Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2015-07-16
6« 3 %u4tRetin9 Spia tuft, lk'J MINUTES OF THE TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE THURSDAY, JULY 16, 2015, 10:00 A.M. CITY OF OKEECHOBEE 55 Southeast 3rd Avenue Okeechobee, Florida 34974 Page 1 of 6 I. CALL TO ORDER — Chairperson. The July 16, 2015, Technical Review Committee meeting was called to order at 10:03 a.m. by Chairperson Cook. II. STAFF ATTENDANCE — Secretary. Voting Members: Interim City Administrator John R. Cook - Present Building Official Jeffrey Newell - Present Police Chief Denny Davis - Present Fire Chief Herb Smith — Present Public Works Director David Allen — Present Non - Voting Ex- Officio Members: City Attorney John R. Cook — Present City Planning Consultant Bill Brisson — Present City Civil Engineering Consultant — Attendance not requested. County Environmental Health Department Representative Doug McCoy — Present OUA Executive Director John Hayford — Present School District Representative - Absent Committee Secretary Patty Burnette — Present III. AGENDA — Chairperson. Chairperson Cook asked whether there were any requests for the deferral or withdrawal of items on today's agenda. New Business Item B was requested to be moved before New Business Item A. IV. MINUTES — Secretary. Chief Davis moved to dispense with the reading and approve the March 19, 2015, regular meeting minutes; seconded by Chief Smith. Motion carried unanimously. V. NEW BUSINESS — Chairperson. B. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 004 -TRC, in regards to the construction of an east wing expansion of 18 beds with additional parking, food service, laundry service, and office space for an existing nursing home facility on an unplatted 2.035 acre parcel located at 1646 Hwy 441 North (North Parrott Avenue), Okeechobee, FL. - Senior Planner. Planning Staff Report: Planner Brisson noted that the applicant previously received approval of a Special Exception for expanding the existing nursing home facility, which includes the two easternmost parcels that have been annexed into the City. The existing facility has approximately 81,127 square feet of floor area with 180 beds. The expansion includes an additional 32,000 square feet within the existing facility allowing for an additional 18 beds, expansion of food services, and nursing and doctors' office space. Two 5,000 square foot buildings are also planned (labeled as phase two and three on the plans) to relocate the existing laundry facilities and to add an additional maintenance building to be constructed as the need arises in the future. There are 71 parking spaces around the existing nursing home facility and another 74 spaces were recently approved on the lot immediately west of the existing facility. The eastern expansion will include another 33 parking spaces, bringing the total to 178 on -site spaces. The required amounts for this facility are 171 spaces (50 for the 198 beds and 121 for employee parking). Eight of the spaces will be designated for the handicapped, one more than the seven spaces TRC - July 16, 2015 - Page 2 of 6 IV. NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED. Faye Haverlock, President, on behalf of the property owner, OHCF Properties, LLC, 15- 004 -TRC continued. required. Mr. Brisson mentioned a need for a unity of title for the original nursing home parcel and the two new parcels to the east and northeast since the two parcels will be providing drainage for the expansion as well as the original nursing home site and the parking lot adjacent to US 441 (North Parrott Avenue). Finally, he stated the new offices included in the expansion could not be used for out - patient services or by doctors or others in private practice. Adequacy of public facilities appear to have been or will be met. Regarding potable water and sanitary sewer, the applicant has provided letters from the OUA documenting there is adequate capacity and facilities, the County has confirmed a considerable level of excess capacity available to serve the solid waste disposal needs, the applicant has supplied an engineer's report addressing drainage and other aspects of the proposed project, the increase in traffic as a result of the expansion will have no effect on the level of service on US 441 (North Parrott Avenue), and the applicant is planning to expand the existing entrance to a 16 foot wide entrance lane and a 12 foot wide exit lane with a safety upgrade through Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). The dimensional standards review appears to meet the requirements for the 10.95 acre site, no sidewalks are required, a photometric lighting plan has been provided, and a new trash compactor is located in the new parking lot located at the west end of the property. Mr. Steven Dobbs of SLD Engineering, LLC, was present to answer the Committee's questions. County Environmental Health Department: Mr. McCoy indicated the existing grease trap would need to be repaired as there are current problems with it. OUA: Mr. Hayford mentioned that the existing grease trap would need to be repaired as well as noting that the plans needed to show the existing water main and that a water meter and backflow preventer should be installed. He inquired as to whether the two buildings labeled as phase two and three would need domestic or fire protection, water, and sanitary sewer service and if so, he would recommend extending the lines now rather than later. The sewer connection also needs to be shown from the building to the manhole. Building Official: Mr. Newell inquired about whether there were any areas identified as wet lands and if so had all issues been addressed with the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). He requested a copy of the DEP permit. Public Works: Director Allen indicated he would need to receive a copy of the FDOT permit relating to access from US 441 (North Parrott Avenue). Police Department: No issues were received. Fire Department: Chief Smith indicated the existing water main should be at least six inches in diameter and that the size of the existing water line would need to be discussed. He had concerns over the fact that the existing water line is a dead -end line and should water be lost to the hospital and /or nursing home, there wouldn't be water for fire suppression. Another hydrant may be needed to ensure water for fire suppression. He in addition mentioned the canopy over the emergency entrance may be too low for clearance needed by new ambulances. Motion and second offered by Chief Smith and Director Allen to approve the site plan review for the construction of an east wing expansion of 18 beds with additional parking, food service, laundry service, and office space for an existing nursing home facility on an unplatted 2.035 acre parcel located at 1646 Hwy 441 North (North Parrott Avenue), with the following conditions: TRC - July 16, 2015- Page 3 of 6 IV. NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED. Faye Haverlock, President, on behalf of the property owner, OHCF Properties, LLC, 15- 004 -TRC continued. 1. Need unity of title for original nursing home parcel and the two new parcels to the east and northeast since the two new parcels will be providing drainage for the expansion as well as the original nursing home site and the parking lot adjacent to US 441 (North Parrott Avenue). 2. Copy of FDOT permit relating to access from US 441 (North Parrott Avenue). 3. Copy of DEP permit to see whether any areas have been identified as wetlands and if so verify any issues. 4. Repair of existing grease trap. 5. Plans need to show the existing water main and a water meter and backflow preventer should be installed. The sewer connection also needs to be shown from the building to the manhole. 6. The existing water main should be at least six inches in diameter and the size of the existing water line will need to be discussed. Review of existing water line and concerns with a dead -end line for the reason that should water be lost to the hospital and/or nursing home, there wouldn't be water for fire suppression. Another hydrant may be needed to ensure water for fire suppression. Confirm the canopy over the emergency entrance is high enough for clearance needed by new ambulances. Motion carried unanimously. A. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 003 -TRC, in regards to the construction of a 3,847 square foot proposed restaurant on an unplatted 1.40 acre parcel located at 100 SE 10th Avenue, Okeechobee, FL. - Senior Planner. Planning Staff Report: Planner Brisson explained the subject parcel is part of a lot split from a parent parcel encompassing about 2.7 acres that recently was the subject of a Future Land Use Map Amendment to Commercial and a Rezoning to Heavy Commercial. The applicant, Ms. Tracy Gibson, is proposing to build a drive -thru Zaxby's Restaurant with associated parking and retention. A Special Exception for drive -thru service was approved earlier in the year. The 3,847 square foot proposed restaurant is expected to have 49 employees and operate from 9:30 AM to 11:00 PM. Adequacy of public facilities appear to have been or will be met. Regarding potable water and sanitary sewer, the applicant has provided letters from the Okeechobee Utility Authority documenting there is adequate capacity and facilities, the County has confirmed a considerable level of excess capacity available to serve the solid waste disposal needs, the applicant has supplied an engineer's report addressing drainage, which covers the entire 2.7 acre parent tract, and the master stormwater pond is designed to provide for requirements for both split parcels. Vehicular access and egress for customers and service vehicles will be via a two -way driveway to State Road 70 (NE Park Street). This driveway will in addition serve the proposed Family Dollar Store to the immediate east. The two property owners will need to enter into a joint driveway access agreement acceptable to the City. The two property owners will also share a driveway along the eastem property line and a vehicular connection in the rear just north of the retention pond. A traffic analysis was provided and it was estimated that between the proposed restaurant and retail uses, 110 trips will be generated during the AM peak hour and 138 trips in the PM peak hours. The increase in traffic as a result of the two proposed uses will have no effect on the level of service on State Road 70 (NE Park Street). The dimensional standards review appears to meet the requirements for the proposed development with the exception of a proposed roof sign. The plans show the restaurant building to be topped with a weathervane containing Zaxby's 12 inch diameter custom logo. According to the definition in the City's Land Development Regulations (LDR's), the logo would be considered a sign and due to the proposed placement would be TRC - July 16, 2015 - Page 4 of 6 IV. NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED. Kaitlin Sims, on behalf of the property owner, Next Turn LLC, 15- 003 -TRC continued. considered a roof sign which is prohibited. There is an existing sidewalk along State Road 70 (NE Park Street), a photometric lighting plan has been provided, and the dumpster location is indicated on the site plan in the southwest corner. Ms. Kaitlin Sims, Design Engineer with Carter Engineering Consultants, Inc., was present to answer the Committee's questions. County Environmental Health Department: Mr. McCoy stated that this location used to be an old trailer park and during site work, not to be surprised should septic tanks be discovered. Should this be the case, to please call the Health Department. OUA: Mr. Hayford mentioned there may be a possible conflict between the sanitary sewer lateral and the storm water piping from the building to the proposed manhole. Elevations on the clean outs located on the lateral line are needed, need detail for proposed terminal manhole connecting to the existing wastewater piping, need copy of driveway construction plans to review the proposed sanitary sewer collection system, need easement for piping for wastewater and water and just as a note, there may be abandoned piping from the previous owner that still may exist on the property. Domestic water, irrigation and fire sprinkler connections shown on the submitted plans are proposed to be connected to a non - existent OUA water main. Building Official: Mr. Newell indicated that he had no issues with locating the rooster emblem on the weathervane on top of the roof. All members agreed as one could buy such a rooster and put it on top of any weathervane, therefore it would not be an unique logo. In addition Mr. Newell disclosed he had many conversations with the applicant, Ms. Gibson, regarding the project. Public Works: Director Allen indicated he would need to receive a copy of the FDOT permit. Police Department: Chief Davis inquired about the width of the entrance driveway and what the requirements were. 30 feet meets the FDOT's standards. Fire Department: Chief Smith indicated all his concerns had been addressed by Mr. Hayford. Motion and second offered by Building Official Newell and Director Allen to approve the site plan review for the construction of a 3,847 square foot proposed restaurant on an unplatted 1.40 acre parcel located at 100 SE 10th Avenue, with the following conditions: 1. A driveway use agreement between Zaxby's and Family Dollar is needed due to the joint use by both businesses. 2. An agreement between Zaxby's and Family Dollar is needed between the two businesses that ensures the drainage facilities on the Family Dollar parcel will always be available to accommodate drainage from both parcels to the extent necessary to handle the drainage. 3. Copy of FDOT permit needs to be submitted. 4. Contact OUA Executive Director Hayford regarding a possible conflict between the sanitary sewer lateral from the building to the proposed manhole, provide elevations on the clean outs on lateral, provide detail for terminal manhole connecting to the existing wastewater piping, provide driveway construction plans, easements for water and waste water piping is needed, domestic, TRC - July 16, 2015 - Page 5 of 6 IV. NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED. Kaitlin Sims, on behalf of the property owner, Next Turn LLC, 15- 003 -TRC continued. irrigation and fire sprinkler conections shown on the plans are connecting to non - existent OUA water main, revisions are needed. 5. The weathervane with the logo as presented on the proposed plans is accepted. Motion carried unanimously. C. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 005 -TRC, in regards to the construction of a 8,320 square foot proposed retail store on an unplatted 1.30 acre parcel located at 100 SE 10th Avenue, Okeechobee, FL. - Senior Planner. Planning Staff Report: Planner Brisson explained the subject parcel is part of a lot split from a parent parcel encompassing about 2.7 acres that recently was the subject of a Future Land Use Map Amendment to Commercial and a Rezoning to Heavy Commercial. The applicant is proposing to build a Family Dollar retail store with associated parking and retention. Adequacy of public facilities appear to have been or will be met. Regarding potable water and sanitary sewer, the applicant for the proposed Zaxby's fast -food restaurant to the immediate east has provided letters from the OUA documenting there is adequate capacity and facilities for the proposed restaurant and these letters are equally applicable to the proposed retail store, the County has confirmed a considerable level of excess capacity available to serve the solid waste disposal needs, the applicant has supplied an engineer's report addressing drainage, which covers the entire 2.7 acre parent tract, and the master stormwater pond is designed to provide for requirements for both split parcels. Vehicular access and egress for customers and service vehicles will be via a two -way driveway to State Road 70 (NE Park Street). This driveway will in addition serve the proposed Zaxby's fast -food restaurant to the immediate west. The two property owners will need to enter into a joint driveway access agreement acceptable to the City. A traffic analysis was provided and it was estimated that between the proposed restaurant and retail uses, 110 trips will be generated during the AM peak hour and 138 trips in the PM peak hours. The increase in traffic as a result of the two proposed uses will have no effect on the level of service on State Road 70 (NE Park Street). The dimensional standards review appears to meet the requirements for the proposed development with the exception of the required landscape for the buffer areas. One tree and four shrubs are required along the south property line and no bushes are shown on the plans. Since the property along the west property line is devoted to the driveway to be shared with the adjacent Zaxby's property, it cannot practically provide a location for required landscaping. However, this does not absolve the property from providing the trees and shrubs required for this area. We suggest that at least the three trees and 10 shrubs required along the south and west interior property lines be used along the south property line to buffer the adjacent residential property to the south. Even more extensive landscaping treatment along this property line would provide a better visual buffer for the residential properties. In regards to sidewalks, there is one existing along State Road 70 (NE Park Street), although there is none along SE 10th Avenue and one should be provided for. A photometric lighting plan needs to be provided and the dumpster location is indicated at the rear of the property on the north side of the retention pond. Mr. Jordan Haggerty, Civil Engineer with Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc., was present to answer the Committee's questions. County Environmental Health Department: No issues were received. OUA: Mr. Hayford stated an easement was needed for water and sewer piping, a detail is needed for the proposed terminal dog house sanitary manhole, a copy of the driveway construction plans to review the proposed sanitary sewer collection system is needed, clarity is needed on the plans detail for the sanitary manhole connection (sheet C800), plan sheet C700 does not show the clean -outs and sanitary manhole covers and plan TRC - July 16, 2015 - Page 6 of 6 IV. NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED. Jordan Haggerty, on behalf of the property owner, JB Realty Partners, LLC, 15- 005 -TRC continued. sheet C900 does not show a stub -out for the lateral coming in from the adjoining property. He further mentioned that the site may have some abandoned piping located on it from the previous land use. Building Official: Mr. Newell asked that consideration be given to make some enhancement to the metal building so as not to look so industrialized. Public Works: Director Allen indicated the applicant needed to extend the sidewalk and curb along SE 10th Avenue to the property line. Would need to tie in the sidewalk and ADA ramp and receive FDOT's input and stamp of approval. In addition, at the northeast comer, the drainage structure extends into the State Road 70 (NE Park Street) right of way and approval is needed from FDOT stating the drainage structure meets their standards. Police Department: No issues were received. Fire Department: No issues were received. Motion and second offered by Chief Davis and Chief Smith to approve the site plan review for construction of a 8,320 square foot proposed retail store on an unplatted 1.30 acre parcel located at 100 SE 10th Avenue with the following conditions: 1. Need to supply photometric lighting plan of the vehicular use areas. 2. Need to provide at least three trees and ten shrubs, preferably more, along the south and west interior property lines to provide more sensitive visual buffer to the adjacent residential property to the south. 3. Need to extend the sidewalk and curb along SE 10th Avenue to the property line. 4. At the northeast corner, the drainage structure extends into the State Road 70 (NE Park Street) right of way and approval is needed from FDOT stating the drainage structure meets their standards. 5. Need to tie in the sidewalk and ADA ramp and receive FDOT's input and stamp of approval. 6. Need an easement for water and sewer piping, a detail is needed for the proposed terminal dog house sanitary manhole, a copy of the driveway construction plans to review the proposed sanitary sewer collection system is needed, clarity is needed on the plans detail for the sanitary manhole connection (sheet C800), plan sheet C700 does not show the clean -outs and sanitary manhole covers and plan sheet C900 does not show a stub -out for the lateral coming in from the adjoining property. Motion carried unanimously. V. ADJOURNMENT— Chairperson. There being no further items on the agenda, Chairperson Whitehall adjourned the Technical Review Committee meeting at 10:42 a.m. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that any person desiring to appeal any decision made by the Technical Review Committee with respect to any matter considered at this proceeding, such interested person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose may need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. General Service's media are for the sole purpose of backup for official records of the Department. ATTEST: John Cook, Chairperson Patty M. Burnette, Secretary tn. L., 0+-Q )(6,ee:fln9 Sp.LL: tau 1.61 CITY OF OKEECHOBEE JULY 16, 2015 TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE HANDWRITTEN MINUTES I. CALL TO ORDER - Chairperson: July 16, 2015 Technical Review Committee Meeting, 10:00 a.m. II. STAFF ATTENDANCE - Secretary Interim Administrator Cook Building Official Newell Chief Davis Chief Smith Engineer Public Works Director Allen Present Absent Position vacant at this time Non - Voting Ex- Officio Member: Attorney Cook County Health Department McCoy OUA Executive Director Hayford Senior Planner Brisson School Representative Secretary Burnette III. AGENDA — Chairperson. A. Requests for the deferral or withdrawal of items on today's agenda. IV. MINUTES - Secretary. Steve. mow apPtiru f-kin A. Motion to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Technical Review Committee Minutes for the March 19, 2015 regular meeting. moved to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Technical Review Committee Minutes for the March 19, 2015 regular meeting; seconded by VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT Allen Davis Newell Smith Cook v APPROVED DENIED V. NEW BUSINESS - Chairperson. A. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 003 -TRC, in regards to the construction of a 3,847 square foot proposed restaurant on an unplatted 1.40 acre parcel located at 100 SE 10th Avenue, Okeechobee, FL. - Senior Planner. 1. Hear from Planning Staff. ()Lod ect -C) (( fa C PO- ►004 - ; prdhie nd 2 V. NEW BUSINESS - continued. A. Site Plan Review Application No. 15-003-TRC continued. 2. Hear from City Staff. - vrt-tt [quire ho LLP3 Lk) WOO k.0 VC a 1- 6v/id — Der PetYYILI aaCLOCIID hot)) 1.1A■ViS — l,t)ttofrkt.i, vci Ot-CCen ic - • An't 1 \ Its .e),(4 app 6t,e1- CAOS I* LOW(' R100.0 ( outA 0 \fit 3 V. NEW BUSINESS - continued. A. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 003 -TRC continued. 3. Hear from Property Owner or Designee /Agent - Tracy Gibson. eetf-e-4 4. Public comments or questions from those in attendance, or submitted to the Committee Secretary. 5. Disclosure of Ex -Parte Communications by the Committee. W'I - n l t ti 4 V. NEW BUSINESS - continued. A. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 003 -TRC continued. 6. a) Consideration of a motion to approve or deny the application with /without contingencies. Motion and a second offered by and to approve /deny the site plan review for the construction of a 3,847 square foot proposed restaurant on an unplatted 1.40 acre parcel located at 100 SE 100, Avenue with the following conditions: 1,0 14-k v41t- _.._ -- CAS ()v° �' Y • 1,00, vt-e tPs7 b) Committee discussion. c) Vote on motion. EI+Pe_a pd-ed VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT Allen Davis Newell Smith Cook APPROVED DENIED B. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 004 -TRC, in regards to the construction of an east wing expansion of 18 beds with additional parking, food service, laundry service, and office space for an existing nursing home facility on an unplatted 2.035 acre parcel located at 1646 Hwy 441 North, Okeechobee, FL. - Senior Planner. 1. Hear from Planning Staff. 5 V. NEW BUSINESS - continued. B. Site Plan Review Application No. 15-004-TRC continued. 1. Hear from Planning Staff continued. 2. Hear from City Staff . Jeff' — 6koie:Drio\gs u)tA \DIP- loe-1 btrtts_ (-.h*lAts a_dOurecwa. to/ 1 Jr wit 1 cal-10- OA) r9 is, t+,fict -to sr- born L-) 43A-c.“4) vo-vt aa 6 COr 14 Of vv,,,i,f 1)-)Ktr (P rri or tot_ 4-146i • ha 0 , t sl rain* od )‘6 -1-Db7- access \k-q `5kve ho v e oca -t- 0 or" ouwiricty t e ‘b-etott_ 1, a_1ici A/cieoorrpiLlyryi-x, V. NEW BUSINESS - continued. B. Site Plan Review Application No. 15-004-TRC continued. 2. Hear from City Staff continued. aNtS — b c fblyi e -ant, Pr() bk(is o.)/ Lbv --V11 Treiug---4--reup j1,.(0,c( /4-(9 PAtts. 1-7101 Oorte- riral4A pha_ce_ p h c IP 1 rIsOt( Watt( (Kt-tt,f e' no i3Ocutfiir / stwp r rob() n-aA) adVgfct-61e_ -frp, do r 0 1.0 So icofc0,--5 10,-. 'ic imr-t- --t-Dvn LL yiJ 0,160 (A1_4[11 ot rYla,n ho e 1.si& 4-errcLs- Phav olocttai C) 61 v_ Cu-nroP-1- rylc,,c4 eyts•h-ri hya,raA4- "13 door). ) ro clAD tA7 tp Gnet,) tA.A.t. rvA v„? 3 Mad 'glyt (ii,c, t,utv, Lvva ciaf ct,,,,.01-1:c. 0 1,00 (._ 1 (, ixi-LL 0 ‘ Nact_ .50-yak o 4-4,-ur )..- 640-c( 4 610 cf.. 0ftc co_ 4-ex n cc4-1 r -e-fk S LTS-5 ‘t)1A ) Prt3cZatcl, loaCt.ti Et Ct. S101/1 (Oat d 4201 r 61.1146.tut LUK-et-C.,r c4orvg109 V. NEW BUSINESS - continued. B. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 004 -TRC continued. 3. Hear from Property Owner or Designee /Agent — OHCF Properties, LLC, Faye Haverlock, Manager or Steve Dobbs, Engineering Consultant. 4. Public comments or questions from those in attendance, or submitted to the Committee Secretary. 5. Disclosure of Ex -Parte Communications by the Committee. 6. a) Consideration of a motion to approve or deny the application with /without contingencies. Motion and a second offered by and to approve /deny the site plan review for the construction of an east wing expansion of 18 beds with additional parking, food service, laundry service, and office space for an existing nursing home facility on an unplatted 2.035 acre parcel located at 1646 Hwy 441 North with the following conditions: b) Committee discussion. 8 V. NEW BUSINESS - continued. B. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 004 -TRC continued. 6. c) Vote on motion. ite Plan Review Application No. 15- 005 -TRC, in regards to the construction of a 8,320 square foot proposed retail store on an unplatted 1.30 acre parcel located at 100 SE 10th Avenue, Okeechobee, FL. - Senior Planner. 1. Hear from Planning Staff. Conf. feu s &n p3 S 9 VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT Allen Davis Newell Smith Whiteh Owe_ APPROVED DENIED ite Plan Review Application No. 15- 005 -TRC, in regards to the construction of a 8,320 square foot proposed retail store on an unplatted 1.30 acre parcel located at 100 SE 10th Avenue, Okeechobee, FL. - Senior Planner. 1. Hear from Planning Staff. Conf. feu s &n p3 S 9 V. NEW BUSINESS - continued. C. Site Plan Review Application No. 15-005-TRC continued. 1. Hear from Planning Staff continued. 2. Hear from City Staff. ovis,Akv el -A. D-F• -D-yrk,e_ -6(1 kalvet, vvie fl 4 -1-0 ktika. u_cure WOOL lokiti So bid.„0\ (r eval, At 101 Hyrk Ave, Ztctattie- to{t, prf I t( StC112,011( W 10 Ci-tCA 41) i2Atk I'6{ d - u ['Q( (11 1(4: n 6kick (-hrucilcre 0(1 hi ec-00-) lot,c4- rtxtuc, HI) ciz(Dof 1\31,0 DviAs-+Ir\- k'Wbv6J.,.. e { C f fl) 0, 0 '1---1 tok if-rryk 1 ifIct01.,c ' A DP rarylp j /"(qt,t,tren/vAN't 0,0 AJJ 10 (1 0 n0:34,1- 141 0.0 Ur. cv 0)\ V. NEW BUSINESS - continued. C. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 005 -TRC continued. 2. Hear from City Staff continued. o1A Le,p,he -1-tt.kAc.5 old coi ie_th M n n (k !/YY t ,/ r, 3. Hear from Property Owner or Designee /Agent — Shawn Jones, manager, JB Realty Partners, LLC. J& to i Hag () -t Vi 4. Public comments or questions from those in attendance, or submitted to the Committee Secretary. 5. Disclosure of Ex -Parte Communications by the Committee. ar ,eCr z ,(.SCt S5t ( -n w r a e-1. 11 V. NEW BUSINESS - continued. C. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 005 -TRC continued. 6. a) Consideration of a motion to approve or deny the application with /without contingencies. Motion and a second offered by and to approve /deny the site plan review for the construction of a 8,320 square foot proposed retail store on an unplatted 1.30 acre parcel located at 100 SE 10th Avenue with the following conditions: b) Committee discussion. c) Vote on motion. VI. ADJOURNMENT — Chairperson. There being no further items on the agenda, Chairperson adjourned the Technical Review Committee Meeting at a.m. 12 VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT Allen Davis Newell Smith -W itettatt (v o lL APPROVED DENIED VI. ADJOURNMENT — Chairperson. There being no further items on the agenda, Chairperson adjourned the Technical Review Committee Meeting at a.m. 12 Transcript of my notes of TRC discussion prior to Approval of 15- 003 -TRC [ Zaxby's] @ July 16, 2015 meeting Highlighted items are those I think were included in the motion to approve. Bill: I mentioned they would need a driveway use agreement between Zaxby's and Family Dollar because of the joint use of the driveway by both businesses and an agreement between the two that ensures that the drainage facilities on the Family Dollar parcel will always be available to accommodate drainage from both parcels to the extent necessary to handle the drainage. David: Need copy of FDOT permit. Denny: Prefers an entrance drive greater than 30 feet, but recognizes that the proposed width meets DOT standards. John: Again couldn't get anything from my notes about what John Hayford said. He said something about a doghouse manhole and to make sure there is no conflict between the sewer lateral and the need for easements before closing ? ? ?. He was also concerned that there was no water main at the north end of the property. Everybody: Agreed that there should be no problem with locating the Rooster emblem on the weathervane on top of the roof because one could buy such a rooster and put it on top of any weathervane, therefore it is not a unique custom logo. Patty, Aside from the need for a unity of title; what John Hayford said; and David's statement that he would need to see the FDOT permit, I don't think there were really any stipulations associated with this one. Transcript of my notes of TRC discussion prior to Approval of 15- 004 -TRC [Nursing Home expansion] @ July 16, 2015 meeting Highlighted items are those 1 think were included in the motion to approve. Bill: Need unity of title for original Nursing Home parcel and the two new parcels to the east and northeast since the two new parcels will be providing drainage for the expansion as well as the original Nursing Home site and the parking lot adjacent to US 441. I also mentioned that new offices included in the expansion may not be used for out - patient services or by doctors or others in private practice. David: Need copy of FDOT permit relating to access from US 441 Doug: Need to repair existing grease trap and Doug also mentioned something I didn't get. John: Something about extending water and sewer to new building and also something about a man- hole. Couldn't get much from my notes on what John Hayford said. Herb: Existing water main should be at least 6" diameter, will need to discuss the size of the existing water line Concerned over the fact that the water line is a dead -end line and if lose water to the hospital and /or nursing home there won't be water for fire suppression. May need another hydrant, depends on what is done to ensure water for fire suppression. Mentioned that the canopy over the emergency entrance may be too low; it needs to be high enough for clearance needed by new ambulances. Patty, sorry, this is the one 1 have the least legible notes on. Transcript of my notes of TRC discussion prior to Approval of 15- 005 -TRC [Family Dollar] @ July 16, 2015 meeting Highlighted items are those I think were included in the motion to approve. Bill: Need to supply photometric lighting plan of the vehicular use areas. Bill Need to provide at least three trees and shrubs, preferably more, along the south and west interior property lines to provide a more sensitive visual buffer to the adjacent residential property to the south. David Need to extend the sidewalk and curb along SE 10th Avenue to the property line. David At the northeast corner, the drainage structure extends into the FDOT SR 70 Right -of- Way; need something from FDOT that the drainage structure meets FDOT standards. David Need to tie in the sidewalk and ADA ramp, etc; wants FDOT input and stamp of approval. John: Again, I couldn't get the detail of John's comments about the doghouse manhole, and need for easements prior to closing, etc. x71/�u,-.7 C A/14s'w4'A /aos'r/a 470.7/i.4-71 ,, ,nom f/ , r,, 4; t7 4,76-;,77 / / ,,( / / /7ed 441/ AC- A /rh'//J.r/ !Y?sf"1 /J/'JG C�A/i.e. --4 ,4 ek-/,,r7c, i-vx,r,‘A/P4A:.'"- "rivrey -7 q ( ," .dam /,diA./.s y fop it d94/G %j4-01 /04 -if Er_ —f n«i ilfreiri,ri I icr i 'D „,, a ,6.4"AL /37,,,,,3 5 !i'4 4 eV/ctd...f fff✓rlCr- IJ'iGt J /,,7« 4-t< dc- /r/v y t, lJor! k' G 4 /.r+ AA 4,#I4 eG —art f Q- yivwsj 4044ee 0, ✓ viii. ,4o// - e.t. 4r- ,/ /1 G001 4 e e 1 eAr 7- Al.” f' i /� � sys )/4--- , ep Ith f w4-Ae"-- ,i,/%/1 #7 e7 ;e4 / /74‘ /71:1; 47./0740 G/1 e7/7 /477 e- G/7-67) „se,' 4.7A f, /7 :e " /f7 4f/7(144:i-4 " ;r«/ dot flow/ e'Xrf/ /�7 / r /7dA (I/04e /714- l;e1r,,t,// 464-1p• a4-111Z) / A/ /1 to f(V of /r if Awel6/',Tl G pr, 74 a on I9/C 4' /G.If -11A/el 4ar•-,Pifee 41 ear /TVr1/ /.s t/ . 0.l /0 /" rare 11,-77 647)( . s •o,u' ,fie/ A0n'1 c- ,D Get L ,�f� //a J ,,74 1 !✓ \1;\L/ - -ii / -leu-61-1/1-4 I cl e4XLA-4-,0 Ce4A.1 ,11-eb,t1 /g 1)7 R-LArce-e - T- - - 6:D.11 4sriA)pA t_IV,124)-1/12v1. 41-41-e- KA-Al"A-'t -1) 01- 4 cAA,,t„, .4=pz LI Li A-602 zA/?z-_ • az/LA.4A_ rb 0•{Ay)t-vtivu-e Cot T ;du, tr4-6-, 4-t-ru,A,u1(4e1.4 ,aAAAAitirLs.L. OLAAltir be-r )s 1) - pcu,Li-) AL€4-41-c-4-0 t. d.4.-A44 r11461 1/14-e- ,4--410244L41 AtZeer/-- />t,e, LATIZ,t, iiht.c.r.L.A., 4- ptitit ,Otcrv: a`744-eel 4A€LAid/4-6- - rYLi)co-r-> 4ziti4t4,4_ /4e4VA-7%.4, (,rv.otAAA- (1_6 p-eAAAT eft/LA- Otzipt5c-rt - let /1_,Te).61„<,<,.../ 11^4L--€ oiv-erkti, 5A-Lei exr 6 41(Arr /6‘ - 4/14•LAi Zge,frt—( t ,OAAA-1/1/42,4_c 7 Tr /Tr_ Zelxix-4A,Le #14/•-e., - GUI Z.o.pozx-- Wnizetc, ac;eL p-Z444A, 66- A 4-6-,)- e-etpetie-Lrie e-e(_e( L/r—K4, /7-L.r.4...6 ec.,/t pl/v)-tj-t pitzLIA.A1 true.4_,e oue 613- is 03 Te (34,- _dam -t`'` y - (ta- A 1> ) 1 a-a r� l . // t- tc, G `C.a� - ti.� c (/ cz k2 -c_ AA-0 G' (/X - AAAALLI - M e :G:2-)-tA-c. f,-) -4)c — kkh- L-c-L, %"Ae Cl/AA/LAO ,tit- .i " . /, Z-nom ors- 01.2 vim! 't.ta.z0 flee, ,-t- t '_� a rev! -L - ? -(c. 1Q- ei- J ti 4)d 4c-c_. /5 -075- - e c d- /der r krALI-ct /k€4,,,--- 2 6:46 e L C eir- tAn.cA.. e44 ie0a/ dam, _"p OT 7J--rictAA, rao T 0..„;,,e4:1,..; A 0 Al .,cv-L-y a �" ,14L - ;? G �,c� "_ 7- , .ct «e4s -cam rrpp T c o- ii-4f c L&f- e- -4 - - 4 -‘-ef f r /4- G.p• fin ?- mss- .7 #.1-Z At-t-e-t 66-)4„, 0/4 1) terwethl9 Sp fi( /,id, ea CITY OF OKEECHOBEE TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE OFFICIAL AGENDA JULY 16, 2015 CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS 55 SOUTHEAST 3RD AVENUE OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA 34974 I. CALL TO ORDER JULY 16, 2015, 10:00 a.m. - Chairperson. II. STAFF ATTENDANCE - Secretary. Voting Members: Non - Voting Ex- Officio Member: David Allen, Public Works Director John Cook, Interim Administrator Denny Davis, Police Chief Jeffery Newell, Building Official Herb Smith, Fire Chief Bill Brisson, Senior Planner, LaRue Planning and Management John Cook, City Attorney John Hayford, Okeechobee Utility Authority Doug McCoy, Okeechobee County Health Department School Representative Patty Burnette, Secretary III. AGENDA - Chairperson. A. Requests for the deferral or withdrawal of items on today's agenda. IV. MINUTES — Secretary. A. Motion to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Technical Review Committee Minutes for the March 19, 2015, regular meeting. V. NEW BUSINESS — Chairperson. A. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 003 -TRC, in regards to the construction of a 3,847 square foot proposed restaurant on an unplatted 1.40 acre parcel located at 100 SE 10th Avenue, Okeechobee, FL. - Senior Planner. 1. Hear from Planning Staff. 2. Hear from City Staff. 3. Hear from Property Owner or Designee /Agent - Tracy Gibson. 4. Public comments or questions from those in attendance, or submitted to the Committee Secretary. 5. Disclosure of Ex -Parte Communications' by the Committee. 6. a) Consideration of a motion to approve or deny the application with /without contingencies. b) Committee discussion. c) Vote on motion. B. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 004 -TRC, in regards to the construction of an east wing expansion of 18 beds with additional parking, food service, laundry service, and office space for an existing nursing home facility on an unplatted 2.035 acre parcel located at 1646 Hwy 441 North, Okeechobee, FL. - Senior Planner. 1. Hear from Planning Staff. 2. Hear from City Staff. 1 3. Hear from Property Owner or Designee /Agent — OHCF Properties, LLC, Faye Haverlock, Manager or Steve Dobbs, Engineering Consultant. 4. Public comments or questions from those in attendance, or submitted to the Committee Secretary. 