229-R WeildingDATE April 11, 1988 NOTICE SEk 3 April 25, 1988
PETITION 4l 229 -R ADVERTISEMENT (4- 22 -88) & (4- 29 -88)
PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING DATE - PLANNING COMMISSION/
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT May 10, 1988
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT & APPEALS
HEARING DATE )tCANI§XX XXKIJX1i,XK0t CITY COUNC
FEE PAID $125.00 / Rec. #003249 VNIMMOTONXXXIXXXXVIXy June 7, 1988
*IN COMBINATION W /SP. FUNIFO4ISLAND USE APPLICATION
GENERAL NATURE OF REQUEST:
A. X Rezone of Land D. Variance
B. Zoning Ordinance Change E. Special Exception
C. Appeal of decision of Zoning Administrator F. Other
NOTICE: PAYMENT OF FEE MUST ACCOMPANY THIS APPLICATION ALONG WITH PROOF
OF OWNERSHIP. (land deed, tax receipt, etc.)
1. Full name of' owner of property MARY & CARL WEIDLING, JACKY & LISA REDIKER, and THOM
J. SCHMIDT Et Al
2. Name of applicant if other than owner Mary Weidling for all property
Relationship to owner: XX agent; attorney
3. Mailing address for notification Weidling @1408 SE 8 Dr.,Okee./Rediker @ 201 NE 10 St., Okee. /and
Schnidt @4281 Country Club Dr.,Utica, Mi. 48087 Telephone 11 t idling @ 763 -0986
4. Legal description of property involved (as found in official records):
Attach additional sheets if necessary. SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
5. Street address and /or descriptive location of property:
REZONE OF LAND
1. Proposed change Zoning Classification from (RG -1) RESIDENTIAL GENERAL -1
(C -II) COMMERCIAL - II w /Special Exception
2. Are there improvements on the property at this time? NO
3. How is the property being used at this time?
Vacant
to
4. Would any present use of the property be considered a violation of Zoning
Ordinance 74 -1, or any other Ordinance or Code of the County of Okeechobee?
NO . If yes,
please state nature of the violation:
Do you wish to appear and make a presentation before the Planning Board
and the County Commission at the necessary public hearing? Yes
6. Have you within the last year made any application for any variance,
special exception, or zoning change which included any or all of the
property described in paragraph 4 above? NO If the answer is yes,
please state name such application was filed under (if different from
above), the date and nature of such application:
I hereby certify that I am the legal owner of the above described property
or that I am the attorney or agent of the legal owner. I further certify
that the above answers and information on this application are true and correct
N. ., 229
u
Sign r:-.4:),P , j , :0 - E (',
Rr7nrF I/99O_0 urrrm Tait_ 1 ncnuvcn i crunnTnr
OAT(.
April 11, 1988 NOTICE SENT April 25, 1988
PETITION 11 218 -S ADVERTISEMENT (4- 22 -88) & (4- 29 -88)
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT & APPEALS HEARING DATE - PLANNING COMMISSION/
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT May 10, 1988
FEE PAID $125.00 / Rec. #003249
*IN COMBINATION W /Rezone #229 -R
GENERAL NATURE OF REQUEST:
A.
f3.
C.
HEARING DATE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
UNIFORM LAND USE APPLICATION
Rezone of Land D. Variance
Zoning Ordinance E. X Special Exception
Appeal of decision of Zoning Administrator F. Other
NOTICE: PAYNENT OF FEE MUST ACCOMPANY THIS APPLICATION ALONG WITH PROOF OF
OWNERSHIP. (land deed, tax receipt, etc.)
1. Full name of owner of property MARY & CARL WEIDLING, JACKY & LISA REDIKER, and THON:
J. SCHMIDT Et
2. Name of applicant if other than owner Mary Weidling for all property
Relationship to owner: XX agent; attorney
3. Hailing address for notification Weidling @1488 SE 8 Dr.,Okee./Rediker @ 201 NE 10 St.,Okee. /and
Scheidt @4281 Country Club Dr.,Utica,Mi. 48087 Telephonell (813)763 -0986
4. Legal description of property involved (as found in official records):
Attach additional sheets if necessary.
LOTS 17,18,19,20,21,22,and 23 to 26 inclusive, BLOCK 31, CITY OF OKEECHOBEE.
5. Street address and /or descriptive location of property:
SPECIAL EXCEPTION
1. Please state nature of special exception desired and reason(s) why it
is desired. ALLOW BUILDING TRADES CONTRACTOR WITH YARD ON PREMISES FOR STORAGE OF EQUIP
MENT AND MATERIALS within the requested C -II zoning district.
2. Please state the Zoning Ordinance Section under which the special
exception is sought. ORDINANCE #87 -1, Special Exception #2.
