1985-02-18 Regular Meeting3633
REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 18,1985
The City Council of the City of Okeechobee, met in regular
session in Council Chambers, 55 Southeast Third Avenue, Okeechobee,
Florida, at 7:00 P.M.
Chairman Oakland R. Chapman called the meeting to order with
the following Councilmen present:
Oakland R. Chapman, Chairman
Andy Rubin, Vice -Chairman
Edward W. Douglas, Councilman
Oscar Thomas, Councilman
Nick Collins, Councilman
Others present were:
Bonnie S. Thomas, City Clerk
L.C. Fortner, Jr., Administrative Assistant
Lydia Jean Wilkerson, Deputy Clerk
AGENDA ITEMS #II & III - INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Invocation was offered by Reverend C.R. Kilgore, Pastor of
the Okeechobee Church of God, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
85-1 AGENDA ITEM #IV - APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
85-9 FEBRUARY 4th, 1985, AND WORKSHOP MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 6, 1985
Chairman Chapman asked Councilmembers if there were any
additions or deletions to the minutes of the Regular Meeting and the
Workshop Meeting. Councilman Rubin stated items concerning Attorney
Jennings will be satisfied by the action of the Council at this meeting
tonight. There being no additions or deletions to the minutes,
Chairman Chapman stated the minutes were approved as presented.
Councilman Thomas made a motion that the minutes be approved.
Councilman Rubin seconded the motion. Motion carried.
85-2 AGENDA ITEM #V - MAYOR OAKLAND CHAPMAN ON BEHALF OF THE CITY COUNCIL
WITH THE PRESENTATION OF A CERTIFICATE OF C014MENDATION TO POLICE
EXPLOYERS POST 456 FOR THEIR EFFORTS IN DECORATING THE BAND STAND IN
THE PARK FOR CHRISTMAS. THE COMMENDATION WILL BE ACCEPTED BY CAPTAIN
DAWN WEBER, LT. CURTIS KING AND LT. JAMES COLDIRON.
Chairman Chapman presented the Certificate of Commendation to
Police Exployers, Captain Dawn Weber, and Lt's, Curtis King and James
Coldiron, for their efforts in decorating the band stand in the park
for Christmas.
85-23 AGENDA ITEM #VI - APPEARANCES;
1) Mr. Jim Dwayne, Executive Director of the Central Florida
Regional Planning Council to discuss updating the City's
comprehensive plan and the merits of merging the City and
County Building Departments.
3634
Z-l�/-II
Chairman Chapman stated that Mr. Jim Dwayne of the Central
Florida Regional Planning Council was going to discuss with the Council
updating the City's Comprehensive Plan. Councilman Rubin stated that
Mr. Dwayne was not present but he had a plaque to present to Mr.
Dowling Watford from the Central Florida Regional Planning Council.
At this time Councilman Rubin presented to Mr.Dowling Watford
a plaque from the Central Florida Regional Planning Council for his
time and service as a member of the Planning Council. Mr. Watford
thanked the Central Florida Regional Planning Council and Councilman
Rubin for the plaque.
2) James R. Morris, General Manager of Harte-Hanks Cable,
Inc. to discuss the proposed 5% increase for cable
service.
85-24 Chairman Chapman asked Mr. Morris to approach the podium at
this time. Mr.Morris presented Councilmembers with a legal opinion
concerning the 5% rate increase.
Mr. Morris pointed out to Councilmembers that they have only
had two rate increases in the past eight years. He then stated that the
Florida Statutes, Section E.1, allows cable companies a 5% rate in-
crease each year, effective December 29, 1984, without the approval of
a board. If the rate increase is over 5%, the company must appear
before the Council to request this increase, it would then be up to the
Council whether the request was granted.
Councilman Thomas asked Mr. Morris if the rate increase of 5%
was only on the first $9.00. Mr. Morris answered yes, the increase
would be a total of .55 cents.
Councilman Rubin stated that he felt, as he interpeted the
franchise agreement, that the cable company regardless of the amount of
the increase still should have permission from the Council for the rate
increase. Mr. Morris stated the Florida Statutes gives them (Cable
Company) the authority to increase the rates, as long as it is not more
than 5%.
