Loading...
95-425-R WatforduNTY APP.LiC )1Q 4,NUM$EA; Bust iai ZONINC .: DEPJlF4 iT : • ;::' 36� yyyyyy S4666d : Streat .Okeechobee,' Ronda :34972...:.. 813- 763-5548 JURI$OICY(O EfER.Aia ;ff e! HEA?W4Q ONO HEAMiHO: PUBLICATION DATE* IFORM LINO; USE :A■PPop!kTI -= '" NAME Of PROPERTY OWNER(8): Watford, Inc . WHAT IS CURRENT USE OF PROPERTY? Residential - DESCRIBE IMPROVEMENTS ON PROPERTY (If none, so state) One small frame house. APROXIMATE NUMBER OF ACRES 2.06 1* PROPERTY PART OF PLATTED SUBDIVISION? yes MAILING ADORES* P. 0. Box 393 .(; 1* THERE ANY CURRENT OR RECENT USE OF THIS PROPERTY THAT WOULD BE A VIOLATION OF COUNTY ORDINANCE7 - =LL CIF *O, DESCRIBE NO . I a. HAVE THERE BEEN ANY LANG USE APPLICATIONS CONCERNING ALL R PART F HIS PR ERTY IN THE LA T YEAR Watford, Inc. is currently applying to nave OF THIS use changed IF *O, DESCRIBE DATE, NATURE AND APPLICANT'* HAMEOn City Comprehensive plan. '~ Okeechobee, FL 34973 BRIEFLY DESCRIBE ADJOINING PROPERTY USE TO THE NORTH Residential :,- SOUTH Residential EAST Commercial :r _ _ 4. • PROPERTY ADORE** 403 N. E. Third St. (All of ��,c�ck 112., City of Okeechobee ;;�: 0. NAME OF APPLICANT IF OTHER THAN OWNER (must state relationship): '' Note: If not Owner or Attorney at Law, proof of authority must • prorMd on Form L -2 HOME TELEPHONE: (813) 763 -5028 WORK TELEPHONE: (813) 763 -4525 .-j. DIRECTION* TO PROPERTY See street address WHAT IS CURRENT USE OF PROPERTY? Residential - DESCRIBE IMPROVEMENTS ON PROPERTY (If none, so state) One small frame house. APROXIMATE NUMBER OF ACRES 2.06 1* PROPERTY PART OF PLATTED SUBDIVISION? yes ARE THERE ANY DWELLINGS ON THE P OPERTY IF ATE NU ER ANO TYPE Y TJ N MOBIL O S ETC.) PROPERTY srnafi' mama "house, coTiver i`oIld'l . I ' `i AND WHETHER THEY ARE OCCUPIED occupied as a rental. .(; 1* THERE ANY CURRENT OR RECENT USE OF THIS PROPERTY THAT WOULD BE A VIOLATION OF COUNTY ORDINANCE7 - =LL CIF *O, DESCRIBE NO . I a. HAVE THERE BEEN ANY LANG USE APPLICATIONS CONCERNING ALL R PART F HIS PR ERTY IN THE LA T YEAR Watford, Inc. is currently applying to nave OF THIS use changed IF *O, DESCRIBE DATE, NATURE AND APPLICANT'* HAMEOn City Comprehensive plan. IS A SALE SUBJECT TO THIS APPLICATION BEING GRANTED? NO , '.. I* THE SUBJECT PARCEL YOUR TOTAL HOLDINGS AT THAT LOCATION? IF NOT, DESCRIBE THE REMAINING USE OR OR INTENDED USE We own adjacent block 113 BRIEFLY DESCRIBE ADJOINING PROPERTY USE TO THE NORTH Residential :,- SOUTH Residential EAST Commercial :r _ _ WEST Residential, but owned by Church of God beck 1) voroptiate CURRENT ZONING CLASS Residential WHAT 1S YOUR DESIRED PERMITTED USE UNDER THE PROPOSED CLASS? Parking IF GRANTED, WILL THE NEW ZONE BE CONTIGUOUS WITH A LIKE ZONET Yes I* A SPECIAL EXCEPTION NECESSARY FOR YOUR INTENDED USE'? NO NUEDO REV AET?QtGN `APPlCA DESCRIBE THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION SOUGHT: PROVIDE SPECIFIC ZONING ORDINANCE CITATION (Class and axo•ption numb-.r) ARE THERE OTHER SIMULAR USES IN THE AREA. IF SO DESCRIBE: WHY WOULD GRANTING YOUR REQUEST BE 1N THE BEST INTEREST OF THE AREA AND RESIDENTS? IF BUSINESS. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE NATURE INCLUDING NUMBER IQF EMPLOYEES. HOURS. NOISE GENERATION AND ACTIVITIES TO BE CONDUCTED OUTSIDE OF A BUILDING: I 9 DESCRIBE VARIANCE SOUGHT: DESCRIBE PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTIC OF PROPERTY THAT MAKES VARIANCE NECESSARY: DtO YOU CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE TO THE CHARACTERISTIC? WHAT IS THE MINIMUM VARIANCE NECESSARY? DESCRIBE RULING THAT YOU ARE APPEALING: WHO MADE DECISION YOU ARE APPEALING? DATE OF DECISION: EXPLAIN WHY YOU FEEL DECISION IS IN ERROR. BE SURE TO LIST ANY ORDINANCE REFERENCES YOU FEEL SUPPORT YOUR POSITION: DESCRIBE ACTION YOU WISH TAKEN: CITE SPECIFIC ORDINANCE AUTHORITY FOR YOUR REQUEST: NOTE: All taquasts to Planning Board / Board of Adiuslmanta MUST have sp.otfloo County Ordlnane• Authority. CONFIRMATION OF INFORMATION ACCURACY E -1 Okeechobee City Council June 20, 1995 Staff Report and Recommendation Petiti i 95 -425 -' , Watford, Inc., property owner and applicant. Request for a change in zoning e existing classification of Residential Single Family (RSF) to Heavy Commercial (C -2). The property is described as Block 112 in the City of Okeechobee. Background The subject