2005-12-20 PB
.
.
CITY OF OKEECHOBEE
PLANNING BOARD DECEMBER 20, 2005
SUMMARY OF BOARD ACTION
I. CALL TO ORDER - Chairperson.
Planning Board, December 20, 2005, 6:45 p.m.
Chairperson Ledferd called the December 20,2005 Planning Board meeting to order 6:45 p.m,
II. CHAIRPERSON, MEMBER AND STAFF ATTENDANCE _ Secretary.
Board Secretary Cook called the roll:
Chairperson William Ledferd
Vice Chairperson Dawn Hoover
Board Member Terry Burroughs
Board Member Kenneth Keller
Board Member Devin Maxwell
Board Member Douglas McCoy
Board Member John Whidden
Alternate Member Carol Johns
Alternate Member Epifanio Juarez
Attorney John R. Cook
Secretary Katrina Cook
Present
Present
Present
Absent - with consent
Present
Absent - with consent
Present
Present - serving as a voting member
Present - serving as a voting member
Present
Present
III. MINUTES - Secretary.
A.
Motion to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Board Action Board Member Hoover motioned to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Board
for the November 15, 2005 regular meeting. Action for the November 15, 2005 regular meeting; seconded by Board Member Burroughs.
VOTE
BURROUGHS-YEA
HOOVER - YEA
JOHNS - YEA
JUAREZ - YEA
LEDFERD - YEA
MAXWELL - YEA
WHIDDEN - YEA
MOTION CARRIED.
December 20, 2005 - Planning Board - Page 2 of 4
IV. NEW BUSINESS.
A.
Rezoning Petition No. 05-015-R. Consider a recommendation to the City
Council to rezone Lots 1 and 2, Block 182, City of Okeechobee from Residential
Multiple Family (RMF) to Heavy Commercial (CHV). The subject property is
located at 304 Southwest 3rd Avenue, Leland Dyals is the applicant on behalf
of the property owner Mary Dyals (Estate).
.
.
Jennifer Morgan, representative of LaRue Planning and Management, City Planning Consultant,
briefly described the Staff Report as follows:
Planning Staff Report Summary: In May of 2005, the City Council granted a Small Scale map
amendment for the subject property from Multi Family to Commercial. The applicant intends to
continue the existing use on the property (Survey office), and in order to do so, the Zoning and
Future Land Use classifications must be consistent. When recommending whether to rezone land,
the City must consider the following analysis before reaching a decision.
Planning Staff Report Analysis: (A) The proposed CHV zoning and its accompanying use are
not contrary to the Comprehensive Plan requirements. (B) Section 90-282(1) allows professional
offices within the CHV Zoning District. (C) The CHV zoning and office use will not adversely
affect the public interest. (D) Surrounding uses show compatibility with existing uses allowed
under this zoning district. (E) If approved, the proposed use and zoning will not deter the
improvement or development of adjacent properties. (F) The site is already developed. All
buffering requirements were met during the Site Plan review phase. (G) The property is already
developed and has not overburdened public facilities nor is it expected to in the future. (H) The use
will not create traffic, flooding or drainage problems. (I) The use has not been inordinately
burdened by unnecessary restrictions. (J) Special privileges will not be conferred on the applicant
as a result of granting this request.
Planning Staff Report Summary and Conclusions Prior to Certification: The subject property
is located in an area developed with commercial uses. The proposed CHV zoning and the existing
office use are compatible with surrounding uses and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Planning Staff Report Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the request to allow
rezoning from RMF to CHV permitting the applicant to continue a commercial office use.
There were no pubic comments, nor any discussion from the Board.
Board Member Juarez motioned to recommend to City Council to approve Rezoning Petition 05-
015-R, changing the zoning from Residential Multiple Family (RMF) to Heavy Commercial (CHV);
seconded by Board Member Hoover.
December 20, 2005 - Planning Board - Page 3 of 4
IV. NEW BUSINESS, CONTINUED.
A.
Rezoning Petition No. 05-015-R, continued.
.
B.
Rezoning Petition No. 05-016-R. Consider a recommendation to the City
Council to rezone Lots 9 - 11, Block E, Wright's Third Addition from Industrial
(IND) to Residential Single Family - One (RSF-l). The subject property is
located 302 Southeast 10th A venue. The property owner and applicant is Daniel
Creech.
.
VOTE
BURROUGHS-YEA
HOOVER - YEA
JOHNS - YEA
JUAREZ - YEA
LEDFERD - YEA
MAXWELL - YEA
WHIDDEN - YEA
MOTION CARRIED.