Councilman Collins stated that he felt it would be best for
this discussion to be tabled until the City had legal Council for
advice.
Chairman Chapman asked if there was any discussion on the
matter being tabled. There being none, Chairman Chapman stated the
matter would be tabled for now.
3635
t_6-�,5�
3) Mr. Alan Markham to request the opening, by the City, of
Northeast Second Street between Fourth and Sixth Avenues.
85-22 Chairman Chapman stated the next agenda item was Mr. Allen
Markham requesting the City to open Northeast Second Street between
Fourth and Sixth Avenues.
Mr. Markham addressed Council and stated that he was the owner
of the North half of Block 150 and he would like for the City to open
this street. He went on to say that Second Street was dedicated many
years ago. It was on the City's Paving Plan for the year 1984 and it
was not paved, and he received a letter from the Council, after his
first request that the street be opened, stating that he would have to
pay for the paving of this street.
Attorney Jerry Bryant, representing Mr. Allen Markham, addres-
sed Councilmembers and stated, "The street we are talking about is the
street that runs behind McDonalds. If you would consider what you have
there I think you would find that it would be a good road to pave
because the traffic in Okeechobee now is mainly on Highway 70. There
is a lot of traffic on N.E. Second Street, because people are turning
beside McDonalds off of Highway 70, which is a busy area, to avoid the
heavy traffic at the main red light in the middle of town. If you
extended that street over two more blocks, you would give an additional
outlet off of 70, which people could use.
Mr. Markham did get a letter from Mr. Fellows back in 1984, in
which Mr. Fellows indicated that it was the City's position that they
were going to stick by their previous decision to require that the
owners or developers pay the cost for development, opening and paving
City streets. That apparently is based upon the Resolution 80-2, that
provides that the extension of water mains be opened at the owner's or
developers expense, of the property needing said improvement.
Our position is that the road was dedicated a long time ago,
the roadway has been opened, the dirt road has been used for several
years and has been used prior to this 1980 Resolution, so it is not a
question of opening the roads, it is a question of paving. And
whether Mr. Markham should be responsible for that, I guess it would be
a decision for you to make, but I also want to point out that this road
that we are asking to be paved is one that was on a resolution adopted
January 16, 1984, #84-3, which set out priorities for paving within the
3636
City and in the fiscal year of 1983-84 this road was in there to be
paved, N.E. 2nd Street from 4th to 7th Avenues. That roadway there
joins Mr. Markhamts property on the north side. As far as the
Resolution 80-2, applying to Mr. Markham, I guess it would be a
question for you to decide whether or not the street was opened and
whether or not this resolution was adopted to address this particular
type of situation.
We do believe Mr. Markham should be given some special
conideration in light of the fact that this is so close to Highway 70,
a major route through Okeechobee. Developing that area would certainly
be of your best interest, and the City's taxpayers best interest. It
is going to increase the taxes along that property there. It is also
going to give us another route with traffic, off of Highway 70.11
Chairman Chapman asked Director Fortner to explain the
reasoning of the Resolution.
Director Fortner stated, "The intent of the Council for the
resolution was that any street right of way or future streets right of
ways that were dedicated, the developer or owner using that street or
developing that street right of way would develop that street, the
reason for that was the enormous cost involved in opening streets after
that time, and in preparing it for the shell base and paving."
Chairman Chapman asked Director Fortner to explain what
brought the resolution about. Director Fortner stated that in the past
the City paved some streets and then began to realize the tremendous
cost involved. Also, at one time a developer came to the City reques-
ting certain streets be paved where they were supposed to have 50 homes
built, but only 4 homes were built in fact. A large amount of costs
were involved to the City for that project.
Chairman Chapman asked Director Fortner to explain the 1983-84
Paving List. Director Fortner stated this proposal was adopted by the
Council at that time, anticipating that if funds were available, these
streets would be paved. Several streets on that list were not paved
at that time and they are not being considered for paving this fiscal
year either. Since this paving list was a proposed list, any of the
streets could be changed at any time.
Chairman Chapman stated that Mr. Markham's first request was
that the City open the street, shell the road, and remove all trees.
363'7
Mr. Markham stated this street was an important street that should be
paved.
