The URL can be used to link to this page

2004-02-03 Regular1. CALL TO ORDER - Mayor February 3, 2004, Regular City Council Meeting, 6:00 p.m. 11. OPENING CEREMONIES: Invocation offered by Larry Kilgore, Church of God; Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor. 111. MAYOR, COUNCIL AND STAFF ATTENDANCE - City Clerk. Mayor James E. Kirk Council Member Noel A. Chandler Council Member Lowry Markham Council Member Dowling R. Watford, Jr. Council Member D. Clayton Williams, Jr. City Attorney John R. Cook City Administrator Bill L. Veach City Clerk Lane Gamiotea Deputy Clerk Adriana Berry IV. MINUTES - City Clerk. CITY OF OKEECHOBEE FEBRUARY 3, 2004 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION Mayor Kirk called the February 3, 2004 Regular City Council Meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Due to the absence of Pastor Kilgore, the Invocation was offered by Council Member Williams; Mayor Kirk led the Pledge of Allegiance. City Clerk Gamiotea called the roll: Present Present Present Present Present Present Present Present Present PAGE I oF 6 A. Motion to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Council Member Watford moved to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Council Action for the Council Action for the January 20, 2004 Regular Meeting. III January 20, 2004 Regular Meeting; seconded by Council Member Williams. There was no discussion on this item. VOTE VJRK - YEA CKUDLR-YFA MARKHM - YFA WATFM - YEA WILUMS - YEA MOMN CAMED. Fammy 3, M4 - ftmm MEum - PAw 2 oF 6 711 V. AGENDA - Mayor. A. Requests for the addition, deferral or withdrawal of items on today's Mayor Kirk asked whether there were any requests for the addition, deferral or withdrawal of items on today's agenda. agenda. I There were none. V1. NEW BUSINESS. A. Consider preliminary plat approval of Applewood Estates The matter before the Council is a request to approve a preliminary plat for Applewood Estates. A subdivision to be Subdivision - Jeff Kennedy (Exhibit 1). implemented on a 1 0-acre parcel of land located the in Southeast section of the City, North of the existing "The Oaks" at Blue Heron Golf and County Club Phase IV -A. This property was part of the Blue Heron subdivision. However the property was sold and the new owner wishes to create their own subdivision consisting of nine lots, one road that dead -ends with a cul-de-sac. The Technical Review Committee discussed the project at their January 21, 2004 meeting and recommended approval. General Services has verified that all property taxes have been paid on the property. Council MemberWafford moved to aRpMve the RL911mina!y Riat forARpiewood Estatess seconded by Council Member Markham. Mr. Tom Murphy was present to represent the project engineer, Jeff Kennedy. The property owners, David and Anita Nunez were also present. Mr. Murphy reported that the OUA advised them today that a wastewater connection was not available at this time, nor was a projected time that it would be available given. Therefore one main change in the project will be the installation of septic tanks. Water can either be connected with existing OLIA waterlines or connection to existing Blue Heron water lines. Southeast 13' Court, the only road into the proposed subdivision was discussed. The developer understands they must install the roadway to City specifications and at their cost. The intention is that the roadway remain a private road. The owners and home owners association will maintain it, and could dedicate it to the City at a later day. The alignment of the roadway is not with 13t' Street, but between existing 13"' and 141 Streets. This is keeping with what The Oaks created to the South of this parcel. The developer's intension is to assist in reducing traffic -flow through the area. The cul-de-sac will be installed to the appropriate standards. A Fire hydrant is to be installed at the entrance to Southeast 13' Court. At the Technical Review Committee meeting, sidewalks were discussed. At the time of the meeting Mr. Hill (City Planning Consultant) was under the impression that sidewalks were a suggestion only. However, afterfurther review, he discovered that it is a requirement. Therefore a sidewalk will be installed in the subdivision. �-12 FEBRumy 3,2004 - REGULM MEEM - PAGE 3 oF 6 VI. NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED. A- Consider preliminary plat approval of Applewood Estates Attorney Cook advised that the developer's agreement, which is only in draft form at this time is not being adopted or Subdi� - Jeff Kennedy (Ed" 11). apprmed. A &W vemien wig be pmeniled at final *Aing. The owners * received #* copy W*A and wiR need to have their attorney and engineer review it for revisions. He also explained the platting procedures, once the preliminary plat is approved, the developer will now make all necessary changes, have all their issues resolved and when ready, will bring it back to the Council for final platting approval at a public hearing. VOTE KRK - YEA CHANMJM - YEA MARMM - YEA WATFOO - YEA VWUMS - YEA MOTON CAMED. Preliminary Platting for Applewood Estates has now been approved. The Council's approval does not constitute acceptance of the final plat, rather it shall be deemed an expression of acceptance for the layout submitted on the preliminary plat as a guide to the preparation of the final plat and approval of construction plans for required improvements and required supplementary materials. Mr. Murphy also stated that they will not sell a lot to anyone until all problems have been solved, and the responsibility of the ownership in the subdivision is understood. B. Discussion related to postage for Main Street - Councilman Watford. Council Member Watford requested the Council continue their support of Okeechobee Main Street by approving use of postage. This request was made to the Council on February 4, 2003 and the Council approved it for one year. He apologized for not bringing it up during budget preparations. Administrator Veach reported they never exceeded their maximum, and used approximately $400.00 for an eight month period. Council Member Markham moved to suppgrt Okeechobee Main SbyelL Inc. by approving them use of.9ft pg "ta 0. up to $100.00 pqr month, for the remainder of this budget "s r (SepLember 30, ?M: seconded Chandler. Council requested this be included during budget discussions for the 2004-2005 Fiscal Year. VI. NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED. B. Discussion related to postage for Main Street continued. C. Special Request of City Council related to an occupational license issue - Bobbi Poole (ExhiNt 2). f, FEBRuARY 3, M4 - REouLAR MEETING - PAGE 4 of 6 71�3 VOTE KRK-YEA CHANDLER - YEA MARKHAM - YEA WATFORD - YEA WIU14MS - YEA MOTION CARRIED. Mrs. Bobbi Poole, owner of Photography by Bobbi, 213 Southeast 2n' Street, is making a request to the Council for approval to use the adjoining property owners paved parking lot in lieu of installing the required three paved parking spaces for her business. Visiting Nurses Association, Inc. owns the entire East half of the block, and submitted a letter authorizing Mrs. Poole the use of their paved parking lot. Mrs. Poole will have the one required handicap parking space at her business, using what was the carport on the structure, which is already paved. She will need to coordinate with staff to obtain the regulations for marking/identifying the handicap space. Council and Staff discussed how this is a unique situation. Mrs. Poole rents the converted residential home as her photography studio and bakery. The bakery is a carry out only business and the studio is mainly by appointments. She is located on the comer of Southeast 3r' Avenue and 2nd Street and has adequate on -street parking. She moved into the structure and started renovations prior to applying for her occupational license. Staff has implemented steps into the required occupations license paperwork to eliminate these types of problems. The City Code requires that she bring the property and building up to existing code. However, once you have a business operating at a location, it is difficult to have them go back and address every issue. The intent is to catch the owners before the move to a location. Council Member Waftrd made moUon to allow PhgLography by Bobbi to use the Visiting Nurses Associsfion pirldng to mod off4bid pIrking Leguilmmntse seconded by Council Membw William. It was also noted that should Mrs. Poole move from this location, any new business will have to bring the property entirely up to Code. The Council also stated again the overriding factors are that the adjoining properties are owned by one owner, this is a residence converted to a business, the parking requirements are very low, it is not a heavily visited type business and has on -street parking. Council also noted there was discussion to consider revising regulations to assist staff when working with residential homes that are being converted to commercial -type businesses. This is some Staff still needs to address and bring to the Council for consideration. 714 V1. NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED. C. Special Request of City Council related to an occupational license issue continued. D. Special Request of City Council related to an occupational license issue - Brad Goodbread (ExhlWt 3). E. Discussion related to areas of consideration for impact fee RFP - City Administrator. FEsRuARY 3, 2004 - REGuLAR MEETING - PAGE 5 oF 6 VOTE KRK - YEA CKMMLM-YEA MARKIAM - YEA WATFM - YEA WLUMS - YEA MOTION CARRM. Mr. Brad Goodbread appeared before the Council requesting permission to allow two businesses to operate on non- conforming use property and in non -conforming buildings. The area is 703 North ParroftAvenue, one business is Signs of All Kinds, the other is a concrete statue manufacturer and sales. Attorney Cook advised this is again a situation brought by businesses opening and operating prior,to completing an occupational license application and checking whether the property is in compliance or not. The Futur� Land Use Map and Zoning Maps are conflicting. The buildings would need to be brought up to code. Parking requirements forlhe sign business need to be met. Mr. Goodbread does not want to rezone the property to Heavy Commercial at this time since that would not allow the concrete statue business to stay in operation. He is requesting the Council allow him to rent to these businesses for awhile, until some of his commercial investment could be recouped. His intentions are to demolish all the buildings on Lots 4 to 10 of Block 58, City of Okeechobee and have a new commercial type business built. However, he contends that he cannot do that at this time, nor can he bring the buildings up to code, due to costs involved. Following a brief discussion, Attorney Cook suggested that Mr. Goodbread meet with him and other City Staff to come to some lypg of resolution and research whether a conditional occupation license could be worked out. There are to many items that need to be addressed for the Council to waive them all. Eve!yone has to bring their buildings up to code. This will give us the oppgrtunily to work uQ some Qrovisions and time frames that can be met. Council agreed. Administrator Veach advised that following the joint City, County and School Board workshop, each entity was to submit a list of items they want researched on the feasibility of impact fee's. Mr. Bill Royce and Mr. Ty Hancock of the County Planning and Development Department were present. Mr. Veach had asked them to attend the meeting to assist with information regarding impact fee's. Mr. Joey Hoover, Director of the Economic Council was also present and provided helpful information to the Council. Following a lengthy discussion, Council listed the following for areas to research for impact fees: 1 - Stormwater 2 - Roadways[Transportation/Right-of-ways/Mass Transit. 