 Divided. e' 4,100 26,000. 32:100 34,500 6 Divides .e 6.500. 40300 ' 49,200 51.800. '18 Divided " 8,500. 53,300 63,800 61,000 Clwm Doom then 4.3 liDrlizediptetseetiene pew and not wit imptionny eU9 Denis{ Witten district of M u,b niederne•over750900) Level of Service B 5,300 12,600 15,500 Divided ▪ •• 12,400 28,900 32,800 16 Divided " 19,300 44,700 49,300 • •. 25,800 58,700 63,800 91315WAY"S ` 1g3 21111-1114a• Lavel of Service 1to4 4ae 23,800. 39,600 55,200 67,100 74,600 6 36,900 61,100 83,300 105,600 115,300 8 49,900 82,700 • 115,300 140,100 156,000 10 63,000 104,200 145,500 116,900 196,400 • 12 75,900 125,800 115,500 213;500 237,100 fnnpcbmge spacing <2 Mi. nod Level etO.cvlce /ones • A B C D. E 4 22,000 36,000 53,000 67,200 76,500 ' .6 30,800 56 ,300 81,100 105,800 120,200 H 47500 71,000 • 111,400 144,300 163,900 10 60,200 97,500 141,200 182,600 207,600 12 72,900 118,100 170,900 221,100 251,200 Lanes Divided 2 Undivided H Divided i •0 d Elba) W (Mora than�4r5.edgmellzsd igteieeoHons per mile emtivith primacy city ecnhsl business district arm mbsnIZ d nee over 710,000)- lames Divided 4 Divl4ed 4 R1v 444 Divided A so ea Level of Service B C D 2 +• 3,2130 13,100 15,000 •• . 12,300 30.300 31,700 •• 19:100 43,800. 47,600 •• 230900 59,900 62,100. BICYCLIBMODE QbprTaval0febrvice vtbsbby* nzod9fo9issableIebeeedonroedw4 oe**es40 insk pasted sped end siftbsoonditiotu,aolmmbacofWyatt, using{ stiO3Kty.)PoftiY nintorized *gad wlC esbownielowbecmAbav . ofd siedensaniedws9. 1aaeetodenvni *nvo.waYmntimamasidesTa men/ 14014;44.11A lanjoritityPCnist09 ltandv,eye toot Atte* F;atpas. aidvidsd - C D. B d . 94100 14600 15.600 4 ..blvlded •e " 21;400 33300 32,900. 6 Divided •* •• 33,400 46,800 19,700 Pored 1asoolderf Leval of Service Sfeee A 0 C D H 9% •. " 3,200 13,600 >13,800 50.84% " 2,300 4,100 >4,100 401, 85 -100% 3,100. 1,200 >7,200 ••• ..• FE0118TAIAN MODE Mein lad of sssviee 0ort66 pe4aebim mods in this table is bad on roadway geoawtlfess44tlmpk posted speed sad men cauditons, not number of pedesnims .. ming lbw pteility.)Odeltiplym dmaidsvolume shown baba, by umber of dfreeaantlteedwsyianes to damnable two-wnymatdmmn settee volume..) Level of Servicq Odom& Covornito 4 • B C 6D 15,500 0,49336 .50.8456. •▪ • " .0 9,900 19,000 115-100% " 2,200 11,100 >11,300 •.0 Bub MODE.68ehedded Find Root) ohm per hour) gisenlbrpew:s ,owsao edykr Ito eak,kirto nw um* 4.04.orthe bleu tnoa 0.0 10vst of Service SamelieCavmcgo A B C 13 B 044% " >5 24 3 22 83400% >6 >4 et d2_ al AlflutigiOlut4slotg0AU WAV Alil'jJS`rMENIII DIVIPO niriu D1iD (ow 90 017704414Svalumeb ydm- 1460galH«odn° Lanni Mallen Ldlt7Ymu1�8nes Adjus Feetor$ 2 Diwa;a No Multi Undivided idea -3°1 -3% 0 Multi Undivided No -2336 Other 6dgnelfzedEmdWIYe (eign011001 nt $ shalyste) Want Seivies • Wee thidIvid e+ B 4,800 10,000 12,600 4 indll : 100 2000 20,200. !omaet 910134ffspestain.5e spoltetieb 02/22102 Systems RWszMgOffc ONR WAYI'AG1f FF1HH 661(5 &W0,e 1, 32399. 419 s twa-dh ctio0,l volamo.l4rhta taws by 406 t 7albigaued t0 735911 OM130 Dcsices egtapoudimg bterVVeil:.uUF si'lL natundcsidefeut6bma . olds0a4io.alutval encdbcet(Mr1 for ono-vre tuskless:.. I •'ts...W wikg' o :y„ a •Wt dl..r«a4oity 5vosost�taou/t r ' 1*+q ci.a0aa?edeonlr► wt.t�erdwd. ,. be.•er tesolprom Prwl:s- y�agwb±.d416}4ky...4,l• aelitlt.bamsaab...ohis tmaa 4+tpt*sv►mw. iodta.A a. w+. +tagwa r.nro.+ar. atawaPd ea'v P•msfs..ds.soma1ri. ameMr bsek•n Yay.t m?e..Wmutde. .baeat.44;eaM!tawua fib dr. Fdb . btywe004..0ahia rios..ak soen, ateosetsheetssows anotdssinsoaisin!a.F pmaamac svoMaYelai etanWordonetwecv,1.49* ongglI o.d..ytarl ,f at mow...m4� 71.10W.t.taar.b.', 0.4.0 i...1'dt.av1..idoessmo ooaMkO?.hari..Natvt'b" *WSOy m3404adep .6116wab..vtiw•Y16.1.,ts.yet.tos MoM e.d.nn l.0s emat..esi.dt 4Mvsy.0#42eliytlZWI nmie1t..w•1t 7vaaatmauwusalt.Wm" P•kodiv.4114.1...4. 01 eddrWof�ds.. m4. ay. •tw6.•0.10Wda Pee autoaob0 .'►ai:. Modes. r.tve..Dab. se. 1. Wier. dda- 3 beams l*vim tistrl. O. tlaWPdda .bw.t0......e.r:lOth67d.mil !?e■Wt4 a•<101, e. I d,.f.aNe! 4,114+l4.o.szb..bt.,6ws..anw. onomdbi+tlarmkk wtmoa®atPuWt.bt.isp r.ae WWI. -. tlr� LS' • HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SR 70 & Parrott Ave Lane Configurations Ideal Flow hpl) Lane UtiI. Factor Fit Protected 3x Flt Permitted !i r� ++ 8/15/2007 tip �n. 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.18 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.15 1.00 1.00: 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 r• 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 0.16 1.00 EN,1f;'. f5 Peak -hour factor, PHF RTOR Reduction (vph) Turn Type F�?fj ,.A�i,�,1.9j^ Permitted Phases Effective Green, • (s) Clearance Time s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Perm Uniform Delay, d1 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.92 0.92 0.92 004 0 20 0 23 0 0 0 247 0 15 pm +pt 8 38.9 24.5 4.0 6.0 pm +pt 4 57.8 39.4 4.0 6.0 m +pt 6 Perm •m +•t 6 2 36.3 23.1 23.1 45.9 28.7 4.0 5.5 5.5 4.0 xr3 5.5 857 Incremental Delay, d2 1 Level of Service pg. Approach LOS HCM Average Control Delay RAO Actuated Cycle Length (s) Analysis Period (min) 9.3 E 7.5 D D ny 167.2 115.2 15 Ef 129.0 305.7 F F F HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) 3.9 5.8 C rs D D 0.3 10,4 D F 12.0 D 2.3 F.f��4Yx�u :Lt;r' D D s'c4g-ztAlfA r, 7:00 am Baseline %user_name% Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: SR 70 & SR 98 ,r- 4.. \, 41 Lane Confi•urations 14 r •h I 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Ideal Flow hpl Lane Util. Factor Flt Protected Flt Permitted Peak -hour factor, PHF 7I RTOR Reduction (vph) Tum T pe Permitted Phases Effective Green, g (s) Clearance lime (s) Aga Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Perm Uniform Delay, di ,tit�rc; 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 � err 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 r� 4 API 0.25 1,00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 5 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 0 0 289 0 81 pm +pt 6 Perm 2 ,s custom 8 34.2 34.2 23.5 23.5 17.5 17.5 i9i f q l4_.F 5.0 5,0 5.0 5.0 5.0 417 2027 1393 623 0.13 6.7 419- 944. t$^�,Stri.rF4 6.3 13.7 12.5 19.0 15.2 0.12 5.0 519 464 7,, Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 0.1 0.3 Level of Service Approach LOS 0.3 5.1 0.1 ....... .... A A BB CB A B C 8/15/2007 HCM Average Control Delay ` Actuated Cycle Length (s) Analysis Period (min) 4 11,St� 13.5 HCM Level of Service 59.7 Sum of lost time (s) $x re yY w gj c s2 15 12.0 7:00 am Baseline %user_name% Synchro 7 - Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10:SR70 &5th 8/15/2007 Lane Configurations eh Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Util. Factor Flt Protected Flt Permitted "' -► ~`fir '"'. -- 4-- 4\ 11 1900 1900 $ict4r r� � �j9i 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.12 1.00 a r I 1900 1900 1900 1.00 0,95 0.95 1.00 0.24 1.00 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.67 1.00 y J Y 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.36 1.00 Peak -hour factor, PHF ��a�i13Y RTOR Reduction (vph) 0.87 0.87 tai 0.87 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.89 0.89 0.89 !7�F Permitted Phases Effective Green, g s) Clearance Time s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Perm 9aa*':f Uniform Delay, d1 Incremental Delay, d2 Level of Service Approach LOS HCM.Average Control Delay Actuated Cycle Length (s) 6 37.9 32.9 5.0 5.0 242 1698 0.11 8.3 11.7 0.5 A 1.0 B B a�w rd R 15.4 m +pt UtF 2 u ay'7 43.3 35.6 5.0 5.0 442 1848 0.18 5.7 0.5 A kfy 4 ,..-fit 67.6 12.1 2.4 B B. HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) Perm 4 15.0 15.0 5.0 278 0.07 5.0 385 22.1 23.8 0.7 -y9iAt �zMa C 3.3 C C B 12.0 Perm Gy 8 15.0 15.0 ?497 5.0 148 0.08 5.0 403 22.2 21.9 1.4 C ?�'�,'ra�:tryn. yi3csS *rte = 0.4 C C 7:00 am Baseline %user_name% Synchro 7 - Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: SR 70 & 8th Ave Lane. Configurations Ideal Flow (v • hpl Lane.Util, Factor Flt Protected Fit Permitted Peak-hour factor, PHF 8/1512007 --"ir 4-- 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0.95 1.00 s.< 0.88 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0 92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Tum Type Perrnitted Phases Effective Green, • s) Clearance Time s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) vls Ratio Perm is 6 f?H 35.7 35.7 tt `ktw ,k 'n TL 2 41.1 42.1 4 16.7 16.7 6.0 is Uniform Delay, d1 Incremental Delay, d2 arF Level of Service Approach LOS 8.0 10.2 0.7 0.3 ✓F N� � "� L� A B B A 8.1 1.8 A A 22.0 3r r' 2.6 c C 0.03 9 Z 19.4 0.1 B B .r, HCM Average Control Delay 66.8 Actuated Cycle Length (s) Analysis Period (min) 11.3 HCM LeVeI of Service Sum of lost time (s) 15 8.0 7:00 am Baseline %user name% Synchro 7 - Report Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SR 70 & Parrott Ave :Lane Confgurations:_ -: ideal Flow (vphpl I I;; 1900:` 1900 1900. 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor . 1.00 - 0,95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00. 0.95. 1.00 FJt:Protected.,_'. Fit - Permitted . . Peak- hourfactor, PHF RTOR Reduction (vph) trey Heavy Vehicles ( %) d�uq„r? 0:95 _ . ,1,00 . � 3=atac a 0.17. 1:0.0 0.89 0.89. 0.89 0 2% jf 21 2% 0 ..0.95 ..1.00. 0.14 . 1.00. lez • . 0.95 - _1.00 1.00 . f; z 0:17. 1.00 1.00 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.95 0.95 0.95 0 z• 45 0 0 2 % . 2% 2% 2% 2% 2 °k 366 2% 0.95 1.00. 1.00 ,r. 0.15 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.92 ry1�� 0 0.92 0 120 2% 2% Protected Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Actuated Yi',tksr y }try 59.0 40.5 42.8 23.5 23.5 53.3 30.0 30.0 0.20 0.43 0.25 0.24 Vehicle Extension (s) I v/s Ratio Prot. Y�- *Ratio Progression Factor ` rite, „46119, 00-4 Dela (s Approach Delay (s 0.08 c0.24 0.72 St 1.14 1.00 1.00 43.2 127.7 111.9 c0.24 0.30 0.97 0.88 0.12 0.17 0.80 0.84 0.70 reig, j ✓5 ?�tz rN aP 41 1.00 1.00 79.7 45.8 56.5 1.00 1.00: ` 1,00 45.2 56.5 52.4 52.8 c0.20 0.23 0.96 0.89. 0.10 1.00 1,00 1.00 69.6 55.7 36.5 57.7 11•• rY•J'�•`r • i HCM:Volume to Capacity ratio. -4r ) taiAti ..e �r Intersection Capacity Utilization Critical Lane Group 0.98 95.5% 7.: ICU Lever ofService VIPeak amHour: user` ne% Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9:SR70 &SR98 Lane Configurations 4-- 4 8/15/2007 Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Util. Factor Flt Protected Fit Permitted 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 . 1.00 0.95 1.00 Peak -hour factor, PHF RTOR Reduction (vph) 0.23 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 0 0 274 Heavy Vehicles ( %). il��e3Ki Protected Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Actuated g /CRatio Vehicle Extension (s) v/s Ratio Prot v/c Ratio - t Progression Factor Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) 2% 1 2% 2% 2% (, 0 205 2% 2% 6 2 3 .8 35.0 35.0 22.2 22.2 17.4 17.4 0 58 0 58 0.37 0.37 0.29 0.29 ,irf����k'�k�.bal- .3e�o-s �y': �7•°°�e`•n*`ir' '� t3?-e 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.37 0.24 0.55 0.28 0.76 .0.23 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7.8 6.6 15:9 14.0 26.4 16.9 6.9 152 22.2 ,�aE -•.xH4 :. HCM :Volume _to Capacity ratio Intersection Capacity Utilization Critical Lane Group 0.60 56.9% & tii`k!x ICU Level of Service y :y PM Peak Hour %user_name% Synchro 7 - Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: SR 70 & 5th Lane Configurations Ideal Flow vphpl) t. 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900 1900 1900 1900 8/15/2007 4, T+ 1900 1900 1900 xtxaBxstiF$ g. 6 Lane Util. Factor. 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 LNr Fwru Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95. 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95. 1.00 1 � I � Fit Permitted Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.21 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.39 1.00 0.41 1.00 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.75 0.75 0.75 iUFzD VA_ -' RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 5 0 0 7 0 0 35 0 0 17 0 is Ocki Heavy Vehicles ( %) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 11),Z1,4 Actuated Green, G (s) Actuated Vehicle Extension KICK v/s Ratio Prot 34.5 33.2 r lyw• 0.50 0.46 44.5 38.2 0.62 0.53 0.00 0.26 3.0 3.0 c0.03 c0.31 19.1 19.1 0.27 0.27 19.1 19.1 0.27 0.27 0.14 0.16 =F7 ri v/c Ratio Progression Factor Delay (s) t g , i ,vAM. sip Approach. Delay (s) 0.03 0.56 0.28 0.58 0.82 0.52 0.70 0.57 3f�a. r 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '40b V4 S ,a 9.8 15.6 7.8 12.9 47.4 23.7 34.3 24.7 P'2 15.6 12.5 32.3 27.9 � 3n HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Intersection Capacity Utilization 0.65 65.7% Critical Lane Group PM Peak Hour %user_name% ICU Level of Service Synchro 7 - Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: SR 70 & 8th Ave 8/15/2007 4\ Lane Configurations Ideal Flow vphpl E�tl Lane Util. Factor Flt Protected Fit Permitted a,. Peak -hour factor, PHF RTOR Reduction (vph) ail �•�, � ��. Protected Phases S� t Iz¢ •y 1`3 ?10- `- }' ;e. 1`� ...:i,r _,�� _ v t °.S' i 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.92 0.92 0}, 5 • L4 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.10 .1.00 t -. 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 0.90 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 2 ',W;;‘• S J 7�° Vic,/ 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0 0 48 0 Actuated Green, G (s) 36.8 36.8 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.56 0.56 Y-'.�d?c�¢•�'��°, ?. a:a�is�`as.C�t�'3i�.�C'.i•F 9 a1S .1- 3.0 3.0 46.7 46.7 0.69 0.70 Vehicle Extension (s) 10.3 0 16 2% 0 2% 10.3 v/s Ratio Prot v/c Ratio � r Progression Factor Approach Delay (s) c0.45 0.41 0.81 1.00 1.00 0.03 c0.41 0.39 0.59 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 0.09 1.00 23.3 23.3 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Intersection Capacity Utilization Critical Lane Group 0.72 ICU Level of Service itiMgar PM Peak Hour %user_name% Synchro 7 - Report Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SR 70 & Parrott Ave 8/15/2007 Lane Confi• urations Ideal Flow vphpl) Lane Util. Factor +t. ig ls� r r: 1 41, . /1 +T r v1i 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 - Flt Protected 0,95 1:00 0.95 : 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 . Fit Permitted • 0.17 1.00 0.14 1.00 0.17 1.00 1.00 0.15 1.00 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92. 0.92 0.92 0.92 _,�,:. 7✓,e 1. .�,� .n` RTOR Reduction vph) Permitted Phases Effective Green, • s) Clearance lime (s Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Perm �rasj ta�tl��ri4 � a .1 Uniform Delay, d1 21 Incremental Delay, d2 Level of.Service C O�Jf F(fC tC7 Approach LOS HCM Average Control Delay pm +pt 8 39.3 26.1 4.0 peas 277 0.14 m+pt 4 x;' {•Gf 59.1 41.9 6.0 4.0 6.0 720 503 1136 1)4 0.26 G :ziF 34.9 48.9 9.2 177.4 D F F 101.6 48.7 41.0 89.6 32.6 F E F ✓'�� ? °K 7 is '"1j 6 6 2 43.4 25.0 25.0 53.3 30.9 4.0 344 0.15 t�UVIG � Y. HCM Level of Service 5.5 714 5.5 4.0 319 429 0.16 0.21 5.5 863 33.1 47.6 47.0 35.9 46.5 13.5 9.5 12.9 32.4 32.3 D E E E F E E E Actuated Cycle Length Analysis Period (min) 123.9 Sum of lost time (s) 15 12.0 2009 Midday %user name% Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8/15/2007 3: SW 21st Street & Parrott Ave -�r Se. 44--- at' t p ' # 4' Lane Configurations as i, Ideal Flow .h .1) s Lane UtiI. Factor t ati ft if ft, 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected Flt Permitted Peak -hour factor, PHF RTOR Reduction (vph Tum Type Permitted Phases Effective Green, . s) Clearance Time s 0.95 1.00 1900 1900 1900 1900 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 100 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 100 0.53 1.00 1.00 0.26 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 79 Perm 4 15.6 15.6 0 t 0 Perm 8 119 0 Perm pm +pt 8 2 0 60 Perm 2 15.6 15.6 15.6 52.9 45.8 45.8 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 's'a `"Y,ti"f`(' Uniforrn Delay, d1 Incremental Delay, d2 Level of Service bb yy. Approach LOS 30.4 28.8 rr 2.5 C 0.5 C C x HCM Average Control Delay Actuated Cycle Length (s) I)I Analysis Period (min) S s aos 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 0 Prot 13 9.3 48.0 5.5 5.5 0 185 351 299 422 1960 877 386 1996 +, fwk,� a'` C a.}j`,� "'� s �-��F� 3 a"d c is Y`i `?�aA`G•.. ;� 3Yi 30.7 27.4 27.7 5.9 10.9 5.4 D a 0.0 0.1 C 0.1 0.7 EF B C A 8.6 34.6 0.2 A 1.0 D 9.9 0.8 B B 16.9 HCM Level of Service 82.7 15 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 1a 2009 Midday %user_name% Synchro 7 - Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: SW 28th St & Parrott Ave 8/15/2007 Lane Configurations YAW Ideal Flow (vphp Ft y y; tikfT'<�, + r ��Xc2T, y;. Y-2.0 3`! 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane UtiI. Factor Flt Protected Flt Permitted Peak -hour factor, PHF s RTOR Reduction (vph) 1.00 1.00 9y 0.95 1.00 r 1 0.71 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 11't`J{ r �yD�GI 1.00 4,. 900. 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 h ' 0.95 1.00 0.58 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.32 1.00 �C. 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.29 1.00 l .. 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 YY fit-, Permitted Phases Effective Green, g (s) Clearance Time s) 4 �r ikfh`k, r.. 12.0 12.0 5.0 5.0 =qc 8 8 2 +J w 12.0 12.0 12.0 42.5 36.9 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 6 49.3 40.3 5.5 5.5 Lane Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Perm 227 292 c0.09 Uniform Delay, d1 Incremental Dela , d2 to Level of Service Approach LOS t4 HCM Average Control. Delay %fr jActuated�,�}}Cycle Length (s) Analysis Period (min) 187tp 320 0.03 459 1855 539 1999 e 26.2 25.2 1.7 ZitfAV C 0.5 C 69.9 15 24.6 24.9 0.4 C 0.4 C C 0.03 0.06 24.6 0.3 C x ry HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) 5.6 0.1 A 9.9 0.6 B B Lek 12.0 a 4.0 0.3 A 8.2 0.6 A A 2009 Midday %user name% Synchro 7 - Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Shopping Center & Parrott Ave Lane :Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl YES Lane Util. Factor Fit Protected Fit Permitted � 1 ads �iEw��: Peak -hour factor, PHF Y1 jS.' RTOR Reduction (vph) I 8/15/2007 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.74 1.00 1.00 0.41 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.46 1.00 92 092 092 092 092 0.92 0.92 •� 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 92 0 92 Permitted Phases cedar tT t r. Effective Green,• s) Clearance Time (s) 8.9 8.9 5.0 5.0 8.9 8.9 8.9 46.5 43.6 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 55.2 48.3 5.5 5.5 v ;z' r‘ Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Perm Uniform Delay, d1 Incremental Delay, d2 �9�sj�ra Level of Service Approach LOS i,il.' 27.9 28.2 0.2 0.3 C C C 170 230 195 534 2118 28.3 28.0 28.0 0.5 0.1 0,2 C C C C ( 4.6 6.4 0.0 A 0.2 A A 758 2338 0.10 2.2 0.1 4.8 0.3 A A HCM Average Control Delay u? a R Actuated Cycle Length (s) }i3 Analysis Period (min) 9.2 HCM Level of Service 72.1 15 Sum of lost time (s) ,A:ems �- -' 8.0 2009 Midday %user_name% Synchro 7 - Report Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: SR 70 & 5th 8/15/2007 - , ; .,_: .*\ t \ �; d Lane Configurations Ideal Row (vphpl) Lane Util. Factor +t+ le , 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected Fk -ci ..'I��Cetre Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.17 1.00 0.95 1.00 0,24 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.70 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.54 1.00 a. }aY.d s'aY Peak -hour factor, PHF RTOR Reduction (vph) 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Turn Type Permitted Phases Effective Green, g (s) i-a Clearance lime (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) "ZriA4 v/s Ratio Perm Uniform Delay, d1. �otJ 0 m +pt 6 36.5 34.3 5.0 1. «..h • ?ter �-% 5.0 250 2032 MEN 0.03 5.3 ti 7.5 it -,,`" M' 401484'0. Incremental Delay, d2 Level of Service 45074 :4, ftig alcaj.reg Approach LOS HCM Average Control Delay Actuated Cycle Length (s) Analysis Period (min) 611t) 0.1 r to A 0.8 A A m +pt O; 2 36.5 34.3 5.0 5.0 320 2030 0.04 4.9 0.1 A 8.1 1.2 A A 10.9 HCM Level of Service 59.7. 5 Sum of lost time (s) 2009 Midday %user_name% f t 119 Perm 4 11.2 11.2 5.0 5.0 244 0.05 308 20.7 20.6 0.6 C =tea - 0.4 C C 33 Perm 8 11.2 11.2 5.0 5.0 190 326 c0.09 21.6 20.4 1.8 C B 12.0 0.3 0rr , �6 C Synchro 7 - Report Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: SR 70 & 8th Ave Lane Configurations Ideal Flow ( • hpl - Nt t4 44 8/15/2007 d 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor Flt Protected Flt Permitted Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 x 1 0.95 1.00 0.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 RTOR Reduction vph Tum T pe ;a f :,y 0 Psi Perm 6 5 0 0 . 0 m +pt 2 57.3 58.3 Permitted Phases Effective Green, • s) Clearance Time (s) 47.4 5.0 4.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2161 256 2690 0 0 Perm 4 76 10.4 10.4 6.0 6.0 0 0 Perm 8 0 0 Uniform Delay, d1 Incremental Delay, d2 2.7 Level of Service Approach LOS B B HCM Average Control Delay Actuated Cycle Length (s) Analysis Period (min) 0.8 1.1 B A ,err 9r�; her A 10.8 HCM Level of Service 76.7 15 Sum of lost time (s) 1.0 0.1 C C C 1, Y A 12.0 2009 Midday %user_name% Synchro 7 - Report Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 51: SR 70 & 10th Ave 8/15/2007 Lane Configurations S, .Ideal Flow ( oh* I) 44 v 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor Flt Protected 0.95 7 l =' n3<?si' 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 zc3 Fit Permitted 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.97 ti: Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 II, 7' V RTOR Reduction (v. h) Tum Type Perm cr, Permitted Phases 2 Effective Green, g s) Clearance lime s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Perm 34.0 6.0 1973 d2. i 1.w m�<.C'� 34.0 34.0 18.5 6.0 6.0 6.5 203 1989 524 0.24 I.' uz; L1 Uniform Delay, di 8.4 7.7 9.5 16.5 finf •A7 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 6.6 2.0 2.1 Level of Service {LCM1� �lf�K';t Approach LOS HCM Average Control Delay Actuated Cycle Length (s) �43t 2r Analysis Period (min) A A 1 �q: B 60.5 15 B 4tK sL B B B HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 YAW 2009 Midday %user_name% Synchro 7 - Report Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 52: SR 70 & SR 710 P Lane Configurations 8/15/2007 Ideal Flow v•h.l Lane Util. Factor A Fit Protected Flt Permitted Peak -hour factor, PHF 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 x l� 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95. 0.97 1.00 RTOR Reduction (vph) Permitted Phases Effective Green, a s) Clearance Time s) Pry 1.00. 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 kb. 17.3 42.6 19.4 21.4 13.2 13.2 10�? 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Perm Uniform -Dela , dl Incremental Delay, d2 Level of Service Approach LOS 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 ttk 1437 1583 360 1778 1064 491 tom; .ioTR, ,1.. 0.10 c0.28 0.03 8.4 k'. 0.00 J;TS: 0.0 8.0 6.4 12.2 10.2 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.0 A A A A B B A9 A B HCM Average Control Delay Actuated Cycle Length Length (s) `i tt Analysis Period (min) 7.5 HCM Level of Service 42.6 Sum of lost time s) 4.0 15 2009 Midday %user_name% Synchro 7 - Report Page 8 Intersection Parrott Ave. at SE 6th Street $R70 at US 98 SR 70 at US 441 (Parrott Ave.) SR 70 (NE Park Street) at SW 5th Avenue Counts From 11/28/2006 5/31/2006 5/31/2006 10/26/2006 EXHIBIT 4 Traffic Counts 2006 Existing Volumes Parrott Ave. at SE 6th Street 1 Hour Period Beginning NB: Parrott Avenue SB: Parrott Avenue EB: SW 6th Street WB: SW 6th Street N'S' E & W 1 Hour Period Beginning Left 26 Left U 6 Thru 885 Right 31 Total 948 Left 24 Left-U' 2 Thrn 880 Right 24 Total 930 Left 14 Thru 1 Right 39 Total 54 Left 12 Thru 2 Right 30 Total 44 7:45 A.M. Peak 1,976 7:45 A.M. Peak PHF = 0.81 PHF - 0.89 PHF = 0.79 PHF = 0.44 4:30 P.M. Peak 27 1 2 1 1,167 1 16 11,212 27 1 4 1 1,089 1 14 . 11,134 28 1 2 1. 45 1 75 14 1 3 1 20 1 37 2,458 4:30 P.M. Peak PHF - 0.93 PHF = 0.94 PHF. = 0.67 PHF = 0.77 SR70 at US 98 1 Hour Period Beginning 7:15 A.M. Peak NB: N/A SB: US 98 EB: SR 70 WB. SR 70 N'S' E & W 1 Hour Period Beginning r .•s �r - ry Left 297 Left -U 0 Thru 0 Right 97 Total 394 Left 120 Thru 370 Right 0 Total 490 Left 0 Thru 172 Right 159 Total 331 1,215 7:15 A.M. Peak PHF = 0.96 PHF = 0.75 PHF = 193 4:45 P.M. Peak 277 1 0 1 0 1 220 1 497 124 1 331 1 0 1 455 0 1 362 1 241 1 603 1,555 4:45 P.M. Peak PHF = 0.79 PHF = 0.89 PHF = 0.77 SR 70 at US 441 (Parrott Ave.) 1 Hour Period Beginning NB: US 441 (Parrott Ave.) SB: US 441 (Parrott Ave.) EB SR 70 WB. SR 70 N S, E & W 1 Hour Period Beginning Left 151 Left -U 0 Thru 364 Right 215 Total 730 Left 2I9 Left -U 1 Thru 383 Right 95 Total 698 Left 175 Thrn 327 Right 97 Total 599 Left 342 Thru 398 Right 247 Total 987 7:45 A.M. Peak 3,014 7:45 A.M. Peak PELF - 0.85 PHF = 0.92 PHF = 0.87 PHF = 0.78 4:30 P.M. Peak 218 1 0 1 444 1 433 11,095 303 . 2 1 570 1 122 1 997 136 1 494 1 148 1 778 347 1 518 1 249 1 1,114 3,984 4:30 P.M. Peak PHF = 0.93 PHF = 0.91 PHF = 0.94 PHF = 0.91 SR 70 (NE Park Street) at SW 5th Avenue 1 Hour Period Beginning NB: SW 5th Avenue SB: SW 5th Avenue EB: SR 70 (NE Park St.) WB. SR 70 (NE Park St.) N S, ' E & W 1 Hour Period Beginning. Left 65 Left -U 0 Thru 96 Right 84 Total 245 Left 32 Left -U .0 Thru 78 Right 14 Total 124 Left 45 Thru 548 Right 81 Total 674 Left 89 Thru 439 Right 43 Total 571 7 :30 A.M. Peak 1,614 7:30 A.M. Peak PHF = 0.75 PIIF = 0.89 PHF = 0.87 PHF = 0.78 4:45 P.M. Peak 119 1 0 1 104 1 88 1 311 84 1 0 1 132 1 49 1 265 7 1 613.1 42 1 662 93 1 822 1 23 1 938 2,176 4:45 P.M. Peak PHF = 0.84 PHF - 0.50 PHF = 0.94 PHF = 0.89 OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: MICHAEL MALONE SIGNALIZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC.' 624 GARDEN/A./WRACK DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272 -3255 FAX (561) 272 -4381 LIGHT VEHICLES, HEAVY VEHICLES US 98 'SR 70 DRIVEWAY 'SR 70 1 From North From East 1From South 1From West 1 1 1 1 Right Thru UTurn Left 4 Right Thru UTurn Left 1 Right Thru UTurn Left Right Thru UTurn Left Total Date 05/31/06 07:00 22 0 0 51 1 34 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 25'1 240 07:15 32 0 0 69 1 33 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 0 20 1 282 07:30 25 0 0 78 1 48 ' 39 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 35 1 295 351 07045 26 0 0 73 1 44 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 344 0 122 1168 Hr Total 105 0 0 271 1 159 167 0 0 08:00 13 1 0 77 1 34 • 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 96 0 23 1 287 08:15 21 0 D 54 1 30 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 0 13 1 230 08:30 16 0 0 59 1 28 ' 54 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 68 0 23 248 08:45 23 0 0 52 1 38 45 0 0 1 0 0 l 0 0 0 80 0 19 1 257 Hr Total 73 1 0 242 1 130 191 0 0 0 0 f 0 0 1 0 307 0 78 I 1022 Site Code : 00060154 Start Date: 05/31/06 File I.D. : 8R701.7898 Page : 1 • BREAK * 11:00 24 1 0 62 35 60 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 57 0 15 254 11:15 17 0 0 46 37 75 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 72 0 15 1 262 11:30 22 0 0 57 49 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 22 290 11 :45 36 1 0 75 47 75 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 85 0 22 341 284 0 74 1 1147 Hr Total 99 2 0 240 168 280 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 12:00 33 0 0 63 1 47 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 0 17 312 12:15 24 1 0 53 36 56 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 74 0 11 256 12:30 23 0 0 59 54 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 0 15 272 0 0 0 0 96 0 28 322 12:45 23 0 0 55 � 56 64 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 314 0 71 � 1162 Hr Total 103 1 0 230 1 193 249 0 0 • BREAK 16:00 34 0 0 52 58 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 67 0 24 314 16:15 42 0 1 62 57 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 68 0 19 339 0 0 0 0 0 82 0 33 366 16:30 31 0 0 72 58 90 0 0 � 0 0 0 � - 1 74 0 35 356 16:45 36 0 0 57 69 84 0 0 0 0 0 1 291 0 111 1375 Hr Total 143 0 1 243 242 343 0 0 0 0 17:00 71 2 0 85 64 97 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 82 0 25 426 17:15 60 1 0 55 61 98 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 88. 0 40 405 17:30 49 1 0 80 47 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 0 24 369 342 17 :45 37 2 0 56 1 47 85 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 I 0 345 0 24 1542 Hr Total 217 6 0 276 � 219 362 1 1 *TOTAL* 740 10 1 1502 1111 1592 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1885 0 569 7416 'SR 70 & US 98 OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: MICHAEL MALONE SIGNALIZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272 -3255 FAX (561) 272 -4381 LIGHT VEHICLES, HEAVY VEHICLES Site Code : 00060154 Start Date: 05/31/06 File I.D. SR70U898 Page : 2 US 98 From North Right Thru Date 05/31/06 Peak Hour Anal is By Entire Peak eta Volume Percent 24# 01 01 Pk total _394 Highest 07:30 Volume 25 0 0 Hi total 103 !SR 70 DRIVEWAY 'SR 70 From East 1From South (From West 1 UTUrn Left'l Right Thru UTUrn Left j Right Thru UTurn Left ( Right Thru UTUrn Left 1 Total PBF SR 70 0 172 96 Intersection for the Period: 07:00 t 07:15 751 78 481 521 331 07:45 44 45 89 • 0 • 0 3 0 93 268 01 01 0 0 US 98 09:00 on 05/31/06 07:15 07 :15 0# 01 0# 01 0 07:00 O 0 0 0 0 281 16 1 673 120 0 159 279 1 • LIGHT VEHICLES • HEAVY VEHICLES 758 998 ( Inters Total 1 1 II • 0 0 1 0 DRI WAY 1 0 0 01 76# 01 24# 490 07:45 0 121' 0 42 163 0 0 0 667 SR 70 297 370 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' SR 70 6 US 98 OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: MICHAEL MALONE SIGNALIZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272 -3255 FAX (561) 272 -4381 LIGHT VEHICLES, HEAVY VEHICLES Site Code : 00060154 Start Date: 05/31/06 File I.D. : BR70US98 Page : 3 US 98 !SR 70 From North !From East Right Thru UTUrn Left I Right Thru UTurn Date 05/31/06 Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 11:00 to 13:00 on 05/31/06 Peak start 11:15 11 :15 I 11:15 Volume 108 1 0 241 180 295 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Percent 31% 0% 0% 69% 3B% 62% O% 0% I 0% 0% 0% 0% Pk total 350 475 I 0 Highest 11:45 11:45 I 07:00 Volume 36 1 0 75 47 75 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 Hi total 112. 