The URL can be used to link to this page

2006-05-23 LPA I I I 2LJ5 CITY OF OKEECHOBEE LAND PLANNING AGENCY MAY 23, 2006 SUMMARY OF AGENCY ACTION I. CALL TO ORDER - Chairperson. Land Planning Agency, May 23,2006,6:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter following Chairperson Ledferd called the May 23,2006 Land Planning Agency meeting at 6:50 p.m. the Board of Adjustment meeting. II. CHAIRPERSON, MEMBER AND STAFF ATTENDANCE - Secretary. Deputy Clerk Eddings called the roll: Chairperson William Ledferd Vice-9hairperson Dawn Hoover Agency Member ~erry Burroughs Agency Member Kenneth Keller Agency Member Devin Maxwell Agency Member Douglas McCoy Agency Member Carol Johns Alternate Member Epifanio Juarez Alternate Member Mike O'Connor Attorney John R. Cook General Services Secretary Betty Clement Deputy Clerk Melisa Eddings Present Present Present Present Present Absent (with consent) Present Present - serving as voting member Present Present Present Present (Deputy Clerk Eddings was present in the absence of Secretary Katrina Cook) Chairperson Ledferd assigned Alternate Member Epifanio Juarez to act as a voting member in the absence of Agency Member Doug McCoy. III. MINUTES - Deputy Clerk. A. Motion to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Agency Agency Member Hoover moved to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Agency Action for the April 25, 2006 regular meetings. Action for the April 26, 2006 regular meeting; seconded by Agency Member Burroughs. III. MINUTES CONTINUED. A. Motion to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Agency Action for the April 25, 2006 regular meetings continued. IV. NEW BUSINESS. A. . Elect Chairperson, term beginning May 23, 2006 and ending May 27, 2008 - Agency Attorney. B. Elect Vice-Chairperson, term beginning May 23, 2006 and ending May 27, 2008 - Agency Attorney. c. Explanation regarding changes to the Land Planning Agency agenda - City Clerk. VOTE HOOVER - YEA KELLER - YEA LEDFERD - YEA MAxWELL-YEA JUAREZ - YEA BURROUGHS-YEA JOHNS - YEA MOTION CARRIED. The Board reappointed William Ledferd as Chairperson, term beginning May 23,2006 and ending May 27, 2008. No official action was taken specificallv at this meetinl!. The official action was taken while the Board was sitting as the Board of Adiustment. The Board reappointed Dawn Hoover as Vice-Chairperson, term beginning May 23,2006 and ending May 27,2008. No official action was taken specifically at this meeting. The official action was taken while the Board was sittinl! as the Board of Adjustment. A memorandum from City Clerk Gamiotea was distributed in the agenda packets which explained changes to the Board Meetings: The first thing we wanted to do was consolidate the Land Planning Agency and the Planning Board agendas. Both are recommendation boards that field the LDR amendments, land use changes, comprehensive plan amendments and rezonings. The LDR' s specifically address the fact that the Planning Board is the City's Local Planning Agency, which is all that is necessary to meeting Florida Statute requirements in setting up the citizen board to review comprehensive plan amendments. The second thing was we wanted to consolidate the Planning Board and Board of Adjustment and Appeals agenda's. I have researched this process and it seems to be common practice among City's and County's to have the consolidated agenda. Therefore, you will only have one agenda and one set of minutes. The title will be the "Planning Board/Board of Adjustment and Appeals." We hope these changes will streamline the process and make it more user-friendly. Even though the agenda's are consolidated, which will enable you to address several petitions for the same property, we will always need to ensure that small scale map amendments are processed and action taken prior to the rezoning petition. IV. NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED. I c. Explanation regarding changes to the Land Planning Agency agenda continued. V. CONSIDER LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION (LDR) AMENDMENTS. A. Consider amending Section 90, Division 6, Commercial Professional and Office (CPO) District regarding Section 90-2L.2 permitted uses to broaden the truck weight limitation - Agency Attorney. I I Memorandum continued: You will also be able to discuss rezoning petitions and special exceptions on the same property. However, this will not change thefact that when you take action as listed under the duties of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, you are sitting as a "quasi-judicial" board. The change will take place beginning with your new meeting date in June." There was no discussion on this matter. Mr. LaRue briefly reviewed Section 90-222. Permitted Uses which reads, subject to the limitations that no retail sales, or display or storage of merchandise, and no manufacture or mechanical repair work shall be permitted, and no trucks larger than three-quarter ton capacity shall be used, the following principal uses and structures are permitted in the CPO district: (1) Professional office, business office, medical office. (2) Funeral home. This matter was brought to light at the March 28, 2006 meeting when an applicant specifically could not request a CPO zoning due to his personal truck being "one-ton." In the absence of Attorney Cook at the April 25, 2006 meeting, the Agency instructed Mr. LaRue to consult with City Attorney Cook to amend the language pertaining to the trucks of Section 90-222 and bring back to the Agency for consideration. While Mr. LaRue nor Attorney Cook offered amendments in writing, they offered various suggested changes from deleting any reference to truck sizes to giving a specific larger truck size. Following a brief discussion, Agency Member Maxwell moved to find the amendment consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and to consider amendinl! Section 90. Division 6. Commercial Professional and Office (CPO) District regarding Section 90-222 permitted uses to broaden the truck weil!ht limitation. authorizing the City Council and Staff to broaden. clarify or eliminate the necessary lanl!uage: seconded by Agency Member Hoover. ZLf2 MAY 23, 2006 - LAND PLANNING AGENCY - PAGE 4 OF 15 V. CONSIDER LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION (LDR) AMENDMENTS CONTINUED. A. Consider amending Section 90, Division 6, Commercial Professional and Office (CPO) District regarding Section 90-222 permitted uses to broaden the truck weight limitation continued. B. Requests for any amendments to the City's LDR's - Chairperson. VOTE HOOVER - YEA KELLER - YEA LEDFERD - YEA MAXWELL - YEA JUAREZ - YEA BURROUGHS-YEA JOHNS - YEA MOTION CARRIED. Chairperson Ledferd asked whether there were any requests for amendments to the City's LDR's. There were none. VI. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER SMALL SCALE FUTURE CHAIRPERSON LED:FERD OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER SMALL LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS - Chairperson. SCALE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS AT 7:05 P.M. A. Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-012-SSA. Consider a recommendation to the City Council to change the land use designation for an unplatted parcel of land shown as the Railroad Grounds, lying within the Plat of the City of Okeechobee, from Single Family (SF) to Multi-Family (MF). The subject property is located between Southwest 2nd and 6th Streets. The application was submitted by Jeff Sumner and/or Ken Treadwell on behalf of property owner Frank Altobello, Trustee - City Planning Consultant. Mr. LaRue briefly reviewed the Staff Report as follows: Planning Staff Report Summary: The applicant is requesting the Multi-Family Future Land Use Future Land ,Use category to develop 9.89 acres of land as a multi-family development. The Multi- Family category would allow apartments, duplexes, and condominiums at a maximum density of 10 units per acre. This could allow up to 99 units on the subject property. The only access for this property seems to be on 2nd Street. This location and narrow access outlet is not a desirable opportunity to convert this property to Multi-Family. Planning Staff Report Comprehensive Plan Analysis: (A) As proposed, the applicant's request is not consistent with the Multi-Family Land Use category as intended in the Future Land Use Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. This is a location with inadequate traffic flow capability. The traffic impacts and potential incompatibility to other Single Family uses have not been appropriately recognized. (B) Water is available to the subject property but sewer availability has not been confirmed. hnpacts to traffic and schools have not been assessed. (C) The proposed change in Future Land Use may accelerate too much residential growth in a location not suitable for such impacts, especially from a traffic standpoint. (D) The City's Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies, as they are I I I VI. SMALL SCALE AMENDMENT PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. A. Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-012-SSA continued. Planning Staff Report Comprehensive Plan Analysis: (D) continued: intended, do not support a change to Multi-Family residential use at this time. Nearby vacant Multi-Family lands should be absorbed prior to further expansion of apartments at this location. Planning Staff Report Analysis and Conclusions: This application and its appearance before the Council and the LP A was duly noticed for the public in accordance with the notice requirements set forth in Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes. Staff does not recommend approval to amend the Future Land Use Map from Single-Family to Multi-Family based on the above comments and the application's inconsistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Mr. LaRue explained that the Department of Community of Affairs (DCA) limits one owner per under 10 acre parcel considered for Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Small Scale Map Amendments, and this property is contiguous with another property which had already been approved for the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Small Scale Amendment by the same owner. Attorney Cook clarified that the limitations by DCA are to prevent large land owners from piecing the property into under 10 acre parcels to have the Small Scale Map Amendments approved. Mr. LaRue suggested that this property be considered as a Large Scale Amendment. Mr. Haynes Williams represented Mr. Altobello, and requested this item be tabled so the applicant can confer with Mr. LaRue in regards to considering a Planned Unit Development (PUD). There was no further discu~sion. Agency Member Burroughs moved to table Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-012-SSA until the June 27, 2006 meeting; seconded by Agency Member Hoover. VOTE HOOVER - YEA KELLER - YEA LEDFERD - YEA MAXWELL - YEA JUAREZ - YEA BURROUGHS-YEA JOHNS - YEA MOTION CARRIED. VI. SMALL SCALE AMENDMENT PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. B. Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-013-SSA. Consider a recommendation to the City Council to change the land use designation for Lots 1 to 26 of Block 12; Lots 1,2,3 and 9, less the East 32.50 feet of said Lot 9, and Lots 10 to 26 of Block 21; Lots 1 to 6 of Block 22, City of Okeechobee,. from Single Family (SF) to Multi- Family (MF). The subject property is located at between Northwest 12th and 13th Streets and Northwest 5th and 8th Avenues. The application was submitted by Steve Dobbs on behalf of property owner InSite Development Group - City Planning Consultant. Mr. Steve Dobbs, representing the applicant, submitted a request to table the application until the June 27,2006 meeting. Agency Member Hoover moved to table Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-013-SSA, until the June 27th regular meeting; seconded by Agency Member Burroughs. VOTE HOOVER - YEA KELLER - YEA LEDFERD - YEA MAXWELL - YEA JUAREZ - YEA BURROUGHS-YEA JOHNS-YEA MOTION CARRIED. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING FOR SMALL SCALE FUTURE LAND USE MAP CHAIRPERSON LEDFERD CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR SMALL SCALE AMENDMENTS - Chairperson. FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS AT 7:10 P.M. VII. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LARGE SCALE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS AND NARRATIVE (TEXT) AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSERVATION AND CAPIT AL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENTS - Chairperson. A. Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-CI-001. Consider a recommendation to the City Council to change the land use designation from Single Family (SF) to Commercial (C) for vacant unplatted property located North of East North Park Street (State Road 70 East, across from the Post Office), and is approximately 21.14 acre(s). The application was submitted by Craig M. Hackl, President on behalf of property owner H20 Holdings, LLC - City Planning Consultant. CHAIRPERSON LEDFERD OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LARGE SCALE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS AND NARRATIVE (TEXT) AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSERV ATION AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENTS AT 7:10 P.M. Mr. LaRue briefly reviewed the Staff Report as follows: Planning Staff Report Comprehensive Plan Analysis: (A) Consistency with the Land Use Categories and Plan Policies. The Comprehensive Plan describes the Commercial Future Land Use category in the Future Land Use Element. It states: Policy 2.1(c): Commercial. Permitted uses include office, retail, automotive, wholesale, and related Commercial activities. Also permitted are public facilities. Commercial development shall not exceed a floor area ratio of 3.00 and the maximum impervious surface for development within this category shall not exceed 85 percent of the site. Under the proposed Commercial Future Land Use category, the applicant would be allowed to develop the VII. LARGE SCALE PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. I A. Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-CI-001 continued. I I Planning Staff Report Comprehensive Plan Analysis: (A) continued: subject property with the Retail/Commercial uses. However, there is more data necessary to be shown illustrating that this presently designated residential area should become an intensive retail high impact location. (B) Concurrency of Adequate Public Facilities. Before this request can be approved, the City must consider the proposed impact on public facilities. Potable Water Supply: The adopted LOS for potable water is 114 gpcpd. The subject property is within the service area of the Okeechobee Utility Authority (ODA) who provides this service to City residents. The anticipated flow for the subject property has not been provided by the applicant, this data is required. The existing capacity of the water supply plant is 6 MGD, with 2.5 MGD already committed to use. As such, the OUA has an excess of 4.5 MGD. The applicant would need to submit a letter to the City which discusses the anticipated flow for the development and that the OUA would have capacity to serve the proposed development. There should also be a deduction of water use for already approved developments because the cumulative impact has not been contemplated should all approved developments be built. Wastewater Disposal: The adopted LOS for wastewater disposal is 130 gallons/ capita/day. The subject property is within the service area of the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA). Impacts for the subject property would be cannot be determined at this time. The existing capacity of the wastewater treatment plant is 1.2 MGD, with between 800,000 and 900,000 GPD already committed to use. As such, the OUA has a minimum of 300,000 GPD of excess capacity. The OUA has stated that plans are underway to construct an addition to the plant which will permit an additional 3 MGD. This is expected to be done by the summer of 2008. The applicant would need to verify that the OUA would have capacity to serve the proposed development. Solid Waste Disposal: The City has an adopted LOS of 13 lbs/capita/day and 3 years available landfill capacity for solid waste disposal. The impacts of the proposed development will be minimal as the uses will be Commercial in nature. Drainage/Stormwater Management: The adopted LOS for drainage is Design Storm, 25-year/24 hour duration. The proposed development is required to meet all conditions and standards required by the City of Okeechobee and the Florida Administrative Code. There should be at least conceptual understanding of how stormwater discharge will be handled for what is obviously going to be the creation of impervious areas. Recreation and Open Space: The adopted LOS for recreation and open space is 3 acres/1,000 persons. The proposed development is Commercial in nature and is not expected to impact parks. Roads and Traffic Circulation: The City's minimum LOS standard for principal arterial roadways is LOS C. All other roads have an LOS D. This LOS must be maintained on the site for all roadways serving the site. The subject property is serviced by SR 70. The applicant has not provided a traffic analysis which demonstrates how the proposed Development would impact the surrounding roadway network. Objective 9 and its corresponding 2!J2 VII. LARGE SCALE PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. A. Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-CI-001 continued. Planning Staff Report Comprehensive Plan Analysis: (B) continued: policies (Traffic Circulation Element) states Objective 9: The City of Okeechobee shall encourage efforts to curtail future level of service standard deterioration, particularly along US Highway 441 and SR 70. Policy 9.1: To assist in improving level of service standards, Commercial redevelopment efforts shall be prioritized to mitigate existing "strip" Commercial sites. Policy 9.2: Access points to Commercial centers shall be limited, where feasible, to decrease traffic congestions along City arterials and other roadways. Policy 9.3: Efforts shall be made, where appropriate, to separate local traffic from through traffic in Commercial areas. The applicant must submit a traffic analysis which demonstrates that the above polices will be met and that the Level of Service would not be degraded for the surrounding roads. Such analysis should include the anticipated trips from the Commercial property to the east. (C) Compatibility with Adjacent and Nearby Land Uses. The proposed change to Commercial has been stated by the applicant that it would not negatively impact surrounding properties. The proposed type of Commercial uses and usage of buffers should be demonstrated before compatibility can be assumed. (D) Compliance with the Specific Standards of the Plan. The Goals, Objectives and Policies (as they are intended) in the Comprehensive Plan would allow for an Amendment to the Future Land Use Map to Commercial should compatibility, acceptable impacts on traffic, sewer, water and overall fiscal feasibility resulting from this re-designation, can be shown by supporting data and analysis. Planning Staff Report Analysis and Conclusions: Staff does not recommend for approval of applicant's request to amend the Future Land Use Map to Commercial. Mr. LaRue added that he is willing to work with the applicant, however additional information is needed such as a traffic impact analysis, stormwater plan and the fiscal anlaysis. There were several surrounding property owners in attendance and spoke their concerns regarding noise, odors, traffic, and buffers so they will still have their natural surrounding environment. These items are addressed during site plan review. Planning Staff advised that any development would be required to address the concerns at that time and would have to comply with all regulations. Mr. Don Hackl, property owner, addressed the Agency by explaining that retail is the highest and best use for this property, it will increase the tax base and create more jobs. Mr. Glenn Stroud, an associate of Mr. Hackl's, added, without the land use change, developers nor retailers, will not look at or consider the property seriously. The traffic study will not be cost feasible without the certainty of the land use or rezoning change. I I I VII. LARGE SCALE PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. A. Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-CI-00 1 continued. B. Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Applic'ation No. 06-CI-002. Consider a recommendation to the City Council to change the land use designation from Single Family (SF) to Multiple Family (MF) for vacant unplatted property located South of Southeast 8th Street and West of Taylor Creek and is approximately 32.97 acre(s). The application was submitted by Thomas Close of CBC corporation on behalf of property owner Frank Altobello - City Planning Consultant. In conclusion, Mr. Hackl asked that the Agency consider the Large Scale Map Amendment with special conditions that they have the information Mr. LaRue is requesting by the transmittal meeting with the City Council, tentatively set for August 1,2006. Agency Burroughs moved to find the application consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and to recommend approval to City Council to change the land use designation from Single Family (SF) to Commercial (C) for Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-CI-001, with the contingency that the applicant provides the additional information as requested by the transmittal meeting with the City Council; seconded by Agency Member Maxwell. Agency Member Hoover left the Chamber room at 7 :45 p.m. Chairperson Ledferd appointed Alternate Member O'Connor to a voting position in her absence. VOTE O'CONNOR - YEA KELLER - YEA LEDFERD - YEA MAXWELL - YEA JUAREZ-YEA BURROUGHS-YEA JOHNS-YEA, MOTION CARRIED. By request of Member Johns. Chair{lerson Ledferd called for a five minute recess at 8:30 {).m. The meetinl! resumed at 8:35 p.m. Board Member Maxwell stated for the record that he would be abstaining from voting due to his firm being retained to assist in the real estate transaction of this property. Mr. LaRue briefly reviewed the Staff Report as follows: Planning Staff Report Comprehensive Plan Analysis: The City Council and Local Planning Agency are required to address certain uses in conjunction with the Comprehensive Plan, which may be categorized as follows: VII. LARGE SCALE PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. B. Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-CI-002 continued. Planning Staff Report Comprehensive Plan Analysis: (A) Consistency with the Land Use categories and Plan Policies. This Large Scale Plan Amendment application speaks about a mixed-use development but there is little data explaining and supporting this approach or justifying the request of Multi-Family Residential for the entire parcel. Objective 2: The City of Okeechobee will ensure that all new development is consistent with the Future Land Use Element. Policy 2.1: The following land use designations are established for the purpose of managing future growth: (b) Multi-family Residential. Permitted uses include apartments, duplexes, condominiums, single-family houses and public facilities. Maximum density shall not exceed 10 units per acre. Where affordable housing is provided in accordance with Housing Policy 1.6, the maximum density for multi-family development shall be 11 units per acre. As submitted, the application and supporting documentation is insufficient to support the change from Single Family to Multi-Family. Given its proximity to Taylor Creek, the Comprehensive Plan states that the City must protect environmentally sensitive areas from high density development such as what is being proposed by the applicant. Because of the property's proximity to Taylor Creek, Policy 7.2 of the Comprehensive Plan must be adhered to and the applicant hasn't given supporting evidence of that. The inclusion of a Marina with 96 slips and a fuel dock has also not been assessed with regard to this Policy. Policy 7.2: The City shall continue to protect environmentally sensitive areas from development of a type and intensity which would disrupt their natural functions. (B) Concurrency of Adequate Public Facilities. Before this request can be approved, the City must consider the proposed impact on public facilities. Potable Water Supply: The adopted LOS for potable water is 114 gpcpd. The subject property is within the service area of the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA) who provides this service to City residents. The below is the anticipated flow for the proposed 320 units is expected to be approximately 95,000 GPD. The existing capacity of the surface and ground water supply plants are 6 MGD, with 2.5 MGD already committed to use. As such, the OUA has an excess of 4.5 MGD. The OVA would have capacity to serve the proposed development but recent approvals have not been considered in this assessment of remaining water capacity. Wastewater Disposal: The adopted LOS for wastewater disposal is 130 gallons/ capita/day. The subject property is within the service area of the Okeechobee Utility Authority (QUA). The estimated wastewater flows for the subject property would be 95,000 GPD. The existing capacity of the wastewater treatment plant is 1.2 MGD, with between 800,000 and 900,000 GPD already committed to use. As such, the OUA has a minimum of 300,000 GPD of excess capacity. The QUA has stated that plans are underway to construct an addition to the plant which will permit an additional 3 MGD. It should be noted that the City has received several recent Plan Amendments counting on future sewer plant expansion. A better analysis showing committed service needs to be shown. I I VII. LARGE SCALE PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. I B. Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-CI-002 continued. Planning Staff Report Comprehensive Plan Analysis: (B) Concurrency of Adequate Public Facilities continued. Solid Waste Disposal: The City has an adopted LOS of 13 Ibs/capitaJday and 3 years available landfill capacity for solid waste disposal. The proposed development would generate approximately 12,350 lbs/day of solid waste. The applicant must provide a letter from Okeechobee County determining whether the existing landfill will have capacity to serve the proposed development. Drainage/Stormwater Management: The adopted LOS for drainage is Design Storm, 25-year/24 hour duration. The proposed development is required to meet all conditions and standards required by the City of Okeechobee and the Florida Administrative Code. Because of the vulnerability of Taylor Creek, there needs to be a more specific delineation of the Best Management Practices used for water quality enhancement in stormwater discharges. Recreation and Open Space: The adopted LOS for recreation and open space is 3 acresll,OOO persons. The proposed development is projected to increase the City's population by approximately 950 additional people. The development would need approximately 3 acres of recreational facilities in order to meet the adopted LOS for parks. The applicant has stated that this would be met with the provision of on-site facilities, but this doesn't seem completely consistent with the intent of the Recreation and Open Space LOS Standards of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Roads and Traffic Circulation: The City's minimum LOS standard for principal arterial roadways is LOS C. All other roads have an LOS D. This LOS must be maintained on the site for all roadways serving the site. In addition, Objective 9 of the Traffic Circulation Element states: Objective 9: The City of Okeechobee shall encourage efforts to curtail future Level of Service Standard deterioration, particularly along US Highway 441 and SR 70. The subject property would be serviced by US 441. The applicant has provided a traffic analysis which showed that traffic would be impacted by the proposed development. It was estimated that the proposed land use would result in an increase of 666 daily trips and 40 PM peak hour trips with 33 more trips in and 7 more trips out. This traffic study is being examined but it does not seem that the traffic analysis has contemplated any of the Commercial Non- Residential or Marina impacts. (C) Compatibility with Adjacent and Nearby Land Uses. The proposed land use change to Multi-Family at ten dwelling units an acre for the entire site is not compatible for this location. There has not been shown enough supporting data to indicate that this level of density is needed to this site. Given the property's proximity to Taylor Creek, staff is concerned that development might negatively impact this environmentally sensitive area. The Taylor Creek right-of- way per recorded plat should be recognized as non-buildable. It is not clear who is being asked to abandon the Taylor Creek right-of-way. Policy 2.3: The City shall continue to require that all development proposals be accompanied by an inventory of wetlands, soils posing severe limitation to construction, unique habitat, City shall further require that the extent to which any development or redevelopment is proposed to be placed in/on, to disturb, or to alter the natural functions of any of these 250 May 23, 2006 - Land Plannin Agency - Page 12 of 15 VII. LARGE SCALE PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. B. Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-CI-002 continued. Planning Staff Report Comprehensive Plan Analysis: (C) Compatibility with Adjacent and Nearby Land Uses Policy 2.3 continued: resources, be identified. Such identification shall occur at a phase in the development review process that provides the opportunity for the City to review the proposed project to ensure that direct and irreversible impacts on the identified resources are minimized, or in the extreme, mitigated. Where development is determined to encroach upon a resource, the City shall require a specific management plan to be prepared by the developer, which results in no net loss of wetlands and which includes necessary modifications to the proposed development, specific setback and buffers, and clustering of development away from site resources, to ensure the protection, preservation or natural functions of the resource. The minimum buffer for wetlands shall be 25 feet and the average of all setbacks from the wetland resource shall be 40 feet. Areas designated as buffers shall preserve all natural vegetative cover, except where drainageways and access paths are approved to cross the buffer. Buffers may be supplemented only with native tress, shrubs and ground covers. Policy 7.1: The City shall continue to amend and enforce land development regulations consistent with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection's (FDEP) Best Management Practices referenced in Policy 1.4, which will minimize the flow into Taylor Creek of organic nutrients, pesticides, sediment, and other substances having the potential to degrade water quality. The applicant has done a brief Florida Land Use Cover & Classification Systems (FLUCCS) analysis on this property but no Management Plan has been suggested to ensure there is not a loss of wetlands. It would seem that there could be an enhancement of some of these wetlands areas rather than just concluding that these areas are marginal. Conservation Element Conservation Element: Policy 4.1: Through Future Land Use Policy 2.3 and implementing Land Development Regulations, the City shall continue to conserve wetlands and protect water quality in Taylor Creek from adverse impacts of development. Policy 5.1: The City shall enforce provisions in its Land Development Regulations to ensure that new development, regardless of its location in the City, meets the following conditions: (a) does not degrade water quality in Taylor Creek; (b) does not threaten groundwater quality, particularly in the vicinity of municipal wells; (c) preserves existing wetland areas; (d) avoids the disturbance of natural drainage features; and (e) preserves habitat for endangered and/or threatened wildlife species. In examining the above Policies, there is not enough supporting evidence to indicate that the wetlands and natural resource areas will be adequately protected. Also, there might be measures to revitalize the wetland areas that haven't been suggested. Postponing the addressing of this until Site Plan time isn't adequately responding to this issue and is more prevalent in poorly planned conversion of rural properties, a characteristic of Urban Sprawl. (D) Compliance with the Specific Standards of the Plan. The Goals, Objectives and Policies, as they are intended within the Comprehensive Plan, do not support an Amendment to the Future Land Use Map to Multi- Family. VII. LARGE SCALE PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. I B. Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-CI-002 continued. I I Planning Staff Report Comprehensive Plan Analysis: (D) Compliance with the Specific Standards of the Plan continued. The proposal would be more consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan by following Single Family densities. Planning Staff Report Analysis and Conclusions: The eXlstmg Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policies will not support Multi-Family uses at this location. Therefore, it should be recommended that the City Council find the application not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. If mixed-uses are warranted at this property, perhaps a new Future Land Use category can be suggested that would provide performance standards and allow development at a lower density. Staff recommends denial of the applicant's request to amend the Future Land Use Map to Multi-Family based on the above inconsistencies to the City's Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Mark Mathes of Lucido and Associates, representative for applicant CBC Close Construction, and on behalf of the property owner Frank Altobello stated, Mr. Close has a strong desire to see the City prosper and is aware of the need for housing. He distributed an aerial map with the land use overlay indicating vacant multi-family parcels. He noted that there were no properties that exceeds five acres. Mr. Mathes then proceeded to address some of the requested information as noted in the Planning Staff Report. The data for the pottable water has been completed with QUA, and that the OUA also used the proposed property development for their stormwater study project. The solid waste analysis shows a capacity for up to 50 years. A traffic analysis was provided showing the roads will be able to service the extra impact. Agency Member Burroughs asked what was the purpose of the wave attenuator? Ms. Mary Haaksma, also from CBC Close Construction, replied that it is to keep the shoreline from eroding, and the waters calm. Mr. O'Connor asked Mr. LaRue whether all the additional requested information had been answered? Mr. LaRue replied yes, most of them were, but he still needed the site specifics density or cap for the residential area. Mr. Mathes responded that at this time they had no numbers available. It was discussed that they have the numbers for the proposed residential area by the transmittal meeting with the City Council. Mr. Mathes also stated that should there be a favorable transmittal meeting then they will submit a Planned Unit Development application, which must give more specifics. VII. LARGE SCALE PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. B. Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-CI-002 continued. c. Consider amending the Conservation Element of the Comprehensive Plan - City Planning Consultant. D. Consider amending the Capital hnprovement Element of the Comprehensive Plan - City Planning Consultant. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING - Chairperson. Agency Member O'Connor moved to find the application consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and to approve a recommendation to the City Council to change the land use designation from Single Family (SF) to Multiple Family (MF) for Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-CI-002 with the contingency that the applicant provide a number of residents proposed for the area by the transmittal meeting with the City Council; seconded by Agency Member Burroughs. VOTE O'CONNOR - YEA KELLER - YEA LEDFERD - YEA MAXWELL - ABSTAINED (VOTING CONFLICT FORM ON FILE IN THE CITY CLERKS OFFICE) JUAREZ - YEA BURROUGHS-YEA JOHNS - YEA MOTION CARRIED. Mr. LaRue distributed the Proposed/Best Management Practices which implemented Possible Policy Recommendations for the City to cooperate and coordinate with the St. Johns River Water Management District, the South Florida Water Management District, and the OUA to improve the water quality of Taylor Creek-. He then requested this item be considered at the next regularly scheduled meeting June 27,2006, which would allow the Board adequate time to review the recommendations. There was no official action taken on this matter. Mr. laRue distributed a Five Year Capital Improvements Program Summary of All Departments and requested this item be considered at the next regularly scheduled meeting June 27, 2006, which would allow the Board adequate time to review the summary provided. There was no official action taken on this matter. CHAIRPERSON LEDFERD CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LARGE SCALE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS AND NARRATIVE (TEXT) AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSERVATION AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENTS AT 9:18 P.M. I I CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. I VIII. ADJOURNMENT - Chairperson. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED mAT IF ANY PERSON DESIRES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY TIlE LAND PLANNING AGENCY WITII RESPECT TO ANY MA TIER CONSIDERED AT TIIIS PROCEEDING, SUCH INTERESTED PERSON Wll.L NEED A RECORD OF TIlE PROCEEDINGS, AND FOR SUCH PURPOSE MAY NEED TO ENSURE A VERBA TIM RECORD OF TIlE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WIDCH RECORD INCLUDES TIlE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WIDCH TIlE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. GENERAL SERVICES TAPES ARE FOR TIlE SOLE PURPOSE OF BACKUP FOR OffiCIAL RECORDS OF TIlE DEPARTMENT. !/~ff~ ~ William Ledferd, Chairperson ATTEST: . 1 d - /' " ~ . let!/{ /W M~isa Eddings, Deputy lerk Chairperson Ledferd commended Mr. LaRue on a job well done. There being no further items on the agenda, Chairperson Ledferd adjourned the meeting at 9:20 p.m. e The Okeechobee News P.o. Box 639, Okeechobee, Florida 34973 (863) 763-3134 Published Daily STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Judy Kasten, who on oath says she is Publishe~ of the Okeechobee News, a DAIL Y Newspaper publIshed at Okeechobee, in Okeechobee County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a -@dJ-0f~ ~/~ in the matter of if..':' uiJ-e./~J i , 7fo~,,-,~ in the 19th Judicial District of the Circuit Court of Okeechobce County, Florida, was published in said newspaper In the Issues o( ~S/L~/Q~~_________ Affiant further says that the said Okeechobee News is a newspaper published at Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been published continuously in said Okeechobee County, Flonda each week and has been entered as second class mail matter a~ the post office in Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County '. FI~nda, for a period of one year next preceding the_ first publIcatIOn of the attached copy of advertisement; and affIant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporatIOn any discount, rebate, commi,ssion or refund for th~ purpose of securing this advertisement for p~gJfcation in the said newspaper. - r. --/--- ""-- ~t_A..--L/ J '\ &L-~/ L--- Sworn to ancJ;subscrib~, before me this d'yof : ~~~ AUf) b . :j/Y1Jl m -1~j)2 L-(~~fr DU')~. Notary Public, State ofFlonda at Large u . PUBLIC HEARING NOnCE LAND PLANNING AGENCY SMAll SCALE MAP AMENDMENTS AND LOR AMENDMENTS NOnCE: The land Planning Agency of the City of Okeechobee, Rorida will meet on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 ot6:30 p,m, or as soon tIlereafter as possible, following tile Board of Adjustment meeting. The meeting will be held at City Hall, 55 Southeast 3rd Avenue, In the Council Chambers, Room 200. Okeechobee, Florida. The items of consideration at this meeting will be to address Small Scale Future Land Use Map Amendments and LOR Amendments. They are as follows: Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider Comprehensive Plan Small Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-012-SSA. Frank Mobello is the property owner. The application is to change tile Future Land Use deSignation from Single Family SF) to Multi-Family (MF) for property iocated between South- west 6t1l and 2nd . unplatted parcel of land, shown as tile Railroad Gro tile City of Okeechobee, as re- corded in Plat Book , ublic Records of Okeechobee County, Florida, Section 21 Township 37 Soutll Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida, be- ing more particularly described as follows: Commence at tile Southwest corner of that parcel of land described in OR Book 452 Page 1439. Public Records at Okeechobee County, Florida and bear South B9 degrees 53 feet 11 inches West along the North right-of-way line of Southwest 6t1l Street. to tile intersection with tile East line of Biock 202, City of Okeechobee. a distance of 1010.82 feet; thence bear North 00 degrees 04 feet 58 inches West. along the East line of Block 202, a distance of 547.44 feet. to the Point of Beginning; tIlence continue North 00 de- grees 04 feet 58 inches, a distance of 54744 feet to tile Northeast comer of Lot 3, Block 202, City at Okeechobee; thence bear North 89 degrees 54 feet 50 inch- es East. to the Southeast Corner of that parcel of land described in OR Book 293 Page 257, Public Records of Okeechobee County. Florida, a distance of 704.88 feet, thence bear North 00 degrees 04 feet 58 inches West. a distance of 398.57 feet to the intersection with a curve in the Soutllerly right-of-Way of Southwest 2 Avenue; said curve concaving to the Northwest, having a radius of 402.71 feet, a della angle of 11 degrees 11 teet 52 inches and a long chord bearing North 62 degrees 53 feet 33 inches East. a distance of 78.58 feet; thence along arc of said Curve a distance of 7811 feet; thence bear South 00 degrees 04 feet 58 inches East. a distance of 534.67 feet; thence bear South 89 degrees 54 feet 50 inches West. a distance of 49.69 feet; tIlence bear South 00 degrees 06 feet 02 Inches East, a distance at 447.26 feet; thence bear South 89 degrees 53 feet 58 inches West. a distance of 725.33 feet to the point of beginning, and is approximately 9.89 ,acrers). The proposed use of tile property is for Multi-Family dwellings. Conduct a Public Headng to Consider Comprehensive Plan Small Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-013-SSA. Steven Oobbs is the appiicant on behalf of owner InSite Development Group. The application is to change tile Future land Use designation trom Single Family (SF) to Multl-Family (MF) tor vacant property located between Northwest 12th and 13th Streets and the Northwest 5th and B1h Avenues. Legal description: lots 1 to 26. of Block 12; LoIs 1.2.3 and 9. less the East 32.50 teet of said Lot 9, and Lots 10 to 26 of Biock 21; Lots 1 to 6, of Block 22. Okeechobee. Plat Book 1, Page 10, and Plat Book 5. Page 5. Public Records. Okeechobee. County. Florida and is approxi- mately 9.159 acre(s). The proposed use of the property is lor Muili-Family dwell. ings The lPA wiH consJder amendmg SectIon 90, DiVision 6, Commercial Professional and Office (CPO) District regarding SectIon 90.222 permitted uses to broaden the trUCk welghllimitation The LPA Wlli also consider any proposed amendments. submitted by City Staff or citIZens. to the ComprehenSive Plan. whICh Inciude the Land Development Regula- tIons (LOWs) and render a recommendation to the Glty Council for consideration and final adoption A copy at tile entire applrcation(s) and agenda are available in tile General Services Office,Room 101 at City Hall or by calling Katrina Cook at (863) 763-3372, exten~on 218. Please be advised that tIlis board serves as a recommendation board. All Comprehensive Plan Small Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Applications considered are forwarded with tIleir recommendation to the City Councit for final PUBLIC HEARiNG on Tuesday, June 6. 2006. ALL INTERESTED PARTIES SHALL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARO AT THIS PUBLIC HEARING. Any person deciding to appeal any decision by the land Planning Agency with respect to any matter considered at this hearing will need to ensure that a verbatim record of tile proceedings is made and tIlat the record Includes tile testimony and evidence upon which tile appeal will be based. General Services Oepartment tapes are for tile sole purpose of backup for official records of tile department. In accordance with Ihe Americans with Oisabitities Act (ADA) and Flodda StaMe 286.26. persons witll disabitities needing speciai accommodation to partiCipate in this proceeding should contacl Kabina Cook no later than two (2) Working days pdor to tile proceeding at (B63) 763-3372 x 218 for assistance; if hearing is Impaired telephone the Rorida Relay Service Number 1-800-955-8771 (TOO) or 1.800-955-8770 (VOICE) tor assistance. BY: Bdan Whitehall, Zoning Administrator 132608 ON 5/5.15/2006 e The Okeechobee News P.O. Box 639, Okeechobee, Florida 34973 (863) 763-3134 Published Daily STATE OF FLORlDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Judy Kasten, who on oath says she is Publisher of the Okeechobee News, a DAIL Y Newspaper published at Okeechobee, in Okeechobee County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a ____ -tJfiLl~v /h.i&::~ in the matter of Lt- /~A I Ai!__v~l'~~_~ 1cj!4_______ u -7 in the 19th Judicial District of the Circuit Court of Okeechobee County, Florida, was published in said newspaper in the issues of 5//,s1/~ Affiant further says thaI' the said Okeechobee News is a newspaper published at Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been published continuously in said Okeechobee County, Florida each week and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for pujJJication in the said newspaper. -~~ f'-~ ) '-- {') PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE: The Land Planning A_the City of Okeechobee, FloIida will meet on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 a16: as soon thereafter as possibfe, following. the Board of Adjustment meeti . eeting will be held at City Hali, 55 Southeast 3 rd Avenue. in the Co I,"" Chambers, Room 200, Okeechobee. Florida. The rtems of consideration at this meeting will be proposed changes fo the adopted Comprehensive Plan. amending the Future Land Use Map and to transmrt the amended Comprehensive Plan to the City Council. The fext narrative amendments will include the following Elements: . Future Land Use .. Conservation 'Caprtallmprovements Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Amendments are as follows: Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-CI-001. Craig Hackl is the applicant on behalf of owner H20 Holdings, LLC. The application is to change the Future Land Use designation from Single Family (SF) to Commercial (C) for vacant unplatted property located North of East North Park Street (State Road 70 East, across trom the Post Office). Legal de- scription: Parcell: The West one-haff of the Southwest one-quarter of the South- east one-quarter of Section 15, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Rorida, lying Nortl1 of the North right-of-way line of State Road No. 70: Except the North 50 feet of the West one-haff of the West one-haff of the South- west one-quarter of the Southeast one-quarter for road purposes; also except the following described property conveyed to the State ot Florida: A parcel of land in the West one-haff of the Southwest one-quarter of the Southeast one-quarter of Section 15, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, being more partiCUlarly de- scribed as tollows: Commence at the South one-quarter comer of said Section 15; thence run Nortl1erly on the one-Quarter section line a distance of 36.95 feet to the centerline of State Road 70; thence North 80 degrees 54 feet 49 inches East, on said centerline a distance ot 347.10 feet; thence Nortl1erly at 90 degrees to said centerline a distance of 40 feet to the Point of Beginning; thenc& continue Northerly a distance of 17 feet; thence Easterly at 90 degrees a distance of 20 feet; thence Southerly at 90 degrees a distance of 17 feet; thence Westerly at 90 degrees a distance of 20 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel 2: Beginning at tile Southwest corner of the East one-haff of the Southwest one-quarter of the South- east one-Quarter of Section 15, Township 37 South, Range 35 East and run Nortl1 along the West boundary a distance of 594 feet; then run East a distance of 186.3 feet; then run South a distance of 594 feet to the South boundary of Section 15; then run West a distance of 1 B6.3 feet to the Point of Beginning. Less'!fld except the right-of-way for State Road 70. OR Book 525 Page 1999, Public Records of Okeechobee County. Florida and is approximately 21.14 acre(s). Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-CI-002. Thomas C. Close of CBC Management Corporation is the appli- cant on behalf of property owner Frank Artobello. The application is to change the Future Land Use deSignation from Single Family (SF) to Multiple Family (MF) for vacant unplatted property located South of Southeast 8th Sfreet and West of Tay- lor Creek. Legal description: Parcel 2: Being a parcel of land lying within the Southwest Quarter of Section 22. Township 37 South. Range 35 East, Okeecho- bee County. Florida. and being more parbcularly described as follows: Commence at the Northwest corner of the Southwest quarter of said Section 22, thence South 00 degrees 17 feet 36 inches East along the West boundary line of said Section 22 a distance of 212.00 feet to the POINT-OF-BEGINNING; thence Nortl1 89 de- grees 44 feet 49 inches East a distance of 1441.65 feet to a point iying on the westerly right-of-way line of Taylor Creek as shown on a Plat recorded in Plat Book 2. Page 83; thence South 16 degrees 59 feet 49 inches West. along said westerly nght-of-way line, a distance ot 319.94 feet; thence South 19 degrees 38 feet 07 inches West. continuing aiong said right-ot-way, a distance of 838.97 feet. Ihence Soufh 20 degrees 17 feet 30 inches West. continuing along said nghl-ol-way. a dIStance of 45595 feet. to the north ime of Parcel 4, as described In ONlclal Records Book 507. Page 209 01 the PubliC Records of Okeechobee County. Flonda. Said Ime measunng 901 00 feef north 01 and parallel with the south line ot said Section 22 Thence South 89 degrees 20 feet 09 inches West along a line bemg 90100 teet North of. when measured at right angles. and paral- lel With the Southerly boundary of Section 22. a dIStance of 517.92 feet. thence North 00 degrees 17 feet 36 inches Wesf. a along a line measunng 210.00 feet east of when measured at nght angles. and parallel with the west boundary of said Section 22, a distance of 36.00 feet; thence South 89 degrees 20 feet 09 inches West. a along a line measuring 937.00 feet north of when measured at nght angles. and parallel with the Southeriy boundary of Said Section 22, a dis- tance of 210.00 feet, to a point on the aforementioned West boundary line of said section 22; thence North 00 degrees 1 7 feet 36 inches West, along the west iine of said Section 22. a distance of 1008.37 feet; thence Nortl1 89 degrees 20 teet 09 inches East. perpendicular to and parallel wrth the Southerly boundary of said Section 22, a distance of 200.00 feet; thence North 00 degrees 17 feet 36 inches West along a line 200.00 feet perpendicular to and parallel with the Westerly boundary of Section 22 a distance of 450.00 feet; thence South 89 degrees 20 feet 09 inches West along a line parallel to the Southerly boundary of said Section 22, a distance of 200.00 feet. to a pOint on the aforementioned Westerly boun- dary line of said Section 22; thence North 00 degrees 17 feet 36 inches West. along said Ime westerly boundary, a distance 01 32.50 feet to the POINT-OF-BE- GINNING. Containing 32.97 acres, more or less. A copy of the entire appiication(s) and agenda are availabie in the General Services Office, Room 101 at City Hall or by calling Katnna Cook a1(863) 763-3372, extension 218. Please be advised that this board serves as a recommendation board. All Comprehensive Plan Amendments considered will be forwarded with their recommendation to the Crty Council for FIRST READING on Tuesday, August 1. 2006. ALL INTERESTED PARTIES SHALL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD AT THIS PUBLIC HEARiNG. Any person deciding to appeal any decision by the Land Planning Agency with respect to any matter considered at this heanng wili need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made and that the record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based. General Services Department tapes are for the soie purpose of baCkup for official records of the department. in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Flonda StaMe 286.26, persons with disabilities needing special accommodation to partiCipate in this proceeding should contact Katrina Cook no laterthan two (2) wor1<ing days prior to the proceeding at (863) 763-3372 x 21 B for assistance; ~ hearing IS impaired teiephone the Florida Relay Service Number 1-800-955-8771 (TOO) or 1-800-955-8770 (VOICE) for assIstance. ------- , . L; Sworn to an,d sub;;crib '/~8'?J . !'",'U/t ublic, State of Florida at G BY: Brian Whitehall, Zoning AdminIStrator 132613 ON 5/5,15/2006 e CITY OF OKEECHOBEE - May 23, 2006 _ LAND PLANNING AGENCY - HANDWRITTEN MINUTES e PAGE -1- I. CALL TO ORDER - Chairperson: May 23.2006. Land Planning Agency Regular Meeting 6:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter following the Board of Adiustment meeting. I{'.!' l.:.lJ u.. J II. CHAIRPERSON, BOARD MEMBER STAFF ATTENDANCE - Deputy Clerk. Present Absent Chairperson William Ledferd Vice-Chairperson Dawn Hoover Board Member Terry Burroughs Board Member Kenneth Keller / Board Member Devin Maxwell v Board Member Douglas McCoy Board Member Carol Johns Alternate Epifanio J urarez v t-tL\+ i:'~ Alternate Mike 0' Connor Pi;-" '\1 . Attorney John R. Cook Gen. Svcs. Secretary Betty Clement Deputy Clerk Melisa Eddings / III. MINUTES - Deputy Clerk. Agency Member ljJiit -/.1'.1,) moved to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Agency Action for ths; April 26, 2006 regular meetings; ;) 'J,', '"i<' seconded by Agency Member , ILc C'L C l<( 1..1 . ;. 0 A. e e PAGE -2- VOTE Burroughs Hoover Keller Ledferd Maxwell McCoy Johns YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT v ~-=-~ MOTION: ~)- DENIED IV. New Business. A. Elect Chairperson, term beginning May 23, 2006 and ending May 27, 2008 - Agency Attorney. Board Member moved to appoint as Chairperson, term beginning May 23,2006 and ending May 27,2008; seconded by Board Member ,\ (\ \\j\, ,/ - J) \ ,Jt" , ~ ( ,( ~.,,\t .' (\)/ . " ':,. f. ,\ -j '. : ~, , ~ ~, ')~J-/, ,'.. '-}'/", K~ ,', / . \y( / If () , (': !; ry n Q/J AI \;) i/( I';~v r ( rIV '----, I)..r r' ( j . i) ,'/.! J . ~Q/L'!- i \,!'/' '\ ~ VOTE Burro~s Hoover ~ ., Keller Ledferd Maxwell McCoy Johns YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT ~, MOTION: CARRIED - DENIED e e PAGE -3- B. Elect Vice-Chairperson, term beginning May 23,2006 and ending May 27,2008 - Board Attorney. Board Member moved to appoint as Vice-Chairperson, term beginning May 23,2006 and ending May 27,2008; seconded by Board Member ., \ ~""'\ \ l\\ \JV .--- 1 I", J jJ . P/' . .'. ~J ,.1" '? 0 l' I; ,,.l, ;,J'> . \\ . j Y \. ~\,j. UJ " ~)'r;'~ J~ f' ~ '1\ t\/ '....D. J '- -f( pX nl,X;- : ~ ,~I ... ,.n .\ I.. -trr:jl--- . ~v\-.-'"" 'II. ./ \J v VOTE Burroughs Hoover Keller Ledferd Maxwell McCoy Johns YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT '. ~ MOTION: c~ - DENIED e e PAGE -4- C. Explanation regarding changes to the Land Planning Agency agenda - City Clerk. 1\ t., -/ll' \ 1 /L~l"'- .' t)j}<' ,0'f)U n [ - ')^.. tr/~ \ ,.,,1 i:J /1 '-' f, '. . ,\ ^J'-/ 'll! L L, .J~U 'x'L9/".~ \ ' . e tJ. i I. / \'..' , , y:.,x IJ I'"~ (': I~ " . 1 'l \ . i"'\. .....,!~v; I ' ~/,v ~- \ ',;(, du dj' \ \Q ,--t\ ' ~ ' I ,'\ ~1 t), r \1~)- I,. .il,)' ~ l~)/ ' , 0 ' ;. j I \ \\.. . .,; v'IY/ '. J . I J i\ \'_ './ I t: i'- e e PAGE -5- V. CONSIDER LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION (LDR) AMENDMENTS. A. Consider amending Section 90, Division 6, Commercial Professional and Office (CPO) District regarding Section 90-222 permitted uses to broaden the truck weight limitation- Agency Attorney. /ldw - ;ud ~ ~!;f-. ~l)M- j.p-x.t~j4 ~>>~ 11"- ~~_ vr1-uJ- ~~ I~ ~0 ~_ w~d ~Io~~ j~ed. CMIL- ClA-1 t ~ Yo C~ ~ ~ ~&A Jv ~ :J1fd - &~ fMu 0/ U ~ iV uJ _ riP .eM ~ 1ft- dukLjd~~? (/YLD-li ~ ~. tf< Bn.-ufW ~ _~J~M~~-. YwwA /)'114/1 y;, ~ ~~;;J;.. ~ r!J ''7- "f- ~ ~ VOTE Burroughs Hoover Keller Ledferd Maxwell ~C9Y--~ V Joons ~ MOTION: ~- YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT DENIED e e PAGE -6- B. Requests for any amendments to the City's LDR's - Chairperson. L /i y/r - .- I (C~-I- "----' VI. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER SMALL SCALE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS AT /7: () 5- P.M. - Chairperson A. Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-012-SSA. Consider a recommendation to the City Council to change the land use designation for an unplatted parcel of land shown as the Railroad Grounds, lying within the Plat of the City of Okeechobee, from Single Family (SF) to Multi-Family (MF). The subject property is located ~etween Southwest 2nd and 6th Streets. The application was submitted by Jeff Sumner or Ken Treadwell on behalf of property owner Frank Altobello, Trustee - City Planning Consultant. .'-~4j<-(f ___ Planning Staff Report Summary: The applicant is requesting the Multi-Family Future Land Use Future Land Use category to develop 9.89 acres of land as a multi-family development. The Multi-Family category would allow apartments, duplexes, and condominiums at a maximum density of 10 units per acre. This could allow up to 99 units on the subject property. The only access for this property seems to be on Second Street. This location and narrow access outlet is not a desirable opportunity to convert this property to Multi-Family. Planning Staff Report Comprehensive Plan Analysis: (A) As proposed, the applicant's request is not consistent with the Multi-Family Land Use category as intended in the Future Land Use Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. This is a location with inadequate traffic flow capability. The traffic impacts and potential incompatibility to other Single Family uses have not been appropriately recognized. (B) Water is available to the subject property but sewer availability has not been confirmed. Impacts to traffic and schools have not been assessed. (C)The proposed change in Future Land Use may accelerate too much residential growth in a location not suitable for such impacts, especially from a traffic standpoint.(D)The City's Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies, as they are intended, do not support a change to Multi-Family residential use at this time. Nearby vacant Multi-Family lands should be absorbed prior to further expansion of apartments at this location. Planning Staff Report Analysis and Conclusions: This application and its appearance before the Council and the LP A was duly noticed for the public in accordance with the notice requirements set forth in Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes. Staff does not recommend approval to amend the Future Land Use Map from Single-Family to Multi- Family based on the above comments and the application's inconsistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan. e e &-dJ~ do put ss;1-. Deft v~ p(lPj-/~ akd (()~- ~~ oJb,yA "f~ ~ ~. iK/h.A (b /VAL j;.;d t M r:: ~~- Fuf-~~~~ ~~ /hit. . G ~~r - ~~ - \}AuUli)>o v ~ l/). ~~~ (()~ Y-&Jz~rp, rJtl;L.t - t!hU ~ M AJ Jlo. ped1- /11. tJd!t~ - ~. qL sa- w/ 14 ~ /o~.~ ~~~ ~PUD ~~tJxJ t ~ fh-wp ~~- e e VOTE Burroughs Hoover Keller Ledferd Maxwell McCoy Johns i , 'ir!' /. I/~/. ,/Y:roJ::Ll')~' I'~ f/J(k' YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT PAGE -7- r::~~~~~ MOTION: ~)- DENIED B. Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-013-SSA. Consider a recommendation to the City Council to change the land use designation for Lots 1 to 26 of Block 12; Lots 1,2,3 and 9, less the East 32.50 feet of said Lot 9, and Lots 10 to 26 of Block 21; Lots 1 to 6 of Block 22, City of Okeechobee,. from Single Family (SF) to Multi-Family (MF). The subject property is located at between Northwest 12th and 13th Streets and Northwest 5th and 8th A venues. The application was submitted by Steve Dobbs on behalf of property owner InSite Development Group - City Planning Consultant. Motion to Table item. Agency Member LIt.J-l!;~/J moved to table Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. O~013-SSA, until the June 27th regular meeting; seconded by Agency Member ~ ':1tUvll))i/lCJJ . , I: ~} VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT Burroughs Hoover Keller Ledferd Maxwell McC9Y=>U-.,/1.. C{ S\' ~-_.._..... . '! {J' .~ Johns" / '\\ MOTION: ARRIE /J. DENIED --~. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING FOR SMALL SCALE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS AT '7 : I () P.M. - Chairperson. e e PAGE -8- VII. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER COMPRENSIVE PLAN LARGE SCALE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS AND NARRATIVE (TEXT) AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSERVATION AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENTS AT rJ: I ;) P.M. - Chairperson. , A. Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06- CI-001. Consider a recommendation to the City Council to change the land use designation from Single Family (SF) to Commercial (C) for vacant unplatted property located North of East North Park Street (State Road 70 East, across from the Post Office), and is approximately 21.14 acre(s). The application was submitted by Craig M. Hackl, President on behalf of property owner H20 Holdings, LLC - City Planning Consultant. Planning Staff Report Comprehensive Plan Analysis: (A) Consistency with the Land Use Categories and Plan Policies. The Comprehensive Plan describes the Commercial Future Land Use category in the Future Land Use Element. It states: Policy 2.1(c): Commercial. Permitted uses include office, retail, automotive, wholesale, and related Commercial activities. Also permitted are public facilities. Commercial development shall not exceed a floor area ratio of 3.00 and the maximum impervious surface for development within this category shall not exceed 85% of the site. Under the proposed Commercial Future Land Use category, the applicant would be allowed to develop the subject property with the Retail/Commercial uses. However, there is more data necessary to be shown illustrating that this presently designated residential area should become an intensive retail high impact location. (B) Concurrency of Adequate Public Facilities. Before this request can be approved, the City must consider the proposed impact on public facilities. Potable Water Supply: The adopted LOS for potable water is 114 gpcpd. The subject property is within the service area of the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA) who provides this service to City residents. The anticipated flow for the subject property has not been provided by the applicant, this data is required. The existing capacity of the water supply plant is 6 MGD, with 2.5 MGD already committed to use. As such, the ~UA has an excess of 4.5 MGD. The applicant would need to submit a letter to the City which discusses the anticipated flow for the development and that the OUA would have capacity to serve the proposed development. There should also be a deduction of water use for already approved developments because the cumulative impact has not been contemplated if all approved developments are built. Wastewater Disposal: The adopted LOS for wastewater disposal is 130 gallons/ capita/day. The subject property is within the service area of the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA). Impacts for the subject property would be cannot be determined at this time. The existing capacity of the wastewater treatment plant is 1.2 MGD, with between 800,000 and 900,000 GPD already committed to use. As such, the ~UA has a minimum of 300,000 GPD of excess capacity. The OUA has stated that plans are underway to construct an addition to the plant which will permit an additional 3 MGD. This is expected to be done by the summer of 2008. The applicant would need to verify '--~, / / e ~ ~ -~- !W-v i 1:f ~ ~-ot~, ~~ ~ 0/- cf~~ ""---' ~~) ~ }n. iJ. 1- ~~_ A.'IA P' i/~/J~*t-fp. ~ ~ jW"-" ~ ~u., . ~::.~ -J !xJ q '3 )yD' t ~ q.;) _ . -m. ~~~ 4Md/~~ rpd~~~~ @~ pMf ~ w) tflf'icu:f- f1D ~ U-..J bJd--Mi~/~_ /lMi~ ~- , ~ appfj /JJht r/Jw-I- (!;w.f ~ ~kfL ~~.) Ff t1JIU{~ F? ~ 300 (t12 IS'J~ ~ jJ)J /1"" · ;. 'I /5'~.q' a&lV-> . _ ' /:; iJ~ /Ul.UJ wW- ~ ~.. ' ~-;;h-7.'~T. r;1J~~ . f1f( ~.. .. /1lA/~_j~~U . V Wu;.tU.Af'a: f ~ ~ ~~ 61k~ .. ________ e e PAGE -9- that the OUA would have capacity to serve the proposed development. Solid Waste Disposal: The City has an adopted LOS of 13 Ibs/capitaJday and 3 years available landfill capacity for solid waste disposal. The impacts of the proposed development will be minimal as the uses will be Commercial in nature. Drainage/Stormwater Management: The adopted LOS for drainage is Design Storm, 25-year/24 hour duration. The proposed development is required to meet all conditions and standards required by the City of Okeechobee and the Florida Administrative Code. There should be at least a conceptual understanding of how stormwater discharge will be handled for what is obviously going to be the creation of impervious areas. Recreation and Open Space: The adopted LOS for recreation and open space is 3 acres/1,OOO persons. The proposed development is Commercial in nature and is not expected to impact parks. Roads and Traffic Circulation: The City's minimum LOS standard for principal arterial roadways is LOS C. All other roads have an LOS D. This LOS must be maintained on the site for all roadways serving the site. The subject property is serviced by SR 70. The applicant has not provided a traffic analysis which demonstrates how the proposed Development would impact the surrounding roadway network. Objective 9 and its corresponding policies (Traffic Circulation Element) states: Objective 9: The City of Okeechobee shall encourage efforts to curtail future level of service standard deterioration, particularly along US Highway 441 and SR 70. Policy 9.1: To assist in improving level of service standards, Commercial redevelopment efforts shall be prioritized to mitigate existing "strip" Commercial sites. Policy 9.2: Access points to Commercial centers shall be limited, where feasible, to decrease traffic congestions along City arterials and other roadways. Policy 9.3: Efforts shall be made, where appropriate, to separate local traffic from through traffic in Commercial areas. The applicant must submit a traffic analysis which demonstrates that the above polices will be met and that the Level of Service would not be degraded for the surrounding roads. Such analysis should include the anticipated trips from the Commercial property to the east. (C) Compatibility with Adjacent and Nearby Land Uses. The proposed change to Commercial has been stated by the applicant that it would not negatively impact surrounding properties. The proposed type of Commercial uses and usage of buffers should be demonstrated before compatibility can be assumed. (D) Compliance with the Specific Standards of the Plan. The Goals, Objectives and Policies (as they are intended) in the Comprehensive Plan would allow for an Amendment to the Future Land Use Map to Commercial if compatibility, acceptable impacts on traffic, sewer, water and overall fiscal feasibility resulting from this re-designation, can be shown by supporting data and analysis. Planning Staff Report Analysis and Conclusions Staff does not recommend for approval of applicant's request to amend the Future Land Use Map to Commercial. i2 #u#-~. e ~ wJ gu-. kuJa. ~u#- ~ IIt,:?