Loading...
523 City of OkeechobeeORDINANCE NO. 523 RN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA, AMENDING APPENDIX A BEING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE WHICH ESTABLISHES ZONING REGULATIONS AND PROVIDES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION, ENFORCEMENT AND AMENDMENT THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE IN THE CLASSIFICATION OF SEPCIFIED LAND FROM INDUSTRIAL TO CCBD (CENTRAL COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DISTRICT) AND INDUSTRIAL TO COMMERCIAL. WHEREAS, application has been duly made to change the zoning classification as herein$tated, and WHEREAS, all public notices have been duly published according to law, and WHEREAS, public hearings have been held as required by Appendix A, the Com- prehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Okeechobee, and WHEREAS after consideration of the requirements of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and the land use plan of the City of Okeechobee as set out in the City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan and further after consideration of the public's interest it is demed to be in the best interest of the City of Okeechobee to change the zoning classification of the land lying wihtin the limits of the City of Okeechobee as herein stated; now therefore BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA: SECTION 1. That the following described real property is hereby rezoned from INDUSTRIAL TO CCBD (CENTRAL COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DISTRICT) Block` 161 and Unplatted lands 3 -B 37S 35E .75 acred and parcels 7,8,10, and 11 east of the Railroad Tracks, City of Okeechobee INDUSTRIAL TO COMMERCIAL Block 162, City of Okeechobee SECTION 2. That the application requesting this zoning change and proof of publication for any and all public hearings in connection herewith shall be attached to and become a part of this ordinance. SECTION 3. The Zoning Administrator shall make the appropriate change on the City's zoning map in accordance with this oridance. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. Introduced on first reading and set for public hearing this6th day of February, 1984. ATTEST: L- ARD W. DO LA Chairman BONNIE S. HOMAS, CMC City Clerk ATTEST: Introduced on second and final hearing this 20th day of February 1984. Lg f %Lwefi � BONNIE S. THOMA , CMC City Clerk EIWARI W. DOUGLAS, D.C. Chairman CITY COUNCIL Dr. Edward Douglas, Mayor Jim Knight, Sr., Vice Mayor COUNCIL MEMBERS Oakland Chapman Dowling Watford, Jr. Oscar Thomas CITY ADMINISTRATION J. Mallette Westbrook Dir. of General Services 813-763-7292 Richard C. Fellows City Administrator 813-763-4116 Bonnie Thomas City Clerk 813- 763 -3372 Landon C. Fortner, Jr. Dir. of Public Works 813- 763 -7054 Larry Mobley Chief of Police 813- 763 -5521 L. Keith Tomey, II Fire Chief 813-763-4423 CITY OF OKEECHOBEE CITY HALL ,5555'SOUTu -AsT THIRD AVENUE OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA 33472-2932 Home of The Second Largest Fresh Water Lake in the United States MEMORANDUM TO: THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: THE PLANNING BOARD DATE: JANUARY 10, 1984 RE: Rezoning request by the city to rezone Block 161 and Unplatted lands 3 -B 37S 35E .75 acres and Parcel 7,8,9,10,11, South Park Street east of the Railroad Track from Industrial to CCBD (Central Commercial Business District) also, Block 162 from Industrial to Commercial. The zoning of these properties needs to be changed to keep out anything that would be hazardous to the city. Request: To keep out hazardous materials. Discussion: No objections were voiced. Action Taken: Board members reviewed the sixteen requirements with no objections to the findings. Member Altobello moved to recommend to the City Council to grant the rezoning request from Industrial to CCBD and Industrial to Commercial. Seconded by member Worthen. Motion carried. J r Wri ght Planning Board City of Okeechobee ice Chairman rec. s Fcrener East re, 17-64,1, rrraci- No. ) 330/ /86 V N • •,,3) ;LI) /4,527 SF 583.43,42., 41, 75 /69. 054 PARCE SQ /0 /84 PA2CEL P.ex 2CEL 3 /84 ' PA2CEL 4 S o° Jo /5- I,/ 84 44 PARCEL 5 • 200,32' RA 2L 15' (Z/se,i GOG 5F. g' 51-) 7AVe t_t••• / .• I S r<tve 5 THIS SURVEY NOT VALID UNLESS IMPRINTED WITH AN EMB&SED SURVEYORS SEAL. This Survey Prepared For Deiv-V3 A41..//beryer SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE This Certifies that a survey of the above described property was made under my supervision and that me sketch hereon Is a true and accurate r •re7.. sontalion thereof. REp.ERTIFIED 1 le AAdAtki!t• SU rttx ',‘ ',I: • Filst Butwy Ord. Nco's(4.: .:', '. .9r0.14Q1 Cl eo:: .::::.. - ' ' paid: MES L. VAN OSTRAN P.L.S. 3372 7. s-.;; • • RtVAED• C4F1AVIN: Ji./0 ‘61-1EOKEO. BROOME, VAN OSTR & ASSOCIATES INC ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEY 350 ROYAL PALM DR (813) 76: OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA '33472 DATE: ORC'ER NO, 243 P!sc"...1.9(). . ArreAdoriMiordaral.....ara • . . • ■ Q t '6 17 18 19 20 21122'23'24125 26 2 4 3 6 i '2 10 9 8 7 6 5 Ir z 1— 10 11 f2 '0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 17 18 19 20 21 '22 23'24 2526 .']4r _ r r -1-7-^ ir_7 A I2 �'. '0 9 8 19964 3 2 i 1- SOUTH „5'4, 3 2 7 4 SOU TN 5 7 $ SOUrH 4 Y 1011 !12 9!JOifl 1 A 09, 20 .20 22123 24 25 3 '2 09 8 7 6 54 3 , 2 1 •= 5 6 7 II ; 7 8 • 10 11 12 ,0 7—H j4t sv kuL 5 6 ,1 WENZE=111 4 ' 4- C r 0 SC ,.. 9 8 7 6 5 4 r3z 3 2 I .6 17 ,8 19 20 21 22 23 24 2526 > ' • 4 4 z 4 Trrir- 5 6 • ___ 2 4 5 • 6 7 8 9 a 111 *41/2"-- 4 2 7 8 9 10 11 l2 RN I2 itt $ ,5 .6 17 .8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Al*m 3 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 19$ I. 7 7 e 9 10 11 -. r 12 4- 9 TATF 411111.111111111.11 •••••••••■•111 •■■ fi.•GLE so Li T r1 PARK MUM , 4 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 .....■■■■■•■■16. 4 3 2 201 5 .6 17 18 9 20 21 22 23 24,25 26 'Pei ' 46 5 4 164 3 • 2 to 11 ; r --- 8 _ ,4 19 10 . Pol 11 - li all . 