Loading...
2010-07-20MINUTES OF THE TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE THURSDAY JULY 20, 2010, 10:00 A. M. CITY OF OKEECHOBEE 55 Southeast 3rd Avenue Okeechobee, Florida 34974 Page 1 of 2 I. CALL TO ORDER — Chairperson. The meeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m. by Chairperson, Administrator Whitehall. II. STAFF ATTENDANCE — Secretary. PRESENT: Administrator Whitehall Chief Smith Engineer Bermudez Public Works Director Robertson ******* * * ****** * * * * ******* * * ***** * **** Non - Voting Ex- Officio Member ******* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Environmental Health Burton — Mr. Doug McCoy represented Mr, Burton PRESENT: Planner Brisson Secretary Clement ABSENT: Building Official Schaub Chief Davis OUA Hayford w/o consent Attorney Cook School Representative III. MINUTES — Secretary. A. Director Robertson moved to dispense with the reading and approve the April 15, 2010 Technical Review Committee Minutes regular meeting; seconded by Chief Smith. Motion carried unanimously. IV. NEW BUSINESS — Chairperson. A. Sacred Heart Catholic Church 10- 005 -TRC — The application was submitted by Kevin McGinley, Agent on behalf of property owner Most Reverent Gerald M. Barbarito, Bishop, to construct a new 11,183 sf church with toilet rooms, sacristy storage area, alter service rooms, and second floor mechanical equipment rooms, on a 12 acre parcel of land to be developed in a single phase - Senior Planner. Technical Review Committee — July 20, 2010 - Page 2 of 2 A. Sacred Heart Catholic Church 10- 005 -TRC continued. This item was requested by the applicant to be moved to the regular August 19, 2010 meeting. B. Nurse Registry 10- 006 -TRC — The application was submitted by Shirley Baker, property owner, to establish a professional office from a residence for the purpose of having a nurse registry for property located at 200 SE 3rd Street with parking, drainage, landscaping and sidewalks to be completed in a single phase — Senior Planner. Senior Planner Brisson addressed the Committee, explaining the Planning Staff recommends approval with the following contingencies. The first parking space, which is handicap, be moved 10 foot into the parking area. This should be no problem due to only 3 and not 4 parking spaces being required, the landscape regulation of 7 trees and 21 shrubs and lighting for the parking lot, and installation of a sidewalk on SE 3rd Street to 2nd Avenue. The confusion over how many parking spaces were needed was based on the applicant's total square footage which included the porch area, which does not have to be part of the parking equation. Mr. Brisson inquired whether the information regarding the parking requirements could be part of the application. Secretary Clement affirmed the request. Mrs. Shirley Baker, property owner stated there would be no problem with the contingencies, however she questioned the sidewalk. The Committee explained the sidewalk was required by code for any development within the City. The Committee requested before the parking lot is constructed to have the contractor meet with Director Robertson for drainage details as well as sidewalk specifications. Chief Smith moved to approve site plan review application submitted by Shirley Baker, property owner, to establish a professional office from a residence for the purpose of having a nurse registry for property located at 200 SE 3rd Street with the contingencies issues of parking, lighting, drainage, landscaping and sidewalks, listed above to be completed in a single phase; seconded by Director Robertson. Motion carried unanimously. Chairperson Whitehall requested comments regarding the fees associated with site plan review. After contemplative discussion by the Committee, Secretary Clement was asked to do the research on the all the costs associated with the application and review process for further analysis. V. ADJOURNMENT— Chairperson. There being no further items on the agenda, Chairperson Whitehall adjourned the Technical Review Committee meeting at 10:47 a.m. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that any person desiring to appeal any decision made by the Technical Review Committee with respect to any matter considered at this proceeding, such interested person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose may need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. General Service's media are for the sole purpose of backup for official records of the Department. AT T: Betty J . ej ent, Secretary an Whiteh • II, Chairperson *MINUTE & AGENDA FILE* PERMANENT RECORbla JULY 20,2010 TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING 1 - APPROVED TYPED MINUTES 2 - HANDWRITTEN MINUTES 3 - ORIGINAL COMPLETE AGENDA 4 - MEETING PROOF OF PUBLICATION INCLUDING ITEMS DISTRIBUTED AT THE MEETING AND CORRESPONDENCES CITY OF OKEECHOBEE JULY 20, 2010 TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE HANDWRITTEN MINUTES I. CALL TO ORDER - Chairperson: July 20, 2010 Technical Review Committee Meetinq, 10:00 a.m. *NOTE: Meeting rescheduled from July 15, 2010 due to not having a guorum. II. STAFF ATTENDANCE - Secretary Present Absent Administrator Whitehall Building Official Schaub Chief Davis Chief Smith Engineer Bermudez Public Works Director Robertson YEA NAY ABSTAIN 1 " 1Z Bermudez V Non - Voting Ex- Officio Member: Davis Attorney Cook County Health Department Burton Senior Planner Brisson OUA Hayford School Representative Secretary Clement 1 LV Schaub I' ! ,/ � III. MINUTES - Secretary. A. Motion to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Technical Review Committee Minutes for the April 15, 2009 regular meeting. fmoved to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Technical Review Committee Minutes for the April 15, 2009 regular meeting; seconded by VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT Bermudez ✓ Davis 1----- Schaub ✓ Robertson Smith Whitehall 1/ APPROVED DENIED /u-o>k: FefiA (t./urv4a-1 d-11 IV. NEW BUSINESS - Chairperson. A. Sacred Heart Catholic Church 10- 005 -TRC — The application was submitted by Kevin McGinley, Agent on behalf of property owner Most Reverent Gerald M. Barbarito, Bishop, to construct a new 11,183 sf church with toilet rooms, sacristy storage area, alter service rooms, and second floor mechanical equipment rooms, on a 12 acre parcel of land to be developed in a single phase - Senior Planner. Discussion: Rescheduled for the regular August 19, 2010 meeting by request from applicant. Request attached. Motion: B. Nurse Registry 10- 006 -TRC — The application was submitted by Shirley Baker, property owner, to establish a professional office from a residence for the purpose of having a nurse registry for property located at 200 SE 3rd Street with parking, drainage, landscaping and sidewalks to be completed in a single phase — Senior Planner. Discussion: i/ li c MILE. - � = Li Motion: �, moved to approve site plan application submitted by Shirley Baker, property owner, totablish a professional office from a residence for the purpose of having a nurse registry for ro ert P p Y located at 200 SE 3rd treet with parking, drainage, landscaping and sidewalks to be completed in a single phase r 6 V. There being no further items on the agenda, Chairperson Committee Meeting at 10 (4 1 a.m. - e,k) fLO 2 adjourned the Technical Review k.S (� -,-�, CUB ),2tt 4442f utii, '00 IJ (sLek_i_„_ beude - / PPC (le 7001/L6?_,eXxf?,(, A/2e //42, fie, ,(.66-eq-k,d(a,./4-2<iirY sa Pte_ 1%�c.c s tiQ ? . )tip (1 l lu ttl■ G 7-)Wc24, 0 CIA;eyc-b- Aq-6-fl-e,‹ 0 T3 f ._ it) L -1 --(z) s d Page 1 of 1 bclement From: "Raymond Schaub" <raymondschaub @hotmail.com> To: "Betty" <bclement @cityofokeechobee.com> Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 2:20 PM Subject: Tech. Review City of Okeechobee Technical review meeting for July 20, 2010. Please excuse Ray Schaub CBO from the meeting because of conflicting schedule. I have no issues with Shirley Baker's project at 200 SE 3rd. St. Thank You, Ray Schaub Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. Learn more. 7/19/2010 CITY OF OKEECHOBEE JULY 15, 2010 TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE HANDWRITTEN MINUTES I. CALL TO ORDER - Chairperson: July 15, 2010 Technical Review Committee Meeting, 10:00 a.m. *Note — see below II. STAFF ATTENDANCE - Secretary Present Absent Administrator Whitehall Building Official Schaub Chief Davis Chief Smith Engineer Bermudez Public Works Director Robertson YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT Bermudez Non - Voting Ex- Officio Member: Attorney Cook County Health Department Burton Senior Planner Brisson OUA Hayford School Representative Secretary Clement Davis Schaub III. MINUTES - Secretary. A. Motion to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Technical Review Committee Minutes for the April 15, 2009 regular meeting. moved to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Technical Review Committee Minutes for the April 15, 2009 regular meeting; seconded by VOTE YEA NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT Bermudez Davis Schaub Robertson Smith Whitehall APPROVED DENIED IV. NEW BUSINESS - Chairperson. A. Sacred Heart Catholic Church 10- 005 -TRC — The application was submitted by Kevin McGinley, Agent on behalf owner Most Reverent Gerald M. Barbarito, Bishop, to construct a new 11,183 sf church with toilet rooms, sacristy storage service rooms, and second floor mechanical equipment rooms, on a 12 acre parcel of land to be of property phase - Senior Planner. ty ge area, developed in a single Discussion: Motion: B. Nurse Registry 10- 006 -TRC — The application was submitted by Shirley Baker, property owner, to establish a office from a residence for the purpose of having a nurse registry for property located at 200 SE 3rd Street office drainage, landscaping and sidewalks to be completed in a single phase — Senior Planner. with parking, Discussion: Motion: *Due to no quorum the next regular meeting date was set for Tuesday, July 20, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. V. There being no further items on the agenda, Chairperson Committee Meeting at p y a.m. Q� adjourned the Technical Review 2 CITY OF OKEECHOBEE TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE OFFICIAL AGENDA JULY 15, 2010 CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS 55 SOUTHEAST 3RD AVENUE OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA 34974 I. CALL TO ORDER JULY 15, 2010, 10:00 a.m. - Chairperson. II. STAFF ATTENDANCE - Secretary. Voting Members: Non - Voting Ex- Officio Member: III. MINUTES - Secretary. Ray Schaub, Building Official Denny Davis, Police Chief Donnie Robertson, Public Works Director Herb Smith, Fire Chief Oscar Bermudez, Engineer Brian Whitehall, Administrator John Burton, Okeechobee County Health Department John Hayford, Okeechobee Utility Authority Bill Brisson, LaRue Planning and Management John Cook, City Attorney School Representative Betty Clement, Secretary A. Motion to dispense with the reading and approve the Summary of Technical Review Committee Minutes for the April 15, 2010 regular meeting. III. NEW BUSINESS - Chairperson. A. Sacred Heart Catholic Church 10- 005 -TRC — The application was submitted by Kevin McGinley, Agent on behalf of property owner Most Reverent Gerald M. Barbarito, Bishop, to construct a new 11,183 sf church with toilet rooms, sacristy storage area, alter service rooms, and second floor mechanical equipment rooms, on a 12 acre parcel of land to be developed in a single phase - Senior Planner. B. Nurse Registry 10- 006 -TRC — The application was submitted by Shirley Baker, property owner, to establish a professional office from a residence for the purpose of having a nurse registry for property located at 200 SE 3rd Street with parking, drainage, landscaping and sidewalks to be completed in a single phase — Senior Planner. IV. ADJOURNMENT TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING — Chairperson. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that if any person desires to appeal any decision made by the Technical Review Committee with respect to any matter considered at this proceeding, such interested person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose may need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Media is the sole purpose of backup for official records of the Department. 1 DA V. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING - Chairperson. A. Petition No. 10-003-SE submitted by Kevin McGinley to allow height in excess of 30 feet Sec. 90- 103(10) for property located at 901 SW 6th Street, Okeechobee, FL - Senior Planner. B. 2010 Evaluation and Appraisal Draft of the City's Comprehensive Plan - Senior Planner. VI. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING - Chairperson VII. NEW BUSINESS - Chairperson A. Consider any additional requests for amendments to the City's Land Development Regulations - Chairperson. JUNE 17, 2010 • PLANNING BOARD /BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS - PAGE 2 OF 3 ACTION - DISCUSSION - VOTE There were none. Mr. Brisson presented the Planning Staff Report, stating compliance with the City's Code of Ordinances. The applicant has met and addressed all requirements therefore Staff recommends, Petition No. 10- 003 -SE, be approved to allow a maximum height of 44' 4" to the top of the architectural dome /bell tower. Mr. Kevin McGinley, for the applicant addressed the Board, reporting there were no actual bells in the bell tower and no chiming. At this time he thanked the Planner for the Staff Report. Public meeting was opened and closed at 6:10 p.m., and there was no board discussion. Board Member Burroughs moved to approve Petition No. 10-003-SE, to allow for height in excess of 30 feet, Sec. 90- 103(10) for property located at 901 SW 6`h Street, Okeechobee, FL; seconded by Member Baughman. VOTE MAXWELL - YEA HOOVER -ABSENT BURROUGHS -YEA MCCOY -ABSENT KELLER -YEA LUVIANO -YEA MORGAN - YEA BRASS • NON VOTING BAUGHMAN -YEA MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Brisson addressed the concerns and questions from the previous Board meeting in May. The Board discussed the 5 Major Issues and had multiple suggestions and concerns. Mr. Brisson requested all suggestions and concerns be e- mailed to him for review, and, discussion and recommendation would follow at the next regular Planning Board meeting. Chairperson Maxwell closed the Public Hearing at 7:30 p.m. There were none. LRM ZONING & URBAN PLANNING MARKET RESEARCH & ANALYSIS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS July 9, 2010 Ms. Betty Clement, General Services Coordinator City of Okeechobee 55 S.E. 3rd Avenue Okeechobee, FL 39974 Re: Sacred Heart Catholic Church Dear Betty: LAND RESEARCH MANAGEMENT, INC. 2240 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD. • SUITE 103 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33409 TEL: (561) 686 -2481 • FAX; 681 -1551 via email to: bclement [bclement @cityofokeechobee.com] As agent for the special exception and site plan review applications for the above referenced project, I respectfully request that the site plan review be considered by the Technical Review Committee (TRC) at its August 19th meeting rather than the July 15th meeting in order to allow us the opportunity to amend the site plans to address issues raised by the City's planning consultant, Bill Brisson. We will be meeting with Bill on July 15th after the TRC meeting to discuss the remaining site plan issues and the revisions to be made. Thanks you in advance for your timely consideration of this request. Respectfully, Kevin McGinley President C.C. Bill Brisson, LaRue Planning & Management Services, Inc. Dale Meaux, API Group, Inc. Fr. Hugh Duffy, Sacred Heart Catholic Church CITY OF OKEECHOBEE Application for Site Plan Review Page 1 of 2 _e�� prezezr 0kF r� �: a _ �kr ; h. "f ;; a 1,...4.7, -n, to g--, : r . _ ,_- _- • ,� �`.' -.. ,� � rI'.