3 - Fire. 4 - Police. VI. NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED. E. Discussion related to areas of consideration for impact fee RFP continued. V11. ADJOURN MEETING - Mayor. Please take notice and be advised that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the City Council with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, helshe may need to insure that a verbatim record of the proceeding is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based City Clerk tapes are for the sole purpose of backup for official records of the Clerk. ATTEST: (� , - I- - " 'o-' � a ' 7 James E. Kirk, Mayor FEBRuARY 3,2004 - REGuLm MEEnNG - PAGE 6 oF 6 Mr. Veach thanked Mr. Royce and Mr. Hoover for their comments and assistance on this matter. Mr. Hoover stated he knew the City and County were entering a new area on this topic. "The Economic Council is here to support you in this endeavor and please let us know if we can help you in any way." There being no further items on the agenda, Mayor Kirk adjourned the February 3, 2004 meeting at 7:35 p.m. The next regularly scheduled meeting is February 17, 2004. 715 1. CALL TO ORDER - Mayor: February 3, 2004, Regular City Council Meeting, 6:00 p.m. 111. OPENING CEREMONIES: Invocation offered by Larry Kilgore, Church of God; Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor. ,./ I1111. MAYOR, COUNCIL AND STAFF ATTENDANCE - City Clerk. Mayor James E. Kirk Council Member Noel A. Chandler Council Member Lowry Markham Council Member Dowling R. Watford, Jr. Council Member D. Clayton Williams, Jr. City Attorney John R. Cook City Administrator Bill L . Veach City Clerk Lane Gamiotea Deputy Clerk Adriana Berry I/ IV. MINUTES - City Clerk. CITY OF OKEECHOBEE FEBRUARY 3,2004 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION Mayor Kirk called the February 3, 2004 Regular City Council Meeting to order at 6:00 p.m- wl U, The Invocation was offered by Council Member William Mayor Kirk led the Pledge of Allegiance. City Clerk Gamiotea called the roll: Present Present Present Present Present Present Present Present Present A. Motion to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Council Member Watford moved to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Council Action forthe Council Action for the January 20, 2004 Regular Meeting. I January 20, 2004 Regular Meeting; seconded by Council Member Williams. There was no discussion on this item. VOTE KIRK - YEA CHANDLER - YEA MARKHAM - YEA WATFORD - YEA WILLIAMS - YEA MOTION CARPJED. M L�-- FEmuARY 3,2004 - REouLAR MEEm - PAGE 2 oF 5 V. AGENDA -Mayor. A- Requests for the addition, deferral dr withdrawal of items on today's Mayor Kirk asked whetherthere were any requests for the addition, deferral or withdrawal of items on today's agenda. agenda. I There were none. v V1. NEW BUSINESS. A. Consider prehminary plat approvil 6f Applewood Estates Watford moved to aDprove the prelimina plat for Appi od Estates; seconded by Council Member Markham. Subdivision - Jeff Kennedy (Exhibit 1). 1 Mr. Tom Murphy - septic tanks, OUA does not have sewer available found out today. Watford, SE 130' Court you put in, yes intention to remain a private road, owners and home owners association maintain, could turn over at a later day. Alignment would be between blocks? Yes will be in between 13th and 10 Streets. Hasn't cause problem with what blue heron put in. Davis, no problem. Reduces traffic through area. SE 13P Court has to wide enough, cul-de-sac, to standards. Yes, TRC. Fire plug at entrance to road. LM - sidewalk, will not be a sidewalk. Not required by City ordinance. Kelly Hill, 78-36 any new subdivision will have sidewalks required. That was the only issue we (planning) saw. That has to go to TRC. Exact procedure will be. Preliminary and then come back with final. John - recently updated those procedures, Pre -application goes to TRC. Preliminary and Final to Council. Draft of developers agreement, document developer will develop project according to plat. Sit down and make changes to document. Markham, how far sewer line? Don't know. None available, no time frame or anything. Septic tank % or larger. OUA water if available, we will use. Looking at blue heron if not available. Hope to have solved by final. Don't intend to sell anyone a lot until we have all these problems solved, responsibility of ownership in the subdivision, Copy of ordinance. Vote - all yea. S. Discussion related to postage for Main Street -Councilman Watford. Watford, last year, approved Main Street with $100.00 per month for postage through the City. Apologized to Council, should have thought about it dudng the budget process, they have requested it again. Used less than allotment. Never exceeded, $400.00 for an ekjtft month period. Any way we can help vft that or work in our posts" budget. Kirk think we should help in any ways we can, and this is a good way. Markham moved to support main street postage, same as last year up to $100.00 for one year, remainder of this budget year; seconded by Chandler. C FEBRuARY 3,2004 - REouLAR MEETING - PAGE 3 oF 5 A NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED. B. Discussion related to postage for� Main Street - Councilman Watford. I Lets remember at budget year to bdng this back up.Vote, all yea. C. Special Request of City Council related to an occupational license issue - Bobbi Poole (Exhibit 2). D. Special Request of City Council related tO an OccuP8001181 New" issue - Brad Goodbread (Exhibit 3). Bobbi Poole, request use of visiting nurses association parking lot which is next to my site and my land owner, don't own property, renting, cant put $4000 in property I don't own, understand what you want from me, but cannot do. Watford, not that there would not be any parking, just use the parking lot of which owns all the land. Not a request we felt was unreasonable, but out of staff authority to approve. VNA adequate parking, it wouldn't hurt them. They have new building, they have adequate, as far as requirements as submitted by design, adequate with other square footage of additional building, not sure, said Veach. Bobbi, bakery is take out only, photographic is by appointment only, there's not that many people coming to the site, don't triple book. Watford, tough one, have to consider every business, only problem I have, when you have, which we have several in the City, if somebody converted a RES structure to Commercial, very difficult to do. Especially when you change the uses, flip side is that its more valuable. As older families move out, better than letting them run down, use the commercial renovations. Need regulations to take that into account. 1 property owner, good plus, adjoining property. Reasonable request. Parameters or guidelines? Businesses usually start operation and find out rules later. Goal of City when RSF converted to C, come up to code as much as possible. We have our documents arranged to put land owners and tenants on notice to let them know before you spend a lot of money, check out the regulations. In Bobbi's case, even if you paved the parking, most of her parking would probably be off street anyway because of her layout of the building. Bobbi - people go to the obvious, even if it was there, don't think they would use. Chandler, you have a different situation. Cook - intent is to catch them before, Williams - cease to do business, this is null and void. If another business comes in there, they have to start from square one. Yes. We gave the City Council authority to do this by the LDR's. Cook - we have done it before. Watford moved to allow Photography by Bobbi to use VNA parking to meet their re quirements; seconded by Williams. This will come up again and again, overriding factor is owned by 1 owner, residence converted to business, very low parking requirements, not heavily visited, has on -street parking. Vote all yea. Goodbm-ad - both zoned Industrial Ww*v to 2 buskwss concerns, I mobile sign shop, makes si�Ins in shop, no retail transactions, the other is old Wooley sheds location, makes concrete figures and sells them. Don't feel that its time to have the entire property commercial. To bring them up to commercial code would be financially unfeasible, want to lease buildings out until we can do the heavy commercial project. Don't feel now is the time. 2 trying to get occupational license, can't due to zoning and land use. r FEmuARY 3, 2004 - REGuLm MEETING - PAGE 4 oF 5 V11. NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED. D. Special Request of City Council related to an occupational license Watford, sign business in old 50 foot lot, with house. How long sign business been in there. Just a few months ago. issue - Brad Goodbread (Exhibit 3). No curb cut, accesses it through computer business or alleyway. Doesn't have a heavy traffic flow. Watford, whats the issue. Veach, lot 7 were sign business started business then came in to apply for license, red flag with staff, non - compatible with zoning and FLU. 2w thing, no parking, building code issues. We have ran into issues With manufacturing. Whole bailiwick of concerns. Staff views - sign company and monument. Computer place is okay? As it stands now, if