1992-10-06 Regular MeetingI��I F OKEEC
1 O y0
�� �OR10'fff
C I T Y O F 0 K E E C H 0 B E E
C I T Y C 0 U N C I L M E E T I N G
OCTOBER 6, 1992 — 7:00 P.M.
SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION
D om .... I .. C 7
COUNCILMEMBERS ACTION
VOTE
YES
NO
Nr
Mayor Kirk called the meeting of October 6, 1992 to
A. Call Meeting of October 6, 1992 to
order at 7:00 P.M.
order at 7:00 P.M.
B. Invocation offered by Rev. Anton Jensen;
Invocation offered by Councilmember Dowling R. Watford, Jr.;
Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor Kirk.
Mayor Kirk led the Pledge of Allegiance.
C. Mayor and Council attendance:
Mayor James "Jim" Kirk
Present
X
Councilmember R.R. "Nick" Collins
Present
X
Councilmember Danny Entry
Present
X
Councilmember Jerry E. Walker
Present
X
Councilman Dowling R. Watford, Jr.
Present
X
Staff attendance:
Attorney John R. Cook
Present
X
Administrator John J. Drago
Present
X
Clerk Bonnie S. Thomas
Present
X
Deputy Clerk Lane Gamiotea
Present
X
D. Motion to dispense with reading and
Mayor Kirk announced that the minutes of the September 22, 1992
approve the Summary of Council Action
regular meeting will be deferred for approval at the next regular
for the Regular Meeting of September
meeting, October 20, 1992.
22, 1992.
nr-tnhar A 1QQ2 _ PpnlllAr Maatinn - Paop 2 of 7
REQUEST FOR T1
WITHDRAWAL OF
E. NEW BI
1. A moti
as a i
Direct
2. Consid
applic
City C
VOTE
COUNCILMEMBERS ACTION
yES
NO
k-TNT
X ADDITION, DEFERRAL OR
ITEMS ON TODAY'S AGENDA.
None.
'SINESS
on to appoint Mr. Kevin Timko
Councilmember Collins made a motion to appoint Mr. Kevin Timko as
egular water plant operator —
a regular employee, water plant operator; seconded by Councilmember
or of Public Utilities.
Entry.
Following brief discussion, vote on motion is as follows:
KIRK
COLLINS
ENTRY
WALKER
WATFORD
X
X
X
XX
MOTION CARRIED.
er an alley closing
Councilmember Entry made a motion to accept the application (#40)
ation from United Feed —
from United Feed Co—op to close a portion of an alley in Block
lerk (Exhibit 1).
59, Lots 4 and 14 through to Lots 10 and 20; and to close the
entire alley in Block 60 all in the City of Okeechobee. And
instruct the attorney to draft an ordinance for Council's
consideration at the next meeting October 20, 1992); seconded by
Councilmember Walker.
KIRK
X
COLLINS
X
ENTRY
X
WALKER
X
WATFORD
X
MOTION CARRIED.
Ortoher 6. 1992 - Renular MPetinn - PanP 3 nf 7
VOTE
E. NEW BUSINESS
COUNCILMEMBERS ACTION
YES
NO
�MNT
Councilmember Collins made a motion to approve the agreement
3. Consider a request to use an alley
from United Feed - City Administrator
(Exhibit 2).
between the City and United Feed Co-op to use a portion of an
alley in Block 61, Lots 1 and 11 through to Lots 2 and 12 City of
Okeechobee; and if they want to build a permanent structure they
have to come back to the City for permission; seconded by
Councilmember Entry.
Council and staff discussed briefly a set of preliminary plans
indicating the retention ponds and flowing areas United Feed Co-
op are proposing in order to meet South Florida Water Management
District regulations. Public Works Director Elders commented
that this would not affect any drainage in that area of the City.
(Permission for use of this alley or any alley is provided by a
letter of agreement stipulating certain requirements of the City
and is signed by officers of the City and the requestee when
approved by action of the City Council.)
