1991-07-30 DCA to File re: Staff Evaluation L } r
K of
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
2 7 4 0 C E N T E R V I E W D R I V E • TALLAHASSEE , F L O R I D A 3 2 3 9 9 . 2 1 0 0
Lawton Chiles v ski
MEMORANDUM
William E. SadD
Governor re ar
TO: File
THROUGH: Meredith Dahlrose, Community Program Administrator,
Bureau of Local Planning, Team C
FROM: Randy Fox, Planner IV N
DATE: July 30, 1991
RE: City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan
Staff Evaluation for Notice of Intent
. DECISION DATE FOR 'NOI : August 2 , 1991
PUBLICATION DATE FOR NOI: August 7 , 1991
COMMUNITY PROFILE
The City of Okeechobee is located in southern Okeechobee County,
approximately 1. 5 miles north of Lake Okeechobee. The City is
situated at the intersections of US 98 , US 441 and SR 70 . The
City is the only incorporated area in the County and serves as a
shopping and employment center for the unincorporated areas
surrounding the City. The City currently provides potable water
and sanitary sewer service to approximately 33 percent of the
City' s residents and a small portion of the County' s residents.
Scheduled sanitary sewer improvements will expand sewer service
to include approximately 74 percent of the City' s residents.
Of the 2 , 367 acres total land area for the City, 34% (813 acres)
is vacant land. The predominate type of land use is Residential
and encompasses 33% (715 acres) of the City' s total land area .
Other land use designations include . 5% Industrial (11 acres) ,
7 . 8% Commercial (171 acres) , .7% Recreation (15 acres) , 1. 6%
Public Buildings (36 acres) , and 26% (606 acres) Right-of-Way.
The City' s 1990 population was 4 , 770 persons. The projected
population for 1995 is 4, 923 and is expected to increase to 5, 086
by the year 2000.
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT • HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMEN1
I. CONCURRENCY
The City has adopted a Concurrency Management System which
ensures that public facilities and services needed to support
development are available concurrent with the impacts of such
development. Policies have been adopted which state that
" [a]pproval of development proposals will be conditioned on the
availability of facilities and services necessary to serve the
proposed development and that the facilities meet adopted level
of service standards. " (Policy 1. 1 p. 2) . Other policies provide
for the CMS to ensure that needed public facilities will be in
place prior to or concurrent with new development. (Policy 1. 2
p.2) . The CMS establishes guidelines for maintaining an
inventory of public facility capacities and for interpreting and
applying LOS standards to applications for development orders.
II. LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS
Policies have been adopted which establish adequate LOS standards
for all public facilities. The LOS standards are supported by
data and analysis and policies have been included to coordinate
LOS standards with those state and local entities having
operational and maintenance responsibilities for such facilities.
All LOS standards are repeated in the Capital Improvements
Element.
III. DRAINAGE
Identified Problem
The City has not adequately analyzed existing and projected
drainage facility needs and has addressed this deficiency by
adopting Policy 7 . 1 (p.29) which states that the City will
undertake a stormwater management study to identify water quality
and drainage deficiencies. However, Policy 7 . 1 does not include
a timeframe for initiating and completing the drainage study and
the study is not included in the Five-Year Schedule of Capital
Improvements; therefore, the City is not committed to undertake
the study within a specified time. (Rule 9J-5. 016 (4) , F.A.C. ) .
Recommended Corrective Action
Revise Policy 7. 1 (p.29) to commit the City to undertake the
stormwater management study and to implement the results of the
study within a specified timeframe. Although a stormwater
management study does not meet the City's definition of a capital
improvement, the City should consider revising the Five-Year
Schedule of Capital Improvements to include projected costs and
funding sources for the stormwater management study and to
identify the year during which the stormwater management study
will be conducted.
2
o t
IV. FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY
The City has adopted a Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements
that identifies projects and funding sources for correcting
existing and projected deficiencies in LOS standards for sanitary
sewer and potable water facilities. The City has additional debt
capacity available and a review of the City's Capital
Improvements Element indicates that the City has the ability to
achieve and maintain the adopted Level of Service standards for
the facilities it has operational and maintenance
responsibilities.