they rezone going to be a problem. ZoningIFLU is in conflict, buildings don't comply with codes. Brad, we just want to keep them rented out until we can do a whole commercial overhaul. Cleaned up the property. Want, to take things and make them nice. Watford, this is even a tougher one. Why can't concrete business get license? Veach, haven't told them to stop, wafting to see what the direction of Council. License is pending until other matter is resolved. Markham, only have to look at lot 7, other can do business? Yes, but defer. But there's a lot to bring 7 up to code. Are we going to put them together or separate out? Kelly, because the FLU is C can only do what is allowed by FLU. Manufacturing would not be aflowed because of that. Lot 6 with internet companies, allowed in both. 7 out what would happen? Shed guy there, no 6 month vacancy, he is allowed. Really don't have to worry about. If every lot 4-10. DonT think council can waive that much, everyone has to bring them up to code. Conditional license. These things have a tendency to go on for years. Brad, don't know how long. All we're trying to do is take a longer time, going to cost a lot of money. Sign guy what can we do about him? Cook would suggest, one of things where you start a business and then find out rules. Staff sits down, work up provision, time frame, meet it, if not come back. Kirk, think good suggestion. Not our fault, don't find out until business up and running, Want to help any new business. Can't overlook the codes either. Brad, area is transitional. Kirk, much better situation, sit down with staff and attorney and come up with something that is working. Still try to work with people. Lydia to schedule, Cook, Lydia, Katrina E. Discussion related to areas of consideration for impact fee RFP - Veach, last week, held joint workshop with County and School Board. Staff to do RFP to do study to implement impact City Administrator. fees in certain areas. Need to know what areas you want to consider. Kirk, building or development being done, does it have to impact that area to charge it? Nexsus of benefit.. Study that says that new development will cost this much of an impact and this is how much its going to cost. Money spent on captial improvements. Can't pay for what you got, personnel. Can pay for new buildings, roads, turn lanes, storm water drainage. Only what that new development created. 1 house? Greatly effect? A formula to develop. IE: 500 homes impact school this much, 1 house would be 1/500 of the impact and therefore that would be the cost. Joey Hoover. Economic Council, supports impact fees, time coming. Preparation of captial facilities or reasonable plan. Life span of longer than 10 , money spent and encombered within 6 years. Do something that's small enough the the city do and could build or do within 6 year time frame. rid FEBRuARY 3,2004 - REGuLm MEETING - PAGE 5 oF 5 VI. NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED. Fire equipment purchased example given by Hoover. Veach why 3 are sitting down together. Hoover, money can be used for. Only for what's in the study, goes into separate accounts, cannot go back and pay for something you did in E. Discussion related to areas of consideration for impact fee RFP - the past. Only on future item. Sold bonds for items, service debt. Don't use the money within 6 years where does the City Administrator. money go? Don't have good answer for you, that does have to be addressed in your reasonable plan, One other thing that has people concemed. IE: 4000 homes built within the county, can't do impact fee after the fact which is one of the good reasons to have this in place. Economic Council support you as a whole, issue whose time has come. Williams, schools has to do their own. Right something small enough to handle, 6 year time frame to collect. Williams, water and sewer, OUA, new subdivision, their required to put in. Not lines but capacity of the plant. Water/sewer our concern? Royce, don't know how they fit into the picture. Markham, impose water/sewer impact fee, something we can't use. Water and sewer is one of the main concerns for the city. OUA needs to be in this mix or the County needs to have some mechanism to impose that fee. OUA has connection fee's etc that handle their capacity, other charges, to address the same issues. Markham, but are they using the money for that? Their auditors have to be the ones to monitor. Veach, agree with Hoover, time limit of what you can spend, areas you want to study need to be cost effective endeavor if we under take it, Hoover, Bill Nht on that. Cost of doing plan doesn't recoup itself, have to discover. Royce, that is addressed in the study, not going to raise enough money will be addressed. Usually you can see where your going to need areas of growth. Watford, to Royce, the payor of the impact fee has to receive benefit of the impact fee. Royce, yes. Commercial development benefits of impact fees. Impact fee the same for the whole county, say build home in Bassinger? Royce some items will be county wide others no, depending on who provides the service. Recreation example. Establish zones, don't have to be countywide, can be countywide and benefit different from one zone to another, those prices could be different depending on zone. Most coastal communities have impact fee, so its an excepted, every developer will fight it, its part of doing business anymore, How much it is and when do you have to pay ft. Permit time? Problem with it them, Attomey General opinion on it. Wont' stop things, can create cash flow problems. Developer put in subdivision, Usually paid during building permit. 1 time cost by developer, he passes it along when he sells the property. Williams, what kind of time frame are we looking at? Veach never been involved can't answer, just as any study. Probably 1 year. Have to review them every 2 years, keep them updated. As quick as you can tell me. FLC what's normal? Veach, found 2-3 areas, transportation, recreation, emergency services. Special needs city, can look at any areas. Police and Fire/EMS. EMS could be countywide and Fire specific to city. We do have parks, that would classify with recreation. Storm water. DEP has a study. Roads/transportation, right of ways, mass transit. Sidewalks are not usually involved. Reasonable to think police. Limited size reasonable to assume. Rsdevelo�t is also an issue, Limit the height. Expanse is just as cumbersome as one 6-7 stories. Adding one fire truck. Thanked Bill and Ty for their comments, ente6ng a new area. Hoover appreciate your comments. Support you, catch flack for it, can help you any way. adjournment 17:35 p.m PAGE -1 - CITY OF OKEECHOBEE -FEBRUARY 3,2004 - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - HANDWRITTEN MINUTES I., CALL TO ORDER -Mayor: hiric Februa[y 3. 2004, City Council Regula Meeting, 6:00 p.m. C 1,cj� fvm 02 th 5 II. OPENING CEREMONIES: Invocation given by Lagy Kilgore, Church of God. Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor Ill. MAYOR, COUNCIL AND STAFF ATTENDANCE - City Clerk. Mayor James E. Kirk Council Member Noel A. Chandler Council Member Lowry Markham Council Member Dowling R. Watford, Jr. Council Member Clayton Williams City Attorney John R. Cook City Administrator Bill L. Veach City Clerk Lane Gamiotea Deputy Clerk Adriana Berry Present Absent V/ IV.. MINUTES - City Clerk. A. CouncilMember NO, _moved to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Council Action for the January 20, 2004 Regular Meeting; seconded by Council Member C Lk) VPTE YE4k NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT KIRK CIIANDLER MARKHAM WATFORD WiLLIAM!� M rl TION: EE�- DENIED V., AGENDA - Mayor. A. Requests for the addition, deferral or withdrawal of items on today's agenda. None PAGE -2- A. NEW BUSI-NESS A. Consider preliminary plat approval of Applewood Estates Subdivision - Jeff Kennedy (Exhibit 1). -rom Murpol- Nune7,0wner. Dw mc Ve 4-o Ll Pf ro va pre. U M SeCoO TDtn- DUA owajlobih�j-nO bo,5e LOafor Wy.�y �ave 4o go qt sqHC +aAY-S. t�w-q )Dfs? M-yP,5. SC 13 Courl- Torm- willdevelop noaotwa;y- pri-vata rOCLCI - 14DMabww_5 Uill Mit)+C(in FOW - t) W ,' a_�U rne-A+ -jxf-w0ej-_ 7� 1007� WN)-Y, 9A i h 9- ty +e rR Y) 0 s #4- eii Or. /0 anoYh&- Murph� -will PD-� Wn 9 C.,h f i f -/) o p r Doje/n , hb f CDinPctPd -redurps im b5c SC 13 CLvr+ -W(Oc. " - ob, _�/_ u s,�- 0, Tee . rife f lug (9 i&prgP6�'&� On Me, road, lood by ct-1 Mwphj - I)o requ � Y oti. Ij - fS �Iu )'rod 78'-3 (o , f) e w 5 Hee ya si de waet - b r) lj e . D lx�- Te c . JV h n 0)(p /c?),) fxompho, JoA n- regaire 3sleps -&cc .-Pplormim OWher yne, D�U �hrOup 11�51- + 0"t �-Pabbc he0ro, P to V0 POP j1Y1PV.Q1 r, Ot - q PPM e, C�'o nt 0 h t A- ft-�- Tom <,a4d, Tbm tmo)374. tM- h&A) far wer ) io . M u p h,� -- fhn Y q "� - 'B S-7 p t6per ldeaJ Am- bn + Onj avad0le . /,;L Ocre e 1? /a t-aemm�- - Tr f-D Of 6Uq IT a V0 i IQ SLL5�er.---). WDrepcl Uj bj iWiav^600. Pctr+ 61k,& ge 1� /of hplb(o, thp� Law nq VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT WI-R-K CHANDLFR MARKHAM WATFOFJD WILLIAMS MOTION DENIED I PAGE -3- Discussion related to postage for Main Street - Councilman Watford. Db\)- tnC1ir)5trP&, )osf �t. "j-nstrw rporg. po�fxy, �r maiA51rPef, 4r (erictii) )e fim-e . Requ-?5i a-,z&jenrP wl posla rlrislllut�r i-\ -� td - Shprod . af wt) 91 te . 0,50 )-eB Ivqq 0 � C1 or, Mon-F. q mv)s. /.�� PIA) -- help Worl( iND p 61 &ci go P) Qy 0 r -,S qp 094--1 - f potl, Oct) wQ cbn help, Jbhn ; n0h6n. _LJ92 5t4ppof t fn� poS)-o fVe s�q jc6V. Fo r 1111�11 rps v 6 c,, J cdd L�� VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT KIRK I/ CHANDLER V MARKHAM WATFORD WILLIAMS MOTION DENIED PAGE -4- C. Special Request of City Council related to an occupational license issue - Bobbi Poole (Exhibit 2). 