Loading...
2007-02-20 Regular Meeting'7 2 0 CITY OF OKEECHOBEE FEBRUARY 20, 2007 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION I. CALL TO ORDER - Mayor: February 20, 2007 Regular City Council Meeting, 6:00 p.m. II. OPENING CEREMONIES: Invocation given by Pastor Duane Eatmon, Treasure Island Baptist Church; Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor. III. MAYOR, COUNCIL AND STAFF ATTENDANCE - City Clerk. Mayor James E. Kirk Council Member Lowry Markham Council Member Dowling R. Watford, Jr. Council Member Clayton Williams Council Member Lydia Jean Williams City Administrator Brian Whitehall City Attorney John R. Cook City Clerk Lane Gamiotea Deputy Clerk Melisa Eddings Police Chief Denny Davis Fire Chief Herb Smith Public Works Director Donnie Robertson IV. MINUTES - City Clerk. A. Motion to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Council Action for the February 6, 2007 Regular Meeting. PAGE 1 OF 14 L Mayor Kirk called the February 20, 2007 Regular City Council Meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. In the absence of Pastor Eatmon, the invocation was offered by Council Member C. Williams. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Kirk and Members of Boy Scout Troop No. 955. City Clerk Gamiotea called the roll: Present Absent Present Present Present Present Present Present Present Present Present Absent Council Member L. Williams moved to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Council Action for the February 6, 2007 Regular Meeting as correcteda ; seconded by Council Member C. Williams. VOTE KIRK YEA MARKHAM -ABSENT WATFORD - YEA C. WILLIAMS - YEA L. WILLIAMS - YEA MOTION CARRIED. 1 � -1 V. WARRANT REGISTERS - City Administrator. A. Motion to approve the January 2007 Warrant Register: General Fund ....:........................... $409,852.89 CDBG Fund ................................... $5,305.80 Public Improvement Facilities Fund ................... $21.53 721 FEBRUARY 20, 2007 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 2 OF 14 Council Member Watford moved to approve the January 2007 Warrant Register in the amounts: General Fund, four hundred nine thousand, eight hundred fifty-two dollars and eighty-nine cents ($409,852.89); Community Development Block Grant Fund, five thousand three hundred five dollars and eighty cents ($5,305.80); Public Facilities Improvement Fund, twenty-one dollars and fifty-three cents ($21.53); seconded by Council Member L. Williams. There was no discussion on this item. VOTE KIRK - YEA MARKHAM - ABSENT WATFORD - YEA VI. AGENDA -Mayor. C. WILLIAMS - YEA L. WILLIAMS - YEA MOTION CARRIED. A. Requests for the addition, deferral or withdrawal of items on today's Mayor Kirk asked whether there were any requests for the addition, deferral or withdrawal of items on today's agenda. agenda. New Business item "I", Exhibit 12 was added. VII. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE ADOPTION - Mayor. III MAYOR KIRK OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE ADOPTION AT 6:08 P.M. A.1. Discussion and public comments regarding a motion and second Ordinance No. 965 was formerly known as Cycle 12006 Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Due to the adoption date, made by Council Members Markham and Watford at the December it will now be known as Cycle 12007. This ordinance adopts, by attached exhibits, Comprehensive Plan Text 5, 2006 meeting to adopt proposed Ordinance No. 965 regarding Amendments to the Future Land Use Element, Conservation Element, Capital Improvements Element, and the Future Cycle 12007 (formerly known as Cycle 1 2006) Comprehensive Land Use Map amendments as they address Large Scale Map Amendment Application No. 06-C1-001 submitted by Plan Narrative (Text) Amendments and Large Scale Future Land H2 Oldings, LLC; and No. 06-C1-002 submitted CBC Management Corporation on behalf of the property owner, Frank Use Map Amendments No. 06-CI-001 HackVH2 Oldings and 06-CI- Altobello. 002 Altobello/Close - City Attorney (Exhibit 1). Mr. Jim LaRue addressed the Council regarding the amendment package. It has been a long time coming, but the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) has confirmed that they have received our modifications of the objections they had sent to us. We are now expecting a notice from DCA to inform us whether or not we are in compliance. Once we receive that notice, we can advertise one last time. The public will have 15 to 20 days to respond to the advertisement. Should there be no objections, it will be finalized, and Cycle 12007 will be approved. Mayor Kirk asked whether there were any questions or comments from the public? Mr. Brandon Tucker, of The Tucker Group, was present on behalf of applicant Mr. Hackl, for Large Scale Map Amendment Application No. 06-C1-001 submitted by H2 Oldings, LLC, who noted they are moving forward with the plans for a nice shopping center. 722 FEBRUARY 20, 2007 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 3 OF 14 VII. PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE ADOPTION CONTINUED. A.1. Discussion and public comments continued. III Council Member Watford asked whether the ingress/egress proposed by the applicant will still be aligned at the signalized intersection at East 10`h Avenue? Mr. Tucker answered yes. 2. Vote on motion. VOTE KIRK - YEA MARKHAM - ABSENT WATFORD - YEA C. WILLIAMS - YEA L. WILLIAMS - YEA MOTION CARRIED. B.1. a) Motion to read by title only proposed Ordinance No. 971 regarding I Council Member Watford moved to read by title only, proposed Ordinance No. 971 regarding Alley Closing Application Alley Closing Application No. 85, InSite Development Group, LLC - No. 85, InSite Development Group, LLC; seconded by Council Member L. Williams. City Attorney (Exhibit 2). b) Vote on motion. VOTE KIRK - YEA MARKHAM - ABSENT WATFORD - YEA C. WILLIAMS - YEA L. WILLIAMS - YEA MOTION CARRIED. c) City Attorney to read proposed Ordinance No. 971 by title only. Attorney Cook read proposed Ordinance No. 971 by title only as follows: "AN ORDINANCE CLOSING, VACATING AND ABANDONING THE ALLEYS OR ALLEYWAYS AS DESCRIBED HEREIN, WITHIN BLOCKS 4, 12, 13, 20 AND 21, CITY OF OKEECHOBEE SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS FOR OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA; RESERVING UNTO THE CITY ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS A PERPETUAL NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR UTILITY PURPOSES; PROVIDING FOR A RIGHT OF REVERSION; AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO RECORD THE ORDINANCE IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT 1N AND FOR OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE." 2. a) Motion to adopt proposed Ordinance No. 971. 111 Council Member L. Williams moved to adopt proposed Ordinance No. 971; seconded by Council Member Watford. b) Public comments and discussion. The purpose of the ordinance is to close the East to West and the North to South alleys in Blocks 12 and 21, and the Ea,-,'L to West alleys in Blocks 4,13 and 20, City of Okeechobee Subdivision. Alley Closing Application No. 85 was submitted by Steve Dobbs, on behalf of property owner InSite Development LLC. Easements are being requested by Florida Power & Light, Embarq and OUA. The property is proposed to be used for a multi -family development. There were 62 letters sent to surrounding property owners with no response to date. 723 FEBRUARY 20, 2007 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 4 OF 14 VII. PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE ADOPTION CONTINUED. B. 2. b) Public comments and discussion continued. Mayor Kirk asked whether there were any question or comments from the public? Mr. Steve Dobbs, representing the applicant, addressed the Council and distributed a revised site plan. The density has changed from 255 units to 238, and the club house has been removed. Mr. Dobbs reviewed the site plan and was inquiring an acceptance from the Council of what was presented. Administrator Whitehall interjected that the revised site plan presented will need to go back to the Technical Review Committee (TRC) for approval. The Council should only be considering the alley closings at this meeting. Mr. Dobbs noted that was correct and he was not trying to get things out of order, but trying to respond to the Council's density concerns. Council Member Markham was the one who brought the density issue to the Council's attention, and in a memorandum submitted by him, he noted that he had reviewed the revised site plan, as presented, and it appears to be a better solution, he would not object to closing the alleyways with this type of plan. He also appreciated the applicant decreasing the density. Council Member C. Williams remarked that he has reservations about the whole project, this area has a lot of these type of apartments already. Council Member Watford also had reservations, it is a lot of alleys to close at one time, but the issues at hand have been addressed. He also asked for reassurance from Mr. Dobbs in regards to a reoccurring appearance before the City Council to ask for Special Exceptions or Variances for this project. Mr. Dobbs understood what Council Member Watford was saying and stated he wanted this to be a good project and will do everything by the code. Ms. Mary Hinton, Governmental Liaison of InSite Development, LLC, was present and informed the Council that there is a need for affordable and attainable housing for professional services, such as nurses, teachers, police officers and firefighters. She herself is a nurse and so she knows firsthand the need for nurses. She has contacted the School Board and they have told her of their need for teachers. This project will be able to provide the type of housing with an option to buy that is needed for these professions and for the area. 0 Vote on motion. VOTE KIRK - YEA MARKHAM - ABSENT WATFORD - YEA C. WILLIAMS - YEA L. WILLIAMS - YEA MOTION CARRIED. C.1. a) Motion to read by title only, proposed Ordinance No. 974 regarding Council Member Watford moved to amend proposed Ordinance No. 974 regarding Rezoning Application No. 07-001-R, Rezoning Application No. 07-001-R, submitted by William Mason - submitted by William Mason, to add "Residential Multiple Family (RMF) and" in front of Holding and read by title only; City Planning Consultant (Exhibit 3). seconded by Council Member L. Williams. b) Vote on motion to read by title only. VOTE KIRK - YEA MARKHAM - ABSENT WATFORD - YEA C. WILLIAMS - YEA L. WILLIAMS - YEA MOTION CARRIED. 724 FEBRUARY 20, 2007 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 5 of 14 VII. PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE ADOPTION CONTINUED. C.1. c) City Attorney to read proposed Ordinance No. 974 by title only. Attorney Cook read proposed Ordinance No. 974 by title only as follows: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA; AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF OKEECHOBEE BY REZONING A CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, FROM RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE FAMILY (RMF) AND HOLDING (H) TO RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY -ONE (RSF-1) ZONING DISTRICT; AMENDING THE ZONING MAP ACCORDINGLY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE." 2. a) Motion to adopt proposed Ordinance No. 974. III Council Member L. Williams moved to adopt proposed Ordinance No. 974 as amended; seconded by Council Member Watford. b) Public comments and discussion This Ordinance amends the Zoning designation from RMF and H to RSF-1 for seven various parcels: Parcel 1: 0.885 acres located East of Block 51, West of Taylor Creek, South of Northeast Y' Street, and North of the Railroad; Parcel 2: All of Block 34, City of Okeechobee Subdivision; Parcel 3: Lots 1 through 3 of Block 34, City of OKeechobee Subdivision; Parcel 4: All of Block 33, City of Okeechobee Subdivision: Parcel 5: Lots 1 through 7 of Block 32, City of Okeechobee Subdivision; Parcel 6: Lot 26 of Block 32, City of Okeechobee Subdivision, Parcel 7: All of Block 17. City of Okeechobee Subdivision; Parcel 8: An oblong unplatted parcel, 5.92 acres, that runs North to South along the West side of Taylor Creek, East of Blocks 1,16, 17, 33 and 34. The South line is Northeast Y' Street, the North line is the City Limits. The petition was submitted by the property owner, William Mason. There were 20 notices sent to the surrounding property owners with one objection by Mr. Charles Farmer to delete the one parcel located next to Block 51. The property was posted with a sign advertising the request of the rezoning, dates and times of both the Planning Board and City Council public hearings. The Planning Board reviewed the application at their January 18, 2007 meeting and recommended approval. Mr. LaRue reviewed the Planning Staff Report, recommending approval. (1) The proposed single family use and RSF-1 Zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies and the Future Land Use Map designation for this property. (2) Section 90-102(1) allows single family dwellings as a permitted use under the RSF-1 Zoning District. (3) The proposed single family use and RSF-1 Zoning District Will not have an adverse effect on the public interest. (4) A single family dwelling would be appropriate for this location and compatible with the surrounding land uses. (5) The RSF-1 Zoning and accompanying single family use would not adversely affect property values or living conditions. Development of the subject property could encourage development of vacant lands adjacent to the applicant's property. (6) Should it be required, the proposed single family use could be buffered from surrounding uses. At this time, however, it does not appear that buffering will be -necessary. Planning Staff Report continued: (7) The proposed single family use will not create a density pattern that would overburden public facilities. The proposed RSF-1 Zoning would create consistency with the existing Single Family Future Land Use category. 725 FEBRUARY 20, 2007 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 6 OF 14 VII. PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE ADOPTION CONTINUED. C. 2. b) Public comments and discussion continued. (8) The applicant is not proposing any density increases for the subject property. The rezoning request is to allow the applicant to develop the property within the parameter of the Single Family land use category consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. As such, traffic congestions, flooding or drainage will not be a problem for the site. (9) The only restrictions placed on the subject property are those which are set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and the Land Development Code. The proposed use has not been inordinately burdened by unnecessary restrictions. (10) By allowing the applicant to develop the property under the RSF-1 Zoning District, the applicant is not receiving any special privileges which are not granted to any other citizen under the same circumstances. Mayor Kirk asked whether there were any questions or comments from the public? Mr. Mason, stated he would agree to delete the property Mr. Farmer objected to, from the rezoning petition, as long as it did not delay the petition to be processed. The property is Parcel 1: 0.885 acres East of Block 51, West of Taylor Creek and South of Northeast 91 Street. Council Member Watford remarked that he could not justify rezoning property next the railroad as RSF-1. Clerk Gamiotea distributed research regarding Blocks 49, 50, 51 and Parcel 1, including Future Land Use and Zoning designation, applications amending the properties, and mapping errors made on the original Future Land Use map by the Central Florida Regional Planning Council. Council Member Watford moved to amend proposed Ordinance No. 974 by deleting the 0.885 acre parcel of land from the rezoning petition that is located East of Block 51, West of Taylor Creek and South of Northeast 9' Street; seconded by Council Member C. Williams. The Council thanked Mr. Mason for agreeing to delete this parcel. VOTE TO AMEND KIRK - YEA MARKHAM - ABSENT WATFORD - YEA C. WILLIAMS - YEA L. WILLIAMS - YEA MOTION CARRIED TO AMEND. c) Vote on motion. VOTE AS AMENDED KIRK - YEA MARKHAM - ABSENT WATFORD - YEA C. WILLIAMS - YEA L. WILLIAMS - YEA MOTION CARRIED AS AMENDED. D.1. a) Motion to read by title only proposed Ordinance No. 975 regarding Council Member Watford moved to read by title only, proposed Ordinance No. 975 regarding Rezoning Petition No. Rezoning Petition No. 07-002-R, submitted by Glenda Bellamy and 07-002-R, submitted by Glenda Bellamy and Renee Ellerbee; seconded by Council Member C. Williams. Renee Ellerbee - City Planning Consultant (Exhibit 4). 11 726 FEBRUARY 20, 2006 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 7 OF 14 VII. PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE ADOPTION CONTINUED. D.1. b) Vote on motion to read by title only. VOTE KIRK - YEA MARKHAM - YEA WATFORD - YEA C. WILLIAMS -YEA L. WILLIAMS - YEA MOTION CARRIED. c) City Attorney to read proposed Ordinance No. 975 by title only. Attorney Cook read proposed Ordinance No. 975 by title only as follows: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OFI OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA; AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF OKEECHOBEE BY REZONING A CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, FROM RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE FAMILY(RMF)ZONING DISTRICT TO COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL OFFICE(CPO); AMENDING THEZONING MAP ACCORDINGLY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE." 2. a) Motion to adopt proposed Ordinance No. 975. 111 Council Member C. Williams moved to adopt proposed Ordinance No. 975; seconded by Council Member L. Williams. b) Public comments and discussion. This Ordinance amends the Zoning designation from RMF to CPO for property located at 203 Southwest 41h Street, legal description: Lots 1 and 2 of Block 185, City of Qkeechobee. The petition was submitted by property owners Glenda Bellamy and Renee Ellerbee. There were 20 notices sent to the surrounding property owners with no response to date. The property was posted with a sign advertising the request of the rezoning, dates and times of both the Planning Board and City Council public hearings. The Planning Board reviewed the application at their January 18, 2007 meeting and recommended approval, after the applicant agreed to change the zoning request from Heavy Commercial (CHV) to Commercial Professional Office (CPO), which they agreed to. . Mr. LaRue reviewed the Planning Staff Report, recommending denial. (1) The subject property is within the Single Family Future Land Use category and the RMF Zoning District is already developed with a single family residence. The surrounding properties are also consistent and allowing this use should be contrary to the Comprehensive Plan policies. (2) Section 90-282(1) permits professional office, business office, and medical offices in the CHV Zoning' District. (3) It has not been demonstrated that the proposed use would avoid an adverse effect on the public interest especially increased traffic generation in a residential neighborhood. (4) The use is not appropriate for this location. Furthermore, any future commercial use in this area could have a detrimental impact on the neighboring residential homes by allowing commercial traffic generation and other impacts related to operating a commercial venture. Such impacts maybe incompatible with and difficult to buffer from adjacent uses. (5) Permitted uses such as those allowed in the CHV Zoning District could affect or have the appearance of affecting property values in the residential neighborhood. (6) Should it be granted, the use maybe required to be buffered from the residential neighborhood. (7) The proposed use and CHV Zoning will not overburden public facilities such as schools and utilities services. Traffic, however, would be increased. (8) The subject property will increase traffic as a result of future commercial use. Should this be approved, a site plan will be required to show drainage on the site. 727 FEBRUARY 20, 2007 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 8 OF 14 VII. PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE ADOPTION CONTINUED. D. 2. b) Public comments and discussion continued. (9) The proposed use has not been inordinately burdened by unnecessary restrictions. (10) The proposed change 11 could be interpreted as a special favor to an individual owner. Mayor Kirk asked whether there were any questions or comments from the public? There were none. The Council noted this is a good fit for the area. D. 2. c) Vote on motion. VOTE KIRK - YEA MARKHAM - ABSENT WATFORD - YEA C. WILLIAMS -YEA L. WILLIAMS - YEA MOTION CARRIED. E.1. a) Motion to read by title only, proposed Ordinance No. 976, amending Council Member Watford moved to read by title only, proposed Ordinance No. 976, amending Code Book Section 90- Section 90-343 of the Land Development Regulations regarding 343, amending the Industrial Zoning District Special Exceptions permitted to add rehabilitation facilities and half -way sexual predators - City Planning Consultant (Exhibit 5). homes for sexual offenders; seconded by Council Member C. Williams. b) Vote on motion to read by title only. _ VOTE KIRK - YEA MARKHAM - ABSENT WATFORD - YEA C. WILLIAMS -YEA L. WILLIAMS - YEA MOTION CARRIED. c) City Attorney to read proposed Ordinance No. 976 by title only. Attorney Cook read proposed Ordinance No. 976 by title only as follows: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OFII OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 90-343 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; CREATING PARAGRAPH ELEVEN THEREIN PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USES IN INDUSTRIAL ZONING CATEGORIES FORA REHABILITATIONFACILITY, ORHALF-WAYHOUSEFOR SEXUAL OFFENDERS, PROVIDING FOR STANDARDS AND RESTRICTIONS TO ESTABLISH SUCH FACILITIES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE." 2. a) Motion to adopt proposed Ordinance No. 976. Council Member C. Williams moved to adopt proposed Ordinance No. 976; seconded by Council Member L. Williams. b) Public comments and discussion. Mayor Kirk asked whether there were any questions or comments from the public? There were none. Council asked whether this would take care of all the additional ordinances that were needed to follow up the initially adopted ordinance? Attorney Cook responded, yes. c) Vote on motion. VOTE KIRK - YEA MARKHAM - ABSENT WATFORD - YEA C. WILLIAMS -YEA L. WILLIAMS - YEA MOTION CARRIED. 728 FEBRUARY 20, 2007 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 9 OF 14 CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING VIII. NEW BUSINESS. MAYOR KIRK CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:02 P.M. A.1. a) Motion to read by title only, and set March 6, 2007 as a final public Council Member Watford moved to read by title only, and set March 6, 2007 as a final public hearing date for proposed hearing date for proposed Ordinance No. 977, amending Chapter Ordinance No. 977, amending Chapter 50, Part II of the Code of Ordinances from "Occupational License Tax' to 50, Part II of the Code of Ordinances from "Occupational License "Business License Tax;" seconded'by Council Member C. Williams. Tax' to "Business License Tax"- City Attorney (Exhibit 6). b) Vote on motion to read by title only. KIRK - YEA C. WILLIAMS -YEA MARKHAM - ABSENT L. WILLIAMS - YEA WATFORD - YEA MOTION CARRIED. c) City Attorney to read proposed Ordinance No. 977 by title only. Attorney Cook read proposed Ordinance No. 977 by title only as follows: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA AMENDING PART II, CODE OF ORDINANCES, GENERAL ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 50, TAXATION, TO REFLECTSTA TUTORY CHANGES ENACTEDBY THEFLORIDA LEGISLATURE, PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SUBSTITUTION; AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE." 2. a) Motion to approve the first reading of proposed Ordinance No. 977. III Council Member L. Williams moved to approve the first reading of proposed Ordinance No. 977; seconded by Council Member C. Williams. b) Discussion. III This change is due to the State Legislation changing the title in the statutes. c) Vote on motion. VOTE KIRK - YEA MARKHAM - ABSENT WATFORD - YEA C. WILLIAMS -YEA L. WILLIAMS - YEA MOTION CARRIED. B.1. a) Motion to read by title only and set March 6, 2007 as a final public Council Member Watford moved to read by title only, and set March 6, 2007 as a final public hearing date for proposed hearing date for proposed Ordinance No. 978 amending Chapter Ordinance No. 978 amending Chapter 62, Part II of the Code of Ordinances regarding the issuance of business 62, Part II of the Code of Ordinances regarding the issuance of licenses for businesses that conduct vehicles for hire, or taxicabs; seconded by Council Member L. Williams. business licenses for businesses that conduct vehicles for hire, or taxicabs - City Attorney (Exhibit 7). b) Vote on motion to read by title only. KIRK - YEA C. WILLIAMS -YEA MARKHAM - ABSENT L. WILLIAMS - YEA WATFORD - YEA MOTION CARRIED. Vlll. NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED. B. 1, c) City Attorney to read proposed Ordinance No. 978 by title only. 2. a) Motion to approve the first reading of proposed Ordinance No. 978. b) Discussion. c) Vote on motion. C. Consider request for a two-hour parking limit in the 500 Block of South Park Street - Earle Strickland, Fantasy Lighting (Exhibit 8). FEBRUARY 20, 2007 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 10 OF 14 729 Attorney Cook read proposed Ordinance No. 978 by title only as follows: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY 01 OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA AMENDING PART Il, CODE OF ORDINANCES, GENERAL ORDINANCES, CHAPTEf 62 VEHICLES FOR HIRE; CREATING ORDINANCE NO 62-32 TO REFLECT THAT THE APPLICATION INVESTIGATION AND APPROVAL OFALL PERMITS FOR VEHICLES FOR HIRE SHALL BE PERFORMED B ) THE BUSINESS LICENSE OFFICk OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SUBSTITUTION, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE." Council Member L. Williams moved to approve the first reading of proposed Ordinance No. 978; seconded by Council Member Watford. Council agreed that it would be better to have this moved under the direction of the Finance Department since they are the office that issues the business license. KIRK - YEA C. WILLIAMS -YEA MARKHAM - ABSENT L. WILLIAMS - YEA WATFORD - YEA MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Earle Strickland, of Fantasy Lighting, 415 Southwest Park Street, requested that a two-hour parking restriction be implemented for parking on the South side of Park Street within his block. The request is to limit employees of other businesses from parking in front of his business for longer than two hours. Sometimes they are parked there all day. He has spoken with the landlord with no prevail. He also spoke with the Police Department, and they have been addressing the businesses with this issue. Mr. Strickland asked whether the restriction could possibly be enforced during the peak hours of the day, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., to limit the workload of the police officers? Chief Davis stated that the officers would still have to enforce the time restriction. Chief Davis also stated that the business owners should be courteous of the other businesses and not use their front parking spaces. Mr. Chuck Parker of Florida Floors and More, 513 Southwest Park Street, addressed the Council and stated that he feels the parking restriction would be detrimental to his business. Sometime a customer may stay longer than a couple of hours selecting the right merchandise for their project. He also stated that he would ask his employees to park on the North side of Park Street, to leave the South side vacant for patrons. Mr. Les McCrary of Ceeco, 519 West South Park Street, addressed the Council and stated that this was the first he had heard of this problem. 730 FEBRUARY 20, 2007 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 11 OF 14 VIII. NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED. C. Consider request for a two-hour parking limit continued. He believes that the business owners should work this out amongst themselves without burdening the Council. He will do his part and be courteous by asking his employees to park on the North side of Park Street. He also wanted the Council to know that a two-hour parking restriction will also be detrimental to his business, as he too has customers that may have to stay longer than two hours. Administrator Whitehall stated he understood the dilemma of not enough parking and that he can see the congestion is a big concern. He also commented that there are some vacant lots on the corner of Southwest 2"d Street which could possibly be turned into parking lots. Council Member L. Williams agreed with Administrator Whitehall and also remarked that we all need to be courteous' when we are parking on Park Street. Council Member C. Williams stated that a good neighbor is worth a million dollars, and that as neighbors they should work this out together. Mayor Kirk remarked that as we grow this will continue to be a problem, right now it would not be in the City's best interest to hire a full time employee to monitor parking restrictions. No official action was taken as all parties agreed to meet to find a solution. Mayor Kirk advised Mr. Strickland that should the matter not resolve itself, that he bring it back before the Council. As Council Member Watford noted, this is City parking and we have the authority to take necessary action, including the installation of ,parking meters. Mayor Kirk Recessed the meeting at 7:25 p.m. The meeting was Reconvened at 7:32 p.m. D. Presentation of conceptual plans for Courthouse Park project - Mr. Devin Maxwell, Chairman of the Okeechobee Main Street Design Committee addressed the Council regarding the Devin Maxwell, Okeechobee Main Street (Exhibit 9). Courthouse Park Project. The property, Lots 1 through 6 of Block 157, located between Northwest 2°d and 3`d Avenues and North of Northwest 2"d Street, City of Okeechobee Subdivision, is owned by the County and contiguous to Flagler Park. An Urban Planner was hired to design the conceptual site plan. At this time, the committee is not asking for action, only to present the plans thus far, and eventually seek the City's "blessing." The proposed park will have a fountain centrally located in the form of Lake Okeechobee, a concession stand area, amphitheater, gazebo and walking paths. The design of the amphitheater will have archways with rod iron bars to mirror the Old Courthouse. The next step is to work toward finalizing the construction plans in order to get costs and budgets to begin seeking funding. The Council noted their support for the project, and added when the project gets to the point of funding, the City may utilize Grant Administrator Nancy Phillips to assist, since the City has been successful in the past with attaining- park grants. 731 FEBRUARY 20, 2006 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 12 OF 14 VIII. NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED. E. Motion to approve Temporary Street Closings submitted by the Council Member Watford moved to approve Temporary Street Closings submitted by the Chamber of Commerce for Chamber of Commerce for the Speckled Perch Festival - City Clerk the Speckled Perch Festival, Southwest 2"d, V, 4th, 5' and 6'h Avenues between North and South Park Streets from (Exhibit 10). 11 12:00 p.m. March 9 through 9:00 p.m. March 11; seconded by Council Member C. Williams. There was a brief discussion. VOTE KIRK - YEA MARKHAM - ABSENT WATFORD - YEA C. WILLIAMS -YEA L. WILLIAMS - YEA MOTION CARRIED. F. Motion to approve an agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, On September 6, 2006 the City entered into an Interlocal Agreement (titled "Public School Facility Planning") with the Inc., (KHA) as the consultant for preparing the school element for School Board and County regarding school concurrency and relative to Florida 2005 Growth Management Legislation the City's Comprehensive Plan, which is a prerequisite of legislative (Senate Bill 360). This requires the entities to amend their Comprehensive Plans by adopting a Public School Facilities concurrency - City Administrator (Exhibit 11). Element and amend their Capital Improvements and Intergovernmental Coordination Elements. The next step in the process was to have School Board initiate request for proposals from consultants to prepare the documents and have the three entities enter into an agreement with the most qualified consultant. Proposals were received and negotiations completed by the School Board, causing the matter at hand to be presented for Council consideration. Council Member Watford moved to approve an agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., (KHA) as the consultant to prepare and present the City Council, for consideration and adoption, a Public School Facilities Element and amendments to the Capital Improvements and Intergovernmental Coordination Elements of the CiVs Comprehensive plan, as required by Florida 2005 Growth Management Senate Bill 360; not to exceed forty-eight thousand dollars (48,000.00); seconded by Council Member L. Williams. Council Member Watford asked whether this is being funded by the School Board? Administrator Whitehall replied yes. The estimated cost is thirty-seven thousand dollars ($37,000.00). The School Board received two grants, one, for twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) and another for ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00). The City, County and School Board will share the remaining costs beyond the grant funds. VOTE KIRK - YEA MARKHAM - ABSENT WATFORD - YEA C. WILLIAMS - YEA L. WILLIAMS - YEA MOTION CARRIED. 732 FEBRUARY 20, 2006 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 13 OF 14 VIII. NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED. G. H. Discussion of new building elevation requirements - Mayor Kirk. Mayor Kirk began by noting the City Code Book (Section 78-1(2)) states "Developments shall be designed to provide adequate access to lots and sites, avoid adverse effects or noise, odor, traffic, drainage and utilities on surrounding properties, and avoid unnecessary impervious surface cover." New developments, but mostly "in -fill" of existing neighborhoods are being adversely impacted due to inconsistency with the elevation requirements. The developments are being built much higher than the surrounding properties. The Council briefly discussed specific areas that have been impacted and that the City needs to find a solution to this problem. The City should be addressing the drainage effect before a Certificate of Occupancy is issued and consider setting a maximum height for determining house elevations. The Code Book only lists the minimum not the maximum. Administrator Whitehall informed the Council that the County uses three factors to determine the elevation of a development. (1) Flood plain; (2) Health Department - Septic Field; (3)18 inches above the crown of the road. There are other surrounding counties which follow the same criteria. Mayor Kirk instructed Attorney Cook to investigate the law and to determine whether the Health Department can set the elevation height. He was also instructed to work with staff to find a better method of determining the elevation rather than just putting the minimum required. Captain John Barry Lege', residing at 1010 Southwest 7`rAvenue, addressed the Council and his concern in regards to the elevation of a new development next to his residence. He wanted to know how this could be allowed when the code states no adverse effects for drainage on surrounding property? He has been told that it was allowed by the Health Department, but has not contacted the Health Department yet. Mayor Kirk reassured Mr. Lege' that Staff will immediately take the necessary steps to address the drainage, will research options and then will bring the findings back to Council. Motion to approve accepting ladder truck from City of Pinellas Park - Council Member C. Williams moved to approve accepting a 1983 Sutphen Quint Aerial Platform ladder fire truck from City Administrator/Fire Chief. IIII the. City of Pinellas Park; seconded by Council Member Watford. Fire Chief Smith remarked that the delivery of the truck is expected to be Monday, February 26' at 11:00 a.m. He also informed the Council that his fire department was chosen out of 60 jurisdictions. The Council thanked Fire Chief Smith for his efforts in obtaining this fire truck by grant. The acquisition of a ladder truck has been a budgeted concern for several years. Having the truck will also continue to keep the City's ISO fire rating down, which in turn keeps home owner insurance costs down. City Clerk Gamiotea was instructed to prepare a Certificate of Appreciation to present to the City of Pinellas Park. VOTE KIRK - YEA MARKHAM - ABSENT WATFORD - YEA C. WILLIAMS -YEA L. WILLIAMS - YEA MOTION CARRIED. 733 1 1 Vlll. NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED. I. ITEM ADDED TO AGENDA: Motion to adopt Resolution No. 07-04, Extension of moratorium for signs and billboards - City Attorney (Exhibit 12). X. ADJOURN MEETING - Mayor. Please take notice and be advised that when a person decides to appeal any decision made by the City Council with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, he/she may need to insure that a verbatim record of the proceeding is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. City Clerk media is for the sole purpose of backup for official records of the Clerk. rV09S! Di James E. Kirk, Mayor FEBRUARY 20, 2006 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 14 OF 14 Council Member Watford moved to adopt proposed Resolution No. 07-04; seconded by Council Member C. Williams. Mayor Kirk read proposed Resolution No. 07-04 by title only as follows: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA EXTENDING THE PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 06-10 WHICH IMPOSED A MORATORIUM ON THE ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY OF APPLICATIONS FOR OFF -PREMISES SIGNS DESIGNED TO BE BILLBOARDS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE." This Resolution extends the provisions of Resolution No. 06-10 previously adopted by the City, in its entirety to May 1, 2007, or until the City Council adopts an amendment to the sign ordinance, whichever first occurs. KIRK - YEA C. WILLIAMS - YEA MARKHAM - ABSENT L. WILLIAMS - YEA WATFORD - YEA MOTION CARRIED. THERE BEING NO FURTHER ITEMS ON THE AGENDA, MAYOR KIRK ADJOURNED THE MEETING AT8:40 P.M. The next regularly scheduled meeting is March 6, 2007, 6:00 p.m.. OO Pages 9 and 10 were corrected by removing Chandler listed on the votes and replaced with C. Williams. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLISHER OKEECHOBEE TIMES 106 S.E. Sth St., Okeechobee, FL 34974 (863' . 763-7483 Published Weekly STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE: Before the undersigned authority personally appeared James A. Hughes, Jr., who on oath says that he is publisher of the Okeechobee Times, a newspaper published weekly at Okeechobee in Okeechobee, - --- CO - CITY UNCII. MEETING Florida: 1 4 ) e TL CANCELLATION NOTICE elrroy bX3 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the mcil o City of Okeechobee will ` that the attached copy of advertisement, �a% rjtM ��• Penury being a City Council Meeting Cancellation Notice PO #013344 ZO 2007 6:�8 try H , , rd Ave, 1Rmi00;'6kcadiobee, Florida. The public is in the matter of City of Okeechobee �17�� invited and encouraged to attend For a copy of the agenda contact City Administration at City of Okeechobee (863)76 x212. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE 55 SE Third Avenue ADVISED that if any person desires to appeal my decision made by the City Council with Okeechobee, FL 34974-2932 respect to any manercopsidered at this meeting, such interested person will need a record of the Proceedings, and for such purpose may need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based In the Court, Tapes are used for the sole purpose of back-up was published in said newspaper in the issues of 02/15/2007 for the Clerk's Office. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Florida Statute 286.26, persons with disabilities needing special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact Lane Gamiotea; no later than two (2) working days prior to the proceeding Affiant further says that the said Okeechobee Times is a newspaper at 863-763-3372 s 214; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call TDD 1-800-222-3448 published at Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, and by' James E. Kirk Mayo°(TTY). that said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in Lane Gamiotea, CMC. City Clerk said Okeechobee, Florida as a daily, weekly, or bi-weekly and has Publish: 02/15/2007 been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Okeechobee Times Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm nor corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. e � James A. Hughes, Jr., (Publisher) Sworn to and subscribed before me Y this ,� D day of A.D. 2007 (SEAL) '� Notary Public = (',Olrifillsslol' 4DD318483 Expires: gun 25. j00K Bondeed f ,-rl F OFF =4ll3iltlC Bonding- CO.. The Okeechobee News P.O. Box 639, Okeechobee, Florida 34973 (863) 763-3134 Published Daily STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OFOKEECHOBEE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Judy Kasten, who on oath says she is Publisher of the Okeechobee News, a DAILY Newspaper published at Okeechobee, in Okeechobee County, Florida; that the attached copy of ad seme t, being a in a matter of in the 19th Judicial District of the Circuit Court of Okeechobee County, Florida, was published in said newspaper in the issues of i 9 / Affiant further says that the said Okeechobee News is a newspaper published at Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been published continuously in said Okeechobee County, Florida each week and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affrant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for pub cation in the said newspaper. PUBIJC NOTICE CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING EA �p thaLtlA�CIdTvYOORRuDINANCE CM of ee& FI a will onT sEsdTaAyKTebruTary 2I1, 20(17 at'6.00 P m or as satin iherearterpoessi6 e�dar City HaH, 55 SE 3rd Ave., Okeechobee, FL conduct a PUBLIC HEARING on and Iheraaftuto consider final reading of the f��Nlaoww��pp Ordinance brio law: NO.966, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OXEECHOSEE, FLORIDA ADOPTING AMEND- MENTS TO ITS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INCLUDING AMENDMENTS TO THE FU- TURE LAND USE MAP, THE TEXT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE, CONSERVATION, AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENTS; TO REVISE AND UPDATE THE EXIST- ING OBJECTIVES, POLICIES DATA AND ANALYSIS; IN ACCOROANCE WRR THE MANDATES SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 163, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR TRANSMITTAL TO THE STATE LAND PLANNING AGENCY; PROVIDING A CON- FLICTS CLAUSE AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. AN members of the public are encouraged to attend and �rbcipate in said hearirhq. The proposed Ordinance may be Inspected in its entirely by members of the pubiu: in the tors a of the City Clack during regular business hours, Non-Fn, 8am-4:3Opm, except hoolidEayssp� pip pp�gEp d rson 1 T' E T d therty C BE T wi�i erect iy � attdes res t8 �d dec swn ma a by punch 4p o a y m er consr e r Haring, such irderosteit person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose may need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. City Cleric tapes are for the sole purpose of backup for official records of the Clerk. 28� co ed sah�s wdh the /�h��ricans yr Diaabil tyd Act 1%and Florida $W de(s p with disc r es nee mg specr cca on to par chp n this proceeding should contact Lane Gamiotea no later than two (2) working days prior to the proceedi at 863.763-3372 x215; if Haring or voice impaired, call TDD 1.800-222-3448 (voice) or 1-888.447-5620 (TTY). 1 "T MC, CITY CLERK ............................................. 42 CONSTANCE L. HAWSE Sworn to an su scribed fore me this _ `fix, Comm# OD0563848 daflof A.D. 20 Expires 6114/2010 Florida Notary Assn., Inc .................................' Notary Public, State of Florida at Large The Okeechobee News P.O. Box 639, Okeechobee, Florida 34973 (863) 763-3134 Published Daily STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Judy Kasten, who on oath says she is Publisher of the Okeechobee News, a DAILY Newspaper published at Okeechobee, in Okeechobee County, Florida; that the attached copy of a e isement, being a in th matter of in the 19th Judicial District of the Circuit Court of Okeechobee County, Florida, was published in said newspaper in the issues Affiant further says that the said Okeechobee News is newspaper published at Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been published continuously in said Okeechobee County, Florida each week and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of 1• ' the said newspaper STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMDNITY AFFAIRS NOTICE OF INTENT TO FIND THE OKEECHOBEE CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT?) IN COMPLIANCE DOCKET NO. 07-1-N01.470�-(A)-(I) re Department gives notice of its intent to find the Amendments to the ComF henswe Phan for the I of Okeechobee, adopted by Ordinance 1. 965 on Feh attyy 20, 2007, IN COMPLIANCE, pursuant to Sections 163.3184, 163.3187 163.3189, F.S. re adapted City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan Amendment(s) and the I partments Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report, (if any), available for rW inspection Monday through Friday, except for Ieal hohda during normal business hours, at the City of Okeechobee, Cdy Hall Clarks Offi 55 Southeast 3rd Avenue, Okeechobee, Florida 34974. ry affected person, as definedc hinaIleSer�ction 163.3184, F.S. , has a right to petition an administrative hearing to challenge pprroopposed agency determination that Amandment(s to the City of Dkeech Comprehensive Plan are In Comptian as defined in subsection 163.3184(1Ili` , F.S. The petition must be filed within tw ty-one (21) days after publication of this notice, and must include all of the in motion and contents described in Uniform Rule 28.106.201, F.A.C. The petit must be filed with the Agency Clerk, Department of Community Affairs, 21. Shumard Oak Boulevard, Tallahassee, Ronda 32399-2100, and a copy mailed delivered to the local limemment. Failure to timely fie a petition shall consBhA waiver of aaniryy d1p to request an administrative proceeding as a petitioner un Sections 120.569 and 120.57, F.S. K a petition is filed, the purpose of the adn istrative hearing will be to present evidence and testimony and forward a recc mended order to the Department. If no petition is filed, this Notice of Intent sl become final agency action. a petition rs filed, other affected persons may petition for leave to intervene in proceeding A petition for intervention must be filed at least twenty (20) days fore the final 'rearing and must include all of the information and contents scribed in Uniform Rule 28-106.205, F.A.C. A petition for leave to intervene N be filed at the Division of Administrative Hearings, Department of Manapem Services, 1230 Apalachee Parkway, Tallahassee, Florida 32399 3060. Failure petition to intervene within the allowed time frame constitutes a waiver of i rght such a person has to request a he under Sect ons 120.569 and 120.i F ., orto participate in Ore administrative hearing. ter an administrative hearing petition is timely Ned, mediation is available pursu to Subsection 163.3189(3)(a), F.S., to any affected person who is made 7 pa to the proceeding by Blirp ttfihI I request with Me administrative law judge aasigr by the Division of Administrative Hearings. The choice of mediation shall not feel a pangs right to any administrative hearing. 204888 ON 4116/07 securing this advertisement r pub lcatron m �L ..,... itiNCE L. hnv„,� Comm# OD0563M =<_ Sw t and ribed before me this ? Expires 6/1412010 Florida Notary Assn.. he day A.D. 20 ' . ... ':'�'................ " nry Public. State of Florida at Large Florida N-0 Oka ab_. cry u' Page -1- CITY OF OKEECHOBEE - February 20, 2007 - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING. HANDWRITTEN MINUTES I. CALL TO ORDER - Mayor: Kirk, February 20, 2007. City Council Regular Meeting 6:00 p.m. II. OPENING CEREMONIES: Invocation aiven hU.9i�#a a , �� , Tranci ira Iclonrl Ror Church: Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor. qr l ,Sec�tts Tire �iS� III. MAYOR, COUNCIL AND STAFF ATTENDANCE - City Clerk. Present ohcant Mayor James E. Kirk Council Member Clayton Williams Council Member Lowry Markham C` 0�, p, Council Member Dowling R. Watford, Jr. Council Member Lydia Jean Williams City Administrator Brian Whitehall City Attorney John R. Cook City Clerk Lane Gamiotea Deputy Clerk Melisa Eddings Police Chief Denny Davis Fire Chief Herb Smith Public Works Director Robertson IV. MINUTES - City Clerk. � N��u 9 rcw.ot 1r V A. Council Member moved to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Council Action for the February 6, 2007 Regular Meet?10�, seconded by Council Member T YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT K Vct � 0" C. WILLIAMS Phi G 4- to MARKHAM �► WATFORD ( �. L. WILLIAMS �.) t.�L.Q„t.a-� MOTION: DENIE CARRIE V. WARRANT REGISTERS - City Administrator. A. Council Member I�L�) moved to approve the January 2007 Warrant Register General Fund, four hundred nine thousand, eight hundred fifty-two dollars and eighty-nine cents Sp„-Q,LW—, ($409,852.89); DB Fund, five thousand three hundred five dollars and eighty cents ($5,305.80); 6WaP 7 PublicA —prover-n—eftStacilifleyFund, twenty-one dollars and fifty-three cents ($21.53); seconded by Council Member. 7VI. AGENDA - Mayor.. A. Requests for the addition, deferral or withdrawal of items on today's agenda. ,d Y Page -2- VII. MAYOR KIRK OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE ADOPTION AT P.M. A. 1. a) Council Member Markham moved to adopt proposed Ordinance No. 965 regarding Cycle 12007 (formerly known as Cycle 12006) Comprehensive Plan Narrative (a Amendments and Large Scale T6�f- Future Land Use Map Amendments No. 06-CI-001 Hackl/H2 Oldings and 06-CI-002 Altobello/Close seconded by Council Member Watford, at the December 5, 2007 meeting. (Exhibit 1). Discussion and public comments. This ordinance adopts the Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments: Future Land Use Element, Conservation Element and the Capital Improvements Element, also Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendments; 06-C1-001 H2O Holdings, LLC; and 06-C1-002 CBC Management Corporation. Mr. LaRue, at the December 5, 2006 meeting had recommended that the Council delay the approval in order to finalize additional amendments proposed by South Florida Water Management. b) Vote on motion. VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT KIRK C. WILLIAMS MARKHA WATFORD L. WILLIAMS MOTION: DENIE /CARRIE B.1. a) Council Member �) w 971 regarding Alley Closing Application (Exhibit 2); seconded by Council Member Page -3- moved to read by title only proposed Ordinance No. No. 85, InSite Development Group, LLC -City Attorney 11 b) Vote on motion. VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT KIRK C. WILLIAMS MARKHAiv WATFORD L. WILLIAMS MOTION: DENIED/ ED C) Attorney Cook read proposed Ordinance No. 971 by title only as follows: "AN ORDINANCE CLOSING, VACATING AND ABANDONING THE ALLEYS OR ALLEYWAYS AS DESCRIBED HEREIN, WITHIN BLOCKS 4, 12, 13, 20 AND 21, CITY OF OKEECHOBEE SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS FOR OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA; RESERVING UNTO THE CITY ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS A PERPETUAL NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR UTILITY PURPOSES, PROVIDING FOR A RIGHT OF REVERSION; AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO RECORD THE ORDINANCE /N THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE." 2. a) Council Member A 0 moved to adopt proposed Ordinance No. 971; seconded by Council Member b) Public comments and discussion. The purpose of the ordinance is to close the East to West and the North to South alleyways of Block 12 and Block 21, Okeechobee and the East to West alleys of Block 4, Block 13 and Block 20, Okeechobee. Alley Closing Application No. 85 was submitted by Steve Dobbs, on behalf of property owner InSite Development LLC. Easements are being requested by Florida Power & Light, Embarq and OUA. The property is proposed to be used for a multi -family development. There were letters sent to surrounding property owners with no response to date. Vjx,)j Ntcco j IS�� a�Z C) Vote on motion. VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT KIRK L, C. WILLIAMS V MARKHAM WATFORD L. WILLIAMS v MOTION: DENIE ARRIED (�, "� Page -4- C.1. a) council Member_ w moved to read by title only, proposed Ordinance No. 974 regarding Rezoning Application No. 07-001-R, submitted y William Mason - City Planning Consultant (Exhibit 3); seconded by Council Member b) Vote on motion to read by title only. VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT KIRK v C. WILLIAMS V MARKHAM WATFORD L. WILLIAMS v MOTION: DENT CARRI c) Attorney Cook read proposed Ordinance No. 974 by title only as follows: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITYOFOKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA; AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OFOKEECHOBEE BY REZONING A CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, FROM HOLDING (H) TO RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY -ONE (RSF-1) ZONING DISTRICT; AMENDING THEZONING MAP ACCORDINGLY, PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. " 2. a) Council Member _ moved to adopt proposed Ordinance No. 974; seconded by Council Member b) Public comments and discussion. This Ordinance amends the Zoning designation from Holding (H) to Residential Single Family -One (RSF-1) for property located at the West Entrance of the Commerce Center. The petition was submitted by the property owner, William Mason. There were 20 notices sent to the surrounding property owners with one response, but no objection to date. The property was posted with a sign advertising the request of the rezoning, dates and times of both the Planning Board and City Council public hearings. The Planning Board reviewed the application at their January 18, 2007 meeting and recommended approval. Senior Planner Brisson reviewed the Planning Staff Report, recommending approval. (1) The proposed single family use and RSF-1 Zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies and the Future Land Use Map designation for this property. (2) Section 90-102(1) allows single family dwellings as a permitted use under the RSF-1 Zoning District. (3) The proposed single family use and RSF-1 Zoning District will not have an adverse effect on the public interest. (4) A single family dwelling would be appropriate for this location and compatible with the surrounding land uses. (5) The RSF-1 Zoning and accompanying single family use would not adversely affect property values or living conditions. Development of the subject property could encourage development of vacant lands adjacent to the applicant's property. (6) Should it be required, the proposed single family use could be buffered from surrounding uses. At this time, however, it does not appear that buffering will be necessary. (7) The proposed single family use will not create a density pattern that would overburden public facilities. The proposed RSF-1 Zoning would create consistency with the existing Single Family Future Land Use category. (8) The applicant is not proposing any density increases for the subject property. The rezoning request is to allow the applicant to develop the property within the parameter of the Single Family land use category consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. As such, traffic congestions, flooding or drainage will not be a problem for the site. (9) The only restrictions placed on the subject property are those which are set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and the Land Development Code. The proposed use has not been inordinately burdened by unnecessary restrictions. (10) By allowing the applicant to develop the property under the RSF-1 Zoning District, the applicant is not receiving any special privileges which are not granted to any other citizen under the same circumstances. Dc�c,Lh Ott 4d LA hL SF `N-Lo +c 4 u P ► ? "bw 0,7q +o &_,04_� � &IL 6l j4d C �• <T-�awf � , �& S ao- / S q 9 �19 � r i Pa . tam � �4� - iti� ��� Page -5- c) Vote on motion. VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT KIRK j- C. WILLIAMS v MARKHAM WATFORD ✓ L. WILLIAMS MOTION: DENIE CARRIED ,�, ..\\ Page -6- D.1. a) Council Member DUV moved to read by title only proposed Ordinance No. 975 regarding Rezoning Petition No. 07-002-R, submitted by Glenda Bell y and Renee Ellerbee - City Planning Consultant (Exhibit 4); seconded by Council Member b) Vote on motion to read by title only. VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT KIRK v C. WILLIAMS MARKHAM WATFORD L. WILLIAMS MOTION: DENIED/ ARRIED c) Attorney Cook read proposed Ordinance No. 975 by title only as follows: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITYOFOKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA; AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OFOKEECHOBEE BY REZONING A CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, FROM RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE FAMILY (RMF) ZONING DISTRICT TO COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (CPO), AMENDING THE ZONING MAP ACCORDINGLY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE." 2. a) Council Member C Uj moved to adopt proposed Ordinance No. 975; seconded by Council Member i („A) b) Public comments and discussion. This Ordinance amends the Zoning designation from RMF to CPO for property located at 203 Southwest 41h Street. The petition was submitted by property owners Glenda Bellamy and Renee Ellerbee. There were 20 notices sent to the surrounding property owners with no response to date. The property was posted with a sign advertising the request of the rezoning, dates and times of both the Planning Board and City Council public hearings. The Planning Board reviewed the application at their January 18, 2007 meeting and recommended approval. c) Vote on motion. VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT KIRK C. WILLIAMS t� MARKHAM — WATFORD L. WILLIAMS MOTION: DENIED/ ARRIiD. \\ Page -7- E.1. a) Council Member (,U moved to read by title only, proposed Ordinance No. 976, amending Section 90-343 of the Land Development Regulations regarding sexual predators - City Planning Consultant (Exhibit 5); seconded by Council Member ao b) Vote on motion to read by title only. VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT KIRK t/ C. WILLIAMS MARKHAM X WATFORD L. WILLIAMS t/ MOTION: DENIE �Rl c) Attorney Cook read proposed Ordinance No. 976 by title only as follows: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITYOFOKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION90-343 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, CREATING PARAGRAPH ELEVEN THEREIN PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USES IN INDUSTRIAL ZONING CATEGORIES FOR A REHABILITATION FACILITY, OR HALF -WAY HOUSE FOR SEXUAL OFFENDERS; PROVIDING FOR STANDARDS AND RESTRICTIONS TO ESTABLISH SUCH FACILITIES, PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE." 2. a) Council Member moved to adopt proposed Ordinance No. 976; seconded by Council Member b) Public comments and discussion. LC& u a — I< c) Vote on motion. VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT KIRK C. WILLIAMS MARKHAM WATFORD v L. WILLIAMS MOTION: DENIED/PARRIED) MAYOR KIRK CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT "�I Cl--) P.M. Page -8- VIII. NEW BUSINESS. A.1. a) Council Member moved to read by title only, and set March 6, 2007 as a final public hearing date for proposed Ordinance No. 977, amending Chapter 50, Part II of the Code of Ordinances from "Occupational License Tax" to Business License Tax" - City Attorney (Exhibit 6)� b) Vote on motion to read by title only. VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT KIRK V C. WILLIAMS- WATFORD t� L. WILLIAMS MOTION: DENIE �R. c) Attorney Cook read proposed Ordinance No. 977 by title only as follows: "ANORDINANCEOFTHE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA AMENDING PART Il, CODE OF ORDINANCES, GENERAL ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 50, TAXATION, TO REFLECT STATUTORY CHANGES ENACTED BY THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SUBSTITUTION, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE." 2. a) Council Member ( U� moved to approve the first reading of proposed Ordinance No. 977; seconded by Council Member 0 0 b) Discussion. �l dew 00,u-k�,x .�,�s�wlca�t� SGJA�— c) Vote on motion. VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT KIRK (� C. WILLIAMS (� MARKHAM - _---- — l WATFORD (� L. WILLIAMS c/ MOTION: DENIE BRIE 1 Page -9- B.1. a) council Member moved to read by title only and set March 6, 2007 as a final public hearing date for proposed Ordinance No. 978 amending Chapter 62, Part II of the Code of Ordinances regarding the issuance of business licenses for businesses that con ict vehicles for hire, ortaxicabs - City Attorney (Exhibit 7); seconded by Council Member JJ b) Vote on motion to read by title only. VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT KIRK C. WILLIAMS MARKHAM ------ iC WATFORD v" L. WILLIAMS MOTION: DENIE RRIE c) Attorney Cook read proposed Ordinance No. 978 by title only as follows: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDAAMENDING PART ll, CODE OF ORDINANCES, GENERALORDINANCES, CHAPTER 62 VEHICLES FOR HIRE; CREATING ORDINANCE NO. 62- 32 TO REFLECT THAT THEAPPLICATION, INVESTIGA TIONAND APPRO VAL OFALL PERMITS FOR VEHICLES FOR HIRE SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THE BUSINESS LICENSE OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SUBSTITUTION, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE." 2. a) Council Member LW moved to approve the first reading of proposed Ordinance No. 978; seconded by Council Member b) Discussion. cos - D�L4 ZQAta Vote on motion. VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT KIRK C. WILLIAMS ti— MARKHAM WATFORD L. WILLIAMS MOTION: DENIE CARRI . q �.A- Page -10- C. Consider request for a two-hour parking limit in the 500 Block of South Park Street - Earle Strickland, Fantasy Lighting (Exhibit 8). Lev S� S �_C'_Q C ;��� [\'� _/V�C)A,�-G. on motion. KI C. WAT RD eo ILLIAMS ft DENIED ARRIED. -7 11xe.1 Page -11- D. Presentation of conceptual plans for Courthouse Park project - Devin Maxwell, Okeechobee Main Street (Exhibit 9). Page -12- E. Council Member moved to approve Temporary Street Closings submitted by the Chamber of Commerce for the Speckled Perch Festival - City Clerk (Exhibit 10); seconded by Council Member Vote on motion. VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT KIRK t/ C. WILLIAMS MARKHAM WATFORD L. WILLIAMS v MOTION: DENIED �RIE F. r' ( t 5- ftt(s, da-�U ,� cruao Council Member IV to moved to approve an agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., (KHA) as the consultant for preparing the school element for the City's Comprehensive Plan, which is a prerequisite of legislative concurrency - City Administrator (Exhibit 11); seconded by Council Member L--A) Vote on motion. VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT KIRK C. WILLIAMS MARKHAM WATFORD L. WILLIAMS MOTION: DENI /CARRIED Page -13- G. Discussion of new building elevation requirements - Mayor Kirk. Gfv-- 1 00- -Ij S4 Lau - Jo law -� coo- GcIA.W— 5�0v�� C. 0 61 *e�, Clue.Yl,�- rj Page -14- H. Council Member �s1N moved to approve accepting ladder truck from City of Pinellas Park - City Administrator/Fire Chief; seconded by Council Member s+,u aA cam? (Xk,�-*AT \ c,,,� Paz � u�t 0c ,- I D� - I 11) vvt Vote on motion. VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT KIRK (� C. WILLIAMS t� MARKHAM WATFORD L. WILLIAMS MOTION: DENIECARR E -- IX. MAYOR KIRK ADJOURNED THE MEETING AT P.M. (u-L ck- plc 4-i 0-�— ljw\k� , OF-OKEECHOBEE = February 2D 2UOT=-REGUCAR-CITY 000NCILMO EET[N = HANDWRITTEN MINUTES -l- CALL.TODRDER-_May=1 - 11.---OPENINGsfREMGNIES-:- Church: Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor. III. MAYOR, COUNCIL AND STAFF ATTENDANCE - City Clerk. Present - James-E-. - Kirk . - --_ _- - ---- - - -- - - --- Ceut'teiF Mer�►ber-�+ayter�-Wi}}iat�ts- -_ Council-Member_.owiyA4arkham_- ---------_ -_ _ __. - _-- - --Council- Member Dowling-R.-Watford,, Council Member Lydia Jean Williams City Administrator Brian Whitehall City Attorney John R. Cook City Clerk Lane Gamiotea Deputy Clerk Melisa Eddings Police Chief Denny Davis Fire Chief Herb Smith PUbfic-Works Director -Robertson RA e = -- -- __- - - 9 - Absent IV. MINUTES -City Clerk. /f - - ---4:- £ouncil-Member�� to-dispenseMth-the- �T�zj1-------��}- eadrnganctapprove-the- - Summary of Founcil Action for the February 6, 2007 Regular Meeting, seconded by Council Member UA- VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT -KIRK- C. WILLIAMS - MARKHAM WATFORD i t WILLIAMS MOTION: DENIED/ RIED ---- AR . V. WARRANT REGISTERS - Pity Ad 'nistr tor. A. Council Member moved to approve the January 2007 Warrant Register in - _ the2mounts-of:__GeneralFund, rhundred_ninethousand, eightbumd P fifty-twadollars nine cents ($409,852.89); Community Development Building Grant Fund, five thousand three hundred five -dollars -and- 803 lrnp me t Fund; twenty-vwdonarsand - ►ghtyeents{$5,305: ;-PubliaFacilities fifty-three cents ($21.53); seconded by Council Member - VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT '7� e KIRK - - -- _ MARKHA -- ---- WATFORD--J L. WILLIAMS _MOTION: -DENIEk-ALRFRUIED.)'. - VI. AGENDA - Mayor. A. Requests for the addition, deferral or withdrawal of items on today's agenda. _ _ A 1 a) Council Member Markham moved to adopt proposed Ordinance No 965 regarding Cycle 12007 (formerly known as Cycle 12006) Comprehensive Plan Narrative (Text) Amendments and Large Scale seconded by Council Member Watford, at the December 5, 2007 meeting. (Exhibit 1). Discussion and public comments. This ordinance adopts the Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments: Future Lano Use Element, Conservation Element and the Gapital Improvements Element, also Gomprehensive PIM Future Land Use Map Amendments: 06-C1-001 H2O Holdings, LLC; and 06-C1-002 CBC Management Corporation. Mr. LaRue, at the December 5, 2006'meeting had recommended that the Council delay the approval in order to finalize additional amendments proposed by South F-Jorida Water Management I— w;' L �"7 tic" f—, W V �LEec.�:i -- b) — — — VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT KIRK C. WILLIAMS WATFORD L. WILLIAMS VL^; Apv OL ac, hd-4 o Im Page -3- B. 1 a) Council Member moved to read by title only proposed Ordinance No. 974- regarding --Alley Application -No. 85E e-Development -GrGup,--LLC -City-Attorney (Exhibit 2); seconded by Council Member. b) Vote on VOTE motion. -NAY ABSTAIN- ASSENT V—-YEA KIRK C. WILLIAMS MARKHAM-- WATFORD -L-.WILLIAMS- -- MOTION: DENIED/CORIED. c) Attorney Cook read proposed Ordinance- No. 97 - 1 by title only as follows: "AN ORDINANCE VACATING AND -ABANDONING_ THEWA4,-L-flY-S- OR 444EY-WA YS-,AS DESCRIBED__ HEREIN, WITHIN BLOCKS 4,12,13,20 AND 21, CITY OF OKEECHOBEE SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED --IN -PLAT- BOOK -A P,4GE­-5_-OF-­THE PUBLIC-RECORDS-FOR-OKEECHOBEE- COUNTY, FLORIDA; RESERVING UNTO THE CITY ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS A pERpET4jAL VON EXCL]USfVE-EASEMEN-T-FOR-UTILjT-y jjfflpOSE8,- PROVIDING -FOR A RIGHT OF REVERSION; AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO RECORD THE ORDINANCE IN THEPUBLIC-RECORDS-OFTHE-CLERKOFTHE-CIRCU[TCOUR7-WANDFOR-OKEECHUBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.."— t a),. -Council Member. moved -to adopt proposed -Ordinance-No.,q7 1;-seconded by Council Member b) Public comments and discussion. The purpose of the ordinance is to close the East to West and the -NoTftto-Souttv-aReyway"Blo-c-klZ-anV3roOR-2-r,�Ok66oh7otee andlb-e—Ea-sff6Wes-t6l6ysbfBFodk 4, Block 13 and Block 20, Okeechobee. Alley Closing Application No. 85 was submitted by Steve ---Dobbs, on behalf of property owner InSite Development LLC. Easements are being requested by F "n. Power-&- LighL Embarq and-OUA. -The-properly- is --proposed -tG-be­used1m-a­multim-farn* development. There were letters sent to surrounding property owners with no, to date. - c -i- -A 4L C �ki- 1414 /k kaeL) --- --- ----- D-k VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT_ KIRK ----C---*LUAMS MAR KHAM—.­­.- ----WATFORD-- L. WILLIAMS 7 -�� - - t a ��-0- itLe --- is Al- C.1. a) Luncil Member (Exhibit 3); seconded by Council Member b) Vote on motion to read by title only. C. WILLIAMS MARK WATFORD L. WILLIAMS MOTION: DENI c) Page -4- moved to read by title only, proposed Ordinance No. 974 Attorney Cook read proposed Ordinance No. 974 I title only as follows: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE BY REZONING A CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED _ __ 6 F M LDING (H) TO RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY -ONE (RSF-1) ZONING DISTRICT; Aw .w ---- -��________ __ _- _ AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE." 2. a) Council Member �t,c t-s ,— moved to adopt proposed Ordinance No. 974; seconded by inni Anrv. nr . -�Tuz. , - b) Public comments and discussion. This Ordinance amends the Zoning designation from Holding (H) _ to Residential Single Family -One (RSF-1) for prnpeft located at the West Entrance of the Commerce Center. The petition was submitted by the property owner, William Mason. There were 20 notices Tsent to the surroun.ding & was posted with a sign advertising the request of the rezoning, dates and times of both the Planning Board and City Council public hearings. e Plannmg Board reviewed the appi ica ion at their january 18, 2007 meeting and recommended approval. _ Senior Planner Brisson reviewed the Planning Staff R ILt recommending avnroval• (1) The,orop�_ single family use and RSF-1 Zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies and the Future Land Use Map des ignation forth is property. (2) SeGtIOR 90-102(i) allows single family dwellingss as a permitted use under the RSF-1 Zoning District. (3) The proposed single family use and RSF-1 Zoning District will not have A single family dwelling would be appropriate for this location and compatible with the surrounding land uses. (5) The RSF-1 Zoning and accompanying single family use would not adversely affect property values or living conditions. Development of the subject property could encourage _ devolopment of vacant lands adjacent to the applicant's property. (6) Should it be required, the rop^.s ed single family use could be buffered from surrounding uses. At this time, however, it does not appear that buffering will be neGessaFy. (7) The proposed single family use will net ereate a density pattern that would --- - overburden public facilities. The proposed RSF-1 Zoning would create consistency with the existing Single ��Ilcant is not proposing y density increases for the su lec - proporty. The rezoning request is to allow the applicant to develop the property within the parameter of the Ingle Family land use category consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. As such, traffic congestions, flooding or drainage will not be a problem for the site (9) The only restrictions placers on the subject areth„sp which are set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and the Land Development Code. The proposed use has not been hordipately burdened by unnecessary restrictions. (10)-By-allowing the applicant to develen tho property under the RSF-1 Zoning District, the applicant is not receiving any special privileges which are not t tAl- �/� v , Y 5 - - J ; ,i� jj c Vote on motion. --�0---------- A1N--A►BSEhIT-— - + KIRK WAfiFQRD _ --_ L. WILLIAMS - - MOTION: DENIED/ ARRIED - D.1. a) Council Member --- - --- egarding Rezon Page -6- moved to read by title only proposed Ordinance No. 975 Planning Consultant (Exhibit 4); seconded by Council Member b) Vote on motion to read by title only. YEA NAY ABS I ArN—, ----- KIRK WATFORD MOTION: c) Attorney Cook read proposed Ordinance No. 975 by title only as follows: "ANORDINANCEOFTHE EE H BE BY REZONING A CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, FROM RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE FAMILY (RMF) ZONING DISTRICT TO COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL OFFICE 1CPO)- AMENDING THE ZONING MAP ACCORDMGI Y; PROVJDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITYAND AN EFFECTIVE DATE." 2. a) Council Member _ moved to adopt proposed Ordinance No. 975; seconded by b) Public comments and discussion. This Ordinance amends the Zoning designation from RMF to CPO for property located at 203 Southwest 4th Street The petition was submitted hVproperty owners _ Glenda Bellamy and Renee Ellerbee. Theremere 20 notices sent to the surrounding property owners ---with no response to date, The pFoperty was posted with a sign adveFtising the request ef the Fezenhgl-- dates and times of both the Planning Board and City Council public hearings. The Planning Board 7 Vote on motion - VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT - KIRK C. WILLIAMS MA WATFORD WILLIAMS MOTION: DENIED/ RIED Page -7- E.1. a) Council Member I 14C moved to read by title only, proposed Ordinance No. 976, - amending Section 90-343 of- e Land Development Re ' gulations regar g ►�9-sexual predators --City- -- . Planning Consultant (Exhibit 5); seconded by Council Member i b) Vote on motion to read by title only. VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT KIRK_ C. WILLIAMS MASK 111__- - - WATFORD -- - L. WILLIAMS _ MOTION: DENIED/C RIED. c) Attorney Cook read proposed Ordinance No. 976 by title only as follows: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OFOKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION90-343 OFTHE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS;__CREATING_ PARAGRAPH__ELEYF.LEI_--THEREA PRO VIDING._FOR _-SPECIAL. - - EXCEPTION USES IN INDUSTRIAL ZONING CATEGORIES FOR A REHABILITATION FACILITY, OR -HALF-WAY HOUSE- FOR -SEXUAL -OFF€-NDEW —PROV = -FOR--STANDARDS--AA►D RESTRICTIONS TO ESTABLISH SUCH FACILITIES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING -FOR -AN -EFFECTIVE -DATA" __ ___-_ _- - - 2: a) C61.. -_ llVTember moved to adopt proposed_Ordmance No 976; secondedby Council Member ) y b) Public -comments and discussions- __14,-I=-- ti. -; _ c W I NN: U Mltwkj�! _ tJ MAYOR KIRK CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT a P.M. VIII. NEW BUSINESS. - --- ---AA a Council Momhar - public hearing date for prop Ordinances from "Occupation seconded by Council Member Page -8- ed to read by title only, and set March 6, 9007 as a " final Ordinance No. 977, amending Chapter 50, Part II of the Code of , b) Vote on motion to read by title only. V TE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT KIRK - - - C. WILLIAMS WATFORD L. W1lLL1AMS- — - MOTION: DENIED/C RIED. c� _Attorney Cook read proposed Ordinance No 977 by title only as follows: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA AMENDING PART 11, CODE OF ORDINANCES, GENERAL THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE, PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SUBSTITUTION, AND AN .I . aCouncil Member move } approve the first reading OT proposed Ordinance - _-___ No. 977; seconded by Council Member 7 � r — c o e on mo ion. VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT KIRK C. WILLIAMS Of MARKHAMI �: ArTFORD- ._ L. WILLIAMS ---- Page -10- ---- C. Consider request for a two-hour parking limit in the 500 Block of South Park Street - Earle Strickland, T- 1 M r n er -- f c n n - A,,�IL C 1 k ( r r KIRK C_-M MARK L. WA MO" /Oa .......... jai f4 AXAL"�' A-4 6�1 'Falk, t-VIL ex -------- -• ki- Q-4 19, - Page -11- D. Presentation of conceptual plans for Courthouse Park project - Devin Maxwell, Okeechobee Main - - - street-(€xlhibit 9). . lI- - 4 _ Page - 12- E. Council Membei moved to approve Temporary Street Closings — ___ ----subnlfttsd-bY-the-Chanber-ofi���, 2 nd , 3rd,-4!h-V-hihAventies-apj- Southeast Park Street, from 12:00 p.m. March 9 through 9:00 p.m. March 11 for the Speckled Perch Fes tival -City C;lerk It 110' ); buUmded by Cow ici I Membe, �bG U d1--V pff f'' S-- i ,I I 1 1 1 -14 h I me on motion. VOTE YEA NAY KIRK Q W111111A -- MA_._ ;DR L. WILLIAMS KILL) Page -13- F. Council Member moved to approve an agreement with Kimley-Horn AssmWes;-fnc.,-KHA) "©mdtant for-preparing-the-scho(*element-#carthe-C+ty'a - Comprehensive Plan, which is a prerequisite of legislative concurrency in the amount of twenty- eight thouservd 11a ($281OW-00j - City Adm inistrator-(Exhibit ff); seconded -by Council Member Vote on motion. KIRK MARKHAM--.__.._._ —VItA't`FORD_ WILLIAMS --------- - - — — M010N: DENIED70 f TT Page - 14- G. Discussion of new building elevation requirements - Mayor Kirk, A -4V -,411Al r1kQ A 77 LU, 1A I/ 1.3 fm) CWYC 07, C� ILI q'4ez/U Y)'" ve qN O-Z/A4 4-4,fe. zic I A e&21 lk, d X L Liz Z�tAAX z2L gut Am--W IF Page - 15- H. Council Member moved to approve accepting ladder truck from -City of-PfneNas- P k - Administrator/Fire-ChL4i-seconded-by Council Member � r IR t (66 Pl- x 777 ti -Dt.--MAYOFUKMKADJOURNEDIWE-MEETtNG-AT----- CITY OF OKEECHOBEE FEBRUARY 20, 2007 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OFFICIAL AGENDA PAGE 10F 5 CALL TO ORDER - Mayor: February 20, 2007, City Council Regular Meeting, 6:00 p.m. OPENING CEREMONIES: Invocation given by Pastor Duane Eatmon, Treasure Island Baptist; Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor. MAYOR, COUNCIL AND STAFF ATTENDANCE - City Clerk. Mayor James E. Kirk Council Member Lowry Markham Council Member Dowling R. Watford, Jr. Council Member Clayton Williams Council Member Lydia Jean Williams City Administrator Brian Whitehall City Attorney John R. Cook City Clerk Lane Gamiotea Deputy Clerk Melisa Eddings Police Chief Denny Davis Fire Chief Herb Smith Public Works Director Donnie Robertson IV. MINUTES - City Clerk. A. Motion to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Council Action for the February 6, 2007 Regular Meeting. V. VI. VII. FEBRUARY 20, 2007 - CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - PAGE 2 OF 5 WARRANT REGISTER - City Administrator. A. Motion to approve the January 2007 Warrant Register. General Fund $409,852.89 CDBG Fund $ 5,305.80 Public Facilities Fund $ 21.53 AGENDA - Mayor. A. Requests for the addition, deferral or withdrawal of items on today's agenda. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE ADOPTION - Mayor Kirk. A.1) Discussion and public comments regarding a motion and second made by Council Members Markham and Watford at the December 5, 2006 meeting to adopt proposed Ordinance No. 965 regarding Cycle 12007 (formerly known as Cycle 12006) Comprehensive Plan Narrative (Test) Amendments and Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendments No. 06-CI-001-Hackl/H2 Oldings and 06-CI-002-Altobello/Close - City Attorney (Exhibit 1). 2) Vote on motion. B.1.a) Motion to read by title only proposed Ordinance No. 971 regarding Alley Closing Application No. 85, InSite Development Group, LLC - City Attorney (Exhibit 2). b) Vote on motion to read by title only. c) City Attorney to read proposed Ordinance No. 971 by title only. 2.a) Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 971. b) Public comments and discussion. c) Vote on motion. FEBRUARY VII. PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE ADOPTION CONTINUED. 2007 - CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - PAGE 3 OF 5 CA.a) Motion to read by title only proposed Ordinance No. 974 regarding Rezoning Application No. 07-001-R, submitted by William Mason - City Planning Consultant (Exhibit 3). b) Vote on motion to read by title only. c) City Attorney to read proposed Ordinance No. 974 by title only. 2.a) Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 974. b) Public comments and discussion. c) Vote on motion. D.1.a.) Motion to read by title only proposed Ordinance No. 975 regarding Rezoning Application No. 07-002-R, submitted by Glenda Bellamy and Renee Ellerbee - City Planning Consultant (Exhibit 4). b) Vote on motion to read by title only. c) City Attorney to read proposed Ordinance No. 975 by title only. 2.a) Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 975. b) Public comments and discussion. c) Vote on motion. E.1.a) Motion to read by title only proposed Ordinance No. 976, amending Section 90-343 of the Land Development Regulations regarding sexual predators - City Planning Consultant (Exhibit 5). b) Vote on motion to read by title only. c) City Attorney to read proposed Ordinance No. 976 by title only. FERRUARY VII. PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE ADOPTION CONTINUED. E.2.a) Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 976. b) Public comments and discussion. c) Vote on motion. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. VIII. NEW BUSINESS. A.1.a) Motion to read by title only and set March 6, 2007 as a final public hearing date for proposed Ordinance No. 977, amending Chapter 50, Part 11 of the Code of Ordinances from "Occupational License Tax" to Business License Tax" - City Attorney (Exhibit 6). b) Vote on motion to read by title only. c) City Attorney to read proposed Ordinance No. 977 by title only. 2.a) Motion to approve the first reading of proposed Ordinance No. 977. b) Discussion. c) Vote on motion. B.1.a) Motion to read by title only and set March 6, 2007 as a final public hearing date for proposed Ordinance No. 978 amending Chapter 62, Part II of the Code of Ordinances regarding the issuance of business licenses for businesses that conduct vehicles for hire, or taxicabs - City Attorney (Exhibit 7). b) Vote on motion to read by title only. c) City Attorney to read proposed Ordinance No. 978 by title only. 2007 - CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - PAGE 4 OF 5 Fr:RRI reav VIII. NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED. B.2.a) Motion to approve the first reading of proposed Ordinance No. 978. b) Discussion. c) Vote on motion. C. Consider request for a two-hour parking limit in the 500 Block of South Park Street - Earle Strickland, Fantasy Lighting (Exhibit 8). D. Presentation of conceptual plans for Courthouse Park project - Devin Maxwell, Okeechobee Main Street (Exhibit 9). E. Motion to approve Temporary Street Closings submitted by the Chamber of Commerce for the Speckled Perch Festival - City Clerk (Exhibit 10). F. Motion to approve an agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., (KHA) as the consultant for preparing the school element for the City's Comprehensive Plan, which is a prerequisite of legislative concurrency - City Administrator (Exhibit 11). G. Discussion of new building elevation requirements - Mayor Kirk. H. Motion to approve accepting ladder truck from City of Pinellas Park - City Administrator/Fire Chief. IX. ADJOURN MEETING - Mayor. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that if any person desires to appeal any decision made by the City Council with respect to any matter considered at this proceeding, such interested person will need a record the proceeding, and for such purpose may need to ensure a verbatim reoord of the proceeding is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. City Clerk tapes are for the sole purpose of backup for official records of the Clerk. 2007 - CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - PAGE 5 OF 5 The Okeechobee News P.O. Box 639, Okeechobee, Florida 34973 (863) 763-3134 Published Daily STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Judy Kasten, who on oath says she is publish r of the DAILY Newspaper published Okeechobee News, a Florida; that the attached i Okeechobee, in Okeechobee County, PUBLIC NOTICE copy of adyeet�seme t, being a CONSIAEMTITY ONOFADOPTING /1 A RATION FARO ncil of the C�dv off l PLE�+SE TAKM0TICE�ia C Y6 p.m. or as sobs tl w Ill on .Es .a , ruarY ^ ra. Hail 55 E 3rd Ave., Okeechobee, FL con et into THE in he matter of SMITTAL TO THE STAR unu ,,.,^•- ••--- S CLAUSE AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE OR OTHER PURPOSES. in said hearing. members of the Public are encouraged to attend and participate roposed Ordinance may be inspected in its enb ery by members of the Public, hours. Mon -Fri, Bam-4:30pm, Office of the City Clerk during regular business torholidays. rt R 8 noeal EASE TA N0T1C pNBE APED that y ma ee consi ea€A at 0 ma a by the fly nci respe o a ying. forsuchose sion such uderesled pion will need a record of the proceedings• de, which may need to ensure a vefbat m record of the proceedinga[ is oabe based.rd LRa District of the Circuit Court ofOkeechobeecordance includes the testimony and eve of backce up fa oon iO calreds of the CleClerktapes arefathe solep. syM Disab''tY Act IAD/ and Flo id Sta ites acc o bon toicW admp rl'an `" in the 19th Judicial p Florida was published in said news a er in the issuesjhi desa�s s i i es nee mg specs N ter 763-3372z215; t ahearingthanorWvole2e mpa redacsll sCounty, rot1 a of pmceedl g at�863 D 1-800-222-3448 (voice) or IaB-447-5620B��MC, CITY CLERK Afflant further says that the said Okeechobee News is a newspaper published at Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been published continuously in said Okeechobee County, Florida each week and has been entered as second class mail matter a' ref °Sa office in Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and afffant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for pub cation the said newspaper . ' ...,..••.......,•......' ........ CONSTANCE L. HAWSE Sworn to an su scri d fore me this .o�.r�r', CAm8 � Expires 6114/2010 A.D. 21 �rctrc' Florida Notary Assn.- Inc ,�}of q(P`S Notary Public, State of Florida at Large EXHIBIT NO. I FINAL FER 20, 2007 ORDINANCE NO. 965 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO ITS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INCLUDING AMENDMENTS TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP, THE TEXT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE, CONSERVATION, AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENTS; TO REVISE AND UPDATE THE EXISTING OBJECTIVES, POLICIES, DATA AND ANALYSIS; IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANDATES SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 163, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR TRANSMITTAL TO THE STATE LAND PLANNING AGENCY; PROVIDING A CONFLICTS CLAUSE AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Okeechobee recognizes the need to plan for orderly growth and development; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Okeechobee, Florida has adopted a Comprehensive Future Land Use Plan and as part of said Plan a Future Land Use Element by Ordinance No. 635 as amended in accordance with the Local Government Comprehensive Planning Act; and WHEREAS, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, and Rule 9-J-5, Florida Administrative Code provide for amendment to adopted Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City has received and reviewed proposed amendments to the Future Land Use, Conservation, and Capital Improvements Elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan, and certain applications for Map Amendments to the Future Land Use Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan, and said proposed amendments being reviewed by the City's Land Planning Agency at a duly advertised meeting, and submitted by staff report, which determined such application to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and appropriate to the future land uses within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has agreed with the recommendations of the Local Planning Agency that the proposed application complies with the requirements of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, Part II, and that the proposed application is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and appropriate to the future land uses within the City. WHEREAS, the City has received and responded to the Objections, Recommendations, and Comments Report. WHEREAS, two (2) public hearings were held by the City Council on said Ordinance on August 1, 2006 and February 20, 2007. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED before the City Council for the City of Okeechobee, Florida; presented at a duly advertised public meeting; and passed by majority vote of the City Council; and properly executed by the Mayor or designee, as Chief Presiding Officer for the City, that: SECTION 1. That the City of Okeechobee, Florida hereby adopts amendments to its current Comprehensive Plan dated March 19, 1991, which amendments consist of the pages which are identified as Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" and which are incorporated into the current Comprehensive Plan. A copy of the Comprehensive Plan, as amended, is on file at City Hall in Okeechobee, Florida. SECTION 2. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to transmit three (3) copies of the amendments of the current Comprehensive Plan to the State Land Planning Agency, along with one (1) copy to the Central Florida Regional Planning Council; Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Forestry; Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Intergovernmental Programs; Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission; Florida Department of State, Division of Historic Resources; Florida Department of Transportation; and the Southwest Florida Water Management District, and to any other unit of local government who has filed a written request for a copy, within ten (10) working days after adoption, in accordance with Section 163.3184(7), Florida Statutes. SECTION 3. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict be and the same are hereby repealed. SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date for the enactment of this Ordinance No. 965 shall be the date a Final Order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs finding this Amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Chapter 163.3184, Florida Statutes; or the date a Final Order is issued by the Administrative Commission finding this Amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Chapter 163.3184, Florida Statutes. INTRODUCED for first reading of the ordinance for transmittal, in accordance with Chapter 9J-11 F.A.C., and F.S. 163.3184 (15), at public hearing this 1St day of August, 2006. ATTEST: Lane Gamiotea, CMC, City Clerk James E. Kirk, Mayor PASSED and ADOPTED on second and final public hearing this 201h day of February, 2007. ATTEST: Lane Gamiotea, CMC, City Clerk REVIEWED FOR LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: John R. Cook, City Attorney James E. Kirk, Mayor EXHIBIT A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENTS: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT CONSERVATION ELEMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Ordinance No. 965 - Exhibit A LARUE PLANNING & MANAGEMENT SERVICES, InC. 1375 Jackson Street, Suite 206 Fort Myers, Florida 33901-2845 239-334-3366 • FAX: 239-334-6384 e-mail: larue-pIanning@att.net Memo To: City Council Members From: James G LaRue, AICP Date: November 29, 2006 Subject: City of Okeechobee Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment DCA No. 06-1 As you know, on October 14, 2006 we received the Objections, Recommendations, and Comments (ORC) Report from the Department of Community Affairs for the above Amendment. Having been given 60 days to adopt the Amendment, we have scheduled this item to be heard at the December 5, 2006 Council meeting. The Department raised seven objections to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment package and we have answered all but one. However, we must be certain that the Department will accept the responses we have given. As such, I am requesting a delay of approval for this item to the January 2, 2007 Council meeting to give Staff a chance to coordinate the amendment responses and try to fully address the water supply objections by DCA. JGL:lk cc: Brian Whitehall, City Administrator John Cook, City Attorney Lane Gamiotea, City Clerk RESPONSE TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT TEXT AMENDMENTS CITY OF OKEECHOBEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 06-1 1.Objection: Capital Improvement Element Amendment The Capital Improvement Element (CIE) was modified using DCA Grant 06-DR-73-07-57-02- 076. During the review of the grant deliverable three, the new CIE was found to have shortcomings and these have gone uncorrected. The projections of public facility capacities needed based on the land use allocations shown on the Future Land Use Map and population projections for the City during the planning timeframe are not provided. The City must identify the projects needed to meet the demands of growth based on the anticipated development shown on the Future Land Use Map and on its population projections. Grants and other non -committed revenue sources are included within the first 3 years of the Capital Improvements Schedule (CIS). These should be revised to limit the identified revenue sources to committed sources of finding within the first 3 years and committed or planned finding sources for years 4 and 5. [163.3177(3)(a)2 and 5, 163.3177(3)(c)3 FS; Rule 9J-5.006(3)(b), 9J-5.016(3)(a)5, (3)(c)3 and (4)(a)l, 93- 5.016(2)(c) FACJ Response: In regard to Objection 1, the City response to DCA Grant 06-DR-73-07-57-02-076 (deliverable 3) on the Capital Improvements Element might have been overlooked but the shortcomings have been answered during the grant process. A copy of the response table is attached. (See Attachment I — CIE Contract Deliverables Table.) There are no existing infrastructure deficiencies for level of service related facilities within the City of Okeechobee. The City has been meeting its adopted level of service standard for recreation and transportation since adoption of the Plan. The Schedule of Capital Improvements, which estimates the public facility costs and projected revenue sources needed to fund the facilities which are required to meet the needs of the City and those projects that continue to maintain the current level of service standards, was included as part of the Amendment Cycle. The City does list a street overlay project and a stormwater retention project which was included to ensure that the level of service standard for transportation and drainage are maintained in the future. However, the Public Works Department does not currently have the information to revise the Schedule to pinpoint the exact locations of the listed public works projects. The Okeechobee Utility Authority has been responsible for the monitoring of public facilities as it relates to sewer, solid waste, drainage, and water since 1998. Coordination with the OUA has been implemented to evaluate the ability to fund projects necessary to correct deficiencies and to provide for future growth at the adopted level of service standard for water, sewer, drainage, and solid waste collections. This is done annually in conjunction with the updating the Five -Year Capital Improvements Schedule for the City. The City submitted OUA's Six -Year Estimated Capital Program to the Department for informational purposes. The OUA's table does identify the existing water and sewer deficiencies for its facilities but the City is trying to communicate to the OUA that some of the OUA projects whose funding source cannot be identified should be revised or \\Laruei\document\Okeechobee-city\2006\Comp Plan Elements\Response to ORC.doc Page 1 of 24 RESPONSE To DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS CITY OF OKEECHOBEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT AMENDMENT 06.1 deleted from the proposed Schedule. The City also advised the OUA to show committed sources of revenue for the first three years and committed or planned revenue sources for the fourth and fifth years. 2. Objection: Modification of the Comprehensive Plan's Population Projections The amendment refers to a letter to the Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) giving building permit evidence that the city's 2005 permanent population is higher that, the BEER estimate: BEER estimates the permanent population at 5,443, while the city estimates it at 5,723. However, the letter and data supporting the higher estimate were not included in amendment package. The analysis then states that a 1.26 percent per year rate of growth for the city from the year 2000 to the year 2005 is a "conservative" estimate because this is the annual growth rate that BEBR estimates for the county for the same time period. The amendment also proposes to delete a portion of the chapter on population, including the deletion of a table showing the past population growth of the city. This table indicates that the city's average annual growth rate has varied between .7 and 1.4 percent per year in the decades since 1970. The chapter then assumes, without any explanation, that in the future the city will grow at an annual rate of 2.6 percent resulting in a permanent population of 7,455 in the year 2015. This population projection is higher than can be justified based on the data. Okeechobee has not grown this fast in any 5-year period in the last 30 years. A more reasonable estimate, although still optimistic, would take the City's estimate of 5,723 persons in 2005 and assume the City maintains a 15.2 percent proportion of the County's population. This would result in a permanent population of 6,925 in the year 2015.The seasonal population is forecasted to increase to 40% of the population for the entire forecast period. No data and analysis was presented to explain what this percentage was in past years or to justify this increase in the tourist/part-time population. [Section 163.3177(8) and (]0)(e), F.S., and Rule 9J-5.005(2), F.A.C.] Response: Based on the objections to the City's modified Population projections, the City has re-examined those revisions. The City's population estimate of 5,723 is reasonable and is below the 15.2% proportion of the total County's estimate of population in 2005 (38,222). The annual population increase has now been reduced to 1.5% and the seasonal annual population rate increase has been reduced to 15%. See the following revisions. Population Forecast Data and Analysis The City of Okeechobee, in its last EAR report of February 1999, had forecasted the following estimated and projected population for years 1996 through 2010. \\Laruel\document\Okeechobee-city\2006\Camp Plan Elements\Response to ORC.doc Page 2 of 24 RESPONSE TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS CITY OF OKEECHOBEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT AMENDMENT 06-1 Table 1 Estimated and Projected Population 1996-2010 AM Po `blatiou 1996 4,943 2000 5,527 2005 6,007 2010 6,472 Source: Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida, July 1997. (Excerpt from: City of Okeechobee EAR Report February 1999 In April 2005, the Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) had stated that the City's permanent population was only 5,443 althetigh-_even though the City had presented awed that new construction permit information indicatinged a higher population for that year (see ene esed let4er1 Also, with the 2000 Census population being 5,376, an increase of 67 persons for a five-year period does not represent the accurate growth rates of Okeechobee. (See Tables 2-5 below.) Table 2 Population Totals County 2005 Average Annual Growth 2001-2005 Trend Indian River 125,483 2.11 % 1.1 % to 2.3% Martin 144,691 2.82% 2.4% or higher Okeechobee 38,222 1.26% 1.1% to 2.3% St. Lucie 216,827 2.25% 1.1% to 2.3% FLORIDA 17,612,584 1.84% 1.1% to 2.3% Source: Florida Trend, 2005 \\Larue I \document\Okeechobee-city\2006\Comp PIan Elements\Response to ORC.doc Page 3 of 24 RESPONSE TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT Table 3 CITY OF OKEECHOBEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 06-1 Job T®tah County 2005 Jobless Rate Leading Job Sectors Indian River 62,782 6.8% Services 36% Retail 19% Government 9% Martin 83,881 4.8% Services 41% Retail 18% Finance, Insurance, Real Estate 9% Okeechobee 12,691 5.7% Services 24% Retail 22% Farming 18% St. Lucie 78,889 7.0% Services 30% Retail 18% Government 15% FLORIDA 9,795,083 4.1% Services 39% Retail 17% Government 12% Source: Florida Trend, 2005 Tahlo A POPULATION BY AGE YEARS OF AGE Coun 0-14 15-19 20-39 40-64 65+ Total Indian River 15.3% 5.7% 19.2% 31.5% 28.3% 125,483 Martin 14.9% 5.6% 17.8% 33.7% 28.0% 144,691 Okeechobee 20.3% 7.5% 25.7% 29.9% 16.6% 38,222 St. Lucie 18.1 % 6.50/. 