Councilman Thomas asked what the cost of paving this street
would be. Director Fortner stated that for paving two or three blocks,
removing necessary trees, putting in the fill, shell and asphalt,
culverts, drainage pipes would cost approximately $20,000.
Councilman Thomas stated he felt this street had merit, and it
would be well traveled.
Chairman Chapman stated that he has asked Director Fortner to
go over this paving list. He then suggested the Council have a workshop
meeting set to discuss the proposed paving list. Councilmembers agreed
for a workshop meeting to be set. After discussion, Council decided to
advertise for a Workshop Meeting on Tuesday, February 26, 1985.
Councilman Rubin agreed that the workshop meeting be set,
stating he felt the proposed paving plan needed to be reworked.
Attorney Bryant stated that Mr. Markham has agreed to pay for
the cost for the culverts and the necessary drainage lines of the
roadway, if the City would just put the road on the paving list to be
opened to the traffic, and be paved later on. Mr. Markham is not
requesting the road be paved in the very near future.
85_22 4) Mrs. Sandra Pierce to request permission to block the
right-of-way of Southwest 12th Avenue along the City
limit ditch.
Mrs. Sandra Pierce addressed Council and requested permission
to block the right-of-way of Southwest 12th Avenue along the City limit
ditch. Mrs. Pierce stated that she has kept the ditches maintained and
last year she paid $1,000.00, to have the ditches cleaned out, and
found out that across the City line, the County had the same work done
and absorbed the cost theirselves. Also, Mrs. Pierce stated for the
record, that the ditch along the right of way was a safety hazard (the
ditch is 8 feet deep). And with Council's permission she would like to
install a gate there, with keys to be issued to the Street Department
and the Fire Department. The right of way is only used by one person,
Larry Williams, which has already appeared before Council, concerning
the right of way staying opened for traffic.
Councilmembers discussed the right of way being a safety
hazard, and a gate being installed, but not locked.
After discussion, Councilman Douglas made a motion that the
3638
Z- J � - 95
City purchase a gate, and have the Street Department install the gate
in the right-of-way without a lock. Councilman Collins seconded the
motion. Motion carried.
COUNCIL TO HIRE NEW CITY ATTORNEY
Chairman Chapman stated that it was now in order for
the hiring of a new City Attorney. Councilman Rubin made a motion that
the City hire Jerald D. Bryant as the City's permanent City Attorney.
Councilman Collins seconded the motion. Chairman Chapman asked for a
vote on the motion. Motion carried.
Chairman Chapman asked Attorney Bryant to take his seat on the
Council. Councilmembers welcomed Attorney Bryant to the board. Attorney
Bryant thanked the Council.
85-21 AGENDA ITEM #VII - PUBLIC HEARING AND FINAL READING OF AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING CHAPTER 18 SECTION 18-30 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES TO PROVIDE
AN EXCEPTION FOR THE EXTENSION OF THE WATER SYSTEM TO THE INDUSTRIAL
PARK
Chairman Chapman opened the floor for discussion concerning
the ordinance providing an exception for the extension of the water
system to the Industrial Park.
Councilman Thomas asked Director Fortner if he had checked on
the master meter for the park. Director Fortner stated that he met
with the IDA and they questioned him concerning water being furnished
to the Industrial Park. And he told them that the ordinance was read
for the first time and scheduled for public hearing and final reading
at the meeting tonight, however, the Council has been advised by two
different attorneys that they may want to consider a master meter ov
that it was dangerous to furnish water without adequate fire protec-
tion, because of an existing ordinance that requires all extensions to
be large enough to provide adequate fire protection through fire hyd-
rants. The amendment listed a Section for governmental agencies. And
he felt the best solution would be a master meter.
Mr. Mosley Collins addressed Councilmembers and stated, "Eve-
ryone seems to be concerned about the City being sued. The amount of
water necessary to fight a fire has been the discussion. According to
the Engineering charts, it says that a diameter of 4 5/8" will provide
1500 gallons of water per minute, with seven pounds of pressure. We
have a six inch line out there and if you will interpret those charts
that I gave L.C. you will see that about one pound of pressure with a
six inch main you will get 1500 gallons per minute. We really don't
3639
know the answer as far as how much more it is going to require,but the
Industrial Park is there, you have got some excellent clients, it would
be highly desirable to make the connection and with or without the
master meter, the City might still get sued."