Jennifer Morgan, representative of LaRue Planning and Management, City Planning Consultant,
briefly described the Staff Report as follows:
Planning Staff Report Summary: The subject property consists of 3 lots (9, 10 and 11) as
described by the submitted survey. Lots 9 and 10 are developed with a single family dwelling and
lot 11 is vacant. The Single Family Future Land Use designation allows the residential use that
is currently on the property. The applicant's request is to bring the zoning into compliance with
the Future Land Use Map.
Planning Staff Report Analysis: (A) The Single Family land use category allows single family
uses at a density of 4 dulac. The existing use is not contrary to the Comprehensive Plan
requirements. (B) Section 90-102(1) allows a single family dwelling as a permitted use in the
RSF-l Zoning District. (C) The use is existing and will not have an adverse effect on the public
interest. (D) The use is appropriate for the location and compatible with the surrounding uses. (E)
The proposed zoning and use will not adversely affect property values. (F) The existing use will
not be required to be buffered from surrounding uses. (G) The use is pre-existing and has not
overburdened public facilities, nor is it expected to in the future.(H) No traffic, flooding, or
drainage problems are expected as a result of granting this request. (I) The applicant has not been
burdened by unnecessary restrictions. (J) By granting this request the City will not confer on the
applicant any special privileges.
Planning Staff Report Summary and Conclusions Prior to Certification: Based on the above
analysis, RSF-l Zoning seems appropriate in this location, The RSF-l zoning approval does not
authorize additional units on these lots.
.
.
17
December 20,2005 - Planning Board - Page 4 of4
IV. NEW BUSINESS, CONTINUED.
B.
Rezoning Petition No. 05-016-R, continued.
V. ADJOURNMENT - Chairperson.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that if any person desires to appeal any decision made by the Planning Board with
respect to any matter considered at this proceeding, such interested person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such
purpose may need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon
which the appeal is to be based. General Services tapes are for the sole purpose.of backup for official records of ~ent.
I 7/J. C::-' i Ii / '
, J'l. ~. ,
tL-{-A'i!t~,:, ~ <--<
William Ledferd, Ch
ATTEST:
j/{t*Jt-lntl CDQJU
Katrina Cook, Secretary
Planning Stafr Report Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the request to allow
rezoning from IND to RSF-l permitting the applicant to continue the single family residential use.
There were no pubic comments, nor any discussion from the Board.
Board Member Hoover motioned to recommend to City Council to approve Rezoning Petition 05-
016-R, changing the zoning from Industrial (lND) to Residential Single Family - One (RSF-l);
seconded by Board Member Whidden.
VOTE
BURROUGHS - YEA
HOOVER - YEA
JOHNS-YEA
JUAREZ - YEA
LEDFERD - YEA
MAxWELL - YEA
WHIDDEN - YEA
MOTION CARRIED.
There being no further items on the agenda, Chairperson Ledferd adjourned the meeting at 6:50
p.m.
-,.,
II
.
CITY OF OKEECHOBEE - DECEMBER 20, 2005 -
PLANNING BOARD - HANDWRITTEN MINUTES
.
PAGE -1-
I. CALL TO ORDER - Chairperson: December 20. 2005. Planning Board Regular Meeting
6:45 p.m.
II. CHAIRPERSON, BOARD MEMBER ST AFF ATTENDANCE - Secretary.
Prese t Absent
Chairperson William Ledferd
Vice Chairperson Dawn Hoover
Board Member Terry Burroughs
Board Member Kenneth Keller
Board Member Devin Maxwell
Board Member Douglas McCoy
Board Member John Whidden
~ \ 'f\C\
Alternate Carol Johns )cse\l. Or\\M
oS \J '(y.;pP-t)
Alternate Epifanio Juarez ~Q;
Attorney John R. Cook
Secretary Katrina Cook
III. MINUTES - Secretary.
A. Board Member D\-\- moved to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary
of Agency Action for the November 15,2005 Regular Meeting; seconded by Board
Member \0 .
VOTE
Burroughs
Hoover
Keller
Ledferd
Maxwell
McCoy
Whidden
YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT
M TION: CARRIED ~ DENIED
.
.
PAGE -2-
IV. New Business - City Planning Consultant.
A. Rezoning Petition No. 05-015-R. Consider a recommendation to the City Council to
rezone Lots 1 and 2, Block 182, City of Okeechobee from Residential Multiple Family
(RMF) to Heavy Commercial (CHV). The subject property is located at 304 Southwest
3rd Avenue. Leland Dyals is the applicant on behalf ofthe property owner Mary Dyals
(Estate).