21.8% 31.7% 21.9% 1216,827 FL )RIDA 18.7% Source: Florida Trend, 2005 6.6% 25.1 % 132.5% T 17.1 % 17,612,584 Table 5 Per C Source of Income Colr�ty Per:CapiEa apne-, 005 Ilubor Pro 031- Transfer` Indian River $42,000 37.8% 49.1% Martin $47,493 38.9% 50.30/. Okeechobee $19,071 54.3% 19.3% 26.3% St. Lucie $25,539 51.0% 27.4% 21.6% FLORIDA $32,662 62.5% 25.8% 11.7% Source. Florida Trend, 2005 \\Laruel\document\Okeechobee-city\2006\Comp Plan Elements\Response to ORC.doc Page 4 of 24 RESPONSE To DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS CITY OF OKEECHOBEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT AMENDMENT 06-1 Even at a conservative rate of 1.26% increase per year, the annual population counts for the years 2000 through 2005 show a greater absolute population increase than calculated by BEBR in April, 2005. Table 6 Proiected 1.26% Increase/Year 2001 2002 12003_ 2004 2005 5,444 15,512 5,582 5,652 5,723 Source: LaRue Planning & Management Services, Inc., 2006 The following Table represents permanent population forecasts for a ten-year planning, beginning in 2005, with a more reasonable population rates increase of 1.5% per year. as suppef4ed by a range of D eugll o Table 7 Prnieeted Permanent Population/Year 2005 - 2015 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 1 2013 2014 2015 6,46.5 5,896 6,2-3-5 "41.0 6;-589 6,454 6i0-23 -7-,816 6,447 7-,2� 6,544 �5 6,642 5;�3 5.723 5-,944 5,809 5,984 6,074 6,165 6,258 6,352 Source: LaRue Planning & Management Services, Inc., 2U06 With regard to seasonal population, BEBR statistics are not available for the City of Okeechobee. With fishing and outdoor related activities being a drawing card in the winter, it is estimated that tourist/part-time residents would expand by 4015% in season_ With that in mind, a peak population forecast for the years 2005 through 2015 is as follows: Table 8 Seasonal Population Forecast Year Resident Population Seasonal Po elation Peak Po ulatian 2005 54,735223 2,309858 8,08_X6,581 2006 54145,809 2- 71 8,2846,680 2007 6 5,896 2,426884 8-,4916,780 2008 6;2365,984 2-, 9 98 &,7496,882 2009 6;4186.074 2,364911 8,9746,985 2010 6;5896,165 2�36925 9,225_.090 2011 6,a546,258 2-,7 2939 9,4567,197 2012 &,9236,352 2,-763953 ", Q 305 2013 7,4W.447 2,838967 9,9347,414 2014 '',-6,544 2;-9A2982 �9527,526 2015 7_;4536,642 2,982996 3�77,638 Source: LaRue Planning & Management Services, Inc., 2006 \\Laruel\document\Okeechobee-eity\2006\Comp Plan Elements\Response to ORC-doc Page 5 of 24 RESPONSE TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT CITY OF OKEECHOBEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT o6-1 3. Objection: Future Land Use Element Amendment One text amendment is the addition of a new "Residential Mixed Use" Future Land Use Map (FLUM) category. The new category contains ambiguities and internal contradictions, which will interfere with its implementation and therefore fail to provide meaningful and predictable standards for the use and development of land. The maximum allowable density of this new category is unclear as is several other aspects of the policy. Following are quotes from proposed Policy 2.1 .c changes along with noted ambiguities and contradictions: 1. "Development within this category would be allowed to be no. more than seven and one-half (7.5) gross dwelling units per acre" • Note — assumed to be 7.5 gross dwelling units per Upss acre; otherwise the planning meaning of these units is unknown 2. "Development within the Residential Mixed Use category is permitted to be clustered at higher than gross density as long as the gross density is not exceeded for the total acreage within the Residential Mixed Use category ". • This language is unclear: as long as the gross density of what is not exceeded — of the parcel or of the entire mixed use district? Unless this categ_o y is only used by one land owner, this appears to give some owners greater densities on their lands as opposed to others. This language should be clarified to provide clear guidance. 3. The "Density/Intensity Table" indicates that the residential portion of the Residential Mixed Use category has a maximum density of'3 gross du/ac" • Similar comment as above regarding "3 gross du/ac" • 3 du/gross ac. conflicts with the earlier indication that the density is to be 7.5 du/gross ac. • Typo —The Density/Intensity Table also indicates that the minimum acreage required for open space (40%) and Commercial/Non-residential (10%) would equal 50% of a site; this restriction would never allow residential to be built up to 59% of the site acreage as the table indicates - the maximum would be 50% [Section 163.3 177(6)(a), F-S.; Rule 93-5,005(6) and 93-5.006(3)(c), FA.C.] Response: The text amendment for the Residential Mixed Use Future Land Use category has been revised to clearly and consistently indicate proposed allowable densities, clarify vague language, and establish meaningful and predictable standards to guide and manage development as the Department requested. The revised policy will read as follows. . c) Mixed Use Residential. Intended to accommodate and provide flexibility for development of multiple uses within a residential setting. In order for land to be considered for this designation, land requested to be placed in this category shall be a minimum of 30 acres. Development within this category would be allowed to \\Lamel\document\Okeechobee-city\2006\Comp Plan Elements\Response to ORC.doc Page 6 of 24 RESPONSE TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS CITY OF OKEECHOBEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT AMENDMENT 06-1 be no more than seven and one-half (7.5) gFess-dwelling units per gross acre. Land developed within this Residential Mixed Use Category must adhere to the following innovative design and planning principles. 1. All new development within the Residential Mixed Use Category shall be required to be zoned as a Planned Development or Planned Unit Development. 2. Development within this Residential Mixed Use Category will be required to be clustered in order to maximize open space and natural areas. Development within the Residential Mixed Use Category is permitted to be clustered at higher than gross density as long as the gross density of the ap rcel is not exceeded for the total acreage within the Residential Mixed Use Category. 3. Development within the Residential Mixed Use Category is encouraged to provide a mix of uses, including a mix of residential types, recreational amenities, civic spaces and convenience and commercial uses intended to serve residents and their guests in order to minimize trips outside the Residential Mixed Use Category. 4. Development is encouraged to provide creative site designs, and clustering is required to provide for greater common open space and mixed -use development. The planning flexibility provided through the planned development process shall encourage and facilitate creative design techniques. a. Residential Development. These areas shall include single and/or multiple family home site acreage, and shall include, but not be limited to, single family attached and detached; duplexes and two- family units; and town homes and other multi -family dwelling types. b. Non-residential Development. These areas will include vehicular and pedestrian ways, commercial and institutional areas, club houses and associated facilities, utility buildings, maintenance areas, tennis courts and associated non-residential uses. C. Residential and Non-residential Development acreage may account for no more then 60% of the gross area within the Residential Mixed Use Category. Intensity/density standards for all uses within this category are set forth in the Intensity/Density Table below: \\Laruel\document\Okeechobee-city\2006\Comp Plan Elements\Response to ORC.doc Page 7 of 24 RESPONSE To DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS CITY OF OKEECHOBEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT AMENDMENT 06-1 Percent Aggregate Land Use Mix Within the Mixed Use Future Land Use Category Land Uses in Mixed Use Minimum Maximum Maximum % Land % Land Density/Intensity Use Mix Use Mix Residential 45% 3950% 3--guess-- 5 d5 du/ oss ac CommerciaUNon-residential 10% 15% .35 FAR en Space 40% 53% .25 FAR d. Open Spaces. These areas will include preserved natural areas, buffers lakes, parks, golf courses, nature trails, retention areas, conservation areas, scenic resources, green belts, wetlands and associated areas and must account for a minimum of 40% of the property within the Residential Mixed Use Category. Golf course fairways will account for no more than fifty percent (50%) of the open space of the subject Residential Mixed Use Category. No development (residential/commercial) structures are intended, but only recreation oriented buildings and/or structures. e. The owners will employ management strategies in and around any golf course to address the potential for pesticide/chemical pollution of the groundwater and surface water receiving areas. The management practices will include: i. The use of slow release fertilizers and/or carefully managed fertilizer applications which are timed to ensure maximum root uptake and minimal surface water runoff or leaching to the groundwater; ii. The practice of integrated pest management when seeking to control various pests, such as weeds, insects, and nematodes. The application of pesticides will involve only the purposeful and minimal application of pesticides, aimed only at identified targeted species. The regular widespread application of broad spectrum pesticides is not acceptable. The management program will minimize, to the extent possible, the use of pesticides, and will include the use of the United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Services Soil Pesticide Interaction Guide to select pesticides that have a minimum potential for leaching or loss to due runoff depending on the site -specific soil conditions; \\Larue I \document\Okeechobee-city\2006\Comp Plan Elements\Response to ORC.doc Page 8 of 24 RESPONSE TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS CITY OF OKEECHOBEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT AMENDMENT 06-1 The coordination of the application of pesticides with the irrigation practices (the timing and application rates of irrigation water) to reduce runoff and the leaching of any pesticides and nutrients; iv. The utilization of a golf course manager who is licensed by the State to use restricted pesticides and who will perform the required management functions. The golf course manager will be responsible for ensuring that the golf course fertilizers are selected and applied to minimize fertilizer runoff into the surface water and the leaching of those same fertilizers into the groundwater; and V. The storage, mixing and loading of fertilizer and pesticides will be designed to prevent/minimize the pollution of the natural environment. f. The shorelines of any stormwater management lakes must be sinuous in configuration, and must be sloped or bermed. The littoral zones around the ponds must be planted with native wetland herbaceous plants, and trees or shrubs can be included within the herbaceous plants. At least four species must be planted. The minimum required number of plants will be one plant per linear foot of lake shoreline as measured at the control elevation water level. The littoral shelf should provide a feeding area for water dependent avian species. 5. As individual zonings to PUD are submitted to the City, they shall include as a minimum the following information: a. A showing of the amount of units as a part of the maximum approved for the parent parcel. b. A Traffic Analysis submitted verifying that adequate capacity currently exists or will exist prior to the issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy. 6. Any lands included or amended into the Residential Mixed Use Category must demonstrate the non-existence of urban sprawl by: a. Submitting a fiscal impact study demonstrating a net fiscal benefit to the City. b. Directing new growth to areas where public facilities exist, are planned within the City or County Five Year Capital \\Laruel\document\Okeechobee-city\2006\Comp Plan Elements\Response to ORC.doc Page 9 of 24 RESPONSE TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS CITY OF OKEECHOBEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT AMENDMENT 06-1 Improvements Plan, or are committed to through a Developer Agreement, or otherwise assured to be funded by the appropriate agency. Requiring all development to be connected to central water and sewer. 4. Comment: Amendment to the Conservation Element The proposed amendments to the Conservation Element include a series of actions to enhance the protection of water quality in Taylor Creek and Lake Okeechobee. The proposed amendments could be strengthened to provide more definitive guidance and a stronger level of commitment. The amendment adds Objective 6 which states that the City should invest investigate setting limits to the amount of nitrogen and phosphorus that can be discharged into Taylor Creek. The word investigate is non -binding and does not commit the City to take additional steps to reduce nitrogen and phosphorus discharges. The Policies that implement this Objective are similarly non -binding and vague. Where the policies advocate periodic reviews such as in Policies 6.9 and 6.11 no time period between the reviews is given. Policy 6.3 says the City shall "begin the process" of revaluating the transfer of developments rights but no target completion date is given. The words "the City shall consider" and "shall suggest" do not firmly commit the City to any action. [Section 163.3 177(6)(d), FS.; Rule 9J-5.005(6), 9J-5.013(2),F.A.CJ Response: The City has revised the Objective and its policies to include more specific statements that commit the City to actions and timeframes as the Department requested. The new Objective and policies shall read as follows: Objective 6: To improve the water quality of Taylor Creek, by 2010 the City shall develop a program to set limits as to the amount of nitrogen and phosphorus that can be discharged into the Creek. Policy 6.1: The —By 2012, the City shall eensidef—adout land development regulations to help maintain vAiet er—a high standard for water quality in Taylor Creek by Would-- equife--re wiring develepme stormwater treatment systems for new developments adiacent to Taylor Creek to be designed using a treatment train approach, using Best Management Practices in a series, to ensure maximum potential treatment of stormwater. Policy 6.2: The City shall cooperate and coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District process for purposes of suggesting improvements to the water quality of Taylor Creek. \\Laruel\document\Okeechobee-city\2006\Comp Plan Elements\Response to ORC.doc Page 10 of 24 RESPONSE TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS CITY OF OKEECHOBEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT AMENDMENT 064 Policy 6.3: The City shall re-evaluate the transfer of development rights to allow for broader use of this function as an effective planning tool. Policy 6.4: The City, in order to protect surface water quality within its corporate limits and beyond, shall adopt a numerical standard for nutrients and pollutants of concern by 2012. Policy 6.5: The City shall evaluate opportunities to implement Okeechobee Utility Authority water quality treatment systems within the Taylor Creek area to improve the quality of surface water discharges. Policy 6.6: The quality of water to be discharged from new surface water management systems shall be subject to Federal, State, Regional and Local permitting programs and regulations that determine compliance with Federal, State and Local water quality standards. Stormwater discharges from development must meet relevant water quality and surface water management standards as set forth in Rules 62-4, 62-40, 62-302, 40E-4, F.A.C. and by local ordinance. Policy 6.7: The City shall require all new developments to meet the provisions of the SFWMD Volume 1V, Basis of Review for Surface Water Management and local provisions pursuant to this Comprehensive Plan to protect surface water quality within the City. Policy 6.8: Grants and incentives should be sought for the development of surface water quality treatment system retrofitting projects for old and/or new surface water management systems that are not effectively managing water volume or flow, or removing nutrients and other pollutants. Policy 6.9: The City shall periodically review the Land Development Code to ensure all codes are conducive to the implementation of such water quality Best Management Practices. Policy 6.10: The a 2012, the City shall consider -regad�t a program_ which shall require future developments to employ the provisions of the Florida Yards and Neighborhoods program. Policy 6.11: The City shall require periodic updates of the current Wellfield Protection Ordinance. \\Laruel\document\Okeechobee-city\2006\Comp Plan Elements\Response to ORC.doc Page 11 of 24 RESPONSE TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS 5.Objection: Transportation CITY OF OKEECHOBEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 06-1 The Florida DOT has identified a number of problems with the transportation analyses which were done to demonstrate that adequate capacity exists (see attached letter from FDOT dated September 14, 2006). The analysis for 06-C1-001 is based on 200,000 square feet of commercial whereas the land use category permits 2.1 million square feet of commercial (16.24 acres X 3.0 FAR X 43,560 sq. ft.). Therefore, the LBFH transportation analysis, which reports minimal impact on US 441 and SR 70, is incorrect. The segment of SR 70 just east of US 441 is currently operating below its adopted LOS. FDOT has no plans for major roadway improvements in the amendment area. This amendment is therefore inconsistent with Objective 9 of the Transportation Element, which states, "The City of Okeechobee shall encourage efforts to curtail future level of service standard deterioration, particularly along US Highway 441 and SR 70." The transportation analysis supplied with 06-C1-002 is incorrectly based on 37.48 acres. Also, the analysis also used an AADT of 34,700 as the capacity for LOS C for the four lane roads U.S. 441 and SR 70 whereas FDOT said that these roads are urban transitioning roads with less than 2 signals per mile which gives them a LOS C capacity of 32,800. Therefore, the amendment is not based on accurate data and analysis. (sections 163.3177(2), (3), (6)(a) and (b), (8), and (10)(e), FS.; and Rules9J-5005(2), 9J-5.006(2) and (3), 9J-5.015(3)(b) and (c), 9J-5.016(1)(a), (2)(c), (3)(b) 1,3, and 5, and (4), 9J- 5.019(3)(fi, (h), and (i), and (4)(b)2,F.A.C.J Response: The Transportation Analysis for 06-CI-001 is valid as the limitation of 200,000 square feet of Commercial development has been placed within a site specific policy for this amendment. See Future Land Use Element Policy 2.6 (Response #6). Clarification has been made as to the acreage involved for Amendment 06-CI-002 (See Comment #6) and adjustments have been made to clarify LOS C volumes for the affected roads impacted by the proposed amendment. fi. Objection: Data and Analysis Both future land use map amendments contain conflicting information about either the acreage or intensity of the Future Land use change being sought, the result is that the analysis of their impacts is not based upon relevant and appropriate data and analysis. Also, the description of amendment 06-C1-002 makes it unclear what type of Future Land Use is proposed. The public hearing advertisement for amendment 06-C 1-002 stated that this 32.97 acre site was proposed to change from the Single Family FLUM category to Multi -Family Residential. The amendment documentation, however, stated that at . their August 1, 2006 meeting the City Council voted to change the FLUM category to Residential Mixed Use. Some of the analysis was done according to Residential Mixed Use and other parts assumed Multi - Family Residential. Also, the acreage of the 06-C 1-002 amendment cannot be dependent on the abandonment of an adjacent parcel because the fact and the timing of this abandonment are uncertain. \\Larue I \document\Okeechobee-city\2006\Comp Plan Elements\Response to ORC.doc Page 12 of 24 RESPONSE TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT Other discrepancies include the following: CITY OF OKEECHOBEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 06-1 Amendment #06-C 1-001 CONFLICTING ACREAGES 1. Staff Report & Legal descriptions indicate 16.24 acres (15.05 + 1.19) 2. The "Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Application" indicates an 18.98 acre parcel 3. February 22, 2006 letter indicates a 21.14 acre parcel, as does a Wilson &Miller topographic survey map dated "23 June 2005" 4. July 27, 2006 letter indicates a 21.3 acre parcel CONFLICTING SIZES OF DEVELOPMENT 1. Change to Commercial Future Land Use for the 16.24 acre parcel would allow approximately 2.12 million square feet (sf) of development under the comprehensive plan's intensities for commercial future land use [ 16.24 acres x 3 FAR x 43,560 sf/ac = 2.12 million sfl. 2. The data & analysis impact analyses assume the approved land use to be 27,000 sf office, 163,000 sf retail and 10,000 sf restaurant = 200,000 sf_ The LBFH traffic analysis indicates, "The initial development plan includes approximately 200,000 square feet of space". No binding limitation to this square footage is contained in the Future Land Use Element text or map. Amendment #06-C 1-002 CONFLICTING ACREAGES 1. "NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING" & Legal description indicates site is 32.97 acres. 2. Staff Report indicates 32.97 acres, but with an "*" that indicates that "The acreage would be 37.48 acres if Taylor Creek ROW is abandoned" 3. Page 9 of CBC Request indicates total acreage at 37.48 acres including ROW abandonment 4. Two legal descriptions (with maps) totaling 37.48 acres, including the ROW abandonment — details regarding the ROW remains to be addressed 5. Traffic analysis addressing 42.92 acres 6. The "Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Application" indicates a 53 acre parcel 7. Environmental Site Assessment indicates three parcels totaling 60 acres CONFLICTING TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT 1. Staff report indicates change to "Multi -Family Residential" FLUM 2. The "Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Application" indicates the proposed land use is to be "RG (Multifamily PUD)" \\Laruel\document\Okeechobee-city\2006\Comp Plan Elements\Response to ORC.doc Page 13 of 24 RESPONSE TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS CITY OF OKEECHOBEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT AMENDMENT 06-1 3. Staff report indicates development is purported to consist of a mix of residential along with commercial and marina uses, and possibly a fuel dock; this is also mentioned several other places in the amendment package without analysis 4. The comprehensive plan's "Multi -Family Residential" future land use category makes no mention of allowing commercial & marina uses — these land uses need clarification, and size and the impacts of these uses, if proposed, will need to be specifically addressed 5. Staff report on page 7 indicates that "8-1-06 Council approved change to Residential Mixed Use" — This approval to the proposed FLUM category "Residential Mixed Use" is not addressed elsewhere in the amendment package, nor are the details concerning the specific Iand uses of such an approval addressed in this amendment package (e.g. residential size is now limited to 3 du/gross acre as in the proposed Residential Mixed Use Density/Intensity Table = 98 du not 330 du?) CONFLICTING SIZES OF DEVELOPMENT 1. Staff report indicates 247 mu ti-family dwell ing units 2. Staff report indicates development is purported to consist of 229 mixed residential dwelling units, 96-slip marina., and a fuel dock. 3. CBC Management's FLUM request analyzes a 380 dwelling unit project. 4. The traffic analysis bases its projections on 429 single family homes. (Sections 163.3177(8) and (10)(e), FS.; Rule 95-5.005(2), FA.C1 Response: The City has supplied documentation of the actual acreage, the allowable densities and intensities, the FLUM categories, and the impacts of all proposed land uses. The impact analysis has been redone based on the correct acreage, the correct FLUM categories, and the correct densities and intensities permitted by the categories. The analysis has been based on the maximum development potential of dwelling units and commercial floor space permitted by the FLUM categories. The City has revised the Amendments more specifically, as shown below: Amendment #06-CI-001 Conflicting Acreages The issue of conflicting acreages has been resolved. When the applicant submitted the application originally, the acreage that was calculated included property that did not need a Future Land Use Map change. This incorrect acreage was also commented on in a letter dated February 22, 2006. The City, also confused by the conflicting acreage, requested that the applicant submit a survey of only that portion of the property which required a Future Land Use Map change. On May 16, 2006 WilsonMiller, Inc. surveyed the property which required a FLUM change and determined the parcels to be 15.05 acres and 1.19 acres, for a total of 16.24 acres. After reviewing all the information submitted by the applicant and records from the Okeechobee County Property Appraiser, Staff determined that this acreage was correct and we proceeded with the Amendment request and analysis for only that portion of the property. (See Attachment 2- Legal Descriptions from WilsonMiller dated 5116106). \\Laruel\document\Okeechobee-city\2006\Comp Plan Elements\Response to ORC.doc Page 14 of 24 RESPONSE TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS CITY OF OKEECHOBEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT AMENDMENT 06-1 Conflicting Sizes of Development While technically the Department's determination that this 16.24 acre parcel could allow up to 2.12 million square feet of commercial development under the Comprehensive Plan's intensities for parcels designated Commercial on the Future Land Use Map is true and correct, the amount of retail area that the entire development (21.14 acres) can support will be specified within the City's Future Land Use Element. The City has revised the Element to include a policy which binds the subject property to allow a maximum amount of 200,000 square feet of space for the entire parcel. This new policy shall read as follows: Policy 6: Development in conjunction with Comprehensive Plan Amendment #06-C1-001 shall be limited to a maximum of 200,000 square feet of commercial development. This amendment is more specifically described as: Parcel 1: The west h of the Southwest ',% of the Southeast 'A of Section 15 Township 37 South Ranee 35 East, Okeechobee County Florida, lying North of the 'north rieht of way line of State Road No 70• Except the North 50 feet of the West ;z of the_ West 1/2 of the Southwest %4 of the Southeast 1A for road nurooses• also except the following described property conveyed to the State of Florida: Aparcel of land in the West 'h of the Southwest !,'4 of the Southeast of Section I5 Township-37 South, Ranee 35 East bein, more particulart� described as follows: Commence at the South ',,4_corner of said Section 1 �: thence rtin Vortherl y on the ',/4 section line a distance of 36.95 feet to the centerline of State Road 70; thence North 80'54'49" Fast, on said centerline a distance of 347.10 feet; thence Northerly at 90 to said centerline a distance of 40 feet to the Point of Be«innine thence continue '-Northerly a distance of 17 feet; thence Easterly at 90` a distance of 20 feet,• thence Southerly at 90 degrees a distance of 17 feet thence Westerl�at 90� a distance of 20 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel 2: Bejzinnin at the Southwest corner of the East :'s of the Southwest ''A of the Southeast '% of Section 15 Township 37 South Ranee 35 East and run North along the West boundary a distance of 594 feet: then run East a distance of 186.3 feet; then run South a distance of 594 feet to the South boundary of Section 15 then run West a distance of 186.3 feet to the Point of Be&nin�. . Less and except the right-of-way for State Road 70. OR Book 525 Page 1999 Public Records of Okeechobee County Florida and is proximately 21.14 acre(sl By posing this limitation on the amount of commercial development allowed on the subject property, it is no longer necessary for the City to reanalyze the impacts of the development. \\Larue I \document\Okeechobee-city\2006\Comp Plan Elements\Response to ORC.doc Page 15 of 24 RESPONSE TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT CITY OF OKEECHOBEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 06-1 Amendment #06-CI-002 Conflicting Acreages The portion of the property which the applicant is requesting a Future Land Use Map Amendment contains approximately 32.97 acres as shown on Attachment 3- Sketch and Legal Description far Amendment #06-CI -002 for the Department's review. This acreage was also verified using records from the Okeechobee County Property Appraiser, which is also included for the Department's review. Until the applicant has provided the City with proof of the Taylor Creek right-of-way abandonment, it shall not be included as part of this Amendment request. The conflicts in the acreage arose from the application which originally included parcels that did not require a Future Land Use Map Amendment. (Please see Attachment 4- Okeechobee County Property Appraiser records for Parcel Nos. 2-21-37-35-OA00- 00042-B-000, 2-22-37-35-OA00-00033-0000, 2-22-37-35-OAOO-0031-0000, and 2-27-37- 35-OaOO-00045-0000.) As such, the Staff Report and Notice of Public Hearing only describe the parcel which is subject to Amendment, while the CBC Request, Traffic Analysis, Comprehensive Plan Application, and Environmental Site Assessment all discuss the entire site which, based on the size of the parcel numbers given on the application, is approximately 45 acres more or less. As stated earlier, the applicant is requesting a FLUM Amendment only for Parcel No. 2-22-37-35-OA00-00031-0000 (32.97 acres). Conflicting Types of Development In the applicant's original request, the Multi -Family Future Land Use category was the intended proposed use for the subject property. However, after much discussion with the Local Planning Agency, City Council and the applicant, it was agreed that this property would be best served under the proposed Residential Mixed Use Category. On October 2, 2006, the City submitted correspondence to the Department which was to serve as an update of this Plan Amendment. (See Attachment 5- Memo dated October 2, 2006)The City has revised the Staff Report to assess the impacts of the development under this proposed Category. (See Attachment 6- Revised Staff Report for CBC Management Corp., Revised Application, Revised Data and Analysis) Conflicting Types of Development The maximum density allowed under the newly proposed Residential Mixed Use Future Land Use Category is 7.5 acres per gross dwelling unit. As such, the applicant is only allowed to develop a maximum of 247 dwelling units on the subject property (32.97 X 7.5 = 247). As can be seen on Attachment 6, the City has completed a full analysis of the impacts of this development using the maximum density allowed on the subject property. \\Laruel\document\Okeechobee-city\2006\Comp Plan Elements\Response to ORC.doc Page 16 of 24 RESPONSE TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS CITY OF OKEECHOBEE COMPREHENSIVE E NT OG-1 OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT 7. Objection: Water Supply The City is currently served by the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA), which has a Consumptive Use Permit for 2.83 million gallons per day (mgd), which will expire in January 2007. According to a July 18, 2006, letter from OUA, the current demands on the system are for 2.8 mgd of water supply. Thus, the amount of water remaining for the increased densities and intensities being proposed by the two land use map amendments is 30,000 gpd. The applicants estimate that their potable water demands will be approximately 55,000 gpd (1120 Holdings) and 95,000 gpd (CBC Management). This estimated demand plus the demands of other future users exceeds the water supply available. Therefore the plan amendments are not based on the availability of water supplies. [Section 163,3177(6)(a), F.S.; Rules 9J.5.006(3)(b)1, 9J-5.011(2)(b)2, and 9J- 5.016(3)(b)3, FA.C.J Response: The OUA has reviewed both Map Amendments and has not voiced a negative comment concerning capacity of water or for these proposed uses. OUA is now in the process of revising their consumptive use permit to accommodate these amendments, if approved. 8. Comment The SFWMD has commented on the need for the city to re-evaluate its water supply source to meet projected needs through 2015, and to be aware of potential constraints on obtaining additional raw water from Lake Okeechobee. These water Source Issues will need to be addressed as part of the City's 10 year water supply plan. The plan must address water supply sources necessary to meet the City's future growth, must demonstrate that future land uses are based on available water supplies and must include a work plan to build necessary potable water infrastructure. This is due within 18 months of the final approval of the Kissimmee Basin Water Supply Plan (see the attached letter from the South Florida Water Management District). [Sections 163.3167(13) and 163.31 77(6)(c), F.S.J Response: When the Kissimmee Basin Water Supply Plan is finalized, the City of Okeechobee will coordinate with the OUA to ensure water source issues are addressed as part of the 10-year water supply plan. The plan will address water supply sources necessary to meet the City's growth and will be adopted within 18 months of the Kissimmee Basin Water Supply Plan's final adoption date. Consistency with the State Comprehensive Plan The proposed amendments are not consistent with the State Comprehensive Plan including the following goals and policies: Goal (15) Land Use, Policies (b) 1,2,3,5 and 6; Promote development in areas with the capacity to serve new population and commerce; encourage a separation of urban and rural areas; \\Laruel\document\Okeechobee-city\2006\Comp Plan Elements\Response to ORC.doc Page 17 of 24 RESPONSE TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS CITY OF OKEECHOBEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT AMENDMENT 06-1 encourage an attractive and functional mix of living working, shopping and recreational activities; establish impact review procedures to evaluate the effects of significant development; and consider the impacts of land use on water quantity and quality, the availability of land, water and other natural resources, and the potential for flooding. Goal (17) Public Facilities, Policies (b) 1,3,4,5,6,7 and 9: Maximize the use of existing public facilities, allocate the costs of new public facilities based on the benefits received by existing and future residents, and develop fiscally sound and cost effective techniques for financing public facilities. Goal (19) Transportation, Policies (b) 2,3,9,11 and 13: Ensure an efficient and coordinated transportation system. Response: Based on the above revisions, the City's amendment is consistent with the State Comprehensive Plan. \\Laruel\document\Okeechobee-city\2006\Comp Plan Elements\Response to ORC.doc Page 18 of 24 RESPONSE TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS CITY OF OKEECHOBEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OB3ECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT AMENDMENT 06-1 Attachment I — City of Okeechobee Capital Improvement Element Update Contract Deliverables Table \\LarueI\document\Okeechobee-city\200b\Comp Plan Elements\Response to ORC.doc Page 19 of 24 DCA Tec )ical Assistance Grant No.: 06-DR-73-07-57-02-076 } Deliverable #2 City of Okeechobee Capital Improvement Element Update Contract Deliverables Evaluation Item DCA Notes City Comments 1. Do the data include the adopted level of No. The table of content mentions it The City's adopted Comprehensive Plan (2000) does service standards? §163.3180(1), Rules 9J- but was not addressed, include the adopted level of service standards which can 5.0055(1) and 9J-5.005(2) be found in Policy 2.1 of the Capital Improvements 2. Do the data include a population projection? No. The projected population of the Element and a Concurrency Management System. The City updated the population projections from 1999 §163.3177(6)(a), Rule 9J-5.005(2) City and the projected land needs to EAR -based Amendments with new information which support the population should be was submitted to the Department as part of the proposed included. package. To date, there have been no insurmountable problems with the allocation of land to meet the demonstrated needs of the City, but the allocation of multi -family residential appears low. Based on the latest information contained within the 1999 Evaluation and Appraisal Report, approximately 430 acres or 18% of the land within the City was vacant with most of this land is in areas currently designated for residential uses. Since that time period, it is estimated that less than 10% of the vacant residential areas have been developed. However, development of these residential areas will depend on potable water and sanitary sewer services being available. Projected population for the City is an estimated 7,455 residents in the year 2015 (See Table 7 of the Population Projections). At current inventory levels, the developable vacant land sum seems adequate to accommodate the existing and anti ci ated o ulation of the City. 1 DCA Technical Assistance Grant No.: 06-DR-73-07-57-02-076 Deliverable #2 Evaluation Item DCA Notes City Comments 3. Do the data show or describe where growth No. No population projection was See City Comments above, is projected to geographically go and when? included. (See 2 above). 163.3177 6 a Rule 9J-5.006 2 4. Does the data identify existing No. They need to identify the existing There are no existing infrastructure deficiencies for LOS infrastructure deficiencies for LOS-related deficiencies for all public facilities related facilities within the City of Okeechobee. facilities? §163.3177(3)(a), Rule 9J- lines The Okeechobee Utility Authority has been responsible 5.0 b) for the monitoring of public facilities as it relates to sewer, solid waste, drainage, and water since 1998. The City submitted Okeechobee Utility Authority's Six -year Estimated Capital Improvement Program to the Department for informational purposes. This Table identifies the existing water and sewer deficiencies for its facilities. 5. Do the schedule address deficiencies? No. (See 4 above) The Schedule of Capital Improvements estimates public §163.3177(3)(a)l, Rule 9J-5.016(3)(b)1 facility costs and projected revenue sources to fund these facilities to meet the needs of the City and continue to maintain the current LOS standards. See City Comment 4 above. 6. Do the data include listing of existing No. But; some projects and their cost All City projects, their costs, and funding sources are revenue and expenditures as well as are listed without indicating the shown. The City is trying to communicate to the OUA projected revenues and expenditures? sources of revenues. The sources of that some of the OUA projects that are listed show the 163.3177 3 a 1, Rule 9J-5.01 3 1 funding must be stated. funding source as "N/A" and this should be revised. 7. Do the schedule show amount coming from No. See 6 above. See City comment (4 and 6) above. each revenue source per project? 163.3177 3 a 2, Rule 9J-5.016 2 8. Are the fiscal year(s) identified for when the Yes. No comments. capital improvements are scheduled? 163.3177 3 a 5 Rule 9J-5.016 4 a 9. Are the names of the projects mentioned in Yes No comments. the schedule? §163.3177(3)(a)2 and 5, Rule 9J-5.01 4 a la DCA Technical Assistance Grant No.: 06-DR-73-07-57-02-076 Deliverable #2 Evaluation Item DCA Notes City Comments 10. Are the limits or location of the projects No. They need to include the exact The City's Public Works Department does not currently specified in the schedule (i.e., Boulevard X from Street A and Lane B)? location of the project, have the information to revise the schedule pinpointing §163.3177(3)(a)2 and 5, Rule 9J- the exact locations of Public Works projects. 5.016 4 a 1 a No comments. 11. Is the type and description of improvement Yes. Only two of the projects may or facility noted in the schedule (i.e., roads, have something to do with the water, sewer, etc.)? §163.3177(3)(a)2 and maintenance of the adopted LOSS. 5, Rule 9J-5.016 4 a la No comments. 12. If multi -phased, is the phase of the project No. noted in the schedule? Rule 9J- 5.016(3)(c)6 13_ Are the project costs noted in the schedule? Yes. None. Rule 9J-5.01 4 a 2 14. Are only committed revenue sources used No. No revenue sources are stated. Revenue sources are stated for all City projects. (See for the first three years of the schedule? So, it is had to tell if the money is comments 6 and 10 above). 163.316 32 and 163.3177 3 a committed or planned. No comments, not applicable. 15. If planned revenues are used for the last two No. (See #14 above). years of the schedule that require referenda or other actions to secure, are alternate committed revenues identified in the event the planned revenue source is not approved? 163.3177 3 a 5 Rule 9J-5.01 4 a 2 16. Does the schedule include a demonstration No. The schedule must identify, using The street overlay project and the stormwater retention of consistency with the individual elements of the plan? Rule 9J-5.016(4)(a)lb footnotes, those projects that are in project will include footnotes indicating which specific placed the schedule to reduce LOS standard is being maintained. existing deficiencies identified in other elements of the comprehensive Plan, and indicating the page of the specific element where the deficiency or program was identified. See City Comment above. 17. Does the schedule identify which projects No. This needs to be done. (See #16 are needed to replace existing facilities? above). Rule 9J-5.016(3)(c)3 and Rule 9J- 5.016 4 (a)1 3 DCA Technical Assistance Grant No.: 06-DR-73-07-57-02-076 Deliverable #2 Evaluation Item DCA Notes _ M CitV Comments 18. Does the schedule identify which projects No. This needs to be done, and it Since adoption of the Plan, the City has been meeting its are needed to meet the future demand? should be based on the projected Level of Service standard for recreation and §163.3177(3)(c)3, Rule 9J-5.016(2)(c) population and the anticipated growth transportation. As stated earlier, the City is expected created by the projected population increase by 1,682 additional residents by 2015. during the planning timeframe. Coordination with the OUA has been implemented to evaluate the ability to fund projects necessary to correct deficiencies and to provide for future growth at the adopted Level of Service for water, sewer, drainage, and solid waste collection. This is done annually in conjunction with the updating of the Capital Improvements Element and the Five Year Schedule of Capital Improvements. The OUA is being asked to pinpoint which projects are needed to meet the projected population. 19. Does the schedule show 10-Year Water No. At this time, there are no water supply projects required. Supply projects for public, private, or regional facilities, if required? 163.3177 6 c 20. Does the schedule include MPO TIP if No. N/A No comments. relied upon for concurrency? Rule 9J- 5.019 3 and 4 3 21. If privately funded projects are listed, is No. There are no privately funded projects shown in the there an agreement and is funds shown as a Schedule. revenue source? 163.3177(3)(a)5 22. After Public School Facilities Element is No. adopted, does schedule show public schools capital improvements schedule? 163.3177(12)(c) 23. If local government adopts a long term No. The City did not adopt a long The 1999 EAR -based Comprehensive Plan contains a CMS, is the schedule also long term (10 or term concurrency management Concurrency Management System. 15 years)? 163.3177 3 d system. 24. Are there items included that are not LOS or Yes. In fact, the overwhelming No comments. concurrency related (i.e., police cars)? majority of the items are not LOS related. DCA Technical Assistance Grant No.: 06-DR-73-07-57-02-076 Deliverable #2 5 Evaluation Item DCA Notes City Comments 25. Does the deliverable include any items not re uired for this deliverable? No. No comments. RESPONSE TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS CITY OF OKEECHOBEE COMPREHENSIVE AMENDMENT PLAN OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT Attachment 2 — Legal Descriptions from WilsonMiller for Amendment #06-CI-001 \\Laruel\document\Okeechobee-city\2006\Comp Plan Elements\Response to ORC.doc Page 20 of 24 Isu . , :�v py�orn rofPlarnvn0 t1 slprt 6 EnpineurrrQ LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A ` A PORTION OF SECTION OKEE HOBEE COUNTY F�LORIDA RANGE 35 EAST A parcel of land lying in Section 15, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE at the Southeast corner of said Section 15; thence along the South line of Section 15; tlf said Section 15, S.89°02'40"W., 486.26 feet to S9"Wn2on the feettheuthnnce ine S.89°54'49"W., 186.29 N.00'57'20"W., 63.49 feet; thence Nine feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue 0along said 17 feet; then NN.00°15'28W., thence N.00°1TS6"W., 943.80 feet; thence 49.99 feet; thence N.89.09'59'W., 336.64 feet; thence S.00°16'59"E., 1002.57 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 15.05 acres, more or less. SEE ATTACHED FOR SKETCH This legal description and the attached sketch are not valid ri inal raised seat of a Florida licensed surveyor and mapper. without the signature and the o g e system, North American Bearings shown hereon are based on the , State lPlane oridaWest Zone. The reference bearing is the Datum of 1983/1990 Adjustment (NAD83/90) Southerly line of Section 15, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida, being S.89°02'40"W. Prepared by: WilsonMiller, Inc. L Ga-I �! . Rashfo *i Mapper No. LS6305 Professionai.SurVr yor and State of Florida P1.N.: o3 !z4oa-002 G!F0o Rel.: A-03652-M Date: 4-4il 18.2006 Date offices strategically located to serve our clients BOo.b, .4336 Fax 934f2 Fort Myers office 4571 Colonial Boulevard - Fat Myers. Florida 33912.239 939.1020 wilsoamiller com &, Y:000- µ266 YY 0,6 YMALL mc. — fL Lia-r cc-000Wo ¢S09i�qQ6- . 00000 3,af'. r r•�_"�'i�*�'2.aKa�q..tx.a-•;r�:,s A-� rx. ^J -,� f� ; !{••c'R"�.7.i °S••-. �7 �`:;: �ZJ"+ ii.... w�i`.•,a. F> & M`Ulsda .,s. •"'-�:•yV`'ra`' h�'L_<.Sr fir=y„ xyra'�y�i�k:PJ''t_•vt,P' YS kr .�.{ tfY-fs ''g'q'r •*. x v�r r£:�`ws 1..Z A - ti ft,Yr^•••`��`,,�''�•_,,•�ib'_1 T•+ "'rc".�-:+.�}=�.s y s,*�..F 4r3 j y i >rI111eK�:.k, Alt:; -New.Obairorls MP6nnN�w'�Iy"�i.Eilnwc"(!Q i ti - _ 1 r i LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL B .• A PORTION OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 35 EAST OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA A parcel of land lying in Section 15, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE at the Southeast comer of said Section 15; thence along the South line of. daid Section 15, S.89°02'40"W., 486.26 feet to a point on the South line of Section 15; thence, N.00°57'2U, W., 63.49 feet; thence, N.00°1659"W., 250.90 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, S.89°54'49' 86'59"E e279.61 f et N.�o the,POfNT OF BEGIN feet; N NG.thence N.89°02'40"E., 186.30 feet; thence S.00° Said parcel contains 1.19 acres, more or less. SEE ATTACHED FOR SKETCH This legal description and the attached sketch are not valid without the signature and the original raised seal of a Florida licensed surveyor and mapper. Bearings shown hereon are based on the State Plane Coordinate System, North American Datum of f Sectio/1990 djustment (NAD83/90), Florida West Zone. The reference n 15, Township 37 Sbearing Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, line oFlorida, Southerly line being S.89°02'40"W. Prepared by: Wilson0ler, Inc. Gary W ashford Professional Surveyor and Mapper No. LS6305 State of Florida ` " Date Offices strategically located to serve our clients 800.549.4336 Fart Myers office 4571 Colonial Boulevard • Forf A/lyers fJorida 339J2.239 939 1020 • Fax239.5t?9.3412 wi/sommnlercom &M&.X °• N2eq Ver. OW WALL Gr, W1HonM/11e41nc. —A. Lk,/LL-0000f70 NOO►OD pm-00000 RESPONSE TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS CITY OF OKEECHOBEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT AMENDMENT 06-1 Attachment 3 -- Sketch and Legal Description ofAmendment #06-CI-002 \\LarueI\document\Okeechobee-city\2006\Comp Plan Elements\Response to ORC.doc Page 21 of 24 r-jknVCLL L+ YYG7I Ut I ATLUrl Rlun I -Ur-VVA7 I�.O.C- �, N.W. COR. S.W.1/4 SEC-22 yI TWP. 37 S, RGE 35 E. $ FOUND AXLE TAYLDR COVE P35. PG 60 P.O.B. F \ S.E. 8TH STREET I � NOD�rJs'rr 200 Cs d p nm s.T *,M-M- ssww �raliaa s�rW Nan � N La 9•G IAN 9L`16?QL uLw z nam raa-s.sw+ t// � 0. w"c" PC InTB l69�]a.UFee � �' W U PARCEL 1 I Z40 AOLES ira •lmaaa n•m¢ na Aum ra-n-x..�..a / .✓ I-wcn ra-a-a-awe..�Mw_ b�b9i 4~ SCALE= 1'= 300, SECTION 22 TOWNSHIP 37 S. RANGE 35 E. ABBREVIATIONS: TN uonoc R•9DRL K rum re-a-n-.e-w.a N 3 r �� � / � �� (C) - CALCULATED COURSE f / ' CLF - CHAIN LINK FENCE PARCEL 3 09 CM -CONCRETE MONUMENT ' g- .9 U9.6Y CONC - CCNCRETE PAVEMENT ` awe maw FOUND 4K4 i CDw. NON. a� (D) - DEEDED CCURSE t+•-n-a4wrt ua • �• �. 'r o+- o •- n PARCEL 4 IR/C - IRON ROD & CAP 'oon M 507 ? N/r - NOW OR FCRVERLY PG M Mom~ p NJi' 2lY (U) - MEASURED CCURSE a 630 229.8T (P) -PUTTED COURSE 6 S89' T 9 33 .�.. (.1 TTP. — TTPICAL v o SURVEY NOTES: N `•' I. BEARING STRUCTURE BASED ON THE NEST LINE OF SECTION 22. TOWNSHIP o n 37 SOUTH. RANGE 35 EAST, BEING SOUTH 00'tr36' EAST. ` !� 2. THE SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION IS NOT VAUD WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE N S AND RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA UCENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. La S.W.1/4 z S.W. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, TTwp. 37 S ; Z GRAPHIC SCALE RGE ss E 22 33�0 1E 22 SOUTH LINE SECTION 22 l �10�20 CbHC2ETC MCNUNENT BEARING NOTE THE BEARMGS S O%N HEREON ARE REFERENCED TO THE SOUTH THIS SURVEY UNE OF SUNSET STRIP AIRP ARK PER O.R.8.1593 PACE C888. !S NOT A QUITIFIC 4 02M &L Vair5 RESER'FD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE SKETCH SHOWN HEREON AND THE ATTACHED DESCRIPTION IS ACCURATE AND ECT TO TiE BEST OF MY KNO,.,&EOC AND BELIEF AND DOES NOT REPRESENT A FIELD SURVEY. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS SKETCH ANO DE ON MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SET FORTH UNDER RULE 61017-6 OF THE FLORIDA AOLItNISTRATIVE CODE PU TO C R 472.027, FLORIDA STATJ `.E= RaNSiONS DATE BY SUBMITTAL 02-23-06 ,I,IL R D ER ItS 4275. STATE OF FLORC 7= JOSEPH J. L Y SURVEYM0 & MAPPING. INC.. j_972 - DATE OF SKETCH DRAWN BY CHECKED BY flLE NA'•�E 02-20-06 TM JJL TCFV_S&D.d-S LEGAL DESCRIPTION for PARCEL 2; WEST OF TAYLOR CREEK RIGt-(T'-OFWAY ` k LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL#2—A Being a parcel of land lying within the Southwest quarter (1/4) of Section 22, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE at the Northwest corner or the Southwest quarter (1/4). of said Section 22, Thence South 0017'36" East along -the West boundary line of said Section 22, a distance of 212.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence North 89'44'49" East a distance of 1,441.65 feet to a point lying on the westerly right—of—way line of Taylor Creek as shown on a Plat recorded in Plot Book 2, Page 83; Thence South 16'59'49" West, along said westerly right—of—way line, a distance of 319.94 feet; Thence South 19'38'07" West, continuing along said right—of—way, a distance of 838.97 feet; Thence South 20'17'30" West, continuing along said right—of—way, a distance of 455.95 feet, to the north line of Parcel 4, as described in Official Records Book 507. Page 209 of the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida, said line measuring 901.00 feet north of and parallel with the south line of said Section 22. Thence South 89'20'09" West along a line being 901.00 feet North of, when measured at right angles, and parallel with the Southerly boundary of Section 22, a distance of 517.92 feet; Thence North 00'17'36" West, a along a line measuring 210.00 feet east of when measured at right angles, and parallel with the west boundary of said Section 22, a distance of 36.00 feet; Thence South 89'20'09" West, a along a line measuring 937.00 feet north of when measured at right angles, and parallel with the Southerly boundary of said Section 22, a distance of 210.00 feet, to a point on the aforementioned West boundary line of said section 22; Thence North 00'17'36" West, along the west line of said Section 22, a distance of 1008.37 feet; Thence North 89'20'09" East, perpendicular to and parallel with the Southerly boundary of said Section 22, a distance of 200.00 feet; Thence North 00"17'36" West along a line 200.00 feet perpendicular to and parallel with the Westerly boundary of Section 22 a distance of 450.00 feet; Thence South 89'20'09" West along a line parallel to the Southerly boundary of said Section 22, a distance of 200.00 feet, to a point on the aforementioned Westerly boundary line of said Section 22; SHEET i of Thence North 00'17'36" West, along said line westerly boundary, a SEAL distance of 32.50 feet to THE POINT—OF—BEGtNNING. Containing 32.97 acres, more or less. THiS IS NOT A SURVEY CER111~i0ATE THIS 15 TO CERTGY MAT 1✓._- SKETCHS:'C HFREO`7 AND THE ATTACHED DESCPIPP.O.N IS ACCURATE AND A&NO BELIEF AND DOES NOT REPRESENT A F:_LD SURVEY. I FORTH=R CERTIFY THAT TH;S S'LETC`I /�/,`�J"j'SCi STANDARDS SET FORTH UNDER RULE 61G17-6 OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CCOE PURSUJ/g/%�% / P� REVISIONS DATE BY SUBMITTAL 02-20-OS TM )SEPH J. t TE OF SKETQ NOT VAU'D WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORtGI.NAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA UCENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER ®ZOCti ML Al 15 R£S£RVtl1 �TkE BEST O. 1st Kv ;c ��DGE .TS 7HE F.ItNUAI;r,/ 7=C'.+PnC%.L . FLORIDA STATUTES. t�VEY'%K A06 iAA;%�' S 4275. STATE OF FLORIDA / SURVCO SU/RIL_4t.NG St MAPPING. INC.. "727e \WN BY CHECKED BY PLE NAvE I '. i I r, . T—. . f :. . - RESPONSE TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS CITY OF OKEECHOBEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT AMENDMENT 06-1 Attachment 4 — Okeechobee County Property Appraiser Records for Parcel Nos. 2-21-37-35-OAOO-00042-B000 2-22-37-35-OAOO-00033-0000 2-22-37-35-OAOO-00031-0000 2-27-37-35-OA00-00045-0000 \\Laruel\document\Okeechobee-city\2006\Comp Plan Elements\Response to ORC.doc Page 22 of 24 ecnoucu %-UUIILy LIUpt:1Ly tippiaiaki - _rt2LN- 1111L� vu 1-;1 . -- 4 Okeechobee County Property Appraiser ;_; C "Mil.. She, naan, rF A - O,Keeciobu�? 'orir 1 t 1 0 U-1 0.2 0.3 MI PARCEL_ 2-21-37-35-OA00-00042-B000 -VACANT (000000) A PORTION OF PARCEL 42A AS DESC IN ORB 375 PG 290 & 291: THE N50 FTOFW300 FT& E61 Name:CBC MANAGEMENT CORPORATION LandVal $59,610.00 Site: 0, Okeechobee BldgVal $0:00 Mail: PO BOX 2558 ApprVal $59,610.00 OKEECHOBEE, FL 349732558 JustVal $59.610.00 Sales 7/28/2003 $198,000-OOV / U Assd $59,610.00 Info 7/16/1999 $0.00 1 / U Exmpt $0.00 2/22/1996 $0.00 11 U Taxable $59,610.00 I s nis mrormation, Last Updated: I Ilb/Zu06, was derived from data which was compiled by the Okeechobee County Property Appraiser's Office solely for the governmental purpose of property assessment. This information should not be relied upon by anyone as a determination of the ownership of property or market value- No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the accuracy of the data herein, it's use, or it's interpretation_ Although it is periodically updated, this information may not reflect the data currently on file in the Property Appraiser's office- The assessed values are NOT certified values and therefore are subject to change before being finalized for ad valorem assessment purposes http://w«•w_okeechobeepa.com/GIS/Pn'nt_Nlap.asp?pj'bolibchhjbnligcafccjfhoj'iaehdomhl... 11/14/2006 V pLGl.t1V VV,+ N-Vu1lls I. I VP%'I1 �Y t .t/t/, w,.+v, , ,µr . ,,. a.v.- v•• - - -' - - - - --- - - - - - w County Property Appraiser r'1T� 0 0.1 0•2 0.3 Mi echobee "Lia" Shen --.an, CFh. Oi,�ech uee. F i r ,E : - ;-: --Y 2 FPARCEC'- �► E 2-22-37-35-0A00-00033-0000 - VACANT (000000� NPLATED LANDS OF THE CITY BEG AT A PT 547 FT N OF SW COR OF SEC 22 RUN N ON SEC }; I - Name:CBC MANAGEMENT CORPORATION LandVal $195,000.00 Site: 0 , Okeechobee BldgVal SO.00 I PO BOX 2558 ApprVal $195,000.00 Mail: OKEECHOBEE, FL 349732558 JustVal $195,000.00 --,�— 7/28/2003 $O.00V l U Assd S195,000.00 Sales 7/16/1999 $115,000.00V l U Exmpt $0.00 Info 2/22/1996 $O.00V / U Taxable $195.000.00 ,. n�......r...tioo f•ninly PrnnartV AnofaiSerS This information, Last Updated: 11/brZU1Jb, was cerrveu ,run, uata will„ way •--^-r^— — •--- -- --- - Office solely for the governmental purpose of properly assessment. This information should not be relied upon by anyone as a determination of the ownership of property or market value. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the accuracy of the data herein, it's use, or it's interpretation Although it is periodically updated, this information may not reflect the data currently on file in the Property Appraisers office. The assessed values are NOT certified values and therefore are subject to change before being finalized for ad valorem assessment purposes. http://w-w%v_of-eechobeepa.com/GIS[Pn'nt_ Iap.asp?pj'bolibchhjbnllgcafccjfhojiaehdomhl 11 /14/2006 ...,,.�ILy 1 I vpt.;►ty tl1PJJ,"Aar t - Up, rrrt�c u �. C Okeechobee County Property Appraiser 0 0.3 0.6 0.9 Mi :' .0 "[ iil- Sherman, CFA - 'eecnob2c. onda_ - E63-763-4422 N"-++ 5 PARCEL: 2-22-37-35-UA00-00031 -0000 -IMP PASTUR (o061so) UNPLATTED LANDS OF THE CITY W 1/2 OF SW 114 LYING W OF CREEK EXCEPT S 901 FT 8 CREEK- Name:ALTOBELLO FRANK TRUSTEE, ETAL LandVat $533.130.00 Site: 0 , Okeechobee BldgVal $0.00 Mail: BOX 417 ApprVal $533,130.00 OKEECHOBEE, FL 349730417 JustVal $533,130.00 411612003 $0.00 V / U Assd $533,130.00 ~� Sales Info 4/16/2003 $0.00 V / U Exmpt $0.00 12/29/2000 $0.00 V / U Taxable $533,130 00 uu.nna-Vn, -d-t upuateu. 1 ,/w/-vuD. was uenveo From Bata wnrcn was compiled oy the Ukeechobee.County Property Appraiser's Office solely for the governmental purpose of property assessment. This information should not be relied upon by anyone as a determination of the ownership of property or market value. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the accuracy of the data herein, ifs use, or irs interpretation. Although it is periodically updated, this information may not reflect the data currently on file in the Property Appraiser's office. The assessed values are NOT certified values and therefore are subject to change before being finalized for ad valorem assessment purposes. http://"-" %w.okeechobeepa.com/GIS/Print_Map.asp?pjbolibchhjbnligcafccjfhojiaehdomhl... 11/14/2006 %_1kJ"1Jt.Y I IUJJ.LLy �jjv, _­_, I I ­k, . . . . ---- - t- - - - - ____ - - Okeechobee County Property Appraiser 0.24 mi A' PARCEL: 2-21-37-35-OAOO-00045-0000 -VACANT COM UNPLATTED LANDS OF THE CITY BE 21.5 FT S OF NE COR OF SE 1/4 SEC 21 RUN S 293.3 FT 0 S tool 00 F Appraiser 0) Name: ALTOBELLO FRANK TRUSTEE, ETAL LandVal $296,750.00 Site 0 . Okeechobee BldgVal $0-00 BOX 4OKEECHOBEE, `17 ApprVal $2FL 349730417 Justval 96,750-00 io 11 Mail: $296J50.00 411612003 $0.00 V I U Assd $296.750-00 —77- Sales 4/16/2003 $0.00 V / U Exmpt $0.00 Info 12/29/2000 WOO V I U Taxable $2 96.7 510.100 This information, Last Updated: 1 i/6/2006, was derived from data which was Compiled by the Okeechobee County Property Appraiser's Office solely for the governmental purpose of property assessment. This information should not be relied upon by anyone as a determination of the ownership of property or market value No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the accuracy of the data herein. it's use, or ifs interpretation. Although it is periodically updated, this information may not reflect the data currently on file in the Property Appraiser's office. The assessed values are NOT certified values and therefore are subject to change before being finalized for ad valorem aspurposes. hitp:/,/xN,",�%,.okeechobeepa.com/GIS/Pnnt_Map.asp?pjboilbchhj'bnligcafccj fho) iachdomhl... 11/14/2006 RESPONSE TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS CITY OF OKEECHOBEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT AMENDMENT 06-1 Attachment S — Memo dated October 2, 2006 to the Department \\Lamel\document\Okeechobee-city\2006\Comp Plan Elements\Response to ORC.doc Page 23 of 24 .. L,ARUE PLANNING & MANAGEMENT SERVICES, Inc. 1375 Jackson Street, Suite 206 Fort Myers, Florida 33901-2845 239-334-3366 • FAX: 239-334-6384 e-mail: larue-planning@att.net Memo To: Parker Collins, DCA Plan Reviewer From: James G LaRue, AICP Date: October 2, 2006 Subject: City of Okeechobee Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment This correspondence shall serve as c update City PlanAmendment Residential/Mixed Use Future Land in response to the Departments concern regarding the proposed Use Category which is being prposed for the subject property. As can be seen from the original Staff ily Report submitted with the Large Scale packet, the appli an denial of the rt originally requested a lequestamfor Future Land Use category for the subject property. Staff several reasons, one being that the application was more suitable in a Mixed Use Future Land use Category with lesser density than the multi -family request. he At the City Council meeting the application was approved ixed Use Future Land Use Categoryfor transmittal to DCA subject to . It applicant agreeing to the property being placed in a n e designation at the adoption was agreed by City Council to advertise the request usiatatand analhe thatsthat supports the Mixed Use public hearing. The applicant has submitted revised d Y Category and this has been submitted to your agency. Please let us know if further information is needed. JGL:lk RESPONSE TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS CITY OF OKEECHOBEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT AMENDMENT 06-1 Attachment 6- Revised Staff Report for CBC Management Corporation, Revised Application and Data & Analysis Completed by CBC Management Corp.. \\Laruel\document\Okeechobee-city\2006\Comp Plan Elements\Response to ORC.doc Page 24 of 24 i .� / ) i acxson street, Suite 206 Fort Myers, Florida 33901-2845 Phone: 239-334-3366 Fax: 239-334-6384 Email: larue-planning a(),att.net REVISED - Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment .Applicant: CBC Management Corp. Owner: FrankAltobello, Trustee From: Single Family Residential To: A4wI4; �'.,.v, ;II' AlfR7/y/7 nfi/Y/Residential Mixed Use Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: CBC Management Corp. 06-Cl -002 Applicant: Agent: Address: Phone Number: Fax Number. Owner of Record: CBC Management Corp Thomas Close 3.01 NW 4th Avenue Okeechobee, FL 34972 863-467-0831 863-763-6337 Frank Altobello Existutg ; .. Proposed Property Control Number 2-22-27-35-OA00-00031-0000 Future Land Use Single -Family Residential Deli gnatton v � Zoning District Residential Mixed Use Holding and PUB Acreage' * . RMF —32.97 *-32.97 Density 132 du Access 247 du/ross ac US 441 US 441 Legal Description: Being a parcel of land lying within the Southwest quarter of Section 22, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida, and being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Northwest corner of the Southwest quarter of said Section 22, thence South 00° 17' 36" East along the West boundary line of said Section 22 a distance of 212.00 feet to the POINT -OF -BEGINNING; thence North 890 44' 49" East a distance of 1441.65 feet to a point lying on the westerly right-of-way line of Taylor Creek as shown on a Plat recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 83; thence South 160 59'49" West, along said westerly right-of-way line, a distance of 319.94 feet; thence South 19'38'07" West, continuing along said right-of-way, a distance of 838.97 feet; thence South 20117'30" West, continuing along said right-of-way, a distance of 455.95 feet, to the north line of Parcel 4, as described in Official Records Book 507, Page 209 of the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida, said line measuring 901.00 feet north of and parallel with the south line of said Section 22. Thence South 89°20'09 West along a line being 901.00 feet North of, when measured at right angles, and parallel with the Southerly boundary of Section 22, a distance of 517.92 feet; thence North 00°17'36" West, a along a line measuring 210.00 feet east of when measured at right angles, and parallel with the west boundary of said Section 22, a distance of 36.00 feet; thence South 89°20'09" West, a along a line measuring 937.00 feet north of when measured at right angles, and parallel with the Southerly boundary of said Section 22, a distance of 210.00 feet, to a point on the aforementioned West boundary line of said section 22; thence North 00°17'36" West, along the west line of said Section 22, a distance of 1008.37 feet, thence North 89'20109" East, perpendicular to and parallel with the Southerly boundary of said Section 22, a distance of 200.00 feet; thence North 00'17'36" West along a line 200.00 feet perpendicular to and parallel with the Westerly boundary of Section 22 a distance of 450.00 feet; thence South 89°20'09" West along a line parallel to the Southerly boundary of said Section 22, a distance of 200.00 feet, to a point on the Staff Report Applicant: CBC Management Corp. Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment 06-C1-002 aforementioned Westerly boundary line of said Section 22; thence North 00017'36" West, along said line westerly boundary, a distance of 32.50 feet to the POINT -OF - BEGINNING. Containing 32.97 acres, more or less. Request: The matter before the Land Planning Agency and the City Council is a request to change the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) for the above described property from Single Family to Mtdti FarnilyResidential Mixed Use. The request � � ��if „" � Exhibit A 0 h �a� vY vaaa trial aaavn Since the property in question is over 10 acres (37:4532.97 acres), this application qualifies under Florida Statutes 163 as a "Large -Scale Amendment' to the PIan. 'Mem than likely, th subjeet pr-epeAy will be eambined with eenti— _q4y, aL-eady in a Multi Family ea4egar-y Adjacent Future Land Use Map classifications and Zoning Districts: North: FLUM, Classification: Single Family Zoning District: RMH Existing Land Use: Vacant and Mobile Homes East: FLUM Classification: Single Family Zoning District: RSF-1 Existing Land Use: Taylor Creek and Single Family South: FLUM Classification: Multi -Family . Zoning District: RMF Existing Land Use: Vacant West: FLUM Classification: Commercial and Multi -Family Zoning District: CHV and RSF-1 Existing Land Use: Various Commercial Application Description: The applicant requests a change in the Future Land Use Map Designation for the subject property from Single Family (SF) to Multi malty (W) Residential Mixed Use (RMU). The subject property is currently vacant and unplatted. The subject property is located along Taylor Creek, parallel to US 441. The applicant intends to develop the property to accommodate the proposed project known as the Taylor Creek Fishing Village. This development is-pt"erted-te ^^�F-will be a planned unit development providing a mix of residential housing units (a total of 229 dwelling units) consisting of a mix of: residential uses ^f single family dwelIings, town homes, and cottages along with some commercial and marina_ uses alt1,aetigl, it is some -hat 2 Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: CBC Management Corp. 06-Cl -002 With the existing densit allocation at a maximum density of 4 dwelli -.._k LU uovviv ine rOPeIIY to suit the maximum density to allow u to a roxi units /gross acre) ;ub ect property will ti,P ; ited to si 7 u«,esracre = i.5L d imum density of 247 d Ise, the appli__cant' ila a increases th -es X 7.5 dwelling Under the Singh 32 dwelling units The City Council and Local Planning Agency are required to address certain uses in conjunction with the Comprehensive Plan, which may be categorized as follows: A. Consistency with the Land Use Categories and Plan Policies. with Maxifnum Fer ieT dii r v l b e Staff Report Applicant: CBC Management Corp. Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment 06-C1-002 The applicant's request for a Future Land Use Mau Amendment to allow a Residential Mixed Use category is consistent as it pertains to the intent and use of the Residential Mixed Use category being proposed by the City and shown below: Policy2.1(c) Mired Use Residential Intended to accommodate and provide flexibility for development ofmtdtiple uses within a residential setting In order for land to be considered for this designation land requested to be placed in this, cate�n, shall be a minimum of 30 acres Development within this category would be allowed to be no more than seven and one half (7 5) divelling units per gross acre. Lund developed within this Residential Afixed Use Category must adhere to the following innovative design and planning principles I. All new development within the Residential AfLyed Use Category shall be required to be zoned as a Planned Development or Planned Unit Development 2.. Development within this. Residential Aftyed Use Categon- will be required to be cluster in order to maximize open space and natural areas. Development within the Residential Hired Use Categon- is permitted to be clustered at higher than gross density as long as the gross density of the parcel is not exceeded for the total acreage within the Residential Afixed Use Categon•. 3. Development within the Residentigl dlired Use Category is encoura eg d to provide a ndr of uses. including a mix of residential types recreational amenities civic spaces and convenience and commercial uses intended to serve residents and theirguests in order to minimize trips outside the Residential Mixed Use Category 4. Development is encouraged to provide creative site designs and clustering is required to provide for greater common open space and n&ed--use development The planning flexibility provided through the planned developrnertt process shg11 encourage and facilitate creative design techniques a. Residential Development These areas shall include single and/or multiple gamily home site acreage and shall include but not be limited to, single family attached and detached; duplexes and two-family units; and tovv.•n homes and other multi -family dwelling tvpEs h._ .Non-residential Development These areas will include vehicular and pedestrian ways. commercial and institutional areas chtb houses arid associated facilities tttility buildings maintenance areas tennis courts and associated non- residential uses. C. Residential and Non-residential Development acreage may account for no more then 60% of the gross area within the Residential Mixed Use Cate on' Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: CBC Management Corp, 06-Cl -002 Intensi /density standardy or all uses within this cafe ot•v Ore s lOrth in the Intens•i /Density Tctble below: Percent A re fate Land Use x Withh, the Mixed Use Future Land Use Cam Land Uses in Mixed Use otitinitnum Max— �mtt�n Maa�um Land Use %Land Density/Intensity ir�_ d QRen S aces. These areas will include presened natural areas bu ers lakes arks. zolf courses nana a trails retention areas conservation areas scenic resources zreen belts' wetlands and associated areas and ntttst account or a minitntun o 40`% o the fro ert , within the Residential ;ijived Use CqteeOj-j,- Golf course ainra •s will account tbr no more than 11tvPercent yo of the open sace o ' the subject Residential A4ired Use Cate o No develo meat residentiaUcommercial structures are intended. but on1 • recreation oriented buddinns• andiors•tructures e. The O nters It -ill em toy many entent strate hn in and aaround an vl course to cldress the otentful or esticirle'lehemic•al Pollution of' the rottrtdxater' and surface hater r-eceivilk areas The managetnent ractice•s trill include: r• Tire uic o glow rc.lccr�c -----1 l��rtilrzc�rs rr,td.�'or carelidh• martaZrd fcrtili er alPUlication- wlr_ich are timed to entire masrntum root u take and minimal swfac•e waxer runrrffor leuchinu to the groundwater ii. The Practice of inte rated Pest mctnrr ercent when seekin to •ontrol various Pfsts, such crs weeds, insects and nematodes. The ct lication of pesticidey will involve onl ' t1le ur ose u! and minimal a lication n esticides. aimed onl • at identi red targeted species. The regular wide-Wread application o 'broad spectrum . estic•ides is• not acre table. The mana entent progrant will ntinirnile to the event ossible the use OLPesticides and will inc.•lude the use of the United States De artnzent o fI riculture Soil Consen ation Sen•ices Soil Pesticide Interaction Guide. to select esticides that have a minimum potential Loy. leachin or loss to due nrno de ending on the site-s eci tc soil conditions; iii. The coordination o ' the a . lication o estractices the timing and aPpliccztion rat stC ferwithtione tin e,�ioon reduce nrno attd the leaching o any Pesticides and nutrients - n> The utilization o_l'a Boll course mama er 11410 is licensed bl, rite .S'tate to use restricted PeRicides and irho trill pe or , the re aired nrana entent unctions. The Vif coarse manager will be yes ons•ihle for ettstrrin�g that the of • c•ourse fertilizers are selected and a lied to nynimi_e ertilizer runotfillto tyre sur acex-ater and the leachingo ' those same ertilizers into the Jroumlwater: and The storage miring and loading, ( �L fertilizer and esticides will be rlesi ned to prevenrlmininliz, the 20117,tion o the natural environmeru. Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: CBC Management Corp. 06-Cl -002 f The shorelines of any sto»mvater management Ickes must be sinuous in Configuration, and must be sloped or bemned The littoral zones around the ponds must be planted with native wetland herbaceous plants and trees or shrubs can be included within the herbaceous plants 4t least four species must be planted The minimum required number of plans will be one plant per linear foot of lake shoreline as measured at the control elevation water level The littoral slielf should provide a feeding area for water de endent avian species .i_ AS individual zonings to PUD are submitted to the City, they shall include cis a minimum the following irtlormation: a. A showine of the amountol'units as a part of the maximum approved for the parent parcel. b. A Traffic Analysis submitted verging that adequate capacity currently exists or will exist prior to the issuance of any Certi icates of OccupaneL 6. Ani, lands included or amended into the Residential Nfi_iedUse Category intist demonstrate the non-existence of urban sprawl by: a. Submitting a fiscal impact study demonstrating a net fiscal heneLt to the Cit. b_ Directing new xrOxall to areas where public facilities exist are planned within the City or Couna Five Year Capital Improvements Plait, or are conimfttCd to through a Developer Agreement or other vue assured to be Iiinded by the q2p � date agency. C. Requiring all development to be connected to central ivater and setiver As stated earlier in this Reportthe subject_ property abuts Taylor Creek and in accordance with Policy 7.2 of the Future Land Use Element the City must `'protect envlrorunentally sensitive areas from development of a type and intensity which would disrupt their natural functions." Therefore the City and the applicant to adhere to newly created Consen�ation Element Objective and policies in addition to existing policies which will ensure the protection of Taylor Creek Conservation Element: Obiective 6: To improve the water quality of Taylor Creek by 2010 the City shall develop a program to set limits as to the amount o 'nitrogen and phosphorus Mat can be discharged into the Creek. Polio' 6.1: By 2012the gV adopt land development regulations to help maintain a hizh standard for watergualih, in Taylor Creek by requiring stonmyater treatment systems for nenv developments adjacent to Taylor Creek to be designed using a treatment train approach using Best Manaizement Practices in series to ensure maximion potential treatment of stormwater. Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: CBC Management Corp. 06-Cl -002 �� r,,rrrt rm roventents to Creek. pouct, 6.3: The City shall re-evaluate the tracts er v develo mertt ri hts to allow or broader use of this unction as an a ectn a planning tool Poll • 6.d: The Cf in order to pro -surface mu atey ality "rithfn its eor orate lintils and beyond shall adopt a numerical standard or nutrients and o!lutants o concern b 2012. Poll The City shall evaluate o portunities to im lenient Okeechobee Utility Authorit water quality treatment -S sterns within the Taylor Creek area to improve the aralin• o sur ace water discharees POUCL, 6.6: The , o muter to be dischar ed rorn new surface water mana ement s stems shall he subject to Federal State Regional and Local ermittin ro yarns and re uI tions that determine con liartce witlt Federal State and Local ",ester unlit" standards. Storrnwater dischar es front. develo Rent must meet relevant water qYgAD, and sur ace water mana ement standards as .set lbrth in Rules 62-4 62- 0 62-302 40E-4. F.,Lc-- and by local ordinance. Polic • 6.7. The OV shall require all new developments to meet the Rrovjsjons OL the SFWAfD Volume IV Basis of Review or Ste ace Witter Afana ement and local provjqons Prasuant to this Gnt reheruive Plan to Protect surface "rater quality within the City. PoNcy h 8: Grants and incentives should be sought or the develo Rent o "'sur ace water uali tj treutntcnt srs7en: retrnirttirre nroiecor o ts ld und`or new cr r rec> water nr«ncr rF meat ntl thus are rtnt e (Iffectively man« in tivater volume or low or rentovinQ nutrients (Intl Other pollutants _ Polio 6.9: The City shall PeriodicaQ, review the Land Development Code to ensure all codes are conducive to the hn glemenlation o such water quality Best Marta entent Praclices. Polio 6.10- B • 2012. the City shall ado t a Proeram which shall require uhrre develo meats to eR to • the provivions o the Florida Yards• and Neiehborhoods pro rant PohLcE 6.11: The ON shall re uire periodic updates of the current Bell teld protection Ordinance. Future Land Use Element: ©b'ective 9: The Ci ' shall continue to ensure that ro. Vsed land use activities in the Taylor Creek area are not inconsistent with the stated Val of the Resource Management Plan for the Lower Kissimmee River and Ta for Creek Drainage Basins re «red rtrsuant to Chapter 380 Florida Statutes Policy 9.1: The City of Okeechobee "rill review the Resource ManaLrement Plan for the Lo„•er Kissimmee River and Taylor Creek Drainage Basins and coordinate its activities it those of other local overnntents addressed in the Resource Management Plan. Poll 9.2: The City shall adoor a rotection ordinance for the Ta >lor Creek Drainage basin area to elintinate inconsistent land use activities while mai7ltauttn consistency ,cith the ^ Resource:ilanauemer_ ttplart Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: CBC Management Corp. 06-Cl-002 B. As resubmitted the application and supporting documents are sufficient to support the change from Single Family to Residential Mixed Use for the subject property. Concurrency of Adequate Public Facilities Before this request can be approved, the City must consider the proposed realistic impact on public facilities. Potable Water Supply: . The subject property is within the service area of the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA) who provides this service to City residents. The adopted LOS for potable water is 114 gpcpd Given that the City has approximately 2 7 persons per household (U.S. Census) this level of service can be construed as 308 gallons per day. The belle'; � is the antieipated flew for - the . Impacts of this development are demonstrated below: 247 units x 114 gpcpd x 2.7 pph = 76,027 gpd Existing WTP Capacity = 6.00 MGD Committed and Used Capacity = 2.80 MGD Excess Capacity_ = 3.20 MGD Currently, the net combined_ average daily demand on the WTP is about 47% of the s tem capacity, according the OUA's Executive_ Director. As shown above, The the existing capacity of the surface and ground water supply plants are 6 MGD, with 2-.5�-2;8 MGD already committed to use. As such, the OUA has an excess of 4S.r3.2 MGD. The OUA would have capacity to serve the proposed development but. , als have- t been eensider-ed in this assessment ef r-emaining water- eapaG4 Wastewater Disposal: The adopted LOS for wastewater disposal is 130 gallons/ capita/day. The subject property is within the service area of the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA). The estimated a tewateT flows -impacts for the subject property is shown below 247 units x 130 gpcpd x 2.7 pph = 86,697 2pd Existing WWTP Capacity = 1.00 MGD Committed and Used Capacity = 0.86 MGD Excess Capacity 0.14 MGD MGD, with between -0 and 90-0,000 GPD air-eady eammitted to use. As sueh, th-e The OUA has stated that plans are underway to construct an addition to the plant which will permit an additional 3 MGD and construction is expected to be completed by 2009. It should be noted that the City has N. Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: CBC Management Corp. as-Cl -Oo2 received several recent Plan Amendments counting on future sewer plant expansion. A have a adequate capacity to service the proposed development. At this time the plant does Solid Waste Disposal: The City has an ,adopted LOS of 13 lbs/capita/day and 3 years available landfill capacity for solid waste disposal. The proposed resid_ e�development would generate approximately 44,-3-50-_8*7700 lbs/day of solid waste with an addition lbs/da being generated by the commercial development. The applicant must has provided a4eReF—,,onfirmation from Okeechobee County 6�,he+ of determined that the existing landfill wilt have capacity to serve the proposed development - Drain Uge/Stormwater Management: The adopted LOS for drainage is Design Storm, 25-year/24 hour duration. The proposed development is required to meet atl conditions and standards required by the City of Okeechobee and the Florida Administrative Code. Because of the vulnerability of Taylor Creek, there new delineation of the Best Management Practices used for water quality enhancement in has been a more specific stormwater discharges. The applicant will be required to adhere to these newly created Objective and policies Recreation and Open Space: The adopted LOS for recreation and open space is 3 acres/1,000 persons. The proposed development is projected to increase the City's population by approximately 9-58-667 additional people. The development would need approximately 3- 2i5 acres of recreational facilities in order to meet the adopted LOS for parks. that this This would be met with the provision of on -site facilities_ —but this do , Roads and Traffic Circulation: The City's minimum LOS standard for principal arterial roadways is LOS C. All other roads have an LOS D. This LOS must be maintained on the site for all roadways serving the site. In addition, Objective 9 of the Traffic Circulation Element states: Objective 9: The City of Okeechobee shall encourage efforts to curtail future Level of Service Standard deterioration, particularly along US Highway 441 and SR 70. The subject property would be serviced by US 441. The applicant has provided a traffic analysis which showed that traffic would be impacted by the proposed development. It was estimated that the proposed land use would result in an increase of 666 daily trips and 40 PM peak hour trips with 33 more trips in and 7 more trips out. This traffic study is being examined but it does not seem that the traffic analysis has contemplated any of the Commercial, Non -Residential or Marina impacts. E Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: CBC Management Corp. 06-Cl-002 C. Compatibility with Adjacent and Nearby Land Uses. The proposed land use change to Residential Mixed Use at *R-7.5 dwelling units nn--per oss acre for the entire site is net be compatible for this location. There has not been show" g'- The supporting data te-vindicates that this level of density is needed would be appropriate for this site. W _I e t.__ intent of fittufe development feF this site equates to a Single Family demit-y, then perhaps a new-Fat� Land Use eategefy sheald be suggested-. Given the property's proximity to Taylor Creek, staff is concerned that development might negatively impact this environmentally sensitive area. The Taylor Creek right-of- way per recorded plat should be recognized as non -buildable. it is not eleaf whe is being asked te abanden the Taylor- Creek right of -way - Future Land Use: Policy 2.3: The City shall continue to require that all development proposals be accompanied by an inventory of wetlands, soils posing severe limitation to construction, unique habitat, City shall further require that the extent to which any development or redevelopment is proposed to be placed in/on, to disturb, or to alter the natural functions of any of these resources, be identified. Such identification shall occur at a phase in the development review process that provides the opportunity for the City to review the proposed project to ensure that direct and irreversible impacts on the identified resources are minimized, or in the extreme, mitigated. Where development is determined to encroach upon a resource, the City shall require a specific Management Plan to be prepared by the developer, which results in no net loss of wetlands and which includes necessary modifications to the proposed development, specific setback and buffers, and clustering of development away from site resources, to ensure the protection, preservation or natural functions of the resource. The minimum bu, f er for wetlands shall be 25 feet and the average of all setbacks from the wetland resource shall be 40 feet. Areas designated as buffers shall preserve all natural vegetative cover, except where drainageways and access paths are approved to cross the buffer. Buffers may be supplemented only with native tress, shrubs and ground covers. Policy 7.1: The City shall continue to amend and enforce land development regulations consistent with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection's (FDEP) Best Management Practices referenced in Policy 1.4, which will minimize the flow into Taylor Creek of organic nutrients, pesticides, sediment, and other substances having the potential to degrade water quality. The applicant has done a brief Florida Land Use C-ever- & Glassifieatien Systems (F UCCS) Environin.ental Site Assessment and water quality analysis on this property but -no --which did suggest a Management Plan has b,e n saggected to ensure there is not a loss of wetlands. it would seem that there ld be an enhaneementf these wetlands aFeas rather- than just eeneluding that these areas ffe mafgiftah 10 Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: CBC Management Corp. 06-C1-002 - ------ - g ft-7-- i: en --sgeeies. In examining `l'tt�H�-jid PFlll:itnl *--+..I A 7_- .i a D. Compliance with the Specific Standards of the Plan. The Goals, Objectives and Policies, as they are intended within the Comprehensive Plan, de -Net —would support an Amendment to the Future Land Use Map to MWti- Fami4ylZesidential Mixed Use. The existing Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policies will support mixed uses at this location. Therefore, it should be recommended that the City Council find the application $etconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. , , ,�• g Brtprt�•t'uvu--H-1.3Eiw W41LU,rrl...., 4 i ,.,- ----- vvv VcilV Attachments to this Staff Report include a copy of the Future Land Use Map indicating the location of the subject property. I Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: CBC Management Corp. 06-Cl -002 Assessment and Conclusions Staff recommends denial -approval of the applicant's request to amend the Future Land Use Map to Multi Farai'-•- Residential Mixed Use based on the above inconsistencies to the City's Comprehensive Plan. Submitted by: James G. LaRue, AICP May 16, 2006 Notes: On May 23`d the LPA recommended approval to Multi -Family. 8-1-06 Recommendation by staff is to create a new FLUC "Residential/Mixed Use". 8-1-06 Council approved change to Residential Mixed Use. 11-15-06 Staff Report Revised during the ORC process to analyze the impacts of the subiect property under the Residential Mined Use Future Land Use category. 12 City of Okeechobee TFee Pctitioallo General Services Department 55 S.E. 3rd Avenue, Room 10X Jurisdiction: Okeechobee, Florida 34974-2903 n2ndxeariaA Phone: (863) 763-3372, ext. 218 Publication oaten: Fax: (863) 763-1686 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Application Please Check One: Small Scale Amendment (Under 10 Acres) Large Scale Amendment (Over 10 Acres) ✓ Property address / directions to property. ee Q+E QChed { q( No Sf reef CLC14- 65 =: = Parcel Identification Number: 2- 2-2 '7 -' 35 - o d o - v o 0 31 _ 0 O 0 0 and T� GD-eP-k iZCPW be ahanclan e _ Size of the Property (in acres): 7, 1-16 `- Current Zoning Designation:H Pt1 B P# R ' Current Future Land Use Desigzzatior-- Existing Use of the Property: V(A C 0-r-Lt r "S' Proposed Future Land Use Desig nation: M u i -f-; - qr,-i i Q Side A 4"1 cZ Proposed Use of the Property: Pj ann -ed lJLn l+ �L'�., eve.t vp t-d vi d'inq f-e-siclenf-;gr ho"GInc J fawn h yes, Cof�a es', E'fe. Qrl �l Mct r}1►oh- r-�s �olenfitt Jq d Description of Surrounding Properties: -S o u t h ' 1/0 c a,,-) 7` E a s f ' 7 cz C.r ee K Alo r- fh ; t-1 o h // f� es Sr�q�e Grp 1 f iV eS.-Y A/oj) res.o/en-hat B n kr2s�Qvr-2� f �fc, / Legal De' scription of the Property (Lengthy Description Maybe Attached): 71a e A 42- Uniform Land Use Application (rev..12/03) Page I of 2 ✓ ' ' Required Attachments. X Survey of Property (I I" x 14", 20" Scale) X Application Fee (non-relflndable) X Letter Outlining Request %>4_ City Location Map �C Notarized Letter of Owner's Authorization ✓ .4 4 r }.' Confirmation ofInforination Accuracy I hereby certify that the information in this application is correct. The information included in this application is for use by the City of Okeechobee in processing my request. False or misleading information may be punishable by a fine of up to $500.00 and imprisonment of up to 30 days and may result in the summary denial of this application. ignature Printed Name Date Uniform Land Use Application (rev. 12/03) Page 2 o 2 0.00%, lnanag�ment Lorp. - Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Future Land Use Change from Single -Family Residential to Mixed Use Consistency with Com rehensive Plan The following policies of the Comprehensive Plan are relevant to the subject request. The proposed amendment is consistent with these policies. As the CGMP has been found to be internally consistent, as required by State statutes, the proposed amendment is thus also consistent with the remainder of the Comprehensive Plan. Future Land Use Element Policy I A — Please refer to the specific sections within this report that present an analysis of the potential demand from the proposed amendment if developed under a worst -case scenario of 7.5 units per acre and a maximum non-residential coverage of 15% with a 0.35 FAR. in summary, all required public facilities will continue to operate at the required levels of service given existing or planned capacities. Policy 2.1.0 (proposed) — The request is consistent with the proposed Mixed Use future land use category and implementing policies. Policy 2.2 — The proposed amendment will not result in the loss of any property rights to adjacent land owners. Policy 7.2 — The proposed amendment will not result in an intensity of use that will disrupt the natural demonstrated through the local government site specific development applicationsystem. The existing site is devoid of native upland habitat. The protection of Taylor Creek will be . This policy 11is not intended to be a restriction on high density or mixed -use development adjacent to Taylor Creek but instead is intended to protect against developments of a type and intensity which would disrupt their natural functions. The proposed request as a mixed use project, by itself, does not endanger the creek. In fact, a clustered development has a better chance of protecting the river than a haphazard single- family development without the means to regulate and control the management of the maintenance of each individual lot. The implementing policies for Mixed Use future land Use category ensures that the project will be developed in a clustered fashion with enhanced environmental protections. Policy 9.1 through 9.3 — The proposed amendment is consistent with the stated goals of the Resource Management Plan for the lower Kissimmee River and Taylor Creek Drainage Basins. Given the requirements of the local government and federal and state permitting agencies. the protection of Taylor Creek will be demonstrated through the local government site specific development application. Transportation Element Policy 8.1 and 8.2 — The proposed amendment is consistent with these policies as demonstrated by the traffic analysis presented. The analysis indicates that the surrounding road network can accommodate the incremental demand that would potentially occur if developed under its worst case scenario of 7.5 units per acre and a maximum non-residential coverage of 15% with a 0.35 FAR. Objective 9 - "This objective is not an outright rejection of requests for development approvals or land use changes that may utilize the identified roads. In fact, as an objective, it is implemented via the underlying supporting policies. When viewing the underlying policies, the intent of this objective is not to restrict development approvals or land use changes that may utilize these roads but instead to Page 1 ubL; management Corp. Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Future Land Use Change from Single -Family Residential to Mixed Use minimize strip commercial centers and an overabundance of access points or driveways. Local government concurrency requirement will ensure that adequate capacity exists at time of development approval. In addition, the analysis contained within this report demonstrates that the long term capacity of the areas roadways can accommodated the incremental demand that may be generated with this change in future land use. . t Housing Element Policy 1.1 and 1.11 — The proposed amendment further implements these policies by allocating additional residential densities near facilities and services where a full complement of public facilities will be available concurrent with the demand. Conservation Element Policy 2.2 and 3.3 — The proposed land use change does not affect the quality or quantity of groundwater and does not endanger any existing native vegetative communities. Such a determination can only be made upon submittal of a site specific development plan. Regulations of the SFWMD dictate that post development conditions must not affect the quality or quantity of groundwater. The existing site is devoid of native habitats except for the large wetland that will be preserved/mitigated as allowed by the City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan. In addition, as a request to the proposed Mixed Use future land use category, the subject site will be bound by additional environmental regulations at time of site plan development as outlined in the City of Okeechobee's proposed Policies 2.1.0 of the Future Land Use Element. Policy 4.4 — The designation of the existing wetland as Conservation pursuant to this policy shall be accomplished through the approval of site specific development plans and required agency permits that require conservation easements over all existing natural systems to remain. At that time, the City may elect to seek an amendment of the land use to Conservation. Recreation Element The City, through various policies clearly seeks to meet a portion of their recreation needs through partnerships with planned developments and on -site recreational facilities. Policy 1.1: "The City shall, by 2002, adopt specific definitions and standards for the designation and protection of open space or recreational lands within proposed development. These standards shall include provisions for improving public access to Taylor Creek." The proposed project through the required 40% open space and required mix of uses in the Mixed Use future land use ensures greater access to Taylor Creek_ Policy 1.2 — The change in future land use will not reduce the compatibility standards between the proposed use and any existing or proposed recreation areas. Policy 2.1: "As recreational needs arise, the City shall continue to identify properties within its boundaries having the potential to meet these needs, and make reasonable efforts to secure those properties for recreational use through financial incentives, direct purchase, or other appropriate means." The City is utilizing "other means" to help meet the future recreational needs of the community. These other means include the 40% open space requirement and required mix of uses. Page 2 (tjc Management _ Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Future Land Use Change from Single -Family Residential to Mixed Use Policy 2.3 (Recreation Element) The City shall continue to provide incentives such as in -lieu -of fees and direct site transfers to encourage the provision of recreation facilities in proposed developments." compliance with State Growth Management Re uirements. < < Florida's Department of Community Affairs evaluates local plan amendments for consistency with Rule 9-J5, Florida Administrative Code, which sets out criteria for determining whether a proposed plan amendment demonstrates consistency with the mandates of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act and the State Comprehensive Plan. The applicant must demonstrate that the proposed plan amendment is consistent with all state requirements. Since the City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan has been found to be consistent with all state requirements, a demonstration of compliance of the proposed amendment with the City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan in turn demonstrates compliance with all state requirements. Please refer to the section titled Compliance with City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan for the applicant's, demonstration of compliance. In addition, the City has virtually no large tracts of vacant multifamily parcels. The Comprehensive Plan seeks a variety of housing options for current and future residents. This cannot be accomplished if the City does not allow adequate vacant or redevelopable lands to develop a variety of housing choices. Preliminary estimates from an aerial vacant land analysis indicates that the City has only approximately 37 acres of vacant land available for multifamily development. Given the long term planning horizon required by the State and outlined within the City's Comprehensive Plan, this acreage may not be sufficient to accommodate the multifamily share of the future population estimates of the City. The proposed Mixed use future land use designation will be able to accommodate some of the needed deficit of multifamily housing stock that exists in the City. The proposed future land use must also not encourage urban sprawl as outlined in Sections 9J5- 006.(5)(g) through (5)0) of the Florida Administrative Code. The noted regulations set forth the major components of a methodology to determine the presence of urban sprawl. Paragraph (5)(g) identifies 13 primary indicators of urban sprawl which are to be applied and analyzed as set forth in the rule. Paragraph (5)(h) describes how land use aspects of a plan shall be analyzed. The land use element, including both the future land use map and associated objectives and policies, represents the focal point of the local government's planning effort. Paragraph (5)(i) describes the unique features and characteristics of each jurisdiction which provide the context of the analysis and which are needed to evaluate the extent, amount or frequency of an indicator and the significance of an indicator for a specific jurisdiction. Paragraph (5)0) recognizes that land use plans generally may be significantly affected by other development policies in a plan which may serve to mitigate the presence of urban sprawl indicators based on the land use plan alone. Paragraph (5)0) describes development controls which may be used by a local government to mitigate the presence of sprawl. In general, Section 9J-5.006(5)([) states that provision of innovative planning such as urban villages, new towns, satellite communities, area -based allocations, clustering and open space provisions, mixed - use development and sector planning that allow the conversion of rural and agricultural lands to other uses will be recognized as methods of discouraging urban sprawl and will be determined consistent with the provisions of the state comprehensive plan, regional policy plans, Chapter 163, Part 11, F.S., and the Florida Administrative Code regarding discouraging the proliferation of urban sprawl. As such, the proposed future land use amendment to the New Community Development district, which requires the creation of mixed -use development, urban villages, and open space, is thus consistent with the Page 3 cast; Management Corp. Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Future Land Use Change from Single -Family Residential to Mixed Use requirements for discouraging urban sprawl. Nevertheless, a detailed urban sprawl analysis is provided below. Our analysis of consistency is provided within a text block following each indicator. Analysis of primary indicators 1. Promotes, allows or designates for development substantial areas of the jurisdiction to develop as low -intensity, low -density, or single -use development or uses in excess of demonstrated need. The proposed request to Mixed Use will actually increase densities within the City of Okeechobee in close proximity to the urban center while also ensuring a balanced mix of uses and their intended benefits. As previously indicated, the City has a shortage of multifamily units and the land available for the development of such multifamily units. 2. Promotes, allows or designates significant amounts of urban development to occur in rural areas at substantial distances from existing urban areas while leaping over undeveloped lands which are available and suitable for development. The proposed request to Mixed Use will actually increase densities within the City of Okeechobee in close proximity to the urban center. The proposed request is also adjacent to an existing designation of Multifamily Residential on the future land use map. 3. Promotes, allows or designates urban development in radial, strip, isolated or ribbon patterns generally emanating from existing urban developments. The location of the proposed future land use amendment is not in a radial, strip, isolated or ribbon pattern generally emanating from existing urban developments. 