Phil Berger addressed Council and stated that the only problem
they had with a master meter was they did not have any way to meter the
water themselves.
Councilmembers discussed the amount of water pressure through
certain size pipes, the possibility of law suits arising from the City
not providing adequate fire protection and attorneys opinions of what
they felt the City should do to protect themselves.
Councilman Thomas asked City Attorney Bryant if he was fami-
liar with the possibility of the City being held liable in a law suit.
Attorney Bryant stated that it was new to him but he would say that the
answer to it would be the "Hold Harmless" agreement.
Councilman Collins stated that he would like to see the attor-
neys (City and County), get together to discuss the hold harmless
agreement. Chairman Chapman asked if he wished to have the ordinance
tabled, to give the City attorney time to research the ordinance.
Councilman Collins stated that he would like to see the ordinance
tabled until both attorneys to get together. Councilmembers agreed
that the ordinance could be tabled.
Chairman Chapman adjourned the meeting for 10 minutes at 8:45
P.M. The meeting was called to order at 8:55 P.M. by Chairman Chapman.
85-31 AGENDA ITEM #VIII - DISCUSSION BY THE COUNCIL RELATIVE TO MAKING THE
OLD TENNIS COURT AND THE WEST PORTION OF THE BLOCK WHERE THE CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE AND THE LIBRARY ARE LOCATED, AVAILABLE FOR ADDITIONAL PARKING
Chairman Chapman opened the floor for discussion concerning
the old tennis court and the west portion of the block where the
Chamber of Commerce and the Library are located, having an additional
parking lot built.
Councilman Collins stated that he did not know if the City was
obligated to provide the parking, he felt the Chamber of Commerce and
the Library should provide their own parking.
Chairman Chapman stated that the City has discussed this
additional parking previously, the parking would not be only for the
Chamber members and the Library employees, it would also be for the
public.
3640
Director Fortner stated that this has been discussed
previously, but he did not know if the City should be obligated to
provide the additional parking area. He also stated that he has not
seen any plans of the parking lot.
Councilman Collins suggested the City wait until after we see
,just what the Chamber will do with their new building. Councilman
Rubin stated that the Chamber and the Library has previously discussed
the parking lot being joined between themselves.
Councilmembers discussed the fence surrounding the project
area and the light poles being removed by the Street Department and
offered to the Recreation Department. Councilmembers agreed for Direc-
tor Fortner to contact the Recreation Department.
85-22 AGENDA ITEM #IX - DISCUSSION BY THE COUNCIL CONCERNING A REQUEST BY THE
COUNCIL ON AGING TO OPEN THE ALLEY SOUTH OF THEIR BUILDING BETWEEN
SOUTHWEST 10TH AND 11TH AVENUES TO TRAFFIC.
Chairman Chapman stated that the Council on Aging has
requested the City open the alley south of their building between
Southwest 10th and 11th Avenues to traffic.
Director Fortner stated that the Council on Aging is having
problems with their delivery trucks unloading in the alley, they pull
into the alley off of 11th Avenue, they must then back out of the alley
into the traffic on 11th Avenue, also causing some traffic accidents.
So they have requested this alley be opened so their delivery trucks
could go straight on through the alley and exit on 10th Avenue.
Director Fortner suggested the Council wait until the sewer
lines have been installed (approximately six months) in this
alley (before they take action on this request).
Councilmembers agreed. Chairman Chapman requested that
Director Fortner write Ms. Barnes of the Council on Aging a letter
explaining the situation to her.
Mr. Jim Morris, of Harte Hanks Cable Television, stated that
if the City were to open this alley it would also benefit his company.
Director Fortner stated there were people parking along the
side of the road at the Council on Aging, causing was a potential
problem with someone stepping out of their car, or opening their car
door, and then suggested that "No Parking" signs be erected along the
right of way near the intersection. Councilmembers agreed that signs
should be installed.