4. at • 4 _ ; 0044 ( 3 4 5 8 9 4 • •-■ 4 AO, i:441‘• 1 i 1; 1.4 2 • flat, a ( 3 4 5 8 9 4 • •-■ 4 AO, i:441‘• 1 i 1; flat, JL t 9 11 121 I I 2 3 F904 5 • NOTICE OF UNTENTION TO AMEND CITY ZONING ORDINANCE #402 NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning Board of the City of Okeechobee Florida, a municipal corporation will consider rezoning from Industrial to CCBD, Central Commercial Business District, and to amend according the Com- prehensive Zoning and Ordinance #402, the following described real property, situate, lying and being within the corporate limits of the City of Okeechobee, Florida, to -wit: All Blocks and unplatted land developed and undeveloped in the Industial Zoning boundary between Southwest 7th Avenue and Northwest 7th Avenue to Southwest 9th Avenue and Northwest 9th Avenue between Northwest 2nd Street and Southwest 2nd Street. and that a public hearing in relation thereto will be held at 7:00 P.M. on the 6th day of December, 1983, in the City Council Room, City Hall, Okeechobee, Florida, at which time all parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard. PLEASE GOVERN YOURSELVES ACCORDINGLY. Mallette Westbrook Building And Zoning Administrator PUBLISH IN THE OKEECHOBEE NEWS: November 18, 1983 Posted on property November 18, 1983, by Building Official Mallette Westbrook. Additional information may be obtained by calling 763 -3372. NOTICE OF INTENTION TO AMEND CITY ZONING ORDINANCE #402 NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning Board of the City of Okeechobee Florida, a municipal corporation will consider rezoning from Industrial to CCB1), Central Commercial Business District, and Commercial, and to amend according the Comprehensive Zoning and Ordinance #402, the following real property, situate, lying and being within the of Okeechobee, Florida, to -wit: Industrial to CCBD, Central described corporate limits of the Commercial Business District all of Block 161 and Unplatted lands 3 -B 37S 35E .75 Acres and Parcel 7,8,9,10,11 West South Park St. and Industrial to Commercial all of Block 162. and that a public hearing in relation therto will be held at 7:00 P.M. on the 10th day of January, 1984, in the City Council Florida, at which time all parties in opportunity to be heard. PLEASE GOVERN YOURSELVES ACCORDINGLY. City Room, City Hall, Okeechobee, interest and citizens shall have an Alj Mallette Westbrook Building and Zoning Administrator PUBLISH IN THE OIfEECHOBEE NEWS: December 23, 1983 Posted on property December 21, 1983, by Building Official Mallette Westbrook. Additional information may be obtained by calling 763 -7292. NOTICE OF INTENTION TO AMEND CITY ZONING ORDINANCE //402 NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning Board of the City of Okeechobee Florida, a municipal corporation will consider rezoning from Industrial to CCBD, Central Commercial Business District, and Commercial, and to amend according the Comprehensive Zoning and Ordinance (/402, the following described real property, situate, lying and being within the corporate limits of the City of Okeechobee, Florida, to -wit: Industrial to CCBD, Central Commercial Business District all of Block 161 and Unplatted lands 3 -B 37S 35E .75 Acres and Parcel 7,8,9,10,11 West South Park St. and Industrial to Commercial all of Block 162. and that a public hearing in relation therto will be held at 7:00 P.M. on the 10th day of January, 1984, in the City Council Room, City Hall, Okeechobee, Florida, at which time all parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard. PLEASE GOVERN YOURSELVES ACCORDINGLY. ?Ae%o Ma lette Westbrook Building and Zoning Administrator PUBLISH IN THE OXEECHOBEE NEWS: December 23, 1983 Posted on property December 21, 1983, by Building Official Nanette Westbrook. Additional information may be obtained by calling 763 -7292. C3L- urtmic&cw,-J ). An/ U.A)-Q-1 ruvt4i ()-1-QA/ NAM! DATE Findings - REZONING A. Is the proposed change contrary use pattern? t () t_h� ostabli Shed land H. Will the proposed change creaL( an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby property? C. Will the proposed change materially alter the population density pattern and thereby increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilities, streets, etc U. Are existing district boundaries illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change? Will the proposed change be contrary to the City's compre- hensive plan? • Do changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary? Will the proposed change adversely influence living condi- tions in the neighborhood? Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or otherwise affect public safety? Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to the adjacent areas? . Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations? M. Will the proposed change constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare? . Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accord with existing zoning? . Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the City? Is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the City for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use? CITY COUNCIL Dr. Edward Douglas. Mayor Jim Knight, Sr., Vice Mayor COUNCIL MEMBERS Oakland Chapman Dowling Watford, Jr. Oscar Thomas CITY ADMINISTRATION .1. MaUette Westbrook lh, nt l•rnrr..I Sr vs II.'S Richard C. Fellows City Administrator 813-763.4 1 1 li Bonnie Thomas City Clerk 813- 763 -3372 Landon C. Fortner, Jr. Dir. of Public Works 813-763-7054 Larry Mobley Chief of Police 813- 763.5521 L. Keith Tomey, II Fire Chief 813- 763 -4423 CITY OF OKEECHOBEE CITY HALL 55 SOUTHEAST THIRD AVENUE OKEECIHOBEE, FLORIDA 33472.2932 Home of The Second Largest Fresh Water Lake in the United States January 5, 1984 John Cassels 400 N.W. 2nd St. Okeechobee, Fla. 33472 Dear Mr. Cassels Please be advised the Planning Board of the City of Okeechobee Florida, will consider the rezoning of Block 161 and the unplatted lands 3 -B 37S 35E .75 acres and Parcel 7,8,9,10 amd 11 At East South Park Street from Industrial to CCBD and Block 162 from Industrial to Commercial and that a public hearing in relation thereto will be held at 7:00 P.M. on the 10th day of January 1984 in the City Council Room, City Hall. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office at 763 -7292. /bc Sincerely, Beatrice Castorina Secretary, Planning Board X,e/171,W . n' al" Yaw SUITE 400 2001 PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33409 TELEPHONE (3051 686 -1000 December 1, 1983 Ms. Beatrice Castorina Planning Board Secretary City of !Okeechobee City Hall 55 S. E.: 3 Avenue Okeechobee, Florida 33472 -2932 Dear Ms. Castorina: I received your letter on November 24, 1983, 16 days from the day of this letter. Therefore, the time does not permit me to make arrangements to be present at the City Hall on Tuesday, December 6, 1983, in view of the fact that I will be in New York City at that time. The description of the land to be rezoned is rather vague to me, and I was unable to follow the boundary lines. In either event, I assume that in the future if the property should be rezoned back to industrial or rezoned to apart- ments there would be no difficulty in doing so, and, therefore, at this time, based upon the above, I would have no objection to the rezoning, assuming that it does cover my property. With kindest regards, JN:mlr pe emeC` REGU4R MEETING JANUARY 10, 1984 The Planning Board /Board of Adjustments and Appeals met in regular session on Tuesday, January 10, 1984, at City Hall in the Council Chambers, Okeechobee, Florida at 7:00 P.M. Members present were: Darrell Ferneau, Frank Altobello, Jim Wright and Lula Worthen. Madam Chairman Brenda O'Connor was absent. Others present were: Building and Zoning Administrator, Mallette Westbrook; Attorney, Conlon and Secretary, Bea Castorina. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS Vice Chairman Wright called the Board of Adjustments and Appeals into session. APPROVAL OF MINUTES There being no additions or corrections to the minutes, member Altobello moved the minutes of December 6, 1983 meeting standed approved as presented. Seconded by member Ferneau. Motion carried. ADJOURNMENT 'There being no business to come before the board, member Altobello moved to adjourn. Seconded by member Worthen. Motion carried. PLANNING BOARD Vice Chairman Wright called the Planning Board into session. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Where being no correction or additions to the minutes of December 6, 1983 meeting member Ferneau moved the minutes stand approved as presented. Seconded by member Altobello. Motion carried. CITY bF OKEECHOBEE - REQUEST FOR REZONING Building and Zoning Administrator, Mallette Westbrook spoke on behalf of the City for the rezoning. He stated the boundries have been revised on the rezoning, due to Mr. Morgan objection. The new requests are all block 161, part of the old canning plant (Parcels 7 8 9 10 11) and 3 -B .75 acres(this ' ' parcel is in Flagler Park), which is noW Industrial will be rezoned to CCBD. and All of block 162, now zoned Industrial will be rezoned to Commercial. Mr. Westbrook stated he has received a letter from attorney John Cassels stating Mr. Morgan with drew his objection to the rezoning as long as the rezoning stands as indicated above. Discussion ensued. No objections were voiced. Attorney Conlon asked if this would cause anybody's property in the zoning area now to be in a grandfather situation in, that there use right now would violate this change, but the use would continue because the City could not violate the pro- perty Owners out of there use. Mr. Westbrook stated no. Attorney Conlon asked if there were any Industrial use being done on this property. Mr. Westbrook Stated no. Attorney Conlon asked if there were still Industrial zoning sites within the City, vacant property, where any Industry moving into town could find, right in the City, more suitable areas. Mr. Westbrook stated yes and within a reasonable distance to down town. The board went over the findings for a rezoning. Member Altobello moved to recommend City Council grant the rezoning of the property. Seconded by member Worthen. Motion 'Carried. ' AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE #258 Discussion to amend Ordinance # 258 for less footage from a church or school for on premises consumption of wine and beer where food is served by special exception Attorney Conlon advised the board needed to distinguish how the distance is to be measured. Discussion ensued. Member Altobello stated he thought the distance should be measured from the center of the lot to the center of the designated lot and measure on city map. Member Ferneau stated he liked the 700 feet with the special exception. Vice Chairman Wright stated he thought to leave the 700 feet and measure from front door to front door and measure on city map. After a lenghty discussion member Ferneau moved to table until the next meeting to give the board members more time to study the matter. Seconded by member Altobello. Motion carried. MALLRTTE WESTBROOK M, Mr. Westbrook advised the board, the tour to Cardinal Industrials is scheduled for February 2, 1984, at 10:00 oclock A.M. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the board, member Worthen moved to adjourn. Seconded by member Altobello. Motion carried. Meeting Adjourned. James C. Wright Vice Chairman Planning Board City of Okeechobee ATTEST: Beatrice Castorina Secretary Planning Board City of Okeechobee THERE IS A TAPE OF THIS MEETING IN IT'S ENTIRETY IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE. 3118 REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 1984 The City Council of the City of Okeechobee, met in regular session in Council Chambers, 55 Southeast Third Avenue, Okeechobee, Florida at 7:08 P.M. Chairman Edward W. Douglas called the meeting to order with the following Councilmen present: Edward W. Douglas, D.C., Chairman James Knight, Vice Chairman Dowling R. Watford, Jr. Oscar Thomas Oakland Chapman Others present were: Bonnie S. Thomas, City Clerk Richard C. Fellows, City Administrator David M. Conlon, City Attorney Lydia J. Wilkerson, Deputy Clerk AGENDA ITEMS #II & III - INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Invocation was offered by Chairman Douglas, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. R4 -I AGENDA ITEM #IV - APPROVAL OF MINUTES Chairman Douglas called for approval of the minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 6th, 1984. There being no additions or deletions, the minutes were approved as presented. 84 -22 ,AGENDA ITEM #V - INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY - ACTION ON A REQUEST FOR WATER & SEWER HOOKUP FOR INDUSTRIAL PARK Chairman Douglas stated that members of the Industrial Development Authority were present to discuss their request for water & sewer service for the Airport Industrial Park, and that Attorney Conlon had been in touch with the Central Florida Regional Planning Council's attorney concerning the drafting of a letter which would secure the $250,000.00 grant. Chairman Douglas asked Attorney Conlon to explain the letter for Council. Attorney Conlon stated that the attorney for the Central Florida Regional Planning Council had dictated the form of a letter to him earlier this afternoon and the City Council put in other disclaimers about meeting City's rules and regulations, charges, and mainly that the City will reserve the water for the Industrial Park. This letter would secure the $250,000.00 grant to be given to the Industrial Development Authority. Attorney Conlon read the letter for the Council as follows: The City regarding the availability of water and sewer service for the proposed Airport Industrial Park located at Okeechobee County Airport. The City of Okee- chobee will provide water and sewer service to the project site as requested after annexation of the project site by the City. The City will reserve for the project site water and sewer capacity as set forth below. Water service will be available in an amount not less than 75,000 gallons per day. Sewer service including service for industrial waste water treatment will be available in at amount of not less than 50,000 gallons per day and will be provided by the new sewer plant currently being developed by the City. Attorney Conlon suggested the City have 2 letters, one stating the water is already available, and one stating the sewer would be available upon annexation. Councilman Thomas asked if this letter was agreeable to the Industrial Development Authority. Attorney Conlon stated that it was probably news to everyone that upon annexation water and sewer would be