-1 ~ ~- &:t~~ ~0f2 16 .16 ~ ~I o..JI-L-'- ah~ f !dt1<Ii-u> - ~. .:zn pttIzM /;Jd<< C~#Cuf~~~~ ~/~~-~~~~~ :+ ~ _ uO ~'!- r-~J~'p~ d-ir ft I1!ff~!//.M/- ~// {}ITtltP C~ 0 . . Pc 11;1 ~ uJtvd;.L ~ 11ft 1J>Lf,'-"P' -;}.'f-"/h<4. - &. h,~LI ~ .n.o -- ~-u.'f uJ~~.ft4- ~ IfN# f\"}aV;#jUocI0 ~cr;[ d ~ Jd~ ~ ~ ,Oy" Wi JiJF~- ~? A~ 2~ ~ ~.&-V ~ !Y ~. ~ - yd-~VJ ~J. ;L -- ~ ;Ll!- -)uvpwl-t0 'to Ju~~- &il; ~~ *-f?.u;f~- ~)f~~~!~-P~ III - ...._--~----~-- --- un - - ~. q~ (j) i., ~ c&-d~ . . ~ th4MftJ--'1A Jk7 ~/-k LJ "'~ k. . 4 F-4 0 p-3- ~- wzM 7re~- /Y'Uf!! ~ uJ/~(iJ~. 0flt u!~ ~ ~ ~ ~- wIJ}J fk ~ ~? _ B:/-.:J ~~ W- U-LL - JLO ~ ~~~-J.u~ ~ vJ6-d- ~ ~ -t--dv~- 6H-~ ~. ~- /.-u!-~- ~ 4#1 ~ uJ) ~P~-J ~LlA/fJ~ r (Jr ~h~ ~~-~~~ ~ . WlJ-A ~tJ/ ~~ &J' . ~ - fYu'/dc/JJ::vt::, .tj~ 0) /l4 #~ ~ ()/> lfu. ~~.t ~ t%jO~ cJ/~ Z;dwf~ {!~ -JjeA- - .~. ~,(- ~ I~JJ-u.;k..~ / ~ ~~.'r ~- ~ ~r;yd- ~ /f-UL ~. (jAuJ g!.~? - rM-wJ!4 ~ 7;(/s-~ /;/'. I;! . , I i : ~ i , , I . fH U~/H' .. ~ ~ ~o-C 0) udp'rw-'1 ~- ~ ~tLJI(!hJ~ iku- ~ ~ ~ ?!~ Jj bdip~- ~ flQ )v ~ ~eH-- ~~vJj~~~- (')a/l/l./.L<J .J.1_ J ~ ~ '" C Ja--4!l~'. 'tJ1"" - I ~~ --- . I f-' tM- r~:,7lhL- uJ~ k ....~.. wMJ &-J ~F cf-.~ ~~~~- ~ ~ ~jItw~ uJ~~- ~ - fl.lu.w nI ~..... . ~- 1fJ/ /Ud'0 ;:.;~ ~ - ~ t2/<-e fJ'JJ.~ ~ . ~~- ~ Wu/;/~ ~ bfJ- W;.7~~;W ~.1-.~.) ?-IJ ~ LJR- ~ . . - J~ ~ ujyf~v ~, ~~ ~ ~.. ~!h-- ~~4-6iOA~~~ ~~ ~o~'-~aJJ~- ~M - ~~~. ~ /' UJJ~'WJ p ~ /W~~d>v ->/M:.u ~ ~ W - ~~~~ J-~ pu'U. rfUM. - -IUA/U~~ -/!-<<t~ 1'1 e e ~ q-CiJ ~~- J-f/L,I ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ lwJ~' ~ . / /~ J~~. vr ~- ~~;h~uJ/~. ~r ~- 7J-AtF ~f- ~.~- fff &r/-l) T~cJ-~- ~ ~~ ~?~ f: o"u~.? Hw.p- dh\t ~ W~ ~~ Yo cin ~ wlrr"J~. ('14.' f Ie ~:;,.J) >> :P-~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ :t ~ ~ WL~flvJV.<~- ~ /kH- MJJ1/ ~ w; cIzk <t ~ ~(). P<~t" "'o1.o~ ~~ 0) 0 ~ ~p {i1.A.llJ7 - ~ ~ ~ .~ j,i /Uf-r ~ - _ - Wfhh fJ1j;U~' LfX4{V~ /;-uA ~ ~ ~ 'h ~ ~k~? f;/w1 ~ W/ ~ cU d t P-o (JlL{ ~ ~ (!h., r JJ~ ~ ~_ C1>>-u- ~T ~(~ iJ~ ~ .p~- ~ ~ ~ ?'~' dNJ.!Jp.e ~. uJ I ~..t'~ - J)"I . oJ-wdfPuf~- ~ - uK w) rru-p1-1~wcu )~ ~~ --~---_. ._._~-:-----_._--.---._-~-----, f , e.. ~ e, / l{'LVlWiff- <~ ~'~L '1f~ < ~10~~~ ji;J~ ? ~- bOT &J4 ~ ~ Y-<> ?-!-f- i Jh1t 4u ~ hiF ~ k ihf~ - f}e; ~- ~ ~~ ~.wa-J~~ f In ~ c:/-- ~~. uJ~ a/2/JA. i }rJ IN'f? ::::;e;~ 'AJCl-Pf :M. fl; r UJ-k,l ~ ~-~ /?~.;/o Ad #/Mt-/~. ~hx.~t<k~~ ~.~_bo ~-~. rv4- ~"ii .'0- r:!~-: ~dPr~< ~~ ~~ AJv-ht- ~UJA ~'edzL uf tu:I ~ - ! eJ;'-'+~.e ~ - ~~-~ tfrfffhlx.~ ~ k ~:=' iiuU -u/ ~ - ;vd-~ ~j~Y-~-f/>)AaJr fk&. ~ fi ~ "Vo(iVi, e \ I., jf-c ./ e /i I~~~ LJ:'/) f'o,-lJ /Yi-tTY.( / l~ " (~t' / ;":C/,' ,){7 (l{o ?'j'v).., , +:j;; ( C--, I '-i (~l.hLl,.(\;t ;.' ~f."f J! r <' (/,;."...p/,~ ' l C{<.-.LL:':' F./>j,;C (){).+;- PAGE-10- - .., . (1 ' l~1-' ~, (, /'1'\/ ) (t.! /-1 l~ //. . )ll.L'~ (u L/!/ VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT Burroughs I ~5:::d c 'CC~~c I /' Maxwell :~:Yfc '- \I J \Y --" MOTION:~~) DENIED B. iL~h i . , (~..-X-. ;11 ,'ft.,. i ria ,\ <; /'I!.U- "-. .'--"""'1 ) ). L '7re.v~'I' , ./ /Y IL~, u;'l-, . /, i/~. ! \ l (,. [.'.Ij.A , f;' (_oj Ct..' ",.' I Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06- CI-002. Consider a recommendation to the City Council to change the land use designation from Single Family (SF) to Multiple Family (MF) for vacant unplatted property located South of Southeast 8th Street and West of Taylor Creek and is approximately 32.97 acre(s). The application was submitted by Thomas Close of CBC corporation on behalf of property owner Frank Altobello - City Planning Consultant. If ! J. t~ !..Il..-. ' " (of....L, ~ It':~j 0. . f I, . J.J1-< t, ;: \. ; /(v'-' ~ / y.. .)..,(, "I ," / ", .-" .,/ . tl'YL\ Ii. r, ~j. . \L;J ./ Planning Staff Report Comprehensive Plan Analysis: The City Council and Local Planning Agency are required to address certain uses in conjunction with the Comprehensive Plan, which may be categorized as follows: (A) Consistency with the Land Use Categories and Plan Policies. The Comprehensive Plan describes the Commercial Future Land Use category in the Future Land Use Element. It states: Policy 2.1(c): Commercial. Permitted uses include office, retail, automotive, wholesale, and related Commercial activities. Also permitted are public facilities. Commercial development shall not exceed a floor area ratio of 3.00 and the maximum impervious surface for development within this category shall not exceed 85% of the site. Under the proposed Commercial Future Land Use category, the applicant would be allowed to develop the subject property with the Retail/Commercial uses. However, there is more data necessary to be shown illustrating that this presently designated residential area should become an intensive retail high impact location. (B) Concurrency of Adequate Public Facilities. Before this request can be approved, the City must consider the proposed impact on public facilities. Potable Water Supply: The adopted LOS for potable water is 114 gpcpd. The subject property is within the service area of the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA) who provides this service to City residents. The anticipated flow for the subject property has not been provided by the applicant, this data is required. The existing capacity of the water supply plant is 6 MGD, with 2.5 MGD already committed to use. As such, the OUA has an excess of 4.5 MGD. The applicant would need to submit a letter to the City which discusses the anticipated flow for the development and that the OUA would have capacity to serve the proposed development. There should also be a deduction of water use for already approved developments because the cumulative impact has not been contemplated if all approved developments are built. Wastewater Disposal: The adopted LOS for wastewater disposal is 130 gallons/ capita/day. The subject property is within the e e PAGE-11- service area of the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA). Impacts for the subject property would be cannot be determined at this time. The existing capacity of the wastewater treatment plant is 1.2 MGD, with between 800,000 and 900,000 GPD already committed to use. As such, the OUA has a minimum of 300,000 GPD of excess capacity. The OUA has stated that plans are underway to construct an addition to the plant which will permit an additional 3 MGD. This is expected to be done by the summer of 2008. The applicant would need to verify that the OUA would have capacity to serve the proposed development. Solid Waste Disposal: The City has an adopted LOS of 13 lbs/capita/day and 3 years available landfill capacity for solid waste disposal. The impacts of the proposed development will be minimal as the uses will be Commercial in nature. Drainage/Stormwater Management: The adopted LOS for drainage is Design Storm, 25- year/24 hour duration. The proposed development is required to meet all conditions and standards required by the City of Okeechobee and the Florida Administrative Code. There should be at least a conceptual understanding of how stormwater discharge will be handled for what is obviously going to be the creation of impervious areas. Recreation and Open Space: The adopted LOS for recreation and open space is 3 acres/1,000 persons. The proposed development is Commercial in nature and is not expected to impact parks. Roads and Traffic Circulation: The City's minimum LOS standard for principal arterial roadways is LOS C. All other roads have an LOS D. This LOS must be maintained on the site for all roadways serving the site. The subject property is serviced by SR 70. The applicant has not provided a traffic analysis which demonstrates how the proposed Development would impact the surrounding roadway network. Objective 9 and its corresponding policies (Traffic Circulation Element) states: Objective 9: The City of Okeechobee shall encourage efforts to curtail future level of service standard deterioration, particularly along US Highway 441 and SR 70. Policy 9.1: To assist in improving level of service standards, Commercial redevelopment efforts shall be prioritized to mitigate existing "strip" Commercial sites. Policy 9.2: Access points to Commercial centers shall be limited, where feasible, to decrease traffic congestions along City arterials and other roadways. Policy 9.3: Efforts shall be made, where appropriate, to separate local traffic from through traffic in Commercial areas. The applicant must submit a traffic analysis which demonstrates that the above polices will be met and that the Level of Service would not be degraded for the surrounding roads. Such analysis should include the anticipated trips from the Commercial property to the east. (C) Compatibility with Adjacent and Nearby Land Uses. The proposed change to Commercial has been stated by the applicant that it would not negatively impact surrounding properties. The proposed type of Commercial uses and usage of buffers should be demonstrated before compatibility can be assumed. (D) Compliance with the Specific Standards of the Plan. The Goals, Objectives and Policies (as they are intended) in the Comprehensive Plan would allow for an Amendment to the Future Land Use Map to Commercial if compatibility, acceptable impacts on traffic, sewer, water and overall fiscal feasibility resulting from this re-designation, can be shown by supporting data and analysis. e e PAGE -12- Planning Staff Report Analysis and Conclusions: Staff does not recommend for approval of applicant's request to amend the Future Land Use Map to Commercial. ~~ jIM~d/ ~ ~- ~1/L/~r)UJJ{J 8-f--.t,.l/d-';'''~ .~- ~c~~ -f, bO A- - (}}~- pJ.,j) /"fW :;# ~ ~ ~p ~ kF - ~jflA}.()A-fl~n-'- J,4 ~~.BI ~ __ V-Yr'~ ~ wdlw-. ftULLw ~ '? uJdu O::1~_Y- ~ ~~ 06 ta.o(H Ct~- ~ uA-Lc~ 1~ 6JG~ ~ fhi-~~Vo~;kk~)LW~ ~~ < , fJ.b '..1 . ~~- ~~ ~r /IF #t w-/JA-;bo- ~ ~i n~~Fif<-h /~ rU P ~~-~~~- , ft7~. Chw ~,)ftJlhO ~ y.ft- u~~- ~aI~'~r ~- tfi~ p-/~/>q'Pd-rMu u.JIJ1 /u.);.)J - 1 .' ~1l.i!hW /YV-f i fa~., ~~ ~ - ~ :) [}1 !f} ~ - / ~44 w/~ /Y;N"I' ~ ~;kd.fPI-f;k. HF~ a.h~~~. (j." r~ ;f~) /lP ~ a/.>~.. o C ~ S;::-'-fo ~. '/ VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT Burroughs .Heaver {Q ~ Keller Ledferd Maxwell X 1/ 1JiJA.J.' ~J 'J-- ~.^--- M~C&y C1~ ~ o_.U (f~- () 0 Joons VV --vr ~ MOTION: ~- DENIED ~~ 'if' ~?Udi - t:u- ~ - PU b ~'deL wdw ~ -:: uk p/tM M:w6.'j ~~1:J4 ('~ . 4~ ~ J~1g ~ gd-~ wli87Jadi. tJ~A~ ~ r~aJM~~~- Uldr~. ~~ jlb!d ~. ~f-;- r W~ gZ:^, Jo'LJJj ~~~- ~)iJAA0) ./rud AM1~.jlud rf/l4e tJ;JjJ ~ - ~o/-,iJp - ~1Th.~-~Io~ . ~-J4-!~~ pu;~~ ~,M-ul tJ{h!u a.Ih;j, Me. W / kpaif ~ ~/~? ? ,~lt ~1;:J~~r~~' P'i}~~- ~ - ~ dA ~a.&.1 -37.t/8' ~ - ~A-f, wd~ ~ - ~ uwyx;J1 ~ c!Aen:-~~? p ~.()AJ~;rf/k!. ~J;;!;!::n~;(:~~~ - ~~CJw ~ - 1J.lJ~~)ad- M/~'-I.~~~-- ,~'<.~, rt'r~"~ ~~~ -~L-UuJ~ '~"'~'" Wfi'AlL ri.. ~ ~ rJ. /MV.L1 /JdN;. ~\\ ,ga ~L ~~ ~~~ .. J~; . ail W pJ-/J oJ~- ~~ (7~ 'ft ~d-9~.JA ~:- ~~ ~~ fllb oppi w-4~ ! ? e e ~: ~ I:J. Chd. ~ - PU}j. &'Irf. J.-v ~J. kupJ CW~~ fl!~- ()t..~ ~~ -w~ ~~- we ~ ~ j,ujj.uj w~ 'Y-0Jvc- W1 ~ ~ 7;f~cf- p4; CLp 'j) ~1 t9-1 ;;D ;;J. j (3, 1/ /f &-t , ~ ~~ ~ L<ku ~ ~IJKC uJain-Jfu.}ufa ~1~/() ~ V:;;:;u'~ a"',~,~({,~.~ ff~? ~- ~&p- JZ/~ - ~ J--.;- C6 j~f/..P j3~/J4~- ~~- ~(~- ~~~? ~~ ~~~~p?J- In" '-;;- ;t~71J fh:6. ~_ c~ Mi-&p I /~ /11J--lJV-{ ~ a ~ 0.-() . ~+~?L~ e e PAGE -13- C. Consider amending the Conservation Element of the Comprehensive Plan - City Planning Consultant. f\{:, /" l'l,OJj . I. ~- ~,_/ J ., A' 1L.A , ,LJ , ~ };.j/;~ \-.\./l7 ( \ I i ki'ilj'./f. II , v ' VOTE Burroughs Hoover Keller Ledferd Maxwell McCoy Johns ) 'j1 . ; /~:... ~.../!L~Y-A'<../ I '1 11-' / "' 11"(j,, '.-L /' .,,- ,/./ ! . . I YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT " MOTION: CARRIED :~ENIED .---f-:- h /i/l/}Cf e e PAGE -14- D. Consider amending the Capital Improvement Element of the Comprehensive Plan - City Planning Consultant. VOTE Burro Hoover Keller Ledferd Maxwell McCoy Johns ~ r- ~ jW{f rrd5. ,PnLJ_ ~ Cl~ ~ ~ ~r ~ ~{fP~ . ~~ y. ~l~ Un - v'JL[ ftJ VI-" ~ uft- ~.~ ~,~ jMd 1 /JAG' ~ /'un-L ? tm- ~~t:t-wLh{0f~F fY1tJ> w# P1-- - - J ~ {11'- i~ ~ YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT MOTION: CARRIED - NIED CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING AT 1: J [( P.M. - Chairperson. VIII. ADJOURNMENT - Chairperson Ledferd at q ;#4 p.m. "I e e PAGE -1- . , CIT~ OF OKEECHOBEE - May 23, 2006 _ LAND PLANNING AGENCY - HANDWRITTEN MINUTES I. CALL TO ORDER - Chairperson: May 23. 2006. Land Planning Agency Regular Meeting 6:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter following the Board of Adjustment meeting. II. CHAIRPERSON, BOARD MEMBER STAFF ATTENDANCE - Deputy Clerk. Present Absent Chairperson William Ledferd /' t/ / / / / .............-- ./ / vi " / / Vice-Chairperson Dawn Hoover Board Member Terry Burroughs Board Member Kenneth Keller Board Member Devin Maxwell Board Member Douglas McCoy Board Member Carol Johns Alternate Epifanio Jurarez Alternate Mike 0' Connor Attorney John R. Cook Gen. Svcs. Secretary Betty Clement Deputy Clerk Melisa Eddings I, H III. ; MINUTES - Deputy Clerk. A. r~r [10'14 ro~ ~~li Agency Member . moved to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Agency Action for the April 26, 2006 regular meetings; .....;.-.-- seconded by Agency Member 1 L'o..:<'-LG _ "' ...........- ~ ---:--. ---~- - - -- -,... e e PAGE -2- VOTE Burroughs Hoover Keller Ledferd Maxwell McCoy Johns YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT IV. New Business. DENIED A. Elect Chairperson, term beginning May 23, 2006 and ending May 27, 2008 - Agency Attorney. Board Member moved to appoint as Chairperson, term beginning May 23,2006 and ending May 27,2008; seconded by Board Member VOTE Burroughs Hoover Keller Ledferd Maxwell McCoy Johns YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT MOTION: CARRIED - DENIED ill e e PAGE -3- B. Elect Vice-Chairperson, term beginning May 23,2006 and ending May 27,2008 - Board Attorney. Board Member moved to appoint as Vice-Chairperson, term beginning May 23,2006 and ending May 27,2008; seconded by Board Member it VOm Burroughs Hoover Keller Ledferd Maxwell McCoy Johns I YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT MOTION: CARRIED - DENIED --r-:-.. ----- e e C. Explanation regarding changes to the Land Planning Agency agenda - City Clerk. PAGE -4- ill e e PAGE -5- V. CONSIDER LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION (LDR) AMENDMENTS. A. Consider amending Section 90, Division 6, Commercial Professional and Office (CPO) District regarding Section 90-222 permitted uses to broaden the truck weight limitation- Agency Attorney. #~k--.,a}:~ ~ L!-0LL-L ~C~UA.-'-V~--k, C"~&-\-t~~~ . lVv.t-+-S{ t.H~L- -. ~,+ ,N.Le>l ~ c?c~'--L, CL-.-.~~~ L~ , Y--~o~~...j- b~ (,VV-f W t'JL'I.'-f ~'-'<-~/VILLc+--:- ~od:.. ~ t;~ '. ~~n~~ kW~b.v-t~~.. ~~. , :W04().)...U.)~ Lo~J3~.J:~-40\Jrv,~. . _ ~ . ~~\h~~ Ol~'*-o ~ ~"i-. ~ p;t-a:h...J . ~;;;o~~~ ~4A~~~~w~w~. .; . e-n. ,1 .~f?)l c ~. :Su4'~h.~L~~. ,.:~..J.;.c.u{> ~lo uPtfJ~'-Z.Oe-w...~- c~ - C--i~ ~.iLp""U+ k ~J.[~L~ ~. f,~,eo.~'-(-L.."+-Ft~. 'I L ~'-3~Ld,,~'4..L~~ ~I~ G<-~A~ . YE NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT DENIED ~ . Burroughs (i) HooVer Kel~.. ~ Ledti. e... rd \J/- Maxwell McC()y Joh~s If e e PAGE -6- B. Requests for any amendments to the City's LDR's - Chairperson. NO.J:sSltzS ~~~. VI. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER SMALL SCALE FUTURELAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS AT '71 C) ~ P.M. - Chairperso~ A. Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-012-SSA. Consider a recommendation to the City Council to change the land use designation for an unplatted parcel of land shown as the Railroad Grounds, lying within the Plat of the City of Okeechobee, from Single Family (SF) to Multi-Family (MF). The subject property is located at between Southwest 2nd and 6th Streets. The application was submitted by Jeff Sumner or Ken Treadwell on behalf of property owner Frank Altobello, Trustee - City Planning Consultant. Planning Staff Report Summary: The applicant is requesting the Multi-Family Future Land Use Future Land Use category to develop 9.89 acres of land as a multi-family i development. The Multi-Family category would allow apartments, duplexes, and condominiums at a maximum density of 10 units per acre. This could allow up to 99 units on the subject property. The only access for this property seems to be on Second Street. This location and narrow access outlet is not a desirable opportunity to convert this property to Multi-Family. Planning Staff Report Comprehensive Plan Analysis: (A) As proposed, the applicant's request is not consistent with the Multi-Family Land Use category as intended in the Future Land Use Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. This is a location with inadequate traffic flow capability. The traffic impacts and potential incompatibility ! to other Single Family uses have not been appropriately recognized. (B) Water is i . I available to the subject property but sewer availability has not been confirmed. Impacts to traffic and schools have not been assessed. (C)The proposed change in Future Land Use ;, may accelerate too much residential growth in a location not suitable for such impacts, especially from a traffic standpoint.(D)The City's Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies, as they are intended, do not support a change to Multi-Family residential use at this time. Nearby vacant Multi-Family lands should be absorbed prior to further expansion of apartments at this location. Planning Staff Report Analysis and Conclusions: This application and its appearance before the Council and the LPA was duly noticed for the public in accordance with the notice requirements set forth in Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes. Staff does not ,; recommend approval to amend the Future Land Use Map from Single-Family to Multi- Family based on the above comments and the application's inconsistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan. lr-'Crl - ? ~ ^ '~~'" ""L~~'1G~'- I D ""^'" - ~ w: ~ ;;L""c ) Jt" , . l' ~ ~SAtf~k~ 6-lf~' 'S~ ~ - d-atL- ~~) ~K~ - ~~ ~- lv""'-*~' ~L4v-- CeolL - I d- ""\tn'\~(,w , ~ ~~Q- ~~Cw~ ~L~~~ ~ CL~ 4kO LUJibJ. Ov.lu.../ 15" or~C' . ~ ~ c0 ( f <A <( fr ~ '!,(l ~ e e fhat ~ --h~UL...- PAGE -7- VOTE-~ I~ d-- oove eller Ledferd Maxwell McCoy Johns YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT B. Comprehensive Plan d Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-013-SSA. Consider a recommendation to the City Council to change the land use designation for Lots 1 to 26 of Block 12; Lots 1,2,3 and 9, less the East 32.50 feet of said Lot 9, and Lots 10 to 26 of Block 21; Lots 1 to 6 of Block 22, City of Okeechobee,. from Single Family (SF) to Multi-Family (MF). The subject property is located at between Northwest 12th and 13th Streets and Northwest 5th and 8th Avenues. The application was submitted by Steve Dobbs on behalf of property owner InSite Development Group - City Planning Consultant. - DENIED Motion to Table item. Agency Member moved to table Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-013-SSA, until the June 27th regular meeting; seconded by Agency Member A NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT MOTION: G- DENIED CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING FOR SMALL SCALE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS AT 7: (0 P.M. - Chairperson. e . PAGE -8- VII. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER COMPRENSIVE PLAN LARGE! SCALE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS AND NARRATIVE (TEXT) AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSERVATION AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENTS AT '1; II P.M. - Chairperson. A. Comprehensive Plan ~ge Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06- CI-001. Consider a recommendation to the City Council to change the land use designation from Single Family (SF) to Commercial (C) for vacant unplatted property located North of East North Park Street (State Road 70 East, across from the Post Office), and is approximately 21.14 acre(s). The application was submitted by Craig M. Hackl, President on behalf of property owner H20 Holdings, LLC - City Planning Consultant. Planning Staff Report Comprehensive Plan Analysi~: (A.) Consistency with the Land Use Categories and Plan Policies. The Comprehensive Plan describes the Commercial Future Land Use category in the Futqre Land Use Element. It states: Policy 2.1(c): Commercial. Permitted uses include offic,?, retail, automotive, wholesale, and related Commercial activities. Also permitted are public facilities. Commercial development shall not exceed a floor area ratio of 3.00 and the maximum impervious surface for development within this category shall not exceed 85% of the site. Under the proposed Commercial Future Land Use category, the applicant would be allowed to develop the subject property with the Retail/Commercial uses. However, there is more data necessary to be shown illustrating that this presently designated residential area should become an intensive retail high impact location. (B) Concurrency of A'dequate Public Facilities. Before this request can be approved, the City must consider the proposed impact on public facilities. Potable Water Supply: The adopted LOS for potable water is 114 gpcpd. The subject property is within the service area of the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA) who provides this service to City residents. The anticipated flow for the subject property has not been provided by the applicant, this data is required. The existing capacity of the water supply plant is 6 MGD, with 2.5 MGD already committed to use. As such, the OUA has an excess of 4.5 MGD. The applicant would need to submit a letter to the City which discusses the anticipated flow for the development and that the OUA would have capacity to serve the proposed development. There should also be a deduction of water use for already approved developments because the cumulative impact has not been contemplated if all approved developments are built. Wastewater Disposal: The adopted LOS for wastewater disposal is 130 gallons/ capita/day. The subject property is within the service area of the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA). Impacts for the subject property would be cannot be determined at this time. The existing capacity of the wastewater treatment plant is 1.2 MGD, with between 800,000 and 900,000 GPD already committed to use. As such, the OUA has a minimum of 300,000 GPD of excess capacity. The OUA has stated that plans are underway to construct an addition to the plant which will permit an additional 3 MGD. This is expected to be done by the summer of 2008. The applicant would need to verify ~E fr/\ f\ ~Jo.~-~~,>>cJk\)~~~~~r - ftt~l ~~I " ~" 1~~uJ~~u~~~ ~I-~'~~,~~~~~~~, D~ ~-C1~~~~.~ ~~~.~~ - . ~7i~~"'~ ,-"~J.. "'b''-W( ~ ~ /JeecQ vn<-<-<JA ~ ~Ce>1'Y\-~ fosif 67'-"- ~U~)te.J-LV~ ~1 . ~~ IL~ ~~\~~~ ''t ~~b-C(~~ ~cc ^2 c~D "-<L,,~x..:dcl~ 0vY1. :r~ {~ c; ~ EM-V ~ ifrc~ -H r 1~~~~,~~J-//~IV---~ " ;Pi~'1 . O't)A~r d-u::t [, ~~ ';U.L(. / (~,t{ <1~~ l(\N'IS LCC~"D . ~ 10CU-~ ~ J4'0-7 l D :;>..\t'- fY\e..~D 'i>S'Jo~~ - ~ fC~~ ~~ -... ~ :- ~ ~ ~'k~~~\~~~. 6::Co~~' . ~/~~ ~l0~~'~~~~~ ~~. lc~\r.u- ~LI/~~ ~~y ~. S'1n-v'M I-Oth,- ~ ~())i }1J~~ $t-a..ti..o ~~B~~. ,Vu Al~UL-.> - T:.eQ,Qa.. ~0~.~+; J-u~ .(,~ . ~t:J,,-~J~- (~j~) JJotQC1ood~ f!t(~.1~l!.(U~ aLtJk~ ~~. ~~c~~- LU~'-Iu F-T (,--a'-U.[)(2~/I.d.l~ ~~ ~~~ f~ - t>.u~ ~ _ dh..r:i... . '-+=-1 JI, ;UWf!::--7) ~ ~ .e. ~2';<-. ." ~L~~~ 4vfc_~ ~~<-~~~~~-1.;~ L ~'fcck:1~j I., ~;Y:::'~' ~~~.~ ~-LD.<4 ~ ~..f-o~- Y r e,oCt2---d- ~~, ~r /-~ JH~/-'h'--"-4- ~ 4tt J.t LC""'.~D rvL~,.J71 GJ-e/Y'.' ~'h. e>b 0cn.h~. W(~~-L - J1.~ t:~'l.~~~~..JS7' '~U'I:>~ CcJf0./ VVGj ~ ~ - - ~P~~~~lj c~~, F-UL~~ 'S~~\ I.. ~ '11~4e~A.4.,~ ~~.:A, ~~LJ~~E'f'~ ~t5i0~}k~~.~~t~~!- -~r' ~ ..__~ ~o.uJ' .L~ ~~ 1~~* c~~ ~ ~- ~'U(L.A~\ ~ '--It,,,- ~ ~",-C'Q...~ - Lk-'---'Jk.c...oL~ <.L ~+< \....A. - f.Q-C^-<-~:""l'vV<.-^- lU,C*=fl... (lL <;;; ~ 1)...'-,- ('~ ~,~ P&"'['~'fA-c-~C1.....~\-0j~Q~. .1T.M C{f~ wA~ Y'~A ~(.u- ~L'- 0d,' t<.J~"'14 ~ - cf~~ !CfY ~~I ~ ~ liLLO ~ ,e II e- A...--. C{kt... 4 v - 'H Iz.. rr re 1 C'I-.\ If-,.. d:. E .. that the OUA would have capacity to serve the proposed development. Solid Waste ... m____...___ .-. Disposal" .-The City has an adopted LOS .of 13 Ibsl('~pita/day ~ncl 3~.available-.._____..___ landfill capacity for solid waste disposal. The impacts of the proposed development will .'-be rniuimal as the uses will-be-€orll1nelcial in natUle.Dlailla~e!Stolm"'atel ------...-.-.-.-----...---- Management: The adopted LOS for drainage is Design Storm, 25-year/24 hour duration. TIie-propose"d develoimient is-required to meet alrconditionsancrsl"andaros reqUIred oy ----.-.-.---. th~.~i!YQLQJce~fhobee and !h~Florid(tAdmiI!istratiY~J~od~~__Th~~e should b~_ at. least a ..__..____.__.._. conceptual understanding of how stormwater discharge will be handled for what is . obviously going to b0 tOO creation of im~s areas. Re(:reation and Open Space' ___..____..___._.___ The adopted LOS for recreation and open space is 3 acres/1,000 persons. The propo~ed development is Commerciatin llature amt-is-not expected to impad pi:Uks. Ruad:s aud.--------..---..-- Traffic Circulation: The City's minimum LOS standard for principal arterial roadways lsLO:s-e:-i\.rrotherroads have-IDi'LOS D: ThIs LOS must be maintainea onthe site ror -----.- M__,' .__allJ:oogw~s.serving the sit~-,-.Th~.~ubject prppertyis servicedJ2y SR 70. Tlw-Mmlicant has not provided a traffic analysis which demonstrates how the proposed Development "--H.-would impact the surroanding roadway ootwork..Obj8ctive 9 and its corresponding ___.__,_,,__,_._.__.._ policies (Traffic Circulation Element) states: Objectiv~ 9: The City of Okeechobee shall --'efiCdlIf'age-efforts to curtail future level-m' service standard deteriuratimr,-parttcnhrrl---.---. al~~~ US.!!i.~E.~~.Y 44.1. ~d ~~ 70:. Policy 9.1: To assist in improving level of service standards, Commercial redevelopmenTefforts shall be prioritizedto"Iilltigateexistmg----'....- I. . "strip~'_.CommerGial sites. -.roJicy..2.2:._Access pojutUQ~1llIllidci.aLc~.enLs.1H~11_be___._._.__.____.._..___.. I . limited, where feasible, to decrease traffic congestions along City arterials and other I p .--reatlways:--P6liey 9.3: -Eff-orts shall bcmade, vmere appropriate, to separate local traffic---.----.. I from through traffic in Commercial areas. The applicant must submit a traffic analysis __h_'_' _.,~_..... .-wllIch-aefuonstrates marllieaoove'pohces-wiUl5emet and thar~'Service .-...------..--- i __ t. - wollld not be~aded for the surrounding roads. Such analysis should include the cIDti~ipiiie~itrips from the CommerCial propertyto-theeast. (C}CominitibiliiywIi'h--.'--'--' .-. I- - . Adjac('nt 9ntl.Nearhy I .9ntl IT~P~. The proposed chHne;e to_CommerciaLhasb.een.state.d.... i .. J. by the applicant that it would not negatively impact surrounding properties. The . ----.- .~---i4I. prupused type of Comnl(~Icial uses anctmage~buffers should be demonstrated before ---- r ! compatibility can be assumed. (D) Compliance with the Specific Standards of the Plan. .....tli.~:~:~i~~~;~:::~~~~~sl~ ~~K~:~~~~d~~~. ~~:;~~~~~;el'laF"-.' ... . .. ~; . ....-. . .. . .....-.--.----..-.--..---....---...-..-..----....--....--.....-......--.--.......--..--..-_-...--...._..._ ...__.__..._p.__...._._._..___ i... '.i,'. :.' compatibility, acceptable impacts 0.. n traffic, sewer, w. ater and overall fiscaffeaS"ibIHi...y............_.-......-.... ._.]H--resulting.from.this.re-desigT1~tion, .can.he s.hown b~ ~mpportine; d~ta..and..~sis_____. .__..._ -~j4- PlilllUillg Staff Repol t Analysis and €ondusions Staff does'ft6t-reeommeBd fOI'-----.-.----. .._.jJ~..._~.P~~.~~al_~~appli:~.!!_r.e9~~_st.!~__~~~~.~~~~~~~~.~~?_~~-=.~~~~~__~~~~~c~~!~__.~_. ... :L -----.--- .---..-- fi..-- l' -..-----..-.... ... ----.. ft---.--_.. ...-...---....--.-...----------......--.. ... .....-.-.-.---.-. .-.....--.-..---.-..... -.--"'--'-'... . ......--.--.,-..-. ---.....--.. ..-.., .... ---..- .... ..--_.___.._.. ~nl e e PAGE -9- --.-"-.-.~'~~______,,~__.__._.'m....,_..._.___~.___".,~__..__,.___.._.. _'^,.__"~.___~._._,_,_".",.,'"___._._.__,.._.,_,._.__. __.'__""___.'_ . .... -."--'-'. . t.......... .----......---..-..----...------.---.-------.---...--.--.--.. ~ -r-.......,.-.. ..J- I Ef'/\ t'r 0:,h <) :cP- <>...~cd:t- ~"t. c J .1"",,"" '10 ~ f"'~...~ LV ~ L01~Sj.~" iJ6'~~' ~c~ oiJ~ ~ 1>c:'fr O-v:to,," ('-~ a~L<-O ~EU.:' rUFFJr!- $]tctlf ~bc- :;'~lbT)~~\)CA . " lil!2",e.. i';1~+~~~ Q..k.t~13'-f.<.U-.=-~6~ DCA lU~~::_-~~.~-.~-~~l'~~-,Q.L~-I-. .. L<A..elcL~ 1\ '1...?-,,?-J,..Ii- \'... r, C~ji';lH$I ~1e:, C-......~^A~ ,.<.. L ~ .. ..I~-OT~"U~6CD.Z5D [) ___0./,-,"3/. ,V _.YY'-"JVY~.. .. T0__Btot_cJv_~hk~._CL.-G -- - ..'__db.__~_.D_O&.~JL\. .. , ( _~fl-t.~(~.u..a 0\'\.Q...>u.. 'r...-.Dv--k:j~ ..uJ ., .~f-fr'1.b~. ... QJQ~~ }~. (J:l ",,-Q...e k ~a:t~l..c pJ"",-, ~. b~ o\.-<< ELk N~ 'S ffZ- PL-Af$ . . .,. B.t<..b~-l.J<4~en-lOVJV)~~~~~!\.A-- - ... .Lufu}L~ tl~'b'L~L44-<-~1 - .. .. L~ - L0""" · .t C!.tDcUp."oY-~ ~ ~ - wd.tb ~. ,,' _ ~~~-~ ~ .., ~---~l \)~ -. ... I. -__~_ k.O )?{)Clf1.) <-b.C c..,.- d-' . c:L "'-*D' Crl>t r Y ~~ ;~~:ft=TK&c ._" --- .__._~- .. .. .. t=~,~~ =~ .(]A... a.rtc,,-~~ -'iJ~~C\~~+l'-L~1~ !>;~k,t C~~_m~..~-~#=~~~~~~-(r---Q~LL+~> . .~.~.~VC~~<k~~ - 1:>('4 (Jw.I.~LA-'.k9 ht~i-~~w.~~ ... . . . ~. ~tl:~Qc-L~ ~~~L:~enL '010'/W,,-? Nt:~.~ f.e?-atJ<.- <-1-0 .J-CAM.~ . eM \.c. ~f-t:l.A-V ~~ <1...-C- k-L '+l\..t C2<-cf~y . · ~l/y->-S&'v~CL.. ~~ - ~~ Q) ~~ c~~ ~ ~L4..."- ~...... Y-~ CAvY' . r-cp ~~ 0 - - ~' -(1 ~::~:~:Z~;::[E~~.: ..-t . ;-L.-______ i~ .......~-_._--- 'r -~--~..]C~-~_ e e ~ ~~ (BUrrou~~~>' ~ Keller Ledferd Maxwell McCoy ?-~~ VY'c1~4u M-e.L . -htc c~~ fb ~I c~-t--. .wCS\-IL ~ (~ YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT PAGE-1G- . DENIED B. Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06- CI-002. Consider a recommendation to the City Council to change the land use designation from Single Family (SF) to Multiple Family (MF) for vacant unplatted property located South of Southeast 8th Street and West of Taylor Creek and is approximately 32.97 acre(s). The application was submitted by Thomas Close of CBC corporation on behalf of property owner Frank Altobello - City Planning Consultant. Planning Staff Report Comprehensive Plan Analysis: The City Council and Local Planning Agency are required to address certain uses in conjunction with the ~. Comprehensive Plan, which may be categorized as follows: (A) Consistency with the Land Use Categories and Plan Policies. The Comprehensive Plan describes the Commercial Future Land Use category in the Future Land Use Element. It states: Policy 2.1(c): Commercial. Permitted uses include office, retail, automotive, wholesale, and related Commercial activities. Also permitted are public facilities. Commercial development shall not exceed a floor area ratio of 3.00 and the maximum impervious surface for development within this category shall not exceed 85% of the site. Under the proposed Commercial Future Land Use category, the applicant would be allowed to develop the subject property with the Retail/Commercial uses. However, there is more data necessary to be shown illustrating that this presently designated residential area should become an intensive retail high impact location. (B) Concurrency of Adequate Public Facilities. Before this request can be approved, the City must consider the proposed impact on public facilities. Potable Water Supply: The adopted LOS for potable water is 114 gpcpd. The subject property is within the service area of the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA) who provides this service to City residents. The anticipated flow for the subject property has not been provided by the applicant, this data is required. The existing capacity of the water supply plant is 6 MGD, with 2.5 MGD already committed to use. As such, the OUA has an excess of 4.5 MGD. The applicant would need to submit a letter to the City which discusses the anticipated flow for the development and that the OVA would have capacity to serve the proposed development. There should also be a deduction of water use for already approved developments because the cumulative impact has not been contemplated if all approved developments are built. Wastewater Disposal: The adopted LOS for wastewater disposal is 130 gallons/ capita/day. The subject property is within the ~~UPI1,otl$5), S-~dW_L!..- ;?~~~+ . (G ct:-+~:JeL\-p E~, ~'-~~- ~(jJ...~ ~cr ~.~. 6.< ~~~.(~~e,M.-L'- .A..~__~, () .. ~~ CUt.L ~ \RP.t'FIc...AN~L~SI'> i 5 I VIe, c..('u-y-- ~ \ he_ VY\a..~Qy, c..A- K~ A.e~o.H..Me~b<; TA-tiC u..,~..jI7L.. iJcxr m o"-llTl.-: Ti~FFrC- JW~"'SL...5Wt::-7c ~ L-(i.P~p .4fP()I!JK..-C) ()IC.QtVI'I u/cTb VOTWc.. fOSrT7o.xJ fcr" tie~ (/Eif::-. ~~L-t.s;h<-k(,,,-J-L...~ J:;e'-0o'-..\ YnOv-.~~ > ~ ct~ (..u cn..q) cd/ Lat'u € .. - . ,. . ';t~~~ ~~ ~<40 .pL.-v... d~ - ". ~~~ 0-+ . ci-c, j-~'fl-u~t~ ~ ({),<- ~ ~ C>Oi u.)~ ~D '-I--t\.L ~~. .... I-A-RL(f - Dc vJe flEE?:> /17IJt''<. C{)J11~ pOl-rt C:'A,/Ce... Sr<EC.'rF,c 0~ - ~ ~"'vLk1-+ - ~~ ~r"'- \J.)c,",* v~T'~ 4'""- ~-c.JL. . clt.~ v--x~ o-.~~~~..~ ", ~10 ~ ~ - $ oe;; '" t>\ LVA-+sl Tb . ~1lible. ~y- hYfcf--{1u...~/~- ~LlrlrDvof-"> &o~ /'"'lo.t S'e.e. rOln-T- ~c~~ r~ ~&~.+- ~6c;:;t-(:l&.~ ~CC- wk4-~? .. GtZIv'E-K Ie.. No, If '/ffYfhefiC!A1- to' ~ ~~~lP,~liJ~~~~ ~~~~ ~.~ Qa~y'~..w.. a. ~~, ~""'4> ~~ Citr-~6fv~- rTE tV, A- , :..