Jenn\rty mOlopXl \ 'f~ttOUl-\-Cl'tVQ O~ lLlQw
~lc~rw<~~ C\.no\ mOJ1Cl~~ \ bh~ f~
c\wcXL~d Uti ~(}M ~y+,
No ~'OLl.~ LDmVYLtn+-
- no 'COarQ cliJJWSJ I en
EJ m01lon 10 Y-ltomJYlmd Clpproval
0\-\ second
.A-\l ~-
.
.
PAGE -3-
B. Rezoning Petition No. 05-016-R. Consider a recommendation to the City Council to
rezone Lots 9 - 11, Block E, Wright's Third Addition from Industrial (IND) to
Residential Single Family - One (RSF -1). The subject property is located 302 Southeast
10th Avenue. The property owner and applicant is Daniel Creech.
J~h\l\h~ morcpn l Ctp,(,lL1tn-tCL-nV~ O~ Lai2vu.
P\;oJJh~ Md \ODt'Q~+1 Phltkj ciuJcruDQd
~-tO~ ~\br+.
no 9,-^D~\L uorYLnL-tX~-\- ~ no tX)JYcA d\ swsslon
D\-\
JV\J
moi\cn 1'0 Y'Q.COYY\JY'Llnd
6~lmd
ltVprovW
Al~ "-6~
I
e
.
PAGE -4-
v. ADJOURNMENT - Chairperson Ledferd at (g: '50 p.m.
.
.
CITY OF OKEECHOBEE
PLANNING BOARD DECEMBER 20, 2005
OFFICIAL AGENDA
PAGE 1 oF2
I.
CALL TO ORDER: Planning Board, December 20, 2005, 6:45 p.m. - Chairperson.
II.
CHAIRPERSON, MEMBER AND STAFF ATTENDANCE - Secretary.
Chairperson William Ledferd
Vice-Chairperson Dawn Hoover
Board Member Terry Burroughs
Board Member Kenneth Keller
Board Member Devin Maxwell
Board Member Douglas McCoy
Board Member John Whidden
Alternate Carol Johns
Alternate Epifanio Juarez
Attorney John R. Cook
Secretary Katrina Cook
III.
MINUTES - Secretary.
A. Motion to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Board Action for the November 15,2005 regular meeting.
IV.
NEW BUSINESS - City Planning Consultant.
A. Rezoning Petition No, 05-015-R. Consider a recommendation to the City Council to rezone Lots 1 and 2, Block 182, City of
Okeechobee from Residential Multiple Family (RMF) to Heavy Commercial (CHV). The subject property is located at 304 Southwest
3rd Avenue. Leland Dyals is the applicant on behalf of the property owner Mary Dyals (Estate).
B. Rezoning Petition No. 05-016-R. Consider a recommendation to the City Council to rezone Lots 9 - 11, Block E, Wright's Third
Addition from Industrial (IND) to Residential Single Family - One (RSF-l). The subject property is located 302 Southeast 1 Oth Avenue.
The property owner and applicant is Daniel Creech.
DECEMBER 20, 2005 - AGENDA -PAGE 2 OF 2
..
v. ADJOURNMENT - Chairperson.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that if any person desires to appeal any decision made by the Planning Board with respect to any matter considered at this proceeding, such interested person
will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose may need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be
based. The tapes are for the sole purpose of backup for official records of the Department of General Services.
City of Okeechobee
General Services Department
55 S.E. 3rd Avenue, Room 101
Okeechobee, Florida 34974-2903
Phone: (863) 763-3372, ext. 218
Fax: (863) 763-1686
Date:
\ \
Petition No.
1st Hearing:
2nd Hearing:
Fee Paid: $
Jurisdiction:
c.,c. I
Owner mailing address:
Notices Mailed:
II' Name of property owner(s):
Name ofapplicant(s) if other than owner (state relationship):
Applicant mailing address:
e...
Name of contact person (state relationship):
Fax: r]lJi- - ~500
'(d Avenu
Indicate current use of property:
Describe improvements on property, including number/type of dwellings and whether occupied (if none, so state):
Approximate number of acres: ,2> do, h
Is property in a platted subdivision?
e.s
Is there a current or recent use of the property that is/was a violation of county ordinance? If so, describe:
)
Have there been any land use applications concerning all or part of this property in the last year? If so, indicate date,
nature and applicant's name:
Is a sale subject to this application being granted?