KIRK
X
COLLINS
X
ENTRY
X
WALKER
X
WATFORD
X
MOTION CARRIED.
4. Discuss additions to the Water
Distribution Master Plan - Director
of Public Utilities (Exhibit 3).
The engineering firm, Reese, Macon and Associates, who are
contracted by the City to implement the Water Distribution System
Master Plan have found "pockets" in the system that the hydraulic
model did not, which was explained at the last Council meeting by
Engineer Reese as being not uncommon. The recommendation of the
engineer is to add the two projects, Southeast section and
Douglas Park, that are outlined in exhibit three to the water
distribution master plan. Engineer Reese estimates the
construction for the two projects to be $185,000.00. Engineering
fees for this work is approximately 6.5% of the construction
costs ($12,025.00).
October 6, 1992 - Reqular Meetinq - Page 4 of 7
E.
VOTE
NEW BUSINESS
�OUNCILMEMBERS ACTION
YES
4. Water Distribution Master Plan:
Public Utilities Director Loftin recommended that the two
projects be approved as part of the master plan. Further
explaining both projects are intended to solve recognized
problems within the existing service area, and are within the
budgetary limits of the proposed bond issue. Director Loftin
came to the podium and answered questions from the Council
concerning the request and his memo to Council, exhibit three.
Councilmember Collins made a motion to add the Southeast section
project and the Douglas Park project to the Water Distribution
Master Plan as recommended by Engineer Reese and Director Loftin;
seconded by Councilmember Entry.
KIRK
X
COLLINS
X
ENTRY
X
WALKER
X
WATFORD
X
MOTION CARRIED.
i. Hear from Judy Huffman — Judy
Huffman (Exhibit 4).
Judy Huffman appeared before the Council on behalf of the bar
owners in the City, requesting that they receive the same
opportunity as the County bar owners receive in being able to
stay open until 2:00 A.M. ten nights a year and four nights for
the rest of the '92 year. Further explaining that when the
County bar businesses stay open and the City businesses close up
at 12:00 P.M. the customers drive down the road into the County
and the City businesses are losing out on the opportunity that is
allowed to the County business owners.
Council felt the City business owners should be allowed this
privilege and instructed Attorney Cook to draft an amending
ordinance permitting the ten nights a year and four nights for
he rest of '92 and bring it back to the Council for
consideration.
Councilmember Watford commented that this only is the beginning
f this process, that a public hearing will also have to be held.
Further commenting that he felt the City's ordinance should state
hat particular dates the City bar business owners are choosing
to stay open until 2:00 A.M.
October 6, 1992 - Regular Meeting - Page 5 of 7
E. NEW BIISINESS
COUNCILMEMBERS ACTION
VOTE
YES
NO
kW
6. Update on the talks concerning
Mayor Kirk addressed the Council explaining the progress from the
Public Utilities and an Authority -
meetings he has had with County Commission Chairman Charlie
Mayor Kirk.
Harvey and Okeechobee Beach Water Association representative Jack
Coker concerning public utilities. Continuing that parties
involved have been very honest in their meetings and have
progressed with the idea of trying to find a joint venture of a
utility authority that everyone would be happy with. They (Kirk,
Harvey and Coker) have concluded that the County and City proceed
to attempt to become partners in the public utility business.
Mayor Kirk continued further, that the County is willing to
address the issue of equity that we have talked about on a number
occasions. They are willing to do this by selecting three
consultants that have done this type of work before to determine
the value of the system. Of the three we (the City) would select
the one that would do the work and the County would pay for it.
The one thing that we would not argue with, once it was done, we
would not debate the value. If this comes back at $7 million
,.
dollars, for example. Then at that point if we think that is too
high or to low we would just have to pull out and say I am sorry,
there is no direction for us to go in here or if the County felt
like that, at that point they would pull out, and say, we are
going our way, you go yours. But we do not want to get into a
battle over that one thing. If this study comes back then, if
the equity is within a dollar range that we and the County both
can accept we will proceed in talks.