5. Disclosure of Ex -Parte Communications' by the Committee. 6. a) Consideration of a motion to approve or deny application with /without contingencies. b) Committee discussion. c) Vote on motion. C. Site Plan Review Application No. 15- 005 -TRC, in regards to the construction of a 8,320 square foot proposed retail store on an unplatted 1.30 acre parcel located at 100 SE 10th Avenue, Okeechobee, FL. - Senior Planner. 1. Hear from Planning Staff. 2. Hear from City Staff. 3. Hear from Property Owner or Designee /Agent — Shawn Jones, Manager, JB Realty Partners, LLC. 4. Public comments or questions from those in attendance, or submitted to the Committee Secretary. 5. Disclosure of Ex -Parte Communications' by the Committee. 6. a) Consideration of a motion to approve or deny application with /without contingencies. b) Committee discussion. c) Vote on motion. VI. ADJOURNMENT — Chairperson. 'Per Resolution No, 1997 -05 Officials must disclose any communication received including the identity of the person, group, or entity; written communication may be read if not received by all Board Members; disclose any site visits made; disclose any expert opinions received; disclose any investigations made; disclosures must be made prior to the vote taken. Persons who have opinions contrary to those expressed in the ex -parte communication are given a reasonable opportunity to refute or respond. Please be advised that should you intend to show any document, picture, video or items to the Board in support or opposition to any item on the Agenda; a copy of the document, picture, video or item MUST be provided to the Board Secretary for the City's records. ANY PERSON DECIDING TO APPEAL any decision made by the Technical Review Committee with respect to any matter considered at this meeting will need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceeding is made and that the record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based. General Services media are for the sole purpose of backup for official records of the Department. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), any person with a disability as defined by the ADA, that needs special accommodation to participate in this proceeding, contact the General Services Department, no later than two business days prior to the proceeding, 863- 763 -3372. 2 INDEPENDENT NEWSMEDIA INC. USA Okeechobee News 107 SW 17th Street, Suite D Okeechobee, Florida 34974 863- 763 -3134 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Katrina Elsken, who on oath says she is the Publisher of the Okeechobee News, a three times a week Newspaper published at Okeechobee, in Okeechobee County, Florida, that the_ttached copy of advertisement being a in the matter of in the 19th Judicial District of the Circuit Court of Okeechobee County, Florida, was published in said newspaper in the issues of 7// Affiant further says that the said Okeechobee News is a newspaper published at Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been published continuously in said Okeechobee County, Florida each week and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement, and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. - Sworn to a d su scribed bef me this day of (Jl/t Notary Public, State of Florida at Large , kp' ;,, ANGIE BRIDGES :: MY COMMISSION # EE 177653 EXPIRES: April 20, 2016 Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwriters IL Katrina Elsken a0 > AD PUBLIC NOTICE TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Okeechobee Technical Re- view Committee (TRC) will conduct a regular meeting on Thu Jul 16, 2015, at 10 AM, or as soon thereafter as possible, at City Hall, 55 SE 3rd Ave, Rm 200, Okeechobee, FL. The public is Invited and encouraged to at- tend. The agenda may be obtained from cityofokeechobee.com or by calling the General Services Office, 863 -763 -3372 x218, ANY PERSON DECIDING TO APPEAL any decision made by the TRC with respect to any matter considered at this meeting will need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceeding is made and the record includes the testi- mony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), any person with a disability as defined by the ADA, that needs special accommodation to participate in this proceeding, contact the General Services Department no later than two business days prior to proceeding, 863 - 763 -3372. BE ADVISED that should you intend to show any document, picture, video or items to the TRC In support or opposition to any item on the agenda; a copy of the document, picture, video, or item MUST be provided to the Committee Secretary for the City's records. By: Interim City Administrator John Cook Staff Report Site Plan Review Prepared for: The City of Okeechobee Applicant: Tracy Gibson/Zaxby's Petition No.: 15- 003 -TRC :l s` t; Planning & Management Services, Inc. 1375 Jackson Street, Suite 206 Fort Myers, Florida 239 -334 -3366 Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Tracy Gibson /Zaxby's Petition No.: 15- 003 -TRC GENERAL INFORMATION Owner Carrol Word Applicant Applicant! Address Site Address contact N on Contact Phone Number Email Address$' ers eechobee Tracy Gibson 43 Ridgemont Lane, Decatur, GA 30033 100 SE 10th Av., Okeechobee, FL 34974 cyyGibson (buyer of thew to (404) 668 -8067 urnl l c @gmail.com LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY Location: 100 SE 10TH Avenue Parcel Identification Number: 2- 22- 37- 35 -0A00- 00011 -0000 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: MPARCEL A A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN AND COMPRISING A PART OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2, SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 35 FAST, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 22, THE .SAME ALSO BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID U.S GOVERNMENT LOT 2; THENCE SOUTH 00' 20'11" EAST ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID US. GOVERNMENT LOT 2, A DISTANCE OF 2297 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT —OF —WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD 70 (MW. PARK STREET) AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89'54'49" EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT—OF- -WAY UN/ A DISTANCE OF 193.65 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTH RIGHT —OF —WAY, SOUTH 0070'11" EASTT, AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID U.S. GOVERNMENT LOT 2, A DISTANCE OF 314.97 FEET TO A PAINT ON THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS 800IC 209, PAGE 451 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLOR/O4; THENCE SOUTH 89'56'18" WEST, ALONG 3410 SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 193.65 FEET TO THE WEST BOUNDARY OF THE AFORESAID U.S GOVERNMENT LOT 2; THENCE NORTH 00'20'11' WEST, ALONG SAID WEST BOUNDARY OF U.S. GOVERNMENT LOT 2, A DISTANCE OF 314.89 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LANDS CONTAIN 1.40 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SAID LANDS BEING SUBJECT TO THE ORDER OF TAKING IN FAVOR OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 391, PAGE 1874, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Tracy Gibson /Zaxby's Petition No.: 15- 003 -TRC GENERAL DESCRIPTION The 1.4 acre property is vacant, and was part of a Future Land Use amendment to Commercial, a rezoning to CHV of the parent tract encompassing about 2.7 acres. The parent tract is the subject of a lot split into two separate parcels, Parcels A and B, of which the subject property is labeled Parcel A. A Special Exception was approved earlier this year for drive - through service for a proposed fast -food restaurant on the subject parcel. The Applicant is now submitting a site plan for a 3,847 square foot Zaxby's fast -food restaurant. The restaurant is expected to have a total of 49 employees. Hours of operation will be from 9:30 AM to 11:00 PM. All sales, service and storage aspects of the use will be conducted within the principal building. Following is the Staff analysis of the project's consistency with the various City require- ments and regulations. Instances where the Staff believes the submission to be deficient are highlighted. Future Land Use Zoning District Use of Property Land Area Existing Commercial CHV Vacant 2.7 acres Proposed Commercial CHV Zaxby's fast -foot restaurant with drive- through service. 1.4 acres ADJACENT FLUM CLASSIFICATIONS, ZONING, AND EXISTING LAND USE East: South: West: onin xistin Future Land Use Map Classification Zoning District Existing Land Use Future Land Use Map Classification 2:04,667 .010-16: Existing Land Use Future Land Use Map Classification Zoning District: Existing Land Use car_ Commercial CHV Vacant, proposed Family Dollar retail store Single - Family Residential Mobile home park Commercial CHV Shopping center Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Tracy Gibson /Zaxby's Petition No.: 15- 003 -TRC ADEQUACY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES POTABLE WATER AND SANITARY SEWER: The Applicant has provided letters from the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA) documenting that the Authority has adequate capacity and facilities to provide for the volume of potable water and waste water treatment and disposal expected to be generated by the proposed fast -food restaurant. These letters follow the graphics at the end of this Staff Report. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL: On a number of occasions the County has confirmed a considerable level of excess capacity available to serve the solid waste disposal needs of other developments in the City. It appears reasonable that the volume of solid waste associated with a development of this size can also be accommodated within the capa- city of the County's Solid Waste Facility. DRAINAGE: The Applicant has submitted the drainage calculations in a Report entitled "Okeechobee Family Dollar" prepared by Kimley Horn and dated June 2015. The report covers the entire 2.7 acre parent tract which will be split into the two parcels, A and B. It is our understanding that the master stormwater pond depicted and discussed in the Report is designed to provide for stormwater requirements for both Parcels A & B. TRAFFIC GENERATION AND IMPACTS: ACCESS AND EGRESS: Vehicular access and egress for customers and service vehicles will be via a two -way driveway to SR 70. This driveway will also serve the proposed Family Dollar store to the immediate east. These two parcels are the subject of a lot split creating two individual lots, each conforming to the City's minimum area and width requirements. The property owners will also need to enter into a joint driveway access agreement acceptable to the City. The subject property will also share a driveway along its eastern property line and a vehicular connection between the two properties in the rear the property just north of the retention pond. Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Tracy Gibson /Zaxby's Petition No.: 15- 003 -TRC TRAFFIC STUDY: The LDC requires that a project generating over 100 peak hour trips provide a traffic analysis. Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E., Inc. has prepared a Traffic Analysis. Based on the ITE Trip Generation 9th Edition, Ms. O'Rourke estimated that together the 3,847 square foot fast food restaurant with drive through service and the 8,320 Family Dollar store will generate 110 trips in the AM peak hour and 138 trips in the PM peak hour. Therefore, a full traffic analysis was required. Impact on roadways and intersections In the detailed analysis, Ms. O'Rourke determined that the combination of the restaurant and retail uses would generate peak hour traffic below the generally accepted threshold of 3% of the roadway capacity. The analysis also determined that even with the addition of the peak hour traffic generated by both the restaurant and retail use, SR 70 will continue to operate at Level of Service C during both the AM and PM peak hours. The traffic analysis also considered the impact of the proposed restaurant and retail uses on the intersection of SR 70 and SE 10th Avenue and concluded that the intersection would operate at an overall Level of Service A for both the AM and PM peak hours. Comparison of Proposal with Dimensional Standards, CHV Zoning: Regulation Required Provided Minimum Parcel Size and Width [ §90- 285(1)] Area: 6,250 square feet Width: 50 feet Area —1.4 acres, Width - 200 feet Minimum Front Yard Setback [ §90- 285(2)a] 20 feet; 10 feet to parking and driveway 86.6 feet to building; 13.6 feet to parking Minimum Side Yard Setback [ §90- 285(2)a] Eight feet; 20 feet abutting a residential zoning district. West setback: 63 feet to building; 8 feet to parking. East seatback: 88 feet to building; 38.1 feet to parking. Minimum Rear Yard Setback [ §90- 285(2)a] Ten feet; 20 feet abutting a residential zoning district. 127.9 feet to building; 65 feet to parking Maximum Lot Coverage [ §90- 285(3)a] 50% 3,847 sf = 60,984 sf = 6.3% Maximum Impervious Surface [ §90- 285(3)] 85% 0.9 ac. _ 1.4 ac. = 64% Maximum Height [ §90- 285(4)a] 45 feet 24 feet Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Tracy Gibson /Zaxby's Petition No.: 15- 003 -TRC Regulation Required Provided Off- street Parking [ §90- 512(2)] One space per 75 sq. ft. Gross square footage = 3,847 sf of which 105 sf are devoted to utility space, with the resulting 3,742 net square footage being used in the calculation of required parking (3,742 _ 75) = 50 At least two of the required spaces must be designated for the handicapped. Parking spaces must be at least 9 feet by 20 feet; and handi- capped spaces must be 12 feet by 20 feet with a five -foot wide handicap aisle. 50 spaces are provided of which two are designated for the handicapped. All standard parking spaces shown on the site plan are nine feet wide and 20 feet deep, including the two -foot overhang over the curb and gutter along the perimeter of the parking areas Both handicapped spaces measure 12' by 20'; provide the required 5' walkway and are conveniently located adjacent to the sidewalk in the front of the building. Off - street Loading [ §90- 513(2)] One required for 5,000 to 25,000 square feet of commercial floor space. None required None provided p Minimum Driveway Width [ §90- 511(d)(2)]) for spaces @ 75° - 90° 20 -feet for spaces @60° but <75° 16 feet any other angled parking Where parking spaces are perpendicular (i.e. 90° to the driveway), the drive aisles are all in excess of the minimum 24 feet in width. Where 60 angle parking is provided, the driveway is 60° the required 20 feet in width. Drive -Thru Facility No specific regulations The drive -thru aisle is 10 -feet wide and allows for stacking up to ten vehicles without blocking any doorway to the restaurant. Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 5 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Tracy Gibson /Zaxby's Petition No.: 15- 003 -TRC Regulation Required Provided Landscaping Required Minimum Landscaping [§ 90 -532] One tree and three shrubs per each 3,000 square feet of lot area: 60,984 = 3,000 = 20 trees and 61 shrubs The landscape plan indicates a total of 24 trees and 209 shrubs. Required Landscaping for parking and Vehicular use areas, [§ 90 -533] 18 square feet/required parking space: 50 x 18 = 900 sq. ft. One 5 -foot by 15 foot landscaped island for every 10 parking spaces, with one tree in each island. 50 spaces require five landscaped islands. One tree required for each 72 square feet of required landscaped area = 13 trees Landscape plan indicates 5,443 square feet of land - scaped area adjacent to or within the vehicular use areas. Eight landscaped islands all of which appear to exceed the minimum requirements and dimensions are shown on the landscaped plan. 13 trees are shown on the landscaped plan. Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Tracy Gibson /Zaxby's Petition No.: 15- 003 -TRC Regulation Required Provided 10 foot buffer along street frontages (less driveways) and two feet along interior property lines, with one tree and three shrubs required for each 300 square feet of landscaped buffer area: SR 70 frontage: 10' x 170' = Six trees and 17 shrubs are shown along the frontage 1,700 square feet = 6 trees and of SR 70. 17 shrubs West property line: 2' x 315' = Seven trees and 11 shrubs are shown along the west 630 square feet = 2 trees and 6 shrubs property line. Required East property line: 2' x 315' = Since the property along the east property line is landscape 630 square feet = 2 trees and 6 devoted to the driveway to be shared with the buffer areas, [Sec. 90 -534] shrubs adjacent Family Dollar property, it cannot practically provide a location for required landscaping. However, there are five trees in the easternmost landscape island which qualify to address the tree requirement. South property line: 2' x 200' = 17 shrubs shown between the south parking area and 400 square feet = 1 tree and 4 the retention pond as well as the two trees and addi- shrubs. tional shrubs at the east and west ends of the parking area. These could be considered to meet the land- scaping requirement for the south property line. Total buffer area= 11 trees and The minimum total number of trees and shrubs are 33 shrubs are required. provided. Trees may be clustered but must not exceed 50 feet on center for buffers abutting a street. One square foot of building The area of the Zaxby's signs on the front and side signage per linear foot of property along the front of the lot. elevations measure about 28.75 and 17 square feet, respectively. This is well within the maximum 200 linear feet of frontage on SR allowable building signage limitation. Signage 70 allows for 200 square foot of [Sec. 90- 572(a) signage. Roof signs are prohibited. The weathervane is topped by Zaxby's 12" diameter (about 0.8 sf) custom logo. Strict interpretation of the definitions in the LDC would indicate that the logo is a "sign ", and that in its proposed location it would qualify as a "roof sign Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Tracy Gibson /Zaxby's Petition No.: 15- 003 -TRC Other Requirements and Considerations: Sidewalks: There is an existing sidewalk along SR 70.S. Lighting Plan: A photometric lighting plan has been provided in conformance with §78- 71(A)(5). Dumpster Location: The dumpster location is indicated on the site plan in the southwest corner of the property immediately north of the retention pond. Recommendation: Based on the foregoing analyses, Staff recommends approval of the site plan provided:: 1. The logo atop the weathervane is removed, or 2. The TRC determines that the logo is permissible in the proposed location. Submitted by: Wm. F. Brisson, AICP Planning Consultant July 8, 2015 TRC Hearing date: July 16, 2015 Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Applicant: Tracy Gibson/Zaxby's Site Plan Review Petition No.: 15-003-TRC Subject Property FUTURE LAND USE MAP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE I SINGLE - FAMILY IIII MULTI - FAMILY Nal COMMERCIAL ITZ,Tid INDUSTRIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES r RESIDENTiAL MIXED US Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Tracy Gibson /Zaxby's Petition No.: 15- 003 -TRC ZONING MAP Subject Prope `ZONING Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 10 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Tracy Gibson /Zaxby's Petition No.: 15- 003 -TRC AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING EXISTING LAND USES Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 11 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Tracy Gibson/Zaxby's Petition No.: 15-003-TRC OKEECHOBEE UTILITY AUTHORITY 100 SW 5th Avenue Okeechobee, Fonda 34971-122 June 24, 2015 Ms. Tracy Gibson Nexttum, ILL 1943 Ridgemont Lane Decatur, Georgia 30033 Ref Water Capacity Request Parcel ID No.: 2-22-37-35-0A00-00011-0000 Address: 100 SE .10'n Avenue Dear Ms. Gibson: (863) 763-9460 FAX ;863) 763-9036 In reference to a request of the availability of water capacity to the subject property, I submit the following information for your use $n meeting the potable water use requirements for the project. The Okeechobee Utility Authority owns and operates two water treatment plants with a combined treatment capacity of 6 MGD. During the twelve month period from February 2014 to January 2015, the maximum daily flow was 3.4 MGD, or about 57% of capacity. At the present time, the OUA has excess capacity at the treatrnent plants. The QUA has a potable water distribution main in the road right of way near the subject property. Any upgrade requirements to the water main due to the demands of the propose e project will be at the project owners expense. Should you have any questions, comments or concerns with regards to the water system capacity, please contact the OUA at 863-763-9460 Sincerely, 1....-lohn F. P.E Executive Director Okeechobee Utility Authority 6osi^rnownis 10i,ti 12 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Tracy Gibson /Zaxby's Petition No.: 15- 003 -TRC OKEECHOBEE UTILITY AUTHORITY 100 SW 5th Avenue Okeechobee, Florida 34974 -4221 June 24, 2015 Ms. Tracy Gibson Nextturn, LLC 1943 Ridgemont Lane Decatur, Georgia 30033 Ref: Wastewater Capacity Request Parcel ID No.: 2- 22- 37- 35 -0A00 -00011 -0000 Address: 100 SE 10th Avenue Dear Ms. Gibson: (863) 763 -9460 FAX: (863) 763 -9036 In reference to a request of the availability of wastewater capacity to the subject property, I submit the following information for your use in the permitting for the above referenced project. The Okeechobee Utility Authority owns and operates one regional wastewater treatment plant with a FDEP permitted capacity of 3.0 MGD. During the twelve month period from March 2014 to February 2015, the annual average daily demand was 0.858 MGD, or about 29% of the current 3.0 MGD treatment capacity. The OUA does have wastewater collection lines in the immediate vicinity of your project. Any upgrade requirements to the wastewater system due to the demands of the proposed project will be at the project owners' expense. Should you have any other questions, comments or concerns with regards to the wastewater system capacity, please contact the OUA at 863.763.9460. Sincerely, 2- ohn F. Hayfor Executive Director Okeechobee Utility Authority Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 CITY OF OKEECHOBEE Application for Site Plan Review Page 1 of 3 Rev. 10/14 �pp •Okti• • _ � .L _'3'p 4*, k. _ m s �- 'n ,....414 O 4 sd '� City of Okeechobee General Services Department 55 S.E. 3`d Avenue, Room 101 Okeechobee, Florida 34974 Phone: (863) 763-3372, t Fax: (863) 7634686 E -mail: pburnette Qcityofokeechobee.com Date Received _ Lo 1 1 Application No. 15- 00.3 - �C_ Fee Paid: `t IOy.a_Ob cr og 1420431-1 Receipt No. P a c o Hearing Date: 7_ 16_15 v. �:'•; ,"A'�� 791 4r- APPLICANT INFORMATION 1 Name of property owner(s): (O'rO 1 LOD -rcP C S of 1'3, LL(_, 2 Owner mailing ddress: V�Gi� t, � g ��� �-� a3 S-�- FL_ -5c-I 7 H 0� 7 3 , J Name of applicant(s) if other than owner: ) r-a ce_A (-) I !a s al l 4 Applicant mailing address: 1 /L 3 aGcl�i(S1-T 11,,,e1 CL(.1' U-v, c 1 3 )3 J 5 Name of contact person (state relationship): ----y7-6,- L� t� t ►,JS Ci-i� C e-� Of- 4i' c I o �- 6 Contact person daytime phone(s): C.0 zi-1 & l tg _ /-,� 7 Engineer: Name, address and phone number: � t n � n -#- ci✓f• 3(9, l Ntr. G 1 Rc_ , �S c zo L776 � 7a /2-0o 8 Surveyor: Name, address and phone number: • ir c:,,, acts .. t St a "1 r.? ; r?a --' e tx, %v D su ri > 6, Dkge ciu b 3 `7`1 a' a3 763 - ;&& ,7 PROPERTY and PROJECT INFORMATION 9 Property address /directions to property: 160 SF « -e,O d beert -- 31/ ci -7 10 Parcel Identification Number 7 - 35 -) 400- 1 1 ._- O ` l� Q @ 11 Current Future Land Use designation: 12 Current Zoning district: „�1„„ l 66Th r ', - OW 13 Describe the project including all proposed uses, type of coil struction and conceptual building layout, how the business or use is expected to operate on the site, including but not limited to: number of employees expected; hours of operation; location, extent and type of any outdoor storage or sales, etc., and fire flow layout. Use additional page if necessary. G� r 19" i S c t" -ke- txzzii --�• i kQ `��.� 1 r - 60X-01 J J?_/ % % ! v' � l� p �i ,�p D �//� . ! -Le A&41 0-296...--a...47 0, -, 4,i q 3U m — // pmt . Au'r Iddi (,� `--h(` 00-414-3( I 1 -6c., Ci>%�:S)l -,des, 14 Describe existing improvements on property (for example, the number and type of buildings, dwelling units, occupied or vacant, etc.). Use additional page if necessary. awn.4-- 15 Total land area in square feet (if less than two acres): or acres: 1, 1 16 Is proposed use different from existing or prior use (_Yes) (1/No) Rev. 10/14 N. ty 21 1 510:56p cA 6 May 21, 2015 Okeechobee City, p.1 am purchasing 1.4 acres of this lot - 100th SE 10th Ave, Okeechobee, FL 34974, to build a restaurant. This is my interest in the property. Please let me know if you have questions. Thank you, Tracy Gibson Next Turn Okeechobee, LLC Traffic Engineering, Transportation Planning TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOR 10TH AVENUE RESTAURANT AND RETAIL Prepared for: Ms. Tracy Gibson Tracy Neely, LLC 1943 Ridgemont Lane Decatur, GA 30033 Prepared by: Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E., Inc. 969 SE Federal Highway, Suite 402 Stuart, Florida 34994 (772) 781 -7918 April 6, 2015 OR15041.0 Prepared by: Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E., Inc. Certificate of Authorization: #26869 969 SE Federal Highway, Ste. 402 Stuart, Florida 34994 772 - 781 -7918 Professiona ngineer, , usan E.`O Rourke, P.E. Date signed an'd sealed: 4/6/15 License #: 42684 3 969 SE Federal Highway Suite 402 Stuart, FL 34994 772.781.7918 SEORourke @comcast.net Traffic Engineering, Transportation Planning April 6, 2015 Tracy Neely, LLC 1943 Ridgemont Lane Decatur, GA 30033 Re: 10th Avenue Restaurant and Retail Dear Ms. Gibson: Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E., Inc. has completed the traffic analysis of the proposed project to be located on SE 10th Avenue and SR 70 in Okeechobee, Florida. The steps in the analysis and the ensuing results are presented herein. It has been a pleasure working with you. If you have any questions or comments, please give me a call. Respectfully submitted, SUSAN E. O'ROURKE, P.E. INC. Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E. Registered Civil Engineer — Traffic c4.o.1Oth Ave Restaurant and Retail 969 SE Federal Highway Suite 402 Stuart, FL 34994 772.781.7918 SEORourke @comcast.net TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PROJECT DESCRIPTION ROADWAY CONDITIONS PROJECT TRAFFIC PROJECT DISTRIBUTION / ASSIGNMENT/ IMPACT FUTURE TRAFFIC INTERSECTION ANAYLSIS DRIVEWAY VOLUMES CONCLUSION TABLES 1 1 3 3 5 5 5 10 10 TABLE 1: Trip Generation 4 TABLE 2: Project Significance 7 TABLE 3: Link Analysis — 2017 8 FIGURES FIGURE 1: Project Location 2 FIGURE 2: Project Assignment 6 FIGURE 3: Turning Movements at SR 70 and 10th Avenue 9 APPENDICES APPENDIX A Site Plan APPENDIX B Transportation Data APPENDIX C Intersection Analysis /Driveway volumes INTRODUCTION Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E., Inc. was retained to prepare a traffic analysis for the proposed project being submitted to the City of Okeechobee. The project is located on the south side of SR 70 and the west side of SE 10th Avenue in Okeechobee County. The purpose of this report is to determine the impact on the surrounding roadway system associated with the proposed project. The following components were addressed: • Project description • existing roadway conditions • Project Trip Generation • Project Significance • 2017 Link Analysis • Intersection Analysis Each of these components is outlined herein. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The 10th Avenue Restaurant and Retail is a development consisting of 3,847 square feet of fast food restaurant with a drive -thru and 8,320 square feet of retail development; The project will have access through project driveways located on SR 70 and SE 10th Avenue. The project location is shown in Figure 1. Appendix A contains the site plan. 1 State Road 70 0 / Project Location SE 10th Ave North not to scale Figure 1 Project Location 10th Ave Restaurant and Retail c4.o.10th Ave Restaurant and Retail Proj Location 2 ROADWAY CONDITIONS The study area roadways were defined in terms of existing lane geometrics. Existing Lane Geometrics The study area was reviewed to determine the existing number and type of lanes along the roadway. Each roadway is described below. SR 70 is a four lane divided highway with a general east /west alignment. US Highway 441 is a four -lane divided state highway from SR 70 to NW 36th Street. From 36th Street to the County line, it is a two -lane state highway. There are several different capacities assigned to the roadway. US 441 has a north /south alignment. SE 10th Avenue is a two -lane north /south collector roadway that intersects SR 70. Existing Traffic Existing traffic was taken from the FDOT 2013 data on the FDOT website. Additional data was taken from the 2011 EAR based Amendments and used to calculate the growth rate. These data sheets are provided in Appendix B. PROJECT TRAFFIC To estimate traffic generated by the proposed 10th Avenue Restaurant and Retail, the ITE Trip Generation, 9th Edition trip rates were applied. These calculations provide an estimate of the typical generation. Trip generation for the project is shown in Table 1. As shown, the project will generate 110 AM peak hour trips and 138 PM peak hour trips. There will be 59 trips entering the project and 51 trips exiting the project in the AM and 69 trips entering the project and 69 trips leaving the project in the PM peak hour. 3 Trip Generation Daily Net Trips CC F 00 0 ON N in O' N v 00 7 o o N 4 4-- v or N ON C r" — vs. R r- 00 st 4/1 N ON Pass -by Trips Pass -by Trips I 34% %0S e 0 N ON V. Nen ON OH O on Gross Trips w F H - O ^ h f.'s' N 0 b CA C CO oo f�•l N ins b VI 0 O b Directional Split a. 0 7 0 e h e 2 0 O' st i on - 0 c. O N 0 O N 0 N O i a 0 0 O' frA C 0 Z CC 7 II' Ln(T)= .65Ln(x) +5.83 T= 496.12(x) T= 45.42(x) 0 Units vNi dS 0, 07 w b in C V C M Square Feet O N l+ 00 l il 3,847 3,847 Land Use Code Land Use Code 820 934 V OO' a auac A Yalta, Description 011.1.1. at, Ault Description C4 43 Fast Food w/ Drive Thru Fast Food w/ Drive Thru Total 4 E N 00 co Net AM Tri o M or b — o. 4/1 h Pass -by Trips 34% e 0 N y Trli N .-• OH O O N OO\ Gross Trips H Cn b N 0 Fa cn C N .... f�•l N = h O y D. 02 Ts C 0 ca Q 7 0 77; 0 0o c� 0 O' st i on b CNI o 'O 0 N 0 C 0 Z CC 7 II' Ln(T)= .61Ln(x) +2.24 T= 45.42(x) 0 vNi . w w Square Feet e 8,320 3,847 — Land Use Code CO et O 000 V OO' 011.1.1. at, Ault Description M Fast Food w/ Drive Thru Total 4 C4.o. Trip Generation 10th Ave Restaurant and Retail Te co Net PM TriI o M M b t. M M 'O 0 y Trli 34 O N Cn b O a Fa - .... N .... f�•l N = h 0 as 77; -.0 . . i on b CNI . 0 0 ectionat S 0 vNi . at e — CO et h M 0 Y v b Q' 'O�� el C w ti C 0 Squn Fee N en.. 3,84 W d O a U a 82C 934 71UIC 1%:- 1 IVA Description a Fast Food w/ Drive Thru H C4.o. Trip Generation 10th Ave Restaurant and Retail PROJECT DISTRIBUTION/ ASSIGNMENT/ IMPACT The project traffic was distributed by general geographic direction and then assigned to the roadway network. Distribution /Assignment — This general distribution led to an assignment of trips based on the anticipated ultimate destinations and the roadway paths used to reach those destinations. Figure 2 shows the project assignment. As shown 60% travel west and 30% travel east on SR 70 with 10% traveling south on SE 10th Avenue. Project Impact —Table 2 summarizes the project impact as a percent of service volume capacity. As shown, there are no links with a 3% or greater impact. FUTURE TRAFFIC Although no links require analysis SR 70 is shown for informational purposes. The project is expected to build out in 2017. To estimate future 2017 volumes on the links on SR -70 the existing (2013) traffic volumes were increased to existing 2017 volumes by a growth rate of 1% per year. Although calculations show negative growth, a 1% growth rate was used in this case. The 2013 Average Annual Daily traffic volumes were factored by the published "K" factor to estimate the 2013 peak hour two way volumes. The growth rate was then applied to estimate the 2017 peak hour two way volumes. The project traffic was then added to the grown volumes to estimate the 2017 Total Traffic volumes. The total traffic volumes were then compared to the acceptable threshold. Tables 3a and 3b show the volumes and level of service for SR 70 with and without the project traffic added during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. SR 70 will operate at level of service C. INTERSECTION ANALYSIS The intersection of SR 70 and SE 10th Avenue was analyzed for the AM and PM peak hours for 2017. Counts were made in 2013 and grown 1% per year to 2017. The traffic entering and exiting 10th Avenue was taken from 2013 FDOT traffic counts. This traffic was estimated turning coming and going east or west based on the two nearest traffic counts on SR 70 to this area. It shows an approximate 60/40 West /East distribution. Project traffic was added to create total traffic. The intersection was analyzed as a signalized intersection. Using HCS signalized analysis, the intersection would operate at overall at Level of Service A for both the AM and PM peak hour. Figures 3 shows the intersection volumes. The intersection data and analysis is included in Appendix C. 5 25% 15% 60% 30% 20% State Road 70 a Project Location 10% SR '70 1 North not to scale Figure 2 Project Percent Assignment 10th Ave Restaurant and Retail c4.o.10th Ave Restaurant and Retail Percent Assignment 6 Table 2a: Project Significance- AM Segment From • To Lanes LOS C Peak Hour Two Way° Two Way Peak Project Volume Project Percent Assignment Percent Project of Capacity Ls Project Traffic More then 3% of Capacity? SR 70 US 98 US 441 4 3060 17 15% 0.5% no US 441 Project Driveway SR 710 4 4 3060 3060 66 33 60% 30% 2.2% LI% no no Project Driveway US 441 NW 9th St SR 70 4 3060 28 25% 0.9% no SR 70 SR 70 SW 21st St 4 3060 22 20% 0.7% no 10th Ave SR 70 SE 7th St 2 580 11 10% 1.9% no SE 7th St 2 580 14 10% 2.4% no (Capacity: FOOT 2012 LOS Table 2b: Project SI nificance- PM In: 59 Out: 51 AM Total 110 Segment From To Lanes LOS C Peak Hour Two Way( Two Way peak Project Volume Project Percent Assignment Percent Project of Capacity Is Project Traffic More then 3% of Capacity? SR 70 US 98 US 441 4 3060 21 15% 0.7% no US 441 Project Driveway 4 3060 83 60% 2.7% no Project Driveway SR 710 4 3060 41 30% 1.4% no US 441 NW 9th St SR 70 4 3060 35 25% I.l°% no SR70 SW2lstSt 4 3060 28 20% 0.936 no 10th Ave SR 70 SE 7th St 2 580 14 10% 2.4% no in Capacity: FOOT 2012 LOS c4.o.10th Ave Restaurant and Retail Table 2 7 In: 69 Out 69 PM Total 138 C. 3 d Z. y C n .Jdv ti G O Ti 0 O. J a a 0 0 A Y 0 .,0.13 > > m IA =3 O Y ° ' a 13 3060 1 3060 I. b £ ° 3 ; w N 7 = F > O Y 2 4 O N> a F 3 a E 0 t 3 t - y 1-• > p O m « m 7 a P. °- o r 0 o N a. u Z d = - o a I- 6 Y 6 6 h ID op 83 O d p a \ 6t1 Q in O °• J 0 1 CI as Y £ ea 7 a o n > O 7 N O Z m Y £ 7 6 O i N �. O 7 N 0 Z CI Of ~ 10 01 N m 7 C. 3 w 4 - e 0 7 6 N y Y a ..0. d V ° d N = rn e''+' m `4 e 'm Q a N 7 0 3 m N m Q 0 6 a N 3 Q s 14 Q 6 N ■ at m c _m d4 at c m o _m n` ID SID o m c 2 -) o d • C 2 c -+ a Roadway Classification Roadway Classification 1PrincipalArterial Principal Arterial r H 1Project Drivewayl Project Driveway P LL £ e W Highway 441 3 R m _ an 1 I c I II, as £ c m g V( n K h SR 70 (1) N 0 N a co ti o 8 tf1 CO w a � .41 c4.o.10th Ave Restaurant and Retail 2017 Unk Analysis ti G O Ti 0 O. J a a 0 > > m IA =3 O Y ° ' a 13 3060 I. O N E 0 t 3 t - y 1-• > p O m « m 7 a P. °- 0 o N Y 6 6 h 83 \ 6t1 Q in O °• J 1 CI m Y £ 7 6 O i N �. O 7 N 0 Z 10 01 N Y a ..0. d V ° d N = m `4 m N m Q 0 6 a N 3 Q 6 N ■ at c m o _m n` SID o d • C 2 -+ a Roadway Classification Principal Arterial H Project Driveway £ e W 3 R m _ an I I I I 1 c m g SR 70 (1) 8 tf1 CO w a � .41 c4.o.10th Ave Restaurant and Retail 2017 Unk Analysis FIGURE 3:TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUME COUNTS o� V f0 O,J CITY: Okeechobee a a 8 s z 4J C0 0-4 01 m OD 0 4. • to �Y ~ F 0 5 0 O O 0 C W 0 N z z Z z c 2 a r. n O O Q N O ry o o 0 0 0 N N fit 0 01 01 01 N 0 N 0 n n n h CO N vs CFI CA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 QQ 0 0 0 0 0 04. 0 0o QQ N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 i.' • g n m m m ap m /1118i $ .Ni d 0 0 .N. m N ▪ r: A st CD Ib CO m 4 7 O 6 0 0 O 0 E0 01 0—► 0_, 01 O L m CO m 0 01 1- 4-1 j 1-► tin 4- t..1 4-0 r �.+ 0 {fl n 01 O o a N T s : `3 el in T. N LL =o ale N O • 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 O C W 0 C 5, CO z Z o H n O w N O rvry n 0 0 0 0 0 1.11 0 elf N O 00 O 0 0 0 0 01 N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 a e 2 O O QN O N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 i 0000'4 C C • d q v q ▪ N ul • N YI N • .• '1. ' p' 0 t3 d an 6 o m s e Q Q Q Q 0 N N Y1 6 7 0 0 6 0 Z c4.e.TMC 101h and SR 70 DRIVEWAY VOLUMES The project volumes were shown at the project driveways to determine the need for turn lanes. Given that the volumes are below industry standard of 30 vehicles in an hour for left turn lanes and a minimum of 70 for right turn lanes, turn lanes are not recommended. The volumes are shown in Appendix C. CONCURRENCY REVIEW/ CONCLUSION 10th Avenue Restaurant and Retail has a traffic impact of 110 Net AM Peak hour trips and 138 Net PM Peak hour trips. These trips will not cause levels of service to fall below acceptable levels in the future. Based on the data and calculations presented herein, the project does not require additional analysis. 