122 I 0 PHF .78 .97 I .0 US 98 0 . 103 0 • 225 76 350 1 I 256 0 . 5 1 • 16 0 180 24 606 (DRIVEWAY ISR 70 From South From West Left I Right Thru UTurn Left ! Right Thru UTurn Left Total SR 70 0 295 403 108 73 3 76 1 287 17 304 380 0 0 0 1 783 • LIGHT VEHICLES • HEAVY VEHICLES 1,020 Intersection Total 1,205 0 1 0 1 • 0 0 DRIVEWAY 0 11:15 O 304 0 76 O} 80% 0% 20% 380 11:45 O 85 0 22 107 .89 0 0 0 180 158 22 261 475 295 34 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 241 545 304 0 SR 70 I 0 • 0 • 0 0 0 0 • SR • 70 & US 98 OREECHOBEE, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: MICHAEL MALONE SIGNALIZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272 -3255 FAX (561) 272 -4381 LIGHT VEHICLES, HEAVY VEHICLES ' Site Code : 00060154 Start Date: 05/31/06 Pile Z.D. : 8R703898 Page : 4 US 98 {SR 70 (DRIVEWAY {SR 70 From North From East }From South {From West Right Thru UTurn Left { Right Thru UTurn Left { Right Thru UTurn Left.{ Right Thru UTurn Left { Total Date 05/31/06 Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 to 18:00 on 05/31/06 Peak start Volume Percent 438 11 03 561 401 601 01 01 Pk total 497 603 Highest 17:00 17:00 Volume 71 2 0 85 64 97 0 0 Hi total 158 161 PHF SR 70 1 361 216 01 01 1001 01 1 17:15 0 0 1 0 1 Ilia US 98 • 0 215 4 262 124 • 0 1 0 15 0 241 p *- 365 862 578 • 0 0 0 1,033 • LIGHT VEHICLES ▪ HEAVY VEHICLES 1,210 Inter 'on Total 01 731 01 271 455 17:15 0 88 0 40 128 0 0 0 SR 70 607 277 330 0 SR 70 & US 98 OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: MICHAEL MALONE SIGNALIZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272 -3255 FAX (561) 272 -4381 HEAVY VEHICLES Site Code : 00060154 Start Date: 05/31/06 File 2.D. : 3R70US98 Page : 1 US 98 ISR 70 'DRIVEWAY ISR 70 From North 'From East 'From South 'From West Right Thru UTUrn Left 1 Right Thru UTUrn Left 1 Right Thru UTurn Left ' Right Thru UTurn Left Total Date 05/31/06 07:00 0 0 0 5 1 5 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 I 18 07:15. 1 0 0 4 I q 4 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 16 07:30 2 0 0 3 1 8 2 0 O I 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 18 07:45 0 0 .0 3 1 3 6 0 0{ 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 1 67 Hr Total 3 0 0 15 1 20 16 0 0 08:00 0 0 0 6 1 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 I 18 08:15 0 0 0 1 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 11 08:30 0 0 0 7 I 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 o 1 0 4 0 1 1 23 08:45 1 0 0 51 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 1 16 Hr Total 1 0 0 19 1 12 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 12 0 4 1 68 * BREAK * 11:00 0 0 0 3 I 4 5 0 0 1 0 .0 0 0 I 0 6 0 0{ 18 11:15 1 0 0 6 1 4 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I 0 5 0 2 1 27 11:30 1 0 0 1 1 9 5 0 0 l 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 19 11:45 2 1 0 4 1 4 14 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 14 0 2 1 93 Hr Total 4 1 0 14 I 21 33 0 0 12:00 1 0 0 5 1 s 6 0 o 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 1 23 4 5 0 0 I 0 1 0 0 I 0 1 0 0 17 12:30 0 0 0 5 I 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 I 0 6 0 0 21 12:30 0 0 0 SI 4 6 0 1 30 12:45 1 0 0 3 1 8 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 Hr Total 2 0 0 19 I 21 26 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 20 0 2 91 * BREAK 16:00 0 0 0 4 1 4 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 1 18 16 :15 0 0 0 3 I 7 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I 0 8 0 1 1 21 16:30 0 0 0 2 1 2 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 19 16:45 0 ' 0 0 7 1 3 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 •0 10 1 0 0 1 14 Hr Total 0 0 0 16 ( 16 23 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 15 0 2 1 72 17:00 1 0 0 3 1 5 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 0 0 1 18 17:15 0 0 0 3 1 5 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 3 1 20 17:30 0 0 0 2 1 1 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 1 13 17:45 0 0 0 2 1 3 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 12 Hr 0 0 0 r Total 1 0 0 10 1 14 14 1 1 1 0 19 0 3 1 63 *TOTAL* 11 1 0 93 { 104 132 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 97 0 13 1 454 OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: I. GONZALEZ & M. GONZALEZ SIGNALIZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272 -3255 FAX (561) 272 -4381 LIGHT VEHICLES, HEAVY VEHICLES Site Code : 00060154 Start Date: 05/31/06 File I.D. : SR70_441 Page : 1 US 441 I8R 70 1US 441 1SR 70 From North From East 'From South From West Right Thru UTurn Left 1 Right Thru UTurn Left 1 Right Thru UTurn Left ( Right Thru UTUrn Left I Total Date 05/31/06 07:00 7 64 0 49 41 66 0 46 07:15 14 63 0 52 44 80 0 61 07 :30 20 67 0 56 58 101 0 66 07:45 34 109 0 46 70 132 0 113 Hr Total 75 303 0 203 213 379 0 286 08:00 18 98 0 54 67 89 0 77 08:15 21 85 1 62 50 78 0 73 08:30 22 91 0 57 60 99 0 79 08:45 18 89 0 43 68 102 0 86 Hr Total 79 363 1 216 245 36B 0 315 • BREAK * 40 51 0 22 1 14 77 0 18 1 495 43 46 0 18 1 24 103 0 30 1 578 46 96 0 20 1 13 83 0 25 I 651 55 118 0 41 1 30 84. 0 55 1 887 184 311 0 101 1 . 81 347 0 128 1 2611 55 95 0 40 1 22 101 0 49 ' 765 59 80 0 36 1 24 60 0 30 1 659 46 71 0 34 1 21 82 0 41 I 703 49 94 0 39 1 22 77 0 37 1 724 209 340 0 149 I 89 320 0 157 I 2851 11:00 19 144 1 79 42 88 0 89 75 103 0 37 ! 31 92 0 30 830 11:15 20 147 1 71 40 91 1 84 102 102 0 57 28 - 87 0 33 864 11:30 25 137 0 82 49 106 0 101 86 90 0 48 51 89 0 21 885 11:45 27 131 1 66 1 45 109 0 91 113 88 1 42 1 44 95 0 42 895 Hr Total 91 559 3 298 1 176 394 1 365 376 383 1 184 154 363 0 126 3474 12:00 26 173 85 54 101 0 76 101 94 0 63 52 115 0 28 969 12 :15 14 117 1 65 44 98 0 B7 117 93 0 58 I 35 112 1 46 808 12:30 22 12B 0 73 45 91 0 91 125 94 1 65 30 79 0 38 882 12:45 15 106 0 61 1 59 128 0 82 133 135 0 61 42 115 0 37 974 Hr Total 77 524 2 284 202 418 0 336 476 416 1 247 159 421 1 149 3713 * BREAK * 16:00 20 120 0 83 58 105 0 96 1 89 106 1 56 38 97 0 38 16 :15 28 128 1 69 41 131 0 81 1 101 99 0 49 32 79 0 29 16:30 27 123 1 73 55 126 0 78 1 96 102 0 64 37 125 0 37 16:45 33 159 1 79 1 59 125 0 93 I_ 102 110 0 51 29 97 0 41 Hr Total 108 530 3 304 213 487 0 348 1 388 417 1 220 136 398 0 145 17:00 41 160 0 74 70 150 0 85 1 121 122 0 50 39 141 0 27 17:15 21 128 0 77 65 117 0 91 1 114 110 0 53 43 131 0 31 17:30 21 145 0 74 I 62 99 0 77 1 111 116 0 50 22 95 0 38 17:45 15 107 0 80 1 52 116 0 83 1_ 101 95 0 55 38 105 0 27 Hr Total 98 540 0 305 249 482 0 336 1 447 443 0 208 142 472 0 123 907 868 944 979 3698 1080 981 910 874 3845 *TOTAL* 528 2819 9 1610 1298 2528 1 1986 1 2080 2310 3 1109 1 761 2321 1 .828 1 20192 SR 70 & US 441 OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: I. GONZALEZ & M. GONZALEZ SIGNALIZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272 -3255 FAX (561) 272 -4381 LIGHT VEHICLES, HEAVY VEHICLES Site Code : 00060154 Start Date: 05/31/06 File I.D. : 6R70_441 Page : 2 U8 441 ISR 70 IUS 441 ISR 70 I From North 1From East IFrom South (From West I I I 1 I Right Thru VTurn Left 1 Right Thru UTurn Left 1 Right Thru UTurn Left 1 Right Thru UTurn Left 1 Total Date 05/31/06 Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:00 to 09:00 on 05/31/06 Peak start mini 07:45 I 07:45 1 07 :45 Volume Percent 141 553 01 311 I 251 401 01 354 -1 294 501 01 211 1 - 166 55% Ot 291 Pk total 698 I 9B7 I 730 1 599 Highest 07:45 07:45 1 07:45 I 08:00 Volume 34 109 0 46 1 70 132 0 113 1 55 118 0 41 1 22 101 0 49 Hi total 189 1 315 1 214 1 172 PHF M I 1111k 1 lin 1 US 441 SR 70 151 398 95 • 0 85 364 204 • 0 10 19 16 0 644 0 1,484 175 364 247 786 0 0 0 231 16 • LIGHT VEHICLES • HEAVY VEHICLES 1,749 Inte on Total 342 383 97 822 1,552 US 441 ono SR 70 1 762 220 327 215 149 345 204 0 2 19 11 0 0 SR 70 OM OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: I. GONZALEZ & M. GONZALEZ SIGNALIZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272 -3255 FAX (561) 272 -4381 LIGHT VEHICLES, HEAVY VEHICLES Site Code : 00060154 Start Date: 05/31/06 File I.D. : SR70_441 Page : 3 Date Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Peak start 12:00 12:00 Volume 77 524 2 284 202 418 Percent 9t 59% Ot 32t 21t 44t Pk total 887 956 Highest 12:00 12:45 Volume - 26 173 1 85 59 128 Hi total 285 269 PHF .78 .89 US 441 ISR 70 IUS 441 ISR 70 From North From East IFrom South From West I I I 1 Right Thru UTurn Left I Right Thru UTurn Left I Right Thru UTurn Left I Right Thru UTurn Left 1 Total 05/31/06 74 3 77 SR 70 248 418 743 77 146 4 150 388 33 421 730 152 7 159 0 1 Period: 11:00 to O 336 01 35t O 82 13:00 on 05/31/06 12:00 476 416 1 42% 36% Ot 1140 12:45 133 135 0 329 .87 �--- US 441 508 • 273 16 • 13 524 286 887 1,473 1 1,655 - LIGHT VEHICLES - HEAVY VEHICLES 150 416 202 768 247 22% 61 2,139 Intersection Total 3,713 2,159 12:00 159 421 1 149 22t 58% 0% 20% 730 12:00 52 115 0 28 195 .94 0 0 0 • 1 202 179 23 384 956 418 • 34 1,140 336 • 243 • 402 524 • 5 • 14 159 1,019 248 416 US 441 1 336 323 13 1,183 SR 70 286 421 476 • 4571 • 0 • 19 • 0 4761 0 SR 70 OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: I. GONZALEZ &M. GONZALEZ SIGNALIZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272 -3255 FAX (561) 272 -4381 LIGHT VEHICLES, HEAVY VEHICLES Site Code : 00060154 .Start Date: 05/31/06 File I.D. : SR70_441 Page : 4 Date Peak peak US 441 From North 18R 70 From East Right Thru UTurn Left 1 Right 05/31/06 Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: star IUS 441 From South Thru UTurn Left 1 Right Thru UTurn ISR 70 From West Left 1 Right Thru UTurn Left Total Volume Percent 121 Pk total 997 Highest 17:00 Volume 41 160 Hi total 275 571 PHF SR 70 218 518 122 01 30% 0 74 • 0 • 0 0 858 221 464 1114 17:00 70 150 0 85 305 01 16 :00 to 18:00 311 US 441 401 1095 17:00 121 122 293 on 05/31/06 0 41% 121 562 287 1 8 18 1,636 145 3 0 01 201 136 444 249 • LIGHT VEHICLES • HEAVY VEHICLES 829 2,346 Intersection Total 347 570 148 1,065 2,160 • 216 433 • 2 11 50 16:30 194 778 17:00 39 207 Wan 631 0t 171 141 0 27 1 0 9 0 0 228 21 1,232 SR 70 US 441 305 494 433 0 0 0 SR 70 & US 441 OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: I. GONZALEZ & M. GONZALEZ SIGNALIZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272 -3255 FAX (561) 272 -4381 HEAVY VEHICLES Site Code : 00060154 Start Date: 05/31/06 File I.D. SR70_441 Page : 1 US 441 ASR 70 ICS 441 1SR 70 From North From East From South From West I Right Thru UTurn Left Right Thru UTurn Left I Right Thru UTurn Left Right Thru UTurn Left I Total Date 05/31/06 07:00 1 2 0 5 2 9 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 1 2 8 0 0 1 33_ 07:15 0 1 0 2 3 6 0 3 6 2 0 1 2 9 0 3 1 38 07:30 0 5 0 9 3 11 0 4 1 2 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 43 07:45 2 4 0 3 6 7 0 3) 4 6 0 0 1 0 5 0 o 40 Hr Tota1 3 12 0 19 14 33 0 12 12 14 0 1 4 27 0 3 1 154 08:00 4 4 0 3 3 8 0 3 2 2 0 1 2 10 0 1 43 08:15 2 7 0 5 4 2 0 3 3 6 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 I 36 08:30 2 4 0 5 3 7 0 3 2 5 0 1 I 0 7 0 1 40 08:45 2 3 0 3 5 6 0 4) 8 2 0 0) 0 9 0 3 45 Hr Total 10 18 0 16 15 23 0 13 15 15 0 2 2 28 0 7 1 164 * BREAK 11:00 1 3 0 6 4 9 0 1 5 4 0 1 1 9 0 2 46 11:15 0 2 0 5 7 11 0 0 7 5 0 0 2 11 0 2 52 11:30 1 3 0 4 4 13 0 1 5 6 0 2 1 9 0 1 50 11:45 0 3 0 1 7 16 0 4 .4 3 1 1 0 7 0 0 47 Hr Total 2 11 0 16 22 49 0 6 21 18 1 4 4 36 0 5 195 12:00 2 4 0 2 8 6 0 3' 5 3 0 2 2 8 0 0 45 12 :15 1 5 0 4 4 11 0 5 l 5 3 0 2 1 9 0 0 50 12:30 0 3 0 4 6 5 0 2 1 6 3 0 0 3 7 0 2 41 12:45 0 4 0 3 5 12 0 3) 3 5 0 1 1 9 0 2 48 Hr Total 3 16 0 13 23 34 0 13 19 14 0 5 7 33 0 4 184 * BREAK * 16:00 0 2 0 5 3 6 0 4 1 1 0 0 1 0 6 0 2 30 16:15 2 1 0 13 4 10 0 4 4 4 0 0 1 3 4 0 1 50 16:30 1 2 0 9 2 13 0 5 2 3 0 1) 1 4 0 0 43 16:45 0 1 0 1 7 5 0 1 1 2 0 0) 0 5 0 2 25 Hr Total 3 6 0 28 16 34 0 14 8 10 0 1 1 4 19 0 5 148 17:00 0 2 0 2 4 9 0 4 1 4 0 1 1 11 0 0 39 17:15 0 3 0 6 8 8 0 3 4 2 0 0- 1 7 0 1 43 17:30 0 O 0 4 7 3 0 1 3 5 0 D 3 7 0 0 33 17:45 0 4 0 3 5 7 0 0 8 2 0 0 I 1 1 0 1 32 Hr Total 0 9 0 15 24 27 0 8 16 13 0 1 6 26 0 2 147 *TOTAL* 21 72 0 107 114 200 0 66 91 84 1 14 I 27 169 0 26 1 992 NORTH PARK STREET & FIFTH AVENUE OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: NORA NAVARRO SIGNALIZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BRACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272 -3255 FAX (561) 272 -4381 ALL VEHICLES Site Code : 00060251 Start Date: 10/26/06 File I.D. : NPARXSAV Page : 1 5TH AVENUE From North INORTH PARK STREET (From East Right Thru UTurn Left Right 5TH AVENUE From South Thru UTUrn Left 1 Right Thru UTurn NORTH PARK STREET (From West Left 1 Right Thru UTUrn Left I Total Date 10/26/06 07:00 2 9 07:15. 2 5 07:30 1 15 07:45 3 23 Hr Total 8 52 OB:00 5 19 08:15 5 21 08:30 4 18 08:45 2 17 Hr Total 16 75 * BREAK* 0 0 0 0 11:00 6 15 11:15 4 12 11:30 2 16 11:45 6 25 Hr Total 18 68 2 5 6 7 20 4 4 9 22 39 83 102 98 125 408 0 0 0 0 0 6 15 19 36 76 9 8 13 20 50 10 7 7 38 62 0 0 0 0 0 16 21 19 17 73 9 14 25 21 69 113 132 121 164 530 O 2 I 265 O 2 I 317 O 10 I 343 O 8 1 484 O 22 1 1409 O 10 7 112 0 23 34 35 0 13 1 21 143 0 15 1 437 O 9 1 5 104 0 11 17 16 0 16 14 120 0 12 I 350 O 8 6 109 0 8 13 20 0 12 1 .4 129 0 6 I 337 O 9 1 8 118 0 12 15 20 0 13 16 132 0 6 I 368 O 36 1 26 443 0 54 79 91 0 54 55 524 0 39 I 1492 12:00 9 46 12:15 4 21 12:30 8 23 12:45 2 16 Hr Total 23 106 * BREAK 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 8 21 16:15 7 23 16:30 10 21 16:45 3 19 Hr Total 28 B4 0 0 0 0 0 10 16 22 21 69 28 11 10 12 61 8 11 2 8 29 11 11 12 9 43 136 152 149 139 576 165 146 154 172 637 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 11 12 9 43 16 21 14 6 57 14 11 20 13 58 24 1B 16 22 80 13 21 20 22 76 25 26 19 34 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 15 18 24 76 18 17 19 21 75 7 123 0 1 363 9 118 0 3 383' 11 162 0 6 440 5 152 0 4 428 32 555 0 14 1614 7 137 0 7 493 5 140 0 3 423 8 128 0 4 415 17 140 0 10 461 37 545 0 24 1792 17:00 22 72 17:15 19 22 17:30 5 19 17:45 5 14 Hr Total 51 127 0 0 0 0 0" 0 0 0 0 0 19 7 16 8 50 39 17 20 12 88 10 9 2 8 29 3 7 5 6 21 172 173 204 177 726 0 0 0 0 0 19 31 21 15 86 21 29 17 25 92 11 12 15 1B 56 0 0 0 0 0 28 32 31 34 125 9 11 8 8 36 141 136 152 155 584 O 3 462 O 1 471 O 2 499 O 3 1 473 O 9 1905 199 0 33 17 29 0 22 1 14 143 0 1 1 593 209 0 24 21 35 0 37 12 162 0 2 567 237 0 21 25 22 0 27 1 8 153 0 1 543 211 0 12 17 15 0 19 ( 4 156 0 1 1 472 856 0 90 80 101 0 104 1 38 614 0 5 1 2175 *3'OTAL* 144 512 0 324 187 3646 0 406 1 439 490 0 507 ( 267 3352 O 113 10387 NORTH P OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: NORA NAVARRO SIGNALIZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272 -3255 FAX (561) 272 -4381 ALL VEHICLES Site Code : 00060251 Start Date: 10/26/06 File I.D. : NPARKSAV Page : 2 Date Peak Peak 5TH AVENUE From North Right 10/26/06 1NORTH PARK STREET From East 5TH AVENUE From South (NORTH PARK STREET From West Thru UTurn Left 1 Right Thru UTurn Left Right Thru UTurn Left 1 Right Thru UTurn Left Total Intersection for the Period: 07:00 t 09:00 on 10/26/06 07 :30 Percent 111 631 01 261 1 81 771 Pk total 124 1 571 Highest 08:15 1 07:45 Volume 5 21 0 9 1 22 125 0 36 Hi total 35 I 183 PHF VW MINI% ilo5TH AVENUE • 14 78 32 45 184 96 43 ,y; ;a:,1'q — 1 308 01 161 341 245 08:00 34 35 82 391 01 NORTH PARK STREET 65 439 14 518 271 0 13 • ALL VEHICLES 1,235 Intersection Total 07 :30 121 811 674 07:45 21 164 0 8 193 01 71 664 32 548 84 NORTH PARK STREET NORTH PARK STREET 6 FIFTH AVENUE OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: NORA NAVARRO SIGNALIZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272 -3255 FAX (561) 272 -4381 ALL VEHICLES Site Code 00060251 Start Date: 10/26/06 File I.D. : NPARK5AV Page : 3 5TH AVENUE From North Right Thru UTurn Date 10/26/06 Peak Hour Analysis By Peak start 12:00 Volume 23 106 Percent 121 561 Pk total 190 Highest 12:00 Volume 9 46 Hi total 83 PHF .57 NORTH PARR STREET , 15TH AVENUE From East From South 1 Left 1 Right Thru UTurn Left 1 Right Thru UTUrn 'NORTH PARR STREET From West Left 1 Right Thru UTurn Left Total Entire Intersection for 12:00 O 61 43 01 324 64 737 12:00 O 28 11 165 the Period: 637 0 864 01 192 .96 • 0 23 0 23 I NORTH PARK STREET 75 637 735 23 • 24 24 545 11:00 to 57 81 0 16 13:00 on 1D/26/06 12:00 80 104 311 404 04 259 12:45 22 34 0 77 .84 5TH AVENUE 106 106 190 0 75 61 1 545 606 37 37 J 61 361 ALL VEHICLES 24 104 43 171 294 21 1,341 1,423 Intersection Total 1,792 1 57 106 37 200 459 75 5TH AVENUE 75 12:00 37 545 0 24 61 901 01 41 606 12:45 17 140 0 10 167 .91 0 0 737 i 43 43 637 637 57 57 686 61 545 80 NORTH PARK STREET 0 TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. NORTH PARK STRAIIIWOOMMSWamis 624 GARDENIA TERRACE OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 COUNTED BY: NORA NAVARRO (561) 272 -3255 FAX (561) 272 -4381 SIGNALIZED ALL VEHICLES Site Code 00060251 Start Date: 10/26/06 File I.D. : NPARK5AV Page : 4 5TH AVENUE From North NORTH PARK STREET From East Right Thru UTurn Left 1 Right Thru trrurn Date 10/26/06 Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 to 18:00 on 10/26/06 16:45 1. 4 Peak Hour Peak star Volume Percent Pk total Highest Volume Hi total PHF 5TH AVENUE From South 1NORTH PARK STREET From west Left Right Thru UTurn Left Right Thru UTUrn Left Total 265 17:00 22 72 0 39 NORTH PARK STREET 119 822 49 990 7 21 88* 01 101 938 17:30 5 237 0 21 284 333 03 381 311 17 :15 21 35 0 37 49 132 • 84 7 104 23 134 61 662 17:15 12 162 0 2 1,652 ALL VEHICLES 1,723 Intersection Total 785 84 613 88 NORTH PARK STREET 0 93 132 42 267 5TH AVENUE 0 0 Exhibit J - Legal Descriptions [4107 - 70848. W PD] Prepared by and return to: Jonathan Bloom President Reliable Title Services, Inc. 2295 NW Corporate Blvd. Suite 117 Boca Raton, FL 33431 File Number: Altobello-Rio2 Will Call No.: [Space Above This Line For Recording Data] FILE NUM 2006002,600 OR BP; 00590 PG 084 SHARON ROBERTSON, CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FL RECORDED 02/03/2006 02:36:11 PM RECORDING FEES 27.00 DEED DOC 0.70 RECORDED BY R Parrish Corrective Warranty Deed to correct Scribner error in legal description This Warranty Deed made this . �Y y of ‘ • •40,14 2001.c between Frank Altobello, Individually as a married man and as trustee of the Frank Altobello C r aritable Remainder Trust III, dated April 16, 2003, as to a 2/3 Interest, and Mildred Frances Altobello as to a 1/3 Interest. whose post office address is PO Box 417, Okeechobee, FL 34973, grantor, and 15th Street Hob a Florida limited liability company whose post office address is 701 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1740, Miam'. 33 , grantee: (Whenever used herein the terms "grantor' an .tee��de all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corpo d trustees) Witnesseth, that said grantor, for and in - of the sum of TEN AND NO /100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to said grantor - s . . aid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the srytd y . � tee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Okeechobee Cou t. ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 21 O 7 SOUTH, RANGE 35 EAST, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING to KS 248 AND 249, AND SOUTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, "FIRST ADDITION TO OKEECHOBEE FLORIDA ", AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 6, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS; SOUTH OF SW 9T11 STREET; NORTH O1! SW 15TH STREET; AND EAST OF BLOCK 202, AND SOUTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, "OKEECHOBEE" AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS; AND EAST OF SW 10TH AVENUE, WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA. LESS AND EXCEPT FROM THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF HOPKINS MEANDER LINE AND THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 35 EAST, AND RUN NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID HOPKINS MEANDER LINE 28.6 FEET FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE EAST PARALLELING SAID SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 21, AFORESAID 56.6 FEET; THEN NORTH 175 FEET; THENCE WEST 240 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 175 FEET; THENCE EAST 183.4 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID LAND LYING IN AND COMPRISING A PART OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 3 AND 5 OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 35 EAST. ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT FROM THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL: A 30' WIDE STRIP OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 351, PAGE 618, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS. SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 49.03 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. OR Bk 00590 PG 0846 Parcel Identification Number: 2- 21- 37- 35-0A00- 00006 -B0000 Note: The property being transferred is not the homestead property of the Grantor. Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2005. In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, se led and delivered i our presence: Name:Stihall GUiilia (Lei Tam A9 �` F Altobello, Trustee and Individually 1 J�YKMl l 1TV`t I �fN rv-"- (Seal) itness Name: Mildred Frances Altobello Witness State of Florida County of Okeechobee The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 013day of December, 2005 by Mildred Frances Altobello, who X] is personally known or [ ] has produced a driver's license as identi , : ion. /.L.[.Gl [Notary Seal] fir" %�Gybs SUSAN WILLIAMS ,• . 4 MY COMMISSION It DD 1344481 2..-4,....:- bf EXPIRES: November 16, 2006 itf„G0 eondW TMi Nowt' Public UndwWs • Mary Public Printed Name: SUS [X V) PIA )11 0,144-5 My Commission Expires: sa V /L, 2006, OR BK 001590 PG 0$4.7 State of Florida County of Okeechobee The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this P3 tdday of December, 2005 by Frank Altobello, Individually and as Trustee, as trustee of the Frank Altobello Charitable Remainder Trust III, dated April 16, 2003, who tiC1 is personally known or [ ] has produced a driver's license as identification. [Notary Seal] Notary Public Printed Name: s��a� ZdiAO ',RS My Commission Expires: Exhibit M - Owner's Authorization [4107 - 70848. W PD] 15th Street Homes LLC 701 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1740 Miami, FL 33131 August 1, 2007 Brian Whitehall, Administrator City of Okeechobee 55 S.E. 3`d Avenue Okeechobee, FL 34974 RE: The Lakehouse - Okeechobee, Florida Dear Mr. Whitehall: Please be advised that I am the manager for 15th Street Homes, LLC, which is the fee title holder ofthe parcel sought to be developed as The Lakehouse in the City of Okeechobee. My intention is to develop the property as a project containing only single family residential opportunities. This letter constitutes the owner's acknowledgment and authorization of the request to re -zone to accommodate The Lakehouse planned unit development. I also confirm Jose Rasco's authority to act on behalf of the company and to serve as the applicant for any and all petitions required to obtain the necessary governmental approvals for this project. Sincerely, 15`) STREET HOMES LLC lle, Manager STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF /1/ /4 04444 - RAL., Sworn to and subscribed before me this I 41 day of August, 2007, by JUAN D. CALLE, who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification. NOTARYLIC, STATE OF FLORIDA — — — — — My Commission Expires: ( 4" ,•• ; REJOICE BOETiUS i,,* `= Notary Public - Slate of Florida g. ''7 .04 Commission Expires Mar 29. 2009 Commission • DD 412351 ' •"�';�' Bonded li Netlonsl Notary Assn. 4 [4107 - 70825. W PD] Exhibit K - Ownership & Property Appraiser's Summary [4107 - 70848. WPD] AUG. 1.2007 9:30AM CASSELS & McCALL 863- 763-1031 Property Appraiser's Office Information Request Form for the City of Okeechobee NO. 3506 Property OwnerNarne: 15th St_ remit Homes, LLC /Montebello 13, LLC, Joint Venture Parcel ldentificatiOfl Number: S ee attached Contact Person Name: John D. Cassels, Jr., Attorne for owners - Contact Person Phone Number:_ 863/763 -3131 Requested items needed by: August 20, 2007 Project Type: (Circle One) Rezoning Items Needed: Location Map 100' surrounding property from the outermost portion of subject property Surrounding Property Owners 300' from the outermost portion of subject property Variance Items Needed: Location Map 100' surrounding property from outermost portion of subject property Surrounding Property Owners 300' from the outermost portion of subject property Special Exception Items Needed: Location Map 100' surrounding property from the outermost portion of subject property Surrounding Property Owners 300' from the outermost portion of subject property Future Land Use Map Amendment Items Needed: Location Map 100' surrounding property from the outermost portion of subject property Information is provided by the Okeechobee Property Appraisers Office. deliver this request form or fax it to the following attention: Walt Taylor Okeechobee County Property Appraisers Office 307 NW 56 Avenue Phone: (863) 763 -4422 Fax.: (863) 7634745 You may hand JUL. 31.2007 3:10PM CASSELS & McCALL 863- 763 -1031 Property Appraiser's Office Information Request Form for the City of Okeechobee NO.3486 P. 1 PropertyOwnerNarne: 15th Street Homes LLC /Montebel10 13, LLC, Joint Venture Parcel IdentificationNumber: See attached ContactPersonName: John D. Cassels Jr., Attorney for owners Contact Person Phone Number: 863/763-3131 Requested items needed by: August 20, 2007 Project Type: (Circle One) Rezoning Items Needed: Location Map 100' surrounding property from the outermost portion of subject property Surrounding Property Owners 300' from the outermost portion of subject property Variance Items Needed: Location Map 100' surrounding property from outermost portion of subject property Surrounding Property Owners 300' from the outermost portion of subject property Special Exception Items Needed: Location Map 100' surrounding property from the outermost portion of subject property Surrounding Property Owners 300' from the outermost portion of subject property Future Land Use Map Amendment Items Needed: Location Map 100' surrounding property from the outermost portion of subject property Information is provided by the Okeechobee Property Appraisers Office. deliver this request form or fax it to the following attention: Walt Taylor Okeechobee County Property Appraisers Office 307 NW 5th Avenue Phone: (863)763 -4422 Fax: (863) 763 -4745 You may hand AUG. 1.2007 9:30AM CASSELS & McCALL 863 - 763 -1031 NO.3506 P. 2 Parcel identification, Numbers for 15`h Street Homes, LLC and Montebello 13, LLC 12- 21- 37- 35 -0A00- 00006 -A000 —I 2-21-37-35-0A00-00006-B000 2-21-37-35-0A00-00027-0000 2-21-37-35-0A00-00027-A000 2-21-37-35-0A00-00027-B000 2- 21- 37- 35 -0A00- 00028 -A000 2-21-37-35-0A00-00028-0000 ¶!I!VJACS0E n 42 PROJECT LOCATION v ORLANDO \� OKEECHOBEE 4 WA FORT PIERCE . LPALM CITY ZA� WEST PALM BEACH LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE © 2006 PERMIT DRAWINGS FOR. THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 37S, RANGE 35E OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA FORT MYERS .1r KEY WEST MIAMI �- ' I J_.' 11 I_1 I J. i i La -_LL_i H— r L7 11111 JUT l 11 i Il': 1� ;1 ��T�i; 1=11 —1 il 171 i 1 A— 1 IT1 '9_ 4_1 t. !I sill -I I 1 -' 1_LI j_L CL� 1 E 1% R I �r,r L—.7•L • !!iuu• 7 1 ; i L31 _1_113! • —r; 1 1, J IL_ 11 _! 1 1 r![� 11! _1 [IL; 1 I T. t L' L1 _^ r CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, INC. Value By Design" 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fax: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 www.lbfh.com VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE SHEET INDEX SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE /DESCRIPTION C K -1 RW -1 PD -01 — PD -04 WS -01 — WS -04 PRF -1 — PRF -12 D -1 — D -7 U -1 — U-2 SP -1 COVER SHEET KEY SHEET ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION SHEET PAVING, GRADING, & DRAINAGE PLAN SHEETS WATER & SEWER PLAN SHEETS PLAN & PROFILE SHEETS PAVING, GRADING, & DRAINAGE DETAIL SHEETS UTILITIES DETAIL SHEETS SPECIFICATIONS & SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS Date 1 21201200E Scale Design By noon Drown By. RR Check By. rnrn 4 N H • CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG IN FLORIDA 1- 800 - 432 -4770 IT'S THE LAW! SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA, INC. © 2007 LBFH Inc i `DATE BY REVISIONS Date 8/15/2007 Scale N.T.S. Design By UM Drawn By. RR Check By- MM VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 1 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY 12E hC. A Boyle Engineering Company 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fax: (863) 763 -6692 BPR do FBPE License No: 959 www.lbfh.com CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, Valve By Design" THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE PROJECT KEY SHEET LBFN PROJECT N. 05 -026.0 SHEET K -1 N. 6 LEGEND EXISTING DITCH TO BE FILLED - WETLAND WETLAND BUFFER IMPACTED WETLANDS WETLAND BUFFER LINE PROPOSED TOE OF SLOPE PROPOSED TOP OF BANK PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED PAVEMENT 1. SLOPE DIRECTION 61 PROPOSED DRAINAGE 8 STRUCTURE NUMBER OPROPOSED DRAINAGE PIPE NUMBER ,p'° EXISTING GRADE •24.0' PROPOSED GRADE -SF- PROPOSED SILT FENCE O CO ct 0 I W U -J ;Zz V) N SO CC Z W1-G O 2FFe- V. ' ~NO CO ES NwW 7 O EZ� J O 0 O U r 0 2 --- ,b„_— _— _— _ —_ _.._ ter. CC ol!u= :p- OW- -- o!u- -- OHO- -- w- - onu- - - oHU- - - OW- - - r� r- Cr u7 Z 0 N CI . Z WJ all 1, .,„panwregagmmommemsaminnuommmnsommanimemormsam"„„,,,,_rsa till WiMaRigiNEMMIMFgafT-IdegiBESMIMENAMMININIZOMINO. CC CC W N v 41 a' Z Z W a Waa0.y_ I. UN e� 00 y y NN: 0 U 0 2 W Z O O 0 LI O Z O a. U 3 3 FM n F e4 N Z N I o 0 Z cri MATCHLINE SHEET PD -02 w rya -� wr u c - COO L/91/8 :WO - oua !w••na Pellold - l0 N -U.0 '•wo noRO] 6WOd_A O WLO- SO \•,eld RI!O \,M1!