Is the subject parcel your total holdings at that location? If not, describe the remaining or intended uses:
es
Describe adjoining land uses / improvements to the North: :3 f d 5tr e e 4-
East: 3 (d Av-e n u e... West:
Future Land Use classification:
L-J Special Exception
L-J Variance
- 3. - 35 -
0010
II'
I hereby certify that the information in this application is correct. The information included in this application is for use by
the City of Okeechobee in processing my request. False or misleading information may be punishable by a fine of up to
$500,0~r~~so en of up t 30 days and may result in the summary denial of this application.
~d/tIv \ ,/ L':l:J 05
Si ature Date
Uniform Land Use Application (rev. 1/03)
Page I of 2
Current zoning classification:
\=
Requested zoning classification :
v
What is your desired permitted use under the proposed classification:
e..on~ f) \A ~ 0l.LV V Q ~ o.(l.{\ (. ~
If granted, will the new zone be contiguous with a like zone?
+h
Variance?
no
Describe the Special Exception sought:
Provide specific LDR ordinance citation:
Are there other similar uses in the area? Is so, describe:
Why would granting your request be in the best interest of the area and residents?
Ifbusiness, briefly describe nature including number of employees, hours, noise generation and activities to be
conducted outside of a building:
Describe Variance sought:
Describe physical characteristic of property that makes variance necessary:
Did you cause or contribute to the characteristic? Is so, describe:
What is the minimum variance necessary?
Uniform Land Use Application (rev. I/03)
Page 2 of 2
.
.
November 14, 2005
City of Okeechobee
Planning Board
55 SE }rd Avenue
Okeechobee, FL 34974
RE: Statement of Interest in Property
Statement of Special Reasons and Basis for the Request
Intended Use, Nature of Activities and Development of Property
Dear Board Members,
Statement of Interest in Property
I, Leland Dyals, am the Administrator of my wife's estate. I am acting on behalf of the Estate to
correct the zoning of our property.
Statement of Special Reasons and Basis for the Request
There are no special reasons for the request. The basis for the request would be to correct the zoning
on our property from RMF to CHV to continue to operate my Land Surveying Business on property
with the correct zoning.
Intended Use, Nature of Activities and Development of Property
I intend to leave the property as it is. There is currently one office building located on the property
that houses my land surveying business.
;?L ~.Jw
Leland ~ Il/f
D SearchResults
Page 1 of2
Okeechobee County Property Appraiser
Last Updated: 10/31/2005
Parcel ID: 3-15-~Z~J5-9j).lQ--Q1820-_0010
2005 Proposed VaJ~e~
Property Card ) I GIS Map II Print I
Owner & Property Info
Search Result: 1 of 1
Owner's Name DY ALS MARY
Site Address 304 SW 3RD AVE, Okeechobee
Mailing 304 SW 3RD AVENUE
Address OKEECHOBEE, FL 349740000
Brief Legal CITY OF OKEECHOBEE LOTS 1 & 2 BLOCK 182
Use Desc. (code) OFFICE BLD (001700)
Neighborhood 113652.00 Tax District 50
UD Codes Market Area 40
Total Land 0.325 ACRES
Area
< < Prey 1 of 0
Next> >
Property & Assessment Values
Mkt Land Value cnt: (1) $27,440.00
Ag Land Value cnt: (0) $0.00
Building Value cnt: (1) $31,792.00
XFOB Value cnt: (1) $416.00
Total
Appraised $59,648.00
Value
Just Value $59,648,00
Class Value $0.00
Assessed $59,648.00
Value
Exempt Value $0.00
Total Taxable $59,648,00
Value
Sales History
Sale Date Book/Page Inst. Type Sale Vlmp Sale Qual Sale RCode Sale Price
5/1/1982 0/0 WD I U 03 $100.00
12/1/1971 133/577 I Q $5,000.00
Building Characteristics
Bldg Item Bldg Desc Year Bit Heated S.F. Actual S.F. Bldg Value
1 OFFICE/SFR (004700) 1930 956 1446 $31,792,00
Extra Features & Out Buildings
Code Desc Year Bit Value Units Dims Condition (% Good)
OCR OPN CC R/F 1991 $416.00 378.000 OxOxO PD (30.00)
Land Breakdown
Lnd Code Desc Units Adjustments Eft Rate Lnd Value
161CIO CITY LT (MKT) 100.000 FF - (.325AC) 1.00/1.00/1.00/1.00 $274.40 $27,440.00
Okeechobee County Property Appraiser
Last Updated: 10/31/2005
Search Result: 1 of 1
I HOME I Record Search I GIS Map I General Info I Exemptions I Tangible Tax I FA Q I Contact Us I
This information was derived from data which was compiled by the Okeechobee County Property Appraiser's Office so
governmental purpose of property assessment. This information should not be relied upon by anyone as a determination of t
http://www.okeechobeepa.com/GISID_SearchResults.asp
11110/2005
.. ., ..