I hereby certify that the above answers and information on this application
are true and correct.
NY , 218
Sign ?-071,_l ` � t ( ,
SPECIAL EXCEPTION #218 -S WEIDLING / REDIKER / SCHMIDT
OKEECHOBEE COUITY
Building & Zoning Dept.
303 N. W. 2nd St.
Okeechobee, Florida 33472
Phone 813/763 -5548
MAY 1988
REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED ZONING RECLASSIFICATION:
NOTICE: A hearing will be held before the Planning Commission on May 10,
1988 to consider a rezoning from the existing classification of (RG -1)
Residential General -1 to (C -II) Commercial -II with a Special Exception
to ALLOW BUILDING TRADES CONTRACTOR WITH YARD ON PREMISES FOR STORAGE
OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS on the following described property:
LOTS 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23 to 26, inclusive, of
BLOCK 31, CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, according to the plat thereof
recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 17, public records of St. Lucie
County, Florida, a copy of said plat being also recorded
in Plat Book 1, Page 10, Public Records of Okeechobee County,
Florida, and also recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 5, Public
Records of Okeechobee County, Florida.
PUBLIC HEARINGS IN RELATION TO THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY WILL BE HELD AS FOLLOWS:
The FIRST hearing will be held before the Okeechobee County Planning
Commission /Board of Adjustment on Tuesday, May 10, 1988 at 7:30 P.M.
in the County Commission Meeting Room, Okeechobee County Courthouse,
304 N.W. 2nd Street, O!:eechobee, Florida.
The SECOND hearing will be held before the City Council on Tuesday,
June 7, 1988 at 2:00 P.M. in the City Council Room, City Hall, 55 S.E.
3rd Avenue, Okeechobee, Florida.
ALL PARTIES IN INTEREST AND CITIZENS SHALL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO
BE HEARD AT THE FIRST HEARING AND THE SECOND HEARING.
If any person decides to appeal any decision made by the Planning Commis-
sion /Board of Adjustment with respect to any matter considered at such
meeting, he will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings
is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal
is based.
Walter Taylor
Zoning Administrator
CARL & MARY WEIDLING, JACKY & LISA REDIKER, AND THOMAS J. SCHMIDT,
Et Al : Application #229 -R and 218 -S.
PUBLISH IN THE OKEECHOBEE NEWS: April 22, 1988 and April 29, 1988.
2
°I W
25 26
I2
25126
30
16
15
14
13
,2
so
ti
10
4,5
9
8
7 Ci 2
9
17
w
I8
19
20
21
16
15
14
22 23
5o 70
24
4111
2'
1109
9
17
dig
16
9
17
18
19
20
21
8
22 23 2
23
16 15 14
24
10 9
75
7
26
>3,
4
5
E1
"""rfrrxTrrIT NORIs.
417 5 r -- r —mil-
11 I I
1 ,
12
11
2/ 12
3 1 - 13
4 0 i4—
S a0 15
6 - tr 16
2
w
4-
'0 9
B
51 4
3
2
17
11
12
13
14
_..1S
10
18. 19,
221
10
22
23124
2526
9
wSTREEr
II „I
6
50
7
89
50
NORTH 13 TH STREET
9
8
4
r
26
5
4
3
i •0
2I
171819 2,
,511.__ l•!7_
10
21
2
22
23
24
25
26
50
NORTH
4d
6
1 2r 21
• 2
10
1I
2 12 10 4 3 1
3 13 1 'j
i�i i : 4 : 1. a.
22
NORTH
•o
�l /ErLDrr...Y, R.CDIKS-P.7 �JCH(�117T —.
App. 4 23 -9 -1- W 218-5
25126
—1T
2
3
5 ;
5 1
J t
f 12
110
7,
w
IS14
4
13 12 111
I
8
10
12
.411 1, A
_2_.
2'
3
.��• 14. 4c:51/•••
17g
•O_
' ABANDONED
24
-
i
17
w
18
19
20
21
22 '3
x •q
24
1.1
25
26
4,1
4
5
1.1
7,
w
2 11,•45
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
'-19~
t 20 „t1
U2
a3
4
5
6
7
4 10 t
STREET
2 1f 141 4451
12 2
13 3
14 4
2 15
t 16
17
i8
:1__ 19
t 20,03
4,510 t
�9Y
J
12
9
12
so
so
9
9
12
STREET
12
STREET•
12
go
4
,445'
1 R
2
3
4
5
6.
G
14.
15
16
I Ii1T'
12
13
14
15
16
R 11
12
13
10
17
NOR T1
11 MIN
11 IN
10
9
9
di
8
17 18119 zu
eo
08
IS14
4
13 12 111
I
8
10
12
.411 1, A
_2_.