•p \oazo -soVd •won e•!.o,Q CO ■ 1 801181DARRYo ELEV. 26.5' II I I Iwo__- (wo - -�w0 3Y{ -�� �n �ua..+- lia lR era -nuo -(00 -.0 z 1 • S.W -IDih AVENUE MIN. BOUNDARY ELEV. 26.5' CURB INLET (TYP.) L6 =26.5' TRANSITION M IFlED CURB INTO VALLEY CURB OVER 2.5' MIN. - 5.0' M SEE DETAIL HP =27.3' TRANSITION DIFIED °E° CURB INTO [VVALLEY CURB OVER 2.5' MIN I- 5.0' MAX. SEE DETAIL I R15.0' H =26.3 3 -WAY CURB TRANSITION SEE DETAIL (TYP.)i I1 TRANSITION MODIFIED CURB INTO IV LLEY CURB OVER 2.5' MIf4.1- 5.0' MAX. SEE DETAIL C0N3T. PRESEt �•�,/ AREA SIGN PER DETAIL (TYP.) CONST. FENCE PER DETAIL HP =27.1' e R15.0' R15.0' III ®Ii ��_ ■ +ia 1 +00 11, k 643 jrIJ TP =25.8' �•-0 -� 615.0' MINIMUM \ FINISHED FLOOR �\ EL =28.0' (TYP.) 1.6 =26.0' TRANSITION MODIFIED -E° CURB INTO VALLEY CURB OVER 2.5 MIN. - 5.0' MAX. SEE DETAIL MINIMUM FINISHED FLOOR EL. =28.0' (TYP.) E1.Irysix_ UPLAND PRESERVE 2.04 ACRES � I MIN. BOUNDARY ELEV. 26.5' HP =26.5' 1- -. - -. WETLAND 3 0.97_ ACRES TRANSITION TYPE •A CURB INTO MODIFIED °E CURB OVER 2.5' MIN. - 5.0' MAX. SE 24. 1 TRANSITION MODIFIED CURB INTO VALLEY CURB OVER 2.5 MIN. - 5.0' MAX. SEE DETAIL CONST. 100' LLF OF 7f SPREADER SWALE PER DETAIL `LP =26.0' R15.0' R15.6' 10' RIGHT -OF -WAY i DEDICATION 3-WAY CURB TRANSITION L- SEE DETAIL ( .) TP 25.8' R15.0' CONST. 142LF OF 24° CAP INV.= 20.6' LP =26.0' I!I w �I 111M®® ®11 ® is 1 e 7 R4.3'-' 12 +00 , 1 111 1' 4s� _ __ ®r ft &WOMEN'S= II lallinawinmatitnmalir 1 1215.0' 615.0' +M1 HP=26.6' 0■L. ®, •© 1215.0' ® 1215.0' 4101 A� ark ice_® All 'Mr '1011 kiNssonatingeme%ss 1215.0' - i oo. 615.0' TRANSITION TYPE •A° CUR AMMENITY AREA 100•. PRIMARY PROTECTION _.ZONE. -. LP =26.0' I 1I © 2007 LBFH Inc_ TRANSITION - MODIFIED - E" CURB INTO VALLEY CURB NOTE ALL ELEVATIONS PROVIDED ARE IN NGVD. VATCHLINeSHEET PD -03 ;. SCALE: 1- - 40' LEGEND EXISTING DITCH TO BE FILLED WETLAND WETLAND BUFFER IMPACTED WETLANDS WETLAND BUFFER UNE PROPOSED TOE OF SLOPE PROPOSED TOP OF BANK PROPERTY UNE PROPOSED PAVEMENT Alk SLOPE DIRECTION 0, PROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURE NUMBER ® PROPOSED DRAINAGE PIPE NUMBER ,,`P EXISTING GRADE 24.0' PROPOSED GRADE -SF- PROPOSED SILT FENCE SHEET KEY D 02 0.03._ f6 CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG IN FLORIDA 1- 800 - 432 -4770 IT'S THE LAWI SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA, INC. DATE BY REVISIONS ! Date- Seek' Design By Drawn By Check By- 8/15/2C07 y 0 8/15/200] RR NVN 1 f VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 1 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY l IL( hep A Boyle Engineering Company 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fax: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No 959 www.lbfh.com CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS. SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, Value By Design" THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE PAVING, GRADING, & DRAINAGE PLANS LBFH PROJECT No: 05 -0260 SHEET PD -02 +0 126 TRANSITION_MODIFIED- CURB INTO VALLEY CURB OVER 2.5' MIN. - 5.0' MAX. E DETAIL R15.0' R15.0' TRANSITION TYPE 'A' CUR INTO MODIFIED 'E° CURB ( OVER 2.5' MIN. - 5.0' MA', SEE - DETAIL MATCHLINE SHEET PD -02 MIN. BOUNDARY ELEV. 26.5' LP =26.0' CONST. 148LF OF 24' CAP INV.= 20.8' POND 3 8.1 ACRES CONTROL EL. =23.5' CONST. 1OOLF OF SPREADER SWALE PER DETAIL IIP'.' I • o i T HP =263' R �^r0, Wj�i • �� t4' ee E g ets R4 3 -- IME -- EXISTING CULVERT TO BE REMOVED TRANSITION MODIFIED CURB INTO VALLEY CURB OVER 2.5' MIN. - 5.0' MAX. SEE DETAIL 13 / 24 TP =25.8' MINIMUM FINISHED FLOOR EL =28.0' (TYP.) R15.0' HP =26.4' I-P =2 R15.0' 15.0' ALP =26.1' HP =26.4' TRANSITION MODIFIED 'E° CURB INTO VALLEY CURB OVER 2.5' MIN. - 5.0' MAX: SEE DETAIL TRANSITION MODI-0ED 'E" CURB INTO VALLEY; CURB OVER 2.5' MIN. 1- .0' MAX. SEE DETAIL 3 -WAY �URB TRANSITION SEE DETAIL I (TYP.) MINIMUM - FINISHED FLOOR EL =28.0' (TYP.) i 22.0' - EXISTING CULVERTS TO BE REMOVED 4 -HP =27.0' UPLAND: PRESERVE. '.0.35 ACRES 24.5' CONST. 4OLF OF 18° PVC MIN. BOUNDARY ELEV. 26.5' LP =26.1' EXISTING CULVERT TO BF REMOVI_0 MIN. BOUNDARY ELEV. 26.5' HP =26.5' - MIN. BOUNDARY ELEV. 26.5' I � MI _ -- 1111 IIII 1111 u11 2007 LBFH Inc. JC o sr ST � ° - - - 22.0' BYPASS SWALE FOR OFFSITE FLOW S.W. 7th AVENUE - REMOVE 21LF OF EXISTING CMP / 2-20-07 RR WETLAND BUFFER AREA NAPACI AND ADDRIONAL PUFFER PROVIDED `DATE BY REVISIONS J Dote e/15/2007 Scolr Design By Drown By Check By MM MM RR I / VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY 0 J 0 A Bo ?. yl a Engineering Company CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, Value Ey Design" 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fax: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 www.lbfh.com MIN. BOUNDARY ELEV. 26.5' BYPASS SWALE FOR OFFSITE FLOW • - sr CONST. PRESERVE AREA SIGN PER DETAIL (TYP.) NOTE ALL ELEVATIONS PROVIDED ARE IN NGVD. r I 0 SCALE: 1' = 40' LEGEND EXISTING DITCH TO BE FILLED WETLAND I WETLAND BUFFER IMPACTED WETLANDS WETLAND BUFFER LINE - -- PROPOSED TOE OF SLOPE PROPOSED TOP OF BANK PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED PAVEMENT SLOPE DIRECTION PROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURE NUMBER PROPOSED DRAINAGE PIPE NUMBER EXISTING GRADE A24.0' PROPOSED GRADE -sF- PROPOSED SILT FENCE SHEET KEY 411402 ) CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG IN FLORIDA 1- 800 - 432 -4770 IT'S THE LAW! SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA, INC. THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE PAVING, GRADING, & DRAINAGE PLANS 11 LBFN PROJECT No: 05 -0260 SHEET PD -03 1 OVER MA1 411 NE SEE IL SERVE PER -) STING DITCH BE FILLED t CONST. FENCE - PER DETAIL =26.8' R15"0' ® V m 23 +00 �� LP=26.6' o ��� t R15.0' 25 00 TP =27.5' R15.0'ink R15.0' R15.0' OVER 2.5' IN. - 5.0' MAX SEE DETAI R150' W VCR 1.3 MIIV. - 3.3 MP.A.I SEE DETAIL 31 2220_ (; LP =27.6' HP =28.0' CONST. 268LF OF 24° CAP BUFFER INV.= 20.9' (0.39 AC) TR NSITION MODIFIED "E' C R8 INTO VALLEY CURB 0 R 2.5' MIN. - 5.0' MAX. SEE DETAIL BUFFER AREA TO BE GRADED TOWARDS WETLAND r II II LP =27.8' LP =26.6' LP =27.1' ;UPLA■D PRESERVE °O.18 ACRES MINIMUM FINISHED FLOOR \ EL. =28.0' (TYP.) 3 -WAY CURB TRANSITION SEE DETAIL (TYP.) TRANSITION MODIFIED "E' CURB INTO VALLEY CURB OVER 2.5' MIN. - 5.0' MAX. SEE DETAIL MINIMUM FINISHED FLOOR EL. =28.0' (TYP.) LP =26.9' R25.0' HP =27. R?4 R15.0' R15.0' R5.0 =27.4' ,1111111MEAM 01F Aga ®® ®mom '7' ® ®11_WIWV®,s 67 +p ter* 66+00 s ae R15.0 R10.0' TP =27.9' HP =28. led b Runell Ryan 3 s 8 WETLAND 4 SECONDARY IMPACT 0.0289 ACRES R! BOUNDARY ELEV. 26.5' TRANSITION MODIFIED 'E" CURB INTO VALLEY CURB OVER 2.5' MIN. - 5.0' MAX. SEE DETAIL CONST. PRESERVE AREA SIGN PER DETAIL (TYP.) 2007 LBFH Inc. WETLAND 4 TO BE IMPACTED 0.0006 ACRES BYPASS SWALE FOR OFFSITE FLOW 0 MIN. BOUNDARY ELEV. 28.0' R34.3' _ IF TRANSITION MODIFIED 'E" CURB INTO VALLEY CURB OVER 2.5' MIN. - 5.0' MAX.' SEE DETAIL • MIN. BOUNDARY ELEV. 29.0' CONNECT TO EXISTING SWALE ALONG SW 9TH STREET AT ELEV - 27.0' NGVD. 1 S.W. 7th AVENUE 0 0 NOTE ALL ELEVATIONS PROVIDED ARE IN NGVD. SCALE: 1° - 40' LEGEND EXISTING DITCH TO BE FILLED WETLAND WETLAND BUFFER IMPACTED WETLANDS WETLAND BUFFER LINE --- --- PROPOSED TOE OF SLOPE PROPOSED TOP OF BANK PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED PAVEMENT I. SLOPE DIRECTION 61 PROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURE NUMBER ®PROPOSED DRAINAGE PIPE NUMBER EXISTING GRADE 824.0' PROPOSED GRADE -sr- PROPOSED SILT FENCE SHEET KEY € E).(12 I P. V"ri 4• CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG IN FLORIDA 1- 800 - 432 -4770 IT'S THE LAWI SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA, INC. Date' 0/15/2f107 Scale. r Design By MM Drawn By RR Check By MM • VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 1 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY l !3E hC. A Boyle Engineering Company 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fax: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 www.lbfh.com CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, Value By Design" THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE PAVING, GRADING, & DRAINAGE PLANS LBFH PROJECT No: 05 -0260 SHEET PD -04 1 2 -23-07 RR WETLAND BUFFER AREA IMPACT AND ADDITIONAL BUFFER PROVIDED `DATE BY REVISIONS • Date' 0/15/2f107 Scale. r Design By MM Drawn By RR Check By MM • VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 1 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY l !3E hC. A Boyle Engineering Company 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fax: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 www.lbfh.com CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, Value By Design" THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE PAVING, GRADING, & DRAINAGE PLANS LBFH PROJECT No: 05 -0260 SHEET PD -04 CONST. STOP SIGN & BAR W/ 4OLF OF 4 -INCH DOUBLE YELLOW(TYP.) CONST. SPEED L1 SIGN 15 MPH (T CONST. 4 -WAY STOP SIGN & BAR W/ 40 FT OF 4 -INCH DOUBLE YELLOW (TYP.) 1 CONST. NO OUTLET SIGN (TYP.) CONST. STOP pIGN & /BAR W/ 40L- OF 4 -INCH DOUBLE YELLOW(TYP.) CONST. STOP SIGN_ TKW W/ 4OLF OF OUBLE YELLOW(T1 CONST. SPEED UMFE. SIGN 15 MPH (TYP.)' & -INCH CONST. STOP `�N & BAR W/ 4OLF OF 4 -INCH DOUBLE YELLO11(TYP.) CONST. 4 -WAY STOP \ SIGN & BAR W/ 40 FT '. CONST. STOP SIGN AND BAR r i LCONST. SPEED LIMIT SIGN 15 MPH (TYP.) © 2007 LBFH Inc. `DATE BY 3x3 MONUMENT CONST. STOP SIGN & BAR W/ 40LF OF 4 -INCH. DOUBLE YELLOW(TYP.) CONST. SPEED UMIT_ SIGN 15 MPH (711.; CONST. STOP SIGN & BAR W/ 4OLF OF 4 -INCH DOUBLE YELLOW(TYP.) CONST. SPEED UMIT SIGN 15 MPH (TYP.) CONST. STOP SIGN & BAR W/ 4OLF OF 4 -INCH DOUBLE YELLOW(TYP.) OF 4 -INCH DOUBLE WTH 40 FT OF 4 -INCH YELLOW (TYP.) \ OF YELLOW(TYP.) - CONST. NO OUTLET SIGN (TYP.) N 0, REVISIONS Date: 12/20/2006 Scale- 1' ■1SC1' Design By MM Drorn By. RR Check By MM CONST. STOP SIGN & BAR W/ 4OLF OF 4 -IN DOUBLE YELLOW(TYP.)_ Cl -`, CONST. STOP. SIGN 7& BAR W/ 4OLF (yF 4 -INCH DOUBLE YELLOW (TYP.) -t/Y m FI it CONST. STOP SIGN & BAR W 4OLF OF "-4 -INCH DOUBLE YELLOW (TYP.) CO ST. SPEED UMIT SIGN 15 MPH (TYP.) m u V CONST. STOP SIGN & BAR W/ 4OLF OF 4 -INCH DOUBLE YELLOW(TYP.) CONST. STOP SIGN & I- BAR W/ 4OLF OF 4 -INCH DOUBLE YELLOW(TYP.) L CONST. STO9�j SIGN & BAR W/ 40LF OF 4 -INCH DOUBLE YELLIrrCW(TYP.) BEGIN STATION 10+00 VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 1 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY CONST. YEILD SIGN br -INC. A Boyle Engineering Company CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, Value By Design" 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, F! 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fox: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 www.lbfh.com CONST. STOP SIGN & BAR W/ 4OLF OF 4 -INCH DOUBLE YELLOW(TYP.) CONST. STOP $I( BAR W/ 4OLF F DOUBLE YELLOYV( CONST. ST4 I SIGN & BAR W/ 401E OF 4 -INCH DOUBLE YEtLOW(TYP.) CONST. STOP SIGI1 & •BAR W/ 4OLF OF 4 -INCH DOUBLE YELLOW(TYP.) �4n IRON ROD INJ 1" IRON PIPE LINE L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 17 L8 L9 L10 L11 L12 113 L14 L15 Lib L17 L18 L19 L20 L21 L22 L23 L24 L25 L26 L27 L28 L29 CURVE C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C17 C18 C19 C20 C21 C22 UNE TABLE BEARING S0013'00 °E S0013'00 "E SOO-13'00 "E S00'13'00 °E S0013'00 °E N29•00'26 "W N0013'00 °W N89'4700 °E N89'47'00 °E S0013'00 °E S29'44'20 °W N5112'56 °W NOOl3'00 "W N89'47'00 °E SOO-13'00 °E 589'47'00 °W S00'25'14 °E N89'36'23 "E 589'47'00 °W N89'47'00 °E S00'23'37 °E N89'36'23 °E N89'36'23 °E N45'50'05 °E S00'23'37E S46'37.19 °E N89'36'23 °E N89•36'23 °E S00'23'37°E CURVE TABLE RADIUS 24.4' 18.0' 15.0' 24.4' 125.0' 24.7' 24.7' 59.7' 618.0' 325.0' 325.0' 618.0' 75.0' 60.0' 618.0' 325.0' 325.0' 618.0' 112.5' 24.4' 24.4' 112.5' LENGTH 574.22' 148.00' 330.09' 148.00' 296.73' 18.21' 105.33' 453.07' 502.50' 108.33' 18.20' 11.76' 386.19' 940.23' 332.25' 99.35' 633.16' 151.94' 311.57' 357.00' 356.71' 76.00' 295.55' 16.47' 305.27' 16.47' 295.55' 282.89' 321.46' - DELTA ANGLE 28'47'26" 90'00'00" 90'00'05° 29'57'21° 50'59'56° 90'00'00° 90'00'00° 125'46'08" 26'00'32° 9'45'36° 9'45'36° 45'05'24° 35'21'14° 34'51'36° 40'05'12° 15'01'34° 15'01'34° 25'59'44° 35'33'28° 43'46'18° 43'46'18° 35'18'11° LENGTH 12.27 28.27' 23.56' 12.77' 111.26' 38.75' 38.75' 130.97' 280.55' 55.36' 55.36' 486.37' 46.28' 36.51' 432.40' 85.23' 85.23' 280.40' 69.82' 18.65' 18.65' 69.32' CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG IN FLORIDA 1- 800 - 432 -4770 IT'S THE LAW! SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA, INC. l THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION SHEET LBFH PROJECT No: 05 -0260 SHEET RW -1 1 CONST. 228±LF OF 6" PVC FORCEMAIN FROM UFT STATION TO EXISTING FORCEMAIN 11E -IN. SEE FORCEMIAN 11E -IN DETAIL SHEET D -5. $TA: 50+41.4 25.31 - CONST. UFT STATION PER DETAIL SHEET U- CONTRACTOR TO FIELD LOCA EXISTING LINE AND COORDIN W/ OUA FOR WATER UNE REMOV L AND INSTALLATION ALONG 9TH S EET CONST. 181±LF OF 'PVC WATERMAIN FROM E STING HYDRANT TO 90' 8 D i • I I� CONST. 6" 90' BEND (TYP.) 53t00 ___ -- 54+00 55+00 31 +00 STA:50+34.8, 25.6' R 1- 6" 45' BEND / MINIMUM FINISHED FLOOR EL. =28.0' (TYP.) \�. CONST. SINGLE SEWER tSERVICE PER DETAIL TYP:) CONST. DOUBLE WATER SERVICE PER DETAIL (TYP.) STA: 55 +48.7. 4,4'L 1- 6" 90' BEND STA: 55 +48.7. 16 3' L CONSTRUCT BLOW -OFF ASSEMBLY PER DETAIL r bio CONST. 61+LF OF 6" PVC WATERM AIN FROM 90' BEND TO 90' BEND 'mot /- CONST. 207±LF OF 6° PVC WATERMAIN FROM FIRE HYDRANT TO 45' ,1i° BEND MINIMUM FINISHED FLOOR EL =28.0' (TYP.) CONST. DOUBLE WATER SERVICE PER DETAIL (TYP CONST. 442±LF OF 6" PVC WATERMAIN FROM 6" CROSS TO BLOW -OFF ASSEMBLY CONST. 475±LF OF 6" PVC WATERMAIN FROM 90' BEND TO 6" TEE / \‘`. . `- i C. 5T. DOUBLE WATER SERVICE PER DETAIL (TYP.) \ CONST. 121±LF OF 6" PVC WATERMAIN FROM 22.5' BEND TO FIRE HYDRANT CONST. DOUBLE WATER SERVICE PER DETAIL (TYP CO ST. SINGLE WATER SER CE IPER DETAIL (TYP.) CONST. 14 PVC WATE' 6° TEE TO ±LF OF 6° MAIN FROM 22.5' BEND 0 ( ! GOVT. SINGLE #ATER SERVICE PER DETAIL!. (TYP.) CONST. 287±LFi DF! 6" IIPVq WATERMAIN FF20M 16" GROSS TO 6" TIEE ICONST. DOUBLE WATER !SERVICE PER DETAIL (TYP.) 278±LF OF 6" TERMAIN FROM TO 6" CROSS 5TA: 36 +01.2 134 6' L 1 -6 "TEE 2- 6" GATE VALVE 11 +00:M_ 0 IO co .a� WETLAND 2 0.51 ACRES T. SINGLE MIA-ER CE PER DETAL (TYP.) CONST. SINGLE WATER SERVICE PER DETAIL (TYP.) UPLAND PRESERVE 0.88 ACRES. 1 *LF OF 6° RMAIN FROM 11.25' BEND ® 2007 LBFH Inc. • DATE BY REVISIONS 1 Date. 0/7/17 Scale' B Design By M. Drown By. RR Check By MN VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 1 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY 1 CONST. SINGLE SEWER SERVICE PER DETAIL (TYP.) 21 CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, A Boyle Engineering CoN pany Value By Design" 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, F1 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fax: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 www.lbfh.com SCALE: 1- - 40' NOTE ALL ELEVATIONS PROVIDED ARE IN NGVD. LEGEND EXISTING DITCH TO BE FILLED WETLAND WETLAND BUFFER IMPACTED WETLANDS WETLAND BUFFER LINE - - --- PROPOSED TOE OF SLOPE PROPOSED TOP OF BANK PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED PAVEMENT SLOPE DIRECTION PROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURE NUMBER PROPOSED DRAINAGE PIPE NUMBER EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE —SF— PROPOSED SILT FENCE THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE WATER & SEWER CONSTRUCTION PLANS SHEET KEY WS 02 'y WS -03.S= • vl ". CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG IN FLORIDA 1- 800 - 432 -4770 IT'S THE LAW! SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA, INC. IBM PROJECT No 05 -0260 SHEET WS -01 J6_ STA: 114+01,„4, 98,,a J2 — `00NST D T BLOW –OFF ASSEMBLY PER DETAIL CONST. 79 ±LF OF 6" PVC WATERMAIN FROM 6" TEE i0, BLOW- .ASSEMBLY_ • TA:114+Q1.8. 19.3' R 1 -6 "TEE 3– 6" GATE VALVES CONST. JINGLE WATER • SERVICE 11P ER DETAIL (TYP.J CONSi. 371±LF OF 6" 1 PVC WATERMAIN FROM 45' BrND TO 6" TEE I • CONST. 127 ±LF QQF 6" PVC WATERMAIN NOM 45' BEND TO 6'. CONJT.I 20 ±LF OF 6" I 6 "'EIPV ATERMAIN FROM T TO 45' BEND STA:110 +17.8. 24.3' R 1- 6" 45' BEND JS S.W -30th AVENUE ill STA: 87 +41.4. 22.9' R 1– 6" 45' BEND 86+00 s I 3 ;,. 851-00 s 83+00 e7- NM Y1M Mk_ 14M CONST. 68 ±LF OF 6" PVC WATERMAIN FROM 6" TEE I TO FIRE HYDRANT STA:114+01.8. 4 &7' L CONSTRUCT FIRE HYDRANT & 6" VALVE ASSEMBLY PER DETAIL - CONST. DOUBLE WATER SERVICE PER DETAIL (TYP ) H al �a CONST. DOUBLE WATER SERVICE PER DETAIL (TYP.) MINIMUM CONS FINISHED FLOOR PVC EL. =28.0' (TYP.) 22 5' CONST. SINGLE SEWER SERVICE PER DET ONST. DOUBLE\ SERVICE PER DETAIL TER (TYP MINIMUM \. FINISHED FLOOR \. \ EL =28.0' (TYP.) \ STA:88+63.2. 25.9' R , 1– 6" TEE N 2– 6" GATE VALVES j/ /// - CONST. 47±LF OF 6° PVC WATERMAIN FROM 6° TEE TO 22.5' BEND CONST. 848 ±LF OF 6" PVC WATERMAIN FROM 45' BEND TO 45' BEND CONST. 628 ±LF OF 6° PVC ` WATERMAIN FROM FIRE HYDRANT TO FIRE HYDRANT ji, UPLAND PRESERVE 2.04 ACRES WETLAND 3 0.97 ACRES CONTRACTOR TO FIELD LOCATE 'o EXISTING UNE AND COORDINATE' ro+ WITH OUA FOR 4" WATER UNE REMOVAL AND INSTALLATION �I II ALONG... TH ]1 EL..— il:ai CONST. 58±LF OF 6° PVC WATERMAIN FROM 22.5' BEND TO FIRE HYDRANT CONST. SINGLE WATER /7 SERVICE PER DETAIL (TIP') // // CONST. DOUBLE SEWER SERVICE PER DETAIL (TYP.) CONST. DOUBLE SEWER SERVICE PER DETAIL (TYP. STA;91+57.6, 13.1' R I CONSTRUCT FIRE HYDRANT' & 6" VALVE ASSEMBLY 1 PER DETAIL 1 X121 +00 AMMENITY AREA 100'. PRIMARY PROTECTION -.ZONE NO ACCESS -- -: NOTE ALL ELEVATIONS PROVIDED ARE IN NGVD. • © 2007 LBFH Inc. `DATE BY REVISIONS 1 Date: 8I7/2110? Scale.z Design By. MM Drawn By Check By. RR N. VERIFY SCALE BAR 15 EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 ■ 1 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY MATCHLINE SHEET WS -03 CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, A Boyle Engineering Company Value By Design" 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, FI 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fox: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 www.lbfh.com 1.0 SM 133HS 3NI1HOIVIN LEGEND EXISTING DITCH TO BE FILLED WETLAND WETLAND BUFFER IMPACTED WETLANDS WETLAND BUFFER UNE - -- PROPOSED TOE OF SLOPE PROPOSED TOP OF BANK PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED PAVEMENT SLOPE DIRECTION PROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURE NUMBER PROPOSED DRAINAGE PIPE NUMBER EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE —SF— PROPOSED SILT FENCE CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG IN FLORIDA 1- 800 - 432 -4770 IT'S THE LAWI SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA, INC. THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE WATER & SEWER CONSTRUCTION PLANS 'BEN PROJECT No: 05— 0260 SHEET WS -02 MATCHLINE SHEET WS -02 MIME L_-- — — CONTRACTOR TO FIELD LOCATE EXISTING LINE AND COORDINATE W14-1 OUA FOR 4" WATER LINE 1 i` i REMOVAL AND INSTALLATION `I ALONG T5T I TREET .._.._. I CONST. DOUBLE SEWER SERVICE PER DETAIL (TYP. STA:143 +66.3. 62.6' R CONSTRUCT FIRE HYDRANT & 6" VALVE ASSEMBLY PER DETAIL STA: 93+44.8. 19.5' R CONSTRUCT BLOW —OFF ASSEMBLY PER DETAIL CONST. 60±LF OF 6" PVC WATERMAIN FROM 22.5' BEND;, TO BLOW —OFF ASSEMBLY it CONST. DOUBLE WATER SERVICE PER DETAIL (TYP.) CONST. 86±LF OF 6" PVC WATERMAIN FROM FIRE HYDRANT TO 6° TEE 1 E _ 143 +00 STA:94 +01.6. 23.7' R 1— 6" 22.5' BEND CONST. 233±LF OF 6" PVC WATERMAIN FROM 6" TEE TO 22.5' BEND CONST. DOUBLE WATER 1 SERVICE PER DETAIL (TYP.) MINIMUM ,', FINISHED FLOOR \, \ EL. =28.0' (TYP.) `7 \ i ti POND 3 8.1 ACRES CONTROL EL. =23.5' // MINIMUM FINISHED FLOOR EL. =28.0' (TYP.) SERVICE PER DETAL STA' 143 +66.3. 22.9' L 1— 6" TEE 3— 6" GATE VALVES T 1— 6" TEE ONST. SINGLE WATER SERVICE PER DETAIL (TYP. —CONST. 300±LF PVC WATERMAI• TEE TO 22.5'18 • 6" FROM _ND 6° -- CONST. 265±LF OF 6" PVC WATERMAIN FROM 6" TEE TO BLOW —OFF ASSEMBLY • I CONST. DOUBLE SEWER SERVICE PER DETAIL (TYP. 0 0 STA' 143+66.2 288.3' L CONSTRUCT BLOW —OFF ASSEMBLY PER DETAIL CONST. SINGLE SEWER ;SERVICE PER DETAIL (TYP. I © 2007 LBFH Inc. cr C —� J S W - 7th AVENUE CON T; 53tLF OF 6" PVC WATERMAIN FROM 22 5 BEND TO 6° TEE; CONST. 1y33±LF OF 6" PVC W RMAIN FROM 6 " -- TEE TO FIRE HYDRANT / / MINIMUM f FINISHED FLOOR EL. =28.0' (TYP.) UPLAND PRESERI 0.35 ACRES or TS A. 129 +37 9 288.7 L CONSTRUCT FIRE HYDRANT & 6" VALVE ASSEMBLY PER DETAIL 0 NOTE ALL ELEVATIONS PROVIDED ARE IN NGVD. 0 SCALE: 1° — 40' LEGEND EXISTING DITCH TO BE FILLED WETLAND WETLAND BUFFER IMPACTED WETLANDS WETLAND BUFFER UNE PROPOSED TOE OF SLOPE PROPOSED TOP OF BANK PROPERTY UNE PROPOSED PAVEMENT .J.. SLOPE DIRECTION PROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURE NUMBER PROPOSED DRAINAGE PIPE NUMBER ..i EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE —SF— PROPOSED SILT FENCE CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG IN FLORIDA 1- 800 - 432 -4770 IT'S THE LAW! SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA, INC. 2200] DATE RR WETLAND BUFFER AREA IMPACT AND ADD(I IONAL BUFFER PROVIDE BY REVISIONS i Dete. 8P /2037 Scale - Design By Nor Drown By RR Check By MM VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 1 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY ft( CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, INC_ Value By Design" A Boyle Engineering Company 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fax: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No 959 www.lbfh.com THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE WATER & SEWER CONSTRUCTION PLANS LBFH PROJECT No: 05 -0260 SHEET WS— 03 ar MAC' cjitiNH pHEE (WS -q 1 SINGLE WATER -I. SER GE PER DETAIL (TYP.) 25 00 24 CONST. SINGLE WATER SERVICE PER DETAIL (TYP. CONST. 201±LF OF 6" PVC WATERMAIN FROM 6" TEE TO 11.25' BEND // //// i, j CO ST. DOUBLE WATER RVICE PEI DETAIL (TYP.) /( 1CONST. 518±LF OF 6" PVC WATERMAIN FROM 6" CROSS TO BLOW –OFF ASSEMBLY STA:71 +11.6. 34.9' R 1– 6" 22.5' BEND \\ \� / MINIMUM l FINISHED FLOOR \ EL. =28.0' (TYP.) i CONST. DOUBLE WATER SERVICE PER DETAIL (TYP. CONST. DOUBLE WATER SERVICE PER DETAIL (TIP.) CONST. 195 WATERMAIN BEND TO FIR OF 6" PVC OM 22.5' YDRANT STA: 64 +87.2. 14,8' L CONSTRUCT BLOW –OFF ASSEMBLY PER DETAIL CONST. 301±LF OF 6" PVC WATERMAIN FROM 6" TEE TO PROPOSED HYDRANT STA: 39+02.0. 134.5' L CONSTRUCT FIRE HYDRANT & 6" VALVE ASSEMBLY PER DETAIL CONST. 220±LF OF 6" PVC WATERMAIN FROM PROPOSED HYDRANT TO BLOW –OFF (ASSEMBLY MINIMUM FINISHED FLOOR EL =28.0' (TYP.) CONST. SINGLE WATER SERVICE PER DETAIL (TYP.) CONST. DOUBLE WATER SERVICE PER DETAIL (TYP. 66 ±00 — _ 42 h00' - 8 2207 ♦DATE RR BY WETLAND BUFFER AREA IMPACT AND AD081ONAL BUFFER PROygC) REVISIONS I Dote- 8/7/21D? Scale: R Design By- mAA Drown By. RR Check By MM i r STA:69 +22.5. 15.9' L CONSTRUCT FIRE HYDRANT & 6' VALVE ASSEMBLY PER DETAIL 0 STA; 41 +20.0. 134.4' L CONSTRUCT BLOW –OFF ASSEMBLY PER DETAIL VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 1 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY A 8oyie Engineering (Company 18: I� I iy 0 S.W. 7th AVENUE CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Resells, Valve By Design.. 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fax: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 www.lbfh.cam IIM 0 NOTE ALL ELEVATIONS PROVIDED ARE IN NGVD. LEGEND EXISTING DITCH TO BE FILLED WETLAND SCALE: 1" 40' WETLAND BUFFER IMPACTED WETLANDS WETLAND BUFFER UNE — PROPOSED TOE OF SLOPE PROPOSED TOP OF BANK PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED PAVEMENT SLOPE DIRECTION PROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURE NUMBER PROPOSED DRAINAGE PIPE NUMBER EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE —SF— PROPOSED SILT FENCE CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG IN FLORIDA 1- 800 - 432 -4770 IT'S THE LAW! SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA, INC. THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE WATER & SEWER CONSTRUCTION PLANS LBEH PROJECT No: 05 -0260 SHEET WS— 04 1 28 24 2 1 DATUM ELEV 14.00 STA:1 1 +33, GNAIt tLtV. =L0.LU S- 10 GRATE OEV. =26.30 OUT =19.80 P -68 cv -90 -in INV. ELEV. IN INV. ELEV. 11, INV. ELEV. OJT= SUMP ELEV. =16.39 =16.50 -=16.50 16.40\ GRATE ELEV. =27.30 INV. ELEV. IN =23.30 INV. ELEV. OUT WV. ELEV. OUT =20.70 P -33 20. P-32 P -31 S -33 GRATE INV. ELEV. INV �.EV. ELEV.-27.30 IN =20.00 P -31 IN =21 00 P -30 INV. ELEJ. 5 -70 ORATE Fl INV. ELEV. OUT=-20.70 P -�9 INV. ELEV. IN =19.80 P -68 , --- - - -_ -- DATE BY REVISIONS / S -31 T L _ e ' GRATE ELEV. =27.34 - - INV. ELEV. - _ - OUT =19.80 P -67 , k - - --. _ INV. ELEV. OUT =20.70 P -32 INV. ELEV. OUT SUMP ELEV-1570 15.70 --__ - - - - - - III _ -SU LF OD% PVC ' y ■ RI �1 C. PVC WATERMAIN GRATE F GRATE ELEV. =7 .30 29 INV. ELEV. OLCT-21.00 P -30 0 18' `\ j` „ ill 0 2-32 29 C.00% LF P -31 ! 44 LF 0.00% " 6 PVC WATERMAIN P -6 44 +, 18" PVC 18" PVC 18^00 C 242 LF 0.29% 10" PVC O199 LF 0.30% 10" PVC i - P.! N N N N ^ N N 1. N N m N N 0 01 . _ ,.,. 1 -c+nn 14 +00 15 +00 I0 +00 11 +00 HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 " =30' VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " =3' STA:15 +74.22, GRATE ELEV. =26.60 INV. ELEV. IN =15.00 INV. ELEV. IN =15.00 INV. ELEV. OUT =14.90 SUMP ELEV. =14.90 a © 2007 LBFH Inc. o 213M3S 318f104 1SN00 - 001 41- O f of fl:_ 111 111 111 "1 Date' 7/16/2107 Scale- B Design By. MM Drawn 8y RR Check By 560 VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY be CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results. INC. Value By Design." A Boyle Engineering company 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, F1 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fox: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No 959 www.lbfh.com 30' 60' Scab: 1• - 30' THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE UTILITIES PLAN & PROFILE VIEW ■ PROJECT No: 05 -0260 SHEET PRF -1 DATE BY REVISIONS / Date' 7/16/2107 Scale- B Design By. MM Drawn 8y RR Check By 560 VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY be CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results. INC. Value By Design." A Boyle Engineering company 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, F1 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fox: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No 959 www.lbfh.com 30' 60' Scab: 1• - 30' THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE UTILITIES PLAN & PROFILE VIEW ■ PROJECT No: 05 -0260 SHEET PRF -1 © 2007 LBFH Inc. DATE BY 28 24 STA:18 +96, GRATE ELEV.=27 10 INV. ELEV. IN =15.10 INV. ELEV. OUT =15.00 SUMP EL . =14.9 20 16 DATUM ELEV 13.00 18 +00 S -54 GRATE EL INV. ELEV. INV. ELEV. =26.80 S-64 GRATE =22.80 P -52 INV. ELEV. IN? 9420 P -56 AIM=23.30 P— 3 NV. ELEV. IN =22.40 P -72 " T=19.20 • —56 NV. L . OU =21.9r • -71 4_� i ill STA20 +78.09, GRA fE ELEV. =26.60 IF- P—SB I V EL IN =14.41 III Ulm 182 LF 19 +00 HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 " =30' VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " =3' 159 LF 0.33% INV. ELEV. IN =14.40 INV. ELEV. OUT =14.30 SUMP ELEV. =14.30 0.00% 30" PV.: 10 PVC 20 +00 30' Scale: 1' - 30' 60' REVISIONS oat., 016/2037 Scoln Y Design By MM Drawn By RR Check By MM VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 INliMsmom 1 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY 1 DATUM ELE 14.00 GRATE 0 IT. Ttg118C�:111a: 23 +00 ('dA1) 10/130 213d 331■213S 213M3S 310NIS 1SNO0 HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 " =30' VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " =3' STA:25 +44.73, GRATE ELEV. =26.60 INV. ELEV. IN =15.60 INV. ELEV. IN =15.60 INV. ELEV. OLTT =15.50 SUMP ELEV. =15.50 'dA1) 11V130 213d 301/213S 213M3S 31E1900 1SNO3 CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, Value By Design" 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fox: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 www.lbfh.corn THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE UTILITIES PLAN & PROFILE VIEW 30' 60' Seale: i• = 30' PROJECT No: 05 -0260 SHEET PRF -2 28 24 2 DATUM ELEV 16.00 GRATE ELEV. =27.30 S-12 INV. ELEV. IN =23.50 P P -16 S- 5 5 G 5- 4 I GRATE ELEV. =27.30 P -13 S-20 =23.50 P -17 G 5 -18 G =27.00 G INV. ELEV. OUT =23. 0 INV, E ELEV. IN =23.00 P- 5 5 G GRATE E ELEV. =27.30 INV. ELEV. IN =23.80 P P -11 _ - I INV. ELEV. OUT = =23.50 P -16� I INV. ELEV. O OUT =23.50 P -17 I INV. ELFV. OUT= 3 3.50 P -14 - 1I G ---------- - - - - - - -- - '� S S -13 P -13 - - - I L_i 5 5 I INV. E ELEV.= I =27.60 . INV. E . N=1 . 0 I INV. ELEV. I 0 Ii*im I 24 INV. • •U =1:.�0 2 17 ' ' P -16 1 171 LF 0 0.00% 1 18 PVC i i2 I IF 1 P -14 18 P PVC P -13 LF p pp% ' 'r' 2 18" PVC 0 18 P PVC 1 18" PVC 18" P 20 1 342 LF 0.2996 293 LF 0 031% 1 10" � �VC 1 L 161 I 0.31% 1 10" PVC 16 161 LF 0 0.31% 1 10" PVC L NN N N 40 1 r N N N 1--- N N r r n n ^ ^ N N a rn o o N M M O O 32 +00 33+ HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 " =30' VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " =3' 8 36 60 Scale: 1. 30' 5.