4. As a result of premature or poorly planned conversion of rural land to other uses, fails adequately to protect and conserve natural resources, such as wetlands, floodplains, native vegetation, environmentally sensitive areas, natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas, lakes, rivers, shorelines, beaches, bays, estuarine systems, and other significant natural systems. The proposed request to a Mixed Use future land use will not result in the premature or poorly planned conversion of rural land to other uses. Adequate site design techiques will be employed to adequately to protect and conserve natural resources, such as wetlands, floodplains, native vegetation, environmentally sensitive areas, natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas, lakes, rivers, shorelines, beaches, bays, estuarine systems, and other significant natural systems. 5. Fails adequately to protect adjacent agricultural areas and activities, including silviculture, and including active agricultural and silvicultural activities as well as passive agricultural activities and dormant unique and prime farmlands and soils. The location of the proposed future land use amendmentis within the existing boundaries of City's corporate limits and is removed from any existing agricultural uses. 6. Fails to maximize use of existing public facilities and services. The proposed site will be served by a full complement of existing urban services. 7. Fails to maximize use of future public facilities and services. Page 4 CBC Management Corp. Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Future Land Use Change from Single -Family Residential to Mixed Use A higher utilization of this site will ensure that future pubic services are minimized within outlining areas. 8. Allows for land use patterns or timing which disproportionately increase the cost in time, money and energy, of providing and maintaining facilities and services, including roads, potable water, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, law enforcement, education, health care, fire and emergency response, and general government. The proposed site will be served by a full complement of existing urban services. Because the property has been planned for "next -in -line" development, it will enable public facilities and services to be extended in an orderly manner without disproportionate increases in cost. 9. Fails to provide a clear separation between rural and urban uses. The proposed site is surrounded by other lands within the City of Okeechobee's coporate limits and thereby maintains clear separation between urban and rural uses. 10. Discourages or inhibits infill development or the redevelopment of existing neighborhoods and communities. The proposed request provides for an opportunity to develop multifamily housing that is currently lacking to a large degree within the City. 11. Fails to encourage an attractive and functional mix of uses. The proposed site, being within the City and adjacent to equal or higher intensity lands, will provide for an attractive and functional mix of uses. 12. Results in poor accessibility among linked or related land uses. The proposed project will provide for reasonable connections to surrounding development to ensure among linked or related land uses. 13. The proposed change will not result in the loss of significant amounts of functional open space. The proposed change will not result in the loss of significant amounts of functional open space. The existing use does not provide functional open space. With the conversion to a Mixed Use future land use and the development of a mixed use project of housing, shops, marina, restaurants, etc., the proposed land use will provide significant amounts of functional open space that will be planned for active and passive recreation by residents of the new community and others. Encroachment of incompatible development As the City of Okeechobee has developed, US-441 south has developed as an area of mixed commercial and residential uses from hotels, restaurants, and other service businesses to repair shops and retail stores. The residential uses in the area though have remained largely the same stock that has been in place for a number of years. US-441 has also been expanded and a full complement of urban services is available along the corridor. The subject site is bound on the east by Taylor Creek and the west by developed commercial land fronting SR-441 with a Commercial future land use designation. To the north lies an existing single - Page 5 CBC Management Corp Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Future Land Use Change from Single -Family Residential to Mixed Use family and mobile home development known as Taylor Creek with a Single Family Reh Street sidential future land use designation. This development is separated from te h subjthe souect th bylieS.E. 8t t and with scan be adequately buffered through internal buffering pro is ons Multifamily Residential future land use designation which is under the same ownership as the subject parcel. Given the adjacent existing and future land uses, the proposed but will actuaMixed Use lly cornplement'the and use will not result in the encroachment of incompatible development existing uses and provide a balance mix of uses in a well planned development. Natural resource protection holdings Please refer to the enclosed environmenalfor afuture and use ssessment conducted oamendmentr the entire property The s to is mostly including the 37.48 acres subject l the request as devoid of native habitat except for largest wetland system.side of the to Chas been restricted to,the point he hydrology of the cypress slough on the southwestern s cypress canopy will that subsidence of the soil is clearly evident. If this condition continues, the eventually be replaced with upland species. Ade uate Public Facilities Analysis The following analysis demonstrates that adequate y ecilities are ed resentutureland or planned to acc analys sodate the incremental demand that may be generated by proposed determines the net incremental demand from a worst - nase eed to the excess capacity. lopment scenario of the 'Thecur current proposed land use categories. The net demand is thecompareound demand from the existing future land use is assumed to be addressed within the c grof C growth ty assumptions since such analyses have previously been determined Affairs to be internally consistent based upon the current future land use maps. Transportation Please refer to the enclosed traffic statement. Schools Currently, the Okeechobee County School school syst m srict has currently aquate t capacitacity at y. The School Boardmiddle and has school levels; however, the elementary school y programmed additional elementary school capacity through the StateRural is Program. n FY2007 Funding has been requested through the legislative delegation. Appropriation with construction to commence by 2008. The Okeechobee School District has utilized this funding source for expansion to the school system in the past. The timing is concurrent with the expected timeframe of proposed project. The request far a future land y mid - use amendment is expected to be transmitted to the State St Department o sdnew requirements for public school 2006 with final adoption expected by late-2006. With the)ject is concurrency passed during the 2005 legislative session, theo the demand for capacity as allowed by roposed prc concurrency requirements through mitigation proportionate asite plan approval is not expected to be State statutues. As the local government applicationt for submitted until late-2006, with approval granted in mid-2007, the certainty of the funding program Page 6 CBC Management Corp. Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Future Land Use Change from Single -Family Residential to Mixed Use l i the additional capacity will be in place. Site construction would then commence with the first certificate of occupancy in 2008 — the expected timeline for the construction of the new elementary school. Please refer to the enclosed letter of Okeechobee County School Board for confirmation. The closest elementary school, Central Elementary, is located at 610 S.W. Fifth St. The middle school is located at 825 S.W. 28 h St. The high school is located at 2800 N.W. Highway 441 North. Water & Wastewater The water and wastewater service for this project is provided by the Okeechobee Utility Authority. Application for capacity reservation has been submitted to OUA. Existing Conditions The following is an analysis of the water and wastewater flows for the property with its existing future land use designation of Residential Single Family allowing up to four units per acre. Based upon this criterion, the 33 acre parcel would allow for up to 132 single family residential units to be constructed on this site. The balance of the site (approximately 4.5 acres) does not currently contain a development allowance. With each unit individually metered, the estimated water and wastewater flows are as follows: Use Single Family Residential - Proposed Conditions Units Rate Gallons per day 132 250 GPD —water 33,000 250 GPD - sewer The following is an analysis of the water and wastewater flows for the property with the proposed future land use designation allowing up to 7.5 units per acre and up to 15% nonresidential converage at 0.35 FAR. The analysis is based upon maximum development scenario of 280 units and 85,700sf of nonresidential use (including a 6,000sf - 200 seat restaurant) over the 37.48 acre site. The estimated water and wastewater flows are as follows: Use Measure Rate Gallons per Multi Family Residential 280 units 250 GPD —water day 70,000 250 GPD - sewer Nonresidential — Retail0.2 79,700 GPD 15,940 Nonresidential — Restaurant 200 40 GPD/seat 8,000 (200 seat) Total -- -- 93,940 Reference: HRS 10D-6 Page 7 k;ksc Management Corp. Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Future Land Use Change from Single -Family Residential to Mixed Use Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants Based on information obtained from the Okeechobee Utility Authority, the permitted capacity of the surface water treatment plant is 5.0 mgd with the ground water treatment plant rated at 1.0 mgd. The wastewater treatment plant permitted capacity is currently 1.0 mgd. 4 The Okeechobee Utility Authority is currently in the construction phase of additional filters which will bring the wastewater treatment plant to a temporary capacity of 1.23 mgd. This work should be completed by June 2006. Additionally, the wastewater treatment plant is under a design/permitting phase for an expansion of 3.0 mgd that will bring the total treatment plant capacity to 4.0 mgd and should be operational by June 2008. The average daily flow of the combined water treatment plant finished water production is 1.93 mgd for the period of January 2005 through December 2005. The average daily flow of the wastewater treatment plant is 0.89 mgd for the same time period. The Okeechobee Utility Authority reports an outstanding water treatment plant flow commitment of approximately 0.25 mgd with an out$tanding wastewater treatment plant flow commitment of approximately 0.1 mgd. Water Sewer Plant Ca aci 6.00 mgd 4.00 m d Avg. Daily Flow 1.93 mgd 0.89 m d Committed Capacity 0.25 mgd 0.10 m d Excess Capacity 3.82 mgd 3.01 and Based upon these figures and as stated in the attached service availability letter, the Okeechobee Utility Authority will have on or before June 2008 adequate capacity to serve the proposed demand created by the increased density of the proposed future land use amendment. Police Please refer to the enclosed letter of service availability from the City of Okeechobee Police Department. The nearest police station is 50 S.E. Second Ave. No additional police stations are scheduled. The existing police station should be able to maintain its level of service standard with the proposed amendment given that the project is already allocated for residential development and is within the service area approximately one mile from the site. Fire Please refer to the enclosed letter of service availability from the City of Okeechobee Fire Department. The nearest fire station is located at 55 S.E. Third Ave. No additional fire stations are scheduled. The existing fire station should be able to maintain its level of service standard with the proposed amendment given that the project is already allocated for residential development and is within the service area approximately one mile from the site. Page 8 CBC Management Corp. Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Future Land Use Change from Single -Family Residential to Mixed Use Solid Waste The City of Okeechobee's solid waste level of service is 13 pounds per capita per day and a three year availability of landfill capacity. Given the 280 maximum number of potential units with 2.5 person per dwelling, the maximum demand for the project would be approximately 9,100 punds per day. The City of Okeechobee does not operate solid waste landfills. Currently, the landfill is operated by .` Okeechobee County. As such, the City does not incur any capital expenditures. A letter from the solid waste service provider, Waste Management, pertaining to solid waste service was not available. However, confirmation was provided by Joe Fazula, Solid Waste Manager, that 50 years capacity is available. Consequently, the existing landfill has surplus capacity in excess of three years. Stormwater Management Except for the native wetland which occupies about eight acres, the project site has been altered from its original condition and is currently in use as improved pasture The existing stormwater management system consists of a shallow interconnected ditch system with outfall directly to Taylor Creek. Stormwater runoff quantity and quality are strictly regulated by the City and the SFWMD to ensure that pre -development drainage conditions are maintained. The proposed rate of discharge from the site will be less than or equal to the existing discharge rate from the site. The discharges off -site will be minimized by on -site detention within the stormwater management system. The ultimate site discharge will be to Taylor Creek. The Stormwater Management System will employ, wherever practical, a variety of Best Management Practices (BMP). The following are a list of potential BMP that could be integrated into the Water Management System during the final design and permitting stage: • Oil and grease skimmers; • Environmental swales; • Minimize"short-circuiting* of pond flow patterns; • Raised storm inlets in grassed swaies; • Utilize stormwater retention where feasible; and Street cleaning and general site maintenance. The drainage system will be owned, operated and maintained by a public entity or a responsible property owners association acceptable to the City and the SFWMD. Historical on -site wetlands will be maintained as part of the surface water management system. There are no Outstanding Florida Waters, Florida Aquatic Preserves or Florida Class 1 or 11 waters occurring within or abutting the project site. Potential adverse impacts to ground and surface waters will be minimized by implementation of appropriate erosion control measures during construction in accordance with the NPDES Generic Permit for Stormwater Discharge from Large and Small Construction Activities. Erosion control measures that may be implemented include stabilization practices such as temporary seeding, permanent seeding, mulching, geotextiles, or sod stabilization; structural practices such as silt fences, earth dikes, diversions, swaies, sediment traps, check dams, or storm drain inlet protection; and sediment basins. Page 9 CBC Management Corp. Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Future Land Use Change from Single -Family Residential to Mixed Use The project is located entirely in Zone X according to the Okeechobee County FEMA FIRM panel Map Index. According to the Map Index, the applicable FIRM panel is not printed because the entire panel is located in Zone X. Zone X is defined as "Areas of 500-year flood; areas of 100-year flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 100-year flood". Please refer to the FEMA map. There are currently no known flooding or erosion control problems associated with the project site. No 100-year flood prone areas exist on site, therefore no structures, roadways or utilities are proposed within any 100-year flood prone areas. There are no existing wellfields located within two miles of the project site. Parks and Recreation The project will be designed to provide residents with a variety of recreational facilities and open spaces to ensure the community's quality of life. No land will be removed that was previously used, by residents of the region for any recreational use. No existing recreational trail is designated across the property. Therefore, the project doesn't have the potential for impacting a recreational trail designated pursuant to Chapter 260, F.S. and Chapter 1613-7, F.A.C. The City's adopted level of service standard for recreation and parks is 3.0 acres per 1,000 people. Based on the estimated population of 700 people (37.48 acres x 7.5 upa x 2.5 ppd), the project's minimum acreage requirement for recreation and park space is approxmately 2.1 acres. The project will meet the park and open space mandates through on -site facilites and provision of impact fees. The planned system of parks and open spaces is consistent with the City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan. Historical/Archeological Resources There are no known archeological or historical sites within the project boundaries. A request has been sent to the Florida Division of Historic Resources. Given the improvements made to date (improved pasture), the likelihood of the presence of a historic or archeological site regarded as potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Sites to occur on the parcel is limited. Hurricane Preparedness According to information in the Treasure Coast Transportation Analysis Hurricane Evacuation Study Update 2003, dated November 2003, the property is not located in any storm surge zone. The property is not within the Category 3 Hurricane Evacuation Area. it is estimated that the majority of people will remain in their homes within the project during a hurricane event, due to the project location relative to the Atlantic coastline. However, in the event of a significant hurricane, the County Emergency Operations Center (EOC) may activate evacuation shelters throughout the County as it deems necessary. The evacuation shelters are typically opened in areas within the hurricane's 100-mile path. Many of the public schools in Okeechobee County serve as evacuation shelters. US-441, directly adjacent to the project site, is the closest evacuation route. Additionally, SR-70, approximately 1 mile to the north will assist in evacuation of the area by providing additional evacuation routes. All traffic control devices will utilize hurricane tested mast arms and street lights further Page 10 Utsu Management Corp. Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Future Land Use Change from Single -Family Residential to Mixed Use minimizing service interruptions and enhancing safety prior to, during, and after a major hurricane It should also be noted that due to recent changes to the Florida Building Code, specifically, Chapter 16, Structural Design, as well as the construction methods to be used in the project, the residential homes will provide shelter for residents during hurricane events. As a result of the changes in the construction process, residents will have safer and more secure homes, thereby reducing evacuation volumes and shelter space requirements. In addition, underground utilities will be used throughout the development reducing potential service interruptions. Finally, additional mitigation measures for special needs populations will be determined through the local government approval process of the Planned Unit Development. Miscellaneous Data Parcel Control Number Acreage Existing FLU Propose FLU Taylor Creek ROW Abandonment 4.51 None RMF 2-22-27-35-OA00-00031-0000 32.97 RSF RMF Total 37.48 Legal Description Please refer to the attached legal and sketches of the two tracks that comprise this application for future land use amendment. Maximum Allowable Development Existing Future Land Use — Single Family up to four units per acre Proposed Future Land Use -- Mixed Use up to 7.5 units per acre and 15% maximum non-residential with 0.35 FAR and Parcel Control Number Acreage Taylor Creek ROW Abandonment 4.51 2-22-27-35-OA00-00031-0000 32.97 4.51 x 7.5 = 33 units 4.51 x 15% x 0.35 = 10,300sf nonresidential 32.97 x 7.5 = 247 units 32.97 x 15% x 0.35 = 75,400sf nonresidential Total 280 units 85,700sf nonresidential Existing FLU Propose FLU None MU RSF MU Page 11 Traffic Engineering, Transportation Planning ETC ANALYSIS FOR LAND USE PLAN ANMNDMYNT TAYLOR CREEK FISBING VILLAGE Prepared for: Close Construction 301 NW a Avenue Okeechobee, Florida 34972 Prepared by: Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E., Inc. 229 SE Villas Street Stuart, FL 34994 (772) 791-7918 February 20, 2006 August 10, 7.006 TR05117.0 St 1 SE Ocean 8culevard Stuart. Florida 3499» 772.781.7918 772.781.9261 fax SORourke@adalPnia. ne= Traffic Engineering, Transportation Planning February 20, 2006 Mr. Chris Close 301 NW 4a' Avenue Okeechobee, FL 34972 Re: Taylor Creek Fishing Village LUPA Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E., Inc. has completed the analysis of the proposed land use plan amendment from RSF to RMF at 10 units per acre. The land use amendment affects a parcel Iocated east of SR 441 and generally north of 1 I h Street in the City of Okeechobee. The steps in the analysis and the ensuing results are presented herein. It has been a pleasure working with you. If you have any questions or comments, please give me a call. Respectfully submitted, Susan E 9,Rourke, P.E_ Registered Civil Engineer - Traffic 811 SE Ocean Bcuteiar Steuart, Florida 34994 772.781.7916 772.781.9261 fax SO9ourke@adelphia. re- TABLE OF CONTENT'S INTRODUCTION 1 ` PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 TRIP GENERATION 3 ROADWAY CONDITIONS 4 PROJECT DISTRIBUTION / ASSIGM%,M T/IMPACT 4 STUDY AREA 6' FUTURE TRAFFIC 6 CONCLUSION 6 TABLES TABLE 1: Trip Generation TABLE 2: Project % of Capacity TABLE 3: Link Analysis FIGURES FIGURE 1: Project Location FIGURE 2: Project Traffic Assignment APPENDIX Future Volumes and Comprehensive Plan Data 3 7 8 2 5 EYMODUCTTON Susan E. O'Rourke, PE. Inc. was retained to prepare a traffic analysis for the proposed land use amendment of 37.48 acres of land of which 3297 acres has an existing future land use category of RSF at 4 dwelling units per acre. The balance does not have a firture land use category. The proposal is to change the 37.48 acres to nixed use at 7.5 dwelling units per acre and 15o commercial with .35 FAR. The site is located east of 441 and generally north of 12 Street in the City of Okeechobee. The report is to determine the impact on the surroundingroadway purpose of this change in land use. The following analytical steps were taken:stem associated with the `summary of the existing land use and proposed land use, 'summary of existing lane geometries, 'summary Of maximum allowable service volumes, *assessment of the change in trip generation *determination of study area •summary of 2011 Long Range traffic volumes •summary of 2011 Long Range traffic volumes with the net change in project traffic added •summary of levels of service with and without the project traffic added Each of these steps is outlined herein. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed land use amendment involves a parcel of land located north of 12`, Street and east of SR 441. Figure 1 shows the project's location. The existing land use designation for the site is allowing up to 4 dwelling units per acre. The proposed future land use is that of MU which allows up to 7.5 dwelling units per acre and 15% commercial with .35 FAR. TRIP GENERATION The trip generation for the land use under the existing and proposed future land use categories is shown in Table 1. For trip generation purposes, single family rates were applied to the existing future land use and mixed use for the proposed future land use. Table 1 shows that the proposed land use change would result in a potential increase in trips of 3905 trips on a daily basis and 354 trips in the PM peak hour with 176 more trips in and 176 trips out. FIGURE f f Odom Taylor Ca ek F ig v Mat b Scwo Description j W Land Use Average Code SF/Quantky Daily Trip Equation Daily Trips PM Equation 210 1 132 Lnrn n"i..-7--- ._._. Land Use Average Code SF/Quantity Daily Trip Equation Daily Trips PM Equation PM PM PM Internal ExtwmExternal External Trips. pus- pass- pass. Net Tripp 961. N 96Qut } dpa ( now Trips i TrIWIN I Out i by % by tripe Not in . Net taut Tots} PM PM PM inlamal External Exlernal Txternal Not Trips %IN %out in out Tr TripsT' IN Out Pass Passnew - - by % by tripe Net in Net Out Total ROADWAY CONDITIONS T<re study area roadways were defined in tams of custing lane geometries and cuing traffic volumes. The study area was reviewed to determine the cuing number and type of hum along the roadway. Each roadway is described below. SR 441 is a four- lanq divided, principal arterial with a north/south aid through the City. North of SR 70 it becomes a 2 lane arterial. SR 70 is a four lace divided roadway that became a set of one-way pairs thorough the downtown area PROJECT DISTRIBUTION / ASSIGNMENT The project traffic was distributed by Sweral geographic dnv;bm and then asmgned to the roadway n aworic. Dis&%ui* -- The project general geographic traffic distribution was estimated as 20% north, 30'/o south, 20% west and 30% east. Assgpu heat -- This general distribution led to an assignuhent of trips based on the anbcqmwd ultimate destinations and the roadway paths used to reach those destinations. The project pment asApment is shown in figure 2. 4 I North Not to Scale ay FIGURE 2 Project % Assignment Taylor Creek Fishing Village 5 STUDY AREA The study area was defined as the area upon which the project traffic (the net increase in traffic) represented 1% or more of capacity on the roadway link of service. SR 441 was the only roadway where the change in land use would create a significant impact. Table 2 summarizes the project percent impact on the roadway links_ ` FUTURIE TRAFFIC Future traffic estimates were developed for those links where the project impact was considered significant as identified in Table 2. The land use plan amendment was analyzed based on the five year growth for the roadways based on Historical growth rates obtained form FDOT count data. In order to estimate 2011 volumes, 2004 AADTs from the FDOT were used. Those counts were increased to 2011 by increasing the vohunes using the growth rates. Table 3 summarizes the vohunes for the 2011 Total Traffic condition under the existing and future land use designation. The potential trip generation of the proposed future land use was compared to the trips generated by the existing future land use. The increase in trips was then added to the Total Traffic identified in Table 3 to estimate total traffic with the land use change. The links in the study area would show a slight increase in traffic with the proposed land use amendment. However, the future land use designation would not create the need for additional improvements on the network. CONCLUSION The proposed land use will result in an increase in trips of 3,905 daily trips and 354 PM peak hour trips with 178 more trips in and 176 more trips out. On the adjacent link within the study area, there would be a slight increase in traffic associated with the land use plan amendment. However, the roadways contemplated to be in place for long term development will be sufficient to accommodate the increase in traffic. Short term impacts will be addressed at the time the site is brought forward for site plan and concurrency. a Table 2: Percent Assignment +coaaway Segment SR 70 east.of 441 �— SR 70 east of 98/700 west of SR 710 441/ SR 15 800' South of CR 718 441/ SR 15 North of Wolff Road North of SR 70 South of SR 70 Source: FDOT 2004 Traffic lnformatlon I-J Capacity Project % DAILY Project % (LOS C) Assignment TRIPS impact 34700 5 195 0.56% 34700 20 781 2,25% 34700 25 976 2.81 % 13800 3 117 0.85% 34700 30 1172 3.38% 34700 10 391 1.13% 34700 35 1367 3.94% Additonal Tdps=Project Table 3: Link Analysis Years grown 7 Capacity 2011 Change in Project,% DAILY Project % Roadway Segment (LOS C) 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Growth Forecast LUPA Assignment TRIPS Impact SR TO east of 98/700 34700 17100 17700 17900 18000 16900 17200 1.001 17341 18122 20 781 2.25% west of SR 710 34700 19100 19400 21000 21500 22000 23000 1.038 29833 30809 25 976 2.81% 4411 SR 15 North of Wolff Road 34700 25500 23500 26000 28000 29000 27000 1.011 29249 30421 30 1172 3.38% North of SR 70 34700 22500 24000 22500 27000 23500 25500 1.025 30384 30774 10 391 1.13a/e South of SR 70 34700 28000 28500 30000 30500 27500 30000 1.014 33042 34409 35 1367 3.94% ^IIAI�I��I�I�r■ � ■ � Source: FDOT 2004 Tragic information 100 Existing FU Proposed FLU Additonai Trips=Project APPENDIX COUNT DATA CIRCULATION MAP CITY OF OKEECHOBEE EAR REPORT — COMPR$HBNsm PLAN COMMONS MATRIX: TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELIEmzM 9J-5 CITATION CONDITION AT THE TIME OF ADOPTION (19901 CURRENT CONDMONS 1997-98 SIR - ���r�rrrrrrrr�r�� ��rrrrrrrrr�r rrsrrrrr®rrrr 0.i'YLWhi1`t:.i1•l��tic��'J erAl!!.!19.b?FxY&b:P73k1sVYuIlGC� wCSQ, .p�'Ad'!�d" �r�rrrrrrr���r�� ��r�rrrrrr�rr rrr:. ■r■©r©rasa■ rrrrrrrr,"GrEM �rrirrrrr�r�� �rrrrrrrrr�r�� fiT41W(2)(b) Projected Traffic CireWatlan ho sdW Deaaad: P*omod pat demands wen Sepaued for the am six (6) road sopmu Levels aionl US 441 and SR 70. oavodq tho period 19" dmIt 2000, Table II•10 deaalba do arma, wWk Tables 84 wA H-7 nmurndsed pat hour Va1RC pMoo*m and loveh of savkce dm qh the end of the plurAnf period. TAn.a lh10 CLASS lcATION of FDOT ROAD 8aamma - OltucHomm C1Tr 1 US 441 SR 70 SR 70 2 Urban An axial Hope 2 SR 70 CSX Raffrad 6 Utbm ArArid Nara February it, mg hP n-16 rr CrN OF OMWHOBU EAR. REPORT -- COMPR9MSIVE PLAN CONDITIONS MATRM: TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELDWgT V CONDITION AT THE TIMR OF ADOPTION 1990 CURRENT CONDI'TON$ 19S 3 csx RRWrmd R.a:E ry 2 Uttiao Attaelal 4lwa 4 SR 70 US 9t Be WMI of 2 Urban Arterial 4 Lane► 4 lttm 3 IkOftialof US 441 4 Urban Artarkt4 LAVA None 6 US "1441 End of4 Luca 4 Urban Marla) Now Somme FDOT 034007(2)(b) Expanelon of Exitdq FaciNdes Ao mentioned earlier, expans4om bow beau platraW tlbr SR 70 and US 441, but acrAuucrion rt not Id-fulad until 2010.. However, two (2) wren in the City hive been elated for n"kinie which are SR 70 A= 7' Avow ant to IT Avenue, The M. ie 41001 US 441 north ft m NW 13e Strew to NW 346 Sacs,. The *Qdty of these baptoveet m an worlds of the City tlmia. Major Robim etDenlopaeet The *or problam of dowlopmatt bag been the tack of -is" deta lbr imd and County roads. Tlw City ate witty, m elled on tt Mc daa btfotmati m provider! by FDOT a n Satre and Fedw, Ronde that ibr reSrttettp of Saa Roads that h9wiect County Ruda. while this data is ho � a emblem for!coaldevelopment, The city of Okeerltobea ragmen drat 7rtft Analyds Stadlp be to detaeatlne the bees¢, m roadways. ffowwey titan are m far now dewlopmmu detamdae what in curie, Lewd of Setvko an am its !oval toads Nor ate � ibr the Clry w Mk 1br iaibam*M On Couttyroad,. As .,wale, dda bu provided aotnertdtat of aM*Om avadw City. ym=taly, 9W hu stet ptevanoed tow dwdopMaat.1% will bowavw WRO do o nll cirmlopotmt IwWwde for me city in the mate because ne adapted Level or SW** has beet, estabNehed for local railways, Th Wbm, y part of do EAR•buW Tian AnwrAm nra, the C ity should consider ways to provide t ins mum on bcal roads andlor want in carlancam with the C%mtY in t»wJAE this aced. CrN OF OMWHOBU EAR. REPORT -- COMPR9MSIVE PLAN CONDITIONS MATRM: TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELDWgT V CONDITION AT THE TIMR OF ADOPTION 1990 CURRENT CONDI'TON$ 19S 3 csx RRWrmd R.a:E ry 2 Uttiao Attaelal 4lwa 4 SR 70 US 9t Be WMI of 2 Urban Arterial 4 Lane► 4 lttm 3 IkOftialof US 441 4 Urban Artarkt4 LAVA None 6 US "1441 End of4 Luca 4 Urban Marla) Now Somme FDOT 034007(2)(b) Expanelon of Exitdq FaciNdes Ao mentioned earlier, expans4om bow beau platraW tlbr SR 70 and US 441, but acrAuucrion rt not Id-fulad until 2010.. However, two (2) wren in the City hive been elated for n"kinie which are SR 70 A= 7' Avow ant to IT Avenue, The M. ie 41001 US 441 north ft m NW 13e Strew to NW 346 Sacs,. The *Qdty of these baptoveet m an worlds of the City tlmia. Major Robim etDenlopaeet The *or problam of dowlopmatt bag been the tack of -is" deta lbr imd and County roads. Tlw City ate witty, m elled on tt Mc daa btfotmati m provider! by FDOT a n Satre and Fedw, Ronde that ibr reSrttettp of Saa Roads that h9wiect County Ruda. while this data is ho � a emblem for!coaldevelopment, The city of Okeerltobea ragmen drat 7rtft Analyds Stadlp be to detaeatlne the bees¢, m roadways. ffowwey titan are m far now dewlopmmu detamdae what in curie, Lewd of Setvko an am its !oval toads Nor ate � ibr the Clry w Mk 1br iaibam*M On Couttyroad,. As .,wale, dda bu provided aotnertdtat of aM*Om avadw City. ym=taly, 9W hu stet ptevanoed tow dwdopMaat.1% will bowavw WRO do o nll cirmlopotmt IwWwde for me city in the mate because ne adapted Level or SW** has beet, estabNehed for local railways, Th Wbm, y part of do EAR•buW Tian AnwrAm nra, the C ity should consider ways to provide t ins mum on bcal roads andlor want in carlancam with the C%mtY in t»wJAE this aced. CITY OF DYEECHOBn EAR RETORT -- COMPRKMNSIVE PLAN CONDITIONS MATRIX: TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELEMENT CONDITION AT THE TIME OF ADOPTION (Ito) CURRENT 22M1TI0N8 07-2) 9J 5 CITATION TASLt 11.7 2000 PIAK HWR ORMAND AND LOS OKUCMBU CITY LOS wkitoat Sgtaeat Pwk Hoar ii"pow LOs vrkk N Ober llafflaCnt1�1trw ItmtoNoaettl 1 3.080 B . 2 LM B 3 2,030 F A 4 1,720 B A 3 2,6M C - 6 2,970 D Sonnet FDOT 9J Expettalon Needs 13a+ed on At Pisa FDOTth 6 Year Walt P�� sovenl road impeovW=W for usto- Adepied Wert ft*gmm • 1"74"1. 2001R002: The adopted wMk ptovnm ptovlded by FDOT Dorm ects in District 1 for the five (S) Yea 1 ogWnIM Froj Exisd)(e) wet uo highways SyAwn owned highways within the City which were as folbws; in FY 19�97I91(� My 1.19M. 1. Preliminoy daipa and atgirtedring for six•laning US 441 icon CSX Wroad to Ca atory Each m Woet l Nt No. Rears Numb From, To, has key iafawn Road, p qmW for 1992.1993 fiscal yea. in WOOFroL k Ok aid Type of Pto}ea an eln�ent lq ttr left Wook In sddldaa, brlbematfau such et ltumbw of TM of 2. Dosiga kTmvarow for rho buorsecdon of US 441 and SR 70 wcn scheduled for Unproved Lsoas, Number of Added Lana, Paojaot Lan#*. and Pdairy (if SWUabls) We 4100 in the left block. IR the Dents block, ilmding kNvk on shown for each r4or Phse. 1) cartsavctiaet in the l992.1993 fiscal year. Protmted PE (ProitrniruryEAj*s rw4Udp)� 2) ROW (Ripltt-of Wsy) AoWWdm)I end 3) CST 3, The CSX Railroad aoaaing at US 441 were scheduled for reaurfacmg in the 1989.1990 (Ctwtructioo) at Orarw. Those are shown by fiscal ye" A column is aLo provided to slaw tool fiscal year. costs for arch major phase. IAW Road Date Since the City of Okeechobee was not a reenopolitan area, it had no Fa each project, the block at the right stows flmding for owh detailed phase (seta! by Phm). Bak detailed is snaobared and whu" out with Fiscal Year. Ft d.4 Level, and F-Aq Metropolitan PluAtn Orymlzation (MPO). Theeefom avaUeblo infateatiaa m tmMG vohrow, were by FDOT and were limited to woo toads. Lilco woe until cities in Florida, phw Solace for a psedoufar detaflad pica as ahosva provided Okeechobee lanai an m8aini pmpm fat measuring u%MQ on the Clty's collom made so da for dw 4-laning of US 441 tam the CSX to *DOT Wort Plea. design lmprod Aachen 1915 Highway M&mW was wed to podia dw fW= Dads. Railroad trorth m the County b befog pru�osed nor finest year 2010.0titar improveataw being r for proposed fit the 4-Laing of SR 70 finm 8 Avenue weer to the Cotmty which is also schoduled for 2010. BaatifieWm and S&Mr. At PLn sdopdm4 a few besio improvements were needed slang steoe' glaadfWaUm and Safely owned roada U a mono to reduce maiam"M 00ets and brvw the appeaanoe end Mtety of the City's rod room. These Projects, woo lde dAW by the City A6adahwalor, sad were as follows: TABU! 11-0 Prrrnr Aux av 1, Ctabing of fiftoen (15) median strips •long US 441 hots SW r Streak 10 SW 23" Sueet Pwe D.} Februecy tor, 1999 CrTY of oKsEc80BEE TAR REPORT -- COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONDITI0N8 MATRDC: TRAFFIC CIRCULAMON EL MMT 9J-5 CITATION CONDITION AT THE TIME OF ADOPTION 1990 CURRENT CONDITIONS 1997-98 2. Modify design of vWin swipe on US 441 south to provide left-MM lanes where naded- 3. Replace damned lu deoeping and grass on fifteen (17) twain stripe on US 441 soup, rodealp Medians to prevent ftttt W dmuge. 4. Replace grass scrips with caner*@ between sidewalk'nd crab oat US 441 bawom NW 8• and SW 23" Screw, and OR SR 70 f"om BE 7" to BE 1311 Avenues, S. Elimim,te gross dividers on SR 70 tram SE 1* Avenue m BE 136 Avenue, replace with iniaid brick with a center oocnbning pabn trees. 6. Install awpanded suet idanWicadon signs over aU pomace of US 441 and SK 70 io help motorists boner loate'troea. 7. Conduct a study of smta nwmw drofnage facUides on US 441 south and SR 70 and notify FDOT of aeoded ianproverttera. S. Stripa pordow of US 441 south to prevent pasting in Rant of tiro hydrants and ensue that pa*W veblcles an kept the puoper diamnce ham corn"' and driveway'. 9. Widen SR 70 ftamUS 98 to the SCL roUrod cussing, 10. Four -lining US 441 north ham to railroad crossing to Cemetery Road. 11. Widen the int"eeWan of US 441 and SR 70. 12. Repair railroad txoasing on SR 70 west at 8• Avenue. Concnrrwtcy. Concuusocy -pired that public facility capacity, pankularly on rods, be available to serve deveioPmant u Of prior to the time it occur. Widauu suft'"A capacity, dovdop =t ardor, could rat be Issued. The@ibro, it was necessary for the City to bav@ an ongoing program to Morita Wft volume so that avuportatiorn iMproveroats could be mod concurrently with bwasm in demaad. Skyeles: As state funds were f we mtiy available fcr bikeway imp menu OR atete toads, the City considered who possibility of a system of bicycle facilities. Such a system was proposed 10 reduce trek oongexd o and improve rocroatierW appomadtios for Cky residents. This mode of M-portad n was becoming more and,Saes populu and represented an tmpo mt Alternative to dye mower vehicle, Fmndiog Sources: rMdjQ"y, vaWmucion program had been supported by WAng the use+ of the uwnspcosedon s:vm Typical user tax include Swum fuel teases, rooter vehicle fees, vnd mvemue bords saw W by a pledge of the tansy motor fuel tax cotl@ctions. These fluding mactuaisraa proved to be ituufWanr fbt ccsrecting existing deficiencies. Traclor (mower type) 13,000 City =VwM SwPw4-tak 801000 s BE r Mean* 137.200 NW 7e Avenue between SR 70 and 2" Sum 14,000 SW 6e Avmw between 216 and 190 Street 10800 SW 15e Suet between 3e and 3" Avenge 19,500 SW a Avow botwem 0 and 2" Suet 14,000 NW 13, Street and NW 10" Avwm 54,4W SW 12" Avenue betwesa SR 70 & 2" Street Ism Sark Putt Brat am and mpsir RAR 42,400 NE 2" Street between 441 and 4e Avmw nyU 21,500 Weimnm to Meech" signs (4) 30M Tesbtg LOW Stripping SWWA 10AM (hurdrafl lam The City considared special ----0, Mdovololan W fbea, W Wor 6"an impact !lea to boip with The capital outlays made on the ldentilfed City mesa wars t hr beautification purposes inchubg rite entry feature signs. Ovor do planning paroled, the City has made cooaWouble W psovereesw in site downtown area which include cwbing and antigw lighting. TA@LB N4 Fln-YW AOOMD WORK PRoalt►nMl (FY 97M - FY 200M) DWAdt Gnanaresd ik caw Ito SLOM ��rr�rrrrrrr;a �� : r©rrirrr �r�r�rrrr■ Page U-6 Fabawry l6, i999 FUTURE TRAFRC CIRCULAT16 LEGEND Principal Arterlols major Calectors Minor Col actor: i nji Mtir * krnilfki we baI�1 pl�at�r�lNMt AV04m ♦giul on :►Iww INdu, MAPO.2 v co m m m o� cn (V la M a, t,0 m CY t0 CV m fts- TNG i'RAFF c _EGENQ... Princlpo! Artartale mojor COIIactofl Mlnor Collaztora .:•Im ew from edke" N*4 to .«a dty Ws W%Os% a "OR$ cwg& MAP 1-1 . rint Date: February ..,, 2006 Florida Depw.�t�tnt of Transportation rr T soortation 2004Annuaiiverage tat' tie "aly Trae Report .o„nty 91 __ OKEECHOBEE AADT +'K30" ++D3Oil ++T" Site �L'&c tort 1 �? �.�Y Factor F c Up FICI43: i1T Description SR 15/US 441 NORTH OF NW 13TH STREET, OKEECHOBEE 8,700 N 9,000 S 17700 C 10.82 F 61.42 F 1.0.41 A Q02 P ►003 P SR 70, E OF KISSIMMEE RIVER, E OF HIGHLANDS COUNTY 2,300 E 2,400 W 4700 C 10.82 F 61.42 F 61.42 F 22.44 A 17.3E A ►006 P SR 70, EAST OF NE 64TH AVENUE, EAST OF OKEECHOBEE 4,400 E 4,600 W 9000 C C 10.82 F 10.82 F 61.42 F 18.8E A 1007 P SR 70 WEST OF SR 710, EAST OF OKEECHOBEE 11,500 1,600 E N 11,500 1,600 W S 23000 3200 C 10.82 F 61 A2 F 22.94 P ►008 P SR 15/700/[1S 98/441, SE OF CR 15B/SE 126TH BLVD 12,500 N 13,000 S 25500 C 10.82 F 61.42 F 10.55 A 1009 P SR 15/US 441, NORTH OF SR 70 8,400 E 6,200 W 14600 C 10.82 F 61.42 F 15.00 P )012 P SR 70 WEST OF SR 700/t1S 98, OKEECHOBEE 2,300 N 2,500 S 4800 C 10.82 F 61.42 F 35.Of A )014 P SR 15/1JS 441 N OF CR 15C/NE 304TH ST, FT DRUM 2,900 N 2,900 S 5800 C 10.82 F 61.42 F 27.82 A )016 P SR 15/US 441, SOUTH OF CR 68/NW 160TH STREET 8,900 E 8,300 W 17200 C 10.82 F 61.42 F 11.54 A )019 P SR 70, 700/US 98 EAST OF SR 700/1JS 98, OKEECHOBEE 2,000 N 1,800 S 3900 C 10.82 F 61 A2 F 22.17 A )023 P SR 700/US 98, SOUTHEAST OF CR 68/NW 160TH ST 14,500 N 15,500 S 30000 C 10.82 F 61.42 F 8.39 A )103 P SR 15/700, US 98/441 SOUTH OF SR 70 710 SOUTHEAST OF SE 59TH BOULEVARD OKEECHOBEE 3,700 N 3,900 S 7600 C 10.82 F 61.42 F 20.24 P A )104 P )105 P SR SR 15, 700/US 98,441 WEST OF TAYLOR CREEK BRIDGE 6,100 E 6,100 W 12200 C C 10.82 F 10.82 F 61.42 F 61.42 F 9.90 12.13 P )106 P SR 15/700/US 98/441, EAST OF SE 38TH AVENUE 4,200 1,700 E E 4,100 1,600 W W 8.300 3300 C 10.82 F 61.42 F 29.83 A )111 P SR 700fUS 98 NE OF KISSIMMEE RVR BR & HIGHLANDS CO 5,500 N 5,900 S 11400 C 10.82 F 61.42 F 16.93 A )112 P SR 700/US 98 NORTH OF SR 70/US 98 OKEECHOBEE 2,800 N 2,800 S 5600 C 10.66 F 52.25 F 12.21 P 0114 P SR 78 NE OF KISSIMMEE RIVER BR, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY N 13,500 S 27000 C 10.82 F 61.42 F 8.34 A 0123 P SR 151700, US 98/441, N OF WOLFF RD, OKEECHOBEE 13,500 5,900 N 5,700 S 11600 C 10.92 F 61.42 F 16.52 P 0207 P SR 710, S OF CENTER STREET 8c NE 34TH AVENUE 4,200 N 4,000 S 8200 C 10.82 F 61.42 F 17.88 P 0208 P SR 710, SOUTH OF SE 40TH STREET 7,100 N 7,400 S 14500 S 10.82 F 61.42 F 11.08 P 021 1 P SR 15/US 441, S OF CR718/NW 36TH STREET 4,600 N 4,300 S 8900 F 10.82 F 61.42 F 12.8C P 021P 1000, NORTH OF CR718/800' SR 15/US441, NW 36TH STREET 3,900 E 3,800 W 7700 C 10.$2 F 61.42 F 21.3S A 0213 P SR 70, WEST OF CR 70A/SW 48TH AVENUE 2,500 N 2,500 S 5000 C 10.82 F 61.42 F 20.Of A 0214 P SR 700/US 98, 700' NW OF CR 718/NW 36TH STREET 8,900 N 9,800 S 18700 C 10.82 F 61.42 F 9.05 P 021 S P SR 15/700, US 98/441 SOUTH OF WOLFF ROAD 4,400 E 4,100 W 8500 C 10.82 F 6I.42 F 8,32 P 0216 P SR 15/700, US 98/441 500' NORTHEAST OF SR 78 1,900 E 2,000 W 3900 C 10.82 F 61.42 F 17.1E P 0217 P SR l5/7001US 99/441, SE OF CR 15A/SE 86TH BLVD 3,200 N 3,400 S 6600 C 10.66 F 52.25 F 16.57 P 0218 P SR 78, 0.3 MI SW OF SR 15/700/US 98/441 16,000 E 18,000 W 34000 C 10.92 F 61.42 F 18.8f F 5012 P SR 70, EAST OF SR 15/700/[JS 98/441 Site type; T = Telemetered; P = Portable AADT Flags: C = Computed; E = Manual Estimate; F = First Year Est; S = Second Year Est; T = Third Year Est; X - Unknown " K/D,,Flags: A - Actual; F = Volumc Fctr Catg; D 'Dist/Functional Class; P = Prior Year; S = Statewide Default; W = One -Way Road "T^ F1nnv A = AChlal; F - Axle Fctr Crtn; D - Dist/Fanctlonsl Class; P . Prior Year; S = Stato.wicie Default; X - Cross-Rcfe mnoe Liwtla u..i,:.^..^.^�. :::. --Port County. 91 - OKEECHOBEE r' • /L it'll lUt It 1.JV VV JJ 20 2lv� V,VV C 5,900 N 2,900 00 S 3,0 0.11 0.58 �?.60 --Q001 /• K 1 N' 2Av2,Svry ft T t I/t ill i2.vti Nv v J,\ ,il.JA site: 5004 Descr-sptinn: 100 FEET S SR 70 fear Aikiiii, iwrrerina i ilirnxrina L N N$I+rAT � hl�IIejnr ! a£rnr w' 7 Ills l• 7 773 v:v 't v.vii.ini 'Site- 5006 Description: 100 FEET N JCT SR 70 _ .; wwir! iiirelTinn i air rema G ii !ia/`Y/1r }I��'I^r %ar 1lNG T9 /174 wt 6 3[t7 �•, v�v l ii.w ----- n nit u.vtr ttt tut V.vV Site: 5009 I>�scription: OKEECHOBEE N CITY LIMITS 'i Ji/a ii i iiiltttina i i ii rrrrian 1!t �: $aT�lrl �Igrnr e n arm r cte r 5010 Description: E END BRIDGE 300 FEET E OKEECHOBEE ST Site: icae Aq i� i l'errifln i iii ltrrina ii R r acyor !s factor ! n aruar t [17G 1w AVt L Site: 5012 Description: SR 70, EAST OF SR 15 oanurS 981441 /�.4l/l I/!rK(MIn ! lJl rrt[wln G i► !+a[-rI�Y jv raf for i racrur IL Cit 2004 C 34,000 E 16,w.; W 15,000 0.11 0.61 18.90 ^ffln: r • zit non aL, * ". c.:.':: ::' : [,,�L':.' ::.::: II.Aft 115.3" C 3"5^v0 E 16,000 w 16,500 0.10 0.56 14.10 2002 v `t /Vitt I: TA [JVl L aY"Nul ��! lA GJ]JS .-,✓VV v i v'..[iv a✓.�-v 2I-V'1 J VVV C 30,500 E 15,500 W 15,000 0-11 0.59 16.70 -In Grvl JV,✓VV Y., i ;+�[Vv ;:' 1G;Vw �'.; i V.S� 12.��' /J 1993 C 26,50-0 E 113,0v0. W :3,5L0 0_I i 0.59 14-50 i�%i (• 2f1 [�U� � J,✓ L' t G !Vl[l Li 1✓,VVV ��/ Y,✓ - v.VV 1996 C 29,000 E 13;000 W 16,00-3 0.10 0.56 12.60 :: �;' .� wit 1994 C 25,5W E 0 W 0O.iO 0.57 13.60 27,Vv'v' it ful 1991 24,606 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 iy>v v c v h v v.00 v.vv v.00 1999 20,309 E 0 w 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 118� a'. 907 1987 21,194 E 0 YY 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 rut rt flit 1985 19,696 E 0 w C. 0.00 0.00 0.00 1V U4I '1 V w 1/;V � LLi Site: 5013 Descrip How 100 FEET W SE.MffiNOLE ST VC a s ii i iiirnaisn i iiirrriisn G K i a/-wnr i s i� s�rrnr i' i� Prmr 1ciTa o w�� .. it ..fl 1 ...L s rut t....� Site: 5014 Description: 100 FEET E SEMINOLE ST .i icae i►tiiii irirerrinn i iiirttriinn K i:arrnr it ei�a�•Tnr iinrmr 1 /''V fl L V �1� rt V �l vll� fl llfl V.VV fl fV•1 V.V 11 IfV / , Site: 5015 Description: 300 FEET E FEC RR ^'ielft A,viil iiinnriiln i iiirccisln i� rsa�-srlr ii pkrr�sr ± _r arrrtr ii,lvi� i ft ��r �t fl rtfl I\ fl!t it Mt lwV V.VV V•VV V.VV AADT Fags; C = Ccxr-Pui .i; E = ;It;ai F.s:;l:ral: ; F s Fcs:."gar Es:; C .- [` J V...... i-� T� TL'.rl V = 7 t..t�.-•- - V c.- IV abN D�, t [ Wl4 l VJr LJI, A VI WtV •'.lt Dagc I i•W.,/ZsWnmOn aL#U7LiW v1&-- 2004 Historical AADT Report County:91 - OKEECHOBEE S 2,300 0.10 0.00 13.00 1993 C 4,600 N 2,300 S 0 0.00 0. 1 .90 1992 C 4,500 N 0 0 S 0 O.Qg 0.53 11.00 1991 3,742 4,250 N N 2,103 S 2,147 0.08 0.52 11.50 1990 4,128 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 22.60 1989 3,722 N 0 S 0 0.09 0.51 15.10 1988 4,008 N 0 S 0 0.09 0.53 14.20 198 7 N 0 S 0 0.08 0.55 13.90 19963,520 3,024 N 0 S 0 0.08 0.51 830 1985 3,142 N 0 S 0 0'� 0-00 0.00 1984 2,513 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1993 1,743 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1982 2,335 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1981 1 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1980 ,838 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1979 ,838 2,894 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1978 2,188 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0-00 1977 2,099 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 t976 1,932 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0-00 1975 1,958 N 0 S 0 0.0(1 0.00 0.00 1974 1,853 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 197 3 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0-00 19721,975 1,869 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1971 2,099 N 0 S 0 0-00 0.00 0.00 1970 0119 Description:cttioom 2, KFacRiorN Site: �� 170(1 Direcdon D Factor T Factor Year 15,394 E 0 W 0 ------- 0.00 0.Q0 0.00 1999 1989 16,066 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1987 15,568 E 0 0 W W 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0-00 1996 16,013 E E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 I9$5 14,426 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1994 7,487 9,877 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1983 1982 i0,660 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1981 11,449 E 0 W W 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 1980 10,142 E 0 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1979 10,153 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1979 10,327 11,779 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1977 1976 10,652 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1975 9,555 E 0 0 W W 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1974 9,397 7,713 E E 0 W 0 0.00 0-00 0.00 1973 8,198 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1972 1971 6,996 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1970 6,739 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0123 Description: SR I5/7Q0, US 98/441, N OF WOLFF RD, OKEECHOBEE Site: Year AADT Direction 1 Direction2 K Factor D Factor T Factor 2004 C 27,000 N 13,500 S I3,500 0.11 0.10 0.61 0.60 8.30 5.90 2003 F 29,000 N 14,500 N 14,000 S S 14,500 14,000 0.10 0.56 5.90 2002 2001 C 28,000 C 26,000 N 13,000 S 13,000 0.11 0.58 9.40 9.50 - ZpbO C 23,500 N 12,000 S 11,500 0.11 0.11 0.59 0.59 7.80 1999 C 25,500 N 12,500 S 13,000 AADT Flags: C = Computed; E - Manual Estimate; F = First Year Est; S = Second Year Est; T = Third Year Est; X - Unknown page l !"�LS'l1Vi laatvta .•••...,•.�.... _- 2004 Historical AADT Report County:91 - OKEECHOBEE 1979 1,339 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Z977 1,292 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 ,.- 176 774 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1975 949 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1974 908 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1973 855 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1972 729 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1971 799 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 --1970 794 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 Site: 0103 Description: SR 15r700, US 98/441 SOUTH OF SR70 Year AADT Direction 1 Direction 2 K Factor D Factor T Factor 2004 C 30,000 N 14,500 S 15,500 0.11 0.61 8.40 2003 C 27,500 N 13,000 S I4,500 0.10 0.60 7.90 2002 C 30,500 N 14,500 S 16,000 0.10 0.56 5.90 2001 C 30,0W N 14,500 S 15,500 0.11 0.58 7.50 2000 F 29,500 N 13,000 S 15,500 0.11 0.59 18.10 1999 C 28,000 N 13,000 S 15,000 0.11 0.59 6.50 1998 C 29,500 N 14,500 S 15,000 0.11 0.58 6.80 1997 C 28,500 N 14,000 S 14,500 0.11 0.60 6.60 1999 19,194 N 8,711 S 9,483 0.00 0.00 0.00 1998 20,600 N 10,110 S 10,490 0.00 0.00 0.00 1987 20,360 N 9,898 S 10,472 0.00 0.00 0.00 1996 21,906 N 10,796 S 11,110 0.00 0.00 0.00 1985 17,338 N 8,676 S 8,662 0.00 0.00 0.00 1994 77,275 N 10,606 S I1,669 0.00 0.00 0.00 1983 20,904 N 10,366 S 10,538 0.00 0.00 0.00 --1992 18,772 N 9,786 S 8,986 0.00 0.00 0.00 1981 14,958 N 7,457 S 7,401 0.00 0.00 0.00 1980 16,069 N 8,464 S 7,605 0.00 0.00 0.00 1979 15,659 N 7,406 S 8,253 0.00 0.00 0.00 1979 19,115 N 9,322 S 9,793 0.00 0.00 0.00 1977 15,345 N 7,602 S 7,743 0.00 0.00 0.00 1976 14,677 N 7,675 S 7,002 0.00 0.00 0.00 1975 10,171 N 5,289 S 4,882 0.00 0.00 0.00 1974 10,456 N 5,474 S 4,982 0.00 0.00 0.00 1973 11,101 N 5,641 S 5,460 0.00 0.00 0.00 1972 9,999 N 4,934 S 5,065 0.00 0.00 0.00 1971 10,643 N 5,352 S 5,291 0.00 0.00 0.00 1970 10,957 N 5,491 S 5,466 0.00 0.00 0.00 Site: 01104 Description: SR 710 SOUTHEAST OF SE 59TH BOULEVARD OKEECHOBEE Year AADT Direction 1 Direction 2 K Factor D Factor T Factor 2004 C 7,600 N 3,700 S 3,900 0.11 0.61 20.20 2003 C 7,500 S 3,600 N 3,900 0.10 0.60 2020 2002 C 8,100 S 3,900 N 4,300 0.10 0.56 15.10 2001 C 6,600 S 3,300 N 3,300 0.11 0.58 15.90 2000 C 7,200 S 3,600 N 3,600 0.11 0.59 23.00 1999 C 6,600 S 3,300 N 3,300 0.11 0.59 20.00 1998 C 6,400 S 3,100 N 3,300 0.11 0.58 22.00 I997 C 6,200 S 3,100 N 3,100 0.11 0.60 19-20 1996 C 5,500 S 2,800 N 2,700 0.10 0.56 16.40 1995 C 5,800 S 2,900 N 2,900 0.11 0.54 19.40 1994 C 5,900 S 2,900 N 3,000 0.10 0.57 18.40 1993 C 5,900 S 2,900 N 3,000 0.10 0.55 12.40 1992 C 7,100 S 0 N 0 0.00 0.00 13.10 AADT Flags: C= Computed; E = Manual Estimate; F =First Year Est; S = Second Year Est; T = Third Year Est; X = Unknown Page 9 114JOP l UUJVLL viu++....•.v v.....� 2004 Historical AADT Report County:91 - C OKEECHOBEE 4,800 N 2,400 S 2,400 0.1 0.5 0 i 946 1995 G 3,900 N 0 S 0 0.I1 0.54 31.0.90 1994 C 4,400 N 0 S 0 .IO 0.57 2 6.50 1993 C 4,400 N 0 S 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1991 3,951 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1990 0 N 0 S Q 0.00 0.00 0.00 1989 3,459 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1988 3,870 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0-00 1997 3,790 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1986 3,019 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 I995 3,970 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1984 3,767 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1983 4,213 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1992 4,217 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1981 3,387 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1980 3,121 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1979 2,781 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1978 3,539 N 0 S 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0-00 1977 3,812 3,305 N N 0 0 S S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1976 1975 3,752 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1974 3,171 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1973 2,859 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1972 2,863 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1971 1970 2,2 74 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 SR 70, 700/US 98 EAST OF SR 700/US 98, OKEECHOBEE Site: 0019 Year Description: AADT Direction 1 Direction 2 K Factor D Factor T Factor 2004 C 17,200 E 8,900 W 8,300 0.11 0.61 0.60 11.50 12.00 2003 C 16,900 E 8,700 W W 8,200 8,700 0.10 0.10 0.56 13.00 2002 2001 C C 18,000 17,900 E E 9,300 9,400 w 8,500 0.11 0.58 12.50 2000 C 17,700 E 9,300 W 9,400 0.11 0.59 13.00 1999 C 17,100 E 8,900 W 8,200 0.11 0.59 0.59 13.70 11.90 1998 C C 16,600 17,300 E E 8,600 8,900 W w 8,000 8,400 0.11 0.11 0.60 9.50 1997 1996 C 14,100 E 7,200 W 6,900 0.10 0.56 12.60 1995 C 13,700 E 6,700 W 7,000 0.11 0.54 9.00 8.40 1994 C 13,700 E 7,I00 W W 6,600 6,900 0.10 0.10 0.57 0.55 7.60 1993 C 14,300 E E 7,400 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 720 1992 1991 C 14,500 14,456 E 0 w 0 0.08 0.52 8.40 1990 0 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1999 13,648 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1988 15,103 E E 0 0 w w 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1987 1986 13,651 11,087 E 0 w 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1995 12,562 E 0 W 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1984 4,315 E E 0 0 w w 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1983 1982 7,237 8,109 E 0 w 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1991 8,939 E 0 w 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1980 10,572 E E 0 0 W w 0 0.00 0.00 1979 1978 8,708 7,684 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 00 0.00 AADT Flags: C = Computed; E = Manual Estunate; F = First Year Est; S = Second Year Est; T- Third Year Est; X = Unknown Pa,e 2004 Historical AADT Report County:91 - 01MCHOBEE 1990 0 S 0 N 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1999 1,518 S 0 N 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 '-' 1998 1,925 S 0 N 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1997 2,017 S 0 N 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1986 4,963 S 0 N 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1985 1,888 S 0 N 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Site: 0009 Description: SR 15/US 441, NORTH OF SR 70 #-- Year AADT Direction 1 Direction 2 K Factor D Factor T Factor w 2004 C 25,500 N I2,500 S 13,000 0.11 0.61 10.60 2003 C 23,500 N 11,500 S 12,000 0.10 0.60 10.40 2002 C 27,000 N 14,000 S 13,000 0.10 0.56 6.90 2001 C 22,500 N 11,500 S 11,000 0.11 0.58 7.70 2000 C 24,000 N 12,000 S 12,000 0.11 0.59 9.60 1999 C 22,500 N 11,000 S 11,500 0.11 0.59 9.50 1999 C 22,000 N 10,500 S 11,500 0.11 0.58 10.90 1997 C 22,000 N 11,000 S 11,000 0.11 0.60 7.50 1996 C 2I,500 N 10,500 S 11,000 0.10 0.56 7.00 1995 C 22,500 N 10,500 S 12,000 0.11 0.54 10.00 1994 C 21,500 N 11,000 S 10,500 0.10 0-57 8.50 1993 C 17,900 N 8,700 S 9,200 0.00 0.00 0.00 1991 18,622 N 9,070 S 9,552 0.00 0.00 0.00 1990 0 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1989 16,043 N 7,800 S 8,243 0.00 0.00 0.00 1988 19,766 N 9,706 S 10,060 0.00 0.00 0.00 1987 18,261 N 9,096 S 9,165 0.00 0.00 0.00 1985 6,933 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Site: 0010 Description: EAGLE BAY DR S OF SR-70 IN OKEECHOBEE Year AADT Direction I Direction 2 K Factor D Factor T Factor 1997 3,001 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1986 1,040 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1985 3,193 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Site: 0011 Description: AIRPORT ENTRANCE RD E OF SR 700, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY Year AADT Direction 1 Direction 2 K Factor D Factor T Factor 1987 174 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1986 641 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1985 346 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Site: 0012 Description: SR 70 WEST OF SR 700/US 98, OKEECHOBEE Year AADT Direction I Direction 2 K Factor D Factor T Factor 2004 C 14,600 E 8,400 W 6,200 0.11 0.61 15.00 2003 C 11,800 E 6,000 W 5,800 0.10 0.60 15.00 2002 C 10,200 E 4,900 W 5,300 0.10 0.56 13.00 2001 C 12,300 E 6,300 W 6,000 0.I1 0.58 12.30 2000 C 12,300 E 6,200 W 6,100 0.11 0.59 10.30 1999 C 9,000 E 4,500 W 4,500 0.11 0.59 14.30 1998 C 8,100 E 4,100 W 4,000 0.11 0.58 14.70 1997 C 8,800 E 4,500 W 4,300 0.11 0.60 10A0 1996 C 10,100 E 5,100 W 5,000 0.10 0.56 11.60 1995 C 9,300 E 4,700 W 4,600 0.11 0.54 10.10 1994 C 8,100 E 4,100 W 4,000 0.10 0.57 10.10 1993 C 7,000 E 3,500 W 3,500 0.10 0S5 9.60 1992 C 10,500 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 8.30 AADT Flags: C = Computed; E = Manual Estimate; F = First Year Est; S = Second Year Est; T = Third Year Est; X - Unknown Page 4 2004 Historical AADT Report County:91 - OKEECHOBEE 0.00 1971 2,945 E 0 w 0 0.00 0.00 1970 1,971 E 0 w 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 ,-- Site: 0007 Description: SR 70 WEST OF SR 710, EAST OF OKEECHOBEE .i-r Year AADT Ditectioa 1 Dimetion 2 K Factor D Factor T Factor 2{104 C 23,000 E 11,500 W 11,500 0.11 0.61 18.90 2003 C 22,000 E 11,000 W 11,000 0.10 0.60 1530 2002 C 21,500 E 11,000 W 10,500 0.10 0.56 14.10 2001 C 21,000 E 10,500 W 10,500 0.11 0.59 1520 2000 C 19,400 E 9,900 W 9,500 0.11 0.59 16.70 1999 C 19,100 E 9,200 w 9,900 0.11 0.59 12.40 1998 C 18,700 E 9,300 W 9,400 0.11 0.58 14.50 1997 C 19,600 E 9,600 W 10,000 0.11 0.60 11.00 1996 F 17,000 E 8,500 W 8,500 0.10 0.56 14.40 1995 C 16,900 E 8,400 W 8,400 0.11 0.54 13.40 1994 C 17,500 E 9,600 w 8,900 0.10 0.57 13.60 1993 C 16,9W E 8,400 W 8,500 0.10 0.55 12.30 1992 C 17,5W E 0 w 0 0.00 0.00 11.90 1991 16,029 E 0 w 0 0.09 0.50 9.60 1990 0 E 0 w 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1989 14,658 E 0 w 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1988 16,231 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1987 12,915 E 0 w 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1986 18,518 E 0 w 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1985 12,971 E 0 w 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1984 10,022 E 0 w 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1993 10,801 E 0 w 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1982 8,795 E 0 w 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1991 91216 E 0 w 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1980 9,572 E 0 w 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1979 9,416 E 0 w 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1978 7,885 E 0 w 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1977 7,519 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1976 8,182 E 0 w 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1975 4,765 E 0 w 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1974 5,077 E 0 w 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1973 5,114 E 0 w 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1972 5,004 E 0 w 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1971 4,939 E 0 w 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1970 4,658 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Site: o0o8 Description: SR 15/700/US 98/441, SE OF CR 15B/SE 126TH UVD Year AADT Direction 1 Direction 2 K Factor D Factor T Factor 2004 C 3,200 N 1,600 S 1,600 0.11 0.61 22.90 2003 C 2,900 S 1,400 N 1,500 0.10 0.60 22.90 2002 C 3,600 S 1,800 N 1,800 0.10 0.56 16.30 2001 C 2,050 S 1,200 N 950 0.11 0.58 23.80 2000 F 2,C00 S 1,300 N 1,300 0.11 0.59 18.10 1999 C 2,600 S 1,300 N 1,300 0.11 0.59 26-20 1998 C 2,400 S 1,200 N 1,200 0.11 0.58 22-10 1997 C 2,600 S 1,200 N 1,400 0.11 0.60 23.00 1996 C 2,900 S 1,500 N 1,400 0.10 0.56 11.00 1995 C 3,300 S 0 N 0 0.11 0.54 9.10 1994 C 3,300 S 0 N 0 0.10 0.57 8.60 '-' 1993 C 2,700 S 0 N 0 0A0 0.00 0.00 1991 2,244 S 0 N 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 AADT Flags: C = Computed; E = Manual Estimate; F = Fast Year Est; S - Second Yew Est; T = Third Year Fst; X = Unknown Page Jerner & Associates, Inc Marine & Environmental Consulting 705 Boston Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34950 PHONE: (772) 466-5201 / FAX: (772) 466-5203 E-MAIL youmans@bellsouth.net February 10, 2006 Environmental Site Assessment Property Location: PIN's: 2-22-37-35-OAOO-00033-0000, 2-22-37-35-OA00-00031-0000 & 2-21-37-35-OA00-00045-0000, Okeechobee, Okeechobee County, FL Discussion: The site consists of three contiguous parcels of land that are located along the western bank of Taylor Creek in the town of Okeechobee. These three parcels total approximately 60 acres. Wetlands were identified, delineated and flagged on the site. In addition, the - site was inspected for flora and fauna that are listed on the state and federal threatened and endangered species list by Mark Youmans of Jerner and Associates, Inc. These site inspections occurred over the course of several separate visits in the summer of 2005. Follow-up surveys by Survco Inc. placed the wetland boundary on a certified land survey. The wetlands were verified by Stephanie Raymond from the South Florida Water Management (SFWMD) on January 22, 2005. On February 8, 2006, Andy Phillips from the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) verified the consultant's jurisdiction wetland findings during a joint site visit. Three minor wetland areas were added to the wetland inventory. This information is included on the attached site map (Exhibit B). A FLUCCS map is included as Exhibit C. Conclusion: Although the three additional wetland areas are updated on the attached site map, the certified land survey has not yet been updated to include them. This will take place within the next few weeks as scheduling permits. During the course of the field work, Mark -Youmans of Jerner and Associates, Inc. also searched for Flora and Fauna that are listed on the state and federal threatened and endangered species list. No threatened or endangered species have been Iocated on site. This finding was verified by the staff from SFWMD and ACOE. A list of all plant species identified on site is included as Exhibit A. It is of special concern that many of the heavily vegetated/forested areas contain large percentages of invasive/exotic plant species that are displacing the native plants. It is recommended that any mitigation plans proposed for this project include plans to climiilme the III vasive/cNo"iC species Oil site. In addition, the hydrology of the cypress slough on the southwestern side of the site has been restricted to the point that subsidence of the soil is clearly evident. If this condition continues, the cypress canopy will eventually be replaced with upland species. Please see the attached exhibits (A, B & C) for further information. Mark Youmans Jerner & Associates, Inc. EXHIBIT (AA P LANT SPECIES IDENT FIED 4N SITE My Rn►0 1 STATUS GENUS/SPEICIES CD:N,LiONNA,�IE Psychotria sulateri shortleaf wild coffee FAC UPI, Sy�ngonium podophyllum American evergreen UPL Clerodendrum speciosissimum Javanese glorybower FACW Cettis laevigata sugar -berry; hackberry hairy beggar -ticks FAC Bidens pilosa Costus pulverulentus spiral inger g p FAC OBL Erianthus strictusnarrow pumegrass UPL Momordica charantia balsampear UPL Sida rhombifolia cuban jute FACW Trema mieranthum trema FACW Cirsium sp. thistle Mascarene Island leafflower Phyllanthus tenellus FAC Oplismenus setarius woods grass shield fern FACW Thelypteris sp. Caesarweed UPL Urena lobata Sambucus conadensis elderberry FAC FACW Ulmus americana American elm ticktrefoil UPL De-smodium sp. Surinam cherry UPL Eugenia unij7ora rosemallow FAC Hibiscus tiliaceussea Ambrosia artemisiifolia annual ragweed UPL UPL Kalanchoe sp. kalanchoe golden polypody UPL Phlebodium aureum Parthenocissus quinquefolia Virginia creeper vine FAC V erbesina virginica white crownbeard UPL Rivina humilis rougeplant West Indian chickweed FAC Diymaria cordata sandbur UPL Cenchrus sp. American beautyberry UPL Callicarpa americana Indian goosegrass UPL Eleusine indica Florida strangler fig FAC Ficus aurea Justicia brandegeana shrimp plant UPL UPL Citrus sp. citrus false buttonweed FAC Spermacoce sp. roughfruit scaleseed UPL Spermolepis divaricata bald cypress OBL Taxodium distichum vine Dioscorea bulbifera air yam FACW Xanthosoma sagittifoliunt elephant ear Virginia pepperweed UPL Lepidium virginicum mountain ebony UPL Bauhinia rariegata Campsis radicans trumpet creeper p vine FAC Digitaria sp. Schinus terebinthifolius crabgrass Brazilian pepper -tree FAC FACW Platanus occidenialis sycamore Canadian horseweed UPL UPL ColryYa canadensis IridaV lzro�un:bens co�tbutt�its inch lant UPL Tradescantia zebrina twoleaf nightshade UPL Solamun diphyllum flame old g UPL Koelreuteria elegans UPL Panicum manimum guineagrass live oak UPL Ouercus virginiana Florida tasselflower UPL Emilia fosbergii paspalum FACW paspalum sp. Taylor Creek Water Quality Concerns Main concerns with water Quality 1- Existing water quality is low *due to low dissolved oxygen content in the water L *non -point sources of pollution *low current velocity 2- Project's impacts to water quality *raise dissolved oxygen levels *contain non -point sources of pollution from the local area *model responsible stewardship for other local marinas Discussion of existing water gualily issues Taylor Creek currently has poor water quality due mainly to dissolved oxygen 1eVels and from local pollution sources that can not easily be pinpointed (non -point sources of pollution.) Oxygen enters the water through contact with the atmosphere (air) at the surface and from microscopic algae and aquatic plants. The wider the water body in respect to its depth, the greater the dissolved oxygen in the water. If temperatures were the same, a wide shallow bay would have greater dissolved oxygen (D. O.) than a narrow, deep creek. However, cooler water holds the dissolved oxygen (D. O.) better than warm water, and therefore deeper depths that remain cooler in the summer will have a greater capability of holding the dissolved oxygen once it enters the deeper layers of cool water. Now that is a text book answer to the situation, but that is not how it really works in nature. in Florida the summer temperatures cause the deeper waters (over 8' deep) to become stratified with warm water sitting on the top 3-5 feet and cooler water held to a layer just below the warm one. It's called a thermocline. These two layers do not normally mix during the summer (when D. O. issues are a problem) unless there is a drastic storm that causes a current in the normally still waters. Therefore, in the summer, most of the canals along Taylor Creek have very low oxygen content due to hot stagnant upper water not being able to hold what little bit of oxygen there is, and the cooler lower depths are not able to acquire the dissolved oxygen, because it's not able to mix with the upper warm layer. So the canal remains deprived of oxygen throughout the warmer months. At the same time, the rain storms that frequent the state wash in literal tons of fertilizers, herbicides, pesticides, dissolved metals, paint, petroleum products and best of all septic tank effluent, into the canals. These collect and then wash down with the low oxygen content in the water, where they empty into Taylor Creek. These are called non -point sources of pollution. They add up quickly and cause lots of problems. Petroleum cuts off any oxygen from the water's surface, and fertilizers cause algae blooms that use up far more oxygen than they produce. The result is a dead zone to all but alligator gar (which can breathe air) and a few catfish. Discussion of the vroject's impacts to water quality The Taylor Creek Fishing Village has been carefully thought out for its potential negative and positive impacts to the water quality of Taylor Creek. Innovative thinking has lead to a systematic design which will actually improve the areas water quality. Two canals currently exist on the property. One is a "dead end" canal that is approximately 30' wide, 7' deep and about 600' long. It is stagnant; choked with water lettuce and algae; and dumps directly into Taylor Creek. The second is a DOT drainage easement that takes untreated runoff from an area west of 441 and channels it directly into the creek. The proposed project will fill in the dead end canal and re-route the drainage easement south along the east side of a large historic cypress slough. The wetland area that contains the cypress slough is currently being cut off from surface waters by the drainage canals berms. The project will channel the runoff of the DOT canal into the cypress slough, where it will be re -hydrated and the waters will be filtered naturally by the ecosystem in the sough. A weir at the end of the easement along Taylor Creek will maintain proper water levels which will both maintain the dissolved oxygen - levels in the wetland runoff (high levels due to the natural mixing in the swamp) and chemical impurities will be filtered out and metabolized by the microbes in the swamps submerged soils. The marina is designed to exceed the guidelines of the latest EPA marina standards. It is cut from the uplands, so as to not take up the navigable channel. It's much longer than it is wide, so it will mix easily with the low current of Taylor Creek. And as an innovative twist, it has a wave attenuator that doubles as a scoop to actually draw the current from Taylor Creek into the basin where the upper and lower water layers will mix and oxygenate. Residues will not be allowed to accumulate in the basin either. This leads to greater water quality. The added mixed surface area actually increases the D. O. levels of the creek. The pier and wave attenuator structures will not utilize any CCA treated lumber. The entire structure including the seawalls will be made from concrete. In addition, antifouling paint on boat bottoms (which leads to high copper levels in the water) and live -a -boards) will be explicitly restricted from mooring at the facility. The marina facility will be certified as part of the Clean Marina Program by the DEP and must meet strict environmental guidelines to achieve this. Some of the examples of the criteria are a pump out station for the facilities vessels, strict hazardous waste and petroleum containment for the fueling docks, containment of the surrounding areas storm water discharges, educational displays posted for the public, maintained trash facilities and the design of the marina itself. The project will also utilize the cities municipal sewer system. So the antiquated use of septic systems near water bodies will not be an issue. Also, storm water will be captured and treated in a self contained manmade lake. So non -point discharges of fertilizers will not be a problem. The D. O. levels in the lake will be maintained year-round by a system -- of aerial fountains that spray lake water high into the air and oxygenate it. EXHIBIT B COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LARGE SCALE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS: 06-CI-001 HACKL/H2 OLDINGS 06-CI-002 ALTOBELLO/CLOSE (City of Okeechobee, (.,in. of Okeechobee LSA 1120 1161*09%, From: Single-F"mlly To: MEN - mg, a 0 -Igo -;so KIM& nosa an M as =0 639:4 a It no noun 01M." Sal"j-r Pwp 4L.Ity. aj (RCIlamWeinext Corpoojz6on Front: sijwKle-Famgv To. Residepilialthred Use COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE SINCA F - FAMIL' MUIT, . FAIVIIV -nk4M=Rr:IA; NuJsvRI?.L -IJBI.IC FACILMES City O r RY of Okeechobee Cleneral Services Department 55 S.F.. Yd Avenue, Room 101 , wli -j Okeechobee; blorida 34974-29(3 4 Phone; (863)763-3372,ext-218 Fax: L863) 763-1686 M W54 Datw Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Application Please cbcck�Qy: —Sraall .Scale Amendment (Under 10 Acres) wLN4,arge Scale Amendment (Over 10 Acres) Name of property owner(,%)' C) U Owner mailing addre&r ?c:> ?>Cq 9bf-vA c. AanF-N,:s. 2c> Name of applicant(s) if other d= owner (SIM, ICItkdonship): 0 er mailing Aram of applica 644,kcj VA. -1 N c i �I ir rApplicant mailing jVg address: C> Name Of contact person AA (state relationship): L/ P-. Contact , d contact der daytime horjc(s): Fax: �Z 6- 00 (0 daytime n10 VjO[ Property address i dircedons to property- to Sro� e, r, , V -7 0 Moss- Pat xI Identification Number - 00 - 0 OC)C) Size OF the Property (iD acres): 2 Current Zoning .0csiguation. G 0 W\ VA P73 Eta Current FuMm Land Use Dcsi;mion: VY\ VV\ (2-E S Existing Use of the Property: vPGPN Proposed Future Land Use Designation: Proposed Use of the Property: Description of Surrounding Properties: (VA-r—Cs-�t) P,?9LkEQ FE>q- Cc, VA A-j, RG7-c>Okr-1, 57 -ow\w, Des of Surrounding f . ] 11 co LegaJJ Description Of the -PrOPOMY (Lengthy Description May be Attached): T P,6-iX E� Uniform I.Ind Use Application (rcv. 1=3) Page I of ?- 1✓ Survey of Property (11" x 14% 20" Scale) - Letter Outlining Request Notarized.Letter of Owner's Authorization -- w Ys ran. 4'�?i. f ♦r nvwwn..:.^�7sr,. «« Application n. it V. City Location Map ., �:.. &� iN3.�„e+�� • Y'2"�.,.e� ,�.»,,"�.».r� C.:-...•a. �- �+.��'� `.."`..:...... ...�.,--r..•,�.1�•"X.+R�esT `."� N ..�1... ,J 'b....w ..r�,$.i"'-.L'�c.•:' µ..me �'."+_.f"•• �"-•.� r�.••rt=Y� .t..-•�rr++.,3�.�3" w � s':�:1"'�!� .C(9'� ,_i„ f.r.w1•. M I hereby certify that the information in this application is correct. The information included in thiti application is for use by the City of Okeechobee in processing ray request. False or misleading information may be punishable by a fine of up to $500.00 and imprisonment of up to 30 days and may result in the summary denial of this application. f _lG Uln 2 2t 1 0 Si tore Printed Namc Date Uniform Land Use Application (rev. 12103 'age 2 of 2 February 22, 2006 The City of Okeechobee Board of Adjustments, Land Planning Agency & Planning Board City Hall 55 S.E .Third Avenue Okeechobee, FL Re: Zoning Change Request Tax ID 2-15-37-35-OA00-00007-0000 2-15-37-35-OA00-00008-0000 Dear Zoning Board Members: Attached herewith are the necessary documents in support of our request for a zoning change for a portion of the property described in this submittal. The subject of this request is a 21.14 acre parcel fronting on the north side of State Route 70, east of State Route 441 in Okeechobee City, Florida. That portion of the subject site fronting on State Route 70 is currently zoned "Commercial" whereas the rear portion of the same site is zoned "future residential". Current interest in new housing development in Okeechobee suggests significant increases in population in the near future. In turn, the need for commercial space and the jobs it brings rises in response to hous- ing growth. The advantages that commercial zoning development brings to Okeechobee City in the form of sales taxes, an enhanced real estate tax base and increased level of employment is self evident. State Route 441 presently has the largest commercially developed properties within the city. State Route 70, immediately west of State Route 441 and now to the east of 441 constitutes the other principal commercially zoned district serving the community. Future development along State Route 70 eastward to Fort Pierce and southeast along State Route 710 (Bee Line Highway) will attract significant traffic and commercial potential to the benefit of Okeechobee, both City and County. This concept is already supported by every inquiry we have had on the subject property to date in which interest in the property has been to zone the site "Commercial" in its entirety. As indicated herein, the subject site is surrounded by commercially zoned property to the East and South. Small trailer parks exist immediately West and across State Route 70 to the Southwest. A drainage swale and overhead power lines separate the subject site from undeveloped residentially zoned property to the North accessible only via SE 13th Avenue or perhaps off of State Route 441 North of State Route 70. We respectfully request the subject property be changed to "all commercial" zoning from its current zoning which is part commercial, part residential for the following reasons: 1. "Highest and best uses" of the subject site zoning is "Commercial" in that this zoning will benefit the city most through sales taxes, higher real estate property taxes and increased employment. 2. State Route 70 at the subject property's location could hardly be considered a suitable roadway from a residential perspective. Despite the fact that a four way intersection can be developed midway across the subject site frontage, there is no other access to the currently zoned "Residential" portion of this prop- erty. This means that access to the residential portion would only be available from a highly trafficked roadway (State Route 70) through property that is currently zoned "Commercial" — a circumstance which is neither safe nor attractive to residential development. 3. All inquirers to date concerning the subject property have expressed the desire to have the entire site zoned "Commercial". Furthermore, these interested parties wish to co -develop the subject site with the adjoining 18 acres to the East (currently zoned commercial), to create a "destination" spot for the city. Although premature, early talks reveal a mixed -use plan of retail (both large and small) and office space. This would not only create a "destination" spot for family and friends, but it could also generate numer- ous jobs for local citizens. 4. As Okeechobee City and County continue to grow, the State Route 70 corridor, particularly extending east from State Route 441, will be better served by a site of the size, shape and character of the subject property to be commercially zoned. This property, along with the adjoining 18 acres, has the potential not only to becoming a "destination" spot, but it WILL be the first thing travelers from the East will see when they cross into city limits. 5. Currently zoned trailer parks along State Route 70 should be phased out over time as they no longer meet the "highest and best use" test and in fact are fast becoming a liability to the community in terms of real estate tax contribution, requirements for City services, stability and appearance. We would be pleased to respond to any questions that our proposal raises, but hopefully circumstances cited in support of our request for the zoning changes requested are both self evident and self explanatory. Respectfully submitted, Craig M. Hackl President H2O Holdings LLC *Okeechobee,, All rights reserved Use Subject to License/Copyright This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. Mapquest and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use. s� b je� Si fc (oc.�f I urn hn��. 12-4!4- http://www.mapquest. com/maps/map.adp?searchtype=address&country=US&addtohistory... 2/21 /2006 S rr, SN. ae'�vx gr, mow= � p '4 � sJ A �s� r-"'.­ ' Fund F[IeNo.: 57-04-61 OR B K 00525 j5 25 PG 2000 Exhibit A Parcel 1: The West '/2 of the Southwest.'/4 of the Southeast'/, of Section 15, Township 37 South, Rangg 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida, lying North of the North right-of-way line of State Road No. 70; Except the North 50 feet of the West %2 of the West '/2 of the Southwest '/4 of the Southeast'/4 for road purposes; also Except the following described property conveyed to the State of Florida: A parcel of land in the West,%2 of the Southwest''/4 of the Southeast'/4 of Section 15, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the South'/4 corner of said Section 15; thence run Northerly on the '/4 section line a distance of 36.95 feet to the centerline of State Road 70; thence. North 80'. 54' 49" East, on said centerline a distance of 347.10 feet; thence Northerly at 90' to said centerline a distance of 40 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence continue Northerly a distance of 17 feet; thence Easterly at 90° 'a distance of 20 feet; thence Southerly at 90° a distance of 17 feet: thence Westerly at 90' a distance of20 feet to the Point of Beginning. Parcel Id. Number: R2-15-37-35-OA00-00007-0000 Parcel 2: Beginning at the Southwest corner of the East/2 of the Southwest'/. of the Southeait'l. of Sectior 15, Township 37 South, Range 35 East and run North along the West boundary a distzncc of 594 feet; then run East a distance of 186.3 feet. then run South a distancc of 594 feet to the South Boundary of Section 15. then run West a distance of 186.3 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, Less and Except the right-of-way for State Road 70. Parcel Id. Number: R2-15-37-35-OA00-00008-0000 I FN0 XIME3.5' LLW 691 - - P,Y AWL d' 06K 29 1221 • - - - - s �^ .. NB97ZS5'F SJ74.J1' p z-Y'. _. pI .. 76B50J' MD. 2"I/hOiV P�E� AM Ca4NER a fRVO. LONG NOK _/J I - _ KW. CORNER Or SEG 15-J7--U N 114 CORNER OF - gG 15_J7-J5 (CAEG Po9710N, SEG 15-J7-.15 CORNER FALLS BV GLW1J - - a - - RATE INLET GRATE INLET GRA - - _ .. - - iINV. - 11,71 - - - AVRTN LOVE 0' 24Iw-"X36- RG.P. SW 114 SE 1/4, 24'k36' R.C. INV. - 12-1 BT.OA A�09Y9F - SEG I.rrA--.� - - E SOIIIN POC PGulr O�ERI pM E - FIST atg QEc " �C � P.tlt PU01C UfMT - - -uN(R6 lIN YAti1G1E MG - - - GRATE IN 58425IY 254.R'.5 INV. 17.72 ` W RGy .INV. . f -twr� K CaSL dT 7Ag M! A P7 fir- •L �_ �' - - - - - - 2 _ JI \ UFr ST0. I y - - -- 12" GM.P.� --• �- -- � - _ - _ 1. gosu aF w UE3T r/Y ar Mr SLV7hMF5T 1/R. o' nt' SGund;C_ r 1/4 CF Jmzw LS mmov-7.AJMR 9V4:F.TSEL5r a7EFOVCI6E£ CWflY, nail1 ZMV AOPM CF IM AVM . 12- C.N. RN: = 15.0 � 11 PN... ia:971 1 GRATE vLErt �lh1w - 5,/M-RL W d C'p .. - AQEY. _. 1717 V - - - - - .. - -. ..' - AXW-a-AY LA'E ar SA1F.W10 7a ADD M OL7 I/$ a- ar . SZM//IME57 l/4, OF Ar SMMMSUr. r/R aF.¢LJ.6V 14 IDIM(4tP J7 _ SOVAC IdMCE 3f E61.- .lF�J4QR7✓!S 07H MW T{A35'E 9 fflx INLF.W( a0v faw Loctr ! - I _ . -._CEMEW 1 _ - ZO - I I I ZI III J' 1 I I _ - - - a - - - _ Mr awomol ar suT nw 70 AC swft - - - WOW 7f'E' aW,7 MMY m0S ar 5mT M91070 C59T.f 77E Fwa - - - CPPARId/fl/t ¢r MAY3RwW7laY - - 4 AIrk arar l t E22YA7xv6,w B[SZD ow swm ;�'w BY )1E S: hORIMAC MVIMq as Esc mow LFS canv f/NE 945E . *-; a9v' C wim SLi7MW WVOW REW QWhWV ,%W INr AIXIYIC - -IMM'E; A51 5 8-M U-IM 71E QVr PfME CCaROLW7r - - - S157E2S RaGml TASr IMM 77M" RMS" aUE9l SSW AW 87 (1990� 6 lA6 SrLPVri d SUMECT ro AVr PAC'/5 71Nr Ar ar REIEA'm EN A 001N. E AW ACQL4AE MILL SE6 7 Md 5W1LETIS S(®ECI 10 EA52MF/$ AE3]$71316 AM RfaOS W RVY W RfZXKII c .n I I S"0 d 24-- Ry C' I i 21-14 ACRES I y4 3 - E=,'PIIG999 RMMSLAP J7 `LU' 1K KVICf' J5 EKI, MIIZ}ttIBF GLGagY• FG4?6d4 (Y/NG fh:H a� 16-9 1: 77 E MES7 1/2 ar ME sa dkRZ /r W xE llaRIX5T 1/r s cz , j F RX71T aF HNY LPA ar-ME AW AV 14-EMPr 7Al Naf& .'L faT ar MT VEST l/2 W ME ME7 1/? Or AF-MMVEST 1/4 OF AE SW7WAV 1/4 f h ARFIGfEr ALSO l52TPT ME nU MMC MC-MW MOIL Y CaN£YEa 7a Mr 57517r OF ACRAX - A PAVCa a' L6 N 7AF 71E M 37 1/2. Ur ME S%YR.4HET7 1/4 OF Ild- - SFCIX,N 74 IGM5W A50 M AVA2 M FAS; BaW MMF PA47A=4wY VESUM0 AS - - AZWI S COMOAF AT MSARN 114 'Caalev WSW -%MXW RY Aer-1 A AU97AMY aY - - ME 11! 5Y7RY11AFA a5RWZ af"EEET 717 Af M�M Cr SM2r, 7T At9V7AERL�YA STr 7a 501 C2NRR WA VtS7AKF or �70 Mr 7/R1TT ar *wwI _ YA7 FF -. �8.'�+'rry _ I.I2 �a _ I -. A3'AAf7 CET PEST: AEMYSO&?MMYAT17 I A DTAKE ar 7fEE7r�AKMF hnMaY - AT ATA A3&APF ar 1Yl RFl XI AE PC1M Clr RTSNYO,G '• ': .. `TJ _ i aMVUC AT Af SU M23T 025W7 ar M6 Wr 1/2 ar MF.5ai77aicrr 1/4 _ ar Mr SW WI 7 1/4 gr SEMRW 14 7OW6W -7 5MMEE MQia J5 &U7A®. ATW A6F/N SW . 7SMW'El1TAASF5 CJ<I1.t - O 1 .fr♦u`,a£iw - I AMW 1? 6W/dtGf FAmMY! (RF RAi IJ'P.aE (RM RAOFMV _ZJ"re.Y MCt705NLD - 1P $ jt - AM EN AM MM.445YAAVrFW M fFFET.•-!fA'T,' RLR1 SLY/D/ A (bTMCf ZrLSDf fFET ro-ME SaUM bLVAfpaPr ar SEL7RW ILE ft-�A XI;S.T FFFf ro Af fbGl'f OF EYLPdi@!a E6S AW E10E7'T ML� a- SWERaV - - XV..RX ROW d C:W afV... 17-V SPANL�IISM17R OF - E-I SN 1/4 SE- - - ' - � 1y'. il@ 5/e',9'91RdW XM4' GLTYTEYTD ro SL1IE ar GRATE INLET -aR .525 P1. 1R'6 T.O.S. INV. 2Q42 T0.0. � - -"!\. r _--. lS�T/�3S - /T.O.S. _ i t.oe -- _ eAcz - - GRATE M. - 20.98 cRa WLEE PN.. &GG EDGE OF '- PAVEMENT POSTOFFICEOFFICE 35 MPN. 9GN - scN .3ps d b6m - - '... - -. SURVEYORS QYTIF/G4dL 17OY - • ,Srsp'S7'd 2691 bad SP/KE_PSA' CUTOUI BENT CORNER OFJ .SEC 15-37-35 - - - �-- : SIGfI - - $EOfC Rood JO .--- - fNQ Px /W7L d -Q6X _ LANE -- -� ' 1 S/78- UNE CHNN - 'STREET - - -.. CORNER OF 894vaN5t' - F. I11GRATE - VT AY MC d LiSA' - .INV: = 20.36 INV. = 2Q28 _ SEG IS-J7--U - UEY - 21.10 __--- - - - - .SCUM LINE .. aC.c EDGE- OF �� J SEC. 15-T/- - PAVEMENTUNE RATE N ErBV INV. = 21.67 20.9 - .. .Rb PN.-- 20.94 _ - _ Y1- SE CLWNER CIF or Amwr aRw ro 7AC ffff ar aw MAMEtlC£ A.0 - - ME' 7Mr MS a@m91CA MC AW a%RC17 .. a47w � SERMY OF. Ri RFAC - - n.R1Er- tes Plef7wem ev ALLT15iaMW Y11N Mr.wfcrAae - ATTJM7M Ol CURIER 51G17-4 ROM4 A(tl019M W 0-17EfNO. . LLZ ACSW L4� E#WAW AYA LSC - - - . - - - - - - SM 15-J7-35 - - AAR M SILY/MA7 - - - %+SCIZS4'1"d<f i1YA'EMI? d iawvY /A2 LS4= - - - - - - - - LAST WE OF F970 SI ViFH 15 .AAVE TQ25' Acre In Ga,'- BY BY: -I - - a*` jRc 6-i3-a5 WilsonMillEr ��.� TM-E: BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY - ii ,NNE zoos CUENT: - ""°�°^*'�' Phillips &Jordan, Inc. FlELO ROON. Of�E ]i P0.GE 1-a fy7nfVN Rv: M7 iOOJ ,1Rc 6-23-a5 ♦ - A PORTION OF ( - I0G P.O. U.. 2295 Zaphyrni9s, 33559-2295 CNECAEO 9*. AW5 5-z3-a5 �rM• ••r ••mow'•-L. >p.Ar�rd,•tE.,w�.aea o,.a� SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH- RANGE 35 EAST sv.c FloriCo cLDSEo BY: �rwm.R-ron OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA I *+� w.� �� �x aamo-. wo ra wco¢n a. om. .n --_-- ____-- M+d�-Fu1 Mlva.9ermo-®WMm•r' asm..caM. 4P fn[I4n,'xd DAefl£bio SGGS Rusgd)5!@-Frs eo-ms-MOS YteC-S3 worweb .. - s[� nm ucL 1 a 1 �+cT 221,09Mt VI. SMALL SCALE AMENDMENT PUBLIC BEARING CONTINUED. B. Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-013-SSA_ Consider a recommendation to the City Council to change the land use designation for Lots 1 to 26 of Block 12; Lots 1, 2, 3 and 9, less the East 32.50 feet of said Lot 9, and Lots 10 to 26 of Block 21; Lots 1 to 6 of Block 22, City of Okeechobee,. from Single Family (SF) to Multi - Family (Mr). The subject property is located at between Northwest 12`h and 13" Streets and Northwest 5`h and 8' Avenues. The application was submitted by Steve Dobbs on behalf of property owner InSite Development Group - City Planning Consultant. CLOSE PUBLIC. HEARING FOR SMALL SCAI,E FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS Chairperson_ 2006 - Land lung Agency - Page 6 of 13 Mr. Steve Dobbs, representing the applicant, submitted a request to table the application until the June 27, 2006 meeting. Agency Member Hoover moved to table Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-013-SSA, until the June 27ih regular meeting; seconded by Agency Member Burroughs. VOTE HOOVER - YEA KELLER - YEA LEDFERD - YEA 1Vh1XWELL - YEA JUAREZ - YEA BURROUGIIS - YEA .Imi"S - yr'.y '10'110, CXURIED CHAIRPERSON LEDFERD CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR SMALL SCALE FUTURE LAN]) USE MAP AMENDMENTS AT 7:10 P.M. VII. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER COMPREHE LARGE SCALE FUTURE LAND USE MAY AMENDNSIVE PLAN CHAIRPERSON LEDFERD OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING I'® 'DER MENTS AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LARGE SCALE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT NARRATIVE (TEXT) AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSERVATION AND NARRATIVE (TEXT) AMENDMENTS TO THCONSERVATION E CONSERV SAND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENTS - Chairperson. IMPROVEMENT ELEMENTS AT 7:10 P.M. AND CAPITAL A. Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-CI-001. Consider a recommendation to the City Council to change the land use designation from Single Family (SF) to Commercial (C) for vacant unplatted property located North of East North Park Street (State Road 70 East, across from the Post Office), and is approximately 21.14 acre(s). The application was submitted by Craig M. Hack], President on behalf of property owner H2O Holdings, LLC - City Planning Consultant. Mr. LaRue briefly reviewed the Staff Report as follows: Planning Staff Report Comprehensive Plan Analysis: (A) Consistency with the Land Use Categories and Plan Policies. The Comprehensive Plan describes the Commercial Future Land Use category in the Future Land Use Element. It states: Policy 2.1(c): Commercial. Permitted uses include office, retail, automotive, wholesale, and related Commercial activities. Also permitted are public facilities_ Commercial development shall not exceed a floor area ratio of 3.00 and the maximum impervious surface for development within this category shall not exceed 85 percent of the site. Under the proposed Commercial Future Land Use category, the applicant would be allowed to develop the May 23, 2006 - Land Planning Agency - Page 7 of 13 VH. LARGE SCALE PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. A. Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No_ 06-CI-001 continued. Planning Staff Report Comprehensive Plan Analysis: (A) continued: subject property with the Retail/Commercial uses. However, there is more data necessary to be shown illustrating that this presently designated residential area should become an intensive retail high impact location. (B) Concurrency of Adequate Public Facilities. Before this request can be approved, the City must consider the proposed impact on public facilities. Potable Water Supply: The adopted LOS for potable water is 114 gpcpd. The subject property is within the service area of the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA) who provides this service to City residents. The anticipated flow for the subject property has not been provided by the applicant, this data is required. The existing capacity of the water supply plant is 6 MGD, with 2.5 MGD already committed to use. As such, the OUA has an excess of 4.5 TN/lGD. The applicant would need to submit a letter to the City which discusses the anticipated flow for the development and that the OUA would have capacity to serve the proposed development. There should also be a deduction of water use for already approved developments because the cumulative impact has not been contemplated should all approved developments be built. Wastewater Disposal: The adopted LOS for wastewater disposal is 130 gallons/ capita/day_ The subject property is within the service area of thw Okeechohcr Utility /\uthority (()t':1)_ hlyhlel, iOr t1w -,uhico property %tNli(l hc he dctcrrnincd at this timc_ the existint_ of the %%Ith between 500,000 and 900,000 GPD already committed to use. As such, the OUA has a ininirnum of 300,000 GPD of excess capacity. The OUA has stated that plans are underway to construct an addition to the plant which will permit an additional 3 MGD. This is expected to be done by the summer of 2008. The applicant would need to verify that the OUA would have capacity to serve the proposed development. Solid Waste Disposal: The City has an adopted LOS of 13 Ibs/capita/day and 3 years available landfill capacity for solid waste disposal. The impacts of the proposed development will be minimal as the uses will be Commercial in nature. Drainage/Stormwater Management: The adopted LOS for drainage is Design Storm, 25-year/24 hour duration. The proposed development is required to meet all conditions and standards required by the City of Okeechobee and the Florida Administrative Code. There should be at least conceptual understanding of how Stormwater discharge will be handled for what is obviously going to be the creation of impervious areas. Recreation and Open Space: The adopted LOS for recreation and open space is 3 acres/1,000 persons. The proposed development is Commercial in nature and is not expected to impact parks. Roads and Traffic Circulation: The City's minimum LOS standard for principal arterial roadways is LOS C. All other roads have an LOS D. This LOS must be maintained on the site for all roadways serving the site. The subject property is serviced by SR 70. The applicant has not provided a traffic analysis which demonstrates how the proposed Development would impact the surrounding roadway network. Objective 9 and its corresponding 3 4 � a a � £ :.7177777,7Tmay 23 2006 -band Planning t..,S. �-, v. w' ^� �r_,S l r �,, � i . �,, t 'u -" a�,° s �5'ai -<y a: ,...s.. Agency - FGNIIx Page l; of 13 - � ;v.,:h,.;,�, s_,�':�-`»:.s.. �' �z�..:' ACTION �. 1SCUS� ' � -'� � i. ��� VII. LARGE _ ., .,IOC } 3 SCALE PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. �..=��e� A. Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-CI-001 continued Planning Staff Report Comprehensive Plan Analysis: (B) continued: policies (Traffic Circulation Element) states Objective 9: The City of Okeechobee shall encourage efforts to curtail future level of service standard deterioration, particularly along US Highway 441 and SR 70. Policy 9.1: To assist in improving level of service standards, Commercial redevelopment efforts shall be prioritized to mitigate existing "strip" Commercial sites. Policy 9.2: Access points to Commercial centers shall be limited, where feasible, to decrease traffic congestions along City arterials and other roadways. Policy 9.3: Efforts shall be made, where appropriate, to separate local traffic from through traffic in Commercial areas. The applicant must submit a traffic analysis which demonstrates that the above polices will be met and that the Level of Service would not be degraded for the surrounding roads. Such analysis should include the anticipated trips from the Commercial property to the east. (C) Compatibility with Adjacent and Nearby Land Uses. The proposed change to Commercial has been stated by the applicant that it would not negatively impact surrounding properties. The proposed type of Commercial uses and usage of buffers should bed err ionstrated before compatibility can be assumed. (D) Compliance with the Specific Standards of the Plan_ The Goals, Objectives and Policies (as they are intended} in the C'ornprehensive Plan would allo\% feu an ;Arnenilment to (hc Future Land t<e "al)CoCommercial should )itT;11 ility icceptal>le ili tI�I(tic_ se«cr. «ater <�nd ���'cr<<II �i�c.�l f��<<sihili(� resnl�ing. tmin ttEi� is designation, can be shown h� >upp,iting data and analysis. Planning Staff Report Analysis and Conclusions: Staff does not recommend for approval of applicant's request to amend the Future Land Use Map to Commercial. Mr. LaRue added that he is willing to work with the applicant, however additional information is needed such as a traffic impact analysis, stormwater plan and the fiscal anlaysis. There were several surrounding property owners in attendance and spoke their concerns regarding noise, odors, traffic, and buffers so they will still have their natural surrounding environment. These items are addressed during site plan review. Planning Staff advised that any development would be required to address the concerns at that time and would have to comply with all regulations. Mr. lion Hackl, property owner, addressed the Agency by explaining that retail is the highest and best use for this property, it will increase the tax base and create more jobs. Mr. Glenn Stroud, an associate of Mr. Hackl's, added, without the land use change, developers nor retailers, will not look at or consider the property seriously. The traffic study will not be cost feasible without the certainty of the land use or rezoning change. May 23, 2006 - Land Planning Agency - Page 9 of 13 VII. LARGE SCALE PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. A. Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future ],and Use Map Amendment In conclusion, Mr. Hackl asked that the Agency consider the Large Scale Map Amendment with special Application No. 06-CI-001 continued 11 conditions that they have the information NVv-. LaRue is requesting by the transmittal meeting with the City Council, tentatively set for August 1, 2006. B. Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-CI-002. Consider a recommendation to the City Council to change the land use designation from Single Family (SF) to Multiple Family (MF) for vacant unplatted property located South of Southeast 8' Street and West of Taylor Creek and is approximately 32.97 acre(s). The application was submitted by Thomas Close of CBC corporation on behalf of property owner Frank Altobello - City Planning Consultant. Agency Burroughs moved to find the application consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and to recommend approval to City Council to change the land use designation from Single Family (SF) to Commercial (C) for Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-CI-001, with the contingency that the applicant provides the additional information as requested by the transmittal meeting with the (-'ity Council; seconded by Agency Member Maxweii. Agency Member Hoover left the Chamber room at 7:45 p_m_ Chairperson Ledferd appointed Alternate Member O'Connor to a voting position in her absence. VOTE O'(`c►��ott - LLDFHZD - Y b:A MAX -WELL - YEA JUAREZ - YEA BURROUGHS - YEA JOHNS - YEA MOTION CARRIED. By request of Member Johns, Chairperson Ledferd called for a rive minute recess at 8:30 p.m. The meeting resumed at 8:35 p.m. Board Member Maxwell stated for the record that he would be abstaining from voting as the applicant, CBC Corporation, retained his law firm to provide legal representation. Mr. LaRue briefly reviewed the Staff Report as follows: Planning Staff Report Comprehensive Plan Analysis: The City Council and Local Planning Agency are required to address certain uses in conjunction with the Comprehensive Plan, which may be categorized as follows: LARUE PLANNING & MANAGEMENT SERVICES, Inc. 1375 Jackson Street, Suite 206 Fort Myers, Florida 33901-2845 239-334-3366 • FAX: 239-334-6384 e-mail: larue-planning @ att.net Memo To: City Council From: James G. LaRue, AICP Date: July 28, 2006 Subject: Update for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Large Scale request from H2O Holdings Staff had not recommended the change from Single Family to Commercial for this property in a prior staff report primarily because there were unanswered questions concerning traffic impacts, sewer capacity and overall lack of understanding of the effects of this use on the surrounding neighborhood. The Land Planning Board, as the Local Planning Agency, recommended approval of this request subject to having support data and analysis being provided at the Council Hearing. Staff has been in touch with consultants preparing a traffic analysis and associated reports. Hopefully, we will be able to analyze this information prior to the August 1 S` hearing. JGL:glp 1375 Jackson Street, Suite 206 Fort Myers, Florida 33901-2845 Phone: 239-334-3366 Fax: 239-334-6384 Email: larue-planning(d),,att.net REVISED Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: H2O Holdings, LLC 06-C1-001 General Information 7 Existing. Proposed Property Control 2-15-37-35-OA00-00008-0000 and Number 2-15-37-35-OA00-00007-0000 Future Land,Use se Single Family -o. inerci�l Deslgnatl©rn Zoning District RMH, CHV, & H To be determined Acreage 16.24 16.24 Density 4 du/ac NA Access SR 70 Same Legal Description: Parcel A: A parcel of land lying in Section 15, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE at the Southeast corner of said Section 15; thence along the South line of said Section 15, S.89°02'40"W., 486.26 feet to a point on the South line of Section 15; thence N.00°57'20"W., 63.49 feet; thence N.00°16'59"W., 250.90 feet; thence S.89°54'49"W., 186.29 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue along said line S.89°54'49"W., 674.15 feet; thence N.00°13'56"W., 943.80 feet; thence N.89°10'00"E., 336.67 feet; thence N.00°15'28"W., 49.99 feet; thence N.89°09'59"W., 336.64 feet; thence S.00°16'59"E., 1002.57 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 15.05 acres, more or less. Parcel B: A parcel of land lying in Section 15, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE at the Southeast corner of said Section 15; thence along the South line of said Section 15, S.89°02'40"W., 486.26 feet to a point on the South line of Section 15; thence N.00°57'20"W., 63.49 feet; thence N.00°l6'59"W., 250.90 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence S.89°54'49"W., 186.29 feet; thence N.00°13'56"W., 276.78 feet; Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: H2O Holdings, LLC 06-C1-001 thence N.89°02'40"E., 186.30 feet; thence S.00°16'59"E., 279.61 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 1.19 acres, more or less. The matter before the Local Planning Agency and the City Council is a request to change the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) for a portion of the above described property from Single Family to Commercial. The request is more specifically shown on Exhibit A attached. Since the property in question is over 10 acres (16.24 acres), this application qualifies under Florida Statutes 163 as a "Large -Scale Amendment" to the Plan. The Table below summarizes the Future Land Use of the adjoining properties as well as the zoning classifications. Given the property's proximity to SR 70, in addition to the existing land uses of the abutting properties, the proposed Commercial development appears consistent with the area to the east, but it is difficult to assess the total impact of the combined Commercial with the neighborhood to the west. North: FLUM Classification: Single Family Zoning District: RMH Existing Land Use: ResidentialNetcant East: FLUM Classification: Commercial Zoning District;:, GHV Existing Land Use: Commercial Application Description: The site is currently vacant and undeveloped and within the RMH, Holding, and CHV Zoning Districts. Obviously the applicant is proposing Commercial uses for the property, but an exact use has not been determined at this time. As such, before the applicant can receive a change in 2 Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: H2O Holdings, LLC 06-C1-001 Future Land Use for this site the City must have an idea of how the applicant plans to develop the property. Comprehensive Plan Analysis: The City Council and Local Planning Agency are required to address certain uses in conjunction with the Comprehensive Plan, which may be categorized as follows: A. Consistency with the Land Use Categories and Plan Policies. The Comprehensive Plan describes the Commercial Future Land Use category in the Future Land Use Element. It states: Policy 2.1(e): Commercial. Permitted uses include office, retail, automotive, wholesale, and related Commercial activities. Also permitted are public facilities. Commercial development shall not exceed a floor area ratio of 3.00 and the maximum impervious surface for development within this category shall not exceed 85% of the site. Under the proposed Commercial Future Land Use category, the applicant would be allowed to develop the subject property with the Retail/Commercial uses. However, there is more data necessary to be shown illustrating that this presently designated residential area should become an intensive retail high impact location. B. Concurrency of Adequate Public Facilities Before this request can be approved, the City must consider the proposed impact on public facilities. Potable Water Supply: The adopted LOS for potable water is 114 gpcpd. The subject property is within the service area of the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA) who provides this service to City residents. The anticipated flow for the subject property has not been provided by the applicant, this data is required. The existing capacity of the water supply plant is 6 MGD, with 2.5 MGD already committed to use. As such, the OUA has an excess of 4.5 MGD. The applicant would need to submit a letter to the City which discusses the anticipated flow for the development and that the OUA would have capacity to serve the proposed development. There should also be a deduction of water use for already approved developments because the cumulative impact has not been contemplated if all approved developments are built. Wastewater Disposal: The adopted LOS for wastewater disposal is 130 gallons/ capita/day. The subject property is within the service area of the Okeechobee Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: H2O Holdings, LLC 06-C1-001 Utility Authority (OUA). Impacts for the subject property would be cannot be determined at this time. The existing capacity of the wastewater treatment plant is 1.2 MGD, with between 800,000 and 900,000 GPD already committed to use. As such, the OUA has a minimum of 300,000 GPD of excess capacity. The OUA has stated that plans are underway to construct an addition to the plant which will permit an additional 3 MGD. This is expected to be done by the summer of 2008. The applicant would need to verify that the OUA would have capacity to serve the proposed development. Solid Waste Disposal: The City has an adopted LOS of 13 lbs/capita/day and 3 years available landfill capacity for solid waste disposal. The impacts of the proposed development will be minimal as the uses will be Commercial in nature. Drainage/Stormwater Management: The adopted LOS for drainage is Design Storm, 25-year/24 hour duration. The proposed development is required to meet all conditions and standards required by the City of Okeechobee and the Florida Administrative Code. There should be at least a conceptual understanding of how stormwater discharge will be handled for what is obviously going to be the creation of impervious areas. Recreation and Open Space: The adopted LOS for recreation and open space is 3 acres/1,000 persons. The proposed development is Commercial in nature and is not expected to impact parks. Roads and Traffic Circulation: The City's minimum LOS standard for principal arterial roadways is LOS C. All other roads have an LOS D. This LOS must be maintained on the site for all roadways serving the site. The subject property is serviced by SR 70. The applicant has not provided a traffic analysis which demonstrates how the proposed Development would impact the surrounding roadway network. Objective 9 and its corresponding policies (Traffic Circulation Element) states: Objective 9: The City of Okeechobee shall encourage efforts to curtail future level of service standard deterioration, particularly along US Highway 441 and SR 70. Policy 9.1: To assist in improving level of service standards, Commercial redevelopment efforts shall be prioritized to mitigate existing "strip" Commercial sites. Policy 9.2: Access points to Commercial centers shall be limited, where feasible, to decrease traffic congestions along City arterials and other roadways. Policy 9.3: Efforts shall be made, where appropriate, to separate local traffic from through traffic in Commercial areas. 11 Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: H2O Holdings, LLC O6-C1-001 The applicant must submit a traffic analysis which demonstrates that the above polices will be met and that the Level of Service would not be degraded for the surrounding roads. Such analysis should include the anticipated trips from the Commercial property to the east. C. Compatibility with Adjacent and Nearby Land Uses. The proposed change to Commercial has been stated by the applicant that it would not negatively impact surrounding properties. The proposed type of Commercial uses and usage of buffers should be demonstrated before compatibility can be assumed. D. Compliance with the Specific Standards of the Plan. The Goals, Objectives and Policies (as they are intended) in the Comprehensive Plan would allow for an Amendment to the Future Land Use Map to Commercial if compatibility, acceptable impacts on traffic, sewer, water and overall fiscal feasibility resulting from this re -designation, can be shown by supporting data and analysis. The applicant's supporting data and analysis do not presently support Commercial uses at this location. It is recommended that the LPA and City Council find the application to be inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan until the applicant submits the following information: 1. Traffic analysis; 2. Water and sewer analysis for the proposed development; and 3. Discusses the type of Commercial uses to be developed on the site as some levels of intensity might be appropriate while some uses would not; 4. Demonstrate the Fiscal impacts for this Plan Amendment that would qualify this Amendment as being fiscally feasible under Florida Statutes. Attachments to this Staff Report include a copy of the Future Land Use Map indicating the location of the subject property. Assessment and Conclusions Staff did not recommend for approval of applicant's request to amend the Future Land Use Map to Commercial. 5 Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: H2O Holdings, LLC 06-C1-001 On May 23, 2006, the Land Planning Agency recommended for approval of the applicant's request contingent upon the applicant providing the following additional information before the August 1, 2006 City Council transmittal meeting. 1. Potable Water Issue: The anticipated flow for the subject property has not been provided. We need a determination of how much potable water the entire site is expected to demand. Submit a letter to the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA) to determine whether the OUA will have the capacity to serve the proposed development. The response should take into consideration the existing capacity of the water supply plant, how much is already committed to use, and a cumulative impact for already approved development. 2. Wastewater Issue: The anticipated flow for wastewater has not been determined. As with the potable water issue, a determination of wastewater flows should be given to the OUA. As you know, the excess capacity of the wastewater treatment plant is less than 300,000 gallons per day (GPD), but until the expansion to the plant is completed we need to know if the OUA will have the capacity to handle your commercial development. 3. Drainage/Stormwater Management Issue: Because of the amount of impervious areas which is customary with commercial uses, we need an idea of how stormwater discharge will be handled on the site. Drainage plans can be submitted during the site plan review phase of development, but for now we need a statement which will discuss, for example, possible detention areas, connecting culverts or outfall structures which will manage surface water on the site. 4. Traffic Issue: We also requested that you submit a traffic analysis which demonstrates how the proposed development would impact the surrounding roadway network. The study must contain quantitative analysis dealing with the impacts of the proposed commercial development throughout the short-term planning timeframe (5-years) and the long term planning timeframe (I 0-years). It is suggested that this be done for the roadway segments within a 3-mile radius of the subject property. In addition, the analysis must take into consideration the adopted level of service (LOS) standard for the surrounding roads, especially SR 70, and how the proposed development will impact the LOS. Submitted by: James G. LaRue, AICP July 2006 fel LOT AREA =21.14±A RETAIL = 200,000 SF ± PARKING = 650 CARS ± 0 75' 150' 300' r PARKING PARKING r iA STATE ROUTE 70 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN: OKEECHOBEE COMMONS OKEECHOBEE CITY, FL H2O1dings LLC. Palm Beach Gardens, Florida July 18, 2006 LBFH Project No. 06-0162 Report of Supplemental Information ' In Support of an Application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment ' City of Okeechobee Application No. 06-CI-001 Prepared for: ' H2O1dings, LLC 233 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 3000 Chicago, IL 60601 Prepared by: ' LBFH, Inc. A Boyle Engineering Company ' 421 N.W. 3rd Street ' Okeechobee, Florida 34972 (863) 763-8999 (863) 763-6692 (fax) ' July 2006 ' PA06-0162\Permit\city\corapl plan - letter report.doc LIST OF EXHIBITS AND APPENDICES Exhibits A — Location Map B — Conceptual Site Plan C — Topo Quad Map Agaendices 1 — Water Capacity Request Letter (a) and Response (b) 2 — Wastewater Capacity Request Letter (a) and Response (b) 3 — SFWMD Wetland Correspondence 4 — Traffic Impact Analysis PA06-0162\Permit\city\comp1 plan - letter report.doc ftb ' INC. c N� L)iTrvc (_IVH I NGNFIRS. July 25, 2006 St!RVFY016 RS ' City of Okeechobee Attn: Mr. Jim LaRue, Planning Director 55 S.E. 3rd Avenue ' Okeechobee, Florida 34972 ' RE: H2O1dings, LLC Property civil Proposed Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment AGRICULTURAL City of Okeechobee Application No. 06-CI-001 WATER RESOURCES WATER & WASTEWATER Dear Mr. LaRue: TRANSPORTATION SURVEYING x tiIAPPING I am writing, on behalf of Mr. Don Hackl (applicant), in response to a GIs memorandum from Ms. Ladaysha King dated July 6, 2006. Based on that ' memorandum, it is our understanding that the Land Planning Agency of the City of Okeechobee approved the above -referenced application subject to submittal of certain additional information. The purpose of this ' letter, and its associated attachments, is to provide that additional information. Specifically, this letter report will address the following items: potable water, wastewater, drainage / stormwater management, and ' traffic. The subject parcel is located on State Road 70, in the vicinity of Southeast 10th Avenue. Please see attached Exhibit A — Project Location Map. Top aide in review of the application and these supplemental materials, the applicant has provided a conceptual site plan illustrating what the proposed use may entail — please see Exhibit B — Conceptual ' Site Plan. "Partners for Results Value by Design" Potable Water Issue An analysis of available water infrastructure and capacity is based on the ' following: Flow Estimates: ' Anticipated daily water needs are estimated by calculating projected wastewater flows from Chapter 64E-6, Florida Administrative Code, as follows: ' Proposed Gross Floor Flow Criteria Flow Justification Use Area (gpd) Office 27,000 sq. ft. 15 gpd per 100 sf 4,050 Ch. 64-E6, FAC Retail 163,000 sq. ft. 0.1 gpd per sf 16,300 Ch. 64-E6, FAC Restaurant 10,000 sq. ft. 240 gpd per 100 sf 24,000 Ch. 64-E6, FAC TOTAL 44,350 Based on an assumption of 6 seats per 100 sq. ft. gross floor area. 421 N.W.3"Street Okeechobee, FL. 34972 (863) 763-8999 FAX: (863) 763-6692 P:\06-0162\Permit\city\compl plan - letter report.doc Based on the above table, the development would generate an estimated total ' wastewater flow of 44,350 gallons per day. Typically, wastewater flows are less than potable water demand by a factor of 0.8. So, anticipated potable water demand would be 44,350 / 0.8, or 55,438 gpd. Average daily flows and peak flows are based on an ' assumed nine hour business day and a peaking factor of 2.5: • Average Flow = 55,438 gpd x (1 day/9 hrs) x (1 hr/60 min) = 103 gpm ' Peak Flow = 103 gpm x 2.5 = 267 gpm It is also anticipated that fire flow will be required of 500 to 1000 gallons per minute (to ' be determined by the Fire Marshall at permitting. ' Infrastructure: This element of our analysis concerns the availability of infrastructure at or near the project site. It is our understanding that the following facilities are available: • An existing 12" ductile iron water main runs along the north side of State Road ' 70, adjacent to the subject property. Based on the existence of these facilities, it is our understanding that water infrastructure ' is immediately available to the site. Capacity: ' On behalf of the applicant, LBFH submitted a letter to the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA) requesting confirmation that adequate water capacity is available to serve the proposed use. A copy of that letter, along with the response letter from OUA, is attached ' as Appendices 1 a and 1 b, respectively. According to the letter from OUA, adequate water capacity will be available to the subject site based on the estimated development schedule. ' Wastewater Issue ' An analysis of available wastewater infrastructure and capacity is based on the following: ' Flow Estimates: Anticipated wastewater needs are based on the following: Proposed Gross Floor Flow Criteria Flow Justification Use Area (gpd) Office 27,000 sq. ft. 15 gpd per 100 sf 4,050 Ch. 64-E6, FAC Retail 163,000 sq. ft. 0.1 gpd per sf 16,300 Ch. 64-E6, FAC ' Restaurant 10,000 sq. ft. 240 gpd per 100 sf 24,000 Ch. 64-E6, FAC TOTAL 44,350 Based on an assumption of 6 seats per 100 sq. ft. gross floor area. ' Based on the above table, the development would generate an estimated total wastewater flow of 44,350 gallons per day, or 177.4 equivalent residential connections ' (ERCs). PA06-0162\Permit\city\compl plan - letter report.doc Infrastructure: ' This element of our analysis concerns the availability of infrastructure at or near the project site. It is our understanding that the following facilities are available: • An existing wastewater lift station, owned and operated by OUA (OUA Station ' NE-3), is located near the northwest corner of the subject property, It is our understanding that the lift station currently serves 84 mobile home units in the River Run mobile home park. ' • An existing 4' force main runs along the west boundary of the subject property. It is our understanding that the force main runs from Lift Station NE-3 to existing OUA facilities along State Road 70. ' Based on the existence of these facilities, it is our understanding that wastewater infrastructure is immediately available to the site. ' Capacity: On behalf of the applicant, LBFH submitted a letter to the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA) requesting confirmation that, based on the proposed project schedule ' (approximately 36 months), adequate wastewater capacity is available to serve the proposed use. A copy of that letter, along with the response letter from OUA, is attached as Appendices 2a and 2b, respectively. According to the letter from OUA, adequate ' wastewater capacity will be available to the subject site based on the estimated development schedule. IDrainage Issue ' Existing Conditions: The project site slopes, generally, from east to west toward Taylor Creek, with an average elevation of approximately 20.0 feet NGVD. Please see attached Exhibit C — Topo Quad Map, showing project topography taken from USGS Quadrangle maps. The ' site drains to Taylor Creek via an existing ditch along the north property line, connecting to Taylor Creek via a 36-inch culvert under Northeast 80 Avenue. Proposed Facilities: The project proposes a typical surface water management system meeting the requirements of both the City of Okeechobee and South Florida Water Management ' District (SFWMD). It is anticipated that the system would consist of a wet or dry detention pond, situated in the northwest corner of the property to take advantage of the existing drainage outfall from the site. As stated above, the average site grade is approximately 20.0 feet NGVD, whereas the wet season control elevation of Taylor Creek is held at 13.5 feet NGVD, thereby providing a positive gravity discharge from the proposed water management system. Discharge rates and volumes from the project site ' will be restricted to the allowable discharge criteria set forth by SFWMD for the Taylor Creek Basin, and in no instance will they be greater than in the pre -development condition. ' It should also be noted that, based on a preliminary environmental analysis, no jurisdictional wetlands occur on the project site. A copy of the preliminary wetland report, as well as a confirmation letter provided by SFWMD staff is attached as Appendix 3. I PA06-0162\Permit\city\comp1 plan - letter report.doc Traffic Issue The applicant understands that a project of this magnitude will likely affect the surrounding transportation network. In order to anticipate those potential impacts, a detailed Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared for the proposed use, and is attached as Appendix 4. In summary, the proposed use would require specific improvements to State Road 70 in the immediate vicinity of the proposed project entrance, including turn lanes. While the analysis does indicate that future traffic growth will cause failure to certain nearby segments of roadway, it is not anticipated that the proposed use would cause a Level of Service (LOS) failure on any associated nearby road links or intersections. Rather, the report indicates that overall traffic growth in the region is a much more significant factor than proposed traffic generated by this project. Summary The intent of this letter report and attached exhibits and appendices is to supplement the ' current application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment. We have attempted to fully address the known items of concern, including potable water, wastewater, drainage and traffic. Based on our studies and findings, these elements of the proposed Plan ' Amendment have been adequately addressed. However, if you have any questions, or require any further information, please don't hesitate to contact our office at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your continued assistance in this process. Sincerely, LBFH, Inc. A Boyle Engineering Company i M. Sum er, PE Client Service Manager cc: Don Hackl (applicant) PA06-0162\Permit\city\compl plan - letter report.doc of P PARKING PARKING STATE ROUTE 70 Ps' _CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN: OKEECHOBEE COMMONS OKEECHOBEE CITY, FL 100 0 100 200 SCALE: 1" r 200' EXHIBIT B H201dings LLC. Pai, ,. Reach Gardens. Florida Exhibit C USGS TODOMa 711��SSN 18.9�9:Acres 2.320 Acres is 0 0 p a - vss Qu arte rs full wa n�jh Sob r vICI of I j r ■ IN V a 0 H2Oldings, LLC a W a j?4 1 inch equals 500 feet � Feet 0 250 500 1,000 I I July 17, !40Voj)( Appendix 1 Water Capacity Request Letter and OUA Response NC. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, July 17, 2006 SURVEYORS & MAPPERS Okeechobee Utility Authority Attn: Mr. John Hayford, PE, Executive Director 100 SW 5 h Avenue Okeechobee, Florida 34974 RE: H2O1dings, LLC— Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment City of Okeechobee Application No. 06-CI-001 Request For Water Capacity Determination CIVIL Dear Mr. Hayford, AGRICULTURAL WATER RESOURCES We are writing to request a determination of available water capacity for a Proposed comprehensive plan amendment (CPA) on the following parcels in the WATER & WASTEWATER City of Okeechobee: TRANSPORTATION SURVEYING & MAPPING • 2-15-37-35-OA00-00007-0000 (18.98 acres) GI S • 2-15-37-35-0A00-00008-0000 (2.32 acres) A location map is included as Exhibit "A". The application proposes to amend the Local Comprehensive Plan to allow Commercial Zoning on the 21.3 acre property. The applicant proposes approximately 200,000 square feet of various commercial uses, including professional office and retail space, with a minor portion of the development anticipated as food service. The application for CPA requires that the applicant demonstrate that adequate utilities are available to support the proposed use. In this case, the applicant must demonstrate that adequate water facilities (infrastructure) are available, as well as that adequate system capacity is available to serve the proposed use. By this letter, we are requesting a written statement from OUA that water facilities and capacity are available. Project Schedule: The applicant has provided the following tentative project schedule: • Due Diligence, Zoning: 2 months • Marketing and Negotiations: 2 months "Partners for Results . Planning, Design and Permitting: 14 months Value by Design" . Construction: 18 months • TOTAL: 36 MONTHS Flow Estimates: Anticipated daily water needs are estimated by calculating projected wastewater flows from Chapter 64E-6, Florida Administrative Code, as follows: Proposed Gross Floor Flow Criteria Flow Justification Use Area (gpd) Office 27,000 sq. ft. 15 gpd per 100 sf 4,050 Ch. 64-E6, FAG Retail 163,000 sq. ft 0.1 gpd per sf 16,300 Ch. 64-E6, FAC Restaurant 10,000 sq. ft. 240 gpd per 100 sf 24,000 Ch. 64-E6, FAC TOTAL 44,350 Based on an assumption of 6 seats per 100 sq. ft. gross floor area. Based on the above table, the development would generate an estimated total wastewater flow of 44,350 gallons per day. Typically, wastewater flows are less 421 N.W. 3n'Street than potable water demand by a factor of 0.8. So, anticipated potable water Okeechobee, FL 34972 (863) 763-8999 FAX: (863) 763-6692 P:\06-0162\Petmiticomp planloualwater request letter.doc demand would be 44,350 / 0.8, or 55,438 gpd. Average daily flows and peak flows are based ' on an assumed nine hour business day and a peaking factor of 2.5: • Average Flow = 55,438 gpd x (1 day/9 hrs) x (1 hr/60 min) =103 gpm • Peak Flow = 103 gpm x 2.5 = 257 gpm It is also anticipated that fire flow will be required of 500 to 1000 gallons per minute (to -be determined by the Fire Marshall at permitting. ' Infrastructure Component: This element of our analysis concerns the availability of infrastructure at or near the project site. ' It is our understanding that the following facilities are available: • An existing 12" ductile iron water main runs along the north side of State Road 70, adjacent to the subject property. Based on the existence of these facilities, it is our understanding that water infrastructure is immediately available to the site. ' Capacity Component: Based on the flow estimation table, above, the proposed use would require plant capacity to produce average daily flows of 55,438 gallons per day, or 103 gallons per minute with peak flows of 257 gallons per minute (excluding fire flows). The applicant understands that adequate ' capacity is available at the OUA water treatment plant to serve the proposed use. The applicant also understands that a lack of available capacity is not anticipated in the near future. ' Based on the above information, and per our recent meeting, the applicant requests that you provide a letter of water capacity determination to supplement the application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment. As we discussed, time is of the essence as the capacity determination must be provided to City of Okeechobee staff prior to July 27. Therefore, please ' forward you letter to our office at your earliest possible convenience. Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to our request. If you have any questions, as always, please feel free to call. Sincerely, ' LBFH, Inc. Q9�� I Jeffrey M. Sumner, PE Associate ' cc: Don Hackl (w(o attachments, via fak) file ' PA06-0162\Permit\comp plan\oua\water request letter_doc 7 L 1 OKEECHOBEE UTILITY AUTHORITY 100 S.W. 5th Avenue Okeechobee, Florida 34974-4221 July 18, 2006 Mr. Jeffrey M. Sumner, P.E. LBFH, Inc. 421 NW P Street Okeechobee, Florida 34972 Ref: Water Capacity Request Okeechobee Utility Authority Dear Mr. Sumner: (863) 763-9460 FAX: (863) 763-9036 ' In reference to your letter dated July 17, 2006, requesting the availability of potable water capacity to the subject property, I submit the following information for your use in pursuing the comprehensive plan amendment. ' The Okeechobee Utility Authority owns and operates two water treatment plants: the ground water treatment plant (1 MGD) and the surface water treatment plant ' (51VIGD). Currently, the net combined average daily demand on the OUA system is approximately 2.8 MGD utilizing about 47% of the system capacity. ' As noted in our recent conversations, there is a 12-inch water main along the southerly property line. Based upon the average daily demand for the proposed development indicated in the July 17th letter and current system demand, this ' main should provide the necessary flow and pressure to meet the proposed demand. Further analysis will be required once the fire flow requirements are defined. ' Should you have any other questions, comments or concerns with regards to potable water system capacity, please contact the writer at 863.763.9460. ' Sincerely, ohn F. Hita, P.E. ' Executive Director Okeechobee Utility Authority Appendix 2 Wastewater Capacity Request Letter and OUA Response INC. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, July 17, 2006 SURVEYORS & MAPPERS Okeechobee Utility Authority Attn: Mr. John Hayford, PE, Executive Director 100 SW 5' Avenue Okeechobee, Florida 34974 RE: H2O1dings, LLC— Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment ' City of Okeechobee Application No. 06-CI-001 Request For Wastewater Capacity Determination CIVIL Dear Mr. Hayford, AGRICULTURAL ' WATER RESOURCES We are writing to request a determination of available wastewater capacity for a Proposed comprehensive plan amendment (CPA) on the following parcels in the WATER & WASTEWATER City of Okeechobee: TRANSPORTATION SURVEYING & MAPPING • 2-15-37-35-OA00-00007-0000 (18.98 acres) 0 2-15-37-35-OA00-00008-0000 (2.32 acres) G IS ' A location map is included as Exhibit "A". The application proposes to amend the Local Comprehensive Plan to allow Commercial Zoning on the 21.3 acre ' property. The applicant proposes approximately 200,000 square feet of various commercial uses, including professional office and retail space, with a minor portion of the development anticipated as food service. The application for CPA requires that the applicant demonstrate that adequate utilities are available to ' support the proposed use. In this case, the applicant must demonstrate that adequate wastewater facilities (infrastructure) are available, as well as that adequate system capacity is available to serve the proposed use. By this letter, ' we are requesting a written statement from OUA that wastewater facilities and capacity are available, or will be available based on the proposed project schedule. ' Project Schedule: The applicant has provided the following tentative project schedule: • Due Diligence, Zoning: 2 months "Partners for Results • Marketing and Negotiations: 2 months ' Value by Design" . Planning, Design and Permitting: 14 months • Construction: 18 months • TOTAL: 36 MONTHS Flow Estimates: Anticipated wastewater needs are based on the following: ' Proposed Gross Floor Flow Criteria Use Area Flow Justification (gPd) Office 27,000 sq. ft. 15 gpd per 100 sf 4,050 Ch. 64-E6, FAC Retail 163,000 sq. ft. 0.1 gpd per sf 16,300 Ch. 64-E6, FAC Restaurant 10,000 sq. ft. 240 gpd per 100 sf 24,000 Ch. 64-E6, FAC- TOTAL Based on an assumption of 6 44,350. seats per 100 sq. ft. gross floor area. Based on the above table the development would generate an estimated total. wastewater flow of 44,350 gallons per day, or 177.4 equivalent residential connections (ERCs). 421 N.W. 31Street Okeechobee, FL 34972 ' (863) 763-8999 FAX: (863) 763-6692 P:X06-01621Pemuttcomp planlouftastewater request letter.doc 1 Infrastructure Component: This element of our analysis concerns the availability of infrastructure at or near the project site. It is our understanding that the following facilities are available: • An existing wastewater lift station, owned and operated by OUA (OUA Station NE-3), is located near the northwest corner of the subject property, It is our understanding that the lift station currently serves 84 mobile home units in the River Run mobile home park. ' An existing 4' force main runs along the west boundary of the subject property. It is our understanding that the force main runs from Lift Station NE-3 to existing OUA facilities along State Road 70. Based on the existence of these facilities, it is our understanding that wastewater infrastructure is immediately available to the site. ' Capacity Component: Based on the flow estimation table, above, the proposed use would require plant capacity to accept average daily flows of 44,350 gallons per day. The applicant understands that existing capacity at OUA's wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) is very limited. However, the applicant requests that you make a capacity determination based on the proposed project schedule, above. ' Based on the above information, and per our recent meeting, the applicant requests that you provide a letter of wastewater capacity determination to supplement the application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment As we' discussed, time is of the essence as the capacity determination must be provided to City of Okeechobee staff prior to July 27. Therefore, please forward you letter to our office at your earliest possible convenience. Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to our request If you have any questions, as ' always, please feel free to call. Sincerely, LBFH, Inc. ' JeffreyM. Sumner, umner, PE Associate icc: Don Hackl (w/o attachments, via fax) file u ' PA06-0162\Permit\comp plan\oua\wastewater request letter.dm r1l OKEECHOBEE UTILITY AUTHORITY 100 S.W. 5th Avenue Okeechobee, Florida 34974-4221 July 18, 2006 Mr. Jeffrey M. Sumner, P.E. LBFH, Inc. 421 NW 3`d Street Okeechobee, Florida 34972 (863) 763-9460 FAX: (863) 763-9036 ' Ref: Wastewater Capacity Request Okeechobee Utility Authority Dear Mr. Sumner: In reference to your letter dated July 17, 2006, requesting the availability of ' wastewater treatment capacity to the subject property, I submit the following information for your use in pursuing the comprehensive plan amendment. ' The Okeechobee Utility Authority owns and operates one regional wastewater treatment plant: the Cemetery Road Wastewater Treatment Facility (1 MGD). Currently, the annual average daily flow to the treatment facility is approximately 0.86 ' MGD utilizing about 86% of the system capacity. As noted in our recent conversations, there is gravity collection, force main and pump station on the adjoining property. Based upon further development of the proposed land use, this ' system may be utilized in your final site plan. However, upgrades to the pump station may be required (i.e. impellers, pumps, etc...). ' The Okeechobee Utility Authority is currently permitting an expansion to the Cemetery Road facility. At this time, construction is anticipated to be complete within ' 24-30 months of the date of this letter. Until construction actually begins and progresses to a satisfactory point, the completion date provided at this time is preliminary and provided for planning purposes only. ' Should you have any other questions, comments or concerns with regards to the wastewater system capacity, please contact the writer at 863.763.9460. ' Sincerely, n F. Hayford, . Executive Director Okeechobee Utility Authority Appendix 3 SFWMD Wetland Correspondence SOUTH RoRIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT • OKEECHOBEE SERVICE CENTER 205 North Parrott Avenue, Suite 201, Okeechobee, FL 34972-2916 ' (863) 462-5260 • FL WATS 1-800-250-4200 • Suncom 761-5260 Fax (863) 462-5269 ' www.sfwmd.gov/org/exo/okeechobee/oldndexl.hbml Environmental Resource Regulation Pre -Application No. 040224-1 ' March 3, 2004 Mr. D. Robert Willson 410 SE 2"d Avenue Okeechobee, FL 34974 Subject: Willson Property Okeechobee County —S15/ 37S/R35E Dear Mr. Willson: ' The District offers the following in response to your request for a determination of wetland boundaries and other • surface waters located within the subject property. A site visit was conducted on March 3, 2004. Based on the site visit and other site information, the 18.98-acre and 2.5-acre parcels contain no wetlands as defined by Chapter 62-340 Florida Administrative Code (FAC). The black line on the attached aerial indicates the project boundaries. ' This correspondence is an informal pre -application wetland determination pursuant to Chapter 373, Florida Statutes. It does not bind the District, its agents or employees, nor does it convey any legal rights, expressed or implied. Persons obtaining this informal pre -application wetland determination are not entitled to rely upon it for purposes of compliance with provision of law or ' District rules. A binding wetland determination may be obtained by petitioning the South Florida Water Management District for a wetland declaratory statement pursuant to FAG Rule 62-340 or by applying for an Environmental Resource permit. Although no wetlands, other surface waters or potentially other areas of the property not jurisdictional under State rules were identified, there may be wetlands and/or other waters of the United States under federal rules. Dredging or filling in such areas may require a Department.of ' Army (DA) permit. Receipt of a state or local government permit does not obviate the need to obtain a DA permit prior to commencing work. For more information about the DA Regulatory Program, you may access the Corps' website at: hftp://www.saj.usace.army.mil/peimitrindex.htmi. You may also contact the local Corps regulatory office for additional information, at one of the following numbers: 772-781-8085, 772-781-8087, or 772-781-8088. A file has been set up at the Okeechobee Service Center office with pre -application materials. If you have any further questions, please contact me at (863) 462-5260, ext. 3018. Sincerely, A �; o' ' jyBoiscTair Senior Regulatory Professional Okeechobee Service Center Cc: Greg Sawka (letter and aerial) ACOE- Stuart Regulatory Office (letter and aerial) GovERAwG BOARD FYECUTIFE OFFICE ' Nicoliis J. Gutierrez, Jr., Esq., Chair Michael Collins Kevin McCarty Henry Dean, Executive Director Pamela Brooks -Thomas, vice --Chair Hugh M. English Harkley R. Thornton Irela M. Bagu(i Lennart E. Lindahl, P.E. Trudi K. Williams, P.E. ' DIsTRICTHEADQUARTERS.' 3301 Gun Club Road, P.O. Box 24680, West Palm Beach, FL 33416-4680 (561) 686-8800 • FL WATS 1-800-432-2045 Southeast Soil & En vironm en tal Service, in c. 4511 S. Indian River Dr -,Ft. Pierce, FI 34982 ' February 04, 2004 TO: files FROM: Gregory J. Sawka, CPSS PROJECT: Soil Evaluations & Site Feasibility 20acres, SR 70 parcel, across from Post Office Okeechobee, FL Preliminary site inspections were conducted in March during periods of moderate precipitation on the 20 ac parcel. Inspections were conducted in ' coordination with D.R.Wilson Land Development, Okeechobee, FL. Field investigations included soil borings, hydrologic and vegetative ' assessments to evaluate hydric soil conditions, extent of potential wetland area and site disturbance. ' SUMMARY of FINDINGS The project area is locatedon Hwy 70 in Okeechobbe across from the post office. Areas consist of improved pasture. Soils are indicative of former ' Lake bottom sandy sediment. Both upland and wetland plants were observed. However, due to surrounding development and changes in drainage the parcel no longer exhibits characteristics of jurisdictional ' wetlands. Exotic vegetation dominantly Brazilian Pepper, was of minor extent. No areas of site contamination was noted I the pasture area. ' Agency (SFWMD) field review verification was conducted on February 25 and March 3ro. No wetland were found to occur within the project area. The following page includes a topographic map of the area and aerial photo of the subject parcel. L 'aa',e+b �'We Ati y K :5""�R'�.`�ss���F�+..- l��t __ �����,�. ... _ ,�:.-��,. •.� .�:.4drA.,,'�'4�"rii,,::. ^,t. �i�-_ .`l P 9 " / .. r n,t ��@ �' e ✓ � n Appendix 4 Traffic Impact Analysis INC. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS& MAPPERS 1 CIVIL AGRICULTURAL WATER RESOURCES WATER & WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION SURVEYING AND MAPPING 1 ' "Partners for Results Value by Design' 3550Corporate Palmlm City, FL 3499090 (772) 28"883 (772)286-3925 —.Ibth.mm TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared by: Donald E. Holloman PE Reg # 37496 7/24/06 For Okeechobee Commons Prepared for: HZOldings, LLC Okeechobee, Florida 1 INC. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS & MAPPERS ' CIVIL AGRICULTURAL WATER RESOURCES WATER & WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION SURVEYING AND MAPPING 1 ' "Partners for Results Value by Design' ' 3550 Corporate Palmlm City, FL 3499090 (T72) 2M3883 (772) 286-3925 w .Ibfh.com TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Site Data 1 Project Traffic 2 Trip Generation 2 Trip Distribution and Assignment 2 Future Traffic Conditions 3 Design Year 3 Design Year Traffic 3 Roadway Capacity 4 Roadway Improvements 5 Committed Trips 5 Project Traffic Volumes 5 Roadway Link Analysis 6 2006 Analysis — Existing Conditions 6 2006 Analysis — With Project Added 8 2009 Analysis — Without Project 9 2009 Analysis — With Project Added 10 Conclusions 11 Recommendations 11 lbfb ' . CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS& MAPPERS F1 ' CIVIL AGRICULTURAL WATER RESOURCES ' WATER & WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION SURVEYING AND MAPPING ' "Partners for Results Value by Design' ' 3550Corporate Pl Palmlm City, FL 3499090 (772) 285-3883 (772) 286-3925 —.lbfi.00m Introduction LBFH has been retained to prepare a traffic impact report for a proposed development located on the north side of SR 70 at 10th Avenue. The site is located such that its main entrance is opposite 10th Avenue. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of the proposed development on adjacent roadway links and to determine if there are specific traffic improvements that are necessary in order to maintain acceptable levels of service in the vicinity of the project. Site Data The site is located on the north side of SR 70 at 10th Avenue. The initial development plan includes approximately 200,000 square feet of space. Approximately 165,000 would be commercial retail space, approximately 25,000 general office space and 10,000 in restaurant use. Access plans for the site indicate that the main entrance would be an extension of 10tn Avenue and would be signalized as the north leg of the existing traffic signal. Exhibit 1 is a map of the area depicting the project location. A copy of the proposed site plan for this project is included as Exhibit 2. SR 70 in this vicinity is a four lane divided facility. Left turn lanes are provided in the center median of this existing facility. 10th Avenue is a two lane facility that serves a residential area along the south side of SR 70. The Okeechobee Post Office is located on the east side of 10th Avenue and much of the traffic using the existing intersection here is associated with this facility. SR 98/441 (Parrott Avenue) is also a four lane divided facility with turn lanes in the median. Traffic volume data for the year 2004 was obtained from FDOT for State roads in the vicinity and current data was collected at selected intersections and roadway links within the general vicinity of the site. The data was factored to represent peak conditions for 2006 Exhibit 3 is a tabulation of the data utilized for this analysis. The data from FDOT is taken from the 2004 summary report of traffic information state wide. Project Traffic Trip Generation Trip generation for the proposed site was developed utilizing the 7th Edition of the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. The table below tabulates the daily, AM and PM peak hour trip generation data for the proposed development. Okeechobee Commons Summary of Mufti -Use Trip Generation Average Weekday Driveway Volumes Total Trips Net Trips 24 Hour AM Pk Hour PM Pk Hour 24 Hour AM Pk Hour PM Pk Hour TMWay Percent Tv Way Land Use Size Volume Enter Exit Enter Exit New Trips Volume Enter Exit Enter Exit 1000 SF Shopping Center 165 9404 129 82 418 453 0.64 6019 83 52 268 290 General Office Building 25 459 54 7 18 89 0.75 344 41 5 14 67 Restaurant 10 1272 60 55 67 43 0.77 979 46 42 52 33 Total 200 11135 243 144 503 585 7342 170 99 334 390 Included in this table is an estimate of the percent new trips that are likely to be associated with the proposed development. This factor accounts for the fact that some of the traffic that will be associated with the proposed development is contained in the existing traffic stream. The percentage values are taken from other agency data where impact assessments have been made. We think that they are reasonable for use in this instance. The PM peak hour is the most intense with a total of 390 trips expected to exit the site and 334 trips to enter the site. Trip Distribution and Assignment The overall distribution of trips into and away from the project site will be influenced by socio-economic conditions in the communities that surround the area. The conditions in the Okeechobee area are changing in the current climate of growth in the south Florida region. Population density, job base, recreational amenities and travel time were utilized as factors impacting the final trip distribution estimate. While the population of Okeechobee County is relatively low, it is surrounded by areas where population is growing and the growth in these surrounding areas will be an influence on growth in the Okeechobee region. \\pc\Emp1oyee\don-h\06.0162 Okee Commons\A. Report\TIA Okee Commons.doc 2 � lb(h The graphic below provides a detail of the anticipated project traffic distribution to the surrounding roadway network. Future Traffic Conditions Design Year Based upon the size and complexity of the proposed project, a design year of 2009 has been selected as an appropriate year to expect that this project will be completed. Design Year Traffic The growth of traffic in the area was estimated by combining data from the MOT Traffic Information 2004 data set along with recent trends in the area. Based on the data from FDOT, forecasts for traffic growth in the area for the next ten years is likely to be just under 2% per year. This same data package indicated that growth over the past ten years to be just under 3% per year. Although the past 4 years experienced growth at a slower rate, it was felt that a more conservative approach to the estimate should be made in order to ensure that under estimates are avoided. \\pc\Emp1oyee\don-h\06.0162 Okee Commons\A. Report\TIA Okee Commons.doc 3 hc Consequently, a growth rate for the expected life of this project was selected at 2.5% per year. Turning movement data collected at the intersections was compared to machine collected data and traffic volumes were adjusted through the area to reflect continuity of volumes. From this data, a set of traffic volumes for the current year was developed for the roadway network. These data were used for detailed corridor and intersection analyses. A summary of these turning data is included in Exhibit 4. For the planning years of 2007 through 2009, the daily traffic volumes for the roadway links were factored to reflect the growth anticipated through the years. A 2.5% annual growth rate was applied along with a peak season factor in each instance. The graphic below details the anticipated growth in traffic using the adjacent roadways over the projected life of this project. Route From To 2004 AADT 2007 Year 2008 2009 SR 70 Parrott 8th 34,000 41,754 42,669 43,607 SR 70 11th SR 710 23,000 26,971 27,590 28,225 SR 70 SR 98 Parrott 17,200 20,505 20,968 21,443 441 SR 70 6th 25,500 28,709 29,395 30,099 441 21st SR 70 30,000 33,995 34,803 35,631 Roadway Capacity The ability of roadways to accommodate specific volumes of traffic at certain speeds and with measured delays is generally termed as its "capacity". Capacity is typically given a letter designation from A to F denoting acceptable to unacceptable. The Generalized Tables from FDOT are typically used as an initial basis for making a determination as to whether or not operating conditions will be acceptable under specific volumes of traffic. A copy of the section of the Generalized Tables used for this project is included as Exhibit 5. The table below summarizes the general level of service thresholds for the roadways in the vicinity of the project. The capacities indicated in this table are for Level of Service (LOS) D. While none of the roadway segments exceed the assigned capacity threshold, the segment of SR 70 east of Parrott and SR-441 Route From To 2004 AADT Service Volume AADT PK Dir SR 70 Parrott 8th 34,000 34,200 1,810 SR 70 11th SR 710 23,000 34,200 1,810 SR 70 SR 98 Parrott 17,200 34,200 1,810 441 SR 70 6th 25,500 34,200 1,810 441 21st SR 70 30,000 34,200 1,810 approaching SR-70 are both nearing the noted threshold. \\pc\Employee\don-h\06.0162 Okee Commons\A. Report\TIA Okee Commons.doc 11 � lbfh 71 The values provided in the generalized tables are derived from a specific set of operating conditions that could be expected to be used where traffic is operating at non -critical levels of service. Actual operating conditions are frequently different and a detailed arterial analysis may indicate that the roadway has an operating capacity above the limit given in the generalized tables. Roadway improvements FDOT currently has no plans for major roadway improvements in this general area. A project has recently been completed on SR 70 that continued the four lane treatment to the west to a point just west of SR 98. There are long range plans being made for improvements to SR 70 in the region as an element of the intra-state highway program. No immediate improvement plans were found, however, within the area potentially impacted by this project. Committed Trips Traffic that is associated with approved projects that are not yet being constructed must be accounted for in the impact analysis for the design year. There are no projects that have been identified within the influence area of this proposed project that would have an impact that is not adequately addressed in the overall growth rate for traffic in the area. Project Traffic Volumes Traffic volumes from the project have been distributed to the roadway network in accord with information noted previously in this report. This distribution indicates that approximately 17% of the traffic will be destined for points to the north; about 23% to the south; about 27% to the west and north toward Brighton and Lake Placid; and the remainder to the east and south toward Palm Beach County. The table below summarizes the anticipated traffic from the project on the roadway links adjacent to the development site. Project Traffic 2004 Service Volume 7,342 Route From To AADT AADT PK Dir % ADT SR 70 Parrott 8th 34,000 34,200 1,810 70.0% 5,139 SR 70 11th SR 710 23,000 34,200 1,810 30.0% 2,203 SR 70 SR 98 Parrott 17,200 34,200 1,810 27.0% 1,982 441 SR 70 6th 25,500 34,200 1,810 17.0% 1,248 441 21 st SR 70 30,000 34,200 1,810 23.0% 1,689 \\pc\Employee\don-h\06.0162 Okee Commons\A. Report\TIA Okee Commons.doc L Roadway Link Analysis Background traffic for the years 2007, 2008, and 2009 was added to the estimated project traffic in order to determine the likely demand on roadway capacity in each of these years as the project is constructed. The table below provides an initial estimate of the ability of the roadway segments to handle both the normal growth in traffic through the region as well as traffic from the proposed development. Project Traffic 2004 Service Volume 7,342 Year Route From To AADT AADT PK Dir % ADT 2007 2008 2009 SR 70 Parrott 8th 34,000 34,200 1,810 70.0% 5,139 38,670 41,384 43,607 SR 70 11th SR 710 23,000 34,200 1,810 30.0% 2,203 25,650 27,040 28,225 SR 70 SR 98 Parrott 17,200 34,200 1,810 27.0% 1,982 19,315 20,472 21,443 441 SR 70 6th 25,500 34,200 1,810 17.0% 1,248 27,960 29,083 30,099 441 21St SR 70 30,000 34,200 1,810 23.0% 1,689 32,982 34,381 35,6 31 As is evident from the data included in this table, a segment of SR 70 and of SR 441 is projected to exceed the level of service thresholds, as defined within the generalized tables, by the design year of 2009. Consequently, a detailed analysis of the corridor and impacted intersections is needed in order to confirm actual operating conditions. 2006 Analysis- Existing Conditions A traffic simulation network was developed to include the intersections along SR 70 from SR 710 to 5th Avenue W.; and SR- 441 (Parrott Avenue) from SR-70 to 21st Street. This network provides a basis for evaluating the capacity of the corridor based upon the signalized intersections within the corridor and the operating conditions that exist at the intersections. Current signal operating data was obtained from FDOT. With current operating data along with traffic volume data, an assessment of current operating conditions can be made. Data obtained from FDOT is included in Exhibit 6. The operating parameters for the signalized intersections through the immediate area were input into the traffic simulation network and level of service parameters were calculated for the existing traffic conditions. Current level of service calculations indicates that conditions, at present, are reasonably good in both travel directions. An increased amount of delay and a somewhat slower travel time is evident at the major intersection of SR 70 and Parrott Avenue. \\pc\Employee\don-h\06.0162 Okee Commons\A. Report\TIA Okee Commons.doc 0 IbFh The chart shown below summarizes both the morning and afternoon operating conditions for SR 70. Existing Conditions Period 2006 AM Route SR 70 EB Route SR 70 WB Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS 5th 5.4 25 B SR 710 7 23.7 C Parrott 48.6 12.3 E t Oth 12.2 31.7 A 8th 13.5 24.6 B 8th 8.6 19.5 C 1Oth 10.2 18.5 C Parrott 34.3 19.2 C SR 710 8.1 32.7 A 15th 5.4 25.9 B Summary 85.8 24.1 B 67.5 25.4 B Period 2006 PM Route SR 70 EB Route SR 70 WB Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS 5th 7.3 23.6 C SR 710 7.5 23.4 C Parrott 160.5 5.2 F 1Oth 13.4 29.4 B 8th 15.5 23.9 C 8th 5.6 21.9 C IOth 9.2 19.1 C Parrott 48.3 16.8 D SR 710 9 32.5 A 15th 1 8.1 24.2 B Summary 201.5 18 C 82.9 23.7 C The increased signal delay time and slow operating speeds at the intersection of SR 70 and Parrott Avenue are evident during both peak traffic periods. The slower speed and higher delay to the eastbound travel direction is attributable to the very heavy volume of traffic turning left onto Parrott Avenue southbound from SR 70. The overall level of service, however, is within acceptable limits. A similar series of calculations was performed for the intersections along Parrott Avenue. The chart below summarizes the operating conditions currently being experienced along this roadway segment. Existing Conditions Period 2006 AM Route Parrott Av NB Route Parrott Av SB Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS Shopping Cntr 8.4 39.2 A SR 70 42 23.4 C 28th 9.8 29.1 B 21 st 7.7 42.1 A 21 st 8 31.5 B 28th 7.2 32.1 B SR 70 46.4 31.7 B Shopping Cntr 7.5 30.7 B Summary 72.6 32.9 B 64.4 33.3 B Period 2006 PM Route Parrott Av NB Route Parrott Av SB Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS Shopping Cntr 7.3 39.9 A SR 70 64.8 18.5 D 28th 10.5 28.7 B 21 st 10.7 41 A 21 st 11.9 29 B 28th 9.2 30.7 B SR 70 55.2 30 B Shopping Cntr 4.5 33.1 B Summary 84.9 31.6 B 89.2 30.7 B \\pc\Emptoyee\don-h\06.0162 Okee Commons\A. Report\TIA Okee Commons.doc hc Current level of service on SR 70 through the area is B in the morning and C in the afternoon. Parrott Avenue has level of service B during both the morning and afternoon peak traffic periods. Exhibit 7 contains details of this analysis. 2006 Analysis- With Project Added The same network was used and the project traffic was added to the volumes on the impacted links. The results are summarized in the charts included below. Existing Conditions with project traffic added Period 2006 AM with project traffic Route SR 70 EB Route SR 70 WB Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS 5th 5.5 24.9 B SR 710 7.2 23.6 C Parrott 54.1 11.5 E 10th 12.2 31.7 A 8th 14.4 24.3 B 8th 9.1 19.2 C 10th 10.2 18.5 C Parrott 36.3 18.8 C SR 710 8.2 32.7 A 5th 5.5 25.8 B Summary 92.4 23.6 C 70.3 25.2 B Period 2006 PM with project traffic Route SR 70 EB Route SR 70 WB Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS 5th 7.9 23.2 C SR 710 7.8 23.2 C Parrott 224.7 3.9 F 10th 11 29.9 B 8th 20.8 22.4 C 8th 7 20.7 C 10th 9.2 19.1 C Parrott 89.4 12.2 E SR 710 9.1 32.5 A 5th 8.8 23.8 C Summary 271.7 15.6 D 124 21.2 C LOS numbers for eastbound SR 70 are impacted the greatest amount. This impact is due to the increased volume of traffic turning south onto Parrott Avenue. The chart below summarizes the impacts to Parrott Avenue_ Existing Conditions with project traffic added Period 2006 AM with project traffic Route ParrottAv NB Route ParrottAv SB Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS Shopping Cntr 8.4 39.2 A SR 70 42.2 23.3 C 28th 10 29 B 21 st 7.8 42 A 21 st 8.2 31.4 B 28th 7.3 32 B SR 70 49.1 31.1 B Shopping Cntr 7.5 30.7 B Summary 75.7 32.6 B 64.8 33.3 B Period 2006 PM with project traffic Route ParrottAv NB Route ParrottAv SB Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS Shopping Cntr 7.3 39.9 A SR 70 57.7 19.8 D 28th 10.8 28.5 B 21 st 11.3 40.8 A 21 st 12.5 28.6 B 28th 9.6 30.4 B SR 70 55.8 29.9 B Shopping Cntr 4.5 33.1 B Summary 86.4 31.5 B 83.1 31.3 B \\pc\Employee\don-h\06.0162 Okee Commons\A. Report\TIA Okee Commons.doc 8 � IbFh 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Conditions along Parrott Avenue remain at LOS B. Overall, the effect of adding the full impact of the proposed project to the roadway network under current conditions will have a relatively minor impact on traffic operating conditions. Exhibit 8 contains details of this analysis. 2009 ,analysis- Without Project The analysis for 2009 conditions was performed only for the afternoon peak period. The afternoon period is the critical period of the day for traffic in Okeechobee as well as other areas of South Florida. Summary operating condition charts are included below for the two corridors with traffic projected for the year 2009 used as the basis for analysis. Current signal operations were continued for this initial analysis. 2009 without project traffic added Period 2009 PM without project traffic Route SR 70 EB Route SR 70 WB Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS 5th 9.5 22.1 C SR 710 7.8 23.2 C Parrott 211.4 4.1 F 10th 11.9 29.7 B 8th 18.1 23.2 C 8th 6.2 21.4 C 10th 9.7 18.8 C Parrott 72.3 13.8 E SR 710 9 32.5 A 15th 8.6 23.9 C Summary 257.7 16.1 D 106.8 22.2 C Period 2009 PM without project traffic Route Parrott Av NB Route ParrottAv SB Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS Shopping Cntr 7.4 39.8 A SR 70 74.3 17 D 28th 11 28.3 B 21 st 11.4 40.8 A 21 st 12.7 28.5 B 28th 9.8 30.3 B SR 70 59 29.3 B Shopping Cnt 5.9 32 B Summary 90.1 31.1 B 101.4 29.6 B The information contained here indicates that operating conditions on roadways within the study area will be reduced slightly due to normal growth in traffic volumes that is expected over the time period noted. Conditions will remain at an acceptable level and congestion \\pc\Employee\don-h\06.0162 Okee Commons\A. Report\TfA Okee Commons.doc we � hc� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 will remain to be a concern for the intersection of SR 70 and Parrott Avenue. Exhibit 9 contains details of this analysis. 2009 Analysis- With Project Traffic Added When project traffic is added to the 2009 projections and the operating results tabulated, there is little difference in the overall operating parameters. 2009 with project traffic added Period 2009 PM with project traffic added Route SR 70 EB Route SR 70 WB Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS 5th 10.2 21.7 C SR 710 8.2 23 C Parrott 273.1 3.3 F 10th 46 23.8 C 8th 23.8 31.6 C 8th 7.4 20.4 C 10th 15.5 15.7 D Parrott 134.2 9.4 F SR 710 9.4 32.4 A 5th 9.6 23.4 C Summary 332 14 D 205.4 17.6 D Period 2009 PM with project traffic added Route Parrott Av NB Route Parrott Av SB Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS Cross Street Signal Delay Arterial Speed LOS Shopping Cntr 7.4 39.8 A SR 70 67.8 18 D 28th 11.4 28.1 B 21 st 12.1 40.6 A 21 st 13.2 28.2 B 28th 10.2 30 B SR 70 56.9 29.7 B Shopping Cntr 5.9 32 B Summary 88.9 31.2 B 96 30 B The results clearly indicate that the overall growth in traffic within the region will have a greater impact on operating conditions than will the proposed development project. Exhibit 10 contains details of this analysis. \\pc\Employee\don-h\06.0162 Okee Commons\A. Report\TIA Okee Commons.doc 10 � Lh 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Conclusions The overall impact of the proposed project is not expected to push traffic operating conditions to unacceptable levels. Level of service is likely to remain at level of service D or better within the impact area. The intersection of SR 70 and Parrott Avenue will remain the critical intersection within the area. Congestion is being experienced at this location at the current time due to the high volume of turning vehicles at the intersection and the limitation of space for additional turn lanes. This situation will continue to be a concern into the future as traffic volumes increase. Recommendations The proposed project will generate a relatively large flow of traffic into and out of the proposed development site. The entrance of the project should be incorporated into the signal that exists at the intersection of SR 70 and 10th Avenue. This will require the signal facilities to be adjusted accordingly. A left turn lane at the project entrance will be needed. Based on the projected volumes entering from the west, this lane should be approximately 350 feet in length. With the growth in traffic expected within the region, a right turn lane should also be provided along with the development. This turn lane should be a minimum of 150 feet in length and should be channelized into the entrance in order to facilitate the right turn movement with a minimum of delay to traffic on SR 70. Although existing traffic signals in the area are not operating in a coordinated system, the signals at 8th Avenue and 10th Avenue should be considered for local coordination. A conduit system should be installed and the two signal controllers connected. \\pc\Employee\don-h\06.0162 Okee Commons\A. Report\TIA Okee Commons.doc 1 1 Exhibit 1 Project Location Exhibit 2 Proposed Development Plan Exhibit 3 Traffic Data 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 w TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. ' SR 70 & US 441 OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: I. GONZALEZ SIGNALIZED & M. GONZALEZ (561) 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 272-3255 FAX (561) 272-4381 Site Code : Start Date: File I.D. 00060154 05/31/06 SR70 441 — Page 1 US 441 From North _----- ---LIGHT ISR 70 IFrom East _VEHICLES, ---------------------------------------------------------------------' HEAVY VEHICLES JUS 441 I From South ISR 70 lFrom West Date 05/31/06 Right ------------------------------------------------- Thru UTurn Left I Right Thru UTurn Left ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I Right Thru UTurn Left I Right Thru UTurn Left Total ' 07:00 07:15 07:30 07:45 Hr Total 7 14 20 34 75 64 63 67 109 303 0 0 0 0 0 49 41 52 44 56 j 58 46 I 70 203 213 66 80 101 132 379 0 46 0 61 0 66 0 113 0 286 40 43 46 I 55 184 51 46 96 118 311 0 0 0 0 0 22 14 18 24 20 13 41 I 30 101 81 77 103 83 84 347 0 0 0 0 0 18 30 25 55 I 128 495 578 651 887 2621 ' 08:00 08:15 08:30 08:45 Hr Total 18 21 22 18 79 98 85 91 89 363 0 1 0 0 1 54 62 57 43 216 67 50 60 68 245 89 78 99 102 368 0 77 0 73 0 79 0 86 I 0 315 55 59 46 49 209 95 80 71 94 340 0 0 0 0 0 40 36 34 39 I 149 22 24 21 22 89 101 60 82 77 320 0 0 0 0 0 49 30 f 41 37 I 157 765 659 703 724 2851 ' ---------- * BREAK * 11:00 19 144 11:15 20 147 11:30 25 137 11:45 27 131 Hr Total 91 559 1 1 0 1 3 79 71 82 66 I 298 42 40 49 45 176 88 91 106 109 394 0 89 1 84 0 101 0 91 I 1 365 75 102 86 113 376 103 102 90 88 383 0 0 0 1 1 37 57 48 42 I 184 31 28 51 44 154 92 87 89 95 363 0 0 0 0 0 30 33 21 42 I 830 864 885 895 3474 126 '12:00 ' 12:15 12:30 12.45 Hr Total 26 14 22 15 77 173 117 128 106 524 1 1 0 0 2 85 65 73 61 1 284 54 44 45 59 202 101 98 91 128 418 0 76 0 87 0 91 0 82 0 336 101 117 125 133 476 94 93 94 135 416 0 0 1 0 1 63 58 65 61 247 52 35 30 42 159 115 112 79 115 421 0 1 0 0 28 46 38 37 969 888 882 974 3713 1 149 ---------- * BREAK *--------------------------- ------ --------- - --- ----- -- ---' ------- ---------------- --' - '16:00 ' 16:15 16:30 16.45 Hr Total 20 28 27 33 108 120 128 123 159 530 0 1 1 1 3 83 69 73 79 304 1 58 41 55 59 213 105 131 126 125 487 0 96 0 81 0 78 0 93 0 348 ! 89 101 96 102 388 106 99 102 110 417 1 0 0 0 1 56 49 64 ( 51 220 38 32 37 29 136 97 79 125 97 0 0 0 0 38 ( 29 ' 37 41 907 868 944 974 3698 398 0 145 '17:15 17:00 17:30 17:45 Hr Total *TOTAL* 41 21 21 15 98 528 160 128 145 107 540 2819 0 0 0 0 0 9 74 77 74 80 1 305 1 1610 1 70 65 62 52 249 --- 1298 ISO 117 99 116 482 2528 ---------- 0 85 0 91 0 77 0 83 0 336 1 ----1986--------2080-------2310 1 121 122 114 110 111 116 101 95 447 443 ---------- 0 0 0 0 0 3 ---- 50 53 50 55 208 1109 ------ --- � 39 43 22 38 141 131 95 105 0 0 0 0 27 31 38 27 1080 981 910 3845 2--' 20192 142 761 ------ 472 2321 -------- 0 1 ----- 123 828 --------- � SR 70 6 US 441 ' OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: I. GONZALEZ 6 M. GONZALEZ SIGNALIZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272-3255 FAX (561) 272-4381 Site Code : 00060154 Start Date: 05/31/06 File I.D. SR70_441 Page 2 VEHICLES, HEAVY VEHICLES US --------------LIGHT ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 441 ISR 70 JUS 441 ISR 70 From North IFrom East IFrom South lFrom West ' Right Thru Date 05/31/06 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- UTurn Left I Right Thru UTurn Left I Right Thru UTurn Left I Right Thru UTurn Left I Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:00 to 09:00 on 05/31/06 ' Peak start 07:45 Volume 95 383 1 219 1 07:45 1 247 398 0 1 07:45 342 1 215 364 0 151 1 07:45 1 97 327 0 1 175 Percent 141k 55t Ok 31t 1 25t 40t Ok 35t 1 29% 50t Ok 21t 16t 55t Ok 1 291, Pk total 698 1 987 1 730 599 'Highest 07:45 Volume 34 109 0 46 1 07:45 1 70 132 0 1 07:45 113 1 55 118 0 41 08:00 22 Hi total 189 1 315 1 214 101 1 172 0 49 PHF 92 1 .78 1 .85 1 .87 ' US 441 0 85 364 • 204 175 ' 0 10 19 • 16 364 ------ ------ ------ 247 0 95 383 ------ 220 ------ 786 0 0 0 698 1,484 231 SR 70 151 398 644 ' 95 171 • 4 175 ' 1,243 • 303 • 24 327 599 ' 95 • 2 97 • LIGHT VEHICLES • HEAVY VEHICLES 247 16 374 987 398 24 330 1,749 342 - 12 Intersection Total 220 3,014 762 327 .1, n5.Z 342 149 383 2 97 822 151 US 441 730 • 345 2 19 364 2: 215 SR 70 ' TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. SR 70 6 US 441 624 GARDENIA TERRACE Site Code : 00060154 OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 Start Date: 05/31/06 COUNTED BY: i. GONZALEZ & M. GONZALEZ (561) 272-3255 FAX (561) 272-4381 File I.D. SR70 441 SIGNALIZED — Page 3 LIGHT VEHICLES, HEAVY VEHICLES US 441 ISR 70 -------------------'- --- ---- From North IUS 441 �SR 70 I From East From South IFrom West I ' Right Thru UTurn Left I Right Thru UTurn Left I Right Thru UTurn Left I Right Thru UTurn Left I Total Date 05/31/06------------------ ---------- - - Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 11:00 to 13:00 on 05/31/06 Peak start 12:00 j 12:00 I 12:00 I 12:00 I ' Volume 77 524 2 284 I 202 418 0 336 I 476 416 1 247 I 159 421 1 149 1 Percent 97, 59% Oi 32t I 21t 444 0% 35% 1 42e 36e Ot 22% I 22} 58% 0% 20% I Pk total 887 I 956 1 1140 I 730 Highest 12:00 I 12:45 - I 12:45 I 12:00 I ' Volume 26 273 1 85 I 59 128 0 82 I 133 135 0 61 I 52 115 0 28 Hi total 285 PHF .78 I 289 I 387 I 195 I .94 ' US 441 ' 0 74 508 • 273 150 0 3 16 13 416 202 __-_^------ _---77 _----- ---286 768 0 0 0 ) 887 655 SR 70 1,179 202 23 248 • LIGHT VEHICLES 418 743 • HEAVY VEHICLES ' 384 77 956 418 34 146 • 4 150 ' 323 1,473 2,139 336 13 388 33 421 730 Intersection Total 286 3,713 1,183 421 • 152 476 7 159 SR 70 I 2,159 — r--- 1, 14 0 336 243 • 402 45 524 5 • 14 1 159 1,019 248 416 47 US 441 Site Code : 00060154 Start Date: 05/31/06 File I.D. SR70-441 Page : 4 LIGHT VEHICLES, HEAVY VEHICLES US 441 ISR 70 IUS 441 ISR 70 From North From East (From South IFrom West I I I ' Right Thru UTurn Left I Right Thru UTurn Left I Right Thru UTurn Left I Right Thru UTurn Left I Total Date05/31/06--------------------------------------------------------- - -- - ---------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 to 18:00 on 05/31/06 Peak start 16:30 I 16:30 I 16:30 I 16:30 Volume 122 570 2 303 I 249 518 0 347 I 433 444 0 218 I 248 494 0 136 I Percent 12t 57% Ot 30t I 22t 46t Ot 31t I 40t 414 Oft 20t I 19t 63t Oft 17% Pk total 997 I 1114 I 1095 ' 7 Highest 17:00 I 17:00 I 17:00 I 17: I I :00 I Volume 41 160 0 74 I 70 150 0 85 I 121 122 0 50 I 39 141 0 27 I Hi total 275 07 PHF .91 I 322 91 93 94 I ' US 441 0 121 562 • 287 136 0 1 8 18 444 249 ------ ------ ------ p 0 122 570 ---305 ---829 p 0 997 - SR 70 1,826 228 ' 249 21 218 LIGHT VEHICLES 518 858 HEAVY VEHICLES 122 483 • 1,114 518 35 133 3 136 ' 1,636 33 2,346 1 347 34 467 • 27 494 778 Intersection Total 305 3,984 1,232 494 145 433 • 3 148 SR 70 fl SR 70 & US 441 ' OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: I. GONZALEZ & M. GONZALSZ SIGNALIZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272-3255 FAX (561) 272-4381 2, 160 r--- 1,095 347 216 - 433 42 570 2 11 - 148 1,065 218 444 43 US 441 I Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 'Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1 Data File : D0531018.PRN Station : 000000053019 'Identification : 009701450073 Interval : 15 minutes Start date : May 31, 06 Start time : 00:00 Stop date : May 31, 06 Stop time : 24:00 City/Town : Okeechobee, Florida County : Okeechobee 'Location : 441/Parrott North of SW 32 Street May 31 Northbound Volume for Lane 1 --------------------------- ------------------------------------------ ' End Time 00 --01 --02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 15 22 18 21 9 16 24 29 57 93 108 136 159 30 25 10 7 4 12 53 36 77 92 130 132 160 '45 27 14 2 11 10 69 61 95 116 112 137 160 ---00--- --17 14 4 10 27 25 56 127 109 149 136 173 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Hr Total 91 56 34 34 65 171 182 356 410 499 541 652 ---------------------------------------------- En-------------------- Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 173 163 159 133 164 153 131 122 86 66 25 31 30 192 169 167 135 134 146 126 99 77, 41 48 27 45 174 189 142 144 141 151., 127.. 104 69 38 34 11 ---00--- 173 160 123 142 142 134 121 96 64 42 ' 20 6 ---- ---- ---- ---- Hr Total 712 681 591 554 581 584 505 421 2196::_. 187 127 75 -------------------------------------- 24 Hour Total 8405------- AM peak hour begins : 11:30 AM peak volume`: 698 Peak hour factor : 0.91 PM peak hour begins : 12:00 PM peak volume : 712 Peak hour factor 0.93 *tfcirik****at'**facto ***0.93 May 31 Southbound Volume for Lane 2 ------------- ;. End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 --- ---- ---- ---- _ _ ---- is 22 11 6 3 10 20 29 70 119 135 152 196 ' 30 21 5 7 4 6 21 46 84 ill 130 133 194 45 11 4 6 5 18 22 53 71 128 145 138 181 ---00--- --12 ---6 4 14 17 36 78 106 129 157 176 187 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- r Total 66 26 23 26 51 99 206 331 487 567 599 758 ------------------- ------------------ ---- ------ ------ ------ -------------------- End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 215 184 166 160 182 200 119 104 95 70 34 24 30 188 184 194 163 175 194 146 102 79 54 33 12 45 172 173 147 172 188 158 129 99 88 47 27 20 ---00- 195 203 156 180 183 137 140 99 63 33 14 24 -- ---- --- ---- --- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- _ _ -r-Total 770 744 663 675 728 689 534 404 325 204 108 80 --------- ------------- -------- 24 Hour Total 9163 ------------------------------------------- AM peak hour begins 11:1 AM peak volume : 777 Peak hour factor : 0.90 PM peak hour begins 12:4 PM peak volume . 770 Peak hour factor 0.90 Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 2 Data File : D0531018.PRN Station : 000000053019 Identification : 009701450073 Interval : 15 minutes Start date : May 31, 06 Start time : 00:00 Stop date City/Town : May 31, 06 : Okeechobee, Florida Stop time County : 24:00 : Okeechobee Location : 441/Parrott North of SW 32 Street May 31 ------------------------------------------------------------ Total Volume for All Lanes En Time 00 01 02 03 04 - ---- ---- ---- 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 44 30 46 29 27 12 26 ---- ---- ---- 44 58 127 ---- ---- 212 243 288 355 45 38 15 14 8 18 18 8 16 28 74 82 161 203 260 265 354 ---00--- --29 20 8 24 44 ---- ---- ---- 91 114 166 61 134 233 244 257 238 306 275 312 341 360 Hr Total 157 ---------------------------------- ---- 82 57 60 116 ---- -------- 270 388 687 ---- ---- 897 1066 ---- 1140 ---- 1410 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 ----------------------------------- 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 388 30 380 347 325 293 346 353 361 298. 309 353 250 226 181 136 59 55 45 346 362. ' 289 316 .;329' 340 272 201 309 .;. 256 203 156 95 157 85 ' 81 61 39 31 00 -- 368 363 279 322.. "' 325 ---- ---- ----- - ---- 271 261 195 127 75 34 30 Hr Total 1482 ----------------------------- 1425 1254 - 1229 . 1309 ---- 1273 : ,1039 , 825 621, 391 235 155, 4 Hour Total 17568 AM peak hour begins.::11:30 AM peak PM peak hour begins : 12:00 volume : 1469 Peak hour factor : 0.95 PM peak volume,:-1482::-: Peak hour factor : 0,95 I 1 Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1 'Volume Data File : D0531009.PRN Station : 000000053020 : 004117430002 Interval : 15 minutes 'Identification Start date : May 31, 06 Start time : 00:00 Stop date : May 31, 06 Stop time : 24:00 City/Town : Okeechobee, Florida County : Okeechobee Location : SW 32 Street West of 441/Parrott May 31 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Westbound Volume for Lane 1 End Time 00 01 02 --03 --04 ---- 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 2 30 1 0 0 0 0 0 --05 ---- ---- 0 3 5 ---- ---- ---- 13 10 23 27 45 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 7 9 6 3 11 20 24 21 19 24 21 23 27 ---00--- ---0 1 ---- 0 0 1 ---- ---- 2 7 23 15 27 24 19 Hr Total 4-----1-----2-----1-----1- End Time 12 13 ---- ---- ---- ---- 8 20 48 ----------- ----------- ---- ---- ---- 67 85 89 ---- - ---- ---- ---- 96 --- 14 15 16 ---- ---- ---- 17 18 19 20--' 21 22 22 23 23 15 2'8� 3.0 25:. 3116 2': 17 27 32 23 26 ---- ---- 31 11 17 32: 7 - 6 v 2 _ 5 �. s =' , 17. 24 14 28 26 18' 9, 26 _14 8.. 9:; 5- 6 12. 5 i_ 2 3: 2 00. 25, .18 20 34 26 22' 15 ' 4 7: : 4 1 ,. 1 Hr Total 95 102 ------------------------------------------ - ---- 82 10.2 105 ---- --- ---- Ill- 5.8,. 38 -- �:35 _ ; :20 =11 : 11 r z: 24 Hour Total : 1192------- ---------- AM'peak.hour begins : PM peak hour begins.: 10:45 AM peak 15:30 PM volume : 101 Peakhour factor : 094 -peak volume : 115 Peak .hour factor 0..85 :... May 31 Eastbound Volume for Lane 2 End Time 00 01 ---- 02 03 04 ---- ---- ---- 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 1 30 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 ---- ---- ---- 0 5 6 ---- ---- 10 13 19 13 45 1 0 1 0 1 0 5 14 0 2 12 19 19 17 21 11 17 16 18 00 0 0 ---- 0 0 0 --- - ---- ---- 1 6 19 18 17 18 21 r Total 2 ------------------------------- 3 2 2 2 ---- ---- ---- 1 18 51 ---- ---- 68 60 71 68 En Time 12 13 ---- 14 15 16 ---- ---- ---- ------------ ----- 17 18 19 2-------------------- 0 21 22 23 15 21 30 10 18 18 22 6 12 16 19 18 ---- ---- ---- 18 13 16 ---- ___ ___ 4 6 0 0 45 12 15 13 25 17 18 10 3 14 3 5 9 1 1 12 1 1 1 ---00--- 22 12 14 19 22 13 12 7 7 4 1 0 1 Hr Total 65 ---------------------------------------------------------- 63 65 69 69 -- ---- 63 -- 38 31 ---- 32 12 3 2 24 Hour Total 860 ------------ ' AM peak hour begins PM peak hour begins 11:15 AM peak 15:15 volume : 76 Peak hour factor : 0.90 PM peak volume . 75 Peak hour factor 0.75 Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 2 'Volume Data File : D0531009.PRN Station : 000000053020 : 004117430002 Interval : 15 minutes 'Identification Start date : May 31, 06 Start time : 00:00 Stop date : May 31, 06 Stop time : 24:00 City/Town : Okeechobee, Florida County : Okeechobee Location : SW 32 Street West of 441/Parrott May 31 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Volume for All Lanes End Time 00 01 02 --03 -- ---- 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 3 30 1 --04 2 1 0 0 1 1 3 --05 ---- ---- 0 8 11 ---- ---- ---- 23 23 42 40 45 2 1 0 2 0 1 0 12 23 6 5 23 39 43 38 40 35 38 39 45 00 ---0 1 0 ---0 ---1 ---- ---- 3 13 42 33 44 42 40 Hr Total 6 4 4 3 3 ---- -------- 9 38 99 ---- ---- ---- 135 145 160 ---- 164 End Time 12 13 -- 15 -- ------ ------------ 17 18 ---------------------- 20 22 -- 23 15 49. 30 35. 49 38 23 39 47 48 42 49 24 33 11. 12 2 5 45. 29. 44 39; 27 53 43 50 28' 12 40 1.7 13 18' 6 7 24 : 6 4 010 47., 30 34' 53 48 --- ---- ---- ---- 35 27, 11 , 141 ' . 8 2 ' 2 2 Hr Total,: 160 ---------------- 165 147. 171 174 ---- 174 96- . 69 67; 32 -14 ;_13_ 2.4 Hour Total : 2052 ------ ----'-------- AM.peak hour begins PM -peak, hour begins : 11:15 AM peak : 16:30 volume : 1.73 Peak hour fact1. or : 0.88 PM peak volume : 190 Peak hour factor :.0: 9595 *IFir*�F,. Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1 Data File : D0531011.PRN Station : 000000053017 'Identification : 009601150098 Interval 15 minutes Start date : May 31, 06 Start time : 00:00 Stop date : May 31, 06 Stop time . 24:00 City/Town : Okeechobee, Florida County : Okeechobee Location : 441/Parott South of SW 32 Street May 31 Northbound Volume for Lane 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- End Time 00 01 02 03 --04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 15 23 19 21 8 17 23 29 59 97 105 130 153 30 25 10 7 5 11 53 40 79 97 137 131 152 45 27 15 2 11 11 72 61 97 ill 116 137 153 00--- --17 14 4 ---9 29 26 59 135 114 150 138 173 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Hr Total 92 58 34 33 68 174 189 370 419 508 536 631 - --------------------------- -------------- End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 15 167 163 144 131 162 158- 126 115 77 63 27 32 30 191 160 162 125 134 145 118 97 70 38 42 26 45= 170 193 126 138 146 148' 122 99 62 37 26 9 00 - 165 157 118 143 138 126 122 92 66- 43 19 6 Hr'Total 693 673 550 537 580 577 488 403 275 181 114 73 ------------------------------.---------- 24 Hour Total : 8256 'AM peak hour begins : 11:30 AM peak,volume 684 Peak hour factor : 0.90 PM peak hour begins : 12:00 PM peak volume.: 693 Peek hour factor,: 0.91 May 31 Southbound Volume for Lane 2 End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 ---- ---- ---- ---- _ _ _ 15 21 12 5 3 9 17 26 66 119 136 135 186 ' 30 21 6 7 3 8 18 48 89 112 122 139 172 45 12 5 6 5 20 19 52 74 135 134 130 168 ---00--- -_12 ---6 ---4 14 16 35 73 109 134 141 161 175 - ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- r Total 66 29 22 25 53 89 199 338 500 533 565 701 ---------------------------------- ------------- ----------------------- En Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 201 187 162 149 168 180 113 104 86 74 34 22 ' 30 172 168 174 140 169 184 130 99 75 51 26 11 45 159 164 136 149 175 142 114 90 80 43 25 18 ---00 _187 184 137 170 188 135 134 100 59 29 15 23 ---- ---- - --- r Total719 703 609 608 700 641 491 393 300 197 100 74 ------------------------ ---------------------------------- 24 Hour Total 8655------------- AM peak hour begins 11:15 AM peak volume : 716 Peak hour factor : 0.89 PM peak hour begins 16:30 PM peak volume • 727 Peak hour factor 0.97 Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 2 Data File : D0531011.PRN Station : 000000053017 Identification : 009601150098 Interval : 15 minutes Start date : May 31, 06 Start time : 00:00 Stop date : May 31, 06 Stop time : 24:00 City/Town : Okeechobee, Florida County : Okeechobee Location. : 441/Parott South of SW 32 Street May 31 Total Volume for All Lanes -------------------------------------------------------- ------------ End Time 00 01 --02 03 --04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 44 31 26 11 26 40 55 125 216 241 265 339 30 46 16 14 8 19 71 88 168 209 259 270 324 45 39 20 8 16 31 91 113 171 246 250 267 321 00 --29 20 8 23 45 61 132 244 248 291 299 348 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Hr Total 158 87 56 58 121 263 388 708 .919 1041 1101 1332 ------------------------------------------- En Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15-- 368 350 306 280 330 338 239 219 163 137 61 54 . 30:. 363 328 336 265 303 329 248 196 145, . '; 89 :" 68 :' : 37 45 ,329 357 262 287, 321 290 236 189. 142 80.— 51..i '27 0o 352: 341 255 313 326 261 256 192 125 '. = 72 - . -, 34 29 -- -- ---- -- - -- ---- Hr, Total 1412 1376 ::`1159 1145 1280 1218 979 796 ; 575. r 378* 4 .,214 :147 ----------------- 24.'Hour Total 16911 AM:.peak hour begins : 11:30- AM peak volume : 1400. Peak, hour factor : 0.,95 _PM peak:.hour begins 12:.00 PM peak volume : 1412 Peak hour. factor=• ,6 9 0. ,6 I. Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1 Page tit Data File D0425013.PRN Station 000000042404 Identification 000411692109 Interval : 15 minutes Start date Apr 25, 06 rum Start time : 00:00 Stop date Apr 25, 06S _o Stop time : 24:00 City/Town Okeechobee, Florida County : Okeechobee ' Location SR 70 West of SR 710 Apr 25 Eastbound Volume for Lane 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------- End Time 00 01 --02 --03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 25 21 21 15 14 72 196 186 172 155 166 188 30 29 9 20 12 33 87 193 200 181 163 161 181 45 24 14 20 26 34 128 188 155 163 176 185 178 ---00--- --19 10 16 16 54 149 189 151 165 169 149 169 --- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Hr Total 97 54 77 69 135 436 766 692 681 663 661 716 --------------------- --------- End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ---------------- 20 21 22 23 15 197 200 196 232 216 287 200 146 142 119 61 43 30 202 188 202 226 215 269 194 201 111 83 � 78 45 45 200 190 200 237 249 270 176 116 125 75 45 30 ---00--- 161 178 227 233 264 222 169 140 110 63 '.43 30 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Hr Total 760 756 825 928 944 1048 739 603 488 340 227 148 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24 Total :'12853 AM peak hour begins : 06:00 AM peak volume : 766 Peak hour factor : 0.98 PM peak hour begins : 16:45 PM peak volume : logo Peak hour factor 0.95 Apr 25 Westbound Volume for Lane 2 -------------- ------------------------------ ____ End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 -- ---- ---- ---- ---- _ _ 15 24 28 22 14 26 40 82 165 246 179 187 182 30 9 22 16 17 14 55 141 203 246 175 208 168 45 16 11 8 42 22 60 181 286 215 201 184 156 ---00--- 8 13 21 26 35 74 244 380 218 213 183 202 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Hr Total 57 74 67 99 97 229 648 1034 925 768 762 708 ----------------------------- -------------------------- -- En Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 202 162 180 237 189 254 242 155 95 82 65 42 30 148 203 205 206 202 262 206 136 98 63 56 32 45 180 236 194 243 218 237 175 127 90 67 35 18 ---00--- 207 191 206 227 229 217 169 110 97 60 36 9 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -r-Total 737 792 785 913 838 970 792 528 380 272 192 101 ------------------------------ ----------------------------------- 24 Hour Total 12768 --- AM peak hour begins : 07:30 AM peak volume : 1158 Peak hour factor : 0.76 PM peak hour begins : 16:45 PM peak volume : 982 Peak hour factor 0.94 Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 2 2 Data File : D0425013.PRN Station : 000000042404 Identification : 000411692109 Interval : 15 minutes Start date : Apr 25, 06 Start time : 00:00 Stop date : Apr 25, 06 Stop time : 24:00 City/Town : Okeechobee, Florida County : Okeechobee Location : SR 70 West of SR 710 Apr 25 Total Volume for All Lanes ---------------------------------------------------------- End Time 00 --01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 49 49 43 29 40 112 278 351 418 334 353 370 30 38 31 36 29 47 142 334 403 427 338 369 349 45 40 25 28 68 56 188 369 441 378 377 369 334 ---00 --27 23 37 42 89 223 433 531 383 382 332 371 - ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Hr Total 154 128 144 168 232 665 1414 1726 1606 1431 1423 1424 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 ---1-8----19---- 20-----21----22 ----23 15 399 362 376 469 40.5 541 442 301 237 201 126 85 30 350 391 407 432 417 531 400 337 209 146 134 77 45 380 426 394 480 46-7 507 351 243 215 142 80 48 ---00 368 369 433 460 493 439 338 250 207 123 -79 - 39 ---- ---- ---- Hr Total 1497 '1548--1610 1841 1782 2018 1531 1131 868 612 419 249 ------- ------ 24 Hour Total - --- --- ----------------------------------------- 2562 AM peak hour begins :30 AM peak volume : 1817 Peak hour factor : 0.86 PM peak hour begins : 1'6:45 PM'peak volume : 2072 Peak hour factor : 0.96 Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1 Data File : D0425015.PRN Station : 000000042407 Identification : 000058410088 Interval : 15 minutes Start date : Apr 25, 06 Start time : 00:00 Stop date : Apr 25, 06 Stop time : 24:00 City/Town : Okeechobee, Florida County : Okeechobee Location : SR 710 S of SR 70 1=NBLT 2=NBRT to SR 70 Apr 25 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Northbound Volume for Lane 1 End Time 00 01 02 03 04 ---- ---- 05 06 07 ---- 08 09 10 11 15 15 30 10 12 12 16 5 17 12 7 ---- ---- 21 31 75 ---- 127 82 116 99 45 13 9 7 5 33 10 22 64 92 30 77 136 96 94 106 91 106 75 74 74 ---00--- 5 ---7 16 14 17 ---- ---- ---- 27 123 198 ---- 103 114 106 90 Hr Total 43 40 ----------------------------- 49 59 51 -------- 100 295 501 ---- ---- ---- 432 381 403 ---- 337 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 -- ---- ---- ----------------------------------- 17 18 19 ---- 20 21 22 23 15 108 73 85 121 96 131 94 109 89 92 ---- 113 126 72 48 35 31 __ 21 ,30 45 70 102 83 104 98 132 98 54 124 79 47 41 30 36 31 31 9 16 00 101 98 101 108 113 94, 97 41 48 32 9 12 5 Hr Total 352 406 ---------------------------------------- 389, 432 397 463 400 214 173 128 80 54 24 Hour Total : 6179 -------------------- --- AM peak hour begins PM p,eak.hour begins : : 07:30 AM peak 16:45 PM volume : 557 Peak hour factor : 0.70 peak volume : 482Peak hour factor :'0.91 Apr 25 ------------------------------------------- Northbound Volume for Lane 2 End Time 00 01 02 03 04 ---- ---- ------------------------- 05 06 07 ---- 08 09 10 it 15 0 30 5 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 ---- ---- 0 6 0 ---- ----___ 3 3 2 ___ 4 45 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 4 0 2 0 1 2 6 1 2 3 p 00 0 0 --- 0 ---0 0 ---- ---- 1 1 3 3 2 1 0 3 r Total5-----1-----7-----0--- 1 2 13 7 ---- ---- 13 8 ---- -------------------------------- 8 En Time 12 13 -- 14 15 16 ---- ---- ---- 17 18 19 ---- ------------- 20 21 22 23 15 5 30 4 0 4 1 2 6 2 2 5 ---- ---- 8 2 2 ---- ---- ___ 1 5 0 ___ 0 45 0 13 2 2 0 5 2 2 2 1 4 1 1 0 0 3 0 00 2 4 ---- 4 6 1 ---- ---- ---- 3 1 4 0 0 Q 1 1 4 r Total 11 21 12 12 ---- ---- ---- 18 6 12 - ------6 ---2 6 - ---5 ------ -----9- ----------------- 4 24 Hour Total : 190 ------------------------------------ AM peak hour begins : PM peak hour begins : 08:30 AM peak 13:15 volume : 14 Peak hour factor : 0.58 PM peak volume : 22 Peak hour factor : 0.42 Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 ' Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page *************gear2 2 Data File : D0425015.PRN Station : 000000042407 Identification : 000058410088 Interval : 15 minutes Start date : Apr 25, 06 Start time : 00:00 Stop date City/Town : Apr 25, 06 Stop time : Okeechobee, Florida : 24:00 Location County : SR 710 S of SR 70 1=NBLT 2=NBRT to SR : Okeechobee 70 Apr 25 ------------------------------- Total Volume for All Lanes End Time 00 ------------------------------------ 01 --02 --03 04 05 06 07 - ---- ---- 08 09 10 11 15 15 30 15 ---- ---- 13 23 5 17 21 37 75 12 12 7 8 130 85 118 103 45 13 23 68 96 9 5 33 10 30 79 136 97 96 108 112 92 78 74 00--- --- ---5 ---7 16 14 17 28 124 201 ---- ---- ---- ---- 106 116 107 74 93 Hr Total 48 End Time 12 ---- ---- 41 56 59 52 102 308 508 --------------- 13 ---- --- --- 445 389 411 -------------- --- 344 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 113 30 77 85 97 133 100 121 128 74 125 ill 91 97 49 40 31 21 45 70 137 100 56 115 85 106 98 126 80 51 42 31 34 36 31 16 --_00-- 103 102 105 114 114 97 98 45 9 48' 32 10 13 9 Hr Total '363 ---- - -- ---- ---- 427 398 444 409 481 406 226 175 134' 84 __ 59 24 Hour Total ---------------------------- 6369 ----------- AM peak hour begins 07:30 AM peak volume-: 564 PM peak hour begins 16:45 Peak hour factor : 0.70 PM peak volume 498 Peak hour factor : 0:91 Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1 Page 1 Data File : D0425010.PRN Station : 000000042405 Identification : 000058410084 Interval : 15 minutes Start date : Apr 25, 06 Start time : 00:00 Stop date : Apr 25, 06 Stop time : 24:00 City/Town : Okeechobee, Florida County : Okeechobee Location : SR 70 East of SR 710 Apr 25 Eastbound Volume for Lane 1 ---------------------- ---------------------------------------------- End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 ---- ---- ---- -- 15 16 10 7 6 9 30 105 97 87 --71 91 104 30 18 2 9 4 14 29 ill 79 93 86 85 102 45 14 4 10 11 17 49 106 78 88 103 78 95 ---00--- ---5 4 ---3 ---2 29 69 87 69 88 78 92 105 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Hr Total 53 20 29 23 69 177 409 323 356 338 346 406 ------------------------------- ----------------------- En Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 92 94 99 146 123 180 101 93 80 67 27 25 30 121 109 115 127 131 141 112 122 73 58: 43 24 45 107 101 98 123 150 178 109 77 60 40 23 14 00 -- 88 106 114 142 148 139 87 88 66 40 5."-20 22 -- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- Hr Total 408 410 426 -- 538 552 638 409 380 279 205 i113 85 --------------------------------------------- 4 Hour Total : 6992 AM peak hour begins : 11.:30 AM peak volume : 413 Peak hour factor : 0.85 PM peak hour begins : 16:45 PM peak volume 647 Peak hour factor : 0.90 Apr 25 Westbound Volume for Lane 2 -------------- ------------ En Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 -- ---- ---- ---- ---- _ __ ---- 15 8 19 6 9 8 22 61 101 135 98 75 86 30 1 9 6 9 7 38 87 123 153 95 122 98 45 7 5 4 15 12 33 104 158 120 114 107 90 00 3 7 4 ---7 17 48 130 177 115 101 88 119 ---- ---- _ _ ---- ---- ---- r Total 19 40 20 40 44 141 382 559 523 408 392 393 ------------- --------------------------------------------- --------------------- En Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 94 82 92 99 109 146 118 85 52 46 34 -23 t 30 83 87 112 128 Ill 137 106 82 54 32 27 16 45 110 140 120 140 123 122 86 81 54 36 22 8 ---00- ill - 106 109 128 120 126 97 76 58 27 26 8 -- ---- --- ---- _ ---- ---- ---- Hr Total 398 415 433 495 463 531 407 324 218 141 109 55 : 6950 ------------- ------------------------------------- 24 Hour Total ------------------ AM peak hour begins : 07:30 AM peak volume : 623 Peak hour factor : 0.88 PM peak hour begins : 17:00 PM peak volume : 531 Peak hour factor 0.91 Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 2 Page t2 Data File D0425010.PRN Station 000000042405 MIdentification : 000058410084 Interval : 15 minutes Start date Apr 25, 06 Start time : 00:00 Stop date Apr 25, 06 Stop time : 24:00 City/Town Okeechobee, Florida County : Okeechobee Location SR 70 East of SR 710 Apr 25 Total Volume for All Lanes --------------------------------- ------------------------------------ ' End Time 00 01 --02 --03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 24 29 13 15 17 52 166 198 222 169 166 190 30 19 11 15 13 21 67 198 202 246 181 207 200 45 --21 9 14 26 29 82 210 236 208 217 185 185 --- 00--- 8 11 ---7 9 46 117 217 246 203 179 180 224 --- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Hr Total 72 60 49 63 113 318 791 882 879 746 738 799 ------------------------------- ----------------------- End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 186 176 191 245 232 326 219 178 132 113 61 48 30, 204. 196 227 255 242 278 218 204 127 90 70 40 45 217 241 218 263 273 300 195 158 114 76 45 22 ---00_ 199 212 223 270 268 265 184 164 124 67 46 '30 --- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- r Total 806 825 859 1033 1015 1169 816 704 497 346 >222 140 ----------------------------------------- ----------- 24 Hour Total : 13942------------ AM peak hour begins :_07:30 AM peak volume : 950 Peak hour factor : 0.97 PM peak'hour.begins : 16:45 PM peak volume : 1172 Peak hour factor i3O.90 u Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 **********************************************************************Page**1* Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1 Data File : D0425011.PRN Station : 000000042406 Identification : 000210749420 Interval : 15 minutes Start date Stop date : Apr : Apr 25, 06 25, 06 Start time : 00:00 City/Town : Okeechobee, Florida Stop time County : 24:00 : Okeechobee Location : SR 70 1=EBRT to 710 2=WBLT to 710 Apr 25 --------------------------------------- Eastbound Volume for Lane 1 End Time 00 -------- ---- 01 ---- 02 03 ---- 04 05 --------------------------- 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 11 30 14 8 5 ---- 10 9 11 13 6 18 36 83 95 __ __ 74 72 68 76 45 7 8 9 7 17 47 77 86 117 82 81 94 72 78 78 71 85 76 -_-00 14 _-_5 11 10 ---- 23 ---- 83 80 83 80 90 75 78 71 Hr Total 46 ----------------------- 26 41 39 64 ------------------------------------------ ---- 243 -------- 331 376 ---- ---- ---- 326 312 299 301 End Time 12 13 14 15 _-16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 94 30 89 95 79 84 92 99 109 92 85 118 123 ---- ---- 79 58 94 82 ---- ---- 56 45 29 19 87 83 91 97 91 102 66 49 48 38 55 28 36 16 20 9 '45 __-00_-- _-78 73 110 98 ---- ---- 115 ---- 93 ---- 76 55 41 21 21 0 348 330 384 396 383 ---- 436 ---- 315 244 ---- ---- ---- 200 132 102 48 i _r-Tota ---------------------------- 24 Hour Total ________________________________________________ 5722 AM peak hour begins PM peak hour begins 07:00 AM 16:45 PM peak peak volume volume : 376 458 Peak hour factor : 0.80 g*P*otr**g*Peee***e*PgPgg*aekeae*ePaa*PPPaP***Pa*a*eaa*a*P*aPatktlreaP*aikPa*ea*ease** : Peak hour factor : 0.93 Apr 25 ---------------------------= Westbound Volume for Lane 2 End Time 00 15 0 01 0 02 03 0 04 ---- --------------------------------------- 05 ---- ---- 06 07 ---- 08 09 ------ - - ---- 10 11 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 5 2 5 3 1 45 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 2 3 9 4 4 4 0 0 5 0 5 -------- ---- ---- 0 0 ---- ---- 0 ---- 4 1 1 3 4 2 Hr Total 0 -------------------- 0 ----------------------------------- 0 0 0 ---- ---- 13 ---- 16 17 ---- ---- ---- 13 13 10 __ _ 8 End Time 12 13 14 15 ---- ---- ---- 16 17 ---- ------------------ 18 19 20 21 22 __ 23 15 4 30 4 2 0 4 5 8 6 3 1 ---- 6 1 ---- 4 1 ---- ---- ___ 2 2 0 ___ 1 45 2 4 5 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 00 3 1 0 8 5 2 3 1 3 1 0 0 5 0 f r Total13 _________________ 7 17 21 _________________________________________________ 11 ---- ---- 10 ---- 9 6 ---- ---- ---- 5 4 0 ' 24 Hour Total ; 20Q AM peak hour begins PM peak hour begins 05:15 AM 15:00 peak volume : 22 Peak hour factor : 0.61 PM Pot*g*ggeaaaeaea*eee*gge*ggegggee*ae**eg*****ea****PP********ePeg*g*****ea*aeP*a peak volume : 21 Peak hour factor : 0.66 Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 ' Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page Page 2 2 Data File D0425011.PRN Station 000000042406 Identification 000210749420 Interval : 15 minutes Start date Apr 25, 06 Start time : 00:00 Stop date City/Town Apr 25, 06 Stop time Okeechobee, Florida County : 24:00 : Okeechobee 'Location SR 70 1=EBRT to 710 2=WBLT to 710 Apr 25 --------------------- Total Volume for All Lanes End Time 00 ------------------------------------------------ 01 --02 --03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 11 30 14 8 10 9 6 36 92 100 5 11 13 18 53 ---- ---- ---- 76 77 71 77 7 89 119 8 9 7 17 80 85 90 98 76 71 82 78 90 76 '45 -- 00--- --14 ---5 11 10 23 87 81 84 ---- ---- ---- ---- 83 94 77 83 73 Hr Total 46 ---- ---- 26 41 39 64 256 347 393 ---- ---- ---- 339 325 309 309 End Time 12 ------------------------------- 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 98 30 93 97 88 97 95 124 83 59 79 107 115 86 124 95 84 58 47 29 20 45 89 87 96 99 93 103 67 51 48 38 36 55 29 16 21 14 ----81 74 110 106 120 95 79 56 ---- ---- ---- ---- 44 22 21 p ' Hr Total 361 -------- ----- 337 401 --417 394 446 '324 250 ----------------------- ---- ---- 205 136 -102 55 24 Hour Total -------------- : 5922 AM peak hour begins : 07:00 AM peak volume : 393 PM peak hour begins : 16:45 PM Peak hour factor : 0.83 peak volume : 471 Peak hour factor : 0.95 1 1 Print Date: JuYl7/2006 Flori da Department of Transportation Transportation Statistics Office 2004 Peak Season Factor Category Report CNTYWIDE 'OKEECHOBEE Category: 9100 Week Dates MOCF = 0.91 SF PSCF 1 01/01/2004 - 01/03/2004 0.98 1.08 ' 2 01/04/2004 - 01/10/2004 0.98 1.08 * 3 01/11/2004 - 01/17/2004 0.97 1.07 * 4 01/18/2004 - 01/24/2004 0.96 1.05 * 5 01/25/2004 - 01/31/2004 0.94 1.03 ' * 6 02/01/2004 - 02/07/2004 0.92 1.01 * 7 02/08/2004 - 02/14/2004 0.91 1.00 * 8 02/15/2004 - 02/21/2004 0.89 0.98 ' * 9 02/22/2004 - 02/28/2004 0.89 0.98 * 10 02/29/2004 - 03/06/2004 0.88 0.97 * 11 03/07/2004 - 03/13/2004 0.88 0.97 * 12 03/14/2004 - 03/20/2004 0.87 0.96 ' * 13 03/21/2004 - 03/27/2004 0.90 0.99 * 14 03/28/2004 - 04/03/2004 0.92 1.01 * 15 16 04/04/2004 - 04/10/2004 04/11/2004 - 04/17/2004 0.95 0.98 1.04 1.08 17 04/18/2004 - 04/24/2004 0.99 1.09 18 04/25/2004 - 05/01/2004 1.00 1.10 ' 19 05/02/2004 - 05/08/2004 1.02 1.12 20 05/09/2004 - 05/15/2004 1.03 ' 1.13 21 05/16/2004 - 05/22/2004 1.05 1.15 22 05/23/2004 - 05/29/2004 . 1.06 1.16 ' 23 05/30/2004 - 06/05/2004 - 1.07 1.18 24 06/06/2004 - 06/12/2004 1.08 1.19 25 26 06/13/2004 - 06/19/2004 06/20/2004 - 06/26/2004 : 1.10 1.10 1.21 1.21 27 06/27/2004 - 07/03/2004 1.11 1.22 28 07/04/2004 - 07/10/2004 1.12 1.23 ' 29 07/11/2004 - 07/17/2004 1.13 1.24 30 07/18/2004 - 07/24/2004 1.11 1.22 31 07/25/2004 - 07/31/2004 1.10 1.21 32 08/01/2004 - 08/07/2004 1.09 1.20 ' 33 08/08/2004 - 08/14/2004 1.07 1.18 34 08/15/2004 - 08/21/2004 1.06 1.16 35 08/22/2004 - 08/28/2004 1.09 1.20 ' 36 08/29/2004 - 09/04/2004 1.12 1.23 37 09/05/2004 - 09/11/2004 1.16 1.27 38 09/12/2004 - 09/18/2004 1.19 1.31 39 09/19/2004 - 09/25/2004 1.13 1.24 40 09/26/2004 - 10/02/2004 1.08 1.19 41 10/03/2004 - 10/09/2004 1.02 1.12 ' 42 43 10/ 10/2004 - 10/ 16/2004 10/17/2004 - 10/23/2004 0.97 0.97 1.07 1.07 44 10/24/2004 - 10/30/2004 0.96 1.05 45 10/31/2004 - 11/06/2004 0.96 1.05 ' 46 11/07/2004 - 11/13/2004 0.95 1.04 47 11/14/2004 - 11/20/2004 0.95 1.04 48 11/21/2004 - 11/27/2004 0.96 1.05 49 11/28/2004 - 12/04/2004 0.97 1.07 ' 50 12/05/2004 - 12/11/2004 0.97 1.07 51 12/12/2004 - 12/18/2004 0.98 1.08 52 12/19/2004 - 12/25/2004 0.98 1.08 53 12/26/2004 - 12/31/2004 0.97 1.07 Note: "*"indicates peak season week Page 1 Print Date: JuU17/2006 ' Florida Department of Transportation Transportation Statistics Office 2004 Peak Season Factor Category Report SR 78 ' Category: 9101 Week Dates SF PSCF 1 01/01/2004 - 01/03/2004 0.94 1.09 * 2 01/04/2004 - 01/10/2004 0.91 1.06 ' * 3 0l/11/2004 - 01/17/2004 0.89 1.03 * 4 01/18/2004 - 01/24/2004 0.88 1.02 * 5 01/25/2004 - 01/31/2004 0.86 1.00 * 6 02/01/2004 - 02/07/2004 0.85 0.99 * 7 02/08/2004 - 02/14/2004 0.83 0.97 * 8 02/15/2004 - 02/21/2004 0.82 0.95 ' * 9 * 10 02/22/2004 - 02/28/2004 02/29/2004 - 03/06/2004 0.83 0.84 0.97 0.98 * 11 03/07/2004 - 03/13/2004 0.84 0.98 * 12 03/14/2004 - 03/20/2004 0.85 0.99 ' * 13 03/21/2004 - 03/27/2004 0.88 1.02 * 14 03/28/2004 - 04/03/2004 0.92 1.07 15 04/04/2004 - 04/10/2004 0.96 1.12 16 04/11/2004 - 04/17/2004 0.99 1.15 17 04/18/2004 - 04/24/2004 1.00 1.16 18 04/25/2004 - 05/01/2004 1.02 1.19 ' 19 20 05/02/2004 - 05/08/2004 05/09/2004 - 05/15/2004 1.03 1.05 1.20 1.22 21 05/16/2004 - 05/22/2004 1.06 1.23 22 05/23/2004 - 05/29/2004 1.07 1.24 ' 23 05/30/2004 - 06/05/2004 1.09 1.27 24 06/06/2004 - 06/12/2004 1.10 1.28 25 06/13/2004 - 06/19/2004 1., 1 1.29 26 06/20/2004 - 06/26/2004 1.13 1.31 ' 27 06/27/2004 - 07/03/2004 1'.14 1.33 28 07/04/2004 - 07110/2004 1.15 1.34 ' 29 30 07/11/2004 - 07/17/2004 07/18/2004 - 07/24/2004 1.17 1.17 1.36 1.36 31 07/25/2004 - 07/31/2004 1.16 1.35 32 08/01/2004 - 08/07/2004 1.16 1.35 33 08/08/2004 - 08/14/2004 1.15 1.34 34 08/15/2004 - 08/21/2004 1.15 1.34 35 08/22/2004 - 08/28/2004 1.15 1.34 36 08/29/2004 - 09/04/2004 1.15 1.34 37 09/05/2004 - 09/11/2004 1.15 1.34 38 09/12/2004 - 09/18/2004 1.15 1.34 39 09/19/2004 - 09/25/2004 1.12 1.30 40 09/26/2004 - 10/02/2004 1.10 1.28 41 10/03/2004 - 10/09/2004 1.07 1.24 42 10/ 10/2004 - 10/ 16/2004 1.04 1.21 43 10/17/2004 - 10/23/2004 1.03 1.20 44 10/24/2004 - 10/30/2004 1.02 1.19 45 10/31/2004 - 11/06/2004 1.00 1.16 46 11/07/2004 - 11/13/2004 0.99 1.15 47 11/14/2004 - 11/20/2004 0.98 1.14 48 11/21/2004 - 11/27/2004 0.97 1.13 49 11/28/2004 - 12/04/2004 0.96 1.12 ' 50 12/05/2004 - 12/11/2004 0.95 1.10 51 12/12/2004 - 12/18/2004 0.94 1.09 52 12/19/2004 - 12/25/2004 0.91 1.06 53 12/26/2004 - 12/31/2004 0.89 1.03 MOCF = 0.86 INote: "*" indicates peak season week Page 2 Print Date: Jul/17/2006 ' Florida Department of Transportation Transportation Statistics Office 2004 Peak Season Factor Category Report ' Note: "*" indicates peak season week Page 3 ' Print Date: July 17, 2006 Florida Department of Transportation Transportation Statistics Office 2004 Historical AADT Report Coimty:91 - OKEECHOBEE Site: 5012 Description: SR 70, EAST OF SR 15/700/US 98/441 Year AADT Direction 1 Direction 2 K Factor D Factor T Factor 2004 C 34,000 E 16,000 W 18,000 0.11 0.61 18.90 2003 C 30,000 E 14,500 W 15,500 0.10 0.60 15.30 2002 C 32,500 E 16,000 W 16,500 0.10 0.56 14.10 C 29,000 E 14,500 W 14,500 0.11 0.58 15.20 '2001 2000 C 30,500 E 15,500 W 15,000 0.11 0.59 16.70 1999 C 30,500 E 14,500 W 16,000 0.11 0.59 12.40 '1998 1997 C 26,500 C 29,500 E 13,000 E 15,000 W 13,500 W 14,500 0.11 0.11 0.58 14.50 0.60 11.00 1996 C 29,000 E 13,000 W 16,000 0.10 0.56 12.60 1995 C 27,000 E 0 W 0 0.11 0.54 13.40 '1994 C 25,500 E 0 W 0 0.10 0.57 13.60 1993 C 27,000 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1991 24,606 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 '1990 1989 0 20,309 E 0 E 0 W 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1988 22,907 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1987 21,194 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 '1986 23,146 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1985 19,686 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1976 16,829 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 ' AADT Flags: C = Computed; E = Manual Estimate; F= First Year Est; S = Second Year Est; T = Third Year Est; X = Unkn own Page 1 - Print Date: July 17, 2006 Floae aVent rlanspion M Transportation Statistics Office 2004AADT Forecast COUNTY: 91 -- OKEECHOBEE SITE DESCRIPTION 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 0007 SR 70 WEST OF SR 710, EAST OF OKEECHOBEE 23,500 24,000 24,500 24,900 25,400 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 25,900 26,400 26,900 27,400 27,900 This report estimates the future AADT for a site based upon that site's historical AADT. These estimafes should only be used as a first guess; more detailed analysis is required for planning purposes. Future year AADT estimates are straight-line projections between 1991-1993 average and the 2001-2003 average. Future AADT estimates will only be projected for a time period commensurate with the amount of history available. This means, for example, if there is only 5 years of history available at a site, the AADT will only be projected for 3 years. Projected AADT estimates are rounded to the nearest thousand vehicles. Page: 1 Print Date: July 17, 2006 Florida Department of Transportation Transportation Statistics Office 2004 Historical AADT Report County:91 - OKEECHOBEE ' Site: 0007 Description: SR 70 WEST OF SR 710, EAST OF OKEECHOBEE Year AADT Direction 1 Direction 2 K Factor D Factor T Factor 2004 C 23,000 E 11,500 W 11,500 0.11 0.61 18.90 2003 C 22,000 E 11,000 W 11,000 0.10 0.60 15.30 2002 C 21,500 E 11,000 W 10,500 0.10 0.56 14.10 C 21,000 E 10,500 W 10,500 0.11 0.58 15.20 '2001 2000 C 19,400 E 9,900 W 9,500 0.11 0.59 16.70 1999 C 19,100 E 9,200 W 9,900 0.11 0.59 12.40 1998 1997 C C 18,700 19,600 E E 9,300 9,600 W W 9,400 10,000 0.11 0.11 0.58 0.60 14.50 11.00 1996 F 17,000 E 8,500 W 8,500 0.10 0.56 14.40 1995 C 16,800 E 8,400 W 8,400 0.11 0.54 13.40 1994 C 17,500 E 8,600 W 8,900 0.10 0.57 13.60 1993 C 16,900 E 8,400 W 8,500 0.10 0.55 12.30 1992 C 17,500 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 11.90 1991 1990 16,029 0 E E 0 0 W W 0 0 0.08 0.00 0.50 0.00 9.60 0.00 1989 14,658 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1988 16,231 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 '1987 12,915 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1986 18,518 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1985 12,971 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 '1984 1983 10,022 10,801 E E 0 0 W W 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1982 . 