6P- Ctfdn4 britNo - VNA if WrOOW COA I'Sa pqrkj'4 )D f- � g cati,5, . por -1 D WA PqPv-q DO /10 f- 0 Wg �5 Wf/1 hN I-Ntl $Y,06.0 10I)d. DAJ-QA�gd -foa/10to Q POrMB- bu6. Gom V&4..731 AS 19 Ila,") - CC,u-,qQ- rnethodlS�-Ohur&). sl-O-P- prt jqbnce. bko - V NA ba vo odequohe poqrr��i �o ( bu j ILI i n qferuvo, cl . Sj IV IV Ito Ct o-PA shele-;�- porr,-Pj . Boke�y ILI te &r 0/1) ?A 0 1 /_3 00s/) 0- CC) On OD d ft -6 iple, ccf us C q /,0 / 0 /'Coa, servfce�? Pom. Dp-,,j- Copsider e i/ P�y Pus it) a§ . /10 U0 0) 4es. fo 6us.5truclui-e_ lnpel- 0 (2 od.,PS. 1_)J4 fD oto COIN vo fl-- f7) bu 5 . Ljsg, M 0 aS-U O.J34 0— a 9 COMI-),j . ft /) rP S /'49r) /7 OS - Pa ve re 3 . M �a ke- ji) �-o oAcca,1jt-. CB.D -jewt hque Oh- KQQW-� Q O)e, r(29 Q6� - pa to-pvtor 0J(A4de111V . f�fit*m ctf 115 - ,PJ"- COMMOnCe /-V,5. �6-Ad MY- rli),ps lo&r. C UfYW, QP tZ C 0 Ole L ,,.e,fC. AMA) nWSO, *)-nqs- Ary. All sfvfe_� aus 5rtL0_6+ rqf4rg . Done in 0 �her rou�� jr- or-lum, ptopkIn. JC- come, bQCL Qqc1o, Cokhi0&re_ Cots IV pb)t)f , 'DPL010firif SJM CtUre - CLJ -new OW"r Spy, HQUa 091h. Ivao �h i-5 , 7) 0 POr CNA � I DIA) - of //0,0 Pholv /-v t4s P vlv,4 , 11)e - PV4�5 �D f)p f M? U /, rplyMt5. . C A) rCj . Dw - Corr)? &.p Qgi?il), i- ogail-) . Ufd,91- sqly)o &Aershp, Pe5. M N-s U-S-8- 10W OYP'P�, rcrlu iretm,W-, No - Of PAGE -5- D. Special Request of City Council related to an occupational license issue - Brad Goodbread (Exhibit 3). Of ad - bo tn ItOned ird /0L?,S/'A9 -a0- I trobile 5 j Shtp , Ta t e 5 4- o'cic s P d no r e la j) .Maang CY)c - 5W5 sla e 0-) 610!00f On DA. FtttUre CIN - f?_4�41f OA) -POY me - Ichm m�e 011-t tv 0 lhpm C000 160jo, Of)h� time aut. /I bp 0 p, op . WlVt-- h ul� MO/7 #-6. am�lt hr _P 0 CUM ea�_ (Y) P (DPO f TD f r) ha / Y, rew-,p . 0 r old., akev ,� - Gw n rcI9 in �Ton 4-% am. 13ill - lo-t -7 ne w bu 5. PO 00� Saafx OonCro�e AD bU5 - oymlotM5 S/gps -Cot_r"I", Cbrne- f6 COCkO . I�al.�y Si-4. A1.50 C Apy. P0j12h'I'5 h 5 f 0 /�t4 ra/l /7;0 C1. C1001W d a P h & ig n 12" -nt65 I - g M 67 te. f i o /,>u - con C. d ect'de lb re z v n4e, - Co P r - pbn t-. Z op j /) � . - braa_ LM- lot I ctiq 0,11 Flurn, im. flof 011&ue. AW u 1�fef j oel, L rf) -SO ( \)Q PrOPIPM . J C fWYX fU lUre. JC - fro-J. ()CC'. GO Wo ly)tyft PV/) rr5. m /2) frato Johl- Amhc)L,�IT iLf kfar. 'go At . b)0. SfOff �_ JA)0t 16 qp proV. Pfcccmodam, aet.Jtusme�s. h��e6",e. /1-, -S11 dWP Wl§tqg I ATPOC iule L�JA - _'�Q4-6WMMh�y�. PAGE -6- E. Discussion related to areas of consideration for impact fee RFP - City Administrator. AaAr, CW� ffi- iOSk Wt - 1,J KSAP. 0 C) 9-vp (�br cunsu 1 �4rl 0 r 5" 10 M p0li i� T 46 1. heO h) ltn&) 4w $ ivo, wpa I A M8. ha ve lo q -P-Pery oA ren, Pa ro M 0 br, I Uj de 0 - Sh M 51a 4 9 9xw ly 0) e v (r./ rap �/M ach 0,0 [MfQ 011 � Actve CO Use, �Pm k C)/n C, lq�/ rwalnmll- n avp J- u4 heive pqy new Sch 6o I , oelAj to��jx 41jyn �Qne- - aue aAdo s a r-n P, r (t e, �d9 057 67Y 500 he (11) 610-e S ftffth Joej lk&r. 6 X ec bk-o� C amev'l. �Q PP Or--�- TnPQC-�- rePS , P-..PQCJ-\Ol it � 17�W. prop, OP fbolij h9re hove M besfeAtm )Y9 Spal Cr more #�J/) /1) thl 1)3 smaj� 4emx�K . �-o I i h r ry)e Ppame, P-poswhl(2 etocpanr- C� U i pprrlpf)� aso For Ca (bt w hrch co Pe e, 'WJ b6hds ror H-em . a UtpV)W L r A) S1)W0hW2- fib/ Oattyv- s�wt-,x-. Cw vt ccup rn aN q. Lkla4 P r- k w er . Aill - MS 0 61N PO 1 6 v Q (/0 aS C n tt)o OtLJ9 +h(Ott(� CowthM Pee VW 3 al r6ffPc-� o�� b1n;1-- C��Povc �h-� Ca p. q5s�ef,� bcv- rwed ohen jak �v-ou,3. C-fpgNot) O(UmoClaloe. grotoAh . 70-vp�� Joerph4t Sarre Cmj U -ur a in CUjr) Who pfbvdif,�Serulre. SW $NA� zone,- 3-1� fps. Me/ SCO/;0M, cur) kc tb r w fl) A-ght - U -Sed lo d OIN - t6) -t co lk�i, bl 0ap Orr- il) Ova ojwO. hl!�Rp -�b reumb., eueA�� a) qua> o r to rK s ho as - ree, r. eir��li ed, >E Y�EA NAY ABSTAIN AIB§ENT YCI rxSP(V t� t7 KIR ftAt, Nit - emeryl) sortl, CHANDL > M M ARKHAM �V O� 0 WATFORD MOTION CARRIED - DENIED --1-.3(0 IV. CITY OF OKEECHOBEE FEBRUARY 3,2004 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OFFICIAL AGENDA PAGE I OF 2 CALL TO ORDER - Mayor: February 3, 2004 City Council Regular Meeting, 6:00 p.m. OPENING CEREMONIES: Invocation given by Larry Kilgore, Church of God. Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor. MAYOR, COUNCIL AND STAFF ATTENDANCE - City Clerk. Mayor James E. Kirk Council Member Noel A. Chandler Council Member Lowry Markham Council Member Dowling R. Watford, Jr. Council Member Clayton Williams City Attorney John R. Cook City Administrator Bill L. Veach City Clerk Lane Gamiotea MINUTES - City Clerk. A. Motion to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Council Action for the January 20, 2004 Regular Meeting. V. AGENDA - Mayor. A. Requests for the addition, deferral or withdrawal of items on today's agenda. FEBRUARY 3,2004 - CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - PAGE 2 OF 2 VI. NEW BUSINESS. A. Consider preliminary plat approval of Applewood Estates Subdivision - Jeff Kennedy (Exhibit 1). B. Discussion related to postage for Main Street - Councilman Watford. C. Special Request of City Council related to an occupational license issue - Bobbi Poole (Exhibit 2). D. Special Request of City Council related to an occupational license issue - Brad Goodbread (Exhibit 3). E. Discussion related to areas of consideration for impact fee RFP - City Administrator. V11. ADJOURN MEETING - Mayor. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that if any person desires to appeal any decision made by the City Council with respect to any matter considered at this proceeding, such Interested person will need a record of the proceeding, and for such purpose may need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceeding Is made, which record Includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. City Clerk tapes are for the sole purpose of backup for official records of the Clerk. 12/11/2CO 2 FJ5: 09 863:jk7@611 DA 50D 9 Apr( 11do mom SIF and Rosal's to, rtv P.A. W. cmny, 1= 40X W.W. 4TH 11TAIRT 1367 TL 34973-1367 11WD W - 2-22-37-35-OACO-00041-0000 PA6E 01 %v ' ar anity Deed rhi � i Inde M Made this 3 0 th day of September 2003 A-D.. Betwem QU W C. T BAJM & TRUST COKPANY. a Louisiana Bankiuii corporation I of it I i comew !of sma of Iouisiana gnmtor, wd D 11 MD JR. and ANITA S. NUNEZ, his wife W"gdd=u!jL. 2083 S.Z. 4th Strout, Okeechobee, rL 34974 of it, C0414W Okeechobee stow of Florida W1 Mena* ---------------- TBN VOLr.hRj4 ($10) ----------------------- DOLLULS, A othu swd " vtluiNo CmAwnum w GRAN"R 'R �ood vud by OXANTas. *A Mee* whotoof is hordby wkwwkdpd, how wied, 4wned Lad soM io &r. ag GRANTM and GRANTEET beus, vocomms wd usaw rm". tic 65DWiNg dwalOW 410KI, ututdiv 411141�sgindsocuwoyjf Okeechobee stsio of Florida L-) wk —a 91zhibit "All attached. �Jtht to restrictions, reservations and e"ements of record, if I ; ich lare not reimposed hereby, an4 taxes subsequent to December t,j 2002. In �tb. #%o*w don hat6) folly warvant. dsa dtle tD said W4 sad wt1l difwd *w saw ;ipind lowld Cw= of am ve"M .1mowzWK. tbae�@ Wbwwf, L* vuw bw hesvuwD set it. land nd tool flue da-Y AW yew 3M *m wftm wood and deHwed In our praw"; GULF COAST BANK & TRVST COMPANY By g (Sea]) PttedL Name t DOUGLAS P. CAIRE w Sao Vice Pr4sidont P.0, A4dmn ISO vvm ramummay Appmals, S&L C NUandow lllw� LA 70471 PALlatia No= g wi6esil (C,*rpar&U Se&4 S il:'E� F LOUISIANA OF '-4jPg imetwowt �u ackisowleftW befte um fts 30th day 9f September 2003 by P. CAXRZ, Vice President of GULF COAST BANK G TRUST COMPANY on if of tAe corporation bLtO4ww-4imw*mtomcrhcbupo&mdhi3d.rLver*a Printed Names Notary Public WIC C) t-t (,-- &.0 0 t, i,- , 6z- ;�, �L(q -7 q Phone: -7C) O—Fax: Parcel identification number: Application for Site Plan Review Name of project: wL-cw 00!) Applicant: 4P IT -A 6--Z- Address: "o I; LC, 34q-7 q Phone: 3 --0 Lo i I Fax: Other phone: Contact Person: `5 k-VK- 4, 14-, A,6o v �-- Address: Phone: Fax: Other phone: Property Owner: �; +W t i4ec) )k- Address: Phone: Fax: Engineer: 1&0 ri L2j, L�Lu C- 0C Z�� C- Address: 11)-3 5, C L >&-.rC_CJ r, 09 ,5�c6actjc- 1:�- �3 5 5-7 0 Phone: -2/o3- ck-7 �-398c�r Fax: ;6 63 - ck-I I - zz I Surveyor J"ts At- WL-0 P...) V -7 Address: 0 EXHIBIT I — FEBRUARY3 AGENDA City of Okeechobee 55 Southeast VdAvenue Okeechobee, Flodda 34974 Phone: (863) 763-3372 Fax (863) 763-1686 Application for Site Plan Review Name of Project: Appu,�IoOO.. Applicant: 14rJ1T-A Nor-jQ--z- Property Owner: 1?1 Alvo 41v iT-+ A)u/,ve:,--- Description of project including all proposed uses: M f/V 0 PKO(io5l�") 6T L-0'r- 5v '3 0 1 '-J' 910 Number/description of phases: 0 N C Location of/Directions to the project: o e-T-LL U F-,p .0t,j ee) L� LO—�e L -J Existing improvements on property: N V (Q f- Is proposed use different from existing or prior use? LILYes) No) N/A) Total Land area in square feet: q3g 00 or acres: /0,010 Existing impervious surface: 0 square feet 6 acres C) %of site Additional impervious surface. 1-7 (0 square feet 2. ZA acres 7-(Pr3% of site Proposed total impervious surface t1u,square feet 2-- 64 acres Z41c22 % of'site Current zoning: Current Future Land Use: General Services Department Tax Information Verification 1/7/04 Called the Tax Collectors office and spoke to Paula. She stated that all taxes were up to date on the property, parcel number being 2-22-37-35-OAOO-00041-0000. The taxes were paid on 11 / 12/03 by David and Anita Nunm, KVO Katrina Vinson General Services Coordinator cr n-ra i A k ir- YAW 0. 111 p I,' A -I V �9-2 Q,� cl z MIR gypps zt3 0 149 MDHT-W-WY :: � P P P P 4' �4 v 7A a f4 HN 192- =1 §6 Imp & p :5 8 3. .4 gEn 64 -4 In rn -0 34 I F. 4 * .- � > ;o rn IL 0 u [[I 0 W I w Im m -u ;u Z Au 227.7W- 1105-35' Mb --11Q�.28' MFAS. "% 244M — --1 — — — — — — — — — — - z at co --25OL34'— V 00 IN, 3AINO I C.1p 2 q All, WAY- / .41 4U.50L lo L4 lit p r F I Ln A F.-- U. o w r" 4E ol 4. uj p. 01, 13 Ilt II n 2 1,4 10 IN m -i rn -n 0 C') 77 ;:-.: CD -< CD 0 0 — =r 00 cr ;.7- cD CD cD CD 0 ZY 0 =r cr CD cD -0 CD E3 0 -0 0 CD 3 ,F<� 3 o CD * a =3 CD CD n CD CD =3 3 =3 ;:�: 0 =r CD (n 0 Ep CD CD CD (n = CD . M < PO CD =r 0 C/) E5: CT cD CD a) CD -0 0 co 0 > > -n a- g: 0 CD 0 3 EP M- 0 1 CD 0 =3 W Cn CD -0 25 moc C, — = " -0 CD < " cD z 0- CD -, cn CL — cn m 0 0 0 0 0- > ;G < C :3 C�L Fn CD =r CL 0 0 =3 0 C2. W CD 0 L ca. w cD En CD CD CD M cn -0 a) ca CD 3 0 =. -o CD M cr = 0 = 0- CD (0 — — a) W o =3 w w cr o =: = — CD 0 CD EP 4- 0) 5 :E 0 0 cn W U — CD ch — ' c5 — CD CD CD CA 0 -0 al = * 5; 0 w h CD - cn CD cn. 0- o cr CL) =3 CD CD cr a) :3 CD OF w CD CD C-) 0 C:> CD — ca a) -0 C) 0 -0 j,-"L = — CD =r -o CD CD a) =3 CD (n CD 0 0- < = 0 CD — 0 0 0 C3, CD 0 CD CD M 1 3 cl 0 CC) _0 a 3 —0 (a cD 3 =:r =:r o CD cr W =r o CD 0 W E3 - CD m cn CD CL EP 2- --1 cn cn =r — cn cn -C3 CD 0 =r — — m B 00-0 CD ;r cn cn CD CD CD C-) CD ZD' 2 =r a) 0 =3 CD 0- C- C) cn CD CD CD 3 C-71 CD CD 0 Ca- 3 CD cn m :z w c cn > (a. a -0 Cr :=r -o CD CD CD -0 cn cn 0 0 �o 0 =3 CD CL 0 m U) 0 CD C= (n CL D cr cL CL cn 0 0 0 Cl) ::r CD CD 0- 2) = o -4 0 0 n CD _0 @7 =3 CD 0 0 a 0 =3 M a > cn CD CD - co CD N --I X =: a w w cn ?