property is Block 112 in the City of Okeechobee. It is bounded op the north by N.E. 5th Street, on the west by N.E. 4th Avenue, on the south by N.E. 4th tae, and on the east by N.E. 5th Avenue. Across N.E. 5th Avenue to the east is the existing Watford Trucking business. To the north of the subject property, across N.E. 5th Street, there are single family dwellings. In addition to the Watford Trucking business, the block to the east also supports two single family dwellings. The block to the west of the subject property is vacant. In the general area of the subject property are a church, a school, single family dwellings and some vacant lots. The Watford Trucking business is located to the east of the subject property, and is zoned Heavy Commercial (C -2). Other surrounding zoning to the north, west and south is Residential Single Family (RSF). Two blocks further to the west and south, along Highway 441 and along S.R. 70, is commercial zoning. There is also some Residential General zoning about one and one -half blocks to the south. The subject property is approximately 88,500 square feet, or about 2 acres in size. The property is vacant except for a single family dwelling located on the south portion of the block, fronting N.E. 4th Street. Consistency with Land Development Regulations The applicant has indicated that the purpose for the requested change in zoning is to provide parking for tractors and trailers. Such a use would be permissible in a C -2 zoning district, provided that the use is accessory to the permitted permissible use which is located on the adjacent block and where that property is under the same ownership as the subject parcel. Although this change in zoning would result in two blocks zoned C -2 which are surrounded by residential zoning districts, both blocks have been designated as appropriate for commercial development by the city's comprehensive plan. 1 Stall Report and Recommendation Okeechobee City Council Petition 94 -425 -R June 20, 199S Consistency with Comprehensive Plan Last year, the city amended the future land use map, so that the subject parcel is now located in the Commercial future land use classification of the adopted City of Okeechobee County comprehensive plan. The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Staff Recommendation The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the city's comprehensive plan. The intended use, provided that it is limited to a use accessory to the permitted use on the adjacent block, is also consistent with the proposed zoning district and with the city's zoning regulations. Staff recommends that the City Council grant the request for a change in zoning from Residential Single Family (RSF) to Heavy Commercial (C -2). Planning Board At. the May 23, 1995 Public Hearing, the Okeechobee County Planning Board unanimously recommended that the City Council grant the request for a change in zoning from Residential Single Family (RSF) to Heavy Commercial (C -2). William D. Royce Planning Director 2 Staff Report and Recommendation Okeecbobee (sty Council Petition 94 -473 -R June 20, 1995 Okeechobee County Planning Board Summary of Meeting May 23, 1995 The Okeechobee County Planning Board /Board of Adjustments and Appeals met in regular session on Tuesday, May 23, 1995 at 7:00 p.m. in the County Commission Meeting Room, Okeechobee County Courthouse, 304 N.W. Second Street, Okeechobee, Florida. Board members present were Chairman Frank Marsocci, Brenda O'Connor, Keith Pearce, Warren Watt, and alternate member Mike Long who was designated as a voting member for this meeting. Board members absent were Jim Burke, Renee Hazellief, and John Smith. Also in attendance were John Cassels, County Attorney; Bill Royce, Planning Director; Damian Peduto, Planner; and Vikki Aaron, Secretary. Petition 425 -R, Watford, Inc., property owner and applicant. Request for a change in zoning from the existing classification of Residential Single Family (RSF) to Heavy Commercial (C -2). Mr. Royce presented the application and described the surrounding properties. Mr. Royce stated the City's future land use classification for this site is commercial which was done through a map amendment to the city's comprehensive plan last year. The applicant has indicated that the purpose for the requested change