1 d
3641
AGENDA ITEM #X - APPROVAL BY COUNCIL OF PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NUMBER 3
TO TADDIE UNDERGROUND UTILITY COMPANY FOR THE PERIOD OF DECEMBER 26,
1984 TO JANUARY 26, 1985, SUBJECT TO FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION
APPROVAL.
Director Fortner stated there was a partial payment request
from Taddie Underground Utility Company for the period of December 26,
1984 to January 26, 1985 for approval, subject to Farmers Home
Administration.
Councilman Douglas made a motion that the payment request be
approved. Councilman Collins seconded the motion. Chairman Chapman
asked for a vote on the motion. Motion carried. Councilman Rubin asked
Director Fortner for the amount of the payment request. Director
Fortner stated the total amount was $151,201.27.
85-7 AGENDA ITEM #XI - REVIEW OF BIDS AND APPROVAL OF COUNCIL TO PURCHASE
FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT.
Chairman Chapman opened the floor for Council's discussion
concerning the Fire Department's bid on fire fighting equipment.
Councilman Collins asked Chief Tomey if the equipment on the
bid tabulation list was absolutely vital at the present time and could
it be put off being ordered for a couple of months, due to the
possibility of the Fire Department merger with the County Fire
Department.
Chief Tomey stated that concerning the bunker gear - he would
find out in a couple of months, whether he would be required to replace
all of the bunker gear. He also stated that according to OSHA's re-
quirements, the City does not come up to Code, the air packs are 20
years old. Possibly, some of the equipment could wait to be ordered,
but he definently needed to order the bunker gear, because five firemen
have already been burned.
Councilman Rubin made a motion that the City purchase the
equipment the Fire Chief says he needs immediately, providing it would
not hurt the Fire Department, but hold off on ordering the rest of the
equipment for the time being.
Councilman Thomas seconded the motion. Chairman Chapman asked
for a vote on the motion. Councilman Douglas stated that since the Fire
- Department was part of the City's Charter, the possible merge between
the two fire departments would be months down the road, and he felt
that if any equipment was needed, the City should go ahead and purchase
all of the equipment at this time.
3642
Councilman Rubin suggested the attorneys for the County and
City check into the situation concerning the fire department being a
part of the City Charter.
Councilman Thomas asked Chief Tomey how much was the total
bid. Chief Tomey answered that the total bid would be under
$13,000.00, although he did not know the exact amount at this time due
to the fact that he was deciding on which company to purchase the
required air tanks from.
Chairman Chapman asked Councilmen Rubin and Thomas if they
wished to withdraw their motion or if they wished to table the discus-
sion concerning the bid tabulations. Councilman Rubin stated that he
would withdraw his motion, if the Council wished to order all the bid
at one time. Councilman Thomas withdrew his second. Councilman Collins
stated that he would agree to accept the entire bid at one time, if the
fire department merger would be several months ahead.
Councilman Thomas moved that the City accept the bid as
requested by Chief Tomey in the amount of $13,136.78. Councilman
Douglas seconded the motion. Motion carried.
85-25 AGENDA ITEM #XII - DISCUSSION BY THE COUNCIL OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
RELOCATING THE NEW SEWER LINE FROM THE EAST SIDE OF S.E. 10TH AVENUE TO
THE CENTER OF THE PAVEMENT. THE RELOCATION WOULD BE FOLLOWED BY RE-
BUILDING OF THE ROADWAY WITH $16,000.00 OF FINA14CIAL ASSISTANCE PRO-
VIDED BY UNITED TELEPHONE COMPANY.
Chairman Chapman asked Director Fortner to explain the agenda
item.
Director Fortner stated that he needed a decision by the
Council tonight on the possibility of relocating the new sewer line
from the east side of S.E. 10th Avenue to the center of the pavement.
