Loading...
1992-09-22 Regular MeetingC I T Y O F 0 Y E E C H 0 B E E C I T Y C O U N C I L M E E T I N G SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 — 7:00 P.M. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION PAGE 1 OF 34 - COUNCILMEMSERS ACTION VOTE YES NO Mayor Kirk called the meeting of September 22, 1992 to A. Call Meeting of September 22, 1992 to order at 7:00 P.M. order at 7:00 P.M. B. Invocation offered by Rev. Bill Tweedale; Invocation offered by Rev. Bill Tweedale; Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor Kirk. Mayor Kirk led the Pledge of Allegiance. C. Mayor and Council attendance: Mayor James "Jim" Kirk Present X Councilmember R.R. "Nick" Collins Present X Councilmember Danny Entry Present X Councilmember Jerry E. Walker Present X Councilman Dowling R. Watford, Jr. Present X Staff attendance: Wrl Attorney John R. Cook Present X Administrator John J. Drago Present X ' Clerk Bonnie S. Thomas Present X Deputy Clerk Lane Gamiotea Present X D. Motion to dispense with reading and Councilmember Collins made a motion to dispense with reading approve the Summary of Council Action and approve the Summary of Council Action for the recessed foe the Recessed Meeting of September meeting of September 9, 1992 held on September 14, 1992; 9, 1992 held on September 14, 1992. seconded by Councilmember Entry. KIRK X COLLINS X ENTRY X WALKER X WATFORD X MOTION CARRIED. CCDTCMDCD 77 1nn7 nrrlu nn urrrrur nnnr n nr nA JJL - I\LUUL/l1\ FILL 111\U - I P1UL L VI 0-t COUNc:1 LMEMBERS ACTION VOTE VES AVRBQIIEST FOR THE ADDITION, DEFERRAL OR WITHDRAWAL OF ITEMS ON TODAY'S AGENDA. None. E. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING FOR FINAL ORDINANCE Mayor Kirk opened the public hearing for final ordinance ADOPTION adoption at 7:02 P.M. 1. a. Motion to read by title only, Councilmember Watford made a motion to read by title only, Ordinance 648 — City Attorney (Exhibit 1). Ordinance No. 648Utilit (Utility Tax revision); seconded by Councilmember Entry. KIRK X COLLINS X ENTRY X WALKER X WATFORD X MOTION CARRIED. Attorney Cook read Ordinance No. 648 by title only as follows: "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA; AMENDING CHAPTER 15, ARTICLE I, SECTION 15-1 TO PROVIDE FOR A TAI ON EACH AND EVERY PURCHASE, IN THE CITY, OF ELECTRICITY, BOTTLED GAS (NATURAL AND MANUFACTURED) AND LOCAL TELEPHONE SERVICE. ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATUTES, CHAPTER 166.231; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE." b. Motion to adopt Ordinance 648. Councilmember Collins made a motion to adopt Ordinance No. 648; seconded by Councilmember Watford. C. Public Comment. Mayor asked if there were any comments or questions from the public. There were none. Councilmember Watford commented that basically what we are doing is taking off the two hundred dollar cap and we are doing this because of the budget deficit. UPTFMRFR 77. 1992 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 3 OF 34 E. F. VOTE COONCILMEMBERS ACTION yES NO PUBLIC HEARING FOR FINAL ORDINANCE ADOPTION CONTINUED d. Vote on motion. KIRK X COLLINS X ENTRY X WALKER X WATFORD X MOTION CARRIED. CLOSE PIIBLIC HEARING Mayor Kirk closed the public hearing at 7:04 P.M. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE FINAL READING Mayor Kirk opened the public hearing for the first reading of the Budget Ordinances at 7:04 P.M. OF THE BUDGET ORDINANCES — 7:00 P.M. 1. Mayor announces that the purpose of Mayor Kirk announced that the purpose of this public hearing is this public hearing is to consider to consider the first reading of ordinances for the proposed the first reading of ordinances for millage rate levy and proposed budget for the fiscal year 1992— the proposed millage rate levy and 93. proposed budget for fiscal year 1992-93. 2. Mayor announces that the proposed Mayor Kirk announced that the proposed millage rate levy millage rate levy represents 1.43% represents 1.43% under the roll back rate computed pursuant under the roll back rate computed to Florida Statute Section 200.065(1). pursuant to Florida Statute Section 200.065(1). 3. Mayor asks for comments or questions Mayor Kirk asked for comments or questions from the public, there from the public, were none. SEPTEMBER 22. 1992 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 4 OF 34 F. PIIBLIC HEARING FOR THE FINAL BEADING COUNCILMEMBERS ACTION VOTE VES NO VUNT OF THE BUDGET ORDINANCES CONTINUED 4. a. A motion to read by title only, Councilmember Collins made a motion to read by title only, Ordinance 649 levying a millage rate Ordinance No. 649 levying a millage rate for the General Fund for the General Fund Budget and Budget and Debt Service; seconded by Councilmembers Collins and Debt Service - City Attorney Watford. (Exhibit 1). KIRK X COLLINS X ENTRY X WALKER X WATFORD X MOTION CARRIED. Attorney Cook read Ordinance No. 649 by title only as follows: "AN ORDINANCE LEVYING A MILLAGE RATE 'WHICH RATE IS SET ON ALL REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY, PROVIDING THAT 4.15 PER THOUSAND C7 DOLLAR VALUATION SHALL NOT BE LEVIED ON HOMESTEAD PROPERTY: THAT + 4.15 PER THOUSAND DOLLAR VALUATION SHALL BE USED FOR GENERAL CITY PURPOSES AND .39, PER THOUSAND DOLLAR VALUATION INCLUDING HOMESTEAD, SHALL BE USED TO PAY PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST ON GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS: THAT SAID MILLAGE RATE IS 1.43x LESS THAN THE ROLL-BACY RATE COMPUTED IN ACCORDANCE 'WITH F.S.200.065(1); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE." b. Motion to adopt Ordinance 649 Councilmember Entry made a motion to adopt Ordinance No. 649 levying a millage rate for the levying a millage rate for the General Fund Budget and Debt General Fund Budget and Debt Service; seconded by Councilmember Collins. Service. IRK X COLLINS X ENTRY X WALKER X WATFORD X OTION CARRIED. SEPTEMBER 22. 1992 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 5 of.34 F. PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE FINAL READING COUNCILMEMBERS ACTION VOTE VES OF THE BUDGET ORDINANCES CONTINUED 5. a. A motion to read by title only, Councilmember Collins made a motion to read by title only, Ordinance 650 establishing the Ordinance No. 650 establishing the revenues and expenditures for revenues and expenditures for the the General Fund Budget; seconded by Councilmember Entry. General Fund Budget - City Attorney (Exhibit 3). KIRK X COLLINS X ENTRY X WALKER X WATFORD X MOTION CARRIED. Attorney Cook read Ordinance No. 650 by title only as follows: "AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AN ANNUAL BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 1992 AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1993; WHICH BUDGET SETS FORTH GENERAL FUND REVENUES OF $2,264,515. AND EXPENDITURES OF $2,264,515.; PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT FUND REVENUES OF $742,900. AND EXPENDITURES OF $580,000., LEAVING A FUND BALANCE OF 162,900.; DEBT SERVICE REVENUES OF 293,772. AND EXPENDITURES OF 235,147. LEAVING A FUND BALANCE OF $58,625.; LAW ENFORCEMENT SPECIAL FUND REVENUES OF $2,738. AND NO EXPENDITURES LEAVING A FUND BALANCE OF $2,738. PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE." b. A motion to adopt Ordinance 650 Councilmember Entry made a motion to adopt Ordinance No. 650, establishing the revenues and establishing the revenues and expenditures for the General Fund expenditures for the General Fund Budget; seconded by Councilmember Collins. Budgets. KIRK X COLLINS X ENTRY X WALKER X WATFORD X MOTION CARRIED. SEPTEMBER 22. 