Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2015-11-19
1� � kt l ltvlPPitr1C c�i 4 {i �it[!It 1Pd MINUTES OF THE TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2015, 10:00 A.M. CITY OF OKEECHOBEE 55 Southeast 3rd Avenue Okeechobee, Florida 34974 Page 1 of 5 I. CALL TO ORDER — Chairperson. The November 19, 2015, Technical Review Committee meeting was called to order at 10:04 a.m. by Chairperson Montes De Oca. II. STAFF ATTENDANCE — Secretary. Voting Members: City Administrator Marcos Montes De Oca Present Building Official Jeffrey Newell - Present Police Chief Denny Davis - Absent (Major Peterson in attendance) Fire Chief Herb Smith - Present Public Works Director David Allen - Present Non - Voting Ex- Officio Members: City Attorney John R. Cook - Absent (with consent) City Planning Consultant Bill Brisson - Present City Civil Engineering Consultant - Attendance not requested County Environmental Health Department Representative Doug McCoy - Absent (with consent) OUA Executive Director John Hayford - Present School District Representative - Absent Committee Secretary Patty Burnette - Present III. AGENDA — Chairperson. Chairperson Montes De Oca asked whether there were any requests for the deferral or withdrawal of items on today's agenda. There being none the Agenda stands as published. IV. MINUTES — Secretary. Public Works Director Allen moved to dispense with the reading and approve the Minutes for regular meetings held July 16, 2015, and September 17, 2015; seconded by Building Official Newell. Motion carried unanimously. V. NEW BUSINESS — Chairperson. A. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 007 -TRC, regarding the construction of a 1,800 square foot proposed professional office building with associated parking and drainage on approximately .33 acres, Lots 9 and 10, Block 168, City of Okeechobee, Plat Book 1, Page 10, and Plat Book 5, Page 5, and located at 210 Southwest 2nd Street, Okeechobee, FL. - Senior Planner. Planning Staff Report: Planner Brisson explained the property owner, Mr. Shannon Murray, is proposing to construct a premanufactured insurance office on the two undeveloped Tots. The building will face to the South, with an asphalt drive (access off Southwest 2nd Street), a six space parking lot and dry retention area, all to be located in the front of the office (or south side of Lots 9 and 10). TRC - November 19, 2015 - Page 2 of 5 V. NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 007 -TRC continued. Adequacy of public facilities appear to have been or will be met. While the Applicant did not specifically address traffic in the site plan submission, the total traffic generation from a general office is expected to only increase slightly and will not burden the City's roadway system. The dimensional standards review appears to meet the requirements with the exception of the 20 -foot wide access driveway instead of the required 24 feet width. The consensus of the Committee Members was that this would be acceptable. The plans show a five -foot wide sidewalk to be constructed along the front of the property within the Southwest 2nd Street right -of -way. A formal photometric lighting plan is not necessary due to the number of required parking spaces, although the location of light fixtures should be indicated. No dumpster location or how solid waste pickup will be accommodated has been provided. Planner Brisson noted for the record, the parking calculations were based on office use, and should the use change in the future to a more intensive one, then the required number of parking spaces would need to be adjusted accordingly. Mr. Steven Dobbs of SLD Engineering, LLC, was present for Mr. Murray and added, there will be flood lights provided on the outside of the building. He requested allowing the smaller garbage cans provided by Waste Management placed at the curb instead of a dumpster, as other small offices have in the area. The Technical Review Committee (TRC) members all agreed. A lengthy discussion ensued regarding the placement of the sidewalk along Southwest 2nd Street and drainage for the property. It was determined by the TRC that the sidewalk would need to be adjusted to accommodate a telephone pedestal and a ground sign that has existed on the property for many years. Drainage for the property would need to be configured to minimize run -off into the alleyway located north of the lots. County Environmental Health Department: No issues were received. OUA: No issues were received. Building Official: No issues were received. Public Works: Other than the previously discussed issues with the sidewalk and drainage, no additional issues were received. Police Department: No issues were received. Fire Department: No issues were received. Chairperson Montes De Oca asked whether there were any comments or questions from those in attendance. There were none. Chairperson Montes De Oca asked Committee Members to disclose for the record whether they had spoken to anyone else regarding the application or visited the site. Building Official Newell disclosed he had conversations with Mr. Murray regarding the actual structure, Destiny Builders, to verify the structure was a modular unit with a foundation and not a mobile unit, and with the sales associates at Central Mobile Homes (where unit is being purchased). TRC - November 19, 2015 - Page 3 of 5 V. NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 007 -TRC continued. Motion and second offered by Chief Smith and Building Official Newell to approve the site plan review for the construction of a 1,800 square foot proposed office building with associated parking and drainage on approximately .33 acres, Lots 9 and 10, of Block 168, City of Okeechobee, Plat Book 1, Page 10, and Plat Book 5, Page 5, Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida, and located at 210 Southwest 2nd Street with the following conditions: 1. Revise the plans pertaining to a sidewalk along Southwest 2nd Street showing the adjustment needed to accommodate a telephone pedestal and a ground sign. 2. Submit electrical plan showing the location of the flood lights on the building. 3. Revise the drainage plans to configure and minimize drainage run -off to the alleyway located north of Lots 9 and 10. Motion carried unanimously. B. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 008 -TRC, in regards to the construction of a 2,997 square foot proposed Taco Bell restaurant with drive -thru service and associated parking, drainage and utilities on approximately 1.035 acres, Lots 4 to 9, Block 150, City of Okeechobee, Plat Book 5, Page 5, Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida, and located at 501 North East Park Street (State Road 70 East), Okeechobee, FL. — Senior Planner. Planning Staff Report: Planner Brisson explained the applicant, Luihn Four, Inc., is proposing to construct a Taco Bell restaurant on the four undeveloped lots, which are divided by a 15 -foot wide alleyway running east to west. The building's main entrance will face east with access from either North East Park Street or Northeast 5th Avenue. Parking will be to the east of the building with a dry retention area to the north. Special Exception No. 14- 007 -SE was approved by the Board of Adjustment on October 16, 2014 to allow drive thru service. The dimensional standards review appears to meet the requirements with the exception of the off - street parking, which was erroneously computed using the County's standards. Mr. Brisson notified Mr. Michael Palmer, the Director of Facilities, of this issue. To correct this, the project engineer, Mr. Andres Boral of Maastricht Engineering, Inc., provided an email to TRC Secretary Burnette stating the building will be reduced to 2,690 square feet, which meets the City's requirement for 36 parking spaces. In regards to landscaping, while the overall requirement for shrubs is met, Mr. Brisson offered the suggestion that some shrubbery be provided between the parking spaces and the eastern property line. There is a sidewalk along North East Park Street only. A photometric lighting plan has been provided, and the solid waste dumpster is located at the northeastern corner of the parking lot. Adequacy of public facilities appear to be available. Regarding potable water and sanitary sewer, the applicant should obtain a letter from Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA) documenting there is adequate capacity and facilities, the County has confirmed a considerable level of excess capacity available to serve the solid waste disposal needs, the applicant has supplied an engineer's report addressing drainage and other aspects of the proposed project. A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) was not submitted. The applicant did a "Project Traffic Statement ", which based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, TRC - November 19, 2015 - Page 4 of 5 V. NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 008 -TRC continued. would generate 98 trips in the evening peak hour and 136 trips on the morning peak hour. The evening peak hour trips will be adjusted to accommodate to the reduction in the building size. The Site Plan application requires that should a proposed use generate 100 or more peak hour vehicle trips, a TIS must be prepared. Planner Brisson suggested the Engineer research the situation to determine whether the ITE morning peak trip generation factor is appropriate for application to a Taco Bell as they are generally based more towards McDonalds or Burger King restaurants. Should Mr. Boral submit practical data that would prove the number is not over 100 trips, the TRC may consider substituting this information for the TIS. County Environmental Health Department: No issues were received. OUA: Executive Director Hayford requested a floor plan that identifies the inside plumbing for the grease trap. In addition, he had concerns with the location of the drive -thru lanes in relation to the alley. He inquired whether an Alley Use Agreement was being considered and that language be included to protect the OUA interests. Those interests being access to their utilities and lift station located on the eastem -end of the block. Building Official: Building Official Newell called attention to the bypass lane located west of the drive -thru lane, asking whether it was needed and recommended eliminating it as it has caused safety issues on similar sites. Mr. Boral responded the lane was there in case someone needed to drive around the drive -thru lane and his client would like for it to remain. Public Works: Public Works Director Allen requested copies of the Department of Transportation (DOT) permits. He further noted, a right -hand turn only exit sign onto North East Park Street from the site will be required. The sidewalk installation along Northeast 5th Avenue is to be the entire length of the property line; trees located