— 00 +5£ 00 s I + i [CD ' © 2007 LBFH Inc. `DATE BY REVISIONS 1 Dote' 7/18/3107 Scaly Design By MM Drown By RR Check By MM VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 ■ 1 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS. SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, ■INC. Value By Design" A Boyle Engineering Company 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fax: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 www.lbfh.com THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE UTILITIES PLAN & PROFILE VIEW 00 1 PROJECT No 05 -0260 SHEET PRF -3 8 8 8 24 20 /GRATE EV. =28.40 INV. ELEV. OUT =18.10 SUMP E_EV. =18.09 10" PVC a © 2007 LBFH Inc. 16 0 40 +00 41 +00 HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 " =30' VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " =3' 0 0 30' 80' Seale: 1' w 30' 00 +0 17 00 \ DATE BY REVISIONS Hi Date: 7/1872,17 Scale R Design By. M2 Drawn By RR Check By MM 32 28 24 20 76 DATUM ELEV 12. 00 N 50 +00 6° PVC WATERMAIN 71 LF 0.285 10° FVC n N 51 +00 HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 " =30' VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " =3' 0 ai N 52 +00 30' Scale: 1' r. 30' VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 1 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, value By Design.. 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fax: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 www.lbfh. corn 32 28 24 20 16 14 N S -74 GRATE ELEV. =26.40 INV. ELEV. OLT =22.90 P -62 S -75 GRATE ELE\ INV. ELEV. INV. ELEV. STA:70 +66.18, GRATE ELEV. =26.76 INV. ELEV. IN =16.50 0.005 18" PJC 69 +00 70 +00 HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"=30' VERTICAL SCALE: 1"=3' 132 LF 0 30' LO 71 +00 Scale: 1' — 30' 60' STA:71 +98 GRATE ELE INV. ELEV. SUMP ELE\ 0.305 THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE UTILITIES PLAN & PROFILE VIEW 1� - PROJECT No: 05 -0260 SHEET PRF -4 HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 " =30' VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " =3' 1" t DATE BY REVISIONS Date- 7nei2o07 Scale e Design By- MM Drawn By. RR Check By VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 1 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY 114 hC. A Boyle Engineering Company 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fox: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 www.lbfh.com CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results. Value By Design" THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE UTILITIES PLAN & PROFILE VIEW PROJECT No 05 -0260 .................. SHEET PRF -5 JL 5-71 GRATE EV. I= 18.6 INV. ELEV. IN =78.60 ELEV. OUT =18.60 P -64 P -65 S-70 GRATE EV. INV. ELEV. INV. ELEV. IN =79.80 P -68 114=19.8 OUT =19.80 P -67 5 -65 GRATE ELEV. =26.60 INV. ELEV. IN =23.10 INV. ELEV. OUT =21.90 P -69 P -70 5 -66 GRATE INV. ELEV. INV. ELEV. ELEV. =26.40 IN =21.90 P -70 IN =27.90 P -71 S -63 GRATE ELEV. =26.41 INV. ELEV. OUT= 2'.90- S-62 GRATE ELEV.-26.40 INV. ELEV. IN =22.90 INV. ELEV. OUT =22 P -73 40 P -72 28 5 -75 GRATE EV. 14 =2 INV. ELEV. OUT INV. ELEV. OUT - 5 -73 4D GRATE =22.30 2. P-63 INV =22.30 P -63 INV INV INV. EV. I =2 01 ELEV. IN =22.10 P- ELEV. IN -22.30 P- LEV. eU =1.60 P�•4 7 3 lif 5 -72 GRATE ELEV. -26.50 INV. ELEV. IN 6 -18.60 P -65 ee • •. S INV. -,INV. -69 GRATE ELEV.= 26.40 , a . _ • ELEV. 11=-T1 MO ELEV. OUT 23.10 '- • • P-67 P -69 5 -64 GRATE ELEV. �� a INV. ELEV. INV. ELEV. =26.40 - - IN =22.40 P -72 OUT=21.90 P -71 . =IM _ - _ __ -__l�� ----------- MIMI i I - It, e 1111111111 41 ■ ®IIII 63 LF D.r O 24 PVC ma 1 ®■ P -6• TD - • ®i [rj��y■�� ' ®® ■._ �� . 0" PVC �72 12d '_ LF 0.00% 24" PVC [ STA:77 +64.68, 0.00' INV. = 6 INV. 7+6 I8, 0.0 0 INV. ELEV. OUT =13.7e SUMP ELEV. =13.70 STA:78 +91.59, 0.00' GRATE ELEV. =27.19 1 a - INV. ELEV. OUT =13..0 INV. ELEV. OUT =13.:0 SUMP ELEV. =73.20 RT. RT. „ 2 6 14 - Z 6 p -63 , STA:76 GRATE INV. , +02.80, 0.00' RT. ELEV. =26.60 . N =1 . IN =14.40 OUT =14.30 ELEV. =14.30 •- 21 LF 0.00% 1.00% ^ PVC GTA: E ELEV.= GRATE EV. IN INV. ELEV. IN 16.0 =16.00 � GRATE EL .77, GRATE EVEV. =26.6 INV. ELEV. IN =15.6) 'i I 6" P -65 PVC WATERMAIN STA:74 +37.46, P -67 GRATE ELEV. INV. EL I. ELEV. =26.60 IN =15.00 IN =15.00 OUT =14.90 =14.90 a • SUMP ELEV =15.90 _ • r I. IN =1 INV. ELEV. OUT =15 SUMP ELEV. =15.50 50 �I 28 LF 0.00% ' 0.00% INV. ELEV 8" PVC SUMP ELEV. INV. ELEV. INV. ELEV. SUMP 36" PVC 320 LF 0.30% 10" PVC I - 78 LF - �" - 0 31% 1C PVC 165 LF 0.30% 10" PVC Q 161 LF 0.31% 10" PVC _ • C N N N N N N N 6 N N N N N M N N 78 0 cc; N +00 o 79 co +00 N -,-. ,... 74 +00 75 +00 76 +00 77 +00 HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 " =30' VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " =3' 1" t DATE BY REVISIONS Date- 7nei2o07 Scale e Design By- MM Drawn By. RR Check By VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 1 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY 114 hC. A Boyle Engineering Company 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fox: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 www.lbfh.com CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results. Value By Design" THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE UTILITIES PLAN & PROFILE VIEW PROJECT No 05 -0260 .................. SHEET PRF -5 32 S -81 STA:81 +38.70, 10. GRATE ELEV. =26.30 INV. L . IN= 2.8 SUMP ELEV. =22.80 GRATE ELEV.= INV. ELEV. IN INV. ELEV. 0 SUMP ELEV.= 7.00 11.80 =11.70 1.70 S -82 STA:84 +32.20, 10.3:' RT. INV. ELEV. OUT =22.80 P -83 SUMP ELEV. =22.80 S -83 STA:84 +32.26, 10.49' LT. GRATE ELEV. =26.30 INV. LEV. IN =2 .:e ' -8 SUMP ELEV. =22.80 . =26.60 OUT =22.20 P -103 S -101 INV. ELEV. 84 =22.20 P -10 INV. ELEV. OUT =22.20 P -1 6" PVC WATERMAIN 0.00% 18" PVC 0.00% P -103 96 LF 0.00% STA:86 +50, GRATE ELEV =27.10 N INV. ELEV. OUT= 13.00 SUMP ELEV. = 13.00 ST :87 +69.05, G• -TE ELEV. =26.81 IN �'. ELEV. OUT =13.50 SL ..4P ELEV. =13.50 0.30% 79 +00 80 +00 81 +00 S 82 +00 83 +00 84 +00 HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"=--30' VERTICAL SCALE: 85 +00 86 +00 87 +00 88 +00 30' 60' Scale: 1' a 30' ',Ill '130 213d 30IA213S 213M3S 31ONIS 1SNO3 wM WM wu W1A mw wM wu __ - -ww 00+8 2 6 I © 2007 LBFH Inc. DATE BY REVISIONS -n 133HS 11V130 213d NOLLVIS 1311 1SNO3 1,E'SZ 'i"L' +OS :b1S -1 00 +S8 • 4' Dote: ]/18/200] Scale: 0 Design By. Men Drawn By. RR Check By nnM VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 — 1 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY A Boyle Engineering Co pan Y CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, Value By Design," 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fax: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 www.lbfh.com 1f1NIAV 1{1OI "M'S THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE UTILITIES PLAN & PROFILE VIEW PROJECT No: 05 -0260 _ SHEET PRF -6 88 +00 HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 " =30' VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " =3' 32 32 S- GF IN` 103 S -101 -ATE .= A I -k1111 INV. ELEV. . INV. ELEV. IN =22.20 P -103 OUT =22.20 P -102 22 il FAI ii 5 -99 GRATE ELEV.= • 70 �j•� I. '1. 5 -98 GRATE EV. 26.=2200 .0 INV. ELEV. EL O=UT P -100 'IP -103 9� LF 0.00% 18" 'alI II t STA:88 +75.17, - r P -102 P -107 2.20 P-100 20.80 P -104 _- P- 3C 0, 3 50 - - INV. ELEV. IN INV. ELEV. IN INV. ELEV. OU SUMP ELEV.= 13.90 14.00 =13.90 3.90 =26.20 IN =22.40 P -91 �..���' 18 Itt P-100 - -- iI11 _„� • 20 =110 PVC o N N 243 LF C N N N a N ' 88 +00 HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 " =30' VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " =3' 32 32 STA:94 GRATE 49.87, L EV. =26.60 S -100 GRATE ELEV. =24.7 INV. ELEV. OUT =22 30 P -101 5 -99 GRATE ELEV.= • 70 5 -98 GRATE EV. 26.=2200 .0 INV. ELEV. EL O=UT P -100 28 INV. LEV. IN -'2.2• INV. ELEV. I '2.30 I. ELEV. IN= INV. ELEV. OU P -102 P -107 2.20 P-100 20.80 P -104 _- �_ - - -- S-91 GRATE EL INV. EL =26.20 IN =22.40 P -91 �..���' , Itt P-100 - -- iI11 _„� 1�=T� MI -! 11 = 243 LF 0.00% ' ..� -.._. _,. ®_.� ®11111 3010E 6• PVC WATERMAIN ill0.00%> � " 165 LF 10 I■I, I 18 PVC 20 _ ■__ INV.E +77.99, SUATE INV. ELEV. OUT= 14.6 SUMP ELEV. =14.59 I LEV.= 4.59 16 16 202 LF 0.3 - 10" PVC _' �__ 14 r 14 4 N 4 a a) 4 a N N N N N Q N Y N N N N n N N 95 +00 94+00 ,,. .,^ 92+00 93+00 89 +00 90 +00 HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 " =30' VERTICAL SCALE: 1"=3' 0 MEM 30' 60' © 2007 LBFH Inc. DATE BY REVISIONS Date. 7/10/2007 Scale. B Design By AMA Drown By RR Check By MM 0 30 60' Scale: 1" = 30' VERIFY SCALE BAR 15 EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, A Boyle Engineering INC. n] Value By Design" 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fax: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 www.lbth.corn THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE UTILITIES PLAN & PROFILE VIEW PROJECT No 05 -0260 SHEET PRF -7 -32 S -89 —28 —24 GRATE E . =25.90 INV. ELEV. IN =22.40 P -90 INV. ELEV. OUT =22.40 P -91 SUMP ELEV. =22.40 STA:96 +15.43, 1GRATE EELLEV.. =26.10 11RTE F. M =1g0 L18 INV. ELEV. OUT =18.70 SUMP ELEV. =18.70 S -88 GRATE ELEV.= 25.90 INV. ELEV. IN =19.60 P -136 INV Fl FV IN22 40 P -88 INV. ELEV. IN =22.40 P -89 INV. ELEV. OUT =22.40 F'-90 S -87 GRA F FI FV. =26.10 INV. ELEV. OUT =22.40 P -88 u.uu% L4' rye P- 90 28 LF 0.00% 24" PVC P -88 43 LF 0.00% 18" PVC `STA:97 +35.24, 28.45' LT G" TE ELEV. =26.64 ELEV. OUT =19.20 SUMP ELEV.-19.19 0.307 10" PVC 26 LF 0.327 10" PVC —16 14 95 +00 N N N a 96 +00 HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 " =30' VERTICAL SCALE: 1"=3' 97 +00 28 2 DATUM ELEV 13 00 S -54 UItAI LLLV. =2b.8U INV. LEV. IN =22.80 P -5 INV. LEV. 0 20 P- 6 9 -59 GRATE ELEV. =2 .80 INV. ELEV. OUT 23.30 P -77 S -56 GRATE ELEV. =2 INV. 'ELEV. IN= INV. ELEV. OU .80 3.30 P -77 23.30 P -53 P -52 29 LF 0.007" 24" PVC 0.007 18" PVC :10 +84.20 T ELEV. =27.20 ELEV. OUT =15.90 P ELEV. =15.89 STA:100 +00 1 .10 15.00 '0 LF 100 +00 UJ 101 +00 39 60' Scale: 1' = 30' DATE BY REVISIONS Data. 1 /18/2001 Scale: t Design By MM Drown By, RR Check By MM VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 — ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY (O a7 102 +00 HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"=30' VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " =3' 103 +00 CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, Value By Design" 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, 61 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fox: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 www.lbfh.com 30' 60' Scale: 1' - 30' THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE UTILITIES PLAN & PROFILE VIEW 'jfPROJECT No 05- 0260 SHEET PRF -8 1 r 28 DATUM ELEV 14.00 5 -50 GRATE E INV. EL EV. =26.90 . IN =23.40 P-49 P -48 ' ELEV. lit INV. ELEV. 18=22 INV. ELEV. IN =22 INV. ELEV. OUT =:Q.BQ S-48 GRATE EL INV. ELEV. . =26.40 IN =22.90 F'-47 G'A IF -}- -` INV. EL . =0 =20.. 10 '- OU 2 =22.40 P -105 I ��'- (I OUT =23.40 P -48 I I 26.90 OUT =22.90 P -49 ' 1 5 -47 GRATE EL INV. ELEV. . =26.40 B UT =22.90 P -47 G ATE ELEV.=27.29 91 , GRATE ELE INV. ELEV. OUT =1720 SUMP ELEV.= 17.19 1 til 1. 1' P 102 ',30 LFp_104 0.00% 226 ipi1 P- 29 LF 0.00% 18" PVC P -47 20 LF 18" PVC STA-111 +00 STA:110+00, GRATE ELEV.= 26.J0 INV. ELEV. IN =13.90 '0.00% 18" PVC GRATE ELEV. =26.25 INV. ELEV. IN= INV. ELEV. OU1=14.30 SUMP ELEV.= 14.40 4.30 0.00% 18" PVC 10. PVC 1 INV. ELEV. IN =14.00 INV. ELEV. OUT= SUMP ELEV. =13.90 3.90 STA:105 +00, GRATE ELEV. =2710 INV. ELEV. IN =1 .20 98 LF 0.415 10" PVC 169 LF INV. ELEV. OUT U L . =1 °." 16.10 29 LF 0.30% 0.30% 10" PVC - m r. < N .._.,,,. Dr � N r N N N . _, N . ,,,. N 1 nR r N +nn 0 105 +00 106 +00 HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"=30' VERTICAL SCALE: 1"=3' 28 2 2 DATUM FLFV 12.00 S -99 06 EV S -1 INV. ELE'.. INV. ELE\. IN =22.20 P -103 OUT =22.20 P -102 ' ELEV. lit INV. ELEV. 18=22 INV. ELEV. IN =22 INV. ELEV. OUT =:Q.BQ 20'x' 10 INV. EL'V. 30 P -101 INV. ELEV. 20 P -100 INV. ELEV. P -104 IN =2080 P -104 IN =22.40 P-105 IN =22.40 P -106 G'A IF -}- -` GRATE ELEV. =25.90 INV. ELEV. OUT =22.40 P -105 I ��'- (I n I ' 1 I 1 til 1. 1' P 102 ',30 LFp_104 0.00% 226 LF 0.00% 18" PVC P -105 I 29 LF 0.00% 18" PVC STA-111 +00 STA:110+00, GRATE ELEV.= 26.J0 INV. ELEV. IN =13.90 GRATE ELEV. =26.25 INV. ELEV. IN= INV. ELEV. OU1=14.30 SUMP ELEV.= 14.40 4.30 STA:112 +68.82. GRATE ELEV. =26.10 INV. ELEV. IN =15.20 INV. Fl EV, IN =15.20 10. PVC 1 INV. ELEV. IN =14.00 INV. ELEV. OUT= SUMP ELEV. =13.90 3.90 INV. ELEV. OUT =14.90 SUMP ELEV. =14.89 98 LF 0.415 10" PVC 169 LF O 0.30% 10" PVC - m r. < N .._.,,,. 111 110+00 111 +00 HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 " =30' VERTICAL SCALE: 1"=3' 280\0..wn \S -0x60 N 30' Scale: 1° - 30' © 2007 LBFH Inc. r DATE BY REVISIONS Date' 1/18/2007 Scale Deeign By: Drown By: Check By e ANA RR avn VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0I■11 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY 60' .77/ III 0 30' 60' Scab: 1' = 30' ('du) 11V130 213d 301A213S 213M3S 318(100 1SNO0 00+£L ti PC. A Boyle Engineering Coenpony 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fax: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No 959 www.1bfh.com CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, Valve By Design. 0 THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE UTILITIES PLAN & PROFILE VIEW ■ PROJECT No: 05 -0260 SHEET PRF -9 0 9 28 24 20 DATUM ELEV 14.00 6 S -106 INV. ELEV. IN =2C.80 P -104 INV. ELEV. IN =22.40 P -105 INV. ELEV. IN =22.40 P -106 STA:1 15 +04. GRATE ELEV. INV. ELEV. 0 _ SUMP ELEV.= S -4e GRATT ELEV. =25.80 INV. ELEV. OUT =22.30 P -108 26.30 T= 15.40 5.39 GRAT INV. INV. 'A:115 +76, GRATE ELEV. =26.1 NV. ELEV. IN =15. P -106 29 LF 0. 18" PVC . IN =22.30 P -109 . IN =19.30 P -111 . IN =22.30 P -112 STA:1 18 +71.55, GRATE ELEV. =26.20 INV. ELEV. IN =16.10 INV. LEV. OUT =16.00 SUM ELEV. =16.00 10" PVC 76 LF 0.39% 10 115 +00 16 +00 117 +00 118 +00 119 +00 HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 " =30' VERTICAL SCALE: 1"=3' HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 " =30' VERTICAL SCALE: 1"=3' Seale: 1' _ 30' 00 " s ClOi� — 54 2007 LBFH Inc. Q _J W W ci -J N DATE BY REVISIONS Dote: 7/IB/2007 Seale: Design By Drawn By RR Cheek Bye VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 — 1 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY I A Boyle Engineering ICompany CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS ••Partners For Results, Value By Design., 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, FI 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fax: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 www.lbfh.com THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE UTILITIES PLAN & PROFILE VIEW PROJECT No: 05 -0260 SHEET PRF -10 28 24 2 1 DATUM ELEV 15.00 S -113 GRATE ELEV. =25.90 EV IN -21 90 P INV. ELEV. IN =19.70 P -117 S -114 5 -178 G -109 GRATE EL. OUT .80 INV. ELEV. OUT =22.30 5 -111 GRATE ELEV. ELEV. INV. ELEV. OUT =19 =25.90 IN =22.40 P -114 60 P -136 /GRATE ELEV. =5.90 INV. ELEV. IN =22.00 I. ELEV. 0U" P -122 =21.90 P -116 - /GRATE / ELEV. =25.90 INV. ELEV. OUT =22 40 P -118 STA:131 +04.33, P -113 INV. , 5 -110 GRATE ELEV. =25.80 INV. ELEV. IN =22.3Q OUT =22.50 P -713 P-112 S -112 GRATE ELEV. INV. ELE'. =25.90 OUT =22.40 P -114 S -717 GRATE ELEV. =25.90 INV. ELEV. IN =22.40 INV. ELEV. OUT =19.70 - - - P -716 P -117 GRATE INV. ELEV. SUMP ELEV. =26.50 OUT =18.70 ELEV. =18.69 _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ - n INV. ELEV. - - PVC. P -114 P -116 29 LF 29 LF 0.00% 0.00%. 18" PVC 24" PVC _ P -118 20 LF -n Ong 18" PVC 'VC ,_ P -112 125 R00% 18° PVC P -113 21_LE 0.00% 18" STA:128 +25.68, GRATE ELEV. =26.10 INV. ELEV. IN =1i.90 INV. ELEV. IN =1 .60 INV. E. OUT= 7.80 SUMP ELEV. =17.50 P_177 149 LF 0.00% 18" PVC STA:125 +35.13 GRATE ELEV.= 26.20 INV. ELEV. IN =16.90 I. ELEV. OUT =16 80 _ �--�� 0.29% 10" 279 is 0.39% ' SUMP ELEV. =76.80 - 0.31% 10" PVC = 291 LF 1n" PVC C N N ,1- v N 0 < N 131 +00 . ,., ...,. 128+00 129 +00 130 +00 125 +00 126 +00 HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 " =30' VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " =3' 6 CI 2007 LBFH Inc. DATE BY REVISIONS Dote. 7/18/Z07 Scale i Design By M'n Drown By RR Check By 607 VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY It( CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, A Boyle Engineering CNomC pony Value By Design" 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fax: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 www.lbfh.com 0 so. Seale: 1• = 30• THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE UTILI11ES PLAN & PROFILE VIEW 1" PROJECT No: 05 -0260 SHEET PRF -11 © 2007 IBM Inc. DATE BY REVISIONS Date: 1/18/2101 Scale- Design By MM Drown By RR Check By MM • 28 S -88 GRATE ELEV. =25.90 INV. ELEV. INV. ELEV. INV. ELEV. S -90 GRATE EL INV_ELEV. 30 LF 0002 =25 OUT =22..90 40 P -89 GRATE ELEV. =25.30 INV. ELEV. IN =24.00 P -122 INV. ELEV. OUT =21.90 P -116 GRATt ELEV. =25.90 INV. ELEV. IN =21.90 P -1' 6 INV. ELEV. IN =19.70 P -1'7 S -122 GRATE ELEV. =25 INV. ELEV. IN=-1! INV. ELEV. C UT= S -121 GRATE ELEV. 27.0 INV. ELEV. OLT =1 P -122 127 LF P -136 211 LF 0.002 24" PVC 98 LF 0.31 0.302 DATUM ELEV 16.00 STA:140 +00, 0.00 GRATE ELEV. =26.1 INV. ELEV. IN =18. STA:142 +33.27, GRATE ELEV. =26.10 INV L . IN =17 •0 INV. ELEV. IN =1 .90 INV. ELEV. OUT =17.E SUMP ELEV. =17.90 140 +00 141+00 142 +00 HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 " =30' VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " =3' 143 +00 VERIFY SCALE BAR 15 EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 — 1 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY LIE e Inee�hC. A Boyle Erg g Company CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS ..Partners For Results, Value By Design" 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fax: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 www.lbfh.com 30' 60• Scale: 1' = 30' THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE UTILITIES PLAN & PROFILE VIEW PROJECT No: 05 -0260 SHEET PRF -12 • 1 LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10.0' 10.0' FFE 30.0' 1 3 MIN. 3 MIN. ELEV. (SEE PLANS) SECTION A. 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT SCALE: N.T.S. 5.0' 29.5' 12.0' 5.0' 5.0' MIN. (SEE PLAN) SECTION B SPREADER SWALE SCALE: N.T.S. 20.0' 12.0' MIN. ti 0 0 m 20.0' 10.0' SLOPE VARIES PER PLAT! TO BE DIRECTED TOWARDS YARD DRAINS 10.0' 4 MIN. Q 1 ELEV. (SEE PLANS) ROADWAY FACING YARD SECTION C SCALE: N.T.S. 3 h 0 8 NATURAL GROUND 4 MIN SECTION E SCALE: N.T.S. 25.0' PRIMARY BUFFER co 5 40.0' 20.0' VARIES 6 � 1 6 ELEV. (SEE PLANS) SECTION F SCALE: N.T.S. 20.0' 5.0' 5.0' 10.0' MAX. TOP OF BANK VARIES 12.0' MAX. 4 MIN 20.0' 12.0' MIN. ti 1 ELEV. PER PLAN MIN. BOUNDARY ELEV. PER PLAN 3 MIN. 40.0' 1 3 MIN. ELEV. (SEE PLANS) SECTION G SCALE: N.T.S. SLOPE VARIES PER PLAN SECTION D TYPICAL LAKE SECTION SCALE: N.T.S. EDGE OF PAVEMENT 24° WHITE STOP BAR NATURAL GROUND 23.5' 22.5' 21.5' 21.5' 1 /4 -R - TRANSITION TO NATURAL GROUND OVER 25' 1/2' Pre - molded Expansion Joint Material EXPANSION JOINTS 1 4'R 11-1/2" YP) J. 16" 3/16- Saw Cut Joint Maybe Substituted coNTRAOTTON IDINTS Varies (See pion) 3000psi Class I Concret Stabilize Subgrade to Minimum FBJ of 50 P.S.I. Compacted to 95C of T -180 MICA]. SECTION OF 8" TNTCE CONCRETE SIDEWALK SCALE: N.T.S. NOTES: 1. All materials and construction shall be in accordance with FDOT Specifications Sections 345 & 350. 2. All testing shall be in accordance with FDOT Specifications Section 345 -8 for 28 day compressive strength 3000 psi concre Provide expansion joints 20" center to center, at PC & PT of curves. junctions of existing & new sidewalks, and where sidewalk abuts curbs. driveways & similar structures. 4. Provide contraction joints 5' center to center. 5. Sod shall be placed below edge of sidewalk to ollow drainage. CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECTIONS SCALE: N.T.S. 2007 LBFH Inc. NOTES: 1) EXOTIC /NUISANCE VEGETATION WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE MITIGATION AREA AND DISPOSED OF OFF SITE. 2) PLACEMENT MITIGATION IN CELL WILL N CELL SCRAPED CDODOWN ETWITH OF SCRAP DOWNS STOCKPILED SEPARATELY FOR 3) PLANTING ZONES 2 AND 3 SHOULD BE OVER EXCAVATED BY 6- INCHES AND THEN BACKFILLED TO EL 21.5 AND 22.5 RESPECTIVELY WITH THE STOCKPILED ORAGNANIC MATERIAL. 4) THREEAWN�(LINER) 3' OSLASH ENTER, (7 AND SAW 20' PALMETTO CENTER, 1 CORDGRASS ON CENTER_ ) ON CENTER, PINELAND 5) VEGETATION WILL BE PLANED RANDOMLY WITHIN THE DESIGNATED ZONES TO MIMIC A. NATURAL HABITAT. A. CONSTRUCTION NOTES PROVIDED BY: • F FLOR 1: SECTION I WETLAND VERTICAL RELOCATION SCALE: N.T.S. MATCH EXISTING TYPE AND DEPTH OF ASPHALT TO 1 %" MAXIMUM., INCLUDING FRICTION COURSE. DRIVEWAY SAWCUT BACK OF TRAFFIC STRIPE EXISTING PAVEMENT PROPOSED 6" COMPACTED LIMEROCK J /'- BASE COURSE (98% OF MAXIMUM) PROPOSED 8' STABILIZED SUBGRADE B MAXIMUM DENSITY PER 18098(TYP) SAW CUT DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. EXISTING BASE TRANSITION TO NATURAL GROUND OVER 25' 15" 18' 24" 15 18' 24' e z0 31[OE3i` [f):MQMIO: C N 5" MIN 6' MIN 6' 6115 D 8 NA NA NA E N A 8' IN 8' MIN B MIN 8 MIN (1) 24' STANDARD. 120' MAX 2 30' STANDARD. 120' MAX 3 34' 4 48' STANDARD, 120' MAX AST IRON FRAME AND GRATE 12" MIN.. g�pN� o� GRpyEL BAACTERFIfSLApLI MEETINGNgECApL5AL5Mi oe UNIFORMLY IN 12 UFTS LAND 321. COMPACTED. .1• CKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE CRUSHED STONE OR GRAVEL \ \p \\ \ MATERIAL MEETING CLASS 1 OR 2 AS SPECIFIED IN ASTM D -2321. BACKFILL SHALL aE PLACED UNIFORMLY IN 12 LIFTS AND COMPACTED. HDPE DRAINAGE BASIN NOT TO SCALE a 0 N 6' MIN 12' MAX EDGE OF PAVEMENT 24' ° 24° (TYP) 6' MIN 12' MAX STOP SIGN LOCATION DETAIL SCALE: NTS DRNEWAY APPROACH TYPE 111 HIGH EARLY CEMENT WITH EITHER 6X6 10/10 WIRE MESH OR RBERMESH CONCRETE 1/4 "R-\\ r 1/4 ' SLOPE TO MATCH DRNEWAY OR SIDEWALK ASPHALT BA5EROCK 3/4 ' 8 Fl8096050 CONCRETE (2500 P.S.I. 11PE I11 HIGH EARLY CEMENT) 1/4 " PREMODED EXPANSION JOINT TYPE 'A' TYPE 'B' 1/2 " STABILIZED SUBGRADE 1/4 a CONCRETE DRIVEWAY CURB WITH JOINT DETAILS SCALE: NTS MATLOt AI C• SURFACE COURSE: 1N� IIDASP ASPHALT PASSENGER CAR AREA BASE 6" COMPACTED UMEROCI( OR C000INA BASE WITHIN PASSENGER CAR AISLES AND PARKING AREA (DENSITY SURE AS SUBGRADE) SUBGRADE: SHALL BEU985 OF MAXIIAUM AS DETERMINED N D BY AASH10 T -180 METHOD TYPICAL ASPHALT PAVEMENT SECTION NOT TO SCALE TYPE 'C' EXPANSIO CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG IN FLORIDA 1- 800 - 432 -4770 IT'S THE LAW! SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA, INC. r 1 `DATE BY REVISIONS 1 Dale. 11/30/2006 Scale' 2 Design By: MN Drawn By_ RR Check By- MN 1 VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 =MOM= 1 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY l 13E CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, INC. Value By Design" A Boyle Engineering Company 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fox: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No. 959 www.lbfh.com 1 THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE PAVING, GRADING, & DRAINAGE DETAILS LINN PROJECT No: 05 -0260 SHEET D -1 - Potted tot 8,8.01 Li z C d ai 5.0' SIDEWALK 2% 1.3' 5.2' 6.9' PARKING 9.8' TRAVEL LANE 1.3' 75.0' 12.0' LANDSCAPED MEDIAN .3' 9.8' TRAVEL LANE 2.0' 8.9' PARKING .3' 5.2' 5.0' z SIDEWALK 3 a2 2% TYPE A' CURB (TYP.) _ SEC TION J OADW GUTTER (TYP. - RAY y/_m DIAN oARKING ) SCALE: N.T.S. 30.0' 9.3' TRAVEL LANE 2% 9.3' TRAVEL LANE 2% 0 z C d 5.0' DEWALK 2% VALLEY GUTTER (TYP.) SECTION L -TWO I eN RO Y W/ VALLEY CURB SCALE: N.T.S. 1.3' 6.9' PARKING 2% 2.0' 9.6' TRAVEL LAN 2% 50.0' 9.6' TRAVEL LANE 2% z . SIDEWALK 2X 5.0' 13.4' 2.0' 9.8' TRAVEL LANE 1.3' 75.0' 12.0' LANDSCAPED MEDLAN 2% 2.0' 6.9' PARKING 1.3' 5.0' SIDEWALK 2X 2X sink TYPE A' CURB (TYP.) VALLEY GUTTER (TYP.) SECTION M - TWO LANE ROADWAY W/ VALLEY CURB & PARKING SCALE N.T.S. MODIFIED TYPE "E CURB (TYP) VALLEY GUTTER (TYP,): SECTION O - TW LAN B AO DWAY SCALE: N.T.S. 1.3' 9.6' TRAVEL LANE - Viers+ VALLEY GUTTER (TYP.) 2.0' 6.9' PARKING 1.3' 5.0' z SIDEWALK 3 O ac 2% TYPE A- SECTION R - ONE LAN ROADWAY W PARKING (ONE SI El SCALE: N..S. 2.0' a: 34.7' 3.4' 5.0' SIDEWALK 2% 8.3' 2.0' 9.6' TRAVEL LANE 2% W 3 7. 2. 44.0' z Re 1.3' 9.8' TRAVEL LANE 2% TYPE i1' CURB (TYP.) MODIFIED TYPE SECTION K - ROADWAY W/ MEDIAN CURB (TYP.) SCALE N.T.S. 9.6' TRAVEL LANE 2% 9.6' 2 TRAVEL LANE 13.4' 2.0' MODIFIED TYPE "E" CURB (TYP.) SECTION S - ONE LANE ROADWAY SCALE: N.T.S. 100.0' 34.7' MODIFIED TYPE "E' CURB (TYP .),u SECTION P - TWO LANE ROADWAY W/ TYPE E MODIFIED CURB SCALE N.T.S. 2.0' 30.0 Re 0 an 9.6' TRAVEL LANE 2% 9.6' TRAVEL LANE 2X MODIFIED TYPE VALLEY GUTTER (TYP_) 'E' CURB (TYR.) SECTION T - TWO LANE ROADWAY SCALE: N.T.S. 0 9.6' TRAVEL LANE 9.6' TRAVEL LANE 2% 2% z 3 d Z 3 z 3 O z 3' an 5.0' SIDEWALK 13.4' 1.3' 2.0' 13.4' 5.0' SIDEWALK 2% 44.0' 6.9' 2.0' 9.8' PARKING 9.6' TRAVEL LANE 2% TRAVEL LANE 2X °'-- -+ TRAV 2% TYPE 'A' VALLEY GUTTER (TYP.)MODIFlED.TYPE..... CURB (TYP.) 'E' CURB (TYP.) SECTION N - TWO LANE ROADWAY W/ VALLEY CURB & PARKING (ONE SIDE) SCALE: N.T.S. 1.3' 2.0' 9.6' 2.0' TRAVEL LANE 2X 13.3' 7.4' z RI 0 TYPE A' VALLEY CURB (TYR) GUIILN (TYR) SECTION 0 - ONE LANE ROADWAY SCALE: N.T.S. 9.6' TRAVEL LANE 30.0' 9.6' TRAVEL LANE 2 2X MODIFIED TYPE 'E' CURB (TYP.) SECTION U - TWO LANE ROADWAY WI TYPE E MODIFIED CURB SCALE: N.T.S. 50.0' 7 3 a LLI WI VALLEY GUTTER (TYP.) TYPE A' SECTION W - TWO LANE ROADWAY W/ VALLEY CURB CURB PARKING SCALE N.T.S. 65.0' © 2007 LBFH Inc. TYPE -A' CURB (TYP.) VALLEY GUTTER (TYP.) S CT ION X - TWO LANE ROADWAY W/ VA I EY CURR SCALE. N.T.S. & PARKING 65.0' MODIFIED TYPE 'E' CURB (TYP.) SECTION Y - TWO LANE ROADWAY W/ TYPE E MODIFIED CURB SCALE N.T.S. 1.3' 5.0' / 6.9' SI EWALK PARKING I 6.9' TRAVEL LANE PARKING 2% 2% 2% 2.0' 9.6' TRAVEL LANE se 2% 7.7' 5.0' SIDEWALK 2X 8.2' 9.6' TRAVEL LANE 9.6' TRAVEL LANE MODIFIED TYPE 'E' CURB (TIP.) SECTION Aq - TWO LANE ROADwev W f T PE_ E MODIFIED SCALE. N.T.S. CURB Dote. 11/30/2006 Scale: 1 Design By MM Drawn By RR Check By MM 0 VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 1 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS INC. "Partners For Results, A Boys Eagineedng Company Value By Design" 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fax: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 www.lbfh.corn TYPE A' CURB (TYP.) VALLEY GUTTER (TYR) SECTION Z - TWO LANE ROADWAY W/ VALLEY CURB & PARKING SCALE: N.T.S. 1.3' 5.0' SIDEWALK 2% THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE PAVING, GRADING, & DRAINAGE DETAIIS CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG IN FLORIDA 1- 800 -432 -4770 IT'S THE LAVA SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL ` OF FLORIDA, INC. LBFH PROJECT Ns: 05 -0260 SHEET D -2 35 36 TYPE "P TYPE "P 61+42.2 61 +70.3 R 15.5 R14.8 209 23.2 20.5 23.7 27.2 20.0 5120 - GRATER 6167 37 TYPE "P 61 +70.7 L 14.4 23.7 20.9 38 TYPE "P 63+12.3 L 196 20.5 39 TYPE"). 63 +122 R 194 20.5 40 TYPE "J" 42+68 0 R 108 24 I 20.5 27.2 27.1 271 20.4 277 200 200 5120 - GRATER 6167 100 101 TYPE" T' 110+11.5 R142 22.2 222 5120 - GRATER 6167 5120 - GRATER 6167 102 TYPE "P 87 +68.6 R103 222 25 7 103 TYPE "1" 115 +61.1 L 13.7 23.6 5120 - GRATER 6167 104 TYPE "J" 115+60.9 R 145 224 224 41 TYPE "J" 42 +71 7 L 122 24 1 237 42 43 TYPE" I" TYPE' 1" 65+07.8 66+49.9 R 106 1.1a9 23.7 24.1 24 1 23.5 27 6 277 232 23 6 5120 - GRATER 6167 5120 - GRATE)! 6167 105 TYPE "1" 115+905 R 14.2 22 4 19 3 22 4 25 9 21.7 21.7 21.9 25 9 5105 - GRA'TER 6148 21 9 5120 - GRATER 6167 5105 - GRATER 6148 co PI AN V1FW GRATE MINI BE CAST YODEL 5290 OR APPROWD ECM SEE STEET 0.-1 CONTROL STRUCTURE #2 MODIFIED FDOT TYPE "C" INLET NOT TO SCALE STRUCTURE STRUCTURE TYPE STATEN ORME NORTE INVERT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE TABLE SOLITTI PPTERT NEST WITERT TYPE TC. TYPE 'CT 5/2 21.5 2119 RECT. 25.8 BLEEDER TOP MTN BLEEDER AA 17.0 10 18 8 106 TYPE" J" 115+904 L 14.9 22 4 22 4 27.2 23.0 44s TYPE "P 118 +22.8 R 103 22.3 45 46 TYPE "J" TYPE `J* 66+360 66+64.7 R 14.6 R14.8 23.5 23.5 23.2 23.5 25.8 27.0 21.8 5120 - GRATER 6167 5105 - GRATE)/ 6148 107 108 TYPE 'I" TYPE' J" 118 +229 121+312 L 10.3 L0.1 22.3 22.3 223 22.3 22.3 259 23.0 5120 - GRATER 6167 109 TYPE' 1" 125+83.5 R 105 223 27.0 227 5120 - GRAM 6167 110 TYPE"). 47 48 TYPE"P TYPE' J' 106+61.8 106+61.2 L 11.0 R 9.8 229 22.9 23.4 264 224 5105 - GRATER 6148 111 TYPE "P 125+83.6 128 +109 L 10.1 R14.4 224 22.3 26.4 224 5105 - GRATER 6148 112 TYPE "J" 49 TYPE "P 23+81.9 L 14.4 23.2 229 23.4 50 51 52 53 TYPE 'r TYPE "J" TYPE "J" 24+10.4 23+95.5 TYPE "P 18+95.3 L14.4 R 10.2 L99 229 20.1 23.4 23.4 269 26.9 22.4 26.9 19.6 229 5120 - GRATER 6167 113 TYPE" P' 128 +10.9 128 +40.3 L 14.3 L143 19 6 224 224 223 26.6 25.8 25.8 5120 - GRATER 6167 21 8 5120 - GRATER 6167 5105 - GRATER 6148 5120 - GRATER 6167 5105 - GRATER 6148 21 8 5105 - GRATER 6148 25.9 21.9 19.7 5120 - GRATER 6167 114 TYPE "r 5105 - GRATER 6148 115 TYPE "I" 23.3 26.9 22.8 18+81_4 R13.4 228 228 23.3 268 223 5105 - GRATER 6148 54 TYPE "I" 19+10.7 R 14.4 228 55 56 TYPE" J" TYPE" J" 101 +53.6 101 +53.4 R104 1162 23.3 19.2 23.3 23.3 26.8 23.3 26.8 26.8 18.7 22.8 5120 - GRATER 6167 5120 - GRATER 6167 5105 - GRATER 6148 116 117 TYPE "C 118 TYPE "3" TYPE "1" 128 +40.4 129+65.8 129+66.5 119 18" -YARD DRAIN 228 57 TYPE "I" 54+00.2 R14.4 23.3 23.4 58 59 60 TYPE"J" TYPE "2" TYPE 'r 53 +71.9 52+03.9 52+019 R 14.8 L 10.3 23.4 234 22.9 26.9 269 264 228 22.9 5105 - GRATE# 6148 224 5120 - GRATER 6167 120 121 18" -YARD DRAIN 18" -YARD DRAIN 129+894 129+89.7 R14.3 L 183.4 L26.9 L 10.3 21.9 19.7 224 220 19.4 22.4 25.9 25.9 23 7 21.9 21.9 23.4 25 9 25.9 19.1 5120 - GRATER 6167 5120 - GRATER 6167 21.4 5120 - GRATER 6167 189 192 21.9 5120 - GRA'TER 6167 3111 - GRATER 5665 5120 - GRATER 6167 5105 - GRA -TER 6148 131 +10 0 129+866 R 1214 23.5 23.0 R 1218 23 5 27.0 129+09.6 23.5 193 5120 - GRATER 6167 122 TYPE °I" 143+740 L 10.5 220 19.3 220 25.5 5120 - GRATE# 6167 123 TYPE "0" R 193 23.4 229 22.9 26 6 22.4 5120 - GRATER 6167 61 62 TYPE" C" TYPE *J" 77+76.2 77 +37.4 R 97.7 R 10.9 22.4 229 22.4 224 229 26.4 21.9 6610 - GRATE#6210 124 125 18" -YARD DRAIN 18" -YARD DRAIN 26 4 21.9 63 64 TYPE "P TYPE "P 77 +382 76+112 L 10.1 R 13.3 229 192 65 TYPE "P 75+36.1 L10.6 21.6 21.9 23.1 22.4 66 67"' TYPE "J" 18" -YARD DRAIN 75+80 2 118 +20.7 R 169 R 1228 21.9 193 21.9 26.4 21.9 264 26.6 264 22.4 5120 - GRATER 6167 5105 - GRATER 6148 126 127 TYPE' J" TYPE "2" 143 +73.9 127 +43.4 125+64.1 R. 1229 R123.2 22.0 193 19.3 25.5 27.0 27.0 5120 - CRATER 6167 5120 - GRATER 6167 122 +88.0 122 +88.1 193 193 220 220 18.7 21.1 5120 - GRATER 6167 5105 - GRATER 6148 128 129 18" -YARD DRAIN 27.0 21.4 18.8 5120 - GRATER 6167 PVC -TYP 130 TYPE"? TYPE "J" 116+85.7 114+04.7 R123.1 L14.5 25.5 25.5 18.8 18 8 18 8 5120 - GRATE# 6167 5120 - GRATER 6167 19.3 114+04_5 19.3 22.0 193 131 18" -YARD DRAIN 115+371 68 69 TYPE 'r 70 TYPE" J" TYPE "I" 15+61.6 74 +37 6 R 21.7 L 10.3 19.8 198 23.0 23.1 26.3 26 4 19.3 5120 - GRATER 6167 132 TYPE "J" 19.3 5120 - GRATE)/ 6167 15+59 8 L223 19.8 19.8 263 193 5120 - GRATER 6167 . Located south of Structure # 107 Located west of Structure # 127 2007 RBFH Inc. `DATE BY REVISIONS l Date. 11/30/2006 Scale. 