V. AFFORDABLE HOUSING
The City has adequately analyzed the housing needs of the
projected population and has adopted policies to address
affordable housing. The City's primary role is to provide
adequate public facilities to meet projected housing needs and to
hold periodic meetings with builders, non-profit housing
providers, and interested persons to assess and improve the
production of housing for City residents. (Policies 1. 1 and 1. 2
p. 18) . A density bonus is available for residential developments
providing units which qualify as affordable housing. (Policy 1. 6
p. 19) . The City will bring substandard housing units into
compliance with applicable regulations at an average rate of 10
per year. (Policy 2 .2 p.20) .
VI. URBAN SPRAWL
Urban sprawl is not a primary issue for the City of Okeechobee as
only 219 additional dwelling units are projected to be needed by
the year 2000 and adequate land is available within the City to
accommodate the anticipated population. Additionally, objectives
and policies have been adopted which regulate the extension of
public facilities to discourage sprawl and to maximize existing
facilities. (Objective 3 p.24) . The extension of water and sewer
service in unincorporated areas will be coordinated with the
County and limited to the Urban Residential Area depicted on the
Okeechobee County Future Land Use Map. (Objective 4 and Policy
4 . 1 p.25) . Non-city residents will pay the full cost of
providing sewer and water service in unincorporated areas.
(Policy 4 .3 p. 25) . Capital improvement projects will be ranked
to promote infill development. (Policy 2 .2 p.27) .
VII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION
Policies have been adopted which adequately address
intergovernmental coordination and which ensure coordination in
establishing and maintaining LOS standards with entities
providing public facilities to the City. (Policies 3 . 1 and 3 . 2
p. 38) . The informal mediation process established by the Central
Florida RPC will be utilized to resolve land use conflicts with
3
adjacent local governments and a review procedure will ensure
that any proposed development which may have extra-jurisdictional
impacts will be compatible with the Okeechobee County
Comprehensive Plan. (Policies 2 . 1 and 2.4 p. 36) .
Identified Problem
The City's adopted plan does not adequately address coordinating
future land uses with the Resource Management Plan for the Lower
gissimmee River and Taylor Creek Drainage Basins. Although the
City has included objectives and policies which state that review
procedures will be established to address coordination with the
Resource Management Plan, the review procedures have not been
described and the Resource Management Plan has not been
discussed; therefore, the City has not established specific
programs. and activities it will undertake to implement the
Resource Management Plan. (Rules 9J-5. 006 (3) (b) 6. and 9J-
5.015 (3) (c) 1. , F.A.C. ) .
Recommended Corrective Action,
Expand the plan to include an analysis of the Resource Management
Plan for the Lower Kissimmee River and Taylor Creek Drainage
Basins and include an analysis of the suitability of future land
uses in order to support the goals of the resource management
plan. Include objectives and policies which describe the
specific programs and activities including specific review
procedures the City will undertake to implement the Resource
Management Plan. If necessary, revise the Future Land Use Map to
be consistent with and further the resouce management plan.
VIII. RROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES
The Future Land Use Map depicts all natural
resources within the City and policies have been adopted to
establish review procedures to ensure coordination with the
Resource Management Plan for the Lower Kissimmee River and Taylor
Creek Drainage Basins. (Policy 1. 1 p. 37) . An Environmental Site
Review process will be applied to development proposals which
will identify environmentally sensitive areas, wetlands, soil
limitations, and existing vegetation. The Environmental Site
Review will be used to prescribe measures for preserving
environmentally sensitive areas and will specify the conditions
necessary for development approval .
Identified Problems,
The Future Land Use Map does not depict Conservation land uses.
Taylor Creek, which drains into Lake Okeechobee, several isolated
wetlands, and several relatively large undeveloped tracts
containing vegetative and wildlife communities exist within the
4
City and are appropriate areas for designation as a conservation
land use. (Rules 9J-5. 006 (4) (a) 6. , 9J-5. 006(4) (b) , and 9J-
5. 013 (2) (c) 9. , F.A.C. ) .
The Future Land Use Map does not adequately protect natural
resources because an approximately 175 acre parcel that is
currently vacant and that contains several isolated wetlands is
depicted as Industrial land use on the Future Land Use Map. The
parcel is adjacent to Taylor Creek which drains into Lake
Okeechobee and buffers have not been established to protect the
creek and wetlands from the impacts of development. The parcel
is not presently served by sanitary sewer and the expansion of
services into this area has not been specifically addressed.