2'
3
.��• 14. 4c:51/•••
17g
•O_
' ABANDONED
2 11,•45
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
'-19~
t 20 „t1
U2
a3
4
5
6
7
4 10 t
STREET
2 1f 141 4451
12 2
13 3
14 4
2 15
t 16
17
i8
:1__ 19
t 20,03
4,510 t
�9Y
J
12
9
12
so
so
9
9
12
STREET
12
STREET•
12
go
4
,445'
1 R
2
3
4
5
6.
G
14.
15
16
I Ii1T'
12
13
14
15
16
R 11
12
13
10
17
NOR T1
11 MIN
11 IN
10
9
9
di
8
17 18119 zu
eo
08
..
3
4
3
2
10
12
22 limn
11 ea 451 Q
12.1- 2..�
13 V t 3 U
• 75 `c 5
t 16
17 7
t 20,, ,5 ,,310 }
44 •
11.
12
13
14
▪ 16
17
18
19
2
w
4
50
95
4
3
•0
22
•
It
• •
96
50
7
8
9
09
47 •
II
'0 •
TWEL_T►
40
8
7
6
5
STREET
50 r0
4
3 2 9 I ►,
g9
70
X)
II
12
13
-
14
40
15
10'
16
S0
17g
•O_
oc
18 j
U• ,
ELEVENTH
•O
013
12
11
STREET
9
10
8
7
50
6
5
4
3
2
12
21415
50
.
76
..
17
.
IB
..
19
50
20
l0
21
50
22
23
-
24
-
25
TENTH
50^
V3
STREET
12
I I
10
9
50
8
r0
7
5C
6
5
4
2
50
,o14
50
15
16
17
18
19
50
"C
20 21
10 50
22
23
24
25
26
.,
1-
er
0
z
5C
21312
..
..
11
10
9
50
8
r0
7
50
6
5
4
3
-
2
_,
10
'.1116111111i so ; ®7' 25
13
14
6
8 10 11 12
54
104 I
7 T?rT —r--1 --1 T Ps 5I 1
40
6
5
4
3
2
8
IQ
9
10
11
7
12,
5o
.50
6
5
4
7
7
sl[
8
9
3
E.9
2
10'
0
10
11
4
12
50'
044
6
7
1v
7 I8
1b
5
413
2
50
1
2
9 110
II
50
6
U.2 =
Z
> 7
4
0
so'
•4 5
12
13
14
• 15,42
• lb
17
18
19 —
• ▪ 26-
2
3
4 4
.4755
7
8
9
•
NORTH iminimaimm SEVENTH
5
4
3
2
sr,
50
8
9
NORTH
'0
II
2
6
5
4
2
5
s0
8
3
Ft
9
2
50
0
10
11
12
50'
NORTH
50'
'6
5
413
2
50
2
7
8
9110
II
w
w
44
6
5
4
3
2
7 9
5c1.
0
IC
II
SIXTH
7
s0'
8
-
9
-
10
II
S
12
30
FIFTH
NORTH 700,7111
f E "11.,.1- 14751 1 .I' ► ' 1'1_i5o is<,1 - 1 - -i_i_ 171 171-'1-7-'1—F71 71
br.AFT
THE OKEECHOBEE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 10, 1988
The Okeechobee County Planning Commission met in regular session
on Tuesday, May 10, 1988 at 7:30 P.M. in the County Commission Meeting
Room, Okeechobee County Courthouse, 304 N.W. 2nd Street, Okeechobee,
Florida.
Chairman Frank Williamson, Jr. presided with the following members
present: Chris Hooker, Robert Hoover, and Roger Jones. Also present
were County Attorney Ed Curren, Zoning Administrator Walter Taylor, and
Secretary Norma Williams.
Robert Hoover made a motion to accept minutes of the regular meeting
of April 12, 1988. Seconded by Chris Hooker. The vote was unanimous
to accept the minutes as drafted.
Chairman Williamson asked the Board members to take note of a letter
received from the City of Okeechobee. (A copy of the letter follows.)
He pointed out that the Board works for both the City Council and the
Board of County Commissioners and should have the desire to do their
job as well as can be done. He explained that at the beginning of every
meeting the 16 factors are read which the Board considers on each petition.
He stated that when a petition is recommended for denial the Board should
carefully state the reasons for denial.
After a discussion concerning the action needed when making a decision
on any petitions, County Attorney Curren stated that their decision should
be based on the consistency with the County Ordinance.
It was the concensus of the Board that at all future meetings the members
should be supplied with a copy of the factors to be considered.
County Attorney Curren stated that the Board does not have a copy of
the minutes of the Council's April 19, 1988 meeting to understand more
clearly the reasoning behind the letter from the City.