10 APPENDIX B TRANSPORTATION DATA Okeechobee 2010 EAR volumes Growth Rate Calculations 2013 FDOT Traffic Counts REPORT TYPE: ALL E-1 HW HP4 C4H Caw cn Z g >1 kI H O4 A H 2 C g C4 CA w4 I.4 4 oz H a4 0 1-4 1h W ri 0 N OKEECHOBEE COUNTY: 91 aI HH I O I P4 • H AU e W • H t U • W w PI 4 PI a 4 PI PI 4 4 PI r•C 4 PI 1: 4 4 Cs. tO O V• 1.0 0 01 Cn N CO Oo r 0 01 r-1 r cn 0 Co 01 V1 V' r 01 0 tO CO CO 1-1 0 l0 0 o 0 0 H c-1 -4 N r1 C) N ,N N N U w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w II ri 4-1 4-1 . i 4-1 .-1 4-1 .-I ri .-1 :-1 .-1 r1 r1 .-1 ri x Z OD CO CO o CO CO CO CO m CO CO CO OD CO CO O a•. In In In U) In In In 1n in In In In In In to 1n 0 0 x0 Za O u) O 0 In 0 O in in O in in o in 0 o 0 ▪ A 01 01 O) al O) O1 O1 O1 0) 01 01 O1 O1 O1 O) O) II 4 P+ X3 1 N W N H Z t0 0) 0 1 91 CAADT.TXT > • I W 0 W W 0 W W 0 0 Cu U 0 W 0 0 0 W II • 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o a 3 H I 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 V' In at 0 to O CO r 01 In 0 In In 0 1*) r W •• 4 3 1 0 V• r ri N N N 01 111 0 CO ri t0 CO 0 r >1 H 4 H 1 N N N r1 N N ri A� a64 N I1 W W W W W W W Hr II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ]C W Z II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In 0 0 0 0 H0 O 11 0) N 0 In C) In ri CO 0 In In r In 0 N at H 01 N V' 0 r-1 H tO ri M 0 ri M V' In CO II W U ri r1 r-1 ri H 0 H M r1 E-I W O m 3 S 3 Z 0 S cn 0 3 Z 3 0) Z 3 3 NWE aaU) ri I W W W W W W W 44 t o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W W 11 Z 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O In 0 0 0 0 >1 >1 CO O 1 In M 01 In M In N 0) 01 0 In r 0 0 r1 m H 1 0 N 01 0 ri 0 10 r1 N 0 ri M V' In 07 H 0 1 H 4-1 4-4 H ri Z U Z PI 41 C4 II 0w>>4 HII En 0 Il z W W W m z W z DESCRIPTION U W w x O SR 15 /US 441, NORTH OF NW 13TH KISSIMMEE RIVER /E OF HIGHLANDS COUNT AVENUE /EAST OF OKEECHOBEE WEST OF SR 710 /EAST OF OKEECHOBEE SE OF CR 158 /SE 126TH BLVD O r NORTH OF SR OKEECHOBEE OF SR 700 /U z w 0) w z cn Al w x a HCOH 3 a A 0 w A zcnt1 W W H HWPi E4 w 0 0) 0 0w 0 ED4a WW0 W >1 Z 0 aHW 0) H 0) ri a o 4 U x HaH O H O) G4 W[s1 A Cl M CA >4 GI 11 H 0 •. waH •• W A W H Fl H• El4a 11 z0 HA4H W w 11 w 0)0• ..41 r-• 1 0 0) 0 H 0) 0 a H w H •• • sr a 0) H 0 0 0 0ZE cr . 0 \ \ PI 41 0 64 6 0 4 11 HRH 0 2 41 4: CU a un 0)004 N OF CR 15C /NE 304TH SOUTH S z OD t0 U W 0 SOUTHEAST 14 S 0 3 EAST OF SE 0 3 0 \ \ • O O O In In 0 In 15/U 7 w 0 o O N 1n ri r N ri r S 1 1 ▪ a a a a a a a a a w a a a O CO CO m U) V) cn CO w o Z CO 0) to w 0)0) 43 C4 0 >IHI -71a HU[=I[>1 W W H= W II N r) t0 r oo c1 N T' to 0) P) •cr M sr 1n t0 H A H H 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 ri 4-1 ri r1 N N 0 0 0 0 H: H II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rl ri H H 0 W II O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C PAGE -01- 21 -FEB -2014 12:51:37 eg O4 >4 EA 0 Oa a a zo 0a HW H[L gC E0 C4 ow aw co sC (-1 H >+ a oa zW W C7 M E-1w P4 4 as 1: CI HZZ 0� 0 OKEECHOBEE COUNTY: 91 E x H 0 w W 0 M I I w ru A a A w A w r=4 w w w w w w w •i H E 11 O 0 N O N l0 N WO t0 11) 1f) 1n In O WI CO CO ClI = U 11 u) u) u) r- 0 u) u) 0 u) N N N N u) N a' 0 1-1 w II N N r+ 4-1 e-1 N N N N N t-1 t-1 U - H A U =w PI w w w w w w fxr w w w w w w w w 11 H r-1 ri ri .1 H r-1 ri .-1 .-1 .-1 ri t-+ H H r 1 x . . . . . . . . . . . . . • z CO 0 03 CO m m ao O m CO 0D CO 03 CO CO CO 3 in 1f) in in in in u) in in in in in u) N try u) 0 0 x0 2 1 u) O O O O 0 O O O O 0 u) 1) O 1n .7 • 1 N •• W N H 2 to CO 0 co CO CO CO CO CO 1n CO CO CO co U) V) CO co co W II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 in 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u) 0 in 0 0 0 0 4 u) at in O Cl CO N in N CO at N a1 r• •1 0o W •. ri N .-4 ri ri ri ri H co ri >1 N a a11I) r. 01!0' DIRECTION 2 ri O1 H I 0 N I HI A I DESCRIPTION AA a� w w w w w w w w w w w w w w -w w Hw 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -o o aC W o HA o .1 II w HH .-4 on. $ H 4 0V)H N W ap C4 M W W W W W W W W 1.1 W W W W W W 0O 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 N�in 0 t1 O HILOLO ROAD, NORTH OF NE 224TH HAMMOCK ROAD, EAST OF NW 30TH TERRACE 0 16TH AVENUE, NORTH OF 2 H w 24TH STREET, NORTH OF SW 32ND 32ND STREET, EAST OF SW 24TH AVENUE 24TH AVENUE 16TH STREET, EAST OF SW 7TH AVENUE, NORTH OF 28TH STREET 6TH STREET, EAST OF U.S. 98 9TH STREET, EAST OF U.S. NORTH PARK ST 0 13TH AVENUE, NORTH OF S.R. NORTH OF SE 10TH STREET 8TH AVENUE, FT E OF SE 8TH AVE o 0 128TH AVE, 200 FT N OF SR -70 eg x b ri z w 0 W H w 0 N H 240TH ST, • 3 E z Z 0 EA zza 0 O 14 0 W >4 CO a H V] H 3 a W w rn C7 H I HWw 0 0 z t- 04a `o aHw 0 EaE Z 0ww 0 0 Cu El axwu o EEll A .. A o WaH EA CV M gC 05 CD 1W N -7W44 EE 44 CI COaa II W H A 4 H E H WZ0 W m ..Ea 4 M r-+ 01 04 0 E4 w 4eg-w M 2 Ha H W 3 \ OZHa Z WZZPi0 I1 ENH 400 FT NE OF SR -700 / Ig H al V' co 0 Cl N t-1 ri 1n 1N r- 1 3 3 3 3 z 3 w w w 4 14 o4 CO CO CO CO CO z z 2, CO CO 0 0 0 BERMAN RD PAGE -03- HW 11 WO14:FC H>4II >1Haa ca EA II H0W411 w0= W II ri N a' 11) co r- c•) •• u) r o co to r- W H A H H 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 4-1 4-1 4-1 r-4 a i .-4 N N N N H A' \ H II o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0[4.410 A II a1 nr at a■ a• •cr sr at 'r at a' a' •1 a' _ 21 -FEB -2014 OKEECHOBEE COUNTY Evaluation and Appraisal Report 2011 Table 1.10 Estimated 2010 Roadway LOS - State Roads Source: Kimley=Hom and Associates, Inc. 2009. OKEECHOBEE COUNTY EAR — ADOPTED APRIL 2011 A3 19 « :-:: 1. 1i 1I I; SWUM Tema 2t. Principal Medal C 790 527 C c 87th Terrace 48th Ave 2L� r"" �'-7=11111 C 1460 776 C 48th Ave SW 24th Ave 21 Principal Arterial C 1,460 653 B - 24th Ave ' 98 21.. .:4- Medal C 1370 C Hwy98 9th Ave 4l. Principal Medal C 3,110 1,759 8 9111 Ave US , . 441 41. Principal Arterial C 3110 1 :' 8 Hwy 441 SR71Q 41. PrircipalMledal— C 3,110 2,547 B 710 NE 80th Ave 21 Prindpal Arterial C 1460 1071 C NE 801h Ave NE 128th Ave '' ` -. 2l Principal Arterial C 790 601 C NE128thAve East «. Line 2t. C 790 657 C ,t., : Road 78 . .. "r -rr- r , i: SW181hAve 2L :,'� �:. �.:,.•li 0 1,350 594 C 16th Aare US Hwy441 2L Moor Medal 0 Z040 707 B US • ,,u.,:s 98 •• • County Line NW 176Th Ain 21 Principal Arterial C 790 260 6 176th Ave NW 160th SVCR -68 2 . NIKON Arterial C 790 259 B 160thStlCR -68 NW38thSt 21 Parietal Arterial C 790 455 C 361hSt State Rd70 21 Principal Arterial C 1460 1,071 C -t = Road 710 ...,.. Rd70 SE4001 Ave/Everglades Blvd 2l. Pdndpal Arterial • C 1,370 1,044 C SE 400h - .:.., . BNd .` ?;� 2. . ,- Arterial C 1,450 684 B SE 860i B v d K R 15A SE 1281h A v e (Berman R d ) a P ei Arterial C t460 740 B 128th ve (Berman Rd) SE 126111 BIvdICR 15B 21. Philp Medal C 1,460 765 B c. 126th BlvdtCR 15B County Line 3. Principal Arterial C 1A60 829 C Highway 441 North • 4 , County Line \t4 .1, . c ,.— . 21 Prin palArtedal C 790 405 8 0, t -:1 ;; «- 240th St • 21 Principal Arterial C 790 299 8 24001St NE224thSIICR•66 2C Principal Medal C 790 354 B 224111 SVCR•68 160th SV R-68 2L. Primal Medal C ' • 790 416 C 160th StICR•68 1 9811h 3t 2L Pdncipat Medal C 790 508 C 98th St NW 38th St 2t. Principal Arterial C 1,460 815 C 36th St NW 23rd Ln 41 Primal Arterial E 3,280 1,065 B 23rd Ln NW 9th St 41 Principal Arterial E 3,280 1,633 8 9th St State Rd70 41 Principal Medal C 3,110 1,849 B S : ;,::;•ti 441 South - Y / Rd 70 SW 21st St 41 Principal Arterial E 3,280 2,238 • 21st St SW281h StrWoprRd 41. Pdncipat Medal 5 3,280 1,722 2801 SUWbHf Rd SW 32nd St 41 Principal Arterial E 3,280 1,815 32nd St : -r ,- Rd78 41. Principal Medal 5 IIIIEM 1,017 B - Highway 4 {4 S� -- — 84178 SE 18th Terrace 3. Principal Medal 0 2,040 761 18th Terrace SE 341h Ave 2! Principal Arterial 0 2,040. 987 C 3411) Ave SE 861h SlvdlCR 15A 21. Principal Medal E 2,590 845 C 86thBlvdICR 15A ,~ 126lhBivdfCR 156 3. ' . Medal C 790 391 B ." , , i • w dale 2L PrinciPalNOBda4 C 79ii 355 8 Source: Kimley=Hom and Associates, Inc. 2009. OKEECHOBEE COUNTY EAR — ADOPTED APRIL 2011 A3 19 Growth Rate Calculation Growth Rate m N N CT) O O ai 00 r-1 O 10 c-1 J d O co .-1 ci 3 t E O L NW 9th Avenue US Highway 441 d.+ c d a1 N 0 O W n M c-1 m N � 0.1" • w • .Lt .c o u b C1 o w.a ▪ o L 0 0. O en O E d � ao+• N O Z c4 o growth rate calculation 10th ave TABLE 2 Generalized Annual Average Daily Volumes for Florida's Transitioning Areas and Areas Over 5,000 Not In Urbanized Areasi ERRUF.,TEDFLOW 1lClt lT STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS Class I (40 mph or higher posted speed limit) Lanes Median B C D E 2 Undivided * 14,400 16,200 ** 4 Divided * 34,000 35,500 6 Divided * 52,100 53,500 Class II (35 mph or slower posted speed limit) Lanes Median B C D E 2 Undivided * 6,500 13,300 14,200 4 Divided * 9,900 28,800 31,600 6 Divided * 16,000 44,900 47,600 ** ** Lanes 2 2 Multi Multi Non -State Signalized Roadway Adjustments (Alter corresponding state volumes by the indicated percent) Non -State Signalized Roadways - 10% Median & Turn Lane Adjustments Exclusive Left Lanes Yes No Yes No No No - - Yes Median Divided Undivided Undivided Undivided Exclusive Adjustment Right Lanes Factors No +5% No -20% -5% -25% + 5% One -Way Facility Adjustment Multiply the corresponding two - directional volumes in this table by 0.6 BICYCLE MODE2 (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two -way maximum service volumes.) Paved Shoulder/Bicycle Lane Coverage 0-49% 50 -84% 85 -100% B C D E * 2,600 6,100 19,500 1,900 5,500 18,400 >19,500 7,500 19,500 >19,500 ** PEDESTRIAN MODE2 (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two -way maximum service volumes.) Sidewalk Coverage 0-49% 50 -84% 85 -100% B C * * * 1,600 3,800 10,500 D E 2,800 9,400 8,600 15,600 17,100 >19,500 BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route)3 (Buses in peak hour in peak direction) Sidewalk Coverage 0 -84% 85 -100% B >4 C D >4 >3 >_3 > -2 E >_2 >1 INTERRUPTED :FL -ILM Lanes B 4 44,100 6 65,100 8 85,100 10 106,200 12/18/12 FREEWAYS C D E 57,600 68,900 71,700 85,600 102,200 111,000 113,700 135,200 150,000 141,700 168,800 189,000 Freeway Adjustments Auxiliary Lanes Ramp Present in Both Directions Metering + 20,000 + 5% UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Lanes Median B C D E 2 Undivided 9,200 17,300 24,400 33,300 4 Divided 35,300 49,600 62,900 69,600 6 Divided 52,800 74,500 94,300 104,500 Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustment factors 2 Divided Yes Multi Undivided Multi Undivided of Yes No +5% -5% -25% 4,00+ srFlorHSa Depa�u9ntof;?tensporianon` fs�eY�Plsnnmg�Offce��t� a� s;,;'i't�'•�,: � > _'�� �-? a�vnvdo 1 ui firar` n u, ti emsls sfdcraal[s i 2012 FDOT QUALITY /LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK TABLES TABLE 5 Generalized Peak Hour Two -Way Volumes for Florida's Transitioning and Areas Over 5,000 Not In Urbanized Areas1 12/18/12 INTERRUPTEE .OW;1:ACILIT(£S STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS Class I (40 mph or higher posted speed limit) Lanes Median B C D E 2 Undivided * 1,300 1,460 ** 4 Divided * 3,060 3,200 ** 6 Divided * 4,690 4,820 ** Class 11 (35 mph or slower posted speed limit) Lanes Median B C D E 2 Undivided * 580 1,200 1,280 4 Divided * 890 2,590 2,850 6 Divided * 1,440 4,040 4,280 Non -State Signalized Roadway Adjustments (Alter corresponding state volumes by the indicated percent.) Non -State Signalized Roadways - 10% Median & Turn Lane Adjustments Exclusive Exclusive Adjustment Lanes Median Left Lanes Right Lanes Factors 2 Divided Yes No +5% 2 Undivided No No -20% Multi Undivided Yes No -5% Multi Undivided No No -25% - - - Yes + 5% One -Way Facility Adjustment Multiply the corresponding two-directional volumes in this table by 0.6 tININTERRUPT fl -OW FAQ:I_Ttl:S FREEWAYS Lanes B D E 4 3,970 5,11 90 6,200 6,460 6 5,860 7,710 9,190 9,990 8 7,660 10,230 12,170 13,500 10 9,550 12,750 15,190 17,010 Freeway Adjustments Auxiliary Lanes Ramp Present in Both Directions Metering + 1,800 +5% UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Lanes Median B C D E 2 Undivided 820 1,550 2,190 2,990 4 Divided 3,170 4,460 5,660 6,260 6 Divided 4,750 6,700 8,480 9,400 Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustment factors 2 Divided Yes +5% Multi Undivided Yes -5% Muki Undivided No ' -25% I z BICYCLE MODE (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two -way maximum service volumes.) Paved Shoulder/Bicycle Lane Coverage B C D E C 0-49% * 140 550 1,760 o 50-84% 170 500 1650 >1,760 1 � 85 -100% 670 1,760 >1760 ** ! 2 PEDESTRIAN MODE (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below number of directional roadway anes to determine two-way ma mum service Y Y volumes.) Sidewalk Coverage B C D E 0 * * 0 -49 /0 250 850 50 -84% * 150 780 1,410 85 -100% 340 950 1 540 >1,760 a BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route) 3 (Buses in peak hour in peak direction) Sidewalk Coverage B C D E 0-84% > $ > 4 > 3 > 2 ° 85 -100% >4 > 3 >2 >1 } brio,):,70 `+ atiM `rf t'�i tA0' K`� Fai �P ' e � t i a; , -., a : r�'values.shoivire e',:ot ffipeal hour' A i' gxot iTor*1c Y,pE�sety ' t 'il'knutuR!°bi; /rruc Cipvdcss,14,440163# � r },. h i c}iecs nt } leons pa 5tondard NO ,...4 d be ustd iii*, ,; ad anntp he d"rk: he zr cr of r , se ��eenn�, c ffr, Y cQmY eF - giitel Age.tt m xs table rs derxt tk u :1546ed3'oi �n *if ecd x f , M T i, orr , i t. 45 r .N 4t f `-°+v +rx .' ; (plaixnurg r+��tlmcngo-rl he�able'�ap-I t�eriv#�?$s° m�d �1�'�it�`I>���'�Seor. i, � , �_Zr' r � u rr or or liµx tseCi�rbgaesigp �vha tnt �eru'i`eiit�ekl tis fl�7 at`t_e cma ar ��o` r based oriplannuig aRphca16" -rr oEtl-eltii�i� YTVP. • yaM° tm}3'the�'raifS ' �t `j�N" �-ra7`� Ts�s'" t�� �, » r�4„ - :I "V a-4 1, $ ..R"4.r tt b s 4 d .' ,c.c.. `, "� oe s < t , 4 .� 't 'C � e � t f l fie. {t i-3 Y" i � \l � c'� � R.� Sh � 4} 4i:tis stY!` }. a. �h�Sd�$r'i }1 i � �tr�'+r -?.rn tY"' T ;etltofSL� c,,, -, 1e3'c(e� Q� Lax no at ts �1SE� 30.11n11110C ,.., nzat enetrW, rmunb'cj'o a t'i`7y`��(',{yy�$`{Jr utsw"q-gthe3ac 4 Y9 ��'t�' i"TCW 1 i 21.f�+Y'c- �+[��' "'F "' 3�, .k7ffl? � � ti4. a 3 y ��' +ap`�'`r `fi urr of z vsx` . `.r 5 } t v , s ! � ��Tp A�ij -�. n'7,t.t tr.7. 4! �r�� '�y -'�f`' -,^}+ i It �e Bide , jr shownnn:bc, orlhepl.c. 1,Q.�-rYtxc3al tivectarizl . , } f (. }�,�c- �'''',w- s x 1v ra �� 4i7 t:1,: c.e" k �` q t �$.4 2`i } .., c r3a . it {; f {s tr n , r� w �y �,� .. r� � � fit =1c. �..x� r °� !4 a �' a t . X�' c�1'rs.,4 �� s r 'r Cam L °? t I a �K t �' { a f 3" s i z�+'" ... .. b`` "efab r;F 4 x �x ? tt g;`h '' 1 s fi4 �` �. ` S{ �� �-i b .aw � �.Fk..f..}"�.'nf P�s -fr��z r � fc� E ♦1 No 1-ca lcYor[at'!'e�reloes 7� Yeaeri�tadv F 5ta,,,,,,��tr-�o Qpny ?t� X . 9. P _ c2y, 2 Y 2l "'Mt4 i +r li l'' » i2r cwt i y 1 ' 1-an�lh :l'�ofki�ttv's io.' -aormt 5cct» 'cupitiacs lave$ ;r'tY.. : t ` lev9 SP�d' .�. � 'Y'�nol ��'ixab--rFac F6rltmob -escfet�rot�iS;�c�cl�fGl L`1e «�faC S�rC gag 1SIlD� '1 r° i" ire I- ati ouffitricki+alw,�„ -; f -tearic e tte. bitxbold o-r n {It , to 'r m x �e- rNI�., 1 F @, �fY C�2yL F- Z�E;Ty "`.' rybt'�? "�. `5 yT- %Y'w't�'�Y � �1 Fs � x � r a le ht rM1 S�, 3'++ �" a ' }� F' ,i t s.Y ,.�,i x" ;,t ;, ` �,,1. r, =. t `4,r, iW t lf. v. 1 42 ,,,, wa r 4 t n { yy rGty {t �P +ulf t 1 'kl .a* ' hi t t4+ fnP yZw7c 5'`p. T7,` � k , Nr i+c e" 5 r 3 k � 1,14 x'' "�.� � 1.r'a4i lrtEr t" 0%-..,,, x„1 .7.2; � .. i'a�y, u�+ yxF^ 11,.: � �- " , j.- , € K � 7 ,'mac pY tx'�� t>rr s i� „' r` {w'"i i',/'� cr t ,4"y'X,}'�er. r ' ((� rs'T fir, n �y� t `� `r '�K}D1 6 F ;.i tF \; 'r t{ r 1 A 2 `t r 3s� ",st F1i x rn, wi i m,t'� k� t& 5-+, Ss , t r r k� �' t 4, Cr^i r f r; loraa'4S t of Fly t .�{..��{rh` „„N sk `�' POrr1,f�� S � c.,V'�i ��u'ys t t^+a`rS ins rtemr�t�nnn �tiFr:e.+ �t..� ti��w�� r� �� ��,� t�uh � wW$.dotsitc ii7slp7annu -eTsastems/sm'Tjosfdcf )CCshIM f ,ip �--vi�+ , {. ;.r1< _...,:.iwo. ,,. to.i. :;411, ,,,xr �'' U >r.r�...`. 2012 FDOT QUALITY /LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK TABLES F— 963 0 (963) (963) 0 6 I �5 r(18) (11) (35) 35 0 18 0 Project Location In /Out: 59/51 State Road 70 u1 SE 10th Ave 1 North not to scale 0= Existing Traffic 0= Project Traffic (0)= Total Traffic Figure 3 Driveway Volumes- AM 90th Avenue Restaurant and Retail c4.0.10th Ave Restaurant and Retail AM Driveway 9 In /Out: 69/69 963 0 (963) (963) 0 963 I 0 - (21)(11) (41) 41 0� 21 21 0 (21) 01 111 T Project Location co > 0 U.1 State Road 70 North not to scale 0= Existing Traffic Figure 4 0= Project Traffic Driveway Volumes- PM (0)= Total Traffic 10th Avenue Restaurant and Retail c4.0.10th Ave Restaurant and Retail PM Driveway 10 HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary T�, Signal General Information Agency Analyst Jurisdiction Intersection File Name Project Description Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E., Inc. AAA Analysis Date 14/6/2015 Okeechobee lime Period SR 70 and 10th Avenue Analysis Year 2015 10th and SR 70 AM.xus SR 70 and 10th Avenue -AM 1�7 Intersection Information Duration, h 0.25 Area Type Other PHF Analysis Period J dIJ..E•.i b.� _4. >4i3ai.;r IAN t2� Approach Movement liffoim ation Reference Phase Reference Point .. End Simult. Gap E/W On Yellow Force•Mode Fixed Timer: Results Assigned Phase Case Number , Phase Duration, s 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 WBL`. ; _ : WBT 6 6.0 _. 103.8 6.0, 0.0 103.8 Change Period_(Y +Rc); s Max Allow Headway (MAH), s Queue, Clearance Time s Green Extension Time (ge), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability NBT• 8 10.0 SBL SBT> 6.0 3.2 .9.9 Movement Group. Results Approach Movement Assigned: Movement Adjusted Flow Rate (v), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate (s) veh/h/ln Queue Service Time (gs), s Cycle Queue Clearance Tme Green Ratio (g/C) Capacity:(c),.veh/h Volume -to- Capacity Ratio 90 Available Capacity (co); veh/tr Back of Queue (Q), veh/ln (50th percentile) Queue'Storage; a o` ' P ( +percen I e Uniform Delay (dr), s/veh - Incremental Delay (d2) s/veh Initial Queue Delay (d3), s/veh Control Delay. (d)s/veh Level of Service (LOS) Approach - Decays /veh I LOS Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 1549 0.385 1549. 0.386 0.281 2948 0.370 2948 :0:00 0:00 21.7 2.5 000' 154:: 0.788 1267 0.422! EINE IIIIIIIIIIIII `.x 000: 000 2.9 53.8 52.1 0.0 24.3 C Multimodal Results Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS Bicycle LOS Score / LOS %,j,0, 7f /PryT� 1:.5. A 1.5 0:8 ( A © 2015 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 20101" Streets Version 6.65 Generated: 4/6/2015 3:51:15 PM HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results summary r3cyJY t} . i��i4linj�v)n'sr) t�x,'s�itF T5• iT Hnr'IA General Information Agency Analyst Jurisdiction Intersection File Name Project Description ;Demand'lnformation Approach Movement ,Demand (v), vehlh: - Signal Information 120.0 Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E., Inc. AAA Okeechobee SR 70 and 10th Avenue Analysis Date ittlITtala Analysis Year 10th and SR 70 PM.xus SR 70 and 10th Avenue- PM 4/6/2015 Intersection Information Duration, h 0.25 Area Type PHF Analysis Period J k4 Other 0.90 1> 7:00 1,'r1-rrr v?i. :s,.;;6",:t';.,;e oq^2 �,tiMM.',L;}3ri',::-.1, fiier'.` ,t�, • 7? sa; 119 0' 7 is k�T i t•-•• iL4E ask. sc..��rti.ti1.t L ��w s 3 c�� Uncoordinated Reference Phase R f ' <P t:: Simult. Gap EIW Fixed Green 97.1 Yellow 4.0 Red 2.0 10.9 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 • k 5. ,Timer-Resulte - Assigned Phase `Case Number Phase Duration, s 103.1 Change Period, :(Y +Rc) "s.:.; Max Allow Headway (MAH), s Queue Clearance .Tiime;(gs) s Green Extension Time (ge), s Phase Max Out Probability Movement Group Results Approach Movement Assigned ;Movement Adjusted Flow Rate (v), veh/h Adjusted Saturation- Flow Rate (s); veh/h/In Service Time (gs), s Queue Cycle Queue. Clearance Time • (gc), s Green Ratio (g/C) Capacity(c), veh/h Volume - to-Capacity Ratio (X) Available Capacity (ce), veh/h 597 1900: 43.9 43.9 0.388 1537 10.5 10.5 0.81 132 1810 8.6 NB VR 8 '18 58 1610. 4.1 1497; 0.389 1497 274: 0.296 274'-' Back of Queue (Q), veMn (50th percentile) Queue:Storege :Retie. (RQ) :(50th. percentile; Uniform Delay (di), s/veh IncrementalDelay (d2); S/veh 0.00 3.2 0.8, 2.7 0.00> 3.1 Initial Queue Delay (d3), s/veh Control Delay.(c ), s/veh: Level of Service (LOS) Approach' Delay, s/veh /`LOS Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS Bicycle LOS Score /LOS .5 Copyright © 2015 University of Florida, AR Rights Reserved. HCS 20107' Streets Version 6.65 Generated: 4/6/2015 3:53:59 PM S.MCTIVEIPNAILY DOLLAR OKEECHOBEE%FAMILY DOLLAR OKEECHOBEE- BTsMg.EI1g215 1423 PM. Kan Thompson Asia %B El leugge 0 o g4 •n•fli9t i@8eneee 111 ka eaolmaia log MOIR grip 1 91 � Ei I 0 0 g o3IUS -441 S SE },II Ave �f) N Parrott Ave PIE 1■I, A,v KE 513 Av VEmIt NC 11h M: 53 YS� �yx�l Rgi Pel pi" 4 ; ! % 1550 t a i,4! Ili ii . ;31 X. y a1' . � a l III ^• 1 !I ' : «P b..S q zr 41 .a 'A 451%!1-2 VE g p Ill 1,gs 1! , I �. lag sal PTAs CA. LUNCH, INC. PARCEL 2-22- i- 25-CACC -0071 f -.L70O lho LeLI \ I I I I 23 C A s et - -Nlwvs'sswamorrr 1 ,; _;: -No arN- 3FS_rp- -�= EC N S.E, AI /z. Avz. INA/VCdCI1 STREET) PA1tV£M *MN ...es - 4o• • R riot -P11v /02114 WC RAM ARMOR RAVHE 530. sewnFMrw3.N"w 3131 ♦O41,LIbrr4 80362 338 33 196/18FO50 • P.c INN 6804434 • sWVFYINOANO WVlNGDUSINFSS•sO 31ST •PRGfESWNAL 6NGJNEEJRNOSSRVIC:S•G1NI63 UMW; .` ,1TE3 POSTAL -- 7: -O.TO- 00009 -OM!: JB REALTY PARTNERS FAMILY DOLLAR S.R.70&SE1OTHAVE. CITY OF OKEECHOBEE OKEECHOBEE COUNTY. FLORIDA BOUNDARY& TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY /AL TA/ACSMLAND 7777E SURVEY) 'NOT VAMO MIITHOIM'. rut .S,G/J11 N NI9O THE ORIGINAL RAISED SE 1P*%PE -QR1P' LICENSED SU R.i,NO PIE . .�, MAIO V" DI OOki ELD DgTF /2 4O;)w i R JOHNC ...WAY, Y,�JR. O.0.4.4003.. • =a a 141 ii Aa 411;40: 14 i R 1 33 l ""1 1 R j 11 11:1 �y7 1R R a R11 C� Rg !+ coP API 2 II 12 �1Q CLCf�O'7NO • ile LLOAM. MAW* ONA LML LOOP M AWAIACCURACY hop ANT�/ISIT O maLTnwnVECODMA T NORIIONTAL CONSROL NOTE: L, T,, IL L, N OLUNCIORTMVLASO ONG1,1 • TIN 14000 MATIMIMMUM/. —z NOTE T1175O 4 MAT ACMM .1 IN IDORCIALOV L,70 OFTIW 7WYGC1 LAwv T FIYA0 I•LY40WVD5 • CI4W0SrtvDIN AND ▪ Ift JYIMANTADIN DE ALT ro*ITYDr ANY OTHER OI TNAStlliYAM FOAM V Drainage Calculations City of Okeechobee, FDOT, & SFWMD • echobee Family Dollar e Road 70 obee County, Florida 22, Township 37, Range 35 LLC 3811 • KimIey>» Horn Drainage Calculations Okeechobee, FDOT, & SFWMD Okeechobee Family Dollar State Road 70 Okeechobee County, Florida Section 22, Township 37, Range 35 Prepared for: JB Realty Partners, LLC 3929 Aero Place Lakeland, Florida 33811 Prepared by: Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Lakeland, Florida 046158017 June 2015 © Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 2015 Jordan L. Haggerty Mp� • .••c.••. /��' psi o • NSE �. -k 1i CO : v �TC/: SSI14` (3 `gym Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 SUMMARY 1 1.1 LOCATION 1 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 2.1 SOILS 1 2.2 GROUNDWATER 2 2.3 FLOODZONE 2 2.4 ENVIRONMENTAL SUMMARY 2 2.5 PREDEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE 2 2.5.1 BASINS 2 2.5.2 CN CALCULATIONS 2 2.5.3 TIME OF CONCENTRATION 2 2.5.4 PRE - DEVELOPMENT DISCHARGE RUNOFF 3 2.6 UTILITIES 3 3 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 3 3.1 REQUIRED PERMITS AND REVIEWS 3 3.2 POST- DEVELOPMENT STORM DESIGN PARAMETERS 3 3.3 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT /BASINS 4 3.3.1 CN CALCULATIONS 4 3.3.2 TIME OF CONCENTRATION 4 3.3.3 TREATMENT VOLUME (TV) 4 3.3.4 RETENTION STAGE /STORAGE 5 3.3.5 TREATMENT VOLUME PROVIDED 5 3.3.6 TV RECOVERY 5 3.3.7 POST- DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF 5 3.4 WETLAND IMPACTS 6 3.5 FLOOD PLAIN IMPACTS 6 4 SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE 6 Kimley>»Horn June 2015 K:\LAK Civil \046158017 - Okeechobee Family Dollar\Desigi \Drainage \Report\2015 -05 OkeechobeeFD.doc Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) EXHIBITS LOCATION MAPS VICINITY MAP EXHIBIT A -1 USGS QUADRANGLE MAP EXHIBIT A -2 AERIAL PHOTO EXHIBIT A -3 NRCS SOIL SURVEY MAP EXHIBIT B FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP EXHIBIT C PRE - DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE BASIN MAP EXHIBIT D POST- DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE BASIN MAP EXHIBIT E APPENDICES CURVE NUMBER AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 1 TREATMENT VOLUME & STAGE STORAGE CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 2 PRE - DEVELOPMENT ROUTING (ICPR) APPENDIX 3 POST- DEVELOPMENT ROUTING (PONDS) APPENDIX 4 INPUT REPORT TREATMENT INPUT REPORT 25 YR - 72 HR STORM EVENT Kimley» >Horn June2015 K: \LAK_Civil \046158017 - Okeechobee Family Dollar\Desipn \Drainage\Report\2015 -05 OkeechobeeFD.doc Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store 1 SUMMARY The proposed "Okeechobee Family Dollar Store" project includes construction of an 8,320 sf general retail store with associated master storm water pond, paving, grading, storm water conveyance system, and utility services. The project is situated on a 2.70 acre parent parcel located within Okeechobee, Florida. The parent parcel will be split into two sub - parcels. The project area is comprised of one (1) Post Development Basin (Basin 1). Storm water runoff, from the aforementioned basin is managed by one dry retention pond (Pond 1) that is designed to treat and attenuate runoff from the 25 yr. /72 hr. storm event per SFWMD criteria. The project discharges away from the FDOT SR 70 right of way and therefore the FDOT critical storm analysis is not necessary. Proposed construction and improvements will result in 0.85 acres of impervious located within the project area. The total designed impervious located within the Post - Development Basin area is 1.75 acres of which an assumed future 0.90 acres is located on the western sub - parcel to be developed by others. The proposed storm water management system has been designed to comply with the City of Okeechobee, FDOT, and the South Florida Water Management District. 1.1 LOCATION This project is located at 100 SE 10th Avenue on the southwest corner of the intersection between State Road 70 and SE 10th Avenue. The general site location is shown superimposed on a vicinity map (See ExhibitA -1) along with the USGS Quad map (See ExhibitA -2), and an aerial photograph (See ExhibitA -3.) 2 PRE - DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS The project is located within the Northern Lake Okeechobee Basin. The project site currently contains remnants of an existing trailer park, but vastly remains undeveloped and heavily vegetated. 2.1 SOILS Existing soils were determined by the U.S. Department of Agriculture - National Resources Conservation Service and subsequently published in the Okeechobee County Soil Survey Report. The predominant soil type on -site was identified as Udorthents (Hydrologic Group A); a Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Soils Map has been provided (See Exhibit B). Andersen Andre Consulting Engineers, Inc. performed a Geotechnical Engineering Investigation for the site. Please see attached, under separate cover, the Geotechnical report for subsurface evaluation dated April 23, 2015. K m ey» >Horn June 2015 K: \LAK_Civil \046158017 - Okeechobee Family Dollar \ Design \Drainage \Report \2015 -05 OkeechobeeFDl.doc 1 Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store 2.2 GROUNDWATER The seasonal high groundwater level was estimated by Andersen Andre Consulting Engineers, Inc. and are included as part of their Geotechnical Engineering Report. Based on their report it is estimated that the seasonal high groundwater level is between 2 and 3 ft. below existing grade. Please refer to the attached, under separate cover, a copy of the aforementioned Geotechnical Exploration Report. 2.3 FLOODZONE The project site lies outside of the established 100 -year flood plain (See Exhibit C). 2.4 ENVIRONMENTAL SUMMARY There are no existing wetlands within the project area. 2.5 PREDEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE The site has been modeled with one (1) Pre - Development Drainage Basin (Basin A). Basin A is located within an Open Basin. Storm water runoff from Basin A currently sheet flows overland toward the western portion of the site and discharges through a drainage structure that discharges offsite. This site, along with surrounding areas, discharge into the contributing waters of the Okeechobee Basin. 2.5.1 BASINS There is one (1) Pre - Development Basin (Basin A) that is within the project area. See basin summary below. Please see Exhibit D for a pre - development drainage basin map. Pre - Development Basin Summary Table Basin Name Basin A Basin Area 2.78 Acres Tc 38.9 minutes Curve Number 59 2.5.2 CN CALCULATIONS The pre - development curve number was calculated using SCS Curve Number tables and the hydrologic soil information from the Geotechnical Exploration Report. (See Appendix 1 for spreadsheet calculations) 2.5.3 TIME OF CONCENTRATION The Pre - Development time of concentration for Basin A was calculated using the spreadsheet found in Appendix 1. Kim ey »>Horn June 2015 K: \LAK_Civil \046158017 - Okeechobee Family Dollar \ Design \ Drainage \Report \2015 -05 OkeechobeeFDl.doc 2 Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store 2.5.4 PRE - DEVELOPMENT DISCHARGE RUNOFF Pre - Development runoff was determined using Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR). The Pre - Development 25yr /72hr storm -event discharge rate (QpRE) for Basin A has been determined to be 2.29 cfs. (See Appendix 3.) 2.6 UTILITIES The Project utilities such as potable water and sanitary sewer will be provided by the Okeechobee Utility Authority. Wire utilities will be provided by the appropriate service area providers. 3 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed "Okeechobee Family Dollar Store" project includes construction of an 8,320 sf general retail store with associated master storm water pond, paving, grading, storm water conveyance system, and utility services. The project is situated on a 2.70 acre parent parcel located within Okeechobee, Florida. The parent parcel will be split into two sub - parcels. The project area is comprised of one (1) Post Development Basin (Basin 1). Storm water runoff, from the aforementioned basin is managed by one dry retention pond (Pond 1) that is designed to treat and attenuate runoff from the 25 yr. /72 hr. storm event per SFWMD criteria. The project discharges away from the FDOT SR 70 right of way and therefore the FDOT critical storm analysis is not necessary. Proposed construction and improvements will result in 0.85 acres of impervious located within the project area. The total designed impervious located within the Post - Development Basin area is 1.75 acres of which an assumed future 0.90 acres is located on the western sub - parcel to be developed by others. The proposed storm water management system has been designed to comply with the City of Okeechobee, FDOT, and the South Florida Water Management District. 3.1 REQUIRED PERMITS AND REVIEWS • City of Okeechobee • FDOT • FDEP 10 -2 General Permit for Stormwater System (Self- Certification) • NPDES 3.2 POST - DEVELOPMENT STORM DESIGN PARAMETERS Per SFWMD criteria, the following design storm will be utilized: Storm Frequency Storm Duration Rainfall Criteria 25 Years 72 Hours 9.0 Inches Pre vs. Post Discharge Kmley » >Horn June 2015 K: \LAK_Civil \046158017 - Okeechobee Family Dollar \ Design \ Drainage \Report \2015 -05 OkeechobeeFDl.doc 3 Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store 3.3 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT /BASINS The stormwater management system is designed to meet the requirements of the City of Okeechobee and SFWMD. The proposed project consists of one (1) Post - Development Basin [Basin 1 (2.49 acres)]. The storm water runoff from Basin 1 will be conveyed to Pond 1. Pond 1 was modeled in Ponds v3.2 as a wet detention pond. Located within Pond 1, a control structure is proposed to limit the discharge rate to a level at or below the pre - development discharge rate. The management system is designed to attenuate stormwater runoff and provide pollution abatement before discharging to the associated boundary. See basin summary below. Please see Exhibit E for a post - development drainage basin map. Post - Development Basin Summary Table Basin Name Basin 1 Basin Area 2.49 Acres (100 %) Pervious Area 0.75 Acres (28 %) Impervious Area 1.75 Acres (65 %) Pond Area @ 19.8' 0.20 Acres (7 %) Curve Number 85 3.3.1 CN CALCULATIONS The post- development curve number has been calculated utilizing the SCS Tr -55 methodology. The basin has been broken down into different soil types and assigned a Hydrologic Soil Group classification. Based on land cover, a curve number was then assigned (See Appendix 1.) 3.3.2 TIME OF CONCENTRATION The Post - Development time of concentration for the Basin is the minimum value of 10 minutes. 3.3.3 TREATMENT VOLUME (TV) The proposed storm water management system will contain a wet retention pond to treat the storm water runoff prior to discharging. According to SFWMD and the City of Okeechobee criteria, the required water quality volume is retention of the first one inch over the basin (See Appendix 2.) The following table summarizes the treatment volume required: Required Treatment Volume Basin Name Basin 1 Ktmley » >Horn June 2015 K: \LAK_Civil \046158017 - Okeechobee Family Dollar \ Design \ Drainage \ Report \2015 -05 OkeechobeeFD.doc 4 Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store Basin Area 2.49 Acres 0.75" Over Basin Area 0.16 Acre ft 3.3.4 RETENTION STAGE /STORAGE The Stage /Storage data is as follows: Stage /Storage Data Pond Name Stage Area (SF) Storage (ac. -ft.) Pond 1 (Basin 1) Top 22.5' 16,254 0.987 Control 19.8' 10,059 0.169 Bott. 19' 8,302 0 3.3.5 TREATMENT VOLUME PROVIDED Required /Provided Treatment Volume Basin Area Required Treatment Volume Provided Treatment Volume Basin 1 2.49 Acres 0.16 ac. ft. 0.169 ac. ft. 3.3.6 TV RECOVERY The required TV in a wet retention pond must be recovered within 72 hours. The TV recovery within the wet retention pond is accomplished by drawdown. PONDS (Version 3.2) was used to demonstrate that the wet retention pond recovers the required TV through percolation within 36 hours. Please refer to the attached Geotechnical Report for permeability rates and S.H.W.T. elevations, and Appendix 4 for drawdown analysis. 3.3.7 POST- DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF As previously mentioned the storm water runoff from Basin 1 will be managed through one (1) wet retention pond (Pond 1) designed to attenuate the post - development discharge rates such that they do not exceed the pre - development discharge rates for the 25yr /72hr storm - event. PONDS (Version 3.2) has been used to route the storm water runoff from the development through the wet retention pond. The pond has been designed such that the proposed development discharge rate does not exceed the pre - development discharge rate for the 25yr /72hr storm - event. (See Appendix 4) Kimley » >Horn June 2015 K: \LAK_Civil \046158017 - Okeechobee Family Dollar \ Design \ Drainage \ Report \2015 -05 OkeechobeeFDl.doc 5 Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store Post Development Results Basin Name Pond Name Top of Bank Syr/72 hr Stage 25yr/72 hr Stage 100yr/72 hr Stage Pre Dev. Discharge Rate Post Dev. Basin 1 Discharge Rate Basin 1 Pond 1 22.5' 20.47 21.39 21.97 2.29 cfs 1.57 cfs 3.4 WETLAND IMPACTS There are no wetland impacts proposed for this project. 3.5 FLOOD PLAIN IMPACTS The Project is not located within a flood plain, and therefore will have no impact on the surrounding area. 4 SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE Construction of the proposed project will be finished in one phase. Erosion control methods will be utilized to prevent siltation to surrounding areas. The surface water management system will be maintained and operated by the Developer. K coley » >H©rn June 2015 K: \LAK_Civil \046158017 - Okeechobee Family Dollar \ Design \Drainage \Report \2015 -05 OkeechobeeFDl.doc 6 Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store EXHIBIT A LOCATION MAPS General Vicinity Map Aerial Photograph USGS Quad Map Kimsey > >Horn K:ILAK Civi11046156017 - Okeechobee Family DollarlExhibits\Drainage PDFsISITE VICINITYmxd - 6/10/2015 5:21:45 PM - TylerSwonger NW 2nd Ave a trt z a N NE 11)9 5t NE 10th St NE 919 5t Ad,* t�,= tot,•., NE B ".t, r z a b SW 7th . 1 9th Si 4 a 4 z NE 7th 5t NE 6th St NE 5th 5t w z 4'NE 4th St r, a w e 4 2 w 2 NE 3rd SlZ NE Ind St .:..:. 5R•70.. NE Park St SE Park St SE 3rd Ave 5E 3rd 5t NE 12th St- 4 z NE 90 SE 4th SI w 4' 5 L SE 5111 5t — rn SE 601 St 5E Sth Ave SE 719 St 5E 8th 5t 94 z w SE 9th St SE 9th Ct SE 101h St SE 12th St SE 13th St m N.rs SE 14th St NE 9th Ave SE 6th St SE 9th Ave SE 11th Ave SE 719 St SE 119 5t NE 12th St NE 17th Ave NE 131h Ave NE 14th Ave NE 14th St NE 131h 5t r p w NE 11th 5t z NE 10th St NE 9th St 4' NE 8th St z NE 7th St NE 6th 5t NE 5th St z NE 2nd 5t cYpre 5 Quarters 4' w 9 SE 4th St SE 5th SI SE 12th Ave 4' W 0 n SE 14th Ave z SE 2nd St SE 1Sth Ave 5E 6th SI 5E 8th 51 M e Feet 0 490 980 NE 3rd St 4' w z SE SE 4th St SE 6th L Legend Property Boundary Kimley >» Horn © 2015 Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 116 South Kentucky Avenue Lakeland, FL 33801 Phone: 863 701 8702 www.kimley- hom.com CA 00000696 SITE VICINITY OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA Scale: As Noted I Project No.: 046158017 I June 2015 Exhibit A -1 1 • r-111_76.— Feel 200 400 -SR 70 Park—St.