~ III e e PAGE -11- service area of the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA). Impacts for the subject property would be cannot be determined at this time. The existing capacity of the wastewater treatment plant is 1.2 MGD, with between 800,000 and 900,000 GPD already committed to use. As such, the OUA has a minimum of 300,000 GPD of excess capacity. The OUA has stated that plans are underway to construct an addition to the plant which will permit an additional 3 MGD. This is expected to be done by the summer of 2008. The applicant would need to verify that the OUA would have capacity to serve the proposed development. Solid Waste DisP9sal: The City has an adopted LOS of 13 lbs/capita/day and 3 years available landfill capacity for solid waste disposal. The impacts of the proposed development will be minimal as the uses will be Commercial in nature. Drainage/Stormwater Management: The adopted LOS for drainage is Design Storm, ?5- year/24 hour duration. The proposed development is required to meet all conditions and standards required by the City of Okeechobee and the Florida Administrative Code. There should be at least a conceptual understanding of how stormwater discharge will be handled for what is obviously going to be the creation of impervious areas. Recreation and Open Space: The adopted LOS for recreation and open space is 3 acres/1,000 persons. The proposed development is Commercial in nature and is not expected to impact parks. Roads and Traffic Circulation: The City's minimum LOS standard for principal arterial roadways is LOS C. All other roads have an LOS D. This LOS must be maintained on the site for all roadways serving the site. The subject property is serviced by SR 70. The applicant has not provided a traffic analysis which demonstrates how the proposed Development would impact the surrounding roadway network. Objective 9 and its corresponding policies (Traffic Circulation Element) states: Objective 9: The City of Okeechobee shall encourage efforts to curtail future level of service standard deterioration, particularly along US Highway 441 and SR 70. Policy 9.1: To assist in improving level of service standards, Commercial redevelopment efforts shall be prioritized to mitigate existing "strip" Commercial sites. Policy 9.2: Access points to Commercial centers shall be limited, where feasible, to decrease traffic congestions along City arterials and other roadways. Policy 9.3: Efforts shall be made, where appropriate, to separate local traffic from through traffic in Commercial areas. The applicant must submit a traffic analysis which demonstrates that the above polices will be met and that the Level of Service would not be degraded for the surrounding roads. Such analysis should include the anticipated trips from the Commercial property to the east. (C) Compatibility with Adjacent and Nearby Land Uses. The proposed change to Commercial has been stated by the applicant that it would not negatively impact surrounding properties. The proposed type of Commercial uses and usage of buffers should be demonstrated before compatibility can be assumed. (D) Compliance with the Specific Standards of the Plan. The Goals, Objectives and Policies (as they are intended) in the Comprehensive Plan would allow for an Amendment to the Future Land Use Map to Commercial if compatibility, acceptable impacts on traffic, sewer, water and overall fiscal feasibility resulting from this re-designation, can be shown by supporting data and analysis. ~ CaRlJ\.-e... 1-\ov.....~ L~~+L~'V~ s 'n l::'U,YI. S ke.(~ ! I ~ W A-n;tZ G.. lJ..ALl '1 .. rV\A-f2., r0 A v's: t: f C S ( +,' Ii €- I /J' pOL d 7, ."1 IT e Iv\ r;~ ~L-~d~4.. -~ 7. \{@> · r/17~.fe ~:t,- c~ ~ ~. ~ - (~~c~+, Cl 't:- bCn-';~ b~ -uJo.;:t-,~k ~~ ~~ - ~~.~-~M'~&~ ~ r .. ~ ~ w/Cbe-.'-.J Lf.lt~ . iJr.~, _ ~'-~ cu.:t ~ a,/ ~ ~ e1-~~ ,. "'-0 ~k ~ ~\ ~i::Ld t1A.- >>~. ~ /Y}~~~ '5 ~ .. fM-~ ~ wHy ~ ~--:.S~1~~ 1- ~ kQA.Q~'~~~'J, ~'J.~~'1- I.() p~_~~~.~L-~Cd)k~c. 6--- 1 "'1M.-~~~ ~kdtDL 7 ~i nc~~.J ~C:tt~k.L~~~'-'~' ..- ~~/ J~ tl- f~~ CrW11L'fSiS Dt>.IJ~ .souP WJ4a~ ~.4~(it SlJ Ji> . · 4'5f~ ek:~t;v. a;, Ir ~ ..0-. L<-IDfe~ . ,.. ~~* f4-d~. ~~. .. Feu+- \1'l~ .... 5!J ~'lt-- fuJ f\,'i'i~ /0 L~U ~DuT fu b '~ . , ~~~~.~-. ~ DCA- ('-~ fn- ~i-('~!~ - dt{6. Lk~~tc~ 2a~ i.LLL-J ()~~-t Sl~ LU--c - 31 ~~ cd-1e-~,_IL~.. ~ ~"^f~~~~ '1~-t2cM oK,-. . ~ (1j&;L1-~ (!~ ~ A ~ CJu1.k. A-~.a . L0tl.~ (!)'f\..k o''f - ~'-4lCv.---f~~~-k-- '-W,wiJ..J.v "'"'-'f':~ - ~",tt.&kk#;r;:;b @l J-...7'r 4>>fH4hl Cnp C4---d LU~iP ~<-~.} iUt--tTz, 0-1--1}t...,J' ~ . cf) ~~......{i ~~......-' ptf i!.L~ ~ ' -~i~{) /1t-~~ l~ _~ ~u.A-A C/~U~~~ <-,~-c~~.".-~&}.~~n~~ ~ ~ . (~~~ ?&:1.~6no,- (!.C4....... )~~'- ..LLLe~~ .. fV\.h-,M~LL'H-i; f2~ ~~. .'~JJ j~~~c:kA-dr,. .. L0~,- "6t<--> ~'-<- ~l..~~ ,.t1>-~o wd( J:r"~f..---~rt..{;"~ ft.t j))1--- . .. ~~~----' ,.l.a.. (l'~"'<"'" C'<'I'."-L.<lt'.k"'~~-<' . . IP'M'--'-.LT7:!)".I~U L1 - "'.'4-. lc...,.:t.J- d--~~~ k"f--0~ e--.lcJ-~'--'L.4-'L..JU::/4 No \ Su..t.c~ e,'f-71= . fir T;~f-4:.' ~uf.,.J C()cY-~d.l"~ 0.... t-f cr(;../L{:-"-/ - fui)>J con.k. ~ ~..,-?W e e PAGE -12- Planning Staff Report Analysis and Conclusions: Staff does not recommend for approval of applicant's request to amend the Future Land Use Map to Commercial. .I~)~ ~ &Ao<4. Kv ._ .,. UJ~6u)/ s~ .. ~Lc-f1-e.. ~, Wl%..~ .- CL'~ /J~ Crc~ (]~~ VO~ .::?---cnurroug~ Hoover Keller Ledferd Maxwell McCoy .. Johns IT~(?) t e..cN /Y,O r::- '~D'-h C'\" ~\( YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT ~ / DENIED MOTION: ill e . PAGE -13- C. Consider amending the Conservation Element of the Comprehensive Plan - City Planning Consultant. .""';ta/!-LJ..; f(~ (~rhr~~)'Jf.1l~~fk~Le~ fJee-;1V"'~~~2 ~ C~k- fr~' ..~ r ~~(M~~ ~ '5Gf ~'->'- ~6Ltfr . D. ~~~ ~ll-~.~L '\46le*~~ ()~tl 81u~ Cc-. . ~ ycc<t.tr-~' oiQ \v-..pA'-~ If"'- ~vJ ''''-tL.-6 ' " ~~ e~l1~W cia k . VOTE Burroughs Hoover Keller Ledferd Maxwell McCoy JohJIs YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT MOTION: CARRIED - DENIED e - PAGE -14- D. Consider amending the Capital hnprovement Element of the Comprehensive Plan - City Planning Consultant. VOTE Burroughs Hoover Keller Ledferd Maxwell . McCoy Johns YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT MOTION: CARRIED - DENIED CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING AT q: ~ P.M. - Chairperson. VIII. ADJOURNl.\1ENT - Chairperson Ledferd at p.m. ~ ! ! I . ~ y\~~"P;,? ()O (" (p " 30 III e a '. ;AD f. i1 . Cro-o6Cf -K }1-IS ~ IS 0- -+0 ~mJ ~?'r'co~ - NO ~,\\O\;"" <-\u ]<.L 11!lt I'/-l,<; FJt ~ c~ ~~ ~-.; ~4' CITY OF OKEECHOBEE LAND PLANNING AGENCY MEETING MAY 23, 2006 OFFICIAL AGENDA PAGE 1 OF 3 I. CALL TO ORDER: Land Planning Agency, May 23,2006,6:30 p.m following the Board of Adjustment Meeting. - Chairperson. e II. CHAIRPERSON, BOARD MEMBER AND STAFF ATTENDANCE - Deputy Clerk. e Chairperson William Ledferd Vice-Chairperson Dawn Hoover Board Member Terry Burroughs Board Member Kenneth Keller Board Member Devin Maxwell Board Member Douglas McCoy Board Member Carol Johns Alternate Epifanio Juarez Alternate Mike 0' Connor Attorney John R. Cook General Services Secretary Betty Clement Deputy Clerk Melisa Eddings III. MINUTES - Deputy Clerk. A. Motion to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Agency Action for the April 25, 2006 regular meetings. IV. NEW BUSINESS. A. Elect Chairperson, term beginning May 23,2006 and ending May 27,2008 - Agency Attorney. B. Elect Vice-Chairperson, term beginning May 23,2006 and ending May 27,2008 - Agency Attorney. MA Y 23, 2006 - AGENDA - PAGE 2 OF 3 e e IV. NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED. C. Explanation regarding changes to the Land Planning Agency agenda - City Clerk. V. CONSIDER LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION (LDR) AMENDMENTS. A. Consider amending Section 90, Division 6, Commercial Professional and Office (CPO) District regarding Section 90-222 permitted uses to broaden the truck weight limitation - Agency Attorney. B. Requests for any amendments to the City's LDR's - Chairperson. VI. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER SMALL SCALE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS _ Chairperson A. Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-012-SSA. Consider a recommendation to the City Council to change the land use designation for an unplatted parcel of land shown as the Railroad Grounds, lying within the Plat of the City of Okeechobee, from Single Family (SF) to Multi-Family (MF). The subject property is located at between Southwest 2nd and 6th Streets. The application was submitted by Jeff Sumner or Ken Treadwell on behalf of property owner Frank Altobello, Trustee - City Planning Consultant. B. Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-013-SSA. Consider a recommendation to the City Council to change the land use designation for Lots 1 to 26 of Block 12; Lots 1,2,3 and 9, less the East 32.50 feet of said Lot 9, and Lots 10 to 26 of Block 21; Lots 1 to 6 of Block 22, City of Okeechobee,. from Single Family (SF) to Multi-Family (MF). The subject property is located at between Northwest 12th and 13th Streets and Northwest 5th and 8th A venues. The application was submitted by Steve Dobbs on behalf of property owner InSite Development Group - City Planning Consultant. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING FOR SMALL SCALE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS - Chairperson. MA Y 23, 2006 - AGENDA - PAGE 3 OF 3 e e VII. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER COMPRENSIVE PLAN LARGE SCALE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS AND NARRATIVE (TEXT) AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSERVATION AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENTS _ Chairperson. A. Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-CI-001. Consider a recommendation to the City Council to change the land use designation from Single Family (SF) to Commercial (C) for vacant unplatted property located North of East North Park Street (State Road 70 East, across from the Post Office), and is approximately 21.14 acre(s). The application was submitted by Craig M. Hackl, President on behalf of property owner H20 Holdings, LLC - City Planning Consultant. B. Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-CI-002. Consider a recommendation to the City Council to change the land use designation from Single Family (SF) to Multiple Family (MF) for vacant unplatted property located South of Southeast 8th Street and West of Taylor Creek and is approximately 32.97 acre(s). The application was submitted by Thomas Close of CBC corporation on behalf of property owner Frank Altobello - City Planning Consultant. C. Consider amending the Conservation Element of the Comprehensive Plan - City Planning Consultant. D. Consider amending the Capital Improvement Element of the Comprehensive Plan - City Planning Consultant. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING - Chairperson. VIII. ADJOURNMENT - Chairperson. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that if any person desires to appeal any decision made by the Land Planning Agency with respect to any matter considered at this proceeding, such interested person will need a record of the proceeding, and for such purpose may need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceeding is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. General Services tapes are for the sole purpose of backup for official records of the Department. e e MEMORANDUM TO: LPAlPB/BOAlORB Members Lane Gamiotea, City Clerk c~ SUBJECT: Changes to the meeting agendas and minutes FROM: DATE: May 16, 2006 First, let me apologize for not being able to attend this meeting to explain the changes we are planning for the agendas and minutes. However, I am confident that Melisa can handle any questions you may have. The first thing we wanted to do was consolidate the LPA and PB agendas. Both are recommendation boards that field LOR amendments, land use changes, comprehensive plan amendments and rezonings. The LOR's specifically address the fact that the Planning Board is the City's Local Planning Agency, which is all that is necessary to meeting Florida Statute requirements in setting up the citizen board to review comprehensive plan amendments. The second thing was we wanted to consolidate the Planning Board and Board of Adjustment and Appeals agenda's. I have researched this process and its seems to be common practice among City's and County's to have the consolidated agenda. Therefore you will only have one agenda and one set of minutes. The title will be the "Planning Board/Board of Adjustment and Appeals." We hope these changes will streamline the process and make it more user-friendly. Even though the agenda's are consolidated, which will enable you to address several petitions for the same property, we will always need to ensure that small scale map amendments are processed and action taken prior to the rezoning petition. You will also be able to discuss rezoning petitions and special exceptions on the same property. However, this will not change the fact that when you take action as listed under the duties of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, you are sitting as a "quasi judicial" board. The change will take place beginning with your new meeting date in June. As always, please contact me if you have questions at 763-3372 extension 215. Thank you. cc: John Cook, City/Board Attorney Brian Whitehall, City Administrator LARuE Pu&G & MANAGEMENT SER~ES, Inc. 1375 Jackson Street, Suite 206 Fort Myers, Florida 33901-2845 239-334-3366 . FAX: 239-334-6384 e-mail: Iame-pIanning@attnet Memo To: From: Date: Subject: Brian Whitehall, City Administrator Lane Gamiotea, City Clerk James G LaRue, AICP May 22, 2006 June LPA Meeting The week of June 12th is the week my daughter is getting married and J will not be available that Thursday, June 15th Is there any flexibility on the start of our new schedule? Can we do the fourth Thursday for start-up and then the third Thursday from then on? JGL:vr I appreciate your consideration. cc: Melisa Eddings Betty Clement John Cook e e LARuE PLANNING & MANAGEMENT SERVICES, Inc. 1375 Jackson Street, Suite 206 Fort Myers, Florida 33901-2845 239-334-3366 . FAX: 239-334-6384 e-mail: larue-planning@att.net Memo To: LPAMembers From: James G. LaRue, AICP Date: May 23, 2006 Subject: 06-012 SSA for Frank Altobello As discussed with the applicant's representative Jeff Sumner, it is obvious that this application is part of a project which was previously submitted and adopted as a Small Scale Amendment (05-004-SSA). The Florida Department of Affairs would treat this type of development as a Large Scale Amendment as the properties are contiguous and are all owned by Mr. Altobello. JGL:lk cc: Brian Whitehall, City Administrator John Cook, City Attorney Lane Gamiotea, City Clerk .- City of Okeechobee General Services Department 55 S.E. 3rd Avenue, Room 101 Okeechobee, Florida 34974-2903 Phone: (863) 763-3372, ext. 218 Fax: (863) 763-1686 Date: t.t I ~'f 10 ~ Fee Paid: 506 ,(:JC,", 1st Hearing: 5/?. 3/6(~ Petition No. Q(,~OI;l. ~'$sA Jurisdiction: LfA -\- Cc.. 2nd Hearing: f.p I G I d,p Publication Dates: Notices Mailed: Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Application / Please Check One: ~ Small Scale Amendment (Under 10 Acres) _ Large Scale Amendment (Over 10 Acres) V Name ofpropertyowner(s): F ANI< A Lro 8ElLO t tlLS'rEE Owner mailing address: Do 1-1 1- ()KfJ:~HO/j15.J: FL 31'173-04/7 IA Name of applicant(s) if other than owner (state relationship): Applicant mailing address: , Name of contact person (state relationship): 'J€F~ SlAM,)E-R. I EA&J];l.~ Contact person daytime phone(s): BL"$ .1[,'3. 't/iC}q 5u 1.711. oqo L Fax: Bb3 .?t.5. &'/'92- 56>/. -rib. ("go4- V Property address / directions to property: 0 S. IN'. 2 ~o :5~E ET Parcel Identification Number: ;l. -..2 1- 31- 35 - OA 0 0-00 00 r;,.. 0000 Size of the Property (in acres): q. S AC.~E5 - N~n-/W.cSKI?N' MO.fr Current Zoning Designation: H oJ../);JJ 6, Current Future Land Use Designation: SF - 1 Existing Use of the Property: A CANT Proposed Future Land Use Designation: M F Proposed Use ofthe Property: ? . A.h/"u_,; F/tMI).Y t\ E 51' i~EN7) If/.. '-I Description of Surrounding Properties: M LA '- r,' FAM " t. Y ( C d/lll ME- kC ;AL I 'INs7irv.1\t1.JAL. (~HU/UH) h-,J/) RES"/)~/J'ni9L. Legal Description of the Property (Lengthy Description May be Attached): A - 1/ II SeE rrACHE;; l: }tfl/A/r A Uniform Land Use Application (rev. ]2/03) Page I of 2 v' Survey of Property (11" x 14",20" Scale) Letter Outlining Request Notarized Letter of Owner's Authorization Application Fee (non-refundable) City Location Map v' I hereby certifY that the information in this application is correct. The information included in this application is for use by the City ofOkeechobee in processing my request. False or misleading information may be punishable by a :fme of up to $500.00 and imprisonment of up to 30 days and may result in the summary denial of this application. ~ a~~_~_ Signature ,.-' t-RM)(. Al-7D ~E Lt..tJ Printed Name f/vyl vt Date Uniform Land Use Application (rev ] 2/03) Page 2 of 2 --Okeechobee CountY-Property AppraIser - Map-Printed on 4/20/2006 3:57:13 PM e e Okeechobee County Property Appraiser w.c. "Bill" Sherman, CFA - Okeechobee, Florida - 863-763-4422 PARCEL: 2-21-37-35-0AOO-00006-0000 - NON AG ACR (009900) THAT PART OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY lYING NORTH OF THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF Name: Al TOBEllO FRANK TRUSTEE landVal Site: 0 SW 2ND ST, Okeechobee BldgVal Mail: BOX 417 ApprVal OKEECHOBEE, Fl 349730417 JustVal Sales 4/16/2003 $0.00 V / U Assd Info 4/16/2003 $0.00 V / U Exmpt Taxable $458,940.00 $0.00 $458,940.00 $458,94000 $458,940.00 $0.00 $458,940.00 Page 1 of 1 I 110 I 220 I 330 tt N W+E S This information, last Updated: 4/10/2006, was derived from data which was compiled by the Okeechobee County Property Appraiser's Office solely for the governmental purpose of property assessment This information should not be relied upon by anyone as a determination of the ownership of property or market value. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the accuracy of the data herein, it's use, or it's interpretation. Although it is periodically updated, this information may not reflect the data currently on file in the Property Appraiser's office. The assessed values are NOT certified values and therefore are subject to change before being finalized for ad valorem assessment purposes. http://www.okeechobeepa.com/G I S/Print_ Map .asp ?pj boiibchhj bnligcafcee1bjemnolkjkaibfepfga.. _ 4/20/2006 April 21, 2006 City of Okeechobee General Services Department 55 S.E. 3rd Avenue, Room 101 Okeechobee, FI 34974-2903 Re: Comp Plan Amendment and Rezoning Request Northwesternmost 9.9+/- Acres of Parce #2-21-37 -35-0AOO-00006-0000 To Whom It May Concern: This letter hereby outlines the my request as property owner to rezone the above referenced parcel from Holding to RMF, and amend the comprehensive plan map from SF-1 to MF as outlined in the attached applications. Please contact me if you should have any questions, or require any additional information Thank you for your consideration of this request. Sincerely, /~t- ~ {,~nk Altobello Trustee (Owner) ~ r::IDCD rl')C)~ .........COO n1~ ..... en C\J l!s .... ---' i!! 51 S! I!i .~ ~ -I u z: LEGEND RBF - Rebar Found RBS - Rebar W/Cap Set IPF - Iron Pipe Found CMF - Concrete Monument Found PRM - Permanent Reference Monument (P) - As per the plat of (F) - FIeld Measurement [D} - As per the deed (C) - CalculatIon -' <- z: o U'J U'J L.UCf) u.. 2ED: c..W ~~~O rI') :0- >- I ~ ~ ~ ----I NI ~ :0- j:; ~I ~ ..J ::::> CO NO TES: 1. BasIs bearIng SW 6TH STREET 2. Bearings ASSUMED 3. Not valid wIthout the sIgnature and the original raIsed seal of a FlorIda lIcensed surveyor and mapper. 4. NO DESCRIPTION EXIST STREET ADDRESS: N/A ~ ~ en ... ..... . - 9 CD . ~ - .. CU L;JI t ..... ..J aI ~ ~III III..J lA: CERTIFIED TO: ROYAL PROFESSIONAL BUILDERS, INC. DESCR I PT ION: AN UNPLATTED PARCEL OF LAND, SHOWN AS THE RAILROAD GROUNDS, LYING WITHIN THE PLAT OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, AS RECORDED IN PLAT 5 PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, SECTION 21 TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH RANGE 35 EAST, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULAR DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND OESCRIBED IN OR BOOK 452 PAGE 1439, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEAR SB9"53"11"W ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT-OF--WAY LINE OF SW 6TH STREET. TO THE INTERSECTION WI TH THE EAST LINE OF BLOCK 202. CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, A DISTANCE OF 1010. B2 FEET; THENCE BEAR NOO"04'58W, ALONG THE EAST LINR OF BLOCK 202, A DISTANCE OF 547.44 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NOO.04'58", A DISTANCE OF 54~ 44 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 3. BLOCK 202, CITY OF OKEECHOBEE; THENCE BEAR N89"54'50'S TO THE SE CORNER OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN OR BOOK 293 PAGE 25~ PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. A DISTANCE OF 704. B8 FEET; THENCE 8EAR NOO.04'58"~ A DISTANCE OF 398.57 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE IN THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SOUTHWEST 2ND AVENUE; SAID CURVE CONCAVING TO THE NORTHWEST, HAVING A RAOIUS OF 402.71 FEET, A DELTA ANGLE OF 11"11'52" AND A LONG CHORD BEARING N62" 53' 33'E, A 0 I STANCE OF 7B. 5B FEET; THENCE ALONG ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 78.71 FEET; THENCE BEAR SOO"04'58"E, A DISTANCE OF 534.67 FEET; THENCE BEAR S89" 54' 50' W, A 0 I STANCE OF 49. 69 FEET; THENCE BEAR SOO.06'02"E, A OISTANCE OF 447.26 FEET; THENCE BEAR SB9"53'5B"W, A DISTANCE OF 72~ 33 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ; :0- III t! I I Vi ~ -;fduu6 ,gr~ S! ~~ en ~ lL. % 'I re -J rY'"\ ai" . '-U Q) . ~a~~ :>- (""'\ I ~ ~ a " '-J : ~ ------------------------------------- LELAND DYALS. RLS 2084 ar~ai <VJ~ ~ -J" ~m -J n" Lu " ~~ -JCI: .: en. ~~ lJ.J 6 ~ 7 ...., 1-00:::( ~ Q B "<( l..() "<( 9 0 -' I- a r-a::i 0> ~ ai (/) " ~ a.: 11 (C) .... a. 3t ....~ 00 lu - lJ.J LO ;:).....r-W q. ~ffi. 2 0 lu'" CO 1 0 ::::.1Z 1-0 0 "<('-' :r:: 1 3 ::z: 1-1:..) :t: Lu 14 f- a :""-' .... ~ 15 ~ 0-- (/) ('\J 1 6 -- 017 ('\J I-~ 1 B I:..) 19 0 I -.l 20 CO 21. ~ 22 23 N&T ~ 150' C f 10 2 3 CMF 4 i.f) 5 -- ill to j .,. I , I II I I , I I 1 I I I I I til 11.;;: I rll i~ ... ... it l!! '" ~~ ... ~ I I I I I II I I \ \ \ .1. , o '" '" N&T j...-V I L_ 'SCALE 1 n m200' SOUTH PARK STREET BLOCK 200 I ~ II I / I / I ~ II BLK 20t / / f:Je" I Vl ~ .~'1e. I ~ I / ,3'3 ~ I ~~ ti: I /" ..~& ---' ~ L ~ ,/ R'S./ ~~Q;\~ ,~~ K~ ~e'1\ .\\\ _ ~ 5 ~':AO~'" \\1e.1 .--J ~~~\.. ~:\'I~" -- \..~~ SOUTHHEST 2ND A VENUE N89'54'SO'E 704.88' ~ 70' en ~ cD ..... en to (T) oct ~ C"'l I", tn LO I ~t-- lD W q. 00 "'In C> I.Cl eC\J 0 ;g \:) co.... 0 <!> % 0 0:"'1: OQ. 0 I en RBF I RBS S89'54' O'W 49.69' R8Se H~ R8S q. .... ,...: 10 .... LO N :II: AREA= 9. 89 ACRES ,...: to .... .... LO q. UJ 0 N 0 0 0 10 :z 0 0 0 en PO I NT OF BEGINNING ReS SBg' 53' 58' W 72S. 33' R8S q. .... ,...: .... LCl :Jt: Co U'l ;,. o o o ::z: I~ / , oN / I ;:;:- I I ~~ I I r-;;5 I I V.J I / / I ~/ / / 1 L 1 1 ;';:-1 1 ~I I (',"- I / '<. 1 I L / I ;....' / / S;;JI I "" / / I I 1 I ~I ....1 ., leI 31:1 - I 01 ~I enl :" 01 ~I \ 589'51'52'W249.91' \ I \. .'" OR BOOK 452 i S89' 53' 11' W 265. 32' PGE 1439 SB9' 53' 11' II 725. 50' SH 6TH STREET CENTERLI NE - ~ - , \ I -------~------- POINT OF COMMENCEMENT RBF SB9'S3'11'W 149S.69' o SPIKE C\J ~ ~ ~lSm ~i:& - l7>> .... C'\J ~!:Ii c....J :z: --' -< - :z: 0 - en .. en lLJ CJ) LL.. 0 CC c: o.W ~~~ Cl ~~~ ---1 (\j1C: - ~~ ::J gl m ~ 9 I ~ .... . - CD . - '. ~LLh ~ ~ III .a: m ~ IQ ~ ~ I Wi ~ . ~~ Cf) ~ ~% -J ..... -~ f"Y"\ lb . '-4.J lb . "<::( ~ -g ~ ........ '--J..c: "'C ~r"\I(.)lI.: a'"\.J~ ~ ar~ ~ <:U)~ ~ -J- ~I -J 0'),. ~ Lu .=-=~ -JCC .: 0). ~~ ~f e 1375 Jackso~treet, Suite 206 Fort Myers, _ida 33901-2845 Phone: 239-334-3366 Fax: 239-334-6384 Email: larue-planning@att.net LaRue Planning & Managell1ent Services, Inc. Staff Report - Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Prepared for: Applicant: Petition No. The City of Okeechobee FrankAltobello c/o Jeff Sumner 06-012-SSA Staff Report Small-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: Frank Altobello c/o Jeff Sumner Petition No. 06-012-SSA General Information Applicant Address: Not provided Owner Address: Frank. Altobello Box 417 Okeechobee, Fl. 34973 Existing Single Family Future Land Use Map Classification Multi-Family Use of Property Vacant Multi family housing Legal Description: An unplatted parcel of land, shown as the railroad grounds, lying within the plat of the City of Okeechobee, as recorded in Plat 5 Page 5, Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida, Section 21, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida. Being more particularly described as followed: Commence a the southwest corner of that parcel of land described in OR Book 452 Page 1439, Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida and bear S 89053' II" W along the north right-of-way line of SW 6th Street, to the intersection with the east line of Block 202, City of Okeechobee, a distance of 1010.82 feet; Thence bear N 00004'58" W, along the east line of Block 202, a distance of 547.44 feet to the point of beginning; Thence continue N 00004'58", a distance of 547.44 feet to the northeast corner of Lot 3, Block 202, City of Okeechobee; Thence bear N 89054'50" E to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land described in OR Book 293 Page 257, Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida, a distance of 704.88 feet; Thence bear N 00004'58" W, a distance of 398.57 feet to the intersection with a curve in the southerly right-of-way of Southwest 2nd A venue; said curve concaving to the northwest, having a radius pf 402.71 feet, a delta angle on 11011 '52" and a long chord bearing N 62011 '52" and a long chord bearing N 62053'33" E, a distance of 78.58 feet; Thence along arc of said curve a distance of 78.71 feet; Thence bear S 00004'58" E, a distance of 534.67 feet; Thence bear S 89054'50" W, a distance of 49.69 feet; Thence bear S 00006'02" E, a distance of 447.26 feet to the point of beginning. Staff Report Small-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment e Applicant: FranaObellO clo Jeff Sumner Petition No. 06-012-SSA Request: The matter for consideration is for an Amendment to the City of Okeechobee's Future Land Use Map from Single Family to Multi-Family to allow a multi-family housing development on the subject property. Based on the size of the property (9.89 acres), this application qualifies under Chapter 163, F.S., as a Small-Scale Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. This property is located next to property on the eastern border that recently was changed to Multi-Family Future Land Use. Other surrounding properties designated are Single Family. Concurrent with the request, the applicant is also requesting a rezoning for the subject property from Holding to RMF. Adjacent Future Land Use Map classifications and Zoning Districts: .N orth:';F,utllre 'Land lJseMap Classificatiqn; ..... ' ; Zoning District: : Ettistmg La;n,dUse: i,-:L"- RSF-1 FQ.fure Land'UseM~p Classification:.. Zoning District: R-3 Existing Land Use: .' . South: Future Land Use Map Classification: Zoning District: Existing Land Use: Single Family Holding Vacant West':'; Future I,...~dUse Map Classification: ..,:,.' Zoning District: SingTefamily .... RSF-1 'Single faplil)!:and Vacant, Summary: The applicant is requesting the Multi-Family Future Land Use Future Land Use category to develop 9.89 acres of land as a multi-family development. The Multi-Family category would allow apartments, duplexes, and condominiums at a maximum density of 10 units per acre. This could allow up to 99 units on the subject property. The only access for this property seems to be on Second Street. This location and narrow access outlet is not a desirable opportunity to convert this property to Multi-Family. Comprehensive Plan Analysis A. Consistency with the Land Use Categories and Plan Policies. As proposed, the applicant's request is not consistent with the Multi-Family Land Use category as intended in the Future Land Use Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. 2 Staff Report Small-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: Frank Altobello c/o Jeff Sumner Petition No. 06-012-SSA This is a location with inadequate traffic flow capability. The traffic impacts and potential incompatibility to other Single Family uses have not been appropriately recognized. B. Concurrency of Adequate Public Facilities Water is available to the subject property but sewer availability has not been confirmed. Impacts to traffic and schools have not been assessed. C. Compatibility with Adjacent and Nearby Land Uses The proposed change in Future Land Use may accelerate too much residential growth in a location not suitable for such impacts, especially from a traffic standpoint. D. Compliance with Specific Standards of the Plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies, as they are intended, do not support a change to Multi-Family residential use at this time. Nearby vacant Multi-Family lands should be absorbed prior to further expansion of apartments at this location. Analysis and Conclusions This application and its appearance before the Council and the LP A was duly noticed for the public in accordance with the notice requirements set forth in Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes. Staff does not recommend approval to amend the Future Land Use Map from Single-Family to Multi-Family based on the above comments and the application's inconsistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Maps or Diagrams Submitted by: James G. LaRue, AICP May 16, 2006 3 e e Page 1 of 1 Ms. Eddings and Mr. LaRue, In regard to the agenda items 06-011-R - Southern Trace Rezoning Request and 06-013-SSA - Southern Trace Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment scheduled for May 23, 2006, please table both items until the June 27, 2006 meeting. Your assistance in this matter is greatly appreciated. Steven L. Dobbs, P. E. Senior Fiudd Jones, P E. & Associates. P. A. ~) 10 r~V\i Park Street. Suite 204 FL. 34972 863-467-0076 863-461-0091 The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received this e-mail in error, then please note that any review, retransmission, copying, distribution or other use of the e-mail is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please delete the material from any computer that may have it and contact sdobbs@ruddiones.com.. Thank you for your co-operation. The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software viruses, which could damage your computer system. We cannot accept liability for any damage you may sustain as a result of software viruses. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachments. 5/22/2006 City of Okeechobee General Services Department S5 S.E. 3rd Avenue, Room 101 Okeechobee, Florida 34974-2903 Phone: (863) 763-3372, ext. 218 Fax: (863) 763-1686 Date: It ?, "f' {j."p Fee Paid: 4fSO:O .6D etitionNo. (){,- Ol~ .SSA 1 st Hearing: 0 f..:p Jurisdiction: LA I ~. c.c 2nd Hearing: C::; rp Co Publication Dates: Notices Mailed: Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Application / Please Check One: .L Small Scale Amendment (Under 10 Acres) _ Large Scale Amendment (Over 10 Acres) V" Name of property owner(s): Owner mailing address: Contact erson daytime phone(s): Size of the Property (in acres): Current Zoning Designation: Current Future Land Use Designation: Existing Use of the Property: Proposed Future Land Use Designation: Proposed Use of the Property: V" Property address / directions 10 property: Parcelldentification N urn ber: Legal Description of the Property (Lengthy Description May be Attached): "3~e II Uniform Land Use Application (rev_ 12/03) Page 1 of 2 v . ,- .. ..., .. . .... .,.........., --. -..-.---.""'--"-' --- --. . - .---.........-.............,....... '. ............. ---...- - .. - .... -'. .,,-,.. ',- "'"."""-, ... .P ,.. - ........., . .. Required Attachments.... . Survey of Property (11" x 14",20" Scale) Letter Outlining Request Notarized Letter of Owner's Authorization Application Fee (non-refundable) City Location Map v I hereby certify that the information in this application is correct. The information included in this application is for use by the City ofOkeechobee in processing my request. False or misleading information may be punishable by a fme of up to $500.00 and imprisonment of up to 30 days and may result in the summary denial of this application. Ijt-~M__ ~~ Cl1bhS, P.P' SIgnature Printed Name Uniform Land Use Application (rev. 12/03) l-i1~l.\\ClP Date ' Page 2 of 2 . e l<udtl r/tJiW7, t: &: & ;477ttaat~ t:;4. City of Okeechobee. 55 SE 3rd Avenue Okeechobee, FL 34974 Job: Southern Trace Re.: Minor Comprehensive Plan Amendment Letter Outlining Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose for request of a Minor Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the parcels listed below is to allow the development of multi-family residences up to 10 units per acre. By allowing the multi-family zoning, we feel we can provide more affordable housing to the growing Okeechobee market and would also be compatible with existing uses. The proposed Minor Comp, Amendment is for the following parcels: BLOCK 12 3-15-37-35-0010-00120-0010 3-15-37-35-0010-00120-0110 3-15-37-35-0010-00120-0170 BLOCK 21 3-15-37-35-0010-00210-0010 3-15-37-35-0010-00210-0100 3-15-37-35-0010-00210-0110 3-15-37-35-0010-00210-0170 BLOCK 22 3-15-37-35-0010-00220-0010 710 # If ?arf. StrM! . SUIte-70ft- . Of.~ fi-;?1r977 . ?Iume- S6;?-ft-67-0076 . m S67-ft-67-009f If you should have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to give us a call Sincerely, Rudd Jones, P.E. & Associates, P.A. ~". Q4 Steven L. Dobbs, P.E. cc: Curt Lundberg . e I, ]), C"T<;ns L,-,N.""~~ . authorize Steven L. Dobbs, P.E. to si n applications amd ,statements on behalf of InSite Developme ro p b r . keechobee. D. Curtis undberg InSite Development Group CEO/President Signe Subscribed and sworn to me before by t> C,-".d<) L_...V1JI:J~ This i8'~ay of April, 2006. Witness by hand and official seal My Commission expires: Ap(2..( \ [) I dll() 7 S~f~~ Notary Public State of Flo~d4 'I ~~ - Produced Identification Type .?;~P% .a.ty~ \;...;:; 1:0-., 'D01S1Q221 ~,.. Apnl 21, 2fX1T ATTACHMENT MINOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMMENDMENT PARCEL NUMBERS: BLOCK 12 3 -15 - 37 - 35 -0010-00120-0010 3-15-37-35-0010-00120-0110 3-15-37-35-0010-00120-0170 BLOCK 21 3-15-37-35-0010-00210-0010 3-15-37-35-0010-00210-0100 3-15-37-35-0010-00210-0110 3-15-37-35-0010-00210-0170 Block 22 3-15-37 - 35-0010-00220-0010 . e I I I : I I z ~. >,.. ~o ~o Il" 'i' in ~ c ::tl b :... ~ V:l '""l C) ~ V:l '""l - ~ - t::: '\ .:: ::tl ~ b ,;> ::tl ;C' .' .... .<C' c;) ~ ",. '""l ,- 1 I ~ c :;: ",.p.