Additionally, the allocation of Industrial land is not supported
by data and analysis because although the analysis of projected
land use needs indicates a need for only one additional acre of
Industrial land by the year 2000, the City has allocated an
additional 167 acres of Industrial land on the Future Land Use
Map. (Rules 9J-5. 006(2) (c) 2. , 9J-5. 006 (4) (a) 3 . , 9J-
5. 006(4) (b) 3 . , and 4. , F.A.C. ) .
Policies for the protection of environmentally sensitive land and
policies establishing development densities and intensities do
not adequately protect natural resources. Policy 1.4 (p.2)
states that " [p]ermitted densities and intensities in
environmentally sensitive areas shall be as established under
Objective 2 and the Future Land Use Map. " However, no intensity
standards have been included under Objective 2 for Industrial ,
Commercial, and Public Facilities land use categories and
residential densities permit 4 d.u./ac for single-family, 6
d.u./acre for mobile home parks, and 10 d.u./acre for multi-
family housing. These densities do not protect environmentally
sensitive areas and policies have not been included to address
clustering development to protect environmentally sensitive
areas. Additionally, Policy 2 . 2 (p.3) , which requires an
Environmental Site Review for development proposals, exempts
applications for single-family residential structures from the
site review process. (Rules 9J-5. 006 (3) (c) 6, and 7 . , 9J-
5. 013 (2) (c) 1. , 9J-5.013 (2) (c) 3 . , 9J-5. 013 (2) (c) 6. , and 9J-
5. 013 (2) (c) 9. , F.A.C. ) .
Recommended Corrective Action
Revise the Future Land Use Map to depict conservation land uses.
Wetlands, floodplains, areas of high aquifer recharge or natural
karst formations, areas with native vegetative and wildlife
communities, and areas adjacent to surface water bodies are
suitable for conservation land use designations. Taylor Creek,
which drains into Lake Okeechobee, and the isolated wetlands
located within the City should be depicted as conservation
areas on the Future Land Use Map and the conservation areas
5
should include appropriate buffer zones which prohibit all
development activity adjacent to environmentally sensitive areas.
Revise the Future Land Use Map to protect natural resources by
restricting development within and adjacent to wetlands, Taylor
Creek and other significant natural resources. The City may
choose to designate an entire parcel containing isolated wetlands
as a conservation area or may choose to depict only the
individual wetlands as conservation so long as a specified buffer
zone is established which prohibits all development activity
adjacent to the wetland and additional policies are adopted which
implement further development controls that adequately protect
natural resources. Include additional policies that require
clustering of development away from wetland areas of the site and
maintenance of upland buffers adjacent to the wetlands (specify
the minimum buffer width) . Prohibit septic tank systems adjacent
to wetlands and Taylor Creek. Additionally, revise the
allocation of Industrial land depicted on the Future Land Use Map
to be supported by adequate data and analysis indicating a
projected need for the amount of acreage allocated.
Revise Policy 2 . 1 (p. 3) to include densities or intensities for
all land use categories. Revise Policy 2 . 2 (p. 3) to delete the
text exempting single-family residential structures from the
Environmental Site Review Process unless the development proposal
is for a single dwelling unit that is not part of a larger
development and is clearly located in an area suitable for
development. Revise Policy 1.4 (p.2) to reference additional
policies which establish less intensive land uses for
environmentally sensitive areas and delete the reference in
Policy 1. 4 regarding the densities and intensities established
under Objective 2 for environmentally sensitive areas. The
additional policies should specify the land use categories and
the less intensive densities and intensities permitted in
environmentally sensitive areas as well as the specific
requirements for site review, clustering development on suitable
portions of environmentally sensitive areas, the extent of
natural buffer zones applicable in these areas and any additional
development controls that will be implemented to ensure the
protection of environmentally sensitive areas.