in zoning is to provide parking for tractors and trailers. Mr. Royce stated the proposed change in zoning is consistent with the city's comprehensive plan, and that the intended use, provided that it is limited to a use accessory to the permitted use on the adjacent block, is also consistent with the proposed zoning district and with the city's zoning regulations. Mr. Royce recommended that the Planning Board recommend that the City Council grant the request for a change in zoning from Residential Single Family (RSF) to Heavy Commercial (C -2). Cecil Fitt was recognized by the Board. Ms. Fitt stated she was opposed to the rezoning and expressed concern regarding the number of children in the area and the traffic patterns used by Watford Trucking. Sandra Seebach addressed the Board. Ms. Seebach expressed concern with regard to the noise level and the effect this development may have on property values in the area. Esther Mall stated she was concerned about the increased noise and traffic in the area. Ms. Mall suggested an alternate traffic pattern be used by Watford Trucking. Staff Report and Recommendation Okeechobee City Council Petition 94 -725 -R June 20, 199S Marie Mathis also expressed concern regarding the number of children in the area and the increased traffic. John Burdeshaw was recognized by the Board. Mr. Burdeshaw supported the rezoning stating the business has been located there for almost 50 years and Block 113 has been commercial for a long time. Mr. Burdeshaw also assured the Board that Watford Trucking was not getting larger and the amount of traffic would not increase. The intent of the applicant is to enclose the area with a fence to provide parking and storage of tractors and trailers. Frank Marsocci stated the main issues are safety, noise and declining property values. Mr. Marsocci asked if this development would be subject to Site Plan Technical Review. Mr. Royce stated there will be some mechanism to discuss the precise uses and a meeting with Mr. Watford would be suggested to discuss traffic patterns. Cecil Fitt reiterated her previous concerns. Mike Long made a motion to recommend that the City Council grant the request for a change in zoning from Residential Single Family (RSF) to Heavy Commercial (C -2). The motion was seconded by Brenda O'Connor. The motion carried unanimously. Staff Report and Recommendation Okeechobee City Council Petition 94-125 -R June 20, 1995 Al 11 311 ■n •• AV VC aN zM W(n ro: r �C[LL 1D�•. s' .11007 ��.1I- on9 _ Ad Ad il!r.. /�l�ir ®;� E NIi1 !laLii" fliMta" ragiTINEWERIla 1r.4Oraaa E; !. wi 1110E111 Izt 16,116TEAW 0E1 i .l I 3Ad n 1 14Z = �ri�ra.��t as AvsW 101111Y( w wrrini AMf1 31' 310 1-00) zW < 2U ULt. z W AV a 3A H1SV MS I< /A S.A.L. R.R. R /W) • luf � - -Iavin \ \ \ CO 0 b CO P \� (.0C) 30 H1> 3N m 1h r a01J 0 N CO 0 CO P N RICO 01 0 3 0 CC Cv COIF (AC) 3M QNZ 51N • c Ng - 0 a IMES OL) 3M H[ MN -Inl- 0 tfl N CC' a, 0 0 0, F- aD 0 CV CV Intl HI6 �N -41Ie =la Alet Emma UM CO CO N 0 47.71 IEEE MEE , 1421 MEI It I VI Of, CO It tit VI b ev • 0 30 KU 3N � s N CO (,001) 3AV H19 3N °a © ® a MA- •o --JUL 30 HIS 3N 0 0. 30 HO 3N • 0 30 oar 3N 1P1 M EEO MEI IEEI SWAM 40 'KIM WM WM 8 - 0 • b OL O. aO oICEMEN ?nv aat MN - a ( N m b n 1J b 11 __ O:43E1 ye- CO 11-4 MCI MN 9:21 o • n r1 —'9 Ism m L1 30 H19 35 In r� 0 a O milk; %brim \m� O-� co V1. 0 m iP ow o o 0 1111= 111:10 • u z cc 0_ N J rref Ad OL 3Ad !a HIS 3S. 1111 ri 0 Of a EHM • ICE 811611465 ..1112 I at 8 0 MEI © O 10 ? SE 0 > av 0 01 4. .5' a. 11 1 11r 3 1,/x.` Z 4 141212. l F 615 4131211 7j8 a ubject Parcel as t` ULUre Lan(' Use • I - Indt>Estrial • C - Commercial •SF - Single Family •MF - ilrLtad1ti- Family • PF - P„ t,1;.. Facilities 4H - Hntoc Marker Watford, Inc. ■ Petition 95 -425 -R • 121 13 14 13 5 I=1 4 3 3 2 1 6 5 4(31212 4 7 a 10 11 12 13 14 13 16 17 11 11 32 Z2 II 24 2 3 4 5 4 7 a 2 3 6 7 10 2 3 4 1713I4I5 I 71 11 SF 12 OFFICE 813 763 -4525 Watforct Jnc. ESTABLISHED 1939 DEALERS IN FEED AND GRAIN July 13, 1994 Okeechobee County Building & Zoning Department 303 N. W. 2nd St. Okeechobee, FL 34972 SHOP 813763 -8108 Gentlemen: We are attaching this to our application to have Block 112, City of Okeechobee rezoned for commercial use. In the late 1950's John Ed. Watford bought all of Block 113, and on it he erected his home, another home for