1992 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 6 of 34 COGNCILMEMBERS ACTION VOTE yes NOF. PIIBLIC HEARING F08 THE FINAL BEADING OF THE BUDGET ORDINANCES CONTINUED 6. a. A motion to read by title only, Councilmember Watford made a motion to read by title only, Ordinance 651 establishing the Ordinance No. 651 establishing the revenues and expenditures for revenues and expenditures for the the Public Utilities Budget; seconded by Councilmember Walker. Public Utilities Budget - City Attorney (Exhibit 31). KIRK X COLLINS X ENTRY X WALKER X WATFORD X OTION CARRIED. Attorney Cook read Ordinance No. 651 by title only as follows: "AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AN ANNUAL BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF KEECHOBEE, FLORIDA FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 1992 AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1993; WHICH BUDGET SETS FORTH PIIBLIC TILITIES REVENUES OF $12,214,846. AND EIPENDITURES OF 10,376,744., LEAVING A FUND BALANCE OF $1,838,072., PROVIDING AN FFECTIVE DATE." b. A motion to adopt Ordinance 651 ouncilmember Collins made a motion to adopt Ordinance No. 651 establishing the revenues and establishing the revenues and expenditures for the Public expenditures for the Public Jtilities Budget; seconded by Councilmember Entry. Utilities Budget. IRK X OLLINS X NTRY X ALKER X ATFORD X OTION CARRIED. CLOSE PIIBLIC HEARING 4ayor Kirk closed the public hearing at 7:10 P.M. SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 7 of 34 COUNCILMEMBFRS ACTION VOTE VES G. NEW BIISIHESS 1. Proclaim Northwest 9th Avenue Mayor Kirk read the Proclamation in its entirety as follows: as Dean Avenue - Mayor Kirk. "WHEREAS, the Reverend C. Dean served as Pastor of the First Missionary Baptist Church of Dean's Court; and WHEREAS, the Reverend J.W. Dean served as Pastor of the First Missionary Baptist Church of Dean's Court; and WHEREAS, the members of The First Missionary Baptist Church of the Dean's Court wish to recognize Reverend C. Dean and Reverend J.W. Dean's service to their Church and Community; and WHEREAS, the members of The First Missionary Baptist Church of Dean's Court respectfully request that Northwest 9th Avenue be renamed as Dean Avenue; and WHEREAS, the Dean Family has been a great influence to the people of this Community and it would be an honor to name this Avenue after them; NOW THEREFORE, I James E. Kirk, Mayor of the City of Okeechobee, do hereby acknowledge that the Reverend C. Dean served as Pastor of The First Missionary Baptist Church of Dean's Court for 35 years, and the Reverend J.W. Dean served as Pastor of The First Missionary Baptist Church of Dean's Court for 32 years. In recognition of their outstanding service to the Community, I do hereby proclaim Northwest 9th Avenue from State Road 70 North to the City Limits as DEAN AVENUE in honor of the Reverend C. Dean and Reverend J.W. Dean." The proclamation was accepted by Emma Johnson and Pat Grant. 2. Proclaim October 4-10, 1992 as Fire Mayor Kirk read the Proclamation in its entirety as follows: Prevention Week - Mayor Kirk. "WHEREAS, the threat of destructive fire is ever present throughout the United States as illustrated by over 6,000 people in the United States dying in fires and over 70,000 are hospitalized with burn injuries; and SEPTEMBER 22. 1992 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 8 OF 34 CvuNCILMFMHFRS ACTIN VOTE YES NOG. NEW BDSINESS 2. Proclamation continued: WHEREAS, working smoke detectors in homes, businesses and schools i give early warning of a fire allowing people time to escape and cutting the risk of a fire death by 50 percent; and WHEREAS, 80 percent of all homes have. smoke detectors of which only two—thirds are operable, most often due to dead or missing batteries; and WHEREAS, in an effort to heighten public awareness of the need to maintain smoke detectors in operable condition, the National Association of State Fire Marshals has instituted a campaign entitled RIs Yours Working: Smoke Detectors Save Lives„; and WHEREAS, the National Association of State Fire Marshals, in a concerted effort to work with states, has donated over 4,000 smoke detectors in Florida; and WHEREAS, the City of Okeechobee is desirous of joining with the C� National Association of State Fire Marshals, RIs Yours Workings campaign to promote the use, testing, and maintenance of smoke detectors in our homes, work places and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, James E. Yirk, Mayor of the City of Okeechobee, do hereby Proclaim the week of October 4-10, 1992, as "FIRE PREVENTION WEEYR in the City of Okeechobee, and encourage all citizens to participate in activities that utilize smoke detectors as a vital component for the preservation of life and the protection of property from the devastating effects of fire. E IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Okeechobee extend special thanks to the National Association of State Fire Marshals for heir involvement in the prevention of fires.„ I Proclamation was accepted by Fire Chief Tomey. CFDTFMRFR 2? 1QQ2 _ RFMIIAR MEETING - PAGE 9 of 34 COUNCILMEMBERS ACTION VOTE vES NO Jzsar3. G. NEW BIISINESS Hear from Mr. Marvin Wheeler - Mr. Mr. Marvin Wheeler appeared before the City Council commenting Marvin Wheeler (Exhibit 5). on the 92/93 budget line item 519 (General Services) 4604 repairs and maintenance for $10,000.00 expressing that it could be lowered and that insurance should take care of major repairs on the computers. Mr. Wheeler also requested' that Mayor Kirk have for the public at the next Council meeting the balance of the debt service fund and its distribution. Mayor Kirk stated he would have an answer for Mr. Wheeler at the next meeting. 4. Motion to adopt Resolution 92-13 - Councilmember Watford made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 92-13 City Attorney (Exhibit 6). (supporting an economical and safe supply of blood and blood products); seconded by Councilmember Collins. Attorney Cook read Resolution No. 92-13 by title only as follows: "A RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA SUPPORTING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ECONOMICAL AND SAFE SUPPLY OF `. BLOOD AND BLOOD PRODUCTS FOR THE CITIZENS OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE." KIRK X COLLINS X ENTRY X WALKER X WATFORD X MOTION CARRIED. 5. a. Motion to read by title only, Councilmember Watford made a motion to read by title only, and and set October 20, 1992 as the set October 20, 1002 as the Public Hearing date, Ordinance 652, Public Hearing date, Ordinance 652 closing, vacating and abandoning an alley; seconded by closing, vacating and abandoning an Councilmember Collins. (New Horizons, Application #39). alley - City Attorney (Exhibit 7). KIRK X COLLINS X ENTRY X WALKER X WATFORD X SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 10 OF 34 G. NEW BUSINESS COUNCILMEMBERS ACTION VOTE VES W 5. a. Ordinance No. 652 continued: Attorney Cook read Ordinance No. 652 by title only as follows: "AN ORDINANCE CLOSING, VACATING ANDABANDONING THE ALLEY, STREET OR ALLEYWAY AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 17, PUBLIC RECORDS, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, DESCRIBED AS THAT ALLEY IN BLOCK 30, FIRST ADDITION TO SOUTH OKEECHOBEE, AS.IT RUNS IN BETWEEN LOTS 1- 6 AND LOTS 7-12; ALL LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO RECORD THE ORDINANCE IN THE PIIBLIC RECORDS OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE." b. Motion to approve the first Councilmember Walker made a motion to approve the first reading reading of Ordinance 652. of Ordinance No. 652; seconded by Councilmember Collins. KIRK X COLLINS X �., ENTRY X WALKER X WATFORD X MOTION CARRIED. 