� CD --I =r (n — �:E , CD -- =r 0 CD :q M C-. =r cn - CD =T 0 0 F 0 m CD ic w r- -< ;a 0 0 CD -0 CL CD =r CD CD =3; CD 0 =3 M a ic =3 CD CL (D (D CD cn EV CD :E ca En C3 (D 0 CD Cr — =r CD =3 CD 0 3 Z CD =3 Q- 3 m Cr CD z cn (n CD UL 0- 0 a- CD c�- CL — CL =r 0 > < l< 3 0 =r CD CD CC Q) c:) CD 0 6 3 m 0 CD ---1 = cr e;7- > 427 0 :1 =r CD M io o 0 — EL 3-- =r CD M =r -- CD CD CD — 0 CD -D =3 CD 3 EL ---, CD 0- CL a) -0 o %< I — ca- CD 0 0) CD 0 -, -0 0 &5. --1 CD CD -0 cn a) T = * cc CD a) K C'n C3- < (n EL (n 0 0 5 C m Sn 0 0 CD - CD -:v o 3 3 0 3 m m — CL :3 CL CD cr CD =3 0- > CD -n cn CD 0 CD =3 0 0 — 3 — - CD :3 Er CD CD W - " — _-I. 77 0 — cn 0 = CD 3 -E* 'o- — C:l- CD < 0 3 0 en -0 CD CD =:r E-r 0 C) < — 0 cD ET (D CD — (n C-) C:r CD CD W M 0 m ElF CD CL w 3 CL o w " B — M m 0 m 0 M. CL CD CD — CD ::r CD- 0 0 w Pr (n - K -0 0 0) 0- , ;:w 3 — CD 0 CD CD =r 3 CD r -a CD = = CD * E3 (n o l< 0 3 =r CD CD CD =:r 0 -0 CL CD W > - CD Cn CL CD C3- -0�, :-3 CD :3 CD 5 m * o 0 0 CL — :3 cn — m =r CD CD a) 0-,< o CL 3 , m — -- =r — M cn CD , C�- :3 =r CL C -- w CD cr 0 _0 0 0 =r , �Eii (n CD CL — 0 w cr CD ::r cn l< CD — < — (D CD 0 rn 0 0 0 w CD * c2t ch --1 C) CL CD 0 0 0 < o o CD 0 CD CD -0 :3 =r CD M " CD M B 3 CD a) CD , ';�, 0 0 . 0 =r -o M cn CD CD > CD o a) c)- (D * 3 =r a) Cc cn 6T CL (n cr C:)- cn 0 =3 = M CD (p cn = cn 6 0 m m 0 CD , a = -0 0 0) (n cr 0 CD = 3 0 0- CO :3 r_ 0 CD CL D CD CD 0 CL = , U) CD -- �o — ::* -K CD CD cl) 9 S' , — 3 CD m cn 0 C:) :3 EF CL CD 0- cr CL =:r _ C) 0- CD CD --< CD CD CD CD C-D' 'zr cn N M co (n CD — =3 cn 0 0 CD C,- CD CD 0- 0 =r 5r Cm CL 3 CD CL CD Cn CD - . -0 CL CD CD 0 Ca -n 0 — 0 0 a cn o m — 0) CD- CL U) CD CD C-) CD CD ch CD N M CD =1 CL < cl. CL CL CD -0 Cn CD — — CD =r 57 U C =3 =r =r Cr Q—) R—) up R� -0 = i3 Er' C—n CD C- z M C= m z 0 0 m m Q m CA 0 9 V4 All DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS Agreement, made and entered into this day of 2004, by and between David Nunez, Jr. and Anita S. Nunez, (hereinafter refereed to as "OWNER"), and THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (hereinafter referred to as "CITY"). RECITALS A. OWNER is the fee simple owner of a certain tract of land located within The City of Okeechobee consisting of approximately 10.06 acres; the said property hereinafter being referred to as "PROPERTY" and being more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. OWNER is the holder of all legal and equitable ownership rights in the PROPERTY. B. The OWNER represents that it is the fee simple owner of the PROPERTY and that the rights granted herein and the obligations created hereby shall in no way be affected by the property right of any other entity at the time of the execution of this Agreement; upon sale or assignment of the property or development to any other person or entity; or at any time between the execution of this Agreement and the recording of this Agreement in the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida. C. The OWNER desires to develop the PROPERTY as a subdivision consisting of nine developed lots, with improvements, tentatively to be named APPLEWOOD ESTATES at this time. The current land use plan is therefore reasonable and appropriate for application to the PROPERTY upon fulfillment of the OWNER's obligations under this Development Agreement. It is the purpose of this Agreement to provide a mechanism to mitigate potential adverse roadway, drainage, parking and traffic circulation impacts created by the development of the PROPERTY and to ensure that adequate public services may be provided to the PROPERTY and to the balance of the residents of the CITY. D. The OWNER agrees to construct certain roadways, parking, landscaping, pedestrian, and transportation improvements as set forth in this Agreement, in conjunction with development of residential lots, which improvements will mitigate the potential adverse impacts of the proposed development. E. This Agreement is authorized by Florida Statutes (2000), and the CITY OF OKEECHOBEE Unified Land Development Code Ordinance No. 716, as amended, and the provisions of those laws as they exist as of the date of this Agreement are incorporated herein by reference and shall govern the relationship of the parties under the terms of this Agreement. Any matters required by existing state statute or CITY Ordinance(s) which are not a part of this Agreement shall, nevertheless, be complied with by the parties. The OWNER and its successors or assigns in interest shall be responsible for every obligation set forth under the terms of this Agreement. The PROJECT as set forth herein is consistent with the CITY OF OKEECHOBEE Comprehensive Land Use Plan and CITY OF OKEECHOBEE Unified Land Development Code. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein made and agreed to be kept, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1 The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference. Page 1 of 6 2. This Agreement will be valid for twenty (20) years from the date that it is executed by all parties. This Agreement may be extended by mutual consent of the CITY and OWNER, subject to a public hearing and participation. Further, this Agreement may be canceled only by the mutual consent of the parties or their successors in interest. 2. The OWNER represents that nothing herein is barred or prohibited by any other contractual agreement to which it is a party or to which any of its agents or representatives are a party, by any existing statute or rule, by an existing governmental agency, by any third party, or by the rights of any other party with a direct or contingent interest in the PROPERTY, whether legal or equitable. 3. All development rights created hereunder will be subject to compliance with all CITY ordinances, and including but not limited to zoning approval, Ordinance No. 814, and site plan approvals, and platting requirements, including ch. 86 land development regulations, each of which shall be in compliance with all development permits and applicable regulations of CITY, Regional, District, State and Federal Agencies. The failure of this Agreement to address a particular permit, condition, term, or restriction shall not relieve the OWNER of the necessity of complying with the existing law governing said permitting requirements, conditions, terms or restrictions and any matter or thing required to be done under existing ordinances of the CITY or regulations of any other government agency or other entity having legal authority over the PROPERTY. No such ordinance, law or regulation will otherwise be amended, modified or waived unless conduct constituting such modification, amendment or waiver is provided for herein and all necessary procedural steps are taken relative to the granting of such modification, amendment or waiver in accordance with terms of applicable CITY ordinances and State Statutes. All applicable impact fees, development review fees, building permit fees, and all other fees of any type shall be paid in accordance with their terms and in such amounts applicable as they become due and payable except as is otherwise specifically provided herein. 4. a. The parties agree that the CITY's willingness to enter into this Agreement, the staff approval or recommendation relative to the proposed development, land use plan designations, the passage of ordinances attempting to modify the land use designations, submittals to or before the City of Okeechobee City Council or the Florida Department of Community Affairs, and any other act in furtherance of this Agreement by the CITY, including the negotiations leading up to the execution of this Agreement, will not be used by the OWNER or its successors in interest in any way whatsoever as committing the CITY legally through theory of equitable estoppel, vesting of rights, obligation of authorship, or any other legal theory to the approval of such proposed development in the event that this Agreement is terminated or for any other reason does not take effect in all material respects. The parties further agree that any and all action by the OWNER or its representatives in negotiation of this Agreement and including all efforts in the implementation of this Agreement or submittals to other governmental bodies shall in no way be deemed to be an action in reliance giving rise to an equitable estoppel, or a vesting of rights, and, in the event that it is not possible to implement this Agreement fully, the parties' legal positions will be identical to the legal position that they would have maintained, if any, and all matters regarding the proposed development of the PROPERTY had never been discussed between them. Page 2 of 6 9PAn 5. Notwithstanding the current land, use plan designations, the maximum intensity which may be built on the PROPERTY shall not be greater than nine residential lots; with roadway, drainage and such improvements as designated on preliminary plat of Applewood Estates prepared by Kennedy, Lynch & Assoc. Inc. on behalf of owner. a. In accord with the Project's preliminary plat, any subsequent phases, expansions, additions, new structures, and/or modifications will require new site plans subject to CITY's ordinances and review and approval process, particularly but not limited to all roadway construction, parking and storm water drainage requirements. b. When the public health, safety and welfare would be adversely affected by such development all such matters will be addressed during the permitting process and nothing herein shall limit the legislative discretion of the CITY in the permitting process to ensure and protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public. However, such limitations shall not act to reduce the maximum allowable development provided for herein above. C. All government approvals and permits will be obtained by OWNER at OWNER's sole cost. In the event that any development permissions are not received, no further development of the PROPERTY will be allowed until such time as the City Council has reviewed the development and determined whether or not to modify it in a manner consistent with the public interest. Under these conditions, action and reliance on these expenditures in pursuance of its terms and of any right accruing the OWNER hereunder, shall not vest any development rights in OWNER nor shall it constitute partial performance entitling OWNER to a continuation of this Agreement. 