8,795 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1981 9,216 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1980 _ 9,572 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1979 9,416 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1978 7,885 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,519 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 '1977 1976 8,182 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1975 4,765 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 '1973 1974 5,077 5,114 E E 0 0 W W 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1972 5,004 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1971 4,939 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 ' 1970 4,658 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 ' AADT Flags: C = Computed; E = Manual Estimate; F= First Year Est; S = Second Year Est; T = Third Year Est; X = Unknown Page 1 rr rr r� r �r rr �■r � � �r r� rr ■� rr rr rr �r Print Date: July 17, 2006 FYo�ep�ent o'fTranspor�iion Transportation Statistics Office 2004AADT Forecast COUNTY: 91 -- OKEECHOBEE SITE DESCRIPTION 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 5012 SR 70, EAST OF SR 15/700/US 98/441 34,600 35,300 35,900 36,500 37,100 37,800 38,400 39,000 39,700 ZS4 6d,NO 85.74W 3MIM- 37,53 3�dd t LY This report estimates the future AADT for a site based upon that site's historical AADT. These estimates should only be used as a first guess; more detailed analysis is required for planning purposes. Future year AADT estimates are straight-line projections between 1991-1993 average and the 2001-2003 average. Future AADT estimates will only be projected for a time period commensurate with the amount of history available. This means, for example, if there is only 5 years of history available at a site, the AADT will only be projected for 3 years. Projected AADT estimates are rounded to the nearest thousand vehicles. Page: 1 Exhibit 4 2006 Base Traffic Volumes Turning Movement Count Base 2006 60 Minute Counts DATE TIME INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 1/5/2006 700 1 171 391 240 249 . .. 417 91. 1/5/2006 700 3 61 587 114 200 : 609 25 1/5/2006 700 4 24 420 14 110 463 86 1/5/2006 700 5 0 450 6 0 465- 48 1/5/2006 700 6 20 369 25 50 441 25 1/5/2006 700 10 15 35 50 10 ;; 41 10 1/5/2006 700 11 125 0 75 0 0 0: 1/5/2006 700 51 125 0 75 0 0 0 1/5/2006 700 52 501 0 7 0 0 0 1= SR 70 @ Parrott 3= Parrott @ 21st 4= Parrott @ 28th 5= Parrott @ 32nd 6= Parrott @ Okee Plaza 10= SR 70 @ 5th 11= SR 70 @ 8th 51= SR 70 @ 10th 52= SR 70 @ SR 710 EBL EBT EBR W BL W BT W BR 221 451 125 444 518 345 50 49 25 25 10 50 103 26 29 21 43 240 0 0 51 0 0 8 10 26 0 25 15 45 10 737 5 20 750 10 0 890 50 75 1182 0 0 890 50 75 1182 0 0 316 376 17 542 0 Exhibit 5 FDOT Generalized LOS Tables TABLE 4 - 2 GENERALIZED ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S AREAS TRANSITIONING INTO URBANIZED AREAS OR AREAS OVER 5,000 NOT IN URBANIZED AREAS* UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS ' FREEWAYS Level of Service Level of Service Lanes A B C D E Lanes Divided A 2 Undivided 2,100 B C D 6,900 12,900 18,200 E 24,900 4 6 23,500 38,700 52,500 62,200 69,100 4 Divided 18,600 30,200 43,600 56,500 64,200 8 36,400 49,100 59,800 80,900 81,100 109,600 96,000 129,800 106,700 144,400 6 Divided 27,900 45,200 65,500 84,700 96,200 10 61,800 101,800 138,400 163,800 182,000 STATE TWO-WAY ARTERIALS Class I (>0.00 to 1.99 signalized intersections per mile) BICYCLE MODE Level of Service (Note: Level of service for the bicycle mode in this table is based on roadway Lanes Divided A B C D E geometrics at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of 2 Undivided ** 4,000 13,100 15,500 16,300 bicyclists using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown 4 Divided 4,600 27,900 32,800 34,200 *** below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way 6 Divided 6,900 42,800 49,300 51,400 *** maximum service volumes.) Class II (2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) Paved Shoulder/ Bicycle Lane Level of Service Level of Service Coverage A B C D E Lanes Divided A B C D 2 Undivided ** ** E 0-49% ** 1,900 3,300 13,600 >13,600 10,500 14,500 4 Divided ** 15,300 50-84% ** 2,500 4,000 >4,000 *** 3,700 24,400 30,600 32,200 85-100% 3,200 7,100 >7,100 *** *** 6 Divided ** 6,000 38,000 46,100 48,400 Class III (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile) PEDESTRIAN MODE (Note: Level of service for the pedestrian mode in this table is based on Level of Service roadway geometric at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number Lanes Divided A B C D 2 Undivided ** ** E ofpedestrians using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown 5,000 11,800 14,600 by number ofdirectional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum 4 Divided ** ** 11,700 27,200 30,800 service volumes.) 6 Divided ** ** 18,400 42,100 46,300 Level of Service /o Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E NON -STATE ROADWAYS 0-49% ** ** ** 6,300 15,400 50-84% ** ** ** Major City/County Roadways 9,800 18,800 85-100% ** 2,200 11,200 >11,200 *** Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D E ARTERIAL/NON-STATE ROADWAY ADJUSTMENTS 2 Undivided ** ** 7,000 13,600 4 ** 14,600 DIVIDED/UNDIVIDED Divided ** 16,400 29,300 30,900 6 Divided ** ** 25,700 44,100 46,400 Lanes Median Left Turn Lanes Adjustment Factors Other Signalized Roadways 2 Divided Yes +5% (signalized intersection analysis) 2 Undivided No -20% Multi Undivided Yes -5% Level of Service Lanes Divided A B Multi Undivided No -25% C D 2 Undivided ** ** 4,400 9,400 4 E 12,000 ONE-WAY FACILITIES Divided ** ** 10,300 20,200 24,000 Source: Florida Department of Transportation 02/22/ 22 Decrease corresponding two -directional volumes in this table by 40% to Systems Planning Office obtain the equivalent one directional volume for one-way facilities. 605 Suwannee Street, MS 19 Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 h ://wwwII.myflorida.com/plarming/systems/sm/los/default.htm -This table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications. The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications. The table and deriving computer models should not be used for condor or intersection design, where more refined techniques exist. Values shown are two-way annual average daily volumes (based on K_ factors) for levels of service and are for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated. Level of service letter grade thresholds are probably not comparable across comparisons should be made with caution. Furthermore, combining levels of service of different modes into service criteria appear on the following page. Calculations are based on planning applications the Highway modes and, therefore, cross modal one overall roadway level of service is not recommended. The table's input value defaults and level of of Capacity Manual, Bicycle LOS Model, and Pedestrian LOS Model, respectively for the automobile/truck, bicycle and pedestrian modes. **Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults. ***Not applicable for the level of service letter grade. For automobile/truck modes, volumes greater than level of service D become F because intersection capacities have been reached. For bicycle and pedestrian modes, the level of service letter grade (including F) is not achievable, because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input value defaults. 87 TABLE 4 - 8 GENERALIZED PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONAL VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S AREAS TRANSITIONING INTO URBANIZED AREAS OR AREAS OVER 5,000 NOT IN URBANIZED AREAS* UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS FREEWAYS Level of Service Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D E Lanes A B C D E 1 1 Undivided 100 330 620 870 1,200 2 1,290 2,130 2,890 3,420 3,800 2 Divided 980 1,590 2,300 2,980 3,390 3 2,000 3,290 4,460 5,280 5,870 3 Divided 1,470 2,390 3,460 4,470 5,080 4 2,700 4,450 6,030 7,140 7,940 5 3,400 5,600 7,610 9,010 10.010 STATE TWO-WAY ARTERIALS Class I (>0.00 to 1,99 signalized intersections per mile) BICYCLE MODE Level of Service (Note: Level of service for the bicycle mode in this table is based on roadway Lanes Divided A B C D E geometries at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of I Undivided ** 210 690 820 860 bicyclists using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown 2 Divided 240 1,470 1,730 1,810 *** below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine maximum service 3 Divided 370 2,260 2,600 2,710 *** volumes.) Class II (2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) Paved Shoulder/ Bicycle Lane Level of Service Level of Service Coverage A B C D E Lanes Divided A B C D E 0-49% ** 100 170 720 >720 1 Undivided ** ** 560 760 810 50-84% ** 130 210 >210 *** 2 Divided ** 200 1,290 1,620 1,700 85-100% 170 380 >380 *** *** 3 Divided ** 320 2,000 2,430 2,560 Class III (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile) PEDESTRIAN MODE (Note: Level of service for the pedestrian mode in this table is based on Level of Service roadway geometric at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not Lanes Divided A B C D E number of pedestrians using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle 1 Undivided ** ** 260 620 770 volumes shown by number of directional roadway lanes to determine 2 Divided ** ** 620 1,440 1,630 maximum service volumes.) 3 Divided ** ** 970 2,220 2,450 Level of Service Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E NON -STATE ROADWAYS 0-49% ** ** ** 330 810 50-84% ** ** ** Major City/County Roadways 520 990 85-100% ** 120 590 >590 *** Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D E ARTERIAL/NON-STATE ROADWAY ADJUSTMENTS 1 Undivided ** ** 370 720 770 DIVIDED/UNDIVIDED 2 Divided ** ** 870 1,550 1,630 3 Divided ** ** 1,360 2,330 2,450 Lanes Median Left Turn Lanes Adjustment Factors Other Signalized Roadways 1 Divided Yes +5% (signalized intersection analysis) 1 Undivided No -20% Multi Undivided Yes _5% Level of Service Multi Undivided No -25% Lanes Divided A B C D E 1 Undivided ** ** 230 490 630 ONE-WAY FACILITIES 2 Divided ** ** 540 1,070 1,270 Increase corresponding volume 20%. Source: Florida Department of Transportation 02/22/02 Systems Planning Office 605 Suwannee Street, MS 19 Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 h ://wwwII.myflorida.com/l)lanniniz/systems/sm/los/default.htm 'This table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications. The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications The table and deriving computer models should not be used for corridor or intersection design, where more refined techniques exist. Values shown are hourly two-way volumes for levels of service and are for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated. Level of service letter grade thresholds are probably not comparable across modes and, therefore, cross modal comparisons should be made with caution. Furthermore, combining levels of service of different modes into one overall roadway level of service is not recommended. The table's input value defaults and level of service criteria appear on the following page. Calculations. are based on planning applications of the Highway Capacity Manual, Bicycle LOS Model and Pedestrian LOS Model, respectively for the "Cannot automobile/track, bicycle and pedestrian modes. be achieved using table input value defaults. -Not applicable for the level of service letter grade. For automobile/truck modes, volumes greater than level of service D become F because intersection capacities have been reached. For bicycle and pedestrian modes, the level of service letter grade (including F) is not achievable, because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input value defaults. 99 1 r Exhibit 6 rFDOT Traffic Signal Operating Data r 1 r r 1 r i r 1 1 r 1 1 r 1 1 07/18/2006 15:54 8635340915 1� A" am SERIES EA100 nro DER RADII 75 iCKO GEM COLOR m+6EN XENO b AMMA Q WN17E FDOT D1 TRAF OPS PAGE 10/21 FINANCIAL PROD. 1D STATE PROD_ N0, swer No. 196900-1-52-01 91070--3526 T-4 Ln ' 1 III N ! EA 9-lOt 1 I 6 AS / I a P659-I07 I EA ! EA 2665-13 1 � I 2660-2-K76 \ / /� II 205-13 1 EA 6 M/ 2b20-I Q / a� 26E17-I 6 M 'STORY BRICK 3 AI/ 2630-l-13 1��I �.� ,{� ` RM-1-13 3 All 2 Ea -l-1! 1 III ac / III I£a 6 NI 26E0-! i III 2635-1-11 _ 1N rArr 2630-1-l3 I ONE STORY BRICK 26RO 1 �. A All 2555-/-£ 1 P! 3•! ml 2530-1-aE 2632-7-1 SO m P8 2 Pe L-2 i. R. 70/SR '700 (U.S. 98) ,a 9 6 ^1^ to A# 45 c-! 5 i • � I L-5 L-6 50 mLij PB d 6 Mr 2 EA 6 26EO-r E635-1-1! L-6 ti 9 B P4 t P630-I-IS SAV 2 EA A _ _ )Iyw_ %59-/07 2665 J\ Arm l 6 MI I EA — 1 EA 2 vl 282D-I 264E-11-20 2630-1-0 9 Ml — = - a 6 M! l EA IN 2 RUNS 2630-1-/2 B v ¢ 2620-I 2659-107 P665-13 3 a/ 9 M/ 2630-h1! 2639 2-/ P E630- -12 6 Ml -r ' 6 N! 2930- 13 6 All IgLE 0CAMm- J EA I /t 5 STA• 13+5&J, him RT E620-1 26o-u-30 16 A/1 S Ml B EA )AS p 2630-1-22 12 M1 CITY PARK -1 2660-1-103 RE70-113-05 32 Ml 2635-1- 2 EA ARK 6 Ml le M1 I I 2620-1 16 Ml 2630-I-J2 .2639-2-1 I * I EA 6 MI ! AS 264/-4/-4I 262D-/ T 2S39-/-2$ ,3 M! 3 !II 2630-I-J3 2 RUNS M30-/-/3 ' 6 M/ 2 EA 101 2eza-r as35-I-N • zsso-r-rs LOCATION NO. �S.Rp. 700 rU5 98) AT 5TH AVE. WEST FLOC Dp SPORTAT cN !1F f 1 DESRNED By., LLU DATEr 0-89 APPROVC0 6Y DRAWN BY: DLW OATEe 9-M CHECKED ®'a MAU DArEe [-W DATg oArE DE Tom FLORIDA DEPARrMEVr OF PLAN SHEET rRANsPDararlov 07/18/2006 15:54 8635340915 FDOT D1 TRAF OPS PAGE 11/21 1 1 1 1 1 1 u 0 d �J PEDESrRIAN SIGNAL 3-SECT., r-wAr 5-sECT. cGusrER I-sEcriw, I -WAY 6 AS 2 AS SAS E650-1-13/ 2Fi50-9-151 2653-lN SIGNAL HEAD DETAILS CONTROLLER OPERATIONS: CI-0-1.es - 7 L3 ` =th DW s£R,Es t Mro0 - g pD ' e,M N Park M950 v\P5 qSp ItA BACKSAWN01 7AD0I1 7! COLOR - v LEGEND a asRnFMr i WwEYv P EA P= WrEt 364 DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS. PUSH ®� BUT TO .® .I•lfr CROSS nrro $T. NAME aeeu., FrP-47 ,MODIFIED FTP-49 I. MAJOR STREET IS SR 70/SR 7RQ.f11S 981. PHASE 3'(MOVE"CAl'S 2 AND 61, - s[ AND MINOR STREET IS STH AI-W'.. PHASE 4 (MOVEMENTS 4 AND 8). 2. STANDARO SIGNAL OPERATING PLAN NO. 7 WITH THE FOLLOWINGe .fAJ FUTURE TIME -BASE COORDINATION ON PHASE 3 lUOVEMENTS 2 AND 6J. SIGNAL WILL BE COORDINATED WITH US 441 (EAST). f91 CONCURRENT/ACTUATED PEDESTRIANS FOR MOVEMENTS 4 rP4), 6 fP61, AND B (P8J. THE FORCE -OFF FUNCTION FOR PHASE 4 SHALL NOT BE EFFECTIVE DURING THE TIMING OF PEDESTRIAN CLEARANCE INTTHE£RVAL FOR CONTROLLER4 SHALL AND PREMAIN INTHECOORDINATED MODEAND S. SYNCHRONIZATION RzAASHALL NOT REVERT TO ISOLATED OPERATION AS A RESULT OF PEDESTRIAN ACTUATION. (C) THE YIELD POINT SHALL eE THE POINT IN THE CYCLE WHERE THE COORDINATED PHASE +3 rMOVCMENTS 2 AND 6) !S TERMINATED, SUBJECT LEAL 4. THE Y IC0 NGTSHALLTBE THE ZERO" PERCENrNOFFSETNOFCTHE LOCAL CYCLE LENGTH. rrM/Nc - ---- ---- r/N. S APE INITIAL AND MAY /MEDMIRE L'MEL0 ADJUSrIW AS DIMCrM 8r PAOlECT ENGINEER. INSTALL CONC lclll TJMIND OF INITIAL AND far£NSIDM /xrERvgLS. AnrE� S,CN DIMENSIONS ARE IN 2 _R/W - S/W /3 s. 4 AS 2660-g-rot 6 All 2 EA 1 MI 2BZ0-! 2635-1-JI 2630-/-/3 • S/W 12 All R/W p L62D-� ,ems 8 Ml 263D-I -l2 2 RUNS DEIAr TIME IS INlrIAL AND Mar OfwIAE FfELD ADA)$)- VG AS DIRECr£D or PAWECr ENGINEER. I -2 POLE LDL'ATfpN- SrA- MJ+J18, IT.I- RT 15 Mi ffi£O-I CITY PAI 6 MI 2620—I 2, 07/18/2006 15:54 8635340915 i FDOT D1 TRAF OPS PAGE 08/21 4 AS 4^9 0-2-102 ztic;p-2-ros B AS ' I.6X9 . ' I IB III I I a 01 ( � e En olc f � I \ FINANCIAL PPOJ. ID STATE PROJ• NO. SH£Er H0. 196900-1-52-01 91070--3526 T-5 \�`•b- I i=4D .. 1.6 X 9 II L-4 — — L-7 A SR 70 Ps v ifl III i I� I tit V IQ I I� LOCATION N0. 2 III I S.R(.. 7(0�/,S.R. 700 (US 98) c' SR 15 (US 441) !�'� /0 I �� FcoRrDA.OcpaQrllr.11r,(�F TRANSPORTATIQN OEStGNEO Brr, Alu DAr[r a-M APPROVED BY e ORAMN 61'e uW DATE+ 9-98 I WA CHEMO BVt 'FIA9 DAT& 4-99 OATS t L — .. -9 9 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OP rRANSPORTATION PLAN SHEET 07/18/2006 15:54 8635340915 FDOT Dl TRAF OPS PAGE 09/21 u o EXISTING SIGNALS, SIGNS, AND. PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS ARE TO REMAIN CONTROLLER OPERATIONS: 1. MAJOR STREET IS SR 15 (US 441)/$A 700 fUS 9B. PHASE 3 (MOVEMENTS 2 AND 6). AND MINOR STREET 1S SR 70/ SR 700 (US 98), PHASE 6 (MOVEMENTS 4 AND 8). 2. STANDARD SIGNAL OPERATING PLA& NO. 10 fEXISTING) iFITH THE FOLLOWING, (A) CONCURRENT/ACTUATED PEDESTRIANS FOR kovemENTS 2 (PE), 4 (P4), 6 (P6). AND a (P8), 'y. j SR 70/SR 700 (US 981 EXISTING MAST ARMS AND CONTROLLER ARE TO REMAIN c 1 EA L:' 07/18/2006 15:54 B635340915 FDOT D1 TRAF OPS PAGE 06/21 1�— FINANCIAL PROD. ID STATE PROD. NO. &+ E 25 R, /96900-l-52-0/ 91070-3526 A10. T-6 200 SERIES LMOO SERVICE POLE SHALL BE 4 m IN LENGTH p\� WITH AN IN -GROUND DEPTH OF 1.5 m. I CA 9AC1fGROUNLI COIF? � CREEN IECEM 6 i"OER WHITE 3�70 rR / 69E /fd 6 ill E £A ;TONS An£ -N MILLIMETERS. 2b�O-/ 2665-/J I IfA O' Y! ? ' 6 mi 8 EA I : e'cc�O-1-/ ' 8 All IEA O 3-1 Af/ P535-1-11 -1 ,Et"iI1-11-? , 2555-1-I p6i0-I I POLE wcATAIAf- J-f xa 86J0-yam 1 : 5 AS I • E�-2^A7s 1 � M YI 4 y/ SrA46+29.2, aim Lr e'KSO-1^12 25w-/-13 GrA- 0.2. STA. P61OI1, IE !a LT 9p I 6 A1/ 1 Ml s All 1 EA l EA I : I Nj^f -r-IJ 26I7�f1^l3 2ws-N p' 9 y 4 -1-9 EA --2 -------R/W Ul�WAI-------------- ol 4 4 P4 r� S.R. 70 26 " L,2 32 ar 44 y/ L�Jr � 1 P-a55�M2 P8T0-/-p2 L-6A I PI ' I AS L`6 %Q'A-ram E EA 1!sso 2-log 6 -/ ac 9-lOT z66s•-IJ A 6 a+� 2 EA 1 L-6 li �n 6 ; r 2b2o� 1 1 t EA 26]5•4-N L3 Ruu or 2 M- l EA s M! !i P9 2660-1-0] ' o I rl y-u — � 12 Almol` 3 AN -- 17 Q/ WN- - - -- -�- �.---- - -.... P6 I IRml 36A1/ - ---`-- '>� a fa-'.�----------=:-�•-- E:-•-- - - - •��• -....�`:''.°_'.:'�.....>�J9,P-r Rom; --------------------- ;, / ..—_ ------ -- 4 PVC 2&QO-- 26.75-l-N a6J0-I-I �. RM-4-I2 —R/N-YV_ Y I! 9M- 6 MI I EA I FA I )AS • I EA 1 �sacv-, � .ms9^rar I YE63iJ 1 k 6Mi EEA ' i' RGM-1 2sJ5-/-9 I cW 1 J-, zo 6 Yl IEA POLE LOCArIOM= 5TA.25-O9.9,E1jm AT z6m-1 -4-9 1 f9 All I- 26J0-1�22 36 All G CONTROLLER TO REMAIN Lu a) 14. cil I IJ All � 1 to OSiO 1-12 CL J9 W 74 6 Ml 3 2 POLE txarnN- I En SrA. PG+P9d, A.Rm Rr q Mt 26Jo-r-rz Lg la ny (2 WI 4 EA 3 Yl 9 AN PI Ml LOCATION NO. 3 S.R. 70 AT 8TH AVE.. EAST VEES-0 Orr LOO nar& 9-se nrrlruvtu S.- r MAW Bra LCC 1-ATEt 9-99 C!l£CXEV @'t MIM OAr£r 9-99 1ATE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PLAN SHEET 07/18/2006 15:54 8635340915 FDOT D1 TRAF OPS PAGE 07/21 0 LA PEDESTRIAN PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL SIGNAL 3-SECT-, I -WAY 5-SE'CT, CLUSTER I-SECT/OAI' .. I-S£CT10N, 7 AS /-WAY 2-WAY J AS 2 AS 2 AS 2650�I-/3I 2650-9-J5/ L26$3-Ill 2653-I/a' SIGNAL HEAD DETA / LS to 8th Ave E _ /a * SEA/F$ EkW q� BORDER AADn l350 En g,�KDNO iy�7g - 69EE// LEGEND A GOWR a WHITE 0J7 9MI I Ave / E PACF 41 2L0 555 Sam SK,d D/uENS/ONS ARf /A y/LL/YETERS. SPACE 1F: WE. S)GN Dc LT, SH• PUSH BUTTON TON TO m O CROSS OSS MA,B MAW ® � �•Anu NA `Ilf,tfl� vV atl� FTP-47 FTP-4@ MODIFIEO FTP-49 C0Nrl40L4ER 0 PR A7IONS: I- MAJOR STREET /S SR 70- PHASE 8 (MOVEMENTS 2 AND 6); Aryp MINOR STREET /S BTH AVE. EAST -PHASE S (MOKEAIENTS 4. AND 8J- 2. STANDARD SIGNAL OPERATING AN N0. PLAN II (EXISTING) WITH THE IA) TIVE-BASE COORDINATION ON PHASE $ (1JOVEM£NTS Q AND 6l, SIGNAL /S COORDINATED WITH IOTH AVE. E, (EAST). (Bl CONCURRENTIACTIJATED PEDESTRIANS FOR MOVEMENTS 2 (pP), 4 IP41 , AND 6 (P61- 1. EXISTING CONTROLLER TImISGS TIMING fUNcTIOfI / MOVEM 2AT Np, r J M/N/MMy CREEK 9 P 7 S EXTENSION - - •_ FO 20 > T O MAX! M OREEN ! 1R/ MAYIM�/N OR EEN e J it - - - �0 40 4 4 15 75 YELLOW CLEARANCE / 5 - t JS JS 34 J2 ALL RFD __ 44 4 ,. P$D- WALK ~ _ --- l l 2 2 PED, CLEARANCE 10 --- RECALL --- --- /3 /J ¢E --- DETECrMS PM LWpS N0. NM OAF AO.OP LR7P OF NEW FPICT SEE MAST ARM DETAIL & OF 2 FOR ELE'VAMN &,SCSC£NCE.HEDULE. SHEET 2 L- f EXIS TIN OELAT T/W IS_1N/T/AL IWD AIAr RFQI/IRC F/CW ADJ -17'MV AS D/AECTED EY PROJECT L'hG1NEER, , 1 1 07/18/2006 15:54 8635340915 FDOT D1 TRAF OPS PAGE 04/21 EXISTING MAST ARMS AND CONTROLLER ARE TO REMAIN. _ S.R. TO III L2 �4] 11 C6 2r u� 2555-l-! Ca 21AII 2630-1-2Z FINANCIAL PROJ. ID SLATE PROJ. No. SnEEr 196900-1-52-01 91070--3526 7 —7 E635-1-11 !EA � 2620-/ 3 ur 1,u1 LOCATION NO. 4 S.R. 70 AT LOTH AVE. EAST- APPROVED -BY'; DESICNEO ®'i LWDATE: 9^99 �q bAAWN BYs LW Darer 9-99 Cam: CHECKED er, rur VArgr 4-99 IDArr: 12"l4- 9 - J FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF I TRANSPORTATION PLAN SHEE T 07/18/2006 15:54 8635340915 FDOT D1 TRAF OPS PAGE 05/21 EXISTING SIGNALS, SIGNS, AND PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS ARE ,TO REMAIN CONTROLLER OPERATIONS: I. MAJOR STREET IS S.R. 70, PHASE I (MOVEMENTS 2 AND 6J. MINOR STREET IS IOTH AVE, E-. PHASE 2 (MOVENENT 4J 2. SPECIAL SIGNAL OPERATING PLAN (EXISTING) WITH THE FOLLOWINGr (AJ TINE -BASE COORDINATION ON PHASE I (MOVEMENTS 2 AND 6J. BASE. SIGNAL 1S COORDINATED WITH BTH AVE. E. (WESrJ. (B). CONCURRENT/ACTUATED PtDESTRIANS FOR MOVEMENTS 4 (P4J AND 6 (P$). EXISTING SPECIAL S.O.P. v- PHASE I PHASE 2 rF'I TF2 ©+® EXISTING CONTROLLER TIMINGS rIUING Fl/NCTIoN i A )MOVEMENT NO. 2 B 4 MININUll GREEN pp 20 7 EaTENsION J S J o i/AYINVII GREEN I 40 40 I5 MAXJuu# CREEN 2 35 JS 25 rELLOW CLEARANCE t ALL RtD PE0- WALK 2 2.5 T T PEO. CLEARANCE ,Y Ia RECALL OETECrms FtiH (ODP5 LOOP N0. OF LOP'S MD.OF NEW VETS. NO, OF DEur fX75T. twE GETS. ISECI 1-0 4 L-PA- L-4 / --- L-4P / / L-C 2 I L- c- L- L- L- MAr TfYG IS INn�TIAL AND YAP REO'1IR&- r'�ew ADJUSTING AS OfACCrED @r PAXLECr ENCINCER. 4 AS Z660-8-IO2 I Ml �2630-1-lJ I E'A 3 MI 26P0-I 07/18/2006 15:54 8635340915 FDOT D1 TRAF OPS PAGE 20/21 SIATf PROD. NO. • 990o1-3S87 ' - 910G 0-DD, ppp '--- I A5 70-13- ,I 62 EA 50 LF A 20 - I-1 6(o0-I-10¢ 1 EA. - — I EA 2 RUNS AG20-1-� 1 20 LF AG30-1-12 9 LF G -1-1 I AS ' - - 4) LF - 20LF \ b�o-I-12 112 LF •. IF 30-1- IZ \ A AG - -11 \ ' 7D IQ 71-F 630-I-I ~ ACn35- -I I I EA 72 . SR. 70 2 IV OF 24" wHT. -2 A66 - -I b `- -1 A6 4 -11 EL,96,4 �- 4 lzEMovE 44 gF o,=4 -MERMOPLASTIC j A7o0-73-I EL,9�A ZVOF 24" wwr ' I EA A(a41-I5-4(e A62 -I-1 20 LF ?Q ACo(oo� 1 I A9 12 A/A RPNI'S ' \ LOCATION OF PROD EC T ' SCALES I 2 6XISTIWm 'io REMAIW \ �2 MAYS DAT6 NAM[ DAY FLORIDA DEPANYMENT OF .�. TRANSPORTATION e. C. .B 6 $q ADn�oreD AT S1G A IZ �.. N ATI01� AND SIGNING : MARKI M6 ICD BY Tbd P� Y DATIQ�MA �iq 18/2006 15:54 8635340915 FDOT D1 TRAF OPS ,• PAGE 21/21 ;. Z © I 1 RED YELLOW GRLEN 4 3 SECT-1 WAY 3 SECT-2WAY _I, 131 5 SECT- 1 WsaY 3AS IAS IAs SILL HEAD DES CONTROLLER OpERa7tONs: I' MAJOR STREET IS $R, 70 PHASE 2 (MOVEMENT 2 AND �o) AND M►1JO R STREET IS S.R, 710 PHA3p 3 ( MOVF.MEI.17 2. SPECIAL SIGNAL OPB RA7!!`I 4 PLAN WITH THE FOGLOwrNG; (A) 8 PHASE CONTROLLER TO OPERATE AS SPECIAL 3 PHASE PEC 1 S�0 R 1 2 3 TP• I TF Z Tr 3 ®-F— V+-® C�7 (B) COUTROLLER TO HAVE PEDESTRIAN CQ1L1TjES FO COORDINAT-fON ON PHASE 2 Fv AApgFA R FUTURE USE, NOTES' SEE' SWEET T-3 (-nME BASED) NUMBERg, GENERAL NOTE SHEET, FOR ALL NOTES PER7AININfi TO 171:M irom��r��� 07/18/2006 15:54 8635340915 FDOT Dl TRAF OPS PAGE 1 _J� 6-0, x -so.0, 401 TRIAN lIAL SPARE CONDUIT FOR FUTURE USE PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN HEAD AY 5 TING 3 CONDUIT RUNS ' ~~ h �_ SPARE CONDUIT FOR FUTURE USE A— — — — — — — — -- 6.01 x 6-0, rug -,far --60 _j 50. 4411 156-f00 \A 0 I 3 CONDUIT AVNS!5.55-)-Z I' 699 ^ I - I �� � � � �i�` •�'^� = — �� �^ w EXISTING PEDESTRIAN KEA 6 =1 AND BUTTON TO REMAIN f- 61— 690 -20 690-31 '—EXISTING CONDUIT AND PULL BOXES A P r 3-0 --o -13 �R. FUTURE USE THE PURPOSE PAY ITEM 'NT'S BASIS. 6-0, x 50-0, SPECIFICATIONS REMA IN 3 LOCATION NO. I 2-q-7za SR /5 (US 441) Q SW 21 Sr. UP J-767 STA 7W OF JM-QMA AWARTMUNr OF 7RAJV5PMTA770Ar SrGNALIZA TION SHEET--mw ko. I T- MCIA PAOICC7 lb OKEECHOBEE rl.968 3-2-52-0/ DES IGNER.-DWU SECT ON NO..r 91020 T-3 07/18/2006 15:54 8635340915 FDOT D1 TRAF OPS PAGE 19/21 EXISTING MAST ARMS AND SIGNAL HEADS ARE TQ REMAIN CONTROLLER OPERATIONS: ' 1- MAJOR STR I EET S S .R. Na. !S (US 4411, PHASE 3 (MOVEMENTS E AND 6), AND MINOR STREET IS 21s1 5►., PHASE 4 (AOVEMENTS ' 4 AND 81. 2. STANDARD SIGNAL OPERATING PLAN NO. 7 WITH 7HE FOLLOWING. - (At C0NC1l1?RENT/AC7UATED PEDESTRIANS POR MOVEMENTS 2 rP2). 4 IP4), 6 (P6), AND 8 rP8). (B) MODIFY EXISTING CONTROLLER TO ACTIVATE PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENTS. CONTROLLER T I/4! I NGS -FUNCTION T lll.I NG 1 2 3 5 6 MOVEMENT N0. 1 2 4 6 5 6 MINIMUM GREEN 7,020.0 10.0 10.0 7.0 20.0 z EXTENSION 2.5 4.0 3.0 3.0 0.5 4.0 ti MAXIMUM GREEN 1 15.0 50.0 30.0 30.0 20.0 50.0 MAXIMUM GREEN 2 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- LL2 YELLOW CLEARANCE 4.0 4-0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 z ALL RED I.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 F' PED. WALK ---- 10.0 12.0 12.0 ---- 10.0 PED- CLEARANCE ---- 21.0 24.0 24.0 ---- 21.0 RECALL ---- MIN ---- ---- ---- uIN R P4 © Ef II l� PED. SIGNAL PED. • SIGNAL PEi I -WAY 2-WAY 653-18/ 653-182 2 659-10T fi69-IJ 6sa-r-r 6J0.1�7J 6J0-I -IJ 635-1-11 659-IDT 665-I J CONOvIT SPARE CONDUI' NOTE: PAY ITEM NUMBERS ARE PROVIDED ONLY I OF DESCRIBING THE WORK TO BE PERFOR, DESCRIPTIONS ARE FOUND IN THE DEPAR; OF ESTIMATES HANDBOOK AND THE PROJEI PACKAGE. ' TIMINGS ARE INITIAL AND MAY REQUIRE FIELD ADJUSTING AS DIRECTED BY PRO✓ECT ENGINEER. INSTALL CONCURRENT TIMING OF INITIAL AND EXTENSION INTERVALS. R E V I S IONS oarE aI DESG/+IPrfON DAt ' 61' � EXISTING DE TEC TORS ARE NA / r ANS_ENGINEER OF RFCOR EDDIE R..rorNE . v E. r5462O1 FLA. DEP Or TRANSPGRTAT/oN DISTRICT I OFFICE SW N. 4MADWAr AVE. SARTDW, rL S393o_Mo9 07/18/2006 15:54 8635340915 FDOT D1 TRAF OPS PAGE 16/21 ■ 'POSE TEIf 75 'Ar 10N5 Y 6 rr saa- -I 63a-1-1S L — .. R/W� C Add/t tonal condull run _ for future use SR 700 & 15 (US 98 & 1� 441)/PARROTT AVE. ') i R/Wr— f3 Runs Sery Ice Pore No. f AIIG I I I I ({ Rum '7 J� � � - 176 f 40' I -5 6' x 50' t{ Runal 6 `------- 5 --lTT -Z N r^E IIIICc1i W W III III I IIIII�.I Ilh �III10 XW, ', Ex ►sr /n9 power �.90urce Addlf Ional condull run for future use kfi0:U7:D:j):�]H Service Pole No. r LOCATION N0. 3-``�'"�O� SR 700 & 15 (US 98 & 441 J 0 WOLFFF :RD-/1' CHARLES W. HARVEY MEM. .NWY - SrA7W OF MXIRJ 4 LE�PAR7'Afmvr a - mA,rVspmm7mv sxl=Ei SIGN.�LIZA7'I®N ' �M AO. cavxrr ru►nhrint PROJECT rn t SR 700 & 15 OKEECHOBEE 196898-1-52-01 DESIGNER; ML M SECT / ON NO . r 9 / 020 T _5 M1012 03 /2:J9IIs ry c�ebroJecta db�ve�eeo 4ge 1 1 1 1 1 1 II1 1� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 07/18/2005 15:54 8635340915 FDOT D1 TRAF OPS El KA PED. S/CNAL 3-SECT.. l-WAY 5-SECT. CLUSTER 2-WAY so-SI-SIr SO-SI- It 53-IIF SIGNAL HEAD DETAILS CONTROLLER OPERATIONS: I- MAJOR STREET IS SR 700 a /5 fU$ 98 a 4411. PHASE 3 (MOVEMENTS 2 AND 61, AND MINOR STREET" IS WOLFF RD-/CHARLES W. HARVEY MEM. HWY., PHASE 4 (MOVEMENTS 4 AND 8). 2: STANDARD SIGNAL OPERATING PLAN NO- 7 fEXISTNG) WITH THE FOLLOWING: (A) CONCURREMT/ACTUATEO PEDESTRIANS FOR MOVEMENTS 2 fP21, It (P41, 6 fP6), AND B (P8). CONTROLLER TIMINGS TIMING FUNCTION I $ 3 6 MOVEMENT N0• I P 4 6 5 6 M/N/MUM GREEN 7.0 to.0 1.0 T.0 1.0 20.0 EXTENSION 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 5.0 o i MAXIlium GREEN 1 AIAX IM(/N GREEN 2 15.0 .... 40.0 .... 30.0 ............ 30.0 13.0 40.0 .... YELLOW CLEARANCE 4.3 4.0 4.01 4.01 4.5 4.0 59 ALL RED r.o l.o I-o I_o I.o I. PFD. (WALK ---- 10.0 r4.0 /4•0 PED- CLEARANCE -- Eo.O pe.o 2a.o •--- 2D.o RECALL .... NIn. •.•. _-. 10PA& AMU MAr REQUIRE FIELD ADJUSTING AS DIRECTED 8r PROJECT ENGINIim INSTALL CONCURRENT Timmo OF INITIAL AND EXTENSION INTERVALS. PAGE 17/21 NOTE, PAY ITEM NUMBERS ARE PROVIVEO ONLY FOR � OF DESCRIBING THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED. DESCRIPTIONS ARE FOUND IN THE DEPARTMENT OF ESTIMATES HANDBOOK AND THE PROJECT Si PACKAGE. UMMAT FOR LOOPS LOOP NO. OF LOOPS A0. OF Nf1W . MrS. NO. OF ExrST. W-1, 1 CCLAr TIME tSEt . J L-I ! I - -- L-2 2 / L-4 1 [ --- L -4P I [ L -5 I [ L L-9A L-89 ! / L -UP r - t -- L^ DELAY TIME is /Nir/AL AND MAr MOIRE FIELD ADJUSTING AS DIRECTED Or WjEIr ENG[NEEA, REMOVAL ITEMS jod-lo 690-TO 690-20 b -i 0 -4e -60 /Remove exist In0 overhead street slpns. J See Gulde Sign Work Sheet tT-6) for detolls of Signs A. C, & D. 12 RUM 6J0-1-I Existing Controller mesf orms are to ran NOTE: SERVICE POLE •2 SHALL Bl H1:IGKT WITH AN /N-GROUNJ 0F' 4.5'. NOTE. SERVICE POLE HEIGHT WITH OF 7'. WA[17ATA7N PLAN5 EAGINEEA OF R ED[JIZr lt• .R7lwfR, P.t;, r5P62U1 FLA. DEPT. OF TW.VVRTAr/0N D[STRA:T r OFFA E W N. BRDALWAY AVE. BARrOW, FL J_VM-3M 07/18/2006 15:54 8635340915 FDOT D1 TRAF OPS PAGE 12/21 �F PURPOSE PAY ITEM 'S BASIS ;C I F ICAT IONS r x Ist Ing s Ignal pot es and �ntroller are fo remain I rir T;: 63o-r -I J 6S8-IDT ' R/W ' Addll fonol condult run for future use'~ 13 Owns) 555-l-P 100 / 1-5 (US 98 & /PARROTT AVE. i '' xr50 6JS-l-ll t TRACTOR SUPPLY CO. SHOPPING CTR. re Rune I 10� I 635-1-11 4j y r R/1r / in i9-10 II Audi! fonol condult 1 i5-!J II I I run ror future use OKEECHOBEE PLAZA (MP 1.027) 0 -- 6' x so' III AddIt lonal condult run for future use im— Z R/w !3 LOCATION NO. 2 SR 700/15 (US 98/441) a OKEECHOBEE PLAZA SM7N OP MA WMA SiIEET AZPARTMIENr CW MA111b "TAMV S.tGNALMATIO.N No. 'ADO AO. =#TT FMIX6IAL PAaI£Cr 10 SR 700 OKEWHOSEE /9689B-I-52-01 T -4 & 15 DESIGAIER1 MLAI SECTIOIN NO-r 91020 amv"y 12.41! ! PM c:�ebroJecrsV 85Hl�xPondeN�rg701d7n 07/18/2006 15:54 8635340915 FDOT D1 TRAF OPS PAGE 13/21 a o pq PED. SIGNAL E- 2-WAY 3-SECT.. I -WAY �J-r1P S-SECT. CLUSTER SIGNAL HEAD DETAILS CONTROLLER OPERATIONS: I. MAJOR STREET IS SR 700 6 1'5 (US 90 & 441). PHASE 3;(00VEMENTS 2 AND 6J, AND MINOR STREETS ARE TRACTOR SUPPLY CO. ShOPPING CTR., PHASE 4 (MOVEMENTS 3 & 81 AMD OKEECHOBEE PLAZA, PHASE 5 fMOVE- MENTS 7 8 4). 2. SPECIAL SIGNAL OPERATING PLAN (EXISTING) WITH THE FOLLOWING: fA) CONCURRENT/ACTUATED PEDESTRIANS FOR MOVEMENTS 2 (PP), 4 (P4). 6 (PG). AND 8 fP8). f8) MODIFY EXISTING CONTROLLER AND PERFORM ANY CABINET AND FIELD WIRING NECESSARY TO ACTIVATE PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENTS. SPECIAL S.O.P. PHASE 2 CONTROLLER TIMINGS TIMING FURCT(OM 1 g ♦ g g MOVEMENT NO. 1 e, D a . 7 5 6 ' MINIMUM GREEN T .0 IE0.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 20.0 EXTENSION 510 5.0 5.0 .7.0 3.0 3.0 3.0.9.0 MAXIMUM GREEN 1 I3.0 40.0 20.0 E0.0 1 p.0 e0.0 15.0 40.0 MAXINUN GREEN E ............ ..-- ................ YELLOW CLEARANCE 4-3 ♦-5 4.0 ca 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.5 14 ALL RED 1.0 I.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 /.0 1.0 1'0 PED. WALK ---- 10.6 ---- 12.0 12.0 ---- ---- to.; ~ PED. CLEARANCE --- 20.0 ---- 22.0 22.0 --.- ---- 20.0 RECALL - Mle. ---- ---- --- I I-4mum Rr,t 1RrfIAL AND MAY REQUIRE FIELD ADJUSTING AS DIRECTED BY PADJEcT ENGINEER. INSTALL CONCURRENT TIMING OF IRIT/AL AND EXTENSION INTERVALS. NOTE+ PAY ITEM NUMBERS ARQ PROVIDED ONLY OF DESCRIBING THE WORK TO BE P£RF'0. DESCRIPTIONS ARE FOUND IN THE DEPA, OF ESTIMATES HANDBOOK AND THE PROJ, PACKAGE. DCrrCrOR5 FOR Loon LOVA NO. OF LOOPS 90. OF RE# OE'75. NO. OF EXIST. DOTS• DELAY MIRE r5w.I -- L-4P 1 I L-5 L -714 L- L- DELAY T/MEIS )N/TIAL AMD MAY REDUIRE FIELO ADJUSTING AS DIRECTED BY PROJECT ENGINEER_ REMOVAL ITEMS 0-10 6 - O 690-I LI© TF 5 2-1® TF 6 S ArION_PIAMS 00INEER OF Ri EDDIE R. JOYNER, P.E. f:,Saa- FLA. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT I OFFICE BW N. BROADWAY AVE. HANTOW, FL 33830-JW3 Exhibit 7 2006 Without Project Analy sis ysas Summary ' Arterial Level of Service Arterial Level of Service: NB Parrott Ave 2006 AM Existing Conditions ' Arterial Cross Street Class Flow Seed Running Time Signal Delay Travel Time s) Dist Arterial Arterial Shopping Center II mi Seed LOS SW 28th St II 45 57.3 8.4 65.7 0.72 39.2 A SW 21st Street II 45 34.0 9.8 43.8 0.35 29.1 g SR 70 II 45 45 37.2 109.9 8.0 46.4 45.2 156.3 0.40 1.37 31.5 31.7 g Total II g 238.4 72.6 311.0 2.84 32.9 g Arterial Level of Service: SB Parrott Ave ' Arterial Cross Street Class Flow Running Signal Travel Dist Arterial Arterial Seed SR 70 Time Delay Times mi Seed LOS 11 SW 21st Street If 45 45.3 42.0 87.3 0.57 23.4 C SW 28th St II 45 109.9 7.7 117.6 1.37 42.1 A Shopping Center II 45 37.2 7.2 44.4 0.40 32.1 g Total II 45 34.0 7.5 41 5 0 35 30 7 g 226.4 64.4 290.8 2.69 33.3 g ' Arterial Level of Service: EB SR 70 Cross Street Arterial Class Flow Seed Running Signal Travel Dist Arterial Arterial ' 5th Time Delay Times mi Seed LOS Parrott Ave III III 35 26.8 5.4 32.2 0.22 25.0 g 8th Ave III 35 33.7 48.6 82.3 0.28 12.3 E 10th Ave III 35 61.2 13.5 74.7 0.51 24.6 g ' SR 710 III 35 19.5 10.2 29.7 0.15 18.5 C Total III 35 116.6 8.1 124.7 1.13 32.7 A 257.8 85.8 343.6 2.30 24.1 g ' Arterial Level of Service: WB SR 70 Cross Street Arterial Class Flow Running Signal Travel Dist Arterial Arterial SR 710 Seed Time Delay Times mi Seed LOS ' 10th Ave III III 30 35.4 7.0 42.4 0.28 23.7 C 8th Ave III 35 116.6 12.2 128.8 1.13 31.7 A Parrott Ave III 35 19.5 8.6 28.1 0.15 19.5 C 5th III 35 61.2 34.3 95.5 0.51 19.2 C Total III 35 33.7 5.4 39.1 0.28 25.9 g ' 266.4 67.5 333.9 2.36 25.4 g Arterial Level of Service 2006 PM Existing Conditions Arterial Level of Service: NB Parrott Ave Arterial Cross Street Class Flow Running Signal Travel Dist Arterial Arterial ' Shopping Center 11 Seed Time Delay Time s) (ml) Seed LOS SW 28th St II 45 57.3 7.3 64.6 0.72 39.9 A SW 21st Street II 45 34.0 10.5 44.5 0.35 28.7 g SR 70 If 45 37.2 11.9 49.1 0.40 29.0 g ' Total II 45 109.9 55.2 165.1 1.37 30.0 g 238.4 84.9 323.3 2.84 31.6 g Arterial Level of Service: SB Parrott Ave ' Arterial Flow Running Cross Street Class Seed Signal Travel Dist Arterial Arterial SR 70 II Time Delay Times mi Seed LOS SW 21st Street II 45 45.3 64.8 110.1 0.57 18.5 D ' SW 28th St II 45 109.9 10.7 120.6 1.37 41.0 A Shopping Center II 45 37.2 9.2 46.4 0.40 30.7 g Total II 45 34.0 4.5 38.5 0.35 33.1 g ' Arterial Level Service: 226.4 89.2 315.6 2.69 30.7 g of EB SR 70 ' oss Street Parrott Arterial Class Flow Seed Running Time Signal Dela Travel Times Dist mi Arterial Seed Arterial LOS Ave III III 35 26.8 7.3 34.1 0.22 23.6 C 8th Ave III 35 33.7 160.5 194.2 0.28 5.2 F 10th Ave III 35 61.2 15.5 76.7 0.51 23.9 C SR 710 III 35 19.5 9.2 28.7 0.15 19.1 C ' Total III 35 116.6 9.0 125.6 1.13 32.5 A 257.8 201.5 459.3 2.30 18.0 C Arterial Level of Service: WB SR 70 Cross Street Arterial Class Flow Seed Running Signal Travel Dist Arterial Arteri al SR 710 III Time, Delay Times mi Seed LOS 10th Ave III 30 35.4 7.5 42.9 0.28 23.4 C ' 8th Ave III 32 125.6 13.4 139.0 1.13 29.4 g Parrott Ave III 35 19.5 5.6 25.1 0.15 21.9 C 5th III 35 61.2 48.3 109.5 0.51 16.8 D ' Total III 35 33.7 275.4 8.1 82.9 41.8 358.3 0.28 24.2 g 2.36 23.7 C Page 1 1 Exhibit 8 2006 With Project Analysis Summary Arterial Level of Service 2006 AM ' Existing Conditions with Proj Traffic Arterial Level of Service: NB Parrott Ave Arterial Cross Street Class Flow Seed Running Time Signal Delay Travel Time s) Dist (ml) Arterial Seed Arterial Shopping Center II 45 LOS SW 28th St II 57.3 8.4 65.7 0.72 39.2 A SW 21st Street II 45 45 34.0 10.0 44.0 0.35 29.0 B SR 70 II 37.2 8.2 45.4 0.40 31.4 B ' Total II 45 109.9 49.1 159.0 1.37 31.1 B 238.4 75.7 314.1 2.84 32.6 B Arterial Level of Service: SB Parrott Ave ' Arterial Cross Street Class Flow Running Signal Travel Dist Arterial Arterial SR 70 Seed Time Delay Times mi Seed LOS II SW 21st Street II 45 45.3 42.2 87.5 0.57 23.3 C SW 28th St II 45 109.9 7.8 117.7 1.37 42.0 A Shopping Center II 45 37.2 7.3 44.5 0.40 32.0 B Total II 45 34.0 7.5 41.5 0.35 30.7 B ' Arterial Level 226.4 64.8 291.2 2.69 33.3 B of Service: EB SR 70 Cross Street Arterial Class Flow Running Signal Travel Dist Arterial Arterial ' 5th 111 Seed Time Delay Times mi Seed LOS Parrott Ave III 35 26.8 5.5 32.3 0.22 24.9 B 8th Ave III 35 33.7 54.1 87.8 0.28 11.5 E 10th Ave III 35 61.2 14.4 75.6 0.51 24.3 B ' SR 710 III 35 19.5 10.2 29.7 0.15 18.5 C Total III 35 116.6 8.2 124.8 1.13 32.7 A 257.8 92.4 350.2 2.30 23.6 C Arterial Level of Service: W B SR 70 ' Cross Street Arterial Class Flow Running Signal Travel Dist Arterial Arterial SR 710 III Seed Time Delay Time s) (mi) Seed LOS 10th Ave III 30 35.4 7.2 42.6 0.28 23.6 C ' 8th Ave III 35 116.6 12.2 128-8 1.13 31.7 A Parrott Ave III 35 19.5 9.1 28.6 0.15 19.2 C 5th III 35 61.2 36.3 97.5 0.51 18.8 C Total III 35 33.7 5.5 39.2 0.28 25.8 B ' 266.4 70.3 336.7 2.36 25.2 B - Page 1 Arterial Level of Service 2006 PM ' Existing Conditions with Proj Traffic Arterial Level of Service: NB Parrott Ave ' Arterial Cross Street Class Flow Speed Running Time Signal Delay Travel Time (s) Dist (ml) Arterial Speed Arterial Shopping Center II 45 LOS SW 28th St II 57.3 7.3 64.6 0.72 39.9 A SW 21stStreet II 45 34.0 10.8 44.8 0.35 28.5 B SR 70 II 45 37.2 12.5 49.7 0.40 28.6 B ' 45 109.9 55.8 165.7 1.37 29.9 B Total II 238.4 86.4 324.8 2.84 31.5 B Arterial Level of Service: SB Parrott Ave ' Arterial Flow Cross Street Class Running Signal Travel Dist Arterial Arterial Speed Time Delay Time (s) (mi) Speed LOS SR 70 II SW 21st Street II 45 45.3 57.7 103.0 0.57 19.8 D ' SW 28th St II 45 109.9 11.3 121.2 1.37 40.8 A Shopping Center II 45 37.2 9.6 46.8 0.40 30.4 B Total II 45 34.0 4.5 38.5 0.35 33.1 B ' Arterial Level 226.4 83.1 309.5 2.69 31.3 B of Service: EB SR 70 Arterial Cross Street Class Flow Running Signal Travel Dist Arterial Arterial Speed Time Delay Time (s) (mi) Speed LOS ' 5th III Parrott Ave III 35 26.8 7.9 34.7 0.22 23.2 C 8th Ave III 35 33.7 224.7 258.4 0.28 3.9 F 10th Ave III 35 61.2 20.8 82.0 0.51 22.4 C ' SR 710 35 19.5 9.2 28.7 0.15 19.1 C III Total III 35 116.6 9.1 125.7 1.13, 32.5 A 257.8 271.7 529.5 2.30 15.6 D Arterial Level of Service: WB SR 70 ' Arterial Cross Street Class Flow Running Signal Travel Dist Arterial Arterial SR 710 III Speed Time Delay Times mi Seed LOS 10th Ave III 30 35.4 7.8 43.2 0.28. 23.2 C ' 8th Ave III 32 125.6 11.0 136.6 1.13 29.9 B Parrott Ave III 35 19.5 7.0 26.5 0.15 20.7 C 5th III 35 61.2 89.4 150.6 0.51 12.2 E Total III 35 33.7 8.8 42.5 0.28 23.8 C 275.4 124.0 399.4 2.36 21.2 C Page 1 Exhibit 9 2009 Without Project Analysis Summary 1 Arterial Level of Service 2009 PM Without Proj Arterial Level of Service: NB Parrott Ave Arterial Cross Street Class Flow Seed Running Time Signal Delay Travel Times) Dist Arterial Seed Arterial Shopping Center II (mi) LOS SW 28th St II 45 57.3 7.4 64.7 0.72 39.8 A SW 21st Street II 45 34.0 11.0 45.0 0.35 28.3 B ' SR 70 II 45 45 37.2 109.9 12.7 59.0 49.9 168.9 0.40 1.37 28.5 29.3 B Total II B 238.4 90.1 328.5 2.84 31.1 B Arterial Level of Service: SB Parrott Ave ' Arterial Cross Street Class Flow Running Signal Travel Dist Arterial Arterial SR 70 II Seed Time Delay Times mi Seed LOS SW 21 st Street II 45 45.3 74.3 119.E 0.57 17.0 D ' SW 28th St II 45 109.9 11.4 121.3 1.37 40.8 A Shopping Center II 45 37.2 9.8 47.0 0.40 30.3 B Total II 45 34.0 5.9 39.9 0.35 32.0 B ' Arterial Level 226.4 101.4 327.8 2.69 29.6 B of Service: EB SR 70 Cross Street Arterial Class Flow Seed Running Signal Travel Dist Arterial Arterial ' 5th III Time Delay Times mi Seed LOS Parrott Ave III 35 26.8 9.5 36.3 0.22 22.1 C 8th Ave III 35 33.7 211.4 245.1 0.28 4.1 F 10th Ave III 35 61.2 18.1 79.3 0.51 23.2 C SR 710 III 35 19.5 9.7 29.2 0.15 18.8 C Total III 35 116.6 9.0 125.6 1.13 32.5 A 257.8 257.7 515.5 2.30 16.1 D ' Arterial Level of Service: WB SR 70 Cross Street Arterial Class Flow Running Signal Travel Dist Arterial Arterial SR 710 Seed Time Dela Times mi Seed LOS 10th Ave III III 30 35.4 7.8 43.2 0.28 23.2 C ' 8th Ave III 32 125.6 11.9 137.5 1.13 29.7 B Parrott Ave III 35 19.5 6.2 25.7 0.15 21.4 C 5th III 35 61.2 72.3 133.5 0.51 13.8 E Total III 35 33.7 8.6 42.3 0.28 23.9 C ' 275.4 106.8 382.2 2.36 22.2 C _ Page 1 Arterial Level of Service 2009 PM ' With Proj Arterial Level of Service: NB Parrott Ave Arterial Cross Street Class Flow Seed Running Time Signal Delay Travel Time (s) Dist Arterial Arterial Shopping Center II (mi Seed LOS SW 28th St II 45 57.3 7.4 64.7 0.72 39.8 A SW 21st Street II 45 34.0 11.4 45.4 0.35 28.1 B ' SR 70 II 45 45 37.2 109.9 13.2 56.9 50.4 166.8 0.40 1.37 28.2 29.7 B Total II B 238.4 88.9 327.3 2.84 31.2 B Arterial Level of Service: SB Parrott Ave ' Arterial Cross Street Class Flow Running Signal Travel Dist Arterial Arterial SR 70 II Seed Time Delay Times mi Seed LOS SW 21st Street II 45 45.3 67.8 113.1 0.57 18.0 D SW 28th St II 45 109.9 12.1 122.0 1.37 40.6 A Shopping Center II 45 37.2 10.2 47.4 0.40 30.0 B Total 11 45 34.0 5.9 39.9 0.35 32.0 B 226.4 96.0 322.4 2.69 30.0 B ' Arterial Level of Service: EB SR 70 Arterial Cross Street Class Flow Running Signal Travel Dist Arterial Arterial ' 5th Seed Time Delay Times mi Seed LOS III Parrott Ave III 35 26.8 10.2 37.0 0.22 21.7 C 8th Ave III 35 33.7 273.1 306.8 0.28 3.3 F 10th Ave III 35 61.2 26.0 87.2 0.51 21.1 C SR 710 III 35 19.5 9.7 29.2 0.15 18.8 C Total- III 35 116.6 9.4 126.0 . 113 324 .257.8 A 328.4 586.2 2.30 14.1 D Arterial Level of Service: WB SR 70 Arterial Cross Street Class Flow Running Signal Travel Dist Arterial Arterial SR 710 III Seed Time Delay Time (s) (mi) Seed LOS 10th Ave III 30 35.4 8.2 43.6 0.28 23.0 C ' 8th Ave III 32 125.6 11.9 137.5 1.13 29.7 B Parrott Ave III 35 19.5 7.9 27.4 0.15 20.0 C 111 35 61.2 134.2 195.4 0.51 9.4 F Total III 35 33.7 9.6 43.3 0.28 23.4 C '5th 275.4 171.8 447.2 2.36 19.0 C Page 1 Exhibit 10 2009 With Project Analysis Summary Arterial Level of Service 2009 PM ' With Proj Arterial Level of Service: NB Parrott Ave Arterial Cross Street Class Flow Running Signal Travel Dist Arterial Arterial ' Shopping Center II Speed Time Delay Time (s) mi Speed LOS SW 28th St II 45 57.3 7.4 64.7 0.72 39.8 A SW 21st Street II 45 34.0 11.4 45.4 0.35 28.1 B SR 70 II 45 37.2 13.2 50.4 0.40 28.2 B ' Total II 45 109.9 56.9 166.8 1.37 29.7 B 238.4 88.9 327.3 2.84 31.2 B Arterial Level of Service: SB Parrott Ave ' Arterial Flow Cross Street Class Speed Running Signal Travel Dist Arterial Arterial SR 70 11 Time Delay Times mi Seed LOS SW 21st Street II 45 45.3 67.8 113.1 0.57 18.0 D ' SW 28th St II 45 109.9 12.1 122.0 1.37 40.6 A Shopping Center II 45 37.2 10.2 47.4 0.40 30.0 B Total II 45 34.0 5.9 39.9 0.35 32.0 B ' Arterial Level of Service: EB SR 70 226.4 96.0 322.4 2.69 30.0 B Arterial Cross Street Class Flow Speed Running Signal Travel Dist Arterial Arterial 5th III Time Delay Time s) (mi) Speed LOS Parrott Ave III 35 26.8 10.2 37.0 0.22 21.7 C 8th Ave III 35 33.7 273.1 306.8 0.28 3.3 10th Ave III 35 61.2 23.8 85.0 0.51 21.6 C SR 710 III 35 19.5 15.5 35.0 0.15 15.7 D ' Total III 35 116.6 9.4 126.0 1.13 32.4 A 257.8 332.0 589.8 2.30 14.0 D Arterial Level of Service: WB SR 70 Arterial Cross Street Class Flow S Running Signal Travel Dist Arterial Arterial erial SR 710 III eed Time DelayTimes ) (mi) S eed LOS 10th Ave III 30 35.4 8.2 43.6 0.28 23.0 C ' 8th Ave III 32 125.6 46.0 171.6 1.13 23.8 CC Parrott Ave III 35 19.5 7.4 26.9 0.15 20.4 5th III 35 61.2 134.2 195.4 0.51 9.4 F Total III 35 33.7 9.6 43.3 0.28 23.4 C ' 275.4 205.4 480.8 2.36 17.6 p Page 1 FFFax:(863) eechobee Date: �f `� Petitionxo.��_ rvices Department Fee Pass r'ty0Q Avenue, Room 101 ' J at on: I,Pty e, Florida 34974-2903 i�tHea�g S 2naHearing Sf 1 ) 763-3372, earl. 218 Publication Dann: 763-1686 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Application Please Check One: _ Small Scale Amendment (Under 10 Acres) X Large Scale Amendment (Over 10 Acres) ✓ Name of propertyowner(s):Frank Altobello, Trustee Owner mailing address: P-O. Box'417 Okeechobee Z. Name of applicants) if other than owner (state relationship): C B C Ma n a e m e n t Corp. Applicant mailing address:301 NW 4th Ave Okee Pro sed 34972 Bu eo Name of contact person (state relationship): ThQmas Contact person daytime hone(s): g 6 3 4 6 7- 0 8 3 I Fax: 63I7h-,_ ✓ Property address / directions to property - 'See At tched Leg al (no strF� (4 Parcels/l-?_1-3/-3`-)-OA00-00042-F3000 Parcel Identification Number.2-22-37-3�-OAOO-00033-0000 2-22-27-35-OA00-00 - 0 Size of the Property (in acres): _ 53 + acres vt Current Zoning Designation: Pz 2 j2ar2 Parcels Current Future Land Use Designation: ult' a + RSF Existing Use of the Property: Vacant Proposed Future Land Use Designation: RG(Multifamily Proposed Use of the Property: create a Planned Unit Development utilizing mixed forms of Residental Housing (Single Family, TWwnhomes,cottac Description of Surrounding Properties: South: Mobile H�vfftt-"_ Park East: Taylor Creek Not;t:h: _ Mobile Homes West; Residence, Bank, Restaurants + Retail Legal Description of the Property (Lengthy Description May be Attached): See Attached ) Uniform Land Use Application (rev. 12/03) Page I of 2 1- v x Survey of property (11" x 14", 20" Scale) x Letter Outlining Request x Notarized Letter of Owner's Authorization x Application Fee (non-refundable) x City Location Map - - �.'i _ _ - 1 hereby certify that the information in this application is correct_ The information included in this application is for use by the City of Okeechobee in processing my request. False or misleading information may be punishable by a fine of up to $500.00 and imprisonment of up to 30 days and may r ult in the summary denial of this application_ Thomas C. Close Signature Printed Name Date Uniform Land Use Application (rev. 12/03) Page 2 of 2 C C.B.C. MANAGEMENT CORP. OFFICE ADDRESS: 301 N.W. 0 Avenue Okeechobee, FL 34972 TELEPHONE (863) 467-0831 FACSIMILE (863) 763-037 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 2558 Okeechobee, FL 34973 REQUEST FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT Applicant: CBC Management Corp. Owner: Frank Altobello, Trustee Re: Request for Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment We present this application for a change in the Comprehensive Plan Map to Residential General (RG) for the following parcels: 2-22-37-35-OA00-00031-0000 2-21-37-35-OA00-00045-0000 2-22-37-35-OA00-00033-0000 2-21-37-35-OAOO-00042-B000 We plan to develop these four parcels as a Planned Unit Development. We envision creating a "fishing village" using a mixed form of single family residences along with a manna, ship's store, limited retail/offices and common areas. The common areas will include a community pool, clubhouse, playground, and walking/biking nature trails overlooking the wetlands areas. We have included a conceptual plan as an overview of our preliminary vision for the PUD. The type of residences within the community will be standard single family residences, "cottages" and a form a zero lot line single family residences. The reduced lot size for the zero lot line dwellings will allow a greater portion of the development to be utilized as common areas. The change in the Comprehensive Plan Map to Residential General will enable us to submit for the PUD and create a planned community including designated recreation and nature areas. We believe the planned community concept provides a beautiful and desirable "village" for its residents. Sincerely, CBC Management Corp. Thomas C. Close, President 0a FrankAltobello, Trustee P. O. Box 417 Okeechobee, FL 34973 City Council City of Okeechobee 55 S.E. 3rd Avenue Okeechobee, FL 34974 Re: Parcel ID #2-21-37-35-OAOO-00045-0000 Parcel ID #2-22-37-35-OA00-00031-0000 Dear Council Members: As the owner of the above referenced parcels, please accept this letter as my official consent to allow CBC Management Corp. to seek a rezoning of these parcels to allow for a Residential PUD. In addition, I hereby certify that these parcels are free of any encumbrances or mortgages at this time. Thank you. Sincerely, Frank Altobello tate of Florida County of Okeechobee Signed before me this RA day of @.✓ 1 2005 by Frank Altobello, who is personally known_ to me or presented the following form of identification: N"" 4 SUSAN WULAMS MY WMMISSION # W 134481 +i EXPIRES: Nwstnb w 16, M BwWBdllmu woWy Pubft UWnrks 9 B 7 2 5 6 5 d 1 3 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 12 11 f0 9 B 7 6 5 3 2 l UY 6 2 f7 230 4 7 I 16 to I1 12 5 B 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 9 9 10 11 12 11E, 7 IB 19 20 22 23 21 6 52 S. W. J TH STREET 1.49 AC S. E. 7 TH STREET 29 1 s 2 AC 238 1 d 3 2 51 I 2 1 12 I1 f0 9 8 7 5 / 3 2 1 6 2 1.T cM K FT] ® L .41 AC d [12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 to 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 IB 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 f 1.5e AL S. E. 8 TH STREET 25 10 4 I 5 48 12 O 3 6 2.81 AC 7 1 5 - 8 2 9 6 47 10 4 7 12 6 dfiA 8 21 .81 AC Q4 V 7 I /6 29 8 Z .90 AC O 10 A 31, a ` 8 A 19 Il 5 O 1 fa 12 6 2.43 AC !� U f3 17 14 C' 16 21 2 IS 27 2 10 d 1. 66 Al ~ 0177 176 W 178 175 O 6 2 2.95 AL 0 9 3 too 173 4i 1 6 10 4 9 172 1 11 5 ) s 171 12 6 � 8 42 204 7 1 vi 4U 182 170 12a 8 2 -; .90 A 33 - 203 9 3 251 AL 169 8.92 AC 202 !, 163 10 4 d IB4 J y II 5 16` 167 6 12 6 201 qLn yGF, I66 q 166 200 7 1 c 187 Gi1i 165 8 2 199 J 9 3 198 188 qq! 10 1 2 52 AC !� 197 189 11 1 q 190 12 6 2 a AC !� 50 3 196 191 7 1 195 B 2 Fi 194 193 etjCITY LIMITS CITY LIMITS la 4 � BOAr 1, < SLIP r^ �4Ir 3Z5� City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Ma • Drawn By: Global Mapping, Inc. 0 625 1,250 2,500 3,750 5,000 November 18, 2005 Feet G.—I Notss: Aaeys chows hanon sro 16 or 20 met In width. Sea eppropoeta .bdMslon plat mr spacak aiisy wld hs. This m ap hec Men compiled from tM most cant data swdmble. The My of Okeachobse Is not nssponstble mr any vrarc m-1ssl ns cordehed heroin. OF pK�FC� rS� ym m LL O j s`1915ff City of Okeechobee April 25, 2006 re_ Traffic Analysis for Taylor Creek Fishing Village Large Scale Amendment Petition No_ 06-CI-002 All Board Members: We have in the City files a copy of the Traffic Analysis available for review upon request. A copy was also distributed to LaRue Planning and Management, the City Attorney, the City Administrator, and the City Engineer. Betty I Clement General Services Secretary 55 S.E. Third Avenue • Okeechobee, Florida 34974-2903 • (863) 763-3372 • Fax: (863) 763-1686 L 1 T ,e► Y A® CATION M 2 6 5 4 3 2 1 12 11 JO 9 0 7 _5 5 3 3 2 I 5 a 9 B 7 2 6 2 I 16 230 4 7 B 7 B 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Jig :20[122 23 J24 f0 1f 12 5 7 B 9 f0 f1 12 li 52 20 1.49 AL S. E. 7 TH STREET S. W. 7 TN STREET 2 AL w _ 0 1 w 2 1 12 11 10 9 8 7 5 A 3 2 1 238 K. 4 3 2 g L:i _ _ _ 1. a 3�c° - -M 6 2 ¢ 50 3 J At AC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I1 12 13 11 15 16 117 10 19 20 21 22 23 2d 25 26 1 nc S. E. B TH STREET 2 q 3 r`' 3 f0 4 •' YG _ 32 12 6 L 01 AC 21 FL _ 5 7 1 fi 22 i0 4 > 21 _ t1' S f2� 5 -81 AC 20 • 1 46 7 _ ..90 AG 11 19 a 2 B 3 .B AC 18 to 4 45 13 11 5 17 2' 2-43 A Id 12 5 1 J 16 28 Eli f5 27 2 3 44 0 177 176 :10 4 1.66 A - y 178 175 11 5 0 0 12 a = 6 ¢ d 179 lb 11 13 `. � 1 too 173 _ fi 2 L95 AC 6 172 ttz 9 9 dd 3 to 1 4 Q 7 B 171 1f 5 s 294 128 1 12 6 fA2 170 203 169 7 1 u� 42A S 1113 2 = 90 A B 2 51 AC 0.92 AL 184 S 9 3 y 167 r 105 to. 4 F165 ' 200 c 12 5 - 107 GJ'�, 155 //X—jpirA' 199 GC' UU f 198 108 a 2 199 197 190 B AC 12 6 2 195 _ 50 3 7 1 P a a 2- 7- 3 S'^ 080 a' P� 3I� O� 19d f93 e 2 CITY LIMITS S BOAT �. CITY LIMITS sup 19 4 (D m -02/17/2006 10:22 8637636337 CLOSE CONSTRUCTION Srperinteadest Patricia G. Cooper, Ed.D. Okeechobee County School Board 963-462-5000 700 S-W. Second Avenue Fax 863-462-5151 to - , - Swaco�m 761-5000 Okeechobee, Florida 34974 February 13, 2000 Mr. Thomas C. Close, President Close Construction 301 N.W. 4t' Avenue Okeechobee,FL 34972 Re: Taylor Creek Marina & Fishing Village Dear Mr. Close: PAGE 02 Chnimo rson Dsvid Williams vke CMdrperson Joe Arnold Members Gay Carlton Ke11y Owens laths Riedel Thank you for the information regarding the above -mentioned proposed land use amendment. As you are aware, we are experiencing unprecedented growth within our county which has the potential of greatly impacting our school population. therefore, we are requesting that any new development being proposed within our county fully comply with the concurrency law passed during the 2005 legislative session. In part, the concurrency law requires that a standard level of service be adopted for school facilities and that standard of service be applied to all residential developments at the time of application for a site plan or at final approval of the development. The law further stipulates that a developer may satisfy school concurrency through mitigation proportionate to the demand of capacity. Mitigation may be satisfied by one or more of the following: contribution of land; payment for construction or land acquisition; school construction. However, the developer must execute a legally binding agreement with the local govemment and school hoard in order to satisfy mitigation requirements. Senate Bill 360 is a "pay as you grow" plan which enables developers, local govemments and school boards to partner as we experience the phenomenal growth anticipated within our state. We in Okeechobee County Schools look forward to continuing our cooperative relationship with local government and private concerns as we keep this most important legislation in mind. Thank you. Si , 'AIJ, Patricia G. Cooper, Ed. D. Aga Superintendent of Schools Cc" School Board Members Tom Conely, School Board Attomey TEB 19 MnA 02/06/2006 10:24 8637636337 CLOSE CONSTRUCTION PAGE 02 City of Okeechobee Fire Department 2JI/20W Chris close Taylor Creek Marim dt Fishing Village In response to your request, as of this time I do not have any objections to this project however I may have concerns m the future when a more detailed plan has been presented. Sin crb Smith Fire Chief/Marshal Okeechobee FD 55 S.E. Third Avenue . Okeechobee, Florida 34974-2932 9 863-467-1586 9 Fax: 863-763-4489 CBC Management Corp. Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Future Land Use Change from Single -Family Residential to Multifamily Residential Consistency with Comprehensive Plan The following policies of the Comprehensive Plan are relevant to the subject request. The proposed amendment is consistent with these policies. As the CGMP has been found to be internally consistent, as required by State statutes, the proposed amendment is thus also consistent with the remainder of the Comprehensive Plan. Future Land Use Element Policy 1.1 — Please refer to the specific sections within this report that present an analysis of the potential demand from the proposed amendment if developed under a worst -case scenario of ten units per acre. In summary, all required public facilities will continue to operate at the required levels of service given existing or planned capacities. Policy 2.2 — The proposed amendment will not result in the loss of any property rights to adjacent land owners. Policy 7.2 — The proposed amendment will not result in an intensity of use that will disrupt the natural system. The existing site- is devoid of native upland habitat. The protection of Taylor Creek will be demonstrated through the local government site specific development application. Policy 9.1 through 9.3 — The proposed amendment is consistent with the stated goals of the Resource Management Plan for the Lower Kissimmee River and Taylor Creek Drainage Basins. Given the requirements of the local government and federal and state permitting agencies. the protection of Taylor Creek will be demonstrated through the local government site specific development application. Transportation Element Policy 8.1 and 8.2 — The proposed amendment is consistent with these policies as demonstrated by the traffic analysis presented. The analysis indicates that the surrounding road network can accommodate the incremental demand that would potentially occur if developed under its worst case scenario of ten units per acre. The analysis utilizes slightly different acreages than those obtained from the legal and sketches due to the timing of each product. However, since the traffic analysis is based on a higher acreage, it represents an even more conservative analysis. Housing Element Policy 1.1 and 1.11 — The proposed amendment further implements these policies by allocating additional residential densities near facilities and services where a full complement of public facilities will be available concurrent with the demand. Conservation Element Policy 2.2 and 3.3 — The proposed land use change does not affect the quality or quantity of groundwater and does not endanger any existing native vegetative communities. Such a determination can only be made upon submittal of a site specific development plan. Regulations of the SFWMD dictate that post development conditions must not affect the quality or quantity of groundwater. The Page 1 CBC Management Corp. Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Future Land Use Change from Single -Family Residential to Multifamily Residential existing site is devoid of native habitats except for the large wetland that will be preserved/mitigated as allowed by the City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan. Policy 4.4 — The designation of the existing wetland as Conservation pursuant to this policy shall be accomplished through the approval of site specific development plans and required agency permits that require conservation easements over all existing natural systems to remain. At that time, the City may elect to seek an amendment of the land use to Conservation. Recreation Policy 1.2 — The change in future land use will not reduce the compatibility standards between the proposed use and any existing or proposed recreation areas. Compliance with State Growth Management Requirements. Florida's Department of Community Affairs evaluates local plan amendments for consistency with Rule 9-J5, Florida Administrative Code, which sets out criteria for determining whether a proposed plan amendment demonstrates consistency with the mandates of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act and the State Comprehensive Plan. The applicant must demonstrate that the proposed plan amendment is consistent with all state requirements. Since the City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan has been found to be consistent with all state requirements, a demonstration of compliance of the proposed amendment with the City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan in turn demonstrates compliance with all state requirements. Please refer to the section titled Compliance with City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan for the applicant's demonstration of compliance. In addition, the proposed future land use must not encourage urban sprawl as outlined in Sections 9J5- 006.(5)(g) through (5)(j) of the Florida Administrative Code. The noted regulations set forth the major components of a methodology to determine the presence of urban sprawl. Paragraph (5)(g) identifies 13 primary indicators of urban sprawl which are to be applied and analyzed as set forth in the rule. Paragraph (5)(h) describes how land use aspects of a plan shall be analyzed. The land use element, including both the future land use map and associated objectives and policies, represents the focal point of the local government's planning effort. Paragraph (5)(i) describes the unique features and characteristics of each jurisdiction which provide the context of the analysis and which are needed to evaluate the extent, amount or frequency of an indicator and the significance of an indicator for a specific jurisdiction. Paragraph (5)(j) recognizes that land use plans generally may be significantly affected by other development policies in a plan which may serve to mitigate the presence of urban sprawl indicators based on the land use plan alone. Paragraph (5)(j) describes development controls which may be used by a local government to mitigate the presence of sprawl. In general, Section 9J-5.006(5)(1) states that provision of innovative planning such as urban villages, new towns, satellite communities, area -based allocations, clustering and open space provisions, mixed - use development and sector planning that allow the conversion of rural and agricultural lands to other uses will be recognized as methods of discouraging urban sprawl and will be determined consistent with the provisions of the state comprehensive plan, regional policy plans, Chapter 163, Part 11, F.S., and the Florida Administrative Code regarding discouraging the proliferation of urban sprawl. As such, the proposed future land use amendment to the New Community Development district, which requires Page 2 CBC Management Corp. Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Future Land Use Change from Single -Family Residential to Multifamily Residential the creation of mixed -use development, urban villages, and open space, is thus consistent with the requirements for discouraging urban sprawl. Nevertheless, a detailed urban sprawl analysis is provided below. Our analysis of consistency is provided within a text block following each indicator. Analysis of primary indicators 1. Promotes, allows or designates for development substantial areas of the jurisdiction to develop as low -intensity, low -density, or single -use development or uses in excess of demonstrated need. The proposed request to Multifamily Residential will actually increase densities within the City of Okeechobee in close proximity to the urban center. 2. Promotes, allows or designates significant amounts of urban development to occur in rural areas at substantial distances from existing urban areas while leaping over undeveloped lands which are available and suitable for development. The proposed request to Multifamily Residential will actually increase densities within the City of Okeechobee in close proximity to the urban center. The proposed request is also adjacent to an existing designation of Multifamily Residential on the future land use map. 3. Promotes, allows or designates urban development in radial, strip, isolated or ribbon patterns generally emanating from existing urban developments. The location of the proposed future land use amendment is not in a radial, strip, isolated or ribbon pattern generally emanating from existing urban developments. 4. As a result of premature or poorly planned conversion of rural land to other uses, fails adequately to protect and conserve natural resources, such as wetlands, floodplains, native vegetation, environmentally sensitive areas, natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas, lakes, rivers, shorelines, beaches, bays, estuarine systems, and other significant natural systems. The proposed request to a Multifamily Residential future land use will not result in the premature or poorly planned conversion of rural land to other uses. Adequate site design techiques will be employed to adequately to protect and conserve natural resources, such as wetlands, floodplains, native vegetation, environmentally sensitive areas, natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas, lakes, rivers, shorelines, beaches, bays, estuarine systems, and other significant natural systems. 5. Fails adequately to protect adjacent agricultural areas and activities, including silviculture, and including active agricultural and silvicultural activities as well as passive agricultural activities and dormant, unique and prime farmlands and soils. The location of the proposed future land use amendmentis within the existing boundaries of City's corporate limits and is removed from any existing agricultural uses. 6. Fails to maximize use of existing public facilities and services. The proposed site will be served by a full complement of existing urban services Page 3 CBC Management Corp. - Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Future Land Use Change from Single -Family Residential to Multifamily Residential 7. Fails to maximize use of future public facilities and services. A higher utilization of this site will ensure that future pubic services are minimized within outlining areas. 8. Allows for land use patterns or timing which disproportionately increase the cost in time, money and energy, of providing and maintaining facilities and services, including roads, potable water, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, law enforcement, education, health care, fire and emergency response, and general government. The proposed site will be served by a full complement of existing urban services. Because the property has been planned for "next -in -line" development, it will enable public facilities and services to be extended in an orderly manner without disproportionate increases in cost. 9. Fails to provide a clear separation between rural and urban uses. The proposed site is surrounded by other lands within the City of Okeechobee's coporate limits and thereby maintains clear separation between urban and rural uses. 10. Discourages or inhibits infill development or the redevelopment of existing neighborhoods and communities. The proposed request provides for an opportunity to develop multifamily housing that is currently lacking to a large degree within the City. 11. Fails to encourage an attractive and functional mix of uses. The proposed site, being within the City and adjacent to equal or higher intensity lands, will provide for an attractive and functional mix of uses. 12. Results in poor accessibility among linked or related land uses. The proposed project will provide for reasonable connections to surrounding development to ensure among linked or related land uses. 13. The proposed change will not result in the loss of significant amounts of functional open space. The proposed change will not result in the loss of significant amounts of functional open space. The existing use does not provide functional open space. With the conversion to a Multifamily Residential future land use and the development of a mixed use project of housing, shops, marina, restaurants, etc., the proposed land use will provide significant amounts of functional open space that will be planned for active and passive recreation by residents of the new community and others. Encroachment of Incompatible development As the City of Okeechobee has developed, US-441 south has developed as an area of mixed commercial and residential uses from hotels, restaurants, and other service businesses to repair shops and retail stores. The residential uses in the area though have remained largely the same stock that has been in place for a number of years. US-441 has also been expanded and a full complement of urban services are available along the corridor. Page 4 CBC Management Corp. Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Future Land Use Change from Single -Family Residential to Multifamily Residential The subject site is bound on the east by Taylor Creek and the west by developed commercial land fronting SR-441 with a Commercial future land use designation. To the north lies an existing single- family development known as Taylor Creek with a Single Family Residential future land use designation. This development is separated from the subject site by S.E. 8th Street and can be adequately buffered through internal buffering provisions. To the south lies vacant land with a Multifamily Residential future land use designation which is under the same ownership as the subject parcel. Given the adjacent existing and future land uses, the proposed request for Multifamily Residential future land use will not result in the encroachment of incompatible development. Natural resource protection Please refer to the enclosed environmental assessment conducted for the entire property holdings including the 38 acres subject to the request for a future land use amendment. The site is mostly devoid of native habitat except for largest wetland system. However, as stated in the assessment, the hydrology of the cypress slough on the southwestern side of the site has been restricted to the point that subsidence of the soil is clearly evident. If this condition continues, the cypress canopy will eventually be replaced with upland species. Transportation Please refer to the enclosed traffic statement. The analysis utilizes slightly different acreages than those obtained from the legal and sketches due to the timing of each product. However, since the traffic analysis is based on a higher acreage, it represents an even more conservative analysis. Schools Currently, the Okeechobee County School District has adequate capacity at the middle and upper school levels; however, the elementary school system is currently at capacity. The School Board has programmed additional elementary school capacity through the State's Rural Schools Program. Funding has been requested through the legislative delegation. Appropriation is expected in FY2007 with construction to commence by 2008. The Okeechobee School District has utilized this funding source for expansion to the school system in the past. The timing is concurrent with the expected timeframe of proposed project. The request for a future land use amendment is expected to be transmitted to the State Department of Community Affairs by mid- 2006 with final adoption expected by late-2006. With the State's new requirements for public school concurrency passed during the 2005 legislative session, the proposed project is expected to meet the concurrency requirements through mitigation proportionate to the demand for capacity as allowed by State statutues. As the local government application for site plan approval is not expected to be submitted until late-2006, with approval granted in mid-2007, the certainty of the funding program for the additional capacity will be in place. Site construction would then commence with the first certificate of occupancy in 2008 — the expected timeline for the construction of the new elementary school. Please refer to the enclosed letter of Okeechobee County School Board for confirmation. Page 5 CBC Management Corp. Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Future Land Use Change from Single -Family Residential to Multifamily Residential The closest elementary school, Central Elementary, is located at 610 S.W. Fifth St. The middle school is located at 825 S.W. 28th St. The high school is located at 2800 N.W. Highway 441 North. Water & Wastewater The water and wastewater service for this project is provided by the Okeechobee Utility Authority. Application for capacity reservation has been submitted to OUA. The following is an analysis of the water and wastewater flows for the property with its existing future land use designation of Residential Single Family allowing up to four units per acre. Based upon this criterion, the 33 acre parcel would allow for up to 132 single family residential units to be constructed on this site. The balance of the site (approximately 4.5 acres) does not currently contain a development allowance. With each unit individually metered, the estimated water and wastewater flows are as follows: Existing Conditions Gallons perday Use Units Rate Single Family 132 250 GPD — water 33,000 Residential 250 GPD - sewer 33,000 The following is an analysis of the water and wastewater flows for the property with the proposed future land use designation allowing up to 10 units per acre. The analysis is based upon maximum development scenario of 380 units based upon the 38 acre site. With each unit individually metered, the estimated water and wastewater flows are as follows: Proposed Conditions Gallons per Use Area Rate day Multi Family 380 units 250 GPD —water 95,000 95,000 Residential 250 GPD - sewer Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants Based on information obtained from the Okeechobee Utility Authority, the permitted capacity of the surface water treatment plant is 5.0 mgd with the ground water treatment plant rated at 1.0 mgd. The wastewater treatment plant permitted capacity is currently 1.0 mgd. The Okeechobee Utility Authority is currently in the construction phase of additional filters which will bring the wastewater treatment plant to a temporary capacity of 1.23 mgd. This work should be completed by June 2006. Additionally, the wastewater treatment plant is under a design/permitting phase for an expansion of 3.0 mgd that will bring the total treatment plant capacity to 4.0 mgd and should be operational by June 2008. The average daily flow of the combined water treatment plant finished water production is 1.93 mgd for the period of January 2005 through December 2005. The average daily flow of the wastewater Page 6 CBC Management Corp. Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Future Land Use Change from Single -Family Residential to Multifamily Residential treatment plant is 0.89 mgd for the same time period. The Okeechobee Utility Authority reports an outstanding water treatment plant flow commitment of approximately 0.25 mgd with an outstanding wastewater treatment plant flow commitment of approximately 0.1 mgd. Based upon these figures and as stated in the attached service availability letter, the Okeechobee Utility Authority will have on or before June 2008 adequate capacity to serve the proposed demand created by the increased density of the proposed future land use amendment. Police Please refer to the enclosed letter of service availability from the City of Okeechobee Police Department. The nearest police station is 50 S.E. Second Ave. No additional police stations are scheduled. The existing police station should be able to maintain its level of service standard with the proposed amendment given that the project is already allocated for residential development and is within the service area approximately one mile from the site. Fire Please refer to the enclosed letter of service availability from the City of Okeechobee Fire Department. The nearest fire station is located at 55 S.E. Third Ave. No additional fire stations are scheduled. The existing fire station should be able to maintain its level of service standard with the proposed amendment given that the project is already allocated for residential development and is within the service area approximately one mile from the site. Solid Waste The City of Okeechobee's solid waste level of service is 13 pounds per capita per day and a three year availability of landfill capacity. Given the maximum number of potential units of 380 with 2.5 person per dwelling, the maximum demand for the project would be approximately 12,350 punds per day. The City of Okeechobee does not operate solid waste landfills. Currently, the landfill is operated by Okeechobee County. As such, the City does not incur any capital expenditures. A letter from the solid waste service provider, Waste Management pertaining to solid waste service availability is attached. According to Okeechobee County, the existing landfill has surplus capacity in excess of three years. Stormwater Management Except for the native wetland which occupies about eight acres, the project site has been altered from its original condition and is currently in use as improved pasture The existing stormwater management system consists of a shallow interconnected ditch system with outfall directly to Taylor Creek. Stormwater runoff quantity and quality are strictly regulated by the City and the SFWMD to ensure that pre -development drainage conditions are maintained. The proposed rate of discharge from the site will be less than or equal to the existing discharge rate from the site. The discharges off -site will be Page 7 CBC Management Corp. Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Future Land Use Change from Single -Family Residential to Multifamily Residential minimized by on -site detention within the stormwater management system. The ultimate site discharge will be to Taylor Creek. The Stormwater Management System will employ, wherever practical, a variety of Best Management Practices (BMP). The following are a list of potential BMP that could be integrated into the Water Management System during the final design and permitting stage: • Oil and grease skimmers; • Environmental swales; • Minimize "short-circuiting" of pond flow patterns; • Raised storm inlets in grassed swales; • Utilize stormwater retention where feasible; and • Street cleaning and general site maintenance. The drainage system will be owned, operated and maintained by a public entity or a responsible property owners association acceptable to the City and the SFWMD. Historical on -site wetlands will be maintained as part of the surface water management system. There are no Outstanding Florida Waters, Florida Aquatic Preserves or Florida Class I or 11 waters occurring within or abutting the project site. Potential adverse impacts to ground and surface waters will be minimized by implementation of appropriate erosion control measures during construction in accordance with the NPDES Generic Permit for Stormwater Discharge from Large and Small Construction Activities. Erosion control measures that may be implemented include stabilization practices such as temporary seeding, permanent seeding, mulching, geotextiles, or sod stabilization; structural practices such as silt fences, earth dikes, diversions, swales, sediment traps, check dams, or storm drain inlet protection; and sediment basins. The project is located entirely in Zone X according to the Okeechobee County FEMA FIRM panel Map Index. According to the Map Index, the applicable FIRM panel is not printed because the entire panel is located in Zone X. Zone X is defined as "Areas of 500-year flood; areas of 100-year flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 100-year flood". Please refer to the FEMA map. There are currently no known flooding or erosion control problems associated with the project site. No 100-year flood prone areas exist on site, therefore no structures, roadways or utilities are proposed within any 100-year flood prone areas. There are no existing wellfields located within two miles of the project site Parks and Recreation The project will be designed to provide residents with a variety of recreational facilities and open spaces to ensure the community's quality of life. No land will be removed that was previously used by residents of the region for any recreational use. No existing recreational trail is designated across the property. Therefore, the project doesn't have the potential for impacting a recreational trail designated pursuant to Chapter 260, F.S. and Chapter 16D-7, F.A.C. The City's adopted level of service standard for recreation and parks is 3.0 acres per 1,000 people. Based on the estimated population of 950 people (38 acres x 10 upa x 2.5 ppd), the project's minimum acreage requirement for recreation and park space is approxmately 3 acres. The project will meet the Page 8 CBC Management Corp. Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Future Land Use Change from Single -Family Residential to Multifamily Residential park and open space mandates through on -site facilites and provision of impact fees. The planned system of parks and open spaces is consistent with the City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan. Historical/Archeological Resources There are no known archeological or historical sites within the project boundaries. A request has been sent to the Florida Division of Historic Resources. Given the improvements made to date (improved pasture), the likelihood of the presence of a historic or archeological site regarded as potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Sites to occur on the parcel is limited. Hurricane Preparedness According to information in the Treasure Coast Transportation Analysis Hurricane Evacuation Study Update 2003, dated November 2003, the property is not located in any storm surge zone. The property is not Within the Category 3 Hurricane Evacuation Area. It is estimated that the majority of people will remain in their homes within the project during a hurricane event, due to the project location relative to the Atlantic coastline. However, in the event of a significant hurricane, the County Emergency Operations Center (EOC) may activate evacuation shelters throughout the County as it deems necessary. The evacuation shelters are typically opened in areas within the hurricane's 100-mile path. Many of the public schools in Okeechobee County serve as evacuation shelters. US-441, directly adjacent to the project site, is the closest evacuation route. Additionally, SR-70, approximately 1 mile to the north will assist in evacuation of the area by providing additional evacuation routes. All traffic control devices will utilize hurricane tested mast arms and street lights further minimizing service interruptions and enhancing safety prior to, during, and after a major hurricane. It should also be noted that due to recent changes to the Florida Building Code, specifically, Chapter 16, Structural Design, as well as the construction methods to be used in the project, the residential homes will provide shelter for residents during hurricane events. As a result of the changes in the construction process, residents will have safer and more secure homes, thereby reducing evacuation volumes and shelter space requirements. In addition, underground utilities will be used throughout the development reducing potential service interruptions. Finally, additional mitigation measures for special needs populations will be determined through the local government approval process of the Planned Unit Development. Parcel Control Number Acreage Existinfq FLU Propose FLU Taylor Creek ROW Abandonment 4.51 None RMF 2-22-27-35-OA00-00031-0000 32.97 RSF RMF Total 37.48 Legal Description Please refer to the attached legal and sketches of the two tracks that comprise this application for future land use amendment. The analysis utilizes slightly different acreages than those obtained from the legal and sketches due to the timing of each product. However, since the traffic analysis is based on a higher acreage, it represents an even more conservative analysis. Page 9 Jerner & Associates, Inc Marine & Environmental Consulting 705 Boston Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34950 PHONE: (772) 466-5201 / FAX: (772) 466-5203 E-MAIL youmans@bellsouth.net February 10, 2006 Environmental Site Assessment Property Location: PIN's: 2-22-37-35-OA00-00033-0000, 2-22-37-35-OA00-00031-0000 & 2-21-37-35-OA00-00045-0000, Okeechobee, Okeechobee County, FL Discussion: The site consists of three contiguous parcels of land that are located along the wester bank of Taylor Creek in the town of Okeechobee. These three parcels total approximately 60 acres. Wetlands were identified, delineated and flagged on the site. In addition, the site was inspected for flora and fauna that are listed on the state and federal threatened and endangered species list by Mark Youmans of Jerner and Associates, Inc. These site inspections occurred over the course of several separate visits in the summer of 2005. Follow-up surveys by Survco Inc. placed the wetland boundary on a certified land survey. The wetlands were verified by Stephanie Raymond from the South Florida Water Management (SFWMD) on January 22, 2005. On February 8, 2006, Andy Phillips from the Anny Corps of Engineers (ACOE) verified the consultant's jurisdiction wetland findings during a joint site visit. Three minor wetland areas were added to the wetland inventory. This information is included on the attached site map (Exhibit B). A FLUCCS map is included as Exhibit C. Conclusion: Although the three additional wetland areas are updated on the attached site map, the certified land survey has not yet been updated to include them. This will take place within the next few weeks as scheduling permit's. During the course of the field work,, Youmans of Jerner and Associates, Inc. also searched for Flora and Fauna that are listed on the state and federal threatened and endangered species list. No. threatened or endangered species have been located on site. This finding was verified by the staff from SFWMD and ACOE. A list of all plant species identified on site is included as Exhibit A. It is of special concern that many of the heavily vegetated/forested areas contain large percentages of invasive/exotic plant species that are displacing the native plants. It is recommended that any mitigation plans proposed for this project include plans to eliminate the invasive/exotic species on site. In addition, the hydrology of the cypress slough on the southwester side of the site has been restricted to the point that subsidence of the soil is clearly evident. If this condition continues, the cypress canopy will eventually be replaced with upland species. Please see the attached exhibits (A, B & C) for further information. Mark Youmans Jerner & Associates, Inc. EXHIBIT (A) P LANT SPECIES IDENTIFIED ON SITE GENUS/SPEICIES Psychotria sulzneri Syngonium podophyllum Clerodendrum speciosissimum Celtis laevigata Bidens pilosa Costus pulverulentus Erianthus strictusnarrow Momordica charantia Sida rhombifolia Trema micranthum Cirsium sp. Phyllanthus tenellus Oplismenus setarius Thelypteris sp. Urena lobata Sambucus canadensis Uhnus americana Desmodium sp. Eugenia uniora Hibiscus tiliaceussea Ambrosia artemisiifolia Kalanchoe sp. Phlebodium aureum Parthenocissus quinquefolia Verbesina virginica Rivina humilis Dymaria cordata Cenchrus sp. Callicarpa americana Eleusine indica Ficus aurea Justicia brandegeana Citrus sp. Spermacoce sp. Spermolepis divaricata Taxodium distichum Dioscorea bulbifera Xanthosoma sagittifolium Lepidium virginicum Bauhinia variegata Campsis radicans Digitaria sp. Schinus terebinthifolius Platanus occidentalis Conyza canadensis Tridax procumbens Tradescantia zebrina Solanum diphyllum Koelreuteria elegans Panicum maximum Quercus virginiana Emilia fosbergii Paspalum sp. COMMON NAME shortleaf wild coffee American evergreen Javanese glorybower sugar -berry; hackberry hairy beggar -ticks spiral ginger plumegrass balsampear cuban jute trema thistle Mascarene Island leafflower woods grass shield fern Caesarweed elderberry American elm ticktrefoil Surinam cherry roseimallow annual ragweed kalanchoe golden polypody Virginia creeper white crownbeard rougeplant West Indian chickweed sandbur American beautyber y Indian goosegrass Florida strangler fig shrimp plant citrus false buttonweed roughfruit scaleseed bald cypress air yam elephant ear Virginia pepperweed mountain ebony trumpet creeper crabgrass Brazilian pepper -tree sycamore Canadian horseweed coatbuttons inchplant twoleaf nightshade flamegold guineagrass live oak Florida tasselflower paspalum HYDROLOGIC STATUS FAC UPL UPI, FAC W FAC FAC OBL UPL UPL FAC W FAC W UPL FAC FAC W UPL FAC FAC W UPL UPL FAC UPL UPL UPL vine FAC UPL FAC UPL UPL UPL FAC UPL UPL FAC UPL OBL vine FAC W UPL UPL Ville FAC FAC FAC W UPL UPL UPL UPL UPL UPL UPL UPL FAC W wj� i ? P� 5 714't 1.- E R f - _ _. *• fie* �,.. re",1 i It ILWetland Area F AS f7 6 IS r rbm F."!i, . �, �, TIC ._ i r Wetland i ih r qAP Mi-1 ow -�. t UMAND AREAe. AL Wetland Area e r L I J..�, 4 ...-_ E' WETLAND AREA s • W a �~r9 a ru- ,-.^ •_ Direction of Flaw d '� siF �t r 5 .41. arc.=r z �: ° ...... IFt �, -sma+l ���1 � ",� � `s `^... « ' N.4b �! +.'p► � � �q' r a i Ilk it o + 'L B . t 4 A }�,rf • r _ JI {"3``•> LT �" bj @ .. �a ": z^. �-y..eT-t„ s e sCi. ze •� ''. a _ ) _ yj`lly ,.'k,L �' i d"c�.;v"!';;.'a:'• �° - c � 4 e�':xi �E- d�&• E � �1�'ii �4 � ��' 'I �` 1; - - � !� ,`ice,..&:., • k r a him } �C -`�1� eil�..' a C ct>7UNDEVELOPED LAND WITHIN URBAN AREAS lift ilm IL L .* r "� •L4� ' l • ,. . _ ., � � �' �; �. � do {; �07161e i 7 1 I '� �'� i •. t d� i�r; t 4 L u� ^� • P '" � "... , _ Q i r �1 >; � � �' n-`t4 Sit. . jay ._ SURVEYING + MAPPING, INC. L.B. Number 7278 8455 SE MAY TERRACE, HOBE SOUND, FL 33455 PH 772/545-2315 FAX 772/545-2318 SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION for PARCEL 2; WEST OF TAYLOR CREEK RIGHT-OF-WAY P.O.C. w N.W. COP. S.W.1/4 SEC.22 P.O.B. SCALE, 1`= 300' o TWP. 37 S, RGE 35 E: INTERSECTION OF NORTH S FOUND AXLE TAYLOR COVE P.B.S, PG. 60 LINE OF PARCEL 2 AND S.E. 8TH STREET TAYLOR CREEK R.O.W. 89'44'49"E S89'20'09"W NORTH LINEN89'44'49"E 1269.30' 5.93' W N00'1736'W 32.50' 200.00'1 PARCEL 2 o ROW M ABANDONMENT h6 SUNTRUST BANK, NA $ 196,280 sq,f t. 2 h PARCEL 2-2(-37-35-M*-" Z ��, "v, 4.51 V? t` � o g z z KEMP PROPERTIES PARCEL B-x-37-3s-aao-os+7 4 N89'20'09"E 200.00' V) w GLO LAND DEVELOPERS, LLC z PARCELLa 2-Y1-37-35-M100-OpIfiA IBA BROTHERS INC Z PARCEL 2-21-37-35-OAW-0016 w U PARCEL 1 2.408 ACRES FRANK ALT®ELLO, TAl1iTFE, ETAL PARCEL 2-21-37-33-MO .ET FRANK AND ETHEL ALTOBELLO PARCEL E-21-3T-35-0A00-0041 Iwo ARCEL 2-212-2137-350-0043� 3 to 1M M r g 0 z 4- PARCEL 2 c� LINE TABLE LINE LENGTH BEARING Ll 292.31 S22.491551W L2 116.51 Sl 46'58'W L3 127.60 S36.22'43W L4 133.27 S37.29'44'W L5_ 140.95 S18.09'S1'W L6 179.24 S01.54'50'W L7 154.70 S17.53'50'W L8 158,12 S19.37'24'W L9 230,67 S20.19'281W LID 105.98 S00.59'20'W S89'20'09"W 210.00 210.13' (D) PARCEL 3 i� OR MVD N CON.W ARCEL 2-2t-37-3SOAOD-NN2 � � F rn ;' LESS L IXCFPT PARCEL � O � Cn 0) 00 �--- PAIPfiL 3 o "7 DAVID � 0 Z PAPLEL 2-2t-37- O z \ LO N t CV AD Z U) 0 w `C) V)o w ro J O Z 3 Z 211 22 36"W 36.00' S89'20'01"W FOUND 4X4 8ZU.22 ` 175. CONC. MON. tv PARCEL 4 / � Z N34 229.81 30.0' 'V cb c� �"I m 4--I�/ U Q FF c.' 3 ABBREVIATIONS: h� (C) = CALCULATED COURSE CLF = CHAIN LINK FENCE CM = CONCRETE MONUMENT CONC = CONCRETE PAVEMENT (D) = DEEDED COURSE IR/C = IRON ROD & CAP N/F = NOW OR FORMERLY (M) = MEASURED COURSE (P) = PLATTED COURSE TYP. = TYPICAL SURVEY NOTES: 1. BEARING STRUCTURE BASED ON THE WEST LINE OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 35 EAST, BEING SOUTH 00-17-36" EAST. 2. THE SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. 3. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. SOUTH LINE SECTION 22 LjCONCRETE MONUMENT BEARING NOTE THE BEARINGS LINE OF SUNSET STRIP AERPARKHREONARPEREOER.B. 593 PAGE 0888RENCED TO THE UTM SHEET 2 OF 2 CERTIFICATE THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE SKETCH SHOWN HEREON AND THE ATTACHED DESCRIPTION IS AC pq AND BELIEF -AND DOES NOT REPRESENT A FIELD SURVEY. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS SKETeH Al STANDARDS SET FORTH UNDER RULE 61G17-6 OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE PURSU N REVISIONS DATE BY SUBMITTAL 02-20-06 TM PR/1FFCCin c , JOSEPH J. LA )ATE OF SKETCH 02-20-06 GRAPHIC SCALE 1 100 200 300 THIS IS NOT A SURVEY L 2006 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CO CT THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE RIP N ETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL E 47 27. FLOFjJDA STATUTES. j/fAQPE r #LS 4275, STATE OF FLORIDA SURV IN0 & MAPPING, INC., #LB7278 CHE ED BY FILE NAME JJL TCFV_S&D.dwg �ik , .•r. 'OL SURVEYING + MAPPING, INC. L.B. Number 7278 8455 SE MAY TERRACE, HOBE SOUND, FL 33455 PH 772/545-2315 FAX 772/545-2318 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR A PORTION OF PARCEL 2;TAYLOR CREEK RIGHT-OF-WAY ABANDONMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION RIGHT OF WAY ABANDONMENT of Taylor Creek Being a parcel of land lying within the Southwest quarter (1/4) of Section 22, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE at the Northwest corner of the Southwest quarter (1 /4), of said Section 22, Thence South 00'17'36" East along the West boundary line of said Section 22, a distance of 212.00 feet; Thence North 89'44'49" East, along the North boundary line of Parcel 2, as described in Official Records Book 507, Page 209 of the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida, a distance of 1269.30 feet, to the intersection of said north line and the westerly right—of—way line for Taylor Creek, as described in Plat Book 2, Page 83 of the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida, said intersection being the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continue North 89°44'49" East, along said north boundary, a distance of 172.49 feet to a point being a 30.00 feet offset from the existing top of bank as delineated in a Boundary and Topographic Survey dated 01-25-06 by Survco Surveying and Mapping, Inc.. Thence along said offset line the following 10 (ten) courses: Thence S 22°4955" W, for a distance of 292.31 Thence S 13°46'58" W, for a distance of 116.51 Thence S 36°22'43" W, for a distance of 127.60 Thence S 37'29'44" W, for a distance of 133.27 Thence S 18*09'51" W, for a distance of 140.95 Thence S 01 °54'50" W, for a distance of 179.24 Thence S 17'53'50" W, for a distance of 154.70 Thence S 19'37'24" W, for a distance of 158.12 Thence S 20*19'28" W, for a distance of 230.67 Thence S 00'59'20" W, for a distance of 105.98 to the north line of Exhibit "A, as described in Official Records Book 507, Page 209 of the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida, said line measuring 901.00 feet north of and parallel with the south line of said Section 22. Thence South 89'20'09" West along a line being 901.00 feet North of, when measured at right angles, and parallel with the Southerly boundary of Section 22, a distance of 175.57 feet to said westerly right—of—way for Taylor Creek; Thence northerly along said right—of—way the following 3 (three) courses: Thence N 20°17'30" E, for a distance of 455.95 Thence N 19°38'07" E, for a distance of 838.97 Thence N 16°59'49" E, for a distance of 319.94 To said north boundary of Parcel 2, and the POINT OF BEGINNING Containing 4.51 acres, more or less. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY CERTIFICATE THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE SKETCH SHOWN HEREON AND THE ATTACHED DESCRIPTION IS ACCURATE AND AND BELIEF AND DOES NOT REPRESENT A FIELD SURVEY. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS SKETC AND DESCI STANDARDS SET FORTH UNDER RULE 61017-6 OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE PUR 0 CHAP REVISIONS DATE BY SUBMITTAL 1 02-23-06 JJL JOSEPH J. LAiVLtTS<Y DATE OF SKETCH DRAWL 02-23-06 TM SHEET 1 OF 2 P94G11 NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER Q2006 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ;T TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL )27, FLORIDA STATUTES. MAPPER #LS 4275, STATE OF FLORIDA SURVEYING & MAPPING, INC., #LB7278 JJL ITCFV—S&D.dwg SURVEYING -I- MAPPING, INC. L.B. Number 7278 8455 SE MAY TERRACE, HOBE SOUND, FL 33455 PH 772/545-2315 FAX 772/545-2318 SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION for PARCEL 2; WEST OF TAYLOR CREEK RIGHT-OF-WAY P.O.C. w N.W. COR. S.W.1/4 SEC.22 SCALE, 1'= 300' TWP. 37 S, RGE 35 E: 0 1` FOUND AXLE SECTION 22 P.C.B.r' TAYLOR COVE P.B.5, PG. 60 N S T❑WNSHIP 37 S, S.E, 8TH STREET / RANGE 35 E. 1567.58' N00'17'36"W 1 - 200.00.1 a 3�t ^/Al O ArySUNTRUST RAW, NA Z , vi 2 vsKEW PARCH L--a-37— IpO -" 'rPR�GPEa3s Taa aoa N89'20'09"E c7� i 0. N 3 r w Z G60 LAND DEVELOPERS, LLCIiVj PARCEL 2-21-37-35-RADD•OD16A 0 Q w Z IRA BROTHERS INC PARCEL 2-0-37 35-RADp-pW6 / 12 • � o P ,3 r .o .3 PARCEL 1 2.406 ACRES FRANK i S I AL1IDElLD, TRUSTEE, ETAL PARCEL 8-21-37-33-OA0p-00{S j i (� W FRANK 2DZANDT PARCEL 135-b100-EHEL ALTO0041BELLO i/ O cp J Tw RRDTNM DEVELOPERS, M % /� ABBREVIATIONS: PARCEL a-PI-37-35-0Am-000 N ��i / 7' W N v (C) = CALCULATED COURSE ^ / / 219 '09Y FOUND 4X4 y 7 9° 9 M CLF = CHAIN LINK FENCE ! 12962' CM = CONCRETE MONUMENT CONC = CONCRETE PAVEMENT LO PARCEL 3 i� Oq TCONC. MON.0 (D) = DEEDED COURSE PAREFI PAACfl.3 0 0)PARCEL Cn 4 /� ���--,,. N IR/C = IRON ROD & CAP o M 0 R,R 507 � 1 PARCEL AVID o Z PG 209 = �k N/F = NOW OR FORMERLY 7C�I Z N34' ' 2"W (M) = MEASURED COURSE 63.0 229.81 S89'19 33 (P) = PLATTED COURSE w v o TYP. = TYPICAL Z w 0 w � (N 00 w �0 S.W.1/4 o SEC.22 3 Z TWP. 37 S RGE 35 E\21 22 SURVEY NOTES: 1. BEARING STRUCTURE BASED ON THE WEST LINE OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 35 EAST, BEING SOUTH 00'17'36" EAST. 2. THE SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. 3. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. LINE LXUUNCRETE MONUMENT BEARING NOTE THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE REFERENCED TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SUNSET STRIP AIRPARK PER O.R.B.1593 PAGE 0888. CERTIFICATE THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE SKETCH SHOWN HEREON AND THE ATTACHED DESCRIPTION IS ACCURATE AND AND BELIEF AND DOES NOT REPRESENT A FIELD SURVEY.I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS SKETCH AND DES STANDARDS SET FORTH UNDER RULE 61G17-6 OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE PU F TO C REVISIONS DATE BY SUBMITTAL 02-23-06 JJL PROF R JOSEPH J. L Y S DATE OF SKETCH DRAWN BY 02-20-06 TM GRAPHIC SCALE 1 10 20 30 THIS IS NOT A SURVEY 02006 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED VONRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL 472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES. 'PER #LS 4275, STATE OF FLORIDA /EYING & MAPPING, INC., #LB7278 KED BY FILE NAME i I TCFV_S&D.dwg SURVEYING + MAPPING, INC. L.B. Number 7278 8455 SE MAY TERRACE, HOBE SOUND, FL 33455 PH 772/545-2315 FAX 772/545-2318 LEGAL DESCRIPTION for PARCEL 2; WEST OF TAYLOR CREEK RIGHT-OF-WAY LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL#2—A Being a parcel of land lying within the Southwest quarter (1/4) of Section 22, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE at the Northwest corner or the Southwest quarter (1 /4), of said Section 22, Thence South 00"17'36" East along -the West boundary line of said Section 22, a distance of 212.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence North 89"44'49" East a distance of 1,441.65 feet to a point lying on the westerly right—of—way line of Taylor Creek as shown on a Plat recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 83; Thence South 16°59'49" West, along said westerly right—of—way line, a distance of 319.94 feet; Thence South 19°38'07" West, continuing along said right—of—way, a distance of 838.97 feet; Thence South 20'17'30" West, continuing along said right—of—way, a distance of 455.95 feet, to the north line of Parcel 4, as described in Official Records Book 507, Page 209 of the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida, said line measuring 901.00 feet north of and parallel with the south line of said Section 22. Thence South 89°20'09" West along a line being 901.00 feet North of, when measured at right angles, and parallel with the Southerly boundary of Section 22, a distance of 517.92 feet; Thence North 00°17'36" West, a along a line measuring 210.00 feet east of when measured at right angles, and parallel with the west boundary of said Section 22, a distance of 36.00 feet; Thence South 89°20'09" West, a along a line measuring 937.00 feet north of when measured at right angles, and parallel with the Southerly boundary of said Section 22, a distance of 210.00 feet, to a point on the aforementioned West boundary line of said section 22; Thence North 00°17'36" West, along the west line of said Section 22, a distance of 1008.37 feet; Thence North 89°20'09" East, perpendicular to and parallel with the Southerly boundary of said Section 22, a distance of 200.00 feet; Thence North 00'17'36" West along a line 200.00 feet perpendicular to and parallel with the Westerly boundary of Section 22 a distance of 450.00 feet; Thence South 89°20'09" West along a line parallel to the Southerly boundary of said Section 22, a distance of 200.00 feet, to a point on the aforementioned Westerly boundary line of said Section 22; SHEET 1 OF 1 Thence North 00`17'36" West, along said line westerly boundary, a SEAL distance of 32.50 feet to THE POINT —OF —BEGINNING. Containing 32.97 acres, more or less. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY CERTIFICATE THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE SKETCH SHOWN HEREON AND THE ATTACHED DESCRIPTION IS ACCURATE AND AND BELIEF AND DOES NOT REPRESENT A FIELD SURVEY. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS SKETCH/"D,'KSC STANDARDS SET FORTH UNDER RULE 61G17-6 OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE PURSUANT AA/CRAPT REVISIONS DATE BY SUBMITTAL 1 02-20-06 TM JOSEPH J. LA DATE OF SKETCH 02-20-06 TM SURVCO NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE TS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL FLORIDA STATUTES. '#LS 4275, STATE OF FLORIDA G & MAPPING, INC., #LB7278 KED BY FILE NAME JJL TCFV—S&C 1 0 V/ �I ry V) W z J ry W z W U TWP. 37 S RGE 35 Ep 0 N.W. COR. S.W.1/4 SEC.22 FOUND AXLE TWP. 37 S S.E. 8TH STREET N89'44'49'E RGE 35 E 889°20''N1 PA.B 212.00 1441.65 S8 200.00' N00'17'44'W 32.50' T.B.M. tq 3 I.R./CAP 2 SURVCO L37278 EL.I7.64 Q P N 1054800.6460 E 712292.2620 C tiry ru � y p A z / O j o o q y o v 3¢ ITI 3 i�• CWMP OF 16) CYPRESS • / , v ti 03 4n ti TOTAL AREA - 48,06 ACRES � p� `70• WETLAND AREA = 6.23 ACRES TOTAL USABLE AREA = 39.83 ACRES S8909'W � 200.00' / / �-? � � P 2 N89'37'30'E i zo H z - T.B.M. / `, '+ 2 50.00 ru o ru c I.R./LAP SURVCD LH7278 EEL20.96 3 ��4 ` a A m E 712370 7890 4283.8140 4 N89'40'02'E qV.a 34I 94• - W� ~ 357.29 j i�ss�'i PARCEL 2 I 8' OAK 42,920 ACRES 3 Z PARCEL 1 N 2,408 ACRES f�ysr/\ 36' OAK n \ O N D/T f Y. V 8' OAK 1 �' 50' D.U.T. Q ? DRAINAGE u) n E SEMENT � \�P \ � hN / ��/ S89'40'02'W 35794 4 0 DO, 2zi Lo 1p 17 / WST /Alq©S �/,'/8,29'AMES'/% / i�/; \ j2r0V o N89'20'31'E -/� ,' /;'- /N00f/7/14"W 0 357.84 Sb�00/ o ru 589 18'32EW3(REMAININC-) !/ ' 'i /', N89'22)'01"E 40 75.57298.25 iDND 414 HUN. Lo m DO . z g �' i j% :' !. •.% m. Ie °' h IBv"IQ? Q to 3 LESS & EXEMPT PARCEL o w / / / 5.:� SS PAR C E L _, j, M 3 0 WA o Z N tI ! PARCEL 3 D. ^ ti � o tv ! of7 n f� a 77 P. if O -.N00'Y8 00'"W" 54 7,s� n J S89 1'32'W 945,00 S89.19'33'W 229.81 m n P.O.C. (I SCALE: 1 "=200 LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS (AS SUPPLIED BY CLIENT) NMn{F NMa'Ctlur N W Iona 1yYq dU,n mt se,meast a, W �actlm, 21. E«roHP 37 Souq. m E..t. PSsoruM Daea,mar CwkY, ilaMa aM MMO tlaASA Melt tMmiN�tlyatt of t1v EeutNn.t �n� » f t»tlw 2Y tllwv fwq On'lT„• E»< •IW 4M East b-,p Mr F SacNv, IN, asba:e of Coredncrq 9MS0 f«t m tm PDNT�-Vmab w fi tivncr tpvq East coon uv ToerlN,p eaar O'i744' wa ba.dvy dsmnu pF 2SS}0 f«t m • pMt. tlrnce Scum QY4Y1L' Vest asmnea I«< VK�n+e n s e1 SS)9, b n pb,t iy1q w Easeerlyp�ht f-va IM or SR u rat m w Sp. Oli ,:Dl tl,Mt. Nrq Tll•10'0} EeatMY roil+<-of-V.Y n .atancr of f«t m ebrpseM,cr EE- , d q 0lancr IIp,•m BS•,2'16• of °}s � r«t m q. Pant-or-Nibwq Nerm It�ie �•• "K CmtnYep 2,,05 eprei nor+ r 4as n9•IB']t' Er /eetl maa N ItPJ' Ea 2allp MJect m eery Rlplitavf-V•Y vdrr Easanents of pot SS•N'N' ni S149 F Sheet 1 of 1 d aM k-v- M fry VM of try td seA, eMMd.e+ta VaN: mM leYp parcel of LMa 1y�p doer tlr Su,ttnest ,h of Sacebn fModnp Souq 1341'l PL T»ntllp 9] ]wtF. liuye ]S En.t �+eawle. t6'iS'IY Vrs4 WLIY fry, Sw WnH• flprlda. eery aaati .on pvtb4aNY drsva»d » f»ti Sa,q pY,}el• veer 41.i cab.. Esat SY.