<;>1. .", ';: . I ~ '" ~ ,.. ;<' " t 0 :f' " " " e 0 .,' :? ::" " " " C;; -l' -l' '.. C) , ;: ;f' .. C) u .. ~ .. ::tl ~ I '" ~ ;:>" . LOCK .1 NOT A. PART Cf' THIS SlJRVEY ED NW !a..!- ~ -----------------, 5M. # L5FH I yo CUT IN lHE NOR1Il SIDE OF . AI.. CF SANITARY MAN--HOl.E AT I I' A~~1:'~. I ElEVATlOIC 30...... I ---I :---------------l' I I I I I I I i I I I II~ M< ~.. PMPNIED Fat: IEWiICIIS No.. DAlE: OESCRlP1lOlC BY: (1) DI/l2/D6 (2) r12/2D/D6 (3) (4) RE\1SED CER1If1CAlIcws. INQJJDED DETAJl.-A AND DETAIL-&. CII 9fEET 2 CF 2. RR RR 44f/~ / DA1E STNIWIlNCnDl 1. llIS ~ WAS PREPARED YflHOUT lHE BENEFIT OF It. 1m.E SEAIDI OR AN ABSTRACT. tHIS CFFJCE HAS NOT ~ A SEAROI CI 1HE Pl8JC RECCRDS FtR EXlSTJrrIQ; ~ RIQfT-<F-lIAY. ABANDDNlIENtS, ZlHNO SElIlACICS at DEED RES1RICIIDNS. .2. -utE ~ DEPIC1m IERE IS NOT CO\IERED BY pRClfESSlOrtAl UABIJTY IHSURANCE.. AOOnJarIS (II: DElE1XJtS 10 ~ MAP OR REPORT BY OTHER lHAN 'DE SKHNG PARtY at PARTe IS PRtIfII1m \IIIlHaJT 'IRTTEH ctJrrtSENT rF THE SIGHNG PNrr'f CR PARlES.. 3. 'MS SlJR\EY IS NOT VALIJ YIJJMClJT THE SlGNAlURE AND RAaSED BI90SSED SEAL IF ~ SJGhH: FlCAOA PRCFE:S:SKIW.. Sl.lR\FtOR /IMJ UAPPat,. 4.. l.H.fSS HOlED ~ AU. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHO't* HERfOH NfE. PElt PLAT at DEED. So. LCCA1KJre rF 8UI.DIHG(s) NIL lJMJlED 10 lHE ABOVE <ROUND WAU..S. FOOltRS [It FtUiDAlKlNS HA'IE NOT BEEN LOCAlEb. 8. UNDERCRa.IND UlIIJ1IES" F NfY. HA\'t: NOT BEEN LOCATm. 7. SYWEKI.S ARE NOT TO SCAlE. PIlCtoEI' SPB:IFIC IlInElIt 1. SIlE ADIlRES!O NOT ASSIGtlED. 2. FUlOO ZONF, SIlE AI'I'ENlS 11) UE 1II111N 1HE NIEA SHOWN /oS "mY OF a<EEOfDIle. NIEA NOT INa.lJDEI)' PER 1HE FnlERAL EMERGENCY _T AGEHCY'S (FEYA) NAllO<AI. flDDD JNSUIt\NC[ _ (NFIP) FLDDD JNSUlANl:E RA1E MAP (FIlIi) Fat """lIUIf1Y NUIIIIER 120177. PAHEI. NUIoIBER D2IXl8. OAlEO 2/4/1981. J. APPARENT USE: SWTARY SEYER UFT SATAJQ\I UES 'II1HIH SUa.n:r PROPERlY. 1HIS SURVEYtR NOT PRCMDED YtlTH EASDlEHT DClCtJWEMT CONCERNINc USE. SfAICIMD UllEIIlI ASI'II. (at) Mil' - ASI'HAlT. 9FP - IlACK FLOW _TDIl. Bl.DG.. - BULIJINf:. 80C - BACK CE aJR8. BOW - IlACK OF (slDEJ WAU<. C8 .. CAitH BASIN.. ca<c. - CO<CREIE. COR. _ _ CUP - CORRtJGAlED METAL PIPE ElLCT. - ElECTRIC RISEIl ECP .. EDGE OF PA'JEWENT. EllS - EDGE OF SHElL (RDac). Fe - FENCE OORNER. F1. - FtOW litE. Foe .. fRCNT M C1IR8.. MH-WANH<lE. NO - NAlURAI. GRaJND/GRADE. DH-CMRlINlIl. <HI - CMRHEAIl U1lUlY {lIIRES/lINES~ p.Q.a - PaNT C'F BEGINNING. P.o.c. .. PWfT CF CCIAIEHCaIENT. SRC - SET Sir uu. ROO WTIH CJP STAMPED .. J.A. 'MlSCK- LS:i1.5/ tnE.. .. lEl.EPttONE RISER. 'MIl - WAlER UE1ER. _ - WDDD POWER P<lL WSP - 'MXD SER\tCE POI.E. I1IllIlI - ElEClRIC RISER/'IAllLT/IlEIER. 1lIIZI- lUEPHa<E RISER/'IAllLT. M - lIAltR VAL'IE,/IIE1EJl . - FIRE H'tDRANT. .~STlJllI"AltR.......... . - SANITARY SE\oEI lIANlKlL . - STlJllI WAltR OJRa INlET. ~ - GUY ANQKJl .. - WDOOEN POWER Pll.E NORTH "",. '" ",,. I , [ 1 INOI .. 100 FEET (,... 1007 lUI\iU ClFl SlJRVEY OF: AU. CF Bl.DCK ~ EIL.OCK 11; El.OCK 12; Bl.OOC: 13: BlOCK 2Ct BlOCK 22; lOTS 1-3., WEST 15 FEET CF lOT 9. lD1S 10-25,. BlOCK 21; lOTS 7-11. LESS lHE WEST 28 FEET OF SAID lOT 11. a..ocK 29;: TOGE'I1iER 'Mrn THE NORTH (HE-HAlF (N.1.fl) OF nfE ABANDONED 15 FEET WIDE'. EAST,AEsT ALlEY L'l'lNG ADJACENT TO SAID LOTS 7-11. BLOCK 29; AU.. L't1HG IN .~. ACCaOHG TO l1iE PlAT THEREOf RECORDED IN PlAT EKXJ( ~ PAGE 5 Of 1HE PUBUC RECORDS Of 0KEEDf08EE COONrv. FlORlDA. TOFOGRAFHICALSURVEY FREF ARE.D FOK IN5ITE.. DEVE..LOFME..NT GROUF, LLC SHE.ET I OF2 LYING IN 5E.CTION 16, TOWN5HIF ~7 SOUTH. RANGE. ~5 LAST OK.E.E.CH05E.E. COUNTY, FLOI\JDA PIICIoEC1' 1llFallA1IlIN LXIEDIT/ON 5Uf(VE Y/NG &> MAIliNG inc. CALCU..AlED ~ JAW 110N FI.E NAWE: HIA OA1E ORA"'" 12/llO/2<lO5 0RA'Mf 8'f': Nt OA~~/2<105 FIElD SUR\9' DATr: ~ 11/U1/05 FIELD BOOK at PACt: 5 ~ a: 5/1-5 PRQ.ECT NUWBfR: DRA'MNG NlIIBER: INSlT[ DE\ti..DPMENT -1tlI'D\DWC\DO-< ~(lU''r'Lp1.' ~ 0fFlCE: JD4. NW 5th STREET - OKEE01OBEE MAlt.; POST OFRCE BOX 1610 - CJ<EE0i0BEE, fLORIDA. 34973 PHONE: 86J-357-66M F"AX: B63-357-5f)M John-esmOeorthlnk.nlllt NO.. t\A.'TE; ~ c :" b :... ~ tI) "i C) ~ tI) "i t:::: ~ I! ;G ~I- ~ I I I ~~ I I: ~.. : i L_~J ---I ~ LM TABL L-1 N8V43'18"E 82.47" L-2 NIIll"48"14"E I 82.47" Bt..OCK .. - HORlH 112 .. 2...JD1% ACRES BlDCX 4 - SOO1H. 112 - 2.JOh ACRES aocx 11 - AU. OF - 1..Q1a5;t: ACRES BLODC 12 - NOR1H 112 - 1_7aS::i: ACRES 8UXX 12 - SDUlH 1/2 - 1.7&ti: ACRES BlDDc '~ - IIESI' 1/2 - 1~ ACRES EILDOC 1"' - NDImt 1/2 .. 2..JOB:l AmES 8UXX II - SOU1H 112 .. 2JDl!t:t: ACRES IIlOCX :m - NOR1H 1/2 - 2.3Oai: ACRES II..OCK 20 - SOUTH 1/2 - 2...JQliI::t.:. ACR[S BlDCK 21 - lOTS 1-3 - D..51ti; ACR[S Bt.DOC 21 - LOT tD-n _ o.2J5:t ACRES 8LDCX 21 - SW1H 1/2 - t.7M:t ACRES 8lDCk 21 - lEST 1/2 - 1..DJQ:t: ACM:S Bl.DCK 22 - ALL CF _ 1.OBSd:: ACRES 8LODC: 2liI - lOTS 1-n - D.81M ACRES IlE\II5IIIIIS """""""" .." (lJ t2l (3) (4J TOTAL MID. - 24.9711% ACRES STANlAAD IIOJESt 1. 'MS suinn ..-s PREPAA:ED II1HIlIT ntE BfJrEFIT OF " lJ1l.E SEAROf DR .vi ABSlRACT. 1ltJS OFI'U:EHASND1 PERfiRuED A SEARCk OF lHE P.\JEIUC RECORDS FOR DaSnNG ~-RlCHT-a=-WAY. ~ 2DtIrG SE1BADCS OR DEED RES'JRIC1lOr& 2. -n-tE SUR\O DEPK:lm HERE IS lOT awERED Err JI'RCFESSKNAL l1AlIl1lY INSURANCE. ADOf11DNS OR ~ 10 SUftVtY MAP (It REPQRT BY emu lHAN 1HE ~ PARTY DR pARTES IS PItl:H81m lI1HCI1TiIIn'1EN CXIGDIT CF TtE SIGIrING PARTY DR PARlES."' 3.. 1HIS S1~ IS NQT YAlD II'nDIT 'DE: SIGNA'nJRE AN) RAISED BIBOSSED SEAL [F 1liE SIGNING F.1.ORIDA JlStOFESSIONAl SUMYtW AND MAPPER. 4.. ~ NOtED atHERMsE.. ALL IIIEARICS AND DlSTANCG SHOWN HEREON- ARE PER PlAT OR om>.: 5. LOCA lIONS Of" Ila.DOfC(S) ARE lAI1ED 10 1K: ABO\oE GROUND WAI.l.S. fOOTERS OR FDl.INDAl1ClNS _H.\\(_NOT BEEN lOCAlED. s. UJmEROROuNo ~ F MY. HAW: HOT BEEM l.OCA7ED. 7_ S'tW8OlS ME. NOT TO SCALE. PRo.ECF.liPfllFIC _ 1. SJ1E ADDRESS: YbT ~ 1. FLOOD -zOE SITE APPEARS 10 LE' WJHIrf 11iE MEA SHOWN AS "'em CF" ~ AREA NOT ~ PER JHE FEDDw. DIERGOI:Y WAHAGEWENT ACEHC'1"S (FDaA) NAllDHAL FlOoD &rGItANCE PROCR.W (NFP) FlOOD INSlJRAHCE RAlE MAP (FlRM) FOR ~ Hl.MJER 1201n", PANEL IU&:R D2lX8., DAlED 2/4/1D81. 3. APPARENT: USE:. SNnAA'Y SDfR lET SATNON lES WIlRN SUB.ECT PROPERTY. 1H1S 5UR\IEl'OR NOT PIKMJED 'MlH EASDIDfT DCM::lJWDIT CONCERNING USE. STAIIDARo lIll8Il: 1 ASPH- (DR:) ASP _ A.9'tW,:t. BFP - 8ACK_'1l..OI' PRE\'EJfTDR. IIUlG- -.1lUUlOOG. 80C - DAc:x OF I1JRB. BOW - ~ OF (SDQ IIAUC. C8 - c",lai B.\SJN.. CONe- -;,CONQtE1E. CCfl-COIOiElI- . DIP - CORRuI:An METAL PIPE D.[CT. .'El.EI:1:RX: RISER.. EDP - EDGE-(F PA\'OIENT. [OS - ~-.f6 9fEU. (ROcX). Fe - FENCE CClRNEJl fl - FLOW lME. FOe - ~ OF" CJRB. lOt -........... :; : ~ QIOOM),ICRADE. """ - IMioEAo U1l1TY <-3~ P.AB.. - -PCaIT Of 8flINrING. P.o.c. - 'PaNT OF ~ SJU: - Sl!T.S/I" ,RaI RoD WTIH tAP STAWPm "'.LA.. IIlSOH- L551ST lB..E. - lB.EPHONE JIIStJt. 'MI - WAlER ME1'EJl WPP - WOCD PDlIlER Pf1L 'IIISP - 110m 5E!MCE POlE. ""'" - ElB:\llIC ~/V"JlT_ am- lUD"HONE RlSER/YAlA.1: M - WAm Y.\L~ )jC - FIRE .........,. o - SlORW ""let WAtHlL $ - SAMTARY 5DlIER WANHCll . - STCRY WAlER CURB 1NLf1. E- - Gtr: AHOiOR co., - 'A1X)(}0I POVoUl PaL NORTH i or ~ i , INCH - XI FEeT (t- - Jo') SUIl\a' Cf: SlJRVEY OF: AU. ry; BlOOC 0\ 8LDCX t1; BlOOC 12: BlDCX 1.1;; 8LOCX 20; EIUXX ~ LOlS 1-~ l1IEST 'JS FEET a:- LOT a. LOTS 1~2&. BLlXX 21; lOlS 7-11. ILSS 1H[ \IlIIESf 28 FEET IT SAID LOT n. BLDOt :m; 1tlGEntDt \W1H 'THE NOR1H 0NE-HAlf (H.1/2) OF tHE ~ 15 FEET 'MOE.. EAST/'II'E5T AllEY l'1lNG AO.IAl%NT 10 SAID LDlS 1-n. BlOCK 25t;; . AlL l'nNG: DI:~. ACaRlING 10 lHE PlAT lHEREDF RECORDED IN PlAT BOCk ~ PAGE.5- ~ 'THE PUBuC' RECalDS CF 0CEEDKlBEE COUNTY. FlDRtDA.. 50UNDARY SURVE.Y FRU ARE.D FORo INSITE. DE VLLOFMENT GKOUF, LLC 5HEE T I OF I LYING IN 5ECTION 16. TOWN5HIF}J SOUTH. RANG!:.}} LAST OK!:.ECH05ITCOUNTY. FLORIDA PIIO.EI:f _1llIt EXiEDrr/ON 5UKVE Y/NG &MAlIING inc. C^l..Q.U'1ED BY: Jd CAl.QJlAlJON FI.E ......-: MIA D.\1E t'RAW: 12/1151'2Cm -..... ~':.C"'r= FlElD SlM"Er DAlE: ~a: l1/t17JQ5 FIElD BOoc It Pia:. . 5/1-6 ~- DltAWiNG: M.AIIIEJt III5JlE IJE\UOI'WDfJ -~ ...~".y.~ ~ f { , 0Fl'lCE: J04 HW stn STREET - 0KEE0t08EE NAIl.: POST 0FFlCf 9C1X T510 - CtCtt010BEL Ft.ORIDA 34lJ73 PHONE:: 1l6J-]57~668D FAJe: ~357-1S684 prw._-.JI~ . 1375 Jackso~eet, Suite 206 Fort Myers, .da 33901-2845 Phone: 239-334-3366 Fax: 239-334-6384 Email: larue-planning@att.net LaRue Planning & Management Services, Inc. Staff Report - Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Prepared for: The City of Okeechobee Applicant/Owners: Steven L Dobbs, PE. [nSite Development Group Petition No. 06-013-SSA Staff Report Applicant: Steven L. Dobbs InSite Development Group Small-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Petition No. 06-013-SSA General Information Applicant Address: 210 NW Park Street, Suite 204 Okeechobee, FL 34972 JnSite Deyelppment Group Owner Address: 2 Nublick Lane Columbine Valley, CO 80123 Ownef'Phone Number:.", " Acreage Vacant and Single Family 9.195 Multi-Family RMF Multi family housing Future Land Use Map Classification Single Family Use of Property same Legal Description: All of Blocks 12,21 and 22, all lying in OKEECHOBEE, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 5 of the Public Records of Okeechobce County, Florida. Request: The matter for consideration is for an Amendment to the City of Okeechobee's Future Land Use Map from Single Family to Multi-Family to allow a multi-family housing development on the subject property. Based on the size of the property (9.195 acres), this application qualifies under Chapter 163, F.S., as a Small-Scale Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. Concurrent with this request, the applicant is also requesting a rezoning for the subject property from RSF-1 to RMF. Adjacent Future Land Use Map classifications and Zoning Districts: .NQrtb: . J?utllre LanqUse M::J.p,Classification: Zoning District: Single Fainily RSF-1 Zoning District: RMF ..:&,outP~,,, Staff Report . .icant: Steven L. Dobbs InSite Development Group Petition No. 06-013-SSA Small-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Zoning District: PUB Zoning District: Holding Summary: The applicant is requesting the Multi-Family Future Land Use category to develop 9.195 acres ofland as a multi-family development. The Multi-Family category would allow apartments, duplexes, and condominiums at a maximum density of 10 units per acre. This could allow up to 92 units on the subject property. The surrounding area to the east (Block 20) has been recently converted to Multi- Family Residential Future Land Use but is still vacant. Comprehensive Plan Analysis A. Consistency with the Land Use Categories and Plan Policies. As proposed, the applicant's request does not show adequate data and analysis to support a conversion to the Multi-Family Land Use category as shown in the Future Land Use Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. B. Concurrency of Adequate Public Facilities Water is available to the subject property. It is not clear whether sewer is available and with recent conversions from Single Family there needs to be some acknowledgement of past approval impacts. hnpacts to traffic and schools have not been assessed. C. Compatibility with Adjacent and Nearby Land Uses The proposed land is in a transitional neighborhood and it is difficult to know whether it will be compatible with the adjacent and nearby uses. D. Compliance with Specific Standards of the Plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies, as they are intended, do allow for a Small Scale Amendment to the Future Land Use Map to Multi-Family. This proposed change at this time is not consistent with the above Objectives and Policies. Analysis and Conclusions This application and its appearance before the Council and the LPA was duly noticed for the public in accordance with the notice requirements set forth in Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes. 2 Staff Report Applicant: Steven L. Dobbs InSite Development Group Petition No. 06-013-SSA Small-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Based on the application being inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Staff recommends denial to amend the Future Land Use Map from Single Family to Multi-Family. Maps or Diagrams Submitted by: James G. LaRue, AICP May 16, 2006 3 " ! Cit)' ~fOk.e<hob'" ~ CeDer..d Services Department I 55 S.E. 3rd Avenue,. Roum 101 Okeechobee,. Florida 34974-2903 Phone; (863) 763-03372, ext.. 218 F~x: (863) 763-1686 ;: Please Chcck.Q~: ~Smal)Scale Amendment (Under 10 Acres) ~arge Scale Amendment (Over 10 Acres) I~:;.II Name of property owner($); ~ , I \.\2 OL.Oll',lCt S, LLc- t 1~:{J OWner mailing aDdress: ~O €>o"t 3 2-0$"3. QA-W\ 6~~ Cf ~(2I:e.N~, h 33~201 I J"..! :P~~1 ; :B~:i Name of applicant(s) if other than owner (state IcIntionship): ~lVt W\. ~16c:..\LL p~,,> I ;r;:~'i . ~1 Applir;ant maiiipg address: {l6 6ot:. 32-0S?:> P f.X.W\ B€-~ 6 A€-Def'3C;. h 3Yfk . I 1-.' Name of COntnct person (state relationship): cep..\CA, rf\J\. ~P>c-~l.- I re..t=-S f~~ Contact per:'lOn daytjm~ phone(s): 56\ -"1Lfl- 22.~5 Fax: 50i -'-)LI b-cgb 2~ .,--- . P~T D~~IGE-- -/ I Property address I directions to property: t-l. s \ OS t> ~ oS ~ 10 I (:!..~s f.~ , ., , Parcel Identitication Number: 2- is' - ~I- 3S - O~OO.- 00001()- 0000 ..l j M I Size of the Property (in acn;s): 2 \ ~1-1 - -1i ClUrent Zomng Designation: CO'M ifJ\ J e-es H I I ~ - ~ES Proposed Future Dmd U~e Designation: Proposed Use of the Property: COW\ W\.E.lLC l ~L- \.~v. Description of SlIlTounding Properties: t-\'. ~ E-:> C" ~(::>..r-':/\) ~ Y'~LlE C? t=o'l- Co Vv'\M. RE. 2-or-:>\N~ '5' Lo~" '1'1'-, ~~ G.o~ VV'. -vJ '. COIN\.",^- { ~e"S l ~r-<.-AN\) ~ePL\e.O Fo~ t:>.LL- COliV\vV\.E=-<2-ClP,- l2-e.2-0r-')\1'.:l4 Legal Description of the Property (Lengthy Description May be Attached); ..-..-..........-=-~ -~ I p..'\\ W-~Ev Uniform r...,na Use AJ)plication (rev. 12/03) Page ] or 2 - .-,.- " I. I v -.-ill~ , SurveyofPropcny (11" x 14'" 20" Scale) Letter Outlining Request NotanzedLetter of Owner's Authorization V ApplicationFee(non-refundnblc) Y Cjty Location Map .-' ."-~ I "" :~* :.~i'-. .;~.r.~~ 4_ I hereby certify that the information in this application is correct. The information included in this application is for use by the City of Okccchobcc in processing my request. False or mislcuding information may be punishable by a fUle of up to $500.00 and imprisonment of up to 30 days and may result in the sumrnflry denial of tlus application. {\ ~ ~ \M\-. -W-Q l~~. ~\~ I/JA. ~ Printed N aIDe 2.( 2-d o~ Dale Uniform Land Use Applic<ltion (rtV_ 12103) Page 2 of 2 e e February 22, 2006 The City of Okeechobee Board of Adjustments, Land Planning Agency & Planning Board City Hall 55 S.E . Third Avenue Okeechobee, FL Re: Zoning Change Request Tax ill 2-15-37-35-0AOO-00007-0000 2-15-37 -35-0AOO-00008-0000 Dear Zoning Board Members: Attached herewith are the necessary documents in support of our request for a zoning change for a portion of the property described in this submittal. The subject of this request is a 21.14 acre parcel fronting on the north side of State Route 70, east of State Route 441 in Okeechobee City, Florida. That portion of the subject site fronting on State Route 70 is currently zoned "Commercial" whereas the rear portion of the same site is zoned "future residential". Current interest in new housing development in Okeechobee suggests significant increases in population in the near future. In turn, the need for commercial space and the jobs it brings rises in response to hous- ing growth. The advantages that commercial zoning development brings to Okeechobee City in the form of sales taxes, an enhanced real estate tax base and increased level of employment is self evident. State Route 441 presently has the largest commercially developed properties within the city. State Route 70, immediately west of State Route 441 and now to the east of 441 constitutes the other principal commercially zoned district serving the community. Future development along State Route 70 eastward to Fort Pierce and southeast along State Route 710 (Bee Line Highway) will attract significant traffic and commercial potential to the benefit of Okeechobee, both City and County. This concept is already supported by every inquiry we have had on the subject property to date in which interest in the property has been to zone the site "Commercial" in its entirety. As indicated herein, the subject site is surrounded by commercially zoned property to the East and South. Small trailer parks exist immediately West and across State Route 70 to the Southwest. A drainage swale and overhead power lines separate the subject site from undeveloped residentially zoned property to the North accessible only via SE 13th Avenue or perhaps off of State Route 441 North of State Route 70. We respectfully request the subject property be changed to "all commercial" zoning from its current zoning which is part commercial, part residential for the following reasons: 1. "Highest and best uses" of the subject site zoning is "Commercial" in that this zoning will benefit the city most through sales taxes, higher real estate property taxes and increased employment. 2. State Route 70 at the subject property's location could hardly be considered a suitable roadway from a residential perspective. Despite the fact that a four way intersection can be developed midway across the subject site frontage, there is no other access to the currently zoned "Residential" portion of this prop- erty. This means that access to the residential portion would only be available from a higWy trafficked roadway (State Route 70) through property that is currently zoned "Commercial" - a circumstance which is neither safe nor attractive to residential development. 3. All inquirers to date concerning the subject property have expressed the desire to have the entire site zoned "Commercial". Furthennore, these interested parties wish to co-develop the subject site with the adjoining 18 acres to the East (currently zoned commercial), to create a "destination" spot for the city. Although premature, early talks reveal a mixed-use plan of retail (both large and small) and office space. This would not only create a "destination" spot for family and friends, but it could also generate numer- ous jobs for local citizens. 4. As Okeechobee City and County continue to grow, the State Route 70 corridor, particularly extending east from State Route 441, will be better served by a site of the size, shape and character of the subject property to be commercially zoned. This property, along with the adjoining 18 acres, has the potential not only to becoming a "destination" spot, but it WILL be the first thing travelers from the East will see when the\' cross into city limits. 5. Currently zoned trailer parks along State Route 70 should be phased out over time as they no longer meet the "highest and best use" test and in fact are fast becoming a liability to the community in terms of real estate tax contribution, requirements for City services, stability and appearance. We would be pleased to respond to any questions that our proposal raises, but hopefully circumstances cited in support of our request for the zoning changes requested are both self evident and self explanatory. Respectfully submitted, ~~7 \M1lJQ Craig M. Hackl President H20 Holdings LLC e ,~' .~ - e * Okeechobee, FL US All rights reserved. Use Sublect to License/Copyrioht This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapQuest and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use. 5~6jec-\ 6l-tC {Oc..JI~ ~f' 1:2- of l4 http://www.mapquest.com/maps/map.adp?searchtype=address&country=US&addtohistory... 2/21/2006 <' (itLl-r - '---r~~ I ~ i e '- .~...:~~-~'\ >... ;...... \..~ ".. '.. '.,,':'~ \ \ '~. '\, '\'" \ .' ,r \. \ )(;~' "I. - ~~. '-" ~ \-~~ '\. f:~\., . :.' '.\ '" _ (-1.\::;'; '~,\-.~ V "1T.-::'\.. ''''"- r~ - \ .""'...,........, '\ ~ " (,--,'~ ' '"" ~~ ~_....I~.>;. rHt. \ ~ \-.- , :~ .-J~~~ :~ I C:: Ft~=-I i l~~L~1 ":'~l I , --J !~.---.-~""'"l ! I ~~ ~ -1-""'. :~ ':. '. ;'.1 I: (~~t~~ : ~~~II ~,c:( I' ,t' I ~ -.J _.- - _ ~ ,.'., . ----. .........~I;o4 ~ 1-1--' . . :,:--- ~ -/ / -.t ~ -.--7---..'; < I r'i"" --- 1 I,~ \, " r. fu9 r - ~ .~ --1 (;) 'l1!"'lIM ... '1) ;.: ~. .., f.....-~~ .-. .. -,..,... ,}. - B. -~..1 . \ "I , I , --- ~ , >c Dr- I I~..' -~-- 'f- I' : il ,t! h ~! , I. "'~-<>ll \ ~ -A,..; k_ , r r------?-- ". ",-,.., 'y \ 1 ! :: 1 ,,; '"'V : -'r' . I! i J:!'l ~ ~~~I~_~ ! &--=-=1<1 I ~c: ,IlL 11"_~ ~...LJ .. -1 (, .f' rJ b--::i:: I.. ~. I ~~~' I <~_' 1.. ;,- till!. ~"7hf I ;. .~.~I' e --l ~-'-1 I \ ! : I: ~~ I r---------. ,1) t) ,: 1 ~ " "T--....,.... (1) , ,~i .~ .. U.lL~ . . TT.----.... 'J~"'~, . I ' .,...". -1 . <'~} :k . ! - '_.' ., rT it ~ , " . ' -, " .. : , Ii , - '''' ,~ ., - :-~' :.. , ....:t....... I Q. l ._...,. . .....-,..... -lilIN.. ''"'!.. tfr-- :. 1}f'I~II!t: ~ "" "'~I"" .' ~.. '1 -r'l..-......:-.L- ,~~ '~~l'<t,ll!<'.l I"IP--i _ _, .... 1_: '" r~'IJr:'1 .l 4.. (1:_\ ~;..;:" Q~;.; (~:"'I '\ \ \ --\ I i i --i ~~ I , I , j cr-f II ; I (M' / +-- ,~~ '" ~- I \ \ l_ i \ i ",: ,,~ I --L _ '(10' 1 d_~ 1 ---.," ; Hl'l I :;,.,'~ ...1- tl", '..,:...' ~ _--1'1---... ,<<- 4'. .j- 1_'~.t:..C....... i1'.J'ct:.. t. '......U'J'I I' rt-1 -I I i r-HI.1C- t::.:.' rJ ::' I 11\ (9) ~ J t: I '~' , ; \ '>I>\J.1""'. . '" '~;-, ;: ) ,-~ I I f i 1 I /;+ .~ , -- CD ? 5 F ~i~rr ~r}',D /' 'D \1(1 f I _~t I.j --+- " \':201)' I (' ! .... I ,.. Fund File No.: 57-04-61 e OR~K (J0525 PG 200C Exhibit A Parcell: The W est ~ of the Southwest.!4 of the Southeast ~ of Section J 5, Township 37 South, Ran~ 35 East. Okeechobee County, Florida, lying North of the North right-of-way line of Slate Road No. 70; Except tneNorth 50 feet .ofthe West % of the West ~ o.fthe Southwest ~ of the Southeast ~ for road purposes; also Except the following descllibed property conveyed to the State of Florida; A parcel ofland in the West,~ of the Southwest ~ of the Southeast ~ of Section 15, Township 37 South, Range' 3S East, Being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the South !14 comer of said Section 15; thence run Northerly on the l.4 section line a distance of36.95 feet to the centerline of State Road 70; thence North 800 54' 49" East; on said centerline a distance of347. 10 feet; thence Northerly at 900 to said centerline . a distance of 40 feet to the Point of Beginning;, thence continue Northerly a distance of 17 feet; thence Easterly at 900 'a distance of20 feet; thence Southerly at 900 a distance of 17 feet thence Westerly at 900 a distance of20 feet to the Point of Beginning. p'arcel Id. Number: R2-15-37-35-0AOO...00007-0000 Parcel 2: Beginning at the Southwest comer of the East V:i of the Southwest Yo oflhe Southeast y~ ofSectio~ 15, Township 37 South. Range 35 East IInd run North along the Wesl boundary a disllmcc of 594 feel: then run East a distance of 186.3 feet: then run South &I distance of 594 feet to the Soulh Boundary of Section 15: then run West a distance: of 186.3 feel to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Less and Except the right-or-way for Slale Road 70. . I I Parcel Id. Number: R2-15-37-35-0AOO-Q0008-0000 Ria I9flNESS CORJIER ~. .PK NM. ~ DISK 'IB IZ2I~ . ill ~ . ".-' " . Itw. (X}RN[l/ OF '- SEe. 15-J7-J5 (C4Le: PrJSIllIJN, COI/NER FAllS IN CANAL) e 2686.03' + S E !' LEGEND N """'" P08 SCUIH pee EAST"" wm ElB: OE:GREES P.UL IIHUTES "" """NOS "In. """""","CW' """'" ReI' FEET OR .... ROO PO ~ tt..lWBER ~ NR~,..,.. CONCREI"E UONl..lWEMT AGE -h-68R27 FNO. ~ IKJIl ::/-1 N 1/1 CORNEll OF SEe: 15-J7-J5 . ~'55T 5JNJI' ~rWN~~ /J.w. CORNER OF $: 15-J7-J5 c,;. FNO . fT .. "" "'" CONe. CONe. """ CA . Ol. Ol. "'" c..... COR. + NORTH lJNC a~ SW 1/1. sE IA--....... . $: 15-J7..]5 , ~ ..- I I I SCAlE: , 1"..100' ~-, , 11 '1S ~ 1110" I "" eft"" INY, [. SUIMYOHS NOirs; .. !:;~ ~~ ~ ,,~ ~' il I~ ~.~ U ~.~ ~. ~ ~I ~ 1. 5l.M<fY OF l1fE JIf:ST 1/2. (T l1E Sot.mIwEsr if". CF T1C srJl/lJtEifST 1/-/ OF SH:llC!N ,~ T011NSHi'.J7 sri.ml JUM;E .E 9ST. 0IfEEC1I08fE CtX1N1'I, ~ ClrNG M1If1H (F lIE NlJH1H mcHT-tJF-1fI.Y UiE OF SWC,i!JID 7D ANfJ lIE FAST 1/2:- OF. THE SOU1HWEST V~ err me: ~ 1/( OF SEI:lX1N ~~ 1CJIIN5H/P J7 stJtIffl,-~!,\(;[" 15 EAST: '.' Z ~anim11Wl'71frJ5i~,~NorlEE1lF1E1.iJlJ)C4Tm "[-_8EMJNr;S..w: tWaJ IIF!:H 1HC CENTEJiwc fT SlAlE AtJ.t1 TIJ Af SHOJIN , lIPOH "DE',~ or I114Y MtDS (Y STAlC /KWI- 1fl 08TANBJ THE FUJR/D4 IJe'AImiOIl' OF ~ -I. 'IEHTlC4l. Q;)f.'W!'!. "AN;) atYA110NS MF lMSID lffJN SW1IJIi ~ IN !HE l1A~OFN4W8lI. .I ~ awma. !AS ESZ'.BU51ElJ l/1lizJNr; GP5 ~ B4St NElWDRKCClNllia SWlCWDltEEPf:Rrae;uO/1fMlEI)IJitJII1HE~ CEDtJEl1(; ~ AND IS 8ASElJ UPO/f 11€ SWF A:41E COO/ilJINf/F S>Sm( r7fJR!DA !ArT JIf1H lHE ~ tWui llEJAC NA/J U (1999) 4. lHiS ~I'IS SlI8.Il1:T mANY F;fI;lS TlJ.l,T JUY lCIiE't9lBJBY'" (XlJJP!ETF NrO AcctJ/WF 7!'U ~ T. lHS ~ IS .sL'B.JB:T l1J EA5DIl7flS:. 1iES1RIC1lt.?iS.MoO RK;mS QF JPI' OFRECOf,'!1 --- @ l/ENCHJMRK , _~# RE&R ,,I- CAP ~"'" _17JT ~I 'I' ~. !r~ ~'.~ ;\i li1 ~ ~ ~. I J .~ ~~ .~ ~ ;\,f ,,'J'... ,.t 2114 ACRES +/~ ..8 I' \ \~\\ 1:"fs.1"~ ql,'n J' at 7";'f~ -" \I \r~" .' .,1- \~" L-O'...>A/. {]F5,:,OfPOCN OJ? 52.5; P'IGF 1999 '\.l '1J,.f' . . ~1>" 0-'1- l I \ \ ; t:1'- .!ri:;q: . ~il:l. . '. j l rlfRCl1. f.- /1-It If'Ej, I/Z OF me S/)U]}{WfST 1/4 a: lliE SOUIHfAST 1/1- OF 5i(7lON 15. IOJYN5HfP J7 _WlH. ~ ...If EAST. 0Jr:ZF0flJIJEE" cawrr. Fl.OI?Ill1t l..J'lNC J\CIRlH CF TRE J<fOIT OF HMY {.wE OF SlATE IifXD AQ ~- DCEPT l1E NCHlH !iJ fElT OF THE iICST _,/2 OF lHC /IITT 1/2 OF !liE SlJU1MfIEST l/~ CF l1E SOUTJEAST 1/4 FOR RCWJ ~ Al.5J EXa;;:rr 1JE _RUOWIN& lJESCRI8fI) ~ a:M!nZ1 TO l1E STAfF CF FlLJNJ/J~: A PMca. OF l.W/J.H 11C J!IE weir I/J.CF lIE $OtJTH/IEST 1/4 iT THE ~ 1/# OF SEClJON 1~ J[jJIN5HP.IT SlJlI11I. /I1IN&E J561S( 8iJNfi JIOIiIE-PNmClAMY 0C5aiJ8t]) AS" FOl.1..lJWS: /XlIliea- AT THE SOlI1H 1/-1 .rDiM11 OF S4Q ~ ~ lNENCE IiUf /Of11€RlJ' CW TW: f/~ S-:cTXJN t.H A 0tSTNa OF.J1i9S FEU TO 11E CENJ'EHJ.JNE cr m~ JiOIJ] 717; lHOICE-NfiKnf 8/n/.'.q'liu7; ON SAI(J aN1EliU€.A lJlSlNCC IT .JI7.10 fllJt THENCC . NDHlliER!.y AT 9fT TO SAD CENlERlIIC A t:IS%.W:i' (7' ~ FEET 17) THE POIff OF ~ lHENCE.ClJImorE NJIiTHEHlY. A l1ISTNIIX fiF f7 FEEJ: lMNCE-E:44SJ'ERI.r AT 9fT AT A 0/SlANCE OF' 211 FEEl: T1CHCE sotJl1IE/1U AT-1fT A aswcc tY 17 ffEP. lHEJiCE 1tESJEJi!l.y g 9(1" A fJISEi.'K;E CF 2D FEET 10 lIE I'CINT OF lECMIIM:. " ,\1. .\t"~ N1J!l'rJZ'-fQT \~<{4 fBL:Jfr . .: -. -" .-." : AMm i: /Jd'M(N; AT l1IE stXI11IWtST ctJRN!R or 11E FAST 1/2 ()F 1H( soti1HJiEsr 1/-/. OF T1fE" SOIlJHE('Sf 1/4 CF SB:l1ON ~ 1lJIW!WI J7.SDIJIH. IMNCC JS EAST Nm-!iIIN NDKTH. ..ctQIC THE IfCT fJa/JIMJfY A aswcc OF >>I FED: /HDI 8Ui F:4ST A t:JtSTAW:C OF 186-1 mr; ~RtJ11 SWTHA ~ tF5!JI.FID:1r1"fHE SD1J1H /iOl.NVIiYOF SEC1XJN_'4" lHFH IlUN IIEST A 0J!>lJINCE IF fMJ fEU: m 11€ 1!OINf OF ~ leiS.ve &t1:EPr !HE /iQjlar-~;"tWSWE~;a' . .\'r+ t C6tJ1i.fla...~..t~. ~~ . . . ---1 \~~ ~ft'8' RBCj S.E COI/NER OF SEe. '5~JT-J5 siJR;rn;e'S t:iJmFJc4T1ON lIE'ii:RE8r.cimH l1J -l1C 8ESr OF 0tI{f KNCJlfI.E])(;i NO 6ElEF ~ lJIS ~ IS A-llftC MO _CORRECT . IiEF1fE:sE1ff.. OF 1HE 80UflIIRY SZRJEY (T.M eo.t. . PROPEJl1'f fESCR8ElJ /IEli'EM. IC RIHfHER CEHTFr-lHAr lHlS . .SlAMY as PRDWiE1J N ACaJilWCE II1H /HE .iPPtJcAeu . PIi'OWSKJI!SfF.~5fG1T-O. R.OR1IJ4~mz ~"" lJCENSElJEI1JS/NCSS.*2 UNJ ~ifz~~ +=51'1 ~ '. s:w. ClJRNElI OF 5li: 15-J7-'J5 """'.- ~-~" MPPEll Att fS.M(J(J_ . SlAff OF ROMlJt lAST lWF OF RElO .5UM7." 16 .JUYE 2JXJS PA,GE; 14 ACTMTY COMPuTED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECXED BY: CLOSED BY: lR<: JRC AWS ..... IH :>-os 6---23-05 6-ll-05 WilsimMiller ~"'~=-- . . .. _. a,p.... "'-......... """,,",-'.--- . .~11c. ~~.r..,...r~f'rI1OlriXfe-use.. . .#S)~w.;,.'itMCl*a !..I:!Jek.l'tri:'!_~f'f!r:ln!~..~~_ ........~--C<II!. SECTION BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY A PORTION Of . 15. TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH. .RANGE 35 EAST' OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FlORIDA ~lT,; JUNE ZOO!5 CUENT: HOIlIlOItT~seou: 100" "'TMI" SENT rO". FIELD BOOK: 0l<EE " 1807 1807 TlTlE: Phillips & Jordon. Inc. P.a. Box 2295 ~~ills, ~ ~9-:"Z29~ ~1l""NO. '''''''' 0ti_1JI'" 0lP'_NCI. Q<{O<[DlIT DlP.~ stc:o fWP: /II;[: ''''''''-;]5 04S82-il1J9.-OO1 0468220~OOI b4 ldllfltr e 1375 Jacksonaeet, Suite 206 Fort Myers, ~da 33901-2845 Phone: 239-334-3366 Fax: 239-334-6384 Email: larue-planning@att.net LaRue Planning & Management Services, Inc. Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: Owner: From: To: Craig Hackl, President H20 Holdings, ILC. Single Family Commercial Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: H20 Holdings, LLC 06-C1-001 General Information Agent: Craig M. Hackl, President Phone Number: 561-747~2295 Owner of Record: H2o Holdings, LLC Property Control Number 2-15-37 -35-0AOO-00008-0000 and 2-15-37 -35-0AOO-00007 -0000 Zoning District RMH, CHV, & H To be determined Density Access 4 du/ac SR70 NA Same Legal Description: Parcell: The West Yz of the Southwest lA of the Southeast l;4 of Section 15, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida, lying North of the North right-of-way line of State Road No. 70; Except the North 50 feet of the West Y2 of the West Y2 of the Southwest lA of the Southeast lA for road purposes; also except the following described property conveyed to the State of Florida: A parcel of land in the West Y2 of the South west lA of the Southeast lA of Section 15, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the South lA corner of said Section 15; thence run Northerly on the lA section line a distance of 36.95 feet to the centerline of State Road 70; thence North 80054'49" East, on said centerline a distance of 347.10 feet; thence Northerly at 900 to said centerline a distance of 40 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence continue Northerly a distance of 17 feet; thence Easterly at 900 a distance of 20 feet; thence Southerly at 90 degrees a distance of 17 feet; thence Westerly at 900 a distance of 20 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel 2: Beginning at the Southwest corner of the East Y2 of the Southwest l;4 of the Southeast lA of Section 15, Township 37 South, Range 35 East and run North along the West boundary a distance of 594 feet; then run East a distance of 186.3 feet; then run South a distance of 594 feet to the South boundary of Section 15; then run West a distance of 186.3 feet to the Point of Beginning. Less and except the right-of-way for State Road 70. OR Book 525 Page 1999, Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida and is approximately 21.14 acre(s). 1 e APPltnt: H20 Holdings, LLC 06-C1-001 Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Item Before the lP A and City Council: The matter before the Local Planning Agency and the City Council is a request to change the Future Land Use Map (PLUM) for a portion of the above described property from Single Family to Commercial. The request is more specifically shown on Exhibit A attached. Since the property in question is over 10 acres (21.14 acres), this application qualifies under Florida Statutes 163 as a "Large-Scale Amendment" to the Plan. Adjacent Future land Use Map classifications and Zoning Districts: The Table below summarizes the Future Land Use of the adjoining properties as well as the zoning classifications. Given the property's proximity to SR 70, in addition to the existing land uses of the abutting properties, the proposed Commercial development appears consistent with the area to the east, but it is difficult to assess the total impact of the combined Commercial with the neighborhood to the west. Zoning District: RMH East: FLUM. Classification: ZOl1ingIDistrict: Existing Land Use: Commercial CHV Commercial Zoning District: CHV, RMH and RMF West: FlUMClassification: Single Family Existing Land Use: Residential Application Description: The site is currently vacant and undeveloped and within the RMH, Holding, and CHV Zoning Districts. Obviously the applicant is proposing Commercial uses for the property, but an exact use has not been determined at this time. As such, before the applicant can receive a change in Future Land Use for this site the City must have an idea of how the applicant plans to develop the property. Comprehensive Plan Analysis: The City Council and Local Planning Agency are required to address certain uses in conjunction with the Comprehensive Plan, which may be categorized as follows: 2 Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: H20 Holdings, LLC 06-C1-001 A. Consistency with the Land Use Categories and Plan Policies. The Comprehensive Plan describes the Commercial Future Land Use category in the Future Land Use Element. It states: Policy 2.1(c): Commercial. Permitted uses include office, retail, automotive, wholesale, and related Commercial activities. Also permitted are public facilities. Commercial development shall not exceed a floor area ratio of 3.00 and the maximum impervious surface for development within this category shall not exceed 85% of the site. Under the proposed Commercial Future Land Use category, the applicant would be allowed to develop the subject property with the Retail/Commercial uses. However, there is more data necessary to be shown illustrating that this presently designated residential area should become an intensive retail high impact location. B. Concurrency of Adequate Public Facilities Before this request can be approved, the City must consider the proposed impact on public facilities. Potable Water Supply: The adopted LOS for potable water is 114 gpcpd. The subject property is within the service area of the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA) who provides this service to City residents. The anticipated flow for the subject property has not been provided by the applicant, this data is required. The existing capacity of the water supply plant is 6 MGD, with 2.5 MGD already cOIlli'llitted to use. As such, the OUA has an excess of 4.5 MGD. The applicant would need to submit a letter to the City which discusses the anticipated flow for the development and that the OUA would have capacity to serve the proposed development. There should also be a deduction of water use for already approved developments because the cumulative impact has not been contemplated if all approved developments are built. Wastewater Disposal: The adopted LOS for wastewater disposal is 130 gallons/ capita/day. The subject property is within the service area of the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA). Impacts for the subject property would be cannot be determined at this time. The existing capacity of the wastewater treatment plant is 1.2 MGD, with between 800,000 and 900,000 GPD already committed to use. As such, the OUA has a minimum of 300,000 GPD of excess capacity. The OUA has stated that plans are underway to construct an addition to the plant which will permit an additional 3 MGD. This is expected to be done by the summer of 2008. 