IX. FUTURE LAND USE
Identified Problem
A policy which establishes standards for densities or intensities
for each future land use category is not included in the adopted
plan. Although Policy 2.1 (p.3) establishes densities for
Residential land uses, standards for densities or intensities for
Commercial, Industrial, and Public Facilities land use categories
are not included. (Rule 9J-5. 006 (3) (c) 7. , F.A.C. ) .
6
c e
Recommended Corrective Action
Expand Policy 2. 1 (p. 3) to establish standards for densities or
intensities for each future land use category. Intensity
standards should specify the floor area ratio, impervious surface
ratio, building volume ratio, or other acceptable intensity
standards.
X. CONSISTENCY WITH THE SCP
The adopted plan does not adequately address the following State
Comprehensive Plan goals and policies (9J-5. 021 (1) ) :
(a) Water Resources Policy (8) (b) 10. , to protect surface and
groundwater quality and quantity in the state;
(b) Natural Systems and Recreational Lands Policies (10) (b) 1. ,
2 . , and 7 . , to conserve forests, wetlands, fish, and
wildlife to maintain their environmental, economic,
aesthetic, and recreational values; and,
(c) Land Use Policy (16) (b) 6. , to consider, in land use planning
and regulation, the impact of land use on water quality and
quantity.
Recommended Corrective Action
The City must revise the Future Land Use Map and policies
protecting natural resources to be compatible with and further
the above referenced goals and policies of the State
Comprehensive Plan.
XI. CONSISTENCY WITH THE RPC
The adopted plan does not adequately address the following
Central Florida Regional Policy Plan goals and policies (9J-
5. 021 (1) ) :
(a) Water Resources (Regional Policy 1) , to protect, manage, and
conserve surface water and aquifer resources; and,
(b) Natural Systems and Recreational Lands (Regional Policy 1
and 2) , to mitigate land development impacts on the City's
natural systems and protect environmentally sensitive areas.
Recommended Corrective Action
The City must revise the Future Land Use Map and policies
protecting natural resources to be compatible with and further
the above referenced goals and policies of the Central Florida
Regional Policy Plan.
7
•
COMPLIANCE DETERMINATION
CITY OF OKEECHOBEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Secretary's Finding
In Compliance
Not In Compliance
For the following reasons:
1) Drainage - no commitment to initiate drainage study
2) Conservation areas not depicted on FLUM
3) Industrial uses allowed in wetlands
4) Plan not coordinated with Resource Mgt Plan
5) No intensities for Indus, Comm, & Public land uses
8
61 c rvt
FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
GOAL, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan
Adopted March 19, 1991
GOAL: THROUGH A WELL-PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES, THE
CITY OF OKEECHOBEE WILL MAINTAIN A HIGH QUALITY LIVING
ENVIRONMENT,PRESERVE ITS DISTINCTIVE NATURAL AND HISTORIC
RESOURCES, AND PROVIDE PUBLIC SERVICES TO ITS RESIDENTS AT
A MINIMUM COST (9J-5.006(3)(a)].
OBJECTIVE 1: The location of future development in the City of Okeechobee will be
guided by the availability and efficient use of public facilities and services
as well as site characteristics such as soil conditions and topography [9J-
5.006(3)(b)1,7].
Policy 1.1: Approval of development proposals will be conditioned on the
availability of facilities and services necessary to serve the proposed
development and that the facilities meet adopted level of service
standards [9J-5.006(3)(c)3].
Policy 1.2: The City of Okeechobee will ensure that needed public facilities will be
in place prior to or concurrent with new development through
implementation of a Concurrency Management System [9J-5.006(3)(c)3).
Policy 1.3: Where minimum levels of service for parks, roads, and solid waste
disposal are met, new residential development and commercial
developments receiving approval from the Florida Department of Health
& Rehabilitative Services may make temporary use of private wells and
septic tanks subject to the requirement that it will connect to public
potable water and sanitary sewer service once such service becomes
available [9J-5.006(3)(c)3].
Policy 1.4: By September 1991, land development regulations applicable in the City
of Okeechobee will be amended to implement appropriate best
management practices described in A Guide to Sound Land & Water
Management (published by the Florida Department of Environmental
Regulation) or limit development densities and intensities in areas where
soil types or topography are not conducive to development. Permitted _ —
densities and intensities in environmentally sensitise areas shall he as
established under Objective 2 and the Future Land Use Map.