his aunt, and the shop for his Tractors and Trailers. That portion of Block 113 occupied by his trucks, trailers and shop is zoned C -II. In 1983, he purchased all of Block 112, which is adjacent to Block 113, for future use in his operation. This operation has been in use for nearly 40 years, and all of the surrounding landowners purchased their property with the operation already there. Under the City of Okeechobee's comprehensive plan for future land use, the future use for both these blocks is Residential Single Family. This precludes our operation from any further expansion. For this reason, we are filing an Amendment application with the City to request that the future land use be changed to commercial. We are filing on Block 112 and 113 separately. According to the application the zoning must comply with the proposed land use requested. Block.113 is already commercial, however 112 is not. It is for this reason that we are requesting this zoning change. We would like to place a chain link fence around the entire area, and use Block 112 to park tractors and trailers. We would be glad to plant shrubbery around the perimeter to shield it from view. We need the fence and parking area to prevent theft. There is a small frame home on the property that we intend eventually to remove. Throughout this area are scattered rental homes, duplexes and two churches. Two blocks to the north the zoning is Industrial, and two blocks to the west and south the zoning is Commercial. SHOP OFFICE MAILING P• O. Box 393 S01 N. E. 4TH STREET 201 S. E. 6TH AVENUE OKEECHOBEE. FL 34973 OKEECHOBEE. FL 34972 OKEECHOBEE. FL 34974 I',, JUL ; Okeechobee County Building -2- July 13, 1994 And Zoning Department We are a long established business in this community, transporting feed and feed ingredients to local dairies. We currently have 30 employees with an annual payroll in 1993 of $850,000.00, and feel that we are a viable part of the economy of Okeechobee. Sincerely, Jeffery S. Watford JSW:cb 199i1 Pi I ,: ;i• t"..70 Watford, Inc. - addressing items of concern in rezoning. a) The proposed change is contrary to the new City Comprehensive plan, however an application to have this land use changed is being presented to the City of Okeechobee this month. In the application, it states that the zoning would have to be in compliance with our request to have the future land use changed. It appears that this must be done first, or at least at the same time, because it stated that we would be informed if this needed to be done. For this reason, we are submitting this now for approval, at least contingent upon the land use change being approved. b) The change would not create an isolated district unrelated to nearby districts, because the block to the east is already zoned commercial, and the block to the west is owned by a Church, probably for future expansion, which would be commercial. c) The proposed change would materially decrease the future population density, thus potentially reducing the load on public facilities such as schools, utilities, streets, etc. d) N/A e) Same as (A above) f) N/A g) The proposed change would not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood, as this operation has been in this area long before any of the adjacent land owners purchased their property. h) There would be no increase in the traffic in the neighborhood. The tractor trailers are in the area currently, and there is no traffic congestion. We merely want to park them on this block for safety at night. i) No drainage problem would be created, and none currently exists. j) There would be no reduction in light and air to the adjacent area. k) There would be no effect on property value to adjacent properties. As stated, this operation has been in place many years before current adjacent landowners purchased their property. 1) The proposed change would not be a deterrent to the improvement or development to adjacent properties. m) This would not be a special privilege. n) There are no reasons why the property cannot be used in accord with existing zoning, however it is needed to join the additional commercial property for the operation to continue. 