`, 'rx Ci of Okeechobee City General Services Department 55 S.E. 3rd Avenue, Room 101 Okeechobee, Florida 399742903 Phone: (863) 7633372, ext. 218 Fax: (863) 763 -1686 e-mail: dement(gcityofokeechobee.com Q Application Iication No. pp / • 6 _� <�+ Fee Paid: �3 �j� 00 Receipt No. o76J _js g" Hearing Date: 6:// %/ i APP_LICANT:INFORMATION - . _ ... :.Reed.. Chk'd 1 Name of property owner(s): Most Reverend Gerald M. Barbarito, Bishop 2 Owner mailing address: P.O. Box 109650 Palm Beach Gardens, FL33410 3 Nameofapplicant (s)ifotherthanowner:Sacred Heart Catholic Church 4 Applicant mailing address: 901 SW 6th Street, Okeechobee, FL 34974 5 Name of contact person (state relationship): Kevin McGinley, Agent 6 Contact person daytime phone(s): (5 61) 686-248 1 7 Engineer. Name, address and phone number: see attached consultants list 8 Surveyor. Name, address and phone number: see attached consultants list _PROPERTT ancl PROJECT INFORMATION 9 Property address /directions to property: 901 SW 6th Street 10 Parcel Identification Number 2— 21— 3 7— 3 5— O AO 0— 0 0 01 3 — 0 0 0 0 11 Current Future Land Use designation: RSF 12 Current Zoning district: RSF 1 13 Describe the project including all proposed uses, type of construction and conceptual building layout, how the business or use is expected to operate on the site, including but not limited to: number of employees expected; hours of operation; Iocation, extent and type of any outdoor storage or sales, etc., and fire flow layout. Use additional page if necessary. see attached 14 Describe existing improvements on property (For example, the number and type of buildings, dwelling units, occupied or vacant, etc.). Use additional page if necessary. see attached narrative 15 Total land area id square feet (if less than two acres): or acres: 12.0 16 Is proposed use different from existing or prior use (___Yes) (X No) 17 Number and description of phases: single phase Rev. 12/09 CITY OF OKEECHOBEE Application for Site Plan Review Page 2 of 2 For questions relating to this application packet, call the General Services Dept. at (863) - 763 -3372, Ext. 218 Rev. 12/09 ATTACHMENTS REQUIRED FORALL `APPLICATIONS 20 18 Source of potable water: Okeechobee Utility Authority 21 One (1) copy of last recorded warranty deed 19 Method of sewage disposal: Okeechobee Utility Authority Notarized letter of consent from property owner (if applicant is different from property owner) For questions relating to this application packet, call the General Services Dept. at (863) - 763 -3372, Ext. 218 Rev. 12/09 ATTACHMENTS REQUIRED FORALL `APPLICATIONS 20 Applicant's statement of interest in property 21 One (1) copy of last recorded warranty deed 22 Notarized letter of consent from property owner (if applicant is different from property owner) 23 Three (3) sealed boundary and topographic, "as is" surveys of the property involved including: a. certified boundary survey, date of survey, surveyor's name, address and phone number b. Legal description of site and parcel number c. Computation of total acreage to nearest tenth of an acre ( ) ( ) ( ) 24 Two (2) sets of aerials of the site. 25 Eleven (11) copies of sealed site plan drawings (see attached checklist for details to be included in site plan) 26 Eleven (11) copies of drawing indicating facades for all buildings, including architectural elevations. 27 Eleven (11) copies of landscape plan, including a separate table indicating the number of trees and shrubs by type and showing both the official and conunon name of each type of tree and shrub. 28 Three (3) copies of sealed drainage calculations 29 Other optional supporting documentation (pictures, etc.) 30 Nonrefundable application fee: $1,000.00 plus $30.00 per acre. NOTE: Resolution No. 98 -11 Schedule of Land Development Regulation Fees and Charges – When the cost for advertising publishing and mailing notices of public hearings exceeds the established fee, or when a professional consultant is hired to advise the City on the application, the applicant shall pay the actual costs. • NOTE: Submissions will be reviewed by the City Engineer and City Planner for all necessary documentation. The Applicant will be notified at least 10 days prior to the TRC meeting whether or not additional information is require to proceed or ff the review will be rescheduled to the next TRC meeting. -- -= - Confirmation of Information Accuracy^= -_ _ - - : .. I hereby certify that the information in this application is correct. The information included in this applica- tion is for use by the City of Okeechobee in processing my request. False or misleading information may be punishable by a fine of up to $500.00 and imprisonment of up to 30 days and may resulting the summary denial of this application. k., Mt.t ,,t,%- 4 - vi, •- iv • Signature Printed Name Date For questions relating to this application packet, call the General Services Dept. at (863) - 763 -3372, Ext. 218 Rev. 12/09 City of Okeechobee Checklist for Site Plan Review To be completed and submitted along with completed application form Rev. 2/08 REQUIRED INFORMATION Date _ Rec'd = Chk'_d -: 1 Completed application (1) 2 Map showing location of site (may be on the cover sheet of site plan) 3 Eleven (11) copies of sealed site plan drawings prepared at a scale no smaller than one inch equals 60 feet, or in the case of small projects, the largest scale that can accommodate the entire site and all areas within 50 feet of the project boundary, and the scale, legend, and author block all on one 24" by 36" sheet. The site plan drawings shall include the location of all existing and proposed improvements, including, but not limited to: 3.1 Water courses, water bodies, floodplains, wetlands, important natural features and wildlife areas, soil types, protected trees and vegetation or environmentally sensitive areas 3.2 Streets, sidewalks, property lines and rights -of -way 3.3 Utility lines/facilities, fire hydrants, septic tanks and drainfields 3.4 Bridges, culverts and stormwater management facilities 3.5. Buildings and structures and their distances from boundaries of the property, streets, and other structures 3.6 Setback lines and required yards 3.7 Ingress and egress to the site and buildings 3.8 Vehicular use areas including off -street parking and loading areas 3.9 On -site recreation and open space 3.10 Landscaping, screens, buffers, walls, and fences, 3.11 Method of solid waste collection and locations of and access to dumpsters 3.12 Lighting and signs 4 Drawing notes and tabulations showing the following information shall be included along with the plan: 4.1 Name, address and phone number of owner 4.2 Name, address and phone number of any agent, architect, engineer and planner 4.3 Compete legal description of the property 4.4 Future land use designation, current zoning and existing land use of the property and all abutting properties 4.5 Total acreage of the property (square footage if less than two acres) 4.6 Total # of dwelling units, by bedroom size; square footage of nonresidential uses by type of use (and/or seating, etc. as necessary to indicate the intensity) 4.7 Number of off -street parking spaces provided (including handicapped spaces) and loading spaces and the calculation of, and basis for, the number of such spaces required by the Land Development Regulations 4.8 Impervious surface calculations showing: the square footage and as a % of the total site for existing impervious surfaces, additional proposed impervious surfaces and the resulting proposed total impervious surfaces Rev. 2/08 Form #0941 08/95 SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE STANDARD GENERAL PERMIT NO. 47-00738-P DATE ISSUED: June 23, 2006 PERMITTEE: DIOCESE OF PALM BEACH C/O FATHER HUGH DUFFY 901 SW 6TH ST OKEECHOBEE, FL 34974 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construction and operation of acre project known as Sacred PROJECT LOCATION: OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, See Special Condition No:1. Code. PERMIT DURATION: a surface water management system to serve a 12.01 Heart Catholic Church. SEC 21 TWP 37S RGE 35E See attached Rule 40E- 4.321, Florida Administrative This Is to notify you of the District's agency action concerning Notice of Intent for Permit Application No. 080426 -5, dated April 26, 2006. This action is taken pursuant to Rule 40E -1.603 and Chapter 40E -40 , Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). Based on the information provided, District rules have been adhered to and an Environmental Resource General Permit is in effect for this project subject to: 1. Not receiving a filed request for a Chapter 120, Florida Statutes, administrative hearing. 2. the attached 19 Generat Conditions (See Pages : 2 - 4 of 5) , 3. the attached 13 Special Conditions (See Pages : 5 - 5 of 5) and 4. the attached 2 Exhibit(s) Should you object to these conditions, please refer to the attached "Notice of Rights" which addresses the procedures to be followed if you desire a public hearing or other review of the proposed agency action. Please contact this office if you have any questions conceming this matter. If we do not hear from you in accordance with the "Notice of Rights," we will assume that you concur with the District's action. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HERBY C TIFY that a "Notice of Rights" has been mailed to the Permittee (and the persons listed in the attachedJ/ istri • tion list) no later than 5:00 p.m. on this 23rd day of June, 2006, in accordance with Section 120.60 it , Flori + a S - tutes. BY: %1_ 4911P ony M. i . Ouse, P.E. Director - Surface Water Management Palm Beach Service Center `Certified mail number 7005 0390 0005 9815 0426 Page 1 of 5 /Application No. UOU4L0 -5 GENERAL CONDITIONS Page 2 of 5 1. All activities authorized by this permit shall be implemented as set forth in the plans, specifications and performance criteria as approved by this permit. Any deviation from the permitted activity and the conditions for undertaking that activity shall constitute a violation of this permit and Part IV, Chapter 373. F.S. 2. This permit or a copy thereof, complete with all conditions, attachments, exhibits, and modifications shall be kept at the work site of the permitted activity. The complete permit shall be available for review at the work site upon request by District staff. The permittee shall require the contractor to review the complete permit prior to commencement of the activity authorized by this permit. 3. Activities approved by this permit shall be conducted in a manner which does not cause violations of State water quality standards. The permittee shall implement best management practices for erosion and pollution control to prevent violation of State water quality standards. Temporary erosion control shall be implemented prior to and during construction, and permanent control measures shall be completed within 7 days of any construction activity. Turbidity barriers shall be installed and maintained at all locations where the possibility of transferring suspended solids into the receiving waterbody exists due to the permitted work. Turbidity barriers shall remain in place at all locations until construction is completed and soils are stabilized and vegetation has been established. All practices shall be in accordance with the guidelines and specifications described in Chapter 6 of the Florida Land Development Manual; A Guide to Sound Land and Water Management (Department of Environmental Regulation, 1988), incorporated by reference in Rule 40E- 4.091, F.A.C. unless a project - specific erosion and sediment control plan is approved as part of the permit. Thereafter the permittee shall be responsible for the removal of the barriers. The permittee shall correct any erosion or shoaling that causes adverse impacts to the water resources. 4. The permittee shall notify the District of the anticipated construction start date within 30 days of the date that this permit is issued. At least 48 hours prior to commencement of activity authorized by this permit, the permittee shall submit to the District an Environmental Resource Permit Construction Commencement Notice Form Number 0960 indicating the actual start date and the expected construction completion date. 5. When the duration of construction will exceed one year, the permittee shall submit construction status reports to the District on an annual basis utilizing an annual status report form. Status report forms shall be submitted the following June of each year. 6. Within 30 days after completion of construction of the permitted activity, the permitee shall submit a written statement of completion and certification by a professional engineer or other individual authorized by law, utilizing the supplied Environmental Resource /Surface Water Management Permit Construction Completion /Certification Form Number 0881A, or Environmental Resource /Surface Water Management Permit Construction Completion Certification - For Projects Permitted prior to October 3, 1995 Form No. 0881 B, incorporated by reference in Rule 40E- 1.659, F.A.C. The statement of completion and certification shall be based on onsite observation of construction or review of as -built drawings for the purpose of determining if the work was completed in compliance with permitted plans and specifications. This submittal shall serve to notify the District that the system is ready for inspection. Additionally, if deviation from the approved drawings are discovered during the certification process, the certification must be accompanied by a copy of the approved permit drawings with deviations noted. Both the original and revised specifications must be clearly shown. The plans must be clearly labeled as "as- built" or "record" drawings. All surveyed dimensions and elevations shall be certified by a registered surveyor. 7. The operation phase of this permit shall not become effective: until the permittee has complied with the requirements of condition (6) above, and submitted a request for conversion of Environmental Resource Permit from Construction Phase to Operation Phase, Form No. 0920; the District determines the system to be in compliance with the permitted plans and specifications; and the entity approved by the District in accordance with Sections 9.0 and 10.0 of the Basis of Review for Environmental Resource Permit Applications within the South Florida Water Management District, accepts responsibility for operation and ry�Nn�;auun ieu. uuuvcv -o GENERAL. CONDITIONS Page 3 of 5 maintenance of the system. The permit shall not be transferred to such approved operation and maintenance entity until the operation phase of the permit becomes effective. Following inspection and approval of the permitted system by the District, the permittee shall initiate transfer of the permit to the approved responsible operating entity if different from the permittee. Until the permit is transferred pursuant to Section 40E- 1.6107, F.A.G., the permittee shall be liable for compliance with the terms of the permit. 8. Each phase or independent portion of the permitted system must be completed in accordance with the permitted plans and permit conditions prior to the initiation of the permitted use of site infrastructure located within the area served by that portion or phase of the system. Each phase or independent portion of the system must be completed in accordance with the permitted plans and permit conditions prior to transfer of responsibility for operation and maintenance of the phase or portion of the system to a local government or other responsible entity. 9. For those systems that will be operated or maintained by an entity that will require an easement or deed restriction in order to enable that entity to operate or maintain the system in conformance with this permit, such easement or deed restriction must be recorded in the public records and submitted to the District along with any other final operation and maintenance documents required by Sections 9.0 and 10.0 of the Basis of Review for Environmental Resource Permit applications within the South Florida Water Management District, prior to lot or units sales or prior to the completion of the system, whichever comes first. Other documents concerning the establishment and authority of the operating entity must be filed with the Secretary of State, county or municipal entities. Final operation and maintenance documents must be received by the District when maintenance and operation of the system is accepted by the local government entity. Failure to submit the appropriate final documents will result in the permittee remaining liable for carrying out maintenance and operation of the permitted system and any other permit conditions 10. Should any other regulatory agency require changes to the permitted system, the permittee shall notify the District in writing of the changes prior to implementation so that a determination can be made whether a permit modification is required. 