available. m(/I Phil Berger addressed Council and stated that as Chairman of the Industrial Development Authority, he could not speak for the County Commissioners as to the annexation. He then stated, "We formally accept the City's reservation for the water and sewer. And hereby for- mally charge the Okeechobee City Council and the County Board of Commissioners to work out their problems with ad valorem, annexation on any other service to the promotion of business and industry. And if you have any other reservation, contingency or stipulations, I wish that you would formally bring it up before the Board of County Commissioners, because we are 'lot message carriers nor are we an agency for the Board of County Commissioners, nor an agency for the City Council. We are citizens for the community of Okeechobee ". Chairman Douglas asked for Public comments. Mr. Henry Kelly, President of the Chamber of Commerce stated he has had numerous calls from members of the Chamber of Commerce and directors, and the gist of them all were that it should be considered unthinkable that we would allow anything to happen in the City and or the County to invalidate the grant. Attorney Conlon asked if anyone had heard from the Central Florida Regional Planning Council since 5:20? Phil Berger stated he was told at 4:30 P.M. that there would be 2 letters. Attorney Conlon replied that the Central Florida Regional Planning Council's attorney had only dictated the "one" letter, but he suggested that there be 2 letters, and it was his understanding this one letter would secure (hold) the grant. Mr. Berger then stated again, that he could not speak for the County Commissioners as to the annexation. Councilman Thomas asked Mr. Berger if the Industrial Development Authority had any problems with the letter. Mr. Berger replied by stating that he had no problems but that he felt the City and County needed to get together. There was a brief discussion among Councilman Watford, Elder Summer and Phillip Berger concerning who was at fault in this situation, (City -- County -- Industrial Development Authority) in waiting until such a late date to work out details concerning all parties and things should have been done in a more timely fashion in preparation for the application of the grant. Mr. Berger asked Councilman Watford to clarify if the Industrial Development Authority was at fault. Councilman Watford answered, "No, I don't think so - the property belongs to the County ". Mr. Berger asked Attorney Conlon if he agreed. Attorney Conlon stated that he did not have anything to do with that part of it, and as he saw it, the City send the letter tomorrow, the grant is reserved and protected and will beawarded. The sewer plant goes in in 1- 2- 3years from now, and you will be signing up some tenants that will need sewer and somewhere between now and then the County will say whether or not they want to annex. If they say they do not want to - then there will be some dialogue back and forth and it will eventually be resolved in the political arena, and if they say they do want to annex they will call a petition - we will hold the hearings and that will be it. The Industrial Development Authority stated, "I believe we rest ". Chairman Douglas asked for discussion. There was no response. Chairman Douglas called for a motion. Councilman Knight moved to accept the letter as stated by Attorney Conlon to preserve the grant. Councilman Chapman seconded the motion. Chairman Douglas asked for any further discussion before voting on the motion. Councilman Watford stated he felt that one of the main problems with this was the annexation. He also noted that some remarks were made earlier by the County Commissioners that they had some money paid into the sewer plant facility and therefore they should be entitled to use the sewer in the County. It was further stated that the County has paid 3/4 of 1% capacity on the sewer facility and the County currently is using 19% capacity and he feels they are getting over their moneys worth already. Councilman Watford then stated, "The 6" water mains will not be sufficient for adequate fire protection, and the Industrial Development Authority and County Commissioners have to be aware of this fact; that everything (including pipes, valves, lines, etc.) must meet the City's requirements - because after all, we are here to protect the City against lawsuits. And we are requesting larger lines in order to provide adequate fire protection and I don't have any problem with the letter being sent - but we have to make sure that we are protected, so no one can come back and sue the City for something one down the road ". Attorney Conlon stated that hecould add a paragraph onto the letter stating that that "subject to the City's rules and regulations ". Attorney Conlon asked Director Fortner, "What size line will supply 75,000 gallons and what size line is needed to supply adequate fire protection ". Director Fortner replied, " "Several questions must be asked first to find out what size line could be used for 75,000' gallons; 1) how many hours is going to be involved in drawing the 75,000 gallons? and 2) how many per minute? That would average the direct effect on the existing water system if they exceed certain amounts and it starts lowering pressure in a given area. Well that compounds the problems down the lines, if it is a small volume stretched out over 24 hours you have a different situation than you do over a few hours ". Attorney Conlon asked, "When you say you are using 75,000 gallons per day - does that not mean that its divided over a 24 hour period and you don't say any further, does that not get the hourly rate ?" Director Fortner answered, "No, sir, they may only be open 8 hours (business) ". Attorney Conlon then asked, "What type of line do we need to meet this letter re- quirement, the way it is worded, 75,000 gallons per day ?" Director Fortner stated, "We are talking about a mile of water lines, a 12" water line would supply you 2,000 gallons per minute. Again it depends on what period of time that they want to draw the water, A 6" water line would supply you 300 gallons per minute. How many hours are you expecting the 75,000 gallons - what period. I don't know if that answers your question ". Councilman Knight stated that no one really knows this yet. Attorney Conlon then said, "If we send this letter, what are we obligating our- selves for ?" Phil Berger stated that the Engineer who designed the Industrial Park was present, Mosley Collins, if the Council wished to ask him any questions concerning the problem. Chairman Douglas suggested that the Engineer and Director Fortner get together and discuss a few things and bring it back before the Council, on the policy, etc. Attorney Conlon stated, "Whatif the Council sends this letter now, we need to have some type of an idea as to the amount of water supply, (the 75,000 gallons of water will be