.
..
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR
GLADES COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PROBATE DIVISION
CASE NO. 2005-CP. ~
In Ie:
Estate of
MARY VIRGINIA DYALS,
a/k/a MARY DYALS,
Deceased.
/
ORDER OF SUMMARY ADMINISTRATION
On the petition of LELAND DYALS, for Summary Administration of the estate of
MARY VIRGINIA DYALS, .a/k/a MARY DYALS, deceased, the court finding that the
decedent died on the 13th. day of Decemher, 1997; that aU interested persons have been
served proper notice of hearing or have waived notice thereof; that the material allegations
of the petition are true; and that the decedent's estate qualifies for summary administration
and an Order of Summary Administration should be .entered, it is c.. f~j;",!
(.'~I.') ~j.
ADJUDGED that ~,\:~~,if>l
. r=",--. ~
1. There be immediate distribution of the assets of the decedent, being th~61l0w.mg .
(~) ..- \ :::.")
described property: r:!.:~:~: ~,
~-:.~ :It
Lots 1 and 2, Block 182,. OKEECHOBEE, according to the plat there~~~ ~~
recorded in Plat Book 5, page 5, public records of Okeechobee Countyf":::\ ';:~,
Florida. (Parcel No. 3-15-37-35-0010-01820.0010) . .. .
...~
,,'
',J
':~"?~
~.",v".
....If'
f'.~.~
~'n
1(:'~)
to LELAND DYAT$, whose address is 304 S.W. 3rd Avenue, Okeechobee, Florida 34974.
2. ThooSe to whom specified parls of the uecedent's estate are ,assigned by this order
shall be entitled to receive and 'collect the same, and to maintain actions to enforce the
right.
........
...-....
3. Debtors of the decedent, those 'holding property of the decedent, and those with
whom securities or other property of decedent are registered, are authorized and
empowered to comply with this order by paying, delivering, or transferring to iliose specified
above the parts. of the decedent's estate assigned to them by this order, and the persons so
paying, delivering, or transferring shall not be accountable to anyone else for the property_
CD~ It.\...
ORDERED on Septentbe.r - t. - , 2005.
#S/ JACK- LUNDY
lL~ CIRCUIT JUnGE
cc:
Conely & Conely, P~A.
/
[/
,
Ln
C'r)
RBS
I SCALE 1" -40'1
o
In
n.i
....
- c:
L&.I _
Co 0
..., In
C N
- ..,
C -
c
:z
RBS
RBF
r
~I
;::1--
L&.I ~
rc La
bl:
- ,....
c
c
:z
RBF
L-
SW 3RD STREET
LEGEND
RBF - Rebar Found
RBS - Rebar W/Cap Set
IPF - Iron Pipe Found
CMF - Concrete Monument Found
PRM - Permanent Reference Monument
(P) - As per the plat of
(F) - Field Measurement
(D) - As per the deed
(C) - Calculation
CENTERLINE
N89'58'02'E 100.05'
100' [PI
I
I
RBS
35"
AREA- . 327 A~RES
1. Basis bearing CENTERLINE OF ROAD
2. Bearings ASSUMED
3. Not val id without the signature and the original raised
seal of a Florida licensed surveyor and mapper.
4. Descr I pt I on as per owner
STREET ADDRESS:
304 SW 3RD A VENUE
'"
NOTES:
o
In
n.i
a: ~
2
-
o L&.I
In C.
n.i N
.., ~
- -
.
c
~
~I
~
~1
-q:
~
Q -
o:~
C'r)~
~ ~
Ci) t.J
LOTS 1 AND 2. BLOCK 1B2. ACCORDING TO THE MAP OF THE CI TY OF OKEECHOBEE.
FLORIDA. AS THE SAME APPEARS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF
C I RCU I T COURT I N AND FOR OKEECHOBEE COUNTY. FLOR IDA. IN PLA T BOOK 1 PAGE 10.
1
CERTIFIED TO:
LELAND DYALS
CITY OF OKEECHOBEE. FORIDA
SURVEY OF:
I
100' [ PI
N89" 58' DO' E 99. 90' [Fl
RBS
15' ALLEY
RBF
1
-----
589' 58' 00'11 99. 89'
100' [ PI
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
I HEREBY CERT I FY THA T THE PLA T OF SURVEY SHOWN HEREON WAS PREPARED
UNOFR HY OIRFCTlON ~~::&~________
LELAND DYALS. RLS 20B,
N1/2 11
I~
-
... ,....