11. This permit does not eliminate the necessity to obtain any required federal, state, local and special district authorizations prior to the start of any activity approved by this permit. This permit does not convey to the permittee or create in the permittee any property right, or any interest in real property, nor does it authorize any entrance upon or activities on property which is not owned or controlled by the permittee, or convey any rights or privileges other than those specified in the permit and Chapter 40E-4 or Chapter 40E -40, F.A.C.. 12. The permittee is hereby advised that Section 253.77, F.S. states that a person may not commence any excavation, construction, or other activity involving the use of sovereign or other lands of the State, the title to which is vested in the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund without obtaining the required lease, license, easement, or other form of consent authorizing the proposed use. Therefore, the permittee is responsible for obtaining any necessary authorizations from the Board of Trustees prior to commencing activity on sovereignty lands or other state -owned lands. 13. The permittee must obtain a Water Use permit prior to construction dewatering, unless the work qualifies for a general permit pursuant to Subsection 40E- 20.302(3), F.A.C., also known as the "No Notice" Rule. 14. The permittee shall hold and save the District harmless from any and all damages, claims, or liabilities which may arise by reason of the construction, alteration, operation, maintenance, removal, abandonment or use of any system authorized by the permit. 15. Any delineation of the extent of a wetland or other surface water submitted as part of the permit application, including plans or other supporting documentation, shall not be considered binding, unless a specific condition of this permit or a formal determination under Section 373.421(2), F.S., provides otherwise. Inr}nn.auvn ivv. VUJM U o GENERAL CONDITIONS Page 4 of 5 16. The permittee shall notify the District in writing within 30 days of any sale, conveyance, or other transfer of ownership or control of a permitted system or the real property on which the permitted system is located. All transfers of ownership or transfers of a permit are subject to the requirements of Rules 40E- 1.6105 and 40E- 1.6107, F.A.C.. The permittee transferring the permit shall remain liable for corrective actions that may be required as a result of any violations prior to the sale, conveyance or other transfer of the system. 17. Upon reasonable notice to the permittee, District authorized staff with proper identification shall have permission to enter, inspect, sample and test the system to insure conformity with the plans and specifications approved by the permit. 18. If historical or archaeological artifacts are discovered at any time on the project site, the permittee shall immediately notify the appropriate District service center. 19. The permittee shall immediately notify the District in writing of any previously submitted information that is later discovered to be inaccurate. Page 5 of 5 SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. The construction phase of this permit shall expire on June 23, 2011. 2. Operation of the surface water management system shall be the responsibility of the permittee. Prior to transfer of title for any portion of the project to a third party modification of the permit will be required. The sate of any of the buildings or portions of the property to a third party shall require the formation of a property owners association (POA) that complies with District POA requirements and submittal of the POA documents to the district for review and approval. 3. Discharge Facilities: 1 -3" dia. CIRCULAR ORIFICE with invert at elev. 26.41' NGVD. 1 -2' W X 3.08' L drop inlet with crest at elev. 29.8' NGVD. Receiving body : SW 7th Ave Ditch Control elev : 26.4 feet NGVD. 4. The permittee shall be responsible for the correction of any erosion, shoaling or water quality problems that result from the construction or operation of the surface water management system. 5. Measures shall be taken during construction to insure that sedimentation and/or turbidity violations do not occur in the receiving water. 6. The District reserves the right to require that additional water quality treatment methods be incorporated into the drainage system if such measures are shown to be necessary. 7. Facilities other than those stated herein shall not be constructed without an approved modification of this permit. 8. A stable, permanent and accessible elevation reference shall be established on or within one hundred (100) feet of all permitted discharge structures no later than the submission of the certification report. The location of the elevation reference must be noted on or with the certification report. 9. The permittee shall provide routine maintenance of all of the components of the surface water management system in order to remove all trapped sediments /debris. All materials shall be properly disposed of as required by law. Failure to properly maintain the system may result in adverse flooding conditions. 10. This permit is issued based on the applicant's submitted information which reasonably demonstrates that adverse water resource related impacts will not be caused by the completed permit activity. Should any adverse impacts caused by the completed surface water management system occur, the District will require the permittee to provide appropriate mitigation to the District or other impacted party. The District will require the permittee to modify the surface water management system, if necessary, to eliminate the cause of the adverse impacts. 11. Minimum building floor elevation: BASiN: Exist Development - 29.99 feet NGVD. 12. Minimum parking lot elevation: Basin: Exist Development - 28.80 feet NGVD. 13. Silt fencing shall be installed at the limits of construction to protect from silt and sediment deposition during the construction of the project. All erosion control measures shall be installed in accordance with "Florida Land Development Manual" Chapter 6 "Stormwater and Erosion and Sediment Control Best Management Practices for Developing Areas" and Exhibit No. 2.01. The sediment controls shall be installed prior to the commencement of any clearing or construction and the installation must be inspected by the District's Environmental Resource Compliance staff. The silt fencing and turbidity barriers shall remain in place and be maintained in good functional condition until all adjacent construction activities have been completed. Upon completion of the project and the stabilization of the fill, the permittee shall contact the District's Environmental Resource Compliance staff to inspect the site. 40E -0.321 Duration of Permits. (1) Unless revoked or otherwise modified the duration of an environmental resource permit issued under this chapter or Chapter 40E -40, F.A.C., is as follows: (a) For a conceptual approval, two years from the date of issuance or the date specified as a condition of the permit, unless within that period an application for an individual or standard general permit is filed for any portion of the project. If an application for an environmental resource permit is filed, then the conceptual approval remains valid until final action is taken on the environmental resource permit application. If the application is granted, then the conceptual approval is valid for an additional two years from the date of issuance of the permit. Conceptual approvals which have no individual or standard general environmental resource permit applications filed for a period of two years shall expire automatically at the end of the two year period. (b) For a conceptual approval filed concurrently with a development of regional impact (DRI) application for development approval (ADA) and a local government comprehensive plan amendment, the duration of the conceptual approval shall be two years from whichever one of the following occurs at the latest date: 1. The effective date of the local government's comprehensive plan amendment, 2. The effective date of the local government devebpment order, 3. The date on which the District issues the conceptual approval, or 4. The date on which the District issues a final order pertaining to the resolution of any Section 120.57, F.S., administrative proceeding or other legal appeals. (c) For an individual or standard general environmental resource permit, the construction phase authorizing construction, removal, alteration or abandonment of a system shall expire five years from the date of issuance or such amount of time as made a condition of the permit. (d) For an individual or standard general environmental resource permit, the operational phase of the permit is perpetual for operation and maintenance. (e) For a noticed general permit issued pursuant to Chapter 40E -406, F.A.C., five years from the date the notice of intent to use the permit is provided to the District. (2)(a) Unless prescribed by special permit condition, permits expire automatically according to the timeframes indicated in this rule. if application for extension is made In writing pursuant to subsection (3), the permit shall remain in full force and effect until: • 1. The Governing Board takes action on an application for extension of an • individual permit, or 2. Staff takes action on an application for extension of a standard general permit. (b) installation of the project outfatl structure shall not constitute a vesting of the permit. (3) The permit extension shall be issued provided that a permittee files a written request with the District showing good cause prior to the expiration of the permit, For the purpose of this rule, good cause shall mean a set of extenuating circumstances outside of the control of the permittee. Requests for extensions, which shall include documentation of the extenuating circumstances and how they haN,e delayed this project, will not be accepted more than 180 days prior to the expiration date. (4) Substantial modifications to Conceptual Approvals will extend the duration of the Conceptual Approval for two years from the date of issuance of the modification. For the purposes of this section, the term "substantial modification" shall mean a modification which is reasonably expected to lead to substantially different water resource or environmental impacts which require a detailed review. (5) Substantial modifications to individual or standard general environmental resource permits issued pursuant to a permit application extend the duration of the permit for three years from the date of issuance of the modification. Individual or standard general environmental resource permit modifications do not extend the duration of a conceptual approval. (6) Permit modifications issued pursuant to paragraph 40E-4.331(2)(b), F.A.C. (letter modifications) do not extend the duration of the permit. (7) Failure to complete corstruction or alteration of the surface water management system and obtain operation phase approval from the District within the permit duration shall require a new permit authorization in order to continue construction unless a permit extension is granted. Specific Authority 373.044, 373.113 FS. Law implemented 373.413, 373.416, 373.419, 373.426 FS. History —New 9 -3 -81, Amended 1- 31 -82, 12 -1 -82, Formerly 16K- 4.07 (4), Amended 7 -1 -86, 4- 20 -94, 10 -3 -95, 5- 28 -00. . NOTICE OF RIGHTS Section 120.569(1), Fie- Stat. (1999), requires that "each notice shall inform the recipient of any administrative hearing or judicial review that is available under this section, s. 120.57, or s. 120.68; shall indicate the procedure which must be followed to obtain the hearing or judicial review, and shall state the time limits which apply." Please note that this Notice of Rights is not intended to provide legal advice. Not all the legal proceedings detailed below may be an applicable or appropriate remedy. You may wish to consult an attorney regarding your legal rights. Petition for Administrative Proceedings 1. A person whose substantial interests are affected by the South Florida Water Management District's (SFWMD) action has the right to request an administrative hearing on that action. The affected person may request either a format or an informal hearing, as set forth below. A point of entry into administrative proceedings is governed by Rules 28- 106.111 and 40E- 1.511, Fla. Admin. Code, (also published as an exception to the Uniform Rules of Procedure as Rule 40E- 0.109), as set forth below. Petitions are deemed filed upon receipt of the original documents by the SFWMD Clerk. a. Formal Administrative Hearing: If a genuine issue(s) of material fact is in dispute, the affected person seeking a formal hearing on a SFWMD decision which does or may determine their substantial interests shall file a petition for hearing pursuant to Sections 120.569 and 120.57(1), • Fla. Stat. or for mediation pursuant to Section 120.573, Fla. Stat. within .21 days, except . as provided In subsections c. and d. below, of either written notice throt ?gh mail or posting or publication of notice that the SFWMD has or intends to take final agency action. Petitions must substantially comply with the requirements of Rule 28- 106.201(2), Fla. Admin. Code, a copy of the which is attached to this Notice of Rights. b. Informal Administrative Hearing: If there are no Issues of material fact in dispute, the affected person seeking an informal hearing on a SFWMD decision which does or may determine their substantial interests shall file a petition for hearing pursuant to Sections 120.569 and 120.57(2), Fla. Stat. or for mediation pursuant to Section 120.573, Fla. Stat. within 21 days, except as provided in subsections c. and d. below, of either written notice through mail or posting or publication of notice that the SFWMD has or intends to take final agency action. Petitions must substantially comply with the requirements of Rule 28- 106.301(2), Fla. Admin. Code, a copy of the which is attached to this Notice of Rights. c. Administrative Complaint and Order: if a Respondent objects to a SFWMD Administrative Complaint and Order, pursuant to Section 373.119, Fla. Stat. (1997), the person named in the Administrative Complaint and Order may file a petition for a hearing no later than 14 days after the date such order is served. Petitions must substantially comply with the requirements of either subsection a. or b. above. d. State Lands Environmental Resource Permit: Pursuant to Section 373.427, Fla. Stat., and Rule 40E- 1.511(3), Fla. Admin. Code (also published as an exception to the Uniform Rules of Procedure as Rule 40E- 0.109(2)(c)), a petition objecting to the SFWMD's agency action regarding consolidated applications for Environmental Resource Permits and Use of Sovereign Submerged Lands (SLERPs), must be filed within 14 days of the notice of consolidated intent to grant or deny the SLERP. Petitions must substantially comply with the requirements of either subsection a. or b. above. e. Emergency Authorization and Order: A person whose substantial interests are affected by a SFWMD Emergency Authorization and Order, has a right to file a petition under Sections 120.569, 120.57(1), and 120.57(2), Fla. Stat., as provided in subsections a. and b. above. However, the person, or the agent of the person responsible for causing or contributing to the emergency conditions shall take whatever action necessary to cause immediate compliance with the terms of the Emergency Authorization and Order. f. Order for Emergency Action: A person whose substantial interests are affected by a SFWMD Order for Emergency Action has a right to file a petition pursuant to Rules 28- 107.005 and 40E- 1.611, Fla. Admin. Code, copies of which are attached to this Notice of Rights, and Section 373.119(3),. Fla. Stat., for a hearing on the Order. Any subsequent agency action or proposed agency action to initiate a formal revocation proceeding shall be separately noticed pursuant to section g. below. g. Permit Suspension, Revocation, Annulment, and Withdrawal: If the SFWMD issues an administrative complaint to suspend, revoke, annul, or withdraw a permit, the permittee may request a hearing to be conducted in accordance with Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Fla. Stat., within 21 days of either written notice through mail or posting or publication of notice that the SFWMD has or intends to take final agency action. Petitions must substantially comply with the requirements of Rule 28- 107.004(3), Fla. Admin. Code, a copy of the which is attached to this Notice of Rights. 