supplied at 300 gallons per minute or something like that) because what if they came back after we send the letter and said that they needed a 12 inch line? Or would an 8" line be better, could I say an 8" line? In the letter I could say 75,000 gallons per day through an 8" line." T Director Fortner stated, one thing, he felt the County Commission would like to know how this is handled because they are also opening bids tomorrow involving these things. They are going to need some guidance concerning what size lines. Their plans show 6" lines." Director Fortner further stated he felt that something might have to be decided tonight. Attorney Conlon asked if a 6" line would be OK for fire protection. What size would be needed for this protection. Director Fortner stated that according to the Fire Chief and again depending on what it out therey you may need 3,0Wiga1.?er minute maybe a 14 or 16 inch line. Phil Berger asked Council with the annexation - what causes the City to be concerned with the lines for the fire protection. Attorney Conlon answered that the City needed to know what size line was needed when we signed the letter. Phil Berger stated, "The lines are on the plans." Councilman Watford asked, "Are these the lines on the plans that the City has ?" Mr. Berger answered, "Yes ". Councilman Watford then asked if they were going to expect the City to accept these lines if they were dedicated to us." Mr. Berger said that it didn't matter to him, and further stated that he had written a letter to the City stating that we could accept the lines if we wanted to, and if we didn't want then he supposed the Industrial park would. Councilman Watford then stated that ifa formal request was made to the City for accepting these line, the Industrial Development Authority needed to know that the lines would have to meet the City's specs. Mr. Berger asked how did the 6" lines fail to meet the City's specs. Councilman Watford answered by saying, "The PVC is 160psi and we require 200 psi. Iron pipe class 50 and we used class 52, and we use solid gate valves. There are 125psi for 1 hour and we would need 150 psi for 2 hours. These are some of the things that show all the items won't meet our specs. So some of this needs to be changed. Apparently we did not make this clear before1but this just points out to me that there are some things we need to have worked out. I realize that time is of the essence. Maybe what I am saying is that you need to be aware of these faults so when you come back next time and maybe you do want us to accept them (the lines), I would hate for you to come up here and say, 'Why didn't you tell us that this didn't meet your specs ?'" Mr. Berger asked, "Well why doesn't this meet your specs ?" Mr. Berger asked Mosely Collins to answer questions. Mosely Collins addressed Council and stated, "The specifications used in the In- dustrial Park designs meet most City's specifications With 160 psi you are only using 40 pound psi it's not recommended you use 200 pound psi. For the verification you might ask Mr. Tommy Markham what he puts in throughout this area." Mr. Collins then stated that they had requested alternate bids on 8" pipe tomorrow and also 7" pipe. Mr. Collins further stated, "All the information that I have given to the City has turned out to be adequate, sufficient, and it has never been indicated to me that there would be any decision made other than by the Council. We submit the information to the Council and the Council submits it to me and this is how it should be. The information has been given back and forth. The information that I needed and we say this is what we have and the final decision is to be made by the Council." Mr. tommy Markham addressed Council and stated that he has been installing these size pipes witivntheCity with no objections, also installed in Jupiter, West Palm Beach and Ft. Pierce. He stated that he understood that the City has just recently changed their specifications to give some extra added protection but it is definitely not necessary where this type was being installed. Mr. Markham wanted to point out to the people pre- 3422 sent that it was not out of the ordinary for the Industrial Development Authority to use these size lines. Councilman Watford stated that he was not picking on this one issue, he just wanted to point out that there were some problems that needed to be resolved. Citizen Jim Baughman addressed Council concerning the jobs which would be available if the Industrial Park developed. He further stated that Mr. Berger and the other men working on the Industrial Park had really done a great job and he felt appreciation was due them. Councilman Watford replied to Mr. Baughman's comments by stating that he in no way wants to jeopardize the grant, but the City still needs to be protected, and as a Council- man, this was his job to see to it. Fire Chief Tomey stated that a 12" water line was needed for fire protection. Chief Tomey also stated that if anyone needed proof they could stop by his office and look in the Fire Almanac and they could find the answers to their questions. Councilman Watford made a motion to amend the motion to say 50,000 gallons per day in the water and 75,000 sewer and to add the following conditions so everybody will understand: 1. Lines will be accepted for maintenance only when brought up to City specs. Otherwise service will be provided by master meter. 2. Any improvements needed to provide a greater level of service will be funded by Industrial Authority or users. 3. The City shall approve each customer and reserves the right to refuse water or sewer service to any user that would interfere with the performance of the City's system. The City will have the right to collect samples at any reasonable time, and 4. The City recommends larger main sizes for fire protection and can not be held responsible for water for this purpose. Chairman Douglas asked if there was a second on the motion to amend. Councilman Knight asked, "If they asked for it then why couldn't a motion be made? Attorney Conlon answered by stating that when the letter was being dictated to him, he asked the attorney from the Central Florida Regional Planning Council, 'If we don't put something in there about complying with our specifications could we put that into the letter' ". Attorney Conlon stated that he was going to ask' the Council that if the letter passed that we rework it a little bit and that Mr. Fellows and himself call before we signed the letter or anything and read it word for word so that we would not send anything to endanger the grant. I don't know if some of those things would or would not be accepted, there is no way I would know, without reading it to their attorney and seeing if it were agreeable to them. Those are all very good points if we put those in and if they understood them and we put something in there about subject to our rules and regu- lations