Director Fortner updated the Council on their previous discussion on
relocating the telephone lines, and stated, "The situation now, is,
there is a 40 foot right of way on S.E. 10th Avenue. 20 feet of that
right of way is under pavement. 10 feet on the west side has power
poles and an 8" water main. 10 feet of grass on the east side has
power poles for crossing the roadway with overhead wires, plus a 600
pair telephone cable serving all of the S.E. section. The location of
the cable is approximately 2 to 3 feet from the east edge of the
paving, the proposed sewer lines are 5 feet from the east edge of the
pavement. The problem is that the sewer lines must start development
12 to 14 feet deep on State Road 70. In order to accomplish that depth,
A i4
3643
they must have the width at the top of the ditch anywhere from 12 to 20
feet wide depending on the area. The Telephone Company feels that it
is next to impossible to move their cable to the east right of way line
and the sewer remain along the pavement and not damage the cable,
because of cave ins, the large oak trees that are not totally within
the street right of way. I think the best solution would be to relo-
cate the sewer line to the center line of the pavement which would
remove all of the pavement. The Telephone Company is willing to parti-
cipate in the resurfacing of this road at $16,000. The City will also
have to participate in the repaving of this road. The Engineer has
suggested that we save as much of the pavement as possible and store it
until the road is ready for repaving. Also at the same time of paving,
he suggested that the City add an additional 2 feet onto the road
making it wider, so it will allow the traffic on S.E. 10th Avenue to
travel that distance safer."
Chairman Chapman asked the Council if they agreed with
�. Director Fortner's suggestions. Council agreed. Councilman Douglas
asked that Director Fortner request a letter from the Telephone Company
stating they would pay $16,000. towards the repaving of the street.
Councilman Rubin questioned the total amount of the relocation
and street paving. Director Fortner said he had an estimated figure
at this time of - $30,000. $16,000. paid from the Telephone Company,
and $14,000. to be removed from the City's contingency's Budget of the
sewer project funds.
85.26 AGENDA ITEM #XIII - DISCUSSION BY COUNCIL RELATIVE TO MAKING PROVISIONS
FOR MONTHLY PAYMENTS TO CONNECT TO CITY WATER FOR THOSE CUSTOMERS WHO
HAVE BEEN RECEIVING DRINKING WATER FROM WELLS AND MUST NOW CONNECT TO
THE NEW WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM AS WELL AS CITY WATER SERVICE
Director Fortner stated that he had a few requests from people
that are on wells that would like to be placed on City water, because
they are also being connected to City sewer. Monthly payments have
been set up for the people who wish to pay their sewer connection fees
on the sewer system. But nothing has been provided for those who are
not on City water, for them to make monthly payments. (20 to 25
customers).
Chairman Chapman asked what the possibility was in waiving the
$500.00 charge. Director Fortner stated that you would be opening the
way for others, and all people needed to be treated the same.
3644
3645
Chairman Chapman asked for the Council's feelings on the
subject. Councilmembers agreed that the people on wells be treated the
same as those who are connecting sewer. Director Fortner stated that he
would proceed with notifying those people on wells that they could,
upon request, make available monthly payments.
85-15 AGENDA ITEM #XIV - DISCUSSION BY THE COUNCIL CONCERNING HIRING AN
ENGINEER TO EVALUATE THE VARIOUS PROBLEMS AT THE CITY'S WATER TREATMENT
PLANT AS ENUMERATED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION, FOR
THE PURPOSE OF RECOMMENDING THE BEST SOLUTION FOR CORRECTION
Director Fortner stated the DER had completed a survey of the
City's Water Treatment Plant and found several problems which needed
to be evaluated, and suggested the City hire an Engineer to make the
survey. An answer or response is requested by February 27th or 45
days, to the City's proposed schedule for correcting these items.
Councilmembers discussed the problems at the Water Treatment
Plant. Councilman Rubin asked Director Fortner if he had an Engineer
in mind for the study. Director Fortner stated the City would have to
advertise for an Engineer under the Consultant's Competitive
Negotiation bid procedure. Council agreed for Director Fortner to
advertise for Engineers.
85-30 AGENDA ITEM #XV - DISCUSSION BY COUNCIL RELATIVE TO ADOPTING THE 101
LIFE SAFETY CODE BY ORDINANCE, AS THE MINIMUM FIRE SAFETY STANDARD. IT
WAS ADOPTED BY THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN 1982 AND REGULATES THE
INSTALLATION OF FIRE PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT AND REGULATES ALL OTHER
CONDITIONS WITHIN A COMMERCIAL OR PUBLIC BUILDLNG THAT WOULD BE
DANGEROUS TO THE SAFETY OF LIFE OR PROPERTY.