2. Because the administrative hearing process is designed to formulate final agency action, the filing of a petition means that the SFWMD's final action may be different from the position taken by it previously. Persons whose substantial interests may he affected by Revised August, 2000 any such final decision of the SFWMD shall have, pursuant to Rule 40E- 1.511(2), Fla. Admin. Code (also published as an exception to the Uniform Rules of Procedure as Rule 40E- 0.109(2)(c)), an additional 21 days from the date of receipt of notice of said decision to request an administrative hearing. However, the scope of the administrative hearing shall be limited to the substantial deviation. 3. Pursuant to Rule 40E- 1.511(4), Fla. Admin. Code, substantially affected persons entitled to a hearing pursuant to Section 120.57(1), Fla. Stat., may waive their right to such a hearing and request an informal hearing before the Governing Board pursuant to Section 120.57(2), Fla. Stat., which may be granted at the option of the Goveming Board. 4. Pursuant to Rule 28- 106.111(3), Fla. Admin. Code, persons may file with the SFWMD a request for extension of time for filing a petition. The SFWMD, for good cause shown, may grant the extension. The request for extension must contain a certificate that the petitioner has consulted with all other parties, if any, concerning the extension and that the SFWMD and all other parties agree to the extension. CIRCUIT COURT 5. Pursuant to Section 373.617, Fla. Stat., any substantially affected person who claims that final agency action of the SFWMD relating to permit decisions constitutes an unconstitutional taking of property without just compensation may seek judicial review of the action in circuit court by filing a civil action in the circuit court in the judicial circuit in which the affected property is located within 90 days of the rendering of the SFWMD's final agency action. 6. Pursuant to Section 403.412, Fia. Stat., any citizen of Florida may bring an action for injunctive relief against the SFWMD to compel the SFWMD to enforce the laws of Chapter 373, Fia. Stat., and Title 40E, Fla. Admin. Code. The complaining party must file with the SFWMD Clerk a verified complaint setting forth the facts upon which the complaint is based and the mariner in which the complaining party is affected. If the SFWMD does not take appropriate action on the complaint within 30 days of receipt, the complaining party may then file a civil suit for injunctive relief in the 151h Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County or circuit court in the county where the cause of action allegedly occurred. 7. Pursuant to Section 373.433, Fia. Stat., a private citizen of Florida may file suit in circuit court to require the abatement of any stormwater management system, dam, impoundment, reservoir, appurtenant work or works that violate the provisions of Chapter 373, Fla. Stat. DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 8. Pursuant to Section 120.68, Fla. Stat., a party who is adversely affected by final SFWMD action may seek judicial review of the SFWMD's final decision by filing a notice of appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110 in the Fourth District Court of Appeal or in the appellate district where a party resides and filing a second copy of the notice with the SFWMD Clerk within 30 days of rendering of the final SFWMD action. LAND AND WATER ADJUDICATORY COMMISSION 9. A party to a "proceeding below" may seek review by the Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission (FLAWAC) of SFWMD's final agency action to determine if such action is consistent with the provisions and purposes of Chapter 373, Fla. Stat. Pursuant to Section 373.114, Fla. Stat., and Rules 42 -2.013 and 42- 2.0132, Fla. Admin. Code, a request for review of (a) an order or rule of the SFWMD must be filed with FLAWAC within 20 days after rendition of the order or adoption of the rule sought to be reviewed; (b) an order of the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) requiring amendment or repeal of a SFWMD rule must be filed with FLAWAC within 30 days of rendition of the DEP's order, and (c) a SFWMD order entered pursuant to a formal administrative hearing under Section 120.57.(1), Fia. Stat., must be filed no later than 20 days after rendition of the SFWMD's final order. Simultaneous with filing, a copy of the request for review must be served on the DEP Secretary, any person named in the SFWMD. or DEP final order, and all parties to the proceeding below. A copy of Rule 42- 2.013, Fla. Admin. Code is attached to this Notice of Rights. PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS PROTECTION ACT 10. A property owner who alleges a specific action of the SFWMD has inordinately burdened an existing use of the real property, or a vested right to a specific use of the real property, may file a claim in the circuit court where the real property is located within 1 year of the SFWMD action pursuant to the procedures set forth in Subsection 70.001(4)(a), Fla. Stat. LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION 11. A property owner who alleges that a SFWMD development order (as that term is defined in Section 70.51(2)(a), Fla. Stat. to include permits) or SFWMD enforcement action is unreasonable, or unfairly burdens the use of the real property, may file a request for relief with the SFWMD within 30 days of receipt of the SFWMD's order or notice of agency action pursuant to the procedures set forth in Subsections 70.51(4) and (6), Fla. Stat. MEDIATION 12. A person whose substantial interests are, or may be, affected by the SFWMD's action may choose mediation as an alternative remedy under Section 120.573, Fla. Stat. Pursuant to Rule 28- 106.111(2), Fla. Admin. Code, the petition for mediation shall be filed within 21 days of either written notice through mail or posting or Revised August, 2000 publication of notice that the SFWMD has or intends to take final agency action. Choosing mediation will not affect the right to an administrative hearing if mediation does not result in settlement. Pursuant to Rule 28- 106.402, Fla. Admin. Code, the contents of the petition for mediation shall contain the following information: (1) the name, address, and telephone number of the person requesting mediation and that person's representative, if any; (2) a statement of the preliminary agency action; (3) an explanation of how the person's substantial interests will be affected by the agency determination; and (4) a statement of relief sought. As provided in Section 120.573, Fla. Stat. (1997), the timely agreement of all the parties to mediate will toll the time limitations imposed by Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Fla. Stat., for requesting and holding an administrative hearing. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the mediation must be concluded within 60 days of the execution of the agreement. If mediation results in settlement of the dispute, the SFWMD must enter a final order incorporating the agreement of the parties. Persons whose substantial interest will be affected, by such a modified agency .decision have a right to petition for hearing within 21 days of receipt of the final order in accordance with the requirements of Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Fla. Stat., and SFWMD Rule 28- 106.201(2), Fla. Admin. Code. if mediation terminates without settlement of the dispute, the SFWMD shall notify all parties in writing that the administrative hearing process under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Fla. Stat., remain available for disposition of the dispute, and the notice will specify the deadlines that then will apply for challenging the agency action. VARIANCES AND WAIVERS 13. A person who is subject to regulation pursuant to a SFWMD rule and believes the application of that rule will create a substantial hardship or will violate principles of fairness (as those terms are defined in Subsection 120.542(2), Fla. Stat.) and can demonstrate that the purpose of the underlying statute will be or has been achieved by other means, may file a petition with the SFWMD Clerk requesting a variance from or waiver of the SFWMD rule. Applying for a variance or waiver does not substitute or extend the time for filing a petition for an administrative hearing or exercising any other right that a person may have concerning the SFWMD's action. Pursuant to Rule 28- 104.002(2), Fla. Admin. Code, the petition must include the following information: (a) the caption shall read: Petition for (Variance from) or (Waiver of) Rule (Citation) (b) The name, address, telephonA number and any facsimile number of the petitioner; (c) The name, address telephone number and any facsimile number of the attorney or qualified representative of the petitioner, (if any); (d) the applicable rule or portion of the rule; (e) the citation to the statue the rule is implementing; (f) the type of action requested; (g) the specific facts that demonstrate a substantial hardship or violation of principals of fairness that would justify a waiver or variance for the petitioner; (h) the reason why the variance or the waiver requested would serve the purposes of the underlying statute; and (i) a statement of whether the variance or waiver is permanent or temporary, if the variance or waiver is temporary, the petition shall include the dates indicating the duration of the requested variance or waiver. A person requesting an emergency variance from or waiver of a SFWMD rule must clearly so state in the caption of the petition. in addition to the requirements of Section 120.542(5), Fla. Stat. pursuant to Rule 28- 104.004(2), Fla. Admin. Code, the petition must also include: a) the specific facts that make the situation an emergency; and b) the specific facts to show that the petitioner will suffer immediate adverse effect unless the variance or waiver is issued by the SFWMD more expeditiously than the applicable timeframes set forth in Section 120.542, Fla. Stat. WAIVER OF RIGHTS 14. Failure to observe the relevant time frames prescribed above will constitute a waiver of such right. 28- 106.201 INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS (INVOLVING DISPUTED ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT) (2) All petitions filed under these rules shall contain: (a) The name and address of each agency affected and each agency's file or identification number, if known; (b) The name, address, and telephone number of the petitioner; the name, address, and telephone number of the petitioner's representative, if any, which shall be the address for service purposes during the course of the proceeding, and an explanation of how the petitioner's substantial interests will be affected by the agency determination; (c) A statement of when and how the petitioner received notice of the agency decision; (d) A statement of all disputed issues of material fact. If there are none, the petition must so indicate; (e) A concise statement of the ultimate facts alleged, as well as the rules and statutes which entitle the petitioner to relief; and (f) A demand for relief. Revised August, 2000 28-106.301 INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS (NOT INVOLVING DISPUTED ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT) (2) All petitions filed under these rules shall contain: (a) The name and address of each agency affected and each agency's file or identification number, if known; (b) The name, address, and telephone number of the petitioner; the name, address, and telephone number of the petitioner's representative, if any, which shall be the address for service purposes during the course of the proceeding, and an explanation of how the petitioner's substantial interests will be affected by the agency determination; (c) A statement of when and how the petitioner received notice of the agency decision; (d) A concise statement of the ultimate facts alleged, as well as the rules and statutes which entitle the petitioner to relief; and (e) A demand for relief. 28- 107.004 SUSPENSION, REVOCATION, ANNULMENT, OR WITHDRAWAL (3) Requests for hearing filed in accordance with this rule shall include: (a) The name and address of the party making the request, for purposes of service; (b) A statement that the party is requesting a hearing involving disputed issues of material fact, or a hearing not involving disputed issues of material fact; and (c) A reference 'to the notice, order to show cause, administrative complaint, or other communication that the party has received from the agency. 42 -2.013 REQUEST FOR REVIEW PURSUANT TO SECTION 373.114 OR 373.217 (1) In any proceeding arising under Chapter 373, F.S., review by the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission may be initiated by the Department or a party by filing a request for such review with the Secretary of the Commission and serving a copy on any person named in the rule or order, and on all parties to the proceeding which resulted in the order sought to be reviewed. A certificate of service showing completion of service as required by this subsection shall be a requirement for a determination of sufficiency under Rule 42- 2.0132. Failure to file the request with the Commission within the time period provided in Rule 42- 2.0132 shall result in dismissal of the request for review. - (2) The request for review shall identify the rule or order requested to be reviewed, the proceeding in which the rule or order was entered and the nature of the rule or order. A copy of the rule or order sought to be reviewed shall be attached. The request for review shall state with particularity: (a) How the order or rule conflicts with the requirements, provisions and purposes of Chapter 373, F.S., or rules duly adopted thereunder; (b) How the rule or order sought to be reviewed affects the interests of the party seeking review; (c) The oral or written statement, sworn or unsworn, which was submitted to the agency concerning the matter to be reviewed and the date and location of the statement, if the individual or entity requesting the review has not participated in a proceeding previously instituted pursuant to Chapter 120, F.S., on the order for which review is sought; (d) If review of an order is being sought, whether and how the activity authorized by the order would substantially affect natural resources of statewide or regional significance, or whether the order raises issues of policy, statutory interpretation, or rule interpretation that have regional or statewide significance from a standpoint of agency precedent, and all the factual bases in the record which the petitioner claims support such determination(s); and (e) The action requested to be taken by the Commission as a result of the review, whether to rescind or modify the order, or remand the proceeding to the water management district for further action, or to require the water management district to initiate rulemaking to adopt, amend or repeal a rule. 28- 107.005 • EMERGENCY ACTION (1) If the agency finds that immediate serious danger to the public health, safety, or welfare requires emergency action, the agency shall summarily suspend, limit, or restrict a license. (2) the 14 -day notice requirement of Section 120.569(2)(b), F. S., does not apply and shall not be construed to prevent a hearing at the earliest time practicable upon request of an aggrieved party. (3) Unless otherwise provided by law, within 20 days after emergency action taken pursuant to paragraph (1) of this rule, the agency shall initiate a formal suspension or revocation proceeding in compliance with Sections 120.569, 120.57. and 120.60, F.S. 40E -1.611 EMERGENCY ACTION (1) An emergency exists when immediate action is necessary to protect public health, safety or welfare; the