maybe it could be handled that way." Councilman Watford asked to withdraw his motion and make another one. Councilman Watford then moved that we amend the water rate to 50,000 gallons per day based on a flow average of an 8 hour day. Councilman Thomas asked, if that had anything to do with the water lines? Councilman Watford replied, "Not yet ". Chairman Douglas asked if there was a second to the motion to amend? Councilman Watford stated, "You better do it gentlemen - we can't supply more than 50,000 gallons." Councilman Knight asked Director Fortner how he felt about this? Director Fortner answered, "With an average flow of 50,000 gallons a day it will .gut out a 100 gallons per minute ". Louncilman Thomas stated, "L.C., are you telling me that you can only put out a 100 gallons per minute ?" Director Fortner answered, "No sir, that is only what 50,000 gallon is calculated for over a period of 8 hours." Chairman Douglas asked if there was a second on the motion. Councilman Thomas stated that he felt fire protection was one of the most important things. Councilman Watford said, "If we are going to send this letter, we are going to be obligated to how ever much water we say. Maybe we can supply 75,000 gallons per day and maybe we can't ". Chairman Douglas asked for a second to amend? Councilman Thomas seconded the motion for discussion. Councilman Thomas stated, "I understand that they were only asking for 25,000 gallons and we are increasing it to 50,000 gallons, and that the attorney would go along with that ?" Chairman Douglas asked for any further discussion. Attorney Conlon stated, "Yes, I have a couple of questions; what would happen if I call up there tomorrow and they say we cannot get the grant for 50,000 gallons per day ?" Councilman Chapman asked,' "Why was the amount held at 50,000 gallons, is it possible that someone contacted the attorney for the Central Florida Regional Planning Council ?" Attorney Conlon replied to Councilman Chapman's comments by stating, "You would not believe how many different amounts that I have been given in the last two days. I do know that the City is going to call someone that has been given a grant recently. All I know is I asked the attorney for the minimum amount in order to secure the grant and he said ^0,000 gallons." Councilman Chapman stated, "Well you always ask for more than you need, its normal procedure." Attorney Conlon again stated, "I asked the attorney what the minimum requirement that we could have in order to secure the grant, and this is what he dictated to me." Members of the audience addressed Council as to the amount of water the industrial park would need. Councilman Thomas state, that Mosely Collins asked for 50,000 gallons and he had confidence in his opinion. And if we could furnish more water fine, but we could only reserve a certain amount. Director Fortner pointed out that on the original application the Industrial Develop - ment Authority only requested 25,000 gallons. Councilman Chapman stated that this bothered him. Audience responded to the amount of water to be used. Councilman Thomas asked if we could supply that amount of water. Mr. Henry Kelly addressed Council asking if the Attorney could write the letter stating subject to the City's rules and regulations. Chairman Douglas noted the letter was subject to annexation - and if it would become the City's property, we have utilities, would we not be subject to furnish utilities, either 25,000, 50,000 or 100,000 gallons. Would we not by law be made to furnish the ,tilities? Attorney Conlon answered, "Yes, by law, if we send this letter to fund a federal grant." Attorney Conlon asked, "How many gallons would the current nearest line be, a 6" an 8" - 30 if we continue that out to their property dead end, how many gallons would that produce now ?" Director Fortner answered, "Well, an 8" line, you're talking about a mile. They are going to have to connect to our line at 98. There are alot of problems." Councilman 'Thomas asked, "Could we say in our letter that this is 75,000 gallons per :'4 hours ?" 3424 Chairman Douglas stated, "There is an amendment and a second, lets take a vote on the amendment of 75,000 gallons to 50,000 gallons." Councilman Watford voted Yes, Councilmen Thomas, Knight, Chapman and Chairman Douglas voted No. Chairman Douglas asked for further discussion. Councilman Knight asked if we were going to change the 24 hours. Attorney Conlon stated that he thought a day was 24 hours. Councilman Knight stated that we could put 24 hours on the side of day in parenthesis. Clerk Thomas asked if the original motion could be stated again for the record. Councilman Knight stated, "I made the original motion to accept this letter so it will need an amendment on it to put 24 hours on it and providing rules and regulations." Attorney Conlon added, "providing that water is available now." Chairman Douglas asked for any further discussion on the original motion. No discussion. Chairman Douglas asked for vote. All Councilmen were in favor. Motion carried. Councilman Watford asked if there was a time limit? Attorney Conlon stated, "We normally do. When I was talking to the attorney, I mentioned that we normally did. If they get the grant approved - I suppose a long term but even a long one is better than a totally open ended one. Do you suppose we could have something like a 5 or 10 years ?" Mr. Henry Kelly addressed Council and stated, "I would like to make one more state - ment before I go, Dowling, don't worry, everything is gonna be all right!" Members of the Industrial Development Authority left the meeting at this time. Councilman Chapman stated, "I would like to say one thing, I hope we have learned a little bit from this. I can't understand how it got through with the approval of the Engineer and everything with L.C. - were you ever involved with this at all ?" Director Fortner answered, "They asked questions while the plans were being drawn up about 3 weeks ago." Councilman Chapman stated, "Not for your approval though, what about the Fire Chief, maybe the County Fire Chief, someone, I think we got left behind somewhere." Councilman Knight stated, "I think we ought to make it a law for all people to come through the right connections(channels)." Councilman Watford stated, "A normal development would. Any.other development this size would furnish him (Dir. Fortner) with the plans and with the capacity they would need." Councilmen agreed that they would still have to meet the City's requirements. If they don't - it would not be approved, and we told them so tonight. Councilman Knight brought up for discussion the size pipe that needed for fire pro- tection. Councilman Thomas asked, "Can't we work our way into that later ?" Council replied, "No because they are opening bids tomorrow." Attorney Conlon asked, "Isn't there something that says what size line is needed for fire hydrants ?" Councilman