What we are proposing at this point is whatever that equity is,
let's say the equity is $7 million dollars. The County would
enter into an agreement with us to pay us $3-1/2 million. We
would continue status quo until which time they paid that. Right
now the discussion is more in the line of we will pay this in a
two or three year period. In other words there would be maybe
three installments to us of equal amounts. Once they bought into
this equity they would become partners with us, then everything
would have to move in a different direction. Keeping in mind
that if we say we are interested, there is a tremendous amount of
work that has to be done here. As far as verbage and I have
concerns for our people; and making sure we protect our people.
October 6. 1992 - Reoular Meetino - PaoP 6 of 7
COUNCILMFMBfRS ACTION
VOTE
YES
E. NEW BIISINESS
6. Mayor Kirk on public utilities:
Mayor Kirk publicly thanked Commissioner Harvey and Jack Coker
for the time they have spent with him and for doing this in a
professional manner, being courteous, but honest. We were
fortunate enough to be in a room were it was just the three of us
and we did not have to worry about somebody misquoting us or
anybody else's personality getting involved. It was just the
three of us. It has been very productive. I am very excited
that ;;e have gotten this far.
Mayor Kirk stated to the Council, I would encourage you to let me
take back to them an answer to go ahead, find the three firms and
let's move in a direction to see what the value is. Then we
would come to a point were we would have to make a decision and
so would they. It should not be very long in coming. Then it
would take a long time to work everything out. It is not
something that is going to happen in two or three weeks or two or
.2
three months because there are too many things that both parties
Y
would be concerned with and we are doing what is best for the
City. The main advantage here is, if we can work this out to
benefit both us and the County, there is going to be a much
broader base as far as people to serve. Whatever grant monies
are available and a much larger base to spread out any kind of a
debt service that would have to be spread out. At the same time
it would help us; and I feel, be an easy way for the County to
get into the business.
Mayor Kirk again encouraged the Council to say "go ahead, let's
let the County pick three consultants. Present the information
to us. We will look at them, we will select one. Note, this
would leave OBWA on their own at this present time, and that is
what they chose. Further stating that what essentially would
happen at some future date is that there would be a board
comprised of equal number of people appointed by the City and by
the County, they would run the utilities. That is what the final
goal would be.
Mayor Kirk asked the Council for comments.
October 6. 1992 - Reoular Meetinq - Pa4e 7 of 7
cOUNCILM6MB6RS ACTION
VOTE
VFS
W
E. NEW BUSINESS
6. Mayor Kirk on public utilities:
Councilmember Collins commented that he had spoken with
1
Commissioner Harvey and he understood it to be the County could
pick the three consultants and the City pick the one consultant,
or the City could pick the three consultants and the County pick
the one consultant, but either way the County would pay for it.
He further stated that he did not have any objections to this.
Councilmember Entry stated -he had no problem with it. I
Councilmember Watford expressed his only concern is, this will be
the third professional study of some description. But it seems
to me we have not addressed the one issue, what direction is best
here? If an authority is the way to head or to me, a
"partnership" sounds better. He further commented that since the
County was willing to pay for it, go ahead.
Councilmember Walker commented he had no objections.
Mayor Kirk thanked the Council and stated he would keep them
updated with what is going on in this matter.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Kirk:
Mayor Kirk adjourned the meeting at 7:50 P.M.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT IF ANY PERSON
SHOULD DECIDE TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE
AT THIS MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL, SUCH
PERSON WILL NEED TO INSURE THAT A VERBATIM
RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING IS MADE WHICH IN-
CLUD$ THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON
WH T $.AP A.L.IBASED.
Ja��-E. Kirk,'Mayor
Attest:
Bonniel:S-. ,Thomas, CMC, City Clerk