6. Motion to award a street paving Councilmember Entry made a motion to award a street paving contract to Better Roads in the contract to Better Roads in the amount of two hundred seventy—six amount of $276,934.29 — Director thousand nine hundred thirty—four dollars, twenty nine cents of Public Works (Exhibit 8). ($276,934.29); seconded by Councilmember Collins. The Council asked Director Elders various questions, he commented that the City has done business with this company before and he felt comfortable with them. Southwest loth Avenue (from 6th to 7th Street, one block) was left out of the bid and will be added on at the end as a change order. KIRK X COLLINS X ENTRY X WALKER X WATFORD X MOTION CARRIED. UPTFMRFR ,22. 1992 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 11 OF 34 COUNCILMFMBFRS ACTION VOTE yES W G. NEW BUSINESS 7. Motion to award the purchase of a Councilmember Watford made a motion to award the purchase of a backhoe to Smith Brothers Contracting backhoe to Smith Brothers Contracting Equipment, Inc. in the Equipment, Inc. in the amount of amount of fifty-three thousand five hundred ninety-five dollars $53,595.00 - Director of Public ($53,595.00); seconded by Councilmember Collins. Works (Exhibit 10). Following discussion vote is as follows: KIRK X COLLINS X ENTRY X WALKER XX WATFORD MOTION CARRIED. 8. Motion to award a contract to G.E. Councilmember Watford made a motion to award a contract to French Construction, Inc. to relocate relocate a water line in the intersection of 441 and 70 to G.E. a water line i n the intersection of French Construction in the amount of seventy-seven thousand 441 and 70 in the amount of $77,935. nine hundred thirty-five dollars ($77,935.00); seconded by - Director of Public Utilities Councilmember Entry. (Exhibit 10). Following brief discussion of Council and staff and upon the recommendation of Public Utilities Director Loftin, vote was as follows: KIRK X COLLINS X ENTRY X WALKER X WATFORD X MOTION CARRIED. + 9. Consider granting permission to Following brief discussion, Councilmember Watford made a motion erect a fence in an alley by Shawn to allow Shaun McGushion use of an alley in Block 33 (First McGushion- City Administrator Addition to South Okeechobee) to erect a fence; seconded by (Exhibit 11). Councilmember Entry. SEPTEMBER 22. 1992 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 12 OF 34 C0(1NCILMEMBERS ACTIN VOTE KW yES NU G. NEW BIISIHESS 9. Use of alley continued: (Permission for use of this alley or any alley is provided by a letter of agreement stipulating certain requirements of the City and is signed by officers of the City and the requestee when approved by action of the City Council) Vote on motion to approve use of alley agreement: I KIRK X COLLINS X ENTRY X WALKER X WATFORD X MOTION CARRIED. Recess: Mayor Kirk called for a recess at 7:42 P.M. and reconvened the ® meeting at 7:52 P.M. 10. Discuss City Administration — Councilmember Collins made a motion to remove from the table the Mayor Kirk. discussion of City Administrator; seconded by Councilmember Entry. KIRK X COLLINS X ENTRY X WALKER X WATFORD X MOTION CARRIED. Mayor Kirk gave the floor to Administrator Drago to answer the seven charges for dismissal with cause that were brought against him at the September 14, 1992 City Council meeting. SEPTEMBER 22. 1992 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 13 OF 34 G. NEW BUSINESS (.OUNCILMEMBERS ACTION VOTE YES NO Fe 10. City Administrator continued: Administrator Drago proceeded by first commenting that he wished to take this opportunity to address the items in order and to be as brief as possible; and that when the Council hears everything that is presented Council will determine the decisions made were in the best interest of the City, nobody from the City gained; and that City staff does make mistakes because if you do your job you are going to make mistakes, if you do not do your job you are not going to make mistakes. LETTER TO ENGINEER: He then asked Engineer Bill Reese to come up to the podium to discuss the letter written by him to Engineer Reese in regard to trying to get a meeting with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). Engineer Reese explained to Council the difficulties encountered by City staff in setting a meeting with SFWMD, concerning a draft agreement between the County and SFWMD wherein grant funds were contemplated to be given to the County whereupon a number of those dollars could go toward a combined effort with the County and Okeechobee Beach Water Association (OBWA) to form, and to build a water plant, possibly. The agreement draft made it appear, Engineer Reese felt, grant monies were going to go for a private entity to take an existing customer (OBWA) away from the City, possibly. Therefore, upon the recommendation of Engineer Reese, Administrator Drago put his thoughts on the matter in writing by letter to Engineer Reese so that he could carry them to SFWMD, saying to them the City is on this thing, we really do need to meet. This is what was done and we subsequently had the meeting. In answer to Administrator Drago`s questions, Engineer Reese further indicated that he was not insulted by the letter to him under the circumstances because it resulted in the meeting being held. The rest of the issues were not resolved but the meeting was held and that was the purpose of the letter. SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 14 OF 34 G. COUNCILMEMBERS ACTION VOTE YES W KW NEW BUSINESS 10. City Administrator continued: LETTER TO ENGINEER CONTINUED: Council and staff discussed this item at some length relative to conversations with Councilmember Walker concerning the letter and Councilmember Collins concerns that grant funds were going to be used by way of the County to OBWA resulting in competition of a I private entity with City Government. Councilmember Collins stated he knew about the letter, after the fact, but if he had known about it before the fact, it did not matter because he felt the City deserved a meeting with SFWMD and the letter got the meeting. PURCHASING: On the neat item Mayor Kirk continued to yield the floor to Administrator Drago. Administrator Drago then responded with the item of purchasing concerning a written quote dated 4/24/92 and the purchase order being dated 4/15/92 and asked Program Coordinator Jim Threewits to the podium. Mr. Threewits distributed copies of a letter from Jeannette's Interiors to Council and staff. He explained the letter will clear up any misinterpretations hopefully. Mayor Kirk asked for questions on the letter. Councilmember Watford explained the letter states "could very well have been," it does not state it exactly was (on the date stated). Mr. Threewits stated he was standing before the Council to tell you that it was. Further stating had this been done after the fact he would probably not have stuck that quote in there, being it was dated like that. After discussion with Council on the matter Mr. Threewits explained a lot of times purchases are done by securing it first number —wise then going back and doing the paperwork afterwards. UPTNUR 22. 