7 Design By. NM Drown By. RR Check By NN i c VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0IIMI■1 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY 73+04.1 R123.2 L 170.3 21.5 19 3 25 5 25 5 18 8 5120 - GRATER 6167 5120 - GRATER 6167 27 0 188 19 5 5120 - GRA TER 6167 1121 A Boyle Engineming Company 421 N.W. 3rd Street. Okeechobee. Fl 34972 (863) 763-8999 Fox: 063) 763-6692 CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, Value By Design" CRATE WALL BE CAST IKE. 88•0 OR APPROVED USUAL 5F...041:1-A=6 CFCTION 9-F1 CONTROL STRUCTURE #1 MODIFIED FD07 TYPE "C" INLET NOT 70 SCALE SNET 17-1 CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG IN FLORIDA 1-800-432- 4770 IT'S THE LAW( SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA. INC. THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE PAVING, GRADING, & DRAINAGE DETAILS LRFIS PROJECT No: 05-0260 SHEET DRAINAGE STRUCTURE TABLE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE TABLE RIM BOTTOM TYPE US STRUCTURE STRUCTURE STATION OFFSET INVERT NORTH SOUTH INVERT EAST INVERT WEST E[EVATION INVERT RIM BOTTOM ELEVATION ��) GRATE/ ��) TOP TYPE US FOUNDARY# STRUCTURE # 71 STRUCTURE TYPE TYPE STATION 72+93.7 OFFSET R148 NORTH INVERT INVERT - SOUTH 19.6 EAST INVERT 18.6 WEST ECEVATTON INVERT - 23.0 ELEVATION ��) 26.3 26.5 GRP.TFITOPTYPE (NGVD) 18.1 191 FE/TOP 5120 - GRATER 6167 5105 - GRATER 6148 # TYPE - 27.0 23.5 PVC - TYP 5 18" -YARD DRAIN 32 +72.9 L 123.3 - 240 - - 27.0 23.0 PVC -TYP 72 TYPE "J" 73+045 L 10.9 19.6 21.5 - 18.6 26.3 18.1 5120- GRATER6167 6 18" -YARD DRAIN 34+40-0 L1229 - 23.5 - - 27.0 23.5 PVC -TYP 73 TYPE"). 72+65.8 R14.7 20.1 - 223 - 264 224 5105 - GRATER 6148 7 18" -YARD DRAIN 37+96.7 L 1227 - 21.0 - - 27.0 23.7 PVC -TYP 74 TYPE" 71+05.7 L 229 - - 22.3 26.4 21.8 5120- GRATER6167 8 18"-YARD 10 DRAIN TYPE "]" 39+67.6 39+66.4 L123.4 L 10.4 - 24.2. 24.2 24.2 - - 23.8 27.7 27.7 23.7 23.3 5105 - GRATER 6148 5105 - GRATER 6148 75 76 TYPE "P TYPE "C. 71+05.5 70+34.9 R 10.4 R 70.3 - - 22.9 - 22.9 229 22.9 22.9 26.4 26.8 224 22.4 6610 - GRATE#6210 5120 - GRATER 6167 11 TYPE "r "P 39+67.1 21 +14.3 R10.6 L 14.4 24.2 23.8 - 23.7 - 23.8 23.8 27.3 23.2 5120 - GRATER 6167 77 TYPE • P 6S +224 75+30.2 L 10.5 L 148.7 232 2 21 6 - - - 23.2 - - 23.2 20 0 26.7 26.6 26.3 22.7 19.5 223 5120 - GlATE1! 6167 5120 - GRATER 6167 5120 - GRATER 6167 12 TYPE "P 37 +99.7 L 10.3 24.0 23.8 - 27.5 23.3 5105 - GRATE# 6148 78 TYPE"). " 13 TYPE -- 27.3 23.3 5105 - GRATER 6148 79 TYPE P 14 TYPE "r "I" 21+145 34+71.1 R 14.2 R 14.3 - - - 23.0 23.8 - 2i 0 27 3 22.5 5105 - GRATER 6148 80 TYPE' P "P 81 +38.1 814 +38.4 84 +32.2 R 10.3 L 11.0 R 10.6 - - - - - - 22.8 20.8 228 - 228 - 26.3 26.3 263 203 223 20.3 5120 - GRATER 6167 5120 - GRATER 6167 5120- GRATFII6167 15 16 TYPE TYPE "J" 34 +39.8 L 10.4 23.5 23.5 - 27.4 27.3 ?3.0 225 5105 - GRATER 6148 5120- GRATER 6167 81 82 TYPE TYPE P 17 TYPE "J" "J" 34+424 32 +71.6 R143 L103 23.5 23.5 - 23.5 23.0 - 23.5 27.0 23.0 5105 - GRATER 6148 83 'I" 84 +31.3 L10.0 - - 20.8 22.8 TYPE -TYPE 69+49.1 L 743.6 - - 18.0 -- 18.0 22.0 24.4 17.5 17.5 6610- QRATR6167 3110 - GRATER 5665 18 TYPE - 27.0 23.0 5105 - GRATER 6148 84 / CS -2 20 TYPE "r 32+71.6 R10.1 23.5 - 23.5 - 26.9 229 5120 - GRATER 6167 85 TYPE "J" 69+49.7 L765.9 - 20 0 - 240 192 3110- GRATER5665 21 TYPE "P 30+14.1 R10.9 - 23.4 - - 269 22.8 5120- GRAT'ER6167 86 TYPE"P 69-1-47.6 L915.4 20.0 19.7 - - 224 26.1 219 5105 - GRATER 6148 22 TYPE "r 30 +11.2 L 122 23.4 23.3 - 26.8 228 5120- GRATE* 6167 87 TYPE'P 96+71.5 R14.8 - - - 22.4 25.9 191 5105 - GRATER 6148 23 24 TYPE "3" TYPE "P 55+28.9 56+72.2 R10.5 L19.6 23.3 - 2i.3 20.4 23.5 - - 23.5 27.0 276 199 19.9 5120 - GRATER 6167 5120 - GRATER 6167 88 89 TYPE "J" TYPE' P 140+13.0 96 +14.8 L14.0 L IO 5 22.4 19.6 224 224 224 25.9 25 9 21.9 21.9 5105 - GRATE!! 6148 5120 - GRATER 6167 25 TYPE' J" TYPE' J" 56+72.9 58+20.6 R 19.5 L 14.6 20.4 - - 20.4 - - - 27.3 199 5120 - GRATER 6167 90 TYPE "J" TYPE" 140+16.7 94+06.7 R149 9 L 11.0 - 20 0 _ - 224 224 - 223 26.2 19.5 5105 - GRATER 6148 26 58+49.6 L 14.5 23.0 20.6 - - 273 20.1 5120 - GRATER 6167 91 P 93 +19.4 93 +10.4 R14.9 L 10.8 - - 22.3 - 223 223 223 25.8 25.8 25.8 21.8 21.8 21.8 5120 - GRATER 6167 5105 - GRATER 6148 5120 - GRATER 6167 27 28 TYPE' P TYPE "r 58 +20.3 R 14.9 20.4 228 23.3 27 3 27.3 19.9 20.1 5120 - GRATER 6167 GRATER 5120 - ATE# 6167 92 93 TYPE' TYPE' P 29 30 TYPE °P TYPE "P 58+49.5 124-98.0 R 14.6 R20.4 20.6 20.7 - - 23.3 20.7 23.3 233 -- 273 273 20.2 20.2 5120 - GRATER 6167 5120- GRATER6167 94 95 TYPE '1" TYPE "J" TYPE 'P 93+00.2 92+06.5 91+87.3 R14.6 R14.6 R14.4 22.3 21.8 - 223 223 - 223 - 223 - 25.8 25.8 21.3 21.8 5120- GRATER6167 5120- GRATER6167 31 TYPE "P TYPE "P 12+64.6 12+63.6 R20.8 L19.9 - - 20.7 21.0 - - - 273 20.5 5120 - GRATER 6167 96 TYPE *J" 91+980 L10.3 - 21.8 223 22.2 25.8 21.3 5105- G1ATF#6148 32 33 TYPE "P 12+98.7 L19.7 21.0 - 20.7 20.7 - 273 27.2 202 20.4 5120 - GRATER 6167 5120 - GRATER 6167 97 98 TYPE' P 91+345 L 10.6 20.0 - 22.2 22.2 22.2 26.0 25.7 19.5 20.3 5105 - GRATER 6148 5120 - GRATER 6167 34 TYPE • P 61+41.1 L 14.4 - 20.9 - "" " ]n 7 77 2 202 5120 - GRATER 6167 - 99 TYPE "7" 110+19.4 L 15.4 223 20.8 22.2 ]SR 21.8 5105 - GRATER 6148 35 36 TYPE "P TYPE "P 61+42.2 61 +70.3 R 15.5 R14.8 209 23.2 20.5 23.7 27.2 20.0 5120 - GRATER 6167 37 TYPE "P 61 +70.7 L 14.4 23.7 20.9 38 TYPE "P 63+12.3 L 196 20.5 39 TYPE"). 63 +122 R 194 20.5 40 TYPE "J" 42+68 0 R 108 24 I 20.5 27.2 27.1 271 20.4 277 200 200 5120 - GRATER 6167 100 101 TYPE" T' 110+11.5 R142 22.2 222 5120 - GRATER 6167 5120 - GRATER 6167 102 TYPE "P 87 +68.6 R103 222 25 7 103 TYPE "1" 115 +61.1 L 13.7 23.6 5120 - GRATER 6167 104 TYPE "J" 115+60.9 R 145 224 224 41 TYPE "J" 42 +71 7 L 122 24 1 237 42 43 TYPE" I" TYPE' 1" 65+07.8 66+49.9 R 106 1.1a9 23.7 24.1 24 1 23.5 27 6 277 232 23 6 5120 - GRATER 6167 5120 - GRATE)! 6167 105 TYPE "1" 115+905 R 14.2 22 4 19 3 22 4 25 9 21.7 21.7 21.9 25 9 5105 - GRA'TER 6148 21 9 5120 - GRATER 6167 5105 - GRATER 6148 co PI AN V1FW GRATE MINI BE CAST YODEL 5290 OR APPROWD ECM SEE STEET 0.-1 CONTROL STRUCTURE #2 MODIFIED FDOT TYPE "C" INLET NOT TO SCALE STRUCTURE STRUCTURE TYPE STATEN ORME NORTE INVERT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE TABLE SOLITTI PPTERT NEST WITERT TYPE TC. TYPE 'CT 5/2 21.5 2119 RECT. 25.8 BLEEDER TOP MTN BLEEDER AA 17.0 10 18 8 106 TYPE" J" 115+904 L 14.9 22 4 22 4 27.2 23.0 44s TYPE "P 118 +22.8 R 103 22.3 45 46 TYPE "J" TYPE `J* 66+360 66+64.7 R 14.6 R14.8 23.5 23.5 23.2 23.5 25.8 27.0 21.8 5120 - GRATER 6167 5105 - GRATE)/ 6148 107 108 TYPE 'I" TYPE' J" 118 +229 121+312 L 10.3 L0.1 22.3 22.3 223 22.3 22.3 259 23.0 5120 - GRATER 6167 109 TYPE' 1" 125+83.5 R 105 223 27.0 227 5120 - GRAM 6167 110 TYPE"). 47 48 TYPE"P TYPE' J' 106+61.8 106+61.2 L 11.0 R 9.8 229 22.9 23.4 264 224 5105 - GRATER 6148 111 TYPE "P 125+83.6 128 +109 L 10.1 R14.4 224 22.3 26.4 224 5105 - GRATER 6148 112 TYPE "J" 49 TYPE "P 23+81.9 L 14.4 23.2 229 23.4 50 51 52 53 TYPE 'r TYPE "J" TYPE "J" 24+10.4 23+95.5 TYPE "P 18+95.3 L14.4 R 10.2 L99 229 20.1 23.4 23.4 269 26.9 22.4 26.9 19.6 229 5120 - GRATER 6167 113 TYPE" P' 128 +10.9 128 +40.3 L 14.3 L143 19 6 224 224 223 26.6 25.8 25.8 5120 - GRATER 6167 21 8 5120 - GRATER 6167 5105 - GRATER 6148 5120 - GRATER 6167 5105 - GRATER 6148 21 8 5105 - GRATER 6148 25.9 21.9 19.7 5120 - GRATER 6167 114 TYPE "r 5105 - GRATER 6148 115 TYPE "I" 23.3 26.9 22.8 18+81_4 R13.4 228 228 23.3 268 223 5105 - GRATER 6148 54 TYPE "I" 19+10.7 R 14.4 228 55 56 TYPE" J" TYPE" J" 101 +53.6 101 +53.4 R104 1162 23.3 19.2 23.3 23.3 26.8 23.3 26.8 26.8 18.7 22.8 5120 - GRATER 6167 5120 - GRATER 6167 5105 - GRATER 6148 116 117 TYPE "C 118 TYPE "3" TYPE "1" 128 +40.4 129+65.8 129+66.5 119 18" -YARD DRAIN 228 57 TYPE "I" 54+00.2 R14.4 23.3 23.4 58 59 60 TYPE"J" TYPE "2" TYPE 'r 53 +71.9 52+03.9 52+019 R 14.8 L 10.3 23.4 234 22.9 26.9 269 264 228 22.9 5105 - GRATE# 6148 224 5120 - GRATER 6167 120 121 18" -YARD DRAIN 18" -YARD DRAIN 129+894 129+89.7 R14.3 L 183.4 L26.9 L 10.3 21.9 19.7 224 220 19.4 22.4 25.9 25.9 23 7 21.9 21.9 23.4 25 9 25.9 19.1 5120 - GRATER 6167 5120 - GRATER 6167 21.4 5120 - GRATER 6167 189 192 21.9 5120 - GRA'TER 6167 3111 - GRATER 5665 5120 - GRATER 6167 5105 - GRA -TER 6148 131 +10 0 129+866 R 1214 23.5 23.0 R 1218 23 5 27.0 129+09.6 23.5 193 5120 - GRATER 6167 122 TYPE °I" 143+740 L 10.5 220 19.3 220 25.5 5120 - GRATE# 6167 123 TYPE "0" R 193 23.4 229 22.9 26 6 22.4 5120 - GRATER 6167 61 62 TYPE" C" TYPE *J" 77+76.2 77 +37.4 R 97.7 R 10.9 22.4 229 22.4 224 229 26.4 21.9 6610 - GRATE#6210 124 125 18" -YARD DRAIN 18" -YARD DRAIN 26 4 21.9 63 64 TYPE "P TYPE "P 77 +382 76+112 L 10.1 R 13.3 229 192 65 TYPE "P 75+36.1 L10.6 21.6 21.9 23.1 22.4 66 67"' TYPE "J" 18" -YARD DRAIN 75+80 2 118 +20.7 R 169 R 1228 21.9 193 21.9 26.4 21.9 264 26.6 264 22.4 5120 - GRATER 6167 5105 - GRATER 6148 126 127 TYPE' J" TYPE "2" 143 +73.9 127 +43.4 125+64.1 R. 1229 R123.2 22.0 193 19.3 25.5 27.0 27.0 5120 - CRATER 6167 5120 - GRATER 6167 122 +88.0 122 +88.1 193 193 220 220 18.7 21.1 5120 - GRATER 6167 5105 - GRATER 6148 128 129 18" -YARD DRAIN 27.0 21.4 18.8 5120 - GRATER 6167 PVC -TYP 130 TYPE"? TYPE "J" 116+85.7 114+04.7 R123.1 L14.5 25.5 25.5 18.8 18 8 18 8 5120 - GRATE# 6167 5120 - GRATER 6167 19.3 114+04_5 19.3 22.0 193 131 18" -YARD DRAIN 115+371 68 69 TYPE 'r 70 TYPE" J" TYPE "I" 15+61.6 74 +37 6 R 21.7 L 10.3 19.8 198 23.0 23.1 26.3 26 4 19.3 5120 - GRATER 6167 132 TYPE "J" 19.3 5120 - GRATE)/ 6167 15+59 8 L223 19.8 19.8 263 193 5120 - GRATER 6167 . Located south of Structure # 107 Located west of Structure # 127 2007 RBFH Inc. `DATE BY REVISIONS l Date. 11/30/2006 Scale. 7 Design By. NM Drown By. RR Check By NN i c VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0IIMI■1 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY 73+04.1 R123.2 L 170.3 21.5 19 3 25 5 25 5 18 8 5120 - GRATER 6167 5120 - GRATER 6167 27 0 188 19 5 5120 - GRA TER 6167 1121 A Boyle Engineming Company 421 N.W. 3rd Street. Okeechobee. Fl 34972 (863) 763-8999 Fox: 063) 763-6692 CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, Value By Design" CRATE WALL BE CAST IKE. 88•0 OR APPROVED USUAL 5F...041:1-A=6 CFCTION 9-F1 CONTROL STRUCTURE #1 MODIFIED FD07 TYPE "C" INLET NOT 70 SCALE SNET 17-1 CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG IN FLORIDA 1-800-432- 4770 IT'S THE LAW( SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA. INC. THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE PAVING, GRADING, & DRAINAGE DETAILS LRFIS PROJECT No: 05-0260 SHEET 8 PIPE DRAINAGE PIPE TABLE TYPE PIPE SIZE (INCHES) LENGTH (FEET) 4:1 MITERED END SECTION 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 24 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 24 24 18 18 18 18 18 18 24 24 18 113 87 166 144 53 152 32 31 24 31 170 23 114 121 121 26 26 41 144 32 31 31 126 32 47 31 126 32 31 31 41 136 32 26 121 121 123 149 2 45 46 PVC PVC 18 18 32 31 47 PVC 18 122 (5) 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 2007 Lars Inc. DATE BY PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC 18 24 18 18 24 18 18 18 30 24 18 18 18 152 27 28 30 31 141 32 169 161 132 161 27 82 REVISIONS PIPE DRAINAGE PIPE TABLE TYPE PIPE SIZE (INCHES) LENGTH (ter) 4: i MITERED END SECTION 61 PVC 18 96 62 PVC 18 23 63 PVC 24 164 64 65 66 PVC PVC PVC 36 36 18 32 28 132 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC 18 18 18 30 30 24 18 24 18 18 18 36 36 36 18 18 18 18 24 24 36 96 52 34 129 23 98 83 32 23 138 160 123 23 42 23 53 39 149 87 PVC 24 149 88 PVC 18 45 89 PVC 18 32 90 PVC 24 32 91 92 93 94 PVC PVC PVC PVC 24 30 18 18 205 147 95 22 95 96 PVC PVC 18 18 30 22 97 98 PVC PVC 24 24 28 62 99 100 101 102 PVC PVC PVC PVC 36 24 18 18 148 244 33 33 103 104 105 106 PVC PVC PVC PVC 18 18 18 18 97 228 32 31 107 108 PVC PVC 18 18 32 23 109 PVC 18 126 110 PVC 18 130 111 112 113 PVC PVC PVC 18 18 18 157 126 23 114 Dot.. 11/30/2006 Scale: T Design By NH PVC 18 VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING ADJUST AU_ SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY 31 WhINC. PIPE 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 DRAINAGE PIPE TABLE TYPE PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC RCP PIPE SIZE 18 24 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 24 LENGTH 32 31 151 23 121 81 77 128 23 62 4:1 MITERED END SECTION 125 126 PVC PVC 18 18 75 97 2 127 PW 18 23 128 RCP 24 62 129 PVC 18 119 2 130 131 PVC RCP 18 24 97 62 132 PVC 18 32 2 133 PVC 18 28 134 135 PW PVC 18 24 124 156 136 PVC 24 212 137 138 PVC PVC 18 36 114 137 Fieoyy Duty Reinforcing Double Stitched Hem Draw Cord 42" Polypropylene Filter Fabric Rigid Oak Stake Recommended Toe—in 1. Silt Fence shall be installed per manufactures specifIcations prior to the start of construction and shall not be removed until construction is complete. 2. The Controctor shall inspect and repair the silt fence after each rain event and remove sediment when necessary. 3. Removed sediment shall be deposited in on area that will not contribute sediment offsite and can be perrnonently stabilized. 4. The silt fence shall be placed on slope contour to maximize its ponding efficiency. 5. If ditch level is deeper than 30". then a Floating Silt Screen shall be used. SILT FENCE DETAIL CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS. SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "ParineTS For Results, Value By Design" 421 N.W. 3rd Street. Okeechobee. Fl 34972 (863) 763-8999 Fax: (863) 763-6692 ALL TRENCHING SHALL C014PLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA TRENCH SAFETY ACT AND THE OCCUPATIONAIJST SAFETY AND HEALTH ASSOCIATION FINISH GRADE SLOPE SIDES AS NECESSA PLACE & COMPACT SPECIFICATIONS NOTES: FOUNDATION BOTTOM WIDTH 1. ALL TRENCHING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA TRENCH SAFETY ACT. 2. DXMIAIMF1 A FOUNDATION 1AAY BE REQUIRED IN POOR SOIL CONDMONS. 3. JEDDM BEDDING IS REQUIRED PRIMARILY TO BRING THE TRENCH BOTTOM UP TO GRADE AND ADJUST FOR PIPE BELLS. BEDDING MATERIALS SHALL PROVIDE A UNIFORM AND ADEQUATE LONGITUDINAL SUPPORT UNDER THE PIPE. MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED IN 4- TO 6" IJFTS, UGHTLY COMPACTED, UNIFORM AND NOT FINER THAN SHE FOUNDATION MATERIAL 4 HAUNCHING; HAUNCHING MATERIAL SHALL BE HAND PLACED TO THE SPRINGLINE OF THE PIPE. MATERIAL SHALL BE CONSOUDATED UNDER THE PIPE AND HAND TAMPED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SIDE SUPPORT. 5. JNITIAL BACKFII I: INITIAL BACKFILL SHALL BE HAND PLACED TO 12- ABOVE THE TOP OF THE PIPE. THE SOIL SHALL BE CONSOLIDATED BY HAND TAMPING. 6. DBLAL_BAOrsjiLL FINAL BACKFILL MATERIAL SIAY BE MACHINE PLACED. MATERIAL UNDER ROADWAYS SIAY REOUIRE SPECIAL COMPACTION AND DENSITY TESTS. 7. DENCITY; TWO (2) DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE TAKEN FOR EACH 12" OF TRENCH BACKFILL AND EACH 5" LIFT OF BASE ROCK OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. THE BACKFIU. FOR THE FIRST AND SECOND STAGES SHALL BE PLACED IN 6. LAYERS (COMPACTED THICKNESS) AND SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 98X OF MAXIMUM DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY A.A.S.H.T.O. T-180. TYPICAL TRENCHING & BACKFILLTNG PIALLMI Reference Per Summary of Droinoge Structures Sheet arsgarairissimal SECTION VIEW FOOT INDEX 272 & 273 MITERED END SECTIONS SCALE N.T.S. Elevation Per Plan Ditch Grade CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE N YOU DIG IN FLORIDA IrS THE LAW! SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE PAVING , GRADING, Sc DRAINAGE DETAILS If LBFH PROJECT No: 05-0260 SHEET Type 1 Concrete (See Specifications) SECTION VIEW NOTES: 1. Saw cut contraction joints on 10' centers max. within 48 hours ofter pouring curb. 2. All materials and construction shall be in accordance with FDOT Specifications Section 520 and FDOT Roadway & Traffic Design Standards index number 300. 2' -0" VALLEY GUTTER 9" SCALE: N.T.S. 1' -3" NOTES: 1. Saw cut contraction joints on 10' centers max. within 48 hours after pouring curb. 2. All materials and construction shall be in accordance with FDOT Specifications Section 520 and FDOT Roadway & Traffic Design Standards index number 300. 7 ." Std. 6" Min.* 2' -0" � Type 1 Concrete (See Specifications) MODIFIED TYPE "E" CURB SCALE: N.T.S. r R T /6" 9" 1 Type 1 Concrete (See Specifications) NOTES: 1. Saw cut contraction joints on 10' centers max. within 48 hours after pouring curb. 2. All materials and construction shall be in accordance with FDOT Specifications Section 520 and FDOT Roadway & Traffic Design Standards index number 300- TYPE "A" CURB SCALE: N.T.S. SIDEWALK 2.0' TRUNCATED DOME MODIFIED "E" CURB MODIFIED "E" CURB TRANSITION AREA 2.5' MIN. — 5.0' MAX. SIDEWALK MODIFIED "E" CURB TRANSITION SCALE: N.T.S. TYPE "A" CURB MODIFIED "E" CURB CURB POINT TYPE "A" CURB 3 -WAY CURB TRANSITION SCALE: N.T.S. SIDEWALK VALLEY CURB (WHERE APPLICABLE) Lk 2.0' TRUNCATED DOME TRANSITION AREA 2.5' MIN. — 5.0' MAX. MODIFIED "E" CURB VALLEY CURB TO MODIFIED "E" CURB TRANSITION SCALE: N.T.S. MODIFIED "E" CURB TRANSITION AREA 2.5' MIN. — 5.0' MAX. TYPE "A" CURB TYPE "A" CURB TO MODIFIED "E" CURB TRANSITION SCALE: N.T.S. 30' 60' Scale: r = 30' APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 11E —IN, PROPOSED FORCEMAIN INTO EXISTING 6" FORCEMAIN. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION. CONST. 228±LF OF 6" PVC FORCEMAIN FROM LIFT STATION TO EXISTING FORCEMAIN TIE —IN. STA: 50 +41.4. 25.3'L CONST. LIFT STATION PER - DETAIL SHEET U- 2I I 2 2I $W 10TH AVENUE - PROPOSED 6" PVC WATERMAIN OFFSITE FORCEMAIN TIE -IN DETAIL CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG IN FLORIDA 1- 800 - 432 -4770 IT'S THE LAW! SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA, INC. © 2007 OREN Inc. 6 `DATE BY REVISIONS 1 Date: 11/30 /2006 Scale' 7 Design By. NN Drawn By, RR Check By_ NN VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 1 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY l 1 5— hC. A Boyle Engineering Company 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fax: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No 959 www.lbfh.com CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, Valve By Design " THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE PAVING, GRADING, & DRAINAGE DETAILS 19111 PROJECT No: 05 -0260 SHEET D -5 e: a: \05- 0360 \fin An \o © 2007 LBFH Inc. DEWATERING NOTES: — CONTRACTOR TO MONITOR DISCHARGE DAILY WITH SAMPLES TO BE PROVIDED TO SFWMD AND ENGINEER FOR REVIEW. — SAMPLE TO BE LESS THAN 29 NTU ABOVE BACKGROUND LEVELS. — DAILY INSPECTION OF TURBIDITY CONTROL REQUIRED — CONTRATOR TO HALT DEWATERING ACTIVITY IN CASES OF FAILING WATER QUALITY TESTS AND CONTACT SFWMD AND ENGINEER — CONTINGINCY SHALL BE, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING ITEMS LISTED BELOW. 1. HALT DEWATERING ACTIVITY IMMEDIATELY 2. INSURE PROPER PLACEMENT AND QUALITY OF TURBIDITY CONTROLS 3. REPAIR OR REPLACE FAULTY EQUIPMENT AND /OR BARRIERS 4. RETEST WATER TO INSURE PROPER QUALITY AND OPERATION OF SYSTEM. AREA TO BE BERMED 1.32 ACRES DEWATERING PUMP I AREA TO BE DEWATERED POND #3 / RECHARGE i TRENCH SAMPLE LOCATION WETLAND 3 \ WETLAND 4 a V SAMPLE LOCATION DATE BY REVISIONS Date: 2/13/07 Scale: NOTED Design By MM Drawn By RR Check By. MM VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 - 1 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY AMPLE LOCATION 1 '.WETLAND / RECHARGE TRENCH Air% RECHARGE TRENCH AREA TO BE BERMED 1.32 ACRES DEWATERING PUMP 90.116 1 a 120' ILLf CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS -Partners For Results, INC. Value By Design.. 421 N.W. 3rd Street. Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fax: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 www.lbfh.com Jf- - THE LAKEHOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE PROJECT DEWATERING PLAN 11 LBFH PROJECT No: 05 -0260 SHEET D -6 h 0 ,SAMPLING POINT (ON HYDRANT\ SCALE N.T.S. WATER SUPPLY) SUPPLY) NOTES: 1 � "S CROSS CO ER POSSIBLE. NG3O INCHES AND B SEPARATION As 1.1.W 2. MEREVER SS u A SEWER MARS OR CROSSES OVER W. LESS lH M . VERTILGL SEPARRAA ION THEN D.P. S AU cB US FEET CENTERED FOR BOTH Np JOINTS PIPES NTHN FOR A DISTANCE OF 5 FEET OF ME CROSSING. SSINO WTI LOOSES SEPARATION MCC. BE MMNTM EO BETWEEN ALL PIPES (STORM. SEWER WATER) WHENEVER POSSIBLE. a ME AB MINIMUM SEPARATIOI WITH ... REWIRED FOR ANYSSEPARATDNL LESS TINA tB RUCHES MMNTAN 10 FEET SEPARATION BETWEEN WATER AND SEWER MINIMUM 5 FORCE MAN CROSSING WATER WIN BE LAI PROVIDE A N.M. VORTICAL SEPARATION OF B INCHES BETWEEN PROVIDE PIPES WITH WATERMAN CRJSSMG OVER FORCE MM. B. ALL CROSSINGS SHALL CONFORM TO DEP STANDARD SEPARMIC. REQUIREMENT. © 2007 LBFH Inc. WATER MAIN — SANITARY SEWER =ELM SCALE: VAL. No.1 VJ III' Il���.�p ►'ql5 CORP. STOP MN. VANE 50.2 O°SOP IDED CRPORRATT=GU . (t T 2 REDUCE PREssJREBtP�A KKROW TO 17 VALE AT TAP OR TEE /•7 VALVE . BOTH VALVES ATP CAL TESTING PURPOSES. HG. H THE FOR ORPOM0ON STOP MY BE USED FOR FEEDING CHLORINE SOUIRONS. AND 1 VENTING DURING PMESSURE/LEMMDE TESTS. 1. THEY 0 MALL BE 1CTfEDO�ORREE F ARE FLUSHING. PERSONNEL ON SHAM A. AFTERTE BACTERIOLOGICAL VALVE VALVE NO. 2 IS TO BE AF OR 5. PRE SURE TEST APB A PE P P ECROMRNREIED R S D ;SS O DAORPCPE R OLVSL E OS 711-Y. THE 000. BEEN NO emu DOUBLE_VALVE nrrAu. SCALE N.T.S. vwvjv >�: DTSTING GROUND OR ROAD BASE • RIG RAOLDLL PLACED PRI °COMPARED PER ASO SPEOWICOT oNS. (3-1/2" O� 5 P EOUWFD se OF TM [N ROMPING BACNFlLL °INCREASES TO 2:- EPA. GRANULAR IY .(17 ItrS12E) BEDDRC. MATERIAL NOTES: 1. BEDDING MTERIIL SHALL CONSSE OF N -SRO GRANULAR MATERIAL - 1/0 • Lux. uNSurrAILLE WINER ROLK BNUI BE MOVED. CI SALON AS WDa DEBRIS D MOVED. IS MO 2. ARPRPIPEUTE CONPAGTION UNDER SUPPORTED 11 PIPE OOUSOHCHES.IENRH WON 3. DIE IS ABE PLACED . INTNEOIL TRENCH. UNLESS A WET TRENCH SHALL H. VFW uSHALL D FREE OF UNSLSTABIE MTERML SUCH AS LARGER SHALL CONFDI ro STATE OF FLORIDA TRENCH SAFETY ALT. B. ALL R CH 'RIDE DETECTOR TAPE SHALL BE INSTALLED AeRLE ALL PPE T 3M� LOCATOR R BALLS SHALL BE INSTM3ID AT EACH P10N10 IN ME PIPE LINE ECTID AND AT EACH Ne:EDON M a 3 LOCATORS TD PROW :LED BY DEVELOPER AS SPFBFIED BF O.uA CouPACT TO 100s • ° et5s oN ALL OTHER AREAS mai NOTE COMPACT TO D ELSEWHERE NOTES 1. RANT SHALL BE INSTALLED PLUM. AND SLUE THE DEL AND COLOR WOR.AIO SHALL BE PER Om R 3. VALVE SHALL BE PLACED MJACIM TO Mw, TIED To TEE A ANCHOR TEES ARE PERMGTED. 5. ALL HYDRANTS SHALL BE TEED OFF OF MAAS. 6. HYDRANTS SHALL NOT RE PLACED IN SIDEWALK. ROA... DR 7. MECALUCS ON ALL M.G. TYPICAL FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY SCALE: N.T.S. TYPICAL TRENCH DETeIIF SCALE N.T.S. 3/ //S NO. YIN M PVC CORPORA TpN STOP DOUBLE STRAP SADDLE BRASS MARKER WITS REQUIRED ABOVE SLGPLE POLAR SHOULD BE ON A SERVICE USE OR FIRE HYDRANT If POSSIBLE SAMPLING POINT (ON )IA1N) SCALE: N.T.S. SEE NOTE No. • FOR ACCEPTABLE DEFLECTION FITTING TYPE CONFECT FIRE pEMTER A R.- LENGTH OF FONT OF CROSSING LII �lii(ii�'11== il� �Tu DEFLECTION TYPE Ms. CC P ERTO NOTES: I. E TO BERG flit COVER 0 S TO Ow PRESSURE PIPE TO MESS MCROSSS ABOVE O PIPE was V VERTICAL SEPARATION WOMAN COVER TO MIMED GRADE O WHEN 2. FITTINGS SHALL BE RFSRRAKED LWTH LRCM/LAICAL RESTRABFTS (MECALUG) AND GRAVITY BLOCK. 3. THE DEFLECT\. TYPE CROSSNG IS PREFERRED. 4. DO NOT DICE. 756 Of MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDED MAXIMUM JOINT DEFLECTION. 5. IIECMANIGALT RESINOUS ALL TORSOS. A5 PER MMUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATION. • 36• MN IN STATE ROAD RAW AND UNDER ASPRALT _PRESSURE PIPE CQli$ICT mum SCALE: N.T.S. TOP OF PA ELAN CAST IRON COVER YARNED 'WATER- OR 'SEWER" ORME M CORM TO SODDED AREAS POUR ,_, /. D.L A TArp VALVE BOX (IN�DE MECHANICAL JOINT VALVE SOUARE UT FINISH GRADE UNPAVED SURFACE BOg. NUT M•TEMODN IS MOORED VALVES IOTA MORE THAN Te OF VALVE COVER. MEAD NUT TO WIMIN TB. OF VALVE BO% TYPICAL VALVE SETTING SCALE: N.T.S. PLAN HEAVY DUTY C.I. FRAME AND COVER. WITH NON- RENETRATNC PICK 110115: MINIMUM WEIONT 325 POUNDS: NEEWVI CAT. No. R1772 -8 OR EQUAL PAVED SURFACE SECTION RAIN GUARD 1 SITES 1. A WATER -TIGHT MANHOLE "RAIN GUARD" INSERT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ALL MANHOLES. NOIES. yh IV "oar.' A LDNluuu OF °C ov °ii. T I""sM+H EF:a E°FSC @". e• To .e• DFrBEr r0 &o P — YSERic .,,VEI°wLD5o0T ErMPVLEEOtu ERHGRiN oRroa- WONG BE POLYETHYLENE 4 ALL S/g M ERR5 A 3/4 , LOCKING ANGLE v RESPECT/RELY. D. DIMENSION RE TIES ( ASS 5 / X 3/4 • METER) DT (1. 7. MAXIMUM SERVICE LENGTH GIS t METER. • 30 AWN_ IN STATE ROAD R/W C UNDER ASPHALT TYPICAL SERVICE CONNECT LION (UNDERGROUND) AND COVER NOT TO SCALE ELE TRWRC PLAN EASELIEM. R/AO OR PROPERTY UNE EASEMENT. RAW OR PROPERTY UNE TREATE0 WOOD MARKER SIMIE, 2" X 4,+'Fifr 1� = nlar_A itU 71 •via MFMmR OP. SINGLE SERVICE CONNECTION ELECTRONIC sums PLUG k SEAL V.V.U. 5. DOUBLE Y MAN TO BE DEITRMNE N THE m (BG 1 DISTURBED EARTH DOUBLE SERVICE CONNECTION SECTION NOTES 1. SEANCE LATERALS SHALL TERMINATE AT PROPERTY UNE AT A DEPTH OF 3 F PLUGGED HT M AND YKED 5I111 A 2 "%2" TREATED STAKE MID A.P.C. ELECTRONIC MARKER 2. 1HE MINIMUM DIAMETER OF ALL SERVICE LATERALS SHALL BE 6 INCHES. 3. CONNECTION TO 0.1.1A. LATERAL SHALL BE MADE WITH A TWO WAY CLFANOVT AT PROPERTY UNE 4. THE BE UU UNLESS DE TH PRE -AP SHALL Er4M MAX. AT THE SISSIES DEPTH OF THE MIRE TYPICAL SEWER oSERVICEE COOP"L' ^TI^DT CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE 1 YOU DIG IN FLORIDA 1- 800 - 432 -4770 ITS THE LAW! SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA, INC. r `DATE BY REVISIONS ■ 5' Dote- 11/30/2006 SCOIe: 4 Design By MM Drown By RR Check By- MM SN 1 VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY L. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, INC. Value By Design." A Boyle Engineering Company 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fox: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 WWW.Ibfh.com THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE WATER Ac SANITARY SYSTEM DETAILS LBFIi PROJECT No: 05 -0260 SHEET U -1 3/4 - BMW UNE aE STOP (TAP) SINGLE SERVICE /-- 3/4 ' UNE (T.) 'i adv.GE UN BRANCH DOUBLE SERVICE NOTES: 1. AUTHORIZED SERVICE UNE NATER1AL *1.131 BE POI111111 10 Tem. 2. MuLOPLE E ON ONS OF MORE TON • ETERS PER HANDLED AN DI�6 S' THAN 2' N DIAMETER SHALL BE 3. BRANCH FOR BETWEEN CORK d.STSTOP 01 ANGLE VALVE OR CORP. SLOP a Y no 4 TYPICAL SERVICE FOR MULTIPLE SERVICES SCALE: N.T.S. PIPE ro 6' E- It" 24' PIPE 0 e- e• 12- 1r x4• 36• 72' -v 3- r 13- 36• 48- 11 1/4' 16- 20- 24' 4E- 11 1/4' 1' 3e. 3r 3r 36- 42• 54- l1- 18' 30- 4e- w- 38- 4e- 76' e• 12. 33. 4r 80' 54- VERTICAL CREST DEGREE OF BEND 22 1/2' 1 H 24- 24' w 49" 54' 66- 98- 45' ZB' 36• 48- 72• VERTICAL SAG DEGREE OF BEND 22 1/2 1 38- Y 3r 2. $4- 78- l8 N' 68- 78- 98- 45' 1• 36- 3e. 48- 68- 18- 99- -H- 4e- w 72• 24• 35. 54. 72 Or 125' 90' -L- 36' 44- e3. 90' 1- 34 X' 48- 72• 95- 123. 60- © 2007 LBFH Inc. \ DATE BY STRAP DFETAIL NOTES: 1. SSEI5 330'0 FOR IWO AND LARGER minas. 2. STRAPS 3.4TH GOSSET TO BE caLvANUED AMER yELgNG. GRAVITY BLOCKS FOR PRESSURE PIPINQ SCALE N.T.S. REVISIONS 1 • is kf Date' 11/30/2006 Scale: 7 De5i60 By MM Drawn By RR Check By NM S49CLIT (TYPICAL) MBE S-1 ASPIYLT TW.' �bL�M.•sS A. o SUBBASE. .9I7p� CODP4CTED SEE 16'PICV. 13001 DETAIL NOTE: 1. 2. FOB ASPINLT DRNEWAn, THE SUBBASE SMALL RE r uM. 3. 4. CW90(10�RET REFUGEYEM 0090 llMTCHOB mCoS11,20 EIE LOTH REPAIR TO BE 001E 1101(0 BY OWNER Or RMDNAY. SCALE: N.T.S. UNO5NRBE5 EARTH DI5 RB PLAN MDISIUR3 O EARTH UNDRTURaro EARTH PLAN BLOCKING DETAIL FOR VERTICAL SAG N.T.S. ELEVATION BLOCKING DETAIL FOR VERTICAL CREST N T.S. 0 termer, INNti Nat GRAvITT BLOC( C To BE FILLED WITH GROUT By 2. FITTINGS I6E E 91.1 BE N 200090 PATH SHIT OvERNG RE.EN7 001(35NCEOT00 00Hwm cALUCS o M Fxncic GRAVITY BLOCKS FOR ESSURE PIPINQ SC N.T.S. . VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 1 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY AB RELEASE VALVE DERGROUND WATER/LAIN) N.T.S. ONCE Y MP. / 1RP'�MRD WIWNE PRAM SIRFACE PRECAST GRADE MOS OR ERIC MASTERED MEE • OUTSIDE .j. OF /0810400 C10l 38-. A P30/Alt W INOE5 SHALL coNFLY M1114 An C 474 P LATEST REV �y UNE 6 c MmEI � C 4" 43. 1 LAnzr RD65NM N A3 ,2. 4UL16 (MN ,J IPII WPESUPPMr °/4 AT tY acLR ryN.) r Y a.v1 M ES: MN4 Dw (IPA) ELEVATION PLAN 2. THE MAN SHALL BE MEO6WICALLY RESTRAINED IN ACCORDANCE 27TH THE OM STANDARDS. THE MADDER or PIPE LC,WT S TO RE RESERANED 445114. BE PER THE OAMFACIURER RECOmENOATION. OY IMER SECTION AND BASE 916 BE NON1U06CM11 POURED 1. PRECAST CONCRETE TYPE II 4000 P.S.I. 2. - RANNEle OR EQUAL AT ALL RISER JOINTS (1/2- THICI( INSIDE ANO OUTSIDE. 9104 WIDTH AT LEAST 1/2 THE WN1 THICKNESS) 911) CROAT 3. ALL OPENINGS SHALL BE SEALED MN A WATERPROOF NON - SHRINKING GROUT. 4. FLOW CHANNELS STUD. BE CONS-Mt/CM TO DIRECT INFLUENT INTO FLOW STREAM (SEE DETAIL). 5. UFT HOLES ARE PERMRTED AND SHALL BE SEALED AFTER FUCCOEM OF RISER. 6. ALL PIPE HOLES SHALL BE PRECAST OR CORE- DRIUED. 