~I~
N N
. ,
- ....
""'Ii
N1/2 12
NOT PART OF TH I S SURVEY
100' [ PI
589'55'55'11 99.81'
---l
----
RBF
SCAU: i' · W LOCA T ION: 1&2 P ILK 182 SE- TP-A6
.
LELAND DYALS ~ aGINMIW IIIWEY FIlL 1o.4JE: BlI8J06
LELAND 10m 110. : 6!i83
R. L. S. 2084 - .", LD
\11&110. :
304 S. H. 3rd A VS. . Oksechobee. Fla. ~Y .JI6683 OVALS r1 OF 1
PHONE. . . . . 1U-4901 FAX. . . . . 1SS-2500 M1 REV" IIJIII DAn: IY 8E'AL F. a /Pa.: CITY 19/' i
.
1375 Jackson Street, Suite 206
Fort M"A Florida 33901-2845
Phone:-~-334-3366 Fax: 239-334-6384
Email: larue-planning(a}att.net
Staff Report
Rezoning Request
Applicant/Owner:
From:
To:
Petition No.
Mary Dyals
RMF
CHV
05-015-R
Staff Report
Rezoning Request
.
.
Applicant:. Mary Dyals
Petition No. 05-015-R
Summary:
In May of2005, the City Council granted a Small Scale map amendment for the
subject property from Multi Family to Commercial. The applicant intends to
continue the existing use on the property (Survey office), and in order to do so, the
Zoning and Future Land Use classifications must be consistent. When recommending
whether to rezone land, the City must consider the following analysis before reaching
a decision.
Analysis
1. The proposed use is not contrary to Comprehensive Plan requirements.
No, the proposed CHV zoning and its accompanying use are not contrary to the
Comprehensive Plan requirements.
2. The proposed use being appliedfor is specifically authorized under the zoning
district in the Land Development Regulations.
Yes, Section 90-282(1) allows professional offices within the CHV Zoning
District.
3. The proposed use will not have an adverse effect on the public interest.
No, the CHV zoning and office use will not adversely affect the public interest.
4. The use is appropriate for the location proposed, is reasonably compatible with
adjacent land uses, and is not contrary or detrimental to urbanizing land use
patterns.
Surrounding uses show compatibility with existing uses allowed under this zoning
district.
5. The proposed use will not adversely affect property values or living conditions, or be
a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property.
If approved, the proposed use and zoning will not deter the improvement or
development of adjacent properties.
6. The proposed use can be suitably bujJeredfrom surrounding uses, so as to reduce
the impact of any nuisance or hazard to the neighborhood.
2
City of Okeechobee
General Services Department
55 S.E. 3rd Avenue, Room 101
Okeechobee, Florida 34974-2903
Phone: (863) 763-3372, ext. 218
Fax: (863) 763-1686
Fee Paid:
Jurisdiction:
Date:
Petition No.
1 st Hearing:
2nd Hearing:
5 rt
Name of property owner(s):
Owner mailing address: 40
Name of applicant( s) if other than owner (state relationship):
Applicant mailing address:
Notices Mailed:
Property address / directions to property: 3~
Indicate current use of property: ~I
Describe improvements on property, including number/type of dwellings and whether occupied (if none, so state):
Approximate number of acres: \.;;)
Is property in a platted subdivision?
'1E..~
Is there a current or recent use of the property that is/was a violation of county ordinance? If so, describe:
J.J
Have there been any land use applications concerning all or part of this property in the last year? If so, indicate date,
nature and applicant's name: N.. 0
Is a sale subject to this application being granted? 1J.
Is the subject parcel your total holdings at that location? Ifnot, describe the remaining or intended uses:
Describe adjoining land uses / improvements to the North:
application is correct. The information included in this application is for use by
request. False or misleading information may be punishable by a fine of up to
days and may result in the summary denial of this application.
~Ifl..- b.Q~
Printed Name .
---.-J)- ~ ) -05
Date
Uniform Land Use Application (rev. 1/03)
Page 1 of 2
.
.
statement of Interest
Rezoning Application
The proposed property was purchased to continue the existing use
as a residence by the property owner and applicant. Daniel B.
Creech wishes to continue this use and to comply with any and all
regulations that the city of Okeechobee may have regarding the
subject property.
.
.
statement of Special Reasons and
Basis for ReZoning Request
The reason for this request is to comply with the City of Okeechobee
Zoning Requirements to continue a residential use. By rezoning this
parcel it will enable the legal use in the appropriate zoning,
Residential Single Family - One.