1992 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 15 OF 34 COUNCILMEMBERS ACTION VOTE VES NO G. NEW BUSINESS 10. City Administrator continued: PURCHASING CONTINUED: Councilmember Collins commented this does not make the practice right or wrong, what I am trying to find out, isn't it what is almost a common practice in the City? I Mr. Threewits stated it does occur, but this one here was not. The prices were gotten prior to the purchase order being assigned to it. That is what I hope the letter will clear up. After further discussion Mayor Kirk cautioned Council about whatever questions asked to each other or to anyone else, be careful, be sure that we do not try to shift things. Do not say somebody else did something wrong, so this makes something else okay. He further indicated he understood Councilmember Collins point let's make sure that we do not bring other employees into this and say so—and—so did something wrong. He cautioned again i- saying, keep it general and do not use names. Councilmember Watford asked Mr. Threewits to explain how this particular purchase was made? Who actually found that particular tile? Mr. Threewits explained this tile was found through Administrator Drago. He found some tile at a good price. We have been looking at alternatives. We have concerns of areas that need some maintenance done. From there I proceeded with getting quotes to justify the purchase. Other discussion on this item included comments from Councilmember Watford relative to Department Heads not being aware they were getting this tile and Mr. Threewits indicated that was the case with one. Mr. Threewits stated he wanted to be sure Council realized this letter does substantiate the price was gotten prior to the award of the contract. Council felt the letter itself did not necessarily verify this scenario but accepted Mr. Threewits explanation of the tile quote for clarification. CFPTPMPFP 79 1QQ? _ PFP11 AP MFFTTNf _ PAU 16 OF 34 COUNCILMFMBERS ACTION VOTE YES W KTNF G. NEW BUSINESS 10. City Administrator continued: BMA ENGINEERING INVOICES: The next item brought by Administrator Drago concerned "Blue Heron" engineering work in the Southeast Section of the City. Engineer Reese explained in lengthy .detail a meeting on the water distribution plat. 'that ::as held with himself, Public Utilities Director Loftin, Bobby Birts and Administrator Drago. Items mentioned here were water lines new and replacements, cleaning, locations, and how the grant was a 50/50 arrangement. In that meeting it was stated that at some time in the future Blue Heron Golf and Country Club development may become a City customer and that point was discussed as to what plans to make if that materializes. Engineer Reese further explained there had been some very preliminary survey work done down in the Southeast Section of the City. We (Reese, Macon and Associates [RMA D have sent a letter to the City stating we are at a point where we need a decision. Whether or not we are going to up —size the line to include Blue Heron Golf and Country Club or not. At this point RMA is waiting on direction from the City on that. Administrator Drago asked Engineer Reese is it unusual for an owner, the City, to ask for other additional lines to be included in a master plan if we find that there are pockets that need to be addressed? Engineer Reese with explanation stated that it was not unusual. It happens. When you move from a conceptual stage to a detailed stage specifics come up that were not contemplated in the master plan. Again the master plan was a hydraulic model it did not deal with detailed knowledge of what somebody might know about, osculated pockets in the system. It happens. Does not happen every time but it does happen from time to time. From time to time a line does get deleted and then gets added, it does happen. G. r.FPTFMRFP 2? 14Q? — RFr.111AR MFFTTNr. — PAGE 17 OF 34 COUNCILMEMBBRS ACTION VOTE YES VLSENT NEW BUSINESS -NO 10. City Administrator continued: BMA ENGINEERING INVOICES CONTINUED: Councilmember Walker questioned Engineer Reese about RMA #92-109 whether it directly relates to a corresponding number that you bill the City under which is the master plan number, our contract number? With explanation Engineer Reese stated no that #92-109 is for things that have not been given some other authorization and does not come under the master plan contract the City has with RMA. Further questions ensued concerning costs incurred on the preliminary work. The dollar amount on one invoice for "Blue Heron" is $434.46. Councilmember Walker asked again if this expense was a part of the master plan contract and it was explained that no it is not. They are all individual separate items not covered under the master plan contract. Discussion involving Engineer Reese, staff and Council concerning invoices over and above the approved master plan contract continued including invoices in amounts of $3,000.00, $2,900.00 and $4,718.65 as presented by Councilmember Walker and they were confirmed accurate by Engineer Reese as being review plans for a trailer park, the telemetry system and 441 and 70 engineering work. Engineer Reese was asked if he had also submitted an invoice for over $10,000.00 and it was given back to him to break down into mounts that were less than that? Engineer Reese explained the invoice was for a "10 amount" and yes, he was asked. It was Alit to put the stuff that related to payment from the bond proceeds as a separate invoice. There was a request to itemize he rest of the them. ouncilmember Watford asked if RMA would be more comfortable and wouldn't it be better for the City for these types of engineering services with an engineer without going through the Consultants ompetitive Negotiations Act, that we should at least have a ontinuing services contract with either your firm or some firm ather than "here, do this or that engineering"? CCDTCMDrD 00 9(]117 ncrm nn W717TT.1f` nnrrr 9n nr nn G. NEW BUSINESS I Ll IV LIB LL I.J .JL - 1\LUULlIr% 1'ILL 1 111U - FMOL four J`f COUNCILMEMBfRS ACTION VOTE YES 10. City Administrator continued: BMA ENGINEERING INVOICES CONTINUED: Engineer Reese stated with explanation he only became uncomfortable if he does work and a month goes by and somebody says I am not going to be paid for that work. He has worked both ways, service contract, with some. Others, none. RMA's rates do not bounce around. Everything I have been asked to do I hope we have done well and we have been paid for it. Mayor Kirk asked if anyone else had any input on this subject. Councilmember Collins referred to "Blue Heron" and asked Mr. Jim Baughman, had we ever done any work for him or had he asked us to? With much explanation Mr. Baughman stated in answer to the question, "NO". Mayor Kirk stated he did not think anything was said last meeting that would draw harm to Blue Heron. The motion indicates that we paid for engineering services to accept Blue Heron or to have Blue Heron come on to our water system, that is no way a reflection on your organization whatsoever Mr. Baughman stated he wanted the public record to reflect that we (Blue Heron development) did not request that (engineering). Mayor Kirk explained neither did we accuse you of that sir, we did not. Further stating let me point out something here so we will understand the process that we are going by here. In Councilman Watford's motion last week, he listed several items. I felt like the Administrator should have an opportunity to answer those things and that's what I am attempting to do here, but if we are going to go off in directions right, left and up and down we will be sitting here in the morning and still not have this done so let's, as much as possible, stick to the facts. There was a motion and it was very precise. The items were mentioned, I think the Administrator should have an opportunity to explain those and the Council to ask him questions about those but if we do not keep it in that line we are going to turn this into a public hearing type meeting. That is not what it is and I do not want it to head in that direction so let's please stick to the issue, you know what the motion was and let's deal with the facts as presented to us by Councilman Watford at the last meeting. Now I will yield the floor to you. G. UPTFMRFR 77. 