197.i JUL I • iv o) The change is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. p) It comprises a hardship to have the operation split into two locations, and the land was purchased for this reason. JUNE 20, 1995 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 2 OF 14 REQUEST FOR THE ADDITION, DEFERRAL OR WITHDRAWAL OF ITEMS ON TODAY'S AGENDA. E. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING FOR REZONING 1. Consider Petition 95 -425 -R for a zoning change for property on Block 112 located at N.E. 4th Avenue and N.E. 5th Street from Residential Single Family (RSF) to Heavy Commercial (0 -2) - Bill Royce (Exhibit 1). tttititi, Mayor Kirk asked if there were any additions, deferrals or withdrawal of items for tonight's agenda. There were none. Mayor Kirk opened the public hearing for rezoning at 7:05 p.m. Mayor Kirk announced that a motion for continuance had been submitted by Attorney Burton Connor, and asked Attomey Connor if he would like to address the Council. Attorney Connor advised the Council that he had been retained last Sunday, by a property owner in the area, Mrs. Cecile Fitt, the request for a continuation is to give Attomey Connor time to prepare Mrs. Fitt's request to deny the rezoning in her neighborhood. Mayor Kirk asked if the applicant, Watford, Inc. would like to respond, Mr. John Ed Burdeshaw, representing the applicant addressed the Council stating that he had no problem with the request for continuance. He did point out that the Planning Board had recommended approval for this rezoning and that the Council approved a Future Land Use Map Amendment (from Residential to Commercial) last year on this same property. Attomey Cook advised the Council they could go ahead with the hearing or ccntinue Councilmember Watford noted that there were several people in attendance for this public hearing and that it had been advertised, notices sent out, and property owners ready to address the Council on this issue. Counciimember Chandler also suggested that the Council proceed with the hearing. Mayor Kirk opened the floor for discussion concerning the rezoning as applied for by Watford, Inc. Attorney Cook advised that Clerk Thomas would be swearing in anyone addressing the Council, since this is a public hearing on a land issue. 589 590 JUNE 20, 1995 - REGULAR MEETING - PAGE 3 OF 14 E. PUBLIC HEARING FOR REZONING 1. Consider Petition 95 -425 -R for a zoning change for property on Block 112 located at N.E. 4th Avenue and N.E. 5th Street from Residential Single Family (RSF) to Heavy Commercial (C -2) continued. Bill Royce, Planning Director approached the podium and was swom in by Clerk Thomas. Director Royce explained Petition 95 -425 -R was filed by Watford, Inc. The request is to change the zoning from Residential Single Family (RSF) to Heavy Commercial (C -2). The property is Block 112, City of Okeechobee. it is bounded on the North by Northeast 5th Street, on the West by Northeast 4th Avenue, on the South by Northeast 4th Street, and on the East by Northeast 5th Avenue. It is approximately two acres in size and is vacant except for a singie family dwelling located on the South portion of the block. In the block directly East is the existing Watford Trucking business and is zoned C -2. Other surrounding zoning to the North, West and South is RSF. Two blocks further to the West and South, along Highway 441 North and along State Road 70 East, is Commercial zoning. There is also some Residential General zoning one and one -half blocks to the South. The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map. The Staff recommends that the City Councii grant the rezoning request. The Okeechobee County Planning Board held a public hearing on May 23, 1995 on this request and unanimously recommended that the City Council grant the rezoning request. Attorney Connor asked Director Royce several questions concerning the types of businesses that could operate in a C -2 zoning classification. Citizen Chris Jones questioned Director Royce on the increase in traffic. Director Royce responded that the applicants have said there would not be an increase in traffic or intensity. Mayor Kirk asked if there was anyone present wanting to address the Council. Citizens Marie Mathis, Chris Jones, Sandra Bum, and Cecile Fitt were swom in and stated various reasons why they were against the rezoning request. 591 JUNE 20, 1995 - REGULAR MEETING -PAGE 4 OF 14 .:.>: 'f..! fVv>. :..;.:v:, ::.