BOUNDARY SURVEY LOCATED IN
SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 35 EAST
TALLAHASSEE MERIDIAN
OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA
DESCRIPTION
Lots 9, 10, and 11, Block E, WRIGHT'S THIRD ADDITION
TO OKEECHOBEE, according to .the plat thereof recorded
in Plat Book 1, Page 9, Public Records of Okeechobee
County, Florida.
SURVEYORS NOTES
Subject to easements and restrictions of'record.
Lands described hereon not' abstracted by this office.
Underground utilities and foundations are not shown.
The description shown hereon was provided by the
client and/or his/her agent.
Not valid without the signature and the original raised
seal of a Florida licensed surveyor and mapper.
The surveyor did not interview adjoining land owners
for unrecorded deeds or easements.
Elevations, if any, are based upon assumed dat4m.
Lands shown hereon are in Flood Zone C, as scaled from
FEMA FIRM panel no. 1201'77 0200B, dated 2-4-81.
Address: 302 SE 10TH AVENUE, OKEECHOBEE, FL.
SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE
I hereby certify that the attached sketch of survey
of the hereon described property is true and correct
to the best of my knowledge and belief as surveyed
in the field under my direct supervision. Subject to
the qualifications noted hereon,
es R. Almond, P
Professional Surveyor-Mapper
Florida Registration No. LS5081
Drawn By: AIT
J~..E..~ LAe.~~r~~t~!lcO...PT~M-
2973 SW 3RD TERRACE
OKEECHOBEE. FLORIDA 34974-2684
TEL: (863) 467-5700 FAX: (863) 467-6121
EMAIl.;surveyor349720yahoo.com
FlDBK/PAGE REVISIONS
116/3
I
o
~
(1~[)
~NUNK
FENCE CORNER
1.0'N, 3.5'E
LOT 8
Sa9"5O' "'#/
37 .48"
CHAlNUNK
FENCE CORNER
ISH, 1.0....
FO 5/a- IRe
RlS 2084
IN CONCRETE
(JO
'"
~
IVI
~
1=
c;;
1-
~
'" I
~ 0
~ ""0' (JO
0 '"
C) ~
,., ",
'" ~
~ ~I
J:
1-
(JO
'"
10
q
I .
r
I
g I... U)
LOT 9 0
q
CO';) ~rr1
z zl,.,
373.48' (11II ~. a ~I~~
-- ~ ~ ~o
'" '" ('l
BLOCK E :i. :i. g~
I'" ::r:
WRIGHT'S THIRD ADDITION 1.288 ACRESt: I~ l>
70 OKEECHOBEE (JO
(IlAPROIElAEHTS NOT SHOWN) 0
PL>\ T BOOK 1 , PAGE 9 LOT 10 ~
OKEECHOBEE COUNTY 'i<
FLORIDA rPl
_ ~z
373.49' g ~ .~c
~ q I'" rr1
LOT 11
WIRE
FENCE CORNER
l.O'N, 2.0'W
OLD WIRE FENCE
FD 5/a- IRe
RlS 2084
>la9"5O'30t:
FO 5/8- IRe
RlS 2084
373.49'
(JO
'"
&
LOT 12
373.50'
~
q N
'" !"
: ~ 44)' R/W
---1_ _ _ _ _ -c;- _ _ _ -.?8~ _ _ _ ~~:.A_ _ --.-:?3.:.5O~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
- SE 4TH STREET
CERTIFIED TO ONLY THE FOLLOWING PARTIES:
DANIEL B. CREECH, JR.
~
~
SCALE:
," - 40'
PROJECT No.
4500
SHEET
OF'
MAP OP ItOUNDARY SUIYn
LECENO
II - lolEASURED DIMENSKlH
o - CEIl) ClW:NSlQN
P - PlAT D1I1EHS1ON
CY - CONCRETE IIOHUIIENT
IR - IRON ROD
IRe - IRON ROO WIl1t eN'
_ - WATER IIUER
YN - WATER VALYE
UP - UTIUTY POLE
SPRINT - SPRINT
L - ARC lDIG1H
.. - CENTRAl. ANGU:
R - RAOIUS 1lISTAHC€
CH _ CHORD .
SF - SQlME FEET
GAL - GALUlH
FO - FOUNO -
P8 - PlAT BOOK
PC - PAGE
ORB - 0FF1CII0L RECORDS BOOIC
~ - RAOIAI.
NR - NOT RADW.
SURVEY DATE: SEPTEMBER 21, 2005
I
TliIS _ IS INTENDED TO MEASURE 1 INCH LONG
AT THE SCAl.E SHoWN. IF BAR IIEASURES DI'FtROm.y
E:NI.ARGE OR REDUCE ACCORDINGLY.