7. APPROVED RUBBER BOOTS MUST BE USED 881) PVC PIPE 8. INSIDE DROPS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0 FEET. 8. COAT INFERIOR k EXTERIOR 97714 2 COATS COAL TM EPDXY, 8 1119. NN. DR3 FILM THICKNESS EACH COAT. r Aso GRAVEL STANDARD MANHNOT OLE TO CALF ((CONCENTRIC CONE) INC. L A Boyle Engineering Company CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, Valve By Design" 421 N.W. 3rd Street, Okeechobee, FI 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fox: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No 959 www.lbfh.com TYPICAL 2' E % END BLOWOFF TYPICAL MAIN LINE TERMINAL CLEANOUT 6' x 6- ( 91.4291.4) OR APPR0030 EQUAL GRADE 3' SQUARE J 3000 PS.I. CONC. PAD 6- PV.C_ WYE TO STREET SERVICE 6- CLEANOUT ASSEMBLY 19/ SCREWED CAP TO BUILDING TYPICAL SERVICE LATERAL TWO WAY CLEANOUT TYPICAL CLEANOUT NOT TO SCALE 03-3 r r 13 NED N. 1R LE® NE Mr WARN ot N earn Mum AMOS at NOT PAO ROMEO WIZ M IXOS YHV Mb � R�r1ESAW cam. MO PME 80 A • Y 1e• bows T r -n' id r X r ]o' l8- 4/3-48- 3-4'18- tee' MOM TYPICAL NAN OIE DIMENSIONS Ma V LOOM 1N1111fE OM MN e4'MIBWMWM IMININM ISM `NW WM S: SON MOOKOINI. at ANON MON MIMS VIED /OR NOWT NM I. CttA US ipM��wFORr 174 Ot 11180119 F1CON. -' gam• CAST W 355 4. A 9901UM OF 2 IAYER5 OF 330042T COMMIE Rem F wawa PRECAST MANHOLE DEPTH 6' AND G RATRA NO TO SCALE CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG IN FLORIDA 1- 800 - 432 -4770 IT'S THE LAW! SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA. INC. j THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE WATER & SANITARY SYSTEM DETAILS 11 1.133N PROJECT No 05 -0260 SHEET U -2 1 9 x SUPPLEMENTAL CONDITIONS SCOPE OF WORK: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL MATERIALS, LABOR, EQUIPMENT, TOOLS. SUPERVISION. TRANSPORTATION D INCIDENTALS NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT THE PAVING, DRAINAGE, UTILITIES D ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS, IN ACCORDNCE W THE PROVISIONS OF THESE SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS, SPECIFICATIONS AND THE THRUD0 -6. l SPI.H REEPAR BY LFFH,NIN�C.. F421 NW'NE 3 HOUSE', COVER BEE.( FLO 1DA 349 2P (6 3) D -1 763 -8999. IT IS THE OBJECTIVE OF THESE DOCUMENTS TO ASSURE THE TOTAL COMPLETION OF THE WORK REQUIRED TO PROVIDE PAVING. GRADING, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE LACE HOUSE' SUBDIVISION. I OCA1] 0 THE PROJECT IS LOCATED ON THE PROJECT IS LOCATED N THE SOUTH SIDE OF S.W. 8TH STREET. AND THE NORTI SIDE OF S.W. 15111 STREET IN OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 37S, RANGE 35E THE WORK IS GENERALLY N THE 50t ARE PARCEL PERMITS NO I IGFNSFS' CONSTRUCTION PERMITS FOR CERTAIN ELEMENTS OF THE PROJECT WORK HAVE BEEN OBTAINED OR APPUED FOR BY THE OWNER. AND THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROJECT REFLECT CONSTRAINTS ND CONDITIONS IMPOSED BY THESE PERMITS. THESE INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION PERMITS FROM THE SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SFWAFD) D CKEECHOBEE COUNTY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM FITS WORK AND SHALL CONSTRUCT THE PROJECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RFREOQM U ENGIt EER. UPON ERREMS E HERCONTRAC ORESSHLWHICURERALL VWORK PERMI75. APPROVALS OUSE LICENSES REQUIRED TO PERFORM HE WORK, ND HE SHALL PERFORM HE WORK IN STRICT ACCORDANCE W THOSE PERMITS, APPROVALS OR LICENSES. REFERFAH'E TO DOCUMENTS WHICH WILL OBE USED TO FOR SPECI SPECIFY R CONTROL TIEUMAERWS PLACED INRSPECIFICATIONS W000 OR CONSTRUCTION METHODS TO BE USED, HE TOLERANCES THAT WILL B ACCEPTABLE, AND CONTRACTUAL OR LEGAL OBLIGATIONS HE SPECIFICATIONS OR DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE 1. 'STANDARD GENERAL CONDITIONS OF HE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT.' THE LATEST EDITION, PREPARED BY HE ENGINEER'S JOINT CONTRACT DOCUMENTS COMMITTEE AND PUBLISHED BY HE NATIONAL SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINES. REFERENCE SHALL BE MADE: "GENERAL C00R10NS." 2. 2000000. 'FLORIDA ED BY HE FLORIDA TRANSPORTATION FRIEM OF OTRAJSPORTAON. REFEREE SHALL BEEMADE 'FDOTON. SPECIFICATIONS." 3. 'ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS 2000' PUBLISHED BY THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. REFERENCE SHALL BE MADE "FOOT INDEX" OR 'DOT STANDARDS." 4. "AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS LATEST EDITION REFERENCE SHALL BE MADE 5. 'OKEECHOBEE COUNTY LAND DE.ELOPMENT REGULATIONS', LATEST DRION. REFERENCE SHALL BE MADE AS 'COUNTY CODE" OR "COUNTY STANDARDS" OR "COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS.' BY REFERENCE, NE DOCUMENTS CITED ABOVE ARE MADE PART OF THESE SUPPLEMENTARY CONDIT10N5 D SPECIFICATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE COPIES OF EACH IN HIS POSSESSION FOR USE THROUGHOUT THE BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT WORK AND /OR B FANILIAR WFH HE APPUCABLE SECTIONS OF EACH DOCUMENT AND BE ABLE TO VERITY THAT ALL MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS ARE CONFORMANCE WITH THESE DOCUMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. ADDITIONALLY. THE WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH All OTHER APPUCABLE LOCAL REGIONAL FEDERAL STATE MID REGULATIONS OF RN 66 SUBPART P. WHICH IS PARTOHETRENCH SAFETY AT AS PART OF LAWS FLORIDA CHAPTER OONTRACT ISSUES GENERAL O . OTHERWISE SUPPLEMENTARY PRCTISIONS OF THE 'STANDARD GENERAL CONDITIONS OTONNSTRUCTI O NRAT REF REFERENCED ABOVE. SHALL BE USED TO GOVERN ALL ISSUES ADDRESSED IN THOSE GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR THIS PROJECT. OWNER -ENGINEER RFI ATWSHIP' NY AGREEMENT BED/JEER OWNER AND ENGINEER SHALL NOT E CONSTRUED TO PROVIDE ANY OBLIGATION FROM THE ENGINEER TO ANY THIRD PARTIES INCLUDING, BUT NOT UNITED T0, ARCHITECTS, UNDER ANY AGGRREMENT BETWEEN CONTRACTORS OWNER AND ENGINEER NUE ONLY TO O HOSE TWO PAR8ES OWNER. THE RAWING4 ERRORS OR MISSIONS IN TI-IF (RAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS: PRIOR TO INITIATION OF THE WORK, NE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK DIMENSIONS. GRADES, ELEVATIONS AND THE SUMMARY OF ES-TWEED QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS TO ASSURE HIMSELF THAT THEY ARE CORRECT AND THAT THE WORK CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED AS INTENDED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE O AWAMAGE OF ANY APPARENT ERROR OR OMISSION WHICH HE MIGHT DISCOVER. BUT SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF SUCH DISCOVERY. WH0 WILL THEN MAKE SUCH CORRECTIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS AS HE DEEMS NECESSARY FOR REFLECTING THE ACTUAL SPIRIT AND INTENT OF HE DRAWINGS NO SPECEIGTIONS BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED BY NORTH STAR GEOWTICS INC. (772) 781 -640. SOIL AND SUB -SOIL CONDITIONS- IT IS HE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR T0: 1. PLACE HIS OWN INTERPRETATION ON ANY AND ALL 501L AND SUB -SOIL DATA PORTRAYED ON THE DRAWINGS. 2. LOCATION PERFORM AND EXTENT SOIL SOOIL SUB-SOIL ND SUB-SOIL MCONDDITIONS THA1 14)1? AFFECT HIS WORK, AND CHARACTER, INCLUDE 3. CONTRACT PRICE CONSIDERATION ALL ASSURE ET 0 SUB-SOIL CONDRO WILL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THSPIFICATIONS AND HEPUCAH REGULATIONS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY. 1K FSTIIIATEO 170ANTRF5- THE QUANTITIES ESTIMATED FOR VARIOUS ITEMS OF WORK ARE ONLY ESTIMATES, AND MAT 0T REFLECT ALL THE REM5 OF WORK OR THE FINAL OUNTRES NEEDED TO COMPLETE HE PROJECT. IT G THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR O DO ALL WORK AND TO FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL IMPROVEMENTS SOWN 014 THE DRAWINGS, WHETHER OR NOT THEY ARE SHOWN IN THE ESTIMATED QUANTITIES. OR WHETHER THE FINAL QUANTITIES ARE MORE OR LESS THAN THOSE ESTIMATED. PAYMENT OF ALL UNIT PRICE WORK SHALL BE ON THE BASIS STATED IN SECTION 11.9 OF THE GENERAL CONDITIONS. HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONROI THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT THE REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS IN THE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS, AND SHALL USE AS HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS THE EXISTING PROPERTY CORNERS AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN SHEET. THE HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS WERE PROVIDED BY NORTH STAR IN ESTABORLISHHIINNG THE NECESSARY ELEVATORS AND GRADES BATH THE LOCATIONS TIONS HOWN ON ET PLANS. R SHALL BE HE RESPONSIBILDY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT ALL CONTROL POINTS AND TO RE- ESTABLISH SAID POINTS AS NECESSARY. REMAINING HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WIN THE PLANS AND DETAILS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE PROWOED FOR CLARITY. WHERE WRITTEN ND SCALED DIMENSIONS CONFCT, WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL GOVERN. 00ORDINATI01 OF WORK WITH ONES: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE HIS WORK W THE WORK OR IMPROVEMENTS OF OTHERS WITH REGARD TO NEW CONSTRUCTION, OR FOR THE NEED OF REMOVAL. RELOCATION OR ALTERATION OF EXISTING IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE FACILITES. HIS INCLUDES. BUT 5 NOT LIMED T0, HE OWNER HIS CONTRACTORS. SUBCONTRACTORS OR AGENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE APPROPRIATE PUBLIC AGENCIES PRIOR TO COMMENCING THE WORK WITHIN THEN JURISDICTION_ STANMR0S FOR OUAI ITT NO WORKMANSHIP, ALL MATERIALS. EQUIPMENT ND SUPPUES FURNISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR PERMANENT INCORPORATION IN THE WORK SHALL BE NEW AND O THE QUALITY STANDARDS SPECIFIED. WORKMANSHIP SHALL BE FIRST -CLASS ND THE FINISHED PRODUCT EQUAL TO THE BEST ACCEPTED STANDARDS OF THE TRADE FOR THE CATEGORY OF WORK PERFORMED. DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL ARRANGEMENTS B CITY COSTS TFORC1 948100TOR POWER. WATER AND WASTEWATER FACILITIES OBSERVING THE WORK: NE PROGRESS AND QUALITY OF THE WORK WILL BE OBSERVED BY HE OWNER'S ENGINEER OR ENGINEER'S APPOINTED EMPLOYEE- NO OBSERVER IS AUTHORIZED TO CHANGE ANY PROVISIONS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS OFF WITHOUT WRITTEN RELIEVE THE CCOONTRACTOR FROM OWNER'S REQUIREMENTS 08 'OlIESHALL DRAWINGS AND PRESENCE 0R HE SPECIFICATIONS. HE CONTRACTOR SHALL 5NE THE ENGINEER A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS NOTICE PRIOR TO REQUIRED INSPECTIONS. AND SHALL SUPPLY ALL EQUIPMENT NECESSARY TO PROPERLY TEST AND INSPECT THE COMPLETED WORK. THE RIGHT OF WA oNSSINCLUDES, BUT SNOT LIMITED TO, OTLJA GOVERN)AENT AGENCIES PRIOR TO OKEECHOBEE COUNTY. WORK IN A PUBLIC (14 AMMON TO THE REQUIREMENTS PREVIOUSLY FOLLOWING CONTROL CHECKPOINTS SHALL BE ADHERED TTO,ND HE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY HEOv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smut BE BORNE BY THE OWNER. ANY RETESTS REQUIRED DUE TO FAILURE TO MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE PERFORMED AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE NAME OF OTHER'S TESTING LABORATORY SHALL BE SUPPLIED AT THE PRECONSTRUC11ON MEETING. FXIGONG 1119 ITIFS AND STRUCTURES EXISTING 0160. STRUCORES AND FACILITIES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS WERE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM THE RECORDS EXNINED. NO GUARANTEE I5 MADE THAT ALL EXISTING MSELF OF THE ACTUAL SLOCATOR 0 THE UTILITIES. STRURTURESROR FACIILLMES PRIOR ON CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE OF ANY ACCURATE. THE WORK IN THE VICINITY. HE UTBIIY COMPANIES OR UTILITY AGENCIES WILL CO-OPERATE WITH THE CONTRACTOR IN LOCATING UNDERGROUND U 11088 THAT MAY E SUBJECT TO DAMAGE OR INTERRUPTION OF SERVICES DURING THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS PRIOR TO START OF THE WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST THAT EACH UTILITY AGENCY ADVISE HIM O HE LOCATION OF HEIR FACILITIES IN NE VGINITY. HE OWNER WILL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES SUSTAINED OR COSTS INCURRED BECAUSE OF HE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATION IN THE VICINITY OF IS DOSING 6�Y MUTES OR STRUCTURES. OR TO 0 SHORE. BRACE OR SWING AEUTUTY, THE UTILITY 1 BRACING 0111 CO SHORING DEPARTMENT IN AFFECTED EVENT BE IT CONTACTED AN0 HEIR PERMISSION SECURED AS TO HE METHOD USED FOR ANY SUCH 0/0011_ RESTORATION OF DAMAGED STRUCTURES OR 0111311ES: IT SHALL BE HE RESPONSIBIUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR, REBUILD OR RESTORE TO ITS FORMER 000HON, ANY AND ALL PORTIONS O EXISTING UTILITIES. STRUCTURES. EQUIPMENT. APPURTENANCES OR FACBITES. OTHER THAN THOSE TO E PAID FOR UNDER THIS CONTRACT, WHICH MAY BE DISTURBED OR DAMAGED DUE TO THIS CONSTRUCTION OPERATION, AT NO COST TO HE OWNER. FINAL CCF 0...NI 1: UPON COMPLETION OF HE WORK BUT BEFORE FINAL PAYMENT WILL BE MADE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND REMOVE EOM THE PROJECT AREA, ALL FALSE WORK. EQUIPMENT, SURPLUS AND DISCARDED MATERIALS, RUBBISH AND TEMPORARY STRUCTURES WHICH RESULT FROM THE WORK UNDER HIS AGREEMENT, AND SHALL RESTORE IN AN ACCEPTABLE MANNER ALL PROPERTY WHICH HAS BEEN DAMAGED DURING THE EXECUTION OF HE WORK. GUARANTEE- ALL MATERIALS AND HE INSTALLATION HEED WHICH NE FURNISHED ND INSTALLED BY HE CONTRACTOR, UNDER HE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT. SHALL E GUARANTEED BY HE CONTRACTOR AGAINST DEFETNE WORKMANSHIP, MECHANICAL AND PHYSICAL DEFECTS. LEAKAGE, BREAKAGE, AND OTTER DAMAGES AND FAILURE NDER NL OPERATION MAERO ONE (1) Y A FROM TIE DATE OF FINAL PAYMNT. 5AD DATE O CONSTITUTE THE OM F OF THE ONE (1) WARRANT( PERIOD. ALL MATERIALS AND INSTALLATIONS PROVING TO BE DEFECTIVE WITHIN THE SPECIFIED PERIOD OF THE GUARANTY SUCH REPLACEMENT SHALL E TO THE OV/NER, BY THE DATE N CONTRACTOR. NSTALLATION THEREOF. D OF GUARANTY OF EACH TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS WTERIAL5, CONSTRUCTION METHODS. ESTNG AND TOLERANCES FOR ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDAOE WITH THE FOLLOWING HE EVENT SP CONNTIONSHR MORE STRINGENT H SPECIFICATIONS N SHALL REFERENCED UNDER THE 'SUPPLEMENTARY CODOONS.' IN 1. MOBIUZATION/DEMRILI2ATION: HE WORK SPECIFIED IN THIS SECTION CONSISTS OF THE PREPARATORY WORK AND OPERATIONS IN MOBILIZING FOR BEGINNING WORK ON THE PROJECT, INCLUDING. BUT NOT OARED T0, THOSE OPERATIONS NECESSARY FOR HE NOVEMEM OF PERSONNEL. EQUIPMENT. SUPPLJES AND INCIDENTALS TO THE PROJECT 5RE. AND FOR NE ESTABLISHMENT OF TEMPORARY OFFICES. BUILDINGS, SAFETY EQUIPMENT AND FIRST ND SUPPLIES, SANITARY AND OTHER FACILITIES, AS REQUIRED BY THESE SPECIFICATIONS, HE SPECIAL PRO/ASTONS, AND STATE AND LOCAL LAWS ND REGULATIONS. ALL COSTS FOR BONDS, PERMITS D ANY REQUIRED 95 01611 THE COST OF THEREMOVALROF HE ABOVE 084 IXPSEINLLSL NECESSARY CO BE (81100D N THIS SECTION. WORK. 2 . 5NSTRL8TON .SL LNG: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT THE REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS AT THE LOCATIONS SOWN ON HE PLANS. A5 OUTJND IN THE "SUPPLEMENTAL COOHON5; HE OWNER SHALL PROVIDE BASIC REFERENCE POINTS FOR H0000MAL CONTROL AND BENCHMARKS IN THE VICINITY OF THE WORK. ALL OTHER CONSTRUCTION STAKING FOR BOTH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL NEEDED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR CONTROL OF HIS WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 3 EARTHWORK AND GRADING,: SHALL BE PERFORMED AS REQUIRED TO ATTAIN THE FINAL GRADES. TYPICAL SECTIONS AND ELEVATIONS AND TO ACCOMPLISH NE OBJECTIVES SHOWN ON THE PLANS FOR THE AREAS TO BE PAVED, SODDED. OR LANDSCAPED. MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 120, FOOT SPECIFICATIONS. ANY PLASTIC OR ORGANIC MATERIAL WIN 36' OF THE FINISHED GRADE OF THE AREA TO BE PAVED SHALL E REMOVED AND REPLACED W A -3 MATERIAL ALL CLEAN EXCESS MATERIAL SUITABLE FOR FILL RESULTING FRO0 THE EXCAVAT ION SHALL BE NCORPORATED INTO HE ON SITE FILLING OR DISPOSED OF AS DIRECTED BY HE OWNER. ALL UNSUITABLE MATERIAL AND DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED AND OSPOSEO OF c :' -.E CONTRACTOR. THE WORK 511AI I 1001110E RM NOT I RATED 10 THE FOI 1 OWING: THE SHAPING OF THE PROPOSED SWALE5, DRY DETENTION AREAS, DITCHES, BUILDING PAD AREAS. PARKING AND LANDSCAPE AREAS. ND PERIMETER BERMS. LIBANAGL_IMP-REDEEMETEIS: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL THE MATERIALS AND LABOR NECESSARY TO 4 COMPLETE THE PROJECT WORK FOR THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AT THE 10CAT014. SIZE AND TYPE SHOWN ON NE INCLUDED PLANS E UNIT FOLLOWING ITEMS EACH ITEM ACCORDANCE E THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH NE DESIGN AND 5. FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, BY THE CONTRACTOR, TO COMPLY WITH THE TRENCH SAFETY ACT. LAWS OF FLORIDA RE APR 90 ACCORDANCE W COMPACTION SECTION 125- DCHFOTFPECIFICATKNS. DEN5ITY TESTS E SHALL E R00NOD AT THE BACKF1LL AND F0LL0910 VERTICAL LOCATIONS TWO 101T5• AT SPRNGUNE (ONE EACH SIDE R THE PIPE); ONE TEST* AT ONE -FOOT ABOVE PIPE; ND RE TEST AT ONE -FOOT BELOW SUBGRADE OR FINISH GRADE • - DENSITY OF AT LEAST 1009 OF MAXIMUM DENSITY AS DEERMNED BY AA5M0 1 -99, METHOD C. THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF HORIZONTAL TEST LOCATIONS IS TWO PER CULVERT INSTALLATION, ONE PER 10 EINEAE FEET FREQUIRD ATFREQUENT RMOR6 FREQUENT 801860 (6 DEEMED NECESSARY En E ADDITIONAL En THE ENG NEE. TESTS MAY BE TESTING LABORATORY DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER. THE TESTING ANCONTRACTOR 1i85(1NG NECESSARY TO ASSURE NAT E WORK HAS BEEN PERFORMED IN STRICT COMPLIANCE W THESE ACTORS. COST FOR THE INITIAL TESTING SHALL BE BORNE BY THE OWNER. ANY RETEST REQUIRED DUE TO FAILURE TO MEET NE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS ABOVE SHALL BE PERFORMED AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. A CULYEBIS: CONSTRUCTION MET005 FOR DRAINAGE CULVERTS SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTIONS 125 AND 430. COOT SPECIFICATIONS. iCORRU�D PIPEUCONORMNG TO AA5M0 Y 96 74 AND FONT SECTTION 9415E HELICALLY WOUND BE 2)POIYVINYL- CHLORIDE PIPE; ALL PVC 5HALL BE ROUND SMOOTH WALE SHALL CONFORM TO AASHTO M 278 AND FOOT SECTION 948. 8. REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (RCP 1' 1) RCP SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 8.51M SPECIFICATIONS C -76. CLASS III, WALL THICKNESS GASKETS FOR LAST JOINTS 5HALL CONFORM BY SECTION 941 OF 9402. STANDARD SPECIFICATIOS, LATEST REVISION, C. 6041190(..S192365805: PRE -CAST CONCRETE CATCH BASINS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF A5TM SPECIFICATIONS 91NN19 COMRESSNE STRENGTH OF 00 S1 01 28 AYS. SHOP DRAWING ARE E REQUIRED. SHALL HAVE DEWATERING CONSTRUCTION DEWAERNG MAY REQUIRE A SHORT OR LONG - TERM DEWATERING PERMIT FROM THE 5FW9D. IF DEWATERING I5 TO TAKE PUCE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE H OBTAINING A DEWATERING PERMIT 5. ON THE PLANS. AND PAVEMENT TMESESSPECIFICATIO S E FDOT D OKEECH0EEECOUNTY TINS SHOWN BE AT SPECIFICATIONS. A PAVEMENT CONTRACTOR SHALL MID N AES OI COMPLETE T SOF WORK FIL IMPROVEMENTS ER THSECTIOT THE L CANS AND TO THE WENT ACFCORDNCE WITH THESE SPECIFICATION S. BE FDOT 0 OKEECHOBEE COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS IN ON THE PLANS AND 1) STABIUZED 508000DE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM FBV RATIO OF 75, AND MINIMUM DENSITIES SHALL BE 98X OF METHODS SMALL MBE AS FURNISHEDEBY THE CONTRACTOR, AND CONFORM TO SECTION AND CONSTRUCTION C. MATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS FOR TYPE C STABILIZATION AND PAID FOR AS PART OF NE WORK UNDER THIS SECTION. COMPACTED FOR ALL ASPHALT WITHIN T E AREAS. SHOWN 014 PLANS. THIS STABN2D SUBGRADE SHALL BE USED 2) COMPACTION. THE BASE SHALL HAVE CADDENSITY THAT E IS 988 0 AS SFICAVN ON THE PLAITS. MAXIMUM AS DETERMINED THE AASHTO T -180 METHOD. MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS SHALL CONFORM TO SECTION 200 OR 250, DOT SPECIFIC -MOMS, WHICHEVER I5 APPLICABLE FOR THE BASE MATERIAL USED. TI-115 BASE COURSE SHALL BE USED FOR ALL ROADS. 3) SURFACE COURSE SHALL BE TYPE 0 -111 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE CONFORMING TO FOOT SECTION 331. EXCEPT THAT THE MAXIMUM AGGREGATE SIZE SHALL BE 1/2' AND SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 1000 POUNDS MARSHAL STABILITY. 4) R HAACBE ( ANSND SLL EITHER FIBER OR STEEL REINFORCED THE DI CTION OF HE OWNER. ADDITIONAL Y NECESSARY BY HE ENGINEER, AY CONSTRUCTION OR AT MORE FREQUENT INTERNALS IF DEWED X'VFMFM NOTES 0' SHALL BE HE RESPONSIBILITY OF HE CONTRACTOR 0 COORDINATE W HE INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY DESIGNATED BY HE OWNER, HE Tuna AND RETESTING NECESSARY TO ASSURE THAT ALL 106 19TTIIALRTTESTING WORK HALL BE BORNE PERFORMED IN OWNER. ANY RETESTS EOUIRD DUEETOPFAILURE TONS MEET HER MIN19UM REQUIREMENTS ABOVE SHALL E PERFORMED AT THE EXPENSE OF HE CONTRACTOR. MINIMUM TESTING DETERMINATION FOR ALL ITEMS OF WORK UNDER PAVING AREAS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: FLORIDA SOIL ITEM BEARING VALUE DENSITY THICKNESS SUBGRADE 100• 10• 50• U1EROCK OR COQUINA BASE - -- 100• 50• ASPHALTIC CONCRETE - -- - -- 50• • - MVLIUUM SPACING SHOWN IN FEET. ALL TESTING SHALL BE TAKEN IN A STAGGERED SAMPLING PATTERN FROM A POINT 12 INCHES INSIDE THE FIRST EDGE. TO HE CENTER. TO A POINT 12 INCHES INSIDE THE RIGHT EDGE OF HE REIN TESTED. B. PAVEMENT MARKINGS: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS AND LABOR REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT WORK IN HIS SECTION. MATERIALS N0 CONSTRUCTION METHODS FOR APPLYING PAINTED TRAFFIC STRIPES AND MARKINGS SHALL CONFORM TO TIE REQUIREMENTS O SECTION 711. FOOT SPEC/MATINS, FOR THERMOPLASTIC TRAFFIC STRIPES AND MARKINGS AT THE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 1) STRIPING AS SHOWN ON PLANS 2) MISC. TRAFFIC CONTROL AS SHOWN ON PLANS 3) ALL EXISTING MARKINGS THAT ARE IN CONFLICT W PROPOSED SHALL BE REMOVED VIA HYORO- BLASTING 4) ALL MARKINGS WITHIN DOT RIGHT-OF -WAY SHALL BE THERMOPLASTIC C. ELEM EENTS 10 CIONNTTARLAL C TSIGNS ATLTHEOLOGTON MATOEWRIA THDE LAUNDD I NCG O NRTNG METHODS SHALL CONFORM TO SECTION 700, FOOT SPECIFICATIONS AND OKEECHOBEE COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS. ALL SIGNS SHALL E INSTALLED AS SHOWN OH PLANS. 6 EROSION AND POI( IRO C0NTR0) - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE SUFFICIENT PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT WATER POLLUTION WITH AQUATIC WEEDS, FUELS. OIL5. BITUMINOUS, CALCIUM CHLORIDE OR OTHER HARMFUL MATERIALS. ALSO. HE SHALL CONDUCT D SCHEDULE HIS OPERATIONS SO AS TO AVOID PODUTN OR SILTATION OF WATER BODIES OR TO INTERFERE WITH INDIGENOUS WILDLIFE HE INSTALLATION OF TEMPORARY EROSION AND POLLUTION CONTROL E S E FTS CONSTRUCTION E S R CONTROL FEATURES TO THE EXTENT NCEESSARYO ASSURE THE W EFFECTIVE AND CONTINUOUS CONTROL O COR• RECT D BY THE CONTRACTOR ATTOHISHEXPE SE. DUE OF TO UNANTICIPATED CONDITIONS. THE ENGINEER IAp1Y LL BE IN SUCH • THE EVENTE HIS ADDITIONAL WORK SWOT BE METHODS OR A5 UNNFFO UNFORESEEABLE THOSE WORK. HE ORIGINAL CONTRACT A. 50D SHALL RE PROVIDED AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, INCLUDING BM NOT UNITED TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS. UTILITY CONSTRUCTION, SLOES AND AREAS ASSOCIATED WITH THE DRY RETENTION AREAS, SNARES_ ALL ARGENTINE BAHIA SHALL CONFORM WAERINNGGQUN1u THE PROJECT 15 COMPLETED. SPECIFICATIONS, FOR B. ALL HEMS NOT SCHEDULED FOR SOD PER THESE PLANS NOR SCHEDULED TO BE STABIU2ED PER THE LANDSCAPE PUN ( PROVDED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) SHALL BE STABRJZD W SEED AND MULCH. C. PO11UTON CONTROI - WATER POLLUTION AND TURBIDITY CONTROL SHALL BE REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION STANDARDS. LOCAL REGULATIONS AND SECTION 104, FOOT REQUIREMENTS INCLUDING BUT NOT UNITED 0 ONE OR MORE O THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS; SHEET PILE OR EARTH COFFERDAM, HAY BALES. SEDIMENT BASIN. SILT FENCE OR TURBIDITY BARRIER. EOU 0V*TED ETD, TO BE WASHED AWAY BY HIGH WATCMIAL RP065609E AREAS OR IN A POSITION 7. RECORD DRAWING,- AFTER COMPLETION OF THE CONTRACT WORK, BM PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL OF THE REDDEST FOR FINAL PAYMENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FINAL RECORD DRAWINGS TO THE OWNER OF THE IMPROVEMENTS. NE RECORD DRAWINGS SHALL BE PREPARED N ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 0.5A. 8.D.0.T.. D.E.P., 5.6.W.M.D. ND OKEECHOBEE CORN. AND SHALL INCUDE BUT NOT BE MATTED TO, THE FOLLOWING: THE FINAL POINTS, FLALL TPAVINGYND DRAINAGE O ELEMENTS, D SHILL IINCELD.UE VISIBLE ELEVATIONIMPROVEMENTS F PERTINENT POURS IN THE DARNER 095,E DRAINAGE PIPE SLOPEES. PIPE LENGTHS..SINLTS AND ORIGINAL CONTROL STRUCTURES VERIFICATION LOCATIN AND ENSIGN E TIONS AND DAL OTHER FORUE RHORIZONTALLY AND VERTICALLY LOCATE AND OPERATE THIMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED ER THIS ON ACE DRAWINGS SHALL INCLUDE: A. INDICATION OF ANY CHANGES OR VERIFICATIONS GET MARKED B. INDICATION OF ALL 'PROPOSED' OR "CONSTRUCTS C. CHARGES TO LOCATIONS OF PIPE, VALVES, MRCS OR MANHOLES. ETC. D. A DETAIL BOX OF ANY SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES E ALL ELEVATIONS FOR MANHOLES AND LIFT STATIONS F. ALL GRADES ND FOOTAGE ON SANITARY RUNS OFECERTIFIED CONTRACTOR FIELDD NOTESR TO THE OWNER THAT ARE SIGNED D SEALED BY A SET LORDA REGISTERED OLANDGOPY SURVEYOR. PAYMENT FOR THE RECORD DRAWINGS SHALL BE ON A LUMP SUM BASIS. 8. SFNFR SYSTEM S. T8ADK' PER STATE OF FLORIDA DEPNTMEM OF HEALTH FAC. CHAPTER 64E- 6.005. TO PREVENT UNSAFE DISCHARGE OR HEALTH HAZARDS SEPTIC SYSTEMS MUST MEET THE FOLLOWING SETBACK CRITERIA FAC. CHAPTER 64E- 6.05(1) SYSTE95 AND SEPTAGE STABILIZATION FACILRE5 ESTABLISHED AFTER THE EFFECINE DATE (EFFECTIVE DATE MAY 24, 2004) O THE RULE SHALL BE PLACED NO CLOSER THAN THE 4INIUM DISTANCES INDICATED FOR THE FOLLOWING: (a) SEVENTY -FIVE FEET FROM A PRIVATE POTABLE WELL AS DEFIED IN RULE 64E - 6.02(44)(.), OR A MOAT- FAMILY WATER WELL AS DEFINED IN RULE 64E- 6.02(44)(c). (d) FIFTY FEET FROM A NON- POTABLE WATER WELL AS DEFINED IN RULE 54E- 6.02(39). (e) TEN FELT EOM ANY STORM SLIVER PIPE. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PO558LE BUT IN NO INSTANCES SHALL THE SETBACK BE LESS THAN 5 FEET. _ (i) DESIGNED TO CONTAIN S1NDIOHIOR uNE OF THE RETENTION AREAS, OR LESS THAN HOURS AFTER AREAS. 00186ALL OR THE DESIGN HIGH-WATER LEVEL O NORMALLY DRY DRAINAGE 006 OR NORMALLY DRY INDIVIDUAL -LOT STORMWATER RETENTION AREAS_ FAC. CHAPTER 64E- 6.05(3) EXCEPT FOR THE PROVISION OF 5. 381.065(4)(5)1. N0 2., F.5.. 5Y51ETAS AND SEPTAGE STABILIZATION FACILRES SHALL NOT BE LOCATED LITERALLY WITHIN 75 FEET OF THE BOUNDARIES OF SURFACE WATER BODES. SYSTEMS AND SEPTAGE STABILIZATION FACILITIES SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 15 FEET FROM THE DESTGN LOWING WATER FOR LSSA THAN U72 HOURS5AFTER ATRAIANFALL. OR THE DESIGN HIGH WAER TO LEVEO OF 84009811? RY DRAINAGE DITCHES OR NORMALLY DRY INDMOUAL LOT STORM WATER RETENTION AREAS. WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM NOTES; 1. ALL NEW AND RELOCATED WATER 58000 5 SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WM 1 THE STATE PUMBING CODE. AND SHALL MEET THE OKEECHOBEE UR11Y AUTHORITY'S (OUR) COOE5 D STANDARDS. ALL NEW AND RELOCATED WATER MAN PIPE FIRINGS. VALVES AND FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE W APPLICABLE AMERICAN WATER WORKS TIANCEGHT (AMU) ECENT LEAD STANDARDS. ALL 00LDERS AND FLUX FOR 060EN1MRELOCAED WATER SERv10ES CONTAIN NO CONTAIN NOTE MID MORE 11-N 0.2 PERCENT LEAD. 2. AU_ PACKING AND JOINTING 901884010 USEO 1)4 THE JOINTS OF NEW OR RELOCATED WATER MAIN PIE SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH APPUCABLE A STANDARDS. 3. NEW AND RELOCATED WATER WINS AND APPURTENANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE AIWA STANDARDS ND /0R THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDED PROCEDURES. 4. ANY ROCK AND UNSUITABLY SIZED STONES (AS DESCRIBED IN APPLICABLE AIWA STANDARDS AND /OR THE PIPE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENCED INSTALLATION PROCEDURES) FOUND IN TRENCHES FOR NEW AND RELOCATED WATER MAN PIPE SHALL BE RIOKNED 0 A DEPTH R AT LEAST SIX INCHES BELOW THE BOTTOM OF THE PIPE, AND CONTINUOUS AND UNBORN BEDDING SHALL BE 810005D IN TRENCHES FOR NEW AND RELOCATED WATER MAN PIPE BACKER!. MATERIAL PIPE TO ADEQUATELY AROUND THE KILO ED WATER MAIN PPE TO A SUFFICIENT HEIGHT ABOVE SUCH BE TAMPED IN 5. PROVIDED WITH RESTRAI ED JOINTS( TO DEGREES, REVENT PLUGS. MOVEMENT. RESTRAINED 30NHT5 SHALL BE DIP A5 FOLLOWS: SHAH BE RESTRAINED JOINT SHALL E U.S. PIPE FIELD LON, NERCAN DUCTILE IRON PIPE WK-FAST. DM IRON MEGA -LUG, OR N ENNALENT PRODUCT. HE RESTRAINT METHOD SHALL BE SUITABLE FOR HE PIPE SIZE THICKNESS AND TEST PRESSURE AS REQUIRED FOR THE SPECIFIC DESIGN CASE 6. ALL NEW AND RELOCATED WATER 1845 SHALL E PRESSURE TESTED NO LEAKAGE 115180 IN ACCORDANCE W ARAM STANDARD C60. 7. ALL NEW ND RELOCATED WATER MAINS BE DISINFECTED IN ACCORDANCE W AWWA C80. SECTION 4, 0601, C651 AND RULE 82- 555.345, F.A.C. HE HYDROSTATIC TEST SHALL E OF 2 HOURS DURATION AT 150 PSI. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING MAINS SHALL BE MADE AFTER COMPLETE DISINFECT ION OF NE PROPOSED 1n1 W. AND SHALL E MADE UNDER HE DIRECTION OF A REPRESENTATIVE OF NE OKEECHOBEE UTILITY AUTHORITY. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXIS1I40 AWNS PROCEDURES HALL BE 006 UNDER INTHHE DIRECT MANUAL O STANDARDS. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED ACCORDING TO 8. HE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, TOOLS, AND EQUIPMENT NECESSARY TO PERFORM HE OPERATIONS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE TESTING AND STERILIZATION. HE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROCURE AND PAY FOR ALL WATER REQUIRED FOR TESTS AND FLUSHING. 