health of animals, fish or aquatic life; the works of the District; a public water supply, or recreational, commercial, industrial, agricultural or other reasonable uses of land and water resources. (2) The Executive Director may employ the resources of the District to take whatever remedial action necessary to alleviate the emergency condition without the issuance of an emergency order, or in the event an emergency order has been issued, after the expiration of the requisite time for compliance with that order. Revised August, 2000 Last Date For Agency Action: 25 -JUN -2006 GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT STAFF REPORT Project Name: Sacred Heart Catholic Church Permit No.: 47- 00738 -P Application No.: 060426 -5 Application Type: Environmental Resource (New General Permit) Location: Okeechobee County. S21/T37S/R35E Permittee : Diocese Of Palm Beach Operating Entity : Diocese Of Palm Beach Project Area: 5.31 acres Project Land Use: Institutional Drainage Basin: S -133 Receiving Body: SW 7th Ave ditch Class: CLASS III Special Drainage District: NA Conservation Easement To District : No Sovereign Submerged Lands: No PROJECT PURPOSE:..: This application is a request for an Environmental Resource Permit to authorize construction and operation of a surface water management system to serve a 12.01 acres of institutional development. Staff recommends approval with conditions. App.no.: 060426 -5 Page 1 of 6 PROJECT EVALUATION: PROJECT SITE DESCRIPTION: The site is located within the City of Okeechobee, south of SW 6th Street, north of SW 9th Street, and west of SW 7th Avenue. There are no permitted surface water management facilities within the project area. The site contains an existing worship facility and associated parking. There are no wetlands or other surface waters located within or affected by the proposed project. PROPOSED PROJECT: Authorization for construction and operation has been requested for a new Surface Water Management (SWM) system to serve 12.01 acres of institutional development to be known as Sacred Heart Catholic Church. Proposed construction includes an additional 0.5 -acre building, parking lot, and dry detention area within Basins 2 and 4A. The existing development within Basins 1, 3, and 4B is not proposed to be modified as part of this application. LAND USE: Construction: Basin : New Construction Total Basin Building Coverage .51 acres Dry Detention Bottom .38 acres Dry Detention Sides .17 acres Pavement 1.88 acres Pervious 2.37 acres Total: 5.31 WATER QUANTITY Discharge Rate : This project is in the S -133 basin which has an allowable discharge of 15.6 csm or 0.02 cfs per acre. The proposed discharge structure has been designed with the minimum size bleeder allowed by District criteria. Off -site discharge will not occur from the site, except through this bleeder, below the 25 -year, 3- day peak stage of 29.81 ft NGVD. Discharge Storm Frequency : 25 YEAR -3 DAY Design Rainfall : 9 inches Basin Allow Disch Method Of Peak Disch Peak Stage (cfs) Determination (cfs) (ft, NGVD) Exist Development .11 Discharge Formula .11 29.81 Finished Floors : As shown in the following table and the attached exhibits, minimum finished floor elevations have been set at or above the calculated design storm flood elevation. App. no.: 060426 -5 Page 2 of 6 Building Storm Frequency : 100 YEAR -3 DAY Basin Exist Development Peak Stage Proposed Min. Finished Floors FEMA Elevation ( ft, NGVD) (ft, NGVD) 29 98 (ft, NGVD) 29.99 N/A Design Rainfall : 10 inches Parking Lot Design : As shown in the following table and the attached exhibits, minimum parking lot elevations have been set at or above the calculated design storm flood elevation. Parking Lot Storm Frequency : 5 YEAR -1 DAY Design Rainfall 4.5 inches Basin Peak Stage Proposed Min.Parking Elev. Exist Development (ft, NGVD) (ft, NGVD) 28.8 28.8 Control Elevation : Basin Area Ctrl Elev WSWT Ctrl Elev Method Of (Acres) (ft, NGVD) (ft, NGVD) Determination New Construction 5.31 26.4 Exist Development 26.40 Wet Season Water Table 6.70 26.4 26.40 Wet Season Water Table Receiving Body : Basin Str.# Receiving Body New Construction CS -1 SW 7th Ave bitch Discharge Structures: Note: The units for all the elevation values of structures are (ft, NGVD) Bleeders: Basin Str# Count Type Width Height Length Dia. Invert Invert Elev. Angle 3., 26.41 New CS -1 1 Circular Orifice Construction inlets: Basin New Construction Str# Count CS -1 Type Width Length Dia. Crest Elev. 1 Fdot Mod C Drop Inlet 2' 3.08' No adverse water quality impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project. Water quality treatment volume equivalent to 2.5 inches over the total impervious area, which equals 1.18 inches for this project, is provided in the dry detention areas. The proposed project is located within the Lake Okeechobee watershed and is therefore subject to the Lake Okeechobee Protection Act which limits projects from discharging higher levels of phosphorus in the post - development condition above that which discharges in the pre - development condition. Staff has reviewed the submitted calculations and determined that the proposed project meets this requirement. Erosion and turbidity control measures will be installed prior to the commencement of construction as App.no.: 060426 -5 Page 31of 6 29.8 indicated in Special Condition 13 of this permit. Silt screens or other turbidity control measures will be installed in all discharge ditches and around the limits of construction for the project as shown in the construction plans. Basin Treatment Method New Construction Treatment WETLANDS: Dry Detention There are no State jurisdictional wetlands within the project area. Vol Req.d Vol Prov'd (ac -ft) (ac -ft) .52 .52 CERTIFICATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: It is suggested that the permittee retain the services of a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Florida for periodic observation of construction of the surface water management (SWM) system. This will facilitate the completion of construction completion certification Form #0881 which is required pursuant to Section 10 of the Basis of Review for Environmental Resource Permit Applications within the South Florida Water Management District, and Rule 40E- 4361(2), Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). Pursuant to Chapter 40E-4 F.A.C., this permit may not be converted from the construction phase to the operation phase until certification of the SWM system is submitted to and accepted by this District. Rule 40E- 4.321(7) F.A.C. states that failure to complete construction of the SWM system and obtain operation phase approval from the District within the permit duration shall require a new permit authorization unless a permit extension is granted. For SWM systems permitted with an operating entity who is different from the permittee, it should be noted that until the permit is transferred to the operating entity pursuant to Rule 40E- 1.6107, F.A.C., the permittee is liable for compliance with the terms of this permit. The permittee is advised that the efficiency of a SWM system will normally decrease over time unless the system is periodically maintained. A significant reduction in flow capacity can usually be attributed to partial blockages of the conveyance system. Once flow capacity is compromised, flooding of the project may result. Maintenance of the SWM system is required to protect the public health, safety and the natural resources of the state. Therefore, the permittee must have periodic inspections of the SWM system performed to ensure performance for flood protection and water quality purposes. If deficiencies are found, it is the responsibility of the permittee to correct these deficiencies in a timely manner. App.no.: 060426 -5 Page 4 of 6 RELATED CONCERNS: Water Use Permit Status: The applicant has indicated that potable water will be used as a source for irrigation water for the project. The applicant has indicated that dewatering is not required for construction of this project. This permit does not release the permittee from obtaining all necessary Water Use authorization(s) prior to the commencement of activities which will require such authorization, including construction dewatering and irrigation, unless the work qualifies for a No- Notice Short -Term Dewatering permit pursuant to Chapter 40E- 20.302(3) or is exempt pursuant to Section 40E- 2.051, FAC. Potable Water Supplier: Okeechobee Utility Authority Waste Water System /Supplier: Okeechobee Utility Authority Right -Of -Way Permit Status: A Right -of -Way Permit is not required for this project. DRI Status: This project is not a DRI. Historical/Archeological Resources: The District has received correspondence from the Florida Department of State, Division of Historical Resources indicating that the agency has no objections to the issuance of this permit. DCA/CZM Consistency Review: The District has not received a finding of inconsistency from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection or other commenting agencies regarding the provisions of the federal Coastal Zone Management Plan. Third Party Interest: No third party has contacted the District with concerns about this application. Enforcement: There has been no enforcement activity associated with this application. STAFF REVIEW: NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: App.no.: 060426 -5 Page 5 of 6 John A eyer SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT: App.no.: 060426 -5 Page 6 of 6 DATE: c,/act(o6 DATE. 64//,9�6ry PROJECT NARRATIVE AND JUSTIFICATION The subject property consists of a 12 -acre parcel of land which has supported Sacred Heart Catholic Church for nearly fifty years. As the parish congregation has grown, so has the need to expand the sanctuary from the existing small chapel constructed in 1961 to a larger church where the congregation can worship in a more uplifting gathering space. Presently the parish consists of 24,500 sq. ft. of building space which includes a 250 -seat chapel, administrative offices, a multi - purpose room and storage space. Sunday Mass is presently being held in the multi - purpose building, with daily Mass and smaller liturgical services held in the chapel. Sacred architecture, also known as religious architecture, is concerned with the design and construction of places of worship and seeks to combine an intensely private and personal intimacy into the expression of religious practice. The interior of a Catholic Church is designed to establish the mood for worship, for preaching the Gospel and to elevate one's mind and heart to the God the faithful come to praise. This gathering place is typically achieved by providing an elevated space above the Altar, therefore, signifying the importance and presence of God in the worship space. In the case of Sacred Heart Church, the elevated area has a height to the mean roof line of 42 ft. - 9 in. and represents only a small portion of the entire roof. That portion of the church that exceeds the 30' maximum allowable height as prescribed by the City Zoning Code is the tower /steeple or clearstory space above the Altar. The architectural elevations prepared by the project architect, API Group, Inc., indicates construction of a 1 1,183 sq. ft. church with a height of 24 ft. — 5 in. to the top of the beam, with the cupola extending to a mid -roof height of just under 43 ft. The proposed height from finished grade to the top of the cross as depicted in the elevations is 54 ft. — 10 in. Construction of the new 1 1,183 sq. ft. church will consist of a slab on grade with shallow concrete foundations, exterior masonry walls, concrete columns and a steel framed roof with concrete roof tiles. The layout is circular in nature with the focal point being the altar. An entrance space with adjacent toilet rooms and sacristy area is located on the street side of the building. To the rear of the altar are storage and altar service rooms with second floor mechanical equipment rooms. Water service comes from S.W. 6h Street to the north and along the east property line to a fire closet to the southeast side of the church. From this location the fire sprinkler system extends throughout the building. Submitted: May 3, 2010 2)507702 WALE ••• t...• • •• -• .44 Na I 47E439.30 . UATCH D251102 GRADE. PAVEMENT AND BASE 122620vAL, ,...... 1-IIPTE._VRD0.41CCIETEVADONE... ck2.11 --.t.■..6 .. 1-..."..f... 1 4 :: !,•.,1 ....:, . .1111 12.1 ..;.„,, ... oasme L., ,.:: EXISTING 18' OPP PI.N• i...6. ow-2611r w. iNV.2740' r. '1, =11 1 FFE,11.05 i , -; 'r.. ..„...v., .144,4,„...t; CONSTRUCT NATCN LEY2siiNc I.- ..'s iv. ' .4.4g, . r •4 1- .-. .: 6142 . , . , .:.- 1 .... ,... [ "<,. i CONCRETE ORIVERAT .1 . I i I • ' .• ',I ', ' EXISTING f. ...• 41 ..tUlt3N11110 ia 19 . ,... ;ot■warg......ftsciormacoartiqp E•••■ 442 ,.....-.-,.6--t 6.1'`.-c; -ji COST. PERIWIER BEM TOP OE 8071L2.EV..30.20 (TVA.) )ETAS. SKEET 5-1) WPC 2. NLET \ ERA ELEV.N2ae0 INV ELEV. 141.24.40' n • 2• so I5i51%51 f • Id' EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVEWAY INv..25.81' iNv..20.93' moue le k 01P DOSING SWALE 257sn00 10. PAP W. aw.-26.ar E INV,211.95. TIME 'C' INLET AVE ELEV.-22.2c• inv. ELEVm24.10' T.OR..25.0' re; Ltv..27.4f 20 Lr INV. V..23. PROPOSED DRY • 10 1 DETENTION AREA ; • scram ELEv..27. 1 • LT.0.13,22.0 (T(P.) EXISTING It 00 W. 204.28.61' E. INv..25.91' DUSTING CONCRETE ONVEWAY 0351160 76 CMP 4747..20.74" • -471431 1+44 1 EMOTING 15* CUP .• a INV.427.30' E. IN6..27.30' ro Dome ,a• cup 0. PNV..27.10. E. INV...25.00' 4. 7% E5IS1INC 36" CUP LECEM C TROL S MUM DET L WELT 1) GRA ELEV..2 110' BLEED ELEV..2 067 I 250 It .yr RCA, C:STRuCT1 12 CONCRE VE ULOLE 4.1E8. . ELEV. ELEV..2/.90' me RI4A111,117., I 14AhR I MANN 4' 014.1 I CXGRIST4CE I 274 416. EliEVV.:2923.°.10°1 SEE 0ETP.t....SNEE141 7f1 LF lr CAP inate IMMO Mgr ma, ammo. 1Ty4QEIT9 1 i2 1 7 1 1 12 I 2 I ;ft:4g 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 L LI li __L fEX' MG (5. MP 42 EX/STING 15 CMP 0.v,3 43 v 0. W. 7TH AVENUE CONSTRUCT TYPE '0' CURB (7.) INC. 1CONCTNC Oy v a ONNReOe M M SURVEYOR VMPS 144.44 ka4 4 Paw B 3550 8.8. GNmato Pau., NON Oa AroVII Sal* PR 14:7111;"3"4 24-34" ..7: , Paving, OrROMat k Drainage Plan Sacred Heart Catholic Church My of Okmagoboo Okeechobee County, Tlarlda 04-045; P-1 ,,,, 1,-..9e1-••■•••• mir trrimitnar ? 1 .122Pel. I i 1 VT' • Of ms L Noma. • .11•11• 40. 