= m St Cb Z% • ✓ • • u i mu] Legend Property Boundary Kimley» >Horn © 2015 Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 116 South Kentucky Avenue Lakeland, FL 33801 Phone: 863 701 8702 www.kimley- hom.com CA 00000696 USGS QUAD MAP OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA Scale: As Noted I Project No.: 0461580171 June 2015 Exhibit A -2 K:ILAK Civi1104 615801 7 - Okeechobee Family DollarlExhibits1Drainage PDFs 4ERIAL.mxd - 6/10/2015 5:19:30 PM - Tyler.Swonger Kimley> »Horn © 2015 Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 116 South Kentucky Avenue Lakeland, FL 33801 Phone: 863 701 8702 www.kimley- hom.com CA 00000696 AERIAL MAP OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA Scale: As Noted I Project No.: 0461580171 June 2015 Exhibit A -3 Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store EXHIBIT B NRCS SOIL SURVEY Ki ey >>> Horn K:ILAK_Civil1046158017 - Okeechobee Family DollarlExhibits\Drainage PDFsISOILS.mxd - 6/10/2015 5:22:31 PM - Tyler. Swonger Kimley >>Horn © 2015 Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 116 South Kentucky Avenue Lakeland, FL 33801 Phone: 863 701 8702 www.kimley- hom.com CA 00000696 SOILS MAP OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA Scale: As Noted I Project No.: 046158017 I June 2015 Exhibit B Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store EXHIBIT C FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP K rn y > >> Horn ■ ■1111■ ■icimm ■ umiliM■ - o ■ ■ ■ ■1 ■ ■ ■■ ■■ ■■II•r■ rt F } s ■r ■■c ■ur ■ ®■■■� t> > ■E�1 ■I ■�ii�ii �■ :: NM �1\ 1a 11"1,11 11111111111111111 11111 11111111112111111E 1011111 11 i� +'lll 'pu1 „mnn N 1F' 1 Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store EXHIBIT D PRE - DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE BASIN MAP Kimley ») Horn lotted By Swonger, Tyler Sheet Set: OKEECHOBEE FDS PRE —BASIN Layout: PRE BASIN June 11, 2015 03 59 05pm K: \LAK_Civil \046158017 — Okeechobee Family Dollar \CAD \Exfi This document. together with the concepts and designs presented herein. as an Instrument of service, Is Intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and Improper rel ROYALS OK LUNCH, INC. PARCEL 2-22-37- 35-0/00-00013 -A000 age PRE—POST BASIN MAPS.dwg ument without wrltl 1)e Norizatlon and odeplatian by Kimley —Horn f land Assr�ciate �Hn�. sh Ci�t ability to Klmle , —Horn and Associates. Inc. re, '3 C.-0 rn Z pf Z \ r m r _.. 23.0 S.E. 10TH AVE. /HANCOC/C STREET) PAVCS4ENT WIDTH VARI£5` - 40 R/CHT -OF- -WAY Z 0i 30 c0 Z -0 pm JagwnN ananD n eaJV u!seg aweN uiseg salnuiw 6'8£ N 00 00 a, OJ D 0, m m 0 v 3 m co m T. 7 '1 3 3 c IF OKEECHOBEE FDS #2025 PREPARED FOR JB REALTY PARTNERS, LLC OKEECHOBEE FL PRE - DEVELOPMENT BASIN MAP KHA PROJECT 046158017 DATE DATE SCALE AS SHOWN DESIGNED BY TAS DRAWN BY TAS CHECKED BY JAL UCENSED PROFESSIONAL JASON A. LEWIS, P.E. FL LICENSE NUMBER 62572 DATE: Kimley » >Horn © 2015 KIMLEY —HORN AND ASSOCIATES. INC. 116 S. KENTUCKY AVENUE, LAKELAND. FL 33801 PHONE: 863- 701 -8702 WWW.KIMLEY— HORN.COM CA 00000696 Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store EXHIBIT E POST - DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE BASIN MAP Kim sey > >> Horn Plotted 8ySwonger, Tyler Sheet Set:OKEECHOBEE FDS PRE —BASIN layout'. POST BASIN June 11, 2015 07:16:18om K: \LAK Civil \046158017 — Okeechobee Eamily Dollar \CAD \Exhibits \Draino.e \PRE —POST BASIN MAPS.dw 9 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is Intended only for the specific purpose and client for which It was prepared. Reuse of and improper rellar'c ROYALS OK LUNCH, INC. PARCEL 2- 22- 37 "-- 35 -0A00- 0001.5 -A000 ent without writte(y,au IAorlxotlpn and bab9tatlon by Kimley—HorM isnd Ass iote, In M1all be w, out fiabll ity to K, — orn and Associates. Inc. 0) r0 ti 1 E1 d1Ed 2p5 'i •� m F a : d = 4 8 Y � m co Z pm JagwnN an.irn n v d aweN uiseg sa;nuiw OI X= mm OKEECHOBEE FDS #2025 PREPARED FOR JB REALTY PARTNERS, LLC OKEECHOBEE FL POST - DEVELOPMENT BASIN MAP KHA PROJECT 046158017 DATE DATE SCALE AS SHOWN DESIGNED BY TAS DRAWN BY TAS CHECKED BY JAL LICENSED PROFESSIONAL JASON A. LEWIS, P.E. EL LICENSE NUMBER 62572 DATE: Kimley> »Horn © 2015 KIMLEY— HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 116 5. KENTUCKY AVENUE, LAKELAND, FL 33601 PHONE: 863 - 701 -8702 WWW.KIMLEY— HORN.COM CA 00000696 No. REVISIONS DATE DV Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store APPENDIX 1 CURVE NUMBER & TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS .. Kimley> »Horn KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT TITLE: OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR PROJECT NUMBER: 46158017 DATE BASIN DESIGNATION: Basin A MADE BY: TS 10- Jun -15 BASIN ANALYSIS (PRE /POST): PRE CHECKED BY: JH BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET A Existing Imperviou 39 98 1.77 0.92 filename: CURVE NUMBER CALCS.xls wOM*OS Kimley -horn and Associates - Lakeland HIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT TITLE: OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR PROJECT NUMBER: 046158017 I DATE BASIN DESIGNATION: Basin 1 MADE BY: TS 10- Jun -I5 BASIN ANALYSIS (PRE /POST): POST CHECKED BY: JH Description / Soil Name' 12- Udorthents : :Pond Soil BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET ions Area Impervious Area A 0.54 1.75 Pervious 39 CN mperviaus 98 Total Area Composite CN 84.09 2.29 0.20 100 0.20 100.00 filename: CURVE NUMBER CALCS.xls E Kimley -hom and Associates - Lakeland Herminio O. Cruz, PE 2503 Quail Park Terrace Kissimmee, FL 34743 Tel. (407) 319 -0106 Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project : Location : Okeechobee Family Dollar Okeechobee County, FL JOB # 46158017 By : TS Date: 6/10/2015 Checked : JH Date: 6/10/2015 Check One : 0 Present ❑ Developed BASIN A Check One : 0 Tc ❑ Tt through subarea Notes: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet flow (Applicable to Tc only) Segment ID 1. Surface description (Table 3 -1) 2. Mannings roughness coeff., n (Table 3 -1) 3. Flow length, L (total L < 300 ft.) ft 4. Two -yr 24 -hr rainfall, P2 in 5. Calculated Land slope, s ft /ft 5a. Land Elevation For Upper End Of Flow Path 5b. Land Elevation For Lower End Of Flow Path 6. Compute Tt [Eq. 3 -3] hr 0.592 + Shallow concentrated flow Segment ID 7. Surface description (Paved or Unpaved) 8. Flow length, L ft 9. Calculated Watercourse slope, s ft/ft 9a. Land Elevation For Upper End Of Flow Path 9b. Land Elevation For Lower End Of Flow Path 10. Average velocity, V (Figure 3 -1) ft /s 11. Tt = L /3600V Compute Tt hr Channel Flow Segment ID 12. Cross sectional flow area, a sf 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft 14. Hydraulic radius, r = a /Pw Compute r ft 15. Channel slope, s ft /ft 16. Manning's roughness coeff., n 17 V = 1.49(r ^0.667)(s ^0.50)/n Compute V ft /s 18. Flow length, L ft 19. Tt = L /3600V Compute Tt hr 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6,11, and 19) AB D. GRASS 0.24 289.78 4.80 0.0104 22.5 19.5 BC Unpaved 146.47 0.0020 19.50 19.21 0.72 0.057 CD 0.000 0.00 0.000 Reference: Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds Technical Release 55, Soil Conservation Service U.S. Department of Agriculture, June 1986 Use Time of Concentration = + 0.592 0.057 0.000 0.649 38.9 minutes hours hours hours hours Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store APPENDIX 2 TREATMENT VOLUME & STAGE STORAGE CALCULATIONS Kimley »' Horn TREATMENT VOLUME CALCULATIONS AND STAGE /STORAGE RELATIONSHIPS Basin Area(acres) = 2.49 Detention Pond 1 OFF -LINE VOLUME CALCULATIONS (PER SWFWMD): 3/4" of Runoff = [Basin Area(3 /4 ")]/12 "= 0.16 ac -ft (Controls) 2.5" times % Impervious = 0.14 ac -ft POND STAGE /STORAGE WEIR POND TOP ELEVATION (NGVD) 22.5 POND BOTTOM ELEVATION (NGVD) 19 TOP AREA OF POND (SF) 16253.4 BOTTOM AREA OF POND (SF) 8302.4 TOTAL VOLUME OF POND (CF) 42973 POND STAGE (NGVD) DEPTH IN POND (FT) CUMULATIVE VOLUME (CF) CUMULATIVE VOLUME (AC -FT) 22.5 3.5 42973 0.987 22.0 3.0 35130 0.806 21.5 2.5 27855 0.639 21.0 2.0 21148 0.485 20.5 1.5 15009 0.345 20.0 1.0 9438 0.217 19.8 0.8 7369 0.169 19.5 0.5 4435 0.102 19.0 0.0 0 0.000 Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store APPENDIX 3 PRE DEVELOPMENT ROUTING (ICPR) Kimley > > >Harn OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR - INPUT -ALL ___= Basins Name: PRE BASIN Node: PRE BNDY Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Area(ac): 2.780 Curve Number: 59.00 DCIA( %): 0.00 ___= Nodes Peaking Factor: 256.0 Storm Duration(hrs): 72.00 Time of Conc(min): 38.90 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 Name: PRE BNDY Group: BASE Type: Time /Stage Time(hrs) Stage(ft) 0.00 24.00 48.00 72.00 17.040 17.040 17.040 17.040 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 17.040 Warn Stage(ft): 20.000 ___= Hydrology Simulations Name: 25yr -3day Filename: K:\LAK_Civi1\046158017 - Okeechobee Family Dollar\ Design \Drainage \Icpr \25yr- 24hr.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 72.00 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 9.00 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) 84.000 5.00 ___= Routing Simulations Name: 25YR72HR Hydrology Sim: 25yr -3day Filename: K: \LAK Civi1\046158017 - Okeechobee Family Dollar\ Design \Drainage \Icpr \25YR72HR.I32 Execute: Yes Restart: No Alternative: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5000 Boundary Stages: Time(hrs) 999.000 Group BASE Print Inc(min) 15.000 Run Yes Patch: No Delta Z Factor: 0.00500 End Time(hrs): 72.00 Max Calc Time(sec): 60.0000 Boundary Flows: Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 1 OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR - BASIN SUMMARY Basin Name: PRE BASIN Group Name: BASE Simulation: 25yr -3day Node Name: PRE BNDY Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 5.19 Comp Time Inc (min): 5.00 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount (in): 9.000 Storm Duration (hrs): 72.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 38.90 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 2.780 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 59.000 DCIA (o): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 36.25 Flow Max (cfs): 2.29 Runoff Volume (in): 3.971 Runoff Volume (ft3): 40073 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 1 OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR - NODE MIN /MAX Name Max Time Max Warning Max Delta Max Surf Max Time Max Max Time Group Simulation Stage Stage Stage Stage Area Inflow Inflow Outflow hrs ft ft ft ft2 hrs cfs hrs PRE BNDY BASE 25YR72HR 0.00 17.04 20.00 0.0000 0 36.25 2.29 0.00 40 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store APPENDIX 4 POST DEVELOPMENT ROUTING (PONDS) Input Report Treatment 25 Year / 72 Hour Storm Event Kimiey >> >Horn PONDS Version 3.2.0265 Retention Pond Recovery - Refined Method Copyright 2012 Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E. Project Data Project Name: OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR Simulation Description: POST DEVELOPMENT Project Number: 046158017 Engineer : TS Supervising Engineer: JAL Date: 05 -15 -2015 Aquifer Data Base Of Aquifer Elevation, [B] (ft datum): 14.00 Water Table Elevation, [WT] (ft datum): 18.00 Horizontal Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity, [Kh] (ft/day): 2.85 Fillable Porosity, [n] ( %): 25.00 Vertical infiltration was not considered. Geometry Data Equivalent Pond Length, [L] (ft): 372.0 Equivalent Pond Width, [W] (ft): 23.0 Ground water mound is expected to intersect the pond bottom Stage vs Area Data Stage (ft datum) 19.00 19.50 20.50 21.50 22.50 Area (ft2) 8302.4 9395.8 11625.1 13911.0 16253.4 OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR PONDS Version 3.2.0265 Retention Pond Recovery - Refined Method Copyright 2012 Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E. Discharge Structures Discharge Structure #1 is active as weir Structure Parameters Description: CS -100 Weir elevation, (ft datum): 19.8 Weir coefficient: 3.13 Weir length, (ft): .25 Weir exponent: 1.5 Tailwater Description: Flow Type: Data Format: Units: Reduction Factor: Elapsed Time (hrs) 0 72 Positive, out of pond only Elapsed time English Modified Mavis equation Elevation (ft datum) 18 18 Discharge Structure #2 is inactive Discharge Structure #3 is inactive OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR 06 -11 -2015 16:18:41 Page 2 PONDS Version 3.2.0265 Retention Pond Recovery - Refined Method Copyright 2012 Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E. Scenario Input Data Scenario 1 :: 5YR -24HR Hydrograph Type: Modflow Routing: Repetitions: Inline SCS Routed with infiltration 1 Basin Area (acres) Time Of Concentration (minutes) DCIA ( %) Curve Number Design Rainfall Depth (inches) Design Rainfall Duration (hours) Shape Factor Rainfall Distribution Initial ground water level (ft datum) No times after storm specified. Scenario 2 :: 25YR -3DAY Hydrograph Type: Modflow Routing: Repetitions: 2.490 10.0 0.0 85 4.5 24.0 UHG 256 SCS Type II Florida Modified 18.00 (default) Inline SCS Routed with infiltration 1 Basin Area (acres) Time Of Concentration (minutes) DCIA ( %) Curve Number Design Rainfall Depth (inches) Design Rainfall Duration (hours) Shape Factor Rainfall Distribution 2.490 10.0 0.0 85 9.0 72.0 UHG 256 SCS Type II Florida Modified Initial ground water level (ft datum) 18.00 (default) No times after storm specified. Scenario 3 :: 100YR -3DAY Hydrograph Type: Modflow Routing: Repetitions: Inline SCS Routed with infiltration 1 Basin Area (acres) Time Of Concentration (minutes) DCIA ( %) Curve Number Design Rainfall Depth (inches) Design Rainfall Duration (hours) Shape Factor Rainfall Distribution Initial ground water level (ft datum) No times after storm specified. 2.490 10.0 0.0 85 12.0 72.0 UHG 256 SCS Type II Florida Modified 18.00 (default) OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR 06 -11 -2015 16:18:41 Page 3 PONDS Version 3.2.0265 Retention Pond Recovery - Refined Method Copyright 2012 Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E. Scenario Input Data (cont'd.) Scenario 4 :: 6880 ft3 slug load Hydrograph Type: Slug Load Modflow Routing: Routed with infiltration Treatment Volume (ft3) 6880 Initial ground water level (ft datum) 18.00 (default) Time After Time After Storm Event Storm Event (days) (days) 0.100 2.000 0.250 2.500 0.500 3.000 1.000 3.500 1.500 4.000 OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR 06 -11 -2015 16:18:41 Page 4 PONDS Version 3.2.0265 Retention Pond Recovery - Refined Method Copyright 2012 Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E. Summary of Results :: Scenario 1 :: 5YR -24HR Stage Minimum Maximum Time Stage Rate Volume (hours) (ft datum) (ft3 /s) (ft3) 6.267 13.689 18.72 20.47 Inflow Rate - Maximum - Positive 12.044 4.5137 Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 24.978 26286.1 Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 25.022 26286.1 Infiltration Rate - Maximum - Positive 9.644 0.1456 Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 25.022 3287.1 Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 25.022 3287.1 Combined Discharge Rate - Maximum - Positive 13.689 0.4329 Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 25.022 12611.5 Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 25.022 12611.5 Discharge Structure 1 - simple weir Rate - Maximum - Positive 13.689 0.4329 Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 25.022 12611.5 Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 25.022 12611.5 Discharge Structure 2 - inactive Rate - Maximum - Positive disabled disabled Rate - Maximum - Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation disabled disabled Discharge Structure 3 - inactive Rate - Maximum - Positive disabled disabled Rate - Maximum - Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation disabled disabled Pollution Abatement: 36 Hour Stage and Infiltration Volume 72 Hour Stage and Infiltration Volume N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR 06 -11 -2015 16:18:41 Page 5 PONDS Version 3.2.0265 Retention Pond Recovery - Refined Method Copyright 2012 Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E. Summary of Results :: Scenario 2 :: 25YR -3DAY Time Stage Rate Volume (hours) (ft datum) (ft3 /s) (ft3) Stage Minimum 10.578 18.66 Maximum 36.689 21.39 Inflow Rate - Maximum - Positive 36.000 4.1250 Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 72.978 64889.6 Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 73.022 64889.6 Infiltration Rate - Maximum - Positive 36.044 0.1512 Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 73.022 5845.9 Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 73.022 5845.9 Combined Discharge Rate - Maximum - Positive 36.689 1.5673 Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 73.022 49651.5 Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 73.022 49651.5 Discharge Structure 1 - simple weir Rate - Maximum - Positive 36.689 1.5673 Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 73.022 49651.5 Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 73.022 49651.5 Discharge Structure 2 - inactive Rate - Maximum - Positive disabled disabled Rate - Maximum - Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation disabled disabled Discharge Structure 3 - inactive Rate - Maximum - Positive disabled disabled Rate - Maximum - Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation disabled disabled Pollution Abatement: 36 Hour Stage and Infiltration Volume 72 Hour Stage and Infiltration Volume N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR 06 -11 -2015 16:18:41 Page 6 PONDS Version 3.2.0265 Retention Pond Recovery - Refined Method Copyright 2012 Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E. Summary of Results :: Scenario 3 :: 100YR -3DAY Time Stage Rate Volume (hours) (ft datum) (ft' /s) (ft3) Stage Minimum 8.311 Maximum 36.489 18.69 21.97 Inflow Rate - Maximum - Positive 36.000 5.6684 Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 72.978 91392.2 Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 73.022 91392.2 Infiltration Rate - Maximum - Positive 36.022 0.1826 Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 73.022 6313.6 Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 73.022 6313.6 Combined Discharge Rate - Maximum - Positive 36.489 2.4986 Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 73.022 75190.6 Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 73.022 75190.6 Discharge Structure 1 - simple weir Rate - Maximum - Positive 36.489 2.4986 Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 73.022 75190.6 Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 73.022 75190.6 Discharge Structure 2 - inactive Rate - Maximum - Positive disabled disabled Rate - Maximum - Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation disabled disabled Discharge Structure 3 - inactive Rate - Maximum - Positive disabled disabled Rate - Maximum - Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation disabled disabled Pollution Abatement: 36 Hour Stage and Infiltration Volume 72 Hour Stage and Infiltration Volume N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR 06 -11 -2015 16:18:42 Page 7 PONDS Version 3.2.0265 Retention Pond Recovery - Refined Method Copyright 2012 Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E. Summary of Results :: Scenario 4 :: 6880 ft3 slug load Time Stage Rate Volume (hours) (ft datum) (ft3 /s) (ft3) Stage Minimum 0.000 19.00 Maximum 0.002 19.75 Inflow Rate - Maximum - Positive 0.002 1146.6670 Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 0.002 6880.0 Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 96.000 6880.0 Infiltration Rate - Maximum - Positive 0.002 0.1827 Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 96.000 4588.8 Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 96.000 4588.8 Combined Discharge Rate - Maximum - Positive None None Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 96.000 0.0 Discharge Structure 1 - simple weir Rate - Maximum - Positive None None Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 96.000 0.0 Discharge Structure 2 - inactive Rate - Maximum - Positive disabled disabled Rate - Maximum - Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation disabled disabled Discharge Structure 3 - inactive Rate - Maximum - Positive disabled disabled Rate - Maximum - Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation disabled disabled Pollution Abatement: 36 Hour Stage and Infiltration Volume 36.000 19.44 3013.2 72 Hour Stage and Infiltration Volume 72.000 19.32 4079.2 OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR 06 -11 -2015 16:18:42 Page 8 Staff Report Site Plan Review Prepared for: The City of Okeechobee Applicant: OHCF Properties, LLC; NH Expansion Petition No.: 15- 004 -TRC 'f et': <_'riPlanning & Management Services, Inc. 1375 Jackson Street, Suite 206 Fort Myers, Florida 239-334-3366 Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 ' Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant's Name: OHCF Properties, LLC Petition No. 15- 004 -TRC GENERAL INFORMATION Owner Owner,` Applicant OHCF Properties,. LLC ox 759et eechobee,rtF Faye Haverlock Applicant - Address Site Address 973 1646 Highway 441 N. Okeechobee, FL 34974 Contact Person', Steven L Dobbs (Engineering Consultant)`' Contact Phone Number (863) 824 -7644 Email Address sdobbs @ste■edobbsengineering.com LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY Parcels 1 — 4 are identified on the map below and the legal descriptions of each follow. 1 Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant's Name: OHCF Properties, LLC Petition No. 15- 004 -TRC Parcel 1: Parcel Identification Number: 1- 10- 37- 35 -0A00- 00001 -B000 A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 35 EAST, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 10, THENCE PROCEED NORTH 89 °32'54" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 10, ALSO BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK (ORB) 315, PAGE 746, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, A DISTANCE OF 448.36 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN ORB 315, PAGE 746 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTH LINE, RUN NORTH 00° 00' 07" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN ORB 315, PAGE 746, A DISTANCE OF 321.60 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE, RUN NORTH 89° 59' 53" EAST, PERPENDICULAR TO THE PRECEDING COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 374.51 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE TAYLOR CREEK PERMANENT EASEMENT AS DESCRIBED IN ORB 49, PAGE 223 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN SOUTH 31° 40' 29" WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE PERMANENT EASEMENT, A DISTANCE OF 289.01 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT IN SAID WEST LINE, SAID CURVE BEING CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 410.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11° 32' 39 "; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE AND CONTINUING ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE TAYLOR CREEK PERMANENT EASEMENT, A DISTANCE OF 82.61 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE AFORESAID SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 10; THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE OF THE TAYLOR CREEK EASEMENT, RUN SOUTH 89° 32' 54" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 10, A DISTANCE OF 186.72 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Serving Florida Local Governments Since L988 Staff Report Applicant's Name: OHCF Properties, LLC Site Plan Review Petition No. 15- 004 -TRC Parcel 2: Parcel Identification Number: 1- 10- 37- 35 -0A00- 00001 -0000 A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 35 EAST, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 10, THENCE PROCEED NORTH 89° 32' 54" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 10, ALSO BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK (ORB) 315, PAGE 746, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, A DISTANCE OF 448.36 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN ORB 315, PAGE 746; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTH LINE, RUN NORTH 00° 00' 07" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 321.60 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN ORB 315, PAGE 746, ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF, LANDS DESCRIBED IN ORB 219, PAGE 593 AND THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN ORB 524, PAGE 180, ALL PER THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 00° 00' 07" WEST, RUNNING ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN ORB 219, PAGE 593, A DISTANCE OF 280.17 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE, RUN NORTH 89° 59' 53" EAST, PERPENDICULAR TO THE PRECEDING COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 547.38 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE TAYLOR CREEK PERMANENT EASEMENT AS DESCRIBED IN ORB 49, PAGE 223 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN SOUTH 31° 40' 29" WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE PERMANENT EASEMENT, A DISTANCE OF 329.21 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE AFORESAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN ORB 524, PAGE 180; THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE OF THE TAYLOR CREEK EASEMENT, RUN SOUTH 89° 59' 53" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN ORB 524, PAGE 180, A DISTANCE OF 374.51 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Parcel 3: Parcel ID: 2- 09- 35 -0A00- 00010 -0000 UNPLATTED LANDS OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, COMMENCING AT SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 9, BEAR SOUTH 89 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 9 A. Parcel 4: Parcel ID: 2- 09- 35 -0A00- 00010 -A000 UNPLATTED LANDS OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, COMMENCING AT SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 9, BEAR NORTH ON EAST LINE OF SECTION 9 A DISTANCE OF 324.12 FEET TO SOUTH BOUNDARY OF LAND. Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant's Name: OHCF Properties, LLC Petition No. 15- 004 -TRC GENERAL DESCRIPTION The Applicant previously received approval of a Special Exception for expansion of the existing nursing home facility, including the two easternmost parcels which are /have been annexed into the City to facilitate the expansion. The existing facility has approximately 81,127 square feet of floor area with 180 beds. The approved Special Exception for expansion includes an additional 32,000 sf within the existing facility allowing for an additional 18 beds, expansion of food services, and nursing and doctors' office space. Two 5,000 square foot buildings are also included in the expansion. These are labeled Phase 2 and Phase 3 on the site plan. Phase two is planned for the relocation of the existing laundry facilities. Phase 3 is planned as an additional maintenance building to be constructed, as the need arises in the future, to house more maintenance functions currently undertaken in the existing facility. There are 71 parking spaces around the existing nursing home facility. Another 74 spaces were recently approved on the lot immediately west of the existing facility. This parking lot also includes the addition of a trash compactor that will handle all of garbage generated by the facility. The existing garbage dumpsters will be removed. The eastern expansion will include another 33 parking spaces, bringing the total to 178 on- site spaces. The parking requirements for a nursing home are one space per four beds and one space per each employee during the peak employment period. With the expansions there will be 198 beds and total peak employment of 121. The resultant parking required amounts to 171 spaces (50 for the 198 beds and 121 for employee parking). Eight of the spaces will be designated for the handicapped, one more than the seven spaces required. The total area of the four parcels comprising the site is 10.95 acres. The total building area of structures associated with the proposed new development is 2.62 acres, resulting in a lot coverage of 23.9 %. As a result of the expansion the total impervious area of the sites amounts to 7.03 acres representing an impervious surface ratio of 64.2 %, appreciably less than the maximum 85% allowable. The applicant is planning to use the existing access to the site from the west with a safety upgrade through FDOT that will expand the existing entrance to a 16' wide entrance lane and a 12' wide exit lane. Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant's Name: OHCF Properties, LLC Petition No. 15- 004 -TRC Following is the Staff analysis of the project's consistency with the various City require- ments and regulations. Instances where the Staff believes the submission to be deficient are highlighted. Existing Future Land Use Commercial Zoning District CHV Parcel 1 Vacant Parcel 2: Vacant Parcel 3: Existing nursing home Parcel 4: ;Vacant/proposed and approved parking lot 10.95 acres Use of Property Land Area Proposed Commercial CHV 18 -bed East Wing Expansion and construction of two new buildings to handle laundry and maintenance functions. 10.95 acres ADJACENT FLUM CLASSIFICATIONS, ZONING, AND EXISTING LAND USE East: xisting and Use Future Land Use Map Classification Zoning District Existing Land Use: Future Land Use Map Classification oning District. Existing Land Use Future Land Use Map Classification Zoning District: Existing Land Use: * CCMU = Commercial Corridor Mixed Use * *URMU West: county CCMU * . &, URMU ** and Agricultural & URMU RG and Agricultural + Vacant` land ...,._ County: Agricultural & URMU Agricultural Vacant land Commercial and Single - Family CHV, H, and RSF1 Vacant land County: CCMU County: Commercial Sunshine State Surgical Center = Urban Residential Mixed Use ADEQUACY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES POTABLE WATER AND SANITARY SEWER: The Applicant has previously provided, as part of the previously approved Small Scale Development Plan Amendment, letters from the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA) documenting that the Authority has adequate capacity and facilities to provide for the volume of potable water and waste water treatment and disposal expected to be generated by the proposed expansion. Serving Florida Local Governments Since L988 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant's Name: OHCF Properties, LLC Petition No. 15- 004 -TRC SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL: On a number of occasions the County has confirmed a considerable level of excess capacity available to serve the solid waste disposal needs of other developments in the City. It appears reasonable that the volume of solid waste associated with a development of this size can also be accommodated within the capa- city of the County's Solid Waste Facility. DRAINAGE: The Applicant has submitted an Engineer's Report for the East Wing Expansion prepared by Steven L. Dobbs Engineering, LLC which addresses drainage and other engineering aspects of the proposed project. TRAFFIC GENERATION AND ACCESS CONSIDERATIONS: TRAFFIC GENERATION: The traffic generation factor for a nursing home cited in the ITE 8th Edition of Traffic Generation is 0.22 trips per bed in the PM "peak hour ". This translates to an additional four trips during the PM Peak Hour for the 18 new beds being added as a result of the planned expansion. It is safe to say that this increase in traffic will have no effect on the level of service on US 441. Since the proposed new laundry and maintenance facility buildings are intended to accommodate activities currently being conducted in the main building, no additional traffic is expected to result if and when these buildings are constructed in the future. However, when these activities are transferred to the new facilities, should the space in the existing facility be used for purposes (e.g. additional beds or out - patient services) such changes will need Special Exception and /or site plan approval at that time as they may increase the intensity of the use. ACCESS AND EGRESS: The applicant is planning to use the existing access to the site from the west with a safety upgrade through FDOT that will expand the existing entrance to a 16' wide entrance lane and a 12' wide exit lane. Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant's Name: OHCF Properties, LLC Petition No. 15- 004 -TRC Comparison of Proposal with Dimensional Standards, CHV Zoning: Regulation Required Provided Min. Parcel Size & Width [ §90- 285(1)] Area: 6,250 sf Width: 50' 10.95 acres 300' Regulation Required Provided Min. FY Yard Setback [ §90- 285(2)a] 20'; 10' to parking and driveway About 320'; not affected by new development Min. SY Yard Setback [ §90- 285(2)a] 8'; 20' abutting a residential zoning district. 61.6' Min. RY Yard Setback [ §90- 285(2)a] 10'; 20' abutting a residential zoning district. 37.3' Max. Lot Coverage [ §90- 285(3)a] 50% 23.9% Max. Impervious Surface [ §90- 285(3)] 85% 64.2% Max. Height [ §90- 285(4)a] 45' Less than 45' Off- street Parking [ §90- 512(2)] 1 space /4 beds and 1 space per employee during peak employment period. 198 beds require 50 spaces. Peak employment of 121 requires 121 spaces. Total required = 171 spaces, at least 7 of which must be desig- nated for the handicapped. Parking spaces must be at least 9' x 20'; and handicapped spaces must be 12' x 20' with a 5 -foot wide handicap aisle. 178 spaces, 7 of which are for the handicapped. All spaces are at least 9' x 20' and all handicapped spaces are at least 12' x 20' with an adjacent 5' aisle. Off- street Loading [ §90- 513(2)] One for 20 — 50 beds, plus one for each additional 50 beds, With 198 beds, 4 loading zones are required. It is our understanding that there will be one new loading space adjacent to the proposed laundry and maintenance buildings. Minimum Driveway Width [ §90- 511(d)(2)]) 24' for spaces @ 75° - 90° 20' for spaces @60° but <75° 16' for any other angled parking Drive aisles adjacent to 90° parking are 24' wide as required. All other interior drives are 20' wide, which should be suitable for two -way internal circulation without the need for backing up. Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant's Name: OHCF Properties, LLC Petition No. 15- 004 -TRC Regulation Required Provided Landscaping Required Minimum Landscaping [§ 90 -532] 1 tree and 3 shrubs /3,000 sf of lot area. Parcels 1 & 2 comprise 218,236 sf = 3,000 = 73 trees and 219 shrubs 73 trees and 219 shrubs provided. Required Landscaping for parking and Vehicular use areas, [§ 90 -533] 18 sf /required parking space: 33 x 18 = 594 sq. ft. One 5' x 15' landscaped island for every 10 parking spaces, with 1 tree in each island. 33 spaces require 5 landscaped islands. One tree required for each 72 sf of required landscaped area = 8 trees There are 7 landscaped islands, all of which are at least the minimum required dimensions and have one tree each. Total landscaped area exceeds the required minimum. 36 trees are provided in the parking lot associated with the proposed new buildings and the driveway serving the expansion. Required landscape buffer areas, [Sec. 90 -534] 10' buffer along street frontages (less driveways) 2 feet along interior property lines, @ 1 tree and 3 shrubs required for each 300 sf of landscaped buffer area: Approx. 2,000 linear feet of non - roadway buffer = 4,000 sf of landscaped buffer area and 14 trees and 42 shrubs Trees may be clustered but must not exceed 50 feet on center for buffers abutting a street. No street front buffers required. Landscaped buffer area and number of trees far exceeds the minimums required. Trees are spaced at less than the maximum 50 feet on centers. Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant's Name: OHCF Properties, LLC Petition No. 15- 004 -TRC Other Requirements and Considerations: Sidewalks: Not applicable Lighting Plan: A photometric lighting plan has been provided in conformance with §78- 71(A)(5). Dumpster Location: A new trash compactor is located in the southwest corner of the new parking lot at the west end of the property. This compactor will replace the existing dumpsters and will handle all of the facilities' garbage. Recommendation: Based on the foregoing analyses, Staff recommends approval of the site plan as submitted. Submitted by: 41 713),„ Wm. F. Brisson, AICP Planning Consultant July 8, 2015 TRC Hearing date: July 16, 2015 Attachments: Future Land Use, Subject & Environs Zoning, Subject & Environs Existing Land Use, Subject & Environs Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Applicant's Name: OHCF Properties, LLC Site Plan Review Petition No. 15- 004 -TRC FUTURE LAND USE Subject Site and Environs COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE 1 SINGLE - FAMILY - MULTI - FAMILY ® COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant's Name: OHCF Properties, LLC Petition No. 15- 004 -TRC ZONING Subject Site and Environs ZONING Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant's Name: OHCF Properties, LLC Petition No. 15- 004 -TRC AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING EXISTING LAND USES CITY OF OKEECHOBEE Application for Site Plan Review Page 1 of 2 Rev. 04/11 A OF of „� s :.:::,.:... •: � -•= "` �� C4'0•1'..,City sir 4t Z tr► �s- ! r == ' ,© ,q = �0� ,: `p v. y � 1k /4 tY of Okeechobee General Services Department 55 S.E. 3rd Avenue, Room 101 Okeechobee, Florida 39974 -2903 Phone: (863) 763 -3372, ext. 218 Fax: (863) 763 -1686 a -mail: clement@cityofokeechobee.com Date Received e-�}_ 15 Application No. 5 -Jii l kc., Fee Paid: 3 _, 4 (a 8 7 �(? Receipt No. Ni �4 Hearing Date: 1— 1 (0- 15 APPLICANT INFORMATION 1 Name of property owner(s): OHCF Properties, LLC 2 , Owner mailing address: P. O. Box 759, Okeechobee, FL 34973 13 Name of applicant(s) if other than owner: Faye Haverlock 4 Applicant mailing address: 5 Name of contact person (state relationship): Steven L. Dobbs (Engineering Consultant) 6 Contact person daytime phone(s): (863) 824 -7644 7 Engineer: Name, address and phone number: Steven L. Dobbs 1062 Jakes Way, Okeechobee, FL 34974 (863) 824-7644 8 Surveyor: Name, address and phone number: GSI 1934 Tucker Court, Fort Pierce (772) 419 -8383 PROPERTY and PROJECT INFORMATION 9 Property address/directions to property: 1646 Highway 441 N, Okeechobee, FL 34972 0.GldreSS -for a.l(of (lu.vsin41tm'- -�-Fae,t.t LI VV 10 Parcel Identification Number 2- 09- 37- 35 -0A00- 00010 -0000, 1- 10- 37- 35 -0A00- 00001 -B000, and 1- 10- 37- 35- 0A00- 000001 -0000 11 Current Future Land Use designation: Commercial 12 Current Zoning district: Heavy Commercial 13 Describe the project including all proposed uses, type of construction and conceptual building layout, how the business or use is expected to operate on the site, including but not limited to: number of employees expected; hours of operation; location, extent and type of any outdoor storage or sales, etc., and fire flow layout. Use additional page if necessary. This project is to provide an east wing expansion of 18 beds with additional parking, food service, laundry service, and office space for an existing nursing home facility. The hours of operation are 24/7/365 with approximately 290 total, and peak shift 111 employees. 