% fW4 tu.tl. I7 tT4', �t»aectMn of ttx e.tenabn ti ore Sp7 d, try CmtaKq 429E4 ama, ive s leea teMp a✓rJect �n<Npntbl VeY Easement fs Tey,ar GeeY rrcvard M t Pm n] f C Necards W pJenct,IYSiItta.niueRcT�wRn 5tn2nr- Swu b Cr i.EgM1 r vn 11 ruhn[ . s or s •r�ybr Grel.'l q..r. ree� Nm Nyv ut., • a.w�p. part M eW W, t«nce txntl VISIT W - DAL W7. Pais M) ro.df4 » w4 oche W p O�f srint�is berg Lents lyap IM Sac= 21 sli0 E2. T-p I Savtly Nnrgr I EounH, ilarba..«,n rse pwt,pleny sow.d ea fal«s PANCEL n FLniDHG et . p,e,< 347 I«t laxq pF w Saugroat con,.. of -t3=.gw ]61 feet m tl�Eept b.ere..y of Parrott mvd a .•w.., tMce r,n m 414 hK • P».s, tMrce Etas[. pvnlielbp ttr zo,m ary IMe pr sed zl.. asmn<. ni`xt frc�< m tae t,t»aeptm pf ud East bwMry i» nr Srctbn 24 enence r.n Sduq 4U f»t m bir PDnIT Q BEGDlNDl4 MID PAR[£L a4 WGGNIM a tTpd•rt 547 Peet �q 0 qe tMest earner ar <bn 22 tn Derq w trctbn rM E`Pt 2N�/- iM•v •ieHor Geek, tMrc veneeraepop �t PGm* Dr ]E�Mn�Ne�`•- pMvei°� . „•, �.. �. m•IBTO'Veatte.•wr��o wE.Pt py �`tlm M to M� e»r na-tn 34443 rrcti Mencerbev Swm n9•,Yt�•V�t, ywp mq tx er Wd Pvcd 40A. n df 59.93 iM tnr� N�6/ nEGDel� , t �gcwtYr.,e s c M M-W! Parcel 422As,� try Intw tlan iilq tld Ess[ r� f-«Y 1 2 Nam l3, a b<sncr of 'JOfID frcp ttdree q N•IEIL'Vest ebrp tAe aeW East .ipM1t�fvny a1 Sbte Reed Na IS W try VM IYr of ma Perch 4PA, a astarae 0 x1.9] Mg Bence be•r N>q nT4T.2•Eut.. d4mna of 30R00 rMr q«cr wsag w•Ivoc'Enat, a a.<Pa:. pf x4m r«t m PDU1T R BEGtNDND preparee by LNwd Oyas. VLSI,. wbatq Job w]•,522 SUKVW 1 N FBN COALSSBTYPANL Na 120178 tMQPE0. 2. NO SEARCHOF THE PIELICRECORDS WERE PERFdB® FOR ENCUERANCES OR OTHER IAATIEMOFTIILE S. NO ENCJiDVB6fIS WERE POtM EXCEPTAB S 40W L NDUNOEAOROUND WROVEMISI 8 WERE LOCAT3 L THIS BURY E NOT COVERED BY PMWEBNONAL lL V LRY INSURANCE S. UST DATE OFSLRVEY. DCTOSER 13.2006. T. PROPEATYADORES& STATE ROAD IS-UXHKN1WAY441. L SEARRMARE BASED ON YOI UTAENTIM WEST UE OF8ECTION 7, 727E R]SE S COORDO,ATESARE BASSOON PLORM STATE KAM COOROI ATE SYSTEWHEAST ZONE. NN) W ANDEIEVATIOIOARE RUMON NANOW DATBL BOTH ARE R@ SOCEC DTO NOS NONIAAR,TS In FOLM IN THE C9RER NIEMN OF U.6 N1. to THIB NNVEY CERFWEMTO CLOW OONfIRUCHON NC LEGEND: 0 - 5/W UA IRON ROD/CAP U3727B (OR AS NOTED) P.O.C. = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT P.O.B.= POINT OF BEGINNING C.M.= CONCRETE MONUMENT IR/C = IRON ROD 6 CAP M = MEASURED COURSE 9011 ------------------ JOSEPH J UT£TS(Y, PSN. 4275 Z L J � Q OL r U DO W DO U) O 0 - T] 0 L0 z In LZ � d Q O 00 (' Z } O N LLJ > m L0 (If 1) O N y GO = ^ c 0 LU X L aL, a O ofLLJ U > M O Q N U) w Rn n N � ^ J ® a � a w eve a over all cww„wm�e.ra I � 37 7____ EaUer>iuy mS aw we aaww at ,>k,e, 437 Landscape Buffer 1— r_ Existing Vegetation to remain — Ea Girn9 u: ra,.�aVnmmr 35T — 22T Relocated 50' DOT Drainage Easement Epee Iarie: eYl Fimf IAw lbrrl 463' 200' 94S Ri Pc (6.t Go (8C To, (2f ential Boat Trailer & Extra Vehicle Storage Landscape Buffer SITE DATA TOW She Ares: Z09Z974 81148o6 Ac tWV wetlmG 188,088 sU424 Am (8%) — Taylor Creek ROW 95.410 sUZ19 Ao. 05%) conm.rclal Port 104544 vV2A Aa. (5%) Net ResNaYW Ares: 170054 aU39.1S Am MM Total LWM 229 Units NetPasider" Density, y 5M DWA C o land User Iioldrp SkIA* Ferw Proposed lard User ► W-Fwrft EAaft llsm Vewrlt BUILDING DATA Proposed ROW to Paskilerdial Pod A- be Abandoned (varies) Towrltlomec (2 a 3 story) 30 Villa ResManSs1 pod @ Tovrtlhomes C2 A 3 etary) 29.ffa Cordw*ar s (3 b. 4 story) 80 unlU Residen8al Pad Q ` Parking Tawrtlanes: (2 a 3 story) 20 Urft Reeldw&M Pad D. Caricl—Rana (3 & 4 story) 7D laktf Total Unit count. Boat Basin TowMomes 79 units Condominkant so units 229 Unite Wave Attenuator Marina (96 slips) - Recreational Site Amenities: Pod Clubhouse TH Bar Boat Remy Tennis (0.31 AC) o Gazebo rC° ` Bak Shop markla U Q' O �S --- Temporary Parking and Unloading/Loading Zone Boardwalk One Way Drive Aisle & Emergency Access Parking Marina Entry/Exit Bait & Tackle Shop Fuel Docks Boat Ramps General Notes - All building, parking and access areasshall document compliance with the requirements of 'American merican Disabilities Act prior to the issuance of a building permit. - Refer to Landscape Plan for landscape details and specifications. Boat Drop-off Staging Lane . - All exotic plant species shall be removed and all required landscaping shall be installed prior to the issuance of a certificate of Occupancy. - Alimprovements shall be coon nstructed in e phase. - Al:l signs will comply with the sign regulations at the time of permitting. -"No Trespass signs to be posted during construction and displayed at all entrances and exits. - NI building numbers to be no less than four (4) inches tall, illuminated, and not blocked by andscapi . - Sediment control measures shall be maintained in working order at all times. - Provisions shall be made to minimize the deposit of sedimard by transport vehicles onto public paved surfaces. - Sediment basin and traps, perimeter dikes, sediment barriers and other measures intended to trap sediment shall be constructed as a first step in any land activityand shall be made Relocated Canal functional before land disturbance takes place. - NI trees to be preserved am to be properly barricaded and kept free from debris, fill, and all barricades will be inspected by the City prior to any lard clearing, - All sidewalks are to be a minimum of 6' in width and will be constructed of paver black, brick or pink concrete. v Lucido & Associates Land Planning / Landscape Architecture ]alEOuuMA.4ewa rbiwiWl olziza e0. fuhrizinsem 1.A,wrwAaaelA iallFere.noea3rae (IMMIT Mi. fafrmei-,em eaeeeemweAwxuAale4q r`wksam Wn=*M re,WMaeea Key / Location: Project Team: Taylor Creek Fishing Village Conceptual Plan Okeechobee, Florida 2 27.06 Nalelff �` SCALE: T- n.La f 0 01 Cr 0• REG. 91018 Thames P. Ludb — sw Sh.at Manager _MM Pmleot NeMber —006.035 1 of 1 MUNdpel Number — NA computer Fh Caraepsrel saw plendw0 07/27/2006 15:20 7722230220 LUCIDOANDASSOCIATES PAGE 01 lUC,104�to&associates July 2% 2006 Betty Clement, General Services City of Okeechobee planning Department 55 SE. 3rd Avenue Okeechobee, FL 34974 Via FAX:863-763-1686 RE: Taylor Creek Marina & Fishing Village — Future Land Use Amendment (LA ref. #06-035) Dear Ms. Clement: A condition of the Local Planning Agency in 1 heir recommendation for approval of the noted future land use amendment was to provide a maximum residential unit count for the anticipated project. Please note, we do not anticipate any more than 296 residential units as part of any future development approval. This level of developr lent is much less than what would be allowed according the maximum development allowances of the requested Multifamily Residential future land use category. Under this category, we w(wld be allowed up to 374 units over the 37.4 acres. Feel free to contact me at any time if you neec any filrther information. We look forward to presenting our request to the City Commissior on August I". Sincerely, Cpe&-t Mark D. Mathes, AICP Planning Director Cncl_ CC: Chris Close 701 East Ocean Boulevard Smart, Florida 34994 tel: 772,220.2100 lax_ 772-223.022.0 web: YAAw.lucidodesign.com LARUE PLANNING & MANAGEMENT SERVICES, MC. 1375 Jackson Street, Suite 206 ' Fort Myers, Florida 33901-2845 239-334-3366 -FAX: 239-334-6384 e-mail: larue-planning@att.net memo To: City Council From: James G LaRue, AICP Date: July 26, 2006 Subject: Large Scale Amendment #06-CI-002 CBC (Altobello) Amendment On May 23rd the LPA recommended approval for this request to Multi Family. While the applicant has presented some additional enviornmental back-up since the original staff report there still are concerns that the wetlands on the property need to be renourished and the larger area protected. Prior to submittal to DCA, the most significant wetlands area should be agreed to be placed in the Conservation 1=uturc Land Use Category. Staff had recommended that this request be placed in a newly created mixed use category which would solve two problems: (1) Allow a density involving a mix of housing products but having a cap of less than 10 units an acre for the whole parcel. The proposal of 229 dwelling units by the applicant could be accommodated; and (2) A mixed use category accommodates commercial uses while multifamily does not. There are still concerns about a marina being located on Taylor Creek even though there are rigorous agency approvals for such a use. Holding tanks and pump out facilities are necessary and some type of gasoline fuel/spill containment plan is needed if fueling is conducted at this site. There has been a traffic report provided but it fails to account for the impact of commercial/nonresidential uses even if it assesses multifamily density for the maximum density. Finally, there are specific "Best Management" Practices that should be included as narrative revisions to the Comprehensive Plan's Conservation Element if a mixed use as proposed is recommended for approval. These proposed policies will be discussed August V as part of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment cycle. JGL:glp It Proposed/Best Management Practices Possible Policy Recommendations To improve the water quality of Taylor Creek, the City should investigate setting limits as to the amount of nitrogen and phosphorus that can be discharged into the Creek The City shall consider whether a high standard for water quality would require new development stormwater treatment systems to be designed using a treatment train approach, using multiple Best Management Practices in series, to ensure maximum potential treatment of stormwater. The City shall cooperate and coordinate with the St. Johns River Water Management District and the South Florida Water Management District process for purposes of suggesting improvements to the water quality of Taylor Creek. The City shall begin the process of revaluating the transfer of development rights to allow for broader use of this function as an effective planning tool. The City, in order to protect surface water quality within its corporate limits and beyond, shall consider adopting a numerical standard for nutrients and pollutants of concern. The City shall evaluate opportunities to implement Okeechobee Utility Authority water quality treatment systems within the Taylor Creek area to improve the quality of surface water discharges. The quality of water to be discharged from new surface water management systems shall be subject to Federal, State, Regional and Local permitting programs and regulations that determine compliance with Federal, State and Local water quality standards. Stormwater discharges from development must meet relevant water quality 7-20-06 and surface water management standards as set forth in Rules 62-4, 62-40, 62-302, 40E- 4, F.A.C. and by local ordinance. The City shall require all new developments to meet the provisions of the SFWMD Volume IV, Basis of Review for Surface Water Management and local provisions pursuant to this Comprehensive Plan to protect surface water quality within the City. Grants and incentives should be sought for the development of surface water quality treatment system retrofitting projects for old and/or new surface water management systems that are not effectively managing water volume or flow, or removing nutrients and other pollutants. The City shall periodically review the Land Development Code to ensure all codes are conducive to the implementation of such water quality Best Management Practices. The City shall consider requiring future developments to employ the provisions of the Florida Yards and Neighborhoods program. The City shall require periodic updates of the current Wellfield Protection Ordinance. 7-20-06 1375 Jackson Street, Suite 206 : Fort Myers, Florida 33901-2845 Phone: 239-334-3366 Fax: 239-334-6384 Email: larue-planning @ att.net Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant.- CBC Management Corp. Owner' FrankAltobello, Trustee From: Single -Family Residential To: Multi -Family Residential Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment General Information Applicant: CBC Management Corp. 06-C1-002 Legal Description: Being a parcel of land lying within the Southwest quarter of Section 22, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida, and being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Northwest corner of the Southwest quarter of said Section 22, thence South 00' 17' 36" East along the West boundary line of said Section 22 a distance of 212.00 feet to the POINT -OF -BEGINNING; thence North 89' 44' 49" East a distance of 1441.65 feet to a point lying on the westerly right-of-way line of Taylor Creek as shown on a Plat recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 83; thence South 16' 59'49" West, along said westerly right-of-way line, a distance of 319.94 feet; thence South 19°38'07" West, continuing along said right-of-way, a distance of 838.97 feet; thence South 20'17'30" West, continuing along said right-of-way, a distance of 455.95 feet, to the north line of Parcel 4, as described in Official Records Book 507, Page 209 of the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida, said line measuring 901.00 feet north of and parallel with the south line of said Section 22. Thence South 89°20'09 West along a line being 901.00 feet North of, when measured at right angles, and parallel with the Southerly boundary of Section 22, a distance of 517.92 feet; thence North 00°17'36" West, a along a line measuring 210.00 feet east of when measured at right angles, and parallel with the west boundary of said Section 22, a distance of 36.00 feet; thence South 89°20'09" West, a along a line measuring 937.00 feet north of when measured at right angles, and parallel with the Southerly boundary of said Section 22, a distance of 210.00 feet, to a point on the aforementioned West boundary line of said section 22; thence North 00°17'36" West, along the west line of said Section 22, a distance of 1008.37 feet; thence North 89°20'09" East, perpendicular to and parallel with the Southerly boundary of said Section 22, a distance of 200.00 feet; thence North 00°17'36" West along a line 200.00 feet perpendicular to and parallel with the Westerly boundary of Section 22 a distance of 450.00 feet; thence South 89°20'09" West along a line parallel to the Southerly boundary of said Section 22, a distance of 200.00 feet, to a point on the Staff Report Applicant: CBC Management Corp. Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment 06-C1-002 aforementioned Westerly boundary line of said Section 22; thence North 00017'36" West, along said line westerly boundary, a distance of 32.50 feet to the POINT -OF - BEGINNING. Containing 32.97 acres, more or less. Request: The matter before the Land Planning Agency and the City Council is a request to change the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) for the above described property from Single Family to Multi - Family. The request is more specifically shown on Exhibit A attached. Since the property in question is over 10 acres (37.48 acres), this application qualifies under Florida Statutes 163 as a "Large -Scale Amendment" to the Plan. More than likely, the subject property will be combined with contiguous property, already in a Multi -Family category to make a total development. Adjacent Future Land Use Map classifications and Zoning Districts: Application Description: The applicant requests a change in the Future Land Use Map Designation for the subject property from Single Family (SF) to Multi -Family (MF). The subject property is currently vacant and unplatted. The subject property is located along Taylor Creek, parallel to US 441. The applicant intends to develop the property to accommodate the proposed project known as the Taylor Creek Fishing Village. This development is purported to contain a total of 229 dwelling units consisting of a mix of residential uses along with commercial and Marina uses although it is somewhat unclear as to the proposed mix of uses contemplated. There is a "bubble" map interaction and overall plan of development. PA Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: CBC Management Corp. 06-C1-002 The City Council and Local Planning Agency are required to address certain uses in conjunction with the Comprehensive Plan, which may be categorized as follows: A. Consistency with the Land Use Categories and Plan Policies. This Large Scale Plan Amendment application speaks about a mixed -use development but there is little data explaining and supporting this approach or justifying the request of Multi -Family Residential for the entire parcel. Objective 2: The City of Okeechobee will ensure that all new development is consistent with the Future Land Use Element. Policy 2.1: The following land use designations are established for the purpose of managing future growth: (b) Multi -family Residential. Permitted uses include apartments, duplexes, condominiums, single-family houses and public facilities. Maximum density shall not exceed 10 units per acre. Where affordable housing is provided in accordance with Housing Policy 1.6, the maximum density for multi -family development shall be 11 units per acre. As submitted, the application and supporting documentation is insufficient to support the change from Single Family to Multi -Family. Given its proximity to Taylor Creek, the Comprehensive Plan states that the City must protect environmentally sensitive areas from high density development such as what can be built under the Multi -Family Future Land Use category by the applicant. Because of the property's proximity to Taylor Creek, Policy 7.2 of the Comprehensive Plan must be adhered to and the applicant hasn't given supporting evidence of that. The inclusion of a Marina with 96 slips and a fuel dock has also not been assessed with regard to this Policy. Policy 7.2: The City shall continue to protect environmentally sensitive areas from development of a type and intensity which would disrupt their natural functions. B. Concurrency of Adequate Public Facilities Before this request can be approved, the City must consider the proposed realistic impact on public facilities. Potable Water Supply: The adopted LOS for potable water is 114 gpcpd. The subject property is within the service area of the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA) who provides this service to City residents. The below is the anticipated flow for the proposed 320 units is expected to be approximately 95,000 GPD. The existing capacity of the t Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: CBC Management Corp. 06-C1-002 surface and ground water supply plants are 6 MGD, with 2.5 MGD already committed to use. As such, the OUA has an excess of 4.5 MGD. The OUA would have capacity to serve the proposed development but recent approvals have not been considered in this assessment of remaining water capacity. Wastewater Disposal: The adopted LOS for wastewater disposal is 130 gallons/ capita/day. The subject property is within the service area of the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA). The estimated wastewater flows for the subject property would be 95,000 GPD. The existing capacity of the wastewater treatment plant is 1.2 MGD, with between 800,000 and 900,000 GPD already committed to use. As such, the OUA has a minimum of 300,000 GPD of excess capacity. The OUA has stated that plans are underway to construct an addition to the plant which will permit an additional 3 MGD. It should be noted that the City has received several recent Plan Amendments counting on future sewer plant expansion. A better analysis showing committed service needs to be shown. Solid Waste Disposal: The City has an adopted LOS of 13 lbs/capita/day and 3 years available landfill capacity for solid waste disposal. The proposed development would generate approximately 12,350 lbs/day of solid waste. The applicant must provide a letter from Okeechobee County determining whether the existing landfill will have capacity to serve the proposed development. Drainage/Stormwater Management: The adopted LOS for drainage is Design Storm, 25-year/24 hour duration. The proposed development is required to meet all conditions and standards required by the City of Okeechobee and the Florida Administrative Code. Because of the vulnerability of Taylor Creek, there needs to be a more specific delineation of the Best Management Practices used for water quality enhancement in stormwater discharges. Recreation and Open Space: The adopted LOS for recreation and open space is 3 acres/1,000 persons. The proposed development is projected to increase the City's population by approximately 950 additional people. The development would need approximately 3 acres of recreational facilities in order to meet the adopted LOS for parks. The applicant has stated that this would be met with the provision of on -site facilities, but this doesn't seem completely consistent with the intent of the Recreation and Open Space LOS Standards of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Roads and Traffic Circulation: The City's minimum LOS standard for principal arterial roadways is LOS C. All other roads have an LOS D. This LOS must be maintained on the site for all roadways serving the site. In addition, Objective 9 of the Traffic Circulation Element states: Objective 9: The City of Okeechobee shall encourage efforts to curtail future Level of Service Standard deterioration, particularly along US Highway 441 and SR 70. M Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: CBC Management Corp. 06-C1-002 The subject property would be serviced by US 441. The applicant has provided a traffic analysis which showed that traffic would be impacted by the proposed development. It was estimated that the proposed land use would result in an increase of 666 daily trips and 40 PM peak hour trips with 33 more trips in and 7 more trips out. This traffic study is being examined but it does not seem that the traffic analysis has contemplated any of the Commercial, Non -Residential or Marina impacts. C. Compatibility with Adjacent and Nearby Land Uses. The proposed land use change to Multi -Family at ten dwelling units an acre for the entire site is not compatible for this location. There has not been shown enough supporting data to indicate that this level of density is needed for this site. If the true intent of future development for this site equates to a Single Family density, then perhaps a new Future Land Use category should be suggested. Given the property's proximity to Taylor Creek, staff is concerned that development might negatively impact this environmentally sensitive area. The Taylor Creek right-of- way per recorded plat should be recognized as non -buildable. It is not clear who is being asked to abandon the Taylor Creek right-of-way. Future Land Use Policy 2.3: The City shall continue to require that all development proposals be accompanied by an inventory of wetlands, soils posing severe limitation to construction, unique habitat, City shall further require that the extent to which any development or redevelopment is proposed to be placed in/on, to disturb, or to alter the natural functions of any of these resources, be identified. Such identification shall occur at a phase in the development review process that provides the opportunity for the City to review the proposed project to ensure that direct and irreversible impacts on the identified resources are minimized, or in the extreme, mitigated. Where development is determined to encroach upon a resource, the City shall require a specific Management Plan to be prepared by the developer, which results in no net loss of wetlands and which includes necessary modifications to the proposed development, specific setback and buffers, and clustering of development away from site resources, to ensure the protection, preservation or natural functions of the resource. The minimum buffer for wetlands shall be 25 feet and the average of all setbacks from the wetland resource shall be 40 feet. Areas designated as buffers shall preserve all natural vegetative cover, except where drainageways and access paths are approved to cross the buffer. Buffers may be supplemented only with native tress, shrubs and ground covers. 5 Staff Report Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant: CBC Management Corp. 06-C1-002 Policy 7.1: The City shall continue to amend and enforce land development regulations consistent with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection's (FDEP) Best Management Practices referenced in Policy 1.4, which will minimize the flow into Taylor Creek of organic nutrients, pesticides, sediment, and other substances having the potential to degrade water quality. The applicant has done a brief Florida Land Use Cover & Classification Systems (FLUCCS) analysis on this property but no Management Plan has been suggested to ensure there is not a loss of wetlands. It would seem that there could be an enhancement of some of these wetlands areas rather than just concluding that these areas are marginal. Conservation Element Policy 4.1: Through Future Land Use Policy 2.3 and implementing Land Development Regulations, the City shall continue to conserve wetlands and protect water quality in Taylor Creek from adverse impacts of development. Policy 5.1: The City shall enforce provisions in its Land Development Regulations to ensure that new development, regardless of its location in the City, meets the following conditions: (a) does not degrade water quality in Taylor Creek; (b) does not threaten groundwater quality, particularly in the vicinity of municipal wells; (c) preserves existing wetland areas; (d) avoids the disturbance of natural drainage features; and (e) preserves habitat for endangered and/or threatened wildlife species. In examining the above Policies, there is not enough supporting evidence to indicate that the wetlands and natural resource areas will be adequately protected. Also, there might be measures to revitalize the wetland areas that haven't been suggested. Postponing the addressing of this until Site Plan time isn't adequately responding to this issue and is more prevalent in poorly planned conversion of rural properties, a characteristic of Urban Sprawl. Compliance with the Specific Standards of the Plan. The Goals, Objectives and Policies, as they are intended within the Comprehensive Plan, do not support an Amendment to the Future Land Use Map to Multi -Family. The proposal would be more consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan by following Single Family densities. 2 Staff Report Applicant: CBC Management Corp. Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment 06-C1-002 The existing Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policies will not support Multi -Family uses at this location. Therefore, it should be recommended that the City Council find the application not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. If mixed -uses are warranted at this property, perhaps a new Future Land Use category can be suggested that would provide performance standards and allow development at a lower density. Attachments to this Staff Report include a copy of the Future Land Use Map indicating the location of the subject property. Staff recommends denial of the applicant's request to amend the Future Land Use Map to Multi - Family based on the above inconsistencies to the City's Comprehensive Plan. Submitted by: James G. LaRue, AICP May 16, 2006 7 2006 - Land - Paae 9 of 13 VII. LARGE SCALE PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. A. Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment In conclusion, Mr. Hackl asked that the Agency consider the Large Scale Map Amendment with special Application No. 06-CI-001 continued III conditions that they have the information Mr. LaRue is requesting by the transmittal meeting with the City Council, tentatively set for August 1, 2006. B. Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-CI-002. Consider a recommendation to the City Council to change the land use designation from Single Family (SF) to Multiple Family (MF) for vacant unplatted property located South of Southeast 8t° Street and West of Taylor Creek and is approximately 32.97 acre(s). The application was submitted by Thomas Close of CBC corporation on behalf of property owner Frank Altobello - City Planning Consultant. Agency Burroughs moved to find the application consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and to recommend approval to City Council to change the land use designation from Single Family (SF) to Commercial (C) for Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-CI-001, with the contingency that the applicant provides the additional information as requested by the transmittal meeting with the City Council; seconded by Agency Member Maxwell. Agency Member Hoover left the Chamber room at 7:45 p.m. Chairperson Ledferd appointed Alternate Member O'Connor to a voting position in her absence. VOTE O'CONNOR - YEA KELLER - YEA LEDFERD - YEA MAXWELL - YEA JUAREZ - YEA BURROUGHS-YEA JOHNS - YEA MOTION CARRIED. By request of Member Johns, Chairperson Ledferd called for a five minute recess at 8:30 p.m. The meeting resumed at 8:35 p.m. Board Member Maxwell stated for the record that he would be abstaining from voting as the applicant, CBC Corporation, retained his law firm to provide legal representation. Mr. LaRue briefly reviewed the Staff Report as follows: Planning Staff Report Comprehensive Plan Analysis: The City Council and Local Planning Agency are required to address certain uses in conjunction with the Comprehensive Plan, which may be categorized as follows: VH- LARGE SCALE PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. B. Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-CI-002 continued. 2006 - Land - Page 10 of 13 Planning Staff Report Comprehensive Plan Analysis: (A) Consistency with the Land Use Categories and Plan Policies. The Comprehensive Plan describes the Commercial Future Land Use category in the Future Land Use Element. It states: Policy 2.1(c): Commercial. Permitted uses include office, retail, automotive, wholesale, and related Commercial activities. Also permitted are public facilities. Commercial development shall not exceed a floor area ratio of 3.00 and the maximum impervious surface for development within this category shall not exceed 85 percent of the site. Under the proposed Commercial Future Land Use category, the applicant would be allowed to develop the subject property with the Retail/Commercial uses. However, there is more data necessary to be shown illustrating that this presently designated residential area should become an intensive retail high impact location. (B) Coneurreney of Adequate Public Facilities. Before this request can be approved, the City must consider the proposed impact on public facilities. Potable Water Supply: The adopted LOS for potable water is 114 gpcpd. The subject property is within the service area of the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA) who provides this service to City residents. The anticipated flow for the subject property has not been provided by the applicant, this data is required. The existing capacity of the water supply plant is 6 MGD, with 2 5 MGD already committed to use_ As such, the OUA has an excess of 4.5 MGD_ The applicant would need to submit a letter to the City which discusses the anticipated flow for the development and that the OUA would have capacity to serve the proposed development. There should also be a deduction of water use for already approved developments because the cumulative impact has not been contemplated should all approved developments are built. Wastewater Disposal: The adopted LOS for wastewater disposal is 130 gallons/ capita/day. The subject property is within the service area of the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA). Impacts for the subject property would be cannot be determined at this time. The existing capacity of the wastewater treatment plant is 1.2 MGD, with between 800,000 and 900,000 GPD already committed to use. As such, the OUA has a minimum of 300,000 GPD of excess capacity. The OUA has stated that plans are underway to construct an addition to the plant which will permit an additional 3 MGD. This is expected to be done by the summer of 2008. The applicant would need to verify that the OUA would have capacity to serve the proposed development Solid Waste Disposal: The City has an adopted LOS of 13 lbs/capita/day and 3 years available landfill capacity for solid waste disposal. The impacts of the proposed development will be mining as the uses will be Commercial in nature. Drainage/Stormwater Management: The adopted LOS fordrainage is Design Storm, 25-year/24 hour duration. The proposed development is required to meet all conditions and standards required by the City of Okeechobee and the Florida Administrative Code. There should be at least a conceptual understanding of how stormwater discharge will be handled for what is obviously going to be the creation of impervious areas. 2006 - Land Planning Agency - Page'll of D VII. LARGE SCALE PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. B. Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-CI-002 continued. Planning Staff Report Comprehensive Plan Analysis: (B) continued: Recreation and Open Space: The adopted LOS for recreation and open space is 3 acres/1,000 persons. The proposed development is Commercial in nature and is not expected to impact parks. Roads and Traffic Circulation: The City's minimum LOS standard for principal arterial roadways is LOS C. All other roads have an LOS D. This LOS must be maintained on the site for all roadways serving the site. The subject property is serviced by SR 70. The applicant has not provided a traffic analysis which demonstrates how the proposed Development would impact the surrounding roadway network. Objective 9 and its corresponding policies (Traffic Circulation Element) states: Objective 9: The City of Okeechobee shall encourage efforts to curtail future level of service standard deterioration, particularly along US Highway 441 and SR 70. Policy 9.1: To assist in improving level of service standards, Commercial redevelopment efforts shall be prioritized to mitigate existing "strip" Commercial sites. Policy 9.2: Access points to Commercial centers shall be limited, where feasible, to decrease traffic congestions along City arterials and other roadways. Policy 9.3: Efforts shall be made, where appropriate, to separate local traffic from through traffic in Commercial areas. The applicant must submit a traffic ices will be met and that the Level of Service would not analysis which demonstrates that the above pol be degraded for the surrounding roads. Such analvsis should include the anticipated trips from the Commercial property to the east. (C) Compatibility with Adjacent and Nearby Land Uses. The proposed change to Commercial has been stated by the applicant that it would not negatively impact surrounding properties. The proposed type of Commercial uses and usage of buffers should be demonstrated before compatibility can be assumed. (D) Compliance with the Specific Standards of the Plan. The Goals, Objectives and Policies (as they are intended) in the Comprehensive Plan would allow for an Amendment to the Future Land Use Map to Commercial should compatibility, acceptable impacts on traffic, sewer, water and overall fiscal feasibility resulting from this re -designation, can be shown by supporting data and analysis. Planning Staff Report Analysis and Conclusions: Staff does not recommend for approval of applicant's request to amend the Future Land Use Map to Commercial. Mr. Mark Mathes of Lucido and Associates, representative for applicant CBC Close Construction, and on behalf of the property owner Frank Altobello stated, Mr. Close has a strong desire to see the City prosper and is aware of the need for housing. He distributed an aerial map with the land use overlay indicating vacant multi -family parcels. He noted that there were no properties that exceeds five acres. VII. LARGE SCALE PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. B• Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. 06-CI-002 continued. 2006 - Land - Page 12 of 13 Mr. Mathes then proceeded to address some of the requested information as noted in the Planning Staff Report. The data for the pottable water has been completed with OUA, and that the OUA also used the Proposed property development for their stormwater study project. The solid waste analysis shows a capacity for up to 50 years. A traffic analysis was provided showing the roads will be able to service the extra impact. Agency Member Burroughs asked what was the purpose of the wave attenuator? Ms. Mary Haaksma, calm. also from CBC Close Construction, replied that it is to keep the shoreline from eroding, and the waters Mr. O'Connor asked Mr. LaRue whether all the additional requested information had been answered? Mr. LaRue replied yes, most of them were, but he still needed the site specifics density or cap for the residential area. Mr. Mathes responded that at this time they had no numbers available. It was discussed that they have the numbers for the proposed residential area by the transmittal meeting with the City Council. ME Mathes also stated that should there be a favorable transmittal medlna then they will submit a Planned Unit Development application, which must give more specifics_ Agency Member O'Connor moved to find the application consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and to approve a recommendation to the City Council to change the land use designation from Single Family (SF) to Multiple Family (MF) for Comprehensive Plan Large Scale Future Land Use Ma endment Application No. 06-CI-002 with the contingency that the applicant provide a number ofresidents proposed for the area by the transmittal meeting with the City Council; seconded by Agency Member Burroughs. VOTE 09COMOR - YEA SELLER - YEA LEDFERD - YEA MAXWELL - ABSTAINED (VOTING CONFLICT FORM ON FILE IN THE CITY CLERKS OFFICE) JUAREZ - YEA BURROUGHS-YEA JOHNS - YEA MOTION CARRIED, 674 DECEMBER 5, 2006 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 7 OF 15 VIII. PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE ADOPTION CONTINUED. C. 2. c) Vote on motion. KIRK - YEA C. WILLIAMS - YEA MARKHAM - YEA L. WILLIAMS - ABSENT WATFORD - YEA MOTION CARRIED. D.1. a) Motion to read by title only, and adopt proposed Ordinance No. 965 Council Member Watford moved to read by title only, and adopt proposed Ordinance No. 965 regarding Cycle 12006 regarding Cycle 12006 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - City Comprehensive Plan Amendments; seconded by Council Member Markham Planning Consultant (Exhibit 4). b) Vote on motion. C) City Attorney to read proposed Ordinance No. 965 by title only 2. a) Motion to adopt proposed Ordinance No. 965. b) Public comments and discussion. c) Vote on motion. KIRK - YEA MARKHAM - YEA WATFORD - YEA C. WILLIAMS - YEA L. WILLIAMS - ABSENT MOTION CARRIED. Attorney Cook read proposed Ordinance No. 965 by title only as follows "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF! OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO ITS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INCLUDING AMENDMENTS TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP, THE TEXT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE. CONSERVATION. AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENTS; TO REVISE AND UPDATE THE EXISTING OBJECTIVES, POLICIES, DATA AND ANALYSIS; IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANDATES SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 163, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR TRANSMITTAL TO THE STATE LAND PLANNING AGENCY; PROVIDING A CONFLICTS CLAUSE AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES." Council Member Markham moved to adopt proposed Ordinance No. 965; seconded by Council Member Watford. Mayor Kirk asked whether there were any comments or questions from the public. Mr. LaRue, recommended that the Council delay approval until January 16, 2007 in order to finalize additional amendments proposed by South Florida Water Management. Council Member Markham moved to delay approval of proposed Ordinance No 965 until time certain, January 16, 2007; seconded by Council Member Watford. KIRK - YEA C. WILLIAMS - YEA MARKHAM - YEA L. WILLIAMS - ABSENT CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. 111 MAYOR KIRK CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:55 P.M. WATFORD - YEA MOTION. CARRIED. The Okeechobee News P.O. Box 639, Okeechobee, Florida 34973 (863) 763-3134 Published Daily STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Judy Kasten, who on oath says she is Publisher of the Okeechobee News, a DAILY Newspaper published at Okeechobee, in Okeechobee County, Florida; that the attached copy of ady�rt $emem. being a i e matter of in the 19th Judicial District of the Circuit Court of Okeechobee County, Florida, was published in said newspaper in the issues of Afiiant further says that the said Okeechobee News is a newspaper published at Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been published continuously in said Okeechobee County, Florida each week and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for pub0ation in the said newspaper. Sworn to and soscribod Wore me this da16 of A.D. 20 0 Notary Public, State of Florida at Large A. PUBLIC NOTICE CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING pL�AgEypKE #'ar tea AdCvITY ORDINANCE as dv o' on 55 u�E �brd A �O�keeczm7 � 6 �onduct a PUBLIC FARIOk NG oere nandthereafter y to consider final readirq of the following Ordinance into law: NO„M, AN ORDI- NANCE CLOSING, VACATING AND ABANDONING THE ALLEYS OR ALLEYWAYS AS DESCRIBED HEREIN, WITHIN BLOCKS 4,12,13, 20 AND 21, CITY. OF OKEE- CHOBEE SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS FOR OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA; RESERVING UNTO THE CITY ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS A f ERPETUAL NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR UTILITY PURPOSES; PROVIDING FOR A RIGHT OF REVERSION; AND DI- RECTING THE CITY CLERK TO RECORD THE ORDINANCE IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The ordinance is regarding Alley Closing Application No. 85 submitted by Steve Dobbs, on behalf ��offh pro" owners InSBeeeddDevelloottpnmdena�tt GGroup, LLaaC.¢ dd ryaanno Tice pr�edTOrdina� a mayebein ed to rtseerdirery Bym P%ir' o?rthe pub0c in the Office of the City Clerk during regular business hours, Mon -Fri, Bam-4:30pm, exceptforholidays. T E p pp g rf aI dec�is on made byOtheCCd�y CouncT withEDesp�ect �oma maitue consi�e, 1� hearing, such interested person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose may need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. City Clerk tapes are for the sole purpose of backup for official records of the Clerk. ''rr� Pdance wilh d 1�1 cans M� PsabiTy Act�A,%and Rorid� ptatrles 286.� ersans sa i es nee i s ecia acco m bon to par i e in this proceeding should contact Lane Gamiotea no later than two (2) working days prior to the proceeding at 863-763-3372 x215; it hearing or voice impaired, call TOO 1-800-222-3448 (voice) or 1-888-447-5620 (TTY). 1 LanelGamiotea.PMC, CITY CLERK ............ ..1................... CONSTANCE L. HAWSE ` Wmrp C=lrlt►il DD0563848 Expires 6114=10 -,,o- Florida Notary Assn.. Inc ...............................: 971 EXNISIT 5 _ JAN ' 16 AGENDA EXHIBIT _ FE8 20 AGENDA ORDINANCE NO. 971 AN ORDINANCE CLOSING, VACATING AND ABANDONING THE ALLEYS OR ALLEYWAYS AS DESCRIBED HEREIN, WITHIN BLOCKS 4, 12, 13, 20 AND 21, CITY OF OKEECHOBEE `SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS FOR OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA; RESERVING UNTO THE CITY ITS .SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS A PERPETUAL NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR UTILITY PURPOSES; PROVIDING FOR A RIGHT OF REVERSION; AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO RECORD THE ORDINANCE IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT IN AND, FOR OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has received an Alley Closing Application (No. 85) from Steve Dobbs, on behalf of InSite Development Group, LLC, for the closing of certain alleyways as described in this ordinance to utilize the property for future development; and WHEREAS, various utility companies have requested easements within certain blocks due to existing utilities located within those alleyways; and WHEREAS, a review of such application reveals that it is in the best interest of the citizens of the City of Okeechobee as a whole to grant said application; and WHEREAS, the granting of the application will serve a legitimate public interest and is a proper exercise of the municipal authority of the City of Okeechobee as a discretionary function; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council for the City of Okeechobee, Florida; presented at a duly advertised public meeting; and passed by majority vote of the City Council; and properly executed by the Mayor or designee, as Chief Presiding Officer for the City: Section One. The alleyways described hereafter is hereby closed, vacated and abandoned by the City of Okeechobee, Florida to -wit: The alleyway running East to West located between Lots 1 through 13, inclusive and Lots 14 through 26, inclusive of Block 4; and The alleyways running East to West located between Lots 1 through 10, inclusvie and Lots 17 though 26, inclusive, and running North to South between Lots 10 and 11 through 16, inclusive and 17 of Block 12; and The alleyway running East to West located between Lots 1 through 13, inclusive and Lots 14 through 26, inclusive of Block 13; and The alleyway running East to West located between Lots 1 through 13, inclusive and Lots 14 through 26, inclusive of Block 20; and The alleyways running East to West located between Lots 1 through 10, inclusive and Lots 17 through 26, inclusive, and running North to South between Lots 10 and 11 through 16, Page 1 of 2 inclusive and 17 of Block 21. All located within the City of Okeechobee Subdivision, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 10, and Plat Book 5, Page 5, of the public records for Okeechobee County, Florida. Section Two. Utility Easements. The City of Okeechobee, Florida hereby reserves unto itself, its successors and assigns, the following perpetual, non- exclusive easements for public utility purposes: Block 20: An easement, 15 feet in width, running East to West between Lots 13 and 14, inclusive of Block 20, City of Okeechobee, as recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 5, public records for Okeechobee County, Florida. Block 21: An easement, 15 feet in width, running East to West between Lots 1 through 10, and 17 through 26, inclusive, and an easement 15 feet in width running North to South between Lot 10, 11 through 16 and 17, inclusive of Block 21, City of Okeechobee, as recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 5, public records for Okeechobee County, Florida. Section Three. Right of Reversion. In the event that the said property owner fails to obtain within thirty-six months hereof a Certificate of Occupancy for their future development, then said alleys shall be declared open and the provisions of this ordinance declared null and void. Section Four. The City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of the ordinance to be recorded in the public records of Okeechobee County, Florida. Section Five. This ordinance shall be set for final public hearing the 201h day of February, 2007, and shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. INTRODUCED for first reading and set for final public hearing this 16"day of January, 2007. James E. Kirk, Mayor ATTEST: Lane Gamiotea, CMC, City Clerk PASSED and ADOPTED on second and final public hearing this 201h day of February, 2007. ATTEST: Lane Gamiotea, CMC, City Clerk REVIEWED FOR LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: John R. Cook, City Attorney James E. Kirk, Mayor Page 2 of 2 0 Lai �iy :. ilh'n� %6` s,4j �IrA dr&�—•" I+ 15df) Ii�} rN r I1! Jf �7rt1 �1,m4: #�afIP 1 e {0 1 5� '�` ir7 ) 6r J r f• a ',; 1! � I�i' •," r' 0 � © t✓�I §} U6V `� r eta rrlS l y ogF,� , I, D � UV-7 s (._.� �, �� , authorize Steven L. Dobbs, P.E. to sign applications and statements on behalf of InSite Developme ro p �Lbef6y-Qkeechobee. Sig D. Curtis`ffndberg G InSite Development Group CEO/President Subscribed and sworn to me before by Cw�5 -6 This day of April, 2006. Witness by hand and official seaj My Commission expires: D 1 uu. 7 Notary Public State of Flur4J,11 _ er all _ Produced Identification Type C= p� '►ido EmNrft April 21, 20V ?0�-e 3 ATTACHMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF ALLEY S15 T37 R35 The 15ft EW Alley and NS Alley of Block 12, Okeechobee The 15ft EW Alley and NS Alley of Block 21, Okeechobee The 15ft EW Alley of Block 4, Okeechobee The 15ft EW Alley of Block 13, Okeechobee The 15ft EW Alley of Block 20, Okeechobee This Instrument prepared by: Steven L. Daniels, Esquire ARN STEIN & LEHR LLP 51rth Flagler Drive. Sixth Floor M�Y m Beach, Florida 33401 le 4620-0001 iiiiiiihillielillill FILE LE HUM 2006001585 OR B14 00588 PG 1621 SHARON ROBERTSDN► CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT OKEECHOBEE COUNTYr FL RECORDED 01/24/2006 12:57:18 PM RECORDING FEES 27.00 DEED DOC 13r650.00 RECORDED BY L Rucks $pace Above This Line for Retarding DataL_ *INDENTURE, WARRANTY DEED made this 12th day of January, 2006, between Kovach Development, Inc., aa corporation and MTS Investments, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, ("Grantor") Site .Development Group, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, whose post office a s is 2 At I fS `l [,v' ("Grantee"). Ga oi,�3 WITNE H, that said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO/100 ($10.00) DOLLA d other good and valuable consideration to said Grantor in hand paid by said Grantee, the rec ereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the Grantee and Grante errs and assigns forever the following described land situate, lying and being in Okeechobi " nty, Florida, to -wit: Parcel 1: Lots 1 through 26i ve, Block 20 of OKEECHOBEE, according to the Plat ord thereof, as rece s lat Book 1, Page 10, and in Plat Book 6, Page 6-of the Public Records of chobee County, Florida; and Lots 7 through 10, inclusive, and Lot 11, I West 28 feet thereof, together with the North 7.6 feet of the vacated alle. 15 feet wide) adjacent to said lots, in Block 29, of OKEECHOBEE, accordin e Plat thereof, as recorded In Plat Book 1, Page 10 and in Plat Book 5, Pag(f the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida. Parcel 2: Lots 1 through 26, inclusive, Block 4; Lots 1 through 6, inclusive, Block 11; Lots 1 through 26, inclusive, Block 12; Lots 1 through 26, Inclusive, Block 13; Lots 1, 2, 3, and 9, in Block 21, less the East 32.60 feet of said Lot 9; Lois 10 through 26, inclusive, Block 21; and Lots 1 through 6, inclusive, Block 22, of OKEECHOBEE, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 10 and in Flat Book 6, Page 6 of the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida. Parcel ID Numbers: 3-15-37-35-0010-00040-0010; 3-15-37-35-0010=00040-0140; 3-15-37-354010-00110-0010; 3-15-37-35-0010-00120-0010; 3-15-37-35-0010-00120-0110; 3-15-37-35-0010-00120-0170,,3-15-37-35-0010-00130-0010; 3-15-37-35-0010-00130-0140; 3-15-37-35-0010-00200-0010; 3-15-37-25-0010-00200-0140; 3-15-37-35-0010-00210-0010; 3-15-37-35-0010-00210-0100; 3-15-37-35-0010-00210-0110;3-15-37-35-0010-00210-0170; 3-15-37-35-0010-00220-0010; 3-15-37-35-0010-00290-0070. Warranty Oeed/Peye 1 of 3 Po CA, e I - j OR UK 0058,5 PG 1622 and said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. SUBJECT, however, to taxes for the year 2006 and subsequent years; to all governmental to restrictions, reservations and easements of record. �-ons; O .OGETHER, with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in a ^ ' e aappertaining, AVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever, AN, , Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that he/she is lawfully seized of said lands in fee p; that he/she has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that he/she hereb , arrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons omsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances whatsoever. "Grantor" IN WITNESS VIAEOI year first above written. (j o Signed, sealed and our presence: STATE OF FLORIDA are used for singular or plural, as context requires. , Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's hand and seal the day and COUNTY OF 1 GG411 � I, KOVACH DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Florida rporation BY Edward J. Kovach, Preshlent MTS INVESTMENTS, LLC, a limited liability company , By: Terry Member BEFORE 'ME, the undersigned authority, on this day, personally appeared Edward J. Kovach, President of Kovach Development, Inc., a Florida corporation, who Is personally known to Warranty Deed/Page 2 of 3 OR SK 00588 !PO 1623 ire " has produced identification as shown below, who, being by me first duly sworn and c �e�, acknowledged, deposed and otherwise stated that he executed the foregoing instrument. L0. S RN TO and SUBSCRIBED before me this /-A day of January, 2006. l 8'rEU L AIE,S No Public MYCOMMIS81 ilZ418M My commission expires: EXPIIiE� May a zoos tMuNoerrpeeougrv�r. Printed Name of Notary No , check onef { Person signs current personally known to me. ( ) Person signement and provided the following form of identification: V / �0 r'' f�� •'�" ' A1EV94 L.QM119„A MYCOAl1M8910NfDD418t36 sa^°'n tide Nay p�lA1eM11+bar STATE OF FLORID COUNTY OF 45�" BEFORE ME, the undersi authority, on this day, personally appeared Terry M. Shahrabani, Managing Member of M stments, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, who is personally known to me, or has produ tification as shown below, who, being by me first duly sworn and cautioned, acknowledged, d and otherwise stated that he executed the foregoing instrument. SWORN TO and SUBSCRIBED before me this 4",,,01- day of January, 2006. " N8rEY L DW.M NZ&y Public s MYCOMMtSMIJDD418M- My commission expires: ��s: May a zoos Printed Name of Notary Notary, check one: ( Person signing document personally known to me. ( ) Person signed document and provided the following form of identification: i=ared bX and return to-. Cristloa Gomez Attorney at Law Cris mez, P.A- 6043 167tb Street Suite A-16 Min FL 33015 30 5 Fite N %B06-162 will Cal Parcel Id ell,No.3-15-37-354010-00210-0040 v Space Above This Line For Recording Daiaj-, f^ C Warrant Deed Y � 'v (STATUTORY FORM • SEC['fON 689.02, F.S.) F'IL.E HUM 2:14fr009161 OFt BK Ot]601D F"G t7875 SHARON R08ERTr CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT RECDRDEO(XEECHOSE05tig SON/iM6 02e45:49 PI7 RECORDIH6 FEES 18.50 DEED DOC 875.00 RECORDED BY L Rucks Pas 0875 - 876; (2P9s) This Indenture -ad_ day of April, 2006 between Cynthia S. Baker, an unremarried widow and surviving spouse of Dewey V. Baker, PIrdeceased whose post office address is 2379 NW 44 Street, Okeechobee, FL 34972 of the County of Okeechobee, S orida, grantor", and Curt Lundberg, a married man whose post office address is 2 Nibllek Lane, Columbine Val 0 80123 of the County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, grantee', Witnessetb, that said grantor, I do consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO1lOO DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations — .rptor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to ,grant=, and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, tying and being in Okeecbo ty, Florida, to -wit: See Exhibit "All attached heretd,6n�Wy this reference made a part hereof. Subject to taxes for 2006 and su�_ie uent years; covenants, couditious, restrictions, easements, reservations and limitations of recortlf�rny, and said grantor does hereby fully warrant the Ctiti SLd land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. "Grantor"and "Gntnta" arcused far singular or plural, as context requires. In Witness'Whereof, grantor bas hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. (S Cyn a S. Baker State of Florida County of OKEECHOBEE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 14th day of April, 2006 by Cynthia S. Baker,an unnnarried widow who [ j are personally known or iX] have produced a driver's license ide 'fication. [Notary Seal] SOFIA DELACRuz Notary li MY cMIONa EXPIRES: �s.,,2W9 Printed Nme:gN G My Commission Expires: Aua- j_�O 7 � T DoubleTlmse Book600/Page875 CFN#2006009161 Page 1 of 2 Exhibit A Lot 4 e East 25 feet of Lot 5, Block 21, OKEECNOBEE CITY SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof, reco ed lat Book 1, Page 10, of the Public Records of OKEECHOBEE County, Florida. Lying and being in the NE 1/ " c on 16, Township 37 South, Range 35 East. A/K/A Street Okeechobee, Florida 34972 Parcel Id u tion Number: 3-15-37-35-0010-00210-0040 0 ��i�1 a File Number, M806-162 DoubleTimem Book600/Page876 CFN#2006009161 Page 2 of 2 100911MIN11 FILE NUN 2i0Ob04$6S9 OFt PK O0�99 PG 1241 SNARDN ROBERTSDNr CLERK, OF CIRCUIT COURT RECORDED 05EE 112/Y006F12r47a51 PM RECORDING FEES 10.00 DEED DOC 375.00 C RECORDED BY 6 Mewbourn Atto w Ps 1241; (lps) C P.A. 6043 N. th Street Suite A-16 Miami La 33015 305-824-15 r, o File Number. ¢-165 will call No.: I\�JLy rSpace Above This Li c For Recording Decal Warranty Deed This Warranty D this 14tb day of April, 2006 between Cynthia S. Baker, an onremarrJed widow whose post office address is 23 44 Street, Okeechobee, FL 34972, grantor, and Curt Lundberg, a married man whose post office address is 2 NibncKE%ue, Columbine Valley, CO so 123, grantee: (Whenever usod herein the tonne "gra d "grantee" include all the pa,is to this inauumem and the hero:, legal mprescamtives, and assigns of indlviduals, and tbo sueoea m and awtgs>ta bona, truvls snd trusees) YY O Witnesseth, that said grantor, fm gr'° -, t sideration of the sum of TEN AND NO1IO0 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to s for in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to th tee, and grantee's bobs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Okeechobee Florida to -wit, Lot 6 and the West 25 feet of Low Block 21, OKEECHOBEE CiTY SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof, recorded In Plat Bol Page 10, of the Public Records of O1MCHOBEE County, Florida. Lying and being In the NE ction 16, Township 37, South, Range 35 East. aka 509 N.W. 12th Street, Okeechobefii a 34973 Parcel IdentHlcation Number. 3-15-37,3 Tfi 0210-0060 Subject to taxes for 2006 and subsequent years; covenants, conditions, restrictions, easetnents, reservations and limitations of record, if any. Together with all the tenements, herodituments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have And t0 Hold, the same in foe simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2005. In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written f State of Florida j� County of Miami.&tde Q I�t t 0 J6if Q ` "'4�(.,) Cynthffi S. Baker The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 14th day of April, 2006 by Cynthia S. Baker, who [J is personally known or Pq has produced a driver's license as idcnnfication. [Notary Seal] 'rotary Public PrintodName: r4,C_ %4y Commission Expires: 7" O p �( 2- DoubleTimeo Book599/Page1241 CFN#2006008659 Page 1 of 1 POWIlMd by and return to Cristina Gomez Attorney at Law Cristin mez, P.A. 604 167th Street Suite A-16 r FL 33015 3 5 File N ? R(806-163 Will Call E?) 1011111111111 FILE NUM 20060091710 OR SK 00600 PG 0913 SHAM ROBERTSONt CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT OKEECHOBEE COUNTY► FL RECORDED 05/19/2008 03:03102 PM RECORDING FEES 10.00 DEED DOC 875.00 RECORDED BY L Rucks ps 09131 (Uasl Parcel Idend" No.3-15-37-354010-00210-0070 � (Space Above This L.ne For Recording Dalai Warranty Deed (STATUTORY FOP-M • SECTION 689.02, F.S.) This Indenture —41 14th day of April, 2006 between Cynthia S. Baker, an unremarried widow whose post office address is 2-1 NW 4¢ !l !, Okeechobee, FL 34972 of the County of Okeechobee, State ofFlorlda, grantor', and Cnrt Lnndberg, a married iJ hose post office address is 2 Niblick Lane, Columbine Valley, CO 30123 of the County of Jefferson, State of Colorad tee*, Witnesseth, that said grantor, fj good and valuable considerations has granted, bargained, and sold to situate, lying and being in Okeechol Lot 7 and the East 5 feet of Lot Plat thereof, recorded In Plat I Florida Lying and Being In the aft 513 N.W.12th Street, Oke1 consideration of the sum of TEN AND N01lOO DOLLARS ($10.00) and other rtor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, grantee, and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, hty, Florida, to -,A- it! 21, OKEECHOBEE CITY SUBDIVISION, according to the 'age 10, of the Public Records of OKEECHOBEE County, f Section 16, Township 37 South, Range 35 East Florida 34973 Subject to taxes for 2006 and sulyears; covenants, conditions, restrictions, easements, reservations and limitations of record, i¢gu C', and said grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. • "Grantor" and'Grawee" are used for singular or plural, as eon=t requites In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year fast above written. ►/lam �i � �lftl. / I VON. W,M State of Colorado County of 1. CynthtA S. Baker The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 14th day of April, 2006 by Cynthia S. Baker, who [jis personally known or [X] has produced a driver's license as identification. [Notary Seal] Awl LACRUZNotary PublicN ♦ ODiJ89" � � �/, 7.M Printed Name: -'emsZ gw*, .m C My Cortunission Expires: Z qLaoi DoubleThnee Book600/Page913 CFN#2006009170 Page 1 of 1 Inn 111111INN NIN Att0 Law Cr 6043 �67Ih Street Suite A-16 Miami 33015 File Nun Will Ca11 Above This Linc For Recording F= IUE NUM 210t06008663 OR 8K 00597 PG 1273 SHARON ROBERTSONr CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT OK.EECHOBEE COUNTYr FL RECORDED 05/12/2006 12r52:19 PM RECORDING FEES 18.50 DEED DOC 875.00 RECORDED BY G Mewbourn Pus 1273 - 1274i (2P90 Warranty Deed This Warranty Dmade this 14th day of April, 2006 between Cynthia S. Baker, an unremarried widow and surviving sponge of D !art berg, 111, deceased whose post office address is 2379 NW 44 Street, Okeechobee, FL 34972, grantor, and Caerg, a married man whose post office address is 2 Niblick Lane, Columbine Valley, CO 80123, grantee: /=1 (Whenever used herein the tcrtna "$ra "Futee" include all the Partin to rhis Immanent and the heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals, and the s000esso,s and agr rations, trusts and try L—) Witnesseth, that said grantor, fooii consideration of the sure of TEN AND NO1100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to rtorin hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to tht,' eel and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Okeechobee Florida to -wit: See Exhibit "A" attached heret64ad by this reference made a part hereof. awit 517 N.W. 12th Street, Okkedwbee, Florida 34973 � l Parcel Identification Number 3-I53�44'Q10-00210-0080 Subject to taxes for 2006 and sabsd'quetfj ears; covenants, conditions, restrictions, easements, reservations and limitations of record, if ant= Together with aU the tenements, bo editaincrits and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining To Have and to Hold, the samo in fee simple forcvcr. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the sane against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2005, In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set gruntor's hand and seal the day and year first above written WIN Lr1..e�.�, State of Florida County of Okeechobee �cs 4Baker The foregoing instrwneut was acknowledged before me this 14th day of April, 2006 by Cynthia A. Baker, who [_J is personally known or [XI has produced a driver's license as identi fication. [Notary Seal) ,W�_ NotaryPubl y''SOFfA DEfACRUZ dd MY COMMISSION VD4.%931 Printed Name: R» FXPIRFS! Aus, r, 7" .w p071 mPOre7 Pbkh Nwry s..�w com My Commission Expires: At r% 9 / DoubleTimee Book599/Page1273 CFN#2006008663 Page 1 of 2 Exhibit A The 2.50 feet of Lot 8 and the East 32.50 feet of Lot 9, Block 21, OKEECHOBEE CITY SUBDIVISION, acco un the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 10, of the Public Records of OKEECHOBEE County, Florid and being in the NE 1/4 of Section 16, Township 37 South, Range 35 East.a/k/a 51:0� 2th Street, Okkechobee, Florida 34973 0 Parcel ldentil wtion Number; 3-15-37-35-0010-00210-0080 05n' o G� CD - File Number: MB06-164 DoubleTime® 1— Book599/Page1274 CFN#2006008663 Page 2 of 2 P-19 e J,3 Authorized Signature Typed Name & Title Phone No. Date Authorized Signature Typed Name & Title Phone No. Date Authorized Signature Typed Name & Title Phone No. A Date ra AM 6� a k i y.v / KIF Jo ® C Y a2 . , CAdthorWed Slignature Typed Name etitle !/ Phone No. Date di Vr/e- 0//-,- 1 l7 i Required Only For Mtv of M-aarhnhon R Gire+ A.4,4;+;-- +.., (-.". _r _ ..__:_ _ rf� fh J 4�iD�J�l/1171'j(��irlt{. jrf�{��F�i.. l�7�llC'�fiS1���'�'�'i'sl..rA��45A�iil�.� a 3-3- p �. ���7C 3(Sf Authorized Signaidre Typed Name & Title Phone No. Date Work Request No. Sec., , TwJ`1 S, Rge35 E Parcel I.D. (Maintained by County Appraiser) Form 3722-A (Stocked) Rev. 7/94 EASEMENT This Instrument Prepared By Name: JONATHAN HARMER Co, Name: Florida Power & L.gt)t Comoany Address: 3301 ORANGE AVE FORT PIERCE. FL 34947 pg _- of The undersigned, in consideration of the payment of $1.00 and other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, grant and give to Florida Power & Lignt Company, its licensees, agents, successors, and assigns, an easement forever for the construction, operation and maintenance of overhead and underground electric utility facilities (including wires, oles, guys, cables, conduits and appurtenant equipment) to be installed frpom time to time; with the right to reconstruct, improve, add to, enlarge, change the voltage, as well as, the size of and remove such facilities or any of them within an easement _ feet in width described as follows: FILE NUN 21306ID 17717 OR BK 00614 PG 0242 SHARON ROBERTSONr CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT OKEECHOBEE COUNTYr FL RECORDED 10/23/2006 12-08.22 Ph RECORDING FEES 18.50 RECORDED BY G hawbourn P9s 0242 - 243; (2p9s) .CeFvlrLLlie:' z,hdJ Q Together with the right to permit any other person, firm or corporation to attach wires to any facilities hereunder and lay cable and conduit within the easement and to operate the same for communications purposes; the right of ingress and egress to said premises at all times; the right to clear the land and keep it cleared of all trees, undergrowth and other obstructions within the easement area; to trim and cut and keep trimmed and out all dead, weak, leaning or dangerous trees or limbs outside of the easement area which might interfere with or fall upon the lines or systems of communications or power transmission or distribution; and further grants, to the fullest extent the undersigned has the power to grant, if at all, the rights hereinabove granted on the land heretofore described, over, along, under and across the roads, streets or highways adjoining or through said property. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed and sealed this instrum o , 20 Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: t-N (Witness' SI nature) Print Nam �+P )p n �61, f , . (Witness) p itn Signa re) �Q Print Name: . )m C.-"n11)LI Ke' (Witness) j By, Gr ntoes Print Name: Print Address: __ Print Name, Print Address: (Grantor's signature) ST E OF F. AND CO NTY OF b D a, The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Xday of 20,, by f1C e Q and who is(are) pers ally wn to me or has(have) produced as Identification, and who did (did not) take an oath. (Type of Identification) My Commission piL&L SHANDA P. VIbU WR- NOhryFuOM -Oft ofFbdd� Notary lic, Signature (] ` ' IAyCom*WmEOM Ad13,M Print �ar)e .��tr�/)t K �U1214TPr Cwv"Wi a 100 41XIM BOnd*d NWb" AWL Book614/Page242 CFN#2006017717 Page 1 of 2 P e )5 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT "A" Section 15 Township 34 S, Range 35 E —Qj��i16b�df , County, Florida Scale: FPL Work Request No, Indicate North Descriptions: An easement, 15 feet in width, lying in Block 21, "Okeechobee", according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 5 of the public records of Okeechobee County, Florida. Said easement occupying lands shown as a 15 feet wide, EastNVest alleyway within said Block 21. Said easement being bounded on the North by the South line of Lots 1 through 10, said Block 21, Bounded on the East by the West right-of-way (R/W) NW 51h Avenue, bounded on the South by the North line of Lots 17 through 2, said Block 21, and bounded on the West by the West line (and the southerly extension thereof) of the aforesaid Lot 10, and the West line (and the northerly extension thereof) of the aforesaid Lot 17, An easement, 15 feet in width, lying in Block 21, "Okeechobee", according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 5 of the public records of Okeechobee County, Florida. Said easement occupying lands shown as a 15 feet wide, North/Southt alleyway within said Block 21, Said easement being bounded on the North by the South right-of-way (R/W) line of NW 12th Street, bounded on the East by the West line (and the southerly extension thereof) of Lot 10, said Block 21 and the West line (and the northerly extension thereof) of Lot 17, said Block 21, bounded on the South by the North R/W line of NW 11t' Street, and bounded on the West by the East line of Lots 1 through 6, aforesaid Block 21, STATE OF FLORIDA OKEECHOWE COUNTY THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY ON' THE RECORDS ON FILE IN THIS OFFICE DATE „(Q Book614/Page243 CFN#2006017717 Page 2 of 2 Expec ition 1 urveying & E rigineering, Inc. 04;ce: 3o4 NW 5" 4)tnect, Qkeecko6ee Legal Description `{epoit Date: July 26, 2006 To: Rudd Jones, P.E. & Associates, P.A. Re: UTILITY EASEMENT FOR SOUTHERN TRACE ESE Job Number: 05-0056 Descriptions: An easement, 15 feet in width, lying in Block 21, "Okeechobee", according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat nook 5, Page 5 of the public records of Okeechobee County, Florida. Said easement occupying lands shown as a 15 feet wide, East/West alleyway within said Block 21. Said easement being bounded on the North by the South line of Lots 1 through 10, said Block 21, Bounded on the East by the West right-of-way (R/W) NW 5tr Avenue, bounded on the South by the North line of Lots 17 through 2, said Block 2 1, and bounded on the West by the West line (and the southerly extension thereof) of the aforesaid Lot 10, and the West line (and the northerty extension thereof) of the aforesaid Lot 17. An easement, 15 feet in width, lying in Block 21, "Okeechobee" according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 5 of the public records of Okeechobee County, Florida. Said easement occupying lands shown as a 15 feet wide, North/Southt alleyway within said Block 21 Said easement being bounded on the North by the South right-of-way (R/W) line of NW 12th Street, bounded on the East by the West line (and the southerly extension thereof) of Lot 10, said Block 21 and the West line (and the northerly extension thereof) of Lot 17, said Block 21, bounded on the South by the North RAN line of NW I I"h Street, and bounded on the West by the East line of Lots 1 through 6, aforesaid Block 21. E xpeciition 15rveying S, F:-_ npincering, Inc. Mail: cost QfFice fjox 1 610 - Qkecc6o6ec, rL 34975-1 610 (Voice) 863-357-6688 (rax) e63,)57-6684 Voice Data I Internet I Wirele55 Entertainment June 8, 2006 Mr. Steven Dobbs Rudd Jones, P.E. & Associates, P.A. 210 NW Park Street, Suite #204 Okeechobee, FL 34974 Dear Mr. Dobbs: P, e l 7 TM EMBARQ" Embarq Corporation Mailstop: FLAPKA0305 P.O. Box 165000 Altamonte Spgs, FL32716-5000 EMBARQ.com I am in receipt of the material you faxed to me on May 30, 2006, regarding your application to close five 15' alleys in Okeechobee, Florida. The alley in Block 21 has Embarq cable, which provides service to 4 residences. Embarq Florida, Inc. has no objection to the closing of the 5 alleys listed in your application, on the condition that an easement will be granted to Embarq covering the alley that is currently in Block 21. Please call me should further discussion be needed. Yours truly, John Hopkins Voice: (407) 889-1627 Wireless: (407) 694-8340 Fax: (407) 889-1636 --VIIA/�. Donnie Robe son, Public Works Date Oscar Bermudez, Engineer Date fi✓K ' r� r..�¢',. �xs fR, k' �i i h Y ' 1 .' lb carreitscr objecticns. t'� 0� .� '.: l rFl b7f nd+.F'ar✓� �' lerb Smith, Fire Chief Date � �fr >, Y�+(NIS'I41 }} /ymyyynJ/ J>iyyq"y}i � �`Y �, W..yyty' T Ti gKFt6r, A �✓ �C n Whitehall/ Administrator APPLICATION APPROVED,, BY: AJI LAN GAMIO A, CMC, CITY CLERK DA E f Dat Mae-, e l9 Memorandum To: Lane Gamiotea, City Clerk From: Oscar Bermudez, Engineer Date: January 04, 2007 Re: Alley - Closing application from InSite Development Group, LLC. The Engineering Department has visited the site and found that future drainage problems may be generated near the requested abandon subject City of Okeechobee Alleys. We are aware of the critical drainage problems on City of Okeechobee City, and for that reason the Engineering Office will recommend not approving the request for the Alley Closing until future Master Drainage Plans for the City of Okeechobee is presented. It is the Engineering Department's opinion that the City of Okeechobee Council shall be very cautious before approving abandoning any Alleys. 4dol6' 71615141312111 �A)11�d9lal 7161514131: ALLEY CLOSING APPLICATION NO. 85 141" s1d1�ie19 zo z1 4 SUBJECT PROPERTY NW 17TH ST I1i6�1{�!9 lillllllCl! NI nma0�on ur'�um� �9eow0000n �uariau:: T SURROUNDING CLOSED STREETS fi„',oi9 8 7 8 5 41 3,. 14 i 5181 11792012IH4,'��� NW 16TH ST — 1 1 1 9 8 7 8 5 41312!1 18181413721170 9 8,7, 2 4 ' 1415161 1519 20 21 4 1�21 NW 10TH ST (100') 3 TT2 tLLU l7.hshd a'f'7'ft. R -L % 7 1 iI1�N1�1�1� nomnwmn= I HIS rzuM E 5141.St2 tt") 9 8 7 Q Ua W D: Z 17111+2f T23 4t' N U O 1mm'wuu cou'lls Q@III�iI October 25, 2006 - TEcmacAL REvIEw COMMITTEE - PAGE 2 OF 6 IV. New Business. A. Southem Trace. The application was submitted by Insite Development Group. Staff Report: This is a site plan review for the first phase of a multi -family development which The owner proposes site development improvements with 130 units on a 14.52 will consist of approximately 135 units on 14.53 acres of land (Blocks 4, 13 and 20). This report is acre multi -family residential development. This application includes Blocks 4, focusing specifically on the portions of the property which already have the proper Future Land Use 13, and 20 only. The owner is proposing to amend the land use for Blocks 11, Category and Zoning District. 12, 21 and 22 to comply with residential multi -family at a later date. The second phase of the development (Blocks 11,12, 21, and 22) will not be discussed within this report as the applicant is in the process of proposing an Amendment to the Future Land Use Map for Multi Family and a rezoning to RMF_ Until the applicant receives approval of the request, Staff will not be reviewing this phase of development findings: V) Land Use Future Land Use Zoning Density Min Lot Area Min Lot Width Set Back Requirements Front Existing None Mulct Family RMF Ref <t fired 10 du/ac or 145 units 4,356 sf/du 100 ft Proposed Multi family development None None Provided 135 units Block 4 = 211.050 sf 27 units @ 7,816 sf/unit Block 13 = 211.959 sf 54 units @ 3,908.3 sf/unit* Block 20 = 211.050 sf 54 units @ 3,908.3 sf/unit* 670 ft 25 ft Block 4 = 40 ft Block 13 = 40 ft Block 20 = 40 ft IV. New Business Continued. A. Southern Trace, continued. October 25, 2006 - TECHNICAL REvIEW CommrrrEE - PAGE 3 'oF -6 Sides 20 ft Block 4 = east (28 ft) west (27 ft) Block 13 = east (27 ft) west (28 ft) Rear Block 20 = east (28 ft) west (28 ft) 20 ft Block 4 = 215 ft from NW 14`r Street Max Lot Coverage 40 % Block 4 = 15.7% Block 13 = 31.4% Max Impery Surface 60% Block 20 = 31.4% Blocks 4, 13, and 20 = 57.44% Maximum Height 45 ft Must not exceed 45 feet in height Parking The minimum parking space Sre 1,11all be 9 X 20_ Number of spaces 2"0 1)a� t {} �t � �- BlO(k Block 1) = 54 un)Is w/ 108 spaces Block 20 = 4 units w/ I08 spaces Total Spaces = 270 spaces Landscaping Parking Area 3 trees/du = 405 trees Not included Staff does not recommend approval at this time until the minimum lot issues are resolved and landscaping is actually seen and evaluated for compliance. Mr. Bermudez requested to see the permit from South Florida Water Management (SFV34). Mr. Dobbs replied that he had the permit, but not with him at the meeting. Mr. Dobbs told the committee that the alley closing application has been filed with the clerk's office on Monday October 23, 2006_ 25, 2006 - TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMTTTEE - PAGE 4 OF 6 LT- R IV. New Business Continued. A. Southern Trace, continued. Mr. Whitehall requested that the committee refer to Mr. Bermudez's memorandum. Mr. Dobbs said that Item two, site boundaries, that a chain link fence is shown on the plans. Item three, regarding parking, the plans show 40 feet in front of building to the parking line. Two point two five (225) spaces are required and Southern Trace project has provided three. Item four calls for sidewalks along the entire sub -division. Item five regarding the SFWM, there are no wetlands located on this property. Mr. LaRue asked, going back to the parking what the total package would be. Mr. Dobbs replied that 270 spaces as indicated on the plans. Mr. Bermudez told Mr. Dobbs that the committee needs to know how many bedrooms will be in each apartment. Mr. Dobbs replied that there will be three bedrooms in each apartment. Mr. LaRue then stated that more parking will be required. Mr. Whitehall stated that the committee needed bold typicals or summary sheet to keep up with the phases of the project_ Chic! Smith reported on itcIn ix_ 'l he inimmum <<i(i;tis is oka}� but U atci il;ti X,Iructure m'rds to be in place before the construction. Mr_ Forbes asked whether the purchase of the lot would include the town home? Mr. Dobbs replied yes. They will be individually platted. The Fair Housing Act has to be complied with when the project starts. Mr. Bermudez asked whether the plans reflected a clubhouse or an office? Mr. Dobbs replied that it is a clubhouse. Mr. Whitehall stated that Item seven, landscaping was typical of all projects. Mr. Dobbs presented the landscaping plans. Mr. Bermudez stated that he wants typical separation on all buildings. Mr. Dobbs said that there will be no wheel stops or curbing. At this time he was instructed that all street striping has to be done with thermal paint. Mr. Whitehall asked whether each unit has a one car garage? Mr. Dobbs replied yes, although the driveways will accommodate two cars. Two units sharing one driveway. Mr. Bermudez said that nine by twenty is an adequate size for a driveway. IV. New Business Continued. A. Southern Trace, continued. October 25, 2006 - TECHNICAL REyIEw CO1V WME - PAGE 5 OF 6 Mr. LaRue asked whether the zoning and land use map has been platted? Mr. Dobbs answered that on the recorded deed that it shows that it has been platted. Mr. LaRue than stated that this needs to be re -platted. Mr. LaRue explained that re -platting could make a difference in setbacks. Mr. Forbes replied that we need a typical site plan_ Mr. Trent had no comments. No action taken on the project, due to re -platting. B. Nunez Office Building. The application was submitted by Tom Murphy on Nunez Office Building. The application was submitted by Tom Murphy on behalf of property behalf of property owners David and Anita Nunez_ The applicant is requesting owners David and Anita Nunez. The applicant is requesting to continue the use of a commercial to continue the use of a commercial office building which, historically, had no office building which, historically, had no on -site parking available. The property is located at 701 on -site parking available. The property is located at 701 Northeast Park Street_ Northeast Park Street. Staff Nlrmo: 'Ihc applicant i, ru(Il t111," F(� COWITIuc th(' OI I ( 011 1h,fcial (,Hlc c F�t,ildina kkBich_ hi"torlcally_ had noon MW parking a� aiia�Ie. 'I he applicant sad [IE�re;,�t� l parkiji�3 Spaces on the street which were being used by the site. "I'he Land Development Code would require the applicant to provide 2 spaces on the site and the applicant is requesting to use street parking instead. After reviewing the application and its attachments, Staff recommendation is for the applicant to submit a site plan which depicts the amount of on -street parking spaces in order for staff to make an educated recommendation for the applicant's request. When an adequate amount of on -street parking spaces is available to accommodate parking in the area, the City Engineer should verify that the existing spaces conform to City requirements. Only then can the applicant's request be recommended for approval. Mr. Murphy spoke on behalf of property owners David and Anita Nunez_ He stated that they have 15 regular parking spaces and one handicap for a total of 16 spaces available. Property owners are requesting not to have to add the two additional parking spaces. The property owners do no feel they need the additional spaces. Construction Plans and Specifications For Southern Trace Lying in City of Okeechobee, Florida Section 15, Township 37S, Range 35E LOCATION MAP Pro, Rudd Jones, P.E. & Associates, P.A. Consulting Engineers �14 210 N. W. Park St., Suite 204 - Okeechobee, Fi 34972 Phone: (863) 467-0076 ROPoOACFrtI1FlCAlE OF NfMOPpgTgIJ l4 000� Flo of �� VICINITY MAP N.T.S. NOTE. THESE PLANS ARE IN ENGLISH UNITS. THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AND ARE GOVERNED BY THE STATE OF FLORIDA. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS BOOM -ET -LATEST EDITION. C20041 ALL ELEVATIONS HEREIN REFERENCE N.G.V.D. 1929 DATUM INDEX OF SHEETS SHEET No. SHEET TITLEIDESCRIPTION 1 Cover Sheet 2 Existing Conditions, Clearing, Demolition, Wind and Water Sediment Control Plan 3 Site Plan - Horizontal Control and Striping Plan 4 Grading, Paving and Drainage Plan 5 Water and Wastewater Plan 6-7 Sanitary Sewer Profiles S Grading, Paving & Drainage Details 9 - 10 Water and Wastewater Details 11 General Notes and Specifications CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG IN FLORIDA 1-800-432-4770 rrs THE uYe S1M8HNE SLATE ONE CN1 OF FLORW. WG Southern Trace - Job No- 20OC-202 _ Il ........ ____-------__---- —---1'--i ---''--I --'--' ....—'--'—— .-.-.-.-. -.-.-.-.-.-.---.—.-.-.-.-.--. ------_- . ---.-.-.YT DITGW ^—'—'— —'—'------------- 1— —J--------- --- — I�I II '1 I—I�*___- —+ P�PPO�P'AAPPFDVvOAIREaGFLSTLE.EA1�EAERSNN]OTE,r +WYE fr IyFI AIFWd,YENx DET III I IlI II IIII( ! IIIIIIIIII kIIiI IIIp^ S_fzs1�PLuE.LrtL,o,AyxFEEgMx4RG�iS3 PxIlpu,AONaAWPsysLroE,GNa4niE-DGnEaYANx£MD+4ixCSJSZLA/EoO.foNnDFwLutMv.C4FiwIF.FNEv,TmPSl�uiOmnm,4fMDm5z�o1,EEPa04vOr,x,G�N.erot�TFSo xvox4.EAe�E 4'�PFrsPam+NErOw�su�AF,aTwSaOFOtFS�"anmPPl�gR®x,�Dx3�MNss„0.4vR4E�rtEIS,,4v 9M1oW�"eEG4LLFm1HP�E4A+CiFTIXD�LPAaN4n<S-J5E: I oPeEae(roi',4"Ormn"rt"SK°suwEaom'�Fa s�Noa�FpC"vvn'�avA�xxrnr"u,ffv��Fw EAxc 4A,4rxix:®Fts,,Nw,xiv,r,.oOs xNPw.4x,e�orma"FvsC,'zT,.rnS.4m1 n�,cwss4�svmrmrs,FFF .s +�rtm4env•4ccc ess,s4uA^,4, vAKK.cGE uP,wasssMeaKE,€�++� v„E,ucPu,sx3,o�!xnnsE,1I1, I II II I I I�Il � I 'II I 1W����1r1 � iIIII I � �':::"'iI'III —1t-I ----ip-LtI M—Eii- —,¢—� D , r 's-z -' -i--_am;+ -_ -L-�II_ TM ATA P� II IM TRm-r—n-�— t BLOCK 3 to I LEGEND I1L ' Nff GCLZRELMFPMHDt,CIL o rll + WT i 1. ALL RADII ARE 30'UNLESS = I OTHERWISE NOTED. DEST CALSLH I!_ BLOCK 31L_----_--_--_,__� =-Z............... -- ------------------------ LoC a BLOCK6 9: JI II% NA44.4,s4,.nx� =m. I I IAUOF&OC4tHDt]cn.Nnt]t,2N.00tReZOoc]O BtnOc2tms,3NFSF4FRT6u1f4 a REFLECfOPS - O(IYQ,TN9 , ZJISFI €NOFX NO. 1>3N I,Drs,o-m.aDOt2,.l0,s],,.If'ssTxENH,m FFEf OFS,DIOf,,.DDOtm: ANO WI-] I S t ( I I V € k , 1 LLti5€xQEFAAILY I � I l,4c.4,,,eN wrt,,,xLNo4rx oxc-.wFlN-vgoFvx4FRNOO+®uF�rwDL F,smN3r.ur:~L..w BLOCK6 I I ' IPEw�mmN FUT40Dc5 P44E,4F TERMULp£i9A05OFOFF8l4AHLpMVNGND4 LU51NGlE FAMLY I {. .�. •:. _ _ _ _ - L _ » a _Jill�•ar - — - — < a+ - F < a xu,sE ♦ I ! ,,s» "v -----'-C I— vM1o43 -JL- - — - �Rr. PEt -. Jo.eL.._ ---- BLOCK12 II L BusLnOr-CF KcuIJ4 IL T 94 .a, — p Sn Is aCE S 2<'THF_NMOPL/C , IIII pO I- z� roPxK coE a E M, .III Xq J MIT II I < . a<a _ { 5Yg A fifi cu mom<�o a >I BLOCKI9 -� o,v _ p 1 f `G ! 1 I ' �` I i i t [ 1 ! I > Gt 5 444 1 Z-N.F I $ BLOCK20- - - - - - - - - - - - - - I usuw�FvmLYS d a< .BLOCK21`.: - - - ---- ---- ---- .AMF ( o z - a- s < —1 J LU 9NGLPFAML la �jQD-��d: Z a J titI - v Ji k ,a ; t T '' _ - i� I\ --- -- I BLOCK I9 W w O: Z - y 1 l-� t;--------' `------- Ili z mF m s of 1 . � L., a l® f k �•. * il. \ — p - Y --- -- Lll-MI0.TI FPNLLY • ii 0 r J `I4Z O V. Z p+ J Z 1 j i, t I i aF 1 i i I I,veE I e W L� a'd 0' O O Q r f d a-06 l .rt J Ii 25 W W t• tY t q f _ r.£ E� J � x { ti / . - 1k� ;y'. 11._ c { t - •� �- _ -1_ 'x ��`�' I I - - — € = W b - p ti to O cc ` -------- - _ 7 N_ 1� w _ — eau sx— Z ~ 0 d LLL R,BLZILRF® -I11 - 'LLR BLZC FPC4 nE5 U NUZLJTiMFFAM Y _--- II 1 BLOCK30 x LL BLOCK 28 29 vOBOKCFMBLOCK BLOC27 2$ UMMY a< J I i I 1 1 I I'I I 17 � JOD Ns��iY�IZ I LASEIYEILOW I I I REFLEcroPs I I 1 1 I I' I I I I l 3 aF 11 AND vne � — P9 FDOT xDpt NQ 1]3,9 — — — — --- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - — — - — - — — - — — — — - — - — - - — - — - — - — - — . . . . . . — — — — — — — — — — — C-- 'CITY LIMITS DITCH' 72 LF OF ADS 77 -------- 0: 0: 0 115 op LEGEND �T co in`" GALLCOTRO 4.=m cFt� R-- I= YOUDIGINFLORIDA N INV - 1750 § o 1. c 2E -800-432.477 a 10 IM 242� 20 LF OF �18 AC @PC—ONTR—OL EL 26.50 a TWIDE I TO B-.M_ PERIMETER B _ (� ___ 1' 70 MIN PROP GRApETOP a 29. 'TIE Tor PHASES — — — — — — — r -- -- — — — — - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — TO BEGIN AFTER BLOCKS 11.1221 TIE TOB: S I INTO EXIST AND 22 ARE REZONED AND THE 124'. 12 j-4 wl BU G U— CHANGED TO RMP F 31.1 1 LAYOUT u TYP AND F�,FUTURE LAND USE HAS BEEN NTO EXIST II To PARKING 7Z I . INTO EXIST EGRADE TOB OPROVII FROM BACK OF LROF 1 CURB �i)l 2 E. III 'F U lit iOB - - — — — — — — — — INTO EXIST J L — — — — — — — —WI�ESINIV-26 A 10�'LFbF� E*=.-.-- @ 0.0% 111 31-F OF 11 Is I�LFOF Al�@ I%, ; 11 OLIIPIED if — — — — — — — — — — — — — - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 172 LF OF !NV 26.50 21� 01 XRC,@2�% -F I' 1ji But— ;8 L F F.E 341C) ;7 'XI 7, REMOVE EXIST STORM REPLACE WITH 68 LF I F W F lir RCP Q 0-0% C21 MES 2520 BU REGRADE TOB TO PROVIDER FROM EDP Ir R.P 4 L __-_..WINES II i 11, y G+ I33LFCF18- m ...... ADS Q 110% L 0 UX.-. W1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - WIMES -j F z Wm z "E 123 1.41 F if RC 1,6 Em ILM CL z > �AWQLI ST lu PVWT z _77 I Z w - x a z ISTSTOR14 , ✓, i tam] '"'H I I I I T=L-29.70MIN Ad 1 71 F ir STM 0 0.0% 0 tu ?!)MES 25M 4PVW LEGEND ASAI..LT PAVEMENT NOTE: ALLFIRE HYDRANTS TO BE IN OPERATION PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF BUILDING COMMENCEMENT .:-tUT 355 LF OF 400 LF OF 4 00 'PVCSAN "PVC SAN O.Q% PLF LIMI :!�FCI- T—j PVC, 0 Q :mI Wl-It MIMI" i7-111-�.- I "1 1, ilmn W—r-, IML OF a, PVC -\�4� Ll 0 P". EXIST 6- I FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY #3 45LFOFB II II lJl � n Inver10N=1e.04 SOUTHERN TRACE SCALE Im $ FOR INSITE DEVELOPMENT VERIFICATION ,M ,� rvL Rudd Jones., P.E. & pf4 Associates, P.A. LOCATED IN THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA ox.o Consulting Engineers ',� eouo exR le eouAL -INAL lRAWIN N.W. Park Bfree SWta 7Q{ 4 oRAwlxo. .o.nx.,: � o owAL xov..cAw .°. SANITARY SEWER PROFILES AO.1. ALL.. EO NOS Okeechobee, E1,;3A87Y oCORxroxc 'e11 °O"1° "" Phone:1889►,441-k N ALCOROwaLY >n.0 - nnte 8V REVISIONS CAoonW Nae"x0 tl o.R NO. to I� II m k, 2 W k W k,•14.57 •••x.•x x SOUTHERN•TRACE x.•W,a••M�.•.••.a• x•a•x ..• �,.x„x..•. w.............. o.....»..,m,..�x... «o. • ...,.. .___ .._.._..— •"*� �wY'•' ' Rudd Jones, P.E. 8� SCALE �. 0NAN1'Y' Associates, P.A. VERIFICATION I •.n•x.•.n FOR INSITE DEVELOPMENT „ 'Consulting Engineers eLOCATED IN CITY OF OKEECH08EE, FLORIDA •ouoe"R,seau"L nwx•.x.: ••�+•� N.W. Park Street, Suite 204 t7 rc oxe wcR a+ .. •xarm Okeechobee, FI 34972 AR_TAonnw,xo, ` �" p rte; 1883 487-0078 nPi SANITARY SEWER PROFILES "°'a; Hep "" p-....'=LY _,_,_, x0. �niE xY - REYI910N6 STOP SIGN LOCATION DETAIL STOP n oe:TaL.sTov slcn ,,,� STOP BAR SIGN DETAIL TYPE "EINLET DETENTION AREA CO"NTROL STRUCTURE TYPICAL TRENCH DETAILS BACKFILLING REQUIREMENTS SECTION A -A ,sue OGTpN VNMES % YA SRFWN% R!£ A-u+l LO(AIgX VNaFS 7W TYPICAL SECTION nav s V� s�oewux n ILAI s zx soEwwc sff b Im (Sff rtnNl SECTION B-B 7OO' TYPICAL SECTION �Im���� U. IN TO EXIST ELEV TYPICAL LOT GRADING Iuu.0 150.0 200.0 SECTION Y-Y ' POTABLE WATER PRESSURE TEST CRRERIA WATER MAIN, SANITARY SEWER 6 STORM SEWER CONFLICT ... -- or — I«n .- ee aes,aAn.Fo .,. w��•—Ym STANDARD MANHOLE Oa 1s v¢ yyr = ar. i m.Wo.aF rt .ec .Ia.Jun n Po, mr4 A M .vt �Oc w 2 TYPICAL TRENCH DETAIL ➢� �m16 � Q = � n C it 0 tl v op = z 0 S WAs wATenu.mnlmo.... none � G0aGl1NG MMWYE .an�.��aw1e[mumc�mn.�oa�vrtx �...wz.n � > � n \ooue�ecu � 3 GRAVITY WASTEWATER MAIN MMGIIIBI6 � Risuee. �aa[ �.rres�ra.2 � :Gruurs oa e:wAe-� � �� •ecuufs oa Eaua. ,�••M 10 .mz,,.�z...c...o...rz .� w�� �� g naeie __ ao , rEwLuus oa Eoux .ae aeowaeo .aaouc�our.ssene�.. w..,®z�.�,w...o.r m.�.�•.,,,•.•*�•® 6.t.,,fPLi1..Fn,c� DUCTILE IRON-MECHANICALJOINT IFORCEMAINI WASTEWATER SYSTEM STANDARD CUTJN DETAILS �aF.A�,a.a.�aF amffffoa�.�.., wa ro�es.,amsssm.e5. meon.aPws �aFxw�nsTP�w+*.ua wena*o„A.ExNEma� „� NA. nea�w®aaFAaare� ec,.� mxs„xna. a� nui wu a. niav+� TYPICAL CLEANOUT INSTALLATION +s N M moo+ w or Nail /�C � sae 9Naos 11ZWb-zvL FUU -P.4EG'Lti?G : T'-I2U3" RESTRr'I?�T . =3i�frsil'M PIPL LE�!aT1i5 .4o �,ImtaTAw BEwcEro 3S' Pacxlaxr cwartearon mTrc,D +iS' ae r CDIaoRATpxsrov �Xux DouelE s.w,PswrnE t �xwl RMAxriosa�a%ies-nv�ue� i TM�®urensa maaoaana.s�m s.u�, _ wxx�vtvrmmorAvvsa,�nx POTABLE WATER MAIN TYPICAL SAMPLING POINT ur�.oesmucrEo-E 7— L r coRP. sroP r �., (vRIX [ASf Wpe� naEA FOR PowFn TRA SWRMER Pqp ��M PA VE BOx ff W VEn AREgI ETER Box mP.l 11(Y OR ]'PVC rP 0-1EP,1I (!6-ypl FND FJICX BRgNCX WITiIA. EocaXo Pnac�oWrroKE cIIRe sroP RvP.i 1 � r-PRessuRehsr,uam -PRESBION I reAu vn�vE R++Rwo ortir� DoueTE sRra MccoNPREssION ,Trnx�v AxD e-wc vuvE Box wmECEssm SgooTE MK 2cuvP) BRA53 PLUG \P1A t �� FL•-�J� W NAx DEP p J�� CENTERED ox BRrIRCH g5sEM9�r WAATER NAlfl t. seM¢PwIxD W1MQ1WWrMILL MOTBEgoC�,%alStpMCFtaE utm9t V®II N4E sxllm P V G tuwcN pox qE DR I IppE mw LA�4 >- ox�E InrxTlox rur �oxorourarien.coxMr+wnoxmavaD �rva xETTp�tNCE MILL xOf BE NSiNtHYxCTI VxT®uxitl -R.YW B0.VID5foR ORIVEw.WA1mR)RmHvwtl(IAEp PIwtECR - mOYpvwv oR 9DEWx{%p p Plx¢ � BxClPiew pIEV EMDON ACSHIYYNEN� 6 p5t�ulID nrm xA5 P�14'tD plTULIE TM,GL56NICE.p.ALLA,mxOEiAxsATv... oe,tTDM+mtoRwsslw� slwieE RESPo"a.• � wRm-•-� I�AwTlpt NEvatD .aEssulrE,tsT u.,Dts As � xr TIE �xRMNNT. ,. NAEmy.-NE,al, oMw,cw,-NeTwwvBEcaRenmroAspmE salMCE,�. POTABLE WATER TYPICAL CONNECTION FOR MULTIPLE SERVICES (2 OR MORE) ,y �r Eft A. TYPICAL FIRE HYDRANT INSTALLATION WITH BOLLARDS UU I Wjf— w Boa= < > e o, D4D a F0 Lu WoLu F V IL w o m 0 z>W zpo 3 = W O G z O to chi Q Ozz (AW OF Q U. 3 O J jw Ndzoo SXEET 10 DP GENERAL NOTES 1. Contractor is responsible for checking actual site conditions before starting construction. 2. Any discrepancies on the drawings shall be brought to the attention of the engineer before commencing work 3. Contractor shall obtain all required building permits before commencing work 4. Contractor shall be responsible for location of all existing utilities. The contractor shag contact all concemed utifties at least 48 hours in advance for construction operations. 5. No field changes or deviations from design to be made without prior approval of the engineer. 6. All construction shag be completed in accordance with the applicable ordinances of the City of Okeechobee Florida. 7. Contractor shag supply density tests to engineer on an sub -grade and base. Tests shag be prepared per AASHTO T-180 method. B. Slope grades from elevations shown to existing grade at property fine. 9. Engineer shall be notified at least 48 hours in advance for any inspection. 10. Ali traffic control devices shall be in accordance with M.U.T.C.D. Standards. 11. Erosion and sedimentation control techniques shag beincorporated during construction as frJnows: (1) sift screens shag be maintained at the project perimeter. (2) No off -site discharges shall occur during consWtiion. In the event discharge is required, hay bales and/or turbidity curtains shall be incorporated at the discharge Point as necessary to control turbidity. ISION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES moon activities can result in the generation of significant amounts of pollutants may reach surface or around waters. One of the primary pollutants of surface i Ls sediment due to erosion. Excessive quantities of sediment which reach bodies of 9oodplains have been shown to adversely affect their physical. Kcal and chemkal properties Transported sediment ran Obstruct Steam els reduce hydraulic capacity of water bodies of floodplains, reduce the desiyr, ily o+culvert= and other -ks_ and eliminate benthic invertebrates and Ssf, �inu sir bstates by sJkaoon Excessive suspended sedvnents renuce light anon and moo -afore. reduce pnmay produrtivay, IUM STANDARDS 1. Sediment basin and tmps. perimeter dikes, sediment barriers and other measures utended to trap sediment shall be constructed as a first step in any land-disl itxrang ctivity and shall be made functional before unslope land disturbance takes place. All sediment control measures are to be adjusted to meet field conditions at the le of construction and be constructed prior to any grading m disturbance of existing dace material on balance of site. Perimeter sediment bamers shag be constructed prevent sediment or trash from flowing or floating on to adjacent properties. Permanent or temporary rerysal stabov' ation shall be applied to denuded areas within ven days after final grade is reached on any portion of the site. Temporary soil hbo¢ation shag be applied within seven days to denuded areas that may not be at at grade but will remain undisturbed for longer than 30 days. Permanent Ibilizabon shag be applied to areas that are to be left undisturbed for room than one During construction of the project, Sol stockpiles shag be stabilized orprotected I sediment trapping measures. The applicant is responsible for the temporery :ection and permanent stabilization of all soil stockpiles on site as well as son ntionally transported from the project site. A permanent vegetative cover shag be established on denuded areas not arwise permanently stabflaed. Permanent vegetation shall not be considered eblished until a gmund cover is achieved that, in the opinion of the Reviewer, is onn, mature enough to survive and will inhibit erosion. Stabilization measures shag be applied to earthen structures such as dams, dices diversions immediately after installation. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES - (continued) 7. Surface runoff from disturbed areas that is comprised of flow from drainage areas greater than or equal to three acres shall be controlled by a sediment basin. The sediment basin shall be designed and constructed to accor mnodate, the anticipated sediment loading from the land -disturbing activity. The ouffal device or system design shag take into account the total drainage area flowing through the disturbed area to be served by the basin- 8- After any significant rainfall, sediment control sbruclures will be Inspected for integrity. Any damaged devices shag be connected immediately. 9. Concentrated runoff shall not flow down cut or fill slopes unless contained within an adequate temporary or permanent channel, flume or slope drain structure. 10. Whenever water seeps from a slope face, adequate drainage orother protection shall be provided- 11. Sediment will be prevented from entering any storm drain system, ditch or channel. Ali storm sewer inlets that are made operable during construction shag be protected so that sediment -laden water cannot enter the conveyance system without first being filtered or otherwise treated to remove sediment. 12. Before temporary or newly constructed stomwra[er conveyance channels are made operational, adequate outlet protection and any required temporary or permanent channel fining shag be installed in both the conveyance channel and receiving channel. 13. When work in a five watercourse is performed, precautions shall be taken to minimize encroachment, control sediment transport and stabilize the work area to the greatest extent possible during construction. Nonerodible material shag be used for the construction of causeways and cofferdams. Earthen fit may be used for these stluctues if armored by nonerodible cover materials. 14. When a live watercourse host be crossed by construction vehicles, a temporary stream crossing constructed of nonerodible material shag be provided. 15. The bed and banks of a watercourse shag be stabilized immediately after work in the watercourse Is completed. 16, Periodic inspection and maintenance of an sediment control structures must be provided to ensure intended Purpose is accomplished. The Developer, owner and/or contractor shall be continually responsible for an sediment leaving the property. Sediment control measures shag be in working condition at the end of each working day. 17. Underground urfity lines shall be installed in accordance with the following standards in addition to other applicable criteria A. No more than 500 linear feel of trench may be opened at one lime B E-ated inalenal shall be Placed on me uphill side of trenches G Effluent from dewatering opemtous shall be filtered or passed through an ap iroveo sediment tapping device, or both, and drscharged in a manner that does not adve.s«:ly affect flowing streams or offsite property. D. Restabg'¢ation shall be accomplished in accordance with these regulations. 18, Where construction vehicle access mutes intersect paved public mads, provisions shall be made to minimize the transport of sediment by tracking onto the paved surface, where sediment is transported onto a public road surface with curbs and gutters. the road shag be cleaned thoroughly at the end of each day. Sediment shag be removed from the mads by shoveling or sweeping and transported to a sediment control disposal area. Street washing shag be allowed only after sediment is removed in this manner. This provision shall apply to individual subdivision lots as Well as to larger land -distributing activities. 19. Ali temporary erosion and sediment control measures shag be removed within 30 days after final he stabilization or after the measures am no longer needed temporary 9 in the opinion of the Feviewer. Disturbed soil areas resulting from the deposition of temporary measures shag be permanently stabilized to prevent further erosion and sedimentation. 20. Properties and waterways downstream from construction site shall be Protected from sediment disposition and emslon. 21. Phased projects should be cleared in conjunction with construction of each phase. 22- Erosion control design and construction shall follow the requirements in Index Nos. 101. 102 and 103 of FDOT Roadway and Traffic Design Standards. 23. The Reviewer may approve modifications or after plans to these erosion control criteria due to site specific conditions. �gg�00p �eee�eeee = mee000v© 'meeooveom TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Seed, Fertilize and Mulch: Ali disturbed areas shall be stabilized with seed, fertilizer and mulch upon completion and acceptance by Engineer of final grading. Seed, fertilizer and mulch shag be in conformance to FOOT Sections 570,575 and 981. The Contractor is responsible for establishing a stand of grass sufficient to prevent erosion and to allow removal of the temporary sot fences. This applies to those areas not covered by the sodding specified above. Testing: The Contractor shall secure the services of an approved independent testing laboratory to conduct all required testing on sub -grade, base, asphalt and concrete. Locations required for these tests shag at a minimum be as required by the City of Okeechobee. Engineer may require additional tests. n Should any tests fail, contractor shall at his owexpense, repair the deficiencies and retest the work until compliance with the specifications is demonstrated. Traffic Control: The installation of Traffic Control Devices shag be in conformance to the requirements of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices and the City of Okeechobee. Drainage Improvements: AN labor, materials and construction methods shag berth conformance to the minimum engineering and construction standards of the City of Okeechobee and FDOT Specifications. Trench excavation and badkfiling operations shag meet or exceed the requirements of FOOT Specifications, Section 125. The Contractor shall provide the necessary back -fill compaction testing required to demonstrate compliance with this section. The pipe trench shag be dry when pipe Is laid and the pipe shaft be bedded per the details and per FDOT Specifications. The Contractor shag comply with Chapter 90-96, Laws of Florida, which requires the Contractor performing trench excavations over five feet in depth comply with all applicable bench safety standards and shoring requirements as set forth in the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) excavation and safety standards, 29 C.F.R. 19926.660. Sub -part P and incorporated as the State of Florida standard, as revised and/or updated. The cost of compliance with this requirement shag be included as a separate fine Rem on the Contractor's bid. Otherwise, Contractor certifies that the cost of compliance is included in the unit cost of all items of work to which this requirement applies. Corrugated Metal Pipe (CMPICAP): Ali CMP shag be aluminum alloy, round, helical -wound corrugated pipe conforming to AASHTO-M 196-74 and FOOT Section 945, Pipe ends at joints shag be reformed to annular comgations for the complete band width All joints shall be soilfight Alf connecting bands shall be corrugated annular coupling bands. A Neoprene gasket of at least 7 inches wide by 3/B inch rick shall be used for all pipes of 36-mfh diameter and smaller Lagef pipe eves requre gaskets of at least 10 12 inches in width. Al GMP shall be installed at maximum lengths to reduce the number of joints. Advanced Drainage Systems (ADS): ADS N-12 pipe shag conform to conform to ASTM and AASHTO standards. all joints shall be soil -tight Installation shall be per manufactures specifications Reinforced concrete pfpe(RCP): All RCA shag conform to the requirements of FDOT standard specifications and shag be Class Ill. Pipe joints shag be rubber gasket joints and the pipe pint shag be manufactured to meet the req-uiremerits of AS"iM Designation C443-74. Inlets: Pro -cast catch basins shag meet the requirements of ASTM Specifications. Section 425 and the uirements of the of Okeechobee. D req GlY Concrete for catch basins shall have a minimum a stre ngth ngth of 4,000psi at 28 days. Ali grates shall be ditch -bottom type, cast iron, tmfric bearing (H-20) design. As an atemate, round srtchims meeting the FOOT requirements may be substituted provided the rectangular tops are provided. Trench Bacldg shag be as shown in the Drainage Details. In addition, testing under paved areas shall be as follows: One test location midway between structures and one test location adjacent to each structure. Engineer may request additional locations. Testing in each location shag begin in the first foot above the culvert with tests every two feet to within two feet of the sub -grade. Density shall be to 100 percent of maximum as determined by AASHTO T-99. Clearing and Grubbing: Clearing and grubbing shot[ be pedomod within the limits of the project work in accordance with Section 110, Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT) Specifications. This Rem shag include, but is not lind[ed to, the complete removal and legal disposal of all trees, blush, stumps, roots, gross, weeds, rubbish and other undesirable material to a depth of 18 inches below natural gmund or proposed finished grade, whichever is lower. The areas to be deared generally consists of the entire site except for existing improvements and adjacent wetland/pres rom areas. Care stall be taken to insure that no preserve areas or -wetland areas am impacted by the clearing operation. Priorto initiating the clearing operation, all adjacent wetland and preserve areas shag be marked and flagged in accordance with the City of Okeechobee and SFWMD requ'hnements, and shad be approved by County Planning Staff, if required. All such areas immediately adjacent to the Gearing operation shag also be protected by the installation of temporary silt barriers, as shown on the drawings, in accordance with the requirements of the City and the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMDj. Further erosion control shag be accomplished by seeding and mulching all disturbed areas as soon as they am at final grade, Per the specifications for seeding and mulching. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS (continued) AN material shag be removed from the site and shag be legally disposed of in accordance with all local, state and federal requirements- Organic Material may be burned w-,Ae provided Contractor obtains any and all required bum permits. Any unbumed remains shall be disposed of off -site as specified above. The Contractor shall maintain all stomrwater on -site during construction to prevent discharge of turbid water oft -site. Should severe storm events occur that make this impossible, the Contractor shall take all possible steps to prevent discharge of turbid water Including installation of additional sit fence, hay bales and treatment of the existing pond with alum Earthwork and Grading: An earthwork and grading shall be performed as required to achieve the final grades, typical sections and elevations shown on the plans. Any fill placed shag be done in approximate 6' gRs. In an other respects, materials and construction methods for earthworkk, embankment, excavation and grading shag conform to the requirements of FOOT Specifications, Section 120. Any plastic or otherwise undesirable material within 36 inches of finished road grade shall be removed and replaced with suitable material. Sit fence shot be installed in the locations shown on the drawings in accordance to the details and specifications included elsewhere on these drawings. Paving Improvements: All areas proposed for paving shag be constructed in accordance with the design grades and typical sections shown on the drawings, and in conformance to the requirements of the City of Okeechobee. Asphalt Prime Coat and tack coat for base course and between lifts of asphalt shall conform to the requirements of Sections 300-1 through 300-7 of the FDOT Specifications, Prime Coat shag be applied at a rate of 025 gallons per square yard and tack coat at a rate of 0.10 gallons per square yard, unless otherwise approved by the Engineer. Asphalt surface course shall be Type S-3 per FDOT Section 331, with a maximum aggregate size of'h-inch and shall have a minimum Marshal stability of 1.000 lbs. Thiclaress shag be as specified on the details for each pavement Base: Limerock base material shag be compacted to 98% of maximum density per AASHTO T-180- All hmerock shag meet the minimum requirements of FDOT Section 911. As an atemate, cemented mquina mnfomting toFDOT Section 915 may be substituted and shall be subject to the compaction specifications detailed above Certified compaction tests shall be submitted to County Engineer Prior to base approval. Thickness shall be as specified on the details for each pavement section Sub -grade Sub grade shall be compacted to 95% of maximum density per AASHTO T-180, and stabilized to a minimum FBV as specificied on the details for each pavement section. Sub -grade shall be thomughiy rolled with a pneumatic bred roller prior to scheduling any subgrade inspection. Certified compaction tests shag be submitted to County Engineer prior to sub -grade approval. Concrete Pavement Concrete slabs shag be constructed in conformance to the requirements of FOOT Section 350, over 12" subgrade that is compacted to a density of 95% of maximum per AASHTO T-180 and stabilized to a minimum 50 FBV. The concrete shall have a minimum unconfined cornpressive strength of 3.500 psi at 28 days. Please see plan for contraction and expansion joint locations. Sub -grade shag be moistened at the time concrete is placed to insure a uniformly damp surface. Ready -mix concrete shall have a slump of between 2 and 4 inches. No water shall be added to increase workability. Test cylinders shag be made for the strength testn of each batch of concrete for 7 and 28 day test . 9 9 Y n9 CurW Curb and Gutter. Shag be constructed per the typical sections and In the locations shown on the drawings and shag meet the requirements of FDOT Section 520. Concrete shag be Class I as specified in FOOT Section 345. Minimum concrete compressive strength shall be 3,000psi after 28 days. Subyrade shallbe moistened at the time concrete is placed to insum a un'dorniy damp surface. Ready -milt concrete shag have a slump of between 2 and 4 inches. No water shall be added to increase workability. Test cylinders shag be made for the strength testing of each batch of concrete for 7 and 28 day testing. Sidewalks: Shag be constructed in the locations and per the typical sections shown on the drawings per FDOT Section 522 Sidewalks adjacent tobudding. shall be sloped at a minimum of 2% away from the building to prevent water from flowing toward the buildings. Concrete for sidewalks shag be as specified above for curbs- The surface shag receive a broom finish with the finish directed consistent with the slope of the sidewalk Sidewalks shag be 4' in thickness and do not require reinforcement unless otherwise specified by the Architect or owner. CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG IN FLORIDA 1-800-432-4770 rrs 1rs iron .VY91WE bTATE eNE fJLL1 of 0.onhoA mO 08 liiIL a m 4 d to - A Y� � C rL 61a0+W e r C W W 0 O X a m o a 1A a foal Q �. O Z V i il z " wi- oat;. � a kai mA4oa uLL lingo 1 m- rc - to O Z� Q Z W� Z U J W W W Z6 Wy a 160 O JOB nit LV V sarFr The Okeechobee News P.O. Box 639, Okeechobee, Florida 34973 (863) 763-3134 Published Daily STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Judy Kasten, who on oath says she is Publisher of the Okeechobee News, a DAILY Newspaper published at Okeechobee in Okeechobee County, Florida; that the attached copy of ve isem ,t, b�i'r?gna .(.�.�' i e matter of Ij C in the 19th Judicial District of the Circuit Court of Okeechobee County, Florida, was published in said newspaper in the issues of Affiant further says that the said Okeechobee News is a newspaper published at Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been published continuously in said Okeechobee County, Florida each week and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Sworn tid and subscribdd before A.D. 20M Notary Public, State of Florida at Large PUBLIC NOTICE CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING 1 FUSE pKE CE that the CAdC�ITCY ORDINANCECdv of ec q on TuesdayT February 20, 20117 of 6OOoP rot a as scoh the0reaiter poess`i61e6a�M Hall, 55 SE 3rd Ave., Okeechobee, FL conduct a PUBLIC HEARING on and thereafter to consider final readln of the following Ordinance into law: NO.� AN ORDI- NANCE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA: AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZON- ING MAP OF OKEECHOBEE BY REZONING A CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, FROM HOLDING H) TO RESIDENTIAL SIN- GLE FAMILY -ONE (RSF-1) ZONING DISTRICT; AMENDING THE ZONING MAP AC- CORDINGLY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATEprdru moard pez �� ty owner Mr. illiam Masod� The pe�hon s�0 cRange U e zon aig�esiggnitted agI m Holding (H) to Residential Single Family -One (RSF-1) for 12 parcels of land located in the Northeast Section of line City and West of Taylor Creek, Plat Book 5, Page 5, Public Records, Okeechobee County, Florida, and is approximately 13.01 acre(s). Ai membe f tt�euMic arPbegcawaed toheapd part date in si�hear The proposed�8rdin a may a insp ed m e rerY o1 m tiers o e in the Office of the City Clerk during regular business hours, Mon -Fri, 8am4:30pm, except for holidays. PLEASE TTE NOTiCF ANpp BE APV ED that it y pars desires to ap yI decision ma a by the ity Councl respect �o a ry maaiter consm3re �at tiIX hearing, such interested person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose may need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. City Clerk tapes are for the sole purpose of backup for official records of the Cleric. qB8CCcordance w�t� the pm ans ith Disabil'dy Act fADp1 aria Flcrida $tannes 2 b.[b, persons wth drsab lies nee rig special "acco rtmod5hon to oarhripe in this proceeding should contact Lane Gamiotea no later than two (2) workw,'I days prior to the proceeding at 863-763-3372 x215, it hearing or voice impai(ed, call TDD 1-800-222-3448 (voice)or 1-888-447-5620 ITTY)iutea 1�gg g�MC.CITY CLERK Comm4 DD0563543 Expires 6/14/2010 Florida Notary Assn.. Inc .................................... 91V EXHIBIT NO. iFiEB 6 - to READ EXHIBIT NO. 3 FEB 20 - FINAL ORDINANCE NO. 974 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA; AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF OKEECHOBEE BY REZONING A CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, FROM HOLDING (H) TO RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY -ONE (RSF-1) ZONING DISTRICT; AMENDING THE ZONING MAP ACCORDINGLY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Okeechobee, Florida has adopted Ordinance Number: 402 in which a revised Official Zoning Map was adopted for said City; and WHEREAS, Mr. William Mason, property owner, of the property more particularly described hereafter, has heretofore filed Petition No. 07-001-R, pursuant to the. Land Development Regulations of the City of Okeechobee for the purpose of rezoning a certain tract of land consisting of 13.01 acre(s) from Holding (H) to Residential Single Family -One (RSF-1) Zoning District and that this request be removed from the boundaries of the above mentioned zone to allow for the processing of the rezoning petition; and WHEREAS, said petition(s) being reviewed by the City's Planning Board at a duly advertised meeting held on January 18, 2007, and submitted by staff report, which determined such petition(s) to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is appropriate with the zoning uses within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has agreed with the recommendation of the Planning Board and hereby finds such rezoning consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and deems it in the best interest of the inhabitants of said City to amend aforesaid revised Zoning Map as hereinafter set forth; NOW THEREFORE, be it ordained before the City Council of the City of Okeechobee, Florida; presented at a duly advertised public meeting; and passed by majority vote of the City Council; and properly executed by the Mayor or designee, as Chief Presiding Officer for the City; that: SECTION 1. LEGAL DESCRIPTION. The following described land, located in the City of Okeechobee, to -wit: ALL THAT PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LAND LESS AND EXCEPTED THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF NORTHEAST 9T" STREET: BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT POINT ON THE NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 35 EAST, SAID POINT BEING DUE NORTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 1, OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 17, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, NOW RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, RUN THENCE SOUTH TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 1; THENCE RUN SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY AND THE SOUTHERLY PROJECTION THEREOF, OF BLOCKS 1, 16, 17, 32, 33, 34, AND 51 OF SAID PLAT OF OKEECHOBEE, TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE Page 1 of 3 SEABOARD AIRLINE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE RUN EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SEABOARD AIRLINE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, TO THE WESTERN SHORE LINE OF THE ONOSOHATCHEE RIVER OF TAYLOR CREEK, AS NOW LOCATED; THENCE RUN NORTHERLY, MEANDERING ALONG SAID WESTERN SHORE LINE OF SAID CREEK, AS NOW LOCATED, TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID SECTION 15; THENCE RUN WEST, ALONG SAID NORTH SECTION LINE, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, LYING IN AND COMPRISING A PART OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 35 EAST, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOTS 1 TO 18, INCLUSIVE OF BLOCK 17, OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOTS 1, 2 AND 3, BLOCK 32, OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOTS 4 AND 5, BLOCK 32, CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 22, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOTS 6 AND 7, BLOCK 32, CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 22, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOT 12 BLOCK 32, CITY OF OKEECHOBEE LOT 13, BLOCK 32, OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOT 26, BLOCK 32, OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 17, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, A COPY OF SAID PLAT BEING ALSO RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 10, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND ALSO RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOTS 1 AND 2 IN BLOCK 33 AND LOTS 1 THROUGH 6, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 34, OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. SECTION 2. ZONING MAP AMENDMENT. That the aforesaid Revised Zoning Map of the City of Okeechobee be amended to reflect the subject property zoning classification to be changed from Holding (H) to Residential Single Family -One (RSF-1) Zoning District. SECTION 3. CONFLICT. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY. If any provision or portion of this ordinance is declared by any court of competent jurisdiction to be void, unconstitutional, or unenforceable, then all remaining provisions and portions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its passage. Page 2 of 3 INTRODUCED for first reading and set for final public hearing on this 61h day of February, 2007. James E. Kirk, Mayor ATTEST: Lane Gamiotea, CMC, City Clerk PASSED AND ADOPTED after Second and Final Public Hearing this 201h day of February, 2007. ATTEST: Lane Gamiotea, CMC, City Clerk REVIEWED FOR LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: John R. Cook, City Attorney Page 3 of 3 James E. Kirk, Mayor City of Okeechobee Dare: 1 _,L 101 © Petition No. General Services Department 55 S.E. 3' Avenue, Room 101 Okeechobee, Florida 34974-2903 Fee Paid: OO .a Jurisdiction: (� 1st Hearing. g 1 �$ Dfo end Hearin * 6 .�, Publication Dates: Phone: (863) 763-3372, ext. 218 Fax: (863) 763-1686 Notices Mailed unuorm Lance use Application RezaM, • !�npeial F.Vek--Minn.. ✓ Name of property owner(s): William H. Mason A P Owner mailing address: 1032 SW 20 Avenue Okeechobee, FL 34974 P. L Name of applicant(s) if other than owner (state relationship): Not applicable I C Applicant mailing address: Not applicable A N Name of contact person (state relationship): Not applicable T Contact person daytime phone(s): 863-697-6547 Fax: 863-467-4618 ✓ Property address / directions to property: West entrance to Commerce Center Indicate current use of property: Vacant - Holding Describe improvements on property, including number/type of dwellings and whether occupied (if none, so state): None Approximate number of acres: 13.01 acresls property in a platted subdivision? Yes, a portion 1',there a current or recent use of the properry that is!v as a xiolation of count\ ordinance? If so_ describe- 0 P E Have there been any land use applications concerning all or part of this property in the last year? If so, indicate date, nature and applicant's name: No R Is a sale subject to this application being granted? No T y Is the subject parcel your total holdings at that location? If not, describe the remaining or intended uses: No_ Lots 12 & 13 Block 32, City of Okeechobe..to remain in natural state Describe adjoining ]and uses / improvements to the North: Future Assisted Living Facility South: Industrial East: Industrial Park West: Multi -Family Existing zoning: Holding Future Land Use classification: RSF I Actions Requested: LMh Rezone Special Exception �) Variance Parcel Identification Number: see attached list I✓ Confirmation of Information Accuracy I hereby certify that the information in this application is correct The information included in this application is for use by the City of Okeechobee in processing my request_ False or misleading information may be punishable by a fine of up to $500.00 and imprisonment of up to 30 days and may result in the summary denial of this application. -cC2� William H_ Mason 12/18/06 Signature Printed Name Date Uniform Land Use Application (n:v 1103) Page l of 2 Current zoning classification: Holding Requested zoning classification : PSF [[R What is your desired permitted use under the proposed classification: Construct a single family residence O N If granted, will the new zone be contiguous with alike zone? Yes E Is a Special Exception necessary for your intended use? No Variance? No Describe the Special Exception sought: S P E C Provide specific LDR ordinance citation: I A L Are there other similar uses in the area? Is so, describe_ E X C E Why would granting your request be in the best interest of the area and residents? P T 1 n if business_ hn�fl� describe nature in, lulling number of emplo,ces- hours_ noise Yeneranon and icitvoic-, to he N conducted outside of a budding Desenle Variance sought r Describe physical characteristic of property that makes variance necessary: I A N C Did you cause or contribute to the characteristic? Is so, describe: E What is the minimum variance necessary? Uniform Land Use Application (re,- vo3) Page 2 of 2 William H. Mason Property Owner and Applicant Statement of Interest in Property I, William H. Mason am the record title owner of the following listed properties. The intent of the attached application is to secure a change in zoning from the existing classification of Holding (H) to Residential Single Family (RSF). R3-15-37-35-0010-0001 0-001B R3-15-37-3 5-0010-00340-0040 R3-15-37-35-0010-00340-0010 R3-15-37-35-0010-00330-0010 R3-15-37-35-0010-00320-0260 R3-15-37-35-0010-00320-0010 R3 -15-3 7-3 5-0010-00320-0040 R3-15-37-35-0010-00320-0060 R3-15-37-35-0010-00170-0090 R3 -15 -3 7-3 5-0010-00170-0010 R3-15-37-35-0010-0001 0-001G R3-15-37-35-0010-00010-001 L O.R. Book 385 Page 962 O.R. Book 386 Page 164 O.R. Book 386 Page 164 O.R_ Book 386 Page 164 O-R. Book 399 Page 024 OR_ Book 322 Page 1344 O.R. Book 379 Page 1817 O.R. Book 396 Page 0858 O.R. Book 450 Page 1584 O.R. Book 450 Page 1584 O.R. Book 614 Page 1666 O.R. Book 385 Page 962 ,: a t 11y sumps paid in the anvynt of p [� DOUK 305. PACE 962 -�ae 10 A FO 00 rated iD Number. 3-15-37-35-0010-00010-001A Grantee #1 mit 264-82-2722 Warranty Deed This Indenture, Made this l lth day of December,19 9 6 A.D. , Between SARAH HAMRICK, a single woman, of the County of Okeechobee I statcof Florida , grantor, and WILLIAM H. MASON, a single man, whoseaddresst.1032 S.W. 20th Avenue, Okeechobee, Florida 34974 of the County of Okeechobee , , state of Florida , grantee. W9tnesseth that the GRANMR, for and in consideration of the sum of — — — — — — — — — — — — — - - - - - - - - - - TEN & NO / 10 0 ($10.00) - - - - - - - - - - DOLLARS, and other good and valuable eonsideration to GRANTOR in hand paid by GPLANIER the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said GRANIM and GRA14= heird and assigns forever, the fo0owing described [and, situate, tying and being in the County of Okeechobee stain of Florida to mt: BEGINNING at a point on the North boundary line of Section 15, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, said point being due North of the Northeast corner of Block 1, OKEECHOBEE, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2,'Page 17, public records of St. Lucie County, Florida, now recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 5, public records of Okeechobee County, *'Florida, run thence South to the Northeast corner of said Block 1; thence run Southerly, along the Eastern boundary and the Southerly projection thereof, of Blocks 1, 16, 17, 32, 33, 34, and 51 of said plat of OKEECHOBEE, to the intersection with the North line of the Seaboard Airline Railroad right-of-way; thence run East, along the North line of the Seaboard Airline Railroad righi of -way, '- the Western shore line of the Onoshohatchee River or Taylor Creek, as now located; thence run Northerly, meandering along said Western shore line of said creek, as now located, to the intersection with the North boundary line of said Section 15; thence run West, along said North Section line, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Lying in and comprising a part of the NW; of Section 15, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida. LESS AND EXCEPT: (Continued on attached) and the grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. In witness whereof, the for has hereunto set her bind and seal the day and year first above written. Sited, ealed delivered in ` (S-0 EVA MAE d0iiELY SARAH HAMRICK i es P.o Address Post once Box 837, Ok eeebobee, FL 34973 TOM W I Wit STATE OF FLORIDA R COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE I' the foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1lth day of December, 1996 . by SARAH HAMRICK, a single woman, Rwho is personally (mown to me_ N This Doeument Prepared Br. TOM W. COmm Y, III EVA lem cofQELY r Com3 Y & CON1u.Y, PA E M' 0owth---al d t,C 243146 A MAE CONELY O 207R W. 2ND s11MET E2'M: Darernha IZ IN6 PUBLIC 6a as >rmr ' `unaanaaaa OKER OBtu:, FL 349rz r ebmmiss[on a*res g m s to< 12 / 12 / 9 6 tv90 (anj��st�s `m`so.m ttwax Warranty Deed - Page 2 QR- BOOK 385 PACE 963 A strip of land 100.00 feet in width, lying in Section 15, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: BEGIN at the Southeast corner of Block 1, CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, according to plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page public records of Okeechobee 5, County:, Florida, said point of beginning is also shown on survey of RIVERSIDE DRIVE, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 22, public records of Okeechobee County, Florida; said point of beginning is also a point of intersection of the Northerly right-of-way line of N.E. 13th Street, (formerly Nineteenth Street), and the Westerly right-of-way line of Riverside Drive; thence bear N 89'56'33" E along the Eastward projection of the North right-of-way line of said N.E. 13th Street a distance of 108.33 feet to the intersection with the Easterly right-of-way line of Riverside Drive; thence bear S 22'40'26" W along the aforesaid Easterly right-of-way, line of .Riverside Drive a distance of 108.33 feet; thence bear S 89'56'33" W parallel with the aforesaid Northerly right-of-way line 'of N.E. 13th Street to the intersection with the said Westerly right-of-way line of Riverside Drive a distance of 108:33 feet; thence 22'40'26" E along bear N the said Westerly right-of-way line of Riverside Drive a distance of 108.33 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Subject to restrictions, reservations and easements of record, if any, which are not reimposed hereby, and taxes subsequent to December 31st, 1996. RED:FOR RECORD OKFICHUBEL- CO. FL 289851 96 IJ_C i i n� ►0= 4 6 StiltROF-J R0I3rT TS0N1 CLERV-Of CIRCUIT COURT (suj�rsfS�Sjs` Inc 19% Form FLtVD-Z � erD e� Zoe— >"/a& Box 386 PAGE 164 3-15-37-35-0010-00340-0010 Documry Stamps Palo In the amount of Parcel iDNamb. 3-15-37-35-0010-00330-0010 caantee #i Tim 264-82-2722 in I 1 Clerk of CW-0 Courl/ dale Warranty Deed 7 This Indenture, Made this _L_L—day of December, 19 96A.D. , Between LOUIS B. FINE FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Virginia limited partnership of the County of State of Virginia , grantor, and WILLIAM H. MASON, a single man, whoseeddressis1032 S.W. 20th Avenue, Okeechobee, Florida 34974 of the County of Okeechobee state a Florida , grantee, Witnesseth that the GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of — — — — — — — — — — — — — - - - - - - - - - - TEN & NO/ 100 ($10.00 ) - - - _ - - - - - - DOLLARS, and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand paid by GRANTEE, the receipt whereof is hereby acknmiedged, has granted, bargained and sold to the mid GRANTEE and GRANTEE'S heirs and o igw forever, the following descnbed iand, situate, tyiagand being in the Countya Okeechobee statcof Florida towitc Lots I and 2 in Block 33 and Lots 1 through 6, inclusive, in Block 34, OKEECHOBEE, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 5, public records of Okeechobee County, Florida. Subject to restrictions, reservations and easements of record, if any, which are not reimposed hereby, and taxes subsequent to December 31st, 1996. 290415 9GDFP21 ii'!II'1,1 S�jjjRo'i -ROO-ER.TSM CLLRi{:Or` CIRCLlfT GOUT+ i and the grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend tha same against lawful claims of an persons whomsoever. In W1tneSS Whereof, the grantor has hereunto set his hand and seat the day and year fast above written Signed, watt d and delivered 6r our Presence: LOUIS FINE FAMILY LIMITED PAR I S P ?�' Printed Name By :i (seal) LOUIS B. FINE, General Partner Witness PD. Address 2101 Parks Avenue Ste- 601, Virginia Beach, VA 23451 Punted Name: `�r^ena S;�rDu Witness r,�C EALTII Olt IRGLN Ch CTWWOF R The foregoing instrument was acknowledged tcfore me this =day of December, i996 by E LOUIS B. FINE, General Partner on behalf of LOUIS B. FINE FAMILY T LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, aVirginia Limited Parmeiship_ U He is personally (mown to me or who has produced his [ S- R as identilieatio,n. N. This Document Prepared B)r - - ""• ..2:,. •: TOM W_ CONELY, III ,: OCONELY & CONELY.PA lnted N �Vn C� l7iJ�rC.Lv — C�tcCi` l �Q 207 N. W 2ND SI'RMT NOTARY PUBLIC ct O%HEQTOBBE, FL 34977 My Commission EVi— lay y 1 1�67-]S55 rwm FLWD 2 Parisi ID N®ixc 3-15-37-35-0010-00320-0260 Grantee #1 TREE 264-82-2722 Documentary Stamps paid In the amount of $ 50 Class C I ngibie Tax paid In the amount of $ N D Cierk of U it Court date [Space Above This line Foe:Remrding Data] Warranty Deed Oq�� This Indenture, Made this Gt( day of November ,19 9 7 A.D_ , Between GEORGE SIMMONS, a married man of the County of OKEECHOBEE WILLIAM H. MASON, a single man State of FLORIDA ,grantor, and whoseaddressis1032 S.W. 20th Avenue, Okeechobee, FL 34974 of the County of OKEECHOBEE , State of FL;ORIDA grantee. Witnesseth that the GRANTOR for and in consideration of the som of — NO/100 ($10.00) — — — — — — — — — _ — — — — — — — — — TEN & and other good and valuable mnsidejion to t DOT 7 kp.S. GRANTOR in hand poid by eRANrEE, the receiptwhercof is hereby ncknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said GRANTEE and G ' RANTEES he and assigns Forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in the county of OKEECHOBEE state Lot 26 of Block 32, OKEECHOBEE , according o the plaatAthereof recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 17, public records of St. Lucie County, Florida, a copy of said plat being also recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 10, public records of Okeechobee County, Florida, and also recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 5, public records of Okeechobee County, Florida. SUBJECT to restrictions, reservations and easements of record, if any, which are not reimposed hereby; and taxes subsequent to December 31st, 1997. THE PROPERTY HEREIN CONVEYED IS NOT THE GRANTOR_ F HOMESTEAD PROPERTY O on end the grnmor don hereby fu[Iy warrant the title to said rand, and will defend th...... attached) 1 dul claims of alt persons whomsx­t. In WltneSS WhereOJ, the grantor has hereunto set his hand aad seal the day and year Cost above written Signed, j aled and delivered in our presence: Pir eU N e�1sa �emen�s - S — (seat) Wit ass ` P.O Add— 1065 N.E. 102ad Street, Okeechobee, FL 349p r1n N e : ina _ o eman (sral) Wit ess Witness (Seat) Witness (Seal) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this OC/r ` R ,'�� day of November 1997 by E G'EORGE SIMMONS, a married man T U who ispasonally known to mcorwho hasproduced hFlorida is Fldriver's license as identification aria who did not R take an oath. This Document Prepared lb, - r N r GINA MDRGIW{jOLB1ApN f T TOM W. comnx, nfr mQ =•:_ : c MY COMMISSION 0 WA14M EM — CONE[Y$CONII.Y,PA ,J7fSb� N0n�16,1 P int d name a Mor a oleman Q 2ft7N_W SHooND mntailttpaltgarrua Otary Public r�t� M34M My Commission Expires: �PCK c�tY9 PACE 024 warranty Deed - Page 2 THIS INSTRUMENT WAS PREPARED FROM INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE PARTIES. MARKETABILITY OF TITLE IS NOT GUARANTEED NOR ACCURACY OF THE DESCRIPTION, AS TITLE WAS NOT EXAMINED. FILED FOR RECORD OKEECHOBEE CO. EL. 3024 10 97 DEC -G AM s, 50 SHARON ROURTSOP! CLLRK OF CIRCUIT COURT aeix 399 PACE 095 ?r {frt-�Ifltyt 5 OR qq??q�} 866K 322 PACEIJYY Tj L 2 8 l 8 l 47 CLERK 01- Parmf IDNumber 3-15-37-35-0010-00320-0010 Grantee #i mN-- 264-82-2722 (Space Above This Line For f-c rding Data) Warranty Deed This Indenture, Made this `L_ day of A p g l L ,19 91 A.D.. Between JO--IRM C- PIRTS'L, III and JOAN PIRTEL, his wife. of the County of Ne7 [jnyC-r'1 smteof Connecticut ,grt�ntors, and WILLIAM H. MASON, a single man, ,vhoseaddressis:1032 S.W. 20th -Avenue, Okeechobee, Florida 34974 of the countyof Okeechobee state or Florida ,gC8ntee. Wltnesseth that the GRANTORS, for and in consideration of the sum of — — — — — — _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - TEN & NO/ 10 0 ($10 .0 0) - - - - - - - - - DOLLARS, and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTORS in hand paid by GRANTEE, the receipt whereof is hereby aclmowfcdgcd, bade granted, bargained and sold to the said GRANTEE and GRgNTEE.'S hcin:iand assigns forever, the following described land, situate, - lying and being in the county of OKEECHOBEE State of Florida to wit: 1/3 INTEREST IN AND TO THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 32, OKEECHOBEE,'according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 5, Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida. Subiect to restrictions, reservations and easements of record, if any, which are not reimposed hereby, and taxes subsequent to December 31st, 1990. Iand the grantors do hereby fully warrant the tide to said land, and will defend the some against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever - n W1tneSS Whereof, the grantors have nt hereuo set their hands and seals the day and year first above writteo- Signed, sealed ta)[I d 'veced in our presence ,s C . PIR (Seal) �/i�tat�! `(G ]E��rl, r� L � • I I F.� witness o JO PIRTEL (Seal) (seal} (Seal) STATE OF CONNECTICUT R COUNTY OF f l t it t 1::jj 0 Ft, I HEKEe'i r CEWi 1p y that on this day an officer duty qualifw to ot:c acknowJcd rntcaLS, T JOHN C. PIRTEL, III and JOAN PIRTEL, his; wife, g Personalty appeared IT R to me (mown to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and th aclmowlWgcd before me that they executed T the same. y VaTNESS my band and official seat in the County and state last aforesaid this / This Document Prepared >IY y of 7991E - 0 TOM W- CONELY, nr CONELY & CONELY, PA 7b7 M W-IlND ctutrrrr ARY PUBLlc, STATE OF CONNEcrlruT:.i pKEFAMORDEL FL 34M - My Commission Expires: - - ho1o�•$yy ENOTARY�. SEAL) P BCUK .3 7 PAGr81 7 I-c'3s: $Da Siam s aid : tote �:it4uni ai This Tu8trnmcnt Prepared y Ll,'f:rrk of Circuft Caw Robert V. Sennedy 200 HS 4th Avenue 0Okeechobee, FL 34972 J Parcel No. 3-15-37-35-0010-00320-0040 !f THIS WARRANTY DEED, made the 1st day of July, 1996 by WILLIAM CHAD ' KENNEDY, a married man, hereinafter called the Grantor to WILLIAM D-' MASON, a single man and whose post office address is 1032 SW 20th Avenue, Okeechobee, FL 34974 hereinafter called the Grantee. WITNESSETH, That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of $ 10.00 and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the Grantee all that certain land, situate in Okeechobee County, State of Florida, to -wit: Lots 4 and 5, Block 32, CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 1, page 22, public records of Okeechobee County, Florida. SUBJECT TO restrictions, reservations and easements of record. TOGETHER, with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. fi0' �_�.._.s, _v_. HAVE` ANtSTO IiOY;l?, the same in feeimple forever. AND the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land, and hereby warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 1995. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, aled and deliver in the presence of: X Jj6k�"' . WITNESS WIttIAM CHAD KENNEDY 24 13227 153rd Road North Jupiter, FL 33478 Print Wit s N e WI SS JOSEPH J_ DERMPM `` MY COMMISSION i CC 445= EQ!M: March 15, 1999 Bonded TIw Nulacy Aub6c Undervu C dtars Print Witness Name _ o � • 3� foc This Instrument Prepared and Return to: Robert v. Kennedy 200 HE 4th eveaue Okeechobee, FL 34972 Parcel No. 3-15-37-35-0010-00320-0060 Documentary Stamps paid in the amount o€ $ �% O Clas intangible Tax pinithemounta ni A erk of Circuit Court date Z THIS WARRANTY ` DEED, made the 22nd dZY ay of September, 1997 by ROBERT V. KENNEDY, a single man hereinafter called the Grantor to WILLIAM MASON, a single .man and whose post office address is 1032 SW 20th Avenue, Okeechobee, FL 34974, hereinafter called the Grantee_ WITNESSETH, That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of $ 10.00 and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the Grantee all that certain 'land, situate !Y. Qn"eeCu bee county, State of Florida, to -wit: Lots 6 and 7, Block 32, CITY of OKEECHOBEE, recorded in according to the plat thereof Florida_ Plat Book 1, page 22, public records of Okeechobee County, SUBJECT TO restrictions, reservations and easements of record. TOGETHER, with all the tenements, hereditaments belonging or in anywise appertaining_ and appurtenances thereto TO'HAVE-_AND TO"HOLD, the same in fee simple forever. AND the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor have good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land, and hereby warrant the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subse�ent to December 31, 1996_ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. �1 Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: t s r Pri�gt Witness ame �� ��_ CXf%�14eew WITNESS C. i e,—&- ' c"e 1� es eq'q Print Witness Name 200 N. E. 4th Avenue Okeechobee, FL 34972 °m0396 P49[0858 FILED FOR RECOPD OKEECHOBEE CO. FL. 300016 g 25 PM 1:21 5 :; C P. O i, T- f J,- CLERK OF 6 RCU T COURT STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgments, personally appeared ROBERT V. RENNEDY, a single man known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, who acknowledged before me that they executed the same. (X) Said person(&) is/are personally known to me. ( ) Said person(s) provided the following type of identification: WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this dap of September, 1997. 11 NOTARY PL[$IS .��i►t�r£ �Cl� f Sc�r-c Print notary name My commission expires: � lllll.�lAlllLilt'lITTTllTlll-7TllllllllllfTllllllT c os".V`Y Pts Linda Wilgon ; > : Notary Public, State of Flarida .. - FOFFto 'isiyCrnamdasionE 05690' tl91Gc"r%9": t 1-S003-WL-TA F_Y - R, N. ;• 3- jv & inn Co. C IR EiW0396 PAGE0859 � Do � paid in the amoulrt of tits 0 4 5 D VAR (5 `S`4 Clasp C Ilrfelt11111bla TaK .—Aida f anwllnt of $ $dare[) f+o6srlso�►, clam Of Circa+ t ft +►• _ BVl D.C. Joe �D• oa Dats: _ Parcel ID Number_ 3-15-37-35-0010-00170-0010/0090 Grantee 01.71N: 264-82-2722 Warranty Deed This Indenture, Made this _day of February, 2001 A.D. , Between CARROLL M_ JOHNSON and DELIGHT DREESE, of the County of State of Ohio WILLIAM H . MASON, a single man, a, grantors, and whose address is:1032 S.W_ 20th Avenue, Okeechobee, Florida 34974 of the County of Okeechobee ' Stateof Florida ,grantee. W1tneSSeth that the GRANTORS, for and in consideration of the sum of - — — — — — _ - - - - - - - - - TEN & NO/ 10 0 ($10 . 0 0) - - - - - - - - - - DOLLARS, and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTORS in hand paid by GRANTEE, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, have gramed, bargained and sold to the said GRANTEE and GRANTEE'S heirs'and assigns forever, the following describer) land, situate, lying and being in the County of Okeechobee Stale of Florida to wit: Lots 1 to 18, inclusive, of Block 17,: OKEECHOBEE, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 5, public records of Okeechobee County, Florida. The property herein conveyed does not constitute the homestead property of Grantors. SUBJECT to restrictions, reservations and easements of record, if any, which are not reimposed hereby, and taxes subsequent to December 31st, 2000_ and the gmotors do hereby hilly wu am the tide to said land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. In Witness Whereof, he granmrs have hereunto set her hands and seals the da Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: Y and year first above /written. Printed Name: ]__ ) C 1T CARROLL M . JO ON (Sear Witness as `ty0_ Jo11n50n P'O. Address 1712 Brookwood Drive, Akron, OH 44313-5054 Printed Name: Ann L. Bz-and Witness as to Johnson Prii teedd Name j e = (Seal) Wi ess !� DELIGHT REESE as O D eS2 P:1. Address 07 S.W. 74th Terrace, Gainesville, FL 32670 rinted Name. - Witness as to Dreese STATE OF OHIO R COUNTY OF sT g4IT Et' The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 12th da T CARR(D.1j -VM: JOHNSON, y of February, 20O1 by LT R who vn td ale or who has produced her r is nca copy as ideodfication. Th¢ Domrnf TOM w.��C(,*r'EL1�r -� .I<r• �. Ci 4�1'1 S T ceN t Y,& --- - P✓ : Printed Name: THOMAS E. PARRISH �MCE Atto g �� nRnwfrR lsc7 NOTARY PUBLIC NOTARY PUBLIC, STAT HI` Y — \ ofcEcct3o[IE, , %:� 1�7j_y�� MY commission Expires: My Cornmfaslon.Hes No Eltplratlon Data «b-� tRs3i" ssss "F... F . D-2 Sectlon 147.03 Ohio Revised Code Warranty Deed - Page 2 IR sR0 4 5 0 PARE It 5 8'5 FILE} FOR RECORD OKE£CHORE" COUNTY. FL 348: 4 2 N91 FEB 22 Pit Z= 57 SHARO:N ROBERTSOH CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before roe this day of February, 20 01 by DELIGHT DREESE, who is personally known to me or who has produced her iC/ as identification. ' + CL rinted Name::_/I NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Expires: MYCOMMISSIOyp�g�B� 063)%Gt£555 rmm FLW62 I j g,, a ,'boc,_ /a, -° This Instrument Prepared By: and Return To: TOM W. CONELY, In CONELY & CONELY, P.A. Post Office Drawer 1367 Okeechobee, Florida 34973-1367 Parcel ID Number: 3-15-37-35-0010-00010-001 G 8HAROH ROBERTSOKr CLERK OF CIRCUIT Cl OKEECHOBEE C:OUNT`I`r FL RECORDED 1CV 1]1/2 016 02.23--05 PH RECORDING FEES 19.110 DEED DOC 10.50 RECORDED BY H Pinon Pss 1166 - 166 ; (2p9s) TRUSTEE'S DEED [PREPARED WITHOUT EXAMINATION OF TITLE] THIS DEED made this 30th day of October, 2006, by SARAH REGINA HAMRICK, as Trustee of the SARAH REGINA HAMRICK Revocable Trust dated April 2, 2002, hereinafter called "Grantor", to WILLIAM H. MASON, a single adult,_ whose address is 1032 SW 202h Avenue, Okeechobee, FL 34974, hereinafter called "Grantee": (Wherever used herein the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" shall include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations.) WITNESSETH: That the Grantor, for and in consideration ofTEN AND NO1100s DOLLARS ($10.00) and other valuable considerations receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto Grantee all that -certain land situate" in Okeechobee County, Florida, to wit: A strip oi_lLin (1 1C1G.0 feet in width Iying in Section ,, � Township 37 SoLlth, Ranee 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: BEGIN at the Southeast comer of Block 1, OKEECHOBEE, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 5, public records of Okeechobee County, Florida, said point of beginning is also shown on survey of RIVERSIDE DRIVE, according to the plat thereof and recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 22, public records of Okeechobee County, Florida; said point of beginning is also a point of intersection of the Northerly right of way line of NE 13d' Street (formerly Nineteenth Street) and the Westerly right of way lime of Riverside Drive; `thence Bear North 89°56'33" East along the Eastward projection of the North right of way line of said NE 13' Street a distance of 108.33 feet to the intersection with the Easterly right of way line of Riverside Drive; thence bear South 22°40'26" East along the aforesaid Easterly right of way line of Riverside Drive a distance of 108.33 feet; thence bear South 89°56'33" West parallel with the aforesaid Northerly right of way line of NE 13`h Street to the intersection with the said Westerly right of way line of Riverside Drive a distance of 108.33 feet; thence bear North 22°40'26" West along the said Westerly right of way line of Riverside Drive a distance of 108.33 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The property conveyed herein is not the homestead property of the grantor. SUBJECT TO restrictions, reservations and easements of record, if any, which are not reimposed hereby and taxes subsequent to December 31, 2005_ TOGETHER WITH all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND HOLD, the same in fee simple forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, Sealed and Delivered in our presence: ,—I, XLJJ� . v �. Z, 1" Witness Signature EVA MAE CONELY is'Witness Printed Name MOM 1e: CONEL , III 2" Witness Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE SARAH REGINA HAMRICK, Trustee P.O. Box 837 Okeechobee, FL 34973-0837 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 30th day of October, 2006, by SARAH REGINA HAMRICK, on behalf of said trust, who is personally known to me. NOTARY PUB IC EVA MAE LONELY MY COMMISSION; DD 365751 o EXAlRES: December 1Z 2M BaidwThuNaftyPw*uadenxrmn Application for a Change in Zoning William H. Mason — Property Owner and Applicant Statement of Special Reasons and Basis for Request William H. Mason currently owns the subject property previously described in the attached petition. The property is approximately 13 acres in area and located east of the Commerce Center. The property is currently zoned Holding (H) and lies within the Residential Future Land Use classification of the Unified Land Development Code as adopted by the City of Okeechobee. The applicant wishes to construct a single family residence on the property. In accordance with city regulations, a change in zoning will be required to allow the construction of a single family residence. The applicant respectfully requests that the Planning Board recommend that the City Council grant the request for a change in zoning from the existing CiaSSiiicaiiun of uitig (iij io Residential �ingie i'am, "y' (RSF). Application for a Change in Zoning William H. Mason — Property Owner and Applicant Intended Use, Nature of Activities and Development of Property William H. Mason currently owns all property included in the attached petition. The property is located at west entrance of the Commerce Center and is approximately 13 acres in area. The applicant wishes to construct a single family residence on the subject property. The subject parcel has adequate area for ingress and egress with access points on NE 9`h Street and NE 10' Street. The need for screening and buffering in not anticipated given the location is in an area designated specifically for future residential development. Application for a Change in Zoning William H. Mason — Property Owner and Applicant Existing Use of Surrounding Properties William H. Mason currently owns all the property included in the attached petition for a change in zoning. The property is approximately 13 acres in area and located at the west entrance of the Commerce Center. The subject property is zoned Holding and lies within the Residential Single Family future land use classification of the Unified Land Development Code as adopted by the City of Okeechobee. To the North of the subject property is an assisted living facility and additional property designated as a future assisted living facility. Further north is the Raulerson Hospital and property in agriculture use. To the West of the subject property is the Commerce Center, fartber west is vacant property owned by the City of Okeechobee. l'o the South of the subject property is a variety of commercial and industrial uses and also vacant industrial and agriculture properties. To the East of the subject property is sparsely developed residential properties and vacant residential. Further east is a variety of commercial development. The proposed use of the subject property as residential would be consistent and compatible with the residential development already existing in the general area, and therefore would not adversely impact adjacent or nearby properties in the area. 1375 Jackson Street, Suite 206 Fort Myers, Florida 33901-2845 Phone: 239-334-3366 Fax: 239-334-6384 Email: larue-planning@att.net Staff Report Preparedfor The City of Okeechobee Applicant: William H. Mason From: RHF and Holding To: RSF Petition No. 07 001-R Staff Report Rezoning Request Applicant: William H. Mason Petition No. 07-001-R General Information Applicant A�c�ress ` 02 SV 20` Menue x. 4y" Okeechobee, FL 34974 Applicant Phone Number: ` 863 697 `6547/Fax 863 467 4618 Single Family Future Land Use Map Single Family Classification ZonYng bxstn+vt a R and I�ldmg -`'�� k ' ; Use of Property Vacant Single Family Residence Acreage a... 13.01.k.. , , , . .,:. Legal Description: ALL THAT PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LAND LESS AND EXCEPTED THE RIGHT- OF-WAY OF NORTHEAST 9T' STREET: BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS 1�EG1\,AING AT A POINT ON HIE NORTH BOI \I)4RY LINE OF SECIIO\ I), TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH_ RANGE 35 EAST, SAID POINT BEING DUE NOR IH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK L OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 17, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST_ LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, NOW RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA- RUN THENCE SOUTH TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 1; THENCE RUN SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY AND THE SOUTHERLY PROJECTION THEREOF, OF BLOCKS 1, 16, 17, 32, 33, 34, AND 51 OF SAID PLAT OF OKEECHOBEE, TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SEABOARD AIRLINE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE RUN EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SEABOARD AIRLINE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF- WAY, TO THE WESTERN SHORE LINE OF THE ONOSOHATCHEE RIVER OF TAYLOR CREEK, AS NOW LOCATED; THENCE RUN NORTHERLY, MEANDERING ALONG SAID WESTERN SHORE LINE OF SAID CREEK, AS NOW LOCATED, TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID SECTION 15; THENCE RUN WEST, ALONG SAID NORTH SECTION LINE, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, LYING IN AND COMPRISING A PART OF THE NW 'A OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 35 EAST, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOTS 1 TO 18, INCLUSIVE OF BLOCK 17. OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOTS 1, 2 AND 3, BLOCK 32, OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT 'THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. Staff Report Rezoning Request Applicant: William H. Mason Petition No. 07-001-R LOTS 4 AND 5, BLOCK 32, CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 22, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOTS 6 AND 7, BLOCK 32, CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 22, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOT 12 BLOCK 32, CITY OF OKEECHOBEE LOT 13, BLOCK 32, OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOT 26, BLOCK 32, OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 17, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, A COPY OF SAID PLAT BEING ALSO RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE ]0, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND ALSO RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOTS 1 AND 2 IN BLOCK 33 AND LOTS 1 THROUGH 6, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 34, OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 13.01 acres from the RMF and Holding Zoning Districts to the RSF-1 Zoning District. North: Future Land Use Map Classification: Single Family Zoning District Holding 01 pp Q aw;e ... (gam q /�y lUVgV`i6°Y�.,'*�. Zoning District. 1ND tVi`kmLv��.�.. _. lu.-«. §-....dt.&:E r c . ON RM i Aft Zoning District: rIII IND and Holding Elstllag �arld . £:e Indust West Future Ld Use Map �lassificat>xon Single Flyaiid 1Vlu�ti'�'a�nil Zoning District Holding and RMF Existn an�sr e . z l�' 2 Staff Report Rezoning Request Applicant: William H. Mason Petition No. 07-001-R The subject property consists of several lots located in the northeastern portion of the City. All of the subject property is within the Single Family Future Land Use category as shown on the City's Future Land Use Map. All of the lots are vacant and undeveloped. It is the applicant's intent to construct a single family residence on the property (Lots 2 and 3, Block 32) and leave the rest of the property vacant. The surrounding existing uses are a mix of residential, commercial and industrial uses. The request to rezone the subject property will make the zoning consistent with the Future Land Use classification and will allow development which is compatible with the neighboring properties. 1. The proposed use is not contrary to Comprehensive Plan requirements. The proposed single family use and RSF-I Zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies and the Future Land Use Map designation for this property. Policy 2.1(a): Single -Family Residential. Pennitted uses are one single-family dwelling oil cach lot and stnictures accesson, to the residential use. mobile home parks and public facilities_ Ma-aims-nn density- of four units per acre for residential emits oil individual lots, and six units per acre for mobile home parks. 2. The proposed use being applied for is specifically authorized under the zoning district in the Land Development Regulations. Section 90-102(1) of the City's Land Development Code allows single family dwellings as a permitted use under the RSF-1 Zoning District. 3. The proposed use will not have an adverse effect on the public interest. The proposed single family use and RSF-1 Zoning District will not have an adverse effect on the public interest. 4. The use is appropriate for the location proposed, is reasonably compatible with adjacent land uses, and is not contrary or detrimental to urbanizing land use patterns. A single family dwelling would be appropriate for this location and compatible with the surrounding land uses. 3 Staff Report Rezoning Request Applicant: William H. Mason Petition No. 07-001-R 5. The proposed use will not adversely affect property values or living conditions, or be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property. The RSF-1 Zoning and accompanying single family use would not adversely affect property values or living conditions. Development of the subject property could encourage development of vacant lands adjacent to the applicant's property. 6. The proposed use can be suitably buffered from surrounding uses, so as to reduce the impact of any nuisance or hazard to the neighborhood If required, the proposed single family use could be buffered from surrounding uses. At this time, however, it does not appear that buffering will be necessary. 7. The proposed use will not create a density pattern that would overburden public facilities such as schools, streets, and utility services. The proposed single family use will not create a density pattern that would overburden public facilities. The proposed RSF-1 Zoning would create consistency with the existing Single Family Future Land Use category. 5_ Thc° proposed nse will not cre crtc traffic congestion. flooding or dram(ig e problems. or olherwoe affect publlC safetV. The applicant is not proposing any density increases for the subject property. The rezoning request is to allow the applicant to develop the property within the parameter of the Single Family land use category consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. As such, traffic congestions, flooding or drainage will not be a problem for the site. 9. The proposed use has not been inordinately burdened by unnecessary restrictions. The only restrictions placed on the subject property are those which are set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and the Land Development Code. The proposed use has not been inordinately burdened by unnecessary restrictions. 10. The proposed change will not constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. By allowing the applicant to develop the property under the RSF-1 Zoning District, the applicant is not receiving any special privileges which are not granted to any other citizen under the same circumstances. n Staff Report Rezoning Request Applicant: William H. Mason Petition No. 07-001-R Staff recommends approval of the request to allow rezoning from RW and Holding to RSF-1 permitting the applicant to develop a single family residence on the property. Submitted by: James G. LaRue, AICP Planning Consultant January 7, 2007 5 i w Z POINT OF COMMENCEMENT OR BK If/ PAGE 9 , 10 !CORNER NOT IN] 14TH STREET 16 15 A I PPOPT DITCH APO' PI AT ROOK 1 PAW PP 1019 8 7 6 15 4 13 2 1 1 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 13TH STREET 12TH 1 5 8 7 6 5 q 32 1 I B 1 113 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 1 TH S Trrl-'EE T 70 OF BEG I NN 1,0 Q) 1 30. 00 �— N89° 54' 32" E 4 3 2 1 5 6 7 8 W .o e OUA EASEMENT 'Q O �op � A N89° 54' 32" E 400.00 o O �9 s AREA= 1.50 ACRES 9 o7A 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 7 CD CD Z OP BK 45011584 6 9 10 1 1 �12�13�14� 15 16 1 7 18 �� Des p�� �` 13 AREA- 1.85 ACRES \�� W N89° 54' 32" E 59i. 85 I \ n OP BK3961858_ 0 5 4 13 12 1 16 scp 10 v 0 d a 6 7 8 9 10 11 \e SCALE APE 1. 50 AC 1.85 1. 27 .17 .446 .482 482 885 5.92 13. 005 1 W I II z 1 1 TH STREET w Q 10 g 8 7 6 5 4 3 z 1ri Ln Lo Q 0 0 0 z 31 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 10TH 9TH STREET FOUND IRON PIPE 10TH 9TH STREET FOUND IRON PIPE N89° 54' 32' E 591. 85 \ N o OR BK396 858 N 4' 7 00 W W OR BK 290 /171 A=361.03 A=17*34'53' A=i10.—D s m AREA OR BK 322/1644 = 1. 27 ACRES OR BK 32211344 s= 0 o a oti xx 11 10 9 B� 67 6 5 4 AA 3 2 1 � cn 00 22��9 - Q R=449. 98 A=34° 35' 48" A=271. 71 — Z 0�N89° LU P 54' 2' E 37 . 00 OR BK386/164 \ 32 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2324 25 26 cli m ? 2 1 `L_z_-L3 m 3 50' N89° 54' 32' E 137. 42 R=449.98 A=12°5i'35" A=i01.00 — OR BK3991024 AREA- . 446 AC. kL/ 0 150.00 OR BK3861164 \ Q 70 13 1211 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 Z 1 3 jr 14 15 16 11 18 1 20 21 22 23 2425 26 -GAS W a 3 2 A 1 0 AREA-. 482 AC. o c p o = m m � 3 S Ao 20' ALLEY m H v v W p o o 0 cD z 4 5 6 Z AREA . 482 AC. 70 175.76 */- R6F RBF 156.41«/- 0 50 m 5� m AREA-. 885 ACRES v 0 0 z �162 F- O p/R Cfk VENT 1n SCL R/R CENTERLINE OR BK 3B5/962 LELANDDYALS5 RLS 2OB4 PHONE _(8631 763-49 304 S.W. 3rd AVE OKEECHOBEE, FL 34974 FAX rae3> 7e3-e5 2 1 LEGEND RBF - Rebar Found PBS - Rebar W/Cap Set - 0 IPF - Iron Pipe Found CMF - Concrete Monument Found PRM - Permanent Reference Monument (P) - As per the plat of (FI - Field Measurement (DI - As per the deed (C) - Calculation NOTES: 1. Basis bearing 2. Bearings ASSUMED 3. Not valid without the signature and the original raised seal of a Florida licensed surveyor and mapper. 4. Description as per owner CERTIFIED TO: WILLIAM MASON DESCRIPTION: ALL THAT PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING DEICPIBED LAND LESS AND EXCEPTED THE RIGHT -OF WAY 017 NORTHEAST 9TH STREET: ------------- BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: CRES TOTAL BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 35 EAST, SAID POINT BEING DUE NORTH OF THE NORTHEAST COP14EP OF BLOCK 1, OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT TH17PEOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 17, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, NOW RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, RUN THENCE SOUTH TO THE NORTHEAST C017NEP OF SAID BLOCK 1; THENCE RUN SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY AND THE SOUTHERLY PROJECTION THEREOF, OF BLOCKS 1, 16, 17, 32, 33, 34, AND 51 OF SAID PLAT OF OKEECHOBEE, TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF FHE SEABOARD AIRLINE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE RUN EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE. OF THE SEABOARD AIRLINE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, TO THE WESTERN SHORE LINE OF THE ONOSOHA TCHEE R I VER OR TA YL OR ,'REEK, AS NOW L OCA TED; THENCE RUN NORTHERLY, MEANDERING ALONG SAID WESTERN SHORE LINE OF SAID CREEK, AS NOW LOCATED, TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID SECTION 15; THENCE RUN WEST, ALONG SA I D NORTH SE'..T 1 ON L I NE, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LYING IN AND COMPRISING A PART OF THE rnmk,nu , n -1� one ITIJ OAAIGC QC CACT IT LnVLV I , WIT rr 1 I II , II" n✓n I I I ✓v✓n✓nn I L. I lYC L/r OA I L/ SECTION 15; THENCE RUN WEST, ALONG SA I D NORTH SE'. -,'ON L I NE, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LYING IN AND COM(SING A PART OF THE NW114 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIC7 37 SOJTH, RANGE 35 EAST, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. i LOTS 1 TO 18, INCLUSIVE OF BLOCK 17, OKEECHOBEE. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOTS 1, 2 AND 3, BLOCK 32, OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, RAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOTS 1, 2 AND 3, BLOCK 32, OKEECHOBE!-, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, WAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOTS 1, 2 AND 3, BLOCK 32, OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, ;SAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOTS 4 AND 5, BLOCK 32, CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 22, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOTS 6 AND 7, BLOCK 32, CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 22, PU•9LIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOT 12 BLOCK 32 , CITY OF OKEECHOBEE LOT 13, BLOCK 32, OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LOT 26, OF BLOCK 32, OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 17, PU9L 1 C RECORDS OF ST. LUC I E COUNTY, FLORIDA, A COPY OF SAID PLAT BEING 4LSO RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 10, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND ALSO RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOTS i AND 2 IN BLOCK 33 AND LOTS 1 THROUGH 6, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 34, OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO TyE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PLAT OF SURVEY SHOWN HEREON WAS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECT 1 ON AND SLAEPV ION. 5 LELAND DYALS, RLS�2`0 SCALE: 1g = 000 LOCATION: L-00, B-00, SUBDIVISION SE-TP-RG COMPUTED BY: SURVEY FOR: W I L L I A M M A S O N DATE: 11/02/06 DRAWN LD BY: JOB NO.: 6915 DWG. NO.: L I ME: JN6915 NAME: SHEET 1 OF REVISIONS DATE BY � SEAL _ - �F. B. /Pg.: CO. XX/00 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor, Council Members, Administrator Whitehall, Attorney Cook, Planner LaRue, Mr. Mason and Mr. Farmer FROM: City Clerk Gamiotea'� SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 974/07-001-R William Mason DATE: February 20, 2007 After the discussion on the above noted ordinance regarding the impact to the neighboring Industrial property owned by Mr. Farmer (Block 51), please note the following research that might be of some assistance to you in making the final decision: First, during the research, we also discovered that the ordinance was "modified a little too much" after it was sent to our office and the "mufti -family" was left out of the ordinance language. I need for the Council to please, prior to a final vote, amend the ordinance title and body to reflect any where the rezoning change is noted from Holding to add "Residential Multiple Family (RMF) and" in front of it I have attached a revised ordinance underlining all the language to be added. I apologize for any confusion this may cause. Now for the research, the area is basically 13.005 areas and encompasses unplatted parcels together with platted parcels. In order to look at each individual piece I have broken them down into six separate items. Item Current 07-001-R Future Land Maps would be consistent No. Zoning Request Use after rezoning? (1 a) Holding RSF-1 Single Family Yes A small unplatted parcel located between Block 51 (to the West), Taylor Creek (to the East), NE 9' Street is the North street frontage and the railroad is to the South. 0.885 acres. This is the parcel Mr. Farmer was asking to be deleted from the rezoning application due to the impact itwould cause on the neighboring Industrial zoned property (Block 51). The only additional restrictions I could find that would be placed on the industrial property are: Bw Side and rear set backs. Side are 15 feet; 40 abutting residential zoned districts and Rear are 20 feet; 40 feet abutting residential zoned districts. ow As far as permitted and special exception uses, the adult entertainment was the only one listed that had restrictions tied to neighboring residential property. None of the other uses have this restriction placed on it. However, I would note to see also Sec. 90-638(2) "No accessory building used for industrial or commercial storage of hazardous, incendiary or noxious materials shall be located closer to a street line than 15 feet, a side or read yard than 20 feet and residential district than 25 feet." So this type of use could be permitted, only the accessory storage of these materials would have a greater setback to the RSF-1 property. I could not find any restrictions for the RSF-1 property abutting Industrial. The minimum lot requirements are 10,000 sq. ft. with a width of 75 feet. This lot has 38,550.6 sq. ft. with a street frontage of 156.41 ft. The avenue (NE 51h Avenue) is closed due to SFWMD declaring it a wetland therefore the second yard would not apply in this case. The building official or planner may know of additional requirements. Regarding the maps: Originally Blocks 50, 51 and the subject parcel were designated SF on the Future Land Use Map. Mr. Farmer applied for and received a land use change to Industrial by Ord. No. 666 adopted 2/21/1994. All the other remaining properties are still designated SF. The zoning on Blocks 50 and 51 have been Industrial since the 1978 zoning map. Mr. Mason's property is zoned Holding on the 1978 zoning map. (1 b) Holding RSF-1 Single Family Yes An oblong unplatted parcel that runs North to South along the West side of Taylor Creek. Blocks 1, 16, 17, 33 and 34 are to the West of the parcel. The South line is NE 90, Street. The North line is the City Limits. There is also a 0.270 acre OUA easement in the North of this property for their large distribution lines from the ground water treatment plant. 5.92 acres. (2a) Holding RSF-1 Single Family Yes Lots 4 - 6 of Block 34, 0.482 acres. (2b) Holding RSF-1 Single Family Yes Lots 1 - 3 of Block 34. 0.482 acres. (2c) Holding RSF-1 Single Family Yes All of Block 33, 0.446 acres. (3) Holding RSF-1 Single Family Yes Lot 26 of Block 32. 0.17 acres. (4a) Holding RSF-1 Single Family Yes Lots 1-3 of Block 32. (4b) RMF RSF-1 Single Family Yes Lots 4-7 of Block 32. (Items 4 a and b total 1.27 acres) (5) RMF RSF-1 Single Family Yes Lots 9-18 of Block 17. 1.85 acres. (6) RMF RSF-1 Single Family Yes Lots 1-8 of Block 17. 1.50 acres. REVISED EXHIBIT NO. 3 FEB 20 - FINAL ORDINANCE NO. 974 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA; AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF OKEECHOBEE BY REZONING A CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, FROM RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE FAMILY (RMF) AND HOLDING (H) TO RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY -ONE (RSF-1) ZONING DISTRICT; AMENDING THE ZONING MAP ACCORDINGLY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Okeechobee, Florida has adopted Ordinance Number: 402 in which a revised Official Zoning Map was adopted for said City; and WHEREAS, Mr. William Mason, property owner, of the property more particularly described hereafter, has heretofore filed Petition No. 07-001-R, pursuant to the Land Development Regulations of the City of Okeechobee for the purpose of rezoning a certain tract of land consisting of 13.01 acre(s) from Residential Multiple Family (RMF) and Holding (H) to Residential Single Family -One (RSF-1) Zoning District and that this request be removed from the boundaries of the above mentioned zone to allow for the processing of the rezoning petition; and WHEREAS, said petition(s) being reviewed by the City's Planning Board at a duly advertised meeting held on January 18, 2007, and submitted by staff report, which determined such petition(s) to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is appropriate with the zoning uses within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has agreed with the recommendation of the Planning Board and hereby finds such rezoning consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and deems it in the best interest of the inhabitants of said City to amend aforesaid revised Zoning Map as hereinafter set forth; NOW THEREFORE, be it ordained before the City Council of the City of Okeechobee, Florida; presented at a duly advertised public meeting; and passed by majority vote of the City Council; and properly executed by the Mayor or designee, as Chief Presiding Officer for the City; that: SECTION 1. LEGAL DESCRIPTION. The following described land, located in the City of Okeechobee, to -wit: ALL THAT PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LAND LESS AND EXCEPTED THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF NORTHEAST 9T" STREET: BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 35 EAST, SAID POINT BEING DUE NORTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 1, OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 17, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, NOW RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, RUN THENCE SOUTH TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 1; THENCE RUN SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY AND THE SOUTHERLY PROJECTION THEREOF, OF BLOCKS 1, 16, 17, 32, 33, 34, AND 51 OF SAID PLAT OF OKEECHOBEE, TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SEABOARD AIRLINE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE RUN EAST, ALONG Page 1 of 3 THE NORTH LINE OF THE SEABOARD AIRLINE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, TO THE WESTERN SHORE LINE OF THE ONOSOHATCHEE RIVER OF TAYLOR CREEK, AS NOW LOCATED; THENCE RUN NORTHERLY, MEANDERING ALONG SAID WESTERN SHORE LINE OF SAID CREEK, AS NOW LOCATED, TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID SECTION 15; THENCE RUN WEST, ALONG SAID NORTH SECTION LINE, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, LYING IN AND COMPRISING A PART OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 35 EAST, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOTS 1, 2, AND 3 OF BLOCK 32, OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOTS 4 AND 5 OF BLOCK 32, CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOTS 6 AND 7 OF BLOCK 32, CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLATTHEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOT 26 OF BLOCK 32 OF OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOTS 1 AND 2 OF BLOCK 33 AND LOTS 1 THROUGH 6, INCLUSIVE, OF BLOCK34, OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOTS 1 TO 18, INCLUSIVE, OF BLOCK 17, OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. SECTION 2. ZONING MAP AMENDMENT. That the aforesaid Revised Zoning Map of the City of Okeechobee be amended to reflect the subject property zoning classification to be changed from Residential Multiple -Family (RMF) and Holding (H) to Residential Single Family -One (RSF-1) Zoning District. SECTION 3. CONFLICT. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY. If any provision or portion of this ordinance is declared by any court of competent jurisdiction to be void, unconstitutional, or unenforceable, then all remaining provisions and portions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its passage. Page 2 of 3 INTRODUCED for first reading and set for final public hearing on this 6 th day of February, 2007. James E. Kirk, Mayor ATTEST: Lane Gamiotea, CMC, City Clerk PASSED AND ADOPTED after Second and Final Public Hearing this 201h day of February, 2007. ATTEST: Lane Gamiotea, CMC, City Clerk REVIEWED FOR LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: John R. Cook, City Attorney Page 3 of 3 James E. Kirk, Mayor § 90-77 OEEECHOBEE CODE Sec. 90-77. Maximum redevelopment area dwelling unit densities. Residential developments which qualify as substandard are allowed a density bonus when cleared and renewed. Such residential areas may be increased by one dwelling unit per acre as follows: Redeveloped Housing Residential Zoning District Code Density du lac (1) Residential single-family one RSF 1 (2) Residential single-family two RSF 2 (3) Residential multiple -family Rd" (LDR 1998, § 307) Secs. 90-78-90-100. Reserved. DIVISION 2. RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ONE (RSF 1) DISTRICT Sec. 90-101. Generally. (a) Residential single-family one (RSF 1) zon- ing districts shall be permitted only on land designated as future land use category single- family residential in the comprehensive plan- (b) Uses in residential single-family one (RSF 1) zoning districts shall be subject to the regula- tions of this division. (LDR 1998, § 320) Sec. 90-102. Permitted uses. The following principal uses and structures are permitted in the RSF 1 district: (1) Single-family dwelling. (2) Public and private schools. (3) House of worship, on a lot at least five acres. (4) Open space. (5) Public facility or use. (LDR 1998, § 321) 5 7 11 Comprehensive Plan Category Single-family residential Multifamily residential Multifamily residential Sec. 90-103. Special exception uses. The following uses and structures are permit- ted in the RSF 1 district after the issuance of a special exception use petition: (1) Boardinghouse. (2) Adult family care homes or assisted living facilities as provided by law. (3) Guesthouse, servant's quarters, or pool house, provided that the lot area shall be not less than 12,500 square feet. (4) House of worship, on a lot less than five acres. (5) Community center. (6) Indoor recreation. (7) Outdoor recreation. (8) Golf course. (9) Public utility. (10) Permitted uses in excess of 30 feet in height. (LDR 1998, § 322; Ord. No. 781, § 1, 10-2-2001; Ord. No. 866, § 1, 8-17-2004) Sec. 90-104. Customary accessory uses. Each permitted principal use and special ex- ception use in the RSF 1 district is also permitted to have the customary accessory uses for that use. (LDR 1998, § 323) Supp. No. 2 CD90: 00 ZONING § 90-131 Sec. 90-105. Lot and structure requirements. (a) Minimum lot area. Except where further restricted by these regulations for a particular use, minimum requirements for the RSF 1 district shall be as follows: (1) Single-family dwelling: Area 10,000 square feet Width 75 feet (2) Other permitted principal uses: Area 20,000 square feet Width 100 feet (b) Minimum yard requirements. The maximum yard requirements in the RSF 1 district, except where a greater distance is required by yard setbacks, shall be as follows: (1) Single-family dwelling: Front 25 feet Side 10 feet Rear 10 feet (2) Other permitted principal uses: Front 25 feet Side 20 feet Rear 20 feet (c) Maximum lot coverage by all buildings. Maximum lot coverage by all buildings in the RSF 1 district shall be as follows: Maximum Coverage Maximum Impervious Surface (1) Single-family dwelling: 45 percent 55 percent (2) Other permitted principal uses: 25 percent 55 percent (d) Maximum height of structures. Except where further restricted by these regulations for a particular use, the maximum height of structures in the RSF 1 district shall be as follows: (1) Single-family dwelling: (2) Other permitted principal uses: (LDR 1998, § 324) Sec. 90-106. Additional regulations. Additional regulations which shall apply to all uses in the RSF 1 district include, but are not limited to: (1) Concurrency regulations. (2) Parking and loading regulations (3) Landscaping regulations. (4) Sign regulations. 30 feet, unless a special exception is granted 30 feet unless a special exception is granted (8) Utilities regulations. (LDR 1998, § 325) Secs. 90-107-90-130. Reserved. DIVISION 3. RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TWO (RSF 2) DISTRICT Sec. 90-131. Generally. (5) Accessory use regulations. (6) Supplementary use regulations. (a) Residential single-family two (RSF 2) zon- ing districts shall be permitted only on land (7) Environmental and stormwater regula- designated as future land use category multifam- tions. ily residential in the comprehensive plan. Supp_ No. 2, Rev. CD90:11 ZONING 90-342 (3) Maximum lot coverage by all buildings. Maximum Coverage Maximum Impervious Sur face All uses: 85 percent 100 percent (4) Maximum height of structures_ Except where further restricted by these regulations for a particular use, the maximum height shall be as follows: All uses shall be 45 feet, unless a special exception is granted. (5) Maximum floor area ratio. All uses shall be 3 feet. (LDR 1998, § 394) Sec. 90-316. Additional regulations. The following additional regulations shall ap- ply to all uses within this district. In the event an applicant cannot comply with any additional reg- ulation due to the requirements in section 90-394, such applicant may, in conjunction with the site plan review by the technical review committee, request a waiver of any such additional regula- tion. If the technical review committee deter- mines that the applicant cannot comply with the ,Additional regulation due to circumstances be- yond the control of ,applicant, the committee may recommend to the board of adjustments to waive such additional requirement. Additional regulations which sh411 apply to all uses include but are not limited to: (1) Concurrency regulations. (2) Parking and loading regulations. (3) Landscaping regulations. (4) Sign regulations. (5) Accessory regulations- (6) Supplementary regulations. (7) Environmental and stormwater regula- tions. (8) Utilities regulations. (9) Building design guidelines. (LDR 1998, § 395; Ord. No. 816, § 1, 2-4-2003) Secs. 90-317-90-340. Reserved. (b) Uses in industrial (IND) zoning districts shall be subject to the regulations of this division. (LDR 1998, § 400) Sec. 90-342. Permitted uses. The following principal uses and structures are permitted in the IND district: (1) Business office. (2) Business school. (3) Retail service, retail store including out- door display of merchandise. (4) Research laboratory. (5) Manufacturing, processing, except those which produce explosives. (6) Mechanical and repair services- (7) Bulk storage of nonhazardous material. (8) Off -site sign. (9) Outdoor sales and storage, building con- tractor. (10) Wholesale sales and distribution. (11) Enclosed warehouse and storage. (12) Commercial laundry, dry cleaner. (13) Printing. (14) Auto service station, car wash_ DIVISION 10_ INDUSTRIAL (IND) DISTRICT (15) Drive -through service. Sec. 90-341. Generally. (a) Industrial (IND) zoning districts shall be (16) Parking garage, parking lot. permitted only on land designated as future land (17) Radio, television or cable reception, trans - use category industrial in the comprehensive plan. mission or operational facilities. *Gross reference —Businesses, ch. 14. (18) Veterinary service. Supp. No. 1 Cf D90.25 j 90-342 (19) Railroad facilities. (20) Public utility. (21) Public facility. (LDR 1998, § 401) Sec. 90-343. Special exception uses. OKEECHOBEE CODE The following uses and structures are permit- ted in the IND district after issuance of a special exception use petition and may have additional conditions imposed at the time of approval: (1) Manufacturing chemical or leather prod- ucts. (2) Bulk storage of hazardous material and flammable liquid. (3) Salvage yard. (4) Other industrial uses not listed. (5) Cafe- (6) Crematory. (7) Fortuneteller_ (d) Permitted uses in excess of 45 f( et in heibht. (9) Outdoor vehicle sales lot. (10) Adult entertainment: a. Notwithstanding any other provi- sion of this Code, adult entertain- ment establishments subject to arti- cle V, chapter 14 of subpart A of this Code may not be permitted in any area of the city except as permitted within the industrial district within the provisions and conditions of this Code. b_ Distance minimums_ In addition to subsection (10)a of this section, an Sec. 90-345. Lot and structure requirements. adult establishment shall not be per- mitted to open, operate, or be en- larged so as to come within the fol- lowing distances: 1. One thousand feet of a permit- ted, preexisting adult entertain- ment establishment; 2. One thousand feet of a preex- isting commercial establishment that in any manner sells or dispenses alcoholic beverages for on -premises or off -premises con- sumption; 3. One thousand feet of a preex- isting religious institution; 4. One thousand feet of a preex- isting educational institution, or library; 5_ Five hundred feet of an area zoned for residential uses: 6. One thousand feet of a park, whether improved or not; 7. Two hundred feet of a preexist- ing government facility, and any halfway house_ (LDR 1998, S 402; Ord. No. 743, § 1(11-80), 3-21-2000) Sec. 90-344. Customary accessory uses. Each permitted principal use and special ex- ception use in the IND district is also permitted to have the customary accessory uses for that use. (LDR 1998, § 403) Except where further restricted by these regulations for a particular use, the minimum lot and structure requirements in the IND district shall be as follows: (1) Minimum lot area. Stipp- No. 1 CD90:26 ZONING 3 90-345 All uses: Area As needed to comply with requirements set out in this division Width None Stipp. No. 1 C1)90 1 ZONING § 90-372 All uses: Area As needed to comply with requirements set out in this division Width None (2) Minimum yard requirements. Except where a greater distance is required by these regulations for a particular use, the minimum yard setbacks shall be as follows: All uses: Front 25 feet Side 15 feet; 40 feet abutting res- idential zoning district Rear 20 feet; 40 feet abutting res- idential zoning district (3) Maximum lot coverage by all buildings. Maximum Coverage Maximum Impervious Surface All uses: 50 percent 85 percent (4) Maximum height of structures. (a) Except where further restricted or enacted by these regulations for a particular use, the maximum height shall be as follows: All uses shall be 45 feet, for any structure in which workers are employed and occupy, or a structure not occupied but which is in the nature of a silo, spire, storage elevator, towers and similar structures, except telecommunication towers governed by [section] 90-601 of land development regulations; For all structures exceeding this height regardless of whether workers are employed therein, and including any structure which may be erected at a location that would adversely affect the navigational requirements and air space surrounding the Okeechobee County airport regard less of its height, such structures shall be permitted only by special exception_ (LDR 1998, § 404; Ord. No. 898, § 1, 7-19-2005) Sec. 90-346. Additional regulations. Additional regulations which shall apply to all uses in the IND district include, but are not limited to: (1) Concurrency regulations. (2) Parking and loading regulations. (3) Landscaping regulations. (4) Sign regulations. (5) Accessory use regulations. (6) Supplementary use regulations. (7) Environmental and stormwater regula- tions. (8) Utilities regulations. (LDR 1998, § 405) Secs. 90-347-90-370. Reserved. DIVISION 11. PUBLIC USE (PUB) DISTRICT Sec. 90-371. Generally. (a) Public use (PUB) zoning districts shall be permitted only on land designated as future land use category public facilities in the comprehen- sive plan. (b) Uses in public use (PUB) zoning districts shall be subject to the regulations of this division. (LDR 1998, § 410) Sec. 90-372. Permitted uses. The following principal uses and structures are permitted in the PUB district: public facility or use. (LDR 1998, § 411) Supp. No. 2 C27 § 90-405 (4) Minimum yard requirements. PUD district yard minimum All uses- (5) Maximum lot coverage. OKEECHOBEE CODE 20 feet on all property bound- anes Front As appropriate to the use Side As appropriate to the use Rear As appropriate to the use Maximum Coverage Maximum Impervious Surface All uses: 40 percent 60 percent (6) Maximum height of structures. Except where further restricted by these regulations for a particular use, the maximum height shall be as follows: All uses shall be 45 feet, unless a special exception is granted. (LDR 1998, § 434) Sec. 90-406. Additional regulations. Additional regulations which shall apply to all uses in the PUD district include, but are not limited to: (1) Concurrency regulations. (2) Parking and loading regulations- (3) Landscaping regulations- (4) Sign regulations. (5) Accessory use regulations. (6) Supplementary use regulations. (7) Environmental and stormwater regula- tions. (8) Utilities regulations. (LDR 1998, § 435) Secs. 90-407-90-440. Reserved. ARTICLE IV. SUPPLEMENTARY DISTRICT REGULATIONS DIVISION 1. GENERALLY Sec. 90-442. Conflict of article with other applicable regulations. Where conflicts exist between regulations, the more stringent regulation, standard or require- ment shall apply. (LDR 1998, § 601) Sec. 90-443. Calculation of building cover- age. In determining the percentage of building cov- erage of a lot, principal buildings, roofed porches, garages, carports, swimming pool, solid decks, and other accessory buildings shall be included. Vehicular driveways and pedestrian paths are not included in the coverage. (LDR 1998, § 602) Sec. 90-444. Measurement between uses. When minimum distances are required to be maintained between uses, the distance shall be measured by a straight line between nearest lot property lines. (LDR 1998, § 603) Sec. 90-445. Minimum street frontage. Sec. 90-441. Application of article provisions. Single-family residential lots shall have at least The supplementary regulations of this article 40 feet frontage on a street, unless otherwise shall apply to permitted and special exception approved under the planned unit development uses in all zoning districts, unless otherwise noted. district regulations. (LDR 1998, § 600) (LDR 1998, § 604) (CD90:30 ,t ZONING Sec. 90-446. Required area or yards: No space necessary under the regulations of this article to satisfy area, yard or other space requirements to relation to a building or use shall be counted as part of the required open space in relation to another lot or building. (LDR 1998, § 605) Sec. 90-447. Yards on corner lots. Any yard adjoining a street shall be considered a front yard. One front is required to comply with the minimum depth requirements of the regula- tions of this article, the second front yard shall be not less than 75 percent of the required minimum depth_ (LDR 1998, § 606) Sec. 90-448. Obstructions in required yard. A required yard shall be open from -round to sky unobstructed, except for the following: (11 Ground structures, not exceeding two feet hi-h above the adjacent grade level. (2) Building overhang, eaves, cornice, gutter, sill, screen, chimney, fire escape, not ex- ceeding two feet projecting into the re- quired yard- (3) Play equipment, mailbox, lighting fixture, entry gate, boundary wall and fence. (4) Landscape features including fountain, steps, seating, and horticultural growth. (LDR 1998, § 607) Sec. 90-449. Yards required for accessory uses in residential districts. Residential accessory uses shall comply with the following minimum yard requirements: (1) Front, side and rear yards: as required for principal structure. (2) Uses housing persons, such as a guesthouse, shall not encroach into any required yard. (LDR 1998, § 608) 90-453 Sec. 90-450. More than one principal build- ing on a lot. More than one principal structure may be erected on a lot, provided that surveyed legal descriptions shall be used, and area, yard and all other zoning regulations shall be met for each structure as though they were on separate lots. Except for detached single-family housing, all other development is subject to site plan ap- proval. (LDR 1998, § 609) Sec. 90-451. Building setbacks from water bodies. Notwithstanding any other provision of the regulations of this article, lots with yards abut- ting any required water retention lake, any re- quired drainage canal, or other water body over 50 feet wide, shall maintain an unobstructed easement 20 feet wide; except that in residential zoniuP districts, the rear setback may be reduced to 7rro to :tccon1tnodate a boathouse oe �imihi- structure th.tt i� adjacent to or extends beyond the rear property line. (LDR 1998, § 610) Sec. 90-452. Swimming pool. (a) As an accessory use to a residential use_ Pools shall be surrounded by a wall, fence or other barrier safety enclosure at least five feet high. Doors and gates in the exterior enclosure shall have a self-locking fastener installed at least five feet above the ground level. (b) As a principal commercial or recreation use. Pools shall comply with applicable district requirements. Pools shall be surrounded by a wall, fence or other barrier safety enclosure at least six feet high, constructed to prevent normal unauthorized access to the pool. (LDR 1998, § 611) Sec. 90-453. Exclusions from height limits. In any nonresidential district, the height limi- tations do not apply to spires, belfries, cupolas, water tanks, ventilators, chimneys or other ap- Stipp. No. 1 �CD90_:_3 § 90-603 OKEECHOBEE CODE use of the tower. Upon such abandonment, the (3) The communication antenna complies with owner/operator of the tower shall have an addi- all applicable FCC and FAA regulations; tional 180 days within which to: and (1) Reactivate the use of the tower or transfer the tower to another owner/operator who makes actual use of the tower; or (2) Dismantle and remove the tower. The owner of the real property shall be ulti- mately responsible for all costs of disman- tling and removal, and if the tower is not removed within 180 days of abandon- ment, the city may proceed to do so and assess the costs against the real property. The lien of such assessment shall bear interest, have priority and be collectable at the same rate and in like manner as provided for special assessments by state law. At the earlier of 181 days from the date of abandonment without reactiva- tion or upon completion of dismantling and removal, any special exception, waiver and/or variance approval for the tower shall automatically expire. (q) Futished color. Communication towers not requiring FAA painting/marking shall be painted a noncontrasting flat blue, gray, or black finish. The color should be selected so as to minimise the equipment's visibility. (r) Certification of compliance with FCC. Cer- tification of compliance with current Federal Com- munication Commission (FCC) nonionizing elec- tromagnetic radiation (NIER) shall be submitted prior to receiving final inspection by the building department. (LDR 1998, § 583) Sec. 90-604. Communication antennas. Communication antennas shall meet the fol- lowing requirements: (4) The communication antenna complies with all applicable building codes and other provisions listed in section 90-603 to the extent applicable. (LDR 1998, § 584) Secs. 90-605-90-630. Reserved. DIVISION 7. ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES Sec. 90-631. Generally. Accessory uses and structures shall be subject to the regulations of this division. (LDR 1998, § 650) Sec. 90-632. Applicable regulations for all. (a) Where the technical review committee de- termines that a proposed accessory use or struc- ture may have an adverse impact. on the health. safety or welfare of the public, due to the at- tributes of the property or the structure, the board of adjustment shall have the authority to deny the permit. (b) There shall be a principal use on the parcel built in compliance with the regulations of this division. (c) Accessory structures shall comply with the yard setback and height regulations pertaining to the principal use. (d) Vehicles, recreation vehicles, mobile homes and boats shall not be used as an accessory structure. (LDR 1998, § 651) Sec. 90-633. Home occupation. (1) The communication antenna must locate A home occupation may be permitted adminis- on towers or buildings which are at least tratively in a dwelling, subject to the following: 35 feet in height; (1) Only the resident who is licensed to do so (2) The communication antenna shall not ex- shall be engaged in the home occupation. ceed 20 feet above the highest point of the (2) A home occupation shall be clearly inci- communication tower; dental to the residential use, and shall CD90:48 ZONING not occupy more than 20 percent of the total building floor area, nor more than 300 square feet. (3) There shall be no ternation the resi- dential character, or visa a evidence of the conduct of such occupation. (4) No equipment or process shall be used in the occupation which creates interference to neighboring property due to noise, vi- bration, glare, fumes, odors or electrical disturbance. (5) Outdoor storage of materials used in the occupation is prohibited, except for gar- den produce. (6) No goods or services shall be sold on the property. (7) Individual instruction in art, music or education may be given to one person at a time. (8) The following shall not be permitted as home occupations: a beauty shop or bar- bershop; group band, dance or swimming instruction, a dining facility or tea room; antique shop or giftshop; fortunetelling or similar activity; photographic studio; out- door repair; retail sales; and a nursery school. (LDR 1998, § 652; Ord. No. 781, § 5, 10-2-2001) Cross reference —Businesses, ch. 14. Sec. 90-634. Accessory apartment, pool house, and servant's quarters. An accessory apartment, pool house or servant's quarters may be permitted by special exception use petition in a single-family dwelling, subject to the following regulations: (1) No variance to the regulations of this division shall be permitted to accommo- date such accessory use. (2) Only one such accessory use shall be permitted on a residential lot. (3) An accessory apartment or servants quar- ters shall be attached to, or located within, the principal structure, and shall not al- ter the appearance as a single-family dwell- ing. § 90-637 (4) Such accessory use shall not exceed 25 percent of the total floor area of the prin- cipal structure. (5) Such accessory use shall not be used as a rental unit. (LDR 1998, § 653) Sec. 90-635. Amenities. Any development shall be permitted to provide amenities for the use of their employees or resi- dents subject to the following: (1) Amenities include an accessory dining room, snack bar, community or recreation center, and a fitness center. (2) Such facilities shall not be open to the general public. (LDR 1998, § 654) Sec. 90-636. Antenna. An accessory antenna shall be permitted, sub- ject to the following: (I) Dish antennas larger than two feet in diameter shall require a special exception use petition. (2) A drawing prepared by the manufacturer, an architect or engineer shall be submit- ted showing the antenna, the foundation or method of attachment to the building. (3) Antennas attached to multiple -family structures exceeding two stories, commer- cial or industrial buildings shall require a certificate of structural integrity that they are designed to withstand a wind load of 120 miles per hour, issued by an architect or engineer. (4) Antennas shall not be installed in the front yard, and shall not be closer than five feet to a property line. (LDR 1998, § 655) Sec. 90-637. Antenna for single-family and duplex buildings. The following additional regulations shall ap- ply to single-family and duplex dwellings: (1) Antennas shall not be used for a commer- cial purpose, and shall be limited to two per residential lot. CD90:49 § 90-637 OKEECHOBEE CODE (2) Antennas requiring a permit shall not be installed on a roof, and shall have a max- imum dimension of 12 feet. Larger anten- nas may be permitted only by special exception use petition. (3) Ground -mounted antennas shall have a maximum height of 35 feet. Larger anten- nas may be permitted only by special exception use petition. (LDR 1998, § 656) Sec. 90-638. Storage, garage, carport, green- house, gazebo and utility struc- ture. Storage, private garage, carport, greenhouse, gazebo and utility structures shall be permitted, subject to the following: (1) Except a gazebo, such buildings shall not be permitted in the front yard, and shall not encroach into any required yard set- back- (2) No accessory building used for industrial or commercial storage of hazardous, in- cendiary or noxious materials shall be Y located closer to a street line than 15 feet, a side or rear yard than 20 feet, and a residential district than 25 feet. (3) Such buildings shall be included in calcu- lations of impervious surface, floor area, and other site design requirements of the principal use. (4) Detached accessory buildings shall not exceed 100 percent of the floor area of the principal structure. (LDR 1998, § 657) Sec. 90-639. Walls and fences. (a) Walls and fences may be located in front, side and rear yard setback areas, and shall not exceed a height of five feet in front of the front building line, nor a height of two feet, six inches in a visibility triangle, nor a height of eight feet elsewhere. (b) Walls and fences shall be constructed with the finished side facing the adjacent property. (c) Barbed wire and similar fences shall be prohibited on residential lots. (LDR 1998, § 658) Sec. 90-640. Boat docks and piers. (a) Boat docks and piers may be permitted in buffer areas. (b) Occupied live -aboard boats are not permit- ted to be docked in a residential district more than 15 days in a calendar year. (LDR 1998, § 659) Sec. 90-641. Seawall and riprap. (a) Seawalls and riprap may be permitted in buffer areas. (b) Riprap may be used to stabilize shorelines in lieu of seawalls. (c) Native vegetation shall be used to stabilize shorelines in lieu of seawalls and riprap where possible. (LDR 19987 § 660) Sec. 90-642. Tennis, basketball, racquetball, and similar court facilities. (a) Court facilities shall not be permitted in a front yard, nor encroach into a yard setback. (b) Court facility enclosures and backstops shall not exceed 14 feet in height. (c) Lighting shall be directed away from adja- cent property and shall not be used between 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. (LDR 1998, § 661) Sec. 90-643. Flagpole. (a) Flagpoles shall be permitted in all zoning districts, and shall be at least five feet from any property line in residential districts and five feet from any property line in other districts. (b) Flagpoles shall require a certificate of struc- tural integrity that they are designed to with- stand a wind load of 120 miles per hour, issued by the manufacturer, an architect or engineer. CD90.50 f I D i'i I 1 1 C: i: 3L2 W.E I tTH STF E E T, x X.LIATH 7tFEF=7 id 18 a -3 m 21 m 22 21 m m I.E. 11 T14 mTP EET 22 21 m 20 E IOTH lzrg.EF-7 ID 9 3 . . i� E 9 TH —,r P. w. r - , a 19 m 21 ZZ 22 21 M M ING ".ILMAD_ A0, It LV L, 2 3 m 2- 21 2 a 15 The Okeechobee News P.O. Box 639, Okeechobee, Florida 34973 (863) 763-3134 Published Daily STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Judy Kasten, who on oath says she is Publisher of the Okeechobee News, a DAILY Newspaper published at Okeechobee, in Okeechobee County, Florida; that the attached copy of adver115@ment, being a -- n ;, in,the matter of in the 19th Judicial District of the Circuit Court of Okeechobee County, Florida, was published in said newspaper in the issues of Affiant further says that the said Okeechobee News is a newspaper published at Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been published continuously in said Okeechobee County, Florida each week and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for.0blication in the said newspaper. Sworn to d ubscd before me this CONSIACPttYIORRDOF INANCE TING PLE�+SE TAKFF �JOTICE tthhat �h City uncil of the G o UKee nouee, nui ��a all on uesdayy, a ruary 20, ZOOe/ at 6� p.m. or as soUn herea er possible, at 'all Hall, sd 8E 3rd Ave., Okeechobee, FL conduct a PUBLIC HEARING on and ity Hall,after 5 consider foal reading of the fallowing Ordinance into law. NO AN ZONING MAP OF ON EICHOBEE BYTY OF EREZON NG A CERTFLOW A NIt MTRACT OF NOENDING THEOFF ;ARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, FROM RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE FAMILY RMF) ZONING DISTRICT TO COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (CPR); AMENDING THE ZONING MAP ACCORDINGLY: PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The Ordinance is regarding Rezoning Petition No. 07 002-R, submitted by oiopel- ly owners Ms Glenda Bellamy and Ms. Renee Ellerbee the petition is to change the zoning designation from Residential Multiple Family (nNIF) to Commercial oro- tessmnal Office (CPO) for property located at 203 Southwest 4t tat Book h Street Legal a - eruption being. Lots and 2 of Block 185. City o Public Records Okeechobee County, Florida. and is approximately 0.54 acres. All members Dt ��e Uublic ar en mra8e� to jttend.agd gficip% in s�i hear6r�P The proposed 8rdinaRce may %e mspec e m i s entireT�Y y mein ers o e pu c in the Office Of the City Clerk during regular business hours, Man -Po, Sam-4.30pm, except for holidays. PLEASE T%E yO; fiANp BE PgV( ED that ij fny RersortIdesires t8 aR8eatl j� decision ma e b t e ity Council wi respec o a y ma er consi er a t�i hearing, such interested person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such de, which Peco�rdsincludesethettestimony o ensure aand evidence upoverbatim (board n whicthe hrthe appeal is tos is bebased City Clerk tapes are for the We purpose of backup far Official records of the Clerk. II cordance wit tt�p Am scans ith Disabilp�v Act ffADpp and Florid $[a�utes persons w sabil es nee mg speclal'accorttmod�bon to par icipa e m this proceeding should contact Lane Gamiotea no later than two voice working days prior to the proceeding at 863-763-3372 x215; if hearing or voice impaired, call ITDD 1-800-222-3448 (voice) or 1-888-447-5620 (TTY). I — Gamioea. CMC, CITY CLERK .......... 0.................. CONSTANCE L. HAWSE �r141Utry wail • � ' Expires EiNHZMO a �?'crrc��;.+� Rprida Notary Apo.. Mc ...........................