Thomas stated, "Doesn't our letter state that, isn't it in our specificatibds?" Attorney Conlon answered, "Well you see our letter just states that we will supply the water it doesn't say that we are going to accept their lines. So I would suppose if they were to put in an adequate size line and if they are ready to start taking our water now, I suppose after sending this letter we could let them know that our policy is to inpect each hookup, and any new hookup would have to sign a disclaimer with us that we S4 -I 5 are not responsible for water pressure for hydrants." Councilman Thomas said, "Lets take one step at a time ". Councilman Watford asked, "Could it be that the conditions I tried to make them accept, we could send them something similar to that - because you mark my word, they are going to come back to us and say why didn't you tell us that before we put these lines in - that you would not accept them. Then we will have every taxpayer up here saying that we are going to keep all of these jobs out of here." Attorney Conlon stated, "We are not going to keep their jobs out - they will just have to maintain their own lines. Councilman Watford asked, "What if we don't supply enough water ?" Attorney Conlon answered, "After this letter goes out there probably would npt be a problem for the Public Works Department to send a letter to them saying - for your information here is our rules and regulations for acceptance of lines. And if we annex we don't have to accept private water lines." Attorney Conlon asked, "Does the specifications call for fire hydrants ?" Councilman Chapman stated, "Well who called for the fire hydrants if we didn't ?" Director Fortner said that the County fire hydrants have to be inspected by the County Commission. Attorney Conlon stated, "They have to approve the fire hydrants but we don't have to extend water unless they do. There is a policy by either resoltuion or something that has been in effect for several years." Director Fortner commented the wording was not exactly like that. Fire Chief Tomey stated that about 3 years ago there was a resolution that they had to have a fire hydrant within so many feet before we would put in service in the County or anywhere. Councilman Chapman said, "What if .hey dug a big pond right in the middle of it and got the water from that for the fire hydtants." Fire Chief Tomey stated, "Yes, that would be fine. You could do that." Chairman Douglas asked, "Is it agreeable with the Council for Mr. Fellows and Director Fortner to get together and send a letter to the Central Florida Regional Planning Council and the Industrial Development Authority stating the City's specifica- tions." Administrator Fellows stated, "They have a copy of the requirements. We furnished a copy of the specifications to Mr. Collins and evidentally, they have not gotten back with Director Fortner. It is going to be their problem if they don't install the right size pipe. The City just won't accept the lines." Councilman Watford asked if Mr. Berger knows what size lines we require. The Administrator affirmed Mr. Berger verbally knows that Mr. Collins has the list,. AGENDA ITEM lVI - FIRST READING ORDINANCE - SPEED LIMIT SIGNS - CHURCHES Chairman Douglas introduced the ordinance and read the title only as follows: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA; AMENDING CHAPTER 17 TO ADD A NEW SECTION 17 -2 TO PROVIDE THE OKEECHOBEE POLICE DEPARTMENT WITH AUTHORITY TO SET SPEED ZONES ON SUNDAYS IN THE VICINITY OF CHURCHES AND IN CONNECTION WITH OTHER SPECIAL. EVENT..; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chairman Douglas asked for any discussion before voting. Councilman Thomas made amotion to set the ordinance for Public Hearing on March 5th. Councilman Knight, seconded the motion. Chairman Douglas asked for any comments concerning the ordinance. 3426 Attorney Conlon stated there was one thing with the wording he would like to change. Citizen Andy Rubin asked the Council if the Police Chief had Ok'ed the ordinance. Council replied, "Yes ". Chairman Douglas noted that he felt the ordinance should not state "Sundays" only. There are some denomenations which worship on Saturdays. Attorney Conlon said this was the changes he was speaking of earlier. Chairman Douglas asked for vote. All Councilmen were in favor of the ordinance being set for Public Hearing on March 5th with the changing of the word "Sundays ". Motion then carried. 84 -23 AGENDA ITEM #VII - PUBLIC HEARING & FINAL READING - ORDINANCE PROVIDING PROGRESSIVE SCHEDULE ON WATER & SEWER RATES Chairman Douglas read the ordinance by title only as follows: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE; AMENDING CHAPTER 18, ARTICLE II, SECTION 18 -22 TO ESTABLISH NEW RATES AND CHARGES FOR THE WATERWORKS SYSTEM; AMENDING CHAPTER 18, ARTICLE III, SECTION 18 -48 SUB - PARAGRAPH (2) (d) TO INCREASE SEWER USE FEES AS RE- QUIRED BY THE CITY'S BONDING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chairman Douglas noted the ordinance should read 1984 instead of 1985. Chairman Douglas asked for any comments from the audience concerning the ordinance. Citizen Andy Rubin addressed Council on the following subjects: having two ordinances one for water and one for sewer; water raises in 1976, 1982, 1983, 1984 and 1985; as President of the Taxpayer's Association he requested the Council not to agree to the raise; and stated the Industrial Development Authority was doing a wonderful thing for the City. Citizen Frank Wilbur, Vice President of Taxpayer's Association addressed Council and stated that he agreed with Mr. Rubin's statements notto increase the water & sewer rates. Councilman Knight made a motion to amend the ordinance where it read 1985 instead of 1984. Councilman Watford seconded the motion. Chairman Douglas asked for any further disucssion. Attorney Conlon asked if the rates charged outside the City limits exceed 25 %: Administrator Fellows answered, "No ". Councilman Thomas asked Council, "If we see we do not need these increases later on, can we eliminate the increases ?" Attorney Conlon replied, "Yes, by an ordinance." Councilman Watford noted that the water will be increased March 1st, only for the larger amounts of gallons used such as 5,000 - 8,000. And even if we did not increase the rate now - come January 1st, 1985 we would have to whether we liked it or not because in order to pay for the new sewer plant. Administrator Fellows noted that if we found out later on we did not need the addi- tional money received in the increase in order to pay for the sewer plant - that the Council by an ordinance change the increase rate charged. Councilman Thomas stated he felt the same as Andy Rubin concerning the rate increase. He felt there were alot of pee; on fixed incomes which could not afford the increase. Chairman Douglas called for a vote on amending the ordinance changing the dates. All Councilmen were in favor