>r ...,. .....................:. ....:... ....:.......:...........: ............................ .......... ........: EIS .._. ....r .......................... ......::.. ..:::..::::::: >;::<...........: ....:...... � Kit C.:. <:: >:<::::<>; ............ Cam! ..... .... ....... X X X X X E. PUBLIC HEARING FOR REZONING John Ed Burdeshaw, was sworn in, and explained that the purpose of the rezoning is to allow Watford Trucking to fence in the block to give them an area to park their trailers; and that they would plant shrubs on the outside of the fence as a buffer. The main flow of traffic would remain as it is. Discussion ensued, after second call for a motion, Counciimem ber Watford moved to 1. Consider Petition 95 -425 -R for a zoning change for property on Block 112 located at N.E. 4th Avenue and N.E. 5th Street from Residential Single Famiiy (RSF) to Heavy Commercial (C -2) continued. 2. Consider Petition 95 -426 -R for a zoning change for property located at 111 N.E. 2nd Street from Residential General -2 (RG -2) to Heavy Commercial (C -2) - Bill Royce (Exhibit 2). approve the rezoning request bv Watford. Inc. for Petition 95 -425 -R (City Rezonina No. 86) for Biock 112. City of Okeechobee. from RSF to C -2: seconded bv Councilmembers Chandler and Oliver. Councilmember Watford commented that Watford Trucking had been in business for forty years in that location and their tract record has a bearing on granting the request. One to two blocks to the North are several industrial type businesses in operation. He also commented that he lives in the area and has a first hand knowledge of the neighborhood and that while the names are the same, he has no financial interest in the business and can vote on issue. KIRK CHANDLER O'CONNOR OLIVER WATFORD MOTION CARRIED. Mayor Kirk requested Planning Director Royce come forward to give the Council information on Petition 95 -426 -R for rezoning. Director Royce was sworn in and addressed the Council explaining that Petition 95-426 - R was filed by Walpole, Inc. and they are requesting a rezoning from Residential General -2 (RG -2) to Heavy Commercial (C -2). The property is located at 111 Northeast 2nd Street and is Lots 1 and 10 to 12 of Biock 141, City of Okeechobee. 591 City of Okeechobee 772 779s % t) July 26, 1995 Okeechobee County Planning and Development Department 499 Northwest 5th Avenue Okeechobee, Florida 34972 Attention: Bill Royce, Planning Director Dear Mr. Royce: Enclosed herewith please find a copy of the June 20, 1995 City Council minutes pertaining to the Public Hearing for Rezoning Petition No`': t 447 and No. 95- 426 -R. This copy is for your records, should you require any additional information please do not hesitate to contact me. With best regards, I am Sincerely, Bonnie S. Thomas, CMC City Clerk BST/lg Enclosure 55 S.E. Third. Avenue • Okeechobee, Florida 34974 -2932 • 813- 763 -3372 • Fax: 813 - 763 -1686 7/27/95' City of Okeechobee July 26, 1995 Okeechobee County Property Appraiser's Office 307 Northwest 5th Avenue Okeechobee, Florida 34972 Attention: W.C. Sherman, Property Appraiser Dear Mr. Sherman: Enclosed herewith please find a copy of the June 20, 1995 City Council minutes pertaining to the Public Hearing for Rezoning Petition No. .14,425.14i and No. 95- 426 -R. And a copy of the Rezoning Application. This copy is for your records, should you require any additional information please do not hesitate to contact me. With best regards, I am Sincerely, Bonnie S. Thomas, CMC City Clerk BST/lg Enclosure 55 S.E. Third Avenue • Okeechobee, Florida 34974 -2932 • 813- 763 -3372 • Fax: 813 -763 -1686 74 7/9s City of Okeechobee July 26, 1995 Okeechobee County Tax Collector's Office 307 Northwest 5th Avenue Okeechobee, Florida 34972 Attention: Juanette Shirey, Tax Collector Dear Mrs. Shirey: Enclosed herewith please find a copy of the June 20, 1995 City Council minutes pertaining to the Public Hearing for Rezoning Petition Noadaie and No. 95- 426 -R. And a copy of the Rezoning Application. This copy is for your records, should you require any additional information please do not hesitate to contact me. With best regards, I am Sincerely, i‘V'IK/l/147/411 onnie S. Thomas, CMC City Clerk BST/lg Enclosure 55 S.E. Third. Avenue • Okeechobee, Florida 34974 -2932 • 813- 763 -3372 • Fax: 813 - 763 -1686