1••• 1•••1 1/0. • YIN MIER MN MEM RAMO ••■■••11, a MI NM ••••• LI MM. AL MS A, WV • ba »s. Apit 21L01 a ' ! CONSIXT114 MIL DICINECIS, IMMO YAWN •¼I_ WI lir BywilA V.A. Iv Ibilirr ROO Lk. Como* Polimp. rain. Ow. FIslea Now t771._2116-aia) rag Dv 01-3011 MI • nrc Wm. MN no .....16.4. Finns& Grading an4 andasse Detail. Sacred Hurt Catholic Church C14 af Olowlidame SION4tims Drag,. Ettbla A Traffic Impact Analysis for: Sacred Heart Catholic Church Located in: City of Okeechobee, Florida Prepared for: Sacred Heart Catholic Church 901 S.W. 6th Street Okeechobee, FL 34974 Prepared by: AECOM 3550 SW Corporate Parkway Palm City, Florida 34990 (772) 286 -3883 AECOM Project No.: 60148984 Prepared: March 2010 Prepareddh; LEO la PE Reg 3/23/2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Trip Generation 2 Trip Distribution 3 Concurrency Requirements 4 Conclusion 4 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 — Site Location 1 Figure 2 — Trip Distribution 3 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 — Trip Generation 2 Table 2 — Link Analysis 4 P :170021ProposaACivillD - Leo GiangrandelSacred Heart Church160148984 Sacred Heart TIA.3- 24- 10.Idgdoc.doc 1 INTRODUCTION Sacred Heart Catholic Church has retained AECOM to provide a traffic impact analysis (TIA) in support of the proposed addition of a church building to their existing property in the City of Okeechobee, FL. This statement serves as public facility impact analysis of the traffic generated as required by the City of Okeechobee Land Development Regulations. The existing site currently includes approximately 24,500 sq. ft. of buildings. These buildings include the current worship site, an education center, a meeting hall, a food bank, a warehouse, and a rectory and parish office. To serve the needs of a growing congregation, a new 35,683 sq. ft. worship building will be constructed on the current property. Currently, there are three driveway access points onto SW 6th Street which will remain after construction of the new worship site. The project is expected to be completed by the year 2012. Figure 1 below details the location of the site in relation to the surrounding roadway network. Y _rlw 3ra Ln sw 3rd St Project Location Figure 1 — Site Location 11th st Se 13th; St Se 14thSt Data fb,PO1ONPOlTEQ or *dummy P:170021ProposallCiviAD - Leo GiangrandelSacred Heart Church160148984 Sacred Heart TIA.3- 24- 10.Idgdoc.doc 1 TRIP GENERATION The peak hour traffic generation for the site was available from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition. The trip generation for weekday peak hour of generator has been utilized since the surrounding roadway network experiences peak traffic during these time periods. The project's impact on the surrounding roadway network is quantified by the additional trips resulting from the new worship building. The trip generation for the existing church property is provided for reference, but is not analyzed since these are established trips on the existing roadway network. The calculation of the trip generation is summarized below in Table 1. Table 1 — Trip Generation AM PM ITE Code Tpe Amount In Out Total In Out Total 560 Church 35,683 SF 17 14 31 18 16 34 AM PM ITE Code T A. e Amount In Out Total In Out Total 560 Church 24,500 SF 12 9 21 13 10 23 The equations utilized in the trip generation shown in Table 1 are summarized as follows where T is equal to vehicle trips and X is the independent variable: • Church — 560 (X = sq. ft. gross floor area) o AM Peak Hour: T =0.87(X/1000) • Entrance Split: 0.55 • Exit Split: 0.45 o PM Peak Hour: T =0.94(X/1000) • Entrance Split: 0.54 • Exit Split: 0.46 P:170021ProposallCivil\D - Leo Giangrande\Sacred Heart Church160148984 Sacred Heart TIA.3- 24- 10.Idgdoc.doc 2 TRIP DISTRIBUTION Access to the site is via three existing driveways off SW 6th Street. The distribution of trips is generally 60% of the traffic traveling east on SW 6th Street and 40% traveling west on SW 6th Street. The development of the trip distributions from the project site to the surrounding communities was based on the location of population and major roadways within the vicinity of the project. The distribution of project trips at the driveway can be viewed in Figure 2 below. (3) 40% SW 6th Street (2) Site Driveway r N M N 60% SW 6th Street and Project Entrance AM(PM) Note: The figure depicts the proposed drivemy volumes to be added to the roadv►ey netvlork as a result of this project. Figure 2 — Trip Distribution P:170021ProposaACiviI\D - Leo GiangrandelSacred Heart Church160148984 Sacred Heart TIA.3- 24- 10.Idgdoc.doc 3 CONCURRENCY REQUIREMENTS A public facility impact analysis of the traffic generated is required. The traffic generated by the project must not cause an impact to the Level of Service (LOS) of the surrounding roadway network. Principal arterials within the City of Okeechobee must meet LOS C, while all other roads must meet LOS D. A link analysis has been performed on the roadway links adjacent to the project that will be impacted (see Table 2). The roadway links are on SW 6th Street adjacent to the project which is not a principal arterial. Therefore, the governing capacity of these links is LOS D. The 2 -Way Peak Hour LOS D Capacity of SW 6th Street is 770 vehicles based on the Generalized LOS Tables published by FDOT. A copy of this table has been included in the Appendix of this report. The additional traffic created by the proposed project will consume less than 1% of the adjacent SW 6th Street capacity. Therefore, the analysis has not been extended past these links. Table 2 — Link Analysis SW 6th Street SW 6th Street Project Entrance Project Entrance SW 10th Avenue SW 5th Avenue 2 -Ln 2 -Ln 5 5 D D 770 770 0.6% 0.6% CONCLUSION The traffic impacts associated with the proposed church building for Sacred Heart Catholic Church are acceptable and manageable. Traffic generated by the proposed project meets the requirements of the City of Okeechobee by not adversely affecting the adjacent roadway links. P :170021ProposallCivillD - Leo GiangrandelSacred Heart Church160148984 Sacred Heart TIA.3- 24- 10.Idgdoc.doc 4 APPENDIX P :170021ProposaACivi!1D - Leo GiangrandelSacred Heart Church160148984 Sacred Heart TIA.3- 24- 10.Idgdoc.doc 5 TABLE 5 Generalized Peak Hour Two -Way Volumes for Florida's Areas Transitioning into Urbanized Areas OR Areas Over 5,000 Not In Urbanized Areas'. 9/4/09 STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS Class I ( >0.00 to 1.99 signalized intersections per mile) Lanes Median B C D 2 Undivided 860 1,370 1,480 4 Divided 2,600 3,110 3,280 6 Divided 4,020 4,710 4,950 Lanes 2 4 6 E * ** * ** * ** Class II (2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) Median B C D E Undivided ** 910 1,330 1,420 Divided ** 2,200 2,910 3,080 Divided ** 3,460 4,400 4,640 Class III /1IV(more than 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) Lanes Median B C D E 2 Undivided ** 460 1,040 1,300 4 Divided ** 1,110 2,480 2,800 6 Divided ** 1,750 3,860 4,260 Lanes 4 6 8 10 FREEWAYS B C D E 4,000 5,410 6,460 6,920 6,000 8,140 9,710 10,690 8,000 10,870 12,930 14,450 10,000 13,690 16,200 18,120 Freeway Adjustments Auxiliary Ramp Lanes Metering + 1,800 + 5% UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Lanes Median B C D E 2 Undivided 770 1,460 2,040 2,590 4 Divided 3,040 4,400 5,700 6,460 6 Divided 4,570 6,600 8,550 9,700 Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustment factors 2 Divided Yes +5% Multi Undivided Yes -5% Multi Undivided No -25% Non -State Signalized Roadway Adjustments (Alter corresponding volume by the indicated percent.) Major City /County Roadways - 10% Other Signalized Roadways - 35% State & Non -State Signalized Roadway Adjustments (Alter corresponding volume by the indicated percent.) Divided /Undivided & Turn Lane Adjustments Exclusive Exclusive Adjustment Median Left Lanes Right Lanes Factors Divided Yes No +5% Undivided No No -20% Undivided Yes No -5% Undivided No No -25% - - Yes + 15% Lanes 2 2 Multi Multi One -Way Facility Adjustment Multiply the corresponding two- directional volumes in this table by 0.6. BICYCLE MODE2 (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two -way maximum service volumes.) Paved Shoulder/ Bicycle Lane Coverage B C D E 0-49% ** 270 710 >710 50 -84% 220 330 1,270 >1,270 85 -100% 400 >400 * ** * ** PEDESTRIAN MODE2 (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two -way maximum service volumes.) Sidewalk Coverage 0 -49% 50 -84% 85- 100% B ** ** ** D 480 1,100 1,820 E 1,390 1,820 >1,820 Values shown are presented as hourly two -way volumes for levels of service and are for the automobile /truck modes unless specifically stated. Although presented as peak hour two - way volumes, they actually represent peak hour direction conditions with an applicable D factor applied. This table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications. The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications. The table and deriving computer models should not be used for corridor or intersection design, where more refined techniques exist. Calculations are based on planning applications of the Highway Capacity Manual, Bicycle LOS Model, Pedestrian LOS Model and Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, respectively for the automobile /truck, bicycle, pedestrian and bus modes. Level of service for the bicycle and pedestrian modes in this table is based on number of motorized vehicles, not number of bicyclists or pedestrians using the facility. Source: 3 Buses per hour shown are only for the peak hour in the single direction of the higher traffic flow. Florida urce Department Of Transportation ** Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults. Systems Planning Office * ** Not applicable for that level of service letter grade. For the autotobile mode, volumes greater than level of service D } become F because intersection capacities have been reached. For the bicycle node, the level of service letter grade (including 605 Suwannee Street, MS 19 F) is not achievable because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input value defaults. Tallahassee, FL 32399 -0450 w ww.dot.state.fl.us/ planning /systems /sm/los /default.shtm 2009 F DOT QUALITY /LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK TABLE 5 (continued) Generalized Peak Hour Two -Way Volumes for Florida's Areas Transitioning Into Urbanized Areas OR Areas over 5,000 Not in Urbanized Areas 9/4/09 INPUT VALUE ASSUMPTIONS Uninterrupted Flow Facilities Interrupted Flow Facilities State Arterials Class II h n n (, N n yy lw. A b R. ROADWAY CHARACATERISTICS Number of through lanes 4 -10 2 4 -6 2 4 -6 2 4 -6 2 4 -6 4 4 Posted speed (mph) 70 50 50 45 50 45 45 35 35 45 45 Free flow speed (mph) 75 55 55 50 55 50 50 40 40 50 50 Aux, meter, or accel/decel >1500 (n,y) n n n Median (n, nr, r) n r n r n r n r r r Terrain (1, r) 1 1 1 no zone 60 passing Exclusive left turn lanes /[impact] (n, y) [n] Y Y y Y y y y y y Exclusive right turn lanes (n, y) n n n n n 11 n n Paved shoulder/bicycle lane (n, y) n,50 %,y n Outside lane width t t Pavement condition t Sidewalk (n, y) n,50 %,y Sidewalk/roadway separation (a, t, w) t Sidewalk protective barrier (n, y) n Facility length (m) 8 5 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Number of segments 4 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS Planning analysis hour factor (K) 0.094 0.097 0.097 0.097 0.097 0.097 0.097 0.097 0.097 0.097 0.097 Directional distribution factor (D) 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 Peak hour factor (PHF) 0.950 0.910 0.910 0.910 0.910 0.910 0.910 0.910 0.910 0.910 0.910 Base capacity (pcphpl) 1700 2100 1950 1950 1950 1950 1950 1950 1950 1950 Heavy vehicle percent 9.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 Local adjustment factor 0.950 1.00 .950 % left tuns 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 %right hams 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 CONTROL CHARACTERISTICS Number of Signals 2 2 6 6 10 10 6 6 Arrival type (1 -6) 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 Signal type (a, s, p) a a s s s s s s Cycle length (C) 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 Effective green ratio (g /C) 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLDS Level of Service Freeways Highway Segments State & Non -State Two -Way Arterials Bicycle Pedestrian Density Two -Lane Multilane Class I Class II Class III Score %ffs Density ats ats ats Score B <17 >0.833 <18 > 34 mph > 28 mph > 24 mph <2.5 <2.5 C <24 >0.750 <26 > 27 mph > 22 mph > 18 mph <3.5 <3.5 D <31 >0.667 _ <35 > 21 mph > 17 mph > 14 mph <4.5 <_4.5 E <39 >0.583 <41 > 16 mph > 13 mph > 10 mph <5.5 <_5.5 % ffs = Percent free flow speed ats = Average travel spee 2009 FDOT QUALITY /LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK INTRODUCTION Sacred Heart Catholic Church has retained AECOM to provide a traffic impact analysis (TIA) in support of the proposed addition of a church building to their existing property in the City of Okeechobee, FL. This statement serves as public facility impact analysis of the traffic generated as required by the City of Okeechobee Land Development Regulations. The existing site currently includes approximately 24,500 sq. ft. of buildings. These buildings include the current worship site, an education center, a meeting hall, a food bank, a warehouse, and a rectory and parish office. To serve the needs of a growing congregation, a new 11,183 sq. ft. worship building will be constructed on the current property. The final site plan will have the sum of the existing plus the proposed for a total of 35,683 sq. ft. of building to service the congregation. Currently, there are three driveway access points onto SW 6th Street which will remain after construction of the new worship site. The project is expected to be completed by the year 2012. Figure 1 below details the location of the site in relation to the surrounding roadway network. MuESy. , W n: ..913 701 .'.0 3 tJ St tiw ;:1,4th`ik Nhr 3rd 3t 'tivi 2,42 St i'9'5)713 1 Ni v, 5t >.. !it (4411 anV P' i.i d N o ime dhoti ee (4411 9:6 ? Project Location Se 2nd 3t Ga T ID ti rG .Se ath:mot ; Se 6th SVt 'Se 7th 3t a 6th Se 9th St Se Se 1 hh'34 Se 1441 51 tJ 2ti:C MapQtsse5t lrrc. Map+ Data 2111C, .MAV T£ait c r haaevm p Figure 1 — Site Location P:170021ProposallCivil\D - Leo GiangrandelSacred Heart Church160148984 Sacred Heart TIA.3- 24- 10.Idgdoc.doc 1 I1\M ZONING & URBAN PLANNING MARKET RESEARCH & ANALYSIS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS May 17, 2010 Ms. Betty Clement, General Services Coordinator City of Okeechobee 55 S.E. 3rd Avenue Okeechobee, FL 39974 [bclement @cityofokeechobee.com] Re: Sacred Heart Catholic Church LAND RESEARCH MANAGEMENT, INC. 2240 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD. • SUITE 103 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33409 TEL: (561) 686 -2481 • FAX; 681 -1551 via email to: bclement Dear Betty: As agent for the special exception and site plan review applications for the above referenced project, I respectfully request that the site plan review be considered by the Technical Review Committee (TRC) at its July 15th meeting rather than the June 17th meeting in order to allow us the opportunity to amend the application and associated plans to address issues raised by the City's planning consultant, Bill Brisson. We intend to proceed with the special exception as planned on June 17th, submit revised site plans to your office prior to the meeting and present the plans to the TRC on July 15th Thanks you in advance for your timely consideration of this request. Respectfully, Kevin McGinley President C.C. Bill Brisson, LaRue Planning & Management Services, Inc. Dale Meaux, API Group, Inc. Fr. Hugh Duffy, Sacred Heart Catholic Church LIST OF CONSULTANTS PLANNING & ZONING Kevin McGinley Land Research Management, Inc. 2240 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 103 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Phone: (561) 686 -2481 ENGINEER John R. Barnett, P.E. AECOM USA, Inc. 421 N.W. 3rd Street Okeechobee, FL 34972 Phone: (863) 763 -8999 ARCHITECT John Dale Meaux, Architect API Group, Inc. 185 NW Spanish River Boulevard, Suite 105 Boca Raton, FL 33431 Phone: (561) 392 -7120 SURVEYOR Brian C. Kiernan, PLS Boyle Engineering 3550 S.W. Corporate Parkway Palm City, FL 34990 Phone: (772) 286 -3883 Project Location - Sacred Heart Church Parcel ID# 22137350A00000130000 Legend 250 125 0 250 500 Feet Okeechobee County Parcels Project Boundary Images 2004 DOQQ's, True Color, 1 -meter res. Source LAWNS Sacred Heart Church Project Location with Aerial Sec 21 Twnshp 37S Rng 35E Okeechobee County, FL 1 inch equals 350 feet ]lvc. P :104- 0459\GIS \Sacred_Heart_Churcb Aerial_Mapmxd November 9, 2005 Proposed Drainage now CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS. SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Resutta. INC. Vatue By Design" 3550 S.W. Corporate Parkway. Palm City. Piorido 34990 (772) 286 -3883 Far (772) 286 -3925 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 www.IWn.coM © 2005 i FIGURE 1 Sacred Heart Catholic Church Post - Development Drainage Basin Map AGENDA V. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING • Chairperson. A. Petition No. 10-003-SE submitted by Kevin McGinley to allow height in excess of 30 feet Sec. 90- 103(10) for property located at 901 SW 6th Street, Okeechobee, FL - Senior Planner. B. 2010 Evaluation and Appraisal Draft of the City's Comprehensive Plan - Senior Planner. VI. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING - Chairperson VII. NEW BUSINESS - Chairperson A. Consider any additional requests for amendments to the City's Land Development Regulations - Chairperson. JUNE 17, 2010 - PLANNING BOARD /BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS - PAGE 2 OF 3 AC ON - DISCUSSION - VOTE There were none. Mr. Brisson presented the Planning Staff Report, stating compliance with the City's Code of Ordinances. The applicant has met and addressed all requirements therefore Staff recommends, Petition No. 10- 003 -SE, be approved to allow a maximum height of 44' 4" to the top of the architectural dome /bell tower. Mr. Kevin McGinley, for the applicant addressed the Board, reporting there were no actual bells in the bell tower and no chiming. At this time he thanked the Planner for the Staff Report. Public meeting was opened and closed at 6:10 p.m., and there was no board discussion. Board Member Burroughs moved to approve Petition No. 10- 003 -SE, to allow for height in excess of 30 feet, Sec. 90- 103(10) for property located at 901 SW 6'" Street, Okeechobee, FL; seconded by Member Baughman. VOTE MAXWELL - YEA HOOVER - ABSENT BURROUGHS - YEA MCCOY - ABSENT KELLER- YEA LUVIANO - YEA MORGAN • YEA BRASS - NON VOTING BAUGHMAN - YEA MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Brisson addressed the concerns and questions from the previous Board meeting in May. The Board discussed the 5 Major Issues and had multiple suggestions and concerns. Mr. Brisson requested all suggestions and concerns be e- mailed to him for review, and, discussion and recommendation would follow at the next regular Planning Board meeting. Chairperson Maxwell closed the Public Hearing at 7:30 p.m. There were none. CITY OF OKEECHOBEE Application for Site Plan Review Date Received 5_12_ to City of Okeechobee General Services Department 55 S.F. 3rd Avenue, Room 101 Okeechobee, Florida 39974 -2903 Phone: (863) 763 -3372, ext. 218 Fax: (863) 763-1686 e -mail: clement @cityofokeechobee.com Page 1 of 2 Application No. /Y -000ti Fee Paid: 1000.0 O Receipt No. 2a517 Hearing Date: %7//O APPLICANTINFORMATI =Date Reed. Ghk'd` 1 2 3 4 5 6 Name of property owner(s): \ Vckv, g- C Owner mailing address: 3' 4 (ki ] a Name of applicant(s) if other than owner: 5k l r\ "Y)c0t,.Q `" Applicant mailing address: f r .., Name of contact person (state relationship): 6\r --xin k 1r■n C'. UtC�ryS ti Contact person daytime phone(s): _ q (p/ -5ckci Engineer: Name, address and phone number: 7 Surveyor: Name, address and phone number: 8 ROPERTY -and PROJECT_'_ INFORMATION 9 10 11 12 Property address /direction to property: ( 'c_1,,Q)-s t 0L. ?juct-1LI Parcel Identification Number 3,02j..... 3 / _ 3 S —, ...� �� 0060 Current Future Land Use designation: zic� m m NYC `a 13 Current Zoning distric pc) '1 / +_ _ meAreta ` 1 ( lam SS, arm , 0A-, C.� Describe the project including all proposed uses, type of construction and conceptual building layout, how the business or use is expected to operate on the site, including but not limited to: number of employees expected; hours of operation; Iocation, extent and type of any outdoor storage or sales, etc., and fire flow layout. Use additional page if necessary. n (J(L S�� PEE 6/5i-�— 1QC) P4T -317Z. 14 Describe existing improvements on property (for example, the number and type of buildings, dwelling units, occupied or vacant, etc.). Use additional page if necessary. F oM P - SrdeINf co,r 0-FTce. 15 16 17 Total land area in square feet (if less than two acres): or acres: 0 1 Is proposed use different from existing or prior use (_s) (_No) Number and description of phases: one Rev. 12/09 CITY OF OKEECHOBEE Application for Site Plan Review Page 2 of 2 For questions relating to this application packet, call the General Services Dept. at (863) - 763 -3372, Ext. 218 Rev. 12/09 ATTACEUVIEENTS RE UIRED FOR ALL APPLICATIONS 20 18 Source of potable water: CAA A. 21 ,.- - 19 Method of sewage disposal: otA A _ For questions relating to this application packet, call the General Services Dept. at (863) - 763 -3372, Ext. 218 Rev. 12/09 ATTACEUVIEENTS RE UIRED FOR ALL APPLICATIONS 20 Applicant's statement of interest in property OVV L r 21 One (1) copy of last recorded warranty deed ,_ 22 Notarized Ietter of consent from property owner (if applicant is different from property owner) N/4 — I 23 �-- Three (3) sealed boundary and topographic, "as is" surveys of the property involved including: a. certified boundary survey, date of survey, surveyor's name, address and phone number b. Legal description of site and parcel number c. Computation of total acreage to nearest tenth of an acre ( ) ( ) ( ) 24 Two (2) sets of aerials of the site. 25 Eleven (11) copies of sealed site plan drawings (see attached checklist for details to be included in site plan) 5cA., (VetA 07� 26 Eleven (11) copies of drawing indicating facades for all buildings, including architectural elevations. 27 Eleven (11) copies of landscape plan, including a separate table indicating the number of trees and shrubs by type and showing both the official and common name of each type of tree and shrub. IVi_A" 28 Three (3) copies of sealed drainage calculations 29 Other optional supporting documentation (pictures, etc.) 30 Nonrefundable application fee: $1,000.00 plus $30.00 per acre. NOTE: Resolution No. 98-11 Schedule of Land Development Regulation Fees and Charges - When the cost for advertising publishing and mailing notices of public hearings exceeds the established fee, or when a professional consultant is hired to advise the City on the application, the applicant shall pay the actual costs. NOTE: Submissions will be reviewed by the City Engineer and City Planner for all necessary documentation. The Applicant will be notified at least 10 days prior to the TRC meeting whether or not additional information is require to proceed or if the review will be rescheduled to the next TRC meeting. Confirmation of Information Accuracy - - - I hereby certify that the information in this application is correct. The information included in this applica- tion is for use byihe City of Okeechobee in processing my request. False or misleading information may be punishablg by a fine of up to $500.00 and imprisonment of up to 30 days and may resulting the summary denial Of this application. , - I (-)A ' I ---> Signatures Printed N Date For questions relating to this application packet, call the General Services Dept. at (863) - 763 -3372, Ext. 218 Rev. 12/09 Prepared by and return to: Pati,1a A. Ragan Attt . Young, PA 31*-, A41 South Oketic , ' FL 34972 8634244176 File Nttirrber: 497 -09 MIME ONO FILE NUM 2009014085 OR BK 00680 PG 0224 SHARON ROBERTSON? CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT OKEECHOBEE COUNTY? FL RECORDED 12/16/2009 10:57:40 At! ANT 44.000.00 RECORDING FEES 18.50 DEED DOC 343.00 RECORDED BY PI Finon P9s 0224 - 225; (2995) [Space Above This Line For Recording Data) Warranty Deed This Warranty tee4.made this 11th day of December, 2009 between Riverside National Bank of Florida whose post office address is ' South Federal Highway, Fort Pierce, FL 34982, grantor, and Shirley Baker, a single woman whose post office address is I.550 S. Ocean Drive, Apt. 20, Fort Pierce, FL 34949, grantee: (Whenever used herein the terms gramnr, and "grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals, and the successors and amigos of tit s, trusts and trustees) Witnesseth, that said grantor or;and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO /100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations, aid:grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold tkthe ;said grantee, and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Okeecho County, Florida to-wit: Lot 6, Block 208, FIRST ADPVII9N TO CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 6; Public Records of Okeechobee County, Florida. Parcel Identification Number: 3- 2�1r37 -35- 0020-02080 -0060 Subject to ; covenants, conditions, re$frj4Ions, easements, reservations and limitations of record, if any. Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and [awful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2009. In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. OoubleTimee Book680 /Page224 CFN #2009014085 Page 1 of 2 « Next Lower Parcel J ( Retrieve Tax Record ) Property Card ) DSearchResults Okeechobee County Property Appraiser CAMA Updated: 5/6/2010 Parcel: 3- 21 -37 -35 -0020- 02080 -0060 ( Next Higher Parcel » Owner & Property Info Owner's Name BAKER SHIRLEY Site Address 200 SE 3RD ST, OKEECHOBEE Mailing 1550 S OCEAN DRIVE APT 20 Address FORT PIERCE, FL 34949 Description p 1ST ADDITION TO CITY OF OKEECHOBEE LOT 6 BLOCK 208 NOTE: This description is not to be used as the Legal Description for this parcel in any legal transaction. Land Area 0.162 ACRES S /T /R 21 -37- 35 Neighborhood 113650.00 Tax District 50 DOR Use Code SINGLE FAM (000100) Market Area 40 The DOR Use Code shown here is a Dept. of Revenue code. Please contact the Okeechobee County Planning & Development office at 863 - 763 -5548 for specific zoning information. Property & Assessment Values Mkt Land Value cnt: (1) $21,000.00 Ag Land Value cnt: (o) $0.00 Building Value cnt: (1) $28,266.00 XFOB Value cnt: (0) $0.00 Total Appraised Value $49,266.00 Sales History Page 1 of 2 2009 Certified Values Parcel List Generator GIS Aerial Interactive GIS Map Print Search Result: 1 of 1 0 37 74 111 148 188 222 259 ft 2009 Certified Values Just Value $49,266.00 Class Value $0.00 Assessed Value $49,266.00 Exempt Value $o.00 Total Taxable Value $49,266.00 Show Similar Sales within 1/2 mile Sale Date Book/Page Inst. Type Sale Vlmp Sale Qual Sale RCode Sale Price 12/11/2009 680/224 WD I U 12 $49,000.00 7/13/2009 672/1444 CT I U 11 $100.00 3/17/2006 594/333 WD I Q $98,500.00 3/9/2006 593/837 PB I U 01 $0.00 Building Characteristics Bldg Sketch Bldg Item Bldg Desc Year Blt Heated S.F. Actual S.F. Bldg Value Show Sketch 1 SINGLE FAM (000100) 1927 884 1172 $28,266.00 Extra Features & Out Buildings - ( Show Codes ) Code I Desc I Year Blt I Value I Units I Dims I Condition (% Good) NONE Land Breakdown I Lnd Code I Desc I Units 1 Adjustments I Eff Rate I Lnd Value I http: / /www.okeechobeepa.com /GIS /D SearchResults.asu 5/7/2010 IJxGGG110UGG t%ppiQ.1JG1 - 1V1Qp rMUGU 011 J/ / /LV1V Z. :1L.:J'F rlvl rage 1011 3-21-37-35-0020-02080-0060 BAKER SHIRLEY 0.162AC 112112009 - $49,000 - I:U Okeechobee Co1.unty Property Appraiser V d : t 'Icy l .. ,r e6. -grid . 363-/63-4422 ARCEL: 3 -21 -37-35 -0020 -02080 -0060 - SINGLE FAM (000100) 1ST ADDITION TO CITY OF OKEECHOBEE LOT 6 BLOCK 208 Name:BAKER SHIRLEY LandVal $21,000.00 Site: 200 SE 3RD ST, OKEECHOBEE BldgVal $28,266.00 Mail: 1550 S OCEAN DRIVE APT 20 ApprVal $49,266.00 FORT PIERCE, FL 34949 JustVal $49,266.00 Sales Assd $49,266.00 Info Exmpt $0.00 Taxable $49,266.00 93 186 279 ft This information, CAMA Updated: 5/6/2010, was derived from data which was compiled by the Okeechobee County Property Appraiser's Office solely for the govemmental purpose of property assessment. This information should not be relied upon by anyone as a determination of the ownership of property or market value. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the accuracy of the data herein, it's use, or it's interpretation. Although it is periodically updated, this information may not reflect the data currently on file in the Property Appraiser's office. The assessed values are NOT certified values and therefore are subject to change before being finalized for ad valorem assessment purposes. http:/ /www.okeechobeepa.com/GIS/Print Map. asp? pjboiibchhjbnligcafcefocnfkfdfefdbblej ... 5/7/2010 ADA COMPLIANCE NOTES 1. CONSTRUCTION SHALL FOLLOW "FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 W/ 2009 REVISIONS" AS ADOPTED BY THE COUNTY AND AS APPLICABLE TO THE AREA IN WHICH THE BUILDING IS TO BE CONSTRUCTER WITH ALL APPLICABLE AMENDMENTS. 2. GUARDRAILS SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL STAIRWAYS, RAMPS, AND WALKS WHOSE ELEVATION ABOVE THE FINISH GRADE IS 30" OR GREATER. 42" HIGH GUARDRAILS SHALL HAVE BALUSTERS SUCH THAT A 4" DIA SPHERE CANNOT PASS THROUGH ANY OPENING UP TO A HEIGHT OF 34" & 8" DIA SPHERE CANNOT PASS THROUGH ANY OPENING FROM A HEIGHT OF 34 " -42 ". FOR STAIRWAYS, THE LOWER RAILING SHALL BE POSITIONED SO THAT A 6" SPHERE MAY NOT PASS BETWEEN THE TREAD AND THE RISER. 3. HANDRAILS SHALL BE REQUIRED ON BOTH SIDES OF ALL RAMPS /STAIIR�WAYS. HANDRAIL HEIGHT SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN INCIDENRTALOTREAD. HANDRAILS SESHALLEBE CIRCULARAMTH EOUTSIDE DIAMETER OF AT LEAST 1.25" AND NOT GREATER THAN 2 ". HANDRAIL EXTENSIONS SHALL BE REQUIRED WHERE INDICATED. 4.OF THIIS DESIGN TTO ACCURAI EOLYSDDETERMINE ELLEVATIIONS OFHTEHEME RAMP AND LANDINGS WITH RESPECT TO THE GRADE. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE RISE FOR THE RAMP, PER THIS DESIGN, SHALL BE 30 ", WITH A RUN NO GREATER THAN 30'. IF CONDITIONS PROVE THAT A APPLICABLE GREATER THAN IS NEEDED, MAY BE DESIGN ALLOWABLE BE HEIGHT UP TO 120 "). REGARDLESS OF THE OVERALL HEIGHT, TREADS SHALL BE 11" MINIMUM AND RISERS SHALL BE 7 MAXIMUM. 60" MINIMUM CONC. LANDING - ELEVATION @ 8.05' HANDRAIL EXTENSION NOTE: GUARDRAILS ARE ONLY REQ'D If ELEVATION ABOVE fINISh GRADE EXCEEDS 30". HA BOT 5E ADA REQ'D EDGE PROTECTION @ 2" ABOVE SURFACE 0\ // / WOOD FRAMED 'STOOP EXTENSION' BY BUILDER - TOP @ ELEVATION 10.00' ADA ACCESSIBLE RAMP (MAX SLOPE I : 12) - MIN. WIDTH OF 30" CLEAR (BETWEEN HANDRAILS) MUST BE MAINTAINED - CROSS SLOPE SHALL BE < I :50 SECTION AT RAMP SCALE: 3/4" = I '_O" N w w CO 0 0 w w 0 0 1- 0 BLDG. CONVERSION SUPPORT DETAILS DRW DRAFTING BY PHILIP PEPE 331 HOSBINE STREET WHITE CITY, FLORIDA 34982 PHONE: (772) 467 -0923 EMAIL: philpepe @gmail.com !HANDRAIL EXTENSION / 00" MINIMUM 42" SEE hlGhl PROJEC- GUAR N RA TES. _. ,Jr r 8" 7- CO v x V / REO'D @ FIN LEVEL 3h LAND FLOOR NG _LEV. ADA REQ'D EDGE PROTECTION @ 2" ABOVE SURFACE 0\ // / WOOD FRAMED 'STOOP EXTENSION' BY BUILDER - TOP @ ELEVATION 10.00' ADA ACCESSIBLE RAMP (MAX SLOPE I : 12) - MIN. WIDTH OF 30" CLEAR (BETWEEN HANDRAILS) MUST BE MAINTAINED - CROSS SLOPE SHALL BE < I :50 SECTION AT RAMP SCALE: 3/4" = I '_O" N w w CO 0 0 w w 0 0 1- 0 BLDG. CONVERSION SUPPORT DETAILS DRW DRAFTING BY PHILIP PEPE 331 HOSBINE STREET WHITE CITY, FLORIDA 34982 PHONE: (772) 467 -0923 EMAIL: philpepe @gmail.com I .2 II GEAR �rONCRETE Wh[ 10 AI ONIAJA f LONGER PAW G4 EXISTING, STRUCTURE I OOR WvOD ECaMNI'211. 0. T CAC -e nI50 'fm1511 GCADCI CONCATIL wNK PITCH 57ALI NOT frr:Ilo 1 SD 1,4 DING WOOD FRAMED CAMP - AUr. HANITRAII [ 15 14,47 OOI /) n MRAINITRA 1,01) FIT15H FLOOR ACCESSABILITY PLAN SCALE: 114" = ' -0" _105 01. •CTL•TIO• NOTT O 01)0f Err VARIE =(1.50 6AX.1 SOU OCY -()) ;) L.giMI150l = 1111001 ,IOD 6.50 MIN. _ 111 11� 11=11 =111111 1 111111111111=111=11 I II NOTES: TOP PORTION OF FIT 25 12• 50AI I HAVE REFLECTIVE BILE BACKGROUND WR H WHITE SYMBOL AND BORDER. BOTTOM PORTION 51ALL HAVE WHllt P,rrLEGDVE. BACKGROUND WITH BIALY. OPAQUE LEGEND AND BORDER. FTP 25 t 26 MAY BE PABRICAFYO ON ONE PANEL OR TWO. HEIGHT 54ALL 135 7 Mf.ASI.PED FR00 111E 0501110 OR 5IDEWALK 10 TI[ BOTTOM 05 5650111 CAIY"N614 OR 6 TO InE BO IOM OF 1250 FINE' 51E21 MAN PIM MY RAM In IMO MIR OLT F1P 25 FTP 26 NOTES: 51)1551011- RI 3000111611 INIEI)511Y. 505 E. 5 if E L FLANGED ChANNEL 5051 PER EDEN INDEX W I, DC5. DUE TO THE CONDIT10N5 OF 51115 PARTICLLAR 5111. 1HL 5)05 51611 CANNOT i 1611050 IN ACCORDANCE MOT OT STANDRD$ A5 INDICATTO ON THE DIAGRAM AT RIGHT. PLAC 01 THE SIGN WILL BE AT Mr BOO O555 FR5 II (;RE 11011, AND SHN L DT 1'055IONED 1 ID n. EANDARD5 IN ` 50 15 IE TO THE STANDARDS INDI(:AiID. RE )511 TION ARIA VARIF.. =- I IIIll III 111 -111 II D fltl I=1TTHT_I =111 -1 III 11 ■ 11� 11 -111 111= SECTION "A - A" RETENTION AREA DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE a 12 MAY DD PARKING DETAILS SCALE: NOT TO SCALE T K tl WET STOP SIGN DETAILS ID SCALE: NOT TO SCALE r1 Wirt I ;-ii. THRESHOLD DETAIL NC., NOT TO REFER TO ATTACHED DRAWINGS FOR FURTHER ADA ACCESSIBILITY DETAILS Ns' 3i'd St btit 8 "701 SITE LOCATION Okeechobee 7 441'(981 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE SITE DATA NAME Of DEVELOPMENT use(;) - EXISTING ZONING SECTION 21 TOWNSHIP 375 SHIRLEY'S PERSONAL CARE SERVICE BUSINESS - GENERAL OFFICE CPO - COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL OFFICE RANGE 35E TOTAL 517E AREA TOTAL FLOOR AREA EXISTING BUILDINGS PROPOSED ADDITIONS GROSS SITE AREA PERVIOUS AREA IMPERVIOUS AREA BUILDING COVERAGE PAVEMENT SIDEWALK (COVERED PARKING PROVIDED (04 REQUIRED) IICP PARKING REQUIRED HCP PARKING PROVIDED OFFICE RFQIIIRED OFFICE PROVIDED 0. 1403 ACRES (7,0005gft) ,. 