14 Describe existing improvements on property (for example, the number and type of buildings, dwelling units, occupied or vacant, etc.). Use additional page if necessary. 1- Nursing Home Facility and associated parking. 15 Total land area in square feet (if less than two acres): or acres: 5 -1, %g 16 Is proposed use different from existing or prior use ( Yes) (X No) Rev. 04/11 SIR CITY OF OKEECHOBEE Application for Site Plan Review Page 2 of 2 17 Number and description of phases: Multiple phases - Phase 1 east wing expansion, future phases services buildings as need arises. 18 Source of potable water: OUA 19 Method of sewage disposal: OUA For questions relating to this application packet, call the General Services Dept. at (863) -763 -3372, Eat. 218 Rev. 04/11 ATTACHMENTS REQUIRED FOR ALL APPLICATIONS , 20 Applicant's statement of interest in property Owner 21 One (1) copy of last recorded warranty deed 22 Notarized letter of consent from property owner (if applicant is different from property owner) 23 Three (3) sealed boundary and topographic, "as is" surveys of the property involved including: a. certified boundary survey, date of survey, surveyor's name, address and phone number b. Legal description of site and parcel number c. Computation of total acreage to nearest tenth of an acre . 24 Two (2) sets of aerials of the site. (25 Eleven (11) copies of sealed site plan drawings (see attached checklist for details to be included in site plan) 26 Eleven (11) copies of drawing indicating facades for all buildings, including architectural elevations. i 27 Eleven (11) copies of landscape plan, including a separate table indicating the number of trees and shrubs by type and showing both the official and common name of each type of tree and shrub. 28 Three (3) copies of sealed drainage calculations 29 Attach a Traffic Impact Study prepared by a professional transportation planner or transportation engineer, if the rezoning or proposed use will generate 100 or more peak hour vehicle trip ends using the trip generation factors for the most similar use as contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers most recent edition of Trip Generation. The TIA must identify the number of net new external trips, pass -bay calculations, internal capture calculations, a.m. and p.m. peak hour trips and level of service on all adjacent roadway links with and without the project. 30 Nonrefundable application fee: $1,000.00 plus $30.00 per acre. NOTE: Resolution No. 98-11 Schedule of Land Development Regulation Fees and Charges — When the cost for advertising publishing and mailing notices of public hearings exceeds the established fee, or when a professional consultant is hired to advise the City on the application, the applicant shall pay the actual costs. NOTE: Submissions will be reviewed by the City Engineer and City Planner for all necessary documentation. The Applicant will be notified at least 10 days prior to the TRC meeting whether or not additional information is require to proceed or if the review will be rescheduled to the next TRC meeting. Confirmation of Information Accuracy I hereby certify that the information in this application is correct. The information included in this application is for use by the City of Okeechobee in processing my request. False or misleading information may be punishable by a fine of up to $500.0 and imprisonment of up to 30 days and may resulting the summary denial of this application. 4.- .4. ,�` t. / Faye Haverlock June 1, 2015 Si • ! ture Printed Name Date For questions relating to this application packet, call the General Services Dept. at (863) -763 -3372, Eat. 218 Rev. 04/11 June 2, 2015 City of Okeechobee 55 SE 3rd Avenue Okeechobee, FL 34974 Job No.: 2014 -042 Subject: OHCF Properties, LLC City of Okeechobee Technical Review Committee Application Dear Reviewer: Enclosed find an application for a City of Okeechobee Site Plan Review Application for a OHCF Properties East Wing Expansion including, one (1) copy of the last recorded warranty deed, eleven (11) copies of the construction drawings including the survey information, eleven (11) copies of the landscape plan, three (3) copies of the drainage calculations. A check in the amount of $1,200.40 for the application fee and the lighting plan will follow under separate cover..cG` tAs Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call me at 863 -824- 7644. Sincerely, Q CveZ Steven L. Dobbs, P.E. President Enclosures Cc: OCHF Properties, LLC File 1062 Jakes Way, Okeechobee, FL 34974 Phone: (863) 824 -7644 Cell: (863) 634 -0194 Email: sdobbs @stevedobbsengineering.com Website: www.SteveDobbsEngineering.com Engineer's Report East Wing Expansion for Okeechobee Health Care Facility (Lifestyles and Healthcare, Ltd.) Okeechobee County, Florida Prepared June 2015 By: Steven L. Dobbs, P.E. # 48134 Steven L. Dobbs Engineering, LLC Florida Certificate of Authorization No. 29206 1062 Jakes Way Okeechobee, FL 34974 1 Purpose: The purpose of this report is to provide the South Florida Water Management District and City of Okeechobee with the calculations and documentation to demonstrate that the surface water management system for the proposed Okeechobee Health Care Facility East Expansion complies with applicable state and local water resource requirements. Project Description: This expansion is 7.68 acres in size and is located in Sections 9 and 10, Township 37 South, Range 35 East. It is located in the City of Okeechobee, on the east side of SR 441 N, north of the City Limits Ditch, on the following parcels (Parcel ID 2- 09- 37- 35 -0A00- 00010 -0000, 1-10-37-35-0A00- 00001- B000, and 1- 10- 37- 35 -0A00- 00001- C000). The site is currently partially developed. There is a nursing home onsite with the only storm water system is two existing culverts that discharge into the City Limits Ditch as show on the construction drawings. The remainder of the site is currently undeveloped. This request is for a construction permit to build a Nursing Home Expansion of approximately 23,000 sf with additional parking at a storm water system to supply water quality and water attenuation for most of the existing site as well as all proposed expansion features. The drainage calculations and routings to address the required water quality treatment volumes and anticipated surface water stages for the proposed site improvements will be provided. The surface water management system for the proposed Nursing Home Expansion will consist of a new dry detention area. The control structure for the new dry detention area will connect via existing culvert on the adjacent property to Tylor Creek to the east. Additionally, a perimeter berm will be constructed that is sized to retain the 25 year, 3 day storm event on the site, around the east, north and south sides of the property with the access road along the south side of the property acting as a perimeter berm. Proposed Use: The project consists of an existing nursing home, associated parking, and an existing exfiltration trench as described above. The proposed improvements consist of an additional parking, a building expansion of approximately 23,000 sf and construction of a dry detention area. Water quality and water quantity requirements will be met in the dry detention areas. Potable water and wastewater service is provided by the Okeechobee Utility Authority. The planned expansion will incrementally increase the existing potable water and wastewater demand. Drainage Considerations: To attenuate the runoff generated by the existing and proposed improvements and to meet water quality requirements, all drainage will be routed through the dry detention area. The dry detention area will be controlled at elevation 17.0 NGVD `29 which is the elevation agreed to by staff for the parking lot control elevation. This portion of the project will discharge through an existing 18" culvert on the adjacent property into Taylor Creek. This culvert is currently unpermitted, but a Right of Way permit will be submitted for this existing culvert. The Soils Map for Okeechobee County indicates that this parcel's soils are made up of Immokalee Fine Sand and Manatee Loamy Fine Sand, Depressional soils, which is a very poorly drained "D soil" in the natural state and a better drained `B soil" in the developed state. The Soils Map information also indicates that the anticipated wet season water table is approximately 0" below natural ground for Manatee Loamy Fine Sand, Depressional soils and approximately 1' below natural ground for the Immokalee Fine Sand. However, since this site is adjacent to Taylor Cree and as established above the discharge elevation for this project is going to be 17.0 NGVD '29, the bottom of the dry detention area will be constructed at 18.0, with a socked slotted pipe at control elevation of 17.0 NGVD '29 to encourage recovery. The site is located in the S -133 Basin. The proposed outfall for the project will be on the southeast side of the proposed dry detention area that will discharge through an existing culvert on adjacent property as described above that discharges into Tylor Creek located east of the property. (Taylor Creek ultimately discharges into Lake Okeechobee.) 2 The allowable discharge for the S -133 Basin is 15.6 csm (cfs /sq. mile) for the 25 year 3 day event: Q = 15.6 csm / 640 acres /sq. mile x Project Area Q = 15.6 csm / 640 acres/sq. mile x 7.68 acres = 0.19 cfs A. Water Quality Water quality treatment is provided in the form of dry detention for the project drainage area. Since the proposed water quality system is dry detention, the volume required is 75% of the calculated volume, however since this project discharge into an impaired water basin and with a presumption of compliance with nutrient control by adding an additional 50% to the water quality volume the total water quality volume is 0.50 acre -feet. The dry pretreatment criteria of (0.5 ") is less than the (1 ") water quality requirement, therefore the system meets the pretreatment criteria as specified under Section 5.2.1 of the SFWMD's Environmental Resource Permit Information Manual Volume IV and the required water quality volume. Based on the attached stage storage spreadsheet, the water quality volume (0.50 acre -feet) is met at elevation 18.88 NGVD '29. B. Water Quantity This project is located in the S -133 Basin which discharges ultimately into Lake Okeechobee. The allowable peak discharge rate in this basin is 15.6 csm. The allowable peak discharge rate for this project, based on the 25 -year, 72 -hour storm event was calculated to be 0.19 cfs. The actual maximum discharge rate for the 25- year, 72 -hour storm event was calculated to be 0.433 cfs, which is greater than maximum allowable peak rate, but discharging through the proposed 3" minimum bleeder. To demonstrate conformance to this criteria, the proposed project was flood - routed using AdICPR. The 10 year, 24 hour storm (5.0 ") w/ discharge, the 25 year, 72 hour storm (9.0 ") w/ discharge, and the 100 year, 72 hour storm (10.0 ") w/o discharge, were evaluated based on the proposed plan. Please refer to the attached AdICPR flood routing input/output parameters. A summary of the flood routings is provided as follows: 10 Year, 24 Hr. Storm (5.0 ") 25 Year, 72 hr. Storm (7.0 ") 100 Year, 72 Hr. Storm (10.0 ") Peak Stage Peak Rate Peak Stage Peak Rate Peak Stage (ft- NGVD'29) (cfs) (ft- NGVD'29) (cfs) (ft- NGVD'29)) 20.0 0.40 20.49 0.433 20.89 3 Parkin¢: The City of Okeechobee requires 1 parking space for every 4 beds and 1 space for every employee at peak shift. This expansion is for 30 beds in the nursing home and 100 employees at peak shift requiring 145 parking spaces onsite. There are currently 71 existing parking spaces and 74 planned parking spaces, which will meet the parking requirements. There are currently 6 handicapped parking spaces around the facility, which meets the ADA required 6 spaces per 150 parking spaces provided. Off -Site Drainase: There is no off -site drainage anticipated onto the property. There are some elevations to the west that are higher than on -site elevations, however, there are closer elevation picked up by the surveyor that are lower than on -site and the assumption is that the existing perimeter berm will prevent any off -site runoff from draining onto the project site. Nutrient Analysis: As previously stated, the project proposes to provide 150% of the required water quality treatment volume in the dry detention system in order to meet the nutrient removal requirements. Flood Plain Analysis: As shown on the attached FEMA Panel 12093C0415C, the eastern portion of this project is located in a flood zone AE el. 16.0 NAVD '88. However, existing land is above this elevation thereby, providing assurance potential flooding of this facility is minimal. Construction Recommendations: Runoff and /or any water generated by short-term dewatering during construction will be contained on -site. However, there is some potential for transport of sediment to off -site areas should heavy rainfall occur. In order to reduce the potential of any off -site transport of sediment or turbidity we recommend installation and maintenance of temporary silt fence inside the southerly property line in the area of the proposed paving of the existing rock road and upstream of the existing control structure until site work has been completed and the site has been stabilized. (The existing perimeter berm should prevent any potential off -site transport of sediment from other areas of the site during construction.) Conclusions: In my professional opinion, the proposed construction should have no impact to existing drainage patterns off -site and should have no impact on off -site areas. The recommendations above should be followed during and after the site work until such time as the ground surface has been adequately stabilized to prevent the off -site transport of any soil or suspended solids. The proposed design and construction will comply with applicable state and Local requirements. 4 I t £. S Okeechobee Health Care Facility 2015 Expansion - Phase 2 Basin Information For: 8 , �8MUd w .e § \7 \ \\ /} })7 } §[f }( /2\'} It Total Basin Area (water II II It It II it II II it II A § n Okeechobee Health Car \ ) _ F:\2014 -042 Health Care Facility next to Raulerson \04Calcs\2014-042 site into - phase 2 to 2 oco 0 %7; 21.00 1 §7 7 -0 / 00 000 c 1800 666 0 j'4 a§] 000 § $7\ 000 f Eƒ7 0 0 § f33 _0 888 00 a § To Elev. l 20.50 20.50 A ) )) B B) Area (ac.) /�/� /k� Is Laud use Category Dry Retention Div Retention Banks Building Pavement ƒ F:\2014 -042 Health Care Facility next to Raulerson \04Calcs\2014-042 site into - phase 2 to 2 ii | r i U 1 1 Pv 1 ( | 1 iq I ! Pj 1 |1 I �i 1 1 11 K I \� | t I |1I , 5' i |% | 1"11 |1 ||� ' §!| ;1,0,11 ; j | 1111 § 5 |!| | ; ;7�! ; Q?� ,!, .,,5 _. _ § \■ § ` . ! [ !- g \ ] i @` , iiI \� i- |. ■ ■ . , f4 i ) . | 2 go E . | |! & \ u. ) § ■ \ |# | | .| t « ©— — m 21da0 = n & 002 I G — - -- — -- — — . M ,A£ .617 o08 0 LL C O o 0 .° O N O C O X _c X U I1 J C 7 7 7W 0 0 0 0O U 0) O O -o 2 M .Sb ,64 o08 Lei 8 z fn OSZSTOE OTZSTOE OLTSTOE 0£TSTOE O60ST GE OSOSTOE OTOSTO£ 2 M „0£ ,6b o08 8 8 8 —r z OSZSTOE OTZSTOE OLTSTOE MIME 060STO£ OSOSTOE OTOSTO£ — z Q M,Sbbb 008 In St N- C) O (N N O) sr CO 0 MAP INFORMATION MAP LEGEND The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. 0 0 0 0 Not rated or not available 0 0 0 0 11 r Streams and Canals a) o 0 co o 7 N 0) 0 • O t I C aY U o m N > ` N - )n a a r CO CO C ° O 'O d O° U 'O a) O as O .0 CO u) N _a .0 7 E -' N W O N C p) E C 7N j N r N — U O 0. w O` t(') a) Q N N 8 CO CO U N.0 O .fo C co w a) f6 N (n • E N O O N M O. N 7 L... 'C a) m C7 O L O N -� �-' L ` 7 N • N 2 (n -o N 2 n N Z LL O .. U E N co 0 .N w @ m o Q 0 C rn 0 s N CO No _o orb v) 7• n n c Ny a) U r g C 6 O oN O U U) m O -- n N c y_. a) m� c— o ▪ 3 .o 0 N = E� c o a) a2 2.o a) ID E o o c a) m E ai to L d °° � N n 0 a m co (n a) m • ° U _ 2.o no a-o a w .) -o anai E d 5 o f u) ( n C C N 0 .D N L O C .92 • Z Q U CO a) _ CO a) O N O cD •CO.. >, E .0 N N 'p (1 n la �0 N co O HE O N 'C co C (D 2 (/) .L-. U O O N < N a3 0 'O .O `E 2cna? E mac �co m.- CO 3 a`) ofo�c �) O C D O a) y o O '` Z Q d N r' t 2, 7 eh v) ` 'o co t") c 0 m ai a) • tom E °) `� o o 'n O co tam 7� o O. @ d U N — 2 — �o a) CA d E m E a) a) 0 0 0 l0 O N E a) 'O 7 O to a E co U i aaQ U I-- co co u) 0 0- i- o._ o Interstate Highways 0 a N a) a) h .. G c a) Q O 2. e 2 a 0 0 0 2 < o, < a ao m 0 0 0 H 000000000 o w i V) Local Roads Not rated or not available n c Soil Rating Lines Q a m m • 0 0 0 Not rated or not available Soil Rating Points 0 0 Q a m CO O 0 0 0 Hydrologic Soil Group — Okeechobee County, Florida OHCF East Wing Expansion Hydrologic Soil Group Hydrologic Soil Group— Summary by Map Unit — Okeechobee County, Florida (FL093) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 6 11 19 Manatee loamy fine B/D sand, depressional Immokalee fine sand, 0 B/D to 2 percent slopes Floridana, Placid, and ND Okeelanta soils, frequently flooded Totals for Area of Interest Description 7.9 97.7% 0.1 1.3% 0.1 1.0% 8.1 100.0% Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long- duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (A/D, B /D, and C /D). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B /D, or C /D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. t!su:k Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/24/2015 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4 Hydrologic Soil Group — Okeechobee County, Florida OHCF East Wing Expansion Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie -break Rule: Higher t!soA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/24/2015 "gm Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4 M ..OE bb 008 0 u 0 o 0 0 c • 0. o x L a) 8 N m = n Y � N qN a) m W ar 0 r O A OLTSTOE OTOStoE 1 z M .OE bb 008 _8 M .Sb bb o0B LA 0 z 0n OSZSTOE OTZSTOE OLTSTOE OETSTOE o60STOE oSOSTOE oTOSTOE z R z M St, bb 008 MAP INFORMATION MAP LEGEND The soil surveys that comprise your AOl were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. C O) C N O N 7 as _N co O C yN c (U U 2 O m U N N C U co a co d as C f0 E m E mN E a m a 2 o co E 3 m 0 C L 0 L N 0 ,f0 , 0 N y O a) a LO, oa N a0 m> a, E E as °' L G O C L •O t0 1— O y U a) m is Es(1) E c0 7 8 N C • N (5 w E o. co Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) O N Transportation Interstate Highways a) 0 00 c) o a) N O W,- .«_. 7 as O L UN o CO a) -O co a� 0 a) 0) 0a @ ) O 3 C O) O L a) Nr N z C 4 aaio Q n o a'ei o c c .,.E E u) 3 a)n N E r N = N — ( — U a) p C y 3 a7 a O co E O ` Lf) a) L N N 8 as m U N L O To- j0 C W r a) f0 N 0) 70 E N N a) N y >.M C@ N 7 0 O V. L r y N a) O O z l,L p U E y a c c G ° v a. N w E U,Nw m o a p crn 0 L N CO c L N N L C aL N u) 70 a @ C co m o a7 L— N O co O 0 (N a) O `L Q 'D 3 coi ovrom y a)p m 0 a CO a0 T a) 0) a O E ?` as as O aa)) a. Z 0.4 E o .0 c H n yo E� L .O 7 N Up N U� CJ O L a) fp o co m u) �.o no -o -o v ui a aNi E m a; Y CO i0 J U) N a C C l0 n O N L :1: C N mQ o — a) m rn 0 z E a >�>i o. m a) o 'a v r N N > V 2) N -0 O) d N L0 as E O T 7 C N a >, a) f0 as .-- N as O W O E_2cn}.) E c m o-o co «3 v a`) oam.-'c O O C p U 0 f0 7 T c0 N y •C .a—) Z' a d 2u)1 0 c am E rn o a) CO CO CI) Crl co ca = L o a • :0 d U N Z — as d N a) E ns E lc 0 a E co>0 i c). '5 o --w v°)0) ci) o 0- tL— 8.g o Local Roads O 0) c O o 0 rn 0 Lt) 0 T 0 0 N N 0 . O O O d . LO 0 0 L N CD O N LA A C OS X ❑ N Aerial Photography Not rated or not available Soil Rating Lines 0 0 v 0 Co 0 Ln 0 m 0 LO 0 0 0 N C 0 0 In N . I 0 Ln . 0 N i 0 0 0 O N . 0 0 O N 0 0 LO N O a' N 0 0 N O N Lf) A Z 0) O N Ll] A Depth to Water Table— Okeechobee County, Florida OHCF East Wing Expansion Depth to Water Table Depth to Water Table— Summary by Map Unit — Okeechobee County, Florida (FL093) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating (centimeters) Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 11 19 Manatee loamy fine sand, depressional lmmokalee fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 0 31 Floridana, Placid, and Okeelanta soils, frequently flooded 8 Totals for Area of Interest 7.9 0.1 0.1 8.1 97.7% 1.3% 1.0% 100.0% Description "Water table" refers to a saturated zone in the soil. It occurs during specified months. Estimates of the upper limit are based mainly on observations of the water table at selected sites and on evidence of a saturated zone, namely grayish colors (redoximorphic features) in the soil. A saturated zone that lasts for less than a month is not considered a water table. This attribute is actually recorded as three separate values in the database. A low value and a high value indicate the range of this attribute for the soil component. A "representative" value indicates the expected value of this attribute for the component. For this soil property, only the representative value is used. Rating Options Units of Measure: centimeters Aggregation Method: Dominant Component Component Percent Cutoff: Tie -break Rule: Lower Interpret Nulls as Zero: No Beginning Month: January Ending Month: December None Specified Natural Resources Web Soil Survey ® Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 4/24/2015 Page 3 of 3 M -0£ bb 008 2 LfI CO O � W L - O . .c C o O X W N m L C O S L > � U +- N Y W 1 L.L. m= z 'o I M .Sb bb 008 z A OSZSTOE OTZSTO£ OLTSTOE 0£TSTOE O6OSTOE OSOS TOE OTOSTOE 1 z Ut M .0£ bb 009 N r _ V N CO tn d L 0 O z 1 1 I OSZSTO£ OTZSTO£ OLISIO£ OfTSTOE 060ST0£ OSOSTOE ()TOME z z!� M.Sb bb 008 co a 0 u- c 0 �'w c c o m o 0• O x W a) 0 .0 .S o L co • 0) �c W LL ca 0 2 0 u) MAP INFORMATION MAP LEGEND The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. ca Q 0) Area of Interest (AOI) Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. a c O Area of Interest (AOI) Very Stony Spot .O y Soil Map Unit Polygons n V) Soil Map Unit Lines L_ 0 Soil Map Unit Points Special Line Features a) 0 00 0) o a) l4 0) O 03 s O L U .c 7 N > N N U 0 Lo 0 a) -O u) c� O co co a 0 3 c o a) p -co N O 0 y O c a w o c c w o co tq N 4_) N O) E u) a) '5 E C �c E C O j 05 r u) T-06 U E ) NN co E O` if j a) L N c, 3 f0 (0 U L O N • 2 T co C O O N u) .O E t a) ul L a) a) CD O L a) a) 'O X ° -co 7 O. Co 7 u. o 'O H '•. `) Z LL' L4- Ti p N CO E U_u'u1 m 4O)..72 p crn o r N m c L y y L c O.L u) =O n C y N a) U U L �O O cp N a) C) u) ° Q p co • c 0 ` (O i) - o o - a) • O O Q a) c °30 aT)�c —� 3 �° a o E?ma) o a`))0 -< 2'o.oa�oi� Eo oc N n ID) — a) Q' --' L 3 W U p 0 2 N c 0 CO ) (N0 L a) >` -' O O a) U a) a) a) Y �L... i f�0 i0 ') u) N O. C m N O> ▪ N L C L z 2] Q U f0 a) — (0 O N O co a) • E -c • >O n f0 t0 q c o y0 f0 0 •� U N N Q 'O c • N a) ' @ � N N • t0 O O C CO o) < • 0 -C a ] CD .LO O O O L o•o E o o y._ • o ZQ m L �= m m �� o n.� m y O. — E m �° o'a�o a) a) o 0 o a) O y L L 'O O •O m M L O Q_ E V) S O 2 n Q 0 I— u) u) u) o 0 t- I— o ._ o Special Point Features Transportation Interstate Highways Closed Depression Local Roads v O Y m 0 (1) 3 d S 2 LL > > 0 at m m c > C7 0 J J Aerial Photography Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water t It @ :? i Severely Eroded Spot Soil Map — Okeechobee County, Florida OHCF East Wing Expansion Map Unit Legend Okeechobee County, Florida (FL093) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 6 Manatee loamy fine sand, depressional 11 immokalee fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 19 Floridana, Placid, and Okeelanta soils, frequently flooded Totals for Area of Interest 7.9 0.1 8.1 97.7% 1.3% 1.0% 100.0% ■si)A Natural Resources Web Soil Survey Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 4/24/2015 Page 3 of 3 Okeechobee Health Care Facility - East Wing Expansion, City of Okeechobee, FL Input Report for AdICPR Model _ - -- Basins Name: Onsite Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: Rainfall File: Rainfall Amount(in): Area(ac): Curve Number: DCIA( %): Node: Onsite Status: Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 0.000 7.680 88.00 0.00 Onsite - -_= Nodes Name: Onsite Group: BASE Type: Stage /Volume Stage(ft) Volume(af) 17.000 0.0000 18.500 0.2700 19.000 0.5700 19.500 0.9200 20.000 1.6300 20.500 3.4200 21.000 5.9600 21.500 8.5000 22.000 11.0400 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 17.000 Warn Stage(ft): 22.000 Name: outfall Group: BASE Type: Time /Stage Time(hrs) Stage(ft) 0.00 73.00 1000.00 15.500 15.500 15.500 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 15.500 Warn Stage(ft): 15.500 -__= Drop Structures Name: CS -1 Group: BASE UPSTREAM Geometry: Circular Span(in): 18.00 Rise(in): 18.00 Invert(ft): 13.000 Manning's N: 0.025000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Bot Clip(in): 0.000 From Node: Onsite To Node: outfall DOWNSTREAM Circular 18.00 18.00 13.000 0.025000 0.000 0.000 Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Weir 1 of 2 for Drop Structure CS -1 Count: 1 Type: Horizontal Flow: Both Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 24.00 Rise(in): 36.00 Weir 2 of 2 for Drop Structure CS -1 Length(ft): Count: Friction Equation: Solution Algorithm: Flow: Entrance Loss Coef: Exit Loss Coef: Outlet Ctrl Spec: Inlet Ctrl Spec: Solution Incs: Bottom Clip(in): Top Clip(in): Weir Disc Coef: Orifice Disc Coef: 0.000 0.000 3.200 0.600 Invert(ft): 22.000 Control Elev(ft): 22.000 40.00 1 Average Conveyance Automatic None 0.500 0.900 Use dc or tw Use do 10 TABLE TABLE Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 3 Okeechobee Health Care Facility - East Wing Expansion, City of Okeechobee, FL Input Report for AdICPR Model Count: 1 Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Type: Vertical: Mavis Top Clip(in): 0.000 Flow: Both Weir Disc Coef: 3.200 Geometry: Circular Orifice Disc Coef: 0.600 Span(in): 3.00 Rise(in): 3.00 Invert(ft): 17.000 Control Elev(ft): 17.000 ___= Hydrology Simulations Name: 100YR3D Filename: F: \2014 -042 Health Care Facility next to Raulerson \04 -Calcs \2014 -042 ICPR Phase 2 \sims \100YR3D.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 72.00 Rainfall File: Sfwmd72 Rainfall Amount(in): 10.00 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) 50.000 10.00 100.000 5.00 Name: 10YR1D Filename: F: \2014 -042 Health Care Facility next to Raulerson \04 -Calcs \2014 -042 ICPR - Phase 2 \sims \10YR1D.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 5.00 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) 10.000 24.000 100.000 10.00 5.00 10.00 Name: 25YR3D Filename: F: \2014 -042 Health Care Facility next to Raulerson \04 -Calcs \2014 -042 ICPR Phase 2 \sims \25YR3D.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 72.00 Rainfall File: Sfwmd72 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.00 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) 50.000 100.000 400.000 10.00 5.00 10.00 --- ----- - - - - -- ___= Routing Simulations Name: 100YR3D Hydrology Sim: 100YR3D Filename: F: \2014 -042 Health Care Facility next to Raulerson \04 -Calcs \2014 -042 ICPR - Phase 2 \sims \100YR3D.I32 Execute: Yes Alternative: No Restart: No Patch: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5000 Boundary Stages: Time(hrs) 50.000 100.000 Group BASE Print Inc(min) 15.000 5.000 Run Yes Delta Z Factor: 0.00500 End Time(hrs): 100.00 Max Calc Time(sec): 60.0000 Boundary Flows: Name: 10YR1D Hydrology Sim: 10YR1D Filename: F: \2014 -042 Health Care Facility next to Raulerson \04 -Calcs \2014 -042 ICPR - Phase 2 \sims \10YR1D.I32 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 2 of 3 Okeechobee Health Care Facility - East Wing Expansion, City of Okeechobee, FL Input Report for AdICPR Model Execute: No Alternative: No Restart: No Patch: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5000 Boundary Stages: Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) 10.000 24.000 100.000 Group 15.000 5.000 15.000 Run BASE Yes Delta Z Factor: 0.00500 End Time(hrs): 100.00 Max Calc Time(sec): 60.0000 Boundary Flows: Name: 25YR3D Hydrology Sim: 25YR3D Filename: F: \2014 -042 Health Care Facility next to Raulerson \04 -Calcs \2014 -042 ICPR - Phase 2 \sims \25YR3D.I32 Execute: No Alternative: No Restart: No Patch: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5000 Boundary Stages: Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) 50.000 100.000 400.000 Group 15.000 5.000 10.000 Run BASE Yes Delta Z Factor: 0.00500 End Time(hrs): 400.00 Max Calc Time(sec): 60.0000 Boundary Flows: Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 3 of 3 Okeechobee Health Care Facility - East Wing Expansion, City of Okeechobee, FL Basin Summary Report for AdICPR Model Basin Name: Onsite Group Name: BASE Simulation: 100YR3D Node Name: Onsite Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.33 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.33 Rainfall File: Sfwmd72 Rainfall Amount (in): 10.000 Storm Duration (hrs): 72.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 10.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 7.680 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 88.000 DCIA (8): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 60.02 Flow Max (cfs): 32.985 Runoff Volume (in): 8.528 Runoff Volume (ft3): 237755.905 Basin Name: Onsite Group Name: BASE Simulation: 10YR1D Node Name: Onsite Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.33 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.33 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount (in): 5.000 Storm Duration (hrs): 24.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 10.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 7.680 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 88.000 DCIA (8): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 12.04 Flow Max (cfs): 19.556 Runoff Volume (in): 3.668 Runoff Volume (ft3): 102249.238 Basin Name: Onsite Group Name: BASE Simulation: 25YR3D Node Name: Onsite Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.33 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.33 Rainfall File: Sfwmd72 Rainfall Amount (in): 9.000 Storm Duration (hrs): 72.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 10.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 7.680 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 88.000 DCIA (8): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 60.02 Flow Max (cfs): 29.489 Runoff Volume (in): 7.545 Runoff Volume (ft3): 210350.216 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 1 a u, 0) 0) A O U 0) 0) 0 O 4-4 O 14 U G O G m % X w a G ro• H w 4< v I 0 ,0x a H�a H U 0 O Hi-71N 0'0 77 9 m W N 44 O $44-1 ro V 4-) N 40 4-112, - 1 0 w (0 (34 E w m • E z G 0.)E N M O o ro S U W W mro ,140 Oz X 3 4) 00.+000 M O W O O O O M O H U 000(00 4< 000000 7 0 W '3 <0 000000 4<044 000000 -440.G H44 000000 N N 0 X X0 0 X $ 771 MONHNM 40 U 171 O O M , 41 M , W G 000000 H M H N O 4<44 000(400 X OW 000C-OH H4-1 000000 G HIN )0 4 < 4- - ) m 40 444<0 000000 N 0)44 0 O a N W N 07=C in Ot 0 H O 00 X N H H ro 40 ( 0 0 ) 4 4 00000,7 07,44 00100400 Hm 000000 0) N 10 0 0 0 O 0 0 m 000000 X m 40 00)44 000000 G 014, 0 0 0 0 0 0 -.1 m 010040040 G a N 0) N u) N N N N ro N H N H N H 40 X o) W HOHONO (009-4 H1000 M0 0 £ m M ul O u1 u) N U) O 10Ou) O u1 NH1NHNI. W O W HONOMO E MM N 0000. -40 H1m-0 H 44 000000 0 N 0 X m E G 0000C10 0 40404X4040 .0 ›),D4)- r r ro 000000 H 000440(41 7 7-1, E wwwwww M M M M 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 400)0)0)0)0) 004<0(0.0 444444.)4)44 ..i N-0 m-N m 10 W N W (0 W 4<440444<44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Max Time N N OP LI me m N 0 X N 1J • t11 W N IJ N a N N 1n E 10 N N C F a) N X rocn • Xav, N W d) £ n1 ) U N A r+ O 0 0 U 11 d o ▪ X o N ro O O w £ W W 0 411 r1 U w E E O o 1 r O F W U X C ro ro a X W 0 0 a + C 0 1 b 3 --1 N ) r O ▪ 1 W N N I 0 O a 0. W U 0 .-1 O r1 N V b (7 ro a N 11 O 11 W N V 11 H 0) O -1 P -1 N U ro a E E z ✓ E N .� O re U wx •v c •■ 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • 0 • 0 CD 0 - N 0 0 01 0 0 V 0 0 0 N O N CO M N O N N 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 o 0 m 0 0 M o 0 o O O N m or e-1 o M N N r 0 0 0 M H M O O ill O N Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. W 9: 9 •': 9 9 9, 1- , - ,r, ^ ,te ,e. ,, I. +, -'7 ,-- -- _ e• _ in ,• Nr▪ • ,ei ,P4 (4 --- W g 4 1 ' 1 N al' a! a! a 2 0 et m „c4 M r a 2 PI PI 0 0 1r W el N 1 c4-- an a 5 N • 03 PI ea _.:;1 °I 6 ▪ ± • 1 N ▪ 1.. m „et ,c▪ 4 +14 .14 ,e1 ,c4 4 a X 4 a E. 2.4 2.0 1.7 • a, • „IV \ 0 In ■-'1.4 ei 10 g P4 1 to !----- ,14 ,P4 4/1 it. W (1, +PI el N +N I: ,N q q *04 1 1 I r ,cc ,ce A1. 4 a! • X ,P4 ,N el 9 ,N ,N N ,• e• io a 0 1 r x A 4 3 t 1 1 I 1- 1 0 2 i = III r :i OO.0 °ici O.O.C?• %sL' BS P. E, SHALL BE V0THO°T LLSSLITY TO STEVEN L OOBES ENGINLERNG, LLC TH�DOCUMENT, (p m € i • o m p p $ TOGETHERV6TH THE �ICE➢TSA000ES N6 FRESENTEOHEREIN, ASANINaihuHtN�L* Okeechobee Healthcare Facility EAST WING EXPANSION OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA AA x,ia in,erA,c�iwxe.�.n SCALE VERIFICATION .cac....,.�nc..s......._.. �..,.....K .. ..................... ....�...._..,.�.._._.._...___.. ....______._..._...__. ___ DATE. Steven L. Dobbs LLC L C 1062 JAKES WAY z Okeechobee, Fl 34974 - s,A,a L, Phone: (863) 824 -7644 FLOROA CERTYICATE OF AUTHORIZATION No. 00029206 DRANK BY: CMS DESIGNED BY: SLD 0 ��' solo BAR Is EQUAL TO ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING, ADJUST ALL SCALEDDIMENSIDNS ACCORDINGLY cHECKEDBY: uD LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT No. 2014042 HORZ SCALE: . VERT SCALE: pNtied Deb: REVISIONS CAM FILE'. Kimley » >Horn Transmittal Date: Job Number: 046158017 Project Name: FAMILY DOLLAR — OKEECHOBEE To: Patty Burnette, 863 - 763 -3372 Zoning pburnette @cityofokeechobee.com City of Okeechobee 55 SE. 3rd Avenue Okeechobee, Florida 34974 We are sending these by US Mail FedEx X UPS Hand Deliver We are sending you X Attached Courier Under separate cover via Other the following items Shop drawings Prints /Plans Samples Specifications Change Order Other Number Date Copy Description 1. 1 Site Plan Review Application 2. 1 Fees 3. 1 Warranty Deed 4. 1 Notarized Letter of Consent 5. 3 Sealed Boundary and Topographic Surveys 6. 2 Site Aerials 7. 11 Construction Plans and Landscape Plans 8. 11 Architectural Sheets (Elevations /Exterior Finish Schedule) 9. 3 Signed and Sealed Drainage Calculations These are transmitted as checked below: For your use As requested X For review and comment Copies for approval Remarks: Copy to: kirnle - horn.com Approved as submitted Resubmit Approved as noted X Submit Returned for corrections Return Copies for distribution .� Corrected prints Signed: Jason A. Lewis, tP. 116 youth hcntuck■ :A c.. LukcIdlid. I I, 338( )1 R6; -70l -8702 m O 0 0 0 W •■ ti m W 0 0 0 0 r ✓ m o' 'a r i C Vy ED 1.£93/8£16-69 O W c c P + + * it X (1) P1 Gr jl 0 z 0) H woJI 03A13032I Ci • �aa City of Okeechobee 55 SE 3" Avenue Okeechobee, FL 34974 Tele: 863 - 763 -3372 Fax: 863- 763 -1686 LAND USE POWER OF ATTORNEY Name of Property Owner(s): e 3 V V I L1-0.