1992 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 19 OF 34 COUNCILMEMBERS ACTION VOTE VES NEW BUSINESS 10. City Administrator continued: BMA ENGINEERING INVOICES CONTINUED: Councilmember Walker commented, all I wanted to say was that by reading this I never even had an idea that he was doing any work for you Jim.what he was talking about when you read this, all he is saying, is that he is doing that for future growth and you are a future growth, I hope. And he also mentioned Rocky's Trailer Park he mentioned other things, US 441/70 project, all of them, so I never was under the assumption that this was done for you. I wanted you to understand that entirely, now where that might have come from I do not know but I never saw it that way at all. Mayor Kirk, thank you. Then asked Administrator Drago, have you answered the things that you want to answer or do you have more? Administrator Drago stated, I just have one more question for Engineer Reese. On that large bill that you were asked to break out, part of it was the bonds that gets paid for, not by the City but by the bond company, but also part of the invoice that you were asked to break out, was the review work you were doing on a specific mobile home park in the County that we have been having some problems with and the owner of the park was instructed that he was to pay for your engineering review services prior to the City moving forward with any approval of the plans so, therefore, you were asked to break those services out so we could bill the owner, is that not right? Engineer Reese answered that is true, you are right. L.P. SANITATION SUMMARY SHEET: The next item was discussion by Council and staff as to whether or not Administrator Drago had the summary sheet attached to his copy on file of the L.P. Sanitation Contract. Administrator Drago stated that he did not ever have the summary sheet and by memo explained he did not place any significance to the summary sheet being relative to the Contract. Further stating he received no personal gain by saying he either knew the summary sheet existed or he did not know the summary sheet existed. CCDTCMRCD 7) 10()7 nCriu nn KArrrrhIrr nnrr nn nr nn G. NEW BUSINESS L4VLlll\ -ILL 111V - I MUL- LV v1 J'Y COUNCILMEMBERS ACTION VOTE VES 10. City Administrator continued: L.P. SANITATION SUMMARY SHEET CONTINUED: Referring to the memo distributed to the Council, Councilmember Watford asked Administrator Drago, is it your comment by this memo, at the time we discussed this issue at the City Council meeting, you did not know at that time that the "summary sheet" existed? Administrator Drago responded by stating, he could not recall if he knew if the summary sheet existed at the time it was being discussed or after. Councilmember Collins explained that the times he asked for and received a copy of the L.P. Contract that was all he got. A copy of the contract with no summary sheet attached. Councilmember �2 Collins referred to the Clerk stating that at the last minute you found it out somewhere out in your files? Clerk Thomas stated to Council the fact that the summary sheet was attached to the original contract in the Clerk's Office. Also, I went out to the records storage room, after the controversy started, to see if it in fact was with the agenda packet material as it was distributed to the Council (for the July 7, 1987 Council meeting) to verify and double check and (a copy of the summary sheet attached to a copy of the contract), it as there, the same as it was in my office, only my office file contains the original contract. Councilmember Collins asked the question when this was discussed t length when it was time to discuss the contract, why wasn't anybody ever told about a summary sheet existing? Attorney Cook also verified that after at least two meetings with discussion on the Contract when the Clerk produced the summary sheet he recalled seeing it before and looking through his office records he found he had a copy of the contract with the summary sheet attached prior to the first meeting. Further stating he ad it all along but had forgotten it too. Also if he had emembered it he would have brought it up. ouncilmember Collins asked where did the summary sheet come rom? G. UPTFMRFR 22 1992 - RFGIIIAR MEETING - PAGE 21 OF 34 COUNCILMEMBERS ACTION VOTE VES NEW BDSINESS 10. City Administrator continued: L.P. SANITATION SUMMARY SHEET CONTINUED: Councilmember Watford reiterated the point he was making that the Administrator had a copy of the summary sheet too. It was in his office and the Mayor can verify that. Further stating it was there, the Administrator knew it and Councilmember Watford agreed with Councilmember Collins that Council should have known about the summary sheet too. After further discussion by Councilmember Collins, Mayor Kirk and Councilmember Watford, Administrator Drago commented that Councilmember Watford said at the last meeting he did not accuse him of doing the summary sheet, (Councilmember Watford interjected, "of writing it, no sir I cannot prove that"), all he said was I was aware of it and my memo admits that I was aware of it. I cannot recall when. Now if Bonnie Thomas, does have the original contract, that is fine, evidently the contract I have in my file is not the original. Clerk Thomas stated that is right. Administrator Drago continued by commenting that whoever gave him the copy, and I am not accusing Bonnie but that summary sheet could have been not put with the copy of the contract when it was given to me, I do not know. Councilmember Watford asked the Mayor if the (contract) copy in his (Administrator's) office had that (summary sheet)? Mayor Kirk responded by saying the answer is yes. And I said that last week. LEASE OPTION PURCHASE PLAN: Discussion on this issue continued and then the neat issue concerning a Lease Option Purchase Plan (LOPP) for city vehicles (Police Packages). CFDTFMRFD 99 1007 DCC111 no MCCTTnIr nnrr nn nr nn G. NEW BUSINESS ' `• •`+ " ) - L4VLIll\ I -ILL 1 11\U I nUL LL VI J'Y COUNCILMfMBFRS ACTIONS vvTE NO k&ENT 10. City Administrator continued: LEASE OPTION PURCHASE PLAN: Administrator Drago distributed a letter to Council, Attorney and Clerk which they read. Councilmember Watford with explanation of a visit to the Administrator's office last Friday when he asked the Administrator if he could see the.file on the LOPP, whereby the Administrator asked his secretary to bring out a copy of the letter that was sent out and Councilmember Watford was told by the Administrator that there was only one page in that file and that is all there was, correct? Administrator Drago answered that is what I said. Councilmember Watford asked that is what you said? Administrator Drago answered yes. Councilmember Watford then asked, is that in .- fact the truth? Administrator Drago commented that is the only thing that I have, we did receive some survey sheets in. Councilmember Watford questioned, survey sheets? Administrator Drago explained, survey sheets, maybe from five or six cities and when the Mayor told me to stop doing what I was doing I assumed there was no interest so I discarded them. Councilmember Watford stated to Mayor Kirk, I would like to request at this time that, I believe there is a thicker file than what is indicated, and I would like to request that we ask the Administrator to go, step next door to his office and I would like that someone from the City staff, Police Chief or someone go with him and ask him to bring those documents to this meeting. If we are going to have witnesses and stuff come up here surely we can see the documents involved here. Attorney Cook stated that is permissible. Mayor Kirk, what are we going to do go now into his office? Councilmember Watford explained, no I want him to go in and bring the file out here. I want someone to go with him preferably the Police Chief or whoever you want to appoint to go with him to his office and ask him to bring all those survey sheets and the other items of correspondence he received back from those cities and the correspondence he wrote to them requesting certain items and bring them here so we may look at them. SFPTFMBFR 22. 