«..........i otary P� , State of Florida at Large EXHIBIT NO. FEB 6 - In READ ,EXHIBIT NO. �_ FEB 20 - FINAL ORDINANCE NO. 975 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA; AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF OKEECHOBEE BY REZONING A CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, FROM RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE FAMILY (RMF) ZONING DISTRICT TO HEAVY COMMERCIAL (CPO); AMENDING THE ZONING MAP ACCORDINGLY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Okeechobee, Florida has adopted Ordinance Number: 402 in which a revised Official Zoning Map was adopted for said City; and WHEREAS, Ms. Glenda Bellamy and Ms. Renee Ellerbee, property owner(s), of the property more particularly described hereafter, has heretofore filed Petition No. 07- 002-R, pursuant to the Land Development Regulations of the City of Okeechobee for the purpose of rezoning a certain tract of land consisting of 0.54 acre(s) from Residential Multiple Family (RMF) Zoning District to Commercial Professional Office (CPO) and that this request be removed from the boundaries of the above mentioned zone to allow for the processing of the rezoning petition; and WHEREAS, said petition(s) being reviewed by the City's Planning Board at a duly advertised meeting held on January 18, 2007, and submitted by staff report, which determined such petition(s) to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is appropriate with the zoning uses within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has agreed with the recommendation of the Planning Board and hereby finds such rezoning consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and deems it in the best interest of the inhabitants of said City to amend aforesaid revised Zoning Map as hereinafter set forth; NOW THEREFORE, be it ordained before the City Council of the City of Okeechobee, Florida; presented at a duly advertised public meeting; and passed by majority vote of the City Council; and properly executed by the Mayor or designee, as Chief Presiding Officer for the City; that: SECTION 1. LEGAL DESCRIPTION. The following described land, located in the City of Okeechobee, to -wit: LOT 1, BLOCK 185, TOWN OF OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 17 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA (FORMERLY ST. LUCIE COUNTY); TOGETHER WITH THAT PART OF ABANDONED NORTH CURVE STREET AND FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 7, BLOCK 185, TOWN OF OKECHOBEE, RUN EAST ALONG SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF LOT 7, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 7 FOR POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE EAST ON EXTENDED LINE TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST BOUNDARY LINE OF KISSIMMEE STREET; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID Page 1 of 2 WEST LINE OF KISSIMMEE STREET TO INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF NORTH CURVE STREET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID NORTH CURVE STREET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; LESS THE FOLLOWING: FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 6 BLOCK 185, TOWN OF OKEECHOBEE, RUN THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 6, A DISTANCE OF 150 FEET FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN SOUTH ON A LINE PARALLEL TO WESTERN BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 6 A DISTANCE OF 100 FEET; THENCE RUN EAST ON A LINE PARALLEL TO THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 6 TO THE WEST BOUNDARY OF KISSIMMEE STREET; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF KISSIMMEE STREET A DISTANCE OF 100 FEET; THENCE RUN WEST TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND LOT 2, BLOCK 185, AND THE NORTH ONE-HALF (N 1/2) OF ABANDONED ALLEYWAY LYING ADJACENT TO SAID LOT 2, CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. SECTION 2. ZONING MAP AMENDMENT. That the aforesaid Revised Zoning Map of the City of Okeechobee be amended to reflect the subject property zoning classification to be changed from Residential Multiple Family (RMF) to Commercial Professional Office (CPO) Zoning District. SECTION 3. CONFLICT. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY. If any provision or portion of this ordinance is declared by any court of competent jurisdiction to be void, unconstitutional, or unenforceable, then all remaining provisions and portions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its passage. INTRODUCED for first reading and set for final public hearing on this 6th day of February, 2007. ATTEST: Lane Gamiotea, CMC, City Clerk James E. Kirk, Mayor PASSED AND ADOPTED after Second and Final Public Hearing this 20t' day of February, 2007. ATTEST: Lane Gamiotea, CMC, City Clerk REVIEWED FOR LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: John R. Cook, City Attorney James E. Kirk, Mayor Page 2 of 2 City of Okeechobee Date: ig i Iq lob Petition No. General Services Department 55 S.E. 3d Avenue, Room 101 Okeechobee, Florida 34974-2903 Phone: (863) 763-3372, ext. 218 Fee Paid:d - Jurisdiction: 3 1st Hearing: i �C�� f�rf g �- 2nd Hearing: a?h ,ja� Publication Dates: ; 1 Notices Mailed: Fax: (863) 763-1686 Uniform Land Use Application Rezone • Special Exception • Variance ✓ Name of property owner(s): Glenda Bellamy and Renee Ellerbee A Owner mailing address: 2106 S. Parrott Avenue, Okeechobee, FL 34974 P P Name of applicant(s) if other than owner (state relationship): L I Applicant mailing address: C A Name of contact person (state relationship). Renee Ellerbee, owner N LIJ, Contact person daytime phone(s): 863-357-0255 Fax: 863-357-3955 ✓ Property address / directions to property: �;treet, UKeecEo5ee, See Attached Exh i b it "A" Indicate current use of property: Single Family e tribe imarovdenifnts on p�opmerty, including number/tie of dwellin s and whether occupied (if no e so c 1 �tory oo rame o e with co�rered Cdrport, roperty occuTied till IV%)31/06 Approximate number of acres: • 54 acres Is property in a platted subdivision? YeS O P I l� ihc-re a current or !!;e of 01, nma(-rty that i; ",ir a v olatlot) ofeokIrI inanc:�" It ;n_ rle�.�rIhw Have there been any land use applications concerning all or part of this property in the last year? Itso, indicate date, nature and applicant's name- No E R Is a sale subject to this application being granted? No T Is the subject parcel your total holdings at that location? If not, describe the remaining or intended uses: Describe adjoining land uses / improvements to the North: Commercial, ' Single Family, RMF / South: Mixed East: Commerical West: Mixed Existing zoning: RMF Future Land Use classification: Single Family Actions Requested: 0_) Rezone ( ) Special Exception L_J Variance Parcel Identification Number•3-15-37-35-0010-01850-0010 & 3-15-37--35-0010-0185-0020 ✓ I Confirmation of Information Accuracy I hereby certify that the information in this a�ation is correct. The information included in this application is for use by the City of Oke ee rotes ques alse or misleading information may be punishable by a fine of up to $500. ��,%rn is e A da d may result in the summary denial of this application. Renee Ellerbee Printed Name Dec. 19, 2006 _ Date Uniform Land Use Application (rev. 1iO3) Page 1 of 2 zoning classification: RMF Requested zoning classification: Heavy Commerical FCurrent R What is your desired permitted use under the proposed classification: E Professional Office Z O N If granted, will the new zone be contiguous with a like zone? E Yes Is a Special Exception necessary for your intended use? NO Variance? NO Describe the Special Exception sought S P E C Provide specific LDR ordinance citation: I A L Are there other similar uses in the area? Is so, describe: E X C E Why would granting your request be in the best interest of the area and residents? P T O �� If f)USl SS_ hneil�descnbr r;,t;nre ins ludin<z numher of und Describe Variance sought: V A R Describe physical characteristic of property that makes variance necessary: I A N C Did you cause or contribute to the characteristic? Is so, describe: E What is the minimum variance necessary? Uniform Land Use Application (rev 1/03) Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT "A" Lot 1, Block 185, TOWN OF OKEECHOBEE, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 17, of the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida (formerly St. Lucie County); together with that part of abandoned North Curve Street and Florida East Coast Railroad right of way described as follows: From the Southwest corner of Lot 7, Block 185, TOWN OF OKEECHOBEE, run East along South boundary line of Lot 7, to the Southeast corner of said Lot 7 for POINT OF BEGINNING; thence east on extended line to the intersection with the West boundary line of Kissimmee Street; thence North along said West line of Kissimmee Street to intersection with the North line of North Curve Street; thence Southwesterly along the North boundary line of said North Curve Street to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Less the following: From the Northwest corner of Lot 6, Block 185, Town of Okeechobee, run thence East along the North line of said Lot 6, a distance of 150 feet for the Point of Beginning; thence run South on aline Parallel to Western boundary of said Lot 6 a distance of 100 feet; thence run East on a line parallel to the Northern Boundary of said Lot 6 to the West boundary of Kissimmee Street; thence North along said West line of Kissimmee Street a distance of 100 feet; thence run West to the POINT OF BEGINNING; AND Lot ?, Block 1 85. and the North One-half (N1l2) of abandoned Alleyway lying adjacent to said I of _ CI I l" OI- ()ICFFCI10RIT. according- to the Plat thereofrecorded in II!,it li()uk Pa of the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Vkmda_ Closers' Choice EXHIBIT `B" Directions From intersection of highway 70 and 441, head South on 441 to SW 4th Street (road just past U-Save and just before Norton Dry Cleaners) make a right (West) on SW 4th Street go down 1 block, property is on SW corner of SW 4th Street and SW 2nd Avenue. STATEMENT OUTLINING REQUEST RE: 203 SW 4°i Street, Okeechobee, FL 34974 `fo Whom It May Concern: We, wish to have the future land Use designation changed from Single Family to Heavy Commercial in order to open a Professional Office. At the present time the property is zoned as RMF with the future land use as Single Family. At the same time that we are making application for the future land Use change we are also making application for the rezoning of the subject property. Prepared by; Record and Retain to: FILE NUM 2006020777 Wendy Bostwick D12 BK 00618 PG 1981 Big Lake Title Company, Inc SHARON ROBERTSOH. CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT 2106 South Parrott Avenue OKEECHOBEE COUNTY. FL Okeechobee, Florida 34974 RECORDED 12/19l2006 11:25:09 AN File Number: 3150 RECORDING FEES 10.00 DEED DOC 1,225.00 Warren Deed RECORDED BY R Parrish P9 1991; (ips) Made this December 19, 2006 A.D. , By Christine E. Campbell, an unmarried person, whose address is: 203 SW 4th Street, Okeechobee, FL 34974, hereinafter called the grantor, to Glenda Bellamy and Renee Ellerbee, as joint tenants with full rights of survivorship, whose address is: 203 SW 4th Street, Okeechobee, FL 34974, hereinafter called the grantee: (Whenever used herein the term'grmtor' and "granted" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives aad assigns of individuals, and the successots and assigns ofcmporatians) Witnesseth, that the grantor, for and inconsideration of the sum of Ten Dollars, ($10.00) and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the grantee, all that certain land situate in Okeechobee County, Florida, viz_ Lot 1, B lock 185, TOWN OF OKEECHOBEE, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 17, of the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida (formerly St_ Lucie County); together with that part of abandoned North Curve Street and Florida East Coast Railroad right of way described as follows: From the Southwest comer of Lot 7, Block 185, TOWN OF OKEECHOBEE, run East along South boundary line ofLot 7, to the Southeast comer of said Lot 7 for POINT OF BEGINNING; thence east on extended line to the intersection with the West boundary line of Kissimmee Street thence North along said West line of Kissimmee Street to intersection with the North line of -North Curve Street; thence Southwesterly along the North boundary line of said North Curve Street to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Less the following: From the Northwest comer of Lot 6, Block 185, Town of Okeechobee, rum thence East along the North line of said Lot 6, a distance of 150 feet for the Point of Beginning; thence run South on a line Parallel to Western boundary of said Lot 6 a distance of 100 feet; thence run East on a line parallel to the Northern Boundary of said Lot 6 to the West boundary of Kissimmee Street; thence North along said West line of Kissimmee Street a distance of 100 feet; thence run West to the POINT OF BEGINNING; AND !..w 2, (clock 185, and the North One -Half (NI/?) of ahandoncd Alleyway lying adjacent to >aid Lor 2, C11Y ()I- tk i f-C-I f, Ilil-1 accorrltn" to rhtc flat rh -r o; recordtd ei P,nt Book 5. Page �, of [he Public Records of Mcc, heoc»nt,{ 3-IS-37-3S-0010-01850-0010 and 3-15-37-35-0010-01830-0020 Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. 'l'o Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and [awful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fiilly warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the [awful claims of all persons whomsoever, and that said land is free of all encumbrances except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2006. In Witness Whereof, the said grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, spaled and del' red in ur prey ce: Christine E. Campbell Witness Printrd Na Address: 203 SW 4th Street, Okeechobee, FL 34974 Wimcss Pr i. amc (_ -J-- State of Florida County of Okeechobee The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 19th day who is/are personally known to me or who has produced Fz__ DEED Individual Warranty Deed - Legal on Face Closers' Choice 2006, by Christine E. Campbell, an unmarried person, as identification - My Commission (SEAL) Commission # DD601433 Expires October 14, 2010 iandrdTM FW YIWnC�FC aadJB.4)a+a Book6181Page1981 CFN#2006020777 Paae 1 of 1 1375 Jackson Street, Suite 206 Fort Myers, Florida 33901-2845 Phone: 2 39-334-3366 Fax: 239-334-6384 I ;mail: larue-PlanningC&att. net Staff Report Rezoning Request Prepared fog: The City of Okeechobee Applicant: Glenda Bellamy & Renee Ellerbee — Big Lake Title From: RHF To: CHV Petition No. 07-002 R Staff Report Applicant: Glenda Bellamy and Renee Ellerbee Rezoning Request Petition No. 07-002-R General Infonnabon Applicant and Owner: Glenda Bellamy and Renee Ellerbee Applicant Address: 2106 S. Parrott Avenue Okeechobee, FL 34974 Applicant Phone Number: 863-357-0255 Applicant Fax Number: 863-357-3955 Existing Proposed Future Land Use Map Single -Family Commercial Classification Zoning District RMF CHV Use of Property Single Family Residence Professional Office Acreage 0.54 acres Same Location: 203 SW 4"' Street, Okeechobee, FL 34974 Legal Description: Lot 1. Block 185_ "1O'\VN OF OK1a Vl1013FE_ accordin<L) to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Bool< 1 Pauc 17, of' the Public Rccords of Okcechohce County. Florida (lormerly St. Lucie County), together with that part of abandoned North Curxc Street and l lorida East coast Railroad right of way described as follows: From the Southwest corner of Lot 7, Block 185, TOWN OF OKEFCHOBEE, run East along South boundary line of Lot 7, to the Southeast corner of said Lot 7 for POINT OF BEGINNING; thence east on extended line to the intersection with the West boundary line of Kissimmee Street; thence North along said West line of Kissimmee Street to intersection with the North line of North Curve Street; thence Southwesterly along the North boundary line of said North Curve Street to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Less the following: From the Northwest corner of Lot 6, Block 185, Town of Okeechobee, run thence East along the North line of said Lot 6, a distance of 150 feet for the Point of Beginning; thence run South on a line Parallel to Western boundary of said Lot 6 a distance of 100 feet; thence run East on a line parallel to the Northern Boundary of said Lot 6 to the West boundary of Kissimmee Street; thence North along said West line of Kissimmee Street a distance of 100 feet; thence run West to the POINT OF BEGINNING; AND Lot 2, Block 185, and the North One -Half (N1/2) of abandoned Alleyway lying adjacent to said Lot 2, CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 5, of the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida. Request: The applicant is requesting that the zoning for the subject property be changed from RMF to CHV to allow the property to be used as a professional office. Staff Report Rezoning Request Applicant: Glenda Bellamy and Renee Ellerbee Petition No. 07-002-R North: Future Land Use Map Classification: Commercial Zoning District: Existing Land Use: CHV Single Family East: Future Land Use Map Classification: Commercial Zoning District: R_MF Existing Land Use: BMJ Towing South: Future Land Use Map Classification: Single Family Zoning District: RMF Existing Land Use: Single Family West: Future Land Use Map Classification: Single Family Zoning District: RMF Existing Land Use: Single Family The subject property contains a residential structure. Additionally, the applicant is requesting to amend the Future Land Use Map from Single -Family to Commercial to allow the proposed office on the property. The surrounding block of the subject parcel is a single-family neighborhood and a commercial office would be out of place. There is adequate commercial nearby and it is not necessary to further encroach into this residential area. Analysis 1. The proposed use is not contrary to Comprehensive Plan requirements. After examining the Future Land Use Element, the subject property would seem more consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies by remaining in the Single - Family Future Land Use category. The intent of the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map is to manage future growth. In implementing the Plan, the City has to ensure that its land development regulations protect the use and value of private property from adverse impacts of incompatible land uses, activities and hazards. (See Policy 2.2) 2 Staff Report Applicant: Glenda Bellamy and Renee Ellerbee Rezoning Request Petition No. 07-002-R In addition, Objective 12 states that the City of Okeechobee shall encourage compatibility with adjacent uses, and curtailment of uses inconsistent with the character and land uses of surrounding areas, and shall discourage urban sprawl. The subject property is within the Single -Family Future Land Use category and the RMF Zoning District and is already developed with a single-family residence. The surrounding properties are also consistent and allowing this use would be contrary to the Comprehensive Plan policies. 2. The proposed use being applied for is specifically authorized under the zoning district in the Land Development Regulations. Section 90-282(l) permits professional office, business office, and medical offices in the CHV Zoning District. 3. The proposed use will not have an adverse effect on the public interest. It has not been demonstrated that the proposed use would avoid an adverse effect on the public interest especially increased traffic generation in a residential neighborhood. 4. The use is appropriate for the location proposal, is reasonahlti compatihle ivith adjacent land uses, and is not contrary or detrimental to zrrbanizing land use patterns. The use is not appropriate for this location. Furthermore, any future commercial use in this area could have a detrimental impact on the neighboring residential homes by allowing commercial traffic generation and other impacts related to operating a commercial venture. Such impacts may be incompatible with and difficult to buffer from adjacent uses. 5. The proposed use will not adversely affect property values or living conditions, or be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property. Permitted uses such as those allowed in the CHV Zoning district could affect or have the appearance of affecting property values in the residential neighborhood. 6. The proposed use can be suitably buffered from surrounding uses, so as to reduce the impact of any nuisance or hazard to the neighborhood If granted, the use may be required to be buffered from the residential neighborhood. Staff Report Applicant: Glenda Bellamy and Renee Ellerbee Rezoning Request Petition No. 07-002-R 7. The proposed use will not create a density pattern that would overburden public facilities such as schools, streets, and utility services. The proposed use and CHV Zoning will not overburden public facilities such as schools and utilities services. Traffic, however, would be increased. 8. The proposed use will not create traffic congestion, flooding or drainage problems, or otherwise affect public safety. The subject property will increase traffic as a result of future commercial use. If approved, a site plan will be required to show drainage on the site. 9. The proposed use has not been inordinately burdened by unnecessary restrictions. No, the proposed use has not been inordinately burdened by unnecessary restrictions. 10. The proposed change will not constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed change could he interpreted as a special favor to an ind1% ideal owner. Summary and Conclusions Prior to Cerfification The proposed zoning and use appears to be inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The change from the Single Family to Commercial would create an incompatible use with the surrounding neighborhood. As stated earlier, the existing Future Land Use category, the existing Zoning and the existing use are all more compatible with the immediate surrounding area. The City must encourage compatibility with adjacent uses, and curtailment of uses that are inconsistent with the character and land uses of surrounding areas as well as discourage urban sprawl. Recommendation Staff recommends denial of the request to allow rezoning from RMF to CHV permitting the applicant to convert a single family residence to a professional office. Submitted by: James G. LaRue, AICP Planning Consultant January 7, 2007 M V. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED. 2007- Board - Page 10 of 14 D. Consider Rezoning Petition No. 07-002-R. Glenda Bellamy and Renee Ellerbee are the property owners. The application is to change the zoning designation, from Residential Multiple Family (RMF) to Heavy Commercial (CHV) for property located at 203 Southwest 41 Street - Planning Consultant. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING - Chairperson. Consider Rezoning Petition No. 07-002-R, submitted by property owners, Glenda Bellamy and R enec. EI lerbee , The request is to change the zoning designation from Residential Multiple Family (RMF) to Heavy Commercial (CHV) for property located at 203 Southwest 4`s Street. Legal description: Lots 1 and 2 of Block 185 City of Okeechobee Subdivision. 11 r, B risson presented the Planning Staff Report that recommended denial for Petition No. 07-002- R. However since the Board recommended the companion Application No. 07-002-SSA land use change a zoning change would be appropriate. However, Heavy Commercial is not an appropriate t,ansition. A lighter zoning would be better, such as Light Commercial or Commercial Professional Office. Chairperson Ledferd asked the applicant, whether Commercial Professional Office zoning would nc agreeable with her? Mrs. Ellerbee replied yes. Chairperson Ledferd inquired whether there were any comments from the public. There were 'une. Beard Member Burroughs moved to recommend approval of Rezoning Petition No. 07-002-R i rr m Residential Multiple Family to Commercial Professional Office to the City Council; seconded by Board member McCoy. VOTE LEDFERD - YEA HOOVER -NAY KELLER-YEA BURROUGHS-YEA MAXWELL-YEA MCCOY-YEA ,JOHNS - YEA MOTION CARRIED. Petition will be forwarded in ordinance form for a final Public Hearing on February 20, 2007 before City Council. CHAIRPERSON LEDFERD CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 8:03 P.M. LIV�L,--tS LI lI-iJ CPF CONCRETE SIDEWALK 49.98'(C) 50'(P) SET MAG NAIL k DISK 'KAB LS 4820" - - - N.E. CORNER OF - BLOCK 185 SET MAG NAIL & EDGE OF ASPHALT -DISK "KAB LS 4820� �- GRASS 9'07" W S 89-59'07" W .99.96' 00 o ^ - U p CON REIE REPS o 20.5' o — 47.1' — `O `O 5LY. LINE OF 20' 2-0 LOT 1- BLOCK 185 LOT 1 3 I DHW—}- OHW— WPP II (ABANDONED) _ TELEPHONE BOX i-. O - - O- - OLD SEPTIC TANK SEPTIC TANK Y U � N O w N 6. - y 0 O - 35.0' - - L0_ 2 IL - _ Lo bi v .t CONCRETE N v N 29.6' - LLI ui LOT 4 LOT 3 C3o LOT 2 — — 45.9' — 3 in - O o / o t0 ZLd N - - 00 GRAVEL DRIVEWAY O (D _ Z WPP O Lr) U f rwImo£t Z L6 Y 0 ORi� o TOTAL PARCEL �� \�- 0 m UT CONTAINS ±O-54 ACRES I 0 CONCRETE N O r i r L- --- j ABANDONE.I) NORTH FOUND I- iPON STRFE 1 & FLORIDA LAST ' o I 15 30 PIPL (ND I D.) COAST RAILROAD PARCEL z 0.3' S & 0.3' E 0 J v � I..,..d,...l L-5 i N 89'59'49" E 99.99' SCALE IN FEET J MAP SCALE 1 INCH = 30 FEET N 89'59'49 E 107.55' K 15' ALLEY EY - L-1 y SET 5/8" IRON ROD & Z CAP "KAB LS 4820" - um WATER -- OHV- DHW DHW / OHw DHW Ok W allw N 89'59'49" E 119-71' METER — DHW DHW C_ EAST 150.00'0) N 89-59'49" E(C) } WEST(D) N 89"59'49" E 150.00'(C WPP -(ORB 153, PG 505). P.O.B. SET-5/8� IRON ROD & _ (ORB -153, PG 505) PLE CORNER Of 1 CAP "KAB LS 4820' � OT 6 N W CORNER - (LESS PARCEL) �L^� - LSET 5/8 BLOCK 0IRON1 ROD P)& a LOT 6. BLOCK 185 _ - - 1�- CAP -'KAB CS 4820" . LOT 6. -ELY. LINE OF LOT w 6.BLOCK 185(P) L-1: N 89'59'49" E 36.36'/ A o I 8(; L-2: 5 39'01'12" W 9.65. Z o a 0 3 L-3: N 39'01'12" E 12.00' o. i o oo _ L-4: N 00'00'11" W 9.33' g L-5: N 89'59'49" E 42.44' o Ld o 0 rn - � m E1Y.-UNE OF LOT. !h m m LOT 7 7 BLOCK 185(P.);o-O ^► _ _ _ _ Z - _ n W C /-- 3 m . -SI' �'r�. NOTE (HATCHED AREA) W. LINE OF NOTHINGMENTIONED IN DEED KISSIMMEE STREET - o ON .LESSING THIS AREA OUT. P.O.C. P.0_B. o (ORB 153.- PG 505) - - (ORB 153, PG-505) - - 0 0 _ SE CORNER-OF>7+F S.W.: CORNER OF - LOT 7. BLOCK 185 _ LOT 7. BLOCK:1B5 `89 9 39'� EAST(D) N 89-59'49- E 150.D4'(C) z EAST (D) N 89-59.49" E 99-30'(C) EAST (D) N 89-59'49" E 200.79'(C) o DESCRIP TION.- I LOT 2, BLOCK 185, AND THE NORTH ONE-HALF (N1/2) OF ABANDONED ALLEY LYING ADJACENT TO SAID LOT 2, CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLA T THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLA T BOOK 5, PAGE 5, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND (OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 153, PAGE'S 505 & 506) PAGE 17 "LOT 1, BLOCK 185, TOWN OF OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLA T THEREOF RECORDED IN PLA T BOOK 2, I OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLOR/DA, TOGE77 R W/TN 1NAT PART OF ABANDONED NORTH CURVE FROM SOUTHWEST CORNER OF STREET AND FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE. RUN EAST ALONG SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF LOT 7, TO THE SOUTHEAST LOT 7, BLOCK 185, TOWN OF. OKEECHOBEE, CORNER OF SAID LOT 7 FOR POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE EAST ON EXTENDED LINE TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST BOUNDARY LINE OF KISS/MMEE STREET, THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF KISSIMMEE STREET TO INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF NORTH CURVE STREET, THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG .THE NORTH BOUNDARY THE NORTHWEST CORNER LINE OF SAID NORTH CURVE STREET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, LESS THE FOLLOWING- FROM EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF 5. /D LOT 6 A DISTANCE OF LOT 6, BLOCK 185, TOWN OF OKEECHOBEE, RUN THENCE OF 150 FEET FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN SOUTH ON A LINE PARALLEL TO WESTERN BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 6 A DISTANCE OF 700 FEET, THENCE RUN EAST ON .A LINE PARALLEL TO THE NOR7HERN BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 6, TO THE WEST BOUNDARY OF KISS/MMEE STREET,• THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF KISSIMMEE STREET A DISTANCE OF 100 FEET; THENCE RUN WEST TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING_ PROJECT SPECIFIC LEGEND: - UTS = TELEPHONE PEDESTAL CPP = CONCRETE POWER POLE WPP = WOOD POWER POLE 1 PROJECT SPECIFIC NOTES• 1) UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE, ALL DIMENSIONS ARE CALCULA 7FD(C) AND MEASURED("). 2) SITE ADDRESS.- 203 S W 47H STREET. 3) PARCEL ID: 3-15-37-35-0010-01850-0010 & 0020. 4) F_ I_ R M ZONE ZONE UNDETERMINED, PARCEL LIES WI THIN 77-IE OKEECHOBEE CITY LIMITS 5) THIS SURREY IS NOT INTENDED TO DEPICT JURISDICTIONAL AREAS OR OTHER AREAS OF LOCAL CONCERN. I 6) THE SUR vEY DEPICTED HERE IS NOT COVERED By PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE. ADD117ONS OR DELE77ONS TO SURVEY MAPS OR REPORTS BY OTHER THAN THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES IS PROHIBITED WIJOUT WRlT7FN CONSENT FouNN ©o^T SPIKE (NO OAT OF 7HE SIGNING- PARTY OR PAR77ES. - ----- -- 7) DA 7E OF LAST FIELD SURVEY 1112%6. S.W. 6 fH STREET those ity (n STANDARD NOTES: No 'search of the public records for de termination of ownership or restrictions affecting the lands shown was performed by the surveyor. The survey depicted here is prepared exclusively above r round parties noted. No res oos i slhown. O C� Z or liability ,is assumed by the surveyor for use by others not specifically named. Not valid without the signature and em�Ossed seal of Florida licensed surveyor and mapper #4820. There are na 9 t i as made to locate underground improvements and/or encroachments (If any) as part of this .survey. llTls survey was prepared in accordance with minimum technical standards established by the Florida Board of Surveyors an D (Tl M No at emp w Mappers (Chapter 61G17-6, F.A.C.) pursuant to Section 472.027, Florida Statutes. z m -�. 0 - PREPARED :FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE -OF: TRADEWINDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC. RENEE ELiFRBY MRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CO. . I BIG LAKE TITLE COMPANY, INC. SURVEYORS :'_AND. -MAPPERS N - • GLENDA BELL.AMY O SEACOAST NATIONAL BANK 200 S. t . 3�r3 Avenue N 11 J .. ESCRIPTION REFERENCE.' ROVIOED.BY CUENT�OR CUENYS_RtPRESFNT - DWG. 'DATE BY CK Okeechb&&., FL 34974 `.(S 3j 763� Z$87 11/21/06 WC ' KAB Crl _ UNDARY .SURVEY . Tel_ 00 TESCRIPTION -... EARING :R¢ERENCE .. ECENTERLR�EOFS.W. 2ND AVENUE tS TAKE TO BEAR NORTH- 00'O7.'OB' WEST41, 202/FB PG: 19139-2 SCALE:.1" 30' Kenneth A:::BreaiiX, Jr. (PSM 482Oj certifi a of Authorization No. LB 6719. F7LE:: . 20527.. . JOB Nfl 20527 _ LEGEND Qo—Set Iron Rod and Cap TWPS 6719 ■—Found CM *—Found Iron Rod (and Cap)O —Found Pipe (and Cap) ABBREVIATIONS =Baseline; BM=Benchmark; CL=Centerline; C=Calculated;:CATV=Cable TV, CM= CE_ � oncrete Monument; CONC=Concrete; D=Deed; =Delta or Central Angle; E=East; E'LY=Easterly, E/P=Edge of Pavement; ESMT=Easement; FIR-M—Flood Insurance Rate Map; FND=Found; IP=iron Pipe; IR&(C)=Iron Rod (and ID Cap); L=(Arc) Length; M=Meosured; MH=Monhole:: N=North; N'LY=Northerly, NGV(D)=National Geodetic Vertical (Datum) of 1929, .NTS=Not to Scale; OHW=Overhead wires;. FE=Property: Line; P=Plat; PC=Point of Curvature; PCC=Point of Compound Curvature; PCP= Permanent Control Point; POB=Point of Beginning POC=Point of Commencement; PRC=Point of. Reverse Curvature; PRM=Permanent. Reference Monument; PT Point of Tangency,: PU&D=Public Utlitiy and Drainage; R=Radius R%W=Right-of-Way S=South;. S'LY=Southerly, T=Tangent TEL=Telephone Splice or Switch. Box; W=West; W LY=WesteHy, UTIL=Utility(ies); �'=Spot Elevation based on indicated Datum- The Okeechobee News P.O. Box 639, Okeechobee, Florida 34973 (863) 763-3134 Published Daily STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Judy Kasten, who on oath says she is Publisher of the Okeechobee News, a DAILY Newspaper published at I Okeechobee, in Okeechobee County, Florida; that the attached copy of adi er semer4, b einp a _ J) ;— PUBLIC NOTICE CONSIDERA r ite matter of � 5 _ V in the 19th Judicial District of the Circuit Court of Okeechobee County, Florida, was published in said newspaper in the issues of Affiant further says that the said Okeechobee News is a newspaper published at Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been published continuously in said Okeechobee County, Florida each week and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisementforpp lication in the said newspaper. Sworn to 46n¢rsubscribed before me this A.D. 20� btary Public, State of Florida at TION OF ADOPTING A CITY ORDINANCE LEASE TAK �JOTICE that the CM Council of the C'1% of Okeechobee, Fl In uesday, a 0 ay 20, 2g07 8t % p.m. or as soon IhereaRer possfbl Hall, 55 SE erd Ave., Okeechobee, FL conduct a PUBLIC HEARING on after to consider final reading of the following Ordinance Into law: N0, 8 INANCE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE. FLORIDA- AMFRnimr 1 90-343 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; CREATING PARAGR ELEVEN THEREIN PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USES IN INDUST] ZONING CATEGORIES FOR A REHABILITATION FACILITY, OR HALFWAY NO FOR SEXUAL OFFENDERS; PROVIDING FOR STANDARDS AND RESTRICTION; ESTABLISH SUCH FACILITIES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABIL PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. All member f �the ublic ar e0coum eAA to aaHHendd.aanndd rtic' a In dd hea The proposeds8rtlina%a mayebe oureletl m is erNrely Vy members ft' pi in the Office of the City Clerk during regular business tours, Mon -Fri, 8am-411 except for holidays. PLEASE TAd(E NO�ICECAN� BE APVtED [ha[i ry �ersordesires t a�el decision ma a by e ty ounce w respe a a y ma er con er hearing, such interested person will need a record of the proceedings, and for ; purpose may need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, w record Includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be be City Clerk tapes are for the sale purpose of backup �for official land c�of thedaClerlL 2BD6.��� persons w ff dlsab� esano g Ospc cal aCconim0od5bondtol p rt clp to this proceeding should contact Lane Gamiotea no later than two (2) working t prior to the proceeding at 863-763-3372 x215; I hearing or voice impaired, TDDD11-800-222-3448 (voice) or 1-888-447-5620 (TTY). 1 9 bf3Gaq ffl CMC, CITY CLERK ........................................: CONSTANCE L. HAWSE uu'np ;os cB�-, Comm# DD0563848 Expires 6/14/2010 Fbn da tdotary Assl b,. EXHIBIT NO. EXHIBIT NO. ORDINANCE NO. 976 FEB 6-I'r'REAV FEB 20-FINAL AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 90-343 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; CREATING PARAGRAPH ELEVEN THEREIN PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USES IN INDUSTRIAL ZONING CATEGORIES FOR A REHABILITATION FACILITY, OR HALF -WAY HOUSE FOR SEXUAL OFFENDERS; PROVIDING FOR STANDARDS AND RESTRICTIONS TO ESTABLISH SUCH FACILITIES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Okeechobee adopted Ordinance No. 967 which created certain standards and restrictions for sexual offenders residing within the City of Okeechobee, and WHEREAS, such ordinance provides for certain exceptions to residential restrictions for Rehabilitation Facilities or Half -Way Homes for Sexual Offenders under the Heavy Commercial or Industrial Zoning categories; and WHEREAS, the City of Okeechobee had no such exceptions in any zoning category in the City, and the creation of such exceptions requires amendment to special exception uses in the City Land Development Regulations; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City of Okeechobee to place restrictions on the placement, design, distance, number of occupants, and other pertinent standards for any such Rehabilitation Facility. NOW, THEREFORE, it is resolved before the City Council for the City of Okeechobee, Florida; presented at a duly advertised public meeting; and passed by majority vote of the City Council; and properly executed by the Mayor or designee, as Chief Presiding Officer for the City: SECTION 1. THAT Ordinance No. 967 previously adopted is amended to reflect the adoption of a Special Exception for Rehabilitation Facilities or Half -Way Homes for treatment of Sexual Offenders, to be included in the Land Development Regulations at Section 90-343(11), as follows: Section 90-343 Special Exception Uses. LL11 Rehabilitation or Half -Way Homes. LaA That as provided in Ordinance No. 967 and included in Section 38-43, Rehabilitation Facilities or Half -Way Homes for treatment and rehabilitation of Sexual Offenders shall be a Special Exception use in Industrial Zoning Categories subject to the following restrictions. LbJ That any such facility shall be subject to all State Laws pertinent to such facilities under the Laws of Florida. Lcl That such facility shall at no time house in excess of six (6) Sexual Offenders excluding employees and staff of the facility. Page 1 of 2 That such facility shall be licensed by the State of Florida and be staffed by professional- and licensed mental health care providers and provide an organized course of treatment and rehabilitation recognized. by the State of Florida do the standard of care recognized by the professions of psycholoqv or psychiattr. Lej That such facility shall not be located within 1000 feet of school public or private; a child care facility church public park adult entertainment facility or a Zoninq District of RSF-1 : RSF 2• RMF. That Sexual Offender is defined as any person convicted under the laws of the State of Florida or similar statutes of any other state count or province, for an offense recognized as a sexual offense regardless of degree of offense or whether adjudication of guilt was withheld by the court. SECTION 2. That this Ordinance shall become effective upon adoption. INTRODUCED for first reading and set for final public hearing this 6 th day of February, 2007. ATTEST: Lane Gamiotea, CMC, City Clerk James E. Kirk, Mayor PASSED and ADOPTED on second and final public hearing this 201h day of Feb_ ruary, 2007. ATTEST: Lane Gamiotea, CMC, City Clerk REVIEWED FOR LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: John R. Cook, City Attorney Language underlined is to be added. Language strieken is to be deleted. Page 2 of 2 James E. Kirk, Mayor LARUE PLANNING & MANAGEMENT SERVICES, Inc. 1375 Jackson Street, Suite 206 Fort Myers, Florida 33901-2845 239-334-3366 . FAX: 239-334-6384 e-mail: larue-planning@att. net Memo To: Brian Whitehall, City Administrator City of Okeechobee From: James Q LaRue, AICP Date: February 1, 2007 Subject: Sexual Predator Ordinance No. 976 In reference to the proposed Ordinance that will be discussed on February 6, 2007, 1 recommend that the 1500' distance requirement from different uses should be lessened to a 1000' distance, and that adult entertainment facilities should be added to the list of those uses that should be distanced from Sexual Offender Rehabilitation or Half -way I -louses. From a planning perspective, this type of facility (Half -way House for sexual offenders) is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Industrial Future Land Use Category based on this use being a treatment facility rather than a principle residential use. JGL:vr cc: Lane Gamiotea, City Clerk John Cook, City Attorney Bill Brisson, LaRue Planning 2007- PB/BOA - Pa2e 12 of 15 V1. NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED. A. Consider recommendation to amend Billboard Policy continued. B. Consider Recommendation to create Special Exception to Sexual Predator Ordinance - City Attorney. Board Member McCoy moved to authorize Attorney Cook to completely re -write the sign ordinance Chapter 90 Article IV Division 5 and recommend approval to the City Council; seconded by Board Member Burroughs. LEDFERD-YEA BURROUGHS-YEA JOHNS - YEA HOOVER - YEA MAXWELL - YEA MOTION CARRIED. KELLER-YEA MCCOY - YEA Attorney Cook advised that the City Council recently adopted an ordinance that restricts the residence of convicted sexual offenders. The ordinance requires that certain areas of the zoning districts be amended in order to allow specific permitted uses and special exceptions uses for the types of housing and half -way housing for these types of offenders_ Distributed just prior to the meetin�� was a draft ordinance that emended Section 9O -, 1; lnduanal 1()1111w district_ Special f.xceptiorn li�e5 addin�� th<� (��ll�,���in� language_ (1 1 j Rehabilitation of half-wayhomcs_ (a) That as provided in Ordinance No. 967, and included in Section 38-43, rehabilitation facilities or half-- wayhomesfor treatment and rehabilitation of sexual offenders shall be a special exception use in industrial zoning categories, subject to the following restrictions. (b) That any such facility shall be subject to all state laws pertinent to such facilities under the Laws of Florida. (c) That such facility shall at no time house in excess of six (6) sexual offenders, excluding employees and staff of the facility. (d) That such facility shall be licensed by the State of Florida and be staffed by professional and licensed mental health care providers, and provide an organized course of treatment and rehabilitation recognized by the State of Florida and the standard of care recognized by the professions of psychology or psychiatry. (e) That such facility shall not be located within 1500 feet of school, public or private; a child care facility, church, public park, or a zoning district of RSF-1; RSF-2; RMH; RMF. (f) That sexual offender is defined as any person convicted under the laws of the State of Florida or similar statutes of any other state, country or province, for an offense recognized as a sexual offense, regardless of degree of offense or whether adjudication of guilt was withheld by the court. Board Member Maxwell moved to recommend approval to City Council the above amendment to Sec. 90-343 (11) Special Exception use category under the Industrial Zoning to allow the treatment and rehabilitation facilities or halfway houses; seconded by Board Member Hoover. B. Consider Recommendation to create Special Exception to Sexual Predator Ordinance continued. C. Administrative Appeal - Steven A- Rarnunni. HI. MINUTES CONTINUED. A. Discussion of October 19, 2006 minutes. LEDFERD - YEA BURROUGHS-YEA JOHNS - YEA VOTE HOOVER -YEA MAXWELL - YEA MOTION CARRIED. KELLER-YEA MCCOY-YEA The Administrative Appeal regarding Building Permit No. 420-06-07 issued in error for improper zoning district was deferred until the February 15, 2007 meeting - Minutes discussion for the October 19, 2006 Regular meeting moved to end of eeting. Clerk Gamiotea addressed the Board by thanking them or the good job they do. The notion in question was to recommend to City Council for approval of Comprehensive plan map Amendment Petition No. 06-012-SSA. There h<r� been sOrne confrrsion as to whom w;r� mid u.;d" not a votinl, tnrnlhcr dunn�� Ihi� it�ru due [�, lie 1I�������11 Merlv iiw 1�Ite ,ifii] \ir. t? i iwliw p)ut in the v()tin(, i71emher, posi(ion_ 1 he lir;t item nc�e�saly will be a motion t(_) >csr,ind the previous cacti at the December Inecting to appru�e the October minutes - on taken Board Member Burroughs made a motion to rescind the action taken at the December 21, 2006 meeting to approve the October 19, 2996 minutes; seconded by Board Member McCoy. LEDFERD-YEA BURROUGHS-YEA JOHNS -YEA HOOVER - YEA MAXWELL - YEA MOTION CARRIED, KELLER-YEA MCCOY-YEA Clerk Gamiotea then requested a motion be put on the floor to approve the Revised October 19, 2006 minutes so that the items being revised could be discussed. Board Member Burroughs moved to approve the revised October 19, 2006 minutes as presented; seconded by Board Member Maxwell. Clerk Gamiotea distributed revised minutes and noted each change as follows: FEB 20 - r READ - EXHIBIT NO. 6 MAR 6 - FINAL PH - EXHIBIT NO. G- ORDINANCE NO. 977 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA AMENDING PART II, CODE OF ORDINANCES, GENERAL ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 50, TAXATION, TO REFLECT STATUTORY CHANGES ENACTED BY THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SUBSTITUTION, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Chapter 50 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of Okeechobee, Florida provides for imposition of Occupational License Tax as provided by Chapter 205, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, said chapter refers throughout, the language traditionally used to describe the permissible tax as "Occupational Llicense Tax," which the legislature has deemed appropriate for a change in wording, to be used by local governments effective January 1, 2007, and the City of Okeechobee intends to comply therewith; NOW THEREFORE, it is ordained before the City Council for the City of Okeechobee, Florida; presented at a duly advertised public meeting; and passed by majority vote of the City Council; and properly executed by the Mayor or designee, as Chief Presiding Officer for the City: THAT from and after the effective date of this ordinance, each and every reference in the City of Okeechobee Code of Ordinances, Chapter 50, to the words "Occupational License Tax" shall be deleted, and inserted in its place the words "Business License Tax," by which all future imposition of business license taxes on business' within the City of Okeechobee shall be named, and all City forms and permits amended accordingly. Conflict. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Severability. If any provision or portion of this ordinance is declared by any court of competent jurisdiction to be void, unconstitutional, or unenforceable, then all remaining provisions and portions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its passage. INTRODUCED for first reading and public hearing on the 20"' day of February, 2007. ATTEST: Lane Gamiotea, CIVIC, City Clerk James E. Kirk, Mayor Page 1 of 2 PASSED and ADOPTED on second and final public hearing this 61h day of March, 2007. ATTEST: Lane Gamiotea, CIVIC, City Clerk REVIEWED FOR LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: John R. Cook, City Attorney Page 2 of 2 James E. Kirk, Mayor FE8 20 - I' READ - EXHIBIT NO. 7 MAR 6 - FINAL PH - EXHIBIT NO. -I ORDINANCE NO. 978 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDAAMENDING PART II, CODE OF ORDINANCES, GENERALORDINANCES, CHAPTER 62 VEHICLES FOR HIRE; CREATING ORDINANCE NO. 62-32 TO REFLECT THAT THE APPLICATION, INVESTIGATION AND APPROVAL OF ALL PERMITS FOR VEHICLES FOR HIRE SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THE BUSINESS LICENSE OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SUBSTITUTION, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Chapter 62 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of Okeechobee, Florida provides for the application, investigation and issuance of business licenses for businesses that conduct vehicles for hire, or taxicabs; and WHEREAS, said chapter refers throughout, that each phase of the application process shall be conducted with the Department of General Services, and that final approval of the business license, shall be conducted and approved by the City Council for the City of Okeechobee; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the process is cumbersome as written, and that significant time and effort would be saved by transferring the entire process to the business license office of the Finance Department for the City; NOW THEREFORE, it is ordained before the City Council for the City of Okeechobee, Florida; presented at a duly advertised public meeting; and passed by majority vote of the City Council; and properly executed by the Mayor or designee, as Chief Presiding Officer for the City: THAT the following be added: Section.62-32. Authority. That from and after the effective date of this ordinance each and every reference in the City of Okeechobee Code of Ordinances Chapter 62 to the words "City Council", "Department of General Services" and "Mayor" shall be deleted. For the words "City Council" the words "Business License Office" shall be inserted in its place. For the words "Department of General Services" the words "Department of Finance" shall be inserted in its place. That the Department of Finance, through the Business License Office shall be the department by which all future application investigation and issuance of business licenses for vehicles for hire and taxicabs within the City of Okeechobee shall be issued, and all city forms and permits amended accordingly. Conflict. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Severability. If any provision or portion of this ordinance is declared by any court of competent jurisdiction to be void, unconstitutional, or unenforceable, then all remaining provisions and portions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Language underlined is to be added. Language strieken is to be deleted. Page 1 of 2 Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its passage. INTRODUCED for first reading and public hearing on the 201h day of February, 2007. ATTEST: Lane Gamiotea, CIVIC, City Clerk James E. Kirk, Mayor PASSED and ADOPTED on second and final public hearing this 61h day of March, 2007. ATTEST: Lane Gamiotea, CIVIC, City Clerk REVIEWED FOR LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: John R. Cook, City Attorney Page 2 of 2 James E. Kirk, Mayor ExnIBIT 8 FEBRualnr 20, 2007 CITY OF OKEECHOBEE (863) 763-3372 FAX (863) 763-1686 AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM Please mail or bring completed form to: City of Okeechobee City Administrator's Office 55 SE 3rd Avenue Okeechobee, Florida 34974 l NAME:;'�,�s/ L�lti�,.n ir���, �,` C , ADDRESS: S-/ 5 S�Ar�C Sf TELEPHONE: 4 `�� % - 5 �/� 3 FAX: 3 41& 5-66 7 MEETING: REGULAR (� SPECIAL ❑ WORKSHOP ❑ DATE: I PLEASE STATE THE ITEM YOU WISH TO HAVE PLACED ON THE CITY COUNCIL A 'ENDA: C tvx PLEASE STATE WHAT DEPARTMENT(S) YOU HAVE WORKED WITH THUS FAR: PLEASE STATE DESIRED ACTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL: C- fo n 5 L , Mry , / 5 PLEASE SUMMARIZE PERTINENT INFORMATION CONCERNING YOUR REQUEST AND ATTACH APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS: IF PRESENTATION IS TO BE MADE, PLEASE STATE HOW MUCH TIME YOU ARE REQUESTING: SIGNED BY: �G��� /�� DATE: a 0 - 6 7 02/07/2007 10 14 FAX 8637631179 MAXWELL & MAXWELL EXHIBIT 9 FEBRUARY 20, 2007 CITY OF OKEECHOBEE (863) 763-3372 FAX (863) 763-1686 AG ENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM Please mail or bring cowpleted ibrm to: City of Okeechobee City Administrator's Office 55 SE 3"' Avenue Okeechobee, Florida 34974 NAME: MOA, a�X ADDRESS: Itl % TELEPHONE: -7-'2-- ►I 1 r4 FAX: 77 /0t t-6- MEETING: REGULARSPECIAL 0 WORKSHOP O DATE; STATE THE ITEM YOU WISH TO HAVE PLAFEb ON /THE CITY COUIN /CIL AGlLN iw4_ —A1,'— ..1/_ �. ! n/r�� n / w� "/ w. �V.N .I�_ ra d PLEASE STATE WHAT DEPARTMENT(S) YOU HAVE WORKED WITH TAUS FAR: PLEASE STATE DF.SDMD ACTIONFJ3 Tfe�i�NCI�: PLEASE SUMMARIZE PERTINENT INFORMATION CONCERNING YOUR REQUEST AND ATTAC APPLIcABLE DOCUMENTS: w"d " vtdjz� IF PRESENTATION IS TO BE MADE, PLEASE STATE HOW MUCH TIME YOU ARE REQUESTING: i MI'At�'S SIGNED BY: DATE: 0L -Z 67 14 �.. UL 0 Courthouse Park Okeechobee, FL IIIIIIIIII1111jIIIII J Ln Lt. CL ANIL IIIIIIIIIIII)IJIIII{ Design Opportunity • Ability to finish one of the most unique city plans for a community of this size. .�d ,.j lbw m L CURRENT CONDITIONS 1 11 1 L i 1"All, III11111li11JIJ11111 ri = = = = = m = = = = m m = = = = m m = r HHlH,000HH, IIIIIIIIIhtIJ1)111Is m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m q LL R RESOURCES 1 11111111111.11) 11 111 �ii ��,As al 11 I111 M fi Nil 11 ii i�i� Lit ����il li► ..i� "I� Ittilflffllllllllllf I I I I oil if 111J iJ 11111 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m I �� d nIsa e vj 7kl7ll 'I L I II 11 Ij fy!' t� t'004 11111111111U U 11ii1 IIIIIIIII1lUiJ11111 c "', ♦ft �1p" p L IIIIIIIIIIJ a��i��t� I Courthouse Park sci),cmim. 2,7,2000 Okeechobee Main Street Design Comn-littee Florida Alain St,,cct (I vviiu of I I i ,I" Nric P rc he' s :11 lon Florida tl.p,irliwlll ol'SlOtc Courthouse Park St!plenibcr 27. 2006 Okcccliobcc Main Strcct Desi n C'ortlmittcc Ak N I:Inrith Main Sneel lid I'C.3Ll Oi.g0l'IC I'I'CSCI'�ati1111 ('lunch Deparilrent ol'Stab «w ��» � � a + a� ; � � i � � / � b@ � §/� wm� ;� E �� »> � ^ ^\ ��� >« . \ r � . ?? � \ ] :� « « ~<.� \ � y , / y� . �\ �- /. #� / q�� �.� «. \ � = = = = = = m = = m = = = = = = = = = /« TM �+ 9 i;'� AV Ab� } � }#` tom'♦ � M1}�� `�.. .� r yy! ,"fie sip q� +- S.ftte ^R 4M#.'!�C wIWA1a v { �"• '� - v ( 1 a» . �' stir04 '� "h %� Ito m = m m = m = = m = = = m = = s m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m s m m m �� � ` , �' (� �� �� � � � �� �J �� �� � E EXHIBIT 10 FEBRUARY 20, 2007 —. 55 Southeast 3rd Avenue # Okeechobee, Florida 34974 #E 863- 763-3371 Complete entire application with all applicable attachments and return to the Office of the City Clerk. The City Departments will be contacted to sign off on the application. The application is then forwarded to the City Council. You will be notified of the meeting date. Please note this application will cover both a City street and sidewalk. There is a separate application should you request the sidewalk only. ADDENDUM TO PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED PERMIT APPLICATION FOR FLAGLER PARK & ADJOINING STREETS: TEMPORARY STREET AND SIDEWALK CLOSING To0ay's Date Name of Applicant Okeechobee Countv Chamber of Commerc inc. Phone(s) 763-6464 Address 55 South Parrott Avenue Name of Property Owner Okeechobee, Florida 34972 Phones) Address Street to be Closed 12nd,3rd,4th,5th,6th Avenues (6th Avenue only c Dates to be Closed March 9th - 2n We - would sincerely ask that these noon closings be done on March 9 Time(s) to be Closed maintained closed throughout the weekend unt; 1 app -n.. 9 - c4 bLa because of expansion of festival activities particularly in the st Purpose of Closing (pedestrians walking thrniiah parks to observe arts/crafts/food) (Alen nnrtnlatc Original Signatures of all residents, property owners and business owners affectec by street closing stating whether they approve or object. This can be done on one list. Make sure if it is a business that the name of the business and owner is legiblt If it is a resident make sure the name and address is legible. (Required of all applications) Copy of proof of insurance. (Minimum $1,000,000.00, required of all applications) Attachments If any items are being sold on City street or sidewalk then a Temporary Use Permit must be attached for each business participating. Permits can be obtained from General Services. State Food Service License if selling food. State Alcoholic Beverage License. (You can only serve on private property. No alcoholic beverages on City property, this includes streets and sidewalks) and llth, ets. age) P PLEASE NOTE: I am submitting this addendum per the request of Mr. Donnie Robertson, with whom BwClean-up is required within 24 hours. I met with today in Flagler Park. Mr. Robertson has shown me where and how to set up activities/rides within the confines of Flagler Park, and adjoining gwNo alcoholic beverages can be consumed or taken out on City property, streets or sidewalk��et: @wNo donations can be requested if any type of alcoholic beverages are served on private propertylbusiness unless you possess a State Alcoholic Beverage License. Please note there are inside consumption and outside consumption licenses. You must have the appropriate license. GwThe City Public Works Department will deliver the appropriate barricades. The City Police Department will set them out and take them down at the appropriate times. 94'Dumpsters and port -a -lets are required when closing the street for more than 3 hours. ov PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT Signature Authorized Signature ADMINISTRATION Auth4ri#(d Signature CLERK'S OFFICE Donnie Robertson, Public Works Director Date Typed Name & Title . ~ 0_ Denny Davis Chief of Police Date Typed Name & Title AHerb QMj tb, Fire Chief Da e Typed Name & Title Occupational and/or State License Verified: dD - (�_[e in f2n.� ()r 0��� �/r O Brian.Whiteha.lI c to ate 1 yped Name & Title OEM , X01AL "�LA 4 ;a- 22Z Lane Gamiotea, City Clerk Authorized Si nature Dale Typed Name & Title APPROVED/DENIED BY COUNCIL ON: Revised 8/05/03 or mml w �mn ma0�mo m��a� �mQAOo �m0 00�� I��it1�16o�011 111111 Yddll �I�1 q�� � M.1111111 I I901 11� om�mmm 0mm�o� omm �m� �m��m DRTA 1nl cx51" 'PfkRk. STREET �ooia Exr[IBIT 11 FEBRuARY 20, 2007 ON 4WKimley-Hom F1 and Associates, Inc. SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR PREPARING THE PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT, UPDATING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT FOR OKEECHOBEE COUNTY PROJECT UNDERSTANDING As part of Florida's 2005 growth management legislation (SB 360), all local governments in the state must adopt school concurrency as part of their comprehensive plans by 2008. To meet the SB 360 requirements, local governments must enter into an Interlocal Agreement (ILA) with the applicable School Board, adopt a Public School facilities Element (PSI=E), and amend their Capital Improvements (CIE) and Intergovernmental Coordination Elements (ICE). Following discussions with staff from Okeechobee County (hereinafter referred to as the "County") it is our understanding that the collection / preparation of the data required for the Public School Facilities Element pursuant to subsection 9J-5.005(2), F.A.C, shall be provided by the Okeechobee County School District (hereinafter referred to as the "School District") and the County. Based on the above, Kinley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as '`KHA") will analyze the required information provided by the County and the School District and prepare the Data and Analysis Report, a new Public School Facilities Element, and update the Intergovernmental Coordination and Capital Improvements Elements for the Okeechobee County Comprehensive Plan. APPROACH Based on the information outlined in the project understanding, KHA has divided our approach into several tasks. Task 1: Data Collection and Analysis KHA will coordinate with the County and verify that the School District and the County have provided all pertinent data required for the project. KHA can provide any necessary data and analysis as an additional service as directed by the client. Once received, the following data shall be analyzed as follows: Review for each school facility: o Existing enrollment c Existing school attendance zones c Existing Florida Inventory of School IIouses (FISH) capacity or other professionally accepted measure of capacity o Surplus capacity based on site size requirements contained within the Department of Education design criteria o Existing level of service (LOS) February 13, 2007 Page I of 7 Kimsey -Horn kht.—I no and Awod tes, Inc. ■ Review for each school facility: o Projected enrollment by year for the initial five years of the planning period o Projected enrollment district wide by school type for the end of the long range planning period of the County, based on projected population. ■ Identify the challenges and opportunities with existing public school facilities and project public school facilities planned in the adopted district facilities work program, including location, supporting infrastructure, and overcrowding in relation to achieving and maintaining LOS standards for the five-year planning period and for the end of the long range planning period. • Identify existing and projected school facility surpluses and deficiencies by concurrency service area by year for the five-year planning period, and district -wide by school type for the end of the long range planning period of the County based on projected enrollment. • Identify school facilities needed for each concurrency service area to accommodate projected enrollment at the adopted level of service standard each year for the five- year planning period, and for the end of the long range planning period of the County, including ancillary facilities and land area requirements. The plan shall explain the relationships. 1f any, of the ancillary facilities to school concurrence. • Review existing revenue sources and ftmding mechanisms available for school capital improvement financing, the estimated cost of addressing existing deficiencies and future needs for the five-year planning period, and for the end of the long range planning period of the County. • Identify the estimated cost of school capital improvements necessary to correct deficiencies and meet future needs based on achieving and maintaining the adopted LOS standard for the five-year planning period, and for the end of the long range planning period of the County. • Identify the ability to finance capital improvements based on projected enrollment and revenues during the five-year planning period; forecasting of revenues and expenditures for five years; projections of debt service obligations for currently outstanding bond issues; projection of ad valorem tax base, assessment ratio and miIlage rate; projections of other tax bases and other revenue sources, such as, impact and user fees; projection of facilities operating cost considerations; and projections of debt capacity. • Review the adequacy of the existing LOS conditions for each school facility to develop appropriate LOS standards. February 13, 2007 Page 2 of 7 owl"! as Km"Om ON and Associates, Inc. • Identify opportunities and problems in ea -locating existing projected public school facilities with other public facilities such as parks, libraries and community centers; the need for supporting infrastructure, including, water, sewer, roads, drainage, sidewalks and bus stops for existing and projected public school facilities; and analysis of opportunities to locate public school facilities to serve community focal points. ■ Provide data and analysis showing how school coneurrency costs will be met and shared by all affected parties, consistent with the requirement for a financially feasible capital improvements program for public schools. Task 2: Data and Analysis Report A Data and Analysis Report will be prepared summarizing the results from the data identified in Task 1. The Data and Analysis Report will include inventories, estimates, projections, data analyses, recommendations and maps. The Data and Analysis Report will also identify any assumptions and methodologies employed to complete this task. More specifically, the Data and Analysis Report presents the following: • County population and trends • Existin'o public school facility conditions. includinb: c. Enrollment (by school and by type) o School facility capacity, • Current surpluses and deficiencies in student stations ■ Projected public school facility conditions, including: o Student generation rates o Projected enrollment/capacity o District School Board utilization o Level of Service standards o School Concurrency Service Areas ■ Revenue/funding sources for capital improvement, including: o School District Revenue Sources o School District Capital Improvements o Financial feasibility at the adopted level of service summary • Opportunities for co -location and joint use between the School District and the local governments Upon completion of the Data Collection and Analysis Report, KI IA will: • Provide an electronic copy of draft Data and Analysis Report to the County for review and comment • Coordinate and attend one meeting with the County to review necessary changes to Data and Analysis Report • Prepare the final Data and Analysis Report February 13, 2007 Page 3 of 7 Kimley-tom bhhlam and Associates, Inc. ■ Provide an electronic copy of final Data and Analysis Report for distribution to the local governments by the County Task 3: Interim Public School Facility Element (PSFE) Development Using the Data and Analysis report, KHA shall prepare draft goals, objectives, and policies and the required map series for the PSFE. As a part of this task, the following items will be taken into consideration: • An annual update process • School site selection • School permitting • Infrastructure necessary to support proposed schools, including potable water, wastewater, drainage, solid waste, transportation, and means by which to assure safe access to schools, including sidewalks, bicycle paths, turn lanes, and signalization • Financial feasibility ■ School level of service • School Concurrency Service Areas • Co -location of other public facilities, such as parks, libraries, and community centers, in proximity to public schools • Locating schools proximate to residential areas • Locating schools to complement patterns of development, including locating schools so they serve as community focal points • School site/surrounding land use compatibility ■ Emergency preparedness issues (including the use of public schools to serve as emergency shelters) Upon completion of the interim draft PSFE, KHA will: ■ Provide the interim draft PSFE, to the County for review and comment • Provide up to two modifications to the interim draft PSFE ■ "transmit the interim draft PSFE to DCA for review and comment no later than March 30, 2007 • Coordinate with the County to discuss DCA comments (if necessary) (1 meeting) ■ Revise Data and Analysis Report and PSFE including a DCA response letter (if necessary) Task 4: Final Public School Facilities Element Upon completion of Task 3, a final PSFE will be prepared and provided to the County for distribution to the local governments. A joint workshop will be held to establish general consensus from the local governments on the PSFE. More specifically, KI IA will: • Provide an electronic copy of final PSFE to the County • Coordinate a joint workshop with the participating local government to discuss and the final PSFF, to establish consensus (1 meeting) Febmary 13, 2007 Page 4 of 7 P' Mr!Khley-Hom and Associates, Inc. ■ Transmit the final PSF E to DCA no later than June 1, 2007 Task 5: Capital Improvements Element (CIE) Revisions Using the information obtained from previous tasks, KHA will identify proposed amendments to both the County's and the City of Okeechobee's Capital Improvements Elements. These amendments will incorporate school concurrency into the concurrency management system portion of the CIE as well as any necessary changes to individual capital improvement programs. This will include appropriate text, graphics, maps, and tables for school LOS standards. To complete this task, KHA will: ■ Provide the amendments to the CIE to the County and the City for review and comment ■ Provide up to two modifications to the amended CIE Please note, this task will be preformed on an hourly basis with a non -to -exceed fee. It is anticipated that the actual fee incurred will be less than the not -to -exceed fee as the policies provided to both jurisdictions will be similar. This fee structure allows for flexibility if the situation changes. Task 6: Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE) Revisions KHA will review and recommend applicable changes to the County's and the City of Okeechobee's Intergovernmental Coordination Element. These changes will address additional coordination activities necessitated by school concurrency. Where necessary, KI{A will amend the ICE to reflect changes in data and analysis sections and changes to goals, objectives, and policies. To complete this task, KIIA will: Provide the amendments to the ICE to the County and the City of Okeechobee for review and comment Provide up to two modifications to the amended CIE Please note, this task will be preformed on an anticipated that the actual fee incurred will be provided to both jurisdictions will be similar. situation changes. Task 7: Final Coneurrency Package hourly basis with a non -to -exceed fee. It is less than the not -to -exceed fee as the policies This fee structure allows for flexibility if the KHA will provide a final package which includes the relevant documents created in support of the project. The final package will include: ■ Provide six (6) compact disks (CD) containing the final versions of the relevant documents created in support of the project. This will be delivered to the County upon completion of the project. February 13.2007 Page 5 of 7 Ow- 00fl Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. ADDITIONAL SERVICES Any services not specifically provided for in the above scope, as well as any changes in the scope you request, will be considered additional services and will be performed at the hourly rates identified in Exhibit `B" of this Agreement. Additional services may include, but are not limited to: • Meetings not identified in the scope ■ Preparation of graphic displays, handouts, and any other appropriate presentation aids for all meetings not identified in the scope ■ Iand Development Code revisions • Consulting services related to implementation of school concurrency • GIS / mapping services not identified in the scope ■ Intergovernmental coordination • Public facilities planning and design • Modifications to Comprehensive Plan Elements not identified in the scope PROJECT MANAGEMENT / SCHEDULE, With seven business day notice. KIIA will attend and prepare the necessary presentation material. including PowerPoint presentations, presentation boards, and handouts for the meetings identified in "Masks I through 7 KHA shall provide the County with electronic documents developed throughout the study. Documents, graphics, charts, and supporting material generated during the course of this project will be furnished to the County on a compact disk in the formats identified below: Technical Memoranda and Correspondence Microsoft Word 2000 Spreadsheets Microsoft Excel 6.0/7.0 Maps/GIS ArcView 9.0 (PDF) Final Reports Microsoft Word 2000 The schedule for completion for the project will be in accordance with the Scope of Work. The deadline dates incorporated herein are subject to change upon mutual agreement by the County and KHA. FEE AND BILLING KHA will perform the Scope of Services in Tasks I through 4 and 7 for a lump sum fee of $28,000.00. "Tasks S and 6 will be performed on an hourly basis on the basis of our hourly rates in effect at the time the services are provided with a not -to -exceed fee of $18,000.00. All permitting, application, and similar project fees will be paid directly by the Client. Fees and expenses will be invoiced monthly based, as applicable, upon the percentage of services performed or actual services performed and expenses incurred as of the invoice date. Payment February 13, 2007 Page 6 of 7 on ri1imley-Hom and Associates, Inc. will be due within 25 days of your receipt of the invoice. We will accomplish the services outlined in Tasks I through 4 and 7 as outlined below plus an amount to cover certain other expenses such as in-house duplicating, local mileage, telephone calls, facsimiles, postage, and word processing computer time. We will provide Tasks S, 6 and any `Additional Services' on the basis of our hourly rates in effect at the time the services are provided plus an amount to cover certain direct expenses for the project which would include in-house duplicating, facsimile, local mileage, telephone, postage, in-house blueprinting and word processing computer use. In addition, other direct expenses will be billed at 1.15 times actual cost over the lump sum amount. Lump sum fees could be provided for additional services once a scope of services is recognized. Kimley-Horn's computer reimbursable expenses are billed at the hourly rate of $25.00. Fees are payable with billing monthly based upon a percentage complete of lump sum elements or for services actually accomplished for hourly rate elements. Billing will be due and payable within 25 days. The following task budgets have been provided for information purposes only: Task 1: Data Collection and Analysis $9,000.00 Task 2: Data and Analysis Report $6,500.00 Task 3: Interim Public School Facility Element $9,000.00 Task 4: Final Public School Facilities Element $2.500.00 "task 7: Final Report $1,000.00 Total Lump Sum: $28,000.00 Hourly Task -Not to exceed "Task S: Capital Improvements Element (CIE) Revisions $12,000.00 Task 6: Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE;) Revisions $6 000.00 Total Hourly $18,000.00 S'PERSONAL`.Kevin'Okeechobae County School Concurrency dmc.doc February 13, 2007 Page 7 of 7 ❑ — /� Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. February 13, 2007 Closure Okeechobee County School Concurrcncy Services In addition to the matters set forth herein, our Agreement shall include and be subject to, and only to, the terms and conditions in the attached Standard Provisions, which are incorporated by reference. As used in the Standard Provisions, the term "the Consultant" shall refer to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., and the term "the Client" shall refer to the School Board of Okeechobee County. If you concur in all the foregoing and wish to direct us to proceed with the services, please have authorized persons execute both copies of this Agreement in the spaces provided below, retain one copy and return the other to us. Fees and times stated in this Agreement are valid for sixty (60) days after the date of this letter. We appreciate the opportunity to provide these services to you. Please contact me if you have any questions. Very truly yours, KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. �,..Ytson Matscan; P.E. David DeYoung, AIC Vice President Project Manager .411achrnent_ Standard provisions Agreed to this day of Client. By: (Print or Type Name) Title: (As Authorized by Law) (Email Address) C:%Dr ents and mil=TOW $ettingslTernporary Internet FilcsOCKDOcluwre (^_).do 6 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. February 13,2007 Okeechobee County School Concurrency Services KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. STANDARD PROVISIONS (1) Consultant's Scope of Services and Additional Services. The Consultant's undertaking to perform professional services extends only to the services specifically described in this Agreement. However, if requested by the Client and agreed to by the Consultant, the Consultant will perform additional services ("Additional Services"), and such Additional Services shall be governed by these provisions. Unless otherwise agreed to in writing, the Client shall pay the Consultant for the performance of any Additional Services an amount based upon the Consultant's then -current hourly rates plus an amount to cover certain direct expenses including in-house duplicating, local mileage, telephone calls, postage, and word processing. Other direct expenses will be billed at 1.15 times cost. Technical use of computers for design, analysis, GIS, and graphics, etc., will be billed at $25.00 per hour. (2) Client's Responsibilities. In addition to other responsibilities described herein or imposed by law, the Client shall: (a) Designate in writing a person to act as its representative with respect to this Agreement, such person having complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, and make or interpret the Client's decisions. (b) Provide all information and criteria as to the Client's requirements, objectives, and expectations for the project including all numerical criteria that are to be met and all standards of development, design, or construction. (c) Provide to the Consultant all previous studies. plans, or other documents pertaining to the project and all new data reasonably necessary in the Consultant's opinion, such as site survey and engineering data, environmental impact assessments or statements, zoning or other land use regulations, etc., upon all of which the Consultant may rely. (d) Arrange for access to the site and other private or public property as required for the Consultant to provide its services. (e) Review all documents or oral reports presented by the Consultant and render in writing decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to delay the services of the Consultant. (t) Furnish approvals and pen -nits from governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the project and approvals and consents from other parties as may be necessary for completion of the Consultant's services. (g) Cause to be provided such independent accounting, legal, insurance, cost estimating and overall feasibility services as the Client may require or the Consultant may reasonably request in furtherance of the project development. (h) Give prompt written notice to the Consultant whenever the Client becomes aware of any development that atTects the scope and timing of the Consultant's services or any defect or noncompliance in any aspect of the project. (i) Bear all costs incident to the responsibilities of the Client. (3) Period of Services. Unless otherwise stated herein, the Consultant will begin work timely after receipt of an executed copy of this Agreement and will complete the services in a reasonable time. This Agreement is made in anticipation of conditions permitting continuous and orderly progress through completion of the services. Times for performance shall be extended as necessary for delays or suspensions due to circumstances that the Consultant does not control. if such delay or suspension extends for more than six months (cumulatively), Consultant's compensation shall be renegotiated. (4) Method of Payment. Compensation shall be paid to the Consultant in accordance with the following provisions: (a) Invoices will be submitted periodically, via regular mail or email, for services performed and expenses incurred. Payment of each invoice will be due within 25 days of receipt. The Client shall also pay to the Consultant all transaction taxes, if any, whether state, local, or federal, levied with respect to amounts paid hereunder, including but not limited to sales tax. The Consultant shall be compensated in U.S. dollars. Interest will be added to accounts not paid within 25 days at the maximum rate allowed by law. If the Client fails to make any payment due the Consultant under this or any other agreement within 30 days after the Consultant's transmittal of its invoice, the Consultant may, after giving notice to the Client, suspend services under this Agreement until all amounts due are paid in full. (b) if the Client objects to an invoice, it must advise the Consultant in writing giving its reasons within 14 days of C\Documents and Sempljisa. milamlLoal SettinO remporuy Intern Fites`Myd)C.closure f'-,lAc 6 IGmley-Hom and AmiateS, Inc. February 13, 2007 Okeechobee County School Concurrency Services receipt of the invoice or the Client's objections will be waived, and the invoice shall conclusively be deemed due and owing. (c) The Client agrees that the payment to the Consultant is not subject to any contingency or condition. The Consultant may negotiate payment of any check tendered by the Client, even if the words "in full satisfaction" or words intended to have similar effect appear on the check without such negotiation being an accord and satisfaction of any disputed debt and without prejudicing any right of the Consultant to collect additional amounts from the Client. (5) Use of Documents. All documents, including but not limited to drawings, specifications, reports, and data or programs stored electronically, prepared by the Consultant are related exclusively to the services described in this Agreement, and may be used only if the Client has satisfied all of its obligations under this Agreement. They are not intended or represented to be suitable for use, partial use or reuse by the Client or others on extensions of this project or on any other project. Any modifications made by the Client to any of the Consultant's documents, or any use, partial use or reuse of the documents without written authorization or adaptation by the Consultant will be at the Client's sole risk and without liability to the Consultant, and the Client shall, to the extent legally permissible and without waiving any governmental immunity, indemnify, defend and hold the Consultant harmless from all claims, damages, losses and expenses, including but not limited to attorneys' fees, resulting therefrom. Any authorization or adaptation will entitle the Consultant to further compensation at rates to be agreed upon by the Client and the Consultant. Any electronic files not containing an electronic seal are provided only for the convenience of the Client, and use of them is at the Client's sole risk. In the case of any defects in the electronic files or any discrepancies between them and the hardcopy of the documents prepared by the Consultant, the hardcopy shall govem. Only printed copies of documents conveyed by the Consultant may be relied upon. Because data stored in electronic media format can deteriorate or be modified without the Consultant's authorization, the Client has 60 days to perform acceptance tests, after which it shall be deemed to have accepted the data. (6) Opinions of Cost. Because the Consultant does not control the cost of labor, materials, equipment or services furnished by others, methods of determining prices, or competitive bidding or market conditions, any opinions rendered as to costs. including but not limited to opinions as to the costs of construction and materials, shall be made on the basis of its experience and represent its judgment as an experienced and qualified professional, familiar with the industry. The Consultant cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids or actual costs will not vary from its opinions of cost. If the Client wishes greater assurance as to the amount of any cost, it shall employ an independent cost estimator. Consultant's services required to bring costs within any limitation established by the Client will be paid for as Additional Services. (7) 'Termination The obligation to provide further services under this Agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven days' written notice in the event of substantial failure by the other party to perform in accordance with the terms hereof through no fault of the terminating party, or upon thirty days' written notice for the convenience of the terminating party. If any material change occurs in the ownership of the Client, the Consultant shall have the right to immediately terminate this Agreement. In the event of any termination, the Consultant shall be paid for all services tendered and expenses incurred to the effective date of termination, and other reasonable expenses incurred by the Consultant as a result of such termination. If the Consultant's compensation is a fixed fee, the amount payable for services will be a proportional amount of the total fee based on the ratio of the amount of the services performed, as reasonably determined by the Consultant, to the total amount of services which were to have been performed. (8) Insurance. The Consultant carries Workers' Compensation insurance, professional liability insurance, and general liability insurance. If the Client directs the Consultant to obtain increased insurance coverage, the Consultant will take out such additional insurance, if obtainable, at the Client's expense. (9) Standard of Care. In performing its professional services, the Consultant will use that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable members of its profession in the same locality at the time the services are provided. No warranty, express or implied, is made or intended by the Consultant's undertaking herein or its performance of services, and it is agreed that the Consultant is not a fiduciary -vith respect to the Client. `Vch uu—t$WAktI:RLLS`•itt3.n103T ',U" Se[ings.rempOrWY )Meme[ r%c,•_ouccx•'.d os_ (3) dab Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. February 13, 2007 Okeechobee County School Concurrency Services (10) LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. In recognition of the relative risks and benefits of the Project to both the Client and the Consultant, the risks have been allocated such that the Client agrees, to the fullest extent of the law, and notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement or the existence of applicable insurance coverage, that the total liability, in the aggregate, of the Consultant and the Consultant's officers, directors, employees, agents, and subconsultants to the Client or to anyone claiming by, through or under the Client, for any and all claims, losses, costs or damages whatsoever arising out of, resulting from or in any way related to the services under this Agreement from any cause or causes, including but not limited to, the negligence, professional errors or omissions, strict liability or breach of contract or any warranty, express or implied, of the Consultant or the Consultant's officers, directors, employees, agents, and subconsultants, shall not exceed twice the total compensation received by the Consultant under this Agreement or $50,000, whichever is greater. Higher limits of liability may be negotiated for additional fee. Under no circumstances shall the Consultant be liable for lost profits or consequential damages, for extra costs or other consequences due to changed conditions, or for costs related to the failure of contractors to perform work in accordance with the plans and specifications. This Section 10 is intended solely to limit the remedies available to the Client, and nothing in this Section 10 shall require the Client to indemnify the Consultant. (11) Certifications. The Consultant shall not be required to execute certifications or third -party reliance letters that are inaccurate, that relate to facts of which the Consultant does not have actual knowledge, or that would cause the Consultant to violate applicable rules of professional responsibility. (12) Dispute Resolution. All claims by the Client arising out of this Agreement or its breach shall be submitted first to mediation in accordance with the Construction Industry Mediation Rules of the American Arbitration Association as a condition precedent to litigation. Any mediation or civil action by Client must be commenced within one year of the accrual of the cause of action asserted but in no event later than allowed by applicable statutes. (13) Hazardous Substances and Conditions. (a) Services related to determinations involving hazardous substances or conditions, as defined by federal or state law, are limited to those tasks expressly stated in the scope of services. In any event, Consultant shall not be a custodian, transporter, handler, arranger, contractor, or remediator with respect to hazardous substances and conditions. Consultant's services will be limited to professional analysis, recommendations, and reporting, including, when agreed to, plans and specifications for isolation, removal, or remediation. (b) The Consultant shall notify the Client of hazardous substances or conditions not contemplated in the scope of services of which the Consultant actually becomes aware. Upon such notice by the Consultant, the Consultant may stop affected portions of its services until the hazardous substance or condition is eliminated. The parties shall decide if Consultant is to proceed with its services and if Consultant is to conduct testing and evaluations, and the parties may enter into further agreements as to the additional scope, fee, and terms for such services. (14) Construction Phase Services. (a) if the Consultant's services include the preparation of documents to be used for construction and the Consultant is not retained to make periodic site visits, the Client assumes all responsibility for interpretation of the documents and for construction observation, and the Client waives any claims against the Consultant in any way connected thereto. (b) If the Consultant provides construction phase services, the Consultant shall have no responsibility for any contractor's means, methods, techniques, equipment choice and usage, sequence, schedule, safety programs, or safety practices, nor shall Consultant have any authority or responsibility to stop or direct the work of any contractor. The Consultant's visits will be for the purpose of endeavoring to provide the Client a greater degree of confidence that the completed work of its contractors will generally conform to the construction documents prepared by the Consultant. Consultant neither guarantees the performance of contractors, nor assumes responsibility for any contractor's failure to perform its work in accordance with the contract documents. (c) The Consultant is not responsible for any duties assigned to the design professional in the construction contract that are not expressly provided for in this Agreement. The Client agrees that each contract with any contractor shall state that the contractor shall be solely responsible for job site safety and for its means and methods; that the contractor shall indemnify the Client and the Consultant for all claims and liability arising out of job site accidents; CADOcuments and SettingstJiss milarn`.I.oi:al SettingstTem"rsry Internet FWOI.KUClck wre (2).dp;6 PEP"] Kimley-Horn �and Associates, Inc. February 13, 2007 Okeechobee County School Concurrency Services and that the Client and the Consultant shall be made additional insureds under the contractor's general liability insurance policy. (15) No Third -Party Beneficiaries; Assignment and Subcontracting. This Agreement gives no rights or benefits to anyone other than the Client and the Consultant, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole benefit of the Client and the Consultant. The Client shall not assign or transfer any rights under or interest in this Agreement, or any claim arising out of the performance of services by Consultant, without the written consent of the Consultant. The Consultant reserves the right to augment its staff with subconsultants as it deems appropriate due to project logistics, schedules, or market conditions. If the Consultant exercises this right, the Consultant will maintain the agreed -upon billing rates for services identified in the contract, regardless of whether the services are provided by in-house employees, contract employees, or independent subconsultants. (lb) Confidentiality. The Client consents to the use and dissemination by the Consultant of photographs of the project and to the use by the Consultant of facts, data and information obtained by the Consultant in the performance of its services. If, however, any facts, data or information are specifically identified in writing by the Client as confidential, the Consultant shall use reasonable care to maintain the confidentiality of that material. (17) Miscellaneous Provisions. This Agreement is to be governed by the law of the State of Florida. "this Agreement contains the entire and fully integrated agreement between the parties and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous negotiations, representations, agreements or understandings, whether written or oral. Except as provided in Section 1, this Agreement can he supplemented or amended only by a written document executed by both parties. Provided, however, that any conflicting or additional terms on any purchase order issued by the Client shall be void and are hereby expressly rejected by the Consultant. Any provision in this Agreement that is unenforceable shall be ineffective to the extent of such unenforceability without invalidating the remaining provisions. "rhe non -enforcement of any provision by either party shall not constitute a waiver of that provision nor shall it affect the enforceability of that provision or of the remainder of this Agreement. C:V?oeuments and SettlKggls -la"A L. al Settingsl'Cempurary tnterna Fdeis OLKDC4=re (2).dnc6 ITEM AVDEV TO AGENVA NEW BUSINESS ITEM I - EXHIBIT 12 RESOLUTION NO. 07-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA EXTENDING THE PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 06-10 WHICH IMPOSED A MORATORIUM ON THE ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY OF APPLICATIONS FOR OFF -PREMISES SIGNS DESIGNED TO BE BILLBOARDS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Okeechobee, Florida by previous Resolution No. 06-10, imposed a moratorium on the acceptance and processing of any applications within the City for the erection of off -premises signs designed as billboards; and WHEREAS, said Resolution set a date of March 1, 2007 by which time the City would consider and enact amended sign ordinances for use in the City that addressed such billboard advertising; and WHEREAS, the legal appeal by a developer concerning the denial and refund of a permit issued by the City for a billboard was not heard and considered by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals for the City until February 16, 2007, which appeal initially caused the moratorium to be enacted; and WHEREAS, such appeal was denied by the Board on February 1, 2007, and additional time is now needed to consider amendments and re -drafting of the existing sign ordinances within the City. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved before the City Council of the City of Okeechobee, Florida; presented at a duly advertised public meeting; and passed by a majority vote of the City Council; and properly executed by the Mayor or designee, as Chief Presiding Officer for the City: SECTION 1. THAT the provisions of Resolution No. 06-10 previously adopted by the City are herein extended in their entirety to May 1, 2007, or until the City Council adopts an amendment to the sign ordinance, whichever first occurs. INTRODUCED AND ADOPTED in regular session this 201h day of February, 2007 ATTEST: Lane Gamiotea, CMC, City Clerk REVIEWED FOR LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: John R. Cook, City Attorney James E. Kirk, Mayor Cab/Chassis: 1983 Sutphen Quint Aerial Platform 100+ Refurbished enclosed cab, seating for four with A/C and intercom 138,000 miles Diesel motor replaced new in mid-90's (main bearings replaced in 2005) Automatic transmission (new 2005) 10KW Onan generator 1500 GPM Hale single stage pump (rebuilt 2006) 300-gallon tank Two 1.75 crosslay discharges One 2.5 rear pre -connect discharge Hose bed capacity 800 LDH ISO ground ladder compliment GVW 52,000 Ibs Road height 10 10 Overall Length 47 Aerial: Aluminum aerial platform with high hand rails (measures 92 ft by today's standards) 700 lb rated platform with twin turrets (fog/solid) Breathing air system with connections in platform Note: This truck was fully functional and compliant with ladder and pump test certifications as of the day it was taken out of service. Donation condition is "as is" with no warranty implied by Pinellas Park. Contact info: Deputy Chief Steve McCarthy Pinellas Park Fire Department Phone (727) 541-0712 Fax (727) 541-0812 Email: smccarthy(Z pinellas-park.com News Release Tue., February 20, 2007 The City of Okeechobee is proud to announce the award of a grant -funded Fire Ladder Truck from the City of Pinellas Park. Pinellas Park Fire Rescue replaced a refurbished ladder truck with a new piece of equipment and offered to donate the retired apparatus to any jurisdiction in Florida or the Gulf coast region. In November 2006, Chief Herb Smith of the Okeechobee Fire Department, with the assistance of the City Administrator and Finance Director prepared the formal grant application. Chief Nick Hopkins of Okeechobee County Fire Rescue, added to our application by speaking with the Pinellas Park Committee and confirming the close relationship between the two departments and that the piece of equipment would be utilized for all citizens of Okeechobee due to the mutual and automatic aid agreements between both entities. Administrator Whitehall, "The truck acquisition has been a part of the City's budgeted concern for some time with the understanding that the City/County is growing and needs have increased accordingly." Chief Smith, "The truck is a 1983 Sutphen Quint Aerial Platform (100 feet). The vehicle has been refurbished and many items such as the transmission and engine have been replaced. It will be able to reach any building presently in Oke,Vchobee and has the ability to pump 1500 Gallons per Minute during firefighting operations. The ladder has fire suppression capabilities as well as the ability to pipe breathing air to the top of the ladder for the firefighter to utilize. There is a 10- kilowatt generator available to light up any emergency scene for safety". A Ladder truck is an important tool the Fire Department uses for above -grade rescues, large -water streams for defensive fire operations, vehicle extrications and other emergencies. Currently the City has a mutual aid agreement with Saint Lucie County to provide a ladder truck from Fort Pierce. Chief Smith added that the Ladder Truck will also play an important role in the insurance rates of our community especially the commercial areas." The City of Okeechobee would like to thank the City of Pinellas Park for this wonderful opportunity. Cab/Chassis: 1983 Sutphen Quint Aerial Platform 100+ Refurbished enclosed cab, seating for four with A/C and intercom 138,000 miles Diesel motor replaced new in mid-90's (main bearings replaced in 2005) Automatic transmission (new 2005) 10KW Onan generator 1500 GPM Hale single stage pump (rebuilt 2006 ) 300-gallon tank Two 1.75 crosslay discharges One 2.5 rear pre -connect discharge Hose bed capacity 800 LDH ISO ground ladder compliment GVW 52,000 Ibs Road height 10 10 Overall Length 47 Aerial: Aluminum aerial platform with high hand rails (measures 92 ft by today's standards) 700 lb rated platform with twin turrets (fog/solid) Breathing air system with connections in platform Note: This truck was fully functional and compliant with ladder and pump test certifications as of the day it was taken out of service. Donation condition is "as is" with no warranty implied by Pinellas Park. Contact info: Deputy Chief Steve McCarthy Pinellas Park Fire Department Phone (727) 541-0712 Fax (727) 541-0812 Email: smccarthy U_ inellas-park.com MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Council Members FROM: Council Member Markham SUBJECT: February 20, 2007 Council Meeting DATE: February 20, 2007 I apologize for not being able to attend the City Council Meeting this evening. My "new" grand baby has decided to arrive a day early, so please keep us in your prayers for a easy delivery. There are several issues on the agenda that I would like to share my idea's and research on. Item No. Research, Information or suggestion VII. A. No objections or comments. VII. B. I reviewed the revised site plan that will be distributed at the meeting. I was only able to briefly review the information, it appears to be a better solution, and I appreciate the decrease in density per block by the applicant. I agree with the plans as presented with the less density and would not object to the alley closing with these type plans. VII. C. No objections or comments. VI1. D. No objections, comments are the same as the first reading. VII. E. No objections, agree with the changes that were made at first reading. VIII. A. No objections or comments. VIII. B. No objections or comments. VIII. C. No objections as long as the remainder of the commercial business within the block agree to the change. VIII. D. No comments at this time. VIII. E. No objections. VIII. F. No objections at this time. VIII. G. I feel we should be concerned about the elevation of new homes going into neighborhoods to keep water from impacting the existing homes. Section 78-1(2) of the Code Book needs to be enforced better. Vill. H. Congratulations to Chief Smith, job well done. of ACTION NOTES BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FEBRUARY 22, 2007 1. Approved minutes from December 21, 2006 special session of BOCC as presented. 2. Approved minutes from January 9, 2007 regular session of BOCC as presented. 3. Conducted public hearing to accept input from interested parties regarding the request to abandon a portion of a County right-of-way known as NW 16th Boulevard as set forth in Petition B-2007-0040; Okeechobee County, applicant. Deferred action on abandonment of a portion of a County right-of-way known as NW 16th Blvd. to an indeterminate date. Petition B-2007-0040; Okeechobee County, Applicant. 4. Received a presentation from Haynes Williams regarding right-of-way for a potential by- pass road around the City of Okeechobee. 5. Received the final report and complete proposed impact fee schedules from Walter Keller. Walter Keller to return to Board of County Commissioners on March 8, 2007 to present the methodology and calculations for the use of impact fees for the improvement of SW 28th Street and/or SW 32"d Street. 6. Engaged MuniFinancial to provide Fire Rescue Assessment Services in the amount of $41,750; and Nabors, Giblin & Nickerson, P.A. to provide related legal services in the amount of $13,500. 7. Awarded contract for fuel, motor oil, lubricants, and other items to Palmdale Oil Company of Okeechobee, Florida. 8. Approved the proposal from Craig A. Smith to provide surveying and platting services for the county industrial park at a cost of $37, 690. 9. Directed the County Attorney to conduct research and make recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners concerning options available to the County for addressing the sale of unplatted lots in the subdivision of Hudson Lakes. 10. Appointed Carl Leonard as a regular member of the Okeechobee Utility Authority; term to expire March 1, 2011. Appointed Edward Trent as an alternate member to the Okeechobee Utility Authority; term to expire March 1, 2009. 11. Appointed Melody Hodges and Suzanna Rucks as regular members of the Agri -Civic Center Advisory Committee; terms to expire March 1, 2011. 12. Appointed Sandra Jones as a regular member to the Construction Licensing Board; term to expire March 1, 2010. 13. Appointed Carl Shumate, Joey Hoover and Carl Ferrero as regular members to the Planning Board/Board of Adjustments and Appeals; terms to expire March 1, 2010. 14. Approved the following warrants: #106106-#106337 for $748,478.75; #3237-#3242 for $4,418.15; #2034-#2035 for $3,755.00; #2224223 for $30,000.00; for a total of $786,651.90. 15. Approved the potential allocation of up to $150,000 in HHRP funds for down payment assistance to buyers of the last six (6) CDBG houses located on NE15th and NE 16tn Avenues. 16. Approved BT07-032 in the amount of $28,755 from the General Fund contingencies to out -of -county hospital expenses. Authorized payment to St. Mary's Physicians Services in the amount of $18,105 for the indigent medical expenses at an out -of -county hospital. Authorized payment to Martin County Lifestar/CJ Systems for transportation to out -of - county hospital in the amount of $10,083. 17. Approved tax deed surpluses be paid to the following: 2005-TD-053; Certificate # 807-1998 Michael C. and Louise W. Lakatos for $9,683.93; 2005-TD-054; Certificate # 812-1998 Michael C. and Louise W. Lakatos for $12,983.93; 2005-TD-032; Certificate # 153-1998 Clarence L. Priddy for $3,010.05 2004-TD-082; Certificate # 1283-1998 Dan B. Dyer and Linda S. Dyer for $7,066.61 2004-TD-083; Certificate # 1287-1998 Dan B. Dyer and Linda S. Dyer for $6,160.71 2004-TD-170; Certificate # 128-2001 O'Donoghue Enterprises, Inc. for $14,506.84 2004-TD-106; Certificate # 1373-1998 Gloria Jackson and Eunice Washington for $2,677.29 2004-TD-109; Certificate # 1526-1998 Anton Danilovich and Fatynia Danilovich for $2,946.73 18. Rescheduled March 2, 2007 workshop to discuss conditions which may warrant amendment of the County's comprehensive plan and/or land development regulations to Thursday, March 22, 2007 at 2:00 p.m. in County Commission Chambers, Courthouse, Okeechobee, Florida. Board of County Commissioners 2 Regular Session 2/22/2007 19. Received information from County Attorney regarding regulation of vehicle "tent sales" in Okeechobee County. 20. Directed staff to look into the feasibility of installing street lights along NW 36th Street in Whispering Pines subdivision. 18. Convened a 5:30 p.m. workshop to discuss the Okeechobee County Visioning Process final report with members of the project steering committee. Board of County Commissioners 3 Regular Session 2/22/2007