- Mailing Address: I3 S E a 3 rc t Si- DI eeciioe, -Pt- Home Telephone: Work: Cell: Property Address: 1 OD $ E I£ "` A w n u Parcel ID Number: A - as _ 37-35 -OAoo- oce t t — 0 e.)4.0 Name of Applicant: S n Jones , moJ\a erg' Home Telephone: J Work: Cell: The undersigned, being the record title owner(s) of the real property described above, do hereby grant unto the applicant stated above the full right and power of attorney to make application to the City of Okeechobee to change the land use of said property. This land use change may include rezoning of the property, the granting of special exception or variances, and appeals of decisions of the Planning Department. It is understood that conditions, limitations and restrictions may be place upon the use or operation of the property. Misstatements upon application or in any hearing may result in the termination of any special exception or variance and a proceeding to rezone the property to the original classification. This power of attorney may be terminated only by a written and notarized statement of such termination effective upon receipt by the Planning Department. IN WITNESS WHEREOF TH,E UNDERSIGNED HAVE SET THEIR HAND AND SEALS THIS A a DAY OF 20 OWNER OWNER 2 WITNESS WITNESS Before me the undersigned authority personally appeared the owner(s) named above who upon being duly sworn acknowledged before me that they are the owner(s) of the real property described above and that they executed the power of attorney for the purpose stated therein. Sworn and subscribed this day of rYk 2015 Notary Public: P f l • SEAL Commission Expires: p 10/Q11(40 /a11(.0 Notary Public State of Florida Patty M Burnette My Commission EE 218158 Expires 10/02/2016 Revised 7/08 Page 10 of 10 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION DATE: RE: Family Dollar— Okeechobee Polk County Parcel #2- 22- 37- 35- 0A00- 00099 -0000 To Whom It May Concern: Please be advised that I/we, the owner(s) of the above identified real property, hereby authorize Shawn Jones, JB Realty Partners. LLC and /or their assigns to pursue Governmental Agency applications for development approval for the above described property. The undersigned hereby certifies to being the fee owner(s) of the real property identified above and that to the best of my /our knowledge the information contained within this authorization is true and correct. (Signature) C L&J 1.3 loy Carr c I (,L)orczt (Print Name) ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of FL County of Keeehabe On l /yi, Dal C z ©!Ss efi 9 Daied bcforc me, personally appeared Y% who proved to trk on the basis of satisfactory evidence to he the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his/her /their authorized capacity, and that by his/her /their signature on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. MICHELLE CHANDLER Notary PubMc - State of %Ida C'ommasion I Ff 197139 My Comm. Expires Fab a, 2019 Seal) l Prepared by and return to: William J. Gardner, PA 7280 W Palmetto Park Rd Suite 208N Boca Raton, FL 33433 File Number: 10644 MMRI23726 Will Call No.: 1111111 i Ill 1111111111111111111111111111 FILE NUM 2014000234 OR BK 741 PG 152 SHARON ROBERTSON, CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA RECORDED 01/09/2014 01:13:29 PM AMT $278,910.00 RECORDING FEES $27.00 DEED DOC $1,953.00 RECORDED BY M Pinon Pss 152 - 154; (3 P35) Consideration: $278,910.00 Case No.11- 60033- CR- COOKE(s) [Space Above This Line For Recording Daal United States Special Warranty Deed This Indenture, made this .271.1 rdayof November, 2013, between UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, whose post office address is c /o Matt 4o1�yt nf�e1 Estate Management, LLC, 2801 Network Boulevard, Suite 500, Frisco, Texas, 70534, grantor, having diveste t. le p rsilant to and in accordance with the terms of the Final Order of Forfeiture entered on the 24th day of August, 2012, by ates District Court for the Southern District of Florida, and filed January 28, 2013 in Official Records Book 725, Page -ii s fficial Records Book 725, Page 542, Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida, in the case of UNITED ST: S O MERICA v. Vincent Colangelo ,and United States of America v Rachel Bass Case No.11- 60033 -CR -COO - an• CSW 13, L.L.C., a Florida Litt iabilty Company whose post office address is: 805 SE 3Cott�tr ; Okee it ee, Florida 34974, grantee: (Whenever used herein the terms grantor and grantee iitel de th gthis instrument and the heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations, trusts and tr5stees)-- Witnesseth, that said grantor, for and in consideration of the sum TEN AND NO /100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the said grantee, and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Okeechobee County, Florida, to -wit: A parcel of land lying in and comprising a part of government Lot 2 in Section 22, Township 37 South, Range 35 East, Okeechobee County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the West right -of -way line of S. E. 10th Avenue (formerly Hancock Street) with the South right -of -way line of State Road 70, thence run West along said South right -of -way line of State Road 70 for a distance of 365 feet, more or less, to a point on the West Boundary line of Government Lot 2 in Section 22, Township 37 South, Range 35 East; thence run South along said West line of Government Lot 2 for a distance of 315 feet to the Southwest corner of a parcel of land described in Official Records Book 209, Page 451, Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida; thence run East, along the South boundary line of said parcel of land described in Official Records Book 209, Page 451, for a distance of 365 feet, more or less, to the West right -of -way line of S. E. 10th Avenue (formerly Hancock Street); thence run North along said West right -of -way line for a distance of 315 feet, more or less, to the Point of Beginning. Being the same property described in those certain instruments recorded in Official Records Book 209, Page 451; Official Records Book 224, Page 733 and Official Records Book 239, Page 1391, all being in the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida. LESS AND EXCEPT that property subject to the DoubleTimeO° Book741 /Page152 CFN #2014000234 Page 1 of 3 Order of Taking in favor of Florida Power and Light Company recorded in Official Records Book 391, Page 1874, of the Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida. Tax Folio No. 2- 22- 37- 35 -0A00- 00011 -0000 SUBJECT TO: 1. Zoning and other governmental rules, regulations and ordinances. 2. Restrictions, covenants, conditions, easements and other matters of record. 3. Taxes and assessments subsequent to December 31, 2014. Together with all the tertements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants ially warrant title to the property hereby conveyed against any claim or action arising for the federal case styled Unite c}/ es o merica v. Vincent Colangelo and Rachel Bass, Case No.11- 60033- CR- COOKE(s), decided in the United States Dis i t Co or the Southem District of Florida, the Final Order of Forfeiture dated August 24, 2012 and as and recorded Januar 20.13-iri.Official Records Book 725, Page 531 and Official Records Book 725, Page 542, Public Records of Okeechobee Coun fort And the grantor hereby covenants with said gr has good right and lawful authority to-selt an and not any mobile homes, if any, and under the grantors. at the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor aid land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land only, efsame against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or In Witness Thereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: UNITED STATES O ICA CORPORATE SEAL Special Warranty Deed - Page 2 Case No.11- 60033- CR- COOKE(s) Asset Forfeiture Unit DoubieTime°D Book741 /Page153 CFN #2014000234 Page 2 of 3 State of )SS County of Li em - 2, a Lc ) Before me, the undersigned authority , this c2-0 day of Ale_ , 2013, personally appeared, gAi.)11. R_ d H . J t T t-2-1 , as the pripeluzi Mgr : on behalf of United States of America, he /she acknowledged to me that he /she executed the foregoing strument or the purposes and consideration therein expressed. He /She is personally known to me Seal: Special Warranty Deed - Page 3 C No . Public State of My Commission Expires: DoubteTime°D Book741 /Page154 CFN #2014000234 Page 3 of 3 K:ILAK Civi11046158017 - Okeechobee Family DollarlExhibits \Drainage PDFsIAERIAL.mxd - 6/10/2015 5:19:30 PM - Tyler.Swonger Kimley> »Horn © 2015 Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 116 South Kentucky Avenue Lakeland, FL 33801 Phone: 863 701 8702 www.kimley- horn.com CA 00000696 AERIAL MAP OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA Scale: As Noted I Project No.: 0461580171 June 2015 Exhibit A -3 Patty Burnette From: Patty Burnette <pburnette @cityofokeechobee.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 3:28 PM To: Neil Buck (nbuck @jbrealtypartners.com) Cc: csoword90 @gmail.com Subject: TRC Meeting for July 16, 2015 Attachments: TRC Agenda 071615.pdt 15 -005 TRC Family Dollar.pdf Hello Neil. Please be advised that the Technical Review Committee of the City of Okeechobee will be reviewing the Site Plan for Family Dollar, Application No. 15- 005 -TRC for the construction of a proposed retail store on Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. in the City Council Chambers. A copy of the Technical Review Committee Agenda is attached, along with a copy of the Staff Report. If you have any questions, please just let me know. Thank you, Patty eeleAci "a 100 'IM /74..k/ Patty M. Burnette general Services Coordinator City of Okeechobee 55 Southeast 3rd Avenue Okeechobee, EL 34974 fek 863-763-3372 ext. 218 Tax: 863 -763 -1686 e mail pbii .rnette@citjoFokeechobee.cont website: vt w.ci"tyofokeeciiobee.conn. NOTICE: Due to Florida's broad public record laws, this email may be subject to public disclosure. Patty Burnette From: John Hayford <jhayford @ouafl.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 11:29 AM To: Tyler.Swonger @kimley- horn.com; Patty Burnette Subject: RE: Okeechobee Family Dollar Tyler: From the City TRC meeting, the following items were discussed or requested: Water • Easement required As noted previously, the applicant has agreed to provide an easement on the property for the OUA lines. • Fees required At this time, fees have not been paid and are not due until service requested. Wastewater • Easement required As noted previously, the applicant has agreed to provide an easement on the property for the OUA lines. • Fees required At this time, fees have not been paid and are not due until service requested. • OUA requested clarity on the sanitary manhole connection detail provided on the plans (C800) A clean detail was provided. Detail is for a drop manhole connection. • OUA requested a detail for the proposed terminal "dog house" sanitary manhole This detail still needs to be provided. The detail shown on the plans is not for a dog house manhole. • OUA requested a copy of the driveway construction plans to review the proposed sanitary sewer collection system The plans provided did not show a profile view of the installation. It is not a requirement provided the contractor meets the design requirements of the OUA. Typically the plans call out the need to adhere to the OUA Standards and Details. The general notes on Sheet C900 do not follow OUA Standards. For example, General Note 7 states that the predominant color for piping shall be blue. Gravity sewer pipe is usually green or sometime white. Please review the OUA Standards and Details and clarify the plan notes to reflect this document in all instances. • Plan Sheet C700 This sheet does not show the clean -outs and sanitary manhole covers. • Plan Sheet C900 This sheet should show a stub -out for the lateral coming in from the adjoining property (Zaxby's). • OUA mentioned that the site may have some abandoned piping on it from the previous land use This comment was provided as informational only to the applicant. 1 Kimley> »Horn Transmittal Date: 07/28/2015 Job Number: 046158017 Project Name: FAMILY DOLLAR — OKEECHOBEE Patty Burnette, 863 - 763 -3372 To: Building Department pburnette@acityofokeechobee.com City of Okeechobee 55 SE. 3rd Avenue Okeechobee, Florida 34974 We are sending these by US Mail FedEx X UPS Hand Deliver We are sending you X Attached Courier Under separate cover via Other the following items Shop drawings Prints /Plans Samples Specifications Change Order Other Number Date Copy Description 1. 1 Building Permit Application 2. 1 Fees (Check #1074, $150) 3. 3 Architectural Building Plans 4. 1 Florida Product Approvals 5. 1 Florida Energy Certificates These are transmitted as checked below: For your use Approved as submitted Resubmit As requested Approved as noted X Submit X For review and comment Returned for corrections Return Copies for approval Copies for distribution Corrected prints Remarks: Copy to: Signed: Jason A. Lewis, tp E. K: \LAK_Civil \046158017 - Okeechobee Family Dollar \_Agencies \City \Building Permit Application \Transmittal.docx kimlcy- horn.com I I( ) licntuck■ c.. Lakeland. 1 1. 33801 86 i -7U 1 -87t1? c I OZ /8Z /L "'MOputsouiad linujap= zreduI2pouopawamaaa/ diusa/ uioa •sdn•dpIssnduzea•nnnnnn//:sduii I Jo 13Svd 0 co 0 V N O 0 did :Dt1IT1 cNEwy geoR N Z O � 0 Iaqui luauidigg :dt4SsnduxeJ Sdfl AUG 4 2MS LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION DATE RE: Family Dollar —Okeechobee Polk County Parcel #2-22-37-35-01490-00011-0000 To Whom It May Concern: Please be advised that I/we, the owner(s) of the above identified real property, hereby authorize Shawn Jones, JB Realty Partners, LLC and/or their assigns to pursue Governmental Agency applications for development approval for the above described property, The undersigned hereby certifies to being the fee owner(s) of the real property identified above and that to the best of my/our knowledge the information contained within this authorization is true and correct (Signature) C :3J ipy Corrol (Print Name) ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of County 0 eeetioixe.e_ ) cs tar 3/ ac on /1 - z 045 before me, personally appeared firra /0de who proved to on thc basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity, and that by his/her/their signature on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, cxecuted the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature MICHELLE CHANDLER .1 Notary Poblic • Sims of Florida Commission Ff 197139 My Comm, Expires Feb 0, 2019 Patty Burnette s(,9 OJJ? ufiwit o 7 Icr Lea) «l 1,9,4's 4,01coa From: Tyler.Swonger @kimley - horn.com Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 7:44 AM To: pburnette @cityofokeechobee.com Subject: RE: Conceptual site plan review. Attachments: FD- OkeechobeeCSP1 with aerial 20150323.pdf Good Morning, I attached a copy of the conceptual site plan to this e-mail. If it would be possible to sit down with the reviewers for a meeting it may be easier to do it that way. We are mainly looking to discuss general site criteria, such as whether the zoning setbacks are correct, any landscape buffers required, and driveway connection points. If you could let me know if this is possible it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, Tyler Kim ley >» Horn Tyler Swonger, E.I. Kimley -Horn 1 116 South Kentucky Avenue, Lakeland, FL 33801 Direct: (863)226-68701 Mobile: (561)779 -9996 Connect with us Totter' 1 . a ebb 1 - :v Proud to be one of FORTUNE magazine's 100 Best Companies to Work For ` *This e -mail from Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential information. It is intended solely for the individual named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete it immediately. Any other use or distribution is prohibited. From: Patty Burnette [mailto: pburnette @cityofokeechobee.coml Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 11:56 AM To: Swonger, Tyler Subject: Conceptual site plan review. Good Morning Tyler. Please email to me a copy of the Conceptual Site Plan in regards to the parcel located on the corner of SR70 and SE 10th Avenue and questions that you have and I will forward this information to the individuals for review and comments. I will then get back to you with this information. Thank you, Patty Patty Burnette From: Sent: To: Subject: Neil Buck <nbuck @jbrealtypartners.com> Monday, June 15, 2015 11:32 AM 'Patty Burnette' RE: [POSSIBLE SPAM] RE: Check recd for site plan review application He is one of the managers of JB Realty Partners. He is my business partner who manages the permitting and construction for all of our projects. From: Patty Burnette [mailto:oburnette @cityofokeechobee.com] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 11:29 AM To: 'Neil Buck' Subject: RE: [POSSIBLE SPAM] RE: Check recd for site plan review application Neil one other question....on the site plan application the contact person listed is Shawn Jones. Is that person the manager of JB Realty Partners? From: Neil Buck [mailto: nbuck(a ibrealtyoartners.com] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 10:59 AM To: 'Patty Burnette' Subject: [POSSIBLE SPAM] RE: Check recd for site plan review application That's perfect, thanks Patty. Just make sure it has Suite 103 on it. Thanks. From: Patty Burnette [ mailto: oburnette Ocitvofokeechobee.com] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 10:58 AM To: Neil Buck Subject: Check recd for site plan review application Importance: High Hi Neil. Wanted to let you know I received the check this morning for $1,039.00. Regarding the other check for $1,060.00, I am returning that to you today via regular mail. I will be sending it to the 1615 S. Congress Avenue address that was on the Fed Ex envelope. Please let me know if this is correct or not. Thank you again, Patty Patty M. 'Burnette general Services Coordinator 1 Patty Burnette From: Patty Burnette <pburnette @cityofokeechobee.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 2:49 PM To: bwhitehall@cityofokeechobee.com Cc: rbrock @cityofokeechobee.com Subject: Conceptual site plan review Tracking: Recipient Read bwhitehall@cityofokeechobee.com rbrock @cityofokeechobee.com Read: 5/5/2015 2:59 PM Brian, received a phone call from a gentleman named Tyler Swonger with Kimley -Horn. He was inquiring about meeting with staff to go over a conceptual site plan for the property located on the corner of SR 70 and SE 10th Avenue (where the old trailer park was). He wanted to review drainage, traffic and zoning. I am assuming this is in regards to the retail space but he didn't give me a lot of information. Both of the contact people I have been speaking to for the retail and restaurant businesses know they need to go to TRC so am not really sure what this is about. Is this something that can be set up? Sounds kind of like what we did today with the Aldi's people ? ?? Thanks, Patty i49 iC1t? eant! Patty vt Burnette genera/Services Coordinator City of Okeechobee 55 Southeast 3rd Avenue Okeechobee, EL 34974 T'el: 863-763-3372 ext. 218 Tax: 863 -763 -1686 e -mail pburnette@ci'thofokeechohee.com website: www.cityofokeechobee.com NOTICE: Due to Florida's broad public record laws, this email may be subject to public disclosure. 'SUSAN E. O'ROURKE, P.E., Inc. Traffic Engineering, Transportation Planning TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOR 10T" AVENUE RESTAURANT AND RETAIL Prepared for: Ms. Tracy Gibson Tracy Neely, LLC 1943 Ridgemont Lane Decatur, GA 30033 Prepared by: Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E., Inc. 969 SE Federal Highway, Suite 402 Stuart, Florida 34994 (772) 781 -7918 April 6, 2015 OR15041.0 Prepared by: Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E., Inc. Certificate of Authorization: #26869 969 SE Federal Highway, Ste. 402 Stuart, Florida 34994 772 - 781 -7918 Professiona ngineer usan E. O'Rourke, P.E. Date signed and sealed: 4/6/15 License #: 42684 969 SE Federal Highway Suite 402 Stuart, FL 34994 772.781.7918 SEORourke @comcast.net Drawing norne, \_Cen'l Marketing \Civil \JB Realty \Okeechobee SR 70 FD \CSP1(FIDOT).dwg Layout1 Mar 24, 2015 1.59pm by jordan.hoggerty 1bls document. together with the concept. aul Designs prem..d hwrein. as 0 in.trummt of ...vim le intend. only fat the specific purpose and client for .101 0 w. prepared. Rms50 of one .proper /WIWI. on this 0.ument without wrIttsn authorisation and adaptation by wirmoy-uorn and ...of. Inc. .601 be without wawa), to oinvor-norn and ...Iota.. Inc. 8,320 S.F. „. . 1 ON 1O3fOad CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN A JB REALITY PARTNERS, LLC FLORIDA FAMILY DOLLAR OKEECHOBEE SR 70 SCALE AS SHOWN DESIGNED BY JAL DESIGN ENGINEER: DRAM. BY JAL CHECKED BY JAL FLORIDA REOSTRAIION NUMBER: DATE: Kimley*Horn @ 2014 KIMLEY- RN AND ASSOCIATES. INC. 116 SOUTH KENTUCKY AWNUE, LAKELAND. FL 33601 PHONE: 863-701-8702 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM CA 00000696 No. REVISI ON S DATE BY Staff Report Site Plan Review Prepared for: The City of Okeechobee Applicant: Shawn Jones /Family Dollar Petition No.: 15- 005 -TRC !'Planning & Management Services, Inc. 1375 Jackson Street, Suite 206 Fon Myers, Floricla 239 - 334 -3366 Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Shawn Jones /Family Dollar Petition No.: 15- 005 -TRC GENERAL INFORMATION Owner Applicant >Ircant'Address Site Address ontact Pers Contact Phone Number Email: re eecno Shawn Jones :elan 100 SE 10th Av., Okeechobee, FL 34974 awn Jones (863) 581 -4222 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY Location: 100 SE 10TH Avenue Parcel Identification Number: 2- 22- 37- 35 -0A00- 00011 -0000 LEGAL OESCR/P77ON: Jp He z 'a7 A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN AND COIZPRISINO A PART OF GOVERNMENT LOT Z SECTION 2Z TOWNSHIP 37 50U771, RANGE 35 EAST, OATIClI08EE COUNTY. FLORIDA, BEN MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT 771E NORTHWEST CORNER OF 711E NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 22, 111E SAME ALSO BEING 771E NORTHWEST CORER OF SAID U.S GOVERNMENT LOT 2; THENCE 501)111 00'20'11' EAST ALONG 771E WEST BOUNDARY OF S417 US GOVERNMENT tor Z A DISTANCE OF 22.97 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LNVE OF STATE 8340 70 (NW. PARK SAAR) ; BAKE NORTH 8r 5449' 84S1 ALONG SUD SOUTH RIGIf --07 WAY LAY& A DISTANCE OF 19345 FEET 117 171E POINT OF BEGINNING:: THENCE CONTINUING ALONG S4V SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY WE NORTH 89 1'49' FAS7, A DISTANCE Of 187.89 FEET,•.7HENCE SOUTH 45'11'19' EAST, STILL ALONG THE SOUTH NWT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE 8040 70, A DISTANCE OF 77.04 FEET 77) 771E WEST RIGh7- 0E-WAY LAC OF SOU7NEAST 10TH AVENUE (MANCOCK J1Ntt1)• THENCE SOUTH 00'1959' EAST; ALONG SAN) WEST RIGHT-OF-MY CNN7 A DISTANCE OF 30.x02 FEET TO NNE SOUTH 000MURY OF THAT CERDVN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRI BED hV OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 209. PACE 451 OF 111E PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE• coUNTY. FLORIDA THENCE SOUTH 8958'18' WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTH 09UNI DRY. A DITANCE OF 179.89 FEET THENCE REPAVING SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY; NORTH 0070'11' WEST, AND PAISILLEL 117771 771E AFOREMENTIONED war BOUNDARY OF U.S. GOYETWMENT LOT 2, A DISTANCE OF 314.97 FEET To THE PD/NT OF 8ECINNWG. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LANDS CONTAIN 1.30 ACRES. M085 OR LESS. S4D LANDS BEING SUBJECT TO THE ORDER OF TAKING IN FAVOR OF FLORIDA POWER AND LX HT COMPANY RECORDED W OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 391, PACE 1 874, OF THE PUBLIC REDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Shawn Jones /Family Dollar Petition No.: 15- 005 -TRC GENERAL DESCRIPTION The 1.3 acre property is vacant, and was part of a Future Land Use amendment to Commercial, a rezoning to CHV of the parent tract encompassing about 2.7 acres. The parent tract is the subject of a lot split into two separate parcels, A and B, of which this is labeled Parcel B. The Applicant is now submitting a site plan for an 8,320 square foot Family Dollar retail store. Following is the Staff analysis of the project's consistency with the various City require- ments and regulations. Instances where the Staff believes the submission to be deficient are highlighted. Existing Future Land Use Commercial Zoning District CHV Use of Property Vacant Land Area 2.7 acres Proposed Commercial CHV Family Dollar retail store 1.3 acres ADJACENT FLUM CLASSIFICATIONS, ZONING, AND EXISTING LAND USE mmerci East: West: xis stm+g Land Future Land Use Map Classification Zoning District Existing Land Use Future Land Use Map Classification )fling District Existing Land Use Future Land Use Map Classification Zoning District Existing Land Use acan Commercial CHV and RMF U. S. Post Office Single- Family Residential Mobile home park Commercial CHV Vacant, proposed Zaxby's fast -food restaurant Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Shawn Jones /Family Dollar Petition No.: 15- 005 -TRC ADEQUACY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES POTABLE WATER AND SANITARY SEWER: The Applicant for the Zaxby's fast -food restaurant to the immediate east has provided letters from the Okeechobee Utility Authority (OUA) documenting that the Authority has adequate capacity and facilities to provide for the volume of potable water and waste water treatment and disposal expected to be generated by the proposed fast -food restaurant. These letters are equally applicable to the proposed Family Dollar store. These letters follow the graphics at the end of this Staff Report. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL: On a number of occasions the County has confirmed a considerable level of excess capacity available to serve the solid waste disposal needs of other developments in the City. It appears reasonable that the volume of solid waste associated with a development of this size can also be accommodated within the capa- city of the County's Solid Waste Facility. DRAINAGE: The Applicant has submitted the drainage calculations in a Report entitled "Okeechobee Family Dollar" prepared by Kimley Horn and dated June 2015. The report covers the entire 2.7 acre parent tract which will be split into the two parcels, A and B. Parcel B is the Family Dollar store. It is our understanding that the master stormwater pond depicted and discussed in the Report is designed to provide for stormwater requirements for both Parcels A & B. TRAFFIC GENERATION AND IMPACTS: ACCESS AND EGRESS: Vehicular access and egress for customers and service vehicles will be via a two -way driveway to SR 70. This driveway will also serve the proposed Zaxby's fast -food restaurant to the immediate west. These two parcels are the subject of a lot split creating two individual Tots, each conforming to the City's minimum area and width requirements. The property owners will also need to enter into a joint driveway access agreement acceptable to the City. TRAFFIC STUDY: The LDC requires that a project generating over 100 peak hour trips provide a traffic analysis. Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E., Inc. has prepared a Traffic Analysis. Based on the ITE Trip Generation 9th Edition, Ms. O'Rourke estimated that together the 3,847 square foot Zaxby's fast food restaurant with drive through service and the 8,320 Family Dollar retail store will generate 110 trips in the AM peak hour and 138 trips in the PM peak hour. Therefore, a full traffic analysis was required. Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Shawn Jones /Family Dollar Petition No.: 15- 005 -TRC Impact on roadways and intersections In the detailed analysis, Ms. O'Rourke determined that the combination of the restaurant and retail uses would generate peak hour traffic below the generally accepted threshold of 3% of the roadway capacity. The analysis also determined that even with the addition of the peak hour traffic generated by both the restaurant and retail use, SR 70 will continue to operate at Level of Service C during both the AM and PM peak hours. The traffic analysis also considered the impact of the proposed restaurant and retail uses on the intersection of SR 70 and SE 10th Avenue and concluded that the intersection would operate at an overall Level of Service A for both the AM and PM peak hours. Comparison of Proposal with Dimensional Standards, CHV Zoning Regulation Required Provided Minimum Parcel Size and Width [ §90- 285(1)] Area: 6,250 square feet Width: 50 feet Area — 1.3 acres, Width — 167.9 feet Minimum Front Yard Setback [ §90- 285(2)a] 20 feet, primary frontage; 15 feet for second frontage; 10 feet to vehicular use areas SR 70 frontage: 90+ feet to building; 13 feet to parking SE 10th Av. frontage: 69.7 feet to building; 20 feet to parking Minimum Side Yard Setback [ §90- 285(2)a] Eight feet; 20 feet abutting a residential zoning district. 85.6 feet from west property line to building; 8 feet to parking Minimum Rear Yard Setback [ §90- 285(2)a] Ten feet; 20 feet abutting a residential zoning district. Over 100 feet to building. Maximum Lot Coverage [ §90- 285(3)a] 50% 14.6% Maximum Impervious Surface [ §90- 285(3)] 85% 65.4% Maximum Height [ §90- 285(4)a] 45 feet Single story: 15 feet to eaves; 23' 4" to top of front elevation. Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 4 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Shawn Jones /Family Dollar Petition No.: 15- 005 -TRC Regulation Required Provided Off- street Parking [ §90- 512(2)] One space per 75 sq. ft. (8,320 = 300)= 28 At least two of the required spaces must be designated for the handicapped. Parking spaces must be at least 9 feet by 20 feet; and handi- capped spaces must be 12 feet by 20 feet with a five -foot wide handicap aisle. 35 parking spaces are provided of which two are designated for the handicapped. All parking spaces, including handicapped spaces, meet the minimum required sizes. Off - street Loading [ §90- 511(c)] [ §90- 513(2)] One 10 foot by 30 foot loading space with a vertical clearance of 14 feet is required commercial uses with 5,000 to 25,000 square feet of floor space. One required One loading space of adequate space is provided along the rear of the building. Minimum Driveway Width [ §90- 511(d)(2)]) for spaces @ 75° - 90° All the drive aisles are equal to or in excess of the minimum required 24 -foot width. Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 5 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Shawn Jones /Family Dollar Petition No.: 15- 005 -TRC Regulation Required Provided Landscaping Required Minimum Landscaping [§ 90 -532] One tree and three shrubs per each 3,000 square feet of lot area: 56,628 _ 3,000 = 19 trees and 57 shrubs 21 trees and 70 shrubs provided. Required Landscaping for parking and Vehicular use areas, [§ 90 -533] 18 square feet per required parking space: 28 x 18 = 504 sq. ft. One 5 -foot by 15 foot landscaped island for every 10 parking spaces, with one tree in each island. Three landscaped islands are needed for 28 required spaces. One tree required for each 72 square feet of required landscaped area = 7 trees 860 square feet of landscaped area provided Six landscaped islands in excess of minimum required size provided. Each has at least one tree. Total seven trees provided. Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 6 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Shawn Jones /Family Dollar Petition No.: 15- 005 -TRC Regulation Required Provided 10 foot buffer along street frontages (less driveways) and two feet along interior property lines, with at least one tree and three shrubs required for each 300 square feet of landscaped buffer area: SR 70 frontage: 10' x 167.9' = Eight trees and 21 shrubs provided along SR 70 1,700 square feet = 6 trees and frontage. 17 shrubs SE 10th Av. Frontage: 10' x 266' Ten trees (including three in parking area = 2,660 square feet = 9 trees landscaped islands) and 49 shrubs provided. Required and 27 shrubs landscape One tree, but no shrubs are provided along the south buffer areas, [Sec. 90 -534] South property line: 2' x 179.89' = 360 square feet = 1 tree and 4 property line. shrubs Since the property along the west property line is devoted to the driveway to be shared with the adja- West property line: 2' x 315 `= cent Zaxby's property, it cannot practically provide a 630 square feet = 2 trees and 6 location for required landscaping. However, this shrubs does not absolve the property from providing the Total = 18 trees and 54 shrubs trees and shrubs required for this area. We suggest are required. that at least the three trees and 10 shrubs required along the south and west interior property lines be Trees may be clustered but must used along the south property line to buffer the adja- not exceed 50 feet on center for cent residential property to the south. Even more buffers abutting a street. extensive landscaping treatment along this property line would provide a better visual buffer for the residential properties. One square foot of building signage per linear foot of property The area of the Family Dollar signs on the front and along the front of the lot. side elevations measure about 93.4 and 34 square Signage 167.9 linear feet of frontage on feet, respectively. This is well within the maximum [Sec. 90- 572(a) SR 70 allows for167.9 square foot of signage. allowable building signage limitation. Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 7 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Shawn Jones /Family Dollar Petition No.: 15- 005 -TRC Other Requirements and Considerations Sidewalks: There is an existing sidewalk along SR 70.S; but none along SE 10th Av. A sidewalk should be provided along SE 10th Av. Lighting Plan: A photometric lighting plan in conformance with §78- 71(A)(5) must be provided. Dumpster Location: The dumpster location is indicated at the rear of the property on the north side of the retention pond. Recommendation Based on the foregoing analyses, Staff recommends approval of the site plan with the following stipulations: 1. At least the three trees and 10 shrubs, preferably more, be planted along the south and west interior property lines to provide a more sensitively visual buffer to the adjacent residential property to the south. 2. A sidewalk is provided along the west side of SE 10th Av. 3. A photometric lighting plan in conformance with §78- 71(A)(5) is submitted. Submitted by: Wm. F. Brisson, AICP Planning Consultant July 8, 2015 TRC Hearing date: July 16, 2015 Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Shawn Jones/Family Dollar Petition No.: 15-005-TRC Subject Property 52 FUTURE LAND USE MAP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE r —1 SINGLE - FAMtLY EMI MULTI - FAMILY all COMMERCIAL i, INDUSTRIAL PUBL/C FAC4LITIES RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE .„/ Servin Florida Local Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Applicant: Shawn Jones /Family Dollar Petition No.: 15- 005 -TRC Site Plan Review ZONING MAP Subject Propert ZONING COmlf 6r :wE St trVilc^ - CON. titan CJmYence,. 4111W- LI 01111E. ero- ear ►etrea;+wK sn tct 1, n- 10IDatG is M•wo�-u. EM PUB Fue i Fitt, TIES haunteo ewe . 4vF RI E4tNTM. 1r V,Tq AMA.: kill" AML MOB1E "F'. 1Mt S •.t t toa ,con•II1111111116,04..441.E PAI -. - String Florida Local Governments Since 1988 10 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Shawn Jones /Family Dollar Petition No.: 15- 005 -TRC AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING EXISTING LAND USES �rning 1'lurida Local Governments Strive 1988 11 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Shawn Jones /Family Dollar Petition No.: 15- 005 -TRC OKEECHOBEE UTILITY AUTHORITY 100 SW 5th Avenue Okeechobee, Florida 34974 -4221 June 24, 2015 Ms. Tracy Gibson Nextturn, LLC 1943 Ridgemont Lane Decatur, Georgia 30033 Ref: Water Capacity Request Parcel ID No.: 2- 22- 37- 35 -0A00 -00011 -0000 Address: 100 SE 10th Avenue Dear Ms. Gibson: (863) 763-9460 FAX: (863) 763 -9036 In reference to a request of the availability of water capacity to the subject property, I submit the following information for your use in meeting the potable water use requirements for the project. The Okeechobee Utility Authority owns and operates two water treatment plants with a combined treatment capacity of 6 MGD. During the twelve month period from February 2014 to January 2015, the maximum daily flow was 3.4 MGD, or about 57% of capacity. At the present time, the OUA has excess capacity at the treatment plants. The OUA has a potable water distribution main in the road right of way near the subject property. Any upgrade requirements to the water main due to the demands of the proposed project will be at the project owners' expense. Should you have any questions, comments or concerns with regards to the water system capacity, please contact the OUA at 863- 763 -9460. Sincerely, John F. • P.E. Executive Director Okeechobee Utility Authority Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 12 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Shawn Jones /Family Dollar Petition No.: 15- 005 -TRC OKEECHOBEE UTILITY AUTHORITY 100 SW 5th Avenue Okeechobee, Florida 34974 -4221 June 24, 2015 Ms. Tracy Gibson Nextturn, LLC 1943 Ridgemont Lane Decatur, Georgia 30033 Ref: Wastewater Capacity Request Parcel ID No.: 2- 22- 37- 35 -0A00 -00011 -0000 Address: 100 SE 10th Avenue Dear Ms. Gibson: (863) 763 -9460 FAX: (863) 763 -9036 In reference to a request of the availability of wastewater capacity to the subject property, I submit the following information for your use in the permitting for the above referenced project. The Okeechobee Utility Authority owns and operates one regional wastewater treatment plant with a FDEP permitted capacity of 3.0 MGD. During the twelve month period from March 2014 to February 2015, the annual average daily demand was 0.858 MGD, or about 29% of the current 3.0 MGD treatment capacity. The OUA does have wastewater collection lines in the immediate vicinity of your project. Any upgrade requirements to the wastewater system due to the demands of the proposed project will be at the project owners' expense. Should you have any other questions, comments or concerns with regards to the wastewater system capacity, please contact the OUA at 863.763.9460. Sincerely, ohn F. Hayfor Executive Director Okeechobee Utility Authority Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 13 l baba+ � • -i'Q i14 t CITY OF OKEECHOBEE Application for Site Plan Review Page 1 of 3 Rev. 10/14 III Of.OK C>> �.;0 = 4.; : �► ` F? y u- T . -,, :. : ,-- 46 ,� ..�-' City of Okeechobee General Services Department 55 S.E. 3rd Avenue, Room 101 Okeechobee Florida 34974 Phone: (863) 763 -3372, ext 218 Fax: (863) 763 -1686 E -mail: pburnette (n)cityofokeechobce.com Date Received G— 1a-15 Application No. 15_ CO5- T RC, Fee Paid: 1 O 3q. 06 0 i<4.,1 t g 3 Receipt No. 3 g 9 Vi, Hearing Date: 1- I10-15 & . .--- x-r- -- ,. �� � •� %' 4 tip APPLICANT INFORMATION 1 Name C SW 131 (- t-C' of property owner(s): ,jg Realty Partners7ttC- 2 Owner mailing address:. • • • • . 8'l 1 0 $0 S E `�i 3rcL -, 0 (fectio . e _ _ - _ _ _ • , 3 Name of applicant(s) if other than owner: Shawn Jones 4 Applicant mailing address: 3929 Aero Place; Lakeland, FL 33811 5 Name of contact person (state relationship): Shawn Jones, Manager Contact person daytime phone(s): _ 4222 6 7 Engineer: Name, address and phone num er: Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc; Jason Lewis 116 S Kentucky Avenue; Lakeland, FL 33810 (863) 226 -6860 8 Surveyor: Name, address and phone number: ECON 5304 South Florida Avenue, Suite 400; Lakeland, FL 33813 (863) 686 -0544 PROPERTY and PROJECT INFORMATION 9 Property address /directions to property: 100 SE 10th Avenue, Okeechobee, FL 34974 Southwest intersection of SR 70 and SE 10th Avenue 10 Parcel Identification Number 2- 22- 37- 35 -0A00- 00011 -0000 11 Current Future Land Use designation: Commercial 12 Current Zoning district: Commercial Heavy (CHV) District 13 Describe the project including all proposed uses, type of construction and conceptual building layout, how the business or use is expected to operate on the site, including but not limited to: number of employees expected; hours of operation; location, extent and type of any outdoor storage or sales, etc., and fire flow layout. Use additional page if necessary. 