6. The OWNER shall provide to the city the following, prior to final plat approval: a. Proof of compliance with all provisions applicable in ch. 86 land development regulations, including but not limited to sections 86-71 through 86-74. b. A description of the work to be done, and the time specified therefore by OWNER. C. That no exceptions to requirements or standards shall be granted to OWNER unless same are duly approved by the technical review committee or the city council. d. A written, separate agreement, as to any participation by CITY in the project. e. A written, separate agreement, if any, as to the lien imposed upon the lands of OWNER for any work to be performed by the CITY. Proof of compliance with all conditions precedent to the issuance of building permits to be issued by the CITY. 9. Proper documents conveying by OWNER to CITY of all water, wastewater, and storm lines installed within dedicated public rights -of - way. Page 3 of 6 h. A written, separate agreement of OWNER to maintain and repair all streets, rights of way, curbing, and drainage facilities in the subdivision for a period of one (1) year prior to acceptance of same by CITY. i. Provide a certificate executed by the city administrator showing approval of the city council that OWNER has complied with either (1) that the development will proceed without bond, or (2) that a surety bond has been procured guaranteeing that the work will be completed in accord with the final plat and all conditions attached thereto. A certified drawing from OWNERS engineer of all Landscaped areas as may be indicated and approved on the site plan of OWNER forthis project, and k. Street/median landscaping, irrigation and continued maintenance; Adequate and safe pedestrian crossings for street parking based on a plan approved by the City Engineer; M. Road improvements to meet CITY parking and curbing standards as per CITY Land Development Regulations and fire safety codes. n. Stormwater drainage facilities based upon a plan approved by the City Engineer, which design shall provide access from public rights of way for maintenance of such facilities. 7. The development of the PROPERTY shall be in accordance with the preliminary plat as approved by the city council, or as thereafter amended; shall be completed with all designated improvements and requirements of CITY; and shall meet the requirements of all existing CITY ordinances except as is otherwise specifically waived or modified herein. The CITY and the OWNER shall coordinate the scheduling of construction obligations herein with the development schedule of the OWNER so that infrastructure improvements provided for herein will be completed in a timely fashion so as to provide services to the proposed development in an orderly manner. 8. Any notice or request required or authorized to be given by the terms of this Agreement or under any applicable law by either party shall be in writing, hand -delivered, or sent by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested. Such written notice shall be addressed as follow: AS TO THE OWNER David and Anita Nunez, Jr. 2085 S.E. 4 1h St. Okeechobee,FL.34972 AS TO THE CITY City Administrator 55 S.E. 31d Avenue Okeechobee, FL 34974 Either party may, by subsequent written notice, designate a different address or party for receiving notice. This Agreement shall constitute a covenant running with the land for the duration hereof and shall be binding upon the OWNER, their heirs, successors in interest or assigns, and upon all persons deriving title by, through or under said OWNER and upon its assigns and successors in title. The Agreements contained herein shall benefit and limit all present and future owners of the PROPERTY and the CITY for the term hereof. A/1 LV jqv.�J �11 Page 4 of 6 2. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement and understanding between the parties and no modification hereof shall be made except by written Agreement executed with the same formality of this Agreement. The parties acknowledge that there are no outstanding agreements of any kind between the parties other than as reflected herein. Except as is otherwise specifically provided herein the PROPERTY shall be subject to the laws, 9011 ordinances and regulations of The City of Okeechobee, Florida, as they exist as of the date of this Agreement. 3. Any reference in this Agreement to the OWNER contemplates the undersigned or its successors in interest. Assignment of any rights or interest or obligations under this Agreement shall not relieve the OWNER from responsibility to perform all obligations of the OWNER hereunder except upon a release being executed by the parties hereto and recorded in the Public Records of Okeechobee County Florida, upon such terms that are mutually satisfactory to the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereto set their hands and seals the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in presence of: Witness Name Printed: Witness Name Printed: Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: Witness Name Printed: Witness Name Printed: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: JOHN R. COOK, CITY ATTORNEY v rQ All ur-p /s/ OWNER /s/ OWNER THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE A political subdivision of the State of Florida FMA James E. Kirk, Mayor ATTEST: Page 5 of 6 Lane Gamiotea, City Clerk (City Seal) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE BEFORE ME, personally appeared, David Nunez, Jr. and Anita S. Nunez, to me well known/produced a drivers license and known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to and before me that he executed said instrument for the purposes therein expressed. 2004. WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of 9VAV STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE Notary Public My Commission Expires. Commission Number: BEFORE ME, personally appeared James E. Kirk, Mayor of THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, to me well known/produced a drivers license and know to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to and before me that he executed said instrument for the purposes therein expressed. WITNESS my hand and official seal this- day of 2004. Notary Public: Lane Gamiotea My Commission Expires Commission Number: VVIAII Page 6 of 6 EXHIBIT 2 - FEBRUARY3 AGENDA Mektonorandum To: Bill Veach, Administrator From: Lydia jean Williams, Administrative Aide/Special Projects Coordinator Date: January 27, 2004 Re: Occupational licenses These business owners and property owners are requesting Council's assistance in obtaining occupational licenses. Staff has met and discussed these items in detail and is recommending assistance from Council. Photography By Bobbi Business Owner Bobbi Poole Location Address: 213 SE 2nd Street Type of Business: Photography Studio & Bakery Visiting Nurse Association, Inc. owns the property. The property has been rezoned; therefore the building must be brought up to code. All departments have metwith Ms. Poole explaining what is required- 'Me only major item in question is the parking requirement. According to the size of the building there should be 3 parking spaces (1 of those being handicapped). The existing back porch could be utilized as the handicap space. She has a letter from the property owner (Visiting Nurse Association, Inc.) agreeing for the additional parking spaces to be used from their parking lot behind their existing facility which is directly to the north of Ms. Poole's business. Signs of All Kinds Business Owner. Martha L. Levitt Location Address: 703 North Parrott Avenue Type of Business: Retail Sales George Goodbread owns all the property surrounding this business. There has never been an occupational license issued at this location. However, we have the adjoining property to the north and south that have been licensed for various businesses. There is a parking issue with the Sign business; they would like to use the existing parking at the Internet business to the north. This business location has not been vacant for more than 6 months and has not had a change of use that would require any upgrades as required in the IDWs. Wooley Sheds was located on the property to the south; however, this business has been out for approximately 5 months. Another business that manufactures and sells concrete statutes has moved in this location and has applied for a license. There is issue with the zoning and the FLUM. If the zoning is changed — they must bring everything up to code. Once again, we have requirements that are required by the LDR's such as parking, building and fire codes. D-SearchResults Page I of 2 itecord Search GIS Map General Info Exemptions Tangible Tax FAQ Download Forms Contact Us Parcel ID: 3-15-37-35-0010-01710-0060 Okeechobee County Property Appraiser Owner & Property Info Show: GIS Map I Property Record Card Owner's VISITING NURSE Name ASSOCIATION OF Sille Address 213 SE 2ND ST, Okeechobee Mailing FLORIDA INC Address 2400 SE MONTEREY RD #300 STUART, FL 34996 CITY OF OKEECHOBEE BEG AT Brief Legal INTERSECTION OF 7TH ST & CHEROKEE ST, RUN W ALONG N Use Desc. SINGLE FAM (000100) (code) Neighborhood 518650.00 Tax District 50 UD Codes 0100 Market 53 ,Area Total Land -Area 0.267 ACRES Property & Assessment Values Mkt Land Value cnt: (1) $14,804.00 Ag Land Value cnt: (0) $0.00 Building Value cnt: (1) $23,006.00 XFOB Value cnt: (2) $374.00 Total Appraised $38,184.00 Value Sales History << Prev F9�77*1` Next >> Just Value $38,184.00 Class Value $0.00 Assessed $38,184.00 Value Exempt $0.00 Value Total Taxable $38,184.00 Ivalue I Sale Date Book/Page Inst. Type Sale Vimp Sale Qual Sale RCode Sale Price 4/25/2002 475/1316 WD Q $50,000.00 6/9/2000 439/1705 WD U 03 $0.00 Building Characteristics Bldg Item Bldg Desc 1 Year Bit 1 Heated S.F. 1 Actual S.F. 1 Bldg Value 1 1 SINGLE FAM (000100) 1940 968 1287 $23,006.00] Extra Features & Out Buildings I I I I I I I D—SearchResults Page 2 of 2 Code I Desc Year Bit Value Units Dims Condition (% Good) CONC A <5000 SLAB 1991 1 $133.00 168.000 0 x 0 x 0 PD (60.00) TCT N4 I TIN CC TIN 2000 $241.00 48.000 8 x 6 x 0 PD (§0.00) Land Breakdown Lnd Code Desc ISFR Units Adjustments Eff Rate I Lnd Value - 000100 (MKT)i 82.100 IFIF - (.267AC) 11.00/1.00/.98/1.00 1$180.32 1$14,804.00. Okeechobee County Property Appraiser 1 of 1 012MM Last Updated: 01/08/2004 I HOME I Record Search I GIS Map I General Info I Exemptions I Tangible Tax I F A Q I Contact Us I This information was derived from data which was compiled by the Okeechobee County Property Appraiser's Office solely for the governmental purpose of property assessment. This information should not be relied upon by anyone as a determination of the ownership of property or market value. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the accuracy of the data herein, it's use, or it's interpretation. Although it is periodically updated, this information may not reflect the data currently on file in the Property Appraisers office. The assessed values are NOT certified values and therefore are subject to change before being finalized for ad valorem assessment purposes. Ptoperty Appraiser Web Site Design, Record Search & GIS Mapping Interface: Copyright 2001., by Grizzly Logic, Inc. Okeechobee County Property Appraise- ,qap Printed on 1/27/2004 9:07:17 A1111 Page 1 of 2 50 2 Li 171 217�9 3-15-37-35-0010-01710-0060 VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF r 4r2512002 - $50,000 - 110 50 3 2 Okeechobee County Property Appraiser WC, "Bill" Sherman, CFA - Okeechobee, Florida - 863-763-4422 PARCEL: 3-15-3 - 5-0010-01710-0060 -SINGLE FAM (000100) CITY OF OKEECHOBE BEG AT INTERSECTION OF 7TH ST, & CHEROKEE ST, R Gme: VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF LandVal Site: 213 SE 2ND ST, Okeechobee BldgVal FLORIDA INC ApprVal Mail: 2400 SE MONTEREY RD #300 JustVal STUART, FL 34996 Assd 4/25/2002$50,000.00 Sa Exmpt es Q Taxable Info 6/9/2000 $0.00 1 / U S..E.2 NO STREET $14,804, $23,006. $38,184. $38,184. $38,184. $0. $38,184. This information, Last Updated: 01/08/2004, was derived from data which was compiled by the - Okeechobee County Property Appraiser's Office solely for the governmental purpose of property assessment. This information should not be relied upon by anyone as a determination of the ownership D-SearchResults I Page I of 2 H 0 M E Record Search GIS Map General Info Exemptions Tangible Tax F * I I 'No. I Contact Us Parcel ID: 3-,15-37-35-0010-01710-0010 39 Owner & Property Info Show GIS Map I Property Record Card Owner's VISITING NURSE Name ASSOCIATION OF Sillie Address 203 S PARK ST, Okeechobee FLORIDA INC Mailing 2400 SE MONTEREY ROAD Address #300 STUART , FL 34996 CITY OF OKEECHOBEE BEG AT Brief Legal NW COR LOT 1 BLOCK 171 CITY RUN S ALONG W BDRY ,SAID Use Desc. PROFESS OF (001900) (code) Neighborhood 518650.00 Tax 50 District UD Codes 0100 Market 53 ,Area Total Land ,Area 0. 574 ACRES I Property & Assessment Values MktLand Value cnt: (2) $62,157.00 Ag Land cnt: (0) $0.00 Value Building Value cnt: (1) $503,150.00 XFOB Value cnt: (5) $10,988.00 Total Appraised $576,295.00 Value Sales History Okeechobee County Property Appraiser Just Value $576,295.00 Class Value $0.00 Assessed $576,295.00 Value Exempt Value (code: 39) $576,295.00 Total Taxable $0.00 Walue Sale Date Book/Page Inst. Type Sale VIrnp Sale Qual Sale RCode Sale Price 3/1/2000 435/472 WD V Q $85,000.00 10/15/1996 383/1005 WD V Q $2,000.00 .5/1/1995 366/1645 WD V Q $34,200.00j Building Characteristics I Bldg Item I Bldg Desc Year Bit I Heated S.F. I Actual S.F. I Blda Value D—SearchResults Page 2 of 2 I I I OFFICE MED (005200) 1 2002 1 5499 1 4382 1 $503,150.00 1 Extra Features & Out Buildings Code Desc Year Bit Value Units Dims Condition (% Good) LCQ1 LGHT C QRZ 2002 $1,911.00 3.000 0 x: 0 x 0 PD (98.00) ASPH 4 PK WATR/RE 2002 $5,910.00 4712.000 0 x 0 x 0 PD (98.00) ASPH 1 < 5000 SF 2002 $2,005.00 2495.000 0 x 0 x 0 PID (98.00) CONC A <5000 SLAB 2002 $970.00 750.000 0 x 0 x: 0 d PD (98.00) CONC I BUMPERS 2002 $192.00 16.000 0 x 0 x: 0 PID (98.00) Lnd Code Desc Units Adjustments Eff Rate Lnd Value 001000 COMMERCIAL 150.000 FF - 1.00/1.00/1.02/1.00 $410.55 $61,582.00 (MKT) (. 540AC) 1 001000 COMMERCIAL 1.000 LT - 1.00/1.00/1.00/1.00 I $575.00 I $575.00 I I (MKT) (.034AC) Okeechobee County Property Appraiser 1 of 1 Last Updated: 01/08/2004 I HOME I Record Search I GIS Map I General Info I Exemptions I Tangible Tax I F A Q I Contact Us I This information was derived from data which was compiled by the Okeechobee County Property Appraisers Office solely for the governmental purpose of property assessment. This information should not be relied upon by anyone as a determination of the ownership of property or market value. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the accuracy of the data herein, it's use, or it's interpretation. Although it is periodically updated, this information may not reflect the data currently on file in the Property Appraisers office. The assessed values are NOT certified values and therefore are subject to change before being finalized for ad valorem assessment purposes. Property Appraiser Web Site Design, Record Search & GIS Mapping Interface: Copyright 2001, by Grizzly Logic, Inc. Okeechobee County Property Appraise Map Printed on 1/27/2004 9:11:39 A Page I of 2 8 9 10 11 12 6 4 3 2 1 12 10 It 7 8 9 to 11 12 7 a 9 L-- PH-HA U10"TAISMA181 171-8 A MCI S- E. PARK STREET 171-9 3-15-37-35-0010-01710-0010 37D VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF 4 3 2 3A /200 0 - $85,000 - V/0 243-7 171 , TER h M 40� 203 171-6 6 5 3 2 217.9 82.1 &E.2 ND STREET 3 2 I Lj- ! F 1 205 7-71 .... .. .. 47 Okeechobee County Property Appraiser W.C,"Bill" Sherman, CFA - Okeechobee, Florida - 863-763-4422 PARCEL: 3-15-37-1�-0010-01710-0010 39 - PROFESS OF (001900) CITv OF OKEECHOBEE BEG AT NW COR LOT 1 BLOCK 171, CITY RUN S ALONG W BDRY SAID Name: VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF LandVal $62,157.05 Site: 203 S PARK ST, Okeechobee BldgVal $503,150.00 FLORIDA INC ApprVal $576,295.00 Mail: 2400 SE MONTEREY ROAD #300 JustVal $576,295.00 STUART, FL 34996 Assd $576,295.00 3/1/2000 $85,000.00V/ Exmpt $576,295.00 Q Taxable $0.00 Sales 10/15/1996 $2,000.00 V/ Info Q 5/1/1995 $34,200.00 V/ Q 0 61 122 183 ft This information, Last Updated: 01/08/2004, was derived from data which was compiled by the ExMBIT 3 - FEBRUARY3 AGENDA Me:lomorandum To: Bill Veach, Administrator From: Lydia jean Williams, Administrative Aide/Special Projects Coordinator Date: January 27, 2004 Re: Occupational licenses These business owners and property owners are requesting Council's assistance in obtaining occupational licenses. Staff has met and discussed these items in detail and is recommending assistance from Council. Photography By Bobbi Business Owner. Bobbi Poole Location Address: 213 SE 2-d Street Type of Business: Photography Studio & Bakery Visiting Nurse Association, Inc. owns the property. The property has been rezoned; therefore the building must be brought up to code. All departments have met with Ms. Poole explaining what is required. The only major item in question is the parking requirement According to the size of the building there should be 3 parking spaces (1 of those being handicapped). The existing back porch could be utilized as the handicap space. She has a letter from the property owner (Visiting Nurse Association, Inc.) agreeing for the additional parking spaces to be used from their parking lot behind their existing facility which is directly to the north of Ms. Poole's business. Signs of AU Kinds Business O-wner. Martha L. Levitt Location Address: 703 North Parrott Avenue Type of Business: Retail Sales George Goodbread owns all the property surrounding this business. There has never been an occupational license issued at this location. However, we have the adjoining property to the north and south that have been licensed for various businesses. There is a parking issue with the Sign business; they would like to use the existing parking at the Internet business to the north. This business location has not been vacant for more than 6 months and has not had a change of use that would require any upgrades as required in the LDWs. Wooley Sheds was located on the property to the south; however, this business has been out for approximately 5 months. Another business that manufactures and sells concrete statutes has moved in this location and has applied for a license. There is issue with the zoning and the FLUM. If the zoning is changed — they must bring everything up to code. Once again, we have requirements that are required by the LDR's such as parking, building and fire codes. Jan 22 04 11:01a Br 1,1_dle!j G. Goodbread 863-357-ISG7 P.1 PAGE 41 '31/221'2004 15:1.5 BE37, .686 CITV OF OKEECHUBEL CITY OF ORCEdECHOREd"Erd (W) 763-3372 FAX ("3) 763-1636 AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM Pbum nuff or brftg coo~ tmm on, Cky of Okwhobee City Admiubtratoes Office 55 Sit 3r' Avenue Okowbobee, Florida 34974 Qut* D - A Mr�&gk�f nLWHCWR.l 4-9-1 a I ir*.x. 9-6-7-154,7 MErMG: M*UIAR f& SPECIAL C1 WORXWOP (3 DATE: r-cs 0:5., 2e!Lm( erpm PLXA*X STATS THE ITEM YOU WISH TOAtAvz PLACVD ON THE CM COUNCM AGFJ40A-, 22D Q 10 <2 1 5V 4M 0^3 -7 -P I N - r-ky-f -cry- dv-m-r PLEASE STATE WHAT D9PARTMVff(S) YOU RAVX WORKED WITH TEM FAR: 6Vj*jA,- tx:*L-LjArm S STATE BY THE -- M PLEAW SUMMARIZE PERTINEVT WORNATION C014CMLWING YOUR "QUEST AND A.TTAM APV1W.A&LE DOCUWFZPM; 17�M ENTATION 13 TO = KADL PLEASE SrATE NOW MUCH TIME YOU ARE AXQUXSMGt I SIG,*" BY; DATE: 2- 0-/ D-SearchResults Page I of 2 H 0 M E Record Search GIS Map General Info Exemptions Tangible Tax F A Q Download Forms Contact Us Parcel ID: 3-15-37-35-0010-00580-0070 Okeechobee County Property Appraiser Owner & Property Info Show-, GIS Map I Property Record Card Owner's Name GOODBREAD GEORGE A Site Address 0, Okeechobee Mailing 12575 HIGHWAY 70 EAST Address OKEECHOBEE, FL 34972 Brief Legal IBLOCK CITY OF OKEECHOBEE LOT 7 58 U 8-7 , 0 esc. VEH SALE/R (002700) (code) Neighborhood 518620.00 Tax 50 District UD Codes 0100 Market 70 jArea I Total Land Aroa 0. 159 ACRES I I Property & Assessment Values Mid Land Value cnt: (1) $22,314.00 Ag Land Value cnt: (0) $0.00 Building Value cnt: (0) $0.00 XFOB Value cnt: (1) $4,924.00 Total Appraised $27,238.00 ,Vakie I Sales History ZMWL� - A. - I< < Prev ET Next > > I Just Value $27,238.00 Class Value $0.00 Assessed Value $27,238.00 Exempt Value $0.00 Total Taxable $27,238.00 Ivalue I I Sale Date Book/Page Inst. Type Sale Virnp Sale Qual Sale RCode Sale Price 7/1/2003 505/1011 PR I U 01 $25,000.00 10/9/1974 192/789 v Q $100.00 Building Characteristics - -r— Bldg Item I Bldg Desc I Year Bit I Heated ST Actual S.F. I Bldg Value N 0 N E Extra Features & Out Buildings Code Desc I IYear Bit Value 1$4,924.00 Units Dims I Condition (% Good) 1 BCY W4 BLK CC SHG 1 1977 1 880.000 140 x 22 x 0 1 PD (80.00) D—SearchResults Page 2 of 2 Lnd Desc Units Adjustments Eff Rate Lnd Value Code 002700 AUTO SALES 49.000 FF - 1.00/1.00/.88/1.00 $455.39 $22,314.00 L- (MKT) (. 159AC) Okeechobee County Property Appraiser 1 of I NEEMM Last Updated: 01/08/2004 HOME I Record Search I GIS Map I General Info I Exemptions I Tangible Tax I F A Q I Contact Us This information was derived from data which was compiled by the Okeechobee County Property Appraisers Office solely for the governmental purpose of property assessment. This information should not be relied upon by anyone as a determination of the ownership of property or market value. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the accuracy of the data herein, its use, or it's interpretation. Although it is periodically updated, this information may not reflect the data currently on file in the Property Appraisers office. The assessed values are NOT certified values and therefore are subject to change before being finalized for ad valorem assessment purposes. Property Appraiser Web Site Design, Record Search & GIS Mapping Interface: Copyright 2001, by Grizzly Logic, Inc. Okeechobee County Property Appraif' - Map Printed on 1/27/2004 9:24:30 At') Page I of 2 Okeechobee County Property Appraiser W,C, "Bill" Sherman, CFA - Okeechobee, Florida - 863-763-4422 ARCEL: 3-16-37-35-0010-00580-0070 - VEH SALE/R (002 CITY OF OKEECHOBEE LOT 7 BLOCK 58, Name: GOODBREAD GEORGE A LandVal $22,314.05 Site: 0, Okeechobee BldgVal $0.00 Mail: 12575 HIGHWAY 70 EAST ApprVal $27,238.00 OKEECHOBEE, FL 34972 Justval $27,238.00 7/11/2003 $25,000.00 1/ Assd $27,238.00 Sales U Exmpt $0.00 info 10/9/1974 $100. OOV Q Taxable $27,238.00 0 28 56 04 ft W S This information, Last Updated: 01/08/2004, was derived from data which was compiled by the Okeechobee County Property Appraiser's Office solely for the governmental purpose of property assessment. This information should not be relied upon by anyone as a determination of the ownership of property or market value. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the accuracy of the Okeechobee County Property Appraise —Map Printed on 1/27/2004 9:25:26 AN) Page I of 2 1.29 23 3-15-37-35-0010-00580-0040 GAGBEE INC 1012312000 - $130,000 - 1/0 7 1% 9 12 �5 is .. . ... . .... . ... .................. .......... 47.5 42�5 1421 4 Okeechobee County Property Appraiser WC, "Bill" Sherman, CFA - Okeechobee, Florida - 863-763-4422 PARCEL: 3-iS-37-35-0010-00580-0040 - STORES/I S (001100) CITY OF OKEECHOBEE LOTS 4 5 6 BLOCK 58, Name: GAGBEE INC LandVal $66,943.05 Site: 709 H\A1Y 441 , Okeechobee BldgVal $26,397.00 Mail: 12575 HWY 70 E ApprVal $94,081.00 OKEECHOBEE, FL 34972 JustVal $94,081.00 10/23/2000$130,000.00 1 / Assd $94,081.00 Q Exmpt $0.00 Sales 1/1/1987 $60,000.00 1 / Taxable $94,081.00 Info Q 2/1/1983 $0.00 V I U 0 45 90 135 N U460 'W w '54"'R q_ W 9 This information, Last Updated: 01/08/2004, was derived from data which was compiled by the Okeechobee County Property Appraiser's Office solely for the governmental purpose of property Okeechobee County Property Appraiser— Map Printed on 1/27/2004 9:27:08 AIV—) Page I of 2 49 14 142.5 17 18 is [t2* Lj (480-600) N. El I —rf 142L5 142.5 142 Z 142.5 12 2 12 2 12 2 13 3 0, '03 14 4 14 14 4 is 59 57 W V 7 17 7 z 3-15-37-35-0010-00580-0080 LU 4"' is a is SOUTHERN CONSTRUCTION 8 DEVELO " 6r AM 27/2000 - $85,000 - I/Q z TO 21 142 �6 20142.6 t42�5 I* 3Z� 2 0 42.5 P W-1 47.5 41.0 11 Q.6 T4"-- T.-�- 5 4 3 9 a 7 5 3 2 71 ............ . ....... ........ .. . ... .. 7 10 11 12 8 9 10 11 12 1 14 It 12 Okeechobee County Property Appraiser W.C. "Bill" Sherman, CFA - Okeechobee, Florida - 863-763-4422 ACEL: 3-16-37-35-0010-00580-0080 - OPEN STORA (0049 ame: SOUTHERN CONSTRUCTION & DEVELO LandVal $66,943.00 te: 701 HWY 441 , Okeechobee BldgVal $9,577.00 ail: 12575 HWY 70 E ApprVal $79,190.00 OKEECHOBEE, FL 34972 JustVal $79,190.00 6/27/2000$85,000.00 1 / Assd $79,190.00 Q Exmpt $0.00 ales 8/1/1988 $30,900.00 1 / Taxable $79,190.00 fo U 7/1/1986 $65,000.00 1 / U r- 0 70 140 210 A N W 9 S "TA This information, Last Updated: 01/08/2004, was derived from data which was compiled by the Okeechobee County Property Appraiser's Office solely for the governmental purpose of property Future Land Use Map W - , 0 . E 0 L 11OJ1ed L11JON a Future Land Use Map Legend Single Family - Yellow Multiple Family - 4kb%� Commercial - maw Industrial - AW PUIG(AZ ast P*_111 It,!jlsnpul UNOWN - 33UJO luuolssojoid -LUOD Aikh*w - 13111SICI ss�)uisns julluaD 'Ilia - '131OUJUJOD IULMH IWX@W - XI!LuL,,q 3jd!jlnW juijuop!so�d MOI13A - XIILUL'A 31BUIS lv[juDp!S3-d I Future Land Use Map Legend Single Family - Multiple Family - Commercial - Yellow RIM jupisnpul I&MON Z)Z)Ujo JBUOISS�Jold .1uoD G ss�)uisnq jiaiju3D It"DJOUJU100 XABOH --moo* - �ptueI ajd!jlnW juiluap1soN molla,k - �J!Wej 011RUIS jL,1juap!sOd puaSaq dvW 2uiuo7 VAN, deVq 6uiuoZ CITY OF OKEECHOBEE MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council DATE: January 29, 2004 SUBJECT: Status Report FROM: Bill L. Veach, City Administrator Below is a brief summary of past and upcoming events. ADMINISTRATION GRIT — NO CHANGE IN STATUS - We are still awaiting the promised proposed AND GENERAL settlement from the GRIT attorneys. Attorney Robbins has officially requested the SERVICES proposal twice. When we receive it, our attorneys (Cook and Robbins) win review it and John will bring the proposal (or a refined version) to the City Council for approval. Industrial Park — The City has withdrawn our original (Sheffield related) EDTF $1.125 million Economic Development Transportation Fund (EDTF) grant and submitted a new proposal (Federal Cast Stone, Inc. related — Robert Meyer's new company). The submittal is being distributed to the approximately 30 reviewing agencies and we hope to receive word within the next 30 to 60 days. We have also officially requested a three-month construction timeline extension form EDA. Asa Williams, EDA's Atlanta based administrator, indicates he will approve the request at the time we sign a notice to proceed for construction. This seems to be a reasonable approach that would offer assurances to EDA that the project is truly moving forward. I spoke with County officials this week and they indicate the $300,000 they have budgeted to assist with the bridge, etc. is still in place and as soon as we sign construction agreements, we can request payment. CAS submitted the proposed site plan to the Technical Review Committee on January 2 1. They will submit a preliminary plat to the City Council on February 17 and request final approval on March 2. John Cook has several issues to address in the preparation of the plat submittal but feels he can meet this tirneline, as well. Right -of -Way Acquisition and Annexation — We received written confirmation from Mr. Mason's attorney that the proposed agreement has been accepted and Attorney Cook indicates a judge has authorized payment. This morning I signed the check to the County Clerk, so it would appear this transaction is final. ADMINISTRATION Property Acquisition Request — On January 15, Attorney Cook and I met with AND GENERAL Dennis Murphy to discuss the possibility of his purchasing property (at the old water SERVICES plant site on Taylor Creek) from the City. As previously reported, our records indicate CONTINUED this same question arose several years ago. John Cook has requested clarification from the Corps of Engineers as to requirements involving their right-of-way. Ultimately, this matter may come before the City Council. Until then, I will keep you updated. Licensing Issues — In accordance with Chapter 50 of our Code of Ordinances and at the request of staff and the City Attorney, I have sent letters to three local businesses (Signs of All Kinds, Sod Services, Inc., and Photography By Bobbi & Bakery) revoking their right to do business. In each case, -we have indicated to the business owners (and the property owners) actions that will remedy their situation. As always, staff has worked for many weeks to try to resolve the matter. As per the procedures outlined by ordinance, these companies may request a hearing in front of the City Council. Signs of All Kinds and Photography By Bobbi have made such a request and will come before the City Council on February 3. I'll send you details of each case with your agenda packets and notes. Impact Fees — Following our workshop on impact fees, I am trying to quickly get up to speed on the subject. I will include this as a discussion item for our February 3 meeting, in order that I can participate, as directed, with the County and School Board staffs in creating an RFP for a consultant. PUBLIC WORKS Oscar Bermudez is working with Katrina in General Services to finalize bid documents for this year's proposed street projects. Oscar is also preparing the engineered drawings for the work to be done with regard to Downtown Redevelopment (parks, storefronts and sidewalks) and staff will be preparing bid documents related to this project within the next few weeks. Donnie Robertson continues preparation for the niodifications to the 0 Street boat ramp. CODE It is my understanding that Code Enforcement staff, working in conjunction with the ENFORCEMENT City Attorney, is preparing a comprehensive citation related to Mr. Brantley and his multiple, repeat inftactions. I'm told this will be served within the next few days. 2 0 DEPARTMEINT SYNOPSIS FINANCE Staff is working with the auditors in finalizing this year's audit. The only missing component is the financial reports related to pensions, which must be provided by OUA. POLICE The police department anticipates the delivery of this year's new cars within the next DEPARTMENT two weeks. They are exploring the possibility ofmodifying next year's fleet request to include a limited number of SUV's. The department personnel are experimenting with 12-hour shifts. It is hoped this will lessen the stresses of revolving 8-hour shifts. Early indications are the change is being well received. FIRE Chief Torney is finalizing details that will permit the installation of a new repeater DEPARTMENT system for the department's radios. This should enhance communication capabilities and improve safety for our on scene firefighters. Chief Torney has raised the issue of possible future increases in the City's ISO rating. He feels very strongly that the City's ISO rating will be increased significantly (to possible maximum levels) when the new Court House becomes operational, if the City does not acquire a ladder truck This will likely be a discussion for a future City Council meeting. CITY ATTORNEY The following are included in the items I have asked Attorney Cook to address. 1 . Recommendations related to reversionary action in alley closings, etc. 2. Hamrick Trust — John is in discussion with the County Attorney on this matter. 3. Research annexation issues. 4. GRIT issues. 5. LDR issues, such as conversion of former residential structures to commercial, non -conforming structures, building site elevations, visibility triangles, drainage, sidewalk requirements and street cut/right-of-way resolution. 6. Marvin Brantley's continuing situation. 7. Advise police on matters related to IRCC Crime Lab Contract and skateboarding.