3 e APPI.t: H20 Holdings, LLC 06-C1-001 Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment The applicant would need to verify that the OVA would have capacity to serve the proposed development. Solid Waste Disposal: The City has an adopted LOS of 13 lbs/capitaJday and 3 years available landfill capacity for solid waste disposal. The impacts of the proposed development will be minimal as the uses will be Commercial in nature. Drainage/Stormwater Management: The adopted LOS for drainage is Design Storm, 25-year/24 hour duration. The proposed development is required to meet all conditions and standards required by the City of Okeechobee and the Florida Administrative Code. There should be at least a conceptual understanding of how storm water discharge will be handled for what is obviously going to be the creation of impervious areas. Recreation and Open Space: The adopted LOS for recreation and open space is 3 acres/l,OOO persons. The proposed development is Commercial in nature and is not expected to impact parks. Roads and Traffic Circulation: The City's minImUm LOS standard for principal arterial roadways is LOS C. All other roads have an LOS D. This LOS must be maintained on the site for all roadways serving the site. The subject property is serviced by SR 70. The applicant has not provided a traffic analysis which demonstrates how the proposed Development would impact the surrounding roadway network. Objective 9 and its corresponding policies (Traffic Circulation Element) states: Objective 9: The City of Okeechobee shall encourage efforts to curtail future level of service standard deterioration, particularly along US Highway 441 and SR 70. Policy 9.1: To assist in improving level of service standards, Commercial redevelopment efforts shall be prioritized to mitigate existing "strip" Commercial sites. Policy 9.2: Access points to Commercial centers shall be limited, where feasible, to decrease traffic congestions along City arterials and other roadways. Policy 9.3: Efforts shall be made, where appropriate, to separate local traffic from through traffic in Commercial areas. The applicant must submit a traffic analysis which demonstrates that the above polices will be met and that the Level of Service would not be degraded for the surrounding roads. Such analysis should include the anticipated trips from the Commercial property to the east. 4 Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: H20 Holdings, LLC 06-C1-001 C. Compatibility with Adjacent and Nearby Land Uses. The proposed change to Commercial has been stated by the applicant that it would not negatively impact surrounding properties. The proposed type of Commercial uses and usage of buffers should be demonstrated before compatibility can be assumed. D. Compliance with the Specific Standards of the Plan. The Goals, Objectives and Policies (as they are intended) in the Comprehensive Plan would allow for an Amendment to the Future Land Use Map to Commercial if compatibility, acceptable impacts on traffic, sewer, water and overall fiscal feasibility resulting from this re-designation, can be shown by supporting data and analysis. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan The applicant's supporting data and analysis do not presently support Commercial uses at this location. It is recommended that the LP A and City Council find the application to be inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan until the applicant submits the following information: 1. Traffic analysis; 2. Water and sewer analysis for the proposed development; and 3. Discusses the type of Commercial uses to be developed on the site as some levels of intensity might be appropriate while some uses would not; 4. Demonstrate the Fiscal impacts for this Plan Amendment that would qualify this Amendment as being fiscally feasible under Florida Statutes. Attachments Attachments to this Staff Report include a copy of the Future Land Use Map indicating the location of the subject property. Assessment and Conclusions Staff does not recommend for approval of applicant's request to amend the Future Land Use Map to Commercial. Submitted by: James G. LaRue, AICP May 16,2006 5 e e (0 City of Okeechobee Date )-1 )-1/ D& Petition No. O(p -GJ: <>fJO ~ General Services Department Fee Paid: 50f) , () 0 Jurisdiction: LfA ... ~ -'ocA 55 S.E. 3rd Avenue, Room 101 ] st Hearing: 5 J;?.3 2nd Hearing: I" {(,_ r;" {"o '8/. -t Okeechobee, Florida 34974-2903 7 Phone: (863) 763-3372, ext. 218 Publication Dates: Fax: (863) 763-1686 Notices Mailed: Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Application Please Check One: Small Scale Amendment (Under 10 Acres) 2L Large Scale Amendment (Over 10 Acres) V Name of property owner(s): Frank Al tabella, Trustee Owner mailing address:p. O. Box 417 Okeechobee L Name ofapplicant(s) if other than owner (state relationship): CBC Mana emen t Cor . Applicant mailing address:301 NW 4th Ave Name of contact person (state relationship): Th 467-0831 Fax: V Propcrty addrcss / dircctions to property=s e eAt t a c he d Lea 1 .. (4 Parce€sj2-21-37-35-0AOO-00042-BOOO Parcel IdentlficatlOn Number:2-2 2-3 7 -3~-OAOO-00033-0000 2-22- 2 7 -35-0AOO-OO 1-00 Size of the Property (in acres): 53 Current Zoning Designation: RG Current Future Land Use Designation: Mu 1 t i f am' + acres 2 Parcels Existing Use of the Property: Vacan t Proposed Future Land Use Designation: R G M u 1 t i fa mil Proposed Use ofthe Property: create a Planned Un i t Developmen t uti 1 i zing mixed forms of Residental Housing (Single Family, Twwnhomes,cotta s) Description of Surrounding Properties: South: Mobile H'1jjrnc, Park East: Taylor Creek Noeth: Mobile Homes West; Residence, Bank, Restaurants + Retail Legal Description of the Property (Lengthy Description May be Attached): See Attached Uniform Land Use Application (rev. ]2/03) Page 1 of 2 v X Survey of Property (Il" x 14",20" Scale) ~ Letter Outlining Request x Notarized Letter of Owner's Authorization x Application Fee (non-refundable) ~ City Location Map v Confirmation of Information Accuracy .. I hereby certifY that the inf'(mnation in this application is correct. The information included in this application is for use by the City ofOkeechobee in processing my request. False or misleading information may be punishable by a fine of up to $500.00 and imprisonment of up to 30 days and ~n the summary denial of this application. ~,_~_~_~_ Thomas C. Close I {) Ie \ la 5'-- Signature Printed Name Date' , Uniform Land Use Application (rev 12/03) Page 2 of 2 02/17/2005 10:22 85375353_ CLOSE CONSTRUCTI~ PAGE 02 . Okeechobee County School Board 863-462-5000 700 S-W. Second Avenue Fax 863-462-5151 StmCOro 761-5000 Okeechobee, Florlda34974 CbairperlOB David Williams Vke a.aJrpenoo Joe .Amold Members Gay Clltlton Kelly Owens lndill Riedel S.perintettdetlt Patricia G. Cooper, Ed.D. February 13. 2006 Mr. Thomas C. Close, President Close Construction 301 N.W. 4th Avenue Okeechobee. FL 34972 Re: Taylor Creek Marina & Fishing Village Dear Mr. Close: Thank you for the information regarding the above-mentioned proposed land use amendment As you are aware, we are experiencing unprecedented growth within our county which has the potential of greatly impacting our school population. Therefore, we are requesting that any new development being proposed within our county fully comply with the concurrency law passed during the 2005 legislative session_ In part. the concurrency law requires that a standard level of service be adopted for school facilities and that standard of service be applied to all residential developments at the time of application for a site plan or at final approval of the development. The law further stipulates that a developer may satisfy school concurrency through mitigation proportionate to the demand of capacity. Mitigation may be satisfied by one or more of the following: contribution of land; payment for construction or land acquisition; school construdion. However. the developer must execute a legally binding agreement with the local government and school board in order to satisfy mitigation requirements_ Senate Bill 360 is a "pay as you grow" plan which enables developers, local governments and school boards to partner 8S we experience the phenomenal growth anticipated within our state. We in Okeechobee County Schools look forward to continuing our cooperative relationship with local government and private concerns as we keep this most important legislation in mind. Thank you. Iga PA~ fl. ~ Patricia G. Cooper, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools CC: School Board Members Tom Conely, School Board Attorney 'fEB 1. ~ ?t'n~ 02/05/2005 10:24 8F~-'535337 CLOSE CON~ JCTION PAGE 02 & City of Ok.eechobee Fire Department. 2/1/2006 rt.B a ~ 'LGrub Chris Close Taylor Creek Marina & Fishing Village In response to your request, as of this time I do not have any objections to this project . however I may ha\'"e COncems in the future when a more detailed plan has been presented. s~~ ti:rl,~mith Fire Chief7MarshaJ. Okeechobee FD SS S.E. Third Avenue. Okeechobee, Florida 34974-2932 . 863-467-1586 . Fax: 863-763-4489 . CBC Management Corp. _ Requemor Comprehensive Plan Amend"-t Future land Use Change from Single-Family Residential to Multifamily Residential Consistency with Comprehensive Plan The following policies of the Comprehensive Plan are relevant to the subject request. The proposed amendment is consistent with these policies. As the CGMP has been found to be internally consistent, as required by State statutes, the proposed amendment is thus also consistent with the remainder of the Comprehensive Plan. Future Land Use Element Policy 1.1 - Please refer to the specific sections within this report that present an analysis of the potential demand from the proposed amendment if developed under a worst-case scenario of ten units per acre. In summary, all required public facilities will continue to operate at the required levels of service given existing or planned capacities. Policy 2.2 - The proposed amendment will not result in the loss of any property rights to adjacent land owners. Policy 7.2 - The proposed amendment will not result in an intensity of use that will disrupt the natural system. The existing site is devoid of native upland habitat. The protection of Taylor Creek will be demonstrated through the local government site specific development application. Policy 9.1 through 9.3 - The proposed amendment is consistent with the stated goals of the Resource Management Plan for the Lower Kissimmee River and Taylor Creek Drainage Basins. Given the requirements of the local government and federal and state permitting agencies. the protection of Taylor Creek will be demonstrated through the local government site specific development application. Transportation Element Policy 8.1 and 8.2 - The proposed amendment is consistent with these policies as demonstrated by the traffic analysis presented. The analysis indicates that the surrounding road network can accommodate the incremental demand that would potentially occur if developed under its worst case scenario of ten units per acre. The analysis utilizes slightly different acreages than those obtained from the legal and sketches due to the timing of each product. However, since the traffic analysis is based on a higher acreage, it represents an even more conservative analysis. Housing Element Policy 1.1 and 1.11 - The proposed amendment further implements these policies by allocating additional residential densities near facilities and services where a full complement of public facilities will be available concurrent with the demand. Conservation Element Policy 2.2 and 3.3 - The proposed land use change does not affect the quality or quantity of groundwater and does not endanger any existing native vegetative communities. Such a determination can only be made upon submittal of a site specific development plan. Regulations of the SFWMD dictate that post development conditions must not affect the quality or quantity of groundwater. The Page 1 cac Management CorJ. Kequest for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Future Land Use Change from Single-Family Residential to Multifamily Residential existing site is devoid of native habitats except for the large wetland that will be preserved/mitigated as allowed by the City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan. Policy 4.4 - The designation of the existing wetland as Conservation pursuant to this policy shall be accomplished through the approval of site specific development plans and required agency permits that require conservation easements over all existing natural systems to remain. At that time, the City may elect to seek an amendment of the land use to Conservation. Recreation Policy 1.2 - The change in future land use will not reduce the compatibility standards between the proposed use and any existing or proposed recreation areas. Compliance with State Growth Mana~ement Requirements. Florida's Department of Community Affairs evaluates local plan amendments for consistency with Rule 9-J5, Florida Administrative Code, which sets out criteria for determining whether a proposed plan amendment demonstrates consistency with the mandates of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act and the State Comprehensive Plan. The applicant must demonstrate that the proposed plan amendment is consistent with all state requirements. Since the City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan has been found to be consistent with all state requirements, a demonstration of compliance of the proposed amendment with the City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan in turn demonstrates compliance with all state requirements. Please refer to the section titled Compliance with City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan for the applicant's demonstration of compliance. In addition, the proposed future land use must not encourage urban sprawl as outlined in Sections 9J5- 006.(5)(g) through (5)0) of the Florida Administrative Code. The noted regulations set forth the major components of a methodology to determine the presence of urban sprawl. Paragraph (5)(g) identifies 13 primary indicators of urban sprawl which are to be applied and analyzed as set forth in the rule. Paragraph (5)(h) describes how land use aspects of a plan shall be analyzed. The land use element, including both the future land use map and associated objectives and policies, represents the focal point of the local government's planning effort. Paragraph (5)(i) describes the unique features and characteristics of each jurisdiction which provide the context of the analysis and which are needed to evaluate the extent, amount or frequency of an indicator and the significance of an indicator for a specific jurisdiction. Paragraph (5)0) recognizes that land use plans generally may be significantly affected by other development policies in a plan which may serve to mitigate the presence of urban sprawl indicators based on the land use plan alone. Paragraph (5)0) describes development controls which may be used by a local government to mitigate the presence of sprawl. In general, Section 9J-5.006(5)(!) states that provision of innovative planning such as urban villages, new towns, satellite communities, area-based allocations, clustering and open space provisions, mixed- use development and sector planning that allow the conversion of rural and agricultural lands to other uses will be recognized as methods of discouraging urban sprawl and will be determined consistent with the provisions of the state comprehensive plan, regional policy plans, Chapter 163, Part II, F.S., and the Florida Administrative Code regarding discouraging the proliferation of urban sprawl. As such, the proposed future land use amendment to the New Community Development district, which requires Page 2 . CBC Management Corp. .. Reques",",or Comprehensive Plan Amendn1lf1t Future Land Use Change from Single-Family Residential to Multifamily Residential the creation of mixed-use development, urban villages, and open space, is thus consistent with the requirements for discouraging urban sprawl. Nevertheless, a detailed urban sprawl analysis is provided below. Our analysis of consistency is provided within a text block following each indicator. Analysis of primary indicators 1. Promotes, allows or designates for development substantial areas of the jurisdiction to develop as low-intensity, low-density, or single-use development or uses in excess of demonstrated need. The proposed request to Multifamily Residential will actually increase densities within the City of Okeechobee in close proximity to the urban center. 2. Promotes, allows or designates significant amounts of urban development to occur in rural areas at substantial distances from existing urban areas while leaping over undeveloped lands which are available and suitable for development. The proposed request to Multifamily Residential will actually increase densities within the City of Okeechobee in close proximity to the urban center. The proposed request is also adjacent to an existing designation of Multifamily Residential on the future land use map. 3. Promotes, allows or designates urban development in radial, strip, isolated or ribbon patterns generally emanating from existing urban developments. The location of the proposed future land use amendment is not in a radial, strip, isolated or ribbon pattern generally emanating from existing urban developments. 4. As a result of premature or poorly planned conversion of rural land to other uses, fails adequately to protect and conserve natural resources, such as wetlands, floodplains, native vegetation, environmentally sensitive areas, natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas, lakes, rivers, shorelines, beaches, bays, estuarine systems, and other significant natural systems. The proposed request to a Multifamily Residential future land use will not result in the premature or poorly planned conversion of rural land to other uses. Adequate site design techiques will be employed to adequately to protect and conserve natural resources, such as wetlands, floodplains, native vegetation, environmentally sensitive areas, natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas, lakes, rivers, shorelines, beaches, bays, estuarine systems, and other significant natural systems. 5. Fails adequately to protect adjacent agricultural areas and activities, including silviculture, and including active agricultural and silvicultural activities as well as passive agricultural activities and dormant, unique and prime farmlands and soils. The location of the proposed future land use amendmentis within the existing boundaries of City's corporate limits and is removed from any existing agricultural uses. 6. Fails to maximize use of existing public facilities and services. The proposed site will be served by a full complement of existing urban services. Page 3 CBC Management Cor~ r<.equest for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Future land Use Change from Single-Family Residential to Multifamily Residential 7. Fails to maximize use of future public facilities and services. A higher utilization of this site will ensure that future pubic services are minimized within outlining areas. 8. Allows for land use patterns or timing which disproportionately increase the cost in time, money and energy, of providing and maintaining facilities and services, including roads, potable water, sanitary sewer, storm water management, law enforcement, education, health care, fire and emergency response, and general government. The proposed site will be served by a full complement of existing urban services. Because the property has been planned for "next-in-line" development, it will enable public facilities and services to be extended in an orderly manner without disproportionate increases in cost. 9. Fails to provide a clear separation between rural and urban uses. The proposed site is surrounded by other lands within the City of Okeechobee's coporate limits and thereby maintains clear separation between urban and rural uses. 10. Discourages or inhibits infi/! development or the redevelopment of existing neighborhoods and communities. The proposed request provides for an opportunity to develop multifamily housing that is currently lacking to a large degree within the City. 11. Fails to encourage an attractive and functional mix of uses. The proposed site, being within the City and adjacent to equal or higher intensity lands, will provide for an attractive and functional mix of uses. 12. Results in poor accessibility among linked or related land uses. The proposed project will provide for reasonable connections to surrounding development to ensure among linked or related land uses. 13. The proposed change will not result in the loss of significant amounts of functional open space. The proposed change will not result in the loss of significant amounts of functional open space. The existing use does not provide functional open space. With the conversion to a Multifamily Residential future land use and the development of a mixed use project of housing, shops, marina, restaurants, etc., the proposed land use will provide significant amounts of functional open space that will be planned for active and passive recreation by residents of the new community and others. Encroachment of Incompatible development As the City of Okeechobee has developed, US-441 south has developed as an area of mixed commercial and residential uses from hotels, restaurants, and other service businesses to repair shops and retail stores. The residential uses in the area though have remained largely the same stock that has been in place for a number of years. US-441 has also been expanded and a full complement of urban services are available along the corridor. Page 4 . CBC Management Corp. . Requesnor Comprehensive Plan Amendn1lrlt Future land Use Change from Single-Family Residential to Multifamily Residential The subject site is bound on the east by Taylor Creek and the west by developed commercial land fronting SR-441 with a Commercial future land use designation. To the north lies an existing single- family development known as Taylor Creek with a Single Family Residential future land use designation. This development is separated from the subject site by S.E. 8th Street and can be adequately buffered through internal buffering provisions. To the south lies vacant land with a Multifamily Residential future land use designation which is under the same ownership as the subject parcel. Given the adjacent existing and future land uses, the proposed request for Multifamily Residential future land use will not result in the encroachment of incompatible development. Natural resource protection Please refer to the enclosed environmental assessment conducted for the entire property holdings including the 38 acres subject to the request for a future land use amendment. The site is mostly devoid of native habitat except for largest wetland system. However, as stated in the assessment, the hydrology of the cypress slough on the southwestern side of the site has been restricted to the point that subsidence of the soil is clearly evident. If this condition continues, the cypress canopy will eventually be replaced with upland species. Transportation Please refer to the enclosed traffic statement. The analysis utilizes slightly different acreages than those obtained from the legal and sketches due to the timing of each product. However, since the traffic analysis is based on a higher acreage, it represents an even more conservative analysis. Schools Currently, the Okeechobee County School District has adequate capacity at the middle and upper school levels; however, the elementary school system is currently at capacity. The School Board has programmed additional elementary school capacity through the State's Rural Schools Program. Funding has been requested through the legislative delegation. Appropriation is expected in FY2007 with construction to commence by 2008. The Okeechobee School District has utilized this funding source for expansion to the school system in the past. The timing is concurrent with the expected timeframe of proposed project. The request for a future land use amendment is expected to be transmitted to the State Department of Community Affairs by mid- 2006 with final adoption expected by late-2006. With the State's new requirements for public school concurrency passed during the 2005 legislative session, the proposed project is expected to meet the concurrency requirements through mitigation proportionate to the demand for capacity as allowed by State statutues. As the local government application for site plan approval is not expected to be submitted untillate-2006, with approval granted in mid-2007, the certainty of the funding program for the additional capacity will be in place. Site construction would then commence with the first certificate of occupancy in 2008 - the expected timeline for the construction of the new elementary school. Please refer to the enclosed letter of Okeechobee County School Board for confirmation. Page 5 CBC Management CorJ. t<equest for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Future Land Use Change from Single-Family Residential to Multifamily Residential The closest elementary school, Central Elementary, is located at 610 S.W. Fifth S1. The middle school is located at 825 S.W. 28th S1. The high school is located at 2800 N.W. Highway 441 North. Water & Wastewater The water and wastewater service for this project is provided by the Okeechobee Utility Authority. Application for capacity reservation has been submitted to ~UA. The following is an analysis of the water and wastewater flows for the property with its existing future land use designation of Residential Single Family allowing up to four units per acre. Based upon this criterion, the 33 acre parcel would allow for up to 132 single family residential units to be constructed on this site. The balance of the site (approximately 4.5 acres) does not currently contain a development allowance. With each unit individually metered, the estimated water and wastewater flows are as follows: Existing Conditions Use Units Rate Gallons pe day Single Family 132 250 GPD - water 33,000 Residential 250 GPD - sewer 33,000 rl ] The following is an analysis of the water and wastewater flows for the property with the proposed future land use designation allowing up to 10 units per acre. The analysis is based upon maximum development scenario of 380 units based upon the 38 acre site. With each unit individually metered, the estimated water and wastewater flows are as follows: Proposed Conditions Use Area Rate Gallons per day Multi Family 380 units 250 GPD - water 95,000 Residential 250 GPD - sewer 95,000 Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants Based on information obtained from the Okeechobee Utility Authority, the permitted capacity of the surface water treatment plant is 5.0 mgd with the ground water treatment plant rated at 1.0 mgd. The wastewater treatment plant permitted capacity is currently 1.0 mgd. The Okeechobee Utility Authority is currently in the construction phase of additional filters which will bring the wastewater treatment plant to a temporary capacity of 1.23 mgd. This work should be completed by June 2006. Additionally, the wastewater treatment plant is under a design/permitting phase for an expansion of 3.0 mgd that will bring the total treatment plant capacity to 4.0 mgd and should be operational by June 2008. The average daily flow of the combined water treatment plant finished water production is 1.93 mgd for the period of January 2005 through December 2005. The average daily flow of the wastewater Page 6 .. CBC Management Corp. _ RequesrTor Comprehensive Plan Amend~t Future Land Use Change from Single-Family Residential to Multifamily Residential treatment plant is 0.89 mgd for the same time period. The Okeechobee Utility Authority reports an outstanding water treatment plant flow commitment of approximately 0.25 mgd with an outstanding wastewater treatment plant flow commitment of approximately 0.1 mgd. Based upon these figures and as stated in the attached service availability letter, the Okeechobee Utility Authority will have on or before June 2008 adequate capacity to serve the proposed demand created by the increased density of the proposed future land use amendment. Police Please refer to the enclosed letter of service availability from the City of Okeechobee Police Department. The nearest police station is 50 S.E. Second Ave. No additional police stations are scheduled. The existing police station should be able to maintain its level of service standard with the proposed amendment given that the project is already allocated for residential development and is within the service area approximately one mile from the site. Fire Please refer to the enclosed letter of service availability from the City of Okeechobee Fire Department. The nearest fire station is located at 55 S.E. Third Ave. No additional fire stations are scheduled. The existing fire station should be able to maintain its level of service standard with the proposed amendment given that the project is already allocated for residential development and is within the service area approximately one mile from the site. Solid Waste The City of Okeechobee's solid waste level of service is 13 pounds per capita per day and a three year availability of landfill capacity. Given the maximum number of potential units of 380 with 2.5 person per dwelling, the maximum demand for the project would be approximately 12,350 punds per day. The City of Okeechobee does not operate solid waste landfills. Currently, the landfill is operated by Okeechobee County. As such, the City does not incur any capital expenditures. A letter from the solid waste service provider, Waste Management pertaining to solid waste service availability is attached. According to Okeechobee County, the existing landfill has surplus capacity in excess of three years. Stormwater ManaQement Except for the native wetland which occupies about eight acres, the project site has been altered from its original condition and is currently in use as improved pasture The existing stormwater management system consists of a shallow interconnected ditch system with outfall directly to Taylor Creek. Stormwater runoff quantity and quality are strictly regulated by the City and the SFWMD to ensure that pre-development drainage conditions are maintained. The proposed rate of discharge from the site will be less than or equal to the existing discharge rate from the site. The discharges off-site will be Page 7 CBC Management Cor(:. t<equest for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Future Land Use Change from Single-Family Residential to Multifamily Residential minimized by on-site detention within the stormwater management system. The ultimate site discharge will be to Taylor Creek. The Stormwater Management System will employ, wherever practical, a variety of Best Management Practices (BMP). The following are a list of potential BMP that could be integrated into the Water Management System during the final design and permitting stage: . Oil and grease skimmers; · Environmental swales; . Minimize "short-circuiting" of pond flow patterns; . Raised storm inlets in grassed swales; · Utilize stormwater retention where feasible; and . Street cleaning and general site maintenance. The drainage system will be owned, operated and maintained by a public entity or a responsible property owners association acceptable to the City and the SFWMD. Historical on-site wetlands will be maintained as part of the surface water management system. There are no Outstanding Florida Waters, Florida Aquatic Preserves or Florida Class I or /I waters occurring within or abutting the project site. Potential adverse impacts to ground and surface waters will be minimized by implementation of appropriate erosion control measures during construction in accordance with the NPDES Generic Permit for Stormwater Discharge from Large and Small Construction Activities. Erosion control measures that may be implemented include stabilization practices such as temporary seeding, permanent seeding, mulching, geotextiles, or sod stabilization; structural practices such as silt fences, earth dikes, diversions, swales, sediment traps, check dams, or storm drain inlet protection; and sediment basins. The project is located entirely in Zone X according to the Okeechobee County FEMA FIRM panel Map Index. According to the Map Index, the applicable FIRM panel is not printed because the entire panel is located in Zone X. Zone X is defined as "Areas of 500-year flood; areas of 1 DO-year flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 1 DO-year flood". Please refer to the FEMA map. There are currently no known flooding or erosion control problems associated with the project site. No 100-year flood prone areas exist on site, therefore no structures, roadways or utilities are proposed within any 1 DO-year flood prone areas. There are no existing wellfields located within two miles of the project site. Parks and Recreation The project will be designed to provide residents with a variety of recreational facilities and open spaces to ensure the community's quality of life. No land will be removed that was previously used by residents of the region for any recreational use. No existing recreational trail is designated across the property. Therefore, the project doesn't have the potential for impacting a recreational trail designated pursuant to Chapter 260, F.S. and Chapter 16D-7, F.A.C. The City's adopted level of service standard for recreation and parks is 3.0 acres per 1,000 people. Based on the estimated population of 950 people (38 acres x 10 upa x 2.5 ppd), the project's minimum acreage requirement for recreation and park space is approxmately 3 acres. The project will meet the Page 8 . CBC Management Corp. .. Requemor Comprehensive Plan Amend~t Future Land Use Change from Single-Family Residential to Multifamily Residential park and open space mandates through on-site facilites and provision of impact fees. The planned system of parks and open spaces is consistent with the City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan. HistoricallArcheoloQical Resources There are no known archeological or historical sites within the project boundaries. A request has been sent to the Florida Division of Historic Resources. Given the improvements made to date (improved pasture), the likelihood of the presence of a historic or archeological site regarded as potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Sites to occur on the parcel is limited. Hurricane Preparedness According to information in the Treasure Coast Transportation Analysis Hurricane Evacuation Study Update 2003, dated November 2003, the property is not located in any storm surge zone. The property is not within the Category 3 Hurricane Evacuation Area. It is estimated that the majority of people will remain in their homes within the project during a hurricane event, due to the project location relative to the Atlantic coastline. However, in the event of a significant hurricane, the County Emergency Operations Center (EOC) may activate evacuation shelters throughout the County as it deems necessary. The evacuation shelters are typically opened in areas within the hurricane's 100-mile path. Many of the public schools in Okeechobee County serve as evacuation shelters. US-441, directly adjacent to the project site, is the closest evacuation route. Additionally, SR-70, approximately 1 mile to the north will assist in evacuation of the area by providing additional evacuation routes. All traffic control devices will utilize hurricane tested mast arms and street lights further minimizing service interruptions and enhancing safety prior to, during, and after a major hurricane. It should also be noted that due to recent changes to the Florida Building Code, specifically, Chapter 16, Structural Design, as well as the construction methods to be used in the project, the residential homes will provide shelter for residents during hurricane events. As a result of the changes in the construction process, residents will have safer and more secure homes, thereby reducing evacuation volumes and shelter space requirements. In addition, underground utilities will be used throughout the development reducing potential service interruptions. Finally, additional mitigation measures for special needs populations will be determined through the local government approval process of the Planned Unit Development. Parcel Control Number Taylor Creek ROW Abandonment 2-22-27 -35-0AOO-00031-0000 Total AcreaQe 4.51 32.97 37.48 ExistinQ FLU None RSF Propose FLU RMF RMF LeQal Description Please refer to the attached legal and sketches of the two tracks that comprise this application for future land use amendment. The analysis utilizes slightly different acreages than those obtained from the legal and sketches due to the timing of each product. However, since the traffic analysis is based on a higher acreage, it represents an even more conservative analysis. Page 9 9 8 17 I : 230 10 11 12 5 6 5. It 7 TH STREET Y'38 II ~ , 3 2 ~ o 6 I ~ ~ 10 [I [2 B:,.. ._c' - -. 