9 AFTER THE LEAKAGE EST HAS BEEN PERFORMED, EACH SECTION OF HE COMPLIED PIPELINE SHALL BE THOROUGHLY FLUSHED. (MINIMUM AMOUNT OF WATER USED FOR FLUSHING SHALL BE 2% TIMES THE VOLUME OF THE COMPLETED SECTION OF PIPELINE) FOLLOWING THE FLUSHING OF NE COMPLETED PIPELINE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STERIUZE ALL DISTRIBUTION D SERVICE MAINS PER A1VNA 8 -61. THE DISINFECTING AGENT SHALL REMAIN IN THE PIPELINE WATER TAKEN BY BY E C4ONTRACTORED DEL 1808D BOY HIM TO THE 00011 HEALTH DEPARTMENT OR SAMPLES SHALL THEN BE LABORATORY FOR A FOR ANALYSIS. 10. IF THERE ARE ANY NEW OR RELOCATED WATER MANS THAT CROSS ANY SANITARY SEWERS, FORCE MAINS OR RECLAIMED WATER UNES, NE WATER MAINS MUST CROSS ABOVE SUCH PIPEUNE5 WITH A MINIMUM VORTICAL DISTANCE OF 18 INCHES BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE OF NE WATER MANS AND 1E OUTSIDE OF SUCH PIPELINES, OR SUCH CROSSING MUST BE ARRANGED 50 THAT ALL PIPE JOINTS ARE EQUIDISTANT FROM NE POINT OF CROSSING W O LESS THAN EN FEET BEIWEE ANY TWO JOINTS (OR, AL080140 RELY. THE SANITARY SEWERS. STORM SEWERS, FORCE MAINS, AND RECWMD WATER UNES AT SUCH CROSSINGS MUST E PLACED IN SLEEVES R ENCASED IN CONCRETE TO OBTAIN THE EQUNALENT OF THE TEN-FOOT REQUIREMENTS MUST BE ATTACHEDDIINEACCORDANCE WITH RULE 62- 555314(4),�AC. TO THESE SEPARATION 11. CONVICTS BETWEEN WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE CONDUITS SHALL BE RESOLVED IN ACORDMCE W THE OEP STANDARD STATEMENT OF THE RESOLUTION R CONFLICTS CONTAINED IN THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS, AND WITH APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER D THE OW. 12. ALL POTABLE WATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE W THE LATEST EDITION OF 'MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARD" AND ATTACHMENTS. MIENS AND REVISIONS THERETO AS ADOPTED BY THE OUA THIS INCLUDES BUT IS NOT WAITED TO PIPE MATERIALS. FITTINGS, GRAVITY SEWER LEAKAGE TESTING AND WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM HYDROSTATIC ND LEAKAGE TESTING 13. ALL STRUCTURES. YMENT SHALL "PLUS O MINUS" DIMENSIONS SAND ARE MEASURED FROM CENTER OF MRCS AND /OR 14. WATER AWN LENGTHS SHALL BE ADJUSTED AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE LENGTHS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF ETRE MECMNJICAL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS AS SHOWN ON AND APPURTENANCES NECESSARY FOR INCLUDE ALL CONSTRUCTION LENGTHS SHALL 15 WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID WITH A MINIMUM OF 30 INCH AND MAXIMUM OF 36 INCHES OF COVER. EXCEPT UNDER PAVEMENT *CHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF -WAY WHERE MINIMUM COVER SHALL BE 36 INCHES AND MAXIMUM OF 42 INCHES. 16 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE (PVC) FOR PIPES 3' OR LESS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM 0 -1705 (SCHEDULE 80) OR ASTM 0- 2241. 17 THE NECESSARY CONTRACTOR SHALL 81 S AS SHOWN RESPONSIBLE E ADJUSTMENT OF VALVE BOX COVERS. GRATES. CLEAN OUTS. ETC.. S5ARY 10. WATER SERVGES SHALL E 0010060 TO THE RIGHT -OF -WAY UNE 19. METAUC -BACKED INDICATOR TAPE AT LEAST 3' WIDE SHALL BE INSTALLED OVER ALL PVC MANS AT 10' BLOW GRADE. THE COLOR SHALL BE BLUE. A LOCATOR BALL SMALL ALSO BE PLACED AT EACH HTTNG AND CHANGE IN DIRECTION OF THE PIPE. 20. THE FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN TE RIGHT OF WAY. STANDARD WATER/SEWER SEPARATION STATEMENT A. SANITARY man, FORCE HAS, SEWER LATERALS AND STORM SEWERS SOUL CROSS URETER WATER WRNS WHENEVER POSSIBLE SANITARY SEWERS, FORCE MAINS, SEWER LATERALS AND STORM SEWERS CROSSING WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM VERTICAL DISTANCE OF 18 INCHES BETWEEN THE INVERT OF THE UPPER PIPE AND THE CROWN OF NE LOWER PIPE WHENEVER POSSIBLE WHERE SANITARY SEWERS, FORCE MAINS, SEWER LATERALS AND STORM SEWERS MUST CROSS A WATER AWN MTH LESS THAN 10 NOTES VERTICAL DISTANCE BOTH THE SEWER AND THE WATER MAN SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) AT THE CROSSING. (DIP IS NOT .REQUIRED FOR STORM SEWERS.) SUFFICIENT LENGTHS OF DIP MUST BE USED TO PROVIDE A 41891194 SEPARATION OF 10 FEET BETWEEN ANY TWO JOINTS ALL JOINTS ON THE WATER WIN WIN 20 FEET OF NE CROSSING MUST E MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED. A TANTRUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 6 INCHES MUST BE MNMANED AT ALL CROSSINGS. ALL CROSSINGS SHALL BE ARRANGED SO THAT THE SEWER PIE „CODS ND 11-11 WATER MAIN PIE JOINTS ARE EQUIDISTANT FROM THE POINT OF CROSSING (PIPES CENTERED ON THE CROSSING). WHERE A NEW PIPE CONFLICTS W N EXISTING PIPE W11H LESS TIN 18 INCHES VERTICAL CLEARANCE. THE NEW PIPE SHALL E CONSTRUCTED OF DIP (EXCEPT STORM SEWERS) AND THE NEW PIE SHALT. BE ARRANGED TO MEET THE CROSSING REM/REVERTS ABOVE B. A MINIMUM 10 FOOT 00800MA SEPARATION SHALL BE MANTNNED BEPNEEN ANY TYPE OF SEWER AND WATER AWN IN PARALLEL INSTALLATIONS WHENEVER POSSIBLE. IN CASES WHERE IT 15 NOT POSSIBLE TO MAINTAIN A 10 FOOT 5011120N1AL SEPARATION. THE WATER PAIN 1N5T BE LAID IN A SEPARATE TRENCH OR ON N UNDISTRIBUTED EARTH SHELF LOCATED ON ONE SIDE OF THE SEWER OR FORCE MAN AT SUCH N ELEVATION THAT THE BOTTOM OF THE WATER WIN 5 AT LEAST 16 INCHES ABOVE NE TOP O THE SEWER. WHERE 0 5 NOT POSSIBLE TO MARITNN A VERTICAL DISTANCE OF 10 INCHES IN PARALLEL INSTALLATIONS. THE WATER MAIN SHALL E CONSTRUCTED O DIP AND THE SEWER OR THE FORCE MAIN SHALL BE (08510UCTD OF DIP (EXCEPT STORM SEWERS) WITH A ANNUM VERTICAL. DISTANCE OF INCHES. SHALL BE LOWED AS FN APART AS THE PO551BLE FROM JOINTS ON THE SEWER RE FORCE MAIN (STAGGERED JOINTS). C ALL DIP FALL BE CLASS 50 OR HIGHER. ADEQUATE POECTNE MEASURES AGAINST CORE/0510N SMALL E USED AS DETERMINED BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER. D HORIZONTAL SE SEPARATION 01 FIVE NFEET (CENTER TO CENTER) EDOR MID THREEEHMFEET (OUTSIDE LINES TO OUTSIDE). 5HALL BED MAINTAINED OF REGLATIAED WATER BETWEEN RECWMED WATER LINES AND POTABLE WATER MANS AND BETWEEN SEWAGE RECLAIMED WATER UNES AND COLLECTION UNES. A MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE O 18 RICHES MUST BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN RECWMED WATER UNES AND POTABLE WATER MANS OR SEWAGE COLLECTION UNES AND SEWER LATERALS. AT CROSSINGS PROVISIONS OF FAC RULE 17 -604 AND 10 STATES STANDARDS APPLY. ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES ALL OFFSITE AREAS WILL BE EPANED TO PRE - CONSTRUCTION GNOMONS. INCLUDING LANDSCAPING N0 50D. NO CLEARING OF PARCEL 5 PERMITTED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT 9/5 BEEN ISSUED. V-2007 LEFW1S . 11 ■DATE BY REVISIONS 1 Dole. 11/30/2006 50.18' Design By MN Drawn 8y. RR Check By MM .1 VERIFY SCALE BAR IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 ■1 ADJUST ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY n A 0059 Engineering Company 421 N.W. 3rd Street. Okeechobee, Fl 34972 (863) 763 -8999 Fax: (863) 763 -6692 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 www.lbth.com CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "partners For Results, Value By Design" THE LAKE HOUSE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE SPECIFICATIONS & SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS SHEET LBFH PROJECT No: 05 -0260 SHEET SP -1 City of Okeechobee 10/5/2007 The Lakehouse To Whom It May Concern: Fire Department The following items are to be addressed when planning above project: 1) Emergency Apparatus shall have a minimum of 20 feet width on road access 2) Emergency Apparatus shall have a minimum of 14 feet vertical clearance on road access 3) Turning radius of any cul de sac shall be a minimum of 50 feet 4) Hydrants shall be a maximum of 500 feet apart Note of concern: On the SE Corner of the property: there appears to be a dead end street which extends to around 350 to 400 feet. Fire codes require any dead end over 150 feet needs to have a way for emergency apparatus to turn around. Herb Sm'th Fire Chief/Marshal Okeechobee-FD 55 S.E. Third Avenue • Okeechobee, Florida • 34974 -2932 • 863- 467 -1586 • Fax: 863- 763 -4489 Chief Smith made a motion to approve Bass Okeechobee Funeral Home and Crematory site plan review for developing a funeral home and associated vehicular use for property located at the Southeast corner of the intersection of US Highway 441 and Northwest 13th Street, subject to confirming that 1. the parking ratio is correct , 2. the 10 foot setback be met, 3. the flow test on hydrant is acceptable, 4. the project meets the proposed lighting standards recommended by the Planning Board and approved by the City Council before breaking ground on this project, 5. the letter from DOT on the Northwest 13th Street access be received, and 6. Sec. 78 -36 Sidewalks, driveways, and pedestrian access. (1) All projects constructed in zoning districts set out in Section 90 -71 of the City Code, except residential districts, wherein the lands of the owner and /or developer adjoin a collector or arterial street or city right of way, shall provide sidewalks adjacent along each such street or right of way.; seconded by Chief Davis. Engineer Bermudez voted nay. Motion carried (4 -1). 4. The Lakehouse. The application for conceptual site plan review was submitted by John D. Cassels, Jr. on behalf of property owner 15th Street Homes, LLC. for recommendation to the Planning Board for rezoning request of Planned Unit Development — Residential (PUD -R). The proposed Lakehouse Community comprises approximately 50 acres in the Southwest section of the City and is made up of multiple parcels separated only by Southwest 9th Street. Brief legal description: All that part of Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County — Planning Consultant. Mr. Brisson stated assuming the applicant provides acceptable explanations of, or modifications to, the proposed concept plan relative to LaRue Staff concerns over the rear yard setbacks, LaRue Staff finds the concept plan to be in conformance with the intent, standards, and requirements of the PUD -R District. Mr. Sumner, Engineer of Record on the project, distributed a colored neighborhood plan detail to the committee. He commented that they want to set the bar high for future projects of this nature. Mr. Whitehall stated that the committee was new at this process. Mr. Brisson explained to the committee, at this stage, the committee should be looking at the layout for the general transportation circulation, road width, fire service and or protective services, and physical attributes in the City Staff area that might cause problems. Primarily safety concerns and provision for utilities. Mr. Hayford stated the applicant recently submitted plans for their usage of water and wastewater. They entered into an agreement with OUA last November for wastewater service only. There is ample water supply in the area for the project. Currently OUA is reviewing their plans. Mr. Schaub inquired as to the type of community that is planned? Mr. Sumner answered, no age restrictions, and community would be open to the public with the exception of the clubhouse. Mr. Schaub expressed concern regarding the radius of turning into the garages from the street. Might be a traffic problem with residents backing out of their driveways across from each other at the same time. Mr. Sumner explained the alley is almost as wide as the standard road. There are nine foot drive lanes, two -way traffic in the alley, so it is not a single use, like a twelve foot alley lane where two vehicles are trying to pull into. Similar to front loaded garages. Mr. Brisson interjected, stating that he lives in a little subdivision that has nine foot driving lanes with aisles of trees in between, all front loading garages and typically there are no problems. Mr. Sumner said he would measure out turning radius's for typical vehicles and make sure there is not a problem. Chief Smith stated, the measurements would have to made for more than typical to accommodate the fire vehicles. Chief Smith also inquired as to the height of the trees and their clearance from the ground? The drawing shows the trees hanging over the roadways, fire trucks may have a problem. Mr. Sumner reported not getting that far into the landscaping to determine that aspect. If you provide us with the vertical separation criteria we will make sure the landscape meets the criteria. Also, Chief Smith said he would provide the turn radius for the fire vehicles. The project will provide for 20 feet of pavement for each entrance from the alley for the stabilizer for the ladder truck. 4 The alleys will be built to the City road standards. Hydrants will have to be supplied in all areas. Chief Smith asked what the houses would be made out of. The answer was cement block. Mr. Hayford commented on the design of the water system for the hydrants. OUA standards are very minimum, 500 gallons per minute (gpm) from the hydrant. We rely on the design engineer to look at the emergency services required based on density of project. It was determined 1,000 gpm would be the starting point. The project is closer to townhouses in net density. Mr. Sumner stated they would start with 1,000 and if the City wanted anything higher to let them know. Engineer Bermudez added the engineering department would be looking into all permitting from SFWMD, DEP and all other agencies. Mr. Sumner replied, we will get them all. Also we will be reviewing all drainage issues. Chief Davis asked about street lighting. Mr. Sumner replied we will be proposing street lighting. Mr. Cassels commented, one of the advantages with this type neighborhood, is that you actually have access to all four sides, where in the typical neighborhood you really only have access to the front. Chief Smith made a motion to approve the Lakehouse concept plan and move it on to the Planning Board for recommendation to City Council for rezoning request of Planned Unit Development - Residential (PUD -R) for approximately 50 acres in the Southwest section of the City; seconded by Engineer Bermudez. Motion carried (5 -0). E. Adjournment — Chairperson. There being no further items on the agenda, Chairperson Whitehall adjourned the Technical Review Committee meeting at 11:55 a.m. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that any person desiring to appeal any decision made by the Technical Review Committee with respect to any matter considered at this proceeding, such interested person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose may need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be bases. General Services media are for the sole purpose of backup for official records of the Department. ATTEST: Betty J. Clement, Secretary Brian Whitehall, Chairperson 5 1375 Jackson Street, Suite 206 Fort Myers, Florida 33901 -2845 Phone: 239 - 334 -3366 Fax: 239 - 334 -6384 LaRue Planning & Management Services, Inc. Staff Report Rezoning Request Prepared for: City of Okeechobee Applicant: 07- 013 -R, The Lakehouse PUD-R Staff Report Site Plan Review Application No.: 07- 011 -TRC Applicant's Name: The Lakehouse General Information Applicant: Jose Rasco, CFO for Owners Applicant Address: 701 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1740 Miami, FL 33131 wif avi ax;�t a� Aber 863Z� y� Owner: 15th Street Homes LLC/Montebello 13 LLC, Joint Venture Owner Address: 701 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1740 Miami, FL 33131 Legal Description of Subject Property: PARCEL I: All that part of Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida, lying West of Blocks 248 and 249. and Southerly extension thereof. "FIRST ADDITION TO OKEECHOBEE FLORIDA ". as recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 6, Okeechobee County Public Records; South of Southwest 9th Street; North of Southwest 15th Street; and East of Block 202. and Southerly extension thereof, " OKEECHOBEE" as recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 5, Okeechobee County Public Records; and East of Southwest 10th Avenue, within the City Limits of Okeechobee, Florida. 1 FSS AND EXCEPT FROM THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL: Beginning at the Intersection of Hopkins Meander Line and the South boundary line of Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, and run Northeasterly along said Hopkins Meander Line 28.6 feet for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence East paralleling said South line of Section 21, aforesaid 56.6 feet; thence North 175 feet; thence West 240 feet; thence South 175 feet; thence East 183.4 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; said land lying in and comprising a part of Government Lots 3 and 5 of Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East. ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT FROM THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL: A 30' wide strip of land as described in Official Records Book 351, Page 618, Okeechobee County Public Records. Parcel ID#: 2 -21 - 37- 35 -0A00- 00006 -B000 PARCEL II: Beginning at the intersection of Hopkins Meander Line and the South boundary line of Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, and run Northeasterly along said Hopkins Meander Line 28.6 feet for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence East paralleling said South line of Section 21, aforesaid 56.6 feet; thence North 175 feet; thence West 240 feet; thence South175 feet; thence East 183.4 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said land lying in and comprising a part of Government Lots 3 and 5 of Section 21, 2 Staff Report Application No.: 07- 011 -TRC Site Plan Review Applicant's Name: The Lakehouse Township 37 South, Range 35 East. LESS AND EXCEPT the East 160 feet. Parcel ID#: 2 -21 - 37- 35 -0A00- 00027 -B000 PARCEL III: A parcel of land lying in Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida. Being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of Hopkins Meander Line and the South line of Section 21, bear Northeasterly along the said Hopkins Meander Line, a distance of 28.6 feet; thence bear East parallel to the said South line of Section 21, a distance of 56.6 feet; thence bear North 175.00 feet; thence bear West, a distance of 80.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue West, a distance of 80.00 feet; thence bear South, a distance of 175.00 feet; thence bear East, a distance of 80.00 feet; thence bear North a distance of 175.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Parcel ID#: 2-21-37-35-0A00-00027-0000 PARCEL IV: Beginning at the intersection of Hopkins Meander Line and the South boundary line of Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, and run Northeasterly along said Hopkins Meander Line 28.6 feet for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence East paralleling said South line of Section 21 aforesaid, a distance of 56.6 feet; thence North 175.00 feet; thence West 80.00 feet; thence South 175.00 feet; thence East 23.4 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said land lying in and comprising a part of Government Lots 3 and 5 of Section 21, Township 37 South. Range 35 East. Okeechobee County. Florida. Parcel 1D #: 2- 21- 37- 35 -0A00- 00027 -A000 PARCEL V: A parcel of land lying in Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: For a POINT OF REFERENCE, commence at the intersection of the Hopkins Meander Line and the South line of Section 21; thence bear Northeasterly along said Hopkins Meander Line a distance of 28.6 feet to the North right -of -way line of Southwest 15th Street; thence bear North 89 °36'23" East along said right -of -way line (also being 25 feet North of and parallel to the said South line of Section 21) a distance of 56.43 feet to the Southeast corner of the lands described in Official Records Book 153, Page 803 and the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence departing said right -of -way line, bear North 00 °18'09" West along the East line of those lands described in Official Records Book 153, Page 803 a distance of 97.24 feet to the Southwest corner of the lands referred to as "Parcel 2" in Official Records Book 581, Page 401; thence bear North 89 °36'39" East along the South line of said "Parcel 2" a distance of 99.49 feet to the Northwest corner of the lands referred to as "Parcel 1 "in Official Records Book 581, Page 401; thence South 00 °39'46" East along the West line of said "Parcel 1" a distance of 97.23 feet to the North right -of -way line of said Southwest 15th Street; thence bear South 89 °36'23" West along said right -of -way line a distance of 100.10 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Parcel ID#: 2- 21- 37- 35 -0A00- 00028 -A000 3 Staff Report Application No.: 07- 011 -TRC Site Plan Review Applicant's Name: The Lakehouse PARCEL VI: From the Southwest corner of Government Lot 5, Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, thence East along the South boundary line of said Government Lots to the intersection with the West right -of -way line of Okeechobee Avenue extended South, thence North along said right -of -way line of Okeechobee Avenue 25 feet for the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North along West right -of -way line of Okeechobee Avenue 97.3 feet; thence West parallel to South boundary line of Government Lot 5, 99.6 feet; thence South parallel to East line of Tract, 97.5 feet; thence East parallel to North line of Tract, 99.6 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; being a part of Government Lot 5, Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida. AND From the Southwest corner of Government Lot 5, Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, run thence East along South boundary line of said Government Lot 5 a distance of 336.7 feet to the intersection with the West right -of -way line of Okeechobee Avenue extended South; thence North along the West right -of -way line of Okeechobee Avenue a distance of 122.3 feet for POINT OF BEGINNING; thence West parallel to South boundary of Government Lot 5 for a distance of 199.7 feet to the intersection with the West boundary line of Government Lot 5; thence Northeasterly along West boundary line of Government Lot 5 a distance of 89:73 feet; thence East parallel to South line of Tract a distance of 154.76 feet to the West right -of -way line of Okeechobee Avenue; thence South along said West right -of -way line a distance of 77.7 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Being a part of Government Lot 5, Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida. Parcel ID#: 2- 21- 37- 35 -0A00- 00028 -0000 General Description: This is an application to rezone approximately 50.8 acres from RSF1 to PUD -R for the development of a residential planned unit involving 136 single- family residences in a variety of lot sizes. The project is located between SW 9`}' and 15th Streets and between SW 7a' and SW 10t Avenues in the southwest quadrant of the City. Future Land Use Map Classification Existing Single - Family: maximum allowable density is four d.u. /acre; up to 201 dwelling units are allowed. Proposed Single- Family Zoning District RSF1 PUD -R Use of Property Three single- family homes; two are occupied and one is vacant. The balance of the property is undeveloped. Planned residential devel- opment 136 detached single - family residences in a variety of lot sizes. Acreage Approximately 50 acres Approximately 50 acres 4 Staff Report Site Plan Review Application No.: 07- 011 -TRC Applicant's Name: The Lakehouse Adjacent Future Land Use Map classifications and Zoning Districts: North: Future Land Use Map Classification: Single - Family Zoning District: RSF1 50+ acres Existing Land Use: Vacant with church to the northeast. 2.7 d.u. /acre Maximum Dwelling Units 201 East: Future Land Use Map Classification: Single- Family 20 — 25 feet Zoning District: RSF1 12 feet Existing Land Use: Single - family 12.62 acres (24.8 %) Maximum Lot Coverage and Other Impervious Surfaces @ 60% = 30.48 acres South: Future Land Use Map Classification: Urban Residential Mixed Use (URMU, Unincorporated Okeechobee County Plan) 22.18 acres (43.7 %) Zoning District: Unincorporated 9.27 acres Existing Land Use: Single- family 2,116 sf West: Future Land Use Map Classification: Single - Family Zoning District: RSF1 Existing Land Use: Single - family Purpose and Intent of the PUD-R District [Sec. 90- 416(b)] It is the opinion of the Staff that the rezoning and associated concept plan address the overall intent and purpose of the PUD -R district as embodied in subsections (1) through (7) of Section 90- 416(b). Comparison of Proposal with Dimensional Standards (Sec. 90 -418) 5 Re I uired Provided Minimum Parcel Size 5 acres 50+ acres Maximum Density 4 d.u. /acre 2.7 d.u. /acre Maximum Dwelling Units 201 136 Minimum Perimeter Setback 20 feet 20 — 25 feet Minimum Building Separation 12 feet 12 feet Maximum Lot Coverage @ 40% = 20.32 acres 12.62 acres (24.8 %) Maximum Lot Coverage and Other Impervious Surfaces @ 60% = 30.48 acres 27.85 acres (54.8 %) Minimum Open Space @ 40% = 20.32 acres 22.18 acres (43.7 %) Maximum Water Bodies as Percent of Required Open Space @ 50% = 10.16 acres 9.27 acres Minimum Active Recreation Area @l5 sf /d.u. = 2,040 sf 2,116 sf 5 Staff Report Application No.: 07- 011 -TRC Site Plan Review Applicant's Name: The Lakehouse Comments: The proposed concept plan meets all of the above dimensional standards. The proposed concept plan meets all of the above dimensional standards. Staff recognizes that the PUD does not set minimum standards for lot size, width or setbacks, other than the minimum separation of buildings. However, we initially had some concerns with a rear yard setback of only three to four feet. The Applicant subsequently submitted a graphic and explanation of how the small rear yard setback is part of the overall "Traditional Neighborhood Development" approach to the project and has alleviated our concerns. General Development Review Standards (Sec. 90 -428) (1) Physical characteristics of the site. The type and pattern of use proposed in the concept plan appears suited to the physical characteristics of the site. (2) Compatibility and relationship to adjacent property. The proposed single- family development, while employing smaller lot sizes than the surrounding area, is of similar density, height and intensity with surrounding development, limits the points access to the surrounding road network, provides for recreational and open spaces for the intended residents and should not materially affect surrounding properties. (3/4) Access and internal circulation. The principal access points are located in a manner that reduces potential conflicts between traffic entering and leaving residences within the project and exterior traffic on the roadways serving the surrounding area. Internal circulation allows for vehicular and pedestrian movement within and among the various residential, recreational and open space areas. (5) Natural and historic features. The development is designed in a manner to preserve the existing eagle's nest from adverse influences and to preserve, and in some instances, enhance existing natural wetland areas. (6) Density. The proposed gross density of four dwelling units per acre is consistent with the limitations imposed in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Screen and trash and refuse containers. This standard will be addressed in the final site plan approval stage. While the Technical Review Committee (TRC) recommended forwarding the concept plan to the LPA for its consideration along with the Applicant's request for the rezoning to PUD -R, the TRC did have some concerns. For the most part, these concerns are of a more detailed nature than will be addressed in a concept plan. However, the Applicant responded favourably to the comments by the TRC members and indicated he would look into these issues. The issues of concern are briefly listed below: (7) 6 Staff Report Site Plan Review Application No.: 07- 011 -TRC Applicant's Name: The Lakehouse a. The Building Official noted that to the extent this development may be oriented to 55+ age group, the radius from the lane (alley) into the rear- loaded garages might be tight. b. The Fire Chief noted that the interior roads will need to be adequate to accommodate a ladder truck in the case of emergencies. The ladder truck needs at least 18' 6" of pavement to accommodate the "outriggers ". Also, the roads need to accommodate the turning radius of the ladder truck. While the height of the structures in the development may not require a ladder truck to fight a fire, if the standard engine trucks are not available at the time of a fire call, the ladder truck may be the only one available. c. The Fire Chief also noted that trees in the development will need to be trimmed to a minimum height of 13 feet to allow passage fire fighting vehicles and that it would be a good idea to plan for a standard of 1,000 pound water pressure for fire fighting purposes, rather than the lower 500 pound standard normally used for residential developments at a lower net density. d. The Police Chief noted that street lighting will need to be considered at the more detail site plan stage. Findings Required for Granting Rezoning Petitions (Sec. 70 -430) Following are the Staff comments pertaining to the nine required findings under Sec. 70 -430. 1. The proposed use is not contrary to Comprehensive Plan requirements. The applicant is requesting to rezone the above - described property from its current zoning of RSF1 to PUD -R in conjunction with a concept plan for the development of 136 detached single - family homes on a variety of lot sizes. Such a use is contemplated in the PUD -R zoning district. 2. The proposed use being applied for is specifically authorized under the zoning district in the Land Development Regulations. Yes. A residential planned unit development is specifically identified as a per- mitted use under Division 13 of the Land Development Regulations. 