1992 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 23 OF 34 - COUNCILMEMBERS ACTION VOTE VES W KTNF G. NEW BUSINESS 10. City Administrator continued: LEASE OPTION PURCHASE PLAN CONTINUED: Mayor Kirk commented didn't he just say he threw them away? Administrator Drago answered, that is what I said. Councilmember Watford asked, you threw them away? Is that permissible to do that? Is it public record? When did y.ou throw them away, it was not Friday? Administrator Drago responded, I do not recall. No it was not Friday. The Mayor said I do not think it is a good idea that you do that anymore and I explained to him what the program was about. I saw no interest in it. That was it. Councilmember Watford stated, Mayor Kirk, I do not know about the rest of you but I find that hard to believe that these documents where thrown away. When I walked into his office I know that file was there. Friday that file was there. I know that if it a: has been destroyed it was destroyed after Friday. I believe Mr. Mayor and I do not want to quote you either so correct me if I am wrong and I believe when I brought this issue up last time you said you discussed this with the Administrator and it was basically, and if I can use his term here, it was a survey or something to that effect. Mayor Kirk answered, something to that effect. Councilmember Watford continued, unfortunately I do not have all my documents here but I had faxed to me today a copy of a letter from the City of Okeechobee signed by John Drago to Lt. John Grines of the Police Department, City of Parkland. "The following information is needed in order to get credit approval for your City." Now that does not sound like a survey to me but I guess maybe it is, "copy of the city's last three financial audits, copy of either approved or proposed 92/93 budget, general information about your city. Once the information is received and I obtain credit approval I will contact you" Credit approval? Credit approval? WPTFMRFP 22 14Q? _ OPM11 AO MFFTTNr DArP 9n nr Jn G. NEW BUSINESS COUNCILMEMBERS ACTION VOTE S AV k&W 10. City Administrator continued: LEASE OPTION PURCHASE PLAN CONTINUED: Councilmember Watford continued, here is a letter from the City of Oakland Park addressed to Mr. John Drago referring to the letter dated July the 28th on credit approval. This is from the Finance Director of Parkland, it says. "enclosed herein are the documents requested, copy of the audited financial statements, copy of annual finance report fiscal year 89-90 and 90-91 proposed budget for 92-93. So this is just from one city. I know that there are other cities and I am trying to obtain those at this time. But I would just like to say that this was more than just a survey. And that file existed, that file was in City Hall on Friday. Administrator Drago explained that during the time that we were ,--� doing the survey work, we did collect some financial data from some cities specifically Parkland that financial information was sent to Mr. Zavara. He has done nothing with it. The reason why it was sent, because they showed an interest in the program and the first step in the program was to get credit approval from a financial institution. Once that was obtained then the financial institution would enter into a contract with the City, not this City, but Parkland, I will use Parkland as an example, in order to lease the police cars. The financial institution would also enter into a contract with the City of Okeechobee to provide some specific services in relationship to the lease program. That is the only reason why that information was gotten, to my knowledge it was never forwarded to the financial institution for credit approval and it is probably still sitting in Mr. Zavara's office. Councilmember Watford asked why was it forwarded to Mr. Zavara? Administrator Drago commented because he is the one who knows three or four financial institutions and how they deal with leasing programs. He understands interest rates and he understands the other mechanisms, the legal part of it and for instance Parkland, I will use that as an example, Parkland would pay for Mr. Zavara's legal service not the City of Okeechobee. SEPTEMBER 22. 1992 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 25 OF 34 G. NEW BUSINESS COUNCILMEMBERS ACTION VOTE YES M) 10. City Administrator continued: LEASE OPTION PURCHASE PLAN CONTINUED: Councilmember Watford continued, and you are denying that that file existed on Friday? That there was not a file in City Hall? With all this information in it on Friday? Administrator Drago answered yes. He denied the file existed on Friday and further stated, now Parkland was one City, I forget who the others are. There were not that many, maybe two or more. Councilmember Watford asked again, you threw all of them away? Administrator Drago responded, they were just one page survey's. Councilmember Watford replied, "NO". Administrator Drago explained, not that stuff, that stuff Zavara has, I do not have any of that. When it came in I sent it to him. Councilmember Watford asked once again, there was nothing else in the City, in your office? Administrator Drago responded, when the Mayor told me to stop, I stopped. Mayor Kirk then asked, number one, I would like to know why you started this in the beginning? Administrator Drago explained in answer to the question, as the letter states as Mr. Zavara wrote, back in 1989 when I had been talking about leasing police cars on a larger scale he was somewhat impressed on the program that we did here in the City and have been doing. And in my meetings with the Florida City Manager's Associations, and going to the Florida League of Cities, a lot of the people would come up and ask me about how our police cars are, they see once a year that its advertised in the paper, so we started generating some interest as far as possibly providing this service to other cities because we kind of knew what was going on. So, Mr. Zavara made a recommendation because I had also talked to him recently that the City was in some sort of budget crunches and he thought this would be a good way to generate some additional revenues for the general fund. So, he made a recommendation to send out survey's just to see what other cities would be interested in leasing vehicles. F'; SEPTEMBER 22. 1992 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 26 OF 34 G. NEW BUSINESS COUNCILMEMBERS ACTION VOTE VES 10. City Administrator continued: LEASE OPTION PURCHASE PLAN CONTINUED: And like I said we got maybe five or six in, but I did receive some telephone calls and I did some talking on the phone a lot of cities said well thanks a lot for the information, or well I will think about it or well I may put it in my budget, you know those kinds of things. Now we had been working on one entity. i i Mayor Kirk interjected, I think you are giving me a lot more information than I need. What I want to know is why, what was your purpose? Administrator Drago commented, the purpose of it was to develop another revenue source for the City's general fund so that the Council did not have to raise property taxes in order to gain revenue. That was the purpose of it. Mayor Kirk then stated, the answer to my first question, you are saying that we are going to make money off of this? Administrator Drago, right. Mayor Kirk, I will accept that on face value. Question number two, when I asked you to stop, did you stop? Administrator Drago, I did stop. Councilmember Watford commented, I guess I am a little curious here, why didn't you tell me Friday that you threw this file away? Administrator Drago, answered you did not ask. Councilmember Watford stated, I asked to see the file. Administrator Drago interjected, you asked to see the file. Councilmember Watford then interjected, and what did you say? You did not say one did not exist. You did not say you threw it away. You said there is only one sheet in it. Administrator Drago responded, that is right, I did not lie. Councilmember Watford, stated, you did not lie? The file was there. Why didn't you tell me? Why didn't you tell me that you threw it away? Cause you did not think about it soon enough that is why. Administrator Drago responded, no because I know the kind of questions you ask me; and I answered the question you asked. SFPTFMRFR 22. 