Fire Chief Tomey stated the City now has the Standard Fire
Code which was adopted by the City Council 1976, which governs service
stations, bulk plants and industry. The 101 Life Safety Code was
adopted by the State in 1982 governs exits, public buildings
(theaters,ete.). Chief Tomey requested that the City adopt the 101 Life
Standard Building Code. The City usually adopts state codes.
Director Fortner suggested the attorney look at the Code
Book, since the City is compelled to follow any code which is state
law.
Councilmembers agreed to allow the attorney time to read the
code book, before the City adopts the 101 Life Safety Code.
AGENDA ITEM #XVI - MAYOR TO CALL ON THE AUDIENCE FOR ANYONE WISHING TO
ADDRESS THE COUNCIL.
Chairman Chapman asked if there was anyone in the audience
wishing to address the Council. There were none.
3646
AGENDA ITEM # XVII - MAYOR TO CALL ON THE CITY CLERK, ATTORNEY,
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT AND COUNCILMEN FOR REPORTS AND/OR REQUESTS
Clerk Thomas presented the Warrant Registers for Council's
approval.
Director Fortner stated there were two members that needed to
be appointed to the Code Enforcement Board and presented the two
applications to Councilmembers. Councilman Douglas made a motion to
appoint Carolyn Bryant and James Palmore to the Code Enforcement Board.
Motion carried. Director Fortner to notify the new board members of the
meeting on Tuesday.
Director Fortner questioned whether the members that were
appointed to the Task Force should be paid the normal $25.00 per
meeting or are they voluntary meetings and not paid for attending.
Councilman Rubin stated he thought the Planning Board was told this was
strictly voluntary. He also stated that if the Council paid these
members, in the future, other voluntary groups would be requesting the
same.
Councilmembers decided that the Task Force should not be paid
for attending these meetings.
Clerk Thomas asked Councilmembers if the Planning Board
.4%
members were; paid for Workshop meetings. Councilmembers stated the
Board members were to be paid only for the Regular Meetings which they
attend.
Director Fortner stated that bids have been received on the
Notice of Code Violation forms, as requested by Council. The low bid
being $127.90 for 1000 forms to be printed. Councilman Rubin made a
motion that the City accept the low bid of $127.90. Councilman Douglas
seconded the motion. Chairman Chapman asked for a vote on the motion.
Motion carried.
Councilman Collins stated that he would like to welcome the new
Attorney to the board.
85_8 Councilman Douglas made a motion to approve the Warrant
Registers for the General Fund in the amount of $12,903.14, Water &
Sewer Fund in the amount of $13,707.69, The Capitol Project Fund
$55,818.53. Councilman Rubin seconded the motion. Chairman Chapman
asked for a vote on the motion. Motion carried.
Councilman Rubin stated that he attended the County
3647
Commissioner's meeting in which the County stated they would purchase
an air conditioner to be used for the Federal Commodities Program to
keep the products fresh, providing the City would purchase another air
conditioner.
Councilmembers discussed the request. Councilman Rubin stated
the air conditioner would cost $466.00.
Councilman Rubin made a motion that the City purchase the air
conditioner to be used for the Federal Commodities Program. Councilman
Thomas seconded the motion for discussion. Chairman Chapman asked for
a vote on the motion. Councilmembers discussed the request further.
Councilman Thomas called Question. Chairman Chapman asked for a vote
on the motion. Councilmen Rubin and Thomas voted for the motion. Coun-
cilmen Douglas and Collins voted against the motion. Chairman Chapman
voted against the motion, until the request has been researched.
Council decided to investigate the request and bring it up for
discussion at another meeting.
Fire Chief Tomey stated that the City presently has a 4 ton
unit which the Council could consider donating.
AGENDA ITEM #XVIII - ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to discuss the meeting was
adjourned at 10:10 P.M.
OAKLAND R. CH AN
MAYOR
ATTEST;
BONNIE3.10 ( 00-all
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
February 18, 1985 - 7:00 p.m.
I. Call to Order.
II. Invocation offered by the Reverend C. R. Kilgore, Pastor of the
Okeechobee Church of God.
III. Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor Oakland Chapman.
IV. Approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of February 4th and
the city and county building department consolidation workshop of
February 6, 1985.