2 C-.C, JO II 12 .' . 7 8 B 10 [j II 10 Jl 12 I I I 9 1 10 [j 12 ""' 9 ~h 3 10 II 11 .8 9 JO 2~.. ' II ii" 21:J !O ~, 4 ~'-= 5 :2V ~ @ LAg AC @ .,J AC .".-. '." Wi) 2.BI f>.C .' :. .... 1 o 4 6" W 4 ~ en . Ii ~ 30 I = u; =i ,. ." @ 1,52AC MAl' ITa I B 17 615 1 3 /2 I I N 6 5 /.0 C,A. T. ~/1'''I t~ 7 B 5. E. 7 TH STREET -. C5!:L LH~F ] 2 I M 5 4 '.' ,'_ L If 213 4 5 6 7 8 , 3 1 I 9 JO IJ 12 13 14 15 15 17 J6 j9 20 1 22 23 24 , ( l (~ @ (16) I--- r-- @ 1 AC I I 12 I I JO 9 8 7 ,'. ..... .... K 5 , 3 1 I I ..' j'" t - - '-... 9 10 JJ 12 13 14 .15 is S. E. B TH STREET J7 [8 la 20 21 12 23\ 2, 7"0 .' . ... ., ' t ' J i~ ~. ~ ~/4 i/{J7J '4vxtVJ' ~~ L )IYJ 115 0 p.. Ja()l,(jp~ 1'\~ooe~P&' ~ ('\ J~ 2. .22. < 2. 7- 3 E:. OAo O'\o~3!' I AC 32 ~.. ] AC @ @) .BJ AC ~ @) ,BO AC @ ~ 20 A / U @ v 1.66 A @ I;, 2_ 95 AC h @> Ba AC \,JJ) 2.51 AC fl. 92 At Ii . , 50 3 -~ Parcel c [TV L I H [ is CD 'Ta.yhr Cr~;>..k l?ow ,\v: "C 22 21 20 JO ~ ~~ ~~ ! "~ "8 13 I ~BI 1/ " 1,',1/[/ -} Lv:;; 177 / 1;;-; N mil I f:f w ~:;: r9 7 112 ~ / B j 171 ;\t2S " l82 170 c(1 103 J 69 <" . cP 184 ~ , I , 204 203 202 157 201 ~ <:<;;, ~ 185 --' >- 2GO 156 ~ S .-' 187'88 ~,;~165 16' "f laB 190 Ja6 JBB IBB la7 laG j9j 195 () boo 194 193 0'R'5 (0 cP CITY L [ H I is BOH SLlP -('-7 be Q hQj}d (:;7) eJ 1 I":; 3~S' e e City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Ma . III .. o COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES 'I II " ~ :r:~l'-T _,:~7:~'1 ~~!~![: - tiW~ ~-.~~~b T:.]! COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE o SINGLE. FAMILY MULTI. FAMILY :. ;f::;H"t'~1; ~""",..p i:"~~~~I~ I !_~'-~~ Drawn By: Global Mapping, Inc. November 18, 2005 o 625 1,250 2,500 3,750 5,000 Feet General Nole!: Alleys shown hereon ere 15 or 20 feet In width. See IIppropr1ooe subdMslon pll!l for spec,"c IIl1ey wIdths. This map has been complied from the most current data Ewalleble. The City otOk88chobee Is nol responsIble I'or any errors or omissions conl.llu,ed herein. - - ", SURVEYING + MAPPING, INC. L.B. Number 7278 8455 SE MAY TERRACE. HOBE SOUND, FL 33455 PH 772/545-2315 FAX 772/545-2318 LEGAL DESCRIPTION for PARCEL 2; WEST OF TAYLOR CREEK RIGHT-OF-WAY LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL#2-A Being a parcel of land lying within the Southwest quarter (1/4) of Section 22, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE at the Northwest corner or the Southwest quarter (1/4), of said Section 22, Thence South 00017'36" East along the West boundary line of said Section 22, a. distance of 212.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence North 89044'49" East a distance of 1,441.65 feet to a point lying on the westerly right-of-way line of Taylor Creek as shown on a Plat recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 83; Thence South 16059'49" West, along said westerly right-of-way line, a distance of 319.94 feet; Thence South 19038'07" West, continuing along said right-of-way, a distan ce of 838.97 feet; Thence South 20017'30" West, continuing along said right-of- way, a distance of 455.95 feet, to the north line of Parcel 4, as described In Official Records Book 507, Page 209 of the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida, said line measuring 901.00 feet north of and parallel with the south line of said Section 22. Thence South 89020'09" West along a line being 901.00 feet North of, when measured at right angles, and parallel with the Southerly boundary of Section 22, a distance of 517.92 feet; Thence North 00017'36" West, a along a line measuring 210.00 feet east of when measured at right angles, and parallel with the west boundary of said Section 22, a distance of 36.00 feet; Thence South 89020'09" West, a along a line measuring 937.00 feet north of when measured at right angles, and parallel with the Southerly boundary of said Section 22, a distance of 210.00 feet, to a point on the aforementioned West boundary line of said section 22; Thence North 00017'36" West, along the west line of said Section 22, a distance of 1008.37 feet; Thence North 89020'09" East, perpendicular to and parallel with the Southerly boundary of said Section 22, a distance of 200.00 feet; Thence North 00.17'36" West along a line 200.00 feet perpendicular to and parallel with the Westerly boundary of Section 22 a distance of 450.00 feet; Thence South 89020'09" West along a line parallel to the Southerly boundary of said Section 22, a distance of 200.00 feet, to a point on the aforementioned Westerly boundary line of said Section 22; SHEET 1 OF Thence North 00017'36" West, along said line westerly boundary, a distance of 32.50 feet to THE POINT -OF -BEGINNING. SEAL Containing 32.97 acres, more or less. NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER THIS IS NOT A SURVEY CERTIFICATE THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT Tl-iE SKETCH SHOWN HEREON AND THE ATTACHED DESCRIPTION IS ACCURATE AND CORREC AND BELIEF AND DOES NOT REPRESENT A FIELD SURVEY. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS SKETCH D SCRIPTIO STANDARDS SET FORTH UNDER RULE 61G17-6 OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE PURSU C flIPT 02-20-06 TM PROFESSI JOSEPH J. LAVE DA TE OF SKETCH 02-20-06 @2006 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE TS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL 27. FLORIDA STATUTES. REVISIONS SUBMITTAL DATE BY FilE NAME TCFV _S&D.dwg ~'- SURVEYING + MAPPING, INC. L.B. Number 7278 8455 SE MAY TERRACE. HOBE SOUND. FL 33455 PH 772/545-2315 FAX 772/545-2318 SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION for PARCEL 2i WEST OF TAYLOR CREEK RIGHT-OF-WAY (fJ "<t "<t ~ :;;: :r: (5 I P.O.C. N.W. COR. S.W.1/4 SEC.22 TWP. 37 S. RGE 35 E: FOUND AXLE TAYLOR PG. 60 SCALE: 1 n= 300' SECTION 22 TUwNSHIP 37 S, RANGE 35 E, P.O.B. S,E, 8TH NOO.l7' 36"W :;: o ci 3< '.... 0 .... '" 'j-....~ rN SUNTRUST BANK. NA ~ 0'> PARro. 2-et-37-35-DA00-00<8 v: ::::> lO KEMP PROPERTIES PARCEl. 2-21-'n-35-tJA00-00.47 lY ~ vi w Z ::J c.:: W I- Z W U PARCEL 1 2.408 ACRES fRAM( AI.. TDBULO. TRUSTEE. ET AI... PARCEL 2-21-37- 35-0A00-004S fRANK AND ETHEL AL TOBELLO PAACQ. 2-et-37-35-OAOD-004< PARCEL 3 ABBREVIATIONS: (C) CALCULATED COURSE CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE CM = CONCRETE MONUMENT CONC = CONCRETE PAVEMENT (D) = DEEDED COURSE IRIC = IRON ROD & CAP NIF NOW OR FORMERLY (M) MEASURED COURSE (P) PLA TTED COURSE TYP. TYPICAL nlO BRllThtRS IIEVEllJ'(R'$, lHC. PARCtL e-eJ-37-35-OAOO-00.43 S.W.1/4 SEC.22 TWP. 37 S RGE 35 E <n N.r N<ri z .... o iD ti~ w 0 Ul 0 wro Sb o ;:: z o ~ SURVEY NOTES: 1. BEARING STRUCTURE BASED ON THE WEST LINE OF SECTION 22. TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 35 EAST, BEING SOUTH 00'17'36" EAST, 2. THE SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. 3. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. 22 SOUTH LINE SECTION 22 GRAPHIC SCALE 1 10 20 30 ~ CONCRETE MONUMENT BEARING NOTE THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE REFERENCED TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SUNSET STRIP AIRPARK PER 0.R.B.1593 PAGE 0888. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY JOSEPH J. L DATE OF SKETCH 02-20-06 @2006 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CERTIFICATE THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE SKETCH SHOWN HEREON AND THE ATTACHED DESCRIPTION IS ACCURATE AND Q AND BELIEF AND DOES NOT REPRESENT A FIELD SURVEY. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS SKETCH STANDARDS SET FORTH UNDER RULE 61G17-6 OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE PU REVISIONS SUBMITTAL DATE BY 02-23-06 JJL D PER fILS 4275, STATE OF FLORIDA SURVEYING & MAPPING, INC., flLB727B FILE NAME TCFV_S&D.dwg .. l.,. SURVEYING + MAPPING, INC. L.B. Number 7278 8455 SE MAY TERRACE. HOBE SOUND. FL 33455 PH 772/545-2315 FAX 772/545-2318 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR A PORTION OF PARCEL 2;TAYLOR CREEK RIGHT-OF-WAY ABANDONMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION RIGHT OF WAY ABANDONMENT of Taylor Creek Being a parcel of land lying within the Southwest quarter (1/4) of Section 22, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE at the Northwest corner of the Southwest quarter (1/4), of said Section 22, Thence South 00'17'36" East along the West boundary line of said Section 22, a distance of 212.00 feet; Thence North 89'44'49" East, along the North boundary line of Parcel 2, as described in Official Records Book 507, Page 209 of the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida, a distance of 1269.30 feet, to the intersection of said north line and the westerly right-of-way line for Taylor Creek, as described in Plat Book 2, Page 83 of the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida, said intersection being the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continue North 89044'49" East, along said north boundary, a distance of 172.49 feet to a point being a 30.00 feet offset from the existing top of bank as delineated in a Boundary and Topographic Survey dated 01-25-06 by Survco Surveying and Mapping, Inc.. Thence along said offset line the following 10 (ten) courses: Thence S 22"49'55" W, for a distance of 292.31 Thence S 13'46'58" W, for a distance of 116.51 Thence S 36022'43" W, for a distance of 127.60 Thence S 37'29'44" W, for a distance of 133.27 Thence S 18009'51" W, for a distance of 140.95 Thence S 01054'50" W, for a distance of 179.24 Thence S 17'53'50" W, for a distance of 154.70 Thence S 19037'24" W, for a distance of 158.12 Thence S 20'19'28" W, for a distance of 230.67 Thence S 00059'20" W, for a distance of 105.98 to the north line of Exhibit "A, as described in Official Records Book 507. Page 209 of the Public Records of Okeechobee County. Florida, said line measuring 901.00 feet north of and parallel with the south line of said Section 22. Thence South 89020'09" West along a line being 901.00 feet North of, when measured at right angles, and parallel with the Southerly boundary of Section 22, a distance of 175.57 feet to said westerly right-of-way for Taylor Creek; Thence northerly along said right-of-way the following 3 (three) courses: Thence N 20'17'30" E, for a distance of 455.95 Thence N 19038'07" E, for a distance of 838.97 Thence N 16059'49" E, for a distance of 319.94 To said north boundary of Parcel 2, and the POINT OF BEGINNING SHEET 1 OF 2 SEAL Containing 4.51 acres, more or less. NOT VALID 'MTHOUT THE SIGNA TURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER REVISIONS DATE BY y DRAWN BY TM APPER #LS 4275. STATE OF FLORIDA SURVEYING & MAPPING. INC.. #LB7278 CHECKED BY FILE NAME JJL TCFV_S&D.dwg CERllFICATE THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE SKETCH SHOWN HEREON AND THE ATTACHED DESCRIPTlON IS ACCURATE AND C AND BELIEF AND DOES NOT REPRESENT A FIELD SURVEY. I FURTHER CERTlFY THAT THIS SKETC AND DESC STANDARDS SET FORTH UNDER RULE 61G17-6 OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE PUR 0 CH SUBMITTAL 02-23-06 JJL PR r=: JOSEPH J. LA DATE OF SKETCH 02-23-06 - --~ SURVEYING + MAPPING, INC, L.B. Number 7278 8455 SE MAY TERRACE, HOSE SOUND, FL 33455 PH 772/545-2315 FAX 772/545-2318 SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION for PARCEL 2; WEST OF TAYLOR CREEK RIGHT-OF-WAY ffi P.O.C. N.W. COR. S.W.1/4 SEC.22 1WP. 37 S, RGE 35 E: FOUND AXLE NOO'17'36"W P.O.B. 1"= 300' TAYLOR COVE P.B.5, PG. 60 S.E. 8TH STREET SB9'20'09"W 200.00'~ ~ II i'i' :1 !1.< ~? i;rlfi '" ~ ?i ~ 0 I <:> n2 I (/) => U') n:: vi W Z ::; 0:: W I- Z W U ?o ...- on ... . "I' N ,CT> SUNTRUST BANK. NA 8 PARCEl. 2-21-37-~ Z KEMP PROPERTIES PARCEL 2-21-37.3S--tlAOO-OO47 f a; N89'ZO'09"E ZOO.OO' G~O LAND DEVELOPERS. LLC PARtn ~-2l-37-3S-0A00-C046A IBA BROTHERS INC PARtn ~-2l-37-3S-0A00-<<M6 PARCEL l Z.40B ACRES FlW<< AL,TDllELlO" TRUSTEE., ET~ PARCO.. 2-21~31~3S-GA00-0045 FRANK AND ETHEL Al TOBEllO PARW. E-i!1-31-35-1lAOO-OO<< ~ to r- ,....,,...., i-.cri 1;8 o ~ Z NO llROThUlS DEVrUI'DlS. IHC. PAAcrL ~-i!1-37-3S-OAOO-OO<3 S89'20'09"W 210.00 210.13' (D) PARCEL 3 Ln N-T Ntei Z '<t aU') B;: Wo (/)0 wCo So o ?i Z 21 22 C NCRETE MONUMENT SOUTH LINE SECTION 22 GRAPHIC SCALE 1 100 200 300 ~ LINE Ll L2 L3 L4 L5. LlS L7 L8 L9 LlO W --.J ~ N89'44' 49"E 1269.30' NORTH LINE PARCEL Z ROW ABANDONMENT 196,280 sq.ft. 4,51 o.cres '0 o d on .... e ;;;: ;;;: . . to .... ,....,.... }....f-. , , 00 00 zZ PARCEL 2 LINE TABLE LENGTH BEARING 292.31 S22' 49'55"w' illS.51 S13046'5B"w' 127.60 S36'22'43'W' 133,27 S37'29'44'W' 140,95 S18009'51 'W' 179.24 SD1054'50'W' 154.70 S17'53'50'W' 15B.12 S19'37'24'W' 230.67 S20'19'2B'W' 105,98 SOO'59'20'W' ABBREVIATIONS: (C) = CALCULATEO COURSE CLF = CHAIN LINK FENCE CM = CONCRETE MONUMENT CONC = CONCRETE PAVEMENT (D) = DEEDED COURSE IR/C = IRON ROD & CAP N/F = NOW OR FORMERLY (M) = MEASURED COURSE (P) = PLATTED COURSE TYP. = TYPiCAL NOOi7'36.W 36.00' S89'20'Ol"W 820.2Z' 8 ~ SURVEY NOTES: 1. BEARING STRUCTURE BASED ON THE WEST LINE OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 35 EAST, BEING SOUTH 00'17'36" EAST. 2. THE SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND RAISED SEAL OF A FLORiDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. 3. THIS is NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. BEARING NOTE THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE REFERENCED TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SUNSET STRIP AIRPARK PER 0.R.B.1593 PAGE 0888. SHEET 2 OF 2 THIS IS NOT A SURVEY DATE BY CERTIFICATE THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE SKETCH SHOWN HEREON AND THE ATTACHED DESCRIPTION IS AC AND BELIEF AND DOES NOT REPRESENT A FIELD SURVEY. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS SKET H STANDARDS SET FORTH UNDER RULE 61G17-6 OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE PURSU NT. REVISiONS SUBMITTAL 02-20-06 TM PROFESSIO JOSEPH J. LA VEl: DATE OF SKETCH 02-20-06 FILE NAME TCFV _S&D. dwg J.er & Associates, Inc e Marine & Environmental Consulting 705 Boston Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34950 PHONE: (772) 466-5201 ! FAX: (772) 466-5203 E-MAIL youmans@bellsouth.net February 10, 2006 Environmental Site Assessment Property Location: PIN's: 2-22-37-3S-0AOO-00033-0000, 2-22-37-3S-0AOO-00031-0000 & 2-21-37-3S-0AOO-0004S-0000, Okeechobee, Okeechobee County, FL Discussion: The site consists of three contiguous parcels of land that are located along the western bank of Taylor Creek in the town of Okeechobee. These three parcels total approximately 60 acres. Wetlands were identified, delineated and flagged on the site. In addition, the site was inspected for flora and fauna that are listed on the state and federal threatened and endangered species list by Mark Youmans of Ierner and Associates, Inc. These site inspections occulTed over the course of several separate visits in the SUlmner of 2005. Follow-up surveys by Survco Inc. placed the wetland boundary on a celiified land survey. The wetlands were verified by Stephanie Raymond from the South Florida Water Management (SFWMD) on January 22, 2005. On February 8, 2006, Andy Phillips from the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) verified the consultant's jurisdiction wetland findings during ajoinl sitc visit. Three minor wetland areas were added to the weIland inventory. This information is included on the attachcd site map (Exhibit B). A FLUCCS map is included as Exhibit C. Conclusion: Although the three additional wetland areas are updated on the attached site map, the celiified land survey has not yet been upd~ted to include them. This will take place within the next few weeks as scheduling pennits. During the course of the field work, Mark Youmans of Jerner and Associates, Inc. also ~, searched for Flora and Fauna that are listed on the state and federal threatened and endangered species list. No threatened or endangered species have been located on site. This finding was verified by the staff from SFWMD and ACOE. A list of all plant species identified on site is included as Exhibit A. It is of special concern that many ofthe heavily vegetated/forested areas contain large percentages of invasive/exotic plant species that are displacing the native pl311tS. It is recommended that any mitigation plans proposed for this project include plans to eliminate the invasive/exotic species on site. In addition, the hydrology of the cypress slough on the southwestern side ofthe site has been restricted to the point that subsidence ofthe soil is clearly evident. If this condition continues, the cypress canopy will eventually be replaced with upland species. Please see the attached exhibits (A, B & C) for fmiher infonnation. Mark Youmans Jemer & Associates, Inc. EXHIBIT (A) PLANT SPECIES IDENTIFIED ON SITE GENUS/SPEICIES P5ychotria sulzneri Syngonium podophyllum Clerodendrum speciosissimum Celtis laevigata Bidens pilosa Costus pulverulentus Erianthus strictusnaITow Momordica charantia Sida rhombifolia Trema micranthum Cirsium sp. Phyllanthus tenellus Oplismenus setal' ius Thelypteris sp. Urena lobata Sambucus canadensis Ulmus americana Desmodium sp. Eugenia uniflora Hibiscus tiliaceussea Ambrosia artemisiifolia Kalanchoe sp. Phlebodium aureum Parthenocissus quinquefolia Verhesina virginica Rivina humilis f)rYl17anu corda/a Ccnchrus sv Callicarpa americana Eleusinc indica Ficus aurea .Iusticia brandegeana Citrus SP. Spermacoce sp. Spermolepis divaricata Taxodium distichum Dioscorea bulbifera Xanthosoma sagittifolium Lepidium virginicum Bauhinia variegata Camps is radicans Digitaria sp. Schinus terebinthifolius Platanus occidentalis Conyza canadensis Tridax procumbens Tradescantia zebrina Solanum diphyllum Koelreuteria elegans Panicum maximum Quercus virginiana Emilia fosbergii Paspalum SP. COMMON NAME shOlileafwild coffee American evergreen Javanese glorybower sugar-berry; hackbeITY hairy beggar-ticks spiral ginger plumegrass balsampear cuban jute trema thistle Mascarene Island leafflower woods grass shield fem Caesarweed elderberry American elm ticktrefoil Surinam cherry rosemallow annual ragweed kalanchoe golden polypody Virginia creeper white crown beard rougeplant West Indian chickweed sandbur American beautybeITY Indian goose grass Florida strangler fig shrimp plant citrus false buttonweed roughfruit scalcseed bald cypress aIr yam elephant ear Virginia pepperweed mountain ebony trumpet creeper crabgrass Brazilian pepper-tree sycamore Canadian horseweed coatbuttons inchplant two leaf nightshade flamegold gumeagrass live oak Florida tassel flower paspalum HYDROLOGIC STATUS FAC UPL UPL FACW FAC FAC OBL UPL UPL FACW FACW UPL FAC FACW UPL FAC FACW UPL UPL FAC UPL UPL UPL vll1e FAC UPL FAC UPL UPL UPL FAC UPL UPL FAC UPL OBL vme FACW UPL UPL vine FAC FAC FACW UPL UPL UPL UPL UPL UPL UPL UPL FACW EXHIBIT B: - TE MAP N ~ PIN's: 2-22-37-35-0AOO-00033-0000, 2-22-37-35-0AOO-00031-0000 & 2-21-37-35-0AOO-00045-0000, Okef;x::lwbee, Okeechobee County, FL e e EXHIBIT C: F.L.U.C.C.S. MAP e e City of Okeechobee April 25, 2006 re: Traffic Analysis for Taylor Creek Fishing Village Large Scale Amendment Petition No. 06-CI-002 All Board Members: We have in the City files a copy of the Traffic Analysis available for review upon request. A copy was also distributed to LaRue Planning and Management, the City Attorney, the City Administrator, and the City Engineer Betty J. Clement General Services Secretary 55 S.E. Third Avenue. Okeechobee, Florida 34974-2903 . (863) 763-3372. Fax: (R63) 763-1686 ~ ~ >- <( 3: I (') I UJ :=J LO 3: 0 Ct: Ct: UJ w Z ---I Ct: W f- Z W U 5 ruO -n--' wru w""": a'; <: TWP. 37 S RGE FOUND AXLE NOO'17'44'\,J 3250' -L- N89'40'02'E 35729 PARCEL 1 2.408 ACRE S S89'40'02'\,J 35794 5 U1 . ~~ 0'" i. N89'20'31'E 357.84 PARCEL 3 (REMAINING) S89'18'32'\,J 298.25 LESS & EXEMPI PARCEL PARCEL 3 ) ; /J / 6 / ~ / 1 i ~<> fily:::: Q. ~4...~ @ ..... ~ ,~r; t;:) .Jo_ ;1 ~/ ~~Z~~~"":0~ I ,~~ ,1:' ",""" J Ie''''; ~1 ! fg;/ rv' ,g ~(. ClJ' ~ Q.' 0, l I I k ? ! ) ~~II /1: "J I.J.. I I I o I if ~ I lit; SEC.22 S.E. 8TH STREET N89'44'49'E 1441.65 S89'20'09'\,J 200.00' ~ T.B.M. LR.JCAP SURVCO LB7278 EL.l7.64 N 1054800.6460 E 712292.2620 .----- ~.----- ---- CJ) 18~ ,.~ ~ t nI z ~ ~ ~ ~ ... <: t.: CLUMP or (6) CYPRESS TOTAL AREA'" 48.06 ACRES IJETLAND AREA = 8.23 ACRES TOTAL USABLE AREA'" 39.83 ACRES S89'20'09'\,J 200.00' /,/ P.O.c. N89'37'30'E ... 50.00' g ru , -ru './0 ;"-6 row i. T.B.M. I.R.lCAP SURVCO LB7278 ftEL.20.96 ~ 1054283.8140 E 712370.7890 PARCEL 2 42,920 ACRES ffi. OAK {] 36. OAK ( J'ro {] 'S' OAK '\ :Jff:; I. <J '\. "6/Tc'- \ \ _~ so. C~ "", DR.A[I\:ACJE \ [~M[NT 6>('1'1- ~ ~.] "- "~,,/~2.'~;j . "- ~ /.:~~ "" /> ~ \ ~ \ '\ \ ~- ~~,,'C><9 '/.9\, 6'~ V.9\ -------- ------ g ",--, ... 0 wo ...'" i. 'It c:/ &' C{ & 6 ;:: ff "- t} t} }j \::' c, ffi 'CACC "",CO- LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS (AS SUPPLIED BY CLIENT) b~J.;.. g~~c~C~. ,,:o~~y~? s::..u:: ~~~""is:. ... Ok..cholilH eo...,ty, F'torlda ~ _no "llI"'P partlcultu"\y uscrlbl'du Fall"... ~c.. 1l1: Uw HorthMs1: c.:rnw or the Soo..thecst I" of Swctlon 211 thWlCI' $cuth OO'll'U' LQ.lit along tM EAst boundCl1"y line 0' Sl'Ctlan 21 0. d1st4t>c1' of 'J2L50 r.'1: to the PCIHT-Qf'-JlE(iINNlHG.I tlwftc:1 corotlnu.lr South 00'17"44' E...1: IllOl'lQ nld Iilounrklry ~. :,~i~f:.a'J..o:t 2:3;.~tI::: o~ ;~t~~. Il~t I~ Otl th.- Eut.rly ~t-o'-"'o.y In of SJt. ~ ~t~~I~~~r~~"lII~~~."'~}t~~ ~t to j~t~.:'~ ~~ar.a:~'~~" c1stnrcr "f C4nto.lnll"Q 2.408 o.c:ru, IOOr"I' or Len Belng ~J..ct to tl.,,~ Rlghtl-of-...."y Gl'ld/",. E,u,..,...,ts of t'Korc1 PARCEU2 D"scrlpt'on :,n~~~~111~~~ ~~wt~E6~:' ~=:'l" o~ S~tlon County, Florida.. Cll'ld bftoIg __ partlcul..r1y a..o-!\:l..d 'lli fallaw.. CCl'Il'IenCI' ..t th.. Horth....rt cern.... Df ~ Sout)"ns't :.. or .,,"" S'l:tIon ZZ. thnIc" Scut'1 :lO"17'U' Elllt A1ClnQ the 'Jest Ioound..,.)' u". of sQId s..::tIon I!.l! .. ....tuc.. 0' ~l2.On ,...t to ~ F'OINT-(f"-II(GDtitNGJ tNna Itor'tl'I 8'.1'47'03' E...1: II. etrtN'1CI' Dr 1567.SI ~crt to Il II'*'''' IINlQ ~ the cl'1'lbl'" IJnIo of Tll.y\lliI'" Crel'kl 1:hIl!'\l,.-' o.lCI'lg II ICI'lg d"IOt"d ...~,......m:lng5GldClt'n'ter~ofT...ylor-c...""'SOUtn 1"Q2'03'" "'iI!'st a. d1si:a.ncil!' of 415.00 rltlt't to II pcW1tl ::~ ~;~ 1~~21~~.~~~:,1~8~ 'ut 'to Q palr'lt, then.:;. continuing ..long 1IClld ",,,,,ttr .Jr.. :,lo;&;r';:'~~ ~~~~:I~'~~ 'W::,k:o~d!'!I~;r o.lcng Q liol. 9CILOO ,..t Narth of and po.rCll.IPl to. tM South..-ly lDoundG.r-y or s.ctIoro ee .. d1.t"l"IC~ of 81!Q.2!!: ,..t to II poIntl ttwnc. Nor-1:h 00'17'44' v.tot II d1sta.,ot<:. ~~jl:~~:f~f~~Ok ~:=!o:~;, .. 'nt t<:l II paIrlt 01'1 the' ",'gr_ntlCFIu v.,t~)' !.1M <:Ir ,oJd SItCtkln .!eJ thitnc:. NQrth 00'\7'44' v.,t l\ dllIitG1lC. o.f looa37 ,..t to 0 P<*"tlth.nce I'lor'th 8'J'l!O'O'J' EAst aLang... llrllt po.ro..U~ to thIt St:utner\y boundcvy of SltCtlOI'l 22 ... d1stvK:e or 2llO.OO fnt to '" pantl ~. Nor"th 00'17''''" \I.st ..long ... u... por..U"" to ttw v.sterl.y Daundu-y of S..::tlon 22 .. IhtCl.n<:. ",r :~: :-::. ~lr:n:~ ~~=~y 8~=;,/:~t S.ct:lan e.J!... d1uan<:. g' eao.aa ,.,..t to II. point Of> to"e ..FOI"_ntlca....d""ltsbPrty bQur"ldo...y Un. of SoJdSKtIo" 2f, tn.n<:. ~th OO"17'U""".rt ..long 5..1c1 I.InIt 0. d1,ta.nc.gF 32.~ '..ttot~Pl)lnt....,F-lloeglrnlnQ. Conto.lrWI<i14Z.'JCOCl~s."'Ol"eor\.n_ BPlng:sulCl.J.d:toClRlght....,f-""ayEas.,.,.ntFQt" To..ylo' c....,. ..s re<:Ot'6rd W. I'I000t BOO!< 2 I'ago' 83 or 1:tI. Ok..<:noh.... Cou.,tyRecordsnr.dsul:lJKttocn.nr,~t-eF-\l")I'S [:t;~I~:)I,\I:r :;' 4~~'j~~a~:c~ ~]Qk50_2~1l :~,?..;~e-<.~ to o.,w ot,,~, ~lY't~.c;"\Jov ono/a- ,,~~n,.,.', '10-\-0---\ ~ utc~Q., ~( Q\\ ~OJ\~lS:; 5\.~b~ SURV&Y NDTESI Sheet 1 lI.E::U:RlPTI~ fit po.rcel 0' lD.nd lying .l'UWl Sl!'ctlOl'l 22.. r....,sNp 37 !>outh, RlI."~ JS (...t, Gc.it<:.hClb.. CCIUI'lty, F\CIr'ia. Sold ~~~ ~~ ~~.~.:-:", T~'~~'~ ;!~ c....1I'k l/oIpr'gVI!'",,,,,t' P\Clt. Ac.Ctlr"dlng to the plAt tn....a' ...<:ordu In P\a.t Book 2, Po.ge 83 of ttIIt Pulollc FI.cords 0' C)c""'c\'Io*I.1t Coo.roty, F1Drlda. o.nd MIrIQ 1'10I". po.rtl<:ulQJ"\y lM-so-lb.d QS 'oIlo.so c-.n<:. (l,t u.. Sa..othll..t <:ClI"nIt.. of s.rct:lofl22 To."shlpJ7South,IIQl"Ig..J:lEo.st,[Ic~c.o...rty, a:~u":"~:':~~:':o'"~ ~'~a:~:~, ~4~"~ to. th-. So..th llnlt 0' sIl.lCII lo.nd dl!'salbN n llnI 507. PClg. 208 Uld 209, thllnCl! <:an~ Ncrth OO'l8'lIO" ......t o.l<lf'QsaJdlJ.stu,.,.,CldlltQnC;.oF414.87Fu'ttoh North Un. Oof SClId lCllldIi d.scrb In lJrl:I sa,. /'Got' 2Qfh thlttlC:,. dItpa...ttng ,o..ld """.-1: SltCtlOI'I LIM. r'U'l Nlrtn 99'\8'32' (ut alor'lg said North lln.. Go cl5t~ of o!lO.IJ '.etl 'tlo'lltfl<:. <:0I'lt!rIuIt Cl\ong SClId I'IoI-th \Init, South 00'\3'21' EClSt. II d1st<lnl:. of 35.98 ,..t\ then<:.- Harth 89'ZO'OI'(o.stcontlrlu!ngCllOtlgs4k/;Nor-thlln..o.dlrl..".:;. of !i15.49 rut to. Narth~,t am.,. or 5o.l?i lands desc...lb.d In Orl:l 507. P..g. 208, ~ a. pcio'It CI"l tNr 'Jnt IV'" Urw of tlw Il'or-nnld 'hylCll" e.-..k'" o.nd ttw e~ e:9'~~tth(L= :~~~~.~~,""" old Nor-tn llnit. Go clsto.nl:.. gF 17'5.57 F...t to II. polrtt locatitd apt:lr'o."""'t.My 30 r..'t ......t of thIt V,"t bo.r'c o.F 'TClyl.Ot" er......... 110. .~ Clnd locot.dl thitoncIt DpllJ"tIrlg "lei .ortl'r'lMd line. nil CllCInQ II IIow ~ with lLI'lol JC ,..t 'J.st of (As "'l!'llSUI""H o.t IlIQht o.ngln to)sl1ido.ppo-o><""'tl!'''''.lItlMrl<oF'TCl)llorCrI'itl<'',tftIt Follc:r.lng Courli.F South 15'21'15' "'I'I-t, 63.03 '..tl South 16"35'19' ......t. lO2.IB '..tl South l.ll'2lI":!I' ....st. 22.tlI 'utI South 00'4:1'1)6' lJ.~t 47,7B F...tl So..rth 18'Z3'45' ["'I<tB9.'306 ,_tl$cutl-Im7"17'''''E4st 4L6:Jr...t tottw ,"tltrnc:tlM ,,' th. utl'l'lslorl of tt. South line g' so.Id 14"dl< In llrkl S07.f'4". ZOBl th....,.,. dlt'p4l"'ting u)d p4I"'4l\ItI Un'" "'UI"l South 89'1~'33 lJlts.1: oJ.ong S4/d ItXbPrtD:>n to th. w.t_UCtlo"..th the of.,....SAiallJ..-t.ll,,,,, Iln. of 'hylOl" ernk'l tn....<:. """ Harth 34'06'22" lJlI5t 4long r;:<>Jd\,/...t.ll/Vlln..Il....to.nc.&3.0'5,..ttolLr'l4l'lQi. "...,tlnsoJd~tthlt'nl:.<:Ot'ItIrIulrIg..thu.ldhl"U'l North 19'19'15' E:4st ..Long 10,,1<1 .....t .II"'" lInIt', 4 ...t""",. 0' 3ZL15 'u,t to 1:hP point ot bIt'-~ [xt!IT'A'(f",."",o.RIi.507.F'o.ge209) l4nd.. lying '" ~<:tIon.. 21 and 22, To.....sNp "S1 South, ~Cl"'gIt 35 ~:~~:.~~o;~ty, florid4, bIt'In9 _. pnrtkulo.rl)' ll(Ci[NN!fiC; Clt a point S.7 ,..t NOI'tn 0' tM Sou1:hal<t CCII"'"'''''' or S1tctlo...21,tnQ......".,., \,i~5t 361 ,..1. to th.. Eo.s.t bour\d<>o"y <:I' Po.rrott "'~.non, th....<:. r"\m North 414 f'..t to Cl point, th..-..::. .....,._ E05t. plU"ollltUrlg thIt South ~y llrl. 0' Hld S.ct",nZl,o.cI\Sto.nc:. of 361 ,..t to th~ Inter's.<:tlor! cf' thIt [ut klOlldo..ry l!noI of "..~ S.ctlon 211 tn.n.:;....un S-outh 414 '..t to tn... f'DlNr or BEGINNrNG. IlEG11'!NING o.t "lK"r'lt 5.' h....tNor-th of tn.P South_5t s.ctl"...Z2.tn...."""'N"rtho"t...S..:;t!o"Llr'lIto. ctst/VIC.. of 39a r....t, tr-..,.nc:1t' ,.,.,., [<>5t 210 F...ltt, trwt\C~ ..........Sout...)6f..t,tI"....c...-u'lE.."'tto~ ...g'H of-..o.y or ;0.)110.- Cr"'."", th.....,ce ,.,.,o.ro<jtrlnQ <>.Long """ '..1..5' ""..,....do,..-y M r"y\Of" '-:r_k ~Q " p<>b"o~ d.... ~u' ~1~~..O;'o~~~;~~r..:';gl...~g. tn-.- -~ "-un ....st to thP A ",Of" t.o..- of P""".., 4"". LV'.-.y "" S.O'1.'o.. 2.. T,,~n"""~ )7 s.c...". R""gO" 15 E~st. [)H....cno"e-.. (nu"'l. '-'''''''d''. "e'~ """.. P"'~'~u''''''y ...."crl"..oJ "s FOil"..... eo"",."",.nIJ "t tr-e- Soutn..nst COrnltf'" of snI" S~c~,c~ 2l. ....".. ...".. '" 00'18"OO""''''5t. o.leng tn. East llr>lt of SltCtlon 2't. t" ~n.. Soutn.4St cor..,.,.. of S4Id ?..,..<:~ 42A, " lII.t"""". of :!l46.4~ rPltt) th....~1t IM'v South ~'42"2't''''.5t, a.lorog OM SOUthllnPo.'..o.Jd?<>.rc.l4.eJ!l,..ct.tlOn<;lto(:S'l.'J3F......t to th.. POINT IT IlEGtNNINGl tn.nc. continue s.outh 89"42"21...-...t, ll.long tI-tIt South Unit 0' s<>lei ?vc,"" 42.4, to thIt lrlt....SltCtlor'I .-ltn th. E:a.st r\Ql'>t....,,-.o.y of $t..t.. Ro"a No. 15. " "stanc. of' 300.110 r..,tl t:hItn<:.. De<:V North OO.Ul'16"'ut otong the sold Eut r"\gl'lt-o,-....)' 0' Sto.tIt Reod No. t~ llnCI thI' \I'"t llnIO of soJd F'o....<:.l ~2A, 0. d1stCl.l'<:. ef 364.93 '''1:.1 thltnC. bl"OT North 99'43'42'(Cl,t, . <A,t4n<;.. 0' 3OO.Olt 'It..'t) tt'IIOnC. W<lT" So.....I:" OO.\O'!i6'[a.t....d1na.nc. rJFJ64.8t ,....t to ~ POrNl Ilf" BEUlNNING: LltgCll. d..scr-Iptlcm ukltn F...DP1 ~~.y .t" July 13, 1"9. jT.po.r"t'd by Le\o.nd Dyels. RLSt 2084, bitftg joill'lO. 4522. 1, SUBJECT PROPERTY ues IN Few. cot.IMUNlTY PANa. NO. t2017& lJNMAPP8). 2. NO SEARCH OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS WERE PERFORMED FOR E:."K:lJMBRANCES OR OTHER MATTERS OF lT11.E.. 3.. NO ENCFlOACHMENTS WERE FOUND, EXCePT AS SHOWN. 4. NO UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS WERE LOCA.TED 5. THIS SURVEY 18 NOT COVERED BY PROFESSIONAl. UA8IUTY lfllS! 1~JfCE. 8. lAST DATE OF SURVEY: OCTOBER 13, 2006. 7, PROPERTY ADDRESS: STATE ROAD 16" U.8.HIGHVVAY 441. a. BEARlNGSARE BASED ON NONUMeNreD WEST UNE OF SECTION Za:.. T37'S, R35E. 8. COOROllNAlEBARE BASED ON FLORIOASTATE PLANE COORDlMA.n:SYSlEM-fAST ZONE. HAD '83 AND I!LEVATIONS ARE BASeDOH NAVD '88 QA.nJM, BOTHME' REFeRNECEDTO NGS IlIONUMENT s 523 FOUND IN nIE CENTER MEDIAN OFU.a. 441. 10. nus SURVEY CERTIFIED TO a.ose CON8TR\JC71ON, tNC. LEGEND: o - 5/8" OIA IRON ROO/CAP LB7278 (OR AS NOTED) P.O.C. P.O.B. C.M. IR/C M : : POINT Dr COMMENCE MEN' : POINT OF BEGINNING : CONCRETE MONUMENT : IRON ROD & CAP MEASURED COURSE S[;.l JOSEPH J. LA.\ot.TSXY, P_5.l.I 4275 of 1 '" D W '.1-, g ~ " '" Z '" 0 --" " i= <( i3 Q ~ in 0:: u 2 ~ (/) CD w :::l '< 0 (f) ~ lCJ 0 w I 0 ~ N L 0 0 I "*' ~ ~ " W g " > ~ ,;; ~ ~ ::1 w ~ IJJ G: ~ U cD H " Q) coO ~ al 0 - .t= ~ - (,) ~ o CIl - CIl 8.><: ~ ~ ffi 0 <Ii Cl.'Q :g <C ~ -g~.Q Q 0 :@slJ.. 08- Z ~ ~ 0 d:Q).... .t=S :J ~ >....w .&.5 Q) 0 0 al 'C :5 Q)$c: :5t\l:c ~ ~ 5:Ej .... 0 0 Lf) Z Lf) (L o;!' (L r<) <( r<) 2 --" lL ~ ci co 0 z ;;:, Z :::l >= 0 N (/) lCJ W > W o;!' lCJ Ct: CD N ..... :::l 0 '" (j] I r--- c r--- 0 W x ~ U <( D- <( u.. V Ct: '0 Ct: 0 w @ e- lCJ >- ;;:, a u <( N 1: 2 lCJ :J .... (j] w lCJ vi N r--- .:.i Lf) r--- <( . Lf) .... I 2 <X) Q W e e /~. Landscape Buffer /' r"t~r. f...t,p~ [.;,tiny SITE DATA: Total Site Area: Wotlond: u... ';;;t" ram,l, 'e,,,,, Co~ .//.// / 2.D\l2.874 IfJ48.l16 IV;. (1001) 186,086 1114.24 IV;. (81) 1l5,41O IIJ2.18 IV;. (51) 104.544 1112.4 At. (51) \706,954 11139.18 IV;. (521) 229lJrvts 5.84 OUt IV;. Holding SWlgIo Fanily Mu~-Fanily Vacant .~ ~r_ Taylor Creek ROW eornr-cial Pod: Not Raoidanllaf Area: Total Urlta: Not _lIaf Donoity: ZOOniJ Land Usa: Propoaad Land Uaa: Existing Use: BUILDING DATA: /r Proposed ROW to be Abandoned (varies) 30 l.nItl RasI_1 Pod Po;. Townhomas: (2 & 3 slory) RasI_1 Pod B: Townhomas: (2 & 3 story) Condon*1Uns: (3 & 4 slory) __ Pod C: Townhomas: (2 & 3 slory) R_I Pod D: CondomnUna: (3 & 4 slory) 291.1'it1 80 ""la Landscape Buffer .~/,-- Parking 20 l.nItl 70 ",Ita -~--------~-~ -----l Total Uni1 Count Townhomas: CondominUna: 79 unit. 150 <.nIta 229 urNta lcod".. 2"",". //.. Boat Basin /- Wave Attenuator Existing Vegetation to remain -~~ /r Marina (96 slips) Site Amenities: Recreational Pod (0,31 AcJ Clubhouse Pool Gazabo Tiki Bar Tennis Coun Lagoon Boat Ra""" Balt Shop Marfna ~~~'Ie SinYIe'o,'T'.,,'Ie';OO"lia ./-- Temporary Parking and Unloading/Loading Zone ~-- Boardwalk One Way Drive Aisle & Emergency Access Parking .