1 INCH
PREPARED
FOR:
DANIEL B.
CREECH,
JR.
I
I
20.00' I
$89"47'47",#/1
I
1
~I
1
z I
a ..
~ 0
~ ~
:i 20.02'
- -+--
I
~
~
'"
o
o
o.
.
1375 Ja.n Street, Suite 206
Fort My Florida 33901-2845
Phone: 239-334-3366 Fax: 239-334-6384
Email: larue-planning~att.net
Staff Report
Rezoning Request
Applicant/Owner:
From:
To:
Daniel B. Creech
IND
RSF-l
05-016-R
Petition No.
Staff Report
Rezoning Request
Applicant: Daniel B. Creech.
Petition No. 05-016-R
General Information
Applicant: Daniel B. Creech
Applicant Address: 406 SW 2nd Street
Applicant Phone Number: 863-634-6359
Contact Person Carolyn Arnold
Owner: Daniel B. Creech
Owner Address: Same
Existing Proposed
Future Land Use Map SF Same
Classification
Zoning District IND RSF-l
Use of Property Residential Same
Acreage 1.286 1.286
Location:
Legal Description: Lots 9, 10, and 11, Block E, WRIGHT'S THIRD ADDITION
TO OKEECHOBEE, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 1,
Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida.
Request:
The applicant is requesting a rezoning from IND to RSF -1 to continue the existing
use as a residence.
Adjacent Future land Use Map Classifications and Zoning Districts:
North: Future Land Use Map Classification: SF and IND
Zoning District: IND
Existing Land Use: Industrial
East: Future Land Use Map Classification: MF
Zoning District: RMF
Existing Land Use: Residential/vacant
South: Future Land Use Map Classification: SF
Zoning District: RMF
Existing Land Use: Residential
West: Future Land Use Map Classification: SF
Staff Report
Rezoning Request
e
.PPlicant: Daniel B. Creech.
Petition No. 05-016-R
Zoning District:
Existing Land Use:
RSF-l
Residential
Summary:
The subject property consists of 3 lots (9, 10 and 11) as described by the submitted
survey. Lots 9 and 10 are developed with a single family dwelling and lot 11 is
vacant. The Single Family Future Land Use designation allows the residential use
that is currently on the property, The applicant's request is to bring the zoning into
compliance with the Future Land Use Map.
Analysis
1. The proposed use is not contrary to Comprehensive Plan requirements.
The Single Family land use category allows single family uses at a density of 4du/ac.
The existing use is not contrary to the Comprehensive Plan requirements.
2. The proposed use being appliedfor is specifically authorized under the zoning district
in the Land Development Regulations.
Yes, Section 90-102(1) allows a single family dwelling as a permitted use in the RSF-
1 Zoning District.
3. The proposed use will not have an adverse effect on the public interest,
No, the use is existing and will not have an adverse effect on the public interest.
4. The use is appropriate for the location proposed, is reasonably compatible with
adjacent land uses, and is not contrary or detrimental to urbanizing land use
patterns.
Yes, the use is appropriate for the location and compatible with the surrounding uses.
5. The proposed use will not adversely affect property values or living conditions, or be
a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property,
No, the proposed zoning and use will not adversely affect property values.
6. The proposed use can be suitably bufferedfrom surrounding uses, so as to reduce the
impact of any nuisance or hazard to the neighborhood.
The existing use will not be required to be buffered from surrounding uses.
2
Staff Report
Rezoning Request
Applicant: Daniel B. Creech.
Petition No. 05-016-R
7. The proposed use will not create a density pattern that would overburden public
facilities such as schools, streets, and utility services,
No, the use is pre-existing and has not overburdened public facilities, nor IS it
expected to in the future.
8. The proposed use will not create traffic congestion, flooding or drainage problems,
or otherwise affect public safety.
No traffic, flooding, or drainage problems are expected as a result of granting this
request.
9. The proposed use has not been inordinately burdened by unnecessary restrictions.
No, the applicant has not been burdened by unnecessary restrictions.
10. The proposed change will not constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual
owner as contrasted with the public welfare.
No, by granting this request the City will not confer on the applicant any special
privileges.
Summary and Conclusions Prior to Certification
Based on the above analysis, RSF -1 Zoning seems appropriate in this location. The
RSF-l zoning approval does not authorize additional units on these lots.
Recommendation .
Staff recommends approval of the request to allow rezoning from IND to RSF-l
permitting the applicant to continue the single family residential use.
Submitted by:
James G. LaRue, AICP
Planning Consultant
December 6, 2005
3