V. Mayor Oakland Chapman on behalf of the City Council with the presen-
tation of a Certificate of Commendation to Police Explorers Post 456
for their efforts in decorating the band stand in the park for Christ-
mas. The Commendation will be accepted by Capt. Dawn Weber, Lt. Curtis
King and Lt. James Coldiron.
V1. Appearances:
1) Mr. Jim Duane, Executive Director of the Central Florida
Regional Planning Council to discuss updating the city's
comprehensive plan and the merits of merging the city and
county building departments.
2) James R. Morris, General Manager of Harte-Hanks Cable, Inc.
to duscuss the proposed 5% increase for cable service.
3) Mr. Alan Markham to request the opening, by the city, of North-
east 2nd Street between 4th and 6th Avenues.
4) Mrs. Sandra Pearce to request permission to block the right -
of -•way of Southwest 12th Avenue along the city limit ditch.
VII. Public hearing and final reading of an ordinance amending Chapter 18,
Section 18-30 of the Code of Ordinances to provide an exception for
the extension of the water system to the Industrial Park.
VIII. Discussion by the Council relative to making the old tennis court and
the west portion of the block where the Chamber of Commerce and the
Library are located, available for additional parking.
Ix. Discussion by the Council concerning a request by the Council on Aging
to open the alley south of their building between Southwest 10th and
llth Avenues to traffic.
X. Approval by Council of partial pay estimate number 3 to Taddie Underground
Utility Company for the period of December 26, 1984 to January 26, 1985,
subject to Farmers Home Administration approval.
XI. Review of bids and approval of Council to purchase fire fighting equipment.
XII. Discussion by the Council of the possibility of relocating the new sewer
line from the east side of S.E. 10th Avenue to the center of the pavement.
The relocation would be followed by rebuilding of the roadway with $16,000
of financial assistance provided by United Telephone Company.
XIII. Discussion by Council relative to making provisions for monthly payments
to connect to city water for those customers who have been receiving
drinking water from wells and must now connect to the new wastewater
collection system as well as city water service.
XIV. Discussion by Council concerning hiring an engineer to evaluate the various
problems at the city's water treatment plant as enumerated by the Department
of Environmental Regulation, for the purpose of recommending the best sol-
ution for correction.
City Council Meeting
Agenda
February 18, 1985
page 2
XV. Discussion by Council relative to adopting the 101 "Life Safety Code"
by ordinance, as the minimum fire safety standard. It was adopted
by the State of Florida in 1982 and regulates the installation of fire
protective equipment and regulates all other conditions within a comm-
ercial or public building that would be dangerous to the safety of life
or property.
XVI. Mayor to call on the audience for anyone wishing to address the Council.
XVII. Mayor to call on the City Clerk, Attorney, Administrative Assistant and
Councilmen for reports and/or requests.
XVIII. Adjournment.
I
�LLbc'� J enncAp
��l cc -'Co O�E
,q L .
2aal k
yqAn�o CI)Oble- TV",
u�cuccn�
C n /
' � Qu �
c� e alox
C�b� z �c `�� ►'1I01 C qA L
Q.o Ch" 5 `� �S2-oil L.;r�c-tied e
eb, ch TAe)L-E 13 L/Qv7�L
1C�.Q�C3�1
C 1 I en
J!5
PCW '
) 6t-k I v,.e
blo. fvE
C,� ��k- -4,c
e") A -1
eual
LUII�as
14-1
U�,Jmt4� C,)g
fjp�
Ct 4
Co) - h� ion
t
CDro cc)ca*�D
fT� .0 .
vc
me
61,k
(16,
Ti) Ivu C(
IK
/M� c2ec(
N
WC i-Ccuc-- 0 xd-t
ac C"t ciltk
���0-.,SS, C--, k" �- .4,5 ph-)
At'
A� � C, "q- ,
11
s-A
tz, Je4'd
C Aqp,�
KOS 'it (IS-
CL kl,-P- - k
(�PrL HUB 44- r)
tS49
co or,�
cq
6"7
C-
r
A-
o,
CoCt/11W -I- d
R� b
(20
CU (
tv O�dpjk
cil, 15cl,