- Marina Entry/Exit /- Bait & Tackle Shop //. Fuel Docks Area to be selectively cleared and replanted .. Boat Ramps General Notes - All building, parking and access arees shall document compliance with the requirements of the American Disabilities Act prior to the issuance of 0 building permit. - Refer to landscape Pion for landscape detaiis and specifications. - AJI exotic plant species sholl be removed and 011 required landscaping shail be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. - All improvements shall be constructed in one phase. - All signs will comply with the sign regulations at the time of permitting. - ~No Tresposs~ signs to be posted during construction and displayed at 011 entrances and exits - All building numbers to be no less thon four (4) inches toll, illuminated, a'1d not blocked by landscaping. - Sediment control measures sholl be maintained in working order at all times. - Provisions sholl be mode ta minimize the deposit of sediment by transport vehicles onto pUblic paved surfaces. - Sediment basin and traps, perimeter dikes. sediment barriers and other measures intended to trap sediment sholl be constructed as a first step in any land activity and shall be mode functional before land disturbance tokes place. - All trees to be preserved ore to be properly barricaded and kept free from debris, fill, and 011 barricades will be inspected by the City prior to any land clearing. - All sidewalks are to be a minimum of 6' in width ond will be constructed of paver block, brick or pink concrete. Residential Pod D (5.34 AcJ Condominiums (70 units) '-"'-- Boat Drop-off Staging Lane Landscape Buffer (enhancement of existing landscape) CANAL TO - Relocated Canal ---.------------ ~~ V",,,/ V"V V Lucido & Associates Land Planning I Landscape Architecture 701 Ec.:-.IlMI"SUrt,FlDrIdI:Ml* (777)22G-21CO. Fu(712)22J..0220 l00A_A!UII2A,fonPlwol,F1artdl:wQSO (712)~-1301.Fu(7T2).4ll1-1303 S27Nolt1Tlw:J:nl1:ln""""",.~,Acn:IJ,32803 {4(IT)I!I98-t521,Fu(.t07)1!l6-918I Key I Location: '2nd st.. Sl'/2nd si ", SE 2nd ~ 9N 3rd sf Sl'I~Sl ~; S€~SlJ}~Sf<l1ll~' ';i~.e ~L.OC'U.i ::: ..1. :...~....~...:s.t. ~;, 'Illh SI! swat, $1-1 it ~)l~9-i , 9th st- E- 1::/',> - sw lObS! (~~r ~. ....li~ :. l :i~'~ : : Sl'/ 15thSI ;~:l'/~ sw.1SffiSt ~~h Ln Scale: N.T.S Project Team: ,.. --. j"",C;;;C 5.,.,.::g!L '1I:i1l2!nllrI,ClII1h; 'mlln . 46EHII t:J)1'iW,*"t.w ~otlf SO.J ,O""C~~ '1;l1tlilae7: I "'." Ern'. ~I~~ i)Il1jclhf( !~'S'l"mte Carn&!t1!l .leme'8I"'l -. 1101 SEW:mr-~BllIl )O~ !lif!tIII 'Sl.rm.l..w. nf'_~l , '1'IIr '"'''''' -~, " , Tor . "l , PII131 Lwe fl34lB:' JOZlSftj I nJmm! crrrmPlan IfIltr.llllj,9 Glrtm: l'lI~cttJa 'LuC,'OOllM~'l;ClOle5 - CllSfCCl 1ll0All! ASot!2-A: ~_O~ \'1/ .If --- F1~;~].1.lil+_ o.~!~ Taylor Creek Fishing Village Conceptual Plan Okeechobee, Florida Date By Description 2.27.06 e SCALE: 1" z n.t.I. 0' REG. # 1018 Thomas P. Lucido 0' 0' DeSigner Man_ Project Number Municipal Number Computer Fie -sw -MM - 06.035 - NA S_ 1 of 1 Conceptual site pIan.dwg e 1375 JacksoIllii.treet, Suite 206 Fort Myers, _ida 33901-2845 Phone: 239-334-3366 Fax: 239-334-6384 Email: larue-planning@att.net LaRue Planning & Management Services, Inc. Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: Owner: From: To: CBC Management Corpo FrankAltobello, Trustee Single-Family Residentinl Multi-Family Residential Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: CBC Management Corp. 06-C1-002 General Information Agent: Thomas Close Phone Number: 863-467-0831 Owner of Record: Frank AltobeHo Property Control Number 2'-22-27-35-0AOO:O0031-0000 Zoning District Density Holding and PUB RMF 132 du 330 du * The acreage would be 37.48 if Taylor Creek Row is abandoned. Legal Description: Being a parcel of land lying within the Southwest quarter of Section 22, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida, and being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Northwest corner of the Southwest quarter of said Section 22, thence South 000 17' 36" East along the West boundary line of said Section 22 a distance of 212.00 feet to the POINT-OF-BEGINNING; thence North 890 44' 49" East a distance of 1441.65 feet to a point lying on the westerly right-of-way line of Taylor Creek as shown on a Plat recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 83; thence South 160 59'49" West, along said westerly right-of-way line, a distance of 319.94 feet; thence South 19038'07" West, continuing along said right-of-way, a distance of 838.97 feet; thence South 20017'30" West, continuing along said right-of-way, a distance of 455.95 feet, to the north line of Parcel 4, as described in Official Records Book 507, Page 209 of the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida, said line measuring 901.00 feet north of and parallel with the south line of said Section 22. Thence South 89020'09 West along a line being 901.00 feet North of, when measured at right angles, and parallel with the Southerly boundary of Section 22, a distance of 517.92 feet; thence North 00017'36" West, a along a line measuring 210.00 feet east of when measured at right angles, and parallel with the west boundary of said Section 22, a distance of 36.00 feet; thence South 89020'09" West, a along a line measuring 937.00 feet north of when measured at right angles, and parallel with the Southerly boundary of said Section 22, a distance of 210.00 feet, to a point on the aforementioned West boundary line of said section 22; thence North 00017'36" West, along the west line of said Section 22, a distance of 1008.37 feet; thence North 89020'09" East, perpendicular to and parallel with the Southerly boundary of said Section 22, a distance of 200.00 feet; thence North 00017'36" West along a line 200.00 feet perpendicular to and parallel with the Westerly boundary of Section 22 a distance of 450.00 feet; thence South 89020'09" West along a line parallel to the Southerly boundary of said Section 22, a distance of 200.00 feet, to a point on the Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment e e Applicant: CBC Management Corp. 06-C1-002 aforementioned Westerly boundary line of said Section 22; thence North 00017'36" West, along said line westerly boundary, a distance of 32.50 feet to the POINT-OF- BEGINNING. Containing 32.97 acres, more or less. Request: The matter before the Land Planning Agency and the City Council is a request to change the Future Land Use Map (PLUM) for the above described property from Single Family to Multi- Family. The request is more specifically shown on Exhibit A attached. Since the property in question is over 10 acres (37.48 acres), this application qualifies under Florida Statutes 163 as a "Large-Scale Amendment" to the Plan. More than likely, the subject property will be combined with contiguous property, already in a Multi-Family category to make a total development. Adjacent Future land Use Map classifications and Zoning Districts: Zoning District: RMH East: FLUM Classification: ZoniogDistrict: Existing Land Use: Single Family RSF-.1 Taylor Creek and Single Family Zoning District: RMF West: FlUMClassificati.on: Commercial and Multi-Family Existing Land Use: Various Commercial Application Description: The applicant requests a change in the Future Land Use Map Designation for the subject property from Single Family (SF) to Multi-Family (MF). The subject property is currently vacant and unplatted. The subject property is located along Taylor Creek, parallel to US 441. The applicant intends to develop the property to accommodate the proposed project known as the Taylor Creek Fishing Village. This development is purported to contain a total of 229 dwelling units consisting of a mix of residential uses along with commercial and Marina uses although it is somewhat unclear as to the proposed mix of uses contemplated. There is a "bubble" map interaction and overall plan of development. 2 Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: CBC Management Corp. 06-C1-002 Comprehensive Plan Analysis: The City Council and Local Planning Agency are required to address certain uses in conjunction with the Comprehensive Plan, which may be categorized as follows: Ao Consistency with the Land Use Categories and Plan Policieso This Large Scale Plan Amendment application speaks about a mixed-use development but there is little data explaining and supporting this approach or justifying the request of Multi-Family Residential for the entire parcel. Objective 2: The City of Okeechobee will ensure that all new development is consistent with the Future Land Use Element. Policy 201: The following land use designations are established for the purpose of managing future growth: (b) Multi-family Residential. Permitted uses include apartments, duplexes, condominiums, single-family houses and public facilities. Maximum density shall not exceed 10 units per acre. Where affordable housing is provided in accordance with Housing Policy 1.6, the maximum density for multi-family development shall be II units per acre. As submitted, the application and supporting documentation is insufficient to support the change from Single Family to Multi-Family. Given its proximity to Taylor Creek, the Comprehensive Plan states that the City must protect environmentally sensitive areas from high density development such as what can be built under the Multi-Family Future Land Use category by the applicant. Because of the property's proximity to Taylor Creek, Policy 7.2 of the Comprehensive Plan must be adhered to and the applicant hasn't given supporting evidence of that. The inclusion of a Marina with 96 slips and a fuel dock has also not been assessed with regard to this Policy. Policy 702: The City shall continue to protect environmentally sensItlve areas from development of a type and intensity which would disrupt their natural functions. B. Concurrency of Adequate Public Facilities Before this request can be approved, the City must consider the proposed realistic impact on public facilities. Potable Water Supply: The adopted LOS for potable water is 114 gpcpd. The subject property is within the service area of the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA) who provides this service to City residents. The below is the anticipated flow for the proposed 320 units is expected to be approximately 95,000 GPD. The existing capacity of the 3 Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment e APPlican.BC Management Corp. 06-C1-002 surface and ground water supply plants are 6 MGD, with 2.5 MGD already committed to use. As such, the OUA has an excess of 4.5 MGD. The OUA would have capacity to serve the proposed development but recent approvals have not been considered in this assessment of remaining water capacity. Wastewater Disposal: The adopted LOS for wastewater disposal is 130 gallons/ capita/day. The subject property is within the service area of the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA). The estimated wastewater flows for the subject property would be 95,000 GPD. The existing capacity of the wastewater treatment plant is 1.2 MGD, with between 800,000 and 900,000 GPD already committed to use. As such, the OUA has a minimum of 300,000 GPD of excess capacity. The OUA has stated that plans are underway to construct an addition to the plant which will permit an additional 3 MGD. It should be noted that the City has received several recent Plan Amendments counting on future sewer plant expansion. A better analysis showing committed service needs to be shown. Solid Waste Disposal: The City has an adopted LOS of 13 lbs/capita/day and 3 years available landfill capacity for solid waste disposal. The proposed development would generate approximately l2,350 lbs/day of solid waste. The applicant must provide a letter from Okeechobee County determining whether the existing landfill will have capacity to serve the proposed development. Drainage/Stormwater Management: The adopted LOS for drainage is Design Storm, 25-yearl24 hour duration. The proposed development is required to meet all conditions and standards required by the City of Okeechobee and the Florida Administrative Code. Because of the vulnerability of Taylor Creek, there needs to be a more specific delineation of the Best Management Practices used for water quality enhancement in stormwater discharges. Recreation and Open Space: The adopted LOS for recreation and open space is 3 acres/l,OOO persons. The proposed development is projected to increase the City's population by approximately 950 additional people. The development would need approximately 3 acres of recreational facilities in order to meet the adopted LOS for parks. The applicant has stated that this would be met with the provision of on-site facilities, but this doesn't seem completely consistent with the intent of the Recreation and Open Space LOS Standards of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Roads and Traffic Circulation: The City's minimum LOS standard for principal arterial roadways is LOS C. All other roads have an LOS D. This LOS must be maintained on the site for all roadways serving the site. In addition, Objective 9 of the Traffic Circulation Element states: Objective 9: The City of Okeechobee shall encourage efforts to curtail future Level of Service Standard deterioration, particularly along US Highway 441 and SR 70. 4 Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: CBC Management Corp. 06-C1-002 The subject property would be serviced by US 441. The applicant has provided a traffic analysis which showed that traffic would be impacted by the proposed development. It was estimated that the proposed land use would result in an increase of 666 daily trips and 40 PM peak hour trips with 33 more trips in and 7 more trips out. This traffic study is being examined but it does not seem that the traffic analysis has contemplated any of the Commercial, Non-Residential or Marina impacts. C. Compatibility with Adjacent and Nearby Land Useso The proposed land use change to Multi-Family at ten dwelling units an acre for the entire site is not compatible for this location. There has not been shown enough supporting data to indicate that this level of density is needed for this site. If the true intent of future development for this site equates to a Single Family density, then perhaps a new Future Land Use category should be suggested. Given the property's proximity to Taylor Creek, staff is concerned that development might negatively impact this environmentally sensitive area. The Taylor Creek right-of- way per recorded plat should be recognized as non-buildable. It is not clear who is being asked to abandon the Taylor Creek right-of-way. Future Land Use Policy 2.3: The City shall continue to require that all development proposals be accompanied by an inventory of wetlands, soils posing severe limitation to construction, unique habitat, City shall further require that the extent to which any development or redevelopment is proposed to be placed in/on, to disturb, or to alter the natural functions of any of these resources, be identified. Such identification shall occur at a phase in the development review process that provides the opportunity for the City to review the proposed project to ensure that direct and irreversible impacts on the identified resources are minimized, or in the extreme, mitigated. Where development is determined to encroach upon a resource, the City shall require a specific Management Plan to be prepared by the developer, which results in no net loss of wetlands and which includes necessary modifications to the proposed development, specific setback and buffers, and clustering of development away from site resources, to ensure the protection, preservation or natural functions of the resource. The minimum buffer for wetlands shall be 25 feet and the average of all setbacks from the wetland resource shall be 40 feet. Areas designated as buffers shall preserve all natural vegetative cover, except where drainageways and access paths are approved to cross the buffer. Buffers may be supplemented only with native tress, shrubs and ground covers. 5 e APPlican.BC Management Corp. 06-C1-002 Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Policy 7.1: The City shall continue to amend and enforce land development regulations consistent with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection's (FDEP) Best Management Practices referenced in Policy 1.4, which will minimize the flow into Taylor Creek of organic nutrients, pesticides, sediment, and other substances having the potential to degrade water quality. The applicant has done a brief Florida Land Use Cover & Classification Systems (PLUCCS) analysis on this property but no Management Plan has been suggested to ensure there is not a loss of wetlands. It would seem that there could be an enhancement of some of these wetlands areas rather than just concluding that these areas are marginal. Conservation Element Policy 4.1: Policy 501: Through Future Land Use Policy 2.3 and implementing Land Development Regulations, the City shall continue to conserve wetlands and protect water quality in Taylor Creek from adverse impacts of development. The City shall enforce provisions in its Land Development Regulations to ensure that new development, regardless of its location in the City, meets the following conditions: (a) does not degrade water quality in Taylor Creek; (b) does not threaten groundwater quality, particularly III the vicinity of municipal wells; (c) preserves existing wetland areas; (d) avoids the disturbance of natural drainage features; and (e) preserves habitat for endangered and/or threatened wildlife speCIes. In examining the above Policies, there is not enough supporting evidence to indicate that the wetlands and natural resource areas will be adequately protected. Also, there might be measures to revitalize the wetland areas that haven't been suggested. Postponing the addressing of this until Site Plan time isn't adequately responding to this issue and is more prevalent in poorly planned conversion of rural properties, a characteristic of Urban SprawL Do Compliance with the Specific Standards of the Plan. The Goals, Objectives and Policies, as they are intended within the Comprehensive Plan, do not support an Amendment to the Future Land Use Map to Multi-Family. The proposal would be more consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan by following Single Family densities. 6 Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: CBC Management Corp. 06-C1-002 Consistency with Comprehensive Plan The existing Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policies will not support Multi-Family uses at this location. Therefore, it should be recommended that the City Council find the application not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. If mixed-uses are warranted at this property, perhaps a new Future Land Use category can be suggested that would provide performance standards and allow development at a lower density. Attachments Attachments to this Staff Report include a copy of the Future Land Use Map indicating the location of the subject property. Assessment and Conclusions Staffrecommends denial of the applicant's request to amend the Future Land Use Map to Multi- Family based on the above inconsistencies to the City's Comprehensive Plan. Submitted by: James G. LaRue, AICP May 16,2006 7 .;," .J l 11 --_...::... --.- ~ , I e Taylor Creek Fishing Vi Ilage Okeechobee Florida May 2006 t?"; ~l!Ne e e Taylor Creek Water Quality Concerns Main concerns with water quality 1- Existing water quality is low *due to low dissolved oxygen content in the water *non-point sources of pollution *low current velocity 2- Project's impacts to water quality *raise dissolved oxygen levels *contain non-point sources of pollution from the local area *model responsible stewardship for other local marinas Discussion of existing water quality issues Taylor Creek currently has poor water quality due mainly to dissolved oxygen levels and from local pollution sources that can not easily be pinpointed (non-point sources of pollution.) Oxygen enters the water through contact with the atmosphere (air) at the surface and from microscopic algae and aquatic plants. The wider the water body in respect to its depth, the greater the dissolved oxygen in the water. If temperatures were the same, a wide shallow bay would have greater dissolved oxygen (D.O.) than a narrow, deep creek. However, cooler water holds the dissolved oxygen (D.O.) better than warm water, and therefore deeper depths that remain cooler in the summer will have a greater capability of holding the dissolved oxygen once it enters the deeper layers of cool water. Now that is a text book answer to the situation, but that is not how it really works in nature. In Florida the summer temperatures cause the deeper waters (over 8' deep) to become stratified with warm water sitting on the top 3-5 feet and cooler water held to a layer just below the warm one. It's called a thermocline. These two layers do not normally mix during the summer (when D. O. issues are a problem) unless there is a drastic storm that causes a current in the normally still waters. Therefore, in the summer, most of the canals along Taylor Creek have very low oxygen content due to hot stagnant upper water not being able to hold what little bit of oxygen there is, and the cooler lower depths are not able to acquire the dissolved oxygen, because it's not able to mix with the upper warm layer. So the canal remains deprived of oxygen throughout the warmer months. At the same time, the rain storms that frequent the state wash in literal tons of fertilizers, herbicides, pesticides, dissolved metals, paint, petroleum products and best of all septic tank effluent, into the canals. These collect and then wash down with the low oxygen content in the water, where they empty into Taylor Creek. These are called non-point sources of pollution. They add up quickly and cause lots of problems. Petroleum cuts off any oxygen from the water's surface, and fertilizers cause algae blooms that use up far more oxygen than they produce. The result is a dead zone to all but alligator gar (which can breathe air) and a few catfish. e e Discussion of the proiect's impacts to water Quality The Taylor Creek Fishing Village has been carefully thought out for its potential negative and positive impacts to the water quality of Taylor Creek. Innovative thinking has lead to a systematic design which will actually improve the areas water quality. Two canals currently exist on the property. One is a "dead end" canal that is approximately 30' wide, T deep and about 600' long. It is stagnant; choked with water lettuce and algae; and dumps directly into Taylor Creek. The second is a DOT drainage easement that takes untreated runoff from an area west of 441 and channels it directly into the creek. The proposed project will fill in the dead end canal and re-route the drainage easement south along the east side of a large historic cypress slough. The wetland area that contains the cypress slough is currently being cut off from surface waters by the drainage canals berms. The project will channel the runoff of the DOT canal into the cypress slough, where it will be re-hydrated and the waters will be filtered naturally by the ecosystem in the sough. A weir at the end of the easement along Taylor Creek will maintain proper water levels which will both maintain the dissolved oxygen levels in the wetland runoff (high levels due to the natural mixing in the swamp) and chemical impurities will be filtered out and metabolized by the microbes in the swamps submerged soils. The marina is designed to exceed the guidelines of the latest EP A marina standards. It is cut from the uplands, so as to not take up the navigable channel. It's much longer than it is wide, so it will mix easily with the low current of Taylor Creek. And as an innovative twist, it has a wave attenuator that doubles as a scoop to actually draw the current from Taylor Creek into the basin where the upper and lower water layers will mix and oxygenate. Residues will not be allowed to accumulate in the basin either. This leads to greater water quality. The added mixed surface area actually increases the D. O. levels of the creek. The pier and wave attenuator structures will not utilize any CCA treated lumber. The entire structure including the seawalls will be made from concrete. In addition, antifouling paint on boat bottoms (which leads to high copper levels in the water) and live-a-boards) will be explicitly restricted from mooring at the facility. The marina facility will be certified as part of the Clean Marina Program by the DEP and must meet strict environmental guidelines to achieve this. Some of the examples of the criteria are a pump out station for the facilities vessels, strict hazardous waste and petroleum containment for the fueling docks, containment of the surrounding areas storm water discharges, educational displays posted for the public, maintained trash facilities and the design of the marina itself. The project will also utilize the cities municipal sewer system. So the antiquated use of septic systems near water bodies will not be an issue. Also, storm water will be captured and treated in a self contained manmade lake. So non-point discharges of fertilizers will not be a problem. The D. O. levels in the lake will be maintained year-round by a system of aerial fountains that spray lake water high into the air and oxygenate it. e e Proposed/Best Mana2:ement Practices Possible Policy Recommendations To improve the water quality of Taylor Creek, the City should investigate setting limits as to the amount of nitrogen and phosphorus that can be discharged into the Creek The City shall consider whether a high standard for water quality would require new development stormwater treatment systems to be designed using a treatment train approach, using multiple Best Management Practices in series, to ensure maximum potential treatment of stormwater. The City shall cooperate and coordinate with the St. Johns River Water Management District and the South Florida Water Management District process for purposes of suggesting improvements to the water quality of Taylor Creek. The City shall begin the process of revaluating the transfer of development rights to allow for broader use of this function as an effective planning tool. The City, in order to protect surface water quality within its corporate limits and beyond, shall consider adopting a numerical standard for nutrients and pollutants of concern. The City shall evaluate opportunities to implement Okeechobee Utility Authority water quality treatment systems within the Taylor Creek area to improve the quality of surface water discharges. The quality of water to be discharged from new surface water management systems shall be subject to Federal, State, Regional and Local permitting programs and regulations that determine compliance with Federal, State and Local water quality standards. Stormwater discharges from development must meet relevant water quality -, (,ttstn btJ.d (,~1 n.jt)~I'I~ ~f L(\kuA. .. e e and surface water management standards as set forth in Rules 62-4, 62-40, 62-302, 40E- 4, F.A.C. and by local ordinance. The City shall reqUIre all new developments to meet the provIsIOns of the SFWMD Volume IV, Basis of Review for Surface Water Management and local provisions pursuant to this Comprehensive Plan to protect surface water quality within the City. Grants and incentives should be sought for the development of surface water quality treatment system retrofitting projects for old and/or new surface water management systems that are not effectively managing water volume or flow, or removing nutrients and other pollutants. The City shall periodically review the Land Development Code to ensure all codes are conducive to the implementation of such water quality Best Management Practices. The City shall reqUIre future developments to employ the provIsIOns of the Florida Yards and Neighborhoods program. The City shall reqUIre periodic updates of the current Well field Protection Ordinance. e e CITY OF OKEECHOBEE FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Improvements Citv Hall Computer Hardware - Monitors & Hardware as 8 needed Computer software - intergrated and 9 compatible with all Departments 10 Com uter u rades based on Software needs Subtotal egen A = General Fund Revenues B = Constituional Fuel Tax; Local Option Gas Tax; SRS Eight Cent fuel Tax C = Community Development Block Grant (Anticipated) D = Possible Homeland Security Grant E = Public Saftey Grant (to be applied for) F = Other Grants to be a lied for Summary - All Departments Current Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Planned Planned Budget Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue FYOS/06 Source FY06/07 Source FY07/0S Source FYOS/09 Source FY09110 Source FY10111 Source $ 1,000 A $ 8,000 A $ 10,000 A A $ 5,000 A $15,00l.l $ A j (---~~ C\ -1 -.:r- ...5:i 51 .~ 6..1 ~ v ~ -,~ ~. ~~ '>- ~ , .~ -e CITY OF OKEECHOBEE FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Summary - All Departments e Current Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Planned Planned Budget Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue Improvements FYOS/06 Source FY06/07 Source FY07/0S Source FYOS/09 Source FY0911 0 Source FYI Oil I Source Citv Hall 3 Imaging plans - Need more detail $ 2,000 A $ 2,000 A $ 2,000 A S 2,000 A $ 2,000 A 4 Map cabinet $ 2,000 A 5 Furniture -Desk, chairs $ 1,100 A $ 800 A Laser Fiche - change from stand alone system to $ 15,790 A, F 6 networking system for City Hall, Police and Fire Subtotal $ 1,100 $ 4,000 $ 17.790 $2,800 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 Fire 1 Ladder Truck $ 800,000 D,F 2 Fire truck/Pumper S 225,000 D,F,A 3 Brush truck $ 75,000 D,F Subtotal $ $ 800,000 $ .... $i75,000 $ - $225,000 Police 1 Computer System - $ 100,000 D,F,A 3 Squad Car Equipment $40,000 A $ 40,000 A $ 40,000 A $ 40,000 A $ 40,000 A S 40,000 A 4 Handheld radios (new) $ 25,000 E,A Subtotal $40000 $ 140()()0 <$ .6siooo 11; 40.000 is 40000 $ 40 000 Public Works City barn# 1 garage doors Truck (30 I) S 50,000 A $ 50,000 A Tractor (30 I 'I) $ 80,000 A Backhoe to replace 15yroldJCB Bucket truck Air compressor GasIDiesel pumps W alkie-talkie/N extels Subtotal $ - $ .. 13Q;OOO $$O,O@ $ - $ - $ - . Legend for Revenue Sources A - General Fund Revenues B ; Constituional Fuel Tax; Local Option Gas Tax; SRS C ; Community Development Block Grant (Anticipaled) D ; Possible Homeland Security Grant E ; Public Safley Grant (to be applied for) F ; Other Grants to he applied for e e e CITY OF OKEECHOBEE FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Summary - All Departments Current Proposed Proposed Proposed Planned Planned Budget Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue Improvements FY05/06 Source FY06/07 Source FY07/08 Source FY08/09 Source FY09/10 Source FYIO/l1 Source Citv Hall 1 City Hall handicapped accessability 2 Record Storage facility (pkg lot shed $ 30,000 A Subtotal $ 30,000 $ - $ i~ $ ~ $ - $ - Fire 4 Training tower $ ] 00,000 D Subtotal $ $ - $ $ Inn nnn i$ $ Public Works 1 Street overlay project (30]) $ 450,000 B $ 350,000 B $ 350,000 B $ 350,000 B $ 350,000 B $ 350,000 B 2 Stann Sewer installation/replacement $ 50,000 A $ 50,000 A $ 50,000 A $ 50,000 A $ 50,000 A 3 Ditch grading/culverts Commerce Park SE Ca]-de-sac/Lakes $ 700,000 C Lighting Sidewalk repairlreplacementlnew Sign replacements Canal cleanup - w/ Air boat - is the airboat part of the request Canal cleanup - removal of debris, trees etc Storage B]dg at SW 23rd St Subtotal $ 450,000 ..$~ $ $ 40<);()OO $ 400,0001. $ 400,000 Total Budget $593,100 $2,247,000 $613,790 $690,800 $529,000 $739,000 Legend for Revenue Sources A = General Fund Revenues B = Constituional Fuel Tax; Local Option Gas Tax; SRS Eie:ht Cent fuel Tax C = Community Development Block Grant Anticinated) D = Possible Homeland Security Grant E = Public Safley Grant (to be applied for) F = Other Grants to be applied for . FORM 8B\ MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS - o OTHER LOCAL AGENCY o ELECTIVE W"APPOINTIVE WHO MUST FILE FORM 88 This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a mea- sure which inures to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the parent organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he or she is retained); to the special private gain or loss of a relative; or to the special private gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163.356 or 163.357, F.S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one-acre, one-vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that capacity . For purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, and daughter-in-law. A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange). ELECTED OFFICERS: In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the min- utes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. APPOINTED OFFICERS: Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you otherwise may participate in these matters. However, you must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made by you or at your direction. IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL r TAKEN: o You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for record minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on other side) CEFORM8B-EFF.1~OOO APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued) o A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. o The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: o You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. o You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who must incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST I, b..o u \"'- J--1.a)(\.,~ ' hereby disclose that on ~() )-3 (a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one) inured to my special private gain or loss; inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate, inured to the special gain or loss of my relative, /inured to the special gain or loss of cBc ~ ,20_ .~~ ( -bfp , by whom I am retained; or inured to the special gain or loss of . which is the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me. (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows: Lo-s-7f- ~t:e lz. ~~ 06~CL ---0 u L- ~ /,~2 [06, Date Filed s;g"1f-~f \ /\ NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES S112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000. PAGE 2 CE FORM 88 - EFF 1/2000 \S'e ~ / ./ :;;.' \,t-0