8,320 SF Family Dollar, associated master stormwater pond, conveyance system, utilties and parking. 14 Describe existing improvements on property (for example, the number and type of buildings, dwelling units, occupied or vacant, etc.). Use additional page if necessary. The site was previously used as a mobile park; reminants of this use still remain, such as the lift station and compacted roadways. 15 Total land area in square feet (if less than two acres): r acres: 2.7 parent, 1.3 acres sub - parcel 16 Is proposed use different from existing or prior use (___Yes) ( No) Rev. 10/14 CITY OF OKEECHOBEE Application for Site Plan Review Page 2 of 3 17 Number and description of phases: Project to be completed in one (1) phase is Source of potable water: Connect to existing watermain located along SE 10th Avenue 19 Method of sewage disposal: Connect to existing manhole 341r v/ ■ For questions relating to this application packet, call the General Services Dept. at (863) - 763 -3372, Ext. 218 Rev. 10/14 ATTACHMENTS REQUIRED FOR ALL APPLICATIONS 20 Applicant's statement of interest in property PP ,9 conhv.e+ 10 piwchasie papefh{ --icy- re lzui Shve- 21 One (1) copy of last recorded warranty deed 22 Notarized letter of consent from property owner (if applicant is different from property owner) 23 Three (3) sealed boundary and topographic, "as is" surveys of the property involved including: a. Certified boundary survey, date of survey, surveyor's name, address and phone number b. Legal description of site and parcel number ? c. Computation of total acreage to nearest tenth of an acre ✓ 24 Two (2) sets of aerials of the site. 25 Eleven (11) copies of sealed site plan drawings (see attached checklist for details of items to be included) 26 Eleven (11) copies of drawing indicating facades for all buildings, including architectural elevations. 27 Eleven (II) copies of landscape plan, including a separate table indicating the number of trees and shrubs by type and showing both the official and common name of each type of tree and shrub. 28 Three (3) copies of sealed drainage calculations 29 Attach a Traffic Impact Study prepared by a professional transportation planner or transportation engineer, if the rezoning or proposed use will generate 100 or more peak hour vehicle trip ends using the trip generation factors for the most similar use as contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers most recent edition of Trip Generation. The TIA must identify the number of net new external trips, pass -bay calculations, internal capture calculations, a.m. and p.m. peak hour trips and level of service on all adjacent roadway links with and without the project. 30 Nonrefundable application fee: $1,000.00 plus $30.00 per acre. NOTE: Resolution No. 98 -11 Schedule of Land Development Regulation Fees and Charges — When the cost for advertising, publishing and mailing notices of public hearings exceeds the established fee, or when a professional consultant is hired to advise the City on the application, the applicant shall pay the actual costs. NOTE: Submissions will be reviewed by the General Services Coordinator and City Planner for all necessary documentation. The Applicant will be notified at least 10 days prior to the TRC meeting whether or not additional information is required to proceed or if the review will be rescheduled to the next TRC meeting. Confirmation of Information Accuracy I hereby certify that the information in this application is correct. The information included the City of • keechobee in processing my request. False or misleading information may $5000 i „ e imprisonme i t of up to 30 days and may result in the summary denial of this '• al i i Aii Shawn Jones ((0 in this application is for use by be punishable by a fine of up to application. Signature � Printed Name Date For questions relating to this application packet, call the General Services Dept. at (863) - 763 -3372, Ext. 218 Rev. 10/14 Traffic Engineering, Transportation Planning TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOR 10TH AVENUE RESTAURANT AND RETAIL Prepared for: Ms. Tracy Gibson Tracy Neely, LLC 1943 Ridgemont Lane Decatur, GA 30033 Prepared by: Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E., Inc. 969 SE Federal Highway, Suite 402 Stuart, Florida 34994 (772) 781 -7918 April 6, 2015 OR15041.0 Prepared by: Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E., Inc. Certificate of Authorization: #26869 969 SE Federal Highway, Ste. 402 Stuart, Florida 34994 772 - 781 -7918 Professiona ngineer / usan E. O'Rourke, P.E.'` Date signed and sealed : 4/6/15 License #: 42684 969 SE Federal Highway Suite 402 Stuart, FL 34994 772.781.7918 SEORourke@corneast.net Traffic Engineering, Transportation Planning April 6, 2015 Tracy Neely, LLC 1943 Ridgemont Lane Decatur, GA 30033 Re: 10th Avenue Restaurant and Retail Dear Ms. Gibson: Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E., Inc. has completed the traffic analysis of the proposed project to be located on SE 10th Avenue and SR 70 in Okeechobee, Florida. The steps in the analysis and the ensuing results are presented herein. It has been a pleasure working with you. If you have any questions or comments, please give me a call. Respectfully submitted, SUSAN E. O'ROURKE, P.E. INC. Z<AAL Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E. Registered Civil Engineer — Traffic c4.o.10th Ave Restaurant and Retail 969 SE Federal Highway Suite 402 Stuart, FL 34994 772.781.7918 SEORourke@comcast.net TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 ROADWAY CONDITIONS 3 PROJECT TRAFFIC 3 PROJECT DISTRIBUTION / ASSIGNMENT/ IMPACT 5 FUTURE TRAFFIC 5 INTERSECTION ANAYISIS 5 DRIVEWAY VOLUMES 10 CONCLUSION 10 TABLES TABLE 1: Trip Generation 4 TABLE 2: Project Significance 7 TABLE 3: Link Analysis — 2017 8 FIGURES FIGURE 1: Project Location 2 FIGURE 2: Project Assignment 6 FIGURE 3: Turning Movements at SR 70 and 10th Avenue 9 APPENDICES APPENDIX A Site Plan APPENDIX B Transportation Data APPENDIX C Intersection Analysis /Driveway volumes INTRODUCTION Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E., Inc. was retained to prepare a traffic analysis for the proposed project being submitted to the City of Okeechobee. The project is located on the south side of SR 70 and the west side of SE 10th Avenue in Okeechobee County. The purpose of this report is to determine the impact on the surrounding roadway system associated with the proposed project. The following components were addressed: • Project description • existing roadway conditions • Project Trip Generation • Project Significance • 2017 Link Analysis • Intersection Analysis Each of these components is outlined herein. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The 10th Avenue Restaurant and Retail is a development consisting of 3,847 square feet of fast food restaurant with a drive -thru and 8,320 square feet of retail development; The project will have access through project driveways located on SR 70 and SE 10th Avenue. The project location is shown in Figure 1. Appendix A contains the site plan. 1 State Road 70 0 m a a t 0 w Project N Location 10 1 North not to scale Figure 1 Project Location 10th Ave Restaurant and Retail c4.o.l0th Ave Restaurant and Retail Proj Location 2 ROADWAY CONDITIONS The study area roadways were defined in terms of existing lane geometrics. Existing Lane Geometrics The study area was reviewed to determine the existing number and type of lanes along the roadway. Each roadway is described below. SR 70 is a four lane divided highway with a general east /west alignment. US Highway 441 is a four -lane divided state highway from SR 70 to NW 36th Street. From 36th Street to the County line, it is a two -lane state highway. There are several different capacities assigned to the roadway. US 441 has a north /south alignment. SE 10th Avenue is a two -lane north /south collector roadway that intersects SR 70. Existing Traffic Existing traffic was taken from the FDOT 2013 data on the FDOT website. Additional data was taken from the 2011 EAR based Amendments and used to calculate the growth rate. These data sheets are provided in Appendix B. PROJECT TRAFFIC To estimate traffic generated by the proposed 10th Avenue Restaurant and Retail, the ITE Trip Generation, 9th Edition trip rates were applied. These calculations provide an estimate of the typical generation. Trip generation for the project is shown in Table 1. As shown, the project will generate 110 AM peak hour trips and 138 PM peak hour trips. There will be 59 trips entering the project and 51 trips exiting the project in the AM and 69 trips entering the project and 69 trips leaving the project in the PM peak hour. 3 Trip Generation Daily Net Trips Ls F O ot 00 an an 01 an et oro w O O V, t` 4 M N Cei 0% C P. Ni 7 .1. 00 t. M co O. Pass -by Trips b 34% %0S 1 34% 0 O h '7 0% d' Gross Trips "ris [_, ON '. ^ O - h N en O 0 e aa, 0°° `O °a` C . n a oh o Cr cn LDirectional Split -`6. O .4 7 O e voi o 0 4. — C O an e O h e_ h s 0 0 is W 0 C W 0 . 0 0 0 0' Ln(T)= .65Ln(x) +5.83 1 T=496.12(x) J T= 45.42(x) Units a c P SF SF SF a v P. Square Feet 8,320__ v el. 3,847 Land Use Code Land Use Code 820 934 934 0 0 0. 1".. u w A 3 i -.... Description a> a Fast Food w/ Drive Thru Fast Food w/ Drive Thru 0 Net AM Trips F N CO o w O O v M _ v, 0 Ni et VI M h Pass -by Trips • b 34% e O h 1 34% 0 O h .N-- 00 CA m ei F O en V1 - Os N Gross Tri 0 M n ^ 0°° °a` C . n N oh o 0 — Directional Split _ .4 7 O 0 ri 0 4. h C e b e_ h s 0 . 0 0 0 0' 0 Ln(Q= .61Ln(x) +2.24 I J T= 45.42(x) O a c P h w to SF Dircctio� Square Feet 8,320 3,847 Land Use Code O N 00 934 -.... Description a Fast Food w/ Drive Thru H 4 a C f Note: Pass-by rates based TTE 9th Edition Pass -by Rates C4.o. Trip Generation 10111 Ave Restaurant and Retail G O O M M b Ni M M b y Trips 1 34% 0 O h en m O o E. ^ -- N M n o " CD a 1 Gross -• h Cel s o 0 O h v Dircctio� -. 00 '- N an Equation Ln(T)= .67Ln(x) +3.31 T= 32.65(x) an = to SF Square Feet 8,320 3,847 d Use Hde N 34 . W 0 Total G u 0 ood w Thru A C4.o. Trip Generation 10111 Ave Restaurant and Retail PROJECT DISTRIBUTION/ ASSIGNMENT/ IMPACT The project traffic was distributed by general geographic direction and then assigned to the roadway network. Distribution/Assignment — This general distribution led to an assignment of trips based on the anticipated ultimate destinations and the roadway paths used to reach those destinations. Figure 2 shows the project assignment. As shown 60% travel west and 30% travel east on SR 70 with 10% traveling south on SE 10th Avenue. Project Impact — Table 2 summarizes the project impact as a percent of service volume capacity. As shown, there are no links with a 3% or greater impact. FUTURE TRAFFIC Although no links require analysis SR 70 is shown for informational purposes. The project is expected to build out in 2017. To estimate future 2017 volumes on the links on SR -70 the existing (2013) traffic volumes were increased to existing 2017 volumes by a growth rate of 1% per year. Although calculations show negative growth, a 1% growth rate was used in this case. The 2013 Average Annual Daily traffic volumes were factored by the published "K" factor to estimate the 2013 peak hour two way volumes. The growth rate was then applied to estimate the 2017 peak hour two way volumes. The project traffic was then added to the grown volumes to estimate the 2017 Total Traffic volumes. The total traffic volumes were then compared to the acceptable threshold. Tables 3a and 3b show the volumes and level of service for SR 70 with and without the project traffic added during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. SR 70 will operate at level of service C. INTERSECTION ANALYSIS The intersection of SR 70 and SE 10th Avenue was analyzed for the AM and PM peak hours for 2017. Counts were made in 2013 and grown 1% per year to 2017. The traffic entering and exiting 10th Avenue was taken from 2013 FDOT traffic counts. This traffic was estimated turning coming and going east or west based on the two nearest traffic counts on SR 70 to this area. It shows an approximate 60/40 West /East distribution. Project traffic was added to create total traffic. The intersection was analyzed as a signalized intersection. Using HCS signalized analysis, the intersection would operate at overall at Level of Service A for both the AM and PM peak hour. Figures 3 shows the intersection volumes. The intersection data and analysis is included in Appendix C. 5 .4- N 25% 15% 60% 30% 20% State Road 70 o Project Location SE 10th Ave 10% SR '70 Figure 2 Project Percent Assignment North not to scale 10th Ave Restaurant and Retail c4.o.l0th Ave Restaurant and Retail Percent Assignment 6 Table 2a: Proiect Significance- AM Segment From • To Lanes LOS C Peak Hour Two WayOt Two Way Peak Project Volume Project Percent Assignment Percent Project of Capacity is Project Traffic More then 3% of Capacity? SR 70 US 98 US 441 4 3060 17 15% 0.5% no US 441 Project Driveway SR 710 4 4 3060 3060 66 33 60% 30% 2.2% LI% no no Project Driveway US 441 NW 9th St SR 70 4 3060 28 25% 0.9% no SR 70 SR 70 SW 21st St 4 3060 22 20% 0.7% no 10th Ave SR 70 SE 7th St 2 580 11 10% 1.9% no SE 7th St 2 580 14 10% 2.4% no al Capacity: FDOT 2012 LOS Table 2b: Proiect Significance- PM 1n: 59 Out: 51 AM Total 110 Segment From To Lanes LOS C Peak Hour Two Wayne Two Way Peak Project Volume Project Percent Assignment Percent Project of Capacity Is Project Traffic More then 3% of Capacity? SR 70 US 98 US 441 4 3060 21 15% 0.7% no US 441 Project Driveway 4 3060 83 60% 2.7% no Project Driveway SR 710 4 3060 41 30% 14% no US 441 NW 9th St SR 70 4 3060 35 25% 1.1% no SR70 SW 21st St 4 3060 28 20% 0.9% no IOth Ave SR 70 SE 7th St 2 580 14 10% 2.4% no ("Capacity: FOOT 2012 LOS c4.o.10th Ave Restaurant and Retail Table 2 7 In: 69 Out 69 PM Total 138 r. 3 d N p 10 o0.t10i U U m Hx3 O s O Jg OWE. f N m o m o a r 3060 N 3 E 0 3 3 at'/ vi , N / 1 A O >6�o3a 0 lo Ri s u S m = I d F- 0. l0 i0 O N 3 Q O a J i U ' ' d N E 00. .0 n > N 0 S e 01 ~ A 7 o c -, o. N x 1 N d Q O , a O s N > `O 3 § •1 N t a c d 1c ^0 _0 d4 O y • o mC 2 J O M m J -II Roadway Classification Principal Arterial I O N Project Driveway i I • E tL A m z o 1 f 1 1 c 1 C E O N 3 n K N 0 0 WI ▪ > N a 6 s • en •■ o a N 0 C m a J a ci U m Hx3 O s O Jg OWE. f 3060 psc°gi C N= Z F T d N O W Ip W 2 >aF34 2050 = mu E d d O. an co o — to c O 0 J 0 m N E 0 6> N 7 N O ON N. Y = p 3 L Q N 2 o% m > d A m O^ m 7 a N > N. 3 p Ca! N le g 0 c ^O m d i a ID O y • o mC 2 J J Roadway Classification Principal Arterial o T D 0 11 W To- 0. E W 4 3 _ WI I 1 1 1 0 I 1 E m a n° N 8 m o v N ti c4.o.10th Ave Restaurant and Retail 2017 Link Analysis FIGURE 3:TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUME COUNTS 8 EO OJ O—► °-+ O1 0 3 � 6 z 8 2 a U1 t 4— 0 0 4 T T 0a€ I O T N cc m ° = M D- O O O O O O O 0 O O 0 0 0 SO F m m z z Z z c v tn g q g o n 1� eG 4 m m iii d N b w e .n X ri n Z. o . 60 O od oo m AM PEAK HOUR IS FROM: o O N N O N N N 0 0 0 0 0 OS N 011 O CO N o N M 0 N N n n n 0 n 141 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 pO O 0 0 O N N N O 0 0 0 0 0 o a 9 40 01(0 O m N 4—° °? L Cl rese O —► a 4-- O 0.÷ 01 11.1 I� 3 O 2 2 Z oo la 0 O O x 0 3 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 N z N d g N m N an N~ m 0 $ 0 Q 0 0 0 N V/ N Y1 00 O I- M O w N O N N N N a1 01 01 0 001 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 coot" a. 2 001 2 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 o4.e.TMC 100: and ER 70 DRIVEWAY VOLUMES The project volumes were shown at the project driveways to determine the need for turn lanes. Given that the volumes are below industry standard of 30 vehicles in an hour for left turn lanes and a minimum of 70 for right turn lanes, turn lanes are not recommended. The volumes are shown in Appendix C. CONCURRENCY REVIEW/ CONCLUSION 10th Avenue Restaurant and Retail has a traffic impact of 110 Net AM Peak hour trips and 138 Net PM Peak hour trips. These trips will not cause levels of service to fall below acceptable levels in the future. Based on the data and calculations presented herein, the project does not require additional analysis. 10 0 IT z !QUJ u) w (/) Ui 0 I t9 Z 0 (,) w 0 2 3 APPENDIX B TRANSPORTATION DATA Okeechobee 2010 EAR volumes Growth Rate Calculations 2013 FDOT Traffic Counts a a REPORT TYPE: EA ZO OW Hfu�r FU pG H ww cn4 Z >i a 0 c A H zw w C7 g C4 PI P4 4 0a oz HZ (4 KC 0 a r) wra CV OKEECHOBEE COUNTY: 91 DIRECTION 2 DIRECTION DESCRIPTION FC a4 a 4 a 04 I 10 P4 4 4 04 < to O 47' t0 0 O (r) CV 0) co r O 0) • ri r W 0) v' r- 0) O t0 t0 O .-1 0 to O OD 00 0 r--1 r-1 ri CV H M N N N N 04 U 1 91 CAADT.TXT w w w w w w W Cu w w w w W w w Cu II r-1 r-I ,-1 1-1 r-I .-1 ,-1 .-4 .-i .-1 -1 H r4 r-1 ri 1-1 X Z OD CO CO OD W 0) 03 CO CO CO CO CO CO � CO CO 3 u 0) In 1n to N to 1) 1n N In to rn In u) U 0 0 •. z4 a40 Z P4 O N O O In O O 0n u) O In 11) O N O O 0 }. A 01 ▪ rn • 01 01 01 01 01 01 rn 01 rn 01 01 01 • rn 01 11 FC w X3 D 1 N W N H Z to CO 0 w 0 k, w 0 w W 0 0 w 0 0 w 0 0 0 W II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P4 3 o in 0 0 in 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 sr N 0l 0 t0 0 M r O) 1() 0 to to 0 () r W •.. 0 Vr r .-1 N N N M to O CO r-1 t0 O 0 r- '7. H N N N •-1 N N r-1 A D P4 4 W W W W W W W H 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o x W 0 O 0 0 o O O 0 0 O 0 1.0 0 0 O 0 H 0 0) N O to (r) 111 H CO O 1.11 10 r In 0 N 0) 0) N V' 0 .-I ri t0 .-4 C) O +-i M •• In CO II W H H r-1 ri N A H r 3 i .-IHW OCAH CO 3 3 3 Z CO 3 CO to 3 Z 3 CO Z 3 3 CV W t4 H P4 P4 U1 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o W W II O 0 O O O O 0 O O O O to O O O O >4 >4 CO in M 6) to (0 10 CV 011 0) 0 1n r 0 0 r-1 CO 0 CV CO 0 ri O t0 ri (V 0 r-I (0 Q' 10 (r) H A r-I H H .-( H Z O c4 KC 0UW UW>• xr'P4 F II 0 H 0) H 3 a M H w 0 0 x w •.w 0 z W A P4 x 0 C7 C7 H W a 0) 0 U W GI r44 00 x 0) H H W 01 01 H x O 0 W W x 0 0 m Z W W W 0 Z W Z Z W 0) W Z 0) W W 13TH STREET z w 0 15 /US 441, NORTH E OF KISSIMMEE RIVER /E OF HIGHLANDS 0 EAST 0 r 70, WEST OF SR 710 /EAST OF OKEECHOBEE 126TH w CO (A 0) r4 C4 0 0 W CO 0 r- OKEECHOBEE 700 /US 98 OF CR 15C /NE 304TH ST 0 0 o 3 CO CO r D A P \ \ \ \ In N o to 1n •-1 .-1 r ,-1 •-1 4 CO 04 70 /700 /US 98, EAST OF SR 700 /US 700 /US 98, SOU 1/4 MILE E 224TH ST /CR 68, P4 1=4 P4 a 04 P4 P4 P4 P4 a P4 w 0) (1) 0 CO CO CO ul CO CO CO CO Z SR 15/700, US 98/441 SOUTHEAST OF SE 59TH BOULEVARD o r P4 SR 15 /700 /US 98/441, WEST 38TH AVENUE EAST OF SE SR 15/700/US Z(n II H W C4 H P• 4 •■ CD W W U al Z O C4Nw 00) HP4F UH(r) 4 H Q04 A 41 II w x w1111 H A WP4H•. XI=Cv1C7 WAWH 01 4aa0 HH4 0'J 04 Il z0 HO4H W 2 H 1C aoww PO HID P4 H w •, OZH0 a1Zaa 11 EAH x(400 a0l I-4 PI II II WAUFC 0) c4 CD a,0FC4 >1Haa U w w WwH= W 11 N in t0 r- 0) a) N 0' to 0) M cr r) v 1n to H A H 11 O O O 0 O O r-4 .-1 H r-'I CV CV 0 0 0 O H C \ H II 0 0 0 O O 0 O 0 O O O O .- 4 r I H ri O p4 1.4 A V) II O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C PAGE -01- 21 -FEB -2014 H w Kg W 0 X w Cu A a o w A w w w w w w w w w H ▪ a II O O N O N l0 N 1.0 10 1n () u) O (0 M Vl a1 E" El CP 1 0 II 1f) in u) r 1n 1f) L() u) (n N N N N u) tf) V' 0 H � w II N N H H H N N N N N H H a U = H A • w H 0 °a H HpG H O H O w a, G4 up 4 H >+ a 04 A 2w wo g 2 Aa a4 1-4 el Co H o N OKEECHOBEE S-1 00 DIRECTION 2 H DIRECTION DESCRIPTION w w w w w w w w• w w w w w w w w H H H H H H ri H H H H H H H '4 H m co co • 00 03 CO O CO CO CO CO CO CO o CO O0 '3 u) 1n N 11) 10 In 1f) u) u) 1f) u) to up u) in u7 0 0 X 2a to if) O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 u7 u) O N D rn a) o o' 01 m al 01 01 01 o (31 • 01 c o' al 11 4 w x3 I N -W N H 2 10 O 0 0) O CO CO u) CO O to (0 CO O CO O CO CO CO W 11 O 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O O O O O O O a 6 0 in O 0 0 0 0 0 0 1n O 1n 0 0 0 0 tzd tf) V' 1) O on 00 N In r 0) V' N V• r V 00 W •- H N H H H H H H M H >1 H A 0 r W W W W W W W W W W W W W W -W W HCv 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'o 0 x w 0 H 0 0 H II W HA H •■ 3 H H Cr) oCf)H 0) NW4 H co w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 N� i11 0 O '-1 HA 222 004 OUW Uw>4 co 2 x a H CO HH Z a H o • -w CO 0 0) 0 H I CD w 1 2v) u r) p4 D HWa 0 a 4 D o 2 I • U W H \ r W WU 0 0 . H F r- N o U) W S+ D W X W W W a H 1 H r 2Hw H W W 0 0 O W p 1 w 00) W H a 2 Z Z W 0 3 a 0 Ha E. W H W W H a z cn O H 2 a x 1n D > w H w w 2 40, H H H F) W co > O W w A k+ 0 co o 0) 0 fZ O 4 0 0 H W 11 cr) r 2 x x H r x Z W aXw 11 x N H H ca co 0o H x W W W 0 H 3 • c•) V' v' 01 cc) • o H H Z 0 H A •- N 2 a 3 N N H a H w w H N 24 U)0 N w co 0) g 3 0o m v) m W W O w W A W H w ° w w `� CO `�) • • w CO CO N u°) 0 w w 4 a 0 2 H 0 0 w w w 0 w w H o > E-i E 2 0 0 0 w w 0 0 - •• 4 ODa w. x x 0 0 x w 11 2 0 0 W H H H H 2 H x W > H - x HA4H a s cn 0 H H H a H s1 1n H H W U x - 0 0 v4 4 a cn co 0 a H co co ••H 4 H 0 2 Z (z1 W 0 4 4 2 0 w x x N W a II w 0 O - Z W w 2 0 cco o E-1 H c0A0w II 2 a W H H H s - - W 0 N M. 111 w 4 4 •- w 0 W W W W H H D W in H N r) 2 H 0 X 2 W W (4 D W W 2 D a H W 0 0 W a a a 2 w w w 2 - 2 2 3"- 02E11 -4 4 0 > E1 H E1 W a s > W H 2 z 2 aWDaC 0 X 4 v) v) CO > H H 4 > co 0 w D a x x A x i 0) 0) x a x '- a II HRH r Gaoo M 0 x H H z H x x x H x H rn m 0o 2 2 4 0 .0 •• 1-4 to V' N 10 H H H M H o rn N H 4 R W H 0 M H (Ni co H r 1,0 61 H o0 H 1n r r 1-4 W II II u7 H ▪ c4 $ 3 z 3 3 3 3 W W W 1 la 1 co co �] U N M 0 CO CO CO CO CO 2 2 2 0) cn 0 0 0 PI •. •..• •• H cn cn a' W044 0 Si H1 -71-7 cV H0ww Iw Ww0c W W II H N v' 1.1) 10 r Cr) c' 1n r o rn V• 10 r- 0) H A H w H 11 0 O 0 0 0 0 H H H H H H N N N N H e 4 \ 1 H 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O N .Y. 64 0 H CO 11 c' V V V d' v' V V V' c' 0r c' V' V' v' V' c c N OKEECHOBEE COUNTY Evaluation and Appraisal Report 2011 Table 1.10 Estimated 2010 Roadway LOS - State Roads Source: Kimley=Hom and Associates, Inc. 2009. OKEECHOBEE COUNTY EAR - ADOPTED APRIL 2011 A3 19 L. , .7. X70 - :: County line SW 87th Terrace 2L Principal Arterial C 790 527 C c 87th Terrace SW 48111 Ave 21 Principal Arterial C 1,460 776 C • 48th Ave SW 2481 Ave 2L Principal Arterial C 1,460 653 ' B • 24th Ave US Hwy 98 21 Princ al Arterial C 1,370 1,297 C ,- Hwy 98 NW 9th Ave 41 Principal Medal C 3,110 1,759 8 9th Ave US Hwy 441 4L Principal Arterial C 3,110 1,804 ' 6 ■- Hwy 441 SR 710 41 Principal Arterial- C 3,110 2,547 B R 710 NE 80th Ave 21 Principal Arterial C 1,460 1,071 C NE 130111 Ave NE 128th Ave '- .... 21 Pt0ncipal Arterial C 790 601 C NE 128th Ave East County line 2L Principal Arterial C 790 651 C 't., : Roed78 , ' :-• County tine SW 16th Ave 2L Minor Arterial 0 1,350 594 C • 16th Ave US Hwy441 2L M or Arterial f) 2040 707 B US Higinvey 98 astern County line NW 176th Ave 21 Principal Arterial C 790 260 8 176th Ave NN 160th St/CR -68 21 Principal Arterial C 790 259 B 160th St1CR -68 NW 36th St 21 Principal Arterial 0 790 455 C 36th St State Rd 70 2L Principal Arterial C 1.460 1,071 C L• :: Road 710 •�r•r• Rd70 SE 40thAvelEveegiadesBlvd 21 Principal Arterial C 1,370 1,044 0 SE 401h Blvd SE 86th Utvd R 15A 2L Principal Attsaial C 1,460 684 B SE 860) B1vWCR 15A SE 128U1 Ave (Benin Rd) 21 Prindpal Arm C 1,460 740 8 128th Ave (Berman Rd) SE 126th BNdICR 158 21 Prinncipai Arterial C 1,460 765 B +4` 126th B1vdt0R 1513 County tine 2L Principal Arterial C 1,460 829 C S Highway 441 North : OorpUy line NW 304th SIICR-15C 2L Principal Anatol C 790 405 B 304th SIR:R -15C NW 240th St • 21 Principal Arterial C 790 299 B 240th St NE 224th SVCR-68 21. Pdnc$pd8Arterial C 790 354 " B 2241h Sb'CR.68 NW 160th MR-68 21. Principal Medal C ' 790 476 C 160th StICR -68 NE 98t1 St 21 Principal Arledal C 790 508 C 988181 NW 36th St 21 Principal Arterial C 1,460 815 C 36th St NW 23rd In at Principal Arterial E 3,280 1,065 8 23rd in NW 9th St at Principal Arterial E 3,280 1,633 13 911t St State Rd 70 4L Principal Arterial C 3,110 1,849 8 S • .11,Li.s 441 South ••,::,• Rd70 SW21stSt 41 Principal Medal E 3,280 2238 ` 8 4 21st St SW28th SWNfottf Rd 4L Principal Arterial E 3,280 1,722 B • 28th Surber Rd SW 32nd St 41 Principal Medal E 3,280 1,815 , B • 32nd St : State Rd 78 41 Principal Arbedal E 3 ,. ► 1,017 B Highway 441 SE •�, ,:: Rd 78 • SE 18111 Terrace 2L PrincOal Arterial 0 2,040 761 B •, 181ti Terrace SE 34th Ave 21 Principal 'Medal 0 2,040. 987 0 • 341tt Ave SE 860h BlvdtCR 15A 21 Prindpal Aiteda l E 2590 845 0 •, 866i BtvdtCR 15A SE 126th Blvd1CR 15B 2L Principal Arterial C 790 391 B 126tt8NdfCR 15B County Una 21 Pttr:tpal Arterial 0 790 355 B Source: Kimley=Hom and Associates, Inc. 2009. OKEECHOBEE COUNTY EAR - ADOPTED APRIL 2011 A3 19 Growth Rate Calculation Growth Rate 00 N 01 O Hour Volume O 00 c-i O rn 00 c-i 0 00 N 00 O 00 c-i c-1 cis In 00 '+-- v) O y • O C Z -+ l0 L aJ t Tu 0. U C L H E O NW 9th Avenue US Highway 441 t"1 0) N c4 o growth rate calculation 10th ave TABLE 2 Generalized Annual Average Daily Volumes for Florida's Transitioning Areas and Areas Over 5,000 Not In Urbanized Areas1 ar44,5.- '+...�G h s. 7..,4X7,,4 fi•+LVy.> , -- <4,,,r ,f R 'CI LiTi • ... .. .:.�f��; >.��v.e^._��� ut� Y15 a'�??.-�G n L: 's +J,.�t. T•.'�� iJ ..i. STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS Class I (40 mph or higher posted speed limit) Median B C D Undivided Divided Divided * 14,400 16,200 * 34,000 35,500 * 52,100 53,500 Class II (35 mph or slower posted speed limit) Median B C D Undivided Divided Divided * 6,500 13,300 * 9,900 28,800 * 16,000 44,900 E 14,200 31,600 47,600 Non -State Signalized Roadway Adjustments (Alter corresponding state volumes by the indicated percent) Non -State Signalized Roadways - 10% Lanes 2 2 Multi Multi Median & Turn Lane Adjustments Exclusive Exclusive Adjustment Left Lanes Right Lanes Factors Yes No +5% No No -20% Yes No -5% No No -25% Yes + 5% Median Divided Undivided Undivided Undivided One -Way Facility Adjustment Multiply the corresponding two-directional volumes in this table by 0.6 Lanes 4 6 8 10 -R fIXT �.= �1V- e.:.�+'c ?Y � a's...'L.. %titY•4- .4"+ A .�2 .� B 44,100 65,100 85,100 106,200 FREEWAYS C D 68,900 102,200 135,200 168,800 57,600 85,600 113,700 141,700 Freeway Adjustments Auxiliary Lanes Ramp Present in Both Directions Metering + 20,000 + 5% 12/18/12 E 71,700 111,000 150,000 189,000 UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Lanes Median B C D E 2 Undivided 9,200 17,300 24,400 33,300 4 Divided 35,300 49,600 62,900 69,600 6 Divided 52,800 74,500 94,300 104,500 Lanes 2 Multi Multi Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustment factors Divided Yes +5% Undivided Yes -5% Undivided No -25% BICYCLE MODE2 (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two -way maximum service volumes.) Paved Shoulder/Bicycle Lane Coverage 0-49% 50 -84% 85 -100% B C D E * 2,600 6,100 19,500 1,900 5,500 18,400 >19,500 7,500 19,500 >19,500 PEDESTRIAN MODE2 (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two -way maximum service volumes.) Sidewalk Coverage 0-49% 50 -84% 85 -100% B C * * * 1,600 3,800 10,500 D E 2,800 9,400 8,600 15,600 17,100 >19,500 BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route)3 (Buses in peak hour in peak direction) Sidewalk Coverage 0 -84% 85 -100% �aifiu�tittilifr "etm>spoi�at frc �- ei pIsnnm�gotl`i'ye ou ryas +www o 's ' 2012 FDOT QUALITY /LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK TABLES TABLE 5 Generalized Peak Hour Two -Way Volumes for Florida's Transitioning and Areas Over 5,000 Not In Urbanized Areasl 12/18/12 .rrt: { ••...3zS .�- �..��v��5.��`` • ^r�.aLurr ^7 -vw-r' y+.+:-r. .:�'�-/r Tc fa¢cwT s 3 � "lIYlyly �7 i��a'F A.Yt {- `^ s�'3L9 •. •z . a.,i, v,: _ p ^:r�`,..v...... a�..xa +F.tsfza.'..4!∎ ?. `r s t -7,. r;n. N f R ORTE� �, {y�{( /j,�► LI;fGS.a .' } .i ... G.:+ '^ni +.- .Ibti,.�.'.,,..J .... :4,.•.. .v1.. ,.-+.....f'>ie...�..~.. K.A'L2, .,_, ..s--r . :,,,. �i,ruver 1T STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS Class I (40 mph or higher posted speed limit) Lanes Median B C D E i 2 Undivided * 1,300 1,460 *# - 4 Divided * 3,060 3,200 ** 6 Divided * 4,690 4,820 ** Class II (35 mph or slower posted speed limit) Lanes Median B C D E 2 Undivided * 580 1,200 1,280 4 Divided * 890 2,590 2,850 6 Divided * 1,440 4,040 4,280 Non -State Signalized Roadway Adjustments (Alter corresponding state volumes by the indicated percent.) Non -State Signalized Roadways - 10% rte- 147..1:AU.. uY�Sk."i i,,,,.._.,e ,,.i' .fi'il•.;t'..i.,.. 4'3,e _ . 3l v�..e. .:rt.;5" FREEWAYS Lan es B C D E 4 3,970 5,190 6,200 6,460 6 5,860 7,710 9,190 9,990 8 7,660 10,230 12,170 13,500 10 9,550 12,750 15,190 17,010 Freeway Adjustments Auxiliary Lanes Ramp Present in Both Directions Metering ? + 1,800 +5% Median & Turn Lane Adjustments Exclusive Exclusive Adjustment Lanes Median Left Lanes Right Lanes Factors 2 Divided Yes No +5% 2 Undivided No No -20% Multi Undivided Yes No -5% Multi Undivided No No -25% - - - Yes + 5% One -Way Facility Adjustment Multiply the corresponding two-directional volumes in this table by 0.6 UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Lanes Median B C D E 2 Undivided 820 1,550 2,190 2,990 4 Divided 3,170 4,460 5,660 6,260 6 Divided 4,750 6,700 8,480 9,400 Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustment factors 2 Divided Yes +5% Multi Undivided Yes -5% Multi Undivided No -25% 2 BICYCLE MODE2 (Multiply by number of motorized vehicle volumes shown below directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes.) Paved Shoulder/Bicycle Lane Coverage B C D E 0-49% * 140 550 1,760 50 -84% 170 500 1,650 >1,760 85- 100% 670 1 760 1 760 # #YSnsl43,� > , PEDESTRIAN MODE2 (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way ma3omum service volumes.) Sidewalk Coverage B C D E o * * 0-49% 250 850 O 50 -84 /0 * 150 780 1410 85 -100% 340 950 1 540 >1,760 3 BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route) (Buses m peak hour in peak direction) Sidewalk Coverage B C D E g 0 -84% > 5 > 4 > 3 > 2 85- 100% > 4 > 3 > 2 > 1 t' k. � 4 { `ice♦ r• r 'c,i"ra.. ^,jW i 4 i)4'3• r �`• 3 rtx 11- � i .1` Tyu 3i�, �fy� f rt � .,� i r �..c a e2, ^r",C ?2x;',t' r.+-+ la..,� ���v yes ih ikgrrsent£o ,aspcaF;� 5y .ofumatloilaric1Kao4e.' 3 iy' nt�°�t1i obilc/�tn �rtiodcs jml ...' 4 �Catt ,smt ,r�1 ta6,ldda rrot � -� ',a rr 3.-- ji „ e- �t6txtardaTtt��s TO0 bru. ... f,: nctal,04,(0 ra�a0pl4vit�v c tamp t ipdets iiial. 3trvh the table !S drieell?s ul� b �used3`or tnp* tci: r .5{ tt r t * � �. F r ut., t _f � �"'+ .t r,�tt '�+ •` iCp73�InIR$aj}�11"lC�r r10 ,-�aR bl�i7l2n+tel:RYnia4R 1RCr ..F+StIQ ire ,,.0,� curr ar0 .,.. cib 4 gn WhetCt .if eit' eahp,,I, # Ts'al°[1t8� 1 C� yba on PH1a trii aippltcatuts otrthn 1Hr�*..0k ,MamtVa' 3,tiiarSratsrt` -�, and ilaiit} ,411:44.- Y'`tc ' t,a - ),. r f r u s r U F 'x w�"^ 'A fi.`R` .�'i ^�Y '{ . �F 3 {Fkx�3�ri i�nti 5 -4 #) iJi ?�h titer y- 7,-,5.- ? • �t tWe, gorJlT tick. Qdie taq tra �s mifialt3 ¢ GSSI� QI' ,ii i�l[1CC "T� ` } �" yt r> ' ,6 t f t r ed ►6 tcle ndr bcPo 6F I c3tLems usgtgthe3`aet Sty ` nir�Cr'i s�2 � ,J f s� y a3 • es {"` Ta.fi�a ��.Y r.! +a,li4�.R <L '� ¢ sa YUf i FT..i3lt5 as to O:148. i s �n l ''' -- hg►tfta3tn avea6ot�t�t fu TCt'tm�Tc 4J ) 1 rK i> rS r �k+ .$ 'j t� S } rr ! F l x)) lr�� J (�"�. ��� l�*t�? •'+Y3' � 4!� •, , ; , t� `� �° � , L i t '''''.',•-i lb' NJ $ 2c l,F.1, .., �, .f 113. f rt.� vim` t'"A 1ny Sf •L3 f i Ui -fY 0 i l S't..-', ( JOY, 41$ts"�C .. .. `.serali> i �{ S {= }tip' 1 �€.��C�Ce1 tir 4a;� �V r �'` 3� �,tt''1��'�� .tf t It'. phcable, ...t'3eyelof`sa yeltx tigradeFF�{jhe5�i gm6 Jeawdr ) V i G4t Y" :y> _v a Zi �d 1{ Ri�CS�rpCt[r tpRlCVt .tAfS'aiVtCC {D�°EpCfICaSQ filcrSCCtpnC8paC1EtCS tC1YC 7 ,^cta 5. Sr',: t x st L Jc i T.iX Rte} y1ibW -3 ,r?'�^}.r t l3tten, . ficd .:E. h°kte�ck,,,. l i.'" elute rat lcttcr pads (ute gig not iachvaUle mtsa`Siei"tsrJiw�mazaatim �Elue a ib ` • - r w t y M)),.. x w nP 3 ,;.,q. 1) > tiv. �„ n' 3 G�£Frr1t 1h 4 Z•F��n1�S2S t Mt./t >/ 1�y*- t 4-' �` s� ti , t« ti;t £� r F tesl3 Z.` vt tv4,4 Cam` -...+ ,. i � t41. tM1 E4, (-i M i ,l �.y 4{ 4 � i� .. Q Ff 11.'x/1 t� , ^�` 5` 53 3rn L r Y ? �` '` {` r �� # i` w, � � �J . � �" j z ,, J3 L likC }4itt i� c! . ., h a ,,, 1 g t Nf t : F,+S. . S ctu Zu> -r-T r .fin`s r � ., gf'ws" F�f ... w .� � %r, 'ti rri yt4Y S''��t x ✓ 1 R ,n,s.0 3,.c..i ,1.'r'Y•'`l 4R XQ r ni _ � g 1 � 6� ..: d E r Ffi $to Y �(i IV' yw '');,.;,f 611'. 1 t r37. 7 v, T i...!{�'G ,ayCiFB )�1 l'Y7�J'+y .i !i.[.b t� i K u T y ,' 1� ` tvlwY F l�tiii°t CT I °fixY Xn� ev ala�lf5 �i, 3� Sy �t i c t t , k,N�k. k ig 9 4., , it s TYY. t} l'.1 .i T l �ar �'t "5 = bnda t..5 T ' it,. , tz, i '? M S to itag- i lez. i„. t° y. ... Teri :..2vny k''rfi . < c; 11 1 f ^ SKt,J ja rX i "A. •'" r Zvi !i4 ' v u�vd`dot.satCfltsi lamm�¢7sYStems/sml�osfdirau) }t skint tk��� �w }' ; } ,, r rp s n awf�> r „IA .. ,..., ... 3:• , ,. .. 5:..++�r.. . .�:.. *3 :.4..3 j.. . :'hy1}.^' :err. . :.1 t fcn;f - ^..r..:, 2012 FDOT QUALITY /LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK TABLES APPENDIX C INTERSECTION DATA/ DRIVEWAY VOLUMES E— 963 0 (963) (963) 0 963 --> (35) 35 01 Project Location I n /Out: 59/51 State Road 70 11 SE 10th Ave 1 North not to scale 0= Existing Traffic 0= Project Traffic (0)= Total Traffic Figure 3 Driveway Volumes- AM 90th Avenue Restaurant and Retail c4.0.10th Ave Restaurant and Retail AM Driveway 9 E- 963 0 (963) (963) 0 963 I 0 21 (21)(11) (41) 41 01/ 21 0 111 (21) O F Project Location In /Out: 69/69 N SE 10th Ave State Road 70 '(<01 t 11 7 0 (7) (11) 1 North not to scale 0= Existing Traffic 0= Project Traffic (0)= Total Traffic Figure 4 Driveway Volumes- PM 10th Avenue Restaurant and Retail c 4.0.10th Ave Restaurant and Retail PM Driveway 10 , ' HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary - . y..rivq..f,„ ,.- ,:;..0v ' ' ''' - ' A '''' ' General Information Intersection Information )4 -1•:' ' '.- .._.......„ Agency Susan E. O'Rourke, RE., Inc. ,,.......:...-: Duration, h 10.25 , Analyst AAA Analysis Date 4/6/2015 Area Type Other ., • Jurisdiction Intersection Okeechobee SR 70 and 10th Avenue Time Period Analysis Year 2015 PHF 0.90 - ... Analysis Period 1> 7:00 File Name 10th and SR 70 AM.xus Project Description SR 70 and 10th Avenue-AM 1 .11 t1-1"1.r ' irr- 4 • - 'A! :r4Wpc,,, Demand Infoniiation - - -1 2 -:;41.ces,?*&.` ._ Fro.. -7,,,v7mcv-z. .'4:,,ii- A-, i,- ,r,,,,teP, 0,1.'%_., e• iiot„,,,,,,,,, ,r, 41:wriw.7-faisf,st.,,,,,,, • EB ' NB ) SB ........-3 Approach Movement R 78 L L WI L T R Demand (v), veh/h . , C,..11,' . ,' , " . -983 Ai14,1:2;',1..,' 70 • *2 ''' ' 983 ' W.' ' i . ; i 109' 1 : 'C'-A ' 52 'lf- INN Signal Information _ Tr • Cycle, s 120.0 Reference Phase Reference Point Erid Green 197.8 Yellow 4.0 10.2 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On 0.0 8 Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Red 120 20 00 00 00 _ 00 fl 6 __._..;..- -1-./?.., e', ,,,.....- '' c„' - "..,„\,,,,,,..4.- LE:,.4§ 1 LL_, - 4 • . ," P 1., , ....:tii:-., , ,..' -k,::..-, ..,:.;,. .:*?."KtV.F. ,1P.,37'M '. .'sF, .7` 4. ';'.! '--, A -;';`. '''-i4......,.- . Timer Results EBL ' - EBT ,= .. 1 0..,Vg*,1%.,:.,$. . v.% sa.X.4c.''..;i•v'T&.-. WBL - t T Acz".... -9; , ,4.','-i* dill...Jar, N.a.ti*I..e.;, ,, ...,-.1. ---,13n,. . NE3L. NBT , SBL :t ,,%., :we- r......1.0,- SBT Assigned Phase 2 ..._, 6 8 , I Case Number 8.0 . • 6.0 10.0 Phase Duration, s , 103.8 103.8 : 16.2 Charge Period, (Y+Rc), s . • '' 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Allow Headway ( M A H ) , s . 3.2 Queue Clearance Tirrie (gs), s Green Extension Time (go), s , 00 ........2,2_4 99 00 i 0 _ .3 1 h N 1.00 Pliase Call Probability 7.--- 1 , Max Out Probability 0.00 qte '-'74.1_zt "Nir :::ATS:PWArte47- ;'''''" : '1::%%,:-. Movement Group Results _... Approach Movement ':..4....3( .,'.7 - ... ' MI:, % • Mg127.6 "Y're-;WA., _:„.,..Tc ' ' ' Woir! -, L EB T R L T 11311111311Sa 6 597 582 1092 NB ; R , A ' 11311111:11 18 affistrEg 7 1810 1610 . ... 7.9 SB Man Assigned Movement i Adjusted Flow Rate (v), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flak! Rate (s) veh/h/In Queue Service Time (gs), s . 1900 43.9 . 1850 ............. 10.2 10.2 483 12.7 56.6 1809 9.6 - : Cycle Queue Clearance Time (gs),:i -- .. ..._....._ . .... -L- 79 4.1 Green Ratio (g/C) 1 0.82 . 0.385 0.82;O.82 1808 0.386 0281 0.82 294_ 0.370 . = 0.08 0.08 , -154- 137 0.788 0.422 Capacity (c), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio Q) Available Capacity (c.e,), veh/h 1549 1508- 277 2948 1267 1127 i Back of Queue (Q), veh/In (50th percentile) 3.0 2.9 1.6 2.5 3.7 1.7 . . _ .. Queue Storage Ratio (RQ) (50th Percentile) , --- 0.00 3.0 .000- 3.0 .006 21.7 0.06 2.9 - - - abo_. .0.00 . -- , - 52.1 ....,. _ Uniform Delay (di), s/veh Incremental Delay (d2), 'aiveli- • • ' 07 07 - 04; .3A -0.8. NM Initial Queue Delay (d3), slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11111 Control Delay (d), s/veh -- ' Level of Service (LOS) 3.7 - A 24-3- .....-..... C ' 3 3- ' A - 572 -1. 52 9 - • tr,........:... . E D .z - •• - : 1111111111111 Approach Deg .; aveh / LOS 37 A , 4.7 - ' 558 E , 00 Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 7.9 A Multimodal Results Ell , ' - ' , ,. ,,,,,,T.,A, E,i -6-. ',4, P, Zieli \NB NB . SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 22 B 1.8 A A 2.8 itammumumm Bicycle LOS-Score i LO . .:1:5;.:.':./:.. 1.5 I A 0.8 - Mill MIN Copyright@ 2015 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010" Streets Version 6.55 Generated: 4/6/2015 3:51:15 PM HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Kesults Summary General Information Agency Analyst Jurisdiction Intersection File Name Project Description Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E., Inc. AAA Analysis Date 4/6/2015 Okeechobee Time Period SR 70 and 10th Avenue Analysis Year 10th and SR 70 PM.xus SR 70 and 10th Avenue- PM Intersection Information Duration, h j0.25 .41.4..1 �. Area Type Other �y PHF 0.90 2015 • Analysis Period r ,_s"yt. ae+�' .>�e t ins es~ �r� r� �+r,� i �'�� :—;��' � , N.��.,,- ..�_,1,� tw r � ;a�,°i. � t.