in the northwest corner will have to be removed. A lengthy discussion ensued in regards to the drainage swale required along the sidewalk sloping to the north. Police Department: Major Peterson commented he agreed with Public Works Director Allen's suggestion with having a right -hand turn only exit sign onto North East Park Street. Fire Department: No issues were received. Mr. Boral commented he would submit revised plans showing a right -hand tum only exit sign onto North East Park Street, a sidewalk and swale along Northeast 5th Avenue, and floor plan of the building showing the reduction in size from 2,997 to 2,690 square feet. He was currently working with OUA on obtaining letters confirming adequate capacity to provide the needed water and wastewater demands for the project. He will also add addressing an Alley Use Agreement. Chairperson Montes De Oca asked whether there were any comments or questions from those in attendance. There were none. Chairperson Montes De Oca asked Committee Members to disclose for the record whether they had spoken to anyone else regarding the application or visited the site. There were none. TRC - November 19, 2015 - Page 5 of 5 V. NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED. Site Plan Review Application No. 15-008-TRC continued. Motion and second offered by Chief Smith and Public Works Director Allen to approve the site plan review for the construction of a 2,690 square foot proposed Taco Bell restaurant with drive -thru service and associated parking, drainage and utilities on approximately 1.035 acres, Lots 4 to 9, Block 150, City of Okeechobee, Plat Book 5, Page 5, Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida, and located at 501 North East Park Street (SR70), with the following conditions: 1. Revise plans to show a right -hand turn only exit onto North East Park Street. 2. Revise plans to show installation of a sidewalk along Northeast 5th Avenue including the removal of two trees from the Northwest corner of Lot 6, allowing installation of the sidewalk to the property line. 3. Revise plans showing a six -inch to a one -foot swale along the sidewalk which slopes to the north and installation of a culvert under the driveway on the east side of Northeast 5th Avenue. 4. Revise plans showing the square footage of the building needed to support the parking available. 5. Floor plan showing the inside utility plumbing for the grease trap. 6. An Alley Use Agreement between the City and the property owner. 7. Letters from OUA confirming adequate capacity to provide water and wastewater demands for the subject property. 8. Copy of FDOT permits. Motion carried unanimously. VI. ADJOURNMENT— Chairperson. There being no further items on the agenda, Chairperson Montes De Oca adjourned the Technical Review Committee meeting at 10:57 a.m. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that any person desiring to appeal any decision made by the Technical Review Committee with respect to any matter considered at this proceeding, such interested person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose may need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. General Service's media are for the sole purpose of backup for official records of the Department. ATTEST: Mar (c os- ontes De Oca, Ch. • = on Patty M. Burnette, Secretary Pott f . 6 tnr? fl1 CITY OF OKEECHOBEE ve.vi r i't - , 2015 TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE HANDWRITTEN MINUTES I. CALL TO ORDER - Chairperson: November 19, 2015 Technical Review Committee Meeting, 10:00 a.m. ! 0 04 II. STAFF ATTENDANCE - Secretary Present Absent Administrator Montes De Oca Building Official Newell Chief Davis Chief Smith Engineer Public Works Director Allen YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT Allen se Peier?,crti Position vacant at this time Non - Voting Ex- Officio Member: Montes De Oca Attorney Cook County Health Department McCoy OUA Executive Director Hayford Senior Planner Brisson School Representative Secretary Burnette /- `ar,4i 1/ ✓ V. ✓ Smith 1[. III. AGENDA — Chairperson. A. Requests for the deferral or withdrawal of items on today's agenda. IV. MINUTES - Secretary. DID Srvti A. Motion to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Technical Review Committee Minutes for the July 16, 2015, and September 17, 2015, regular meetings. moved to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Technical Review committee Minutes for the July 16, 2015, and September 17, 2015, regular meetings; seconded by kittOt 1 VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT Allen Davis (1)0097p n Montes De Oca Newell Smith 1[. APPROVED DENIED V. NEW BUSINESS - Chairperson. A. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 007 -TRC, in regards to the construction of a 1,800 square foot proposed professional office building with associated parking and drainage on an approximate .33 acre parcel, Lots 9 and 10, Block 168, City of Okeechobee, and located at 210 SW 2nd Street, Okeechobee, FL. - Senior Planner. 1. Hear from Planning Staff. I B n ss5-Y‘ I ?DO set: `C4- 6 F1 P) cL . irn r n 1 MU rYl D. v t ve l Ja � 1- Cl L LtJh inq 1yfu s (tLtc /z7 be �I a I (,c. rn p.5 r 1 cx`n 6.-A Shown I JUG :.)$ . - P_rt.'..L s �v aL pa) po _ct a ©�� �s- 110t-c.) c-ror _ j poypt f pp fee au ,S ;s (-6v- ay, bet, IT chcf °f -L c-t-Cto (t_ q-kk. -fiuht re_ pyri rarlohi irn !ILIA -fo djitStiel: havberskO %rChi,r- ,, crams P irv1 Sfncc -6(re was �(..2 rno tc-s I.4 i n h u r t clr 660-1iL CJonc ooc N' S art Z .t s mut niat t o gja roc. C'an 4-0 k2L(2 Octet Ci' -� �°t e.rb - mo� cess areas in (�ItoQhobee S ,S60 ,20(4- 2 V. NEW BUSINESS - continued. A. Site Plan Review Application No. 15-007-TRC continued. C4) Ner S-ticliquAl its 4-o 06,/ 11,04 tt rib Pr1)101/-fro. 2. Hear from City Staff • \-)c Dek, AAIL. CO-CIRP_C‘, ielt \Lif ,-CAP S4- I fir --h)v-YYL. A0,0 coa_ r° Stai,'r 51.a) To- d (cal\ r\t/ Et 0 • e' AD- S'TYol cNtcut- -1) rooA/ o Gine( ra_iiYA_I/Lct, - S;AeLott,014. tvetas -V6 att oclq{, c coal. rinveleJc, 4-ht -fe ltp toi kr\ GL ,-(164_,-1- 10 Caiel- f-ito 2 106", PedC41,1 JD oL .Sr 'TO- 4'k execi.°0 • roct 4-001( n 3d. rtufvo -ft) ■t_41.4 ettatc -\-btoevi-ks V. NEW BUSINESS - continued. A. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 007 -TRC continued. 3. Hear from Property Owner or Designee /Agent — Steven Dobbs. V. NEW BUSINESS - continued. A. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 007 -TRC continued. 4. Public comments or questions from those in attendance, or submitted to the Committee Secretary. i✓ `� Q" Yl�.� 5. Disclosure of Ex -Parte Communications by the Committee. Newe t l rv' a Ira Ora-L. p '40 VP n y. (73 t.3 ri • no +- ( rn o er rco �� i "s r�c�+ 'vu- -(-cel 6. a) Consideration of a motion to approve or deny the application with /without contingencies. L)jThesl-t t Tt dttin r Va..) Si-ern u)O-` --C- 1a s tz, t St dV C)L1 and to approve /deny the site plan review for the Lp:4,,tt t` Motion and a second offered by construction of a 1,800 square foot proposed professional office building with associated parking and drainage on an approximate .33 acre parcel, Lots 9 and 10, Block 168, City of Okeechobee, and located at 210 SW 2nd with the following conditions: CD Ott + Ofrii■t&'CLC-t-00---t ilia'1441( ctiV C (! p Guru_ x..44 ¢ =ram r tax. ck b) Committee discussion. c) Vote on motion. 5 ao Itiilottit (AA- V. NEW BUSINESS - continued. A. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 007 -TRC continued. VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT Allen Davis Montes De Oca Newell Smith APPROVED DENIED B. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 008 -TRC, in regards to the construction of a 2,997 square foot proposed Taco Bell restaurant with drive -thru service and associated parking, drainage and utilities on approximately 1.035 acres, Lots 4 to 9, Block 150, City of Okeechobee, and located at 501 North East Park Street, Okeechobee, FL. - Senior Planner. 1. Hear from Planning Staff. Elce_ 13 - , 6x. `b'✓ Cirto - Flit 6t r-V ' p rir xecL &Lrea otx fo/i( - 9 k)a% calculated. cu lad d o_n too I n*c:ta0 ct 61 115 Skoy+ 4 pactaiuj spa ( 41:). - 3 —1044 t\c nca,l1.5 Cr+ ITE WU. S te9u. l r!(t_ l aS tom- IL> 92, FPe K. (o% DV-um - ` h (eate as- i s re flea �M. Pn'1.., ?8 1()6) • to o uLt no TU Qra r'WQ (ct t Iwp 4-rifJ r n 1 Crr it-T\- Vin &trive LAku_f br SO_'70 arts )\ 6 j� '%1 -rri ate. {t= V. NEW BUSINESS - continued. B. Site Plan Review Application No. 15-008-TRC continued. NUN 2. Hear from City Staff. OLS-1 Cas t)1( 0:3 — ect.5 t, Via+ CbYO s ei)11 Lc&Lt, v h at 1 a_ f'S ntus.50..yii 4- 1avl 10)u,t r eco-nit prwifi ,P,15--r(\LIA CL+1 n leLft (1-1 G,Inctret) c 4to OE cr 40 ri May tK_ C(eA. .1 DOT kre c. oat bOf sdLtft +D p ov ;ctc ecros ac cs ctn (YVro05- Ono, rtcf- (-1-rr-k-10 7 .vso 01 -S7 p -to st,o.A.) ri 1)^ h0 11 el 414 "1 ovi:4 Ct_ndl sCmaa.s chf -eri ,cam V. NEW BUSINESS - continued. B. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 008 -TRC continued. 3. Hear from Property Owner or Designee /Agent — Andres Boral. peuLutt a ss oil> hod ma() cbSau-ssiryt4e app ca..,,y' + to, ta;hce T b_it A 4.4 A o> 13 g Ray_ All/ ggpt tc eat reds cj_d. +-o oka (D feVigct p Io S o qh o 1 o t�1 S o 0ft-f o S k_ 70 + u_ �� tlak�°P o< 6 veiLU -�- 1r �` t'(1 tOO 1/0 i NE- 4 hf 6toal r tt ( .;.,r- ctcL- a1rC.� LYm- tt ✓S ar t" -- 2 "1 C M� 4 Lc ea -K.— A nI �- Y"5 o ( __( `'t lea C ✓i S CA-A. �f ti TaC 0 P)-ti ( c,J � h GN. A Augt-1 Wtru..td- 1,^ c. G e G �9 A1tt VVu1 L .t l` w) a n10 ouLtAz &-k (LAAAIAA � cr uctut Iv t,,r4' 4 u� tfeivivQ,�, 4-41 °-n }NG Vi i, u 5 p-lc . 0.5171., a b lct_g 1- c p o1* panic_,, c p2,vArr eat `U ) �o o1 S� 6 / hea t etwta T ( fc (Qv- f f t( 1 cx_p Jd repo fre. -& su b s4, hit,/ rrs. Co I- p01- n' . Tv; n c� a-x Oho D c-On Cam J hp� 6 vi 100-, v- (lee( Ii3UC u,u_d t-c d o cabs ,of yri . o f ud.u,ni ock, al Le_ - r{ s -ty p c a,1 an-e ).-,a+ 4 v C1 VLA. 4. Public comments or questions from those in attendance, or submitted to the Committee Secretary. ` fi (}}-h4, i'fiC� (.1..i.t hPik Ct05,1f '1 Pc 4 ut Kr/ ,,)-\-,,,tb,),), Sr w> s,,,,,,,,, -,,,4,,,t „,„ -ioor ia'1 Sev) \piP'r,1 p ►r � ce��, u.��_ . t'c Fos,L.Ii)I.e, W rl Y ICI tuts / how a.c e ►,e - 8 air LL&c� cat 1-C) a_C c 5 C! i - r. V. NEW BUSINESS - continued. B. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 008 -TRC continued. 5. Disclosure of Ex -Parte Communications by the Committee. 6. a) Consideration of a motion to approve or deny the application with /without contingencies. Motion and a second offered by and " to approve /deny the site plan review for the construction of a 2,997 square foot proposed Taco Bell restaurant with drive -thru service and associated parking, drainage and utilities on approximately 1.035 acres, Lots 4 to 9, Block 150, City of Okeechobee, and located at 501 North East Park Street with the following conditions: inn sect ID lams 01h-1- p� - OnCL S c �, pra-� 10 t)E ('tx�1c 4 vic J ((,t 1 ©V 1 G�� cl -#tee --� 01, n s 1 Lct ,+-t U y, ► s i cc� toc�..