of the ordinance. Motion carried. Chairman Douglas asked for discussion concerning the increase. Andy Rubin addressed the Council again stating he was against the increase. Administrator Fellows noted that Director Fortner and he were in the process of putting together another application for the recently passed State Sewer Treatment Funding and if we cannot get what we are ;anticipating - it would change this dramitically. Attorney Conlon asked Administrator Fellows, concerning the water rates, "I think the sewer rates were projected to put forth in an official statement in cur bond ordi- nance. That was all calculated out to be what we needed. And with the water rates, have you in your capacity as Administrator reviewed the cost of this production of water rates and made the adjustments for capitol improvements necessary to growth ?" The Administrator answered, "Yes sir we have, we've gone over that quite throughly. We nave found that after capitol improvement the system will measure just a little bit of money. But that doesn't take into consideration any type of improvements such as Line size, etc., a better rate to meet those needs." Attorney Conlon then said, "So the rate increases involved are all on the basis of the projections and analysis of the budget as to the amount necessary to keep the'system going at the proposed rate." Chairman Douglas asked for any other questions or comments before Council voted. There being no response, Councilman Watford moved to approve the ordinance. Motion was seconded by Councilman Chapman. Motion carried. 84 -24 AGENDA ITEM #VIII - PUBLIC HEARING - FINAL READING - ORDINANCE - TAXICABS Chairman Douglas read the ordinance by title only as follows: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA; AMENDING CHAPTER 16, ARTICLE II, DIVISION I, SECTION 16 -25 SUB - PARAGRAPH (a) TO PROVIDE CONDITIONS FOR VEHICLE CERTIFICATION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The Chairman asked for any comments or objections. Mr. Charles Straight asked Council if any if there were any questions. There were no questions. Councilman Chapman asked if the Police Chief had looked over the ordinance. Administrator Fellows noted the Police Chief had agreed to the ordinance. Councilman Watford stated that he thought the vehicles had to be inspected annually by the Okeechobee City Police Department. Administrator Fellows replied by stating yes and it could be added onto the ordinance. Councilman Knight•made a motion to amend the ordinance to read "with a yearly inspec- tion by the Okeechobee City Police Department ". Motion was seconded by Councilman Thomas. Motion carried. Chairman Douglas asked for a decision on the ordinance. Councilman Chapman moved to approve the amended motion, Seconded by Councilman Thomas. Motion carried. S4 -5 AGENDA ITEM #IX - PUBLIC HEARING - FINAL READING - ORDINANCE - INCREASE GARBAGE RATES Chairman Douglas read the ordinance by title only as follows: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE RELATING TO GARBAGE AND TRASH PICKUP AND DISPOSAL; AMENDING CHAPTER 8, DIVISION 2, SECTION 8 -37 TO PROVIDE AN INCREASE IN COMMERCIAL GARBAGE AND TRASH PICKUP FOR THOS INSTITUTIONS NOT REQUIRING DUMPSTERS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chairman Douglas asked for any comments by the audience. Citizen Andy Rubin stated that L.P. Sanitation has done a good job but he has to speak out against this as a taxpayer. Chairman Douglas asked Council for any comments /objections. Councilman Watford stated that mandatory garbage had been disucssed in length and this increase was as fair as possible. Chairman Douglas asked for any disucssion before voting. 3428 84 -2.8 There being no further discussion, Councilman Knight made a motion to approve the ordinance. Seconded by Councilman Chapman. Motion carried. AGENDA ITEM #X - PUBLIC HEARING - FINAL READING - ORDINANCE - REZONING Chairman Douglas read the ordinance by title only as follows: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA; AMENDING APPENDIX A BEING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE WHICH ESTABLISHES ZONING REGULATIONS AND PROVIDES FOR THE ADMINIS- TRATION, ENFORCEMENT AND AMENDMENT THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE IN THE CLASSIFICATION OF SPECIFIED LAND FROM INDUSTRIAL TO CCBD (CENTRAL COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DISTRICT) AND INDUSTRIAL TO COMMERCIAL. Chairman Douglas asked for any comments or objections from the audience concerning the rezoning. There was no response from audience. Clerk Thomas presented to Chairman Douglas a letter from Mrs. Tave Waldron stating that she was not in favor of this rezoning until she discussed this further with Council. (The letter was given to Clerk Thomas by Mrs.!'laldron's son in law). Councilman Watford asked if this rezoning benefited any certain business in the area of rezoning. Attorney Conlon stated, "The classification was discovered when the new restaurant was under construction." Councilman Watford asked if the rezoning was of any advantage to the restaurant. Administrator Fellows answered Councilman Watford by saying it was of no advantage to them. Attorney Conlon stated the Administrator just recognized it and requested the rezoning. Chairman Douglas asked if there were any further discussions. Councilman Chapman moved to r. ;rove the rezoning. The motion was Seconded by Council - man Knight. Motion carried. 84 -42 AGENDA ITEM #XI - INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING - ORDINANCE - GROUP HOUSING BY SPECIAL EXCEPTION Chairman Douglas introduced the ordinance and read the title only as follows: AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND APPENDIX A, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OEKECHOBEE, FLORIDA; AMENDING THE DISTRICT REGULATIONS TO ALLOW GROUP HOUSING BY A SPECIAL EXCEPTION IN RESIDENTIAL GENERAL (RG -1 AND RG -2) DISTRICTS; AMENDING SECTION 22, DEFINITIONS TO PROVIDE A DEFINITION FOR GROUP HOME FACILI- TIES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 84 -11 Chairman Douglas asked for discussion. Citizen Andy Rubin addressed Council as to how many homes there would be in Group Housing. Chairman Douglas asked for any discussion before voting. There being no further discussion Councilman Knight moved to set the ordinance for second and final reading on March 5, 1984. The motion was seconded by Councilman Watford. Motion carried. AGENDA ITEM 41XII - MICROFILMING EQUIPMENT - CONTINUATION OF DISCUSSION ON THE BIDS Chairman Douglas noted the next agenda item was the continuation of discussion re- lative to recommendations on the purchase of microfilming equipment for the City Clerk's office. Councilman Thomas moved to accept the bid from the Lanier 3 -M Company in the amount of $10,447.00. Councilman Chapman seconded the motion. Councilman Watford stated that he would like to thank the Council for allowing him