��a Demand .Infermation>?:. Approach Movement Demand (v), veh/h.: rAtAte,T, Signal Information 120.0 Force Mode P;w Timer-. Results Assigned Phase `Case`Number Fixed '..i•N"' [ t . ; +` •*Ntm.v. a; r N. iS 'i E8 A' , y'i;•�o-eli, } , '9 y5 �rl JJa y+ ` ., C" {.?` .4. i ln-7 l 1 $YL 1 \ ,.,,'y:, a i Reference Phase ' 2 Reference Point;:. i End. Simult. Gap E/W On Simult _Gap`N/ ail -,J, r i ' .;�"iur�''* '• k prtli Y5 V.M. 4.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Phase Duration, s 103.1 103.1 Change Period :(Y -FRe) s Max Allow Headway (MAH), s Queue Clearance Time (gs), s Green Extension Time (ge), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results Approach Movement Assighed;Movement? SB L �T Adjusted Flow Rate (v), veh/h 1092 Adjusted Saturationflow_Rite "(s), venitinn Queue Service Time (gs), s Cycle:Queue Clearance Tme_(gc), s Green Ratio (g/C) 1900 43.9 43.9 0.81 1850 :'10.5 Capacity.(c), veh/h Volume - to-Capacity Ratio (X) Available Capacity (ce),veh/kt Back of Queue (Q), vehlln (50th percentile) Queue Storage _Ratio`(RQ) {50th; percentile) Uniform Delay (di), s/veh incremental Delay (d2); slveh Initial Queue Delay (d3), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) 1497. 0.389 1497 1809': 9.9 99.`: 0.81 2926: 0.373 2926. 132 1810 8.6 0 00 0.00' •Approach Delay, s/veh /LOS Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 'MultimodaLResults , Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS Bicycle LOS Score / LOS Copyright 0 2015 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 20107 Streets Version 6.65 Generated: 41612015 3:53:59 PM Drainage Calculations City of Okeechobee, FDOT, & SFWMD echobee Family Dollar e Road 70 obee County, Florida 22, Township 37, Range 35 LLC 3811 • KimIey>» Horn Drainage Calculations Okeechobee, FDOT, & SFWMD Okeechobee Family Dollar State Road 70 Okeechobee County, Florida Section 22, Township 37, Range 35 Prepared for: JB Realty Partners, LLC 3929 Aero Place Lakeland, Florida 33811 Prepared by: Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Lakeland, Florida 046158017 June 2015 © Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 2015 Jordan L. Haggerty Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 SUMMARY 1 1.1 LOCATION 1 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 2.1 SOILS 1 2.2 GROUNDWATER 2 2.3 FLOODZONE 2 2.4 ENVIRONMENTAL SUMMARY 2 2.5 PREDEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE 2 2.5.1 BASINS 2 2.5.2 CN CALCULATIONS 2 2.5.3 TIME OF CONCENTRATION 2 2.5.4 PRE - DEVELOPMENT DISCHARGE RUNOFF 3 2.6 UTILITIES 3 3 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 3 3.1 REQUIRED PERMITS AND REVIEWS 3 3.2 POST- DEVELOPMENT STORM DESIGN PARAMETERS 3 3.3 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT /BASINS 4 3.3.1 CN CALCULATIONS 4 3.3.2 TIME OF CONCENTRATION 4 3.3.3 TREATMENT VOLUME (TV) 4 3.3.4 RETENTION STAGE /STORAGE 5 3.3.5 TREATMENT VOLUME PROVIDED 5 3.3.6 TV RECOVERY 5 3.3.7 POST- DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF 5 3.4 WETLAND IMPACTS 6 3.5 FLOOD PLAIN IMPACTS 6 4 SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE 6 �. Kimley> »Horn June2015 K: \LAK_Ciril \046158017 - Okeechobee Family Dollar \Design\Drainage\Report\2015 -05 Okeechobee FD.doc Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) EXHIBITS LOCATION MAPS VICINITY MAP EXHIBIT A -1 USGS QUADRANGLE MAP EXHIBIT A -2 AERIAL PHOTO EXHIBIT A -3 NRCS SOIL SURVEY MAP EXHIBIT B FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP EXHIBIT C PRE - DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE BASIN MAP EXHIBIT D POST- DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE BASIN MAP EXHIBIT E APPENDICES CURVE NUMBER AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 1 TREATMENT VOLUME & STAGE STORAGE CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 2 PRE - DEVELOPMENT ROUTING (ICPR) APPENDIX 3 POST- DEVELOPMENT ROUTING (PONDS) APPENDIX 4 INPUT REPORT TREATMENT INPUT REPORT 25 YR - 72 HR STORM EVENT Kimley »>Horn June2015 K: \LAK Civil \046158017 - Okeechobee Family Dollar \Design\Drainage \Report\2015 -05 OkeechobeeFD.doc Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store 1 SUMMARY The proposed "Okeechobee Family Dollar Store" project includes construction of an 8,320 sf general retail store with associated master storm water pond, paving, grading, storm water conveyance system, and utility services. The project is situated on a 2.70 acre parent parcel located within Okeechobee, Florida. The parent parcel will be split into two sub - parcels. The project area is comprised of one (1) Post Development Basin (Basin 1). Storm water runoff, from the aforementioned basin is managed by one dry retention pond (Pond 1) that is designed to treat and attenuate runoff from the 25 yr. /72 hr. storm event per SFWMD criteria. The project discharges away from the FDOT SR 70 right of way and therefore the FDOT critical storm analysis is not necessary. Proposed construction and improvements will result in 0.85 acres of impervious located within the project area. The total designed impervious located within the Post - Development Basin area is 1.75 acres of which an assumed future 0.90 acres is located on the western sub - parcel to be developed by others. The proposed storm water management system has been designed to comply with the City of Okeechobee, FDOT, and the South Florida Water Management District. 1.1 LOCATION This project is located at 100 SE 10th Avenue on the southwest corner of the intersection between State Road 70 and SE 10th Avenue. The general site location is shown superimposed on a vicinity map (See ExhibitA -1) along with the USGS Quad map (See ExhibitA -2), and an aerial photograph (See Exhibit A-3.) 2 PRE - DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS The project is located within the Northern Lake Okeechobee Basin. The project site currently contains remnants of an existing trailer park, but vastly remains undeveloped and heavily vegetated. 2.1 SOILS Existing soils were determined by the U.S. Department of Agriculture - National Resources Conservation Service and subsequently published in the Okeechobee County Soil Survey Report. The predominant soil type on -site was identified as Udorthents (Hydrologic Group A); a Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Soils Map has been provided (See Exhibit B). Andersen Andre Consulting Engineers, Inc. performed a Geotechnical Engineering Investigation for the site. Please see attached, under separate cover, the Geotechnical report for subsurface evaluation dated April 23, 2015. Kimley »> }Horn June 2015 K: \LAK_Civil \046158017 - Okeechobee Family Dollar \ Design \Drainage \Report \2015 -05 OkeechobeeFDl.doc 1 Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store 2.2 GROUNDWATER The seasonal high groundwater level was estimated by Andersen Andre Consulting Engineers, Inc. and are included as part of their Geotechnical Engineering Report. Based on their report it is estimated that the seasonal high groundwater level is between 2 and 3 ft. below existing grade. Please refer to the attached, under separate cover, a copy of the aforementioned Geotechnical Exploration Report. 2.3 FLOODZONE The project site lies outside of the established 100 -year flood plain (See Exhibit C). 2.4 ENVIRONMENTAL SUMMARY There are no existing wetlands within the project area. 2.5 PREDEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE The site has been modeled with one (1) Pre - Development Drainage Basin (Basin A). Basin A is located within an Open Basin. Storm water runoff from Basin A currently sheet flows overland toward the western portion of the site and discharges through a drainage structure that discharges offsite. This site, along with surrounding areas, discharge into the contributing waters of the Okeechobee Basin. 2.5.1 BASINS There is one (1) Pre - Development Basin (Basin A) that is within the project area. See basin summary below. Please see Exhibit D for a pre - development drainage basin map. Pre - Development Basin Summary Table Basin Name Basin A Basin Area 2.78 Acres Tc 38.9 minutes Curve Number 59 2.5.2 CN CALCULATIONS The pre - development curve number was calculated using SCS Curve Number tables and the hydrologic soil information from the Geotechnical Exploration Report. (See Appendix 1 for spreadsheet calculations) 2.5.3 TIME OF CONCENTRATION The Pre - Development time of concentration for Basin A was calculated using the spreadsheet found in Appendix 1. K mIey }» >Horn June 2015 K: \LAK_Civil \046158017 - Okeechobee Family Dollar \ Design \ Drainage \Report \2015 -05 OkeechobeeFDl.doc 2 Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store 2.5.4 PRE - DEVELOPMENT DISCHARGE RUNOFF Pre - Development runoff was determined using Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR). The Pre - Development 25yr /72hr storm -event discharge rate (Q PRE) for Basin A has been determined to be 2.29 cfs. (See Appendix 3.) 2.6 UTILITIES The Project utilities such as potable water and sanitary sewer will be provided by the Okeechobee Utility Authority. Wire utilities will be provided by the appropriate service area providers. 3 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed "Okeechobee Family Dollar Store" project includes construction of an 8,320 sf general retail store with associated master storm water pond, paving, grading, storm water conveyance system, and utility services. The project is situated on a 2.70 acre parent parcel located within Okeechobee, Florida. The parent parcel will be split into two sub - parcels. The project area is comprised of one (1) Post Development Basin (Basin 1). Storm water runoff, from the aforementioned basin is managed by one dry retention pond (Pond 1) that is designed to treat and attenuate runoff from the 25 yr. /72 hr. storm event per SFWMD criteria. The project discharges away from the FDOT SR 70 right of way and therefore the FDOT critical storm analysis is not necessary. Proposed construction and improvements will result in 0.85 acres of impervious located within the project area. The total designed impervious located within the Post - Development Basin area is 1.75 acres of which an assumed future 0.90 acres is located on the western sub - parcel to be developed by others. The proposed storm water management system has been designed to comply with the City of Okeechobee, FDOT, and the South Florida Water Management District. 3.1 REQUIRED PERMITS AND REVIEWS • City of Okeechobee • FDOT • FDEP 10 -2 General Permit for Stormwater System (Self- Certification) • NPDES 3.2 POST- DEVELOPMENT STORM DESIGN PARAMETERS Per SFWMD criteria, the following design storm will be utilized: Storm Frequency Storm Duration Rainfall Criteria 25 Years 72 Hours 9.0 Inches Pre vs. Post Discharge Kimiey » >HOrn June 2015 K: \LAK_Civil \046158017 - Okeechobee Family Dollar \ Design \Drainage \Report \2015 -05 OkeechobeeFDl.doc 3 Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store 3.3 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT /BASINS The stormwater management system is designed to meet the requirements of the City of Okeechobee and SFWMD. The proposed project consists of one (1) Post - Development Basin [Basin 1 (2.49 acres)]. The storm water runoff from Basin 1 will be conveyed to Pond 1. Pond 1 was modeled in Ponds v3.2 as a wet detention pond. Located within Pond 1, a control structure is proposed to limit the discharge rate to a level at or below the pre - development discharge rate. The management system is designed to attenuate stormwater runoff and provide pollution abatement before discharging to the associated boundary. See basin summary below. Please see Exhibit E for a post - development drainage basin map. Post - Development Basin Summary Table Basin Name Basin 1 Basin Area 2.49 Acres (100 %) Pervious Area 0.75 Acres (28 %) Impervious Area 1.75 Acres (65 %) Pond Area @ 19.8' 0.20 Acres (7 %) Curve Number 85 3.3.1 CN CALCULATIONS The post - development curve number has been calculated utilizing the SCS Tr -55 methodology. The basin has been broken down into different soil types and assigned a Hydrologic Soil Group classification. Based on land cover, a curve number was then assigned (See Appendix 1.) 3.3.2 TIME OF CONCENTRATION The Post - Development time of concentration for the Basin is the minimum value of 10 minutes. 3.3.3 TREATMENT VOLUME (TV) The proposed storm water management system will contain a wet retention pond to treat the storm water runoff prior to discharging. According to SFWMD and the City of Okeechobee criteria, the required water quality volume is retention of the first one inch over the basin (See Appendix 2.) The following table summarizes the treatment volume required: Required Treatment Volume Basin Name Basin 1 Kimley » >Horn June 2015 K: \LAK_Civil \046158017 - Okeechobee Family Dollar \ Design \ Drainage \Report \2015 -05 OkeechobeeFD.doc 4 Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store Basin Area 2.49 Acres 0.75" Over Basin Area 0.16 Acre ft 3.3.4 RETENTION STAGE /STORAGE The Stage /Storage data is as follows: Stage /Storage Data Pond Name Stage Area (SF) Storage (ac. -ft.) Pond 1 (Basin 1) Top 22.5' 16,254 0.987 Control 19.8' 10,059 0.169 Bott. 19' 8,302 0 3.3.5 TREATMENT VOLUME PROVIDED Required /Provided Treatment Volume Basin Area Required Treatment Volume Provided Treatment Volume Basin 1 2.49 Acres 0.16 ac. ft. 0.169 ac. ft. 3.3.6 TV RECOVERY The required TV in a wet retention pond must be recovered within 72 hours. The TV recovery within the wet retention pond is accomplished by drawdown. PONDS (Version 3.2) was used to demonstrate that the wet retention pond recovers the required TV through percolation within 36 hours. Please refer to the attached Geotechnical Report for permeability rates and S.H.W.T. elevations, and Appendix 4 for drawdown analysis. 3.3.7 POST- DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF As previously mentioned the storm water runoff from Basin 1 will be managed through one (1) wet retention pond (Pond 1) designed to attenuate the post - development discharge rates such that they do not exceed the pre - development discharge rates for the 25yr /72hr storm - event. PONDS (Version 3.2) has been used to route the storm water runoff from the development through the wet retention pond. The pond has been designed such that the proposed development discharge rate does not exceed the pre - development discharge rate for the 25yr /72hr storm - event. (See Appendix 4) Kim er) }Horn June 2015 K: \LAK_Civil \046158017 - Okeechobee Family Dollar \ Design \ Drainage \Report \2015 -05 OkeechobeeFDl.doc 5 Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store Post Development Results Basin Name Pond Name Top of Bank 5yr/72 hr Stage 25yr/72 hr Stage 100yr/72 hr Stage Pre Dev. Discharge Rate Post Dev. Basin 1 Discharge Rate Basin 1 Pond 1 22.5' 20.47 21.39 21.97 2.29 cfs 1.57 cfs 3.4 WETLAND IMPACTS There are no wetland impacts proposed for this project. 3.5 FLOOD PLAIN IMPACTS The Project is not located within a flood plain, and therefore will have no impact on the surrounding area. 4 SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE Construction of the proposed project will be finished in one phase. Erosion control methods will be utilized to prevent siltation to surrounding areas. The surface water management system will be maintained and operated by the Developer. K mley> »Flom June 2015 K: \LAK_Civil \046158017- Okeechobee Family Dollar \ Design \ Drainage \Report \2015 -05 OkeechobeeFDl.doc 6 Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store EXHIBIT A LOCATION MAPS General Vicinity Map Aerial Photograph USGS Quad Map Kimley »> Horn K ILAK Civi1104 615801 7 - Okeechobee Family DollarlExhibits\Drainage PDFsISITE VICINITYmxd - 6/10/2015 5:21:45 PM - Tyler.Swonger z s v NE 111h St NE 10th St NE 9th St NE 8th y. ...... LIS-441 N NE 2nd Ave NE 7th St NE 6th St NE Sth St NE 5th Ave 4▪ NE 4th St L u e 4' z NE 3rd St NE Ind St 0111-70 NE Park St SE Park St 4' 9 ,Ith St m SW 7th 51 915 St • SL 2nd Ave NE 6th Ave SE 3rd St SE 4th St a h SE Sth St SE 6th St SE 7th St SE 8th St SE 4th Ave NE 12th St NE 7th Ave NE sO w w z NE 9th Ave 0 ktiy 70 E SE 10th Ave SE 6th 5t 0 4 SE 9th St SE 9th Cl SE 12th SI SE 13th St m • SE 14111 St SE 10th St td N SE 701 St SE 1191 St NE 12th St NE 12th Ave L E in r • z• w NE 13th St NE 14411 5t 4 w NE 1(911 5t z NE 10th 5t NE 9th 5t E. NE 8th St w z NE 7th St NE 6th 5t NE 5t5 St w z NE 20d St m e Feet 0 490 980 NE 3rd St " tl L w Z 4 z Cypress Quarters 4 w SE 2nd St SE 4th St SE 5th St tl 4 w h 0 SE 14th Ave w N 4 SE 61h St SE 8th St SE 6111 0n Legend Property Boundary NNW Kimley >>>Horn © 2015 Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 116 South Kentucky Avenue Lakeland, FL 33801 Phone: 863 701 8702 www.kimley- hom.com CA 00000696 SITE VICINITY OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA Scale: As Noted I Project No.: 0461580171 June 2015 Exhibit A -1 Feet 200 400 -SR 70 NE Park-St cis st m 0 CD i A S E Legend Property Boundary Kimley> »Horn © 2015 Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 116 South Kentucky Avenue Lakeland, FL 33801 Phone: 863 701 8702 www.kimley- hom.com CA 00000696 USGS QUAD MAP OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA Scale: As Noted I Project No.: 046158017 June 2015 Exhibit A -2 SR 70 NE Park St e Feet 0 40 80 Kimley >» Horn © 2015 Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 116 South Kentucky Avenue Lakeland, FL 33801 Phone: 863 701 8702 www.kimley- hom.com CA 00000696 AERIAL MAP OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA Scale: As Noted I Project No.: 0461580171 June 2015 Exhibit A -3 Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store EXHIBIT B NRCS SOIL SURVEY KirnIey >» Horn rlw IMO OMNI r MIN SR 70 NE Park St Legend Property Boundary NRCS Soils A B/D Kimley >>>Horn © 2015 Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 116 South Kentucky Avenue Lakeland, FL 33801 Phone: 863 701 8702 www.kimley - horn.com CA 00000696 SOILS MAP OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA Scale: As Noted I Project No.: 046158017 I June 2015 Exhibit B Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store EXHIBIT C FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP .� Kimiey > > >Harn -.9i1 MIME OFETIffai I DJ MTV! MIRE Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store EXHIBIT D PRE - DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE BASIN MAP Kimley > >)Horn Plotted By: Swonger, Tyler Sheet Set: OKEECHOBEE ED5 PRE -BASIN La out:PRE BASIN June 11, 2015 03:59:05 m K: \ AK Civil \046156017 - Okeechobee Famll Dakar \ CAD \Exhibits \ Drainage \PRE-POST BASIN MAPS, do TMs document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein. as an instrument of service. Is Intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it w as prepared. Reuse of and improper rellaricw. ROYALS OK LUNCH, INC. P3176E1 2 22 37 -35- 0300 - 0007.3 3000 anent without wrlttechauiGOnxanon and adoptatIon Ey Kimley-Hmnd AeslWatest shall be witbau1 (roblrty 1 0 9 0 1 , 9 0 , 0 Assoc. tes, Inc l ;~ - .1111111111MMIWNIF.CM bTN r 1 CO '13 Z p m m m 0 V -_ .- . 23.0 _. T S.E. 10TH AVE. (HANC ©C /C STREET/ P4VLMEM MOTH /A85 5 40' aF'IG/Ir OF WAY 030 c0 z-0 om JagwnN anan3 n CO d aweN uiseg LA sa;nww 6'8£ mo X - OKEECHOBEE FDS #2025 PREPARED FOR JB REALTY PARTNERS, LLC OKEECHOBEE FL PRE - DEVELOPMENT BASIN MAP KHA PROJECT 046158017 DATE DATE SCALE AS SHOWN DESIGNED BY TAS DRAWN BY TAS CHECKED BY JAL UCENSED PROFESSIONAL JASON A. LEWIS, P.E. FL LICENSE NUMBER 62572 DATE: Kimley »>Horn © 2015 KIMLEY- HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 116 5. KENTUCKY AVENUE, LAKELAND, EL 33801 PHONE: 863- 701 -8702 WWW. KIMLEY- HORN.COM CA 00000696 No REVISIONS DATE BY Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store EXHIBIT E POST- DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE BASIN MAP Kimley >»Horn Plotted By Swon er, Tyler Sheet Set: OKEECHOBEE FDS PRE —BASIN Layout:POST BASIN June 11. 2015 07:16:18am K. \LAK_Civil \046158017 — Okeechobee Family Dollar \ CAD \Evhibits \ Drainage \PRE—POST BASIN MAPS.dw ument without writ tap, att iba izat,on one odoptatlan Ey ey— Homola d Assgciate This document together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an Instrument of service, is intended only far the speclf,c purpose and oiler( for which 't wos prepared Reuse 0 and Improper reliagc ROYALS OK LUNCH, .00 P010E1 2- 22- .57 -35- 0/10!0 - 000013 -7000 'n shall be withal !lability to K y orn and Assoc otes Inc. u /g J _ __ m >00 111 i ° O n z -1 r C3 4 ' i n D =_( Z m 11 ti < h1 60 0 1 i " (� / 'o I. �._. ,u) - z j 1 00 0, " -I I.1 0 fl o I ^--1 0 i ! -0zz :w. cn G) �'�►, } N CO 0 �1 c0 zm p m JagwnN ananj n CO r5 1v aweN uiseg 3 0 c co D (6 d 1- N 0 0 rt ID rD O 3 tD 3 ee co Dl 3 C 3 3 1 0• ID t t. X= m OKEECHOBEE FDS #2025 PREPARED FOR JB REALTY PARTNERS, LLC OKEECHOBEE FL POST - DEVELOPMENT BASIN MAP KHA PROJECT 046158017 DATE DATE SCALE AS SHOWN DESIGNED BY TAS DRAWN BY TAS CHECKED BY JAL LICENSED PROFESSIONAL JASON A. LEWIS, P.E. DATE: FL LICENSE NUMBER 62572 Kimley> »Horn © 2015 018110 -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 116 5. KENTUCKY AVENUE, LAKELAND, FL 33801 PHONE: 863 -701 -8702 WNW KIMLEY - HORN.COM CA 00000696 No. REVISIONS DATE BY Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store APPENDIX 1 CURVE NUMBER & TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS Kim ley > >)Horn KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT TITLE: OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR PROJECT NUMBER: 46158017 DATE BASIN DESIGNATION: Basin A MADE BY: TS 10- Jun -15 BASIN ANALYSIS (PRE /POST): PRE CHECKED BY: 114 BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET Soil Ni 12- Udorthents A 39 1.77 Existing Imperviou 98 0.92 Product 69.03 90.16 filename: CURVE NUMBER CALCS.xls POSITE Kimley -horn and Associates - Lakeland KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC: PROJECT TITLE: OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR PROJECT NUMBER: 046158017 1 DATE BASIN DESIGNATION: Basin 1 MADE BY: TS 10- Jun -15 BASIN ANALYSIS (PRE /POST): POST CHECKED BY: JH Description / Soil Name 12- Udorthents BASIN RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEET Pervious Area Impervious Area A 0.54 Acre 1.75 Composite CN 84.09 100.00 Pervious 39 mpervious' 98 2.29 Pond 0.20 100 0.20 filename: CURVE NUMBER CALCS.xls MPOSIT Kimley -horn and Associates - Lakeland Herminio O. Cruz, PE 2503 Quail Park Terrace Kissimmee, FL 34743 Tel. (407) 319 -0106 Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project : Okeechobee Family Dollar Location : Okeechobee County, FL Check One : Check One : Notes: Present Tc JOB # 46158017 By : TS Date: 6/10/2015 Checked : JH Date: 6/10/2015 ❑ Developed BASIN A ❑ Tt through subarea Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet flow (Applicable to Tc only) Segment ID 1. Surface description (Table 3 -1) 2. Mannings roughness coeff., n (Table 3 -1) 3. Flow length, L (total L < 300 ft.) ft 4. Two -yr 24 -hr rainfall, P2 in 5. Calculated Land slope, s ft /ft 5a. Land Elevation For Upper End Of Flow Path 5b. Land Elevation For Lower End Of Flow Path 6. Compute Tt [Eq. 3 -3] hr 0.592 + Shallow concentrated flow Segment ID 7. Surface description (Paved or Unpaved) 8. Flow length, L ft 9. Calculated Watercourse slope, s ft /ft 9a. Land Elevation For Upper End Of Flow Path 9b. Land Elevation For Lower End Of Flow Path 10. Average velocity, V (Figure 3 -1) ft /s 11. Tt = L /3600V Compute Tt hr 0.057 + AB D. GRASS 0.24 289.78 4.80 0.0104 22.5 19.5 BC Unpaved 146.47 0.0020 19.50 19.21 0.72 Channel Flow Segment ID 12. Cross sectional flow area, a sf 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft 14. Hydraulic radius, r = a /Pw Compute r ft 15. Channel slope, s ft /ft 16. Manning's roughness coeff., n 17 V = 1.49(r ^0.667)(s ^0.50)/n Compute V ft /s 18. Flow length, L ft 19. Tt = L /3600V Compute Tt hr 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6,11, and 19) CD 0.000 0.00 0.000 Reference: Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds Technical Release 55, Soil Conservation Service U.S. Department of Agriculture, June 1986 Use Time of Concentration = 0.592 0.057 hours hours 0.000 hours 0.649 38.9 minutes hours Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store APPENDIX 2 TREATMENT VOLUME & STAGE STORAGE CALCULATIONS Kirniey > > >Horn TREATMENT VOLUME CALCULATIONS AND STAGE /STORAGE RELATIONSHIPS Basin Area(acres) = 2.49 Detention Pond 1 OFF -LINE VOLUME CALCULATIONS (PER SWFWMD): 3/4" of Runoff = [Basin Area(3 /4 ")]/12 "= 0.16 ac -ft (Controls) 2.5" times % Impervious = 0.14 ac -ft POND STAGE /STORAGE WEIR POND TOP ELEVATION (NGVD) 22.5 POND BOTTOM ELEVATION (NGVD) 19 TOP AREA OF POND (SF) 16253.4 BOTTOM AREA OF POND (SF) 8302.4 TOTAL VOLUME OF POND (CF) 42973 POND STAGE (NGVD) DEPTH IN POND (FT) CUMULATIVE VOLUME (CF) CUMULATIVE VOLUME (AC -FT) 22.5 3.5 42973 0.987 22.0 3.0 35130 0.806 21.5 2.5 27855 0.639 21.0 2.0 21148 0.485 20.5 1.5 15009 0.345 20.0 1.0 9438 0.217 19.8 0.8 7369 0.169 19.5 0.5 4435 0.102 19.0 0.0 0 0.000 Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store APPENDIX 3 PRE DEVELOPMENT ROUTING (ICPR) KmIey > > >Horn OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR - INPUT -ALL ___= Basins Name: PRE BASIN Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Area(ac): 2.780 Curve Number: 59.00 DCIA( %): 0.00 Node: PRE BNDY Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Status: Onsite Peaking Factor: 256.0 Storm Duration(hrs): 72.00 Time of Conc(min): 38.90 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 ___= Nodes Name: PRE BNDY Group: BASE Type: Time /Stage Time(hrs) Stage(ft) 0.00 24.00 48.00 72.00 17.040 17.040 17.040 17.040 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 17.040 Warn Stage(ft): 20.000 ___= Hydrology Simulations Name: 25yr -3day Filename: K:\LAK_Civil\046158017 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 72.00 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 9.00 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) 84.000 5.00 Okeechobee Family Dollar\ Design \Drainage \Icpr \25yr- 24hr.R32 ___= Routing Simulations Name: 25YR72HR Hydrology Sim: 25yr -3day Filename: K: \LAK Civi1\046158017 - Okeechobee Family Dollar\ Design \Drainage \Icpr \25YR72HR.I32 Execute: Yes Alternative: No Max Delta Z(ft): Time Step Optimizer: Start Time(hrs): Min Calc Time(sec): Boundary Stages: Time(hrs) 999.000 Group BASE Restart: No 1.00 10.000 0.000 0.5000 Print Inc(min) 15.000 Run Yes Patch: No Delta Z Factor: 0.00500 End Time(hrs): 72.00 Max Calc Time(sec): 60.0000 Boundary Flows: Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 1 OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR - BASIN SUMMARY Basin Name: PRE. BASIN Group Name: BASE Simulation: 25yr -3day Node Name: PRE BNDY Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 5.19 Comp Time Inc (min): 5.00 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount (in): 9.000 Storm Duration (hrs): 72.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 38.90 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 2.780 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 59.000 DCIA (8): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 36.25 Flow Max (cfs): 2.29 Runoff Volume (in): 3.971 Runoff Volume (ft3): 40073 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 1 OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR - NODE MIN /MAX Name Max Time Max Warning Max Delta Max Surf Max Time Max Max Time Group Simulation Stage Stage Stage Stage Area Inflow Inflow Outflow hrs ft ft ft ft2 hrs cfs hrs PRE BNDY BASE 25YR72HR 0.00 17.04 20.00 0.0000 0 36.25 2.29 0.00 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Drainage Calculations Okeechobee Family Dollar Store APPENDIX 4 POST DEVELOPMENT ROUTING (PONDS) Input Report Treatment 25 Year / 72 Hour Storm Event K mley> »Horn PONDS Version 3.2.0265 Retention Pond Recovery - Refined Method Copyright 2012 Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E. Project Data Project Name: OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR Simulation Description: POST DEVELOPMENT Project Number: 046158017 Engineer : TS Supervising Engineer: JAL Date: 05 -15 -2015 Aquifer Data Base Of Aquifer Elevation, [B] (ft datum): 14.00 Water Table Elevation, [WT] (ft datum): 18.00 Horizontal Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity, [Kh] (ft /day): 2.85 Fillable Porosity, [n] ( %): 25.00 Vertical infiltration was not considered. Geometry Data Equivalent Pond Length, [L] (ft): 372.0 Equivalent Pond Width, [W] (ft): 23.0 Ground water mound is expected to intersect the pond bottom Stage vs Area Data Stage (ft datum) 19.00 19.50 20.50 21.50 22.50 Area (ft2) 8302.4 9395.8 11625.1 13911.0 16253.4 OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR 06 -11 -2015 16:18:39 Page 1 PONDS Version 3.2.0265 Retention Pond Recovery - Refined Method Copyright 2012 Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E. Discharge Structures Discharge Structure #1 is active as weir Structure Parameters Description: CS -100 Weir elevation, (ft datum): Weir coefficient: Weir length, (ft): Weir exponent: Tailwater Description: Flow Type: Data Format: Units: Reduction Factor: Elapsed Time (hrs) 0 72 19.8 3.13 .25 1.5 Positive, out of pond only Elapsed time English Modified Mavis equation Elevation (ft datum) 18 18 Discharge Structure #2 is inactive Discharge Structure #3 is inactive OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR 06 -11 -2015 16:18:41 Page 2 PONDS Version 3.2.0265 Retention Pond Recovery - Refined Method Copyright 2012 Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E. Scenario Input Data Scenario 1 :: 5YR -24HR Hydrograph Type: Modflow Routing: Repetitions: Inline SCS Routed with infiltration 1 Basin Area (acres) Time Of Concentration (minutes) DCIA ( %) Curve Number Design Rainfall Depth (inches) Design Rainfall Duration (hours) Shape Factor Rainfall Distribution Initial ground water level (ft datum) No times after storm specified. Scenario 2 :: 25YR -3DAY Hydrograph Type: Modflow Routing: Repetitions: 2.490 10.0 0.0 85 4.5 24.0 UHG 256 SCS Type II Florida Modified 18.00 (default) Inline SCS Routed with infiltration 1 Basin Area (acres) Time Of Concentration (minutes) DCIA ( %) Curve Number Design Rainfall Depth (inches) Design Rainfall Duration (hours) Shape Factor Rainfall Distribution Initial ground water level (ft datum) No times after storm specified. Scenario 3 :: 100YR -3DAY Hydrograph Type: Modflow Routing: Repetitions: 2.490 10.0 0.0 85 9.0 72.0 UHG 256 SCS Type II Florida Modified 18.00 (default) Inline SCS Routed with infiltration 1 Basin Area (acres) Time Of Concentration (minutes) DCIA ( %) Curve Number Design Rainfall Depth (inches) Design Rainfall Duration (hours) Shape Factor Rainfall Distribution 2.490 10.0 0.0 85 12.0 72.0 UHG 256 SCS Type II Florida Modified Initial ground water level (ft datum) 18.00 (default) No times after storm specified. OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR 06 -11 -2015 16:18:41 Page 3 PONDS Version 3.2.0265 Retention Pond Recovery - Refined Method Copyright 2012 Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E. Scenario Input Data (cont'd.) Scenario 4 :: 6880 ft3 slug load Hydrograph Type: Slug Load Modflow Routing: Routed with infiltration Treatment Volume (ft3) 6880 Initial ground water level (ft datum) 18.00 (default) Time After Time After Storm Event Storm Event (days) (days) 0.100 2.000 0.250 2.500 0.500 3.000 1.000 3.500 1.500 4.000 OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR 06 -11 -2015 16:18:41 Page 4 PONDS Version 3.2.0265 Retention Pond Recovery - Refined Method Copyright 2012 Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E. Summary of Results :: Scenario 1 :: 5YR -24HR Time Stage Rate Volume (hours) (ft datum) (ft3 /s) (ft3) Stage din Minimum 6.267 Maximum 13.689 18.72 20.47 Inflow Rate - Maximum - Positive 12.044 4.5137 Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 24.978 26286.1 Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 25.022 26286.1 Infiltration Rate - Maximum - Positive 9.644 0.1456 Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 25.022 3287.1 Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 25.022 3287.1 Combined Discharge Rate - Maximum - Positive 13.689 0.4329 Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 25.022 12611.5 Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 25.022 12611.5 Discharge Structure 1 - simple weir Rate - Maximum - Positive 13.689 0.4329 Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 25.022 12611.5 Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 25.022 12611.5 Discharge Structure 2 - inactive Rate - Maximum - Positive disabled disabled Rate - Maximum - Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation disabled disabled Discharge Structure 3 - inactive Rate - Maximum - Positive disabled disabled Rate - Maximum - Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation disabled disabled Pollution Abatement: 36 Hour Stage and Infiltration Volume 72 Hour Stage and Infiltration Volume N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR 06 -11 -2015 16:18:41 Page 5 PONDS Version 3.2.0265 Retention Pond Recovery - Refined Method Copyright 2012 Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E. Summary of Results :: Scenario 2 :: 25YR -3DAY Time Stage Rate Volume (hours) (ft datum) (ft3 /s) (ft3) Stage Minimum 10.578 Maximum 36.689 18.66 21.39 Inflow Rate - Maximum - Positive 36.000 4.1250 Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 72.978 64889.6 Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 73.022 64889.6 Infiltration Rate - Maximum - Positive 36.044 0.1512 Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 73.022 5845.9 Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 73.022 5845.9 Combined Discharge Rate - Maximum - Positive 36.689 1.5673 Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 73.022 49651.5 Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 73.022 49651.5 Discharge Structure 1 - simple weir Rate - Maximum - Positive 36.689 1.5673 Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 73.022 49651.5 Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 73.022 49651.5 Discharge Structure 2 - inactive Rate - Maximum - Positive disabled disabled Rate - Maximum - Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation disabled disabled Discharge Structure 3 - inactive Rate - Maximum - Positive disabled disabled Rate - Maximum - Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation disabled disabled Pollution Abatement: 36 Hour Stage and Infiltration Volume 72 Hour Stage and Infiltration Volume N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR 06 -11 -2015 16:18:41 Page 6 PONDS Version 3.2.0265 Retention Pond Recovery - Refined Method Copyright 2012 Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E. Summary of Results :: Scenario 3 :: 100YR -3DAY Time Stage Rate Volume (hours) (ft datum) (ft3 /s) (ft3) Stage Minimum 8.311 18.69 Maximum 36.489 21.97 Inflow Rate - Maximum - Positive 36.000 5.6684 Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 72.978 91392.2 Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 73.022 91392.2 Infiltration Rate - Maximum - Positive 36.022 0.1826 Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 73.022 6313.6 Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 73.022 6313.6 Combined Discharge Rate - Maximum - Positive 36.489 2.4986 Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 73.022 75190.6 Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 73.022 75190.6 Discharge Structure 1 - simple weir Rate - Maximum - Positive 36.489 2.4986 Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 73.022 75190.6 Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 73.022 75190.6 Discharge Structure 2 - inactive Rate - Maximum - Positive disabled disabled Rate - Maximum - Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation disabled disabled Discharge Structure 3 - inactive Rate - Maximum - Positive disabled disabled Rate - Maximum - Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation disabled disabled Pollution Abatement: 36 Hour Stage and Infiltration Volume 72 Hour Stage and Infiltration Volume N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR 06 -11 -2015 16:18:42 Page 7 PONDS Version 3.2.0265 Retention Pond Recovery - Refined Method Copyright 2012 Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E. Summary of Results :: Scenario 4 :: 6880 ft3 slug load Time Stage Rate Volume (hours) (ft datum) (ft3 /s) (ft3) Stage Minimum 0.000 19.00 Maximum 0.002 19.75 Inflow Rate - Maximum - Positive 0.002 1146.6670 Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 0.002 6880.0 Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 96.000 6880.0 Infiltration Rate - Maximum - Positive 0.002 0.1827 Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 96.000 4588.8 Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 96.000 4588.8 Combined Discharge Rate - Maximum - Positive None None Rate - Maximum - Negative None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive None None Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 96.000 0.0 gal Discharge Structure 1 - simple weir Rate - Maximum - Positive Rate - Maximum - Negative Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive MEI Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation None None None None None None None None 96.000 0.0 Discharge Structure 2 - inactive Rate - Maximum - Positive disabled disabled Rate - Maximum - Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation disabled disabled Discharge Structure 3 - inactive Rate - Maximum - Positive disabled disabled Rate - Maximum - Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation disabled disabled Pollution Abatement: 36 Hour Stage and Infiltration Volume 36.000 19.44 3013.2 72 Hour Stage and Infiltration Volume 72.000 19.32 4079.2 OKEECHOBEE FAMILY DOLLAR 06 -11 -2015 16:18:42 Page 8