� lc- NC. + - v1 v u a.. y -e n 8 �. �� �P "�° ►J 9-t' kilt,. - n -fug- a owe.. idkoiA) (VI re,vt u.d -Fi 0aw f lark tiLP 0 b) Committee d f l e d,td ` - , 0,-F has'. Q r a u a rr k at..r+.c " cLe�t . 4-0 �c OvIA-- k c ptet 1,1 0 40 C �h{ iscussion. (061 of joT rn N % 1 ctrn` r v - -m t' 1 c) Vote on motion. 9 I-dp G u C i- 004k 1tz.! fA. ti U iCl-t- V. NEW BUSINESS - continued. B. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 008 -TRC continued. VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT Allen Davis Montes De Oca Newell Smith APPROVED DENIED QC Cv VI. ADJOURNMENT — Chairperson. There being no further items on the agenda, Chairperson 1 51 Meeting at r a.m. 10 adjourned the Technical Review Committee (gut l ieneeting Spi.ty* C,ne�ie.te4 CITY OF OKEECHOBEE TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE OFFICIAL AGENDA NOVEMBER 19, 2015 CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS 55 SOUTHEAST 3RD AVENUE OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA 34974 I. CALL TO ORDER NOVEMBER 19, 2015, 10:00 a.m. - Chairperson. II. STAFF ATTENDANCE - Secretary. Voting Members: Non - Voting Ex- Officio Member: David Allen, Public Works Director Denny Davis, Police Chief Marcos Montes De Oca, City Administrator Jeffery Newell, Building Official Herb Smith, Fire Chief Bill Brisson, Senior Planner, LaRue Planning and Management John Cook, City Attorney John Hayford, Okeechobee Utility Authority Doug McCoy, Okeechobee County Health Department School Representative Patty Burnette, Secretary III. AGENDA - Chairperson. A. Requests for the deferral or withdrawal of items on today's agenda. IV. MINUTES — Secretary. A. Motion to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Technical Review Committee Minutes for the July 16, 2015, and September 17, 2015, regular meetings. V. NEW BUSINESS — Chairperson. A. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 007 -TRC, in regards to the construction of a 1,800 square foot proposed professional office building with associated parking and drainage on an approximate .33 acre parcel, Lots 9 and 10, Block 168, City of Okeechobee, and located at 210 South West 2nd Street, Okeechobee, FL. - Senior Planner. 1. Hear from Planning Staff. 2. Hear from City Staff. 3. Hear from Property Owner or Designee /Agent — Steven Dobbs. 4. Public comments or questions from those in attendance, or submitted to the Committee Secretary. 5. Disclosure of Ex -Parte Communications' by the Committee. 6. a) Consideration of a motion to approve or deny the application with /without contingencies. b) Committee discussion. c) Vote on motion. 1 B. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 008 -TRC, in regards to the construction of a 2,997 square foot proposed Taco Bell restaurant with drive -thru service and associated parking, drainage and utilities on approximately 1.035 acres, Lots 4 to 9, Block 150, City of Okeechobee, and located at 501 North East Park Street, Okeechobee, FL. - Senior Planner. 1. Hear from Planning Staff. 2. Hear from City Staff. 3. Hear from Property Owner or Designee /Agent — Andres Boral. 4. Public comments or questions from those in attendance, or submitted to the Committee Secretary. 5. Disclosure of Ex -Parte Communications' by the Committee. 6. a) Consideration of a motion to approve or deny the application with /without contingencies. b) Committee discussion. c) Vote on motion. VI. ADJOURNMENT — Chairperson. 'Per Resolution No. 1997 -05 Officials must disclose any communication received including the identity of the person, group, or entity; written communication may be read if not received by all Board Members; disclose any site visits made; disclose any expert opinions received; disclose any investigations made; disclosures must be made prior to the vote taken. Persons who have opinions contrary to those expressed in the ex-parte communication are given a reasonable opportunity to refute or respond. Please be advised that should you intend to show any document, picture, video or items to the Board in support or opposition to any item on the Agenda; a copy of the document, picture, video or item MUST be provided to the Board Secretary for the City's records. ANY PERSON DECIDING TO APPEAL any decision made by the Technical Review Committee with respect to any matter considered at this meeting will need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceeding is made and that the record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based. General Services media are for the sole purpose of backup for official records of the Department. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), any person with a disability as defined by the ADA, that needs special accommodation to participate in this proceeding, contact the General Services Department, no later than two business days prior to the proceeding, 863 - 763 -3372. 2 CITY OF OKEECIIOBEE Application for Site Plan Review Page 1 of 2 Rev. 04/11 ,�OF 0'����� �` �'.,0F � 0 ♦ �v A- S y •u- s s n O ►— • _ O �;e4- . � �.. ' ." .: " ; ��� ` 1 ♦ City of Okeechobee General Services Department 55 S.E. 3rd Avenue, Room 101 Okeechobee, Florida 39974 -2903 Phone: (863) 763 -3372, ext. 218 Fax: (863) 763 -1686 a -maii: clement®.cityofokeechobee.com Date Received c- 15 -�r� Application No. � 5 - �� %— ' '`� Fee Paid: 1006.Oa (K4 A Receipt No. p �� a s Hearing Date: 1 101 115 APPLICANT INFORMATION 1 Name of property owner(s): Shannon Brian Murray 2 Owner mailing address: 10770 SE Jupiter Narrows Drive, Hobe Sound, FL 33455 13. 3 Name of applicant(s) if other than owner: Shannon Murray 4 Applicant mailing address: 5 Name of contact person (state relationship): Steven L. Dobbs (Engineering Consultant) 6 Contact person daytime phone(s): (863) 824 -7644 7 Engineer: Name, address and phone number: Steven L. Dobbs 1062 Jakes Way, Okeechobee, FL 34974 (863) 824 -7644 8 Surveyor: Name, address and phone number: Tradewinds Surveying Services, LLC 200 NW 3rd Avenue, Okeechobee, FL 34974 863 - 763 -2887 PROPERTY and PROJECT INFORMATION 9 Property address/directions to property: 210 SW 2nd Street, Okeechobee, FL 34974 10 Parcel Identification Number 3- 15- 37 -35- 0010 - 01680 -0090 11 Current Future Land Use designation: Commercial 12 Current Zoning district: CBD 13 Describe the project including all proposed uses, type of construction and conceptual building layout, how the business or use is expected to operate on the site, including but not limited to: number of employees expected; hours of operation; location, extent and type of any outdoor storage or sales, etc., and fire flow layout. Use additional page if necessary. This project will construct a new building, parking and drainage for a Professional Office 14 Describe existing improvements on property (for example, the number and type of buildings, dwelling units, occupied or vacant, etc.). Use additional page if necessary. Shed 15 Total land area in square feet (if less than two acres): or acres: 0.33 0 3a6` © n Froptay 16 Is proposed use different from existing or prior use (X Yes) ( No) hp p ra.t.Se r Rev. 04/11 CITY OF OKEECHOBEE Application for Site Plan Review Page 2 of 2 For questions relating to this application packet, call the General Services Dept. at (863) - 763 -3372, Ext. 218 Rev. 04/11 Number and description of phases: 17 Applicant's statement of interest in property 01,0nef 18 Source of potable water: OUA 19 Method of sewage disposal: QUA For questions relating to this application packet, call the General Services Dept. at (863) - 763 -3372, Ext. 218 Rev. 04/11 ATTACHMENTS REQUIRED FOR ALL APPLICATIONS ,20 Applicant's statement of interest in property 01,0nef 21 One (1) copy of last recorded warranty deed 22 Notarized letter of consent from property owner (if applicant is different from property owner) 23 Three (3) sealed boundary and topographic, "as is" surveys of the property involved including: a. certified boundary survey, date of survey, surveyor's name, address and phone number b. Legal description of site and parcel number c. Computation of total acreage to nearest tenth of an acre 24 Two (2) sets of aerials of the site. ` 25 Eleven (11) copies of sealed site plan drawings (see attached checklist for details to be included in site plan) 26 Eleven (11) copies of drawing indicating facades for all buildings, including architectural elevations. 27 Eleven (11) copies of landscape plan, including a separate table indicating the number of trees and shrubs by type and showing both the official and common name of each type of tree and shrub. 28 Three (3) copies of sealed drainage calculations 29 Attach a Traffic Impact Study prepared by a professional transportation planner or transportation engineer, if the rezoning or proposed use will generate 100 or more peak hour vehicle trip ends using the trip generation factors for the most similar use as contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers most recent edition of Trip Generation. The TIA must identify the number of net new external trips, pass -bay calculations, internal capture calculations, a.m. and p.m. peak hour trips and level of service on all adjacent roadway links with and without the project. 30 Nonrefundable application fee: $1,000.00 plus $30.00 per acre. NOTE: Resolution No. 98 -11 Schedule of Land Development Regulation Fees and Charges — When the cost for advertising publishing and mailing notices of public hearings exceeds the established fee, or when a professional consultant is hired to advise the City on the application, the applicant shall pay the actual costs. NOTE: Submissions will be reviewed by the City Engineer and City Planner for all necessary documentation. The Applicant will be notified at least 10 days prior to the TRC meeting whether or not additional information is require to proceed or if the review will be rescheduled to the next TRC meeting. Confirmation of Information Accuracy . I hereby certify that the information in this application is correct. The information included in this application is for use by the City of Okeechobee in processing my request. False or misleading information may be punishable by a fine of up to $500.00 and imprisonment of up to 30 days and may resulting the summary denial of this application. ./ - Shannon Murray /��� _� l0 /7 //j - ' gnature Printed Name Date For questions relating to this application packet, call the General Services Dept. at (863) - 763 -3372, Ext. 218 Rev. 04/11 October 8, 2015 City of Okeechobee 55 SE 3`d Avenue Okeechobee, FL 34974 Job No.: 2015 -043 Subject: Murray Insurance New Building Site Plan Application Dear Reviewer: Enclosed find an application for a City of Okeechobee Site Plan Review for the above referenced project including; a completed application, 3 copies of survey, 11 signed and sealed copies of the construction drawings, 11 copies of the facade, 3 copies of signed and sealed Engineer's Report, and a check in the amount of $1,030.0`0 for the application fee"C)1'5-'(--,.