3. The proposed use will not have an adverse effect on the public interest. No, the project will not adversely affect the public interest. Specifically with regard to the availability of public facilities, Staff has determined the following: According to the U.S. Census, the City of Okeechobee averages approximately 2.7 persons per household (pph). Thus, the development of this property could 7 Staff Report Application No.: 07- 011 -TRC Site Plan Review Applicant's Name: The Lakehouse generate approximately 367 additional residents (2.7 pph x 136 d.u.) Potable Water: The adopted LOSS for potable water is 114 gpcpd. The impact for the proposed development is as follows 136 units X 2.7 pph x 114 gpcpd = 41,838 gpd. The Applicant has submitted a copy of the developer's agreement indicating the ability of OUA to provide the needed potable water to the project. Sanitary Sewer: The adopted LOSS for sanitary sewer is 130 gpcpd. The impact for the proposed development is as follows: 136 units X 2.7 pph x 130 gpcpd = 47,710 gpd. The Applicant has submitted a copy of the developer's agreement indicating the ability of OUA to provide the needed sanitary sewer services to the project. Solid Waste: The adopted LOSS for solid waste is 13 lbs /person/day. The impact for the proposed development is as follows: 136 units X 2.7 pph x 13 pounds per person per day = 4,771 ppd. The County has recently confirmed a considerable level of excess capacity available to serve the solid waste disposal needs of other major developments in the City. It appears reasonable that the volume of solid waste associated with a development of this size can also be accommodated within the capacity of the County's Solid Waste Facility. Drainage: The proposed development will be required to meet all standards required by the City of Okeechobee and the South Florida Water Management District. Parks & Recreation: The adopted LOSS for parks and recreation is 3 acres /1,000 persons. Based on the estimated population, the minimum acreage requirement for parks and recreation would be approximately 1.1 acres of recreation/open space. The Applicant has identified park areas in the concept plan in excess of this requirement. Traffic: The Applicant has submitted a Traffic Analysis of the projected impact of the proposed project. The findings of the Applicant's Traffic Analysis are summarized as follows: The proposed project is primarily served by local roads, with access provided by SE 9th and 15th Streets. The overall impact of the project is minimal on local streets, estimated to less than 2% of the capacity of the most heavily traveled link along SW 9th Street between SW 11th Avenue and S. Parrott. The Traffic Impact Analysis indicates that neither will the level of service on the most heavily traveled nearby local road be reduced nor will turn lanes be necessary. 4. The use is appropriate for the location proposed, is reasonably compatible with adjacent land uses, and is not contrary or detrimental to urbanizing land use patterns. 8 Staff Report Application No.: 07- 011 -TRC Site Plan Review Applicant's Name: The Lakehouse Yes. The property involved is surrounded by single - family development. The concept plan for the proposed development includes only single- family homes, although the lot sizes are smaller than those of the surrounding area. There is nothing inherently incompatible between single - family uses of differing character, such as differences in lot sizes. The expected sizes of the residential structures would not be expected to be out -of -scale with surrounding development and will not be detrimental to land use patterns in the area. 5. The proposed use will not adversely affect property values or living conditions, or be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property. The proposed single- family development, while employing smaller lot sizes than the surrounding area, is of similar density, height and intensity with surrounding development, limits the points access to the surrounding road network, provides for recreational and open spaces for the intended residents and should not materially affect the property values or living conditions on surrounding properties. 6. The proposed use can be suitably buffered from surrounding uses, so as to reduce the impact of any nuisance or hazard to the neighborhood As a PUD, all structures on the site will be set back at least 20 feet from the perimeter of the property. and surrounding residential uses he entire site will have a minimum 7. The proposed use will not create a density pattern that would overburden public facilities such as schools, streets, and utility services. While lot sizes are smaller, because of the eagle's nest and wetlands on the site, the overall density of the project is lower than that normally associated with single- family residential uses and the density of adjacent lands. The adequacy of public utilities and the impact on streets have previously been discussed and found to be acceptable. While the actual number of school children has not be estimated, Staff believes at least a substantial portion of the units are likely to be occupied by other than families with school age children. Because of the number of smaller units on smaller lots, the number of school children is likely to be lower than that that would be expected if larger lot development were proposed, even if the number of larger lots were lower than that anticipated under the concept plan associated with the requested rezoning. 8. The proposed use will not create traffic congestion, flooding or drainage problems, or otherwise affect public safety. The Applicant's traffic impact analysis indicates that the proposed use will not reduce the level of service on the affected roadways and have only negligible impacts upon nearby major roadways and local roads. A stormwater management system will be designed to meet standards developed by the 9 Staff Report Application No.: 07- 011 -TRC Site Plan Review Applicant's Name: The Lakehouse oversight agencies to address flooding and drainage. Management systems designed to these standards will result in lower potential for off -site flooding and drainage impacts. No negative affects on public safety are expected to occur as a result of the proposed rezoning. 9. The proposed use has not been inordinately burdened by unnecessary restrictions. No. The only restrictions on the proposed uses are those associated with a planned unit development which, along with the compensating flexibility of the PUD, is especially suited to properties on which are situated environmentally sensitive lands. Conclusion: Staff finds the requested rezoning and associated concept plan to be in conformance with the intent, standards, and requirements of the PUD -R District, and recommends approval. Submitted by: James G. LaRue, AICP Planning Consultant October 10, 2007 TRC Concept Plan Hearing date: September 26, 2007 LPA Hearing date: October 18, 2007 Attachments Maps or Diagrams — FLUM and Property Appraiser Map Ordinance 10 Staff Report Site Plan Review Application No.: 07- 011 -TRC Applicant's Name: The Lakehouse Subject Property City of Okeech bee Future Land Use Map 194 8=- 14- 13 15 2 p_ !242 249 243 244 22 ubject operty 24 7 3 • crwrer iGC rr'ifi�r-' � ••_-_ -� D,'/ f. C — ?� ^ �'�� i a T T - Y j 1 -. j 8; sst�sri`aoexr Ned SW wriu 11 N 1--1 RECE! City of Okeechobee General Services Department 55 S.E. 3' Avenue, Room 101 Okeechobee, Florida 34974 -2903 Phone: (863) 763 -3372, ext. 218 Fax: (863) 763 -1686 Date: q i 7 IC % Petition No. 01- 0 i if_ l Fee Paid: Wc4 yep Jurisdiction: fa /6 a 1st Hearing: I Oil %2,I[j 2nd Hearing: 11 aC.� 'D it )9 Publication Dates: y is a sale subject to this application being granted? Notices Mailed: Describe adjoining land uses / improvements to the North: Uniform Land Use Application Rezone • Sjecial Exception • Variance V Name of property owner(s): d`Yi`1' 8 - Owner mailing address: (en eS'jv z i g)na pv E b 1( p__e_( r c cad Obee__ Approximate number of acres: Is property in a t d subdivision? A P P L 1 C A N T Name of applicant(s) if other than owner (state relationship): y is a sale subject to this application being granted? is the subject parcel your total holdings at that location? If not, describe the remaining or intended uses: Describe adjoining land uses / improvements to the North: South: ? East: kr(c c - West: E.�Qm� Applicant mailing address: / Actions Requested: (/) Rezone ( (/SSpecial Exception ( ) Variance Parcel Identification Number: Name of contact person (state relationship): IQ 6 Contact person daytime phone(s): —� g $ 01 - � -- 1 8 l ll�rf' 9 167 T Asa n g 3 - - V Property address / directions to property: 1g ) 1 'S i 2 644 Are__ E-. pia ji indicate current use of property: Ca 1J VP( ` ` ` S 61nQ (1 "� P R 0 P E R T Y Describe im Joy ents on p erty, i luding nu er /type o dwellings and whether occupied (ifnone. so state): �+- h 0� .�i, , t ®lam" • Approximate number of acres: Is property in a t d subdivision? is there a current or recent use of the that 0 vrasa violation of countv ordinance? if so, describe: Have there been any land use applications concerning all or part of this property in the last year? If so, indicate date, nature and applicant's name: 1.ec j GImm 12406C, 12406C, — RE Z i3 n e y is a sale subject to this application being granted? is the subject parcel your total holdings at that location? If not, describe the remaining or intended uses: Describe adjoining land uses / improvements to the North: South: ? East: kr(c c - West: E.�Qm� Existing zoning: Future Land Use classification: Actions Requested: (/) Rezone ( (/SSpecial Exception ( ) Variance Parcel Identification Number: Confirmation of Information Accuracy I hereby certify that the infon-nation in this application is correct. The information included in this application is for use by the City of Okeechobee in processing my request. False or misleading information may be punishable by a fine of up to $500. impp sonment of up to 30 days and may result in the summary denial of this application. Printed Nat'ne Date Sig z ture Uniform Land Use Application (rev. 1!03) Page 1 of 2 .,n Land Use Application (re\ 1i031 Page 2 of 2 Current zoning classification: 0L1.— Requested zoning classification : (420 R Z O N E What is your desired permitted use under the pro osed classification: (1\c\AA. 0 s )(6.\ CrcD If granted, will the new zone be contiguous with a like zone ? e....5 Is a Special Exception necessary for your intended use? Ne5 Variance? .,n Land Use Application (re\ 1i031 Page 2 of 2 Describe the Special Exception sought: S P E C i A L X C E P T I O- N Provide specific LDR ordinance citation: �^ 6 Are there other similar uses in the area? lF' so, describe: ye _c Q l r e_, .t t ct_C ,ee C� Q ` `e` S In PC K—E - Why would granting your request be in the best interest of the area and residents? If business. briefly describe nature including number of empio' ees. hours. noise generation and act s∎ it to be conducted otmide of ti buiidim SEE PH-Nave-a .,n Land Use Application (re\ 1i031 Page 2 of 2 Describe Variance sought: V A R 1 A N C E Describe physical characteristic of property that makes variance necessary: I Did you cause or contribute to the characteristic? Is so, describe: What is the minimum variance necessary? .,n Land Use Application (re\ 1i031 Page 2 of 2 BUILDING BLOCKS ACADEMY 1811 SW 2ND AVE. OKEECHOBEE FLA. 34974 TO: OKEECHOBEE COUNTY REZONE 1811 SW 2ND AVE Granting this request is in the best interest of this community because I employ 18 full time people, and provide childcare for the working parents in the area. In describing my business I employ 18 people . Provide childcare for working parents. My hours are 6:30am -10:00 pm mon -fri. Sat care is also available. The noise generation is at a minimum, only children on playground outside can be heard nearby. Outside activities are only on playground. To my knowledge there has never been a question of any noise generation. Uii•Z/DIA-JUT lb: 21 13735nosontwO4Ot1 145411rAq2A1144 tanmoiniewall 5.01iterAdaseekra • kr , 1117ootiorsr,s4ostoto 3 14;? 1 - 13 2 3283735E05000330avn ,211g3719106110033900111 menicesessiamoo utspnolicifiroo3,7 15w5waavour- 11 4 1) 142, 5 1 .1a. ts 4 7 9 :0211313ECIPRIO034000)(3 32&3735005000140n010 3267.3500ila3 sOCtIt OKEECHOEEE COWTY PA I 44' r'• • 1 4 3 10 —J 52837350050003400110 3283715k.600113400050 PAGE Or'si ,71 e, 41.1 9 3 AC 1 4Z. 5 1 7 1 211113174C051111113611111170 32/33711500500036000 tO 1),(1, ,12 3590090 —5FirbirsotiktfOrtd t [ 2 4 32837351185001U600330 22f0),B11*S0002PIA1150 14;? 0 7 1 328725:100004001170 21123511050tInglIrlMO CI 3283735011kGtig11011C 20R1711S005011014104 aEorworiontsiOncrt 12 1•i2 5 425 inTF77 • , T" $10151COSOoo4ioao7o 1-1 :.2a373W0500042001.70 10 11 VO3r350o#noo42otrs4o 3;s373orssocro4n4wo I :3 ;2.3 4;? _5 = 42 5 - 3pg:1723m541o,se,a007t ' 41 1 147,7 142 11 14: 5 0 2:1A27Z50115,0011:19101170 3284735005071:1t00010 111 10 PA373500SOOOPID4110 1 1 142 . 5 lant$5074O004006070 .71243.73S0115111000100111111' . ..• 1 42. 15 14? 10 IM27.1505•110040110100 .19.1131/2500%111•10001.10 I 142 5. • !,12 4:1 13137goestscsocsono,,, 11ansomor4otio3o 211 221137Y2011C0110125000C 7!7) • 12$11Z5Or , 2011 255 [70) 220735CANICON50000 79; 1I /1‘.101,0 0000C210000 35,! 3 ; ) !, AC 1 i 0 7 11(13735005000 410DOMil 3283735005000 11 0 n I1S 1 7 12 1.1, 5 r,le 5 7 r 4;1 011 NA3,7.350050004800010 MR37JrailD04540080 9 4, .. •1 r1.• 0a3SWIC0 hein 9 412112715005000411010:10 3;35 221 2, F, :1F5 2211 '1F;1 fC r / 2P011 n Al 215 I SP 8211.4•00;00 A :000:1* 7 . E r ! THIS INSTRUMFM PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO Martha S. Eskuchen✓z<{z111.10 Oceanside Tile, Inc. 14041 U.S .Highway One Jura Beach, FL 53408 (561) 6263530 Property Apprelsers Parcel idehdlicatlwt (Folio) Numbenc 3-2837 -35.0050- 00350.0110 & 00400-0070 BPAOE /WOVE THIS LINE FOR REBIND DATA f11Il/11III1/ FILE MUM 2004003151 OR BK 00524 PG 0655 SHARON ROBERTSON+ CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT OKEECHOBEE COUNTY. FL RECORDED 02/24/2004 01135:59 Ph RECORDING FEES 6.00 DEED DOC 5,565.00 RECORDED BY II Anuez THIS WARRANTY DEED, made the 19th day of February, A.D. 2004 by Building Blocks Child Care, Inc., herein oared the grantor, to Building Blocks Academy of Okeechobee, Inc., A Florida Corporation whose poet once address* 1811 & 1903 S. W. 2nd Avenue, Okeechobee, FL 349'72, hantlardier cared the Omnina Mnraauw lard /amen Yn wnns 'Kantor* and bwdaa' Include an err AIWA* to Ude Instrument and to hero. bed rspr..srralvsa And nsgr• o/ Itdvkluds. art the aaonaors and aadpe of ro ponpa.) WITNESS E T H: That are panor, for and in oonsideraVon of the stun of TB4 AND 00/109S ($10.00) Dollars and other valuable considerations, receipt - , wlmowledged, hereby grants, bargains, acts, spars, remises, releases, conveyer and onn6rms tarto the grantee al p skate in OI�giOBE County, Stab of Florida, Mr Lot 7 and North 1/2 of - • k 40, FIRST ADDITION TO SOUTH OKEECHOBEE, according to the plat the y' „..- • - • In Plat Book 1, page 17, Public Records of Okeechobee County, Lots 11 and 12, Block 35, FIRS 1 a a, a N TO SOUTH OKEECHOBEE, according to the plat thereof recorded , Page 17, Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida. �1 Subject to zoning, restriction I o , and other requirements imposed by governmental augtorily; resin - : , appearing on the plat or otherwise common to the subdivision; public utility easements of record and taxes for year of closing and subsequent years. This property is commercial property and not the Homestead of Grantors. TOGETHER, with err the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same In fee simple forever. AND, the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor to lawlury seized of said land In fee simple, that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said and, and hereby warrants the tide to said land and will defend the same against the Iawftd palms of all persons whomsoever, and that said land Is free of all encumbrances, except taxes subsequent to December Si, 2003_ 9 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, aeQied and deWered in the presence of Build l t , Blocks Child , t BY: • i. Rhonda Strickland, 4991 S.E 44th Ave Rd, Ocala. FL 34480 Witness 82 Printed Herne STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OFD PAL-1h q3S-{t The foregoing Interment was acknowledged before me this 19th day of February, 2004 by Rhonda Snick Building Blocks Child Care, Inc. on behalf of the corporation_ He/she is pe ai own as ki ntificabon. SEAL by Cansdedce Rs No. Fail -10 Printed Notary Signature BOUNDARY SURVEY PREPARED FOR BUILDING BLOCKS OF OKEECHOBEE, INC. NORTH GRAPHIC LAUC1 D VALID Id 20 DO ME ( iN FEET ) 1 inch - 20 ft. DESCRIPTION: LOTS 11 & 12 , BLOCK 35 & LOTS 7 & N1 /2 OF 8, BLOCK 40 FIRST ADDITION TO SOUTH OKEECHOBEE P.B. 1, PG. 17, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY PUBUC RECORDS PARCEL ID: (LOTS 11 & 12, BLOCK 35) 3- 28- 37 -35- 0050 -00350 -0110 (LOT 7 & N1/2 LOT 8, BLOCK 40) 3- 28- 37 -35- 0050- 00400 -0070 ADDRESS: 1811 & 1903 S.W. 2ND AVENUE F.I.R.M. ZONE LOTS UE IN CITY UMITS OF OKEECHOBEE FLOOD ZONE NOT Dt1tHMINED, PROJECT SPECIFIC NOTES: 1. UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE, ALL DIMENSIONS ARE PLAT(P) AND MEASURED(M). 2. THIS SURVEY IS NOT INTENDED TO DEPICT JURISDICTIONAL AREAS OR OTHER AREAS OF LOCAL CONCERN. 3. THE DESCRIPTION SHOWN HEREON WAS PROVIDED BY CLIENT OR CLIENTS REPRESENTATIVE. 4. DATE OF LAST FIELD SURVEY: 11/24/03. PREPARED FOR THE EXCUSIVE USE OF: BUILDING BLOCKS OF OKEECHOBEE, INC. BUSINESS LOAN CENTER OCEANSIDE TITLE, INC. STEWART 11TLE GUARANTY CO. HALEY, SINAGRA. PAUL AND TOLAND, P.A. won. rex( w L1JlS > a O 6 z d CONC u 0.44 (-OJT tar ea N 89'51'48" W 142.50' 1015(0 C-0E+ R S 4-aS [-0.4' O O • °ye 49s CCNC I I8 14.0' • zr 1PPE /T rANa O lxax O O O 4-0.9 +0.9' 10.0 Owtela 07.2. 1.07 11 ±0.33 ACRES LOT 12 506. g 10.04 1 O O O O 10tMO 1/5. MM PPE E-ar I . eM. IIJ 0104 .47 u Fr LOT • n5a amu s-sr 42-01 COT 5 N 89`51'48" W 142.1 0' SW. 19111 STREET (1V,ELF114 STREET) PLAT. NOT OPEN & NOT IN USE I (40' PUTTED R/YQ� �' 420,0E N 89'51'48" W 142.50' 49200 1/9 p5o5 PE TOOND eWe ROO 5-az r-oa' Des ROat OR4VE LOT 7 ±0.25 ACRES 5,1,11 DRIVE NORTH 1/2 LOT B L_ fms(t ) R,s- 11S7Ta 2006 10104 00 9i SW1N 90.4 429 0 O� V/ 0 U an. b 0.r Cr1 O O N 89'51'48" W 142.50' 1/2 LOT 0 49 5-70 In O O O KIPS '-.4 rypil 1019 ADD ACREAGE BOUNDARY SURVEY ((U�U�PDATE) BOUNDARY SURVEY 015170 09/04/07 11/26 03 0'1/03/01 FILE FILE FILE WC WC JS 1 KA8 KA8 KAB DESCR/P7700 DWG. DA72. f8 /PG or CK SCA(E 1' = 20' DRAWING !/UMBER.' 17591 J SHEET 1 or 1 LEGEND 0-Set Iron Rod and Cap TAPS 6719 ■ -Found CM 0 -Found Iron Rod (and Cop) 0 -Found Pipe (and Cop) ABBREVIATIONS t.B.odMC Be-Bna..or1 E 1we,e 00 0.204 CA1V.CO512 tt 01- C.nv.n u- ,.,,h.,b cwC-c -rrN5 0.0e. 51.001. or 0..W 0y0 E -Earl: N V.Each BEN -51501 N Porn.,e EW Inwm T.Emsn.,h: LL.1. 10.0 m Ne aon. 1w,4 P. m% Pr. 0E(C).n. Ree 1.4 a fart 1.4.0.m., oweerwanat 50e0b0 10592110 5114 - 0010.19 11040).4.0220 00a0.6. Vrnwl (0.1wm) of 1590. 515.054 b Scat 010000.0. 'Mrs t`P'2 011 Unc 1 .0 -Punta Combos 4 BnO, n1 C- n.o... Cunene. PO, Pr-22221 C22ea Pant: PW.RAW N boeMBno 400-(eN1 of Cup- eneron .1 wt -Ps0,1 a Ro.ahe Cv0NC PNr.P.,n22w1 RONVwe *It Pr4.4220 of T P1w0,011s ;muT 0401 Ovine, w,roKie wr22N.nY1 SewWw. x 'R ...ow Sp..e� war .92 tnnel.,r. u ol..4.p�swt o.1,m STANDARD NOTE& 1. No search .1 the public records for determination of ownership or mob-lotions affecting the lands shown roe performed by the surveyor. 2. The survey depicted here le prepared exdushely for those parties noted. 1 No reeponolbhlty or Ila0Dlty b osouned by the surveyor for use by others not spedibaNy named 4. Not valid rlthou1 the signature and embossed sod of Florida licensed mrveyor and mapper j4002. 5. There are no Melble above ground encroachments except as shorn. 6. No attempt roe made to locate underground improvements and /or entrenchments (if arty) as port or this survey. 7. Thle 'Levey was prepared In accardonw .124 0111111115171 tedmkd standards setobRshed by the Florida Board of Surveyors and Mapper. (Chapter 81217 -6, FAC.) pursuant to Section 472.027. Florid. Statutes. TRADEVPINDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, IN( SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS 200 &W. 3rd Avenue Okeechobee, FL 34974 Tat (883) 783 -2887 Kenneth A. Breaux, Jr. (P514 4820) learwaUwa LO AUGUST 16, 1994 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 3 OF 13 .,_; ::,.,...,r.,,v ..$,.. »i '.,,. %." ... .. ::q^ . <we: .. ..:,.,o,.k,:.:. :a s<• s,�ria;::a.,t.fiao ia,. z. .. '::s? ,,: '_.,.__ .�.�ae "may �En H : d .o, .'°'i `� >.., wa" .° 3�,l. ,aar. ; ?e„;'nia"r. ';<,.,, ••.%'1 ma.. c�;x.. a ;# 6 "?.`;' ros." °le/s ,m . `.a AM"? r� �..r 1,,,<., r0 s c %waoi£ "':Y".n F. PUBLIC HEARING FOR REZONING ADOPTION Mr. Bill Royce, Planning Director, appeared before the Council explaining this petition is for a rezoning of land from residential single family to light commercial. The property is located at 1903 S.W. 2nd Avenue (Lot 7 and North 1/2 of 8 of Block 40; South Okeechobee) owned by Gary and Deborah Frazier. The Frazier's plan to expand their Building Blocks Day Care Center into this area to open a Pre - School. The Future Land Use Designation is consistent with this request. The Planning Board unanimously recommends that the City Council grant the petition. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals granted the variance and special exception. Mayor Kirk asked if there was any comments or questions from the public, there were none. Councilmember Entry commented he went to the day care center and looked at the proposed site and talked with the property owners around the area and that he did not have a problem with the rezoning or the pre - school. Following brief discussion, Councilmember Walker moved to approve Petition 94- X X X X X 1. b. Consider Petition 94 -471 -R for a rezoning request from Residential Single Family to Commercial for property located at 1903 S.W. 2nd Avenue - Mr. Bill Royce (E.1). 2. a. Motion to read by title only Ordinance 670 - City Attorney (E -2). 417 -R for rezoning from Residential Single Family to Light Commercial at 1903 S.W. 2nd Avenue; seconded by Councilmember Entry. KIRK ENTRY O'CONNOR WALKER WATFORD MOTION CARRIED. Councilmember Entry made a motion to read by title only, (proposed) Ordinance No. 670 (closing an alley in Block 29, City of Okeechobee); seconded by Councilmember Watford. 87 388 F. PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE ADOPTION 2. a. Read Ordinance 670 by title only continued: 2. b. Motion to adopt Ordinance 670. 2. c. Public comment. AUGUST 16, 1994 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 4 OF 13 Vote on motion is as follows: KIRK ENTRY O'CONNOR WALKER WATFORD MOTION CARRIED. Attomey Cook read proposed Ordnance No. 670 by title only as follows: "AN ORDINANCE CLOSING, VACATING AND ABANDONING THE ALLEY AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 10, PUBLIC RECORDS, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, DESCRIBED AS THAT ALLEY IN BLOCK 29; TOWN OF OKEECHOBEE, BY CLOSING SAID ALLEY IN BLOCK 29 BETWEEN LOTS 1 -13 AND LOTS 14-26; ALL LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO RECORD THE ORDINANCE IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE." Councilmember Entry made a motion to adopt Ordinance No. 670; seconded by Councilmember Walker. Mayor Kirk asked for any public comments. There were none. Council discussed the area surrounding the alley to be closed and why the property owners wanted to close the alley. After much discussion, Council - member O'Connor called the question. X X X X 389 AUGUST 16, 1994 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 5 OF 13 a' V: t rw a ,. v `' a2 `4 .un eA�e.Y ! x+ . .,. X X X X X X X X X X X X X F. PUBLIC HEARING FOR REZONING AND ORDINANCE Vote on motion is as follows: KIRK ENTRY O'CONNOR WALKER WATFORD MOTION CARRIED. Mayor Kirk closed the public hearing at 7:34 p.m. Councilmember Watford made a motion to appoint Jessica Gore as a regular dispatcher; seconded by Councilmember Entry. KIRK ENTRY O'CONNOR WALKER WATFORD MOTION CARRIED. Councilmember O'Connor made a motion to appoint Charles Jordan as a regular Utilities Service Supervisor and Hubert Winters as a regular Utilities Service Mechanic; seconded by Councilmember Watford. KIRK ENTRY O'CONNOR WALKER WATFORD MOTION CARRIED. X X ADOPTION 2. d. Vote on motion. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING G. NEW BUSINESS 1. Motion to appoint Jessica Gore as a regular dispatcher - Police Chief. 2. Motion to appoint Charles Jordan as a regular Utilities Service Supervisor and Hubert Winters as a regular Utilities Service Mechanic - Director of Public Utilities. 1375 Jackson Street, Suite 206 Fort Myers, Florida 33901-2845 Phone: 239-334-3366 Fax: 239-334-6384 LaRue Planning & Management Services, Inc. Staff Report Rezoning Request Prepared for: City of Okeechobee Applicant: Tammy Black — Building Blocks' Day Care Academy From: CLT To: CPO Petition No. 07-014-R Staff Report Rezoning Request Applicant: Tammy Black — Building Blocks Day Care Petition No.: 07 -014-R General Information Applicant Phone Number: Contact Person Existing Future Land Use Map Classification Zoning District Use of Property Acreage Access CPO Day care same Location: 1811 and 1903 SW 2nd Avenue Legal Description: Lots 11 & 12, Block 35 and Lots 7 & North 1/2 of 8, Block 40, First Addition to South Okeechobee P.B. 1, PG. 17, Okeechobee County Public Records. Request: The applicant is requesting a rezoning from CLT to CPO to allow continuation of an existing day care facility. Adjacent Future Land Use Map Classifications and Zoning Districts: Future Land Use Zoning Existing Use North: East: South: West: Commercial Commercial Commercial Single Family CHV CHV RSF RSF Single family home Offices Single fam Single fam ly home ly home Summary: The subject property has an existing daycare facility on site. The CPO Zoning is to remedy a mistake made in 1994 when the applicant received a CLT zoning which did not allow the daycare. As such, the applicant has come before you to request CPO that allows a day care facility as a special exception use. The applicant will also need to submit an application for special exception. 1 Staff Report Rezoning Request Applicant: Tammy Black — Building Blocks Day Care Petition No.: 07 -014 -R Analysis 1. The proposed use is not contrary to Comprehensive Plan requirements. Neither the existing use nor the CPO zoning is contrary to the requirements of the Comprehensive Plan. The Future Land Use Map shows that the subject property is within the Commercial category and the request for CPO zoning is consistent with the Commercial Future Land Use category. 2. The proposed use being applied for is specifically authorized under the zoning district in the Land Development Regulations. A day care center is authorized as a special exception use under the requested CPO Zoning district. The applicant will need to submit an application for a special exception to allow continuation of the current use. 3. The proposed use will not have an adverse effect on the public interest. There is no evidence that the existing use has had an adverse affect and none are expected in the future if the use continues. 4. The use is appropriate for the location proposed, is reasonably compatible with adjacent land uses, and is not contrary or detrimental to urbanizing land use patterns. The existing use has been compatible with the surrounding area and will continue to be under the proposed CPO zoning. 5. The proposed use will not adversely affect property values or living conditions, or be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property. Continuation of the day care facility at this location will not affect property values in the neighborhood. 6. The proposed use can be suitably buffered from surrounding uses, so as to reduce the impact of any nuisance or hazard to the neighborhood The use can be buffered with landscaping if necessary. 7. The proposed use will not create a density pattern that would overburden public facilities such as schools, streets, and utility services. The existing use will not increase demand upon schools or utility services. Traffic impacts will be minimal as there will no increase in the flow of traffic on the 2 Staff Report Rezoning Request Applicant: Tammy Black - Building Blocks Day Care Petition No.: 07 -014-R surrounding roadways. In fact, the retail and personal service uses allowed in the CLT district, but not in the CPO district, are typically more intensive and have the potential to generate higher volumes of traffic than the limited office and special exception uses allowed in the CPO district. 8. The proposed use will not create traffic congestion, flooding or drainage problems, or otherwise affect public safety. Continuation of the current use will create no traffic congestion, flooding or drainage problems. 9. The proposed use has not been inordinately burdened by unnecessary restrictions. The property is subject to no extraordinary restrictions. 10. The proposed change will not constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed change will not constitute a grant of special privilege to the owner. Conclusions The proposed zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the Future Land Use Map, and the Zoning Map. An excerpt from the Official Zoning Map and an aerial from the Property Appraiser's web site are provided at the end of this report. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the request to allow rezoning from CLT to CPO permitting the applicant to continue the use as a day care facility. Submitted by James G. LaRue, AICP Planning Consultant October 10, 2007 1st Hearing 10 -18 -07 PB, LPA 2nd Hearing 11 -20 -07 Council 3 Staff Report Rezoning Request Applicant: Tammy Black — Building Blocks Day Care Petition No.: 07 -014 -R City Zoning Map Subject Prope 4 Staff Report Rezoning Request Applicant: Tammy Black - Building Blocks Day Care Petition No.: 07 -014 -R 5