1992 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 27 OF 34 COUNCILMFMBFRS ACTION VOTE VES W G. NEW BUSINESS 10. City Administrator continued: LEASE OPTION PURCHASE PLAN CONTINUED: Councilmember Collins commented, I just want to read one paragraph out of the letter. "The goals of the police car leasing concept are one, to raise money for the general fund without raising taxes, without raising pledged current revenue sources and without City liability and to cooperate with other local governments in obtaining the most competitive purchase price and financial terms." Councilmember Collins continued, I was not, when this program first started, privy to this information, even though I was later, like I assume everybody was up here. But it is just like our police cars I think everybody especially the police department, anytime you can save money you have made money. Now is that right or not? Anytime you save money on any thing you do you have made money. Because you would have to have a certain amount of services. So I understand the letter, I have no problem with that, if the letter is correct and I do not see why Bill Zavara would have any reason to lie to us. Councilmember Watford commented, I find the timing of the letter very interesting. Mayor Kirk stated, I did not even look at the date. Councilmember Watford explained, it is dated today. Administrator Drago stated while the public is here, during the course of us looking into the program, Mr. Zavara came upon one agency that was looking for a large number of cars to lease. Him and I just ran some numbers to see what kind of revenue it would have generated for the City, if in fact the City could have given a proposal to the agency along with some of the other financial institutions that were going to submit and if in fact the City could have given a proposal to this one agency the City could have realized approximately $100, 000.00 a year just from that one deal. And I have not pursued it. CFDTFMRCD ')) 100�) DCCiii AD MCCTTnir DnrC 70 nC On G. NEW BUSINESS COUNCILMEM$ERS ACTION VOTE YES NO 10. City Administrator continued: LEASE OPTION PURCHASE PLAN CONTINUED: Mayor Kirk stated, before we go on to another item let me make a comment here. And I hope I do not offend anyone but there are several People raising their hands in the audience. I do not think it would be wise for me to yield this floor to the audience because if I do we will be here all night. I do not think it is going to accomplish anything. I think this is business for the City Council, you have got every right to sit here and hear every word we say. You know our telephone number, you know where we live if you do not like what we are doing tell us. But, this is not a public hearing and I think it needs to stay up here with us, we are the people who have the information, some more than others but we will deal with it as best we can. So, with that we will proceed. �2 SUSPENSION OF DEPARTMENT HEAD: Administrator Drago stated that, on the neat item, I know the question of whether I have the authority to take the measure is a legal matter. If Mr. Cook does not feel that I do have this authority I will take immediate steps to reinstate Mr. Loftin's pay and request direction from Council as to what other appropriate action they would like me to take, if any. Mayor Kirk responded to each of the charges brought against Administrator Drago, stating, first I would like to say that for myself and for the Department Heads in the City, I think the timing on this was very, very poor. The motion addressed seven items as follows: # Failure to provide positive leadership. I am not even going to attempt to address that because I think that would be too broadly defined. CFPTFMRFR 22. 1992 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 29 OF 34 COUNCILMEMBERS ACTION VOTE VES NU kSENT G. NEW BUSINESS 10. City Administrator continued: # Failure to communicate effectively with Department Heads. That is addressed in your letter that I gave to you before the meeting started last week and I urge you to please read that letter with understanding I.spent four hours with the Department Heads and 'with the Administrator and I think we are headed in a good direction. # The unprofessional behavior in dealing with the consultant. I think that Administrator Drago most definitely did not choose words that I would have chosen, that was an unprofessional letter. I know that Mr. Reese requested the letter but I think you could have done better word -wise. * On the thing dealing with the Department Head. I think as Mayor I need to address this because I have talked with this Department Head. I think that based on the opinion given to me by the Attorney, I do not think the City Administrator J� legally had the right to suspend the Department Head. I a. felt like, based on the evidence as it was being presented that I would have taken similar action and I do have the authority to do that. I appreciate the Department Heads putting up with my telephone calls this week and being courteous and giving me answers that I will accept at face value until something shows otherwise. Councilmember Watford asked Attorney Cook to give a legal determination on cause. Attorney Cook answered that, after researching the employee handbook and various other manuals his legal opinion was that based on the accusations that were made the Council would have legal cause which would justify a 3 to 2 vote. Councilmember Watford restated the charges he brought against Administrator Drago explaining each charge with the evidence to prove the charges correct: SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 30 OF 34 G. NEW BUSINESS COUNCILMEMBERS ACTION VOTE YES NO 10. City Administrator continued: * The letter to the engineer. Contends that number one, Administrator Drago knew that letter would go further than just the engineer. That he knew it would go on to SFWMD. Second point is, the intent of the letter tends to degrade I the engineer. The intent of the letter was to get SFWMD to meet with us not to down -grade the engineer or criticize the engineer according to Engineer Reese. And as far as whether the engineer was insulted by the letter, I could care less. I do not think that's the point here. The matter of purchasing. Using Mr. Threewits words that was a good way to "justify" that purchase. And I think that is a wonderful choice of words, justify purchasing that tile V. 2 from the company down South. a` # And also on the matter of purchasing. One good thing that we do around City Hall or the Administration does is really shares the blame. It really places the blame. Unfortunately in my opinion, the City Administrator, that is his position, he should accept the buck stops there, in my opinion as far as spending goes. # We have also spent approximately $12,353.00 in "repairs to City Hall" and in my opinion a lot of that was remodeling. To