Goa) U`iennes and P.11,es
Fuwre Lare the rlemen•
Coy o!(teem.nee Coenprenensne Plan •
AdopeG 3:19N;
•
/9/74-ad"Ye frol-S
OBJECTIVE 2: The City of Okeechobee will ensure that all new development is
consistent with the Future Land Use Element [9J-5.006(3)(b)7].
Policy 2.1: The following land use designations are established for the purpose of
managing future growth:
a) Single-Family Residential. Permitted uses are one single-family
dwelling on each lot and structures accessory to the residential use,
mobile home parks and public facilities. Maximum density is four
units per acre for residential units on individual lots, and six units
per acre for mobile home parks. Where affordable housing is
provided in accordance with Housing Policy 1.6, the maximum
S'�` density for single family development shall be five units per acre.
b) Multi-Family Residential. Permitted uses include apartments,
duplexes, condominiums, single-family houses and public facilities.
Maximum density shall not exceed 10 units per acre. Where
affordable housing is provided in accordance with Housing Policy
1.6, the maximum density for multi-family development shall be 11
units per acre. • •
c) Commercial. Permitted uses include office, retail, automotive
wholesale, and related commercial activities. Also permitted are
public facilities.
d) Industrial. Permitted uses include large-scale manufacturing or
processing activities. Also permitted are public facilities.
e) Public Facilities. Permitted uses include parks, schools, government
buildings, fire stations and other recreational and non-recreational
public properties.
[(9J-5.006(3)(c)1) and (9J-5.006(3)(c)7)]
Policy 2.2: In accordance with property rights policies adopted by the Central
Florida Regional Planning Council in the Central Florida Regional Policy
Plan, the City of Okeechobee recognizes and will protect private
property rights. In implementing the Comprehensive Plan, the city will
ensure that its land development regulations protect the use and value
of private property from adverse impacts of incompatible land uses.
activities and hazards. Planning for land use and public facilities in the
city will consider private property rights, and ensure citizen input into
government land use decisions affecting property rights.
I 3
ed,O•;eane,and PoI.,e,
Forure.end Use FJemeni
Co)of Oaeecn.Mnce Compfenenuvc
AdopteJ 1'1991
•
rd/,'.-1 .2. 2, (co.t1;-1,.QQ()
By September 1991, the city will adopt land development regulations
establishing an Environmental Site Review process to be applied to all
development proposals. The Environmental Site Review will identify
environmentally sensitive areas and conditions limiting development
potential, prescribe measures to minimize damage to natural systems,
txt .tdr� and ensure the structural integrity of all man-made facilities. •
I t3'
;�t° The Environmental Site Review will be based on the following
,, v information, to be shown on a certified survey supplied by the applicant:
IS a) appropriate data indicating whether soils are suitable for building
I construction;
Ib) appropriate data indicating whether soils are suitable for the use of
' septic tanks (if the site will not be served by public sanitary sewer
I facilities at the time of development);
' / c) areas designated by the South Florida Water Management District
. and/or the Department of Environmental Regulation as
/ jurisdictional wetlands;
' / d) types and approximate locations of wetland areas as shown on
National Wetlands Inventory maps(U.S.Department of the Interior,
I Fish and Wildlife Service);
' e) existing wetlands on-site as of survey date; and
f) types and location of existing vegetation. .
i Using the submitted information, the city will formulate for each
development proposal an appropriate list of conditions for development
I approval. The conditions will be developed by the City Administrator
ilI or his designee, in consultation with City.Council, and will address the
following objectives, where applicable:
a) preventing the degradation of water quality in Taylor Creek;
b) protecting groundwater quality, particularly in the vicinity of
P municipal wells;
c) preserving existing wetland areas;
d) avoiding the disturbance of natural drainage features;
P e) preserving habitat for endangered and/or threatened wildlife species,
if such species are known to be present in the area; and
f) preventing property damage due to flooding, soil compaction, or
other physical conditions of the site.
Building permit applications for single-family residential structures shall
Ibe exempted from the Environmental Site Review process. ,
IP • 4
Ga.,Oneccn•a and Poleua
Future Lan4 Uae FJemem
Gn of Uarrchober Compreherunr •l.n
iAd..pted 3 I'!'.
ff-ccc wtu �!