24 59ft. I , 1 24 sgft 0.00 sgft 1 00% (7,060sgft) 55% (3,883sgft) 45% (3,1 77sgft) 1 G% (1 , 1 24 sift) AREAS) 29% (2,05350t) 04 SPACES 01 SPACES 01 5PACE5 04 SPACES (. PER 3005gft) 04 5PACE5 F— w > �< Z as Z oa 0 In N — Q 0 0 0 r - SOUTHEAST THIRD STREET 70' TOTAL R/W - GO' ASPHALT PAV'MT 50 )10 (ML(S),RED/ 0 a riff' IL r-y� EXISTING SINGLE STORY WOOD FRAMED/ 5E50CFUZE AIce me..w / X) 4 0 WAT LP, RETLNIION AREA e,o X 501X1 (MEA5URED1 200140 R51'I 1015)1NG 051 51NGLE FAMILY HOWL SITE PLAN SCALE: 111 = 10.00' NI BLDG. CONVERSION FINAL SITE PLAN DRW DRAFTING BY PHILIP PEPE 331 HOSBINE STREET WHITE CITY, FLORIDA 34982 PHONE: (772) 467 -0923 EMAIL: philpepe ®gmoil.com • O 0 R lal -J U V1 N` nWIT� LW3`M .3 u SHEET C -1 10 1132 06-16-2010 \\ \ 0 5 142,50' (PLAT) 142.50' (M A5LUF ')) 50,00' (rLA1') 50.00' (M "-A5 2) 35.0' 8,0' co 8.0' 26,0' 26.0' 0 R-- 4.0' 0 0 0 0 0 14250' (PLAT) 142,50' (M�AS p;7) 0 177,50' (YLA1) 177.50' (M;AS�t?;2) SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SUR AND IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO TH AS SURVEYED IN THE FIELD. I FU COMPLIES WITH THE MINIMUM TECH CHAPTER 61- G-17 -6 BY THE FLO PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027 F ARE NO ABOVE GROUND ENCROAC BY: 2N7 AV NU 70' p /W(20' Asp A1,1') MAP IS PER RECORD DESCRIPTION EST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF R CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY C L STANDARDS SET FORTH IN ID OARD OF LAND SURVEYORS R., STATUTES, AND THAT THERE Ma S OTHER THAN SHOWN. REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR FLORIDA REGISTRATION #4015 GEORGE M. AYLOR, JR. R.L.S. DATE: f LEGEND: NO ID -NO IDENTIFICATION • -FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT • -FOUND NAIL & WASHER • -FOUND 5/8" DIA. IRON ROD —OHW— -OVERHEAD WIRE $ - -EXISTING WIRE FENCE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE - EXISTING WOOD FENCE CL - CENTER LINE FFE - FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION PSM - PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER R/W - RIGHT -OF -WAY PC -POINT OF CURVE A -DELTA ANGLE L -ARC LENGTH X 0.00 - TYPICAL ELEVATION FIELD WORK COMPLETED: 12/11/2009 McINTOSH AND ASSOCIATES SURVEYING & MAPPING 325 SW SOUTH QUICK CIRCLE PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA 34953 (772)878 -7568 (voice) (772)343 -1091 (fax) CERTIF. OF AUTHORIZATION NO. LB7332 LOCATION MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 6, BLOCK 208, FIRST ADDITION TO OKEECHOBEE FLORIDA, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 6, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. ADDRESS: 200 SE 3RD STREET OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA FLOOD ZONE: "X" UNMAPPED SURVEY NOTES: 1. NOT VALID UNLESS SEALED WITH AN EMBOSSED SURVEYOR'S SEAL. 2. LANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE NOT ABSTRACTED FOR RIGHTS -OF -WAY, EASEMENTS, OR OWNERSHIP. 3. LAND DESCRIPTION HEREON WAS PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT. 4. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CENTERLINE. 5. THIS SURVEY NOT TO BE USED FOR FENCE INSTALLATION, SPRINKLER SYSTEMS, SHRUBS, OR ANY OTHER UTILITIES WITHOUT REVERIFICATION OF PROPERTY CORNERS. 6. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON N.G.V.D. 1929. 7. DIMENSIONS PREVAIL OVER SCALE. 8, ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO SURVEY MAPS OR REPORTS BY OTHER THAN THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES. 9. SURVEY NOT COVERED BY PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE. CERTIFIED TO: SHIRLEY BAKER RIVERSIDE NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA ANTHONY T. YOUNG, P.A. OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY J BOUNDARY SURVEY PREPARED ON THE ORDER OF: CLEAR TITLE & LEGAL SERVICES, INC. SCALE: 1"=20' t DRAWN BY: TM W FILE NO.: 5357 I Staff Report Site Plan Review Prepared for: The City of Okeechobee Applicant: Shirley Baker Petition No.: 10- 006 -TRC planning & Management Services. lnc. I S jnckum MIrrei, Suite 20(. F rir Serving Fioricta Local Governments Since 1988 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Shirley Baker Petition No.: 10- 006 -TRC General Information Owner /Applicant: Applicant Address: Site Address:'' Contact Phone Number: Contact Person: Shirley Baker 316 NW 5t" Street Okeechobee, FL 34974 200 SE 3rd Street Okeechobee, FL 34974 863 - 467 -6399 Shanda Rainwater & Jeannie Garisson Legal Description of Subject Property: PARCEL ID #3- 27- 37 -35- 0020 - 02080 -0060 Legal Description: LOT 6, BLOCK 208, FIRST ADDITION TO CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 6, PUBLIC RECORDS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. General Description: Future Land Use Map Classification Commercial Zoning District Existing Proposed CPO Use of Property Professional Office Acreage 0.162 Commercial CPO Nurse Registry Professional Office 0.162 The subject property encompasses approximately 7,060 square feet of land located at southeast corner SE 3rd Street and SE 2nd Avenue. The Applicant is converting the existing 1,124 square foot single - family home to a professional office for a nurse registry. Neither a new structure nor expansion of the existing structure is contemplated in this application. The City Council approved rezoning the property from RMF to CPO at the May 4, 2010 City Council hearing. 11,464. 4 i,xrza3 t ",ot Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Shirley Baker Petition No.: 10- 006 -TRC Following is the Staff analysis of the project's consistency with the various City require- ments and regulations. Instances where the Staff believes the submission to be deficient are highlighted. Adjacent FLUM Classifications, Zoning Districts, and Existing Land Use: ure East le -f ngt Existing Lard; `U Future Land Use Map Classification: Zoning District: Existing Land Use: South Future Land Use Map Classification: Zoning Dis Existing Land Use: West: Future Land Use Map Classification: Zoning District: Existing Land Use: ingle-far 1 Hy residence Single- family RMF Multi- family residences Single - family' RMF Single - family residence Commercial RMF and CHV Single- family residence to immediate west and a vehicle sales lot to the southwest. Adequacy of Public Facilities: Water, Sewer, and Solid Waste: The property is presently provided water and sewer service by OUA and the conversion to a nurse registry office is not expected to present a significant increase in demand. Similarly, any increase in solid waste generation will be minimal and the County has recently confirmed a considerable level of excess capacity available to serve the solid waste disposal needs of other major developments in the City. It is reasonable that the volume of solid waste associated with a commercial use of this limited size can also be accommodated within the capacity of the County's Solid Waste Facility. Drainage: The only significant change in the property is the addition of the paved parking area of about 1,936 square feet (four spaces and associated driveway). The proposed alterations are required to meet all standards required by the City of Okeechobee, the South Florida Water Management District and the Department of Environmental Protec- tion's NPDES program. tit■ !amt. 1944h 2 Staff Report Applicant: Shirley Baker Site Plan Review Petition No.: 10- 006 -TRC Traffic: Given the limited size of the property and the nature of the proposed use, a nurse registry office with no visitation by patients, it reasonable to expect that traffic generation will be minimal and not reach a level that would cause traffic congestion or adversely affect levels of service in this area. Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Shirley Baker Petition No.: 10- 006 -TRC Comparison of Proposal with Dimensional Standards and Requirements: CPO Zoning District Regulations Regulation Required Provided Minimum parcel size and width (Sec 90 -255) 6,250 square feet 50 feet 7,060 square feet 50 feet Minimum front yard (Sec 90 -225) Parking Setback (Sec 90 -225) 20 feet for building; 15 feet for 2nd street frontage 10 feet for parking and driveway The existing building was conforming prior to the recent rezoning, and continues to nonconforming with respect the setback along the second street frontage (SE 2 "d Ave.). The existing setbaIli s 8.3 compared to the rired feet. While the parking a along western property li is set about 28 feet from e edge pavement of SE 2venue, parking areas are uired set back at least ten -feet from the property line. The new parking area is just three feet from the west property line adjacent to SE 2nd Avenue. believe approval df a variance required to allow the parking be situated as shown in the plan. The proposed parking scheme does'not pose an immediate safety problem in that the parking space is actually over feet from the edge of pavement, thereby providing for more adequate vehicular stacking the driveway. However, in "d non - be to feet 15 the back of to be We is to site first 30 than in the right- event, SE 2 Street is ever widened within the current of -way, it could make the proposed layout unsafe. t 1'1 ti U. Sin 4 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Shirley Baker Petition No.: 10- 006 -TRC Regulation Required Provided Minimum side yard setback (Sec 90 -225) 8 feet; 20 abutting residential The building has been and will continue to be nonconforming with respect to its setback from the eastern property (7.7 feet versus the required minimum of 10 feet).The proposed plan does not affect the location of the building. Minimum rear yard setback (Sec 90 -225) 10 feet; 20 abutting residential Existing setback is more than adequate and will remain so. Maximum lot coverage (Sec 90 -225) @ 50% = 3,530 square feet 1,124 square feet (16 %) Maximum lot coverage & other impervious surfaces (Sec 90 -225) @ 60% =4,236 square feet 3,177 square feet (45 %) Maximum height (Sec 90 -225) 45 feet One story, less than 45 feet Off - street loading [Sec. 90- 511(c) & Sec. 90 -513] None, floor area is less than 5,000 square feet None required or provided. Minimum driveway width (Sec. 90 -511) Spaces between 75° and 90 °, 24 feet 24 feet Off- street parking, minimum space size (Sec. 90 -511) Minimum size, 9' X 20' Handicapped 12' X 20'plus 5' aisle All parking spaces meet minimum size requirements. Off- street parking, minimum number of required spaces (Sec. 90 -512) Offices: 1 per 300 square feet 1,124 square feet = 4 spaces 4 spaces including one space designated for the handicapped. 5 7a 1,re�aJ t;��e es`r €it��rntc 53r)ie I,18. Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Shirley Baker Petition No.: 10- 006 -TRC Regulation Required Provided Landscaping Total Site (Sec. 90 -532) Minimum of one tree and three shrubs per 3,000 square feet of lot area = 2 trees and 7 shrubs. 2 trees and 12 shrubs Parking & Vehicular Use Areas (Sec. 90 -533), This section applies to parking areas with at least 8 spaces or 2,400 square feet of vehicular use area. There are only 4 parking spaces for this use. While the parking lot and driveway encompass about 2,650 square feet of pavement, the square footage of the vehicular use area on the parcel itself is only about 1,936 square feet. Therefore, we do not believe the landscaping requirements of this section are applicable in this instance. None specifically provided or required. Landscaped Buffers (S. 90 -535) 10' on street frontage; 2' along other property lines. Therefore, based on 118.5 feet of non - driveway frontage along SE 2nd Avenue, 50 feet along the frontage of SE 3rd Street, and 192.50 feet along other property lines, there should be about 2,070 square feet of landscaped area (168.5 feet x 10= 1,685 square feet along roadway frontages plus 192.5 x 2 = 385 square feet along other property lines) At At 1 tree & 3 shrubs /300 feet of required buffer = 7 trees and 21 shrubs are required. Trees may be planted in clusters, but shall not exceed 50' on centers abutting the street. The submission does not include a landscape plan, but does show what appear to be 2 palm trees and 13 other forms of landscaping, either small trees or bushes. While we do not believe such a small project warrants a formal landscape plan, the site plan should note that the appropriate number of trees (7) and shrubs (21) will be planted i n conform- ance with Sections 90-535 through 90 -541. 4t 1"tntttl zal L;rrcet[uiaenic 5in< 6 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Shirley Baker Petition No.: 10- 006 -TRC Other Requirements and Considerations: Sidewalks (Sec. 78 -36): There are no sidewalks located or proposed along either SE 2 "d Avenue or SE 3rd Street. Lighting Plan (Sec. 78 -71): The Applicant has not submitted a lighting plan for the parking area. The site plan should at least include notation as to where and what type of lighting will be used to illuminate the parking area. Dumpster Location: The plan shows the location for a 90- gallon trash bin for solid waste. Recommendations: Based on the foregoing analysis, Staff recommends approval of the site plan pending and provided the following deficiencies are rectified: 1. A variance is subsequently approved by the Board of Adjustment authorizing location of the first parking space three feet from the west property line adjacent to SE 2nd Avenue, or greater setback as otherwise may be proposed by the Applicant. 2. The site plan is modified to include notation that the appropriate number of trees (7) and shrubs (21) will be planted on the site in conformance with Sections 90 -535 through 90 -541. 3. Applicant agrees to provide a sidewalk(s) as may be required by the TRC at the meeting. 4. The site plan is modified to include notation of the location and type of lighting to be used to illuminate the parking area. Submitted by: James G. LaRue, AICP July 8, 2010 Technical Review Committee Meeting of July 15, 2010 Attachments: City Zoning Map and Property Appraiser's Aerial 5wrvine t'1orlda Vvlt. sj, Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Shirley Baker Petition No.: 10- 006 -TRC CITY OF OKEECHOBEE ZONING MAP ZONING H RSF1 RMH RSF2 RMF CPO CLT CBD CHV IND PUB PUD-R PUD-M Serving Florida Local Governments Since 1988 = Subject property 8 Staff Report Site Plan Review Applicant: Shirley Baker Petition No.: 10- 006 -TRC Okeechobee County Property Appraiser's Aerial = Subject Property Serving Florida Local Governments Since 198 - INDEPENDENT _ MEM NEWSPAPERS oxr-r_ctI013ri NF1VS .14 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OKEECHOBEE 107 S.Iti'. 17th Street, D, Ol.c; ,- hubec I.! Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Judy Kasten, who on oath says she is Advertising Director of the Okeechobee News, a three times a week Newspaper published at Okeechobee, in Okeechobee County, Florida, th t the a tac, d copy of advertisement being a --f:+ in the matter of in the 19th Judicial District of the Circuit Court of Okeechobee County, Florida, was published in said newspaper in the issues of 7/9 /7 0 Affiant further says that the said Okeechobee News is a newspaper published at Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been published continuously in said Okeechobee County, Florida each week and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Okeechobee, in said Okeechobee County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement, and affiant fur- ther says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, com- mission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. r � ' , ) Judy Kasten worn to and subscribed before me this Notary Public, State of Florida at Large AD NOTARY LW-STATE OF Dix • , Angie Bridges :Commission #DD779718 Expires: APR. 20, 2012 BONDED THRII IGIANTIC BONDING CO., INC. IiP ' -1974 (863) 763-3134 TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Tedmical Review Committee of the City of Okeechobee will meet In Regular Session on Thursday, July 15, 2010 at 10:00 a.m., City Hall, 55 SE 3rd Ave, Rm 200, Okeechobee, Florida. The public is invited and encouraged to attend. PLEASE TAKE-NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that no stenographic record by a certified court reporter will be made of the foregoing' meeting, Accordingly, any person who may seek to appeal any decision involving the matters no- ticed herein wi l be resposobk: for making a verbatim remrd of the testmo- ny and evidence at said meeting upon which any appeal is to be based. Please contact Beth Clement at 863 -763 -3372, or wetnite wwtiv divufak w nr, to obtain a copy of the agenda. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 per- sons needing special accommodation to partldpate in this proceeding should contact the General Services Office at 863- 763 -3372 for assistance. by Brian Whitehall, City Administrator 359776 ON 7/9/10