give you a little history lesson, we all recall several years ago when we remodeled City Hall there was a big controversy about the Council did not approve it. Because no bids were received the Council had to go back retro- actively and approve the remodeling project. And we were kind of assured that would never happen again. I think you all received copies of as close as I can calculate, we have spent approximately $19,803.00 renovating an office at the Water Treatment Plant and to the best of my knowledge that project was not bid either and I think that merits some type of investigation. SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 31 OF 34 �OUNCILMEMBERS ACTION VOTE YES NO F� G. NEW BUSINESS 10. City Administrator continued: # I regret any reference made to Blue Heron. And I hope that the owners and developers will understand that it was in no way a reflection on their property or their development. Unfortunately in the public records of the City of Okeechobee that is the way that project is on the invoices and I was only quoting from those invoices I was in no way trying to take away from that project. * The point I am trying to make here is that we are spending a lot of money for things that we as a Council do not know about and I think most of us would have to admit that we did not know that we were spending any engineering fees for some of these projects and I think those are things that we should be kept informed of. # I think we have adequately been told that the suspension was not in fact legal. I think we have put a lot of importance on what the Department Heads think and I have a great deal of respect for our Department Heads. But that's not the issue here. The issue is not if the Department Heads are happy or if they are satisfied. # I will state categorically that Administrator Drago knew of the summary sheet on the L.P. Sanitation contract and he did all in his power to hide that. My point is he was not truthful with this Council by admitting that he did know of that summary sheet. And he stated that it was not in his office. It was in fact in his office. # The lease option purchase plan for the cars there is no doubt in my mind that we should have known about that and I + think if you are honest with yourself you will agree that when we are talking about that magnitude of a project, this Council should have been aware of that from day one. I think it is extremely, extremely convenient that that file was thrown away. SEPTEMBER 22. 1992 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 32 OF 34 VOTE G. NEW BUSINESS COUNCILMEMBERS ACTION YES W 10. City Administrator continued: In closing Councilmember Watford stated, I think if this Council, if you really think back to all the things that have happened you will, in your heart, know that you were not told the truth either. And I just hope and pray that is the conclusion you come to for the sake of this City. I hope and pray that's the conclusion you come to. Mayor Kirk called for the vote on the motion to dismiss Administrator Drago with cause. Kirk X Collins X Entry X Walker X Watford X Motion Denied. Councilmember Watford made a motion that we seal the Administrators office and conduct a full audit of all purchasing and contracts issued by the Cit • seconded by Councilman Walker. J Z t Councilman Watford further explained in support for the motion if we do not seal the office more things are going to disappear I promise you. Lengthy discussion was held among Council concerning the type of audit that would be done, who would do it and what was discovered the last time this administrator's office was sealed and audited. Imayor Kirk stated for the record, I have said this to the City Administrator. I do not know if I said it in these exact words or not but I am going to go ahead and say it and get it on record. Part of the problems we talked about in our meeting of which you have got a letter were problems that he needs to orrect. I am not going to go into those because you do have the letter and it is public record. But, he needs to understand that I am going to be watching very closely and if we do not move in these directions, and maybe I should not say just him, I should say the other people in the room also. That meaning the epartment Heads, if we do not move in that positive direction then the person that is holding that process up, be it the dministrator or whomever I would be very much in favor of SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 33 OF 34 VOTE G. NEW BUSINESS COUNCILMEMSFRS ACTION VES NO KW 10. City Administrator continued: Until we stop this back stabbing that has been going on at City Hall, this talking over the fence, in the back yard, we are never going to progress and do the things we should do. And I still think that this is a nice place to be and hopefully there are some things coming up that we will be able to make some progress on. But this is my warning for all seven of the people in that meeting. You are going to be held accountable. And if you do not think so you do not know me too well. I am leaving here John, with some shaken feelings about you and I think I have expressed those to you already. And what I have outlined I certainly hope you will follow because if you do not if I am still up here you are going to have a problem cause then there will be three people trying to remove you. Vote on motion to seal administrator's office and conduct an audit is as follows: Kirk X Collins X Entry X Walker Watford X X ` Motion Denied. Councilmember Watford made a motion that the City -Administrator be instructed to not to destroy any items of public record. To work through the City Clerk's office who is our custodian of records and make sure the records can be destroyed properly before they are destroyed; seconded by Councilman Walker. Mayor Kirk stated that any correspondence that comes into Administrator Drago's office better not be destroyed because we may want to see a copy of it and I think we are entitled to that and I think that is an area were he was wrong. Kirk X Collins X Entry X Walker X Watford X Motion Carried. .4 SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 34 OF 34 VOTE G. NEW BUSINESS COUNCILMEMBERS ACTION S AV kB.TNF Councilmember Collins made a motion to approve a three year 11. Motion to approve a three year auditing contract with J.D. Gilbert auditing contract with J.D. Gilbert and Company in the amount of and Company in the amount of forty-three thousand five hundred dollars ($43,500.00); seconded $43,500.00 - Finance Director by Councilmember Entry. (Exhibit 12). Following discussion, motion and second was withdrawn. Councilmember Collins made a motion to approve a three year auditing contract with J.D. Gilbert and Company in the amount of forty-three thousand five hundred dollars ($43,500 00 contract is to provide provision that if terminated after one year, two years or three years the amounts City will pay for each year; and contract is approved subject to the Attorney researching to make sure the procedure that was used to award this contract is correct; seconded by Councilmember Entry. KIRK X COLLINS X ENTRY X WALKER X C.1 WATFORD X MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Kirk: Mayor Kirk adjourned the meeting at 9:50 P.M. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT IF ANY PERSON SHOULD DECIDE TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE AT THIS MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL, SUCH PERSON°WILL NEED TO INSURE THAT A VERBATIM KEGOI�D.OF THE PROCEEDING IS MADE WHICH IN- '' • ' CLUDES 'THE .-TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON T E- APPEAL IS /BASED. Jam . Kirk, Mayor -- ,� ✓r . i Bonnie S. Thomas, CMC, City Clerk