Policy 6.1: The City of Okeechobee's land development regulation revisions will
include stormwater drainage provisions which ensure that [9J-
5.011(2)(c)4]:
(a) new developments are required to manage runoff from the 25-year
frequency, 24-hour duration design storm event on-site so that post-
development runoff rates, volumes and pollutant loads do not
exceed pre-development conditions;
(b) stormwater engineering, design and construction standards for on-
site systems are provided; and
(c) erosion and sediment controls are used during development:
OBJECTIVE 7: The City of Okeechobee will obtain data needed for correction of
;, existing deficiencies in man-made drainage facilities or altered natural
y 5�,,�b�'� drainage features.
I 4-3— 4-}1.
1
Policy 7.1: The City of Okeechobee will undertake a stormwater management study—Th
to identify water quality and drainage deficiencies and meet all data
B requirements set forth in S. 9J-5.011, F.A.C. The Comprehensive Plan
will be amended in light of the study's results and recommendations. In
addition to using any available funds of its own, the city will request
funding assistance from the South Florida Water Management District
to undertake this study [9J-5.011(2)(c)1].
Policy 7.2: Drainage facility improvements will be provided according to the
following priorities: (1) to fulfill the city's legal obligations; (2) to prevent
further degradation of Taylor Creek; (3) to provide adequate drainage
for existing development in the city; (4)to provide adequate drainage for
new development in the city; and (5) to extend municipal drainage
facilities to areas outside the city.
OBJECTIVE 8: The City of Okeechobee will reduce its per capita water consumption by
10% by the year 2000 [9J-5.011(2)(b)4].
Policy 8.1: The city's utility services shall encourage conservation through special
Lrate structures to reward customers who minimize their water
consumption [9J-5.011(2)(c)3].
I
Goal PaUaee
Sam,an Se+.c'.. Faeme.v
Gi.u:lheeCpnMt Cnmprcna:Ine Phan
Adopted 1'14141
ffCr CAne 4,5
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
GOAL, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES
City of Okeechobee Comprehensive Plan
Adopted March 19, 1991
GOAL: TO ACHIEVE GREATER GOVERNMENTAL EFFICIENCY AND RESOLVE
CONFLICTS BY COORDINATING DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES BETWEEN
THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE AND OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, AND
RELEVANT REGIONAL,STATE,AND FEDERAL ENTITIES [9J-5.015(3)(a)).
•
OBJECTIVE 1: The City of Okeechobee will coordinate its Comprehensive Plan with
Okeechobee County, the Okeechobee County School Board, and other
relevant state or local agencies [9J-5.015(3)(b)1].
Policy 1.1: The City of Okeechobee will establish a review procedure ensuring �--�
coordination of activities in its Comprehensive Plan with plans of the
Okeechobee County School Board, Okeechobee County,and other state
or regional entities. The procedure also will address coordination with
41 r the Resource Management Plan for the Lower Kissimmee River and
Taylor Creek Drainage Basins. This review procedure will be
established by the City Council, and will be implemented by the Council
' or its designee [9J-5.015(3)(c)1].
Policy 1.2: The City of Okeechobee will request, by letter, a copy of the proposed
comprehensive plan or plan update for Okeechobee County [9J-
5.015(3)(c)3].
Policy 1.3: The City of Okeechobee will, on request, provide as much information
and assistance as is feasible to interested local governments or other
appropriate entities regarding its comprehensive plan and plan updates
•
[9J-5.015(3)(c)3].
Policy 1.4: The City of Okeechobee will notify the Okeechobee County Manager in
writing of all proposed annexations. The City Administrator, or his
designee, will meet with the Okeechobee County Manager, or his
designee, to resolve any potential annexation conflicts or issues [9J-
5.015(3)(c)4].
OBJECTIVE 2: Through coordination mechanisms, the City of Okeechobee will address
the impacts of development proposed in its Comprehensive Plan upon
development in unincorporated Okeechobee County [9J-5.015(3)(b)2].
Goal Oolecoses and Po Lots
c
Inter,•wemmenu;Coordmatwn Element
e Cuy of Oteeu,nnee Conprenenane Pun
Adopted 119/91