County Attorney Curren ready the factors in Section 16 (5) for the
Board to consider in each of the following rezoning petitions.
Old Business:
PETITION #228 -R - ROBERT R. HOOVER - AC to RSF
DRAITI
A letter of withdrawal was submitted.
It was the concensus of the Board to accept the letter of withdrawal.
New Business:
PETITION #229 -R - CARL & MARY WEIDLING, JACKY & LISA REDIKER, and
THOMAS J. SCHMIDT, Et Al - RG -1 to C -II w /Sp.Ex.
Mrs. Mary Weidling came before the Board and explained that she is repre-
senting all of the subject property owners. The subject property faces
industrially developed property which is a determining factor for the
sales of it. She explained that a few years ago she had paid for and
developed a road in front of the lots at her expense. The road had been
then dedicated to the City to be maintained. She explained that she
felt the proper zoning for the subject property would be the request-
ed C -II zoning due to the location next to Hwy. 441 North. If approved
it would be a good buffering zone between the RG -1 and Industrial zoning
d...L L iT
She presented photos of the subject property for the Board's review.
There was a discussion concerning the location in the city at Northeast
10th Street, directly behind the office of Dr. Aragon.
There were no letters and no audience discussion.
Ms. Weidling explained that Leslie Summerford would like to be able to
conduct his business from the subject property which would involve the
storage of his equipment and materials.
Chairman Williamson explained that part of the application will be handled
during the Board of Adjustment.
After a discussion concerning Mr. Summerford, County Attorney Curren
reminded the Board to take note of the 16 factors when making a decision.
After all factors were considered Roger Jones made a motion to Recommend
Approval of the requested petition. Seconded by Chris Hooker. The vote
was unanimous.
The Planning Commission was adjourned.
bP44 PP
THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CONVENED DIRECTLY THEREAFTER MAY 10, 1988
County Attorney read the factors for the Board to consider in each of
the applications for a Special Exception.
New Business:
PETITION #218 -S - WEIDLING /REDIKER /SCHMIDT - SPECIAL EXCEPTION -
Allow building trades contractor with yard on premises for
storage of equip. & materials within requested C -II zoning .,
` A
Mrs. Mary Weidling explained that she wanted the Special Exception on
lots 19, 20, 21, and 22 only. She stated that Leslie Summerford wishes
to conduct his business from the subject property and he has some equipment
and materials which would be stored outside. Ms. Weidling stated that
Mr. Summerford is aware that the Board can place conditions on the subject
property and he is fully aware that he will have to abide by them.
The Board discussed the following conditions which they felt were needed
if approved: Fencing with a type of screening and hours of operation.
After discussing all factors to be considered Robert Hoover made a motion
to grant approval with two stipulations.
County Attorney Curren reminded the Board of the factors to be considered.
He explained that in Section 13.3 (e) (5) it states a requirement for
screening and buffering.
Robert Hoover amended his motion to state granting approval on Lots 19,
20, 21, and 22 only with the following conditions:
(1) Fencing to include screening and buffering in order to preserve
and improve compatibility and harmony of use and structure.
(2) No night time activity which would create noise or smell.
Chris Hooker seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous to grant approval
County Attorney Curren read the factors to be considered in the following
application for a Variance.
2
F. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING FOR REZONING PETITION:
1. Consider petition No. 229 -R for rezoning of
property currently classified as RG -1 (Residen-
tial General) to C -II with special exception.
Subject property is located between N.E. 10th and
llth Streets, west of N.E. 3rd Avenue - Exhibit 1
(City /County Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended approval).
CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING
G. New Business
1. Motion to approve the appointment of Lynette Lowe
as a customer service clerk assigned to the Pub-
lic Utilities - Director of Public Utilities.
COUNCI LMEMBER S /ACTION
Motion by Councilman Thomas seconded by Council-
man Rubin to uphold the City /County Planning and
Zoning Commissions decision to approve the re-
quest for rezoning of Petition # 229 -R.
Discussion: Public input relative to the hear-
ing included comments from Mr. Summerford, Mrs.
Mary Weilding and Director of Public Utilities
Fortner. Director Fortner informed Council there
is only a 2" water line in the area. Other stipu-
lations of the petition are:
1) Fencing to include screening and buffering
in order to preserve and improve compatibility
and harmony of use and structure.
2) No night time activity which would create
noise or smell.
Chapman
Collins
Rubin
Thomas
Watford
Motion carried.
Motion by Councilman Collins seconded by Council-
men Thomas and Rubin to approve the appointment
of Lynette Lowe as a customer service clerk in
the Public Utilities Department.
Chapman
Collins
Rubin
Thomas
Watford
.Motion carried.
age 2
X
X
X
X
1