-11, Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call me at 863 -824- 7644. ri c ODRP, -POI( /cx .D Sincerely, aez Steven L. Dobbs, P.E. President Enclosures Cc: Shannon Murray File 1062 Jakes Way, Okeechobee, FL 34974 Phone: (863) 824 -7644 Cell: (863) 634 -0194 Email: sdobbs @stevedobbsengineering.com Website: www.SteveDobbsEngineering.com Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bob Martinez Center 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -2400 Rick Scott Governor Carlos Lopez - Cantera Lt. Governor Jonathan P. Steverson Secretary SELF CERTIFICATION FOR A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN UPLANDS SERVING LESS THAN 10 ACRES OF TOTAL PROJECT AREA AND LESS THAN 2 ACRES OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACES Owner(s)/Permittee(s): File No: File Name: Site Address: County: Latitude: Longitude: Total Project Area: Total Impervious Surface Area: Approximate Date of Commencement of Construction: Registered Florida Professional: License No.: Company: Date: TBD: DATE OF SUBMISSION Shannon Murray I'BD TBD 210 SW 2nd St Okeechobee FL - 34974 4304 Okeechobee 27° 14' 32.6287" -80° 49' 53.831" 0.33 0.14 01/01/2016 Steven Dobbs 48134 Steven L. Dobbs Engineering, LLC Steven Dobbs certified through the Department's Enterprise Self - Service Application portal that the project described above was designed by the above -named Florida registered professional to meet the following requirements: 1. The total project area involves less than 10 acres and less than 2 acres of impervious surface; 2. No activities will impact wetlands or other surface waters; 3. No activities are conducted in, on, or over wetlands or other surface waters; 4. Drainage facilities will not include pipes having diameters greater than 24 inches, or the hydraulic equivalent, and will not use pumps in any manner; 5. The project is not part of a larger common plan, development, or sale; and 6. The project does not: 1. Cause adverse water quantity or flooding impacts to receiving water and adjacent lands; 2. Cause adverse impacts to existing surface water storage and conveyance capabilities; 3. Cause a violation of state water quality standards; or 4. Cause an adverse impact to the maintenance of surface or ground water levels or surface water flows established pursuant to s. 373.042 or a work of the district established pursuant to s. 373.086, F.S. This certification was submitted within approximately 30 days after initiation of construction of the above project. As such, construction, alteration, and maintenance of the stormwater management system serving this project is authorized in accordance with s. 403.814(12), F.S., and that there is a rebuttable presumption that the discharge from such system will comply with state water quality standards when the stormwater management system for this project is designed, operated, and maintained in accordance with applicable rules adopted pursuant to part IV of chapter 373, F.S. Applicants are advised to contact the applicable water management district for requirements that must be followed to properly abandon any existing water wells that need to be removed because they are located where construction is occurring. In accordance with s. 373.416(2), F.S., if ownership of the property or the stormwater management system is sold or transferred to another party, continued operation of the system is authorized only if notice is provided to the Department within 30 days of the sale or transfer. This notice can be submitted to: FDEP Southeast District 3301 Gun Club Road, MSC 7210 -1 West Palm Beach 33406 This certification was submitted along with the following electronic documents: File Description Drainage Calcs Cover existing pgd details general notes If you have submitted this certification as a Florida Registered Professional, you may wish to sign and seal this certification, and return a copy to the Department, in accordance with your professional practice act requirements under Florida Statutes. I, Steven Dobbs, Licens�easIeu48.1 4, do hereby certify that the above information is true and accurate, based upon my knot', `'ckeF fe ' ► e n and belief. In the space below, affix signature, date, seal, company name, address a> itt •iL'. �ation (if applicable). ?Steven L" ab0s, .: °, 1 's * O s °F c G R ! DIPA ° .�GJOo This sealed certific't pf } Vthitted to the Department, either electronically (as an attachment in Adobe PDF or other sectife;kli viral format) at Erp.selfcerts @dep.state.fl.us, or as a hardcopy, at the postal address below: CDA' 2000 Florida Department of Environmental Protection Office of Submerged Lands and Environmental Resources 2600 Blair Stone Road MS 2500 Tallahassee FL 32399 -2400 Engineer's Report New Office Building for Murray Insurance City of Okeechobee, Florida Prepared October, 2015 By: Steven L. Dobbs, P.E. # 48134 Steven L. Dobbs Engineering, LLC Florida Certificate of Authorization No. 29206 1062 Jakes Way Okeechobee, FL 34974 1 �0.4i00s LI ti Purpose: The purpose of this report is to provide the City of Okeechobee County with the calculations and documentation to demonstrate that the surface water management system for the proposed project complies with applicable state and local water resource requirements. Project Description: This parcel is 0.33 acres in size and is located in Sections 15, Township 37 South, Range 35 East. It is located in the City of Okeechobee, on the north side of SW 2nd Street mid -block between SW 2nd and SW 3rd Avenue, on the following parcel (Parcel ID 3- 15- 37 -35- 0010- 01680 - 0090). The site is currently undeveloped. The site is flat with a City ditch on the south side of the parcel. Storm water currently flows to the ditch to the south. There is an inlet at the NE corner of SW 2nd Street and SW 3rd Avenue where the drainage will be directed. This culvert system flows to the west and ultimately to the SW 7th Aven0t Ditch The drainage calculations and routings to address the required water quality treatment volumes and anticipated surface water stages for the proposed site improvements will be provided. Proposed Use: This request is for a single phase construction permit to build an 1,800 sf premanufactured building with parking, drainage and asphalt drives. The storm water system will be sized to supply water quality and water attenuation for both phases. Potable water and gravity wastewater will be provided by the existing tie in locations in the rear of the lot by Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA). This project will incrementally increase the existing potable water demand on OUA. Drainaie Considerations: To attenuate the runoff generated by the existing and proposed improvements and to meet water quality requirements, all drainage will be routed through the dry retention area. The dry detention area will be controlled at elevation 29.4 NGVD `29 which is 0.4' above the bottom of the detention area and the same elevation at the swales south of the project.. The wet season water table is located approximately 1 foot below natural ground, which is also at elevation 28.0 NGVD. This project will discharge through a proposed new discharge location into the adjacent City ditch on SW 2nd street. Additionally, a perimeter berm or pavement elevations will be constructed at an elevation to contain the 25 year, 3 day storm event on the site, around the perimeter of the property. The Soils Map for Okeechobee County indicates that this parcel's soils are made up of Immokalee Fine Sand, which is a very poorly drained "D soil" in the natural state and a better drained "B soil" in the developed state. The Soils Map information also indicates that the anticipated wet season water table is approximately 1.0 feet below natural ground. The site is located in the S -133 Basin. The proposed outfall for the project will be on the south side of the proposed dry retention area that will discharge through an adjacent ditch located on SW rd Street. This ditch flows west through the City Culvert System that discharges into SW 7th Avenue Ditch, which discharges into the rim canal north of the lake, through S -133 and into Lake Okeechobee. The allowable discharge for the S -133 Basin is 15.6 csm (cfs /sq. mile) for the 25 year 3 day event: Q = 15.6 csm / 640 acres /sq. mile x Project Area Q = 15.6 csm / 640 acres /sq. mile x 0.33 acres = 0.01 cfs 2 A. Water Quality Water quality treatment is provided in the form of dry retention for the project drainage area. Since the proposed water quality system is dry retention, the volume required is 50°%o of the calculated volume, however since this project discharge into an impaired water basin and with a presumption of compliance with nutrient control by adding an additional 50% to the water quality volume the total water quality volume is 0.02 acre -feet. The dry pretreatment criteria of (0.5 ") is less than the (1 ") water quality requirement, therefore the system meets the pretreatment criteria as specified under Section 5.2.1 of the SFWMD's Environmental Resource Permit Information Manual Volume IV and the required water quality volume. Based on the attached stage storage spreadsheet, the water quality volume (0.18 acre -feet) is met at elevation 30.84 NGVD '29. B. Water Quantity This project is located in the S -133 Basin which discharges ultimately into Lake Okeechobee. The allowable peak discharge rate in this basin is 15.6 csm. The allowable peak discharge rate for this project, based on the 25 -year, 72 -hour storm event was calculated to be 0.09 cfs. The actual maximum discharge rate for the 10- year, 72 -hour storm event was calculated to be 0.177 cfs, which is greater than maximum allowable peak rate, but discharging through the proposed 3" minimum bleeder. To demonstrate conformance to this criteria, the proposed project was flood - routed using AdICPR. The 10 year, 24 hour storm (5.0 ") w/ discharge, the 10 year, 72 hour storm (7.0 ") w/ discharge, and the 100 year, 72 hour storm (10.0 ") w/o discharge, were evaluated based on the proposed plan. Please refer to the attached AdICPR flood routing input/output parameters. A summary of the flood routings is provided as follows: 10 Year, 24 Hr. Storm (5.0 ") 10 Year, 72 hr. Storm (7.0 ") 100 Year, 72 Hr. Storm (10.0 ") Peak Stage Peak Rate Peak Stage Peak Rate Peak Stage (ft- NGVD'29) (cfs) (ft- NGVD'29) (cfs) (ft- NGVD'29)) 32.65 0.132 32.90 0.177 3330 3 Parkin¢: Please see parking calculations on the site plan. Off -Site Drainage: There are no offsite flow through this property. Nutrient Analysis: As previously stated, the project proposes to provide 150% of the required water quality treatment volume in the dry detention system in order to meet the nutrient removal requirements. In addition, a nutrient analysis was completed using BMP Trains Model version 7.4, which indicates an additional 0.008 acre -feet of retention are required to meet the nutrient load reduction. This will be achieved discharging at elevation of 29.4 NGVD '29, which gives an additional 0.09 inches of retention. With this additional retention, the system will be left at elevation 16.8 inches above wet season water table. From the soil survey, the K -sat is 72 micrometers per second or 10.2" per hour. This would require less than 2 hours to recover to wet season water table. Flood Plain Analysis: As shown on the attached FEMA Panel 12093C0480C, a minor portion of the project is located in Zone "C ". There project is outside the flood plain. Construction Recommendations: Runoff and /or any water generated by short-term dewatering during construction will be contained on -site. However, there is some potential for transport of sediment to off -site areas should heavy rainfall occur. In order to reduce the potential of any off -site transport of sediment or turbidity we recommend installation and maintenance of temporary silt fence inside the southerly property line in the area of the proposed paving of the existing rock road and upstream of the existing control structure until site work has been completed and the site has been stabilized. (The existing perimeter berm should prevent any potential off -site transport of sediment from other areas of the site during construction.) Conclusions: In my professional opinion, the proposed construction should have no impact to existing drainage patterns off -site and should have no impact on off-site areas. The recommendations above should be followed during and after the site work until such time as the ground surface has been adequately stabilized to prevent the off -site transport of any soil or suspended solids. The proposed design and construction will comply with applicable state and local requirements. 4 a e rn N '4 22 rn 8 A m 8 A n g'3 oe'°oo -r d d d 0 0 o 0 o Murray Insurance Basin Information For: C M ^ C 0 M 0 o — x o d o n _ II n II II u II PPS P 55 5F,5H 5t 844 84 0 =6.,9,..3, II II II II II II II II 7 to e Calculations for Basin Murra S6 .o M O 0. 0 O O O O m O N C = rei fei O o 0 0 p o o O O M O Y O g P O O O 0 0 O O O < O en en O M O O 0 0 pp O o 0 0 0 O 5 g Li eV y M ea E y O O 0 0 p o 0 0 0 0 0 OO C r / y N1 O O ° 0 p p O O O O O O p 8 0 ag00 U 000' o d e* 0 0 0 6 O 0 o 0 0 O Ci g R 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o O p S O = N o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 C g N 00 o o 00o 0 0 0 0 0 l_ To Elev. 31.00 _ 34.00 0 O N iti 0 F m88 2 p d G el el oouOtO V Cl e7 M Y 0 !0 N O Q O C O O O O es O a> o a, F. P. c To C c >..aa c F. Land use Category Dry Retention Dry Retention Banks uilding Pavement L F:'2015 -043 Murray Insurance104-Calcs■2015 -043 site info 27° 14'33 "N 27° 1431 N pMp n1 3 A 516649 516655 Soil Map — Okeechobee County, Florida (Murray Insurance) 516661 516667 516673 516679 a 516685 — O M 516649 SS N 0 3 7 516655 516661 Map Scale: 1:249 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 111 sheet � I 516667 516673 Meters 14 21 Feet 0 10 20 40 60 Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WcZ84 Edge tics: urM Zone 17N WGS84 Natural Resources Web Soil Survey Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 7 516679 516685 8 N 2 10/6/2015 Page 1 of 3 27° 14' 33" N 27° 14' 31" N MAP INFORMATION MAP LEGEND The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. a� c rn =_ c y O y U O 5 U y 0 t1/B Si) S. co a) N 03 c E fa To ° )E E E y E _ N o o C0 0 o w o w N O N L - n r- o. o E c E O '0 .c E F VD Tie) (1) 1:4 E� lD 7 C y N O W E aw Very Stony Spot Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines r 0 Soil Map Unit Points Special Line Features a) o o 0) is m 00 C 5 o as t a) 'O CO) �° j O A t6 a N 0 o N a) o a) 2 .0 E (� y .) 'n N E !E U N C E C yy j l0 '.-= N N U m 0 U in a) = N CO f0 N co O y Tf) C c co 7 (..) O E w L N N a) ° Z d LL PO t y a c n CO a) -a a o�.� z N h t; 0 d co U N W m 03 1_o Q O C ■0 O . = m L _ C U y d d O a N a) 0 0 l6 ° a) m U os O N � co N ° D OL N m ° oE aC a. O ° n co o to a° ) d E o N . C a . Ea O Q =.0 7 N U p co a) -5 O Z o ao �-0 y (7) -. aN 0 a) >` co L0 u) a f0 mZ� f Li Q$fo (o a C C y O a)— N a) a L . C d E SD Cn N E @ 0 co a .c >. 0 L d N 'p an d N to T 7 C a) T a) U N N N C a) N U T C G f6 N- N B. C O m o o ° 3 ° °y d o Z� Q cot L-°� 7 a) o N N (0 'O (0 V C N D. N O T t0 O) ) D _� N a a) f0 a) o L o c)--.,... N �0 to > f0 a7 (V E E O) E co a E co B U rd c) -E o I- t (n to co O O N F- 8 .� O 1 Point Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation cc cc a to 0 Interstate Highways Closed Depression a 0 _a 2 N c Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water I Severely Eroded Spot Soil Map — Okeechobee County, Florida Murray Insurance Map Unit Legend Okeechobee County, Florida (FL093) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 11 Totals for Area of Interest Immokalee fine sand, 0 to 2 0.3 percent slopes 1 0.31 100.0% 100.0% usDn Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/6/2015 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 27° 14' 33" N 3 516649 516655 Depth to Water Table— Okeechobee County, Florida (Murray Insurance) 516661 516667 516673 516679 516685 3 9 R- R Ft 27° 14 31• _g 516649 3 NN 516655 516661 Map Scale: 1:249 if printed on A portrait (8.S' x 11 ") sheet. 516667 0 3 7 0 10 20 14 40 Feet 60 516673 Meyers 21 Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 516679 516685 3 9 T. 10/6/2015 Page 1 of 3 27° 14'33 "N 27° 14'31 "N a) O LL 0 c 0 U m ,. a) 8 0 0 a) N C qE 1- co N 0 t a a� O MAP INFORMATION MAP LEGEND The soil surveys that comprise your AOl were mapped at 1:24,000. Not rated or not available Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. c = S y O in p N • O QQ a) 5 f(0 U O 0) N) N 8 C �6 0. as a) 0 cf0-0 E 0 p, �EEa) 0. n as C5 CO E 3 0 c 0L E a) N O C . 0 (; 0) 00 a) .c N .0 w .0 moo > EcE2 C 0 1— 0 E c 8 a) a) l6 rn c E 0 0 0 c = N O W E au) Streams and Canals Transportation Interstate Highways a) p 00 CD o Y 3 m o (5 > 0 U 0 In S¢ o 1 y p y N 67 CO 'O 0. E l6 N 0 p 0 0 O a) 0 .c E C 7 E as r uu)) 6 NI C y 0 vJ Q� N o O a) a N y " l6 6) N .O O y 2 c M .t-_ N CO 7 V E w aLa). 0 0 0 O O 0 a) y -a Q ° 7 �� _ m o �a a°iv y�.� QN o m UAW m C a) p= cOi 0 m. E 0 o Q O o t t CA , p C n N o a) t6 c`n6 0 m Q 8 .0 5) V 00?w o 6 ) a)� 0) 0.- � w N C 0 N !!) C V a) 3 L: H O E �` f6 y a) a� ;� O— L L Nd 0 oy� O OC vi a a)0 E.0 �o Q' U p 0 0 O v .O a) T U� NL� •Op5' .0 vv N N 2 -o O.p E 63 l6 J Cn a O C V) O 0 -c-a! C a) n Z a Q 0 a) — f6 N O N m > E m nio c rn 6 as c °) % m 2a rnm mto o E ob'm o o f -E.2 o .co 0 w '8' 13 as ZE �� d E e 0 7 C 7 o a) N 0 a) 0 0-00 c 01 r O N 8 'O N o 0 2 n a) fn N E H 6 0 a a) 0 0 6) 3 O a d 61 0 0 p> _ Z _@ Y N ) 0a) 0.0o OoyaN t0 00 0 0� =E OE a. E m5U 2 a•0< o 1--r co 11) C0 O oN 1— U E O O o tr `o scir Local Roads n 0 0 a m 0) c co 0 0 0 0 co 0 0 N O O N O O. N ' 0 0 N u) 0 0 0 O N u) A Not rated or not available o o 0 - 0 O O N L. In N 0 J N N 0 0 t0 Ca N C 0 N (4) A Not rated or not available II. It lk It O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 'O • R k l } h N Soil Rating Points 0 0 0 0 0 0 N V) 1 0 0 N 0 cl) 0 0 N • 0 C ® CI • Depth to Water Table— Okeechobee County, Florida Murray Insurance Depth to Water Table Depth to Water Table— Summary by Map Unit — Okeechobee County, Florida (FL093) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating (centimeters) Acres in AO1 Percent of AO1 11 I Immokalee fine sand, 0 131 to 2 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest Description 0.3 "Water table" refers to a saturated zone in the soil. It occurs during specified months. Estimates of the upper limit are based mainly on observations of the water table at selected sites and on evidence of a saturated zone, namely grayish colors (redoximorphic features) in the soil. A saturated zone that lasts for less than a month is not considered a water table. This attribute is actually recorded as three separate values in the database. A low value and a high value indicate the range of this attribute for the soil component. A "representative" value indicates the expected value of this attribute for the component. For this soil property, only the representative value is used. Rating Options Units of Measure: centimeters Aggregation Method: Dominant Component Component Percent Cutoff None Specified Tie -break Rule: Lower Interpret Nulls as Zero: No Beginning Month: January Ending Month: December 100.0% 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/6/2015 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 27° 14'33 "N 27° 14'31 "N MMM pp�I f�1 6 1' 516649 516655 Hydrologic Soil Group— Okeechobee County, Florida (Murray Insurance) 516661 516667 516673 516679 516685 3 1' 516649 516655 516661 Map Scale: 1:249 if printed on A portrait (8.5' x 11 ") sheet. 516667 0 3 7 14 0 10 20 40 Feet 60 516673 Metes 21 Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey :i Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 516679 27' 14'33 "N N 1 27° 14'31 "N 516685 3 10/6/2015 Page 1 of 4 O) 0 u_ 0 0 V .0 0 c m W 7 a) N Y ITO O. 7 7 2 0 — •o O 0) 0 O T MAP LEGEND The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. a) c rn = c O O N N N f` U O C N c ` O 8 m3NN C o a7 a a7 N of (5 c f0 y E c0 f0 p2 o E E n a) • c3a .0 as E3`0m c O L S — co O •c ) O u) C -0 0 -c .0 n o- a) E E t O 0 = 'o c a H o E E L c y co 7 U N c y co wEnco rated or not available 0 o a 0 U O 0 • N 3 Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) 0 C 0 M 0 0 0 C M ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a m m 0 0 0 z c< a m m o v o 2 i❑ [0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ p R l t R co Streams and Canals a) o 0 rn o °m c e. c drf €11 3o L E co to a)-0 N E . o N c rnE c 7 j f0 ;= e N N — U O °- o U liO 0 D C 0 (0 0. N a O L 0 f• . • aN 7 y Z U d' « « +- y N CO ° L.L. p "' t E m y d N 0Z Q N a O •0 m a'n p ' E U y W o c m 0 .c m 0 5-,_ .0 O..0 o U 0 0. 0. t O c 0 N 0 O4 N cu =E0 N 0 c m` z« o m a) N o o to En y o �`��o 'oE o 00 r a a N a 0 a z� N E c N O_ c O O t ° T 13 E 8 __ n o o O � ° N a E N > — c 0 O N o V y °-« N O� H N L y c a` i (J) 0 c _c Tj �L O a)la �v 0'"� N CO O•mN C w a) N U �. w N O f0 E o �` 7 o c m (1) w v ° Nv ¢� « m °•c a.0 2'E �U) ti., . E c m c 0 C y o m E Oy- f0 O O Q' _0 •O < d �: N 1_O L •O 7 N N ` c 'O N z c N O d 0 CO N E 2 N o 'p, 0 t0 oa co a) N p o p N O y �d�p N 0 _ Z _ CO 0 N 0 E N E d E co . 0 M d'5 < o H« U) U) U) o O N I- U ._ o c m O c, a Interstate Highways T a El N o H) o w cc .0 O O .0 o- re 0 ` m D m J a Q iti c 2 c. .0 Not rated or not available Soil Rating Points 0 0 a m Hydrologic Soil Group — Okeechobee County, Florida Murray Insurance Hydrologic Soil Group Hydro ogic Soil Group— Summary by Map Unit — Okeechobee County, Florida (FL093) Map unit symbol Map unit name 11 Immokalee fine sand, 0 I B/D to 2 percent slopes Rating Acres in AOI Totals for Area of Interest Description 0.3 I 100.0% 4 0.3 100.0% Percent of AO1 Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long- duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (A/D, B /D, and C /D). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (ND, B /D, or C /D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff. None Specified t Ism Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/6/2015 00i Conservation Service National Cooperative Sod Survey Page 3 of 4 Hydrologic Soil Group — Okeechobee County, Florida Murray Insurance Tie -break Rule: Higher us i Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/6/2015 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4 27° 14'33"N N 27° 14'31 "N 1 516649 Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity (Ksat), Standard Classes — Okeechobee County, Florida (Murray Insurance) 516655 516661 516667 516673 516679 516685 27° 14' 33" N NN� oMo N - 27° 143r N 3 SS g3 1 516649 516655 516661 Map Scale: 1:249 if primed on A portrait (8.5" x 11 ") sheet 516667 0 3 7 14 516673 Meters 21 Feet 0 10 20 40 60 Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 516679 516685 3 g3 10/6/2015 Page 1 of 3 lC v 0 L c c O 0 a) .0 O L U N li Y � 5 U c c 0 0 U 0) a MAP INFORMATION MAP LEGEND The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. c a) •y y N of • w =688 O °f8 N 0) C O s 0. 0)); cu E o 5 2 o c w E a)'a E 3 m o o C 0) O Op -C!„ '°O N a Qwaa) E E2 m1- o 0) ) C U Ey(7m rn c EEy U 0 f6 N C N o - ° w E a co Streams and Canals Transportation N G 0 O Q O N 0 da c o "ii ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ a m Very Low (0.0 - 0.01) Interstate Highways Low (0.01 - 0.1) 0 a) o co e N E N tc C O ... L N U 0 . y CO 8 o 3 c o - E al u) y a) v N E o (N c °) E 0 0 8 u, N a -5; = la o N d O la C W w 0) l0 N CO L E f6 y O N 0 .c L en O (n ° 'N a N Z L,L p O L E N N f� m o� �� uoi= Q �� 3 ` E UAW oo�oa cm c L f0c N y 0 a C O' . c° V% OO n' t0 o C y N N ai 5a a) ° N a) O Q� U o�,tc6 0) a)� o maNa�i C N\ O N N C U O .. 3 L N "8' E >' 0 a) ° o of Z v ° o ff E o o c N C 0 i E a 0) d' = a O N U 'p N 2 O L O v N a a1 >` mL 0) 0) 0) o. `o v� a y ` ° co tC f0 J U fn N n C N Q N O> v N aL O m N E E a Y d eNo c m .5 � v °N (.13 i U Z 2�' y „. Ua m N a N= m E fO c yo v.o y �V - n N a o co 15- ° � rn m 'i Q m w m E r NaaO `°) m � y o Q d m m 0 a CU Ca 00 a.Oa)0 N> z —o :N a)EmE r O 2 a. E (0> 0 a a'3Q h-Y (n v) v) O ON F U _ O N GI c R. 0 O d' Q_' o co Ff. Moderately Low (0.1 - 1) Moderately High (1 - 10) Local Roads High (10 - 100) t a Ta c O Very High (100 - 705) Not rated or not available Soil Rating Lines Very Low (0.0 - 0.01) Low (0.01 - 0.1) Moderately Low (0.1 - 1) Moderately High (1 - 10) High (10 - 100) t • w l Very High (100 - 705) Not rated or not available Soil Rating Points Very Low (0.0 - 0.01) Low (0.01 - 0.1) Moderately Low (0.1 - 1) Moderately High (1 - 10) Very High (100 - 705) Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity (Ksat), Standard Classes — Okeechobee County, Florida Murray Insurance Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity (Ksat), Standard Classes Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity (Ksat), Standard Classes— Summary by Map Unit— Okeechobee County, Florida (FL093) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating (micrometers per second) Acres in A01 Percent of AOI 11 lmmokalee fine sand, 0 172.3744 to 2 percent slopes i Totals for Area of Interest Description 0.31 100.0% r 0.3 Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) refers to the ease with which pores in a saturated soil transmit water. The estimates are expressed in terms of micrometers per second. They are based on soil characteristics observed in the field, particularly structure, porosity, and texture. Saturated hydraulic conductivity is considered in the design of soil drainage systems and septic tank absorption fields. For each soil layer, this attribute is actually recorded as three separate values in the database. A low value and a high value indicate the range of this attribute for the soil component. A "representative" value indicates the expected value of this attribute for the component. For this soil property, only the representative value is used. The numeric Ksat values have been grouped according to standard Ksat class limits. The classes are: Very low: 0.00 to 0.01 Low: 0.01 to 0.1 Moderately low: 0.1 to 1.0 Moderately high: 1 to 10 High: 10 to 100 Very high: 100 to 705 Rating Options Units of Measure: micrometers per second Aggregation Method: Dominant Component Component Percent Cutoff. None Specified Tie -break Rule: Fastest Interpret Nulls as Zero: No Layer Options (Horizon Aggregation Method): All Layers (Weighted Average) 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/6/2015 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 MAP SCALE 1" = 1000' 500 0 1000 2000 This is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It was extracted using F-MIT On-Line. This map does not reflect changes or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the title dock. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www.msc.fema.gov, r o W Z a 5 Q �?d] o w W g O A w X 11! W E. Z V W g LL Z b AO Q m N Z A o c Z d v z 6* ill Qfad a�8 LL a cc w g z ■ s3 a u.1.4, v u -. o a (04.0:1 4 z a 11� 5 O � S 8 a Z M e- z �� .2 ws aN v= ot Wiga°£° a•— LL-, g m Z Ip b't LL RR �.8C.a w ri O r �0 y Y F i O E 8 �o ? O ..1= 7 °pb Q w w P k E :. W R.-21°g n u�� w -�c = := W_b!219= 0 =21d =3 N_'d f1SNIEGOiO_l° =�dN _ ld'N H15AN! n-Y x o Q z a. N w KAF5554 SE 2ND ST SE 3RD ST TH ST H ST 41. =m 3�x `, a s "gym .b' 1. ` #r a t .g arse �9Y�fi • #i+Y$. 3AV Hit 3N W Z 3AV OW 3N Oasis 5) N M i_ a , 1` NW 5TH ST 3AV ONZ MS I- 3nd ME MS cn ~ CO = Lo in X Q CITY OF Oh 516000m E 120 JOINS PANEL 0415 — — 3AV H1P MS co + CD C 1- S' 3AV H1 MS 2 = C 3AV H19 MS 0 CD N"'" 01108711A1 01108711A1 1 A 12 3AV H1L MS 1 21 SW 9TH ST ` 3AV H1L MS i 1 t 3AV H16 MS co 1- 0 a 3A 3AV H101. MS I— CO 1- � 3AV H101. MS in co 0_1_ 10TH ST 0 z can 1- co N 1- c n co I i SW 8TH C1 • c 3AVI 4 I Murray Insurance, City of Okeechobee, FL Input Report for AdICPR Model ___= Basins Name: Onsite Node: Onsite Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Rainfall File: Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Area(ac): 0.300 Curve Number: 83.00 DCIA( %): 0.00 ___= Nodes Peaking Factor: 256.0 Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 Name: Onsite Group: BASE Type: Stage /Volume Stage(ft) Volume(af) 29.000 0.0000 30.500 0.0100 31.000 0.0200 31.500 0.0600 32.000 0.1300 32.500 0.2300 33.000 0.3300 33.500 0.4500 34.000 0.5800 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 29.000 Warn Stage(ft): 33.000 Name: outfall Group: BASE Type: Time /Stage Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 29.000 Warn Stage(ft): 29.000 Time(hrs) Stage(ft) 0.00 73.00 1000.00 - -_= Drop Structures 29.000 29.000 29.000 Name: CS -1 Group: BASE From Node: Onsite Length(ft): 60.00 To Node: outfall Count: 1 UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Friction Equation: Average Conveyance Geometry: Circular Circular Solution Algorithm: Automatic Span(in): 18.00 18.00 Flow: None Rise(in): 18.00 18.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.500 Invert(ft): 31.000 31.000 Exit Loss Coef: 0.900 Manning's N: 0.025000 0.025000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Solution Incs: 10 Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall * ** Weir 1 of 2 for Drop Structure CS -1 * ** Count: 1 Type: Horizontal Flow: Both Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 24.00 Rise(in): 36.00 * ** Weir 2 of 2 for Drop Structure CS -1 * ** Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Disc Coef: 3.200 Orifice Disc Coef: 0.600 Invert(ft): 31.800 Control Elev(ft): 31.800 TABLE TABLE Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Murray Insurance, City of Okeechobee, FL Input Report for AdICPR Model Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Mavis Flow: Both Geometry: Circular Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Disc Coef: 3.200 Orifice Disc Coef: 0.600 Span(in): 3.00 Invert(ft): 29.400 Rise(in): 3.00 Control Elev(ft): 29.400 ___= Hydrology Simulations - - -- -- Name: 100YR3D Filename: F: \2015 -043 Murray Insurance \04 -Calcs \2015 -043 ICPR \sims \100YR3D.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 72.00 Rainfall File: Sfwmd72 Rainfall Amount(in): 10.00 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) 50.000 10.00 100.000 5.00 Name: 10YR1D Filename: F: \2015 -043 Murray Insurance \04 -Calcs \2.015 -043 ICPR \sims \10YR1D.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 5.00 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) 10.000 24.000 100.000 10.00 5.00 10.00 Name: 25YR3D Filename: F: \2015 -043 Murray Insurance \04 -Calcs \2015 -043 ICPR \sims \25YR3D.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 72.00 Rainfall File: Sfwmd72 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.00 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) 50.000 100.000 400.000 10.00 5.00 10.00 ___= Routing Simulations Name: 100YR3D Hydrology Sim: 100YR3D Filename: F: \2015 -043 Murray Insurance \04 -Calcs \2015 -043 ICPR \sims \100YR3D.I32 Execute: Yes Alternative: No Restart: No Patch: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5000 Boundary Stages: Time(hrs) 50.000 100.000 Group SASE Print Inc(min) 15.000 5.000 Run Yes Delta Z Factor: 0.00500 End Time(hrs): 100.00 Max Calc Time(sec): 60.0000 Boundary Flows: Name: 10YR1D Hydrology Sim: 10YR1D Filename: F: \2015 -043 Murray Insurance \04 -Calcs \2015 -043 ICPR \sims \10YR1D.I32 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 2 of 3 Murray Insurance, City of Okeechobee, FL Input Report for AdICPR Model Execute: No Alternative: No Restart: No Patch: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5000 Boundary Stages: Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) 10.000 24.000 100.000 Group 15.000 5.000 15.000 Run SASE Yes Delta Z Factor: 0.00500 End Time(hrs): 100.00 Max Calc Time(sec): 60.0000 Boundary Flows: Name: 25YR3D Hydrology Sim: 25YR3D Filename: F: \2015 -043 Murray Insurance \04 -Calcs \2015 -043 ICPR \sims \25YR3D.I32 Execute: No Alternative: No Restart: No Patch: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5000 Boundary Stages: Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) 50.000 100.000 400.000 Group 15.000 5.000 10.000 Run BASE Yes Delta Z Factor: 0.00500 End Time(hrs): 400.00 Max Ca].c Time(sec): 60.0000 Boundary Flows: Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 3 of 3 Murray Insurance, City of Okeechobee, FL Basin Summary Report for AdICPR Model Basin Name: Onsite Group Name: BASE Simulation: 10OYR3D Node Name: Onsite Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.33 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.33 Rainfall File: Sfwmd72 Rainfall Amount (in): 10.000 Storm Duration (hrs): 72.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 10.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.300 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 83.000 DCIA (8): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 60.02 Flow Max (cfs): 1.247 Runoff Volume (in): 7.900 Runoff Volume (ft3): 8602.937 Basin Name: Onsite Group Name: BASE Simulation: 10YR1D Node Name: Onsite Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.33 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.33 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount (in): 5.000 Storm Duration (hrs): 24.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 10.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.300 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 83.000 DCIA (8): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 12.04 Flow Max (cfs): 0.671 Runoff Volume (in): 3.173 Runoff Volume (ft3): 3455.420 Basin Name: Onsite Group Name: BASE Simulation: 25YR3D Node Name: Onsite Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.33 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.33 Rainfall File: Sfwmd72 Rainfall Amount (in): 9.000 Storm Duration (hrs): 72.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 10.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.300 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 83.000 DCIA (8): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 60.02 Flow Max (cfs): 1.108 Runoff Volume (in): 6.934 Runoff Volume (ft3): 7551.199 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 1 4 < 4< 4 ) 00 )00400 M O W 0 0400400 0000. -i0 W 0 • 0 • 0 0 0 G O a,.%0 00001n0 >40 r, 000000 H W O O M O, O > X 0 M O X 4 N (0(00(0>0(0 (0 0 4 - 4 M 0 LO )0 0 m o 0 N0,000, W G 000. -1 o O 4< 4) 00000, E 0 4 0 0 00 0 L E-444 O O N M 0. X m 4-) (0(3 4000000 4 0) 49 o M 0 4.444 N a0 N C04,4 W M (0 X m 0) yJ m 00000 a-1 0W 00)00L00 • 0 000000 044 000000 O m 000000 X N E b+01.) 000000 00144 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,M 1000000 4>44 . . . . N 0) I M>M0 M3 b >0>0>00>00 X 41 1 N .4400000 M0,44 ,004000 2M Mom o 0 +) s. 0>00000 M N. `l N M N 0) N N do 00100 E 0.4 000 o oo -.4 N L-+ J M O M 0 .-1 0 ul 10 E ■] W E 0 fn M CD • 0 0 0 0 L S 0 0 ! x a W W W W W W 7 0000410 X Ca.) 0 6 Fi 'C <C < < 44 (40414017=1170 47 G 0 0 0 0 0 0 O iaa>aa 4, ›4›.4> M 0000>0>0 .44 004-4,0N >4 0 O 0 4440 0 4 O 4.) t� W ..) N O a a U O) N 0 • E N 0, H X m >,z 4 (1) 4 0 G O z E ro 2 O) 0 00 0)■ 4, 0 14 .-) 4-1 . -I 4.i (0 -.1 f0 -44 (0 N W N WI N W G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. X U1 N 0 00 ro tr w o 0 0 E ro o 0 w u o rn m N N N 0 N U) N 0 00 E SA 000 N N .G 0) x N 01 X N u 0ot� ro o+4-4 oo - £ ro N )) 0 0 ti 0 0 00 y N N 0 Din E TYa Gr 0 h ro JJ 000 X D U) D X0 N 00 ro w 000 E ro U 0 0 aY 1 0 0 (1) X 3 m o ■o ■0 ro O w o VI Lc, £ •1 U o 0 000 9) 1< N o O u) E O 14 or .G 0 0 1 ti x u G 0 0 ■ O 01 aaa •• r• r ro o o 10 - O ti N 1 E N a www a 0 00V) O < tC a (4 C1 C) CI 0 N 0 01 E 1 ro 0) N N z UUU Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. /mq w 0 a z 0 H 0 0 O 1- z O 1- O E INFORMATION: GENERAL S u 3 IEW ZONE MAP J LL -J DO. z z w 2 7 u w g W c O n 0 0 0 Meteorological Zone (Please use one map): 2 N Mean Annual Rainfall (Please use rainfall map): 0 a E 2 .2 net improvement or B Type of analysi ent efficiency (N, P) (leave empty 4- E E ° Q c c c a c m 4 O a c aE yU 0q 9 OX Es - Zx g ► E E E d X362 CO LL OO wri 2 62 ct F C E ' E • O € ▪ u3 i/ ±-4%. 446 s ~ E 1- z w 2 F w 0 U W 0>" 20 � Z JU 0 LL Q W U. 0 x 0 U. 0 0 0 0 x f- U)2 OY } U) 0Z 00 0z Ow W▪ 0 g O• U.1 } 00u J Z 0 OZ wW WE Ow } W 0} 00 ww 20 a Eg E Zm Q" STORMWATER TREATMENT ANALYSIS O E• t W LL W D 3 « at J - NoCed Wy WATERSHED CHARACTERISTICS V7.4 ` 1 Blew Number I InPUt data GO TO STORMWATER TREATMENT ANALYSIS HEIP LAND USE &EMC Red Numbers = Calculated - 1 SELECT CATCHMENT CONFIGURATION (CLICK ON CELL BELOW TO SELECT CONFIGURATION 1 r VIEW CATCHMENT CONFIGURATION A - Single Catchment ac- ft/year ac- ft/year kg/year kg/year kg/year kg/year ac- ttyear ac-ft/year kg/year kg/year kg/year ko/vear EMC(N): I mg/L EMC(P): mgiL USE DEFAULT CONCENTRATIONS IEMC(N): I rat EMC(P): (( g USE DEFAULT CONCENTRATIONS Average annual pre runoff volume: Average annual post runoff volume: Pre - development Annual Mass Loading - Nitrogen: Pre - development Annual Mass Loading - Phosphorus: Post - development Annual Mass Loading - Nitrogen: Post-development Annual Mass Loading - Phosphorus: tff volume: off volume: 1 Mass Loading - Nitrogen: I Mass Loading - Phosphorus: al Mass Loading - Nitrogen: al a - Loadin • - P os • horus: 'o I! \ -)ICI uelo= TERISTICS: 1 If mixed land uses (side calcutationll %DOOA | «« \8712§\ L- CLICK ON CELL BELOW TO SELECT CUCK ON CELL BELOW TO SELECT CUCK ON CELL BELOW TO SELECT L Lowdnbnatty Commend.: TN -1.110 TP.0.119 CUCK ON CELL BELOW TO SELECT Low-Intensity Commercial: TN =1.150 TP.0.179 \ ° - . ent area. nent or BMP analysis area: N: tags: N. ntage: for rainfall excess not loadinos) ant area: nent or BMP analysis area: N: tage: :N: ntage: for rainfall excess not loadinos) !e =- !!|! �2) |I.18K8. ci ) |t'Sm.”.Z;z rz[`,# k§!} $!_! «! 2.22‹ f k a� §4-4 ! ! JJ} }2!& -. ;§ ) ;�!§!t■g ;.,:R<c 11 �kkkk {.... / |`!fgZEEam)( ■ _v vi- Tf2li «w > k �E `$!)§ \ 0 ) „maagmk T CONCENT a. a. )) 0 u. I E } k CHMENT NO,3 C ( { \ \ \\ 0 j- 2 0 )) 00 §§ ! !¥ CATCHMENT NO,4 CHARACTERISTICS: / § / {eei ■ 4 1111 00 0 RETENTION BASIN: V7.4 Lehman Commercial Rentals v a = m m .E o 0 o a .__ Catchment 1 Catchment 2 Catchment 3 Catchment 4 I.1 0.000 here is a need for additional removal efficiencies in a series of I 00 O 0 00 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 Catchment 2 00 0 o 0 00 0 0 0 0 000'0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 000'0 0 0 0 0 000'0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Efficiency Curve: • System Efficiency (N $ P) CAT 1: • System Efficiency (N $ P) CAT 2: • System Efficiency (N $ P) CAT 3: I10 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 Retention depth (inch): If using media mix as a filter before water enters the ground, specify type Nitrogen mass reduction in groundwater discharge ( %) Phosphorus mass reduction in groundwater discharge ( %) 0 M O 54.7151 10 ti • ao e� N et 0 r 0 0 OD 0 O V M O 47.585 47.585 et CO M r 13.604 CO CO O Watershed area: Required Treatment Eff (Nitrogen): Required Treatment Eff (Phosphorus): Required retention depth over the watershed to meet required efficiency: Required water quality retention volume: RETENTION BASIN FOR MULTIPLE TREATMENT SYSTEMS (if t Retention volume based on retention depth Provided retention depth (inches over the watershed area): Provided treatment efficiency (Nitrogen): Provided treatment efficiency (Phosphorus): Remaining treatment efficiency (Nitrogen): Remaining treatment efficiency (Phosphorus): Remaining retention depth needed:__ RETENTION BASIN SERVING: Input data Calculated or Carryover GO TO STORMWATER TREATMENT ANALYSIS a oo 6. 0 0z -3 Z Q a. iu a 0< = 0 LL W W rz m0 wag >': W a wz 1 a I r I t .- I W 1- } Z F' z W Source of Graphic: draft STORMWATER QUALITY APPLICANT'S HANDBOOK dated March 2010, by the Department of Environmental Protection, available at: http: / /www.dep.state.fl.us/ water /wetlands /erp /rules /stormwater, March 2010. • 3� Il o re �rN _ ► ► 1 t , 1 , / 1 ASONAL HIGH GROUND WATER TABLE (Silt Blue Numbers = Red Numbers = - -4 r m O D � o v) O m c) rn 55 rn M rn rn -o z O Z m u) D M m O c Z C w 0 —4 S m u) O Z 30NVa1000V NI `311S NOIld1IIN3A JOO J JO OOHEN 210J NO1103S SSONO 33S • L igg 40; p itq d!i 0 * � � O 2q g om mNR§ 2A L Z N v T C tl 1K AMNE 2R Fri X m CD 2J r— Erl D O N x 0 P P1 CD 0^^ N 1 CD Co 5 0 0 N m= >z 1= 0. coN N 40 SI 3 cD at C)r c o) 0. 0 0 O f'O 0 R a01e31X3 1HOII 1 -j rOCN(/)m= D)DmC)D o)NO —m mmpirm ?NoO I ,sgm - a G oc)* ZGZ-± -a OOCn -+o vzz cn MAD cn a fig• - �Z —1 ICTIZ N3a N�X.. ZZZZ. Z. Aorn —I -n .-. z per) ins °v+ xxx m , g , j � N rp X N C�-I CO tn -n I? 551-71i-"8" g) oo��°: o MO W xi a) -r1 0 O 00--- cyl T. N N Z t N IOIf3IX3 INO H BY OTHERS ON SITE, IN ACCORDANCE �..JJ C7 0 • N C N Z X c) °' CD <z C!) m C) D D r m Cn Cn-3 co rn oC) m rn o ° N D rn co 0 O O n r c_ ° O N O cr c O Z 0 oz 2 Z M o r- 0 O C 7o m . rn z 0 ° PI CD m 0 z m cn m -11 0 0 z m z v rrn 1. SEE CROSS SECTION FOR METHOD OF ROOF VENTILATION • i°? Cts) 1 m X f • r.. R r°� 77 0 '.Z o rn DAB (Ail o, -xi NOIIVAII1I eiV] I 1 1 mi VW - 1 BEDROOM 3 0 z z 0 IKITCHEN LIVING ROOM [ BEDROOM 4 BEDROOM 2 MASTER BEDROOM CHART' 00 a N O N — N A ? N cn 'OwmO 0) 0 N 0 CO 03 0 - D U• 0 0 N O CO O ' 6§ v ((7) — N 0) 00) 1A Gi 0N) 1 I W P . G OT N 0 O W W". N OP Q D g C c, o84°,2gtg8T8tt8 §5? 01 0 O N W CO CO W N W N 0 iv -0 3, 0- Z s 0) O) a W 0) a (.) 0) a W 0) a (.4 O a W O a 0 WINDOW SCHEDULE 00 a (.4 N 1 0) _ -I. 0 1 W 0) 1 0) 0 a (4 O 1 2 Cs 4. 0 O v U• 0 0 N O CO O O) (0 6§ v ((7) — N 0) 00) 4. 0) Gi 0N) (T 0)) N D - ONIZY10 1.4 OS SZ'9S l 21000 3A00V 311180 211V N2101321 9X81 1 0 D Z O -Zi '0 .Z7 0 0 0 29'-8" r -n n 0 D m Staff Report Site Plan Review Prepared for: The City of Okeechobee Applicant: Luihn Four, Inc. (Taco Bell) Petition No.: 15- 008 -TRC e `Ylanning Management Services, Inc. 1375 Jackson Street. Suite 206 Fort Myers, Florida 239 -33.7 -3366 Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Luihn Four, Inc. Petition No.: 15- 008 -TRC General Information Owner wrier; Applicant Applicant Address Site Address Contact Person Contact Phone Number Email Address Okeeland, LLC 5205 Babcock Stree Palm Bay, FL 32905 Luihn Four, Inc. 2950 Gateway `Center Blvd. Morrisville, NC 27560 501 NE Park Street Okeechobee, FL 34972 Michael Palmer, Director of Facilities (919) 439 -0878 Legal Description Of Subject Property LOTS 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 AND 9, BLOCK 150, OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TOTHE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK R, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA Parcel ID Numbers: 3- 15- 37 -35- 0010 - 01500 -0070 and 3- 15- 37 -35- 0010 - 01500 -0040 General Description The property is located at the northeast corner of NE 5th Avenue and SR 70 /NE Park Street. According to the Property Appraiser's website and the Survey prepared by Mixon Land Surveying, Inc. and accompanying the Application, the property is comprised of two parcels separated by a 15 -foot deep alley. The two parcels and the alley encompasses approximately 45,068 square feet (1.03 acres). The property is vacant with pavement in the front (southernmost) parcel. The owner is proposing to construct a 2,997 square foot Taco Bell restaurant with drive -thru service, and associated parking, drainage and utilities. The site received approval from the Board of Adjustment for a drive -in /drive -thru restaurant (Sonic) on October 16, 2014. Following is the Staff analysis of the project's consistency with the various City require- ments and regulations. Instances where the Staff believes the submission to be deficient are highlighted. Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 1 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Luihn Four, Inc. Petition No.: 15- 008 -TRC Land Use Characteristics Future Land Use Map Classification ' : Commercial Existing Zoning District Use of Property Acreage CHV Proposed CHV Vacant Taco Bell w/Drive-thru Service 1.03 acres 1.03 acres Adequacy of Public Facilities POTABLE WATER AND SANITARY SEWER: The site is provided potable water and sewer service by Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA). During the Board of Adjustment public hearing on the Special Exception for a drive -in /drive -thru restaurant, the Staff Report noted that utilities are available and the specifics would be addressed during the site plan review stage. The Applicant should obtain a letter from OUA confirming that it has adequate capacity to provide service for the proposed use. Applicant is obtaining letters. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL: On a number of occasions the County has confirmed a considerable level of excess capacity available to serve the solid waste disposal needs of other developments in the City. It appears reasonable that the volume of solid waste associated with a development of this size can also be accommodated within the capa- city of the County's Solid Waste Facility. DRAINAGE: The Applicant has submitted the drainage calculations in a Report entitled "Taco Bell Okeechobee Drainage Calculations" prepared by Maastricht Engineering. The report states that "...the water management system will be designed such that the post - development discharge during the 3 -day, 25 -year design storm is equal to or less than the calculated pre - development discharge." TRAFFIC GENERATION AND IMPACTS: ACCESS AND EGRESS: The Applicant did a "project Traffic Statement" which, based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, would generate 98 trips on the PM Peak Hour and 136 trips on the AM Peak Hour. Item #29 on the Site Plan Application requires that if a proposed use will generate 100 or more peak hour vehicle trip ends a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) must be prepared. No TIS has been submitted with the Application. I discussed the matter with Andres Boral and he is researching the situation to determine if the ITE AM Peak trip generation factor is appropriate for application to a Taco Bell or if Taco Bell study data may be more appropriate in determining the traffic impact of a Taco Bell Restaurant in the AM Peak. Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 2 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Luihn Four, Inc. Petition No.: 15- 008 -TRC Comparison of Proposal with Dimensional Standards, CHV Zoning Regulation Required Provided Minimum Parcel Size and Width [ §90- 285(1)] Area: 6,250 square feet Width: 50 feet Area — 1.03 acres Width —150 feet Minimum Front Yard Setback [ §90- 285(2)a] 20 feet, primary frontage; 15 feet for second frontage; 10 feet to vehicular use areas SR 70 frontage: 27.3 feet to building; about 38 feet to parking NE 15th Av. frontage: 36.5 feet to building; 10 feet to drive aisle Minimum Side Yard Setback [ §90- 285(2)a] Eight feet; 20 feet abutting a residential zoning district. 84.1 feet from east property line to building Minimum Rear Yard Setback [ §90- 285(2)a] Ten feet; 20 feet abutting a residential zoning district. 167.8' from north property line to building Maximum Lot Coverage [ §90- 285(3)a] 50% 6.67% Maximum Impervious Surface [ §90- 285(3)] 85% 70.5% Maximum Height [ §90- 285(4)a] 45 feet Single story: 21' 8" to parapet, 24' 4" to top of tower Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Luihn Four, Inc. Petition No.: 15- 008 -TRC Regulation Required Provided Off- street Parking [ §90- 512(2)] One space per 75 sq. ft. of restaurant space: (2,997 _ 75) = 40 spaces At least two of the required spaces must be designated for the handicapped. Parking spaces must be at least 9 feet by 20 feet; and handi- capped spaces must be 12 feet by 20 feet with a five -foot wide handicap aisle The Applicant erroneously computed the number of parking spaces required using the County's standard of one space per 100 square feet of floor area. This resulted in a requirement for just 36 spaces, four spaces short of what is required under the City's parking requirement. The Applicant is re -doing the site plan and will provide the revised plan for discussion at the TRC meeting. Off - street Loading [ §90- 511(c)] [ §90- 513(2)] One 10 foot by 30 foot loading space with a vertical clearance of 14 feet is required for commercial uses with 5,000 to 25,000 square feet of floor space. None required Not applicable. Minimum Driveway Width [ §90- 511(d)(2)]) 24 -feet for spaces @ 75° - 90 °; 20 feet for spaces at least 60 ° but less than 75°. All other driveways must be at least 16 feet wide Driveways serving 90° parking spaces are between 26 feet and 30 feet, with the one -way drives being 16 feet wide. The Drive -thru aisle is 10 feet wide, adequate for its purpose. Landscaping Required Minimum Landscaping [§ 90 -532] 1 tree and 3 shrubs per each 3,000 square feet of lot area: Lot area (excluding 15' alley) = 42,825 sf _ 3,000 = 14 trees and 43 shrubs The current plan shows 34 trees and 91 shrubs. Required Landscaping for parking and Vehicular use areas, [§ 90 -533] 18 square feet per required parking space (18 x 40) = 720 square feet. One 5 -foot by 15 foot landscaped island for every 10 parking spaces, with one tree in each island =4 islands and 4 trees One tree required for each 72 square feet of required landscaped area = 10 trees. The 6 interior landscaped islands alone provide about 1,260 square feet of landscaped area with considerably more landscaping in landscaped areas at the extremities of the parking area as well as along other portions of the vehicular use areas. 6 interior landscaped islands are shown, each with one tree. In addition to the 6 trees in the interior landscaped islands, there are 16 trees located in other landscaped areas adjacent to portions of the vehicular use areas Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 4 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Luihn Four, Inc. Petition No.: 15- 008 -TRC Regulation Required Provided 10 foot buffer along street frontages (less driveways) and two feet along interior property lines, with at least one tree and three shrubs required for each 300 square feet of landscaped buffer area: SR 70 Frontage: 10' x 122' = Five trees and 22 shrubs are provided in the SR 1,220 square feet = 4 trees and 70 buffer strip. 12 shrubs NE 5th Av. frontage: 10' x 249.5 = 10 trees and 46 shrubs are provided along the Required landscape 2,495 square feet = 8 trees and 25 shrubs NE 5th Av. buffer strip. buffer areas, [Sec. 90 -534] North and east interior property lines: 2' x 435.5 '= 871 square There are five trees just outside the north J property line and there are 17 shrubs to be feet = 3 trees and 9 shrubs planted along the south side of this property line, the combination of which, from a practical Total = 15 trees and 46 shrubs standpoint, could be considered to address this are required. Trees may be clustered but must buffer requirement. Along the east boundary, there are four trees in the islands and two not exceed 50 feet on center for existing palm trees, but essentially no shrubs. buffers abutting a street. While the overall requirement for shrubs is met, we suggest that some shrubbery should be provided between the parking spaces and the eastern property line. Building signs: One square foot of building signage is allowed per Building signs: Two Taco Bell symbol signs, about 20 sf each = 40 square feet each linear foot of frontage along Three Taco Bell letter signs, 2 about 9 sf each SR 70 = 150 sf and one about 11 sf = 29 square feet. Total building signage approximates 69 square feet. Signage Total signage (building signs plus Pylon sign: No dimensions shown. Sec. 90 -572 one ground sign or pole sign: One square foot total signage is Total signage will be confirmed by the Building allowed per each linear foot of frontage along SR 70 = 150 sf Official at time of permitting. Plus: One -half square foot of signage is allowed per each linear foot of frontage along SR NE 5th Av. =150 sf Total signage allowed: 300 sf Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Luihn Four, Inc. Petition No.: 15- 008 -TRC Other Requirements and Considerations Sidewalks: There is a sidewalk along SR 70, but no sidewalk along NE 5th Avenue Lighting Plan: A photometric lighting plan in conformance with §78- 71(A)(5) has been submitted. Dumpster Location: The dumpster is located at the northeastern corner of the parking lot. Recommendation Based on the foregoing analyses, Staff recommends tentative approval of the site plan with the following stipulations: 1. Letters from OUA are submitted confirming adequate capacity to provide the needed water and sewer demands for the subject property. 2. Either a Traffic Impact Study (TIS), or other information acceptable to the City adequately documenting why a TIS is not necessary, is submitted to the City. 3. The site plan is modified to accommodate the needed 40 parking spaces, and all other site plan requirements are met by the revised site plan including the suggested additional shrubbery along the east property line. 4. A sidewalk, meeting all city standards, is provided along the eastern side of NE 5th Avenue for the length of the subject property Submitted by: Wm. F. Brisson, AICP Planning Consultant November 11, 2015 TRC Hearing date: November 19, 2015 Attachments: Future Land Use, Subject & Environs Zoning, Subject & Environs Existing Land Use, Subject & Environs Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 6 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Luihn Four, Inc. Petition No.: 15- 008 -TRC FUTURE LAND USE SUBJECT SITE AND ENVIRONS NE 3rd St. Subject Property COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LANE) USE SINGLE - FA1ALY - k1ULTl - FAMILY - ::COMF32CIAI. I1,0L,S?RI AL PUBL 3 FACILITIES RESIDENT AL. AMXED USE %rrving Florida Lcx31 Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Luihn Four, Inc. Petition No.: 15- 008 -TRC NE ZONING SUBJECT SITE AND ENVIRONS 3rd St Subject Property ZONING -•. 9 • R16wIC M:I . t1 Fa'.17 vrtf9 ?t?AA . pt.t, 4a.r ilRty 4!11: i• IttAitit YNI. vetsLE ;Kg onetCHaTAt ttsc -6 P+ kat: ttlftirtatt. PA,lhri:.E 4.. i, serving Florida Loeal Governments Since